Another provocative video from Skycollection:
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmZ6kGDT_Ow
 
 
Skycollection indicates he took amp meter readings, and he infers, in his Youtube comments, that the seond induction coil is generating an additional 4 watts of power, without increasing input. I advised him to turn the entire apparatus on it's side to spin the sphere on it's axis insread of "skidding"  Like he's been doing.

Hi Gyulasun, That sounds like a good evaluation, I'm not really qualified to say much in the very technical arena, but your post makes sense.

All the OU claims without any descent measurements are running the free energy movement into the mud. there are so many errant claims from within the community itself
that tricksters jump on the bandwagon and add intentional fakes to the mix for ad sense money and they do it because the video's get lots of hits from people linking them in
places like this.

The fake claims continue because it appears to be seen as OK, the "boy who cried wolf syndrome" comes to mind, the way the villagers in that fable should have acted is to take
the responsibility for the "wolf watch" away from the liar after the second false claim, you see the villagers are really the ones at fault for the loss of the sheep because rather
than replace the liar they just ignored him, then the problem was just as much theirs as his. If the boy had cried " I think I see a wolf but I'm not sure because I don't know what a wolf looks like", then things might turn out different. Would the villagers be smart to still leave him on wolf watch if he couldn't tell what was a wolf ?

All energy is originally free, no one pays to run the Sun or paid to put oil in the ground or pays for the rain that deposit the high water that runs hydro electric plants.
The equipment to utilize free energy cost money just like any other equipment and if others harness the energy they can charge whatever they like for it.

Show me a truly closed system and Ill say I see a system that must be unity by definition. Otherwise it is an open system.

I don't think I have seen one single closed system yet on all the forum boards. The way I see it no closed system no breaking of the 2nd Law of thermodynamics. I think it's the second law, I'm not big on laws I read a couple of them once and they seemed pretty logical to me at the time.

Disregarding the Laws of Thermodynamics is easy, we don't need to know them to measure an over 100% efficient device.

In my opinion two false claims of OU that are serious should get one banned.

Whats wrong with saying (look this is interesting, my experiment is showing unusual behavior), then show the behavior and receive comments and offers of replications.

Why does the claim of OU come before the investigation ?

I've got over 100 video's on you tube only three had (bogus) matched third party content (allows them to place ad's on your video's) which was not worth arguing over so I made them link only. One video I wanted to keep public so I contested the stupid false claim and won of course, thier claim was false but they try to scare people with talk of legal action. They are scum internet bullies, but it's their house, so I play by their rules.
Some of my video's have thousands of views but I will never allow ad's on them while I have a choice because I don't do it for money or view counts.
If I wanted I could make lots of money with a few key words and some tricky video's, but I'm not a deceiver, I seek truth.

Look what is so easy to do, If I promoted this video and didn't declare it a joke it could have 100 000 hit's.
There is no obvious input no capacitors and no battery just coils and load. Faking and misleading is easy, finding real solutions is difficult.

Free Energy coils in Action video clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9AjFM5VB2c

Cheers



 

Hi synchro1,

What you quoted from Skycollection youtube comments, I had quoted exactly the same text in my Reply #902 two posts above.
I do not see any sense to mention his measurements in connection with his present video in question, however close his present setup is to his earlier experiment.

What you mention on the speed of the ball sounding like it is accelerating: exactly this is where the input power draw should be checked.  Not only the rise in input (if there is rise) but the total input is to be checked, together with the total output power measurements on both output coils.

And as I wrote, LED lamps as loads are misleading, power resistors should be used which continuously draw power from the outputs, not during the peaks of the waveform like LEDs do.

Gyula

Guyla makes excellent points.  When you change the LEDs for a resistive load, then ideally you will have a True-RMS multimeter to measure the voltage.  Actually you must have a True-RMS multimeter.  You simply measure the load resistance with your multimeter before you attach it to the pick-up coil so you have a more accurate value for the resistance.  Then you measure the True-RMS voltage across the resistor and do the calculation for the power.  So essentially it's just one measurement while you run your tests.   At the same time you measure your input power and compare the two.

An exercise would be to check what happens if you change the load resistance.  For small, medium and large resistance values, what trends do you see in the measured power output?  Can you explain why this is happening?

Another exercise would be to put one scope channel on the pick-up coil voltage.  That's your timing reference.  Then put the other scope channel on the signal that fires the main transistor that energizes the drive coil.  If you have a moveable Hall sensor to control the triggering then you can observe how moving the Hall sensor changes the timing of the triggering.  So by moving the Hall sensor around you can change the phase and duration of the transistor firing pulse and see it in real time on your scope display.  At the same time you are assuming that the ball (or rotor) is speeding up and slowing down and you can use your scope to measure the frequency.  You can try to find the sweet-spot place to put the Hall sensor for the sweet-spot timing, for the phase and the pulse duration for firing the transistor, to give you either the maximum RPM, or the most efficient RPM.

Another trend line has to do with the input power vs. RPM.  The higher the speed the more you pay in terms of air friction.  So the "watts per RPM" must go up as you increase in RPM.  Can you measure it?

I have read Skycollection's comments over the past two weeks and he states several times that he is only doing demonstrations and not serious measurements.  If you have a scope and a True-RMS multimeter and a pulse motor, you can indeed make some serious measurements to define the performance characteristics of your motor.

Skycollection new zero lenz coil:
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8iRrmxJcYg

I don't understand why he always say his coils have zero lenz, as you can clearly hear deceleration when he approach the gen coil to the rotor...

some considerations about the stacked bifilar panckakes.
may be this is only a wrong point of view,so any correction is welcomed.
I do not know how this could influence in the Lorenz law behavior
good theoreticians here may be can (or want to) say.
Just my two cents
cheers
Alvaro

I say ZERO LENZ SKYDYNAMOTOR, because the friction bitwin the magnet rotor and the pancake coil is 0...and you will see that in my next video, and because the pancake coil is a zero...!
saludos, jorge