Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243054 times)

giantkiller · « **Reply #1620 on:** October 27, 2006, 02:10:04 AM »

Quote from: -[marco]- on October 27, 2006, 01:53:31 AM

Quote from: giantkiller on October 27, 2006, 12:35:45 AM
His wife gave hime hell for blowing a hole thru the barn roof.

--giantkiller, some where over the rainbow and beyond!

Over here they are also complaining that i am the one thats being sucked up by this device...
i dont know how long i can hang on.
last week i thought i would be better off just forgetting the whole thing and go on and live my life with the people around me....

but hey i found some faith in tao's words this wont go over a year

marco

Hey, I got better than you! Not only did I read Tao's but after that you told me. Thanks many.
What is interesting is that the different posters get involved in the parts of project that aren't sovled at the right time. Right now the focus is the antennae and resonancy there. As the bigger problems are broken down into their components parts, those who know jump in. Tesla might have had all the answers but he didn't have the team work we got here. As for my controller, I am going to change out the caps on my clocks and speed them up 1k to 800k. I have the power at 12v @ 6amps. But like you, I have other issues. I am putting a new kitchen floor, to sell my house in a bad market as my employment situation downsizes. But hey. It's all good!

--giantkiller, to find the light, lest we cower in darkness.

giantkiller · « **Reply #1621 on:** October 27, 2006, 02:49:51 AM »

We've all seen stories of obsession. Obviously, we are all here.
If you have seen the movie the Butterfly Effect then you'll know where I am coming from.
I am referencing the part where the main character has two robotic arms due to upper bilateral amputation. Both arms are gone from an explosion. He is trying to eat a cookie and when he grabs it, it crumbles out of his grippers. I solved that problem by giving the industry variable, speed variable grip. The user could pick up grapes, potatoe chips, hold their child's hand. I did it on my family's kitchen table. We did not eat off it or for that matter in the kitchen for the year that it took. I was totally obsessed. Parts all over. After that I designed a robot leg that made it to testing on a human. After that I developed a amputee socket fit testing device. After that I designed a Muscular atrophy elimination product. After that I designed and developed the 'Doomrod'. ETC, ETC, ETC. Some of you reading this might interpret this a vain bragging. And believe me I am proud. But I am talking about blind ambition. Obsession is the emotional tool for that. I let massive amounts of other things slip through my fingers. I still design and develop, but now I mandate balance for myself. Or at least am aware of others needs and try to balance. What ever is in your mind becomes your god.
Careful where you tread. I thought I was becoming successful.

--giantkiller, back then my shoes were too small.

giantkiller · « **Reply #1622 on:** October 27, 2006, 04:27:07 AM »

SO,,,
Sam, how long has the window been broken?

--giantkiller, be gentle, but let no one stand in thy way.

argona369 · « **Reply #1623 on:** October 27, 2006, 06:05:39 AM »

giantkiller · « **Reply #1624 on:** October 27, 2006, 06:24:44 AM »

@marco,
What can I say dude?
the nasa antennae paper are the instructions.
Blows my tie back!
Cliff almost spilled his drink, but I wet my pants before I got drunk in celebration. Doesn't take much to make me happy. I will split this up further in the rmorning.
This is incredible because it also lines up with the pictures we came up with and everything all of us have been bantering about!
Didn't take long, did it?
I hope this gives clearer mathmatics to the antennae builders.

--giantkiller, if you don't dream, you're only sleeping.

HMM · « **Reply #1625 on:** October 27, 2006, 06:54:01 AM »

have a look here:

http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/istp/polar/polar_pwi_descs.html

Polar Sound Descriptions

Mike

gn0stik · « **Reply #1626 on:** October 27, 2006, 07:05:38 AM »

Quote from: imnadja on October 26, 2006, 06:40:44 PM

Dom, you cannot tune to a magnetic field, because it is just that, only a field with no electric component. You can only tune into an EM field, as in radio waves. A magnetic field has no oscillation.

this is true, there is no 7.8 hz magnetic field

Quote

There are a few other misconceptions going on here as well. The Shuman resonance is a mechanical resonance, not an electromagnetic resonance, not a radio wave. It is the literal physical vibration of the planet at 7.8 hertz, just like the physical ringing of a bell, and through coupling with the atmosphere, a sound pressure wave at the same frequency.

There is no RF wave at this frequency, at least not for our purposes here, there is extremely little energy in an RF wave of this length anyway, certainly not enough to even begin to power our circuit and be amplified through some self powering mechinism.

This is completely wrong. The 7.8hz Schumann is in FACT an ELF EM frequency that travels through the space between the earth's surface and the ionisphere, which acts as a waveguide and resonant cavity. The earth is not the "bell" as you suggest, but the atmosphere is. However, it is excited, or 'rung', by lightning.

There are in fact schumann receivers that you can build.. see www.vlf.it for the plans, I think.

You are correct however, it doesn't carry much power. But it might be enough to start an oscillation with the right setup.

Quote

Other things to consider:

What do we know from Tesla about releasing the radiant energy? One, it takes a DC pulse, AC won't work, so any energy derivied from RF or AC must be rectified to DC.

Two, that the DC pulse must be repeated very, very fast in order to produce radiant energy. If I recall correctly this must be on the order of 200 MHz just to begin producing radiant which would be hot radiant like in SM's device, and over 400 MHz to produce cold radiant as in Gray's device.

This is all good. But the next part....

Quote

Three, in order to produce Tesla's radiant you need a very high voltage, somewhere between 500,000 and a million volts.

So, if you are trying to produce a radiant with anything less than the above parameters, it ain't going to happen.

The most noticeable effects of radiant are produced at the high voltages that Tesla experimented with, yes, however, there is no evidence that the effect is completely gone at lower voltages. In fact there is more evidence, albeit circumstancial, that says that it does exist at lower voltages. The experiments of Gray for example did not use voltages anywhere near what Tesla used, yet there were strong indications of radiant energy involved. Neither did the devices of TH Moray.

Quote

Just some things to think about.

Yours,

Don

argona369 · « **Reply #1627 on:** October 27, 2006, 07:09:57 AM »

raburgeson · « **Reply #1628 on:** October 27, 2006, 07:56:57 AM »

Well I finally got a math handle on Torroids, the last mistake fixed was the dumbest as you wrap 25 wraps on a collecter core , measure the capacitance of it and divide by 25, (capacitance to low to measure 1 wrap) this is wrong because there are 24 spaces between 25 wraps. Anyway Steven was right I do not know the correct way to build a TPU yet and at that point I was still unready. Now I think I am ready to reread and build. I would like to draw your attention to the picture of the TPU with the cutaway. The cores control windings are for all purposes and effects symetric. The top core and the bottom core are in the exact same relationship with the outer shell or global windings. It would make sense then that these are in either series or parallel with each other. Both will react the same to the outermost windings and the center core. Steven said not interleaved. The center core has the same relationship with both the other 2 cores and the outer windings. One possibility I will try is the top and bottom coils are to be in parallel. I have not yet seen a way to series these to uninterlayed. I feel many posts are lost as I have found references by way of quotes that point to posts that do not exist. Also I have not been able to find anything about bifiler windings, were did that idea come from?

argona369 · « **Reply #1629 on:** October 27, 2006, 09:12:02 AM »

argona369 · « **Reply #1630 on:** October 27, 2006, 09:23:34 AM »

argona369 · « **Reply #1631 on:** October 27, 2006, 09:50:22 AM »

argona369 · « **Reply #1632 on:** October 27, 2006, 09:58:09 AM »

mrd10 · « **Reply #1633 on:** October 27, 2006, 10:08:56 AM »

Quote from: argona369 on October 27, 2006, 09:12:02 AM

Quote from: -[marco]- on October 27, 2006, 09:05:08 AM
Quote from: argona369 on October 27, 2006, 06:05:39 AM
Quote from: -[marco]- on October 26, 2006, 01:26:41 PM
it can be done with 1000 turns.
a coil antenna which uses negative resistance and negative inductance causes the antenna circuit to act as a magnetic dipole field.

significant reduction in the cilinder coil area as well as increased sensitivity could be realized.

this method and apparatus could miniaturize the size of the sensor coil to a couple of inches.

this use allows the coil to act as an atom with increased capture cross section, in which the incomming plane wave will bend toward the much smaller coil, allowing the circuit to absorb energy from a large portion of the plane wave.

Good god!!
Almost spilled my drink!

Searched negative inductance antenna magnetic dipole

http://www.tfcbooks.com/articles/tws5.htm

http://www.unusualresearch.com/Sutton/sutton.htm

but this **NASA** paper blows me away!!

?planetary exploration, communication, wireless transmission of power, or even a
?free? energy source.?

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20040001419_2003137974.pdf

way to go marco!!

Cliff,

yes that surprised me also

Hehehehe you guys make me laugh, at least while we try and build, there's humor, anyway im the simple guy again, and i asked the simple question about , if i were able to tune into 7.8hz, and then i was told by a friend and yourselves that this would require a larger, or a very large antenna, I guess my first step in all of this is to build cystal radio to get an idea what frequencies i can pick up, perhaps build one with fine copper wire, with 1000 turns. Then again this might be going in the wrong direction, and SM's device would be working on two freq of 1:-5khz and the other 5.0078khz, Actually thats what i want to ask you guys, the finer coil windings on second proto, this is on the bottom ring, would something like that give us 5khz?

Dom

mrd10 · « **Reply #1634 on:** October 27, 2006, 10:51:34 AM »

Quote from: -[marco]- on October 27, 2006, 10:12:44 AM

there are all kind of ways the 7.8 hz can come in.
it can even depend on "the space between the collectors"

Hi Marco,

What's that program your using? The collector coils, so were on the same page, would that be the coils where he has the magnets on? The coils we can't actually see because they are obscured in the second proto?

Perhaps by placing the magnets on those collector coils if thats what were refering to. I just want to make sure that the collector coils in our case are the ones that will cause that magnetic rotational field.

@Dave, sorry to hear about your relationships gone bad, I hope that wasnt entirely because your obsessed with free energy. I think about Teslas life, I don't think he would have had a relationship either, or i could be wrong.
His fascination with electricity never gave him the time for such things, what about Steven marks, I wonder what he sacrificed, me I'm happily married and have a supportive wife,...hhehehehe that thinks im crazy doing this, but she doesnt stop me, because i told her i wanted to dedicate at least one night a week for building and experimenting, or vice versa, I don't want to ask you why you went to prison, only if you feel free to.....hope it wasnt a really bad thing that you did.

Dom

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243054 times)

giantkiller

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

giantkiller

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

giantkiller

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

giantkiller

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

HMM

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

gn0stik

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

raburgeson

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"