Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 2371135 times)

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Mr Ramaswami


Here is the Truth: "a machine which produces large industrial electrical currents which until now cannot be obtained but transforming mechanical work into electricity."  Not a single generator in history was converting mechanical energy into electricity and the total pollution and green gases emission and the whole multi-billion "worth" industry is a piece of CRAP. This energy is wasted, completely lost in the job of breaking the natural occurrence of magnetic dipoles in generators. Exactly and precisely it was first explained by Clemente Figuera (maybe because those patents were prevented from destruction). I know that this was not the oldest attempt to explain faulty generators. Daniel McFarland Cook tried to patent his generator obviously based on the same ideas. Ed Leedscalnin talked about the same and so on.... Hidden knowledge perpetually covered from the times of Faraday.




P.S. I have a question to those of you who knew electronics. If I make a transistor amplifier to amplify small sinewave from a Wien bridge oscillator into a 100V 1A current still sinewave, would the inductance react with reactance to this one as to the ordinary sinewave current from grid ? Let's imagine a single transistor amplifier connected to the 100V DC source and driven by a signal from such a generator. Somebody ?


NRamaswami

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Mr. Forest:

I apologize to beg to disagree with you. If what you say is the truth, ( I would accept it, if and only if) please describe a simple device that can generate Electricity without these wastage. Please do not say Figuera for there is not a single Figuera device shown operating as described by Figuera.

Please do not say Cook for one person who indicated he has built a Cook device refused to answer me and there is no known cook device.

You please describe a simple device that can work without mechanical motion and can produce more output than input. I will then try to replicate it and see if it works or not. If it works Great. I validate your device and replicate it and it also becomes open source. Right?

I have conducted hundreds of experiments for more than 3 years now. I have concluded that there are at least two types of fundamental particles associated with Electricity. One is very small particle that can travel very fast and likes material with lot of resistance. This particle is responsible for Voltage. The other particle is comparatively very thick and can capture and hold a lot of charge and can release the charge but it requires material with low resistance and it needs thicker wires. Thicker the wire better it is. I have produced 500 volts or more in the secondary with some type of coils and you connect it to load the voltage drops to zero if there is no amperage. Because the coils can be made to block the movement of the particle that causes amperage. There are other coils that can light 10x200 watts lamps or more even at 30 volts and higher the voltage brighter the light and hotter the lamp. I have already posted the pictures of some experiments.

I do not want simple statements and I'm prepared to accept statements. Back it up with a simple device that can be made by people. I agree from my experiments that Figueras principle is correct.

There is yet another member in the forum who has indicated he has built a self sustaining device.  He can also tell us.

It will be very difficult for me to do these experiments myself and I have to ask some students to do it. So if you have any device that you have already tested say it in the forum but if you do not have any thing working,,except some conspiracy theories how can I believe your words? Pray tell me. Please do not tell me about any non working device as it will be a waste of my time, effort and money. If you do not have any such device let us see if others describe any such device.

Let me try my hand at this if no one can describe after a few weeks.

Sir..Erfinder I always try to learn from other people. I have no intention or competence to argue. I keep my mind open and try to learn always.

That said I can confirm What Mr. Marathonman indicated about magnetic research.  There is only one advanced Magnetics lab for Research and it is in US. Only prior vetted competent people can enter that. There is no funding for Magnetics research in India after 1940 so much so that this area lacks competence in India right now. I can confirm all this is true.

cliff33

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Forest:
P.S. I have a question to those of you who knew electronics. If I make a transistor amplifier to amplify small sinewave from a Wien bridge oscillator into a 100V 1A current still sinewave, would the inductance react with reactance to this one as to the ordinary sinewave current from grid ? Let's imagine a single transistor amplifier connected to the 100V DC source and driven by a signal from such a generator. Somebody ?




I am assuming  you'll be driving just ONE of the primary coils at 100v/1A with 60hz sine wave. Then I would say "yes" the output would be like
that from the grid.  But why try to replicate an ordinary transformer?


   Because there are TWO primary coils to be pulsed, then you will need two separate amplifiers.
I'll be using a wien bridge oscillator to drive two different transistor amplifiers. A type npn and a type pnp.
Study the "G" switching diagram to give you a better idea as to what needs to be done.




Marathon:
 Yah, I threw those 10 bad transistors into the garbage along with that broken LP record lol.


 







forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Forest:
P.S. I have a question to those of you who knew electronics. If I make a transistor amplifier to amplify small sinewave from a Wien bridge oscillator into a 100V 1A current still sinewave, would the inductance react with reactance to this one as to the ordinary sinewave current from grid ? Let's imagine a single transistor amplifier connected to the 100V DC source and driven by a signal from such a generator. Somebody ?




I am assuming  you'll be driving just ONE of the primary coils at 100v/1A with 60hz sine wave. Then I would say "yes" the output would be like
that from the grid.  But why try to replicate an ordinary transformer?


   Because there are TWO primary coils to be pulsed, then you will need two separate amplifiers.
I'll be using a wien bridge oscillator to drive two different transistor amplifiers. A type npn and a type pnp.
Study the "G" switching diagram to give you a better idea as to what needs to be done.





Cliff33


That's exactly what I want to do  :)  Two amplifiers and two sinewave signals. First I will try single sinewave with other circuit, I was simply not sure if the coil will react to this amplified signal with reactance or not. I knwo that simply using diode bridge will nullify reactance and coil only react to the first change of DC current. I need sinewave of any chosen frequency for LC circuit also (another related project).Thanks for confirmation.
Do you have schematic with two transistor amplifiers ? I suppose transistors should have the same Hfe

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Cliff; LP record is hilarious Transistors are not, sorry you got taken. i have some new 2N3055's you can have, with heat sinks.

Just for future info the field of an AC coil can not build up fast enough in the Figuera device unlike DC low ohm's that is lightning fast. just saying !

bajac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285

ps Bajac...........what about your progress report/s.... sheesh


Randy,

I should start the test of the device by next month, June 2016. At this time I am tied up with a patent application that is taking all of my time.

With respect to the power supply to be used with the Figuera device, I am researching two approaches:

1) Two true sinusoidal inverters or UPS. If the UPS equipment have a way of adjusting the phase angle, then it might be possible to have two of them connected to generate two voltages with adjustable phase angles. The problem seems to be that manufacturers do not add this feature to small UPS units. Large UPS units can be specified with a phase angle adjustment feature for synchronizing UPS units configured in parallel.

2) It looks like this will be the way to go. I am looking for connecting two identical universal motors and a larger induction motors on the same shaft. The goal is to operate the two universal motors as generators and the induction motor as the prime mover. I will modify the field winding of the universal motors and connect them in series to be used as the exciting magnetic fields. It should be able to adjust the phase angles of the voltages coming out of the generators by changing the relative position of the armature winding of the universal motors working as generators. I am still looking for two identical universal motors rated between 0.5 and 0.25 HP.

There are people proposing to use inductors and/or capacitors to generate the two voltages, which works OK for small signal circuit applications. But the ball game changes for power applications because of the high loads (low impedance) to be connected. 

Bajac




marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Quote;"The time it takes for the field strength of an AC electromagnet to reach a high enough state is too slow ,it also has a lot of other things fighting it from going into the coil of induction in the form of load resistance and the time for the magnetic domains of the core to flip in the core with the coil being induced.
If this were not true generator field magnets would not have to use DC to excite the field."

good clear statement Doug, and you wonder why Figuera used DC. imagine that !

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Something to think about....
"

As near as a layman can understand, Mr Perrigo's theory is the revolution of the earth sets up a form of electric currents that are forever present in the ether. His theory is to capture those electrical impulses in very much to same way that a radio antenna picks up the programs broadcast from WDAF. Instead of a machine to turn the radio impulses into music, Mr Perrigo has a machine to turn the ether's electrical store into controlled power. He declares it is really no more mysterious than the fact that an electric dynamo picks electricity out of the air, although the dynamo must have a power to revolve it while his device sits perfectly still and seemingly produces many fold more electricity than a dynamo of the same bulk.[/font]
Demonstrating the different nature of this electricity, Mr Perrigo showed how high voltage could be transmitted over hair-size wires and light a series of electric lamps although a sufficient power of the well known electricity to light those lamps would have melted the small wires immediately.[/font]
http://rexresearch.com/perrigo/perrig.htm


as you see Figuera was not the only one who was convinced that dynamo is not transforming mechanical energy into electricity....



forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Please read it carefully as it the best description of history of free energy inventor struggle http://rexresearch.com/perrigo/perrig.htm

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Unfortunately, Mr Perrigo has a flood of accusers who swear that he faked his electric car demo by hiding the batteries inside hidden parts of the car.




But, on a  positive note  I've had a thought.  What if the Figuera drive coils were wound Cw and ccw.  This would negate lens.


Also the resistors.  What if they were wire wound in the same way ie cw and ccw.  That would also negate Lens.

NRamaswami

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Mr. A. King 21

The coils may look CW and CCW wound but the current has to flow in the same direction if it is to produce output in the shape of Figuera device of  straight core.

Lenz is cancelled if Permanent magnet core is used in the device. Magnetic field is already present. You just need to send high voltage to oscillate the existing static field using the resistors. Otherwise DC or pulsed DC will draw high amps V=IR in DC.

It is enough if we oscillate the static magnetic field already present to get a significant output in secondary. The two electromagnets that move towards and away from the central core automatically cancel backemf. I do not know how to draw but backemf of one Primary supports the opposite primary always and both backemf are nullified in the process by the design.

If P1 current goes like this ---> the back emf if <-----. However the P2 current at that time goes like the backemf of P1,. The back emf of P2 likewise goes in the way current moves in P1. Both backemf are therefore cancelled.

If you are using identical poles  a square coil or four coils that are at 90' to the secondary must be placed to tap the output. This is cumbersome and is not indicated by the drawings. I have checked both and this also works but it is easier to do the opposite poles method.

In my view the resistors are there to reduce the current and increase the voltage and the core is a permanent magnet core.

I can do a small experiment if you can advise me how to make steel a strong permanent magnet and that cannot be demagnetized by the current. 

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Harry Perrigo was a honest man. Nobody is going to put so much efforts into invention and risk his life for a fake device.
You people, already have all the required parts to build Figuera device. It's all on this forum and in patents. Just think a little.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
I petty much think your all wrong about the Lenz law but that is just my opinion.

the Lenz's law is not thwarted or side stepped at all and a matter of fact Figueras counted on it using it to his advantage.

as the primaries of NN polarity, one is taken up while the other is taken down. the Lenz law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. so when the declining electromagnet is receding the lenz effect kicks in and causes the field to react in the opposite direction to maintain said field that is already their causing the pressure between the two primary electromagnet to be maintained. as long as the two primary electromagnets are in unison the pressure between the two electromagnets will be maintained also, if not the induction falls off to the lowest peak between them which will be almost nill.

again the Lenz law is not side stepped in the Figuera device and NEVER will be. THIS IS A FACT and can not be refuted and if one had done proper research one will find this to be absolutely true.

PS. i to believe Perrigo to be an honest man.... "BUT" at the present time i am working on the Figuera device and have no time for other devices nor another full time thread.
also the dynamo is  transforming mechanical energy into electricity,  as so stated in the patent. where the electricity comes from is of no consequence because Figuera is referring to the act of not where it is coming from. the "ACT OF" in the present day Generators the system used is turning the generator with a motor and this "ACT OF" is wasteful to no end. so Figuera designed a motionless Generator to remove this "ACT OF" mechanical work to energy thus ending with an very efficient motionless generator.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
CLICK THIS LINK IF YOU WANT TO KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE FIGUERA DEVICE IS DOING,  OF COURSE THE SECONDARY IS IN THE MIDDLE.

http://web.archive.org/web/20060525100959/http://www.gocs1.com/gocs1/Psionics/SCALARBEAMER_files/scalarbm3.gif

Exactly as stated in my previous post. imagine that !

Thanks Hanon.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Pic says it all.