Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: quentron.com  (Read 1254794 times)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1860 on: January 20, 2014, 03:22:36 AM »
my old point proves my new point
Your old point is unproven...you have provided one cite and no formal logical argument.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1861 on: January 20, 2014, 08:48:07 AM »
my new point is proven: you have provided no cite and no argument whatsoever,nevermind logical.@sarkeizen.

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1862 on: January 20, 2014, 03:53:16 PM »
my new point is proven:
No, not really.

So can I take your post here as an admission that you don't know how stupid your request is?  Again, a simple "yes" and I'll go through and mow it down.   If you're afraid please continue evading the question.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1863 on: January 20, 2014, 08:15:14 PM »
its not a request @sarkeizen.its a demand.a demand petitioned by me and the entire overunity community.a demand that you uphold a very important statement in physics,a statement made by lord kelvin over 100years ago.you have to show us how it applies to the wikipedia battery.you have to show us where it fits in with the wikipedia battery and how it kills the wikipedia battery.anything less than this is unacceptable and unscientific.if you dont do this we are forced to declare the foundation of your entire arguments in this thread null and void. 

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1864 on: January 20, 2014, 09:01:34 PM »
its not a request @sarkeizen.its a demand.a demand petitioned by me and the entire overunity community.
So can I take this demand from you and the clown patrol as an admission that you don't know how stupid it is?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1865 on: January 20, 2014, 09:37:50 PM »
its not an admission either @sarkeizen.its a demand.a demand that you show us how kelvin statement gets into and destroys the wikipedia battery.we want to know @sarkeizen.we are going to start stomping our feet now...

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1866 on: January 21, 2014, 12:22:18 AM »
its not an admission either @sarkeizen.
So you *do* know how stupid your demand is?

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1867 on: January 21, 2014, 01:06:02 AM »
stomp,stomp,stomp...@sarkeizen..stomp..

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1868 on: January 21, 2014, 01:44:08 AM »
stomp,stomp,stomp...@sarkeizen..stomp..
Is that "Yes, I profitis know how stupid my demand is?"

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1869 on: January 21, 2014, 08:07:12 AM »
no its the sound of the entire overunity and scientific community worldwide stomping their feet with growing impatience @sarkeizen...they want an answer,they want you to explain kelvin statement role in not only the wikipedia battery but in my hydrogen battery too! Their list of demands are growing now in what could be the most important thread in the history of this website,fuelled by YOUR inability to answer!  Stomp!,stomp!,stomp!...(getting louder now)
« Last Edit: January 21, 2014, 10:20:04 AM by profitis »

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1870 on: January 21, 2014, 10:29:46 AM »
cmon @sarkeizen,where are you.where are you.where are you.the whole scientific and overunity community are waiting your explanation..stomp! Stomp! STOMP!....

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1871 on: January 21, 2014, 02:01:01 PM »
cmon @sarkeizen,where are you.where are you.
How can I show you that you're wrong if you refuse to answer any questions?   I've only asked you two different ones in the past few days and you simply refuse to answer.

Anyway, so who is this really?  You're starting to sound whiny like Bruce_TPU.  The idea that you might be Philip just talking to himself is also possible...and amusing.   I mean clearly you are going out of your way to wear a (a particularly stupid) fake mustache.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1872 on: January 21, 2014, 04:13:13 PM »
whooooaaar!! in other words you cant show me where im wrong by pointing out how kelvin statement is supposed to do its thing here @sarkeizen??? Here with my hydrogen battery and here with wikipedia battery?? You want to argue without knowing your own shit first?? (no im not any of those guys,phillip is australian im south african,bruce who?no mustache here)

sarkeizen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1923
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1873 on: January 21, 2014, 04:42:59 PM »
in other words you cant show me where im wrong
Not until you answer my questions.  This would be true of any thesis, by anyone anywhere.

profitis

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3952
Re: quentron.com
« Reply #1874 on: January 21, 2014, 05:23:48 PM »
i,l answer questions directly pertaining to the  subject at hand,ie..the workings of the wikipedia device.anything else is going off-tangent,e.g.arguing about arguments and the like..ask me questions about the wikipedia battery ok @sarkeizen.