Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243122 times)

supersam · « **Reply #765 on:** September 27, 2006, 06:34:53 PM »

dave,

i think when it all comes together, you will find that if you use a 1 as a value of 90, then the next place should be a 90 as well, looking at the golden number series. this will mean that the next place will 180 not 120. then you hit the 270. maybe the fact of going down across the "equator and back gives you the other two 30's". to rectify your 120 to 180. i don't think you'll find anything at 120 by itself. but if you look at the three coils as north, south and equator you might find something of interest.

please note i am thinking purly theoretically from an amateur position, with no other training in this field other than what i have imagined from reading this shi on the internet. so please take all with a grain of salt. however i have been spending alot of time looking at it with a few bad experiments with magnet setups under my belt.

i seem to be really absorbed with it of late.

good luck and lol
sam

gn0stik · « **Reply #766 on:** September 27, 2006, 06:57:35 PM »

Quote from: ctglabs on September 27, 2006, 06:13:51 PM

Dear all,

For those without an oscilloscope, you can download this full software which contains a dual channel scope which can run on your PC, it can also work in XY mode (Lissajious figures) and it also has a signal generator.

Note: your mic socket must be a stereo one for dual scope channels, otherwise will work as single channel.

http://www.zeitnitz.de/Christian/Scope/Scope_en.html

Regards,

Dave.

Is this safe to use with power applications? Won't it fry my PC's soundcard/motherboard?

supersam · « **Reply #767 on:** September 27, 2006, 07:17:18 PM »

dave,

i don't know. $:-\$
i am only making the observation that i 90=1, 180=2, 270=3,450=4,720=5, then you again hit the 360 mark and start a resonance.

lol
sam

supersam · « **Reply #768 on:** September 27, 2006, 07:18:22 PM »

dave,
there is that stupid 5 again where is the six? if we could find it i think then all we have to do is PLUG IT IN!

sam

supersam · « **Reply #769 on:** September 27, 2006, 08:46:52 PM »

thanks,
that should keep me up all night.

\
lol
sam

hartiberlin · « **Reply #770 on:** September 27, 2006, 08:51:54 PM »

Quote from: tao on September 27, 2006, 08:17:59 AM

The Perpetual Motion Rotating Globe
This is the worlds most advanced globe, capable of continuously rotating on its own without any need for human contact, cords, or batteries, and most faithfully recreating the earths rotation in space right at your desktop.

Hi.
here on Ebay you can get it already for 400 US$:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=230032958613

I wonder how the light comes through into the globe...?

supersam · « **Reply #771 on:** September 27, 2006, 08:58:02 PM »

marco,

if you are going to try overlapping the coils, why not at least try the 36 and 72 points in conjunction with the 0 and 360 points?

sam

Dingus Mungus · « **Reply #772 on:** September 27, 2006, 09:12:34 PM »

Quote from: hartiberlin on September 27, 2006, 08:51:54 PM

Quote from: tao on September 27, 2006, 08:17:59 AM

The Perpetual Motion Rotating Globe
This is the worlds most advanced globe, capable of continuously rotating on its own without any need for human contact, cords, or batteries, and most faithfully recreating the earths rotation in space right at your desktop.

Hi.
here on Ebay you can get it already for 400 US$:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=230032958613

I wonder how the light comes through into the globe...?

The globe appears to be a clear plastic sphere with the globe printed on to it, leaving the globe translucent. Imagine being inside a big blue sphere with no lights on inside and many lights from all angles on the outside, everything inside the sphere would be lit blue even is it was opaque. Now imagine 20 motion sensors (photocells) putting off small ammounts of power everytime they're exposed to light powering a motor. Not a major discovery or overunity, just a new and novel use of old technology. I also wrote a brief explanation of the globe devices operation on page 219. Hope I'm not being overzealous in my belief of understanding its operation, but its just the most realistic explanation based on the information given.

c0mster · « **Reply #773 on:** September 27, 2006, 09:37:13 PM »

Quote from: -[marco]- on September 27, 2006, 07:01:31 PM

Quote from: gn0stik on September 27, 2006, 06:57:35 PM
Quote from: ctglabs on September 27, 2006, 06:13:51 PM
Dear all,

For those without an oscilloscope, you can download this full software which contains a dual channel scope which can run on your PC, it can also work in XY mode (Lissajious figures) and it also has a signal generator.

Note: your mic socket must be a stereo one for dual scope channels, otherwise will work as single channel.
Regards,

Dave.

Is this safe to use with power applications? Won't it fry my PC's soundcard/motherboard?

hi gnostic,

i use this setup also but you must be careful not to put too much power into your soundcard its verry sensitive.

Hey folks, I'm still here. For what it?s worth, my 2 cents. I have used some similar software on my laptop as a scope. My findings were that A: The frequencies you can measure are limited. B: There is a voltage present that may through off your readings when testing with the mike input. C: The sample rates really depend on how fast your computer is. Now I haven?t tried software worth lots of $$$ but a Velleman 2MHz handheld scope is only a couple hundred dollars and gives great readings. Mind you the soundcard scope was a great learning tool. Keep up the great work.

C0mster

supersam · « **Reply #774 on:** September 27, 2006, 10:40:10 PM »

dave,
what is next? are you suposed to slam my ideas, again or just hope they go away.

are you the guy from the government?

i just don't understand your reasoning. can you explain?

lol
sam

gn0stik · « **Reply #775 on:** September 27, 2006, 11:07:03 PM »

Quote from: supersam on September 27, 2006, 10:40:10 PM

dave,
what is next? are you suposed to slam my ideas, again or just hope they go away.

are you the guy from the government?

i just don't understand your reasoning. can you explain?

lol
sam

Sam, first off, we have no idea what you are talking about. You throw out numbers and magic equations, as if they are supposed to make sense to us, and THEY DON'T. Frankly it seems all a bit silly the stuff you are posting. If you can give us the slightest idea what the stuff you are posting is supposed to mean, maybe it'll make sense. For now you are rather like a bum walking around talking gibberish to himself, all the sense we can make of it. Your ideas are not suggestions, they are just a bunch of meaningless numbers because you have yet to elucidate on what the HELL YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT~!

Perhaps they are great ideas, but how would we know! You obviously don't care to explain them to us. So, instead of taking the polite path, I'll go out on a limb here, and say what I really think.

Explain what you are talking about in a rational manner or shut the hell up and quit derailing this thread!

The buck stops here, put up, or shut up.

For Cthulu's sake!
Rich.

Dingus Mungus · « **Reply #776 on:** September 27, 2006, 11:59:40 PM »

Quote from: gn0stik on September 27, 2006, 11:07:03 PM

Quote from: supersam on September 27, 2006, 10:40:10 PM
dave,
what is next? are you suposed to slam my ideas, again or just hope they go away.

are you the guy from the government?

i just don't understand your reasoning. can you explain?

lol
sam

Sam, first off, we have no idea what you are talking about. You throw out numbers and magic equations, as if they are supposed to make sense to us, and THEY DON'T. Frankly it seems all a bit silly the stuff you are posting. If you can give us the slightest idea what the stuff you are posting is supposed to mean, maybe it'll make sense. For now you are rather like a bum walking around talking gibberish to himself, all the sense we can make of it. Your ideas are not suggestions, they are just a bunch of meaningless numbers because you have yet to elucidate on what the HELL YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT~!

Perhaps they are great ideas, but how would we know! You obviously don't care to explain them to us. So, instead of taking the polite path, I'll go out on a limb here, and say what I really think.

Explain what you are talking about in a rational manner or shut the hell up and quit derailing this thread!

The buck stops here, put up, or shut up.

For Cthulu's sake!
Rich.

(http://www.globalschoolnet.org/about/images/applause.gif)

supersam · « **Reply #777 on:** September 28, 2006, 12:27:27 AM »

everyone,

sorry to be such a pain, in the first place.

i just can't help but (THINK ) that the golden numbers have got to come into play at some point. that is just a thought. it is not backed up by any experimentation. so i can see where it might be anoying.

my thought is that you people that are experimenting are way ahead of people like me!

i just want to see this project brought forward as quickly as possible. i have stated once or twice in some non-sencicle fashion that i "think" the project has got to be brought into a spherical train of thought.

i believe that is the shape of a magnetic force, whether it is generated on a cicular toroid coil or not. i don't think that steven overlooked this fact.

the numbers 0,90,180,270, begin a fibonacci series,if you give 90 the value of one. just an observation. if it helps great, if it is just babling great. i don't think it hurt anyones experiments.

on the other hand i can't help but go back to thinking of the magnetic field as a sphere just like every other organization of matter in the universe, except for us and other organic organizims, that are made up of them.

sorry, if i have distracted you. i am very distracted by your work. i just can't sit back and wait. HURRY. I CAN"T WAIT!

shutting up for now,
sam

supersam · « **Reply #778 on:** September 28, 2006, 12:31:58 AM »

dave,

shuttin up shuttinup!

lol keep up the good work
sam

Dingus Mungus · « **Reply #779 on:** September 28, 2006, 12:46:46 AM »

Quote from: supersam on September 28, 2006, 12:27:27 AM

everyone,

sorry to be such a pain, in the first place.

i just can't help but (THINK ) that the golden numbers have got to come into play at some point. that is just a thought. it is not backed up by any experimentation. so i can see where it might be anoying.

my thought is that you people that are experimenting are way ahead of people like me!

i just want to see this project brought forward as quickly as possible. i have stated once or twice in some non-sencicle fashion that i "think" the project has got to be brought into a spherical train of thought.

i believe that is the shape of a magnetic force, whether it is generated on a cicular toroid coil or not. i don't think that steven overlooked this fact.

the numbers 0,90,180,270, begin a fibonacci series,if you give 90 the value of one. just an observation. if it helps great, if it is just babling great. i don't think it hurt anyones experiments.

on the other hand i can't help but go back to thinking of the magnetic field as a sphere just like every other organization of matter in the universe, except for us and other organic organizims, that are made up of them.

sorry, if i have distracted you. i am very distracted by your work. i just can't sit back and wait. HURRY. I CAN"T WAIT!

shutting up for now,
sam

I'm pleased that people who don't fully grasp the electronics, mechanics and forces involved are excited about this field of research. I don't believe gn0stic wasn't telling you that 'shuting up' was the best outcome, rather you should be studying how these numbers can be related to the research that is occuring or develope a concept that relates to those numbers. Which is really implying just because those numbers are important in the fibonacci sequence does not make those same numbers important in all things... With research you can learn why those numbers are important in the fibonacci sequence and then determine if those same reasons apply to this technology. I'll save you the time though (this time), it doesn't apply because you cant posibly wind a proper coil to follow such geometry. The wires thickness would have to increase with distance from the start point, and there would have to be space between the wires coils.

(loose coils = bad inductance and field propagation, making a coil with a cone shaped wire = expensive and pointless)

Now you don't need to shut up but please research before you speak...

(http://www.ka-gold-jewelry.com/images/golden-spiral.gif)

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243122 times)

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

gn0stik

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

hartiberlin

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Dingus Mungus

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

c0mster

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

gn0stik

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Dingus Mungus

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

Dingus Mungus

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"