If it was any good there's no reason a qualified person wouldn't be able to verify it.
    Koala, MarkE and Mark Dansie are all really honest as far as I can see and I wouldn't
    doubt their scientific ability.
                        John.

MileHigh
[/left]

Wayne got caught making a statement that destroyed his already destroyed credibility.  I wasn't there for your visits so I can only use my own common sense to try to make sense of this ZED fiasco.  You advising his 'team of engineers' if they had over unity or not is a completely ridiculous farce as far as I am concerned. 
MileHigh

Once the mechanical barrier was broken (past tense for us) to be able to build a machine that harness a process able to generate energy - without fuel, without consuming anything...
The maturity was required to realize that Over unity - was not the only method available to generate Net Energy.
I know you do not get this yet..... because you keep acting superior and insulting good people.
We have a Paradigm shift in the understanding of mechanics----- Mechanical [color=#0081BD !important][/color] does not require Over unity - it requires A Super conservative process.... 
Evaluating it as a Over unity device - is a Pre - paradigm shift Error -
We work as we 'might' to catch you up----- but you are not listening.
You only posture for another self Ego stroke....

Wayne:

Bollocks.  You clearly are not even capable of posing a question or describing a system in comprehensible scientific terms.  You want to pose the question in scientific terms with diagrams that illustrate the problem then you will get an answer.

It makes me think of Webby all proud after posing a similar question to me.  The "catch" was that if a descending bucket is falling under the influence of gravity and also attached to a pulley that lifts another smaller bucket as it falls, then the descending bucket hits the ground with less kinetic energy because some energy was used to lift the smaller bucket.  I clearly explained to Webby that all the energy was accounted for and everything balanced.  I can only guess that Webby was looking for a "victory" and it somehow ties into your "alleged answer to your bizarre and incomprehensible question" quoted above.

So if you want to get out of the Wayne reality distortion zone and pose a question that is actually comprehensible and makes sense and is supported with diagrams and appropriate supplementary information, then I may endeavour to answer it.   However, based on your past history, I am not sure if you are capable.

MileHigh

You are not listening.  Stop talking in your "Wayne universe" nonsense talk and talk in a coherent scientific way that makes sense.  If you can't do that it is just another giant blazing 20-story-tall Las Vegas sign proclaiming for all to see that you are a complete and total fraud.

Plan B, if this is beyond your capacity. is to show something that works.

MileHigh

I will use terms that I feel fit the description.

I see Wayne is a Polly Parrot.

No you will not use terms that you feel fit the description.  You are playing with hydraulics and pneumatics and the proper scientific terminology for describing these systems exists.  Stop your ridiculous nonsensical baby talk and describe your question and your system properly.

You make a laughing stock of yourself when you use that baby talk.  If you met a group of mechanical engineers that design hydraulic and pneumatic systems they would think that you were nuts.

MileHigh