Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2237902 times)

Solomon111 · « **Reply #1350 on:** June 23, 2010, 02:35:53 PM »

On the Internet there are many replicas who confirming surplus and over unity for 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system. Of course, some confirmed less than 12 times, but still confirm the over unity. The easiest way is to contest a success.
There is nothing more powerful than the idea whose time has come.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=951414596138700872#

Merg · « **Reply #1351 on:** June 29, 2010, 06:02:17 PM »

Here are the new videos:

Milkovic's Pendulum Replica video 8, 9, 10 (KG 1340 PENDULUM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9MzYmRFjog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_wAPc4GIC8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ajc6hzY-XXU

tagor · « **Reply #1352 on:** June 29, 2010, 06:19:31 PM »

Quote from: Merg on June 29, 2010, 06:02:17 PM

Here are the new videos:

Milkovic's Pendulum Replica video 8, 9, 10 (KG 1340 PENDULUM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9MzYmRFjog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_wAPc4GIC8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ajc6hzY-XXU

there is nothing !
no data , no OU !!

"The easiest way is to contest a success."

where do you see a success ?

rensseak · « **Reply #1353 on:** June 29, 2010, 09:43:08 PM »

Quote from: tagor on June 29, 2010, 06:19:31 PM

there is nothing !
no data , no OU !!

"The easiest way is to contest a success."

where do you see a success ?

Did he say something about success

tagor · « **Reply #1354 on:** June 30, 2010, 06:13:54 AM »

Quote from: rensseak on June 29, 2010, 09:43:08 PM

Did he say something about success

you have to ask it to salomon

Merg · « **Reply #1355 on:** June 30, 2010, 05:16:44 PM »

Quote from: tagor on June 29, 2010, 06:19:31 PM

there is nothing !
no data , no OU !!

"The easiest way is to contest a success."

where do you see a success ?

It's just a demonstration how I see that.

2 new videos from the same group:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJAHms5h_rs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wk3MABMLa0k

Bubba1 · « **Reply #1356 on:** July 01, 2010, 01:55:10 AM »

"Letâ€™s suppose that force F acted again against the ball pushing it for the
same period of the time and with the same intensity.... it is logical to assume that force F passed the same kinetic energy of
1 Joule to the ball and increased the velocity of the ball for 1m/s again. This
means that force F passed totally energy of 2 Joules to the ball and caused it to
move with constant speed of 2m/s." - From "Jovan Marjanovic, Veljko Milkovic â€“ Kinetic Energy and Over Unity"

These guys are flunking High School physics. The same force F applied to the ball for the same time T would give the same acceleration, meaning the ball would be travelling at 2V at the end; but the energy given to the ball, namely Force times Distance, would be greater the second time because the distance covered by the ball while undergoing acceleration the second time would be greater than the first distance because the ball is travelling faster the second time.

Cloxxki · « **Reply #1357 on:** July 01, 2010, 01:49:04 PM »

Send 10% of the claimed excess energy on the output side, back to the input, and it will run indefinately. Perpetuum Mobile.

Why, I ask, do talented inventors keep spending so much time on a dead end idea? The OU is just not there in the 2-stage oscillator. False math does not subdue laws of nature.

Do they work for Big Oil, keeping mental resources focussed down this dead end road? A big accusation that would be, but the alternative option would be contrasting my mention of them as talented. Time to move on for them to a technology that does work. 1.2x OU will do just fine if they find it. Imagine that, extracting 20% of a complicated flywheel's KE, without it slowing down...
This invention cannot give up 0.01% of its output without slowing down.

Usually I'm not so sure about something working or not working, but this time I am. It just doesn't add up.

Solomon111 · « **Reply #1358 on:** July 01, 2010, 05:54:05 PM »

The easiest way is to deny everything ... Here we see the success! Everyone in the world working on inventions of Veljko MilkoviÄ‡ and that is most important - to explore.
There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come... you will see

tagor · « **Reply #1359 on:** July 01, 2010, 07:13:14 PM »

Quote from: Solomon111 on July 01, 2010, 05:54:05 PM

The easiest way is to deny everything ... Here we see the success! Everyone in the world working on inventions of Veljko MilkoviÄ‡ and that is most important - to explore.
There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come... you will see

where is the success ?
Quote from: rensseak on 29 June 2010, 21:43:08

Quote

Did he say something about success

you have to ask it to salomon

Solomon111 · « **Reply #1360 on:** July 03, 2010, 04:09:59 PM »

You're so jealous ...
Ask something constructive ...
View the Internet, and then say!!!

tagor · « **Reply #1361 on:** July 03, 2010, 05:15:25 PM »

Quote from: Solomon111 on July 03, 2010, 04:09:59 PM

You're so jealous ...
Ask something constructive ...
View the Internet, and then say!!!

why are you scaming people ?

Solomon111 · « **Reply #1362 on:** July 04, 2010, 04:51:36 PM »

The most important thing is to keep working on inventions. Of course, whole world working on them. It's not an easy job and requires high skills.

sm0ky2 · « **Reply #1363 on:** July 04, 2010, 07:32:24 PM »

This is real simple. every piece of this system has been in use for hundreds if not thousands of years.

if you go back several hundred posts, the mathematics of this sytem have been explained in great detail by a number of people working on the problem. but apparently, this is still left misunderstood.

so, for the mechnically inclined ( or the mathematically inhibited),
all one has to do is attach the "hammer" to the winding mechanism from a clock. connect the Escapement to the top of the pendulum arm.

Viola - you have a 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation test unit.
of A, after doing this you will see the reality of the situation, that this is simply a 12 times more Efficient system (than other systems) , but still far less than Unity.

That is not to say the study of this device is without merit.
While it is definately not "OU", This is most likely the closest to a COP=1 system mankind has yet to invent. When you combine the output energies ( from the dozen or so hammer strikes under load) from one [E = Mgh] lift and release of the pendlum, you see that the energy values on both sides of the equation nearly balance out. leaving only a small fraction of the energy lost to friction.
indicating a near perfect conversion of energy from pendulum to hammer.
Considering the frictional losses to be negligible, energy value of each strike of the hammer is equal to the loss in height of the pendulum, at the top of its swing, times its mass, times gravity. Or it can be said that the input energy of the system is equal to the sum of the integral forces from the hammer strikes.

FreeEnergy · « **Reply #1364 on:** July 04, 2010, 09:46:06 PM »

Quote from: sm0ky2 on July 04, 2010, 07:32:24 PM

This is real simple. every piece of this system has been in use for hundreds if not thousands of years.

if you go back several hundred posts, the mathematics of this sytem have been explained in great detail by a number of people working on the problem. but apparently, this is still left misunderstood.

so, for the mechnically inclined ( or the mathematically inhibited),
all one has to do is attach the "hammer" to the winding mechanism from a clock. connect the Escapement to the top of the pendulum arm.

Viola - you have a 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation test unit.
of A, after doing this you will see the reality of the situation, that this is simply a 12 times more Efficient system (than other systems) , but still far less than Unity.

That is not to say the study of this device is without merit.
While it is definately not "OU", This is most likely the closest to a COP=1 system mankind has yet to invent. When you combine the output energies ( from the dozen or so hammer strikes under load) from one [E = Mgh] lift and release of the pendlum, you see that the energy values on both sides of the equation nearly balance out. leaving only a small fraction of the energy lost to friction.
indicating a near perfect conversion of energy from pendulum to hammer.
Considering the frictional losses to be negligible, energy value of each strike of the hammer is equal to the loss in height of the pendulum, at the top of its swing, times its mass, times gravity. Or it can be said that the input energy of the system is equal to the sum of the integral forces from the hammer strikes.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2237902 times)

Solomon111

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Merg

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

tagor

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

rensseak

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

tagor

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Merg

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Bubba1

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Cloxxki

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Solomon111

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

tagor

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Solomon111

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

tagor

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Solomon111

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

sm0ky2

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

FreeEnergy

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !