Hi bolt, thanks for more explanation, though I'm no not so great at visualizing things with words. Could you possibly make drawings or diagram of some kind to help explain your ideas better to me, maybe it could help others understand better as well, thanks very much.
peace love light
Tyson

This sounds like a stun gun to the secondary of an ignition coil if the 2kv does have current. Maintain the outer spark gap of the gun. oops. The ignition coil is not air core though. Could use a ratshack spool? Stacked 4 high to get the turns.

From a practical perspective, the stun gun is too much.  Your typical coil can't handle that much voltage, and the only easily obtainable switch is a spark gap.

Drive a flyback or even an ignition transformer and get a few KV, hv bridge of diodes and cap bank to get HV DC.  Small neon transformer or HV DC converters work great as you only need a few mA.

The drive section can have a ferromagnetic core.  It's just producing HV.

Ratshack wire is enamel coated and will arc through.  HT mag wire or other HV rated wire.

Oh, and ignore "bolt", he doesn't know what he is talking about.

No  need to go back to banging coils its been done for yeas now nothing good came of it. A single fet low powered driving 3 phase WYE can produce several KVARs for a few watts drive.  You don't HAVE to use magamps but if you do no need to use a fet and it makes the device immune (till lightning strikes anyway)  from power surges.

There is very secretive group of highschool kids making power by banging coils.  Probably because they did not listen to people like you.

Only copper wires required no special cocktails of silver and iron wire required.

Depends on how you look at it, but most conductors will work.

In order to create the desired circuit we need to produce NEGATIVE inductors. We all heard about negative resistors but the key here is negative inductors and because we must CANCEL out  the magnetic fields as much as possible in the circuit, there by keeping the total inductance of the circuit negative. We do this by creating VARS as this disturbs the ambient but there is no current flowing as there No in phase amps. If there is no amps there is no current flowing and no Lenze. If you bang the coils you create current and a magnetic field. Everything must be done in complete opposite.

Total BS.  Cancelling magnetic fields is BS in this case.  Has nothing at all to do with it.  VARS has nothing to do with it.  Complete opposite and you get nothing.  Lenz is avoided.  Lorentz still applies.  You really need to try some of this stuff before you pass it on.  Most people in the OU circus just want to make a buck selling books, vids, and other BS.

A bifilar coil cancels out magnetic flux but so does polyphase system as power factor is slashed.

What if it is a different type of bifilar that doesn't cancel?  Two separate wires, same direction.

BUT everything else is happening the space is now highly energized as electrostatic field its pumping longitudinal waves. The i/p power may only be watts but there is several KVARs in circulation. Now there is Kinetic Energy.

It's not a direct process.  You can't just create longitudinal waves and everything starts working because it doesn't.

As Don Smith stuff = Low power precursor (a few real watts) convert to VAR = Kinetic Energy = Device rating 50KVARS+ convert to magnetic as two converging electrostatic fields = real WATTS o/p.

Or RE = RF through RLC where OU derived from RE transformations of one energy type to another.

Don Smith's devices never worked.  Don't believe the hype.

In the case of TPU 3 phase negative inductors create rotational electrostatic stress and not magnetic to begin the process and stores a negative energy charge in a space where the relative magnetic field appears, and as a counteraction, the inductors generates an electric power with a positive energy. The free electrons from the VARS field got  kinetic energy from a space as accelerating returns the kinetic energy to the space becomes deceleration.

The negative inductances  of the negative 3 phase inductors is proportional albeit non linear to the product of the rate of change of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the coils and the number of turns of the coil, like that of a NORMAL inductors but in reverse.  By raising the voltage applied either side of the exciter collector coils  the total number of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the WYE inductors can be increased. So the TPU is a sandwich where we have rotating electrostatics (Not magnetic to begin with otherwise you need current and 100 watts of coil banging only gives you a headaches and eats the power supply) where a HV positive and negative DC charge is applied. While the atomic level dynamics drops the heat out of the device the rotational electrostatic fields create eddy current when driving a real load as now we have REAL amps flowing. Note electrostatic does not mean DC static from my standpoint but much closer related to RF where the nodes are either Zero or Max and not NULL. Null means nothing so bad use for this.

 The device is vertically polarized from this charge as the ambient is polarized from earth to space.

I can;t even begin to say how wrong this rant is.  It sure as hell was not vertically polarized.  It's circular.

In kapanadze the process is actually very similar but instead of 3 phase he using single phase 50Hz as the negative inductor is a VARS tank. In fact its a tube homo-polar transformer where the PF = ZERO or VSWR infinity so its an electrostatic device to begin with not magnetic. The HT DC charge is applied between the inner and outer non magnetic tube copper will work fine. OR it can be separate layer windings.  Whatever method is chosen its important the MASS is identical between the inner and outer layers. (close as practical)

 Now the conditions are SET they need moving side to side to induce a REAL current with amps and volts in phase. So the 50 Hz push pull sine wave driver modulates the HV so the action is a side to side motion of two interactive electrostatic layers. The coil becomes a NEGATIVE inductor and so the normal entropy bell ringing to loss becomes GAINS of increasing magnitude while taking up ambient atomic thermal heat energy drops the inductor through its negative. With this is mind the spark gap only requires just enough to create an arc 2kv perhaps and hardly any current.

As Tesla said "Don't underestimate the force of electrostatics" .

Kapanadze appears to use more than 50Hz and you can bet your ass he is impact exciting that large coil, and he is using a lot more than 2kv.  Probably driving an ignition coil or similar.  Don't let the spark fool you.  It is HV DC into a high impedance load.  Try it yourself.

password 'switching'
http://s1013.photobucket.com/albums/af259/giantkilleroverunity/?action=view&current=compositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy2.jpg#!oZZ2QQcurrentZZhttp%3A%2F%2Fs1013.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Faf259%2Fgiantkilleroverunity%2F%3Faction%3Dview%26current%3Dcompositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy1.jpg%26

http://s1013.photobucket.com/albums/af259/giantkilleroverunity/?action=view&current=compositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy2.jpg

Bolt's process equals the TPU.
Sigma's process equals Hubbard's coil.

But could the TPU be an ignition coil type setup and the sparkgap be a little neon?
The smaller TPUs would then only have 1 to 2 copies instead of 6 or 8 like Hubbard.

@Nz,
good point.
Not too many options now.
The preclude to the STclair patent was my itty bitty coil test. Then the ratshack spool virtual magamps I made.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NB8fXByWj8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkPUVqX3cNk

Degradation through distance and time can be captured.

  @gk

  It is rumoured that the old model ts could run off just the ignition coil output ignitiing air. There is enough heated air around to power something somewhere somehow.  I figure that there is mass in motion until you get down to o degrees Kelvin.  Just a matter of converting the randomized elastic collisions of a heated fluid into more ordered motion of charged mass through a "translatory device" to convert kinetic energy into electrical energy.

  @ GK and All:
   Seams like the best way for the secondary coil to feed-back to the primary, is by winding the secondary coil right on top (or below) the primary. As the greater the distance between them, the less effect the secondary would have to induce the feed-back that makes it all "run with gain"  Close proximity of the resonant coil circuit to each other may be an important point to optimise the output gain effect.
  I liked the idea of the "PTU in a can" that Wattsup mentioned. As it might reflect back more gain to the primary coil, and thus avoid losses, and have also cause less outside interference.  Keelly mentioned that the sphere and the dome worked the best.
  Lidmotor has shown that a big bifilar coil JT with a secondary coil wound on top of it, works very well to light a CFL bulb, and can also charge a battery. Jeanna has shown that the JT can produce 1000v+.
  I still feel that polarity flip-flop is important, and I don't see how the transistor's on-off cycle is going to do that. Maybe it is not totally necessary, though, as it might be enough to just to switch off the power and turn it back on fast enough to see the gain effects, without having to have the change in polarity.
  The magamp idea looks promising as there are no moving parts to burn out, and it reverses the polarity in a passive way. I still have not seen an example of it working in a TPU, though. Maybe Bolt can show us how it's done, (other that on paper).
  Chilliqueen has shown that with a PnP and NpN transistor,  practically no toroid coil is necessary, as both transistors are working together to reverse or flip-flop the fields, and have minimized the input power needed by quite a bit.
                                    NZ