@Rosemary Ainslie

I posted the link to the live video stream back on page one.  Here it is again: http://www.lasersaber.com/public/WebCam/ActiveX1.html

It's been running for 83 days now.

@Rosemary Ainslie

I posted the link to the live video stream back on page one.  Here it is again: http://www.lasersaber.com/public/WebCam/ActiveX1.html

It's been running for 83 days now.

FANTSTIC STUFF Laser. 
Kindest regards,
Rosemary

It's still sitting there and I will test it again when I get home.

DonL

The coil voltage is down to 390mV from .790V over the past 8 hours of sitting here drying out.  Still shows strong magnetic affects using a compass.

DonL

I think the observations of lensing indicate that a quantum theory of gravity, based on gravitons interacting with every particle including individual photons, cannot be correct. For graviton interaction to be correct, a photon would have to follow a polygonal path as it passes a massive body, each segment of the polygon being, perhaps, of planck length.

GB

Hi GB.  Are you talking about gravitational lensing?  I believe they used this to prove the existence of dark matter.  I know that this has been elevated to a full blown thesis courtesy this proof.  But notwithstanding it's still not widely accepted by mainstream.  I think they're trying to find the particle responsible for this.  They're using germanium pucks to detect this particle - these planted deep underground - in disused mines.  And after a 10 year search Caltech have come up with zilch.  But I believe the astrophysicists are looking for a meson.  Something big but so 'non standard' - so off the wall - that it actually needs to be invisible to light.  To me that makes absolutely no sense.  The graviton is like the quark.  If they find it then I think they'll be able to explain much about gravity.  But the simple fact is that gravity itself, like you say, does NOT fit in with quantum nor classical requirements.  It's the proof that mainstream still do not have all the answers.  Which is a good thing.  It keeps them modest.  Personally I think string theorists have aced it.  But I object to the proposal that there's a 'static' scaffold like stucture that they seem to need.  I'd personally prefer to see it moving and energetic.  LOL.

All very interesting.  In any event - I'm not sure what Laser is showing us here.  I'm hoping that it's proof of dark energy - personally.  And I'm proposing that this is located in the material of bound amalgams.  But there again.  That's just my take.  Richard Ellis et al - will still not be able to find it - even in the unlikely event that I'm right.  This because it's too fast and too small for light to EVER find it.  Which means that the aether energies may forever be out of reach of tangible evidence except in those experiments where it can be proven to exceed unity.  And then we can probably only point to the aether - with our fingers crossed so to speak.  What's needed is this test on higher wattages with some conclusive proof as to whether we've got electrolytic actions here or whether it's purely inductive - which is what I'm hoping.

I intend putting a cling wrap covering over each winding to ensure that it stays dry or dry'ish.  This because Don's experiments and Laser's for that matter - point to the fact that there's still that healthy response to magnetic fields - dry or wet.

Regards,
Rosemary

lasersaber – good of you to continue to show your work for those that find it of interest.

However, your latest approach is basically replacing your galvanic ‘air battery’ for a galvanic NS coil.
And you are now utilizing the magnetism of the coil rather than the electrical output of the air battery.

As you state in your “48 days” video:
"I'm sure there's obviously some level of moisture there, but it's nothing to speak of"

Obviously, there is a massive difference between *no* moisture and *low* moisture.
The extremely low output is a direct result of the very low moisture.
The materials are being consumed at a very low rate as a result of the low humidity.
So yes, you should expect to generate a very small output for a very long time until the materials are consumed.

It is very difficult to determine the output as you provide little data.
In fact, you even say you’ve quit using a multi-meter and are concentrating on just getting your ‘motor’ to spin. ?
Magnetism and electricity are just opposite sides of the same coin, so electrical (watts) output is relative to the magnetic field created in a coil.
Concrete output data is much more useful.
The output required to turn your rotor is very tiny.
You did in passing say “less than ¼ volt” then updated that with:
50mV x 50mA = 0.0025 watts
So you need 400 of your large coils to produce 1 watt.
24,000 coils to light (1) 60 watt light bulb.
That equals a lot of $, space, weight and materials to light 1 bulb!

It’s a matter of practicality:
1)   $/kWh
2)   Wh/kg

I posted approximate figures in your air battery thread.
( http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9276.msg245413#msg245413 )
The numbers for your current project are even more impractical.

I trust you all realise FULLY that my training in all matters scientific is somewhat sparse.

You said it, not me.....but your enthusiasm is notable.

you think this is intended to light 60watts lightbulbs? 

I don't see a pratical application for this device due to the issues I presented.

What practical application do you envision for a device of this cost, size, and weight with negligible output?

I don't see a pratical application for this device due to the issues I presented.

What practical application do you envision for a device of this cost, size, and weight with negligible output?

then you're not very imaginative nor creative...

your 60watt bulb suggestion is nothing more than a strawman. whether or not the device can light a 60watt bulb is irrelevant. whether or not the device is practical is irrelevant. capiche?