Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1254737 times)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1875 on: January 21, 2014, 06:09:56 PM »
l answer questions directly pertaining to the  subject at hand
Almost never.  :D :D :D This can be proved with quote after quote after quote after quote.  You are nearly useless at this. :D

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1876 on: January 21, 2014, 06:26:05 PM »
try me @sarkeizen.go on.ask me a question directly pertaining to the workings of the wikipedia device..

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1877 on: January 21, 2014, 08:09:17 PM »
try me @sarkeizen.go on.ask me a question directly pertaining to the workings of the wikipedia device..
Well a) You already refused multiple times....and b) that's not the only question at hand, it's actually the provably absolute least relevant question at hand.  :D

Let me know when you are ready to answer relevant questions.  So far, you are not. :D

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1878 on: January 22, 2014, 12:37:50 AM »
im ready @sarkeizen :-).hand me the first question pertaining to the wikipedia papers :-)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1879 on: January 22, 2014, 03:50:53 AM »
question pertaining to the wikipedia papers
I have no idea what that is.  Sorry.  You absolutely refused to define whatever that might be.  So I can't know if they are relevant to the subject at hand.  If you can provide a formal logical argument as to why whatever nonsense you're imagining is important.  I'm sure I can address it.

Just let me know when you stop being an EOA.  Thanks.  :D :D

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1880 on: January 22, 2014, 09:01:56 AM »
now you see,dear audience, why i tend to get a tad bit angry around the poster sarkeizen.he loves to steer conversations anywhere but ontopic. wikipedia oxygen concentration cell @sarkeizen:google it. Kindly ask me a question pertaining to it and it alone.it is used in that article to describe its effect upon iron corrosion.experience tells us it is impossible to permanently flatten or kill this electric cell. 

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1881 on: January 22, 2014, 02:03:12 PM »
Kindly ask me a question pertaining to it and it alone..
If...whatever you're talking about that you refuse to define...is important to the discussion.  Then you really haven't said why or made a case for it.  I'll be sure to get back to it when you do - which will be never.

While your original point is at least somewhat falsifiable (which is probably why you ran like crazy from arguing about it), your second point is a common logical fallacy called an argument from ignorance.  Which is why it's valueless.

Oh and I got the textbook, the page you mentioned doesn't have the cite you mentioned.  So....can you post a photo of the page with the page number from your textbook?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1882 on: January 22, 2014, 04:06:09 PM »
its valueless to demand that you show how kelvins statement fits in with an electrochemical cell mentioned in wikipedia?ludicrous.heres a diagram of it below seperate from its context in the wikipedia article in which the two platinum electrodes are iron electrodes. My argument is that you cant show us how kelvin statement functions here to destroy it because it doesnt use kelvins statement to function.the temperature is 25celcius,the system standardized in one molar electrolyte.again i ask,kindly ask questions pertaining to this cell @sarkeizen. What is the first sentence in your book under section titled 'nernst equation'.i want to see if you really have that book.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1883 on: January 22, 2014, 04:29:32 PM »
its valueless to demand that you show how kelvins statement fits in with an electrochemical cell mentioned in wikipedia?ludicrous.
Sorry, you're making an argument from ignorance.  It's a really, really common logical flaw.  I could show you if you allowed questions about your argument but you don't....oh well.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Quote
heres a stupid diagram of nothing relevant
Thanks.  I'll file it with the others.
Quote
ask questions pertaining to this cell @sarkeizen.
Again, logic says that your argument is of zero value.  Are you saying I should spend time on something of zero value?  Seems like that would only confuse you further. :D
Quote
What is the first sentence in your book under section titled 'nernst equation'.i want to see if you really have that book.
The page number you gave me doesn't say "Nerst Equation" on it anywhere.  Nor can I find that in the book. Can you post a photo of your book to prove that it is?  Please include the page number in the photo.  That way I can look it up.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1884 on: January 22, 2014, 07:00:31 PM »
its ignorant to ask you to show evidence of kelvin behaviour in a cell mentioned in wikipedia?preposterous. Its of zero value to ask you to show evidence of kelvin behaviour in a cell mentioned in wikipedia? Mad. I dont believe you @sarkeizen,please quote us the first sentence under section 'nernst equation' there in your book.i want to see if its same as mine.i suspect you are attempting to stall publicly answering your own questions. We demand that you ask questions pertaining to the mentioned wikipedia battery and related batteries and not deviate or distort from the pertinent subject here..

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1885 on: January 22, 2014, 08:25:06 PM »
its ignorant to ask you to show evidence of kelvin behaviour in a cell mentioned in wikipedia?preposterous
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
It's irrelevant to the point at hand.  Again I can prove it but again you allow no questioning of your dogma.  So, at this time I can not help you.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Quote
I dont believe you
Logic does not care what you believe, sadly I am right an you are wrong but as your religion allows no questions whatsoever of your premise....
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Quote
please quote us the first sentence under section 'nernst equation' there in your book
I told you, it's not on that page and I can't find it in the book.  So I'm beginning to believe you are faking.  I can easily show you the page *you* told me it was on but you are completely unable to show me yours isn't that suspicious?
Quote
wikipedia battery
No idea what that is.  You have not provided a definition or any information as to why it's important.  Again, if I had information I could help.  Sadly...because of you....I do not. :D :D :D
Quote
and not deviate or distort from the pertinent subject here..
That's your job.  Seriously, if this equation is on a page I can't find all you would have to do is post a photo of your page - at least I'd have a chance of finding the page by flipping through.   That would take you no time at all and would be of zero cost to you but as we both know.  You don't have a copy of this book.

:D :D :D You've been lying. :D :D :D

(again)

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1886 on: January 22, 2014, 11:20:01 PM »
@sarkeizen: WE THE GLOBAL SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY DEMAND THAT YOU THEORETICALY DEMONSTRATE THE ROLE OF KELVIN STATEMENT INSIDE THE WIKIPEDIA OXYGEN CONCENTRATION CELL. WE DEMAND IT NOW. you are lying about that textbook,it was stolen like i said it would be and it didnt arrive.go on,quote the sentence @sarkeizen,prove to us that its the same then i,l put a photo up ok?deal?

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1887 on: January 23, 2014, 06:23:35 PM »
@sarkeizen: WE THE LAUGHABLY STUPID DEMAND
ROFL back to this again...I've said that your argument is a logical fallacy.  My ability or inability to state something does not correlate with it's truth.
Quote
THE WIKIPEDIA OXYGEN CONCENTRATION CELL
Still no idea what this is.
Quote
you are lying about that textbook,it was stolen like i said it would be and it didnt arrive.go on,quote the sentence @sarkeizen,prove to us that its the same then i,
I can't give you a sentence from a page I can't find.  I can give you the first sentence from the page you did reference but the formula that you're talking about isn't there.
Quote
l put a photo up ok?deal?
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
:D Oh please.  You can't put up a photo because you don't have the textbook, remember? :D
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1888 on: January 23, 2014, 07:43:47 PM »
A) it correlates directly with truth because you have to defend kelvin statement in order to attack kelvin-attackers.B)its the last cell diagrammed in this thread.everything under standard conditions except oxygen concentrations.C)does your book have a section titled 'nernst equation'.check in the index.D)oh yes i do but i dont believe you do @sarkeizen.post a photo of the page so that we can see that your telling the truth then.i,l post a photo after.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1889 on: January 23, 2014, 08:07:01 PM »
A) it correlates directly with truth because you have to defend kelvin statement in order to attack kelvin-attacker
Nope.  That's an argument from ignorance.  Again, this is an age old logical fallacy. Look it up, if you doubt it.
Quote
B)its the last cell diagrammed in this thread.everything under standard conditions except oxygen concentrations.
Sorry, no idea what that diagram represents. 
Quote
C)does your book have a section titled 'nernst equation'.check in the index
I did.  Can't see one.
Quote
.D)oh yes i do but i dont believe you do
Think about it.  I realize that thinking is something you almost never do but.  When you first gave the cite and I didn't have the book.  Why not post a photo of the page?  Then make your argument.  It would have got to your point a lot quicker.  If you're trying to make your point.  Then nothing would have made it more quickly than to post a pic and say: "Well until your copy gets here, why don't we work from this".  However you didn't. 
Quote
@sarkeizen.post a photo of the page so that we can see that your telling the truth
You are the only one who lies here.  Not only that you do it entirely without conscience.
Quote
then.i,l post a photo after.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
:D Shhhh....you don't have the textbook remember. :D
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D