@TheNOP

Did you know that in the assembly language that a NOP is a do nothing command used to often fill a patch space or take up time uselessly? Humm.......

i could talk to you about ASM more then you can think of.
to understand my choice of this username, you must look at why and when it is used.

Z80, 6502,6809 was my play toys in that order.

That was one instruction I tried to stay away from.

thay

@amigo
Read back through this thread and you will see that successful replications have consisted of the 06 transistor and asserting that many others will work without (knowing for sure) will only lead to many failures. So you are able to state this without quantitative results as a reference?

Hi Doc,

As you know I always state things from my own observation, and also add a clause that further and more observation is required by others, to deliver some quantitative results.

So no, these are just my short experimental observations and I do not have paperwork to prove other transistors work as good as MPSA06. I even agreed that MPSA06 works the best and is to be used, but I always keep a door open to other possibilities.

Hi Doc,

As you know I always state things from my own observation, and also add a clause that further and more observation is required by others, to deliver some quantitative results.

So no, these are just my short experimental observations and I do not have paperwork to prove other transistors work as good as MPSA06. I even agreed that MPSA06 works the best and is to be used, but I always keep a door open to other possibilities.

@amigo
Accepted. Although the eye is not a very good tool for making theses types of decisions.

Additionally JLN (JL Naudin) did a Negistor with a 2N2222 ( http://jlnlabs.online.fr/cnr/negosc.htm ) and CTG Labs did some looking ( http://www.ctglabs.com/negistorv1.htm ) so the fact that many transistors are capable of this operation is not indicative of it being able to 'Cohere Energy' (SEC). I think the great replications of 'Lidmotor' show that something as simple as coil orientation can make the difference between SEC and somewhat conventional operation.

To identify a SEC Exciter from something convention and able to be simulated is to be able to see a CEC that is above one and this can only be done with correct environment and measurement methodology, of which few replicators have the required equipment. This then implies that one must be very careful in what is stated as working and not working in SEC mode.

@nievesoliveras
If you can have a credentialed University of College request one for you, yes I can supply one. I do not offer boards to the general public.

Thank you @drstiffler !

If you are not going to help the general public, what are you doing here?
God bless you!

Jesus

@nievesoliveras
Well I am not 'My Brothers Keeper', maybe you should look at reaping what you sow?

Thank you again !

Jesus

Z80, 6502,6809 was my play toys in that order.

That was one instruction I tried to stay away from.

i can understand why, in most cases.
but in some other you can't avoid it.

@TheNOP
Oh, quite sure my 50 years of programming pale when compared to yours. The old ASR paper tape punch to read into a PDP8 must be child's play for you.

i know about paper tape punch tech, but that was invented before i started to learn life, so don't expect too much.

i started when cpm/cp and 8 inches disk were at the end of their life.

In short I doubt yo are as good at programming as you are at telling someone how to conduct ones self.

and this confirm what i wrote.

i don't care that you doubt or not.
that is you right.

Why do you need Dr.Stiffler to sell you one of the SEC boards when you can build the circuit yourself?

because, a unit build by the maker of the circuit, is more likely to work as claimed then one you are trying to build without knowing what you are doing ?

i am not insinuating anything here.
it is just a supposition.

Hi Stefan and all,

I have noticed this thread has been alive for several years now.  My scanning has only revealed that important videos have been removed and I still can't find Dr Stiffler's fundamental circuit.  Can someone provide this or steer me in the correct direction, link ... anything.  I would not make a good detective ... sorry.

Thanks in advance,

Greg