Part G is a continuous wind and the reduction of currant is dependent on how many winds are on part G's core. i do not have the math prowess to calculate that so i had to take the hard road and wind then test, well the first time was wrong so i added a few more winds and that was it. see both primaries have to be balanced and has to match the other exactly when taken high and low, if not the pressure between them will drop and induction will fall to half of what is achievable. you have to remember part G or rather the whole system is DC and part G is basically a Variac but with DC.  the opposing magnetic fields will help regulate the saturation of the core which will regulate the currant on an continuous basis.
the pic below is a simple test from a friend that suggested the use of a paper clip on a straw to test where the two fields are at all times. the metal paper clip will follow the two NN fields as a visual indicator of how far your fields move and to let you know weather or not the fields clear the secondary.

William J Hooper did a simple table top demo in one of his lectures that proved the figuera device is NN design in an pure B x V device. the pics below prove scientifically with out a doubt many, many years later that Figuera's device is NN orientation. according to Hooper when two North opposing magnetic field are present near each other the B fields are cancelled but are additive. when one is moved at a certain velocity in and out from the wire and the other the opposite a pure B x V field is created. to be precise B X V = (-B) X (-V).   This will cause the B fields to be cancel = 0 but both products are positive and additive as explained in the pic below.

the only difference between Hooper's demo and Figuera's device is his test has the magnets vertical and Figuera's were Horizontal. their is no difference in the outcome the results are the same B X V = (-B) X (-V) both positive and additive.

the other pic is the proof that NS electromagnets are not possible in the Figuera device. if the north magnet is taken high and the south magnet is taken low the currants are the opposite direction so the cancel out allowing only a small currant to flow because the peaking magnet minus the declining magnet will amount to almost nothing. that is why EVERYONE that uses NS will end up with nothing because they paid NO attention to spin, B field's, and induced direction. assumption will bite you in the ass every time as i am totally aware of this.
output will be normal AC from the secondary at what ever frequency you so choose, assuming you core will allow it.

Part G is a continuous wind and the reduction of currant is dependent on how many winds are on part G's core. i do not have the math prowess to calculate that so i had to take the hard road and wind then test, well the first time was wrong so i added a few more winds and that was it. see both primaries have to be balanced and has to match the other exactly when taken high and low, if not the pressure between them will drop and induction will fall to half of what is achievable. you have to remember part G or rather the whole system is DC and part G is basically a Variac but with DC.  the opposing magnetic fields will help regulate the saturation of the core which will regulate the currant on an continuous basis.
the pic below is a simple test from a friend that suggested the use of a paper clip on a straw to test where the two fields are at all times. the metal paper clip will follow the two NN fields as a visual indicator of how far your fields move and to let you know weather or not the fields clear the secondary.

William J Hooper did a simple table top demo in one of his lectures that proved the figuera device is NN design in an pure B x V device. the pics below prove scientifically with out a doubt many, many years later that Figuera's device is NN orientation. according to Hooper when two North opposing magnetic field are present near each other the B fields are cancelled but are additive. when one is moved at a certain velocity in and out from the wire and the other the opposite a pure B x V field is created. to be precise B X V = (-B) X (-V).   This will cause the B fields to be cancel = 0 but both products are positive and additive as explained in the pic below.

the only difference between Hooper's demo and Figuera's device is his test has the magnets vertical and Figuera's were Horizontal. their is no difference in the outcome the results are the same B X V = (-B) X (-V) both positive and additive.

the other pic is the proof that NS electromagnets are not possible in the Figuera device. if the north magnet is taken high and the south magnet is taken low the currants are the opposite direction so the cancel out allowing only a small currant to flow because the peaking magnet minus the declining magnet will amount to almost nothing. that is why EVERYONE that uses NS will end up with nothing because they paid NO attention to spin, B field's, and induced direction. assumption will bite you in the ass every time as i am totally aware of this.

The Figuera device is also ZPE harvester which needs high frequency to lower primary input current at high voltage.

The part G can be replaced with a DC Pure Sine Wave Variable Frequency DC to AC inverter as WHAT THE PART G is ensuring is constant frequency that does not nosedive to 0  before it pick up over and over.

I think the term "ZPE" is used quite inflatory these days. It is the name of an anomaly, in which helium, contrary to fundamental laws and unlike all other elements, remains liquid at zero degrees kelvin. Despite the lack of thermal energy, the day is saved due to zero point energy, even tho nobody can say what it actually is...

Hey wow you guys are still onto the figuera project. That's cool.
When watching fields under that green magnetovision foil, I noticed when N vs N is very close, the fluxdensity can be highly increased. And a coil left of the frontline must be moved only a few millimeters to the right for a complete polar flip.

Anyway, wish you all the best. And remember, it's about the result, not the talking.

When did Figuera mention cancelling Lenz Law? Your fixated on something you dont even clearly or completely understand. Even if you could cancel it in a generator you wont cancel it in the load that is attached to the generator so how would that work exactly? Or do you intend to have a free wheeling gen that does no work. Even Harry Potter had to wave his wand and speak his spells to make something happen. the only way to have no resistance to change is to do nothing and change nothing.. Can you recognize when Lenz has been eliminated?

When did Figuera mention cancelling Lenz Law? Your fixated on something you dont even clearly or completely understand. Even if you could cancel it in a generator you wont cancel it in the load that is attached to the generator so how would that work exactly? Or do you intend to have a free wheeling gen that does no work. Even Harry Potter had to wave his wand and speak his spells to make something happen. the only way to have no resistance to change is to do nothing and change nothing.. Can you recognize when Lenz has been eliminated?

For a certainty, youbare a spammer operating 2 or more accounts on here for the sole purpose of misleading. The will be the second time Dough1 will bebappearingnas Marathon!!

You can not event cover your tracks smartly.

I think someone else ough be employed to replace you on here your Committee Of 300 paymaster.

deradiomond

 Thats pretty funny i needed a good chuckle. Everyone has to be something even if it is to be consistently wrong as that thing they are. On the upside you are consistent.

Marathon is the Mask On Dough1 Face Vice-Versa. Hmm... What a bang!
Liers everywhere hmmm....

Your free to think what you wish.

The more  you reply the more you expose yourself. I am free to think what I wish you said again?

Thank God  for making you speak this way to expose your true person.

F.Y.I.

Download this book:
 "The Inventions Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla," by Thomas Martin, The Electrical Engineer, American Institute Electrical Engineer, NY, 1894.

http://www.free-energy-info.com/TeslaBook.pdf

Go to {read} Chapter XXIII, page 109, "Tesla Polyphase Transformer."

Referring to Fig. 94 on page 109 - replace the "Generator [left-hand device in diagram] with Figuera's Commutator.

A commutator is also referenced in the text. The "Generator" operation works in a similar manner to Figuera's commutator; although the generator would be pseudo linear versus stepped.

Is the B-EMF eliminated in this design since strength changes in magnetic field rotate 'around' Ring A and need not reverse or fall negative? Can this design support an Asymmetric Transformer scheme, thus providing more out than in?

This was published by the AIEE in 1896 and Figuera's patents, I believe, were dated around 1902, so it may well be directly related.

FIN