Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2231903 times)

Rhead100 · « **Reply #1095 on:** September 09, 2009, 12:54:46 AM »

Check out my videos on youtube.com.

Search Rhead100

Nabo00o · « **Reply #1096 on:** September 09, 2009, 01:22:34 AM »

Rhead, you haven't updated your progress for a long time now, its hell not knowing if your 4ton? pendulum project made it or not

Maybe you have been too busy recently, but I and many others would really have appreciated some information on your latest progress.

Julian

andrea · « **Reply #1097 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:20:58 AM »

Quote from: Nabo00o on September 09, 2009, 01:22:34 AM

Maybe you have been too busy recently, but I and many others would really have appreciated some information on your latest progress.

Julian

This is true. We all want to see the progress of Rhead project on youtube!

Rhead100 · « **Reply #1098 on:** September 09, 2009, 11:22:14 AM »

Sorry fellas;
3 heart attacks and a failing economy has put a little kink in my timing. And that says nothing for my age.
I have done a few tests that did not require a lot of energy from my part. And have watched my own videos in slow motion many times, studying the movements.
We have come up with a design that from all testings should allow the machine to run itself. ALL the timing, movements And forces are there. It is only a matter of hooking them together in the right sequence and proportions. (AND figuring out what to do with the excess energy. IE, make electricity or pump water)
A two hundred pound pendulum almost turned my one thousand pound frame over. Really got a little hairy.

we have solved that problem. In doing so we can swing much heavier pendulums with a lot less poundage of frame work per pound of pendulum.
We have done a lot of tests and calculations as well. It seems as if I was a little off on my first figures as to pendulum weight , length and horse power. The length of the pendulum ADDS to the time, BUT multiplies the power out put. This is ONE of the aspects of the 2 stage oscillator that most people miss. AND there are a few other things about it that a lot of people don't even think about. Key things that once noticed, make it fully understandable.
My health is recovering and the weather is cooling off a bit. SO; I will be making some new videos of my finds, with some explanations. and will try to point out the little things that people are missing when studying this machine.
I have never had a failed experiment. Those that worked were a success. and those that did not work, suckseeded in teaching me what NOT to do.

RHead

FreeEnergy · « **Reply #1099 on:** September 09, 2009, 11:38:40 AM »

Quote from: Rhead100 on September 09, 2009, 11:22:14 AM

Sorry fellas;
3 heart attacks and a failing economy has put a little kink in my timing. And that says nothing for my age.
I have done a few tests that did not require a lot of energy from my part. And have watched my own videos in slow motion many times, studying the movements.
We have come up with a design that from all testings should allow the machine to run itself. ALL the timing, movements And forces are there. It is only a matter of hooking them together in the right sequence and proportions. (AND figuring out what to do with the excess energy. IE, make electricity or pump water)
A two hundred pound pendulum almost turned my one thousand pound frame over. Really got a little hairy. we have solved that problem. In doing so we can swing much heavier pendulums with a lot less poundage of frame work per pound of pendulum.
We have done a lot of tests and calculations as well. It seems as if I was a little off on my first figures as to pendulum weight , length and horse power. The length of the pendulum ADDS to the time, BUT multiplies the power out put. This is ONE of the aspects of the 2 stage oscillator that most people miss. AND there are a few other things about it that a lot of people don't even think about. Key things that once noticed, make it fully understandable.
My health is recovering and the weather is cooling off a bit. SO; I will be making some new videos of my finds, with some explanations. and will try to point out the little things that people are missing when studying this machine.
I have never had a failed experiment. Those that worked were a success. and those that did not work, suckseeded in teaching me what NOT to do.

RHead

how soon will you have the videos up? today?

Nabo00o · « **Reply #1100 on:** September 09, 2009, 03:15:37 PM »

Sad to hear about the heart problems, but still great that you got back to working.
If this counts for anything, I would say that meat in general has a tendency to increase the chance of cardiac arrest. That and also a lot animal fat used in oil. If you want to live healthy and still eat a lot, switch to olive oil in the dinner and meals, it is a change that could turn your life around

Well there you heard my vegetarian bias anyway,
Julian

Rhead100 · « **Reply #1101 on:** September 09, 2009, 08:12:31 PM »

Sorry FreeEnergy from California. Not today hopefully by this weekend.

Juliean; Thanks for the advice. BUT;;; A Lepord can not change his spots. I AM CARNAVOR !!! and nobody GETS OUT ALIVE.
Healthy people are going to feel really foolish one day lying in a hospital bed dieing from nothing. HA HA HA.

Raymond RHead100

Mayo · « **Reply #1102 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:30:02 PM »

Quote from: Charlie_V on August 27, 2009, 03:28:44 PM

And yes energy is conserved because the output is the initial energy input plus the energy required to keep the pendulum swinging. But if Bob puts in the initial energy, and Mike keeps it swinging, it will appear to Mike that the device is over unity (assuming the device is designed so that the pivot point doesn't move). Mike will think this because he is oblivious to the initial energy input that Bob placed. So to Mike, the output (Bob energy + Mike energy) is much more than Mike's input.

This is interesting note that total energy used is Bob energy + Mike energy. However if the system is used for long period of the time we can disregard initial energy put by Bob. So it seams that Mike will correctly see over unity all the time. The problem is moving of the pivot point which consumes energy of the system and decrease over unity.

Jovan

Nabo00o · « **Reply #1103 on:** September 09, 2009, 09:48:37 PM »

Quote

This is interesting note that total energy used is Bob energy + Mike energy. However if the system is used for long period of the time we can disregard initial energy put by Bob. So it seams that Mike will correctly see over unity all the time.

Which is not what happens in a normal damped harmonic oscillator.

FreeEnergy · « **Reply #1104 on:** September 09, 2009, 11:20:03 PM »

:-) found this

Charlie_V · « **Reply #1105 on:** September 10, 2009, 12:03:38 AM »

Hey, theres the ratchet idea!

Rhead100 · « **Reply #1106 on:** September 10, 2009, 12:44:10 PM »

Quote from: FreeEnergy on September 09, 2009, 11:20:03 PM

:-) found this

Did you mean something like this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbWeI2Kam3s&feature=channel_page
Or this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m07VAdJZnp8&feature=channel_page
Or maybe this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AulAeyAjtzk&feature=channel_page

I later took the tire and rime off the wheel and using it like a pulley. Tied a #10 braided nylon line to it and a 10 pound odd shaped peace of steel over 60 feet away. Holding the wheel so it would not turn. I got the machine up to speed and turned loss. It pulled the steel the over 60 foot distants then snatched it into the air (over 6 feet high) so hard it Brock the # 10 braided nylon line. AND did it all in just under 6 seconds.
SORRY !!!! I did not make a video of that. DANG IT !!!!
By the way;; the first video is a coffee can full of concrete (14 pounds)
The second two videos are a 6 gallon bucket full of concrete (122 pounds)
Almost NO difference in power needed to KEEP them swinging ONCE they are swinging. The only difference in energy needed to keep the larger one swinging was the larger size and extra air drag. That is why I now use lead in my pendulums. More weight more power, Smaller pendulum, less air drag.
That is one of the most important parts of the 2 stage oscillator.
Everyone knows that it takes more energy to get a car from zero to 60 in a 1/4 mile than it takes to run a car for a 1/4 mile at 60 miles per hour.

I am making a set of videos explaining the finer points of the 2 stage oscillator and exactly what is happening to make it work, (in detail) step by step. They show many points that the average person is missing.
One example is where does the excess power come from.
My problem with this videos is that the files are too large to post to you tube. OR at the least I don't know how to post them on you tube. They run over 400 megs and 15 minutes each. Is there anyone out there that can help me get them on the net for everyone to see

??

Raymond

Nabo00o · « **Reply #1107 on:** September 10, 2009, 03:11:55 PM »

If you had a special account on youtube you could have the videos as long as you wanted to.
Many are using this system to show films and educational lectures, like MIT for example.

Charlie_V · « **Reply #1108 on:** September 10, 2009, 04:27:11 PM »

What is MIT saying about this machine might I ask?

By the way, adding more weight to the pendulum increases the centripetal force generated. If you released the weight from a 90 degree vertical position the centripetal force is 2mg (twice the mass of the weight times gravity). This was rather bewildering to me because the length of the rod makes no difference. This is because at free fall, the velocity is a function of the rod length and it drops out of the equation so all is left is the factor 2, the mass, and gravity. Turns out the rod length increases the stored energy in the system (and reduces the frequency) - which is important if you have a load with a certain energy requirement.

I'm interested to hear where Rhead100 thinks the excess energy is coming from. I think its from gravity.

Cloxxki · « **Reply #1109 on:** September 10, 2009, 05:48:26 PM »

Nice vids rhead, I had already admired those before.
It would be interesting to see your big 2-stage pendulums do more work than push away some air or keep a bike wheel turning. Your hands are now mostly overcoming the system's air drag, it seems? If the wheel would be a waterwheel, things would be come more understandable, perhaps. If that waterwheel can lift more water weight than the 1st stage weight and to the latter's starting height at that, we've got overunity I would say.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2231903 times)

Rhead100

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Nabo00o

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

andrea

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Rhead100

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

FreeEnergy

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Nabo00o

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Rhead100

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Mayo

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Nabo00o

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

FreeEnergy

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Charlie_V

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Rhead100

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Nabo00o

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Charlie_V

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Cloxxki

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !