Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11844765 times)

NickZ · « **Reply #1110 on:** April 28, 2013, 01:36:22 AM »

@ Hoppy:
I just saw this Dynalight PC microscope, and as you being our house detective and all, I thought it may interest you. If you already have one, or know about it, well, maybe the other guys might like to check this video out. I though that its cool, in any case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfvGiGpcyMM

DSR Diode: 180 watt upper limit
http://www.seekic.com/icdata/DSR180-12-14.html

Hoppy · « **Reply #1111 on:** April 28, 2013, 10:36:40 AM »

Quote from: NickZ on April 28, 2013, 01:36:22 AM

@ Hoppy:
I just saw this Dynalight PC microscope, and as you being our house detective and all, I thought it may interest you. If you already have one, or know about it, well, maybe the other guys might like to check this video out. I though that its cool, in any case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfvGiGpcyMM

DSR Diode: 180 watt upper limit
http://www.seekic.com/icdata/DSR180-12-14.html

Thanks for the link Nick. That down to pixel level device looks great for sniffing out those bugs and a good upgrade to my well used mag glass. However, I would prefer one that could Xray into those out of sight 'hidey holes' and other places that other cameras won't dare to venture

Hoppy · « **Reply #1112 on:** April 28, 2013, 12:57:09 PM »

Quote from: Vortex1 on April 27, 2013, 03:51:50 PM

Regarding the Ikako Chibinidze video:

First I agree with verpies thoughts on the flyback transformer.

I'd like to add that we should be able to rule in or rule out normal transformer induction of the RF output coil with a bit of reverse engineering if we could get a handle on the following:

1) What is the actual power dissipation in the bulb?

2) What is the size of the gap (voltage breakdown)

3) What is the value of the discharge capacitor i.e how many pulses per second of what energy magnitude are required to transfer the required power to light the lamp?

Then we could take a closer look at the flyback transformer. Modern flybacks from TV sets are designed with multiple secondary windings to handle the power for the entire set. The high voltage winding is much lighter duty, designed to maintain anode potential on the CRT being lost by electron emission from the cathode.
Can this winding really support the power dissipated in the lamp?

The ferrites (as noted by verpies) are designed for flyback operation not forward push pull operation. But I doubt the HV secondary can handle enough current to provide 200 Watts or more of power. I could be wrong but would like to attempt to disqualify normal transformer induction in the RF output coil.

We might guess from the video that the two 80 turn windings are bifilar and presumably wound in the same direction. This would put the dots at one end of the coil form for these wires. Let us assume the dot wires feed the transformer. This would create a null output for ordinary induction as the pulse voltage would effectively cancel (not counting the smaller winding with the capacitor).

Food for thought and summary:
If the two 80 turn windings are in series connection (properly phased for normal induction) then all we have is a RF transformer being pinged at the spark gap frequency. This could probably light the bulb shown, but the spark in the gap does not look intense enough to carry that wattage considering the turns ratio 3:160. The flyback transformer HV winding alone may not be designed to carry the power being demonstrated. If anyone can estimate the gap distance, we would have a good idea how high the capacitor is charging before discharge in the gap. We can then calculate the energy per pulse (if we knew the cap value) and get the approximate necessary pulse repetition rate to sustain the lamp at some reasonable level of brightness as shown in the video.

If none of this adds up, we have something unknown and interesting going on in the RF output coil. Keep a rad meter handy.

Also note that the output transformer is a good quality ferro-mag type and I have found that this build type has a better higher frequency response than the more conventional square iron cored transformers.

I'm currently attempting a replication of this device so will be staging a competition for the first to find the 'X' wire.

NickZ · « **Reply #1113 on:** April 28, 2013, 05:32:13 PM »

Hoppy: Glad that you liked the pc microscope link, and also, glad to hear that you're threatening to get your hands dirty. No hiden hole X-wire thingies, please, as we don't have X-ray. The only X-rays are going to be the ones coming from your new device. Ha!

I tried to listening to Wesleys rap on rads video, but fell asleep waiting for the good part, as it was almost 1am when I was listening. But, I'm still waiting for the results, on a shorter personal video that I can view all the way through. However I did hear the part about the previous original yoke device, and how it was also a self runner.
So, T-1000, the yoke is NOT just used for the high voltage pulses, only, at least in that case. Or is it?

Vortex1: The 80 turn windings are both wound in the same direction, single layer, and possibly are not bifilar wound, but it's hard to tell.
Anyone, please add your thoughts, corrections, X-wire suspicions, etz...

Verpies: I'm considering just using a single TIP 3055 or similar transistor for this akula 0083 type of replication, as I don't want to use a fly back, and spark gap set up.
I think that the only reason that most guys are using two FETs or NPN transistors, are either to share the load, or to have a twin circuit like I'm working with currently for (gutted Cfls). But, as I love simplicity, using a single regular power transistors like the 2n3055, TIP 3055, or D13007K may be a easier, and more in line of my way of doing things. Such as with the LaserSaber 3.0 circuits that use only one component, just the one transistor for switching.. As I don't see that two transistors are necessary, in order to at least see the effect. I can also start with one, and add another one, later. I thought that I heard you mention something along those lines. So, what do you think?
I'm ready to go on this...

MenofFather · « **Reply #1114 on:** April 28, 2013, 06:05:33 PM »

Quote from: itsu on April 23, 2013, 09:56:29 PM

My Siberian Husky (itsu) died 2 years ago, so no more chasing there, and if i am chasing wild geese, i am not sure, i do a lot of things which lead to nothing lately.
Anyway, i am still around, and still have the Dally parts waiting for additional info.
But i doubt we will get it.
Same with this new Dally thingy, seems to good to be thru, and if i see that also this guy has disappeared, i don´t think i will invest any time in it for the time being.
It would be better if one of our Russian friends do a replicate, they know the language, and have access to the parts (like the Russian made yoke which seems to be needed).
Regards Itsu

Dally divice not have yoke.
There is schematic http://realstrannik.ru/media/kunena/attachments/3866/Dally---mikmur--3.png
There is two frenquences. One is sinus about 150 volts, about 2 kiloherc. Other is 1000 volts short nanoimpulses. Let say frenquency it about 10-400 megaherc. How many turns have each coil is shown in picture. Then from 83 turns coil going to diode bride, then from it to capasitors 4 mikrofarads 400 volts x 4, then to old power suply for PC computer, who convert from 220 volts to 12 volts. From 12 volts to generators 150 volts about 2 kiloherc sinus and 1000 volts nanoimpulses. You can make 2 kiloherc about and 150 volt sinus with any other metod or nanoimpulses 1000 volts. But there very important is ajusting. Ajusting frenquency nanoimpulses and duty cycle.

verpies · « **Reply #1115 on:** April 28, 2013, 09:41:29 PM »

In the beginning of this thread, you can see Itsu replicating the Dally device including the nanopulser. There are even some nice videos of it.

verpies · « **Reply #1116 on:** April 28, 2013, 09:53:33 PM »

Quote from: NickZ on April 28, 2013, 05:32:13 PM

Verpies: I'm considering just using a single TIP 3055 or similar transistor for this akula 0083 type of replication, as I don't want to use a fly back, and spark gap set up.

What instead are you going to use to generate high-voltage and short pulses?

Quote from: NickZ on April 28, 2013, 05:32:13 PM

I think that the only reason that most guys are using two FETs or NPN transistors, are either to share the load, or to have a twin circuit like I'm working with currently for (gutted Cfls).

Maybe they are using two transistors because Akula uses two transistors. "Replication" means doing everything exactly like the original builder/inventor.

Quote from: NickZ on April 28, 2013, 05:32:13 PM

But, as I love simplicity, using a single regular power transistors like the 2n3055, TIP 3055, or D13007K may be a easier, and more in line of my way of doing things. Such as with the LaserSaber 3.0 circuits that use only one component, just the one transistor for switching.. As I don't see that two transistors are necessary, in order to at least see the effect. I can also start with one, and add another one, later. I thought that I heard you mention something along those lines. So, what do you think?

Yes, if you take a look at my Flyback Transformer simulation you will see that one switch (e.g. a transistor) is sufficient to power the primary of a rectified Flyback Transformer (if you are using such transformer).
It is important that the transistor is capable of opening quickly (short fall time).

@All
Make sure Java is installed in your browser and check if you can view this simulation of a Flyback Transformer.

NickZ · « **Reply #1117 on:** April 28, 2013, 09:58:29 PM »

I add this link of a sister thread, at OUR Forum, for your added inspiration, confusion, or...
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1541.msg31177;topicseen#msg31177

TinselKoala · « **Reply #1118 on:** April 28, 2013, 10:10:27 PM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XRwlNCF1PU

The IRFP260n mosfets in the Royer oscillator driver stay cool while this is happening. They almost don't even need a heatsink. I believe the Royer oscillator is quite efficient at transferring the input power to the flyback itself, in spite of what verpies says. A single transistor 2n3055 flyback driver will require a good heatsink on the transistor and will be wasting power in the switching circuit. However, you can have easy control over frequency with a clocked single transistor or H-bridge driver setup.

NickZ · « **Reply #1119 on:** April 28, 2013, 10:32:05 PM »

Verpies:
"What instead are you going to use to generate high-voltage and short pulses?"

I'm still not quite sure yet, but, so far I had thought of using the similar system that I have, which is using the Lasersaber 3.0 single TIP 3055 transistor circuit, going to either a ferrite rod core, and/or also a yoke core. Or a combination of all of them including an Exciter, which can have a ferrite rod core inside of it, along with an aluminum tube, if needed. All can be seen in picture below.
Maybe replication is not the proper word, but I feel that the secret is not in the low voltage part of the pulse circuit, but in the way that the coils are related to one another. That is my view on this. So, at this time my current set up can generate over 1000 volts, maybe closer to 2000, depending on what coils I use, or add in series.
My speculation is the the bifilar primary coil that akula is using is part of this "secret" so that is my first change to my set up as it now stands.
I'm trying to stay within what I know, and has worked for me so far, thus the reason of this approach. But, I'm flexible to any other way of doing it, if I can get the needed parts.
I am a long ways from the nearest RS, like 100 miles or so, but I have a good stock of junk CRT Tv, or monitor parts to search through, and yes I do have working fly-backs also, along with big iron core transformer, ferrite core transformer, 3" yokes, etz...
I don't have the proper special diode to replace the spark gap, nor do I know if I can find one here, although I don't see akula using one of those in his device.
Here is a picture of what I have to work with, add to, or modifiy, at this time, but I am also limited to a no budget build. As this is again going to be another no cost project.
Any help is greatly appreciated.

verpies · « **Reply #1120 on:** April 29, 2013, 12:05:20 AM »

Quote from: NickZ on April 28, 2013, 10:32:05 PM

I feel that the secret is not in the low voltage part of the pulse circuit, but in the way that the coils are related to one another.

Yes, there is noting unconventional about the pulse generating circuit.
If there is a secret, then you must also consider that it might be in the way that the coils are related to that metal tube.

NickZ · « **Reply #1121 on:** April 29, 2013, 02:25:51 AM »

Yes, I'm looking for an aluminum tube to cut to size now, as I don't have any copper ones of that size. I'll probably use the shown 7 inch Exciter coil as the akula secondary (big air core), and place an inner ferrite coil in that, which already has 63 winds of about 20 gauge on it, both pictured previously, along with an aluminum tube. And also wind the secondary coil on the outside of the Exciter coil, for now, without removing the existing winds of 28 gauge mag wire that is now on it. Just wind insulated house wire on top of it, for now, to start with, and take it from there.
I'll use the yoke for only the primary coil form, but with a center tap, and 10 winds on each side of center. Something like that, any way.
Even if I only get 20 to 100 watts at first as an output I'll be a happy camper. I can already light an incandescent 60 watt bulb to about 60% or so as is, with just a single transistor and 5" ferrite rod coil, LS Joule Ringer 3.0 ver. style, using only 12v, 500 mA.

NickZ

anandml · « **Reply #1122 on:** April 29, 2013, 04:25:57 AM »

Akku or dally device replication details present in this image. please anyone translate this image it maybe helpful for all..... I got this file from TUNGUS-TK video. I think now this file is removed by author from the video part

NickZ · « **Reply #1123 on:** April 29, 2013, 06:11:56 AM »

I ran into this video today dealing with the hows and whys of free energy. As it reminded me of my father speaking, I had to watch it. You may get something out of it also.
It clearly states what T-1000 has been mentioning, in his last few posts.
This video is easy to understand and listen to as well. He has part 2 and part 3 also, which I also recommend watching, if you are interested. This is what we are trying to do, but, hopefully now with even better results.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrDMT6lSeEo

NickZ

Hoppy · « **Reply #1124 on:** April 29, 2013, 02:36:17 PM »

I have attached a photo of the coil / spark gap, transformers and transistors / heat sinks I will be connecting up for my Chibinidze device replication.

The coils L2 & L3 are wound with 14/0.3mm PVC insulated conductors with an overall diameter of 2.66mm. The coil former is 240mm long and 36mm diameter. The slotted aluminium tube is 25mm diameter and enclosed in a thin walled cardboard tube to snugly fit inside the 36mm plastic pipe. Copper tube for L1 is 8mm microbore central heating pipe.

The flyback transformer has a primary winding of 16 turns of 1.2mm ECW. the centre tap has not yet been connected. Note that the tap is not in the centre of the windings in the video.

The multi-tapped mains transformer is of the same build as in the video but a little larger.

I will attempt to construct the device in the same manner as the original, including the straggly twisted wires to the transistors!

Important information still needed: Details for winding the air cored choke L4, the value of C3 and the primary winding voltage on T1.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY (Read 11844765 times)

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Hoppy

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Hoppy

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

MenofFather

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

verpies

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

verpies

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

TinselKoala

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

verpies

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

anandml

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

NickZ

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY

Hoppy

Re: Kapanadze Cousin - DALLY FREE ENERGY