Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation  (Read 61217 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #75 on: July 18, 2019, 06:14:57 PM »
VOID quote It would be nice if even just one person out there who says they have encountered unusual
results would demonstrate it in a reasonable way.


P.S. Itsu. Please stick around. Your efforts are always appreciated here end quote

Yes it would change everything here and everywhere.

 RE itsu I don't believe our host realizes just how privileged he is to have persons like itsu   here[who hopefully is stuck here for now....hint from the street ??
and likewise .... IMO a Privilege on steroids ...the TK lab who's build is discussed here.

sorry for the interruption... 
  EDIT to Nick below you perhaps missed the word on the street hint...IMO it is horrible what happened here to itsu ....working the hardest of all and getting completely blind sided ...unjustly !! If it is true that RF holds the beliefs he professes ,it is one of the oddest paths I could ever imagine towards upholding those standards !putting a revenue stream in front of helping the world ...and watching a man sincerely struggle [itsu] ...and by struggle I mean the language / reading barrier too.and just highlight his handicap [itsu can't "follow" the videos ]
and not show him his errors ...very frustrating and not really behavior I would associate with Ricks Divine mentor
IMO a very offputting reflection on That mentor and what he taughtabout how we should treat others.

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #76 on: July 18, 2019, 06:23:05 PM »
   Yes, but itsu has checked out of OU.com, and will not be posting here any more.
   Thanks to you know who.   

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #77 on: July 18, 2019, 06:24:25 PM »
Hold on a moment in the TB video he says you need something like 2 or 3 KV but I tried it at a much lower voltage and it didn't work GeoFusion used a spark gap and made a video it's on his web site.
No spark gaps in the Bearden schematics.
Please somebody give an accurate and complete schematic along with some description of how it is supposed to behave. And just how the OU manifests.

A Slayer that runs itself until dark. Precise schematic please.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #78 on: July 18, 2019, 06:26:57 PM »
Oh wait... do you mean a Slayer that runs itself until _it_ goes dark?    :-\

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #79 on: July 18, 2019, 06:27:46 PM »
VOID quote It would be nice if even just one person out there who says they have encountered unusual
results would demonstrate it in a reasonable way.


P.S. Itsu. Please stick around. Your efforts are always appreciated here end quote

Yes it would change everything here and everywhere.

 RE itsu I don't believe our host realizes just how privileged he is to have persons like itsu   here[who hopefully is stuck here for now....hint from the street ??
and likewise .... IMO a Privilege on steroids ...the TK lab who's build is discussed here.

sorry for the interruption...
You can check out --- but you can never leave.
Don't you wish MarkE was still around? I sure do.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #80 on: July 18, 2019, 06:30:54 PM »
Scopeshot of the little multivibrator with some manual button presses:

(LED On when signal is LOW)

NickZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5225
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #81 on: July 18, 2019, 06:33:16 PM »
   Geofusion has not shown OU nor could obtain self running any device. Nor has made any claims about that either.   itsu has checked out. But the door is always open, at the Asylum. Where friends will always be friends...

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #82 on: July 18, 2019, 06:37:09 PM »
Ok Let me explain cos I am going to get some heat here.


I powered the slayer from batteries and looped.  So you are going to say batteries again.  well it was a first experiment so hang on and I'll do a schematic.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #83 on: July 18, 2019, 06:39:14 PM »
No spark gaps in the Bearden schematics.
Please somebody give an accurate and complete schematic along with some description of how it is supposed to behave. And just how the OU manifests.

A Slayer that runs itself until dark. Precise schematic please.
I'm not sure on this one but I think from what i've been told its about halting any power fluctuations as it causes a magnetic flux and then dumping all stored capacitance dielectric energy into a pulse of energy usually a high voltage in the first stage if the protocol is not adhered to you get nothing it's about beating the rise time of the electron rumour has it
that's about 5 nano seconds 200 mhz but A.King says there is another way. the spark gap has to be low resistance .005 ohms, you would need at least 10 irf460 fets in parallel and then there is the fly back voltage to contend with but they can be cascaded.
And then there is this apparently he says it works. No he shows it working.
notice during the impulse all current must be activity halted.

AlienGrey

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #84 on: July 18, 2019, 06:53:16 PM »
You can check out --- but you can never leave.
Don't you wish MarkE was still around? I sure do.
who is he ?  (you can't destroy energy (everything is energy EVERYTHING)

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #85 on: July 18, 2019, 07:01:52 PM »
Ok Let me explain cos I am going to get some heat here.
I powered the slayer from batteries and looped.  So you are going to say batteries again.  well it was a first experiment so hang on and I'll do a schematic.

Hi a.king. Yes, there is certainly potential there for misinterpretation.
Various battery types have a flat area in their discharge curves where the battery
terminal voltage will remain pretty constant for a period of time during discharge. The exact length
of time the battery will stay in the flat discharge area of its discharge curve depends on the battery type,
the battery Amp-hour rating, and the current draw from the battery.

Another factor which can potentially be misleading is if you are pulsing a battery
using feedback to charge the battery at a high frequency of several kHz or higher, this can throw off
the voltage reading of digital multimeters and cause them to read a fair bit higher than the
actual battery terminal voltage. When you shut off the pulsing circuit, you see that the battery
voltage is actually lower than the digital multimeter was displaying when the pulsing circuit
was pulsing the battery. I have seen this on numerous occasions.


a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #86 on: July 18, 2019, 07:12:30 PM »
Whenever I have tried the loop with the slayer in the past it never works because the circuit has hi frequency running through it.  The actual circuit was more complicated than this but here is the basics to work on.  The cap I used was a 450 volt motor run cap and the voltage are potentially LETHAL.  Do not do it unless you are qualified.  It can KILL you.  I bear no responsibility.  This is for educational and discussion purposes only.
There are variations you can do on the earth side.  Remember that a  cap is a blocking device so you are picking up electrons from the earth ground and creating a funnelling effect.  Damp humid conditions will hinder the process as will sea level or below sea level because electron activity is low..


This will blow your transistors if not secure.

Void

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2333
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #87 on: July 18, 2019, 07:20:51 PM »
Thanks a.king. That should be an easy enough circuit for people to try to replicate.
Yes, if you use a large value for the capacitor C2, it could potentially give a big shock if
someone touches its terminals after switching off the circuit. .  :o ;D

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #88 on: July 18, 2019, 07:22:30 PM »
You can regulate the voltage going back into the battery by placing a neon or ne2 across the earthing capacitor. 2 in series will double the voltage into the battery and so on,

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: A-King 21 - build discussion /investigation
« Reply #89 on: July 18, 2019, 07:29:25 PM »
Have a look at the DOn SMith Moron level (lol)  and see the way he organises things on the "other side" where there should technically be no power. BUT THERE IS and masses of it.  He uses a SHOE BOX SIZE cap.  Think about that.