Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Ossie motor  (Read 332332 times)

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #180 on: February 11, 2010, 08:17:08 PM »
It has got me thinking, now that I have seen my battery increase in voltage, when the bridge was disconnected and my reeds were sparking themselves to death, I need to look into this further.

I come up with a small variation of the circuit diagram I posted earlier.  This time I eliminated the shottky bridge, and replaced it with spark gaps... Tesla would be proud, lol... If I'm thinking clearly, the small amount of resistance in line with the reeds will make it easier to get the spark to jump the spark gaps instead of the gaps in the reed switches.  If the gaps are tuned precisely, it may be possible for the reeds switches to open and not spark at all, while all the energy jumps the spark gaps instead and absorb into the battery.  Please share your thought's on this new variation idea I shared.  I think it may hold some promise.

neptune

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #181 on: February 11, 2010, 09:13:52 PM »
@Captaipecan . why not use old car spark plugs? You can beg old ones at any garage that does servicing . They will last years . When you get them adjusted , enclose them in an earthed can to prevent stray RF radiation.

futuristic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
    • HTML Color Codes
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #182 on: February 11, 2010, 09:36:10 PM »
@captainpecan:
I like your setup with spark gaps. Do you think of doing it with two wire ends or will you make something more sofisticated? ;)

Frenky

mscoffman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #183 on: February 11, 2010, 09:50:07 PM »
It has got me thinking, now that I have seen my battery increase in voltage, when the bridge was disconnected and my reeds were sparking themselves to death, I need to look into this further.

I come up with a small variation of the circuit diagram I posted earlier.  This time I eliminated the shottky bridge, and replaced it with spark gaps... Tesla would be proud, lol... If I'm thinking clearly, the small amount of resistance in line with the reeds will make it easier to get the spark to jump the spark gaps instead of the gaps in the reed switches.  If the gaps are tuned precisely, it may be possible for the reeds switches to open and not spark at all, while all the energy jumps the spark gaps instead and absorb into the battery.  Please share your thought's on this new variation idea I shared.  I think it may hold some promise.

Typically the solution is to put medium sized capacitors across the
arcing contacts. Capacitors sized to suppress the arc but not affect
circuit operation. Here is the thing; Those arcs represent combustion,
not necessarily oxygen combustion, to some extent and may themselves
be a source of energy in MHD form.

They really need to be fully suppressed in the long term. Lower
voltage then inductive kicks cause those arcs, and they start-up
when the switch contact gap is tiny. Sparkplugs need a much higher
voltage before they start to arc in air. Other discharge gasses might
accord some promise. Neon, Xenon, or Argon in the form of discharge
lamps across the contacts. But switch arcs can form even when there
is no inductive voltage rise at all.

:S:MarkSCoffman

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #184 on: February 11, 2010, 10:27:41 PM »
How about surge suppression devices that are rated just above the operating voltage? Im not sure that they exist at that low of a voltage, but they could act as a great precision rated spark gap. And if it is just above the operating voltage, it would be a one way trip back to the battery and eliminate sparking in the reed as well.
Caps are ok to reduce the spark in the reed, but it would seem to be a waste to put any energy into that kind of suppressive action.
Mags

Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #185 on: February 11, 2010, 11:09:46 PM »
My Orzy is doing the grinding thing again the trace below is across the coils of my 2 motors. The top trace is the Orzy. The wave compresses like that when it grinds. I put a stethoscope on the coils & the noise is definitely coming from there. Feels like there is a lot of pent up energy trying to be released.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #186 on: February 11, 2010, 11:14:35 PM »
Also, I see the resistors in the circuits. I see them as something that is slowing things down.

Look at it like this. Without the resistor, the inductor will charge faster and higher. With the resistor it will be slower and less of a field build at the end of the cycle, where the bemf will also be cut down likewise.
Like how much voltage is actually getting across the coils after the resistor during a short pulse? If the reed cant handle it, use bigger ones that can do the job, but dont "limit" yourself with resistors. I think that is kind of going backwards. But thats just me. =]

I said this before about the voltage, why just us 1.5v? Just because Steorn does? If you went to 3v, replace the resistors with diodes in a forward conducting manor through the reeds, and this will be an extra barrier to resist back feed through the reed. Sure there will be a voltage drop, but at 3v, say we get 2.2 at the least. I dont see any problems with that.

Just thoughts that I am going to play with here in a bit.

Mags


Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #187 on: February 11, 2010, 11:31:53 PM »
Also, I see the  in the circuits. I see them as something that is slowing things down.

Look at it like this. Without the , the inductor will charge faster and higher. With the resistor it will be slower and less of a field build at the end of the cycle, where the bemf will also be cut down likewise.
Like how much voltage is actually getting across the coils after the resistor during a short pulse? If the reed cant handle it, use bigger ones that can do the job, but dont "limit" yourself with resistors. I think that is kind of going backwards. But thats just me. =]

I said this before about the voltage, why just us 1.5v? Just because Steorn does? If you went to 3v, replace the resistors with diodes in a forward conducting manor through the reeds, and this will be an extra barrier to resist back feed through the reed. Sure there will be a voltage drop, but at 3v, say we get 2.2 at the least. I dont see any problems with that.

Just thoughts that I am going to play with here in a bit.

Mags
I have yet to use resistors in my circuits.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #188 on: February 11, 2010, 11:34:49 PM »
Jim
I see that. =]  I am just throwing stuff on the plate from stuff I see otherwise. Ideers. =]

Mags

Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #189 on: February 11, 2010, 11:58:45 PM »
Jim
I see that. =]  I am just throwing stuff on the plate from stuff I see otherwise. Ideers. =]

Mags
Sure. my comment was an FYI. With 3V what sort of battery? Alkaline still? My6v sla at 3v gave no joy. luvyawork

woopy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 608
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #190 on: February 12, 2010, 12:23:36 AM »
Hello all

just for  info

yestertday  i came back to Ossie original polarity  and with my new more resistant and inductive coils i could get very interesting results.

first it was easier to tune the reeds to get the current to drop  (depending of the voltage)  i could get a working motor  with  1.5  to 2 ma   really low

So i put another time my super cap  5.4 (2 x 2.7 volt) and 10 F to charge with my 4.5 alcaline battery. Than i disconnected the main battery and let the super cap works from itself   and it lasted easily 4 hours     but still dropping     and i stopped  the game when the rotor spun always at 60 rpm not dead at all. In my previous test it lasted only 1 hour and really at the end.

so my thinking is that     if we go up with more turns on the coils and thinner wire      the resistance is higher and the inductance also. Than the AC wave is larger but as we are in a air core config the BEMF is not proportional to this increase  ??. Just a supposition  !

But what  is very good  in my thinking    is the TORQUE   this motor works basically as an attraction motor (i did not try the CP config with attraction an repulsion energy yet )  but in attraction it is very powerfull 

I mean the impuls transforms the air coils as a magnet and attracts the rotor magnet, than the magnet approaches the TDC and the second reed cuts the current and the air coil transform itself  back as a generator

So contrary to a ORBO system   Which depends of the orinal net attraction of the magnet to the core ,  with the Ossie^s  we can vary the value of the attraction power by adding plus ore minus voltage. but as we cut this voltage at ( or just before ) TDC , the magnet travel the coils with the kinetik energy and      that is my question      eventually without (or very few ) BEMF

I am thinking  how i can compare a very high end electro motor with 90 % efficiency to this Ossie's config   any idea ?

Its a pleasure to be here and share

regards

Laurent

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #191 on: February 12, 2010, 12:31:47 AM »
Hey Jim
Just 2 cells in series. Or more. It just interests me that so many just use 1.2 - 1.5v, AA C D  when 3 or 4 button cells or just AAAs would give faster test results in time also.

One reason that I can think of that the caps are not doing well here in replacement of the batteries is, the cap does not have resistance like a battery. With fat caps I can say yes to the resistors to limit the output. The cap as a power source, most tend to forget that the resistance is very very low and will dump way to fast. Here I would highly recommend a resistor to limit the output, and leave the recharge as direct as possible, diodes use at max. The resistor value will have to be experimented with but it may just do the trick. =] there may even have to be a zener across the cap to keep the volts down to a safe area below the caps max volts.

Now lets say the bemf is not quite as much as used, still, well that ratio can be very very close to 100% eff. Then all we need is just a hair of regular charge from the coils from the rotor to make up that tiny percentage and we are there. What do ya think?  =]
I have been involved with solid state ways of going about this due to if it ever works, the idea of a spinner in a cell phone for example might not be necessary. But I have gotten up to 97% eff just on just bemf. PWM power supplies can be like that. Now if I can put a few lil coils around the big coil to just capture a bit of field pulses produced by the big one, I just may be able to come up with that 3% or more.  =]  I dont have big caps yet to work with, but am looking into them.

Mags

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #192 on: February 12, 2010, 03:56:02 AM »
hmmm quiet here now.  Was it something I said? Just asking cuz it happens quite a bit that I post a few things and then silence. But anyway....

Some may say Rubbish on my 97% on my output vs input. Did you see my light bulb smoking? If it were on the 5v 1a lil PS I have been using in between battery charges, its not bright at all, which I have shown. But that does not prove much. What i like about this lil supply is that it really does hang at a max of 1a. Now when I put the 5ohm 5w resistor on the output, I can get 4.85v steady across it. So im in the area that I claim. Now just to get that extree 3% or more. I have a lil plan I am going to execute this evening after I eat Lasagna, mmmm Stoffers. =]
As for the Ossie motor, it seems like you guys are somewhere close to 100% eff. Just a few more ingredients and she may be a winner.  Some how once you feel you have optimum from the motor itself, maybe placing a couple more of those coils you have maybe an in. or 2 behind each of the operating coils, and a bridge and cap and use another reed to dump the cap into the bat, during times that the bat is not being drained by the motor. It just may take you over the top.  Just ideas.

Mags

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #193 on: February 12, 2010, 05:35:47 AM »
hmmm quiet here now.  Was it something I said? Just asking cuz it happens quite a bit that I post a few things and then silence. But anyway....

Nope, just got off work.  Trying to catch up on my reading.

As far as the resistors, I have not used them either yet.  I am only referring to JLNaudin's suggestion to use 2 22ohm resistors in the original 1 set of reeds setup.  I have not the resistors that low of value to even try until tonight.  I grabbed some under 100 ohm resistors from The Shack today to try.  According to JLNaudin, the addition of the very low value resistors decreased the amount of current input, but did not decrease the amount being returned by much at all.  The lowest resistor I had to test with was 100 ohm until now.  And that was not working at all, lol.  All my test's are without resistors so far.

As far as what I plan to do with the spark gap?  Not sure yet.  I am just kicking around the idea so far.  I just know that when I disconnected the bridge while my motor was running, the battery was charging up, while I could hear the rotor change in noise due to bemf, and my reeds switches were about to cry, lol.

As far as using diodes to shunt the spark gaps, or capacitors to filter it, I'm not sure what I think of that yet.  I know when you introduce capacitors you can expect to lose nearly half of the energy going into it right off the bat.  I was using a shottky bridge to start with when I found that disconnecting it actually charged the battery faster.  Still not sure on the explanation for that one yet, but it's interesting.

As far as why using a 1.2v battery instead of anything larger?  I have been using larger, I just have not reported the results.  I've been using 3 volts, 6 volts, 9 volts, and 12 volts so far, and a few variations in between.  Tuning seems to be easier to tweak the results at a much lower voltage so far.  Once it gives the desired results at such a low voltage, I'll go back up in voltage and go from there.  But for now, the original Ossie Motor was a 1.2v and I've been trying to successfully replicate before I drift to far from the original and get lost.

First off, I'm trying to figure out what is wrong with my dual pulse per coil setup, there is a short somewhere.  That's what I will be trying to nail down tonight.

Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: The Ossie motor
« Reply #194 on: February 12, 2010, 06:34:36 AM »
I have to go and  tonight so I can't work on the Ossie or Orzy .

@Mags I think it is a time zone thing. You'll notice I always seem to have a bunch of posts then have to wait until the Northern Hemisphere wakes up to get a response :)

That's really interesting with the resistor & cap. So if the voltage is less that shouldn't effect the flyback? Except for the frequency of the pulse? I have been working with a 55F.
@woopy 4.5 hours Woohoo.

I hate to impose on you guys but can anyone explain that top trace in my last scope shot. The noise from the motor is definitely not my Metglas rattling. Realised I had already uploaded this vid with the noise. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEcVPJZl11Q

« Last Edit: February 12, 2010, 07:43:22 AM by Jimboot »