Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!  (Read 368349 times)

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #810 on: October 07, 2010, 09:43:55 PM »
I did a youtube test using an NST with a Neomag placed on the core and the rise in the scope signals was apparent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rs1URHIfYQ

magnet???? :P

bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #811 on: October 25, 2010, 03:41:09 AM »
Think about the Newman motor the "Giant Hotdog" :)  He has converted a low voltage stack PP3 battery source into an ELF pulse through large inductor. The inductor the coil of the motor prevents current flowing so the power factor has been trashed it now like a PF almost 0

http://www.josephnewman.com/  yes i know he is as Loopy as a fruit cake but he worked this out decades ago!

"The energy machine is proof that the strength of the motor's magnetic field
is dependent upon the VOLTAGE --- NOT the CURRENT!

For the first time, Joseph Newman demonstrates the
energy machine that turns a 1,650-lb rotary and powers a
375-lb positive displacement pump using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!

In the video demonstration, the energy machine produces phenomenal
speed, torque, and continuously pumps water using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!"

In so doing now you have a machine which is basically KVARS due to current < very small on the batteries yet in circulation is > massive together with a circulating voltage of hundreds or thousands of volt  from a few PP3 batteries. The central motor contact ARCS violent on switching.

WHERE does the machine gets its power from?  The answer is a PF 0 trashed power factor conditions create large magnet forces from the ambient.  So powerful in fact a magnet 12ft away hanging on a thread spins violently! This magnetic energy is converted to motor torque which provides more HP out then the power IN.  This energy came from the ambient due to scaler PF 0 electrostatic field causing disruption to local electron spin. The misalignment is over corrected in the windings and iron cores where internal spin domain currents create a magnetic field as a result.

Anytime you have a moving charge you get a magnetic field.

So as Newman motor works so slow its the best visual example to see how to convert VARS to magnetic force then use that to create shaft power far in excess of the PP3 batteries.

As also per Don Smith teachings a HV source can become electrostatic (VARS) and THEN modulated to create a powerful alternating magnetic field. Use this FREE magnetic field for the source of your energy and NOT the EM fields. Alike his 1 to 4 copy Tesla tower device.

As TPU its the free magnetic rotational field which does all the work.  The conditions to create a powerful magnetic field in rotation WITHOUT power banging fets is the key!  Class C modulated electrostatic fields is the answer.

If the coils have a rotational 3D 2 layer magnetic force spinning it only takes another standard coil placed close by to make a generator. There is no EMP, no banging not in uS anyway only gentle switching. No CPU's and no 30 volt 20 amp lab PSU's required. OH shit that rules out just about EVERYTHING in the last 5+ years:)
« Last Edit: October 25, 2010, 04:16:08 AM by bolt »

plengo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 962
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #812 on: October 26, 2010, 03:44:49 AM »
Think about the Newman motor the "Giant Hotdog" :)  He has converted a low voltage stack PP3 battery source into an ELF pulse through large inductor. The inductor the coil of the motor prevents current flowing so the power factor has been trashed it now like a PF almost 0

http://www.josephnewman.com/  yes i know he is as Loopy as a fruit cake but he worked this out decades ago!

"The energy machine is proof that the strength of the motor's magnetic field
is dependent upon the VOLTAGE --- NOT the CURRENT!

For the first time, Joseph Newman demonstrates the
energy machine that turns a 1,650-lb rotary and powers a
375-lb positive displacement pump using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!

In the video demonstration, the energy machine produces phenomenal
speed, torque, and continuously pumps water using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!"

In so doing now you have a machine which is basically KVARS due to current < very small on the batteries yet in circulation is > massive together with a circulating voltage of hundreds or thousands of volt  from a few PP3 batteries. The central motor contact ARCS violent on switching.

WHERE does the machine gets its power from?  The answer is a PF 0 trashed power factor conditions create large magnet forces from the ambient.  So powerful in fact a magnet 12ft away hanging on a thread spins violently! This magnetic energy is converted to motor torque which provides more HP out then the power IN.  This energy came from the ambient due to scaler PF 0 electrostatic field causing disruption to local electron spin. The misalignment is over corrected in the windings and iron cores where internal spin domain currents create a magnetic field as a result.

Anytime you have a moving charge you get a magnetic field.

So as Newman motor works so slow its the best visual example to see how to convert VARS to magnetic force then use that to create shaft power far in excess of the PP3 batteries.

As also per Don Smith teachings a HV source can become electrostatic (VARS) and THEN modulated to create a powerful alternating magnetic field. Use this FREE magnetic field for the source of your energy and NOT the EM fields. Alike his 1 to 4 copy Tesla tower device.

As TPU its the free magnetic rotational field which does all the work.  The conditions to create a powerful magnetic field in rotation WITHOUT power banging fets is the key!  Class C modulated electrostatic fields is the answer.

If the coils have a rotational 3D 2 layer magnetic force spinning it only takes another standard coil placed close by to make a generator. There is no EMP, no banging not in uS anyway only gentle switching. No CPU's and no 30 volt 20 amp lab PSU's required. OH shit that rules out just about EVERYTHING in the last 5+ years:)

I love it. Very profound and I think possibly very correct.

Good merging of concepts man.

Fausto.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #813 on: October 28, 2010, 02:25:30 AM »
@Bolt,
I agree 100%.
I know the devices have HV in them someway, somehow. And the manipulation of a control on a magnetic field. I have taken steps to cut out certain parts to see just what the basis is with a full configuration. The TPU being a whole of many parts I wanted to see separate items that I thought were inherent. I have a set up that has a coil between 2 buffers pointing towards the coil. This effectively is no current and strictly potential.  The coils are 3 layers each wound from start to end. This is different from the segmented controls before. The setup is complicated but the process just mentioned is attainable.
I am looking to go back to some of the simpler tests and applying the process of the double pulse to the fields, if that makes sense.

I been off the bench to get things done around the house in the last days of warm weather. The next step I took was to get the hardware removed from my left foot, 8 screws and a bracket.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #814 on: October 29, 2010, 04:58:12 AM »
Things are fine.
No pain today just discomfort. All in a days work.

Just looking at some things:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Rotoverter

GK, I hope all is well with the support "removal".

I'm still lurking about here, and had to wish you well.

Art.

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #815 on: October 29, 2010, 05:20:40 AM »
@GK

Man I was worried from your pretty long absence. Glad to learn that you are doing better and hope you have a quick recovery.

I am back at my bench and continue my tests with Tesla Ozone Patent style using my new huge JFETS. Have to be careful they are about 58$ each. But at last I now have fast pulsing without an internal diode. Now to match the JFET throughput and the copper masses. I will probably need some help from @gyulsan. With the right mix, I am sure this will get very very close. I am seeing new waveforms with multiple inner waveforms that I could never see with a regular mosfet. I am planning on buying 5-10 small transformers or toroids all put in parallel as the working circuit.

What I have learned recently is that when pulsing at high frequency, it is pointless working with just one toroid. The high frequency will be present in one primary or in 10 primaries or in 100 primaries just as strong because it is only resonance that has no limit to the mass it can resonate in. The problem is always grabbing it out with only one secondary so I am sure working with several primary/secondaries will work best.

All in good time.

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #816 on: October 29, 2010, 02:08:27 PM »
@ giantkiller,
I have a 600 lb. rotoverter on my driveway. 25 horse power 1160 rpm. It will run on an 120 volt ac lamp cord. It is supposed to pull over 30 amps at 460 volts. This is my third and largest rotoverter. I could never be sure on the small ones if my measurements were correct. Now I am sure. I tested with the Phil Woods double plug and dc motor system and just with a prony brake and analog ammeter. It is never over unity. At it's best it can be tuned to put out 1 hp using about 2% more energy than 746 watts. In other words it is a dud. Who wants a 600 lb. one horsepower motor... It has to be re-tuned for each load. Tesla was the greatest motor man who ever lived. Where is his rotoverter patent? If there is anyone who would like to prove me wrong on this they are welcome to come here and test this. I would love to be wrong. And no I won't spend any more time on it. Anyone who wants to use it may do so just as long as they come here and spend their time.
Garry

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #817 on: October 29, 2010, 02:47:11 PM »
@iflewmyown

No point in proving you are wrong, because you a right. lol
Yes they will run on peanut juice, but you won't feed an elephant.

The only way I can see this work is with a good DC motor that is modified so that you add two more brushes on the commutator that are right next to the existing pair of working brushes. This way you can get back the energy supplied to the motor and re-cycle it. This lowers the overall DC drive motor consumption while still providing the full torque to turn a generator. Now the generator would have to be double the size, meaning if you wanted to produce 1000 watts, you use a 2000 watts generator that is only loaded at 50%. This way the generator does not produce its maximum drag.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #818 on: October 29, 2010, 04:55:10 PM »
I flew
Perhaps you can share a little more on your experience here?
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=396.0
Chet
Ps Some folks claim this works !

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #819 on: October 29, 2010, 06:36:41 PM »
@Ramset,
I know some folks claim this works. It is quite impressive to see that huge hunk of metal spinning with just a tiny lamp cord. I have talked to Hector on the phone many years ago and he would never explain exactly how to self loop it. I don't believe it has been despite the claims I read. I told my electronics instructor in 1971 that I could use the reactive power in this type of circuit to produce free energy and he laughed. After many nights of experiments and study I now believe him. The rotoverter is easy to be fooled with small replications. This giant will let you see the truth. Again I say that Tesla would have done it if it were worthwhile.
Garry

bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #820 on: October 30, 2010, 05:32:01 AM »
No one ever said RV is OU but its a VERY efficient motor like 99%.  It can never go OU within itself unless method used to cover the 1% losses. If it could and it has happened under certain pulse drive conditions the motor goes into incremental frequency latches and accelerated to 30,000 rpm and explodes like a bomb.

Best I seen is 10HP motor running on 11 watts. So where does the energy come from which is actually driving the motor? The answer is magnetic! Like newman the "power" in converts to VARS and high volts no amps creates local electron spin stress creates high magnetic fields. Its this which drives the motor the 11 watts is just the "energiser". To see this in action is 1000 times more exhilarating than any joule theif flashing an LED or Bedini bicycle wheel:)

 BUT it can go OU when driving another 3 phase motor and use the 3rd phase leading edge as gain typical 1.618 by the book and i have seen it draw 100 watts and provide 160 watts o/p on several occasions. Or you can drive a single phase motor and use that to recover the losses to the prime mover. This method has been looped and documented using pulley 5:1 ratio, banks of caps and 1000 watt inverter to get the thing started.

The best gains are when RV drives an axial perm mag generator. Or you can make one by modifying off shelf 3 phase motor and fit neos on the rotor to make a synchronous generator. This will provide a PF >1 back into the mains supply and drastically lower the electric bill.

I don't have time to trawl the net to show you all the experiments but looping is real i seen it too many times on private skype calls not everyone likes to shout about looping. This one of the better ones. A good neo generator is OU only needs the gearing sorted and cap bank to loop it. THis Would work perfectly without water RV driven.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhwQt1tJYa8

Magnetic drives greatly reduce losses they are also 99% coupling devices. See youtube Donald Duck motor 100 watts i/p for 157 watts o/p.

yuvgotmel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • Çavetroniçs Ä®nformatiçs AçademiÄ…â„¢
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #821 on: October 30, 2010, 06:09:45 AM »
The initial statement caught my attention about the RV and OU, which OU is easily calculable if the device has a load. This is good info that you included:

BUT it can go OU when driving another 3 phase motor and use the 3rd phase leading edge as gain typical 1.618 by the book and i have seen it draw 100 watts and provide 160 watts o/p on several occasions. Or you can drive a single phase motor and use that to recover the losses to the prime mover. This method has been looped and documented using pulley 5:1 ratio, banks of caps and 1000 watt inverter to get the thing started.

The best gains are when RV drives an axial perm mag generator. Or you can make one by modifying off shelf 3 phase motor and fit neos on the rotor to make a synchronous generator. This will provide a PF >1 back into the mains supply and drastically lower the electric bill.


giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #822 on: October 30, 2010, 06:43:31 AM »
The rotoverter on a single shaft is not correct. The Generator and motor have to be side by side to share each others fields.

Howard specifically talks about the pulley ratio and self adjusting for slippage.
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/Howard_Johnson_Motor/

@iflewmyown:
I would be interested in seeing your setup.

tosky

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #823 on: October 30, 2010, 07:36:33 AM »
How did he start up the machine rotor?
Did he use the same battery to make it move from stop to full speed?
If he use other power to start up then it seems already stored much energy before rotating. The battery just use to keep the motion.
If no other loading, it consumes very little energy when implemented very good bearing. That may be the reason of the long last battery.
It needs to clarify the start up method.

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #824 on: October 30, 2010, 05:51:48 PM »
@GK
There is no setup left. Here is a picture of the motor with an automobile battery for size comparison. My goal in posting was to encourage you to stay the course. Your work with coils is important in my estimation. The rotoverter is a myth in my opinion. It is an efficient motor but I don't need a 600 lb. one horsepower motor. Joseph Newman has a similar problem in that his machine puts a tiny fraction of horsepower for its size. I have a pump in a solar tank of 4000 gallons that will pump the same gallons as Newman's multi-ton setup. It uses ten times as much energy as Newman's (400 versus 44 watts) but Newman's setup would not even fit in my tank which is 8' x8'.

I know that some people would have a hard time accessing a motor that size to play with and I will repeat my offer to loan it to whoever wants to play with it. It is unbelievably dangerous with that many hi voltage caps so caution is advised.
Garry