Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Joule Thief 101  (Read 944358 times)

seychelles

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 991
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1440 on: April 06, 2016, 05:56:47 PM »
TINMAN AND MICROMLOW YOU BOTH INVITED TO PRASLIN SEYCHELLES ,JUST TO CHILL OUT AND GO FISHING , I SUPPLY FREE BEER AND ACCOMMODATION, BECAUSE YOU GUYS NEEDS IT..

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1441 on: April 06, 2016, 07:31:15 PM »
Not related to resonance,but why dose a DC current through a coil produce a stable magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field around a coil will not produce a DC current?.
Why is there no equal and opposite effect here ?.
To make this clear,i know that a DC current flow(as well as AC current flow)) cannot exist without a magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field can exist without a flow of current-or can it?
How do we have this !!half! type action/reaction.

The biggest problem here,and by here i mean !world wide!,is that it seems most(if not all) have just settled for knowing what the magnetic field dose,and how we can use that magnetic field. It seems that no one is any longer interested in knowing -or trying to find out what the magnetic force is.
If we knew this,then we could then design devices based around that new found knowledge,and only then would we have machines that can be powered by PM's alone.

No one seems to even want to try and find out what the magnetic force is--but it is something,we know it is,as we can feel it.


Brad
 Oh dear tinman, you really do need to study basic induction,
                    John.
                   

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1442 on: April 06, 2016, 10:24:51 PM »
Brad:

You have been treated normally by me and called out on your misconceptions, mistakes, and wonky beliefs and for once you are not being given a "special pass."  Naturally you are upset, welcome to the real world.  Your attack strategy against me is to just go on and on about my mistakes to the point of absurdity.  I am willing to admit when I make a mistake.  You can't do that, you can't actually admit when you have made a mistake, and that is completely absurd.  You can sit in the frying pan as long as you want.

That's an example of you taking your attack to the point of complete absurdity.  And EMJunkie decided that he would copy you.  You are being given the straight goods by me, because I have a spine.

The most recent example is you milking the JFet business.  I admitted that I was wrong.  A JFET is NOT a common component like you stated.  You will do anything and say anything in a vain attempt to try to make a point to the point of absurdity.

I answer my questions and the wine glass questions that you can't answer will be answered next week.  And there is no fucking apostrophe in "questions."  Demonstrate that you can learn something.

The answer is simple.  You looked up a JFET recently and I haven't thought about one for 35 years since I last sat through that material in an electronics class.

Bullshit, I don't mind being corrected at all.  You are the one that has that problem because you can't admit that you are wrong.  You have a mental block.  And there is no fucking apostrophe in "yours."  Demonstrate that you can learn something.

You can kiss my ass with your bullshit statement about me not knowing about the frequency domain.  You are such a pathetic liar sometimes, it's totally grotesque to read your stupid-ass trash.  I have been discussing issues related to the frequency domain ever since I have been around here and just about everybody knows that - and you damn well know it's true.  You make yourself look horrible, like some sleazy low-life spin doctor.

The main operation on an ICE is a synchronous machine and has nothing whatsoever to do with resonance.  The fact that the air intake and outlets make use of Helmholtz resonators is a distant secondary consideration and I admitted that I was ignorant of that fact.  Spin doctor away.

Bullshit you proved me wrong.  Screw you with your Brad's Bizarro World of anti-logic.  You linked to a book that said resonance in the combustion chamber is undesirable and bad for the engine.  Your link backfired on you.  You said you would find a link to back up your claim and you have not delivered on that.

Kiss my ass Brad with your stupid-ass gratuitous nonsense.  For the past five years you have been claiming that I am one of the "big guns" and you are clearly demonstrating how low you can go and how deeply you can compromise your integrity.

The fact is that you have no problems turning bad and going completely morally bankrupt and making a spectacle of yourself.

You have buried yourself into your own deep dark chasm, you are one creepy dude that can't handle things and you lose your composure and throw away all of your personal integrity.

The wine glass questions about resonance that you can't answer will be answered next week.

MileHigh






Very poor form MilleHehehehe

All Lies and mis-nomers again! Fair bit of bad language also!!! Captian America would not be impressed!!!

You think youre right all the time, there is a term for this, its a God Complex!!!

Even when youre dead wrong, in your eyes youre right!

Good luck with that, youre going to need it!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1443 on: April 06, 2016, 10:30:17 PM »
Not related to resonance,but why dose a DC current through a coil produce a stable magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field around a coil will not produce a DC current?.
Why is there no equal and opposite effect here ?.
To make this clear,i know that a DC current flow(as well as AC current flow)) cannot exist without a magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field can exist without a flow of current-or can it?
How do we have this !!half! type action/reaction.

The biggest problem here,and by here i mean !world wide!,is that it seems most(if not all) have just settled for knowing what the magnetic field dose,and how we can use that magnetic field. It seems that no one is any longer interested in knowing -or trying to find out what the magnetic force is.
If we knew this,then we could then design devices based around that new found knowledge,and only then would we have machines that can be powered by PM's alone.

No one seems to even want to try and find out what the magnetic force is--but it is something,we know it is,as we can feel it.


Brad


Hear, hear!!!

Golden observations! The most prominent is the observations about Lazy, Arrogant Human Mind!!!

We really do have so much to still learn, but the Arrogance gets in the way!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1444 on: April 06, 2016, 10:42:23 PM »


Brad
 Oh dear tinman, you really do need to study basic induction,
                    John.





John, your critique here has totally mised the point of the statements made by Brad.

I think youre being a bit rough, when you do not fully unerstand what Brad is actually saying between the lines! Although prrinciples of Induction were bought up, it is not the primary topic of discussion, at least not the way you invision it.

Perhaps an appology would be order?


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1445 on: April 06, 2016, 11:31:45 PM »
Not related to resonance,but why dose a DC current through a coil produce a stable magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field around a coil will not produce a DC current?.
Why is there no equal and opposite effect here ?.
To make this clear,i know that a DC current flow(as well as AC current flow)) cannot exist without a magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field can exist without a flow of current-or can it?
How do we have this !!half! type action/reaction.

The biggest problem here,and by here i mean !world wide!,is that it seems most(if not all) have just settled for knowing what the magnetic field dose,and how we can use that magnetic field. It seems that no one is any longer interested in knowing -or trying to find out what the magnetic force is.
If we knew this,then we could then design devices based around that new found knowledge,and only then would we have machines that can be powered by PM's alone.

No one seems to even want to try and find out what the magnetic force is--but it is something,we know it is,as we can feel it.


Brad



Brad,

If I said here on this forum, that the Magnetic Field is not the field that is responsible for Electromagnetic Induction - All here would laught at me. Weather it was true or not true!

Electrons, the fundamental outer Atom attribute, are freed by a Force. This force can direct these "Free" Electrons in a specific direction that we can determine only via experimental observation!!! The term for this Freeing is called Electron Orbital Hopping

Many here will laugh at me now, hahaha "Orbital Hopping" what a bunch of BS - Well old fellows, jokes on you!

Once an Electron leaves its Orbital, it leaves a "Hole" this is called "Hole Theory", something that's called the Dirac Sea - by Paul Dirac - So many novices see this and fly off into oblivion, OOOoh Negative Energy, Its a trap...

We already have exactly the same fundamental concepts occuring in every single Electrical "Generator" that Humans have ever used to power their Computers and Lights!!!

However, this process is amazing none the less. Now comes the total blind side, we "Think" we know this much! What if it were the case that this was all wrong? 99.9999% of all the electrical Engineers out ther would have no idea what we are even talking about! 98.99999% of all physicists would have no idea how to even go about proving or diss-proving this. Most all of the current theory is from a very smart man sitting in his chair all day for many years with a pen and paper, mathmatically attempting to prove his theory...

Mathmatical Fudging is not new!



One last thing, what would be required to make Water flow Up hill?



   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1446 on: April 06, 2016, 11:58:57 PM »
Not related to resonance,but why dose a DC current through a coil produce a stable magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field around a coil will not produce a DC current?.
Why is there no equal and opposite effect here ?.
To make this clear,i know that a DC current flow(as well as AC current flow)) cannot exist without a magnetic field,but a stable magnetic field can exist without a flow of current-or can it?
How do we have this !!half! type action/reaction.

The biggest problem here,and by here i mean !world wide!,is that it seems most(if not all) have just settled for knowing what the magnetic field dose,and how we can use that magnetic field. It seems that no one is any longer interested in knowing -or trying to find out what the magnetic force is.
If we knew this,then we could then design devices based around that new found knowledge,and only then would we have machines that can be powered by PM's alone.

No one seems to even want to try and find out what the magnetic force is--but it is something,we know it is,as we can feel it.


Brad

Yeah, the dc coil thing seems like a cunundrum.  Was reading a book on electric motors by Irving Gotleib. May not have spelled that right. But one thing he said was with motors and gens, there are 3 requirements.  Electricity, AC and ;)  or DC, magnetic fields, and the third is motion.  Missing any of the 3 and its not a motor or a gen. Could get into static electric field motors, and the mag fields are there, whether they play a magnetic push and pull could be the reason there is attraction and repulsion between HV charged leafs and other plates and things, like Lasersabers electric field motors, is something that may be a miss. ???

So  if we look at the field of a coil with dc on it, other than producing  the 'stationary' field, it is doing no work, unless say it were to be picking up things or clamping something to a wall, but thats totally something else. We are talking motor/gen action.  Also the reverse, if a magnet is stationary near a coil, and no motion, then no current. 
I know you know all this stuff, but it helps for readers that dont have that understanding. ;) Ive thought the same things as you on that subject. Weird stuff when you try to think deep into it. :o ;D

Mags


TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1447 on: April 07, 2016, 12:05:41 AM »


It’s no lie TK, still to this day, for the input to the output, the Circuit I gave you, is by far the best Neon Light Show you have done - That’s no lie at all!

I even provide your channel link for others to see for themselves: https://www.youtube.com/user/TinselKoala/videos

Should we compare, around 3 times better that your magical: Extreme High Voltage: TinselKoil 8: Bipolar Slayer Success !

Let’s talk about Miss-Interpret shall we, seems this is what you do best. The QEG is one example, your videos show a very poor maturity, for a person of the stature you try to proclaim, especially when you clearly do not understand what it is that you’re talking about!

Then when given the opportunity to build with help, you turn it down? Scared of something TK?

In-fact, the very Electrical Energy you use in the expert work you self-proclaim, you have no idea at all how and where it comes from! This is the biggest joke, professionals that have no idea, at all, how and where the very thing they are professionals at, comes from...


I know that the word "Succeed" is not in your nature, its "give-up" and "explain away" at all costs!!! Nothing to see here, just "Swamp Gas", or another good one is "Weather Balloon", isn’t it TK.


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

You are again MISREPRESENTING my work. You apparently did not notice, or are deliberately ignoring, the actual points of my demonstrations, as usual.

1. You misrepresented the measurements on that circuit-- it is the circuit where you took current and voltage measurements on different branches and multiplied them together and claimed "overunity". For which you were soundly criticised and refuted many times over. You still haven't learned your lesson, clearly.

2. I lit up 30 neons in series-- wired together in series -- with that circuit. This indicates a voltage of around 2700 volts. I can light up a lot more neons than that --- WIRELESSLY-- should I care to do so. You are simply lying, and trying to aggrandize yourself, when you claim that that is my "best" . It's not even close. Lighting neons with high voltage is trivial, especially when they are _wired_ into a circuit. If 2700 volts can light up 30 neons, imagine how many could be lit up with 10,000 volts, or 30,000 volts, or the 300,000 volts that I've shown in some other demonstrations. Your claims that the 30 are the "best" I can do is just laughable. That circuit is rather feeble, and can't hold a candle to my hybrid SS-SGTC, for just one example. Furthermore, you yourself have NEVER demonstrated anything even close to that, because you are stuck in your non-functional fantasies.

3. The coils in my 30 neon demonstration are connected in _aiding_ configuration, not your "partnered" bucking configuration which produces nearly no output when the coils are actually matched. The whole demonstration is a solid REFUTATION of your silly claims.

4. Why should I want you to "help" me? You have done nothing but demonstrate how you can't even make proper measurements with your own equipment, and even in this thread you have demonstrated such ignorance that it's not even funny. You can't even help yourself!

5. LEAVE ME OUT of your fantasy delusions. You've been banned before for your insulting, non-helpful and non-cooperative posts, are you trying for that again? You've done nothing in this thread but try to hijack it with nonsense. At least MileHigh and Brad and PW and the others are having some kind of constructive discussion, even if the tone is a bit antagonistic. YOU, however, are contributing nothing but nonsense and diversion, and I see that you have once again descended into your insulting, vile and gross posting of meaningless insulting images. You need to be spanked, or sent to bed without supper, as appropriate for childish minds like yours.

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1448 on: April 07, 2016, 12:10:17 AM »

Also the reverse, if a magnet is stationary near a coil, and no motion, then no current. 




A truly golden and yet obvious observation. What does Motion introduce? Or a better way to ask the question, How does Motion change the situation where, now Electromagnetic Induction can occur?

The Consequences... Oh the Consequences...

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1449 on: April 07, 2016, 12:14:08 AM »
Yeah, the dc coil thing seems like a cunundrum.  Was reading a book on electric motors by Irving Gotleib. May not have spelled that right. But one thing he said was with motors and gens, there are 3 requirements.  Electricity, AC and ;)  or DC, magnetic fields, and the third is motion.  Missing any of the 3 and its not a motor or a gen. Could get into static electric field motors, and the mag fields are there, whether they play a magnetic push and pull could be the reason there is attraction and repulsion between HV charged leafs and other plates and things, like Lasersabers electric field motors, is something that may be a miss. ???

So  if we look at the field of a coil with dc on it, other than producing  the 'stationary' field, it is doing no work, unless say it were to be picking up things or clamping something to a wall, but thats totally something else. We are talking motor/gen action.  Also the reverse, if a magnet is stationary near a coil, and no motion, then no current. 
I know you know all this stuff, but it helps for readers that dont have that understanding. ;) Ive thought the same things as you on that subject. Weird stuff when you try to think deep into it. :o ;D

Mags
Now you are getting it. In the DC case, the magnetic field is set up while the current is changing during the "switch on" time of the current. Once the current is flowing at a steady rate, it "costs" nothing more to maintain the magnetic field, and the field itself doesn't dissipate power. This is how superconducting magnets work. The situation is perfectly symmetrical. You get no current produced from a stationary magnet sitting next to a coil, because there is nothing changing. Move the magnet (or the coil), so that the coil experiences a changing magnetic field, and you get current.  Remember Faraday's Law of Induction (and pay no attention to the confused ravings of EMJunkie): The induced EMF is proportional to the _time rate of change_ of the linked magnetic field. You can take this algebraic equation and re-arrange it according to ordinary algebra, and see that the two situations are indeed symmetrical. The "conundrum" comes from mis-stating the problem or situation in the first place.

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1450 on: April 07, 2016, 12:16:19 AM »



  Perhaps I'm totally wrong, anyone put me on the right track??
  The thing that satisfied me in my quest to understand induction
  came from Einstein and special relativity,then it all seemed to make
  sense.
  if I was "the creator", I believe I couldn't much improve on what
  already exists, I think nature is fantastic as is!
                        John

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1451 on: April 07, 2016, 12:16:57 AM »
You are again MISREPRESENTING my work. You apparently did not notice, or are deliberately ignoring, the actual points of my demonstrations, as usual.

1. You misrepresented the measurements on that circuit-- it is the circuit where you took current and voltage measurements on different branches and multiplied them together and claimed "overunity". For which you were soundly criticised and refuted many times over. You still haven't learned your lesson, clearly.

2. I lit up 30 neons in series-- wired together in series -- with that circuit. This indicates a voltage of around 2700 volts. I can light up a lot more neons than that --- WIRELESSLY-- should I care to do so. You are simply lying, and trying to aggrandize yourself, when you claim that that is my "best" . It's not even close. Lighting neons with high voltage is trivial, especially when they are _wired_ into a circuit. If 2700 volts can light up 30 neons, imagine how many could be lit up with 10,000 volts, or 30,000 volts, or the 300,000 volts that I've shown in some other demonstrations. Your claims that the 30 are the "best" I can do is just laughable. That circuit is rather feeble, and can't hold a candle to my hybrid SS-SGTC, for just one example. Furthermore, you yourself have NEVER demonstrated anything even close to that, because you are stuck in your non-functional fantasies.

3. The coils in my 30 neon demonstration are connected in _aiding_ configuration, not your "partnered" bucking configuration which produces nearly no output when the coils are actually matched. The whole demonstration is a solid REFUTATION of your silly claims.

4. Why should I want you to "help" me? You have done nothing but demonstrate how you can't even make proper measurements with your own equipment, and even in this thread you have demonstrated such ignorance that it's not even funny. You can't even help yourself!

5. LEAVE ME OUT of your fantasy delusions. You've been banned before for your insulting, non-helpful and non-cooperative posts, are you trying for that again? You've done nothing in this thread but try to hijack it with nonsense. At least MileHigh and Brad and PW and the others are having some kind of constructive discussion, even if the tone is a bit antagonistic. YOU, however, are contributing nothing but nonsense and diversion, and I see that you have once again descended into your insulting, vile and gross posting of meaningless insulting images. You need to be spanked, or sent to bed without supper, as appropriate for childish minds like yours.



Hahahahaha - Classically pathetic - Again. True to form!!!

A shame, you have the potential to be so much more, yet you blow it all away for Arrogance? I fail to understand these tendency’s...


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1452 on: April 07, 2016, 12:25:34 AM »
Now you are getting it. In the DC case, the magnetic field is set up while the current is changing during the "switch on" time of the current. Once the current is flowing at a steady rate, it "costs" nothing more to maintain the magnetic field, and the field itself doesn't dissipate power. This is how superconducting magnets work. The situation is perfectly symmetrical. You get no current produced from a stationary magnet sitting next to a coil, because there is nothing changing. Move the magnet (or the coil), so that the coil experiences a changing magnetic field, and you get current.  Remember Faraday's Law of Induction (and pay no attention to the confused ravings of EMJunkie): The induced EMF is proportional to the _time rate of change_ of the linked magnetic field. You can take this algebraic equation and re-arrange it according to ordinary algebra, and see that the two situations are indeed symmetrical. The "conundrum" comes from mis-stating the problem or situation in the first place.



OMG - Foolishness like I have never seen before!!!

When I push my Toy Car around the Room I get no Induction? No Sparks arching out across anything...

You dammed Fool!!! What does Motion introduce?

Now I know I was wrong, you do not have the potential to be better, you’re completely lost if the tangle of confusion you’re happy to sit in - You have no idea what so ever on Magnetics at all!!! Period!!!

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org
 

minnie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1453 on: April 07, 2016, 12:50:10 AM »



   Good Koala,
           super conductivity is a nice proof of what you're saying,
                   John.

EMJunkie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: Joule Thief 101
« Reply #1454 on: April 07, 2016, 12:50:10 AM »
Now you are getting it. In the DC case, the magnetic field is set up while the current is changing during the "switch on" time of the current. Once the current is flowing at a steady rate, it "costs" nothing more to maintain the magnetic field, and the field itself doesn't dissipate power. This is how superconducting magnets work. The situation is perfectly symmetrical. You get no current produced from a stationary magnet sitting next to a coil, because there is nothing changing. Move the magnet (or the coil), so that the coil experiences a changing magnetic field, and you get current.  Remember Faraday's Law of Induction (and pay no attention to the confused ravings of EMJunkie): The induced EMF is proportional to the _time rate of change_ of the linked magnetic field. You can take this algebraic equation and re-arrange it according to ordinary algebra, and see that the two situations are indeed symmetrical. The "conundrum" comes from mis-stating the problem or situation in the first place.




Truly - you are ignorant to facts! Or is it a chosen response, then that would make it arrogance!

Truly you have no idea, what does motion introduce?

This being the primary and most important concept in Electromagnetic Induction – and You, All Mighty Guru, have no idea!!!


   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org