Mr.Forest..What is the truth that is hidden? Can you tell me that?
Mr. Er Finder..Sir..You appear to be very knowledgeable. Why do you say that Figuera was not a Genius? He was living in an island that is close to Morocco. He did not have the funding or facilties of Dr. Tesla. If you think that the 1908 Patent is unworkable because Prof. Figuera makes the claim that the rotary device will work continuously and the device will run indefinitely and so he is not a Genius as it is against physics. (Normal wear and tear prevents an electromechanical device from running continuously or indefinitely and it is not possible) I would agree with you. But Are you sure that the Patent of Prof. Figuera has not been tampered with?
You can go here
www.alpoma.net/tecob/?page_id=8258Figuera Principle is valid up to this point where the quote ends.
---Beging quote---
PATENT by CLEMENTE FIGUERA (year 1908) No. 44267 (Spain)
Ministry of Development General Board of agriculture, industry and Commerce. Patents of Invention. Expired. Dossier number 44267. Instruction at the request of D. Clemente Figuera. Representative Mr. Buforn. Presented in the register of the Ministry in the 31st of october of 1908, at 11:55 received in the negotiated in the 2nd of november of 1908.
ELECTRICAL GENERATOR “FIGUERA”
BACKGROUND
if within a spinning magnetic field we rotate a closed circuit placed at right angles to the lines of force a current will be induced for as long as there is movement , and whose sign will depend on the direction in which the induced circuit moves.
This is the foundation of all magnetic machines and electric dynamos from the primitive, invented by Pixii, France and modified and improved later by Clarke until the current dynamos of today.
The principle where is based this theory, carries the unavoidable need for the movement of the induced circuit or the inductor circuit, and therefore these machines are taken as transformer of mechanical work into electricity.
PRINCIPLE OF THE INVENTION
Watching closely what happens in a Dynamo in motion, is that the turns of the induced circuit approaches and moves away from the magnetic centers of the inductor magnet or electromagnets, and those turns, while spinning, go through sections of the magnetic field of different power, because, while this has its maximum attraction in the center of the core of each electromagnet, this action will weaken as the induced is separated from the center of the electromagnet, to increase again, when the induced is approaching the center of another electromagnet with opposite sign to the first one.
Because we all know that the effects that are manifested when a closed circuit approaches and moves away from a magnetic center are the same as when, this circuit being still and motionless, the magnetic field is increased and reduced in intensity; since any variation , occurring in the flow traversing a circuit is producing electrical induced current .It was considered the possibility of building a machine that would work, not in the principle of movement, as do the current dynamos, but using the principle of increase and decrease, this is the variation of the power of the magnetic field, or the electrical current which produces it.
The voltage from the total current of the current dynamos is the sum of partial induced currents born in each one of the turns of the induced. Therefore it matters little to these induced currents if they were obtained by the turning of the induced, or by the variation of the magnetic flux that runs through them; but in the first case, a greater source of mechanical work than obtained electricity is required, and in the second case, the force necessary to achieve the variation of flux is so insignificant that it can be derived without any inconvenience, from the one supplied by the machine.
Until the present no machine based on this principle has been applied yet to the production of large electrical currents, and which among other advantages, has suppressed any necessity for motion and therefore the force needed to produce it.
In order to privilege the application to the production of large industrial electrical currents, on the principle that says that “there is production of induced electrical current provided that you change in any way the flow of force through the induced circuit,” seems that it is enough with the previously exposed; however, as this application need to materialize in a machine, there is need to describe it in order to see how to carry out a practical application of said principle.
This principle is not new since it is just a consequence of the laws of induction stated by Faraday in the year 1831: what it is new and requested to privilege is the application of this principle to a machine which produces large industrial electrical currents which until now cannot be obtained but transforming mechanical work into electricity.
Let’s therefore make the description of a machine based on the prior principle which is being privileged; but it must be noted, and what is sought is the patent for the application of this principle, that all machines built based on this principle, will be included in the scope of this patent, whatever the form and way that has been used to make the application.
----End Quote--------------------------------
After numerous experiments I have come to the conclusion that the patent disclosure ( it was not a patent application) has been altered. Some one published the information in 2013. I do not know who? A patent information disclosure document is not a patent application and it is a secret document for ever. No priority date is obtained by the filing of the document except to prove who is the first inventor when the patent application is filed and if there is any dispute.
It is impossible for an electromechanical device like Part G which Tesla admits will create a lot of sparks to run indefinitely. It is against the law of wear and tear of mechanical devices. However Mr.Er Finder would do a big mistake if he thinks that this is the device of Figura.
I will not dare say this unless I have reason to believe. Today I'm not in a position to do any experiments as the team of people that did the experiments have moved away from me all due to different reasons. I pesonally cannot do much as these result in high voltage currents and I'm not a qualified Eelctrician or Electrical Engineer and I needed the support of other competent hands to do what I described to them.
Mr. Forest.. Please read the porition of the patent quoted above. That is genuine information. Correct to my experimental observations. I did not know how to make the device run on its own. After all I'm not a qualified person. But let me tell you that giving a lower input and getting a higher output is easy. Very easy. You just need to open your mind a bit.
Regards,
Ramaswami
