Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Solid States Devices => solid state devices => Topic started by: giantkiller on October 29, 2009, 07:31:19 PM

Title: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 29, 2009, 07:31:19 PM
The subject here is not to discuss but to extract.

Look at all the designs, Steven Mark, Bedini, Tesla, Deyo, Searl, Don Smith, Tom Bearden, Bill Muller, Kunel, Hutchison, Leedskalnin PMH, ETC. Look at these!

The BEMF is the reconnecting of the disconnected Bloch wall in the opposite polarity.
The resonance is a misnomer. The snapping back is the Block wall reconnecting. Put a coil in its way. That is all! Repeat this to yourself and look again at all the designs!

When you use a coil to break the flux then fire it in the opposite direction to get the opposing field, repulsion.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bourne on October 29, 2009, 10:33:37 PM
I think you are right GK I remember hearing Bedini and Bearden explaining how the Bedini coil is a pump. I think I get it now.

The website  altenergy-pro.com mentioned in the video of the Don Smith talk posted by IST in the 'Steven Marks secret' thread and referenced here by GK is gone. 

but...

http://www.archive.org/index.php (http://www.archive.org/index.php) has several years of archived pages ranging from 2001 to 2008, only some of the links work but there are hi-res pictures to be found.

Apologies if this has already been mentioned elsewhere

keep up the amazing work everyone
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Grumpy on October 29, 2009, 10:56:09 PM
http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe38.pdf

Quote
Abstract.
During a collision, momentum is alwaysconserved. The large scale kinetic energy on the other hand,may or may not be conserved.When kinetic energy on the large scale is conserved during acollision, we say that the situation is matched. It will beconcluded that a matched collision involves only a largescale pulse of aether with a prodigious speed that is manyorders of magnitude greater than the speed of light, andmaybe even instantaneous. An unmatched collision on theother hand will involve both a large scale aether pulse aswell as a microscopic particle compression wave with a finite speed in the order of the speed of sound.This aether pulse, which we will call a vitreous pulse, is acompression wave of aether involving an actual net aetherflow that moves through a rigid body and causes large scaleacceleration. This large scale acceleration is due to anaethereal force which we will call G5.

Quote
Analogy with Electric CurrentVI.
The mechanical scenario above has got an analogy with electric current. The action-at-a-distance aethereal effect is similar to electric current, which is a flow of aether through a wire. This aethereal electric current can instantly perceive the path of least resistance. It will initially leak sideways from the wire and arc through the electric sea [2] to thereturn limb of the circuit. This will cause linear polarization which willimpede the flow. The aether will then flow wide of the polarized region.This will continue until the region of electric sea enclosed by the wire istotally polarized, in which case, the electric current will then be confinedto the wire itself. See ‘Electrical Arcing and Action-at-a-Distance’ at,http://www.wbabin.net/science/tombe27.pdf  The linear polarization effect constitutes near field radiation. It will propagate in the space between the outward and return wire of the circuit in the form of a transverse electro-polarization (TEP) wave, and it will propagate with a finite speed.

A rectangular TEP wave propagating in the space between the two wires of an electric circuit is an example of a situation that involves both largescale motion of aethereal kinetic energy, and fine grain elastic wavemotion of the electric particles of the electric sea. It is an electricalanalogy to the sliding row of metal balls that are joined together withsprings.The turns ratio of the coils in an AC transformer will decide the split ratiobetween the magnitude of the pure aethereal electric current in the wireone the one hand, and the magnitude of the elastic displacement currentin the TEP wave on the other hand. The former is the large scale kinetic energy current which uses the symbol I, whereas the latter is consideredto be voltage or tension which uses the symbol V

Like I alluded to, a "force" perp to the mag field, induces particle drift, and here is the force of choice.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Xaero_Vincent on October 29, 2009, 11:02:17 PM
The current website is here but nothing has changed:

http://www.28an.com/altenergypro/

I don't know if Don is still alive. I haven't found any posts by him since 2005. I think the site is hosted and maintained by a relative of his.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 01:32:08 AM
@Grumpy,
Yep, I used 90degrees and Spherics used 45degrees.
Deyo's coil subunits are at 90degrees. His are interesting tho because the base winding produces a circular magnetic current in the steel washers.

Don Smiths site is one of the first ones I found on my journey. I could see his design openly in his pictures.
I should reiterate and correct at the same time. Resonance is the frequency of the 2 dipole coils. Use a lower frequency in the flux cutter/bloch wall seperator coil.

I have the Tesla biography 'The inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla' by Thomas Commerford Martin for $1.99usd mentioned by Don Smith in video. The figure 113 on Page 173 shows this configuration also. Figure 134 on page 211 shows the magnetically quenching spark gap so the fundamental discharges occur in quicker succession.

--gk. Been a good day to lay tracks and leave dust.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Grumpy on October 30, 2009, 01:55:06 AM
@Grumpy,
Yep, I used 90degrees and Spherics used 45degrees.

@

You can see the hexagonal configuration all over Jon's Coral Castle Code site.  Rather uncanny to see it is so fundamental.  60 degrees.

Trying like hell, but can't find an easier way to make the shock that does not require precise timing.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 02:07:32 AM
Also the 2 parabolics. Andrew Basiago mentions these as a temporal field transmission antenna.
You can see the hexagonal configuration all over Jon's Coral Castle Code site.  Rather uncanny to see it is so fundamental.  60 degrees.

Trying like hell, but can't find an easier way to make the shock that does not require precise timing.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 02:19:58 AM
This is as clear as it gets:
http://www.28an.com/altenergypro/device03-1.htm
This picture is the one I had been using for interrogation. The red stripe is the Bloch wall separation coil. It is pulsed in the opposite way as the main 2 copper coils.
At first when I saw the PVC I knew the prospect of low amperage, high resonance.
There is even a fan as a spark gap on the left hand corner of the board. I believe this circuit is a close model of the Telsa ionizer. This can be done with 555s.
And this device here is a Hubbard subset but matches Bill Muller's backyard turbine to a Tee. And Don does have a Hubbard built that runs also.
http://www.28an.com/altenergypro/device09-2.htm
Between the boards is a spinning wheel, most likely aluminum with holes in it that cut between the electromagnetic coils. The motor is in the center view.
And in device 6-1:
Quote
The Magnetic Flux Energy is Amplified then Transformed into Electrical Flux becoming useful Power.
This is the correction to all previous coil attempts where the electrical approach has been tried. Don Smith reiterates this numerous times in the vid. That is why the flux is cut instead of snapping the coils with drive. The difference in the approach is with the wrong way we push a field out then let it collapse. The correct way is cut the flux of a resonant field and let it snap back to normality. Looks a polarity issue.
@Grumpy, The perp fields do this interface / interaction also. This is the kind of control that the Stargate type devices need. Erfinder and Spherics know what they are talking about.

And this one thread has the complete mix of it all. Check out the model of Coral castle. Then the moon fountain.
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/2410-stan-deyo.html

The current website is here but nothing has changed:

http://www.28an.com/altenergypro/

I don't know if Don is still alive. I haven't found any posts by him since 2005. I think the site is hosted and maintained by a relative of his.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on October 30, 2009, 02:58:34 AM
THE LAST  pic you posted gk IS THE EXACT SAME DEAL AS MAC'S BREAKING COIL ... BUT THE MASS OF COPPER IS TUNED TO THE NEO .....

TO CUT THE FLUX ....  THE COIL IS THEN SHORTED ... AND RELEASED TO ATAIN USEABLE  ELECTRICAL POWER FROM 0 INPUT!

MAC HAS DONE THE SAME THING WITH OUT MOVEING PARTS ASIDE THE SW ... BE IT A REED OR WHATEVER .....

BUT IT REALLY DOES NOT MATTER ... 

THEASE THINGS CAN WORK A NUMBER OF WAYS ..  ;D

I REALLY LIKE THE DEMO HE DID ....  KEEPING IT SIMPLE ... 

I LIKE THAT  ;D

IST!

TAKE A T COIL SMACK A STEEL SHEET INSOLATED FROM AN IDENTICAL STEEL PLATE TO YOUR LOAD THEN TO EARTH GROUND ....

 ;)

HOW MANY KW YOU WANT ?

PS GK ... DID YOU DRAW THAT ON FIG 113 ....   LOL !
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Xaero_Vincent on October 30, 2009, 03:12:24 AM
innovation_station,

Where can I find more info on Mac's coils? Any replications?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 03:21:41 AM
I believe Spark's suggest of equal turns of copper and steel were as close as possible to the simplest way. Then individual length is the adjustment like SM said.

You can see the hexagonal configuration all over Jon's Coral Castle Code site.  Rather uncanny to see it is so fundamental.  60 degrees.

Trying like hell, but can't find an easier way to make the shock that does not require precise timing.

But I see what you have said here. The angular displacement is key.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 04:07:13 AM
Don said he used a spark gap. I am going to put a stun gun drive on the separator coil.

Here is a mag amp.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 05:04:55 PM
The connection between the Coral castle hexagon(Star of David), Keely's 2 chords of 3 notes each, Leedskalnin moon fountain, and Andy Basiago's radar boom device called the Chronolizer...

I believe Spark's suggest of equal turns of copper and steel were as close as possible to the simplest way. Then individual length is the adjustment like SM said.

But I see what you have said here. The angular displacement is key.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 05:48:10 PM
Don Smith's device 6-1 Layout and schematic.

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on October 30, 2009, 06:15:40 PM
GK

You're on a roll, keep it up!!!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Grumpy on October 30, 2009, 06:32:18 PM
Don Smith's device 6-1 Layout and schematic.

--gk.

I have been told that two bucking coils can create the shock wave zone between them.  Always thought that a pancake coil would be a good collector for this configuration.  You could put several in a ring configuration.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on October 30, 2009, 07:03:26 PM
GK THAT IS NOT THE CRONOVIZER ....

that is the teleporter ...

and it propagats the engery feild between 2 contact points ... 

i for some reason see it as a pancake style unit ..  and they looked like audio speekers ...


perhaps the cadusious cone coil  ;) 

excited by the 3 on eather side ..

none the less it is speculation and intution with me ...   

i think if spun fast enough you will spinn a hole ... and this hole will manipulate space time .. and if done with in a working range ..  human dna life and non metalic things can pass through .. this tells us it is not such a high freq device .. because strange occourences may take place .. and the only thing ANDY says is that a nickel in a fellow jumpers pocket got excited from the feild in a jump ...  much to the effect of a microwave and metal   sparks hot that kind of thing ..

ist

the dwg dont feel right bro ..

btw 6 fits in 8  ;)

wate a min....  at closer examination at the moon fountian .....  LOL

never mind ...   just drop the boxes ...  lol   and im starting to think 1 wire ...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: DreamThinkBuild on October 30, 2009, 07:12:27 PM
Hi Giantkiller,

I believe you are on the right trail. I've been looking into high speed flux disruption. Every single patent that deals with high voltage/ high current potential snaps the flux lines at high speed. What I believe is going on with these TPU's is that there is way to create a virtual high speed spinning/flipping bloch wall. By virtual I mean it appears to be spinning/flipping without mechanical force only setup through secondary waves/control coils. Think of a resonant domino effect that cascades itself throughout each coil which changes the alignment of the bloch wall. Create a "high speed" spinning, collapsing or expanding bloch wall with enough flux disruption with minimal saturation/impedance and you'll get the power you need.

Here are a couple interesting patents I ran across:

Never mind the 5.54MegaAmp output, the windings are whats interesting. http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=s0siAAAAEBAJ&dq=4935708

This line in particular from above: "...First, a magnetic flux distribution is established in the generator using excitation field windings and armature windings. Second, that magnetic flux is "compressed" or modified in selected areas creating a customized magnetic flux pattern which will induce an electromotive force in the armature windings..."

Another where the windings are shifted.
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=nswRAAAAEBAJ&dq=6720698

Another:
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=plsdAAAAEBAJ&dq=5210452

If your looking for a high power pulser here's one, could snap the flux out of your coils though :) :
http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=ccgkAAAAEBAJ&dq=5434456
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 07:55:19 PM
As the Flux cutter is pulsed opposing the primaries and exists in the gap between the primaries that are in series there would occur 2 bucking joints, one on each side of the flux cutter. That would be a good place to arrange the pancakes parallel to the coil tube around the bucking area. That way the pancakes look like the multi receiver configuration of Tesla's wireless.

I have been told that two bucking coils can create the shock wave zone between them.  Always thought that a pancake coil would be a good collector for this configuration.  You could put several in a ring configuration.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 08:05:02 PM
I go the names mixed up.
I did run across a coil diagram. Here I redrew it.

All of Smith's coils are air core. Muy importante! This keeps the effect in space and not locked inside something.

GK THAT IS NOT THE CRONOVIZER ....

that is the teleporter ...

and it propagats the engery feild between 2 contact points ... 

i for some reason see it as a pancake style unit ..  and they looked like audio speekers ...


perhaps the cadusious cone coil  ;) 

excited by the 3 on eather side ..

none the less it is speculation and intution with me ...   

i think if spun fast enough you will spinn a hole ... and this hole will manipulate space time .. and if done with in a working range ..  human dna life and non metalic things can pass through .. this tells us it is not such a high freq device .. because strange occourences may take place .. and the only thing ANDY says is that a nickel in a fellow jumpers pocket got excited from the feild in a jump ...  much to the effect of a microwave and metal   sparks hot that kind of thing ..

ist

the dwg dont feel right bro ..

btw 6 fits in 8  ;)

wate a min....  at closer examination at the moon fountian .....  LOL

never mind ...   just drop the boxes ...  lol   and im starting to think 1 wire ...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2009, 09:01:23 PM
Or 2 Deyo coils facing each other with the center of the top most platforms extracted to form a hole or tube through both. Then...

Quote
These velocity waves collectively produce an electrostatic potential interference pattern in front of the grating whose presence is sustained by the continuous impingement of the electron’s Turing wave. This induced interference pattern produces electrostatic forces on the electron which influence its subsequent trajectory, guiding it as it scatters from the grating’s surface. That is, the electrostatic potential gradients forming this interference pattern exert forces on the electrostatic potential gradients of the electron’s Turing wave (dissipative space structure), thereby steering the particle towards regions of constructive interference.


--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Paul-R on October 31, 2009, 05:06:09 PM
Don said he used a spark gap. I am going to put a stun gun drive...
Do they give a HV pulse or continuous voltage?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 01, 2009, 06:25:14 AM
In a nut shell...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCY7tYDjXhI&feature=player_embedded#
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ru8YQ6HUwbU&feature=channel
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Kapanadze_Free_Energy_Generator

The LC tank circuit holds it own resonance from the spark gap wide spectrum discharge. Shove anything into it and it will grab what is natural to it. The outside frequencies are passed back to the spark gap. Under the tank at the spark gap you would see frequencies missing. After the tank you would see only the tuned LC frequency which would present itself as a stable magnetic field for canceling or disconnecting. The circuit uses the wide spectrum to break the flux or magnetic field for reconnection.
The windings are gaped to increase the 'Q' which enables a somewhat stable, strong or long term field presence.

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Smith.pdf
http://www.free-energy-info.com/Chapter3.pdf

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=502.msg3088#msg3088
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4233.msg80854#msg80854
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7837.msg193620#msg193620
http://www.tpub.com/neets/book8/32n.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flyback_w_snubber.svg
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 01, 2009, 06:08:18 PM
That first youtube video seems way to good to be true  :o  Have you actually built one of these mag-gens???  ANYBODY???
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 01, 2009, 06:33:48 PM
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Patents/DE3024814.pdf
Here is the specs and mystery that the 'Other guys' didn't mention.
You connect this with Bill Muller's, Don Smith's, Tom Bearden's, Ed Leedskalnin's PMH, Bedini's, and any of the rockest science B.S. and you have the answer. SM stated 'Nothing complicated'.
I reposted the other sites because they died on the vine.
This thread here has the complete process. There is no magic or Majic! It is Tesla's Transformer. I built the Kunel device and it performs, although not OU. My setup needed a tweak as the last step. And then I broke my shoulder.
My inventory looks like this thread. Everything has possibilties. Apply this thread to the TPU. It solves that one too. SM did the same thing! The old site got blown, but the stun gun raised alot of interest. Why? Telsa's transformer. Like Don Smith said 'This is all around us in everyday life'.

That first youtube video seems way to good to be true  :o  Have you actually built one of these mag-gens???  ANYBODY???
@9:00 he states to swipe a permanent magnet!
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/PJKbook.pdf
PDF Page 2024 / A-1076. Shock the copper faster that it can conduct and the coil sings immensely!
'Let's get dangerous'. I said this 2.5 years ago.
PDF Page 2014 / A-1066 - quenched spark gap Search 'quenched'!
PDF Page 1994 / A-1046 - Don Smith coil
PDF Page 1992 / A-1044 - Whoop! dare it is!
PDF Page 311 / 5-34 - Last paragraph
PDF Page 313-319 / 5-36 - 5-42 - Last paragraph
Here is PJK's diagram. This can be adapted in thought to the Smith pipe air coils or the Mark's rings.

Fire a stungun into a coil. Same as it ever was.

--GiantKiller. This is why I titled the thread this way. Now look at what I.S. is doing.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on November 02, 2009, 03:50:59 AM
  Lots of people forget that a deacceleration of charged mass also produces vibrations.  We can steer it into a wall kaboom kabang or we can put it into a loop and let it slow down nice.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Grumpy on November 02, 2009, 02:16:49 PM
you don't want capacitance in the coil that you are exciting
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 02, 2009, 07:19:38 PM
@Grumpy,
I see that.
With an air core coil nothing more need be placed for storage at this stage of operation.
It would only slow the operation. Any and all detriments need to be kept away from the generation stage.
I stated using cores and tanks to include the other, older designs and attempts. We have seen those including cores of differing ilks, specific windings, LC calculations, and a mix of the aforementioned.
It really is a simple at the small TPU with the lump on the inside. That has to be a 9v snap on battery and stun gun circuit. I know of no other thing beside the Tesla transformer/stungun in that size package that would produce the effects of generation that the TPU needs.
The Smith configurations are another clear view of the simplicity.
2 loops fired in opposing directions.

you don't want capacitance in the coil that you are exciting
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 02, 2009, 08:13:47 PM
Good work GK 

Have you tested your Stungun circuite in the manner you describe?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Grumpy on November 02, 2009, 08:20:48 PM
@Grumpy,
I see that.
With an air core coil nothing more need be placed for storage at this stage of operation.
It would only slow the operation. Any and all detriments need to be kept away from the generation stage.
I stated using cores and tanks to include the other, older designs and attempts. We have seen those including cores of differing ilks, specific windings, LC calculations, and a mix of the aforementioned.
It really is a simple at the small TPU with the lump on the inside. That has to be a 9v snap on battery and stun gun circuit. I know of no other thing beside the Tesla transformer/stungun in that size package that would produce the effects of generation that the TPU needs.
The Smith configurations are another clear view of the simplicity.
2 loops fired in opposing directions.

What you are looking for is that when you "interupt" a magnetic field, a force appears perpendicular to the magnetic field.  This force is synonymous with the force produced by the radiant event and this force transfers momentum from the interupted field to the ions in the collector and results in current.

If the collector is parallel to the mag field, you get cold current. 

Parallel and perpendicular are a little subjective, so not every configuration we dream up will produce the desired result, if any result.


Until recently, I thought that Sweet's VTA either couldn't work or would never be deciphered.

Take a look at it, the later version with one magnet (conditioned to create a radial mag field), and three coils, one per axis X, Y, and Z. 

Z coil is excited, Y coil is used for levitation and not power, X collects current and delivers it to a load.  I'm guessing that there is a lot of cold current due to the radial mag field being parallel to the collector coil across the face of the magnet.  the radial mag field is also perpendicular, hence you get conventional current too.

Not sure, how he gets levitation with the other coil.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 02, 2009, 09:23:53 PM
I will give a head start but most know already the other ways.
I did stungun the GK4. Before that tho...
The GK4 was a monster. I did step #1 by winding and positioning the layers. Otto then submitted the interconnections. I built the 4 channel pulser but only used 3 per Otto's submission. I did not know at the time the capacity and capability because this beast was not anything I seen in the slowski world. I fired this unit with a mobius config not in 1 or 2 directions but totaly eclipsing in a 360 sphere.
90 degree windings, iron core as a magnetic current loop mobiused with electrical conduction, Eddy currents, RF, Microwave, RE, headaches, optic nerve pain, purple dartlets, shocks. What amazed me the most was I did not blow up or burn equipment except myself. To this day I know of no replications of this by anyone with this specific configuration. Strange too because it was right out of Tesla's patents. But the pulse circuit and protocol was mine. Funny how it all came together. I built it, I own it, I gained experience from it, I am still fascinated by it. It IS on the shelf. Because of the jumper configurability of it I can still run with it. But only so far because of the iron core. This releases the toroidal field slowly. I reproduced this build with a copper core. I have yet to fire that. It named the BFG2000. It is Smith's model but has 3 layers and each layer is a Smith's table top device X 3 and those 3 are in a loop. It will be more productive than the GK4. Have I yet fo fire it? Don't have to. I know by the configuration the potentialities. The latest copper core did the self resonance with the BEMF feedback blowup. I still repair. Marco told me one day you will be able to look at a device and know what it does. This thread has captured that essence. So go back and look at my previous threads. I ain't God nor do I intend to be. I just have a creative pile of stuff that I am quite happy with. I share too. That is why we are here. If ya wanna be spoonfed I can accomodate but my utensils have a charge...
I did pulse the GK4 with a stun gun to get purple dartlets and guess what? I can't video it. Can you see why?

@Grumpy,
Good info, thanks. I will look that up and absorb it into the present mindframe.



Good work GK 

Have you tested your Stungun circuite in the manner you describe?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 02, 2009, 10:39:09 PM
Last 2 pages of a VTA description:

http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/WatsonVTA.pdf (http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/WatsonVTA.pdf)
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Inventors/FloydSweet/ (http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Inventors/FloydSweet/)

The description of lattice twisting is what the 'perp' fields do.

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Grumpy on November 02, 2009, 11:55:26 PM
TPU based on the particle drift model:

This means everyone that got the bifilar kicks was very close.  Probably just needed the bias and higher voltage.

Notice how the mag field of the collector will add to the mag field of earth and runaway - hence the off-tuning.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on November 03, 2009, 03:01:58 AM
  Over in Faradays Paradox Thread BEP made a statement that I must fully agree with.  The potential between the axis of the disc and the circumference is due to the difference in angular momentum.  In the tpu the same holds true.  The control windings represent a solenoid where the electrons in the control windings are accelerated and loop around the collector.  Very much like the outer circumference electrons on the unipolar generator.  This gives you relative charge between the inert collector winding mass and the accelerated control winding mass surrounding it.  The current in the control windings induces a voltage that swirls around and travels down the collector length skin.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Grumpy on November 03, 2009, 03:37:25 AM
Might be angular velocity or a complex combination of variables that just looks close to angular velocity

Might be the kinetic energy of the little things, or their momentum.

After all, the voltage drop across a copper disc is pretty small, just like the difference in potential across it.  Come on, what else would you expect?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on November 04, 2009, 02:48:28 AM
      A simple transformer turns ratio speaks to angular velocity power flow.  Current in the primary lots of mass moving threw say 10 rotations or turns.  100 rotations in the secondary but with less mass moving through the 100 turns.  Net transfer of power 1to1.  Rotation of the Earth the primary with lots and lots of current moving through one turn very slowly.  Secondary tiny bit of current relative to the Earth but doing a hell of alot more rotations. Transfer of power 1to1 vaporizes the tpu you and most anything nearby.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on November 07, 2009, 02:29:17 AM
Looks like its time to learn

FINALY!! [Thanks felloes]
Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 07, 2009, 07:04:50 AM
Here is another pattern I've seen:
Air core coils, single layer winds, high electrostatic potential. Why? Extremely high 'Q'. Why? We use the electron in the wire to conduct to create a field outside the wire. The high 'Q' enables that field to extend way far out in space thereby grabbing more electrons and coordinating a mass magnetic moment.  ;D
The larger the coil diameter the few number of turns needed and shorter in height and space the windings to increase the 'Q'.
The SM17 uses 2 large coils and two large caps configured as an L.M.D. This must then be excited. Electrostatic.
Don Smith uses a charge circuit to fire a spark gap not into the coils as an initial drive but as feedback to the input of the coil. This is the first time I saw this. I got his book 'An answer to America's energy deficit'. Mondo Kick Bootay!

--gk!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on November 07, 2009, 12:45:56 PM
  Tesla would also make sure his spark gap was oriented so as to receive some feedback from the magnifying transmitter.
GK noted awhile back that a sparkgap was capable of producing a multispectrum oscillation.  Plasma absorbs em radiation.  Thats how they input power to hot fusion machines.    Thats what harp is doing it is beaming em radiation into an ionized gas to heat it.  (Plasma is collisionless so when they say heat it they mean accelerate the ions and produce scalar waves activity) GK also described the tpu as expanding the action of the spark gap.  So if the sparkgap plasma responds to photon energy of a given frequency and this frequency effects the output of the oscillator and the tpu models the spark gap soon input from the oscillator is no longer needed.  The tpu responds to the photon energy input directly.  Electron circulation through the load could be driven either due to the charge seperation between the ion field and electron cloud found in a plasma or by the circulation of electrons about the ion core which would require a current transformer.  Either way if the tpu is modeled after a plasma the plasma picksup photon energy and converts it into charge seperation and collisionless electronic currents.  Cold currents.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 12, 2009, 02:44:04 AM
Tesla was responsible for the first rendition of this coil.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on November 12, 2009, 04:59:02 AM
   Tesla would make sure the generators were running in resonance also.  Using the inductance of the generator coils and capacitance of the distribution system adjusted so the mutual inductance of the generators and primary coil matched the total capacitance of both the distribution system and the in plant capacitor.  Resonance is a storage thing.
I like using the sustain pedal when I play the piano. The hammer falls on the strings and they vibrate for a long time. Unless you damp them.  Tesla would have to damp his to get some attention when folks went to his lightning shows.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 12, 2009, 06:31:01 AM
Telsa also injected a virus into his systems.
60hz is mind numbing. He controlled the delivery of his design. He gave the stupid what they wanted. 60hz.
Think about it. Most of us here know that you  don't need to move electrons. Resonance creates a kinetic ringing powerhouse of untold cold energy. Why is it cold? Because the kinetics don't hit resistance.
The world system is based on resistance not resonance. Ha,Ha,ha!
Resistance is a normal facet of what stupidity is always addicted to. And to add to that they even argue about what is right about their wrongs.

Flatlanders...

--gk. 3 more years to go.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on November 12, 2009, 12:59:57 PM
    60hz was chosen because of the bearing probelms with the mechanical dinosaurs.   Tesla knew he could use the alternators for just exciter power but Westinghouse had too much invested into the mess we have today.  Tesla knew he could put the whole transmission system into resonance without load dampening.  He even designed a coil to get beyond the use of capacitors and a transformer that worked like a dcdynamo for the cities that needed dc because of Edison's foolishness.  All shelved because of shortsighted financial concerns.  Then when he came out with planet ringer he really needed to go.  Then he figures out how to magnify the input into a sparkgap from just plain old air mass and now he is really a problem. If the r in an rlc tank is the load and for every input the tank resonates that's a good thing.  If the L or C is the load that is even better.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 15, 2009, 04:11:18 AM
Be sure your battery supply is connected with wires that equal a 1/4 wavelength of the chosen frequency of oscillation. The DC supply creates a DC bias on the supply lines. The resonance of the circuit produces shockwaves on that DC field which creates an AC charge pump which recharges the battery. Much like the Bedini circuit.
The conductor passes DC and the external field feedbacks the AC percussions.

--gk
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on November 16, 2009, 08:28:42 PM
Hi GK, I have been trying to get power from Don Smith's devices for a couple years now.  I can't quit but have only got small sparks between L2 and ground.  I bought his books and DVD's and replicated the plasma globe and the NST powered unit.  I get no real amps but volts are all over my workshop.  Every wire on the device will make a neon test lamp glow bright when held near.   I just found this thread and will apply what you try to clarify here on my devices.  Thank you for your work here.  I was so caught up in Don's devices that I tried to arrange a visit with him in Texas to learn all I could but he must have had his stroke just before that time, I got no responses.  I just know his units will work, they are in balance with nature. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on November 16, 2009, 08:49:34 PM
I think first is to get primary generate shockwave and this is really visible (and dangerous) at low frequencies.
I think the correct primary is the must in Don Smith system, the rest is pump and collector.
I think his most known device (with series of oil tank capacitors) is just using the same principle as Kapanadze device but in a lot more clever way.
Get residue electrons from positive terminal of capacitor and force them back into negative and do it very fast.
That way you have to really work hard to make such capacitors discharged.A pump analogy is very adequate.
You create a big potential difference on one side of capacitors bank which recharge them fast, on the other side load is discharging it but a slower rate. The device stops when those rates become equal.
My idea is that we could have use the same electrons indefinitely, voltage is real cause of current flow.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 16, 2009, 08:53:05 PM
Don actually says there is no electron loss on the primary side. We get the curent from the ambient. Pretty clear.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on November 16, 2009, 09:06:31 PM
He said also that he used (something) "which is already there" ,I think he might thought about "dead" electrons in discharged capacitor bank.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 16, 2009, 10:23:38 PM
I should have counted how many times he said that...
It is is 'that' which keeps retriggering the involvement.
The pattern can be easily resolved by looking at all the devices and apply what the creator has stated about them. SM, Muller, Bearden, Bedini, Hutchison, Tesla, Moray, Gray, and others have given unexplainable demos at their time of the event. As we look back things become clearer. If there is still something that all these demos have hidden then I would not be the only one infinately baffled forever. I am not even the slightest baffled but thrive on the explicit descriptions given from their view. There was so much to learn now so much to do so I am heading to the clearest of designs. I feel Don Smith has given this. But that is no discredit to the others efforts.
Recently it occured to me the little black box in the SM17 could be a neon ballast. The mag amps on top? Could be a hoax, diversion or a reconfigured output transformer of the last stage of a stun gun circuit.

He said also that he used (something) "which is already there" ,I think he might thought about "dead" electrons in discharged capacitor bank.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 16, 2009, 10:26:28 PM
Thought I would bring this post over here for cohesion.

@tsl,
With a single piece of wire you can achieve an R, an L, an C. The right configuration matched with the right frequency. The wire length(frequency), coil diameter(inductance & impedance), the spacing of the windings(capacitance).

The ringing actually gives us a larger window with which to interact with our pushing pulses. This also lines up with Otto's spec of a negative pulse that would put it in phase with the BEMF. As the initial ringing subsides in the 'primary diminishing echo' that enables us to pick a wave height at a certain time which relates to amplitude for a heterodyned push. In the attached diagram pick a red arrow for the timing you want. You only need to hit one.

Push once in the device or tank ringing to control the amplitude. But if you push trash or uncontrolled then you are pushing in a summing and diminutive effort. That is what my tests ran into. Called freewheeling. The frequency that appeared was the natural resonance of the 6" coil wire length or a subset thereof. The solid state wanted to ring at one frequency but the coil at another.

Look at the SM17 large windings as 2 multiwinds with a spacing of 4" -6" for capacitive storage.

Also,
I found a gas tube power supply that has a 12V input / car battery and 6kv out. I get to skip adding a DC to 120vAC inverter because of newer technology. It runs at a freq fo 30khz. This places a HV of stable frequency as input to the coil. The spark gap appears after the coil to enhance the shock.
I have 45 nonpolarized caps in 3 rows of 15 to equal 102uf @ 12kvac.
With the Kapanadze device running on a 9v battery I believe they have reproduced the Smith device. It is a square TPU.

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on November 17, 2009, 08:35:43 AM
Thought I would bring this post over here for cohesion.

giantkiller

can you post a schematic when a push force is making positive only impulses of higher second harmonic of ringdown ? I'm not good at it. Does somebody have a scope shot of something I'm talking about ?
Seems that I saw somewhere a picture which may be correct but I'm not sure.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 17, 2009, 07:46:19 PM
Otto showed the schematic of the negative pulse from a FET and coil.

giantkiller

can you post a schematic when a push force is making positive only impulses of higher second harmonic of ringdown ? I'm not good at it. Does somebody have a scope shot of something I'm talking about ?
Seems that I saw somewhere a picture which may be correct but I'm not sure.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 20, 2009, 06:54:11 PM
Requirement #1
High 'Q'
Coil wire of quarter wave length of determined frequency.
Requirement #2
Air core
Requirement #3
Tx/Rx Multipli or divisionally lengths of Oscillator frequency.
Requirement #4
Ratio and position dependency on load. (Muy Importante!)
Requirement #5
Copper mass to match load.

Page 6 second pic
http://www.free-energy-devices.com/Smith.pdf

For bifilar tests to work there must a ratio other than 1:1. Don points this out.

Tesla coils have their primary at the bottom. Ever wonder why? Move it to the top and exceed the copper mass current handling of your design. Tesla coils are electrostatic by voltage. I had posted another pic of the orignal Smith PVC coil by Tesla. It clearly showed the primary in the middle. Smith on the other hand made it (tunable? NO!) ratiometrically adjustable. Pure genius of design. Do you want current or voltage? Voltage is a electron left had spin and current is the right hand spin.
The primary has 14 turns and the sensing has 7 turns. Isnt that quaint? Using Don's information we can get alot by knowing the frequency, count the turns and layers. A Helluva lot!

Page 46, 74.

Resonance is think and maintain highest of 'Q'. This excludes high current. The coil abruptly throws out a magnetic charge. The higher the Q the farther the field with the most energy hitting a secondary.This includes alot of free electrons surrounding the coil. They are brought into alignment and then let go returning to statis. That BEMF is our kick in this design. In resonance the driving pulse hits before 100% decline. One - oh - One.
The fractions are positional meaurements and distance ratios. Not electrical measurments. But these figures are usable in the estimations. One can also count the windings! What a blessing.


--giantkiller. Is this a test?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Peterae on November 20, 2009, 07:05:55 PM
At Last people are waking upto Don Smiths stuff.
If you havnt seen the latest videos released into the wild Watch them theres some tasty bits in them

Don_SmithInventors_Weekend_2001

Don_1998_Interview_and_workshop

I had to buy them but they are now appearing on the net

;)

Peter

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 20, 2009, 07:56:01 PM
Glad to hear there are others. I posted this 2 years ago and got dragged away into my curiosity of other coils and processes. Got ADHD. I am easily distracted by sparkly technologies.  :o And have built way cool devices with extensive doco behind them. An engineer's dream!

I do pattern matching to the Nth degree. I know that bothers some. But! Apply Don Smith's descriptions to Hutchison's work! Piece of cake. And that matching up quiets alot of trolls and naysayers. That is why I don't have trouble with them. I just throw another card/example from the masters on the table.
Here is another gift:
Quote
Of all the examples and explanations posted by all, Don gives outright the answer, a deep peer into the goings on in a linear fashion. I have found his to be the most clear cut in language that is native to all of us.

And that is how this thread got its name. 'Nuff said.

Grumpy said
Quote
'By Christmas'
and that schedule has not stopped. Thanks.

So following Don's diagrams I have bought similar parts. I have batches of like capacitors and have built chains and arrays to get the voltage and farads. I have an ignition coil with an automotive spark plug cable connecting the plug and iggy. The plug is mounted in an aluminum can with others layers of cans wrapped around that. I have an em wave ghost meter for field sensing. The iggy will be driven with an IRF840 and 12v. I have the copper core coil that produced the ringing that STPRUE was duplicating with other windings over it. Simliar to the Smith TPU in the previous post but 4" diam. I have an isolated scope for measurements. My 12v supply are parallel RV batteries. This starts the front end pulsing. I also have an HV neon drive module coming in, Just like Don had mentioned.
It is treat time: Don's device has a 120v ballast. We get to skip all that because now they sell 12v input neon drivers for gangster's license plates and running boards. These are cheap. Frequency is 30khz. Don said 35k. Right off the shelf.
The output stage will be played with after I get this input side done. I have a handful of microwave oven diodes also. My cap banks are rated at 12kv102uf and 1kv@1000uf.

My control primary is a full wave length division of the secondary at 1/4 wave length. I can put other primaries on at a moments notice. I need to add a sensing coil. Nothing cut in stone. Everything modular.

No special controllers or technology that is susceptable to outburts. Also I want to start with a small sized device. In this case: size doesn't matter.

So I start off with a 12vdc go thru all the middle stuff to create a 12v supply to charge a cell phone? Why? Because Don stated that the battery leads supply DC and that magnetic field is pulsed with the resonant discharge of the circuit to recharge the battery(like a Bedini motor, mechanical). That means this can be done with a rechargable 'AAA' battery. Just like IST said!

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Peterae on November 20, 2009, 10:22:40 PM
Giant

God's speed

PS you may want to research your spark plug, most these days have some patented tech built in to stop RF emissions, i am not sure what the patent is or if it could kill the effect we are after, but it's worth bearing in mind anyway.

Peter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 20, 2009, 10:25:49 PM
Peter

What ever cam e of your build?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Peterae on November 20, 2009, 10:54:17 PM
Hi stprue
I am self employed and work 6 days a week, and october and november are manic for me, so it's really come down to time, but i am now getting more time, the other problem i have had is i live in a flat full of high tech stuff and couldnt find the courage to power it up incase i damaged my equipment.
This week i have been moving my lad equip to work, so instead of being 6 days away from my work bench i will be 6 days with it and there is very little high tech gear at work so it's much safer for me to power up.
I have just ordered a 200mhz pc scope with a built in Spectrum analyser which will hopefully also come in handy.

So wont be long before i start up again.

Peter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Spider on November 20, 2009, 11:16:45 PM
Hi Peter,

Good to hear from you and your progress! :D

Good luck with the testing!


Spider
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Peterae on November 20, 2009, 11:20:54 PM
Hi Spider
Good to see you are still around long time no speak, same old thing either too much work with money and no time or no work loads of time and no money LOL, it will be good to be back at the bench soon.
I hope you and the Mrs are well.

Peter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on November 21, 2009, 01:06:31 AM
Giant, Thank you for above info., very helpful.  My nst runs at 38khz and the label like Don says shows input and output power and just like he said the nst is overunity staring us right in the face.  My unit is 110 v. and uses 60 watts input to output 150 watts, right there on the nameplate.  Thanks much for sharing.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 21, 2009, 06:28:39 AM
Hey Peterae,
If you have solid links, please post 'em. Would be appreciated. I couldn't find any of them.
Thanks.
At Last people are waking upto Don Smiths stuff.
If you havnt seen the latest videos released into the wild Watch them theres some tasty bits in them

Don_SmithInventors_Weekend_2001

Don_1998_Interview_and_workshop

I had to buy them but they are now appearing on the net

;)

Peter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on November 21, 2009, 06:45:04 AM
GK, here's the links to Don's newest posted video, five parts but well worth seeing if you havent already. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UojMvCN3gck   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H70LbMYPXr4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9kG7QFkt5Y&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u87hcnR8L94&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBOVB9Au0s&feature=related
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 21, 2009, 07:07:05 AM
Tnx.
Thems the ones I followed along with the Smith.pdf.
He even shows the self tuned one at the end.

GK, here's the links to Don's newest posted video, five parts but well worth seeing if you havent already. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UojMvCN3gck   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H70LbMYPXr4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9kG7QFkt5Y&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u87hcnR8L94&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBOVB9Au0s&feature=related
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 21, 2009, 07:26:20 AM
im part way through 2nd vid wow ...


this is what we need to build ...

a dual cone twister ... 

a spin seperator ... and reconnector ..  wild ...

ist!

simple tho  ;)

never mind i already have a picture showing this exact unit built by tesla ...  8)  just nobody or verry few know how it works ...

it is his cone coil ... lol  it must be ac ..  both fired at 1 time and reconnect happins on the fat wire  ;) ;D

it will match up with russels work  ;D 8)


HELLO OMG THERE IS TRANSPORTATION ......  8) 8) 8) 8)  HOLY #$#@

ok we gotta back off on the meds .. say i yi yi ...  o boy ...  this is a can of worms ... or is that worm holes ... . :o  im blowen away    truly an honour!

lets just say it is a damm good thing he has only 1 and dont know how it works ...

i just cant beleave this ....  why is this stuff clicking so rappidly for me reciently ... ???  im becomeing confused ... it is 1 after another and i cant pull myself away ... 

i hope others see what i just saw !

w
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 21, 2009, 02:17:58 PM
maybe you saw it maybe you didnt ... this im un sure of ..

i know what was reviled to me last night .. if farra dont back off ...

the world will understand this faster than they should ...

but this fully explains how and why  portation is possible ..

i dont have to think hard on this at all ..!

i dont think it is time yet for this .. i think someone if there intrested in such things  should study rodin...

how ever this is perhaps a wee bit diffrent... then agin maybe not...  8)

ist!

think the reconnect happins on 9's .. pick a colour ..  ;D ;D ;D ;D

BTW I ASKED MY SUN IF HE WANTED TO PORT WITH ME ...   i guess you now have your answer!

there you go 3 6 9  what is it ... yes indeed ...  8)

like i said an HONOUR

THIS IS THE VERRY BASIS OF QAD!  HELLO ANYBODY HOME  ;D

  ..... :) DO DO DO < BOING     BOING> 8)  DO DO DO  ;)

GET UP AND DANCE !    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iDw08t3TR0


I HOPE WE CAN FILL THE SEATS THIS TIME ... !!

perhaps some intrests should be aroused online ..  prior to  the show ..  ;)

well you all know something ..  i know why all of the surepression has gone on in the past ...  and it honestly has little to do with money power and greed ... to be verry honest

the reality baby humans are and were not ready for such things .. prior to NOW  ..  because a few briliant men arrived at answers long b4 there time ... does not mean they shall be set in the hands of public b4 there time is right ..

just how im looking at it

w814

think it might just by chance  :D be possible they have been held till i woke up ... 

sure must just be by chance .....  :D ;) and just by chance it is carved in stone too ..  ;D ;)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 21, 2009, 07:58:36 PM
Check out the similarities of the coil winding labels.
The Stungun has no bifilar topology that would equate to overunity. Just a typical audio trafo. But Don's topology has symmetry to it for voltage and amperage needs.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 21, 2009, 08:08:59 PM
if i built this ....  and used it properly ...  i could put you in it and put you anywhere ...

william!

but unforuntinally were out of room right now in the cos mos to give you all another daja vu

so you better grow up!

don has done a wonderfull job !   i will shake his hand 1 day ....   
it is only because of the men and ladys of the past we stand where we do today ...

btw that cone unit is a 2 way device ..... jump both ways ....

lol

maybe ... you seperate the cones b4 you climb inside to deturman where you want to go .... kinda like a cap....  8) and tuneing ...

what this will do is pick you apart by your spins .... move you faster than light  and re assemble you there ...

thank you !

if you piss around with this it will hurt you ... your not ready for this .. 2 ways it works ...

1 your a being of light and you understand things ...
2 your wear the rock (s)   or i think it may  not work properly ... i have not tested any of this ..

this is from the back of my hand .. never saw crap but this picture and dons words and my mind!



Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 21, 2009, 09:18:12 PM
If there were 2 devices on at the same time and at the same frequency you could transmit and receive.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on November 21, 2009, 09:25:30 PM
ok.I see primary,secondary and feedback, but what is below under the tape in toroid ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 21, 2009, 09:51:17 PM
If there were 2 devices on at the same time and at the same frequency you could transmit and receive.

 ;)

im back ...  guess they got it running ....  :o :o :o :o

i think when i fainted earlyer today and colapsed they jumped ... hello !

i saw my first ora.. ever today shortly after that ....  ;D

you have no idea of this world unless you know!

you know !

lol
w
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 21, 2009, 10:52:09 PM
ok.I see primary,secondary and feedback, but what is below under the tape in toroid ?

What about a slice of a cardboard tube concrete form covered in copper foil?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on November 21, 2009, 11:34:38 PM
What about a slice of a cardboard tube concrete form covered in copper foil?

I don't know. I see rather some kind of wire wound at 45 degree and covered by foil
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 22, 2009, 04:02:57 PM
I agree forest....It also could be copper foil!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 22, 2009, 04:19:32 PM
I have decided to go back to incorporating spark gaps into a TPU.  Here is a recent coil unfinished.  It is 3 phase at 120 degrees from each other.  the coil is not physically connected to the spark gap, just wires coming off the spark gap have been loosely wrapped around the coil vertically.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on November 22, 2009, 10:33:45 PM
I ran across this guys beautiful tesla coils, might be of interest, great photos http://squid03.instructables.com/id/Jiffycoils-Tesla-Coil-projects/
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 23, 2009, 12:42:43 AM
Way beautiful!
But he missing the last stage.

But these people here have made it full circle:
http://www.instructables.com/id/The-EyeWriter/

I ran across this guys beautiful tesla coils, might be of interest, great photos http://squid03.instructables.com/id/Jiffycoils-Tesla-Coil-projects/
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 23, 2009, 12:59:28 AM
Very nice setup!
You gotta post a schematic because the proof is in your 90 degree coupling that looks sloppy. And that is the really great news! 8) 8) 8)

I have decided to go back to incorporating spark gaps into a TPU.  Here is a recent coil unfinished.  It is 3 phase at 120 degrees from each other.  the coil is not physically connected to the spark gap, just wires coming off the spark gap have been loosely wrapped around the coil vertically.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 23, 2009, 01:11:14 AM
There are four ways this can be done:
#1 is a spark gap.
#2 is disconnecting the flux
#3 is eclipsing waves by opposing field alignment from some degree to 180degree.
#4 is special materials because straight silicon substrate just doesn't cut it.

Thanks for the feedback and tests guys! No man is an island.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 23, 2009, 09:53:44 PM
The larger the ring diameter the larger the electron cloud effected by the field of effective aperture.

With an iron core there is current storage with field storage.

--giantkiller
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 23, 2009, 10:07:39 PM
The larger the ring diameter the larger the electron cloud effected by the field of effective aperture.

With an iron core there is current storage with field storage.

--giantkiller

I was thinking that my next test core should be one of my large ferrites.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 23, 2009, 11:40:18 PM
I have a 10" diam x ~1.5 inches high x 1/4 wall thickness iron core that matches Don's cart coil. My NST runs @ 30khz. I will apply his math to the build and see what appears.
I was able to fire a 300kv stungun into a setup of a neon, large cap, & coil. Measured 1kva mangled sinewave off of the output side of the coil.
I see you put a bridge ic on your board after the HVosc module. I have to do that next. I used a Barkenhauser. Also, was just trying LC tank and series LC setups. Got an LED to light but no big deal. I have a box of minature HVoscs too to place in there. I used a neon as a spark gap but higher voltage transfer with the spark plug.
The stun gun oscillatoror 5khz-6khz does not match my coil's natural resonance. So I can use the 555 to an iggy or static HVosc(this would be a new coil) or wait for my NST(this would be a new coil) to arrive. The 555 would be variable. I had paralleled a cap to force resonance. Grumpy had mentioned the E and H lag time as beneficial due to this. Don says 'Yes' to this also. But I still wonder why one would match the natural wavelength then tune it elsewhere...

Also
How did you wire that rig up?

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 23, 2009, 11:59:15 PM
Sorry to not get a vid ready!

Honestly I'm F....ing pissed right now because the last hour I have been trying to upload my vid of my new TPU to you and now it has crashed...pissed.......f....ing pissed.

I will make another as soon as I can.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 24, 2009, 05:40:46 AM
@Stprue
Thats ok. The next one will be even better. ;)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 24, 2009, 10:02:30 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU47blakiiI&NR=1
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 25, 2009, 12:43:27 AM
he dam near got a paticle decombobulator  :D ;D

wow

w

i dont see why i cant do this from a JT ;D

imagine the heat! lol   if i wound 1 feed back coil it can be made perpetual ...  ;)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on November 25, 2009, 03:07:39 PM
GK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGT5PB733a0
all this stuff is connected, common denominators, similarities.  RESONANCE, magnetic waves, vortex, spin, north/south, yin/yang, upset ambient/big harvest, collect/pump, etc.     Don says OU is "looking right at you" he mentions the NST as showing OU right on the nameplate but also mentions others like photomultipliers and multipactors and others I don't recall just now.  I googled and Wikiped'ed them and gained even more confidence in Don way back when.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on November 25, 2009, 04:47:25 PM
It may be stupid simple really
If Earth is unipolar dynamo then we have currents moving from core up to the surface and back to poles probably. Now you told me how to extract energy from already established currents in unipolar dynamo without connecting to the shaft (we can't connect to Earth core) ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 25, 2009, 06:15:10 PM
Bolt made a very clear statement about the TPU. When on it represents an Iron molecule. Iron is a receiver of magnetic fields (frequency < 20khz) and magnetic waves (frequency > 20khz). Now when the unit is turned on the new Magnetic molecule(<20khz) will meld with the field of the Earth. When the 20khz unit shuts off the Earth field snaps back to itself(flux reconnect) and we can read this. In the >20khz unit the TPU causes wave disruption in the Earth's field. We can read that too. The electrostatic discharge is fast and presents the greatest flux manipulation with the lowest current. The Earth flux snaps back incredibly fast from a 360 degree aspect and depth. When the electrons return to statis then that creates current in our wires by the magnetic field generated.
This is from Don Smith.

My NST is coming in the mail.

I connected up a Fet to iggy and the metal top of my 555 box emitted sparks to my hand and no damage to the surrounding devices.

The picture I created has the same flux perimeter as the 4 quadrant steel collar inside Ed's generator. Similar to a microwave cavity.

Google: Leedskalnin generator and my generator table explanation shows up 3rd on the list. Pretty cool...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on November 25, 2009, 06:53:11 PM
I watched all the Leedskalnin videos this guy posted, good stuff and cool personality  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9z3z1sftowg&feature=channel
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 25, 2009, 07:56:23 PM
great gk

this finally explains ALL that is ...

 8)

including fire wind air and water the 4 egales...  egyptians ...  teleportation incase you never guessed im fire ! ;)


CAN WE CALL IT THE MAP OF CREATION?

 ;)

W814

BTW IT ALSO EXPLAINS DARMA AND SH!FT ... THIS SILLY WORLD THINKS ARE MYSTERIES ...

silly humans!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 25, 2009, 08:02:02 PM
Yep. Well I want to see specs of the output of the NST I am getting. The iron ring will hold the magnetic current forever. So I am going to build Don's cart tpu. I got the parts, the math, the specifications and the pictures. For his special made capacitors I will use microwave oven capacitors.

One should be able to take a 9kw unit and drive a starter motor to at least move a car off of the resonance powered by the auto battery. Since that is a cold drive force then keep the oil level of the engine at the full level, remove the spark plugs to elleviate the compression, remove the distributor cap and one should be able to move a car off of a 12v battery with no internal combustion. That would be a tremendous starting point for a meager beginning. Or think smaller and apply the same technique to a gas scooter or motor cycle. In other words use the starter motor as an access point. This could then piggyback off the current automotive infrastructure.
Instead of removing the distributor, mount the spark plugs on a metal bracket and leave them connected to the existing system. Route this output in a fashion similar to a Hubbard coil.

So my orignal solutions are to piggyback off the housing and the automotive infrastructure. This innocuous fix would be the grass roots tidal wave that no force could stop. Instead of selling parts here would be the instructions to implement that. Replace the gas appliances with electric and you're done. Consumer prices would plummet. Shipping by truck would have no competition. New laws would spring concerning the number of trailers that could be linked. The train schedules would change drastically because there would be no need to ship coal. The corner gas station would morph to a different consumer base. The business of automechanics would change. If your car didn't start then you simply need a new starter motor until that technology changes. Imagine a neodynium starter motor? Generate big enough fields and you don't need tires.
Another industry that needs to change is the telecommunications. Convert to what Tesla said and all the towers and poles come down. Talk about going green?
The wind and solar efforts would die. Oops...

I said last year that a 9vdc plug in transformer could run a house and got flak for it. So I backed off. The house elec meter would spin ever so slowly.

So I'm back on this. Everybody wants it so why should anybody stop. I can't wait to see the herd switching over. The wild west buffalo runs would pale by comparison.

What you see becomes real.

Also, the reason whales beach themselves is because the Japanese use high wattage, high frequency sound to coral them. They beach themselves to escape the noise. Imagine the torment?
Take Hutchison's devices and mount them to small boats and microwave the whaling boats. Use GPS satellites to corner them!

--giantkiller. Gentlemen... Start your engines!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 25, 2009, 08:10:45 PM
Think about this:
If you could go back in time with what you know...

It would take a minimal effort on your part to wow the masses. The leaders would be afraid. The rich would hunt you down or exile you. The masses would wonder how you do what you do as simple as your demostrations are. Why 200 years ago you could tie load stones to a water wheel at a grist mill, wrap up copper wire and show electricity. Without showing any output devices the masses would wonder what this mystery is good for.
This is how the world sees Tesla, Keely, Leedskalnin, & Hutchison.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 25, 2009, 08:34:24 PM
i have had my fill of EARTH THE WAY IT IS....


if they do not stop tormenting ... my creations ...


FIRE FLYS WILL BE SENT!

W814

btw ... i nolonger see farra pissing out side ...  i wonder if they visited him ..... hummmm  i did send a few...

actually the day after i sent them i got conformation they did as they were instructed  ;)

hence the dance they did 4 me ..  :)   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 26, 2009, 02:05:09 AM
Hey GK  here is my crappy vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XipjLmjCSNU
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 26, 2009, 06:27:32 AM
That was a good vid. You have a small scale Don Smith there. If you open the gap a little more you show see the volts go up.
The idea is you are shocking the resonant field. That is why the bulb lights up.
Set or tape the bulb on the side and move the frequency up and down.
When I had the neon in series with the primary I could not transfer much to the secondary gap because the freq did not match my coil. I am working on that now. On Smith's Hubbard type he had tuning caps on each receiver coil. I didn't see caps on yours. Still is a fine test tho. Did it give you a headache?
Are the windings wires the 1/4, 1/2 or full wave length of the CFL freq?
So you have 3 layers of horizontal windings with 1 vertical layer? copper core, right? If so that saved your butt. Iron stores and emits stronger effects. To light the unattached bulb with .45 watts is really good. It is the resonance and not the power.
Hey GK  here is my crappy vid.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XipjLmjCSNU
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MACEDONIA CD on November 26, 2009, 12:08:43 PM
HI

is just begaing  is this 
THIS IS NOTHING MORE ........ GOING IN VRONG DIRECTION <<<IS ANTHERE SOLUTION  BUT  >>>IS NOT OK>
 
 :)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 26, 2009, 01:56:43 PM
That was a good vid. You have a small scale Don Smith there. If you open the gap a little more you show see the volts go up.
The idea is you are shocking the resonant field. That is why the bulb lights up.
Set or tape the bulb on the side and move the frequency up and down.
When I had the neon in series with the primary I could not transfer much to the secondary gap because the freq did not match my coil. I am working on that now. On Smith's Hubbard type he had tuning caps on each receiver coil. I didn't see caps on yours. Still is a fine test tho. Did it give you a headache?
Are the windings wires the 1/4, 1/2 or full wave length of the CFL freq?
So you have 3 layers of horizontal windings with 1 vertical layer? copper core, right? If so that saved your butt. Iron stores and emits stronger effects. To light the unattached bulb with .45 watts is really good. It is the resonance and not the power.

I wish I could open the gap up more but the clf driver is not strong enough.  Shocking the resonant field makes sense because on a test with a cloi and led the led pulses at the spark gap rate or there abouts.  I do have trimmer caps 6pf-76pf that I will try.  I have alreag tried several types of caps but connecting them kills the gap but one thing I did notice sometimes was that the gap was not always necessary for voltage.  It seems like when the conditions are right just the potential difference can creat voltage in the coil.  I'm not sure how to find 1/4 or 1/2 wave to clf freq....I still have so much to learn.  Good news is that I'm getting  a 50mherts RIGOL oscope for Christmas.  The windings are 3 layers as you mentioned and going counter clockwise with 1 vertical layer.  The core is air but I will be trying copper soon.  I did not get a headache but I did notice the spark gap was creating ozone.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 26, 2009, 01:58:13 PM
HI

is just begaing  is this 
THIS IS NOTHING MORE ........ GOING IN VRONG DIRECTION <<<IS ANTHERE SOLUTION  BUT  >>>IS NOT OK>
 
 :)

These are just some tests I am running to help myself understand certain processes MAC.

Thanks...Stew
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MACEDONIA CD on November 26, 2009, 11:55:56 PM
ok NO PROBLEM  ....  :) 

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 27, 2009, 06:02:57 PM
The realization gained is tremendously larger than the statement made.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on November 27, 2009, 06:14:07 PM
The realization gained is tremendously larger than the statement made.

--giantkiller.

 ;D

no joke there ... no joke there ... 

you know RODIN must be credited ... for his work...  if he knew what he has built... 

he would not stand where he does ...  ;)  that is unfair!   as is the treatment i have recieved ...

how ever much of my treatment ... is well erned...  :D  lol   but you all will see it has been a journy ... a journey of LEARNING ...  with out the treatment i have recieved i would not realize what i do to day ...  no regrets...  only lessens learned ... as well i would not be who i am today .. nor the way i am with out each and every one of my previsous experiences here on earth .. 

this planet is a school  ... the ! school... this is a place where you learn over 1000 lives how creation operates ... 

 ;D

now its time to graduate.....    8) :o  imagine ... i will remind you .. the avarge human brain is running 4 percent ...  what the hell is the rest of it for .... lol  96 percent ...  yikes ... lol

like i said you will never be the same again ...

w
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on November 29, 2009, 07:25:10 PM


@GK

I just realized something else!!! 

My 20amp fuse for my multimeter has blown testing the air core TPU!  I know it wasn't putting out that much!

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 29, 2009, 10:23:01 PM
With an input of 90ma. Sounds more like kinetic shockwave.

Lets take the most drastic of situations by considering the case when our 1/4 wave
transmission line is connected to a short circuit. Abbra-kadab-ra, the short circuit
that is present at the end of the cable is transformed at the other end into an open
circuit. The same kind of reversal would also occur if our 1/4 wavelength cable
were connected to an open circuit. It would in turn, transform the open into a
short circuit at the other end. Just remember, this holds true only for the
frequency for which the cable length happens to be a 1/4 wavelength and at odd
multiples of 1/4 wavelength.
http://www.w4gso.org/quarterwave_ant.pdf (http://www.w4gso.org/quarterwave_ant.pdf)

US Patent 7284638
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=Zc&q=1+4+wavelength+transmission+line&aq=5&oq=1%2F4+wavelength&aqi=g7 (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=Zc&q=1+4+wavelength+transmission+line&aq=5&oq=1%2F4+wavelength&aqi=g7)

@GK

I just realized something else!!! 

My 20amp fuse for my multimeter has blown testing the air core TPU!  I know it wasn't putting out that much!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on November 30, 2009, 05:33:23 AM
Quote
The mindset of the professional electrical engineer is restricted to non-resonate and iron core resonate systems. Ohm's law when applied to resonate air core systems, becomes system resistivity (impedance, Z). "Z" at resonance becomes zero. Therefore, in this system, volts and amperes are equal until load (resistivity) is introduced. This is called the V.A.R. (Volt Amperes Reactive) System.
With impedance being Zero, the system is then coupled directly into Earth's immense electrical potential.

Don's L1 is so small, the cap is .1uf, the incoming frequency from the Neon driver is 35.1k, the spark gap is lit all the time.
So, it is as I had stated many times 'The circuit drives the spark gap which is a wide band transmitter'. How else could the 35khz resonate such a small L1? And by 1/4, 1/2, full wave length? The tank circuit tunes what it is resonate at. Don stated a couple of times about 1/4 , 1/2 , & full that you could use any but didn't clarify. That there are caps there 'but you don't need them'. He hid the details by mixing different processes  by components while switching back and forth in configurations. L1 windings are touching. L2 windings are space increasing the capacitance of the inherent tank of L2. L1 and L2 are automatic synchronically tuned.

I received my NST of +12vin, 6kvout @ 38.5khz.

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: EMdevices on December 01, 2009, 03:42:01 AM
GK, now that you have a nice HV power supply,  build a parallel resonant tank circuit.  This tank circuit will have a high impedance at the resonant frequency and won't load down your power supply that much. 

To get the high currents, design the impedance of the inductor and capacitor to be LOW.   This means low inductance and high capacitance (lots of caps in parallel, make sure they can withstand the 6KV) !

Then you will have huge reactive currents flowing (and a bit of phase change from 90 deg since there will be a bit of resistance and some small power will be dissipated)

Now you are ready to do some magnetic resonance wireless power transfer like I'm doing.

EM
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 01, 2009, 05:05:49 AM
   Or build two tanks resonant at the same frequencies but phase the signal input to the tanks so they are 180 degrees out.  Superimpose the two tanks as much as possible by using bifilar inductors which if spaced properly should also give you the capacitance needed to makem ring.  (Tesla pancake coil energy storage resonant circuit coil thingy or a piece of coax?)  Common antennae should issue some longitudinal waves of sort.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 01, 2009, 06:02:01 AM
@EMd,
The NST only has max 35ma. I have the caps too. What you are doing and the build of Don Smith's are similar. Except I think he is reading the BEMF or reflection back on the ckt instead of using transmissive. Either way the resonance is necessary to achieve.

@Sparks,
Yes. You got me thinking on the pancake coil. That configuration would do the same as spacing the windings apart, storage. Thanks. Probably uses the same wire length, no? I would think.

@38.5khz NST sine I have coil work to do to match the cap setups I have.

Just bought a Toyota FJ cruiser. The single ignition coil is gone. Each plug has a hood with a coil and a plug boot. The system doesn't transfer HV any more. The 2002 Isuzu Trooper has what looks like Video flybacks between the ignition system and the spark plugs.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 01, 2009, 07:05:25 AM
  Bifilar allows for the inductance and capacitance of the tank to be created in the same geometric location unlike lumped components.  Capacitors were still pretty archaic when Tesla was around so instead of using discrete components he built the capacitance of his tanks into the coils of the inductors.  Very little losses like in lumped circuits.
So his tanks were just a big old pancake coil which sometime took on the form of a cone.  He must have spent days making these coils and adjusting them geometrically to adjust for the capacitance and inductance parameters of air
   I think all that can be bypassed now with coax.  The coax comes tuned.  So instead of splitting the signal like we do with communications reception converge the signal so that it is superimposed on a radiating element.  The two signals out of phase will give us a double helix wave pattern.  Should be interesting.
   Sorry a quarter wavelength both pieces.  I really dont have the expertise to know how to phase the inputs to the coax to get them so that they will superimpose with the e and m happening in phase instead of 90 out.  Perhaps two oscillators.  If you think about it a piece of coax totally detuned so as to create a shitload of standing waves in the coax ya its storage.  I got a suspicion that sm was using a worse case sceanario to create standing waves in the tpu but the standing waves were from two discrete oscillators so that when they were superimposed they created a scalar standing wave.  Then some sort of reactive energy from the ambient senses the wave.  He also mentions how ss lets you down when you need it the most.  You get the standing wave field to back into your oscillator circuit and poof goes the finals. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 01, 2009, 02:56:54 PM
;)

im back ...  guess they got it running ....  :o :o :o :o

i think when i fainted earlyer today and colapsed they jumped ... hello !

i saw my first ora.. ever today shortly after that ....  ;D

you have no idea of this world unless you know!

you know !

lol
w

ya know since this happened ... i now question ...  how long i was gone and where the heck i went ... and what i was working on ...  might it be possible i left  this time line to live in another .. and then i was returned ...  i have no memery of such things...  i fell and got back up ..  all i saw was a white light and boom no memeries ... 

hummmmm  i was brought back on firday ..  with the FIRST SHIP .. 4 from my plannet  3 from sun 3 from freeze ..  second arrived yesterday ..

i know the ones that drive the ship  and the captians...  i know them in  earth reality aswell as beond.. 

think my kids finished my work ?  and have now returned ...  ;)

w815

cuz ...  i aint just your avarage ... soul being.. come on a human could never solve as much as i have ...  and i been gump in....  ;D  so as not to go to fast...

they ended up interviening in my life to slow me down ...  imagine ... i dont have my family life .. my kids were seperated from me i have been forced to relocate ..  verry close to water .... i solve tranportation  ..  and  colapse on the floor ...  come back and the first thing i do is stand up stretch and focous my tacion .. to the wall and want to burn through it with my eyes ... 

hummmmm

shortly after that i was dipped in the streem ... and wore a borg eye ...  it was a verry ballanced experience ...  altho ...  it was a lot all at once with out knowing what the heck was going on ...

i can now talk back and forth ...  earth to ship ... and children to parents friends to leaders ..  ;)

it is wild... 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 01, 2009, 03:52:43 PM
I don't want to sidetrack but hope to inject something that helps.  I remember seeing somewhere that a Tesla coil produces high voltage and low amps only because the pancake coil is positioned at the base of tower coil.  I think it was Don Smith who said when the pancake is moved up near center the amps and volts are equal. 

GK you said your nst has output of 35mA, isn't that .035a x 6000v = 210. watts out?  I bet the input is less than 210 watts.  Here's a photo of one that is about 50% overunity right out of the box, zoom to read tag.  http://www.brightneonsigns.com/enlarge.html?http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/yhst-31811652982121_2077_60476857
Maybe I'm missing something.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 01, 2009, 07:47:52 PM
@bw,
No, you are not missing anything.
I have no labels or specs of this little monster. The dimensions are 1" x 1"x 3". I will put a meter on the input tonight. The sine wave out is really smooth too. I'll buy another one. This size is very convenient to hide.  8) The one you posted is 108 in and 180 out. :D

@ Sparks,
I will fire this into a loop structure. The heights of the TPUs with multiple layers can be variable caps just by verticle adjustment! I'll get some multiple sizes of coax and spin this up.

On another post it was suggested I take a stun gun and put a fat resistor from the output trafo to the feed back of the oscillator. Nice idea, right up there what I like to do. Since the STGN freely oscillates I don't want to perform this one just yet. A stungun with added gain or runaway? Not on the PC bench. :o


I don't want to sidetrack but hope to inject something that helps.  I remember seeing somewhere that a Tesla coil produces high voltage and low amps only because the pancake coil is positioned at the base of tower coil.  I think it was Don Smith who said when the pancake is moved up near center the amps and volts are equal. 

GK you said your nst has output of 35mA, isn't that .035a x 6000v = 210. watts out?  I bet the input is less than 210 watts.  Here's a photo of one that is about 50% overunity right out of the box, zoom to read tag.  http://www.brightneonsigns.com/enlarge.html?http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/yhst-31811652982121_2077_60476857
Maybe I'm missing something.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MACEDONIA CD on December 01, 2009, 09:12:16 PM
hello  <bw>
ist this a joke,,,,, hv pulse or tesla orpancake coils <,that is the ordenery  things  i thng<,what you thing <bw>all time here is  the  standard setups  and theory ......................  I STIL  DONT SEE vortex effeckt here
i thing the  vortex is the  <tpu>
what you thing how to spin somenthing how is no able to spin in one way <,THAT IS POINT IST  TO GET ALL THAT  SUPERIORS STRANGE  SETUPS IF IS HAPEND VORTEX  i thing  all stuff  all  words of steven explane  whill be in thats Setup <gyroscope effckt and dc  voltage..........................
if you whant ,bw> say, explane  if you whant about this  vortex  and what  you thing how  to make  some setup if you knowING  and you have idea
THANKS
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 01, 2009, 09:59:29 PM
Mac, I'm a baby in this but spin and resonance both fit in with nature, look at the shape of a snowflake, gotta be vibes to do that over and over again.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 01, 2009, 10:11:28 PM
    Tesla pancake coils are just tuned resonance sytems geometrically sharing the same field.  The non radiating scalar wave produced by the superposition of two tanks resonating out of phase at the same frequency is what I think will give us some effects of gravity gain etc.  Sm had upper and lower coils and two capacitors in the big tpu.  There near fields had to superimpose.  The input to the tanks appears to be inductively linked by the outer solenoid windings.
Tesla was utilizing gravity.  Why do you think he often referred to the match in mass of secondaries and primaries.  I was taught mass likes mass or induces attracts sucks in mass.  Don says put her down at the bottom becuse by all accounts we can gain some charged mass acceleration towards the center of the Earth. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: BEP on December 02, 2009, 01:29:57 AM
GK you said your nst has output of 35mA, isn't that .035a x 6000v = 210. watts out?  I bet the input is less than 210 watts.  Here's a photo of one that is about 50% overunity right out of the box, zoom to read tag.  http://www.brightneonsigns.com/enlarge.html?http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/yhst-31811652982121_2077_60476857
Maybe I'm missing something.

Careful folks. It is common for high voltage output devices to have labels that seem to add up to OU.

It is Over Marketing (OM) not OU. The output rating is for part of the time for a single pulse, not continuous. Shoot, if it were true I would be powering my whole neighborhood right now. I have several HV generators from clean-room devices. They even have 16 ga. solid wire for the output coil.

Their output rating is 8kV @ 30A  and the input adds up to a couple of hundred Watts. No OU there. In fact, they are only about 60% efficient.

Watts are not Watt-Hours  ;)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 02, 2009, 03:28:41 AM
@bep

    I dont think the majic is just in the hv hf exciter or catalyzing event.  For all we know Tesla was burning air and pumping up resonant circuits to very high currents wih plasma currents due to the catlyzing  ionization event in the gap.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: BEP on December 02, 2009, 03:35:52 AM
@bep

    I dont think the majic is just in the hv hf exciter or catalyzing event.  For all we know Tesla was burning air and pumping up resonant circuits to very high currents wih plasma currents due to the catlyzing  ionization event in the gap.

@Sparks

I think I've told you this before:

It scares me when I understand your post AND believe it possible  :D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 02, 2009, 10:25:45 AM
Forget about gap. Tesla used it only at start. The power is in resonance harmonics because they are sucking energy from Earth.So if you have resonance and learned how to get power from it without stopping it you will have the same amount of amps per volts.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 02, 2009, 05:56:55 PM
Is that amps per volts from the Earth system or the starting circuit?

Forget about gap. Tesla used it only at start. The power is in resonance harmonics because they are sucking energy from Earth.So if you have resonance and learned how to get power from it without stopping it you will have the same amount of amps per volts.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 02, 2009, 06:22:56 PM
GK this short video has Don Smith showing 604Joe his plasma tube coil.
 
http://www.youtube.com/user/604joe#p/u/4/xBF8VPYGl-g
I got two emails from 604Joe explaining that he was the ground in the video
and he said try using a bus bar instead and put a meter hitting the bus bar and
hitting coil spark flare.  He said "earth ground has negative charge so bus bar
allows for higher amperage current".  He also mentioned Don was not in good
shape when they met and he believes he passed away since then.
This video was removed a few days ago and I found it today back up.

h
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 02, 2009, 06:38:15 PM
the above video also had two comments that may be helpful here.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 02, 2009, 07:09:48 PM
Consider this,  ambient is easy to disturb so tiny power is enough to disturb it 38,000 times every
second with nst.  this disturbance also slams back to ambient 38,000 times every second, with power. 
The nst just pulls the rubber band tight, power is available as the rubber band returns back to rest position.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 02, 2009, 07:54:00 PM
Yep! No truer words spoken, Dude! Flux disconnect and reconnect. Smith, Kunel, Magnecoaster, Kapanadze.
I am working a spreadsheet to extract the winding lengths to wavelength divisors from Don's Ring picture. I start with his 35.1khz and run those findings into 38.5khz which is my NST. With this I can get an idea of the wire length by the height of the core also as a cross check. It seems to be ringing true.

But I am also starting to get the suspicion that it is not necessary. Looking for the common denominator in his wavelength to wire length configurations. I can see where the wirelength greater than wavelength fits, but the wavelength multiple lengths longer is where the short windings are the area I'm am looking at. If the wire is shorter you only get a percentage of the startup cycle which looks like a DC short.

http://www.enigmatic-consulting.com/Communications_articles/EnMnofields/No_time.html (http://www.enigmatic-consulting.com/Communications_articles/EnMnofields/No_time.html)

http://home.comcast.net/~olneytj/wavecalc.htm (http://home.comcast.net/~olneytj/wavecalc.htm)

Consider this,  ambient is easy to disturb so tiny power is enough to disturb it 38,000 times every
second with nst.  this disturbance also slams back to ambient 38,000 times every second, with power. 
The nst just pulls the rubber band tight, power is available as the rubber band returns back to rest position.

But on the other hand if we work with resonance the pushing system gets out of the way for the collapsing system. When the wire lengths are such that we can heterodyne harmonics into the push then the heterodyned effort should report back even greater. I learned this from the HOPI indian tribe. A form of synergy...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 02, 2009, 08:53:15 PM
Giant,  The wirelength Don uses on one device was ten feet.  I found this calculator.

http://www.csgnetwork.com/freqwavelengthcalc.html

I knew I didn't want to wind 25,558.44155844156 feet of wire so I divided by two then that by two
and kept going until I got to around 12.48 feet.  I made coils that length, then half that.  I don't know
if this is correct.  I also tried ten foot coils.   I could be a million miles off here, let me know.  I'm not so
sure length matters so long as L1 coil and L2 coil are the same length or 1/2, 1/4, etc of other coil.  Maybe
it's like the tuning fork and the hammer, the fork cares less about the size or shape of the hammer, it will
ring at it's frequency and so will the L2 fork if it is near and on the same frequeny or an octive (1/2 wave)
up or down.  I don't know if any of this is right but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn last night.

Thanks for the 1/4 wavelength link.  More magic there.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 02, 2009, 09:37:59 PM
The two tuned coils created greater impedance through harmonic resonance? Wow that was a Deja Vu moment.

http://www.alcorn-energy.com/tech4.htm (http://www.alcorn-energy.com/tech4.htm)
Quote
Whenever power factor correction is applied to a distribution network, bringing together capacitance and inductance, there will always be a frequency at which the capacitors are in parallel resonance with the supply.

If this condition occurs at, or close to, one of the harmonics generated by any solid state control equipment, then large harmonic currents can circulate between the supply network and the capacitor equipment, limited only by the damping resistance in the circuit. Such currents will add to the harmonic voltage disturbance in the network causing an increased voltage distortion.

This results in an unacceptably high voltage across the capacitor dielectric coupled with an excessive current through all the capacitor ancillary components. The most common order of harmonics are 5th, 7th, 11th and 13th but resonance can occur at any frequency.

AVOIDING RESONANCE

There are a number of ways to avoid resonance when installing capacitors. On larger systems it may be possible to re-position the proposed capacitor installation onto another part of the system.

The same value of kvar installed at high voltage rather than at low voltage may eliminate a resonant difficulty, or there may be other low voltage busbars where there is no harmonic generating load. Varying the output rating of the capacitor bank will alter the resonant frequency.

With multi stage capacitor switching there will be a different resonant frequency for each stage. Changing the number of switching stages may avoid resonance at each stage of switching.

OVERCOMING RESONANCE

If resonance cannot be avoided an alternative solution is required.

A reactor must be connected in series with each capacitor switching section such that the capacitor/reactor combination is inductive at the dangerous frequencies but capacitive at fundamental frequency. To achieve this the capacitor and series connected reactor must have a tuning frequency below the lowest order of harmonic to be experienced, which is usually the 5th.

This means the tuning frequency is usually in the range of 175Hz to 230Hz, althouth the actual frequency will depend upon the magnitude of the harmonic currents present. The actual tuning frequency will be varied to suit the specific needs of each case.

The inclusion of a reactor in the capacitor circuit increases the fundamental voltage across the capacitor in the order of 5 to 9% in addition to the harmonic voltages previously mentioned.

There is a whole science of Nethanderalism! Friggin' stupified.

Well, well, well! I knew I had seen this in this view before. Same as Tidal waves! Can you believe these idiots want to squash overunity by grounding or hampering resonance!

This thread so aptly named...

Simply the interaction of 2 coils in resonance. Don even said 'The circuit blocks talk with each other'.  He also talked about 3rds, fifths, and sevenths. I just found his divisors are compliments 3, 5, and 7s.
With a core height of 2 inches the primary turns are 5" in length. The secondary is 6" in turn length. The snake biting it's tail.

Some days I wake up better than other days.

Yep BW, you're right again. Have a beer. I am.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 02, 2009, 11:03:37 PM
Remember the folks working so hard to conceal overunity count their profits in billions per hour right now and
will do ANYTHING to keep it that way.  This is why open source is so very important.  When the secrets are
all out things will change.  The energy folks who control governments will find themselves holding many
barrels of hazardous waste material.  Folks won't have to work half their time to buy fuel.  A lot of jobs
will evaporate but if we have no energy expenses we won't need to work so much anyway.  Just get a
fattie and chill with the extra time.

  Dangerous stuff.
Very powerful buttheads running that show.  Just follow the money trail.  The Big Butthead J.P.Morgan told Tesla his wireless was better but he couldn't put a "meter on it".   We've been slaves to those asses too long. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MACEDONIA CD on December 02, 2009, 11:16:55 PM
helo  <<bw> i see plasma  butt  what is the resolts  i thing is only sparking how you whill coneckt the load  <real>  if make like  don smith
you know  whell that is no real IST traid this put load and nothing
no real load can be  working there <that is the problem ??? 
THANKS
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 03, 2009, 12:26:19 AM
You fast charge caps and slow draw off.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 03, 2009, 12:47:14 AM
You fast charge caps and slow draw off.

sounds like a REALLY  safe way to do it from a tiny source ... and simple i might add

ist
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 03, 2009, 06:07:12 AM
Hello all,

Gentlemen,

would you please find the pictures that Mannix made a long time ago and finally think about to use them???

ONLY HIS PICTURES ARE THE REAL TPU PICTURES!!!

Thank you for reading this "historical" post.

Have nice dreams about a TPU as I have ,ha,ha.

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 03, 2009, 01:28:43 PM
Hello all,

Gentlemen,

would you please find the pictures that Mannix made a long time ago and finally think about to use them???

ONLY HIS PICTURES ARE THE REAL TPU PICTURES!!!

Thank you for reading this "historical" post.

Have nice dreams about a TPU as I have ,ha,ha.

Otto

this is silly ness...

lol

i can build the thing tonnes of ways... perhaps you are missing the simplicity of this device ...

lol

i think i have mananged to get a NUMBER OF DIFFRENT TYPES OF KICKS ...

so ya!

dont go telling me and others .. there but 1 REAL  way ...

infact i have yet to see ANYONE else come to the conclusion

i dont need to list the ways of getting kicks .. do i ?

w

1 kick
1 tuned kick
1 tuned kick in the presentes of a magnetic feild ..
is this one the one that makes it jump ... hummmmm
1 kick over many times in a cap  is this how kicks add up the SIMPLE way
2 freq kick combineing .. is this where you get it to bang ?
a npn kick a pnp kick a synced npn and pnp
im sure i can find more ...

infact you get on kicks and off kicks ..  yikes

NOW I WILL NOT LISTEN TO PEOPLE THAT TELL ME THERE BUT 1 WAY ..

when i know for fact there many ...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 03, 2009, 02:06:52 PM
Hello all,

@IS

once a guy said that in a TPU is NO core. OK for me!
another time a guy said that in a TPU is NOT a Mobius. OK for me!
you said the 3 stack is a silly ness...OK for me!!

Please understand you and all the people out there: I DONT CARE ABOUT WHAT YOURE WRIGHTING!!!

I always had and still have my "program".

Everybody has the right for his oppinion and I respect that!!

Not to forget:

IS your pictures are real beauties but a schematic tells me much more.

Please dont think Im attacing you or somebody else. We have more then enough fights and wars on this planet.

Otto

PS: gratulations!! So you have made the TPU. Share with us!! Im only a little man....and I would love to build it but as Im not qualified enough and not clever enough I would love to learn how to build a TPU.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 03, 2009, 02:16:31 PM
can we now call it what it truely is ...

teslas tpu ...

the TESLA POWER UNIT....

THANK YOU!

W815
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 03, 2009, 02:28:31 PM
Hello all,

@IS

OK, if you say Teslas TPU, its OK for me ( I hope SM doesnt read this!)

Now, you know the world needs a source of clean energy, ...bla, bla....

Share with us. Oh, I forgot. MONEY!!! Sorry, I even dont have money to buy fire woods to have a warn garage when Im working on my coils but it doesnt matter. I love my work so..never mind.

Heeeey, rich people, give a few millions to our member here so he can then maybe share with us how to build a TPU!!!

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wings on December 03, 2009, 02:49:20 PM
Im only a little man....)





http://expliki.org/wiki/Toroidal_Power_Unit/Otto_Sabljaric

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 03, 2009, 03:03:46 PM
Hello all,

@wings

WOW!! never seen it before.

But Im still a little man and trust me its OK for me.

For me a "big man" is a person that helps other people. I have met 2 of such people in my home. What an onour for me!! You cant imagine!

This 2 helping the poor people in Africa......better for me to be quiet.

This are real big people. Not me. Im only a little nobody trying to do my best.

Otto

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 03, 2009, 04:01:48 PM
Here's an interesting link on bloch wall connect/disconnect.
http://community-2.webtv.net/@HH!58!7B!CC828678B860/SkyVessel/MagneticNeutral/

also check out this guy, looks like he read Don's book too.

http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS140822+04-Feb-2008+PRN20080204

bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 03, 2009, 04:13:09 PM
Hello all,

@wings

WOW!! never seen it before.

But Im still a little man and trust me its OK for me.

For me a "big man" is a person that helps other people. I have met 2 of such people in my home. What an onour for me!! You cant imagine!

This 2 helping the poor people in Africa......better for me to be quiet.

This are real big people. Not me. Im only a little nobody trying to do my best.

Otto

otto  please ...  you do know better ... 

i am on that tooooooo  ...  sheesh im 1 kid with a penny less budget ... i have posted ... i have shared ...  I SEE NO REPLICATIONS .... 

maybe it works ..

AND BTW SM gets more credit that you know .. he was a real man... and released EXACTLLY HOW IT WORKS ...  and where does he send credits to ...  of course ... TESLA

w
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 03, 2009, 06:21:18 PM
Yep. The bloch wall has the possibilties to manipulate.
If we have a large circuit compared to a small field then the Bloch wall will be small and we have not control or use of it.
If we have a small circuit compared to a large field then the Bloch wall will be large and we can address its properties. Now in this Small circuit / large field the Block wall can be disconnected and reconnected much like Kunel. Now lets throw in harmonic resonance. The Bloch wall moves past a given point as the tide oscillates back and forth. That can be managed also. So this gives a sliding vortex within the confines of Earth's flux. The bigger the field the more pressure of North and South at our vantage point. Like the size of the U.S.S. Eldridge.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Experiment (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Experiment)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Rainbow (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Rainbow)
It was suggest that I read Morris Jessup, Carlos Miguel Allende, and Varo.

--gk.

We need more prairie dogs like O'Keefe N. Douglas that pop up.

Here's an interesting link on bloch wall connect/disconnect.
http://community-2.webtv.net/@HH!58!7B!CC828678B860/SkyVessel/MagneticNeutral/

also check out this guy, looks like he read Don's book too.

http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS140822+04-Feb-2008+PRN20080204

bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 03, 2009, 06:56:06 PM
Right-on Giantdude

I gotta wonder what happened with him.  News everywhere in Feb.'08 then not a word since. 

check out this thing  http://www.aquapol.co.uk/index.php?go=home
click "products"  then click "advantages"   This has been around since the '80's.  Don is right.
Sometimes it is looking right at you.

energy is everywhere, in the water(googe Masaru Emoto), air, earth, space, etc.   There are
likely many ways to harvest it.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 03, 2009, 08:38:02 PM
check out this thing  http://www.aquapol.co.uk/index.php?go=home
click "products"  then click "advantages"   This has been around since the '80's.  Don is right.
Sometimes it is looking right at you.

Kinetic 'Shock and awe'.

I have Don's ring wired up from the spreadsheet I made. I have an NST @ 38khz, 6kv sine.
What I have to put together now is a sine channel from my Keely controller into a varister/microwave trafo supply to boost it up then into the ring. This is the way I get a HV sine wave of variable frequency. I can then test how close my specs are to the NST freq. and Don's specs into the spreadsheet. Setting up a harmonic resonance test. The missing spec I didnt put in was the distance from the far end of the secondary to the start of the feedback windings. Don found this point with a neon light. But that is only seven windings so it can be rewrapped at the appropriate place. This position is based on the resonant place of the incoming frequency and of the tuned primary/secondary resonance. The feedback pumps it at the right place of the cycle. So I build a bigaxx magnetic spreadsheet with one hand rule.

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 04, 2009, 04:52:06 AM
The reason for the square pulses was to effect the copper at very high speed to reproduce the spark gap in electronic means. A bunch of us have succeeded at that. That was the intro into electrostatics. Now the HV sine gives the electrostatics the umph with one frequency. The squares are not rythmic enough to get a smooth harmonic resonance across the circuit as Don Smith points out. With 2 low impedance coils sitting close to each other the spacing gives storage. That is the capacitance. Now the configuration is setup as a lc tank with 1 wire and 1 frequency. The resonance creates the high impedance so the coils don't appear as shorts. As the setup that creates the magnetic field is hit at the right time the swaying occurs. The Bloch wall is moved to and fro in some units. In others it is held constant and large which creates the spin. Look at the field in the Bloch wall (even Ed Leedskalnin shows it on his Sun Clock). And still in others it is broken and healed.
The secret is to move the Bloch wall, spread the Bloch wall and let it snap back, or put perturbations on the field to cause harmonic overload. These things have plagued EEs for decades and corrupted their circuit operations. Too bad. The tidal waves of energy were crashing around them all the time..

--Giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 04, 2009, 09:26:14 AM
Hello all,

@IS

you have my full respect because your a hard worker and youre showing - sharing!!! I mean it!!!

But your posts here are a little bit.....you have to much .... ( dots) and to much huuuuuum.

Try to make posts so they look "nicer", to say it in this way. You can even post your theories, if you have because NOBODY can say your wright or wrong. Only the people who made a working device can say somebody is right or wrong with his work or theory!

Have you EVER seen that I said  to a poster that he is wrong or .....NO!

About knowledge in this new technologies we dont have to discuss because as I know we have here educated people and on the other hand people that dont have any education. Im in the middle of this.

Has anybody of the high educated people found the TPU solution?

Trust me, the answer is NO!

You could read a lot of theories but they ALL missed the point because the TPU uses a well know effect but this effect was never mentioned or if mentioned, nobody has wasted his time to thnk about it.

So, what I wanted to say is that you all have the same chance. Educated or not!!

I hope I dont bother to much the members here.

Otto

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Reisender on December 04, 2009, 11:11:45 AM
Otto, here is the picture!
I think that this configuration produces 3 rotating magnetic fields. 3 Tornados!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 04, 2009, 12:25:13 PM
Hello all,

@Reisender

THANK YOU!!

@All

would the TPU builders maybe think about this drawing?

a core??

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 04, 2009, 01:42:53 PM
yay ...

i built another one last night ..

i used some heavy wire ...  i was given 60 feet of 8 ga 23.3g / foot  i used 10 feet as collector ...

i will wind the jt control over it ...

have fun boys and slow girls ...

ist!

la de da...


i made the ring 7 inches .. 5 turns..

you do know of my jt ring designs do you not ?  lol   maybe you all find there effects intresting ....

mine ramp up ... all by there selves ... by vitrue of winding design .. and i dont need to interleave the controls...  plus ... they AINT air core ... lol

what bout the father sun and ghost ...  electricty magitisum and gravitic ... hummm  caused from 2 feilds .. rotated oppisite ...

they built the contact machine backward!  dont ya think ....  this proves to me they have a flawed understanding ... or they would have built it right ...   why spin all 3 when you only need to spin 2 .
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 04, 2009, 02:26:39 PM
so otto ... remember your test..

what are the results if the wire was  coiled so that the control kicks 5 places on the wire ... per turn .. insted of 1 ..... then if i used a real fine wire  for my control 5 kick points per turn imagine 2000 turns ... bifillar .. jt ... flyback goes to collector input ...  duh... same as my other designs ... i yi yi

hummmmm

ist

otto i do wonder if ... you have done laps on the control ... perhaps i will configure it as my jts that ramp up .....  and just drop a trigger some where ... or wind it bifillar ...

i will try to match it as best as i can to the  mass of the collector .. this will take trial and error to find the correct size of the ring and amount of wires and turns ...  basically it will work no matter what .. it will work better tuned .. but its natural .. and you dont need to tune it so much ..

3055 will work .. or tip 3055 are better as J HAS LEARNED ..

yes otto im sorry ... i do not pick your work apart ...  i know better ...  i just like things simple ...  thats the way the good life is ...  my life is quite simple ... i dont have a lot of money ... but it keeps my thoughts ... SIMPLE... i dont mind...  cuz this world has verry little to do with money ... it only gets you things ... you most likely really dont need .... as i have learned ... im happy to be able to share what i have rediscovered .. as our thoughts are not our own ...  sure ego will get in the way .. it always does ... but this is what makes us ... us! so be it !   were 1 in the same but independent to our point of views ... and this is why the zodiac .. we are broken into groups... we are in tune with signs that share ... it is entanglement ...  makes us a whole ...

yes all this goes deep ... there is no simple final answer ..

w

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 04, 2009, 04:26:41 PM
Deep is right.  VERY DEEP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAvzsjcBtx8

Happy thoughts...off grid....free.....good...peace
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 04, 2009, 06:07:56 PM
Deep is right.  VERY DEEP
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAvzsjcBtx8

Happy thoughts...off grid....free.....good...peace

please wear a smile ..

as we learn about this place ..  it is soooo much more than we were lead to beleave it is ...

thank you for the snow flakes ...

william
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 04, 2009, 07:16:15 PM
You're welcome and thank you Mr. I.S.  Uncovering these truths is so very cool.
They are everywhere too, all around us.  Some folks work so very hard to hide them but
the stars are lining up for change.  Good beats bad in the end.  Hiding the truth is not good.
Trying to control others is not good. 
Some are paid to discredit the truth.  It is happening right now with global warming. 
Follow the money Mr Gore. 
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/24/taking_liberties/entry5761180.shtml
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/globalwarming/6636563/University-of-East-Anglia-emails-the-most-contentious-quotes.html

Thank you to everyone here for sharing what you learn.  Much of this is new for me but I
read and learn from you all.  Thank you, peace, happiness, success, and good things to all. 
bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 04, 2009, 07:20:24 PM
@Otto & Reisender,
I see 1 freq but 3 tanks and that would give 3 seperate resonations. These would be very close to same frequency. Two things are created here, the capacitance due to the spacing of the windings and the inductance due to the differing wire lengths.


I built 2 loops of coax with caps. I fire the grounding sheeth and the caps charge up off of the center wire.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 04, 2009, 08:00:15 PM
yea i can build 1 of them from a aa and a jt ... powering 2 cfl curcuits .. then to your drawing ... why not...

i have all the junk ...  tonnes of coax

yep ... bet it works tickity boo ...

ist!

but if i decide to do it properly...  well ...  define properly first ...  and find the root...
aside that ...  i can tune the jt to replace the CFL.... imagine ... lol

then flip flop round 7 ...  hummmmm

no tank in my design ... why ? lol 

yes of course i can explain ..

first KICK  you get ... kablooie... lol 

as well no super high freq .. such as cfl ... agin why? 

can i pick you brains ...   

my core .. and i KEEP MY KICK MAGNETIC... but for now im building otto tpu's  and gk's unit ...  i think when built properly and used properly EVERYONE HAS A PLACE...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 05, 2009, 04:31:22 AM
http://www.gamaniak.com/embed.swf?file=http://embed.gamaniak.com/vid/descente-cote-buggy-rollin.mp4&image=http://media1.gamaniak.com/vid/tn/descente-cote-buggy-rollin.mp4.jpg&showdigits=true&controlbar=over&link=http://www.gamaniak.com/video-3625-descente-cote-buggyrollin.html&displayclick=link
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 05, 2009, 02:56:05 PM
That's a wild ride Mr. Giant-smasher, thanks.   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: EMdevices on December 05, 2009, 06:00:18 PM
GK, is that you?   wow, what a thrill ride !!!     I'm glad to see he has control in those tight turns,  I would have flown right over the edge or into those pylons,  ouch !!!    :o
EM
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 05, 2009, 10:51:29 PM
   Instead of wasting all that heat reducing drag you actively change the drag into energy storage the trek back up the mountain will be a whole lot easier.  Put the heat in a hot air balloon bubble up coast back down to the top of the mountain.
Should be a self runner. ;D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 06, 2009, 03:21:12 AM
look how im gonna charge the bigger modles..  this will run off an gadget ist jt power can .... lol

i like it ... this is basic OTTO with  TWIST  of JT  and a HINT  of SM combined  with a whole lot of ME ..

64

i love my new H hat ... 

ist!   smile .. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 06, 2009, 04:03:54 AM
A buddy sent that to me. Did you catch yourself weaving the turns?
My mother told me to 'Never play in traffic'.

GK, is that you?   wow, what a thrill ride !!!     I'm glad to see he has control in those tight turns,  I would have flown right over the edge or into those pylons,  ouch !!!    :o
EM
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 07, 2009, 03:22:59 AM
He would wish his mother told him not to play in traffic if a truck popped around the curve when he needed both lanes.  That is totally wild.  Thought the bike was about to mess him up.  NO BRAKES!!! 

Seen this coil yet?   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sahi7zDf8Mw&feature=channel
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 07, 2009, 05:38:47 AM
I have now and blown away.
The future is coming fast...
http://www.inventist.com/orbitwheel/ (http://www.inventist.com/orbitwheel/)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 07, 2009, 03:17:40 PM
Marco Rodin's work explains much in nature.  I learned of his work about a year ago.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 07, 2009, 05:30:41 PM
Seen this coil yet?   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sahi7zDf8Mw&feature=channel

The guy is trying to take out a patent on Rodin Coil!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 07, 2009, 06:28:30 PM
I think we can still build it and use it even if Marco gets a patent, we just couldn't market it. 
Marco's math creates a pattern that replicates itself in every direction.  Like nature.  Perfect 3-D math.
For me it explained the lines on the outside of a vortex, plus a lot more. 
I think the military has dibs on it but I don't know for sure.
He has many videos on youtube, here's one
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7911972442098545165#

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 07, 2009, 09:17:13 PM
@bw
You missed the point. The guy in the video is Jamie Burroff? So, he can not help himself to Rodins property!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 07, 2009, 10:14:52 PM
Correct.   Thought you mean Marco was getting a patent.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 07, 2009, 10:41:01 PM
From Jamie's comments next to the video:

" I have filed a provisional patent on this new coil design this morning. You are free to make this coil for personal use but if you want to make this for commercial use or for sale you will need to license it from me to help fund ongoing research. Thank you.  "
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 08, 2009, 12:12:21 AM
well

this is bs ... 

it is still rodins design ... lol

silly humans ...  all he did was devide the wires lol

now it is his own .. my god!  lol

you do know rodins coil is far more than how the coils is wound .. 

some are soooo dumb..   why dont he pattend creation too .. ? 
he thinks he owns rodins work ..

simple human minds ...  got something and have 0 understanding ... ooouuuucccchhhh !

ist!

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: HopeForHumanity on December 08, 2009, 05:29:45 AM
That patent is not worth anything.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 08, 2009, 04:29:36 PM
Give 1 million Chinese 1 million spools of wire and this is done in a 1 hour while the rest of the human monkeys will still be guarding their tree houses.
Never ends.

Did no one see Rodin's math examples in the crop circles? It is refreshing to see such a peaceful soul doing the right thing. It is not just the coil but the whole supporting environment paradigm change with it. I see total synchronicity here. This explanation is clearer and more concise too. 4 hours long and worth it. The coil, operational geometry with the field vectors is very well conceived and explained. I'll have to post on youtube if the weight of the magnetic sphere is apparent when the coil is lifted.

@IST,
Marco stated he ran into very high levels of ignorance at the top and giving out this information was the best way. Nothing will stop this type of work and the timing is perfect.

The connection is really close:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbvdG8cqhOE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MbvdG8cqhOE)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwA7UT65qy4&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwA7UT65qy4&feature=related)

@bw,
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7911972442098545165# (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7911972442098545165#)
1:41:41 is the coil connection of the field, the math, the geometry, the polarity.
Marco mentions the space between the 2 windings is positive, the storage of 3, 9, 6. Same numbering as Keely mentions.

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 08, 2009, 05:09:09 PM
126= 369  we know what this is ... right ...  tesla told us ...  if you knew the magnificance of 3 6 and 9 you would have the answer to the univirse ... or you would open the door to discovery that lay ahead!

lol
enjoy!

thank q

w815H

btw there 2 of us ....  1 does science ...  the other  speirtuality ...  william and michael

a good friend of mine ....

smile!   

i would think michael is  M999_? and i have another dear friend M777   she can talk to your brain .. and you dont even know ...

case and point many are returning ...  not just 1 .....   the whole judgeing councel  ...  how could a councel judge if they never lived here ?   

hummm   it aint the end of the cycle for nuttin ... of course it dont end it never does ... 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 08, 2009, 09:45:35 PM
   Rodin's math is a base three system.   Nice and easy.  Why we use base 10 is because we have 10 fucking fingers.  I'm sure we are not the smartest critters in the Universe but is that our fault?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 09, 2009, 12:26:56 AM
We have 8 fingers.
The rest are thumbs. :D

   Rodin's math is a base three system.   Nice and easy.  Why we use base 10 is because we have 10 fucking fingers.  I'm sure we are not the smartest critters in the Universe but is that our fault?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on December 09, 2009, 03:39:30 AM
   Rodin's math is a base three system.   Nice and easy.  Why we use base 10 is because we have 10 fucking fingers.  I'm sure we are not the smartest critters in the Universe but is that our fault?

Base 11, you forgot the zero. Without the zero we would still be in the dark ages counting in roman numerals.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 09, 2009, 04:37:25 PM
OK. Looks like every one has forgoteen about Bloch wall by now.
When some people were saying something is starnge about numbers 9
and 11. On number 9:
9 X 1 = 9
9 X 2 = 18, 1 + 8 = 9
9 X 3 = 27, 2 + 7 = 9
etc

9 ^ 2 = 81, 8 + 1 = 9
9 ^ 3 = 729, 7 + 2 + 9 = 18, 1 + 8 = 9
9 ^ 4 = 6561, ---> 9
etc

on #11


11 X 1 = 11 , 1 + 1 = 2
11 X 2 = 22 , 2 + 2 = 4
11 X 3 = 33 , 3 + 3 = 6
11 X 4 = 44 , 4 + 4 = 8
11 X 5 = 55 , 5 + 5 = 1
11 X 6 = 66 , 6 + 6 = 3
11 X 7 = 77 , 7 + 7 = 5
11 X 8 = 88 , 8 + 8 = 7
11 X 9 = 99 , 9 + 9 = 9
11 X 10 = 110 , 1 + 1 + 0 = 2
etc




Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 09, 2009, 06:26:44 PM
Isn't 9 the bloch wall itself in Rodin's math? 

It's been more than a year since I learned his math, maybe I need to re-watch. 
From what I remember 3 & 6 oscillate with 9 at the center.  that is one system. 
the other system(circuit) is 124 and 875.
I think that was the doubling circuit or system.   I gotta review. 

I do remember if you could stand on any number on his coil or graph that you
have a repeating circuit or set of numbers in any direction you point.
Nature fits this same pattern
I understand best by comparing dissimilar things.  Diode=check valve etc.
consider this.  if you pull a vacuum in a large tank at sea level then open
the valve to ambient what happens?  Air rushes into the tank with huge force
until the ambient pressure is the same inside and outside the tank.  Works in
reverse too.  Put pressure in tank then open valve.   It will always return to
ambient.   This is how our tank circuits should work.  Don says it takes very little
to disturb ambient and what you disturb will always return to ambient with force. 
It's easy to disturb like the tiny push needed to keep a swing or pendulum going
when you match it's frequency.   The weight of the swing does the work of pulling
the vacuum or pumping the pressure into the tank.  The faster the better.
There you have it.  Bloch wall= 9     
I just wish I knew more electronics.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 09, 2009, 06:41:17 PM
9 is RECONNECT...

3 will be 1 spin 6 the other ...

do do do  3.<.> 6..  do do do ......  ....  (.)9

devide spin and reconnect...   

ist!

rodins ... colours  freqs....   carriers? lol

so in short wind up to resonance of object ...  and COLPASE THE WAVE ... object ends up at 9 ON RECONNECT...  : )  basically you want to de spinn something ... and draw pos to 1 side and neg to other ...  and re join it ... through mass to mass resonance ... of 3 and 6 on 9 ...

anyhow ...  i have WAYS FAR IN ADVANCE OF THIS ONE ...  ; ) includeing transmitting and recieving via sclar .. back to electro magnetic .. i dont see why it wont work ...  egyptian toys ... operate very similar ... lol

thank you!

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 09, 2009, 08:06:48 PM
Yes,
9 is the Bloch wall.
Think about this: When we see a tornado we only see the matter swirling around. But the spin is magnetic. Same below as above. So what is flowing throught the center to match up with Rodin's recirculating model? In this sentence the ground level is the Bloch wall or just above 0 in Rodin's model. In the 2 liter bottle tornado the air flows up through the center. Same as Schauberger vortex.
That is why the Rodin appeared here. I am still pursuing the Bloch wall model.
Had to clear off the bench to make room for the next cluster of builds coming on board. Plus I am adding modules to previous builds.

Let me explain my bench. I get an idea or see a specification then jump on it. It has to produce something or proof. Then I am onto another. I don't spend alot of time trying to produce OU. Seems people try to beat a dead horse with possibilities or make a small idea blossom into 'The Answer'. There are enough tests out there to piggyback off of without duplication. I extract the nuggets and throw out the trash. This beast is ellusive and made of many specifications. The Rodin coil has cetain tangible aspects to it that pertain acrosss the board for this pursuit. It is the electronic version of Schauberger and this IS a big deal. But alas one part. Rodin mentions 3,6,9 same as Keely and this IS a big deal. Rodin mentions musical notes, chords and harmonics same as Keely and this IS a big deal. He mentions the Poynting vectors and their specific alignment same as Don Smith and this IS a big deal. He mentiones the storage in the gap / ghost winding just like Don Smith and this IS a big deal. He mentions the missing energy field in the third winding of the DNA just like the artifact that Dotto and Rife were chasing and this IS a big deal. He mentions the matrix map and photonic value of the created field just like the photonic camoflague suit in the movie 'Predator' and this IS a big deal.

In essence the phrase I coined: 'Frequency equals Matter' and this IS a big deal. Not matter what size system one looks at this field is there. Matter is the interference of frequencies same as photon production just pick your frequency level.

--Giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on December 09, 2009, 09:03:32 PM
Had to clear off the bench to make room for the next cluster of builds coming on board. Plus I am adding modules to previous builds.

Let me explain my bench. I get an idea or see a specification then jump on it. It has to produce something or proof. Then I am onto another. I don't spend alot of time trying to produce OU. Seems people try to beat a dead horse with possibilities or make a small idea blossom into 'The Answer'. There are enough tests out there to piggyback off of without duplication. I extract the nuggets and throw out the trash. This beast is ellusive and made of many specifications.

In essence the phrase I coined: 'Frequency equals Matter' and this IS a big deal. Not matter what size system one looks at this field is there. Matter is the interference of frequencies same as photon production just pick your frequency level.

--Giantkiller.

Yes, yes and again yes. That is how I am doing also. Find the effects then worry about putting them all together but I concentrate on the SM TPU's. It's a challenge thing. Effects, observation, logical deduction and process of elimination. Oh, and no fear to be wrong and no need to be always right makes you good to change direction when required after more elements of the puzzle are in hand. There is no other way. lol
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 09, 2009, 09:15:38 PM
i like to be worng ..   this way we get the true answer when we do fianlly find it .. and discover it is only the answer to more and more .. and the more we as a human race move forward in time our ansewers come from deeper and deeper back in time till we finally get the correct true understanding .. and as we journy this path the cosmos is designed to aid this process through your shock ya's lol as the planet hits a resonant point or harmonic  so do you ....  know what i mean ... ?

i dont need to know all just know enough where to look for more as i find myself in need of more .. 

if that makes sence ...  we are all in this life this time around .. to over come the last things needed to graduate to the next level this will come no matter what this is nature ...

some are awake early ...  wonder where they stand...

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 09, 2009, 10:06:55 PM
I see exactly why 6 and 9 but I still must comprehend why 3.Hmm or maybe not.... is that really so easy ? I'm astonished

What do you think meant by the number 3 ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 09, 2009, 11:14:37 PM
What do you think meant by the number 3 ?

Any number who's sideways addition is divisible by 3, is divisible by 3!

I don't know the significance of this statement so don't look for a hidden meaning.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 09, 2009, 11:57:25 PM
LOL! I don't know either but try this one.
In this work plan I follow I can now look back at my shelves and see the aspect or nugget of the that try. There is just too much to remember operationally. But physically I can scan the builds and see the new pattterns created or adjust parameters to form the next conclusion. Or when I see a new piece of information I can fit that into some build. Studying and building or the other way around. It is all good.
In the end I will have disassociated the quartz and pulled the gold nuggets out of the sand. Just like Keely did.
At this point, anybody who has been following along, should see the impossible is possible. By frequency alone.

@ist,
Good post.

-- ;)

Any number who's sideways addition is divisible by 3, is divisible by 3!

I don't know the significance of this statement so don't look for a hidden meaning.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 10, 2009, 12:04:19 AM
If at the same time that this forum started, the computers had been given to monkeys, by now they would have typed the complete works of Shakespear and here we are still scatching our heads about an OU device. LOL.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 10, 2009, 12:08:02 AM
Let me pull this wrench from the gears:
If resonance had been applied from the start of the forum alot of people would be done.
Does anybody realize how many devices on the shelf right now are so close or done?

--

If at the same time that this forum started, the computers had been given to monkeys, by now they would have typed the complete works of Shakespear and here we are still scatching our heads about an OU device. LOL.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 10, 2009, 01:04:26 AM
You almost have to see much of the video to get it but like gk said 4+ hours and worth it.
I'm sorry if I mentioned something I shouldn't but like gk says there are similarities in this and
Don's generators and the work of many many others.  I thought it may be helpful, that's all.
 

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 10, 2009, 02:14:53 AM
Forest,  you asked how six ties in with three and nine.  this is the "flux circuit"  3 and 6 oscillate
back and fourth, one plus the other always equals nine, they both hinge on nine, it is at the center
piviot or "bloch wall" 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 10, 2009, 09:54:21 AM
Ok,I have troubles with Bloch wall understanding but last day I realized that Tesla might thought about these numbers because of it's "construction".

3 - it is center tap coil probably or maybe a bloch wall

6 - it i  coil in one direction (for me it's right wound)
 9 - it is coil in opposite direction (for me it's left wound)

folow actual writing of these numbers

Looks like Don Smith is right and I think we are talking about the same.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 10, 2009, 07:10:47 PM
I'll tell what I have found hoping this helps lead to the answer.
I think I may see where power may be captured.  I have wound
two identical air coils using one strand of house wiring.  I use
a capacitor made of a sheet of bronze (couldn't find copper local),
a sheet of aluminum, and a sheet of plastic between.  I have two
spark gaps, one spark plug and a jacobs ladder made of welding rod.
I position the coils at right angle to capacitor plates.  Then I connect
one wire my nst to one end of one coil.  To the other end of that coil,
I connect a jumper wire to one side of my capacitor.  I run another jumper
wire from that same side to my jacobs ladder gap.  To the other side of
the gap I connect the second wire of my nst.

Now for the coil on the other side of my capacitor.
I connect one wire from the end of the coil to the unused plate on my
capacitor.  From the other end of that same coil I connect a jumper to my
other spark gap(old spark plug).  To the other end of the spark plug is connected
to an earth ground. 

Here's what I get with this setup.  My nst runs a good steady spark on jacobs
ladder then "bam"  I get very strong spark on my spark plug and my nst stops
at the same time.  I feel like this spark is the real power.   I guess I need a diode or
something to keep back current or whatever it is from killing my nst.  it restarts
after shutting down when i restart it. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 10, 2009, 10:34:59 PM
@bw,
I have used a neon from a flourescent starter. I get small spikes on the scope. I put in an open gap or just 2 wires and the spikes got larger.

--Giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 11, 2009, 12:06:50 AM
GK   I realize what I described above veers away from Don's units.  I'm just looking for what
works.   I guess Don and others are forced to omit some steps but I'm convinced we'll get there.

I'm grounding to a true earth ground rod on my L2 spark gap, that spark seems to carry a
lot more punch.   It's also the one that makes the nst kick off.   

The guy I referenced awhile back in the video with Don and the plasma tube said to get real
power use a bus bar, I'm just using a heavy copper wire attached to a copper rod driven deep into
the earth.

I've got no scope and very little in meters or tools for testing and even less knowlege in electronics.
I use neon test lamps a lot in this.  The spark gap in L1 seems to have a lot to do with the power in L2.
I've used a jumper and pointed screw to play with the arc length etc. and noticed at points the power
seemed to increase (my neon test lamp glows brighter) and the radio in my shop gets weird so something
is changing with the gap.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 11, 2009, 04:50:00 AM
@bw,
Yes. Because the spark is Tesla's high speed voltage / high speed current. The coil can not conduct that fast and the energy is produced sideways to the next coil. More cannonball analogy. See how you can use a low impedance coil? The speed energy makes it look like a brick wall.

The spark gap is really huge white noise / static like discharges. Very non uniform. That is why the radio sounds like that. And those discharges will hurt your pc.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 11, 2009, 05:16:25 AM
  The spark gap must be geometrically placed within the field of the resonant circuit so that it responds not only to the electric polarization between the electrodes (which should be insulated) but also to the magnetic field produced by the inductor.  This feedback will make alot less jitter in the input pulse.  Grumpy said that he used ultraviolet light to stabilize the spark gap.  Tesla once demonstrated one of his magnetic disruptors and when the spark gap was geometrically placed within the magnetic field warp produced by the inductors there was alot of gain in the circuit.  Plasma creates a field of electrons that circulate about the ionized atom cores forming a giant atom.  The electron cloud is accelerated in such a manner as to magnetically confine the positive ions as well as insulate the proton cores.  The net charge of the plasma is neutral.  The magnetic field  anomally produced by the electron cloud acceleration of course is never neutral.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 11, 2009, 05:31:54 AM
oops my ring tpu fryed my power supply ... lol

i found 1 freq and dc  and a magnet to make it radiate nicely ... around 60 hz....

w

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCuOb_5Wvhc&feature=channel

if i ZAP IT .... I MELT WIRE ... MY RING RADIARES A RETARTED AMOUNT .... HUMMMS AND GROANS THE WHOLE BIT ...   lol

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o77fF7ciD-0&feature=channel
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 11, 2009, 09:40:17 AM
Mr. GK   You nailed it.  Cannonball analogy, I think that is what happens.  The nst is connected to
only one coil so it must overload and jump through the plastic to the other plate to the L2 and fire
the second gap.  It does fire just like you said.  I gotta buy a couple of low impedance coils to try. 
I know low is good and have no idea if what I made is or not.  If I ever get any real power it will be
because even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes, not because I knew electronics.

Mr. IST,  Thank you for making the videos, that spark on the last one looks a lot stronger than the
less than 20 watts your power supply was providing.  Interesting.    I gotta check out
that jthief thread.  I wonder what a compas would do around that coil.   The vibes are odd.  Vibes and
spin seems to appear a lot.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 11, 2009, 12:51:16 PM
  The spark gap must be geometrically placed within the field of the resonant circuit so that it responds not only to the electric polarization between the electrodes (which should be insulated) but also to the magnetic field produced by the inductor.  This feedback will make alot less jitter in the input pulse.  Grumpy said that he used ultraviolet light to stabilize the spark gap.  Tesla once demonstrated one of his magnetic disruptors and when the spark gap was geometrically placed within the magnetic field warp produced by the inductors there was alot of gain in the circuit.  Plasma creates a field of electrons that circulate about the ionized atom cores forming a giant atom.  The electron cloud is accelerated in such a manner as to magnetically confine the positive ions as well as insulate the proton cores.  The net charge of the plasma is neutral.  The magnetic field  anomally produced by the electron cloud acceleration of course is never neutral.

sparks,

Interesting, but spark gap is waste of power actually.This is what Tesla said:

"Moreover, it is important to realize that this principle is universally employed everywhere.  The greatest men of science have told me that this was my best achievement and, in connection with this apparatus [referring to schematics of Fig. 31], I may say that a lot of liberties have been taken.  For instance, a man fills this space [break D] with hydrogen; he employs all my instrumentalities, everything that is necessary, but calls it a new wireless system—the Poulsen arc.  I cannot stop it.  Another man puts in here [referring to space between self-inductive lines L L] a kind of gap—he gets a Nobel prize for doing it.  My name is not mentioned.  Still another man inserts here [conductor B] a mercury[-arc] rectifier.  That is my friend Cooper Hewitt.  But, as a matter of fact, those devices have nothing to do with the performance.If these men knew what I do, they would not touch my arrangements; they would leave my apparatus as it is.  Marconi puts in here [break D] two wheels.  I showed only one wheel; he shows two.  And he says, "See what happens when the wheels are rotated; a wonderful thing happens!" What is the wonderful thing? Why, when the teeth of the wheels pass one another, the currents are broken and interrupted.  That is the wonderful thing that happens? The Lord himself could not make anything else happen unless he broke his own laws.  So, in this way, invention has been degraded, debased, prostituted, more in connection with my apparatus than in anything else.  Not a vestige of invention as a creative effort is in the thousands of arrangements that you see under the name of other people—not a vestige of invention.  It is exactly like in car couplings on which 6,000 patents have been taken out; but all the couplings are constructed and operated exactly the same way.  The inventive effort involved is about the same as that of which a 30-year-old mule is capable.  This is a fact.

This is one of most beautiful things ever produced in the way of apparatus: I take a generator of any kind.  With the generator I charge a condenser.  Then I discharge the condenser under conditions which result in the production of vibrations.  Now, it was known since Lord Kelvin that the condenser discharge would give this vibration, but I perfected my apparatus to such a degree that it became an instrument utilizable in the arts, in a much broader way than Lord Kelvin had contemplated as possible.  In fact, years afterwards when Lord Kelvin honored me by presenting to the British Association one of my oscillators of a perfected form, he said that it was "a wonderful development and destined to be of great importance."
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 11, 2009, 01:32:56 PM
   Tesla moved on from using plasma in the spark gap to other magnetically responsive fluids.  He tuned his spark gaps while the rest of the bozos just duplicated his work not realizing the underlying principals.  The spark gap is capable of converting thermal energy into electrical energy.  Done at thousands of cycles a second over a large field you got yourself a stirling engine connected to a dynamo all within the space of a few centimeters.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 11, 2009, 01:42:41 PM
sparks

forget about spark gap !

"This [Fig. 32] is another improvement in that particular device, which was the weakness of the invention and which I tried to eliminate.  This device incorporated many spark gaps in series.  It had a peculiar feature; namely, through the great number of gaps, I was able, as I have pointed out in my writings, to produce oscillations without even a spark being visible between the knobs.  This device is now known in the art as the "quenched spark gap." Professor Wein has formulated a beautiful theory about it, which I understand has netted him the Nobel prize.  Wein's theories are admirable.  The only trouble is that he has overlooked one very important fact.  It is this: If the apparatus is properly designed and operated, there is no use for the quenched gap, for the oscillations are continuous anyway.  The radio men who came after me had the problem before them of making a bell sound, and they immersed it in mercury.  Now, you know mercury is heavy.  When they struck their bell, the mercury did not permit it to vibrate long because it took away all the energy.  I put my bell in a vacuum and make it vibrate for hours.  I have designed circuits in connection with an enterprise in 1898 for transmission of energy which, once started, would vibrate three years, and even after that the oscillations could still be detected.  Professor Wein's theory is very beautiful, but it really has no practical meaning.  It will become useless as soon as the inefficient apparatus of the day, with antennae that radiate energy rapidly, [are] replaced by a scientifically designed oscillator which does not give out energy except when it gets up to a tremendous electromagnetic momentum."
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 11, 2009, 02:01:46 PM
Hello all,

this post is only for Nikola Tesla the great inventor:

Dear Mr. Tesla,

youre a well known and famos inventor. Your name is well known and honoured but.....

I hope you dont mind but.....

I understand that money is important, especially to finance research work but....

I understand that when someone wrights a patent, some important clues are missing but....

why didnt you make a little dot in some of your schematics? Just a little dot and maybe our history would change in a positive way?

Mr. Tesla, I dont have to mention that you have misleaded todays people with other statenments...

Yes, you couldnt think what would happen 100 years later but ...

I hope you dont think Im a bad man but it was time that somebody says the truth.

Regards

Otto, living in the same country where you was born.

PS: DONT ASK ME ANYTHING, I DONT WANT TO RESPONSE!!! YOU CAN NOW CONTINUE TO SPIT ON ME!!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on December 11, 2009, 02:43:18 PM
@otto

Your post could have also been addressed to SM. lol
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 11, 2009, 03:59:25 PM
@bw

Your experiment made me think.
Who dictates that when you make a capacitor, both plates should be of the same material?

In fact does anyone know of any other experiments with different plate materials in a capacitor?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 11, 2009, 04:28:05 PM
@ otto

if you look hard enough you find your self the TRUE ANSWER!

that is G

THANK YOU ...

all you ever had to do was look!

i have discovered things un documented by tesla ...

what is g?  g is a self running timeing device ... 

a tpu ...  now go build it ... 

 
i have studied only a few pattends ... and if for some reason you THINK i studied more YOUR WORNG   AND ALL THE REST FELL IN MY LAP 

o yes the truth  NOT WHAT YOU THINK AT ALL!

W
btw more things happen at a spark gap than currently understood!

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 11, 2009, 05:23:01 PM
Mr. Masterplaster,   Don Smith describes a cap like I describe except his calls for copper and aluminum.
I substituted bronze or brass I forget which one but I couldn't easily find copper.   No greatness on my part but
I'm happy to get anyone thinking along these lines.  This stuff is very real, just hidden well, likely for good
reason on Tesla's part and others.  Perhaps they had no choice.   The answers will fit with what we see
in nature.  When a tornado starts to really crank up it begins sucking in excess energy from all directions and grows.  Hurricanes, same thing except for several hundred miles in every direction.  Like a vacuum on afterburner
it will suck in excess energy and shoot it straight up to the top through the center vortex.
When we solve the big puzzle I think the device will do similar.   An ocean vortex/whirlpool will take big ships down.  Big power in spin.  Get too close and too bad so sad.   Spin is one way.

Huge energy is present and available in our environment if we can harvest it, I see that in all of nature. 
Look at a photo of earth from space and in almost every one you'll see many storms, especially around the
poles.  Common to all, they all spin and they all spin the same way as all others on that side of equator.

Vibes are also part of nature's way, put salt on a dark plate and set on engine.  Rev up and patterns
develop, speed up or slow down and groupings change.   Nature follows rules and order, Mr. Tesla used vibes.

Yin and Yang.  North and south.  Warm air and cool air.  Static charge and earth ground.  Disturb ambient and
return to ambient.  Awake and asleep.  Positive and negative.  Growing season and resting season. 
Opposites seem to be part of the magic.  I'm brainstorming for links.  With just a nudge these opposites
all seem to start a big process.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 11, 2009, 06:05:29 PM
and so they do ...

and i dont speek of the miss metal match in the tpu's ...

lol

1 i have limited knowalage in this effect ...

however i have done this ... i plan not to digg to every answer ..

if i did  that puts me in too deep!

this is a joint efford  hence why the mistery!

w815
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 11, 2009, 06:30:44 PM
Don's devices use both spin and vibe.   
Electrons spin.   Nst makes vibe and spin.
Flux moves @ 90 degree angle
I'm re-reading some Tesla, Don was a geologist, understood earth magnetic fields, and read Tesla.

http://books.google.com/books?id=bhrreukJiLgC&dq=inventions+researches+and+writings+of+nikola+tesla&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=OBN2DmLHOx&sig=nfbIJz1bi1qngBDYjtaY-jvav1o&hl=en&ei=OILgSrujE5jKtgfB-9wD&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CBIQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=&f=false
especially chapters XXIX, XXX, AND XXXL
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 11, 2009, 07:16:14 PM
  Tesla was the inventor of the tuned circuit..  Before that time the spark gap was employed to cause radiation of hf as the antennae was charged to one potential and the Earth the other.  The dielectric of the spark gap is surpassed at some point and causes an oscillating current which was very unpredictable as the capacitor discharges.  They knew a spark threw radiowaves but as GK mentioned it is very broadband.  Everything from subaudible to uv and above.  Tesla picked out a frequency and made it stand collect whatever you can invision in his resonant electrical circuits.  He pushed the envelope until the amount of current and voltage in the tuned circuit was powerful.  Like gigawatts powerful.  Then of course all that was needed was a tuned receiver that would pickout his oscillations from all the rest of the stuff flowing around.  A capacitor when it is charged develops a tremendous amount of tension within the capacitor itself.  The coluumb force squeezes the shit out of the electrolyte.  The sudden discharge of the capacitor causes the metals employed to be accelerated at great speed away from each other.  This produces mechanical vibrations of the medium that are longitudinal in nature.  The uv noise and heat emanating from the spark gap are all losses of course.  This is energy on the way out or radiating.  What I discovered quite by mistake is the thermal properties of a selfconfining plasma.  The more heat it gets  involved in its field the colder the temperature it radiates.  Blackholes are nothing to fuck around with.  We are all blinded by the light as it condenses into the dark.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 11, 2009, 08:14:16 PM
Mr. Sparks.    All that helps me.  Thank you for explaining in language I understand. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 11, 2009, 08:52:30 PM
@bw

     Thankyou for listening. :)

          Tesla was very agitated by people going off and stealing his inventions.  He believed in patent protection which is a lawyers scheme.  His early work with induction motors and transformers made him a fortune but it wasnt the money with Tesla it was the fame.  He has a new wave of notariaty.  To read Tesla you have to understand the terms of the times.  When he talks about his radiant energy collector he is talking about a photoelectric detector.  He did know how to create and manipulate plasma.  Plasma creates the medium through which light travels.  We see the light but since the plasma is selfcontained energetically we dont see the plasma construct.  The Sun is a magnetically selfconfined plasma.  It will not run out of hydrogen fuel that will stop the fusion process inside it.  That is not the way of things.  It will cease to radiate anything but gravity.  The heliopause will contract into a sphere probably not much larger than Earth.  The vacuum created by the contraction of the heliopause will not go unnoticed by the rest of the interstellar medium.  The contracted core will build itself a new condensation of the Universal plasma or life sustaining force.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 11, 2009, 08:55:07 PM
Let me repeat something:
I have 2 NSTs at 6kv @ 38.5khz.
I have a 10kv power supply with a variac. I need to put 1 channel from my Keely sine controller into the HVpwrsp to produce the HV at the resonate frequency of my current Smith build.
I prefer to find the frequency of my primary or sedcondary by dialing a freq then snipping wire length to find a statice frequency from the NST. The first way is just easier and I can verify my spreadsheet calcs. This type of attempt produces things a whole lot faster.

So this is my next step. A spark gap is not needed if the frequency is bang on with the HV input. Square waves also replace a spark gap.
Mass, length, spacings, & turns... You get these correct with the right distances and you have a huge disturbance with 2 wires. In other words, aside from the signal input parameters one is creating the bell housing to ring at the correct note.

The HV sine controlled power supply willl let me test the performance of any windings of mass, length, spacings, & turns by frequency and voltage. Square waves only give an approximation because of the inherent harmonics. I want true ringing with no degrading noise.

I also realized this about the GK4. It had an iron core and square waves appearing and eclipsing at numerous angles. When the iron saturated then the eclipsing square waves were then absorbed no more, producing the ejecting waves of noise inward & outward. This would make the center most dangerous, uncontrolled unlike Rodin's coil.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 11, 2009, 08:57:10 PM
this is a reason and only 1 reason i use feroite cores ...

to contain the darn thing ...  not make rf noise and run very high speed and safe with low voltage and they offer high returns

all my cool things can be marketed and abide with in fcc guide lines ...

: )

w

and i need not worrie of makeing any holes... 

if they are built properly ...  i do not like the term abient noise..   the earth has a charka just as you do ...   and they run on harmonics ...    you can see this in some of my REAL CLEAR SCOPE SHOTS

the earth speed is the fundemental freq ... a magnet is in tune with earth

your base charaka stone is ...  fundemental ... ie garnet .. smokey quartz  LOAD STONE..... et many orthers ..

ring it ...  do you want to walk on water ?

w815
 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 11, 2009, 10:06:47 PM
GK you make sence and matches my feeble understanding of what Don tries to convey to us.
The two coils need to be dead on in tune one with the other.  Having little to work with, I next
wanted to try a dimmer like Don has just upstream from his 115 v nst.    I was thinking this may
allow me to tune my nst output to match one coil it connects to.     At the moment I'm not
trying to transform voltage, just find answers so I made both coils with the same mass, length,
spacing, and turns.  I got a bunch of resistors and caps and a chart trying to tune but got stuck
so I made both coils the same as best as I could.  My hope was that if both are the same they
could talk.  It would be a freak accident if they were dead on like they really need to be and I'm
sure they are not because I don't hear hum or ring or anything aside from plasma noise.   I guess
I was thinking if I got real close to dead on I'd see real close to real results
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 12, 2009, 12:32:10 AM
We are not just talking about two coils inductively coupled but at a whole nuther level where they ring together. And that is where the air coupling works. Look at Don's 4 vertical coil setup. Nothing but air and wire. The transmitter coil is a Tesla type. Low lying primary with a tall secondary.
The other 3 are tuned by same wire lengths and variable caps for tweekness.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 12, 2009, 12:52:07 AM
If we don't discuss the source of energy we are trying to capture how are we supposed to make a system that harnesses it?

All of you please for a second forget your coils and magnets. bw's comments made me think again! Twice in one day ouch.

when we look at the earth "Gods eye view", everything is supposed to be in balance ( the natural state of things ). When something goes out of balance, forces of nature (I know it sounds wooly), try to correct it and bring about equilibrium.

I this it is this "rectifying" force that we need to harness.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on December 12, 2009, 02:17:01 AM
@GK

Check my post in Understanding Elec. I think you cannot make two copper coils ring because both will become magnetic and stick. When you hit a bell with a hammer, if the hammer sticks to the bell it will not vibrate. It has to hit the bell and leave it alone to ring. In the picture your showed, notice the two coil materials. lol

Incredible timing around here these days.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 12, 2009, 03:27:01 AM
lookie this beast ...

140mm W material 

14 gage solid .. wire can handle 600v 40 amp ... max

yep

ist!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 12, 2009, 04:39:13 AM
Masterblaster, That is exactally what I've been trying to say.  Don Smith says usable energy is available as you return to ambient (balance, natural state of things, equilibrium).   He says this is where you can harvest it, on the return to balance stroke.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 12, 2009, 04:39:56 AM
Everybody is well engaged and in the hunt I appreciate that!

masterplaster, GK,  etc etc... bully to everyone!

The potentials, the movement away from equilibrium, The more neg verses less neg.

harmonics do play a part but if I am not mistaken it is for us to get farther away from it, and the cosmos brings in the ambient.

ie. at the Varistor on the output side of the IT,
 the Air coil through the Air.  whereever, the farther we get from ambient the more potential and pressure is available.

I agree with you This is a worthy discussion,  I bought an electrostatic voltmeter, and gauss meter to measure these values.

All I've got.

h2ocommuter.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 12, 2009, 11:57:11 AM
Earth is unipolar dynamo.Telluric currents flow from core to the surface and then to the poles.
The correct question is : how to tap unipolar dynamo currents without connecting to the shaft (poles) and the edge (equator), having access to only the small part of circuit.Answers ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: innovation_station on December 12, 2009, 02:04:37 PM
Earth is unipolar dynamo.Telluric currents flow from core to the surface and then to the poles.
The correct question is : how to tap unipolar dynamo currents without connecting to the shaft (poles) and the edge (equator), having access to only the small part of circuit.Answers ?

im sure there is more ...

it is peizeo aswell !

humm

ist!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 12, 2009, 06:13:57 PM
could some answers be here?
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-12-21.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 12, 2009, 06:24:34 PM
could some answers be here?
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-12-21.htm

Yep. There is more about this even : those sound-like waves are not one-kind waves, there are various kinds.I'm sure.
One was noted in 1842 to magnetize iron bar, one kind to electrostatically charge metals and one to discharge charged objects.
Many many methods was described to use them.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 13, 2009, 04:21:28 PM
During a  brainstorm I thought of this that may be helpful.
On my setup I have the nst powering one coil on one capacitor plate, that circuit is not connected to the
second coil except when it shoots through the plastic plate between the metal cap plates.  Don indicates
this is a copy of the power from the nst.  He says more plates can be stacked and each makes another copy
of this energy WITHOUT diminishing the supply.  He compares it to a radio broadcast, if one or one million
radios are tuned to the broadcast it does not diminish the power of the broadcast.  My little brainstorm
thinks if we get some power with two plates then we double that with four plates.  What about twenty or
fifty plates in a stack?  Stand clear.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 13, 2009, 05:26:56 PM
New Don Smith videos, here's one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4xEQwwVss0

here's another email response from Don that may help - half way down page.
http://www.angelfire.com/ak5/energy21/ambientpower.htm

here's something I found that may encourage some.
   http://www.gammamanager.com/gallery.html

What we are searching for is very real and we will find it.
Never give up.  And forget making a fourtune, that makes folks vanish.  Just spread it far and wide.
bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 13, 2009, 05:50:23 PM
These are jam packed with new tips from Don himself.   ck out near end of this for amps.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uzD5IaTqL0&feature=related

So far I find 19 videos in this set.   so far i'v seen 2
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on December 13, 2009, 07:42:24 PM
These are jam packed with new tips from Don himself.   ck out near end of this for amps.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uzD5IaTqL0&feature=related

So far I find 19 videos in this set.   so far i'v seen 2

Awesome find!  I haven't seen these before!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 13, 2009, 08:24:51 PM
Yep.running Don Smith device unfortunately not the one he described
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 14, 2009, 12:32:53 AM
here's where I ordered my first DVD, "Don Smith Ambient Energy Device"
I'm telling Mrs. Santa that I want the 2001 "Extracting Ambient Energy From The Environment" shown here
@ $39.95
https://secure.netsolhost.com/nuenergy.org/product_catalog.htm

The quality on my first one was great, it's the one that's free on the net now.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 14, 2009, 12:34:50 AM
Yep, Ron Smith another victim of greed.
This Video is from 1996 and we do not see his device anywhere.
No wonder he is asking for contracts starting at $500 Million.
This was a lot of money in those days.
Run looks about 60 there. If he was to last another 40, makes you wonder why he wants all that money for.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 14, 2009, 02:41:31 AM
I don't it is greed I think what Don is trying to do within the constraints of his agreements is share the basics of
how to build your own, he even says to do it with his blessings.  The $500 million plus he mentions is the size
contracts the international bankers deal in.  They just are not interested in much smaller.  In dealing with a government or big corp. this is not that big.  Don mentioned he gets 50% for the technology and whatever
company or government he shares the specific model with gets the other 50% and I am sure that would be after any cost of manufacturing  etc. has been backed out.   Most of the money mentioned is burned off in cost but he likely did get paid well at half whats left over.  He can only share so much without breaching his agreements.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 14, 2009, 03:51:52 AM
The main clue is video 17 @ 7:54
'We want to disturb the electron, not tear the atom apart.'
The rest of the videos are elusive dog and pony, switch and bait. I detest this kind of secrecy.

Disturb the electron and collect the results.
I finished up other work and am now back on my Smith Iron ring / cart device. Getting the resonance of the primary and the secondary.

Arbitrary:
The height of the ring,
the diameter of the ring,
iron core,
the lead length of the coils.

Matched:
the type of wire used: 16awg stranded speaker wire,
primary turns,
secondary turns,
primary placed at the turn count of Smith's secondary.

Input parameters:
+12v battery supply,
xr2206 sine wave,
frequency of 188khz
(no doubt I could find another harmonic to tune at but I think this is in the megahertz),
driven by a irf840 fet,
tested coil in line with 100ohm 5w resistor,
35.33 milliamps drawn.

Scope shot:
We don't need no stinkin' scope shot,
it is a tuned sinewave. Duh!

Results:
Both windings draw 35.33 milli amps at 188khz!
The coils are resonant at the same freq!
Strickly eyeballed from his pictures.

So:
I will add a variable cap and tune to the NST frequency 38.5.

Guess what that means?:
I have the input side of Smith's coils duplicated!

Final findings?
Tune the coils to disturb or twist the electron's stasis.
Collect the findings.

Don said 'It dips down when turned on'. Well so does mine until the core saturates! In Don's case that is at the point where the spacing between the windings stores up charge. Oh he said 'Solid state'. 'No coils , no caps'. And he is exactly right because those devices would be separate. His are integrated in one set of windings. He kept reiterating how the status quo thinks. More twisty descriptions. He never mentions when he switches his descriptions. Muwa,ha,ha...

On Donner, On Blitzen, up, up and away! Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!

--Giantkiller.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 14, 2009, 04:28:43 AM
Here's a short version of parts of Don's book I haven't seen.     
some new bits of info, look at suggestions. 
http://www.hvlabs.hu/zpe/DonSmith/dsmith-reference%25231.pdf


GK,  I think you mean video 17 at 8.20
did you see video 7 @ 4.08 ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 14, 2009, 04:47:08 AM
Corrected #17 @ 7:54.
Seen #7. Plain as day.
Here's a short version of parts of Don's book I haven't seen.     
some new bits of info, look at suggestions. 
http://www.hvlabs.hu/zpe/DonSmith/dsmith-reference%25231.pdf


GK,  I think you mean video 17 at 8.20
did you see video 7 @ 4.08 ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 14, 2009, 01:30:47 PM
Yep. There is more about this even : those sound-like waves are not one-kind waves, there are various kinds.I'm sure.
One was noted in 1842 to magnetize iron bar, one kind to electrostatically charge metals and one to discharge charged objects.
Many many methods was described to use them.

    Tesla is descrbing an electrostatic speaker.  The columb force between two capacitor plates is avoided as much as possible in electolytic capacitors because it results in heating of the capacitor.  Whereas in an electrostatic speaker it is exploited.  If we have two speaker cones and they are used as capacitor plates there discharge would result in two pressure waves being emitted on discharge of the speakers and a rarification of the space between the speakers.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 14, 2009, 05:05:28 PM
Recreating the lightning is a way to get it.Earth is unipolar dynamo we are flowing inside a huge sea of energy - mostly it's very low voltage but large current.You cannot see current which is all around ambient and undisturbed.Once we see it it's disturbed. Lightning.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 14, 2009, 06:26:08 PM
GK, Very nice coil, looks right.   The variable cap seems logical.  I tried a tuner from an old radio just to try tuning my little toy to match the nst but it must be wrong.  The right kind should do the trick.  You seem to be getting very close to real results.

Sparks, electrostatic speakers are intersting, many similarities to this.  Thank you.  I never knew of these.

Forest, Don talks about just what you say.   Potential is enormous.     Potential energy is available, shake it real fast and catch it on every bounce back to balance.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 14, 2009, 07:41:36 PM
So my next step is to use the Vari-cap to tune the tank to the natural res freq of 188k. That will give me a capacitance value. With the 2 windings at the same res freq I can ring the second one with the primary. Don has a cap on the primary. I know he says 'or you don't need caps'. But that is a ruse and a true statement. Spread the windings or use the correct wire length. Don never mentions 2 freqs. Sm does but that is a ruse also. If I have 2 coils I can say '2 frequencies'. There is a frequency here and a frequency there. Sneaky that is all. A derisive clue.
I have played the investor game to at millions of dollars per contract. I know how to double speak in the game. To hide things or knock status quo engineers out of the saddle. Rabbit trails. Don is just hinding things. Just like the others who have something simple.

Back on track.
But the biggie is to then take a pvc wound coil and spread the windings to see what cap-value is there. I can have no cap device but have spacing, cap and no spacing, or just spacing.

@wattsup,
I have a 2 wind of 1/4 diam aluminum. Will put the 24awg copper on it tonight. I also have stainless steel wire. If I don't see what you see then I move on.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 15, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
starting at 3:25 on this video two waves are shown running just out of sinc.   is this another clue?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhuAAcM2JLA&feature=related

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 15, 2009, 05:26:29 PM
Where can we find this picture Smith is presenting at 3:25 of this video ? This looks like important factor.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 15, 2009, 05:43:30 PM
Forest, I thought this is important too.  Looks to me like this wave gives a second peak at perfect timing to assist the first wave.  I'll search for better photos or source.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 15, 2009, 06:50:27 PM
I too, would like that pic or book, please.

In trying to find the capacitance of the natural frequency I have .1uf in parallel with my L1. The cap for the secondary is .0056uf. The frequency is 188khz. I need to find the cap for the 7 turn feedback winding next.
I am keeping things as static as possible based on the input frequency. I want to transfer this to the end stages. When that is done I will change the frequency. When the ratio of the windings change then the caps change also. When I get all stages resonant I will raise the voltage.
I have not found the res freq of the feedback winding but this is not a show stopper. I wound by count. I am surprised so far by the same resonant freq by the L1 & L2. The feedback winding will probably be a surprise too. The simplicity of it allows windings added or subtracted.

Smith's four vertical coil setup is very similar to the youtube vid of a room full of spinning magnets.
In 1996 Muller, Smith, & Stev Mark all showed suitcase sized devices the ran electrical equipment.
Who is faking what here?

--giantkiller.


Where can we find this picture Smith is presenting at 3:25 of this video ? This looks like important factor.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 15, 2009, 07:59:58 PM
I don't find the book with sinewaves yet but I'd bet it's in one of the many listed in the "additional reading" list in Don's  book.

I did find new additions in this file, start at bottom and look up. 
http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf

I think this was added recently.  Great quality device photos and other new tips here.   
Still looking for the sinewave book.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 15, 2009, 08:55:51 PM
Yep. I am going to get the handbook of tables and the relay books.

I don't find the book with sinewaves yet but I'd bet it's in one of the many listed in the "additional reading" list in Don's  book.

I did find new additions in this file, start at bottom and look up. 
http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf

I think this was added recently.  Great quality device photos and other new tips here.   
Still looking for the sinewave book.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 15, 2009, 09:40:35 PM
 http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf
GK, there's a chart from A.R.R.L. about midway in this file, shows to be page 64 on pdf counter at top.
You may be able to zoom enough to get needed values.  I have a copy from Don's book I bought.  I just
used a ruler to go off the left side of the chart to get the values.  I'm not sure this is what you want but
for 35 khz the lines cross at 1 henry and just a hair under 500 ohns when chart is extended.  I think you
said your nst was 35 khz
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 15, 2009, 11:48:56 PM
Don stated he had made five books on this subject so I am looking for the entire list.  He stated the Tesla symposium office would have them. "If you were persistant, you could get them there". I have only enquired one time when I bought related material there. It may be worth while to collectively pound the counter there to see if they will cough up the documents for us.

I sent this letter to teslatech@teslatech.info "today"
subject: Don Smith Books/literature

  In the Tesla symposium 1996 Don stated there were five books that could be found that he had written.
I am writing to you for any information that I can get on Don Smiths writings you may have in your archives.

I realize these are not his exact words but I figured I would press hard for this quest.

Please let me know of any such compiled or random information.

Thank you

Zane Muckey

My plasma globe measurements are coming along nice.
I got my new clamp meter in and it confirms the frequency readings the other meter gave.
full tilt it cycles at 50,000 Hz with the L2 and the current is well over 100 amps.
Get my spark gaps put together and find the 75 ohm resistor for my IT.

in the hunt....

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 16, 2009, 12:02:39 AM
@H2Oc,
That is what I am talking about. The wife wants a globe And I want to play with it like Don said.
Don said 'You're there'!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 16, 2009, 01:27:50 AM
I looked around and waited till I found the illuma storm because it has the two pots integrated into the circuit. I felt it would allready give me adjustments I could not achieve on my own.

With 14 turns with jumbo speaker wire, on my L-2 it can be adjusted into resonance. Well to me that is the highest oscillation value Hz.  What ever I am not too sure. The adjustment sensitivity gets highly magnified when its getting close to the maximum output zone.
What is curious is the stimulation seems to be the absolute calmness that can be achieved. "visually".

I have a good copy of a freq chart but it is too big to send with a post if you want a copy.  I does not match up exactly to the tables and formula nomograph but it is really close. I use it in my pdf and my excel charts.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 16, 2009, 03:11:42 AM
H2o, I'm emailing  the address you mentioned to "pound the counter" a little too.  Even if we find all five I think they may just be updated versions of one book, I'm not sure.   Someone does seem to be releasing more information on Don's work, a little bit each time.   

I'm very interested in your plasma globe results, it's the first thing of Don's I tried to make work.  I've learned more now and want to try it again.  My old globe burned out and Radio Shack says they don't carry them any more.  Did you find yours there?  100 amps, that's just bad to the bone.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 16, 2009, 03:53:04 AM
On my Smith ring the 7 turn feedback winding has natural resonance at 188k like the others. But because of the different inductance the tank cap will be different.
Iron is bad. The resonant freq is all the same for the different windings of 7, 12, 36.
So now I am going to wind the same thing on a styrofoam ring.

Somebody sent this to me. Ed is charging up an iron rod. I never saw this before.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on December 16, 2009, 04:40:09 AM
@GK

Have you seen this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUvHhBzffWk&feature=channel
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 16, 2009, 05:58:01 AM
Yep. Bizmuth plates.
Didn't spend too much time on it because of the special materials.
But there is resonance in that device also.

@GK

Have you seen this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUvHhBzffWk&feature=channel
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 16, 2009, 07:48:18 AM
H2o, I'm emailing  the address you mentioned to "pound the counter" a little too.  Even if we find all five I think they may just be updated versions of one book, I'm not sure.   Someone does seem to be releasing more information on Don's work, a little bit each time.   

I'm very interested in your plasma globe results, it's the first thing of Don's I tried to make work.  I've learned more now and want to try it again.  My old globe burned out and Radio Shack says they don't carry them any more.  Did you find yours there?  100 amps, that's just bad to the bone.

I looked on Tandy or radioshack website and found the parts list for the plasma globe before I bought it on an eBay sale.
If you can not find this information I will pull it out of my files and send it to you. I am no good at doing that type of thing but I figured I should have it. if I need parts or whatever.

I emailed Patrick Kelly and he said he was not aware of the five books. he stated two things I thought were interresting though.
that he knew of 4 videos. which I only have three and that he had only been looking for Dons things for a short while.

One curiosity Problem of sorts: The two nomograph style charts Don mentions: the grid chart with vertical horizontal and ex marks The RF Cafe chart is excellent but it does not match my Book!, where it does not corroborate the nomograph chart in the Electronic tables and formulas. This is a fifth edition fourth printing in 1982.   This is killing my progress in the technical zone. I said they were close but they are far from close. 75 to 300 ohm! and from 2uF to 16 uF.   using .107 H and 120 cycles per. on both charts.
I need a little help. A definitive choice would be nice.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 16, 2009, 07:50:07 AM
looks like mainstream science confirms zpe at last.  What laws?
http://www.21stcenturyradio.com/zeropointenergy-11.24.00.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 16, 2009, 08:10:22 AM
H2Oc   I reviewed Don's work and he reccomends using the American Radio Relay League chart.  I gave GK some values for 35 khz but I think the values you needed may be to correct frequency from 50,000 cps to 120 cps and I'm not sure how that is done.  I'll work (sleep) on it tonight.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 16, 2009, 05:40:13 PM
GK, Jon De'Pew is the guy you mentioned with spinning magnets, check this out.
http://www.world-mysteries.com/coralcastle.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 16, 2009, 06:59:57 PM
I sent my findings to him and never received a response. His info is very important.

GK, Jon De'Pew is the guy you mentioned with spinning magnets, check this out.
http://www.world-mysteries.com/coralcastle.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 16, 2009, 07:32:40 PM
You are right, very important.   Trinity,     3's,       N-S & neutral,       current, amps, & bloch wall
To me in ways Ed even looks a little like Tesla.      DePew didn't answer my email a year ago.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 16, 2009, 09:53:15 PM
This guy is on the same page as Don Smith and he's still alive.  He is from ex-Russian Georgia republic.  His name is Kapanadze, perhaps someone here speaks his language.  A few pages back I posted a very short video of a man with Don demonstrating the plasma tube with a strong arc to ground.  These links below came from him today and he's also getting ready to start a build.  I'd seen some of this before but no Russian.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV560xfYSJ0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvlTCi93m7U&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWaGp71fyYs&feature=related
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 17, 2009, 06:34:11 AM
@bw,

I want to thank you for contributing here. adding to the discussion and encouragement.

I backtracked to post 13 and followed the various links you've given.  Steady as she goes friend.

I think I will be able to try that spark thing to ground soon and I will post a video when I figure out how to do a utube thing..

Intuitive blessings, enlightenment, new understandings. ambient energy harvesting to all. peace and good will. 

You have infected me. that was a great video link. I saved them all on my utube page.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 17, 2009, 02:01:21 PM
H2Oc 
Thank you brother.  I've got the same infection but have no background in electronics so I just try to encourage others with experience and learn as we go.   I'm happy with that role, but let me know if I ever get in the way of progress please.   You guys are the movers and shakers.  God speed to you all.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 18, 2009, 05:14:24 AM
I'd never seen this short Tesla patent #685957 before, it looks closely tied to a lot of this stuff
http://keelynet.com/tesla/00685957.pdf
Here Tesla collects what he calls rays or streams of radiant matter on an insulated polished metal plate and tells how it is converted into useable power.  A solid earth ground is half this system. 

bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 18, 2009, 10:37:36 AM
I got out my Gauss meter out again today and worked with the video and utube setup and things are coming along fine.
The most I have been able to accurately find  consistently is .25 mG; 25 gamma. that is actually all I need to get 240 V RMS. 

I stumbled around for an hour before figuring out how I found the 100 amperes. yea it is still there and I doubled my acceptance of the readings I got before on the Hz readings.

Let me step back a bit here, I have contemplated Tesla's patents too, I think it is important to cite that he did not have the need like we do today with having the exact type voltage bulbs specifically. I am kinda thinking if he wanted to pump out 100 volts at 3KHz. to operate X bulbs or motors or equip well he could just tune his equip at will, and do it.

  I went to my shop today and picked out various bulbs with different voltages and such, along with spark plugs and things to stimulate my thinking processes. I think about the amount of energy I need to discharge with them. and what kind of voltages I will be getting with various settings, and capacitors.

to me what I think is happening is "Let alone how I am getting the 50k Hz  and 100 amps, I still have to find the voltage somewhere. I may only have 45 volts I need to figure out if I am restricting the excess amperage enough to multiply the voltages or Will I need to squeeze more out of the spark gaps to get the voltages there. What if I use an airspark gap without the ground to gather voltages. I am not yet sure where I will find them but this is the methodology I am using to get the answere now that I have devoured all of Don's writings I can find.

One last thing, just like in this patent, Tesla used timing mechanism, condensers, ground, etc.  I only read the last ten or twelve entries closest to the pics. but I bet he used spark gaps too. I am absolutely positive we can find and harness this energy too.

Thinking outside the box is like when you are on deck and you see how things are working before your up to bat. keep your eyes open, find something that is there you did not know was there.

Grace be with you
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 18, 2009, 11:42:07 AM
I had once such amperage peak measured on digital and analog voltmeters. it was only when radiant wave was riding on top of 12 DC in opposite direction.It was however not usable in common sense - once shorted in closed circuit it simple dissapeared without doing any work. Something is missing
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 18, 2009, 06:52:41 PM
Yes , that scenario is one of the hidden things.

The clamp bounces around 20 amps on DC setting on the end of the L-2 and closer to the windings it is higher.
On the AC side it will be about 50 amps at the end of the wire and closer to the windings it will go up over 150 amps.

I am not going to hope for everything with the L-2 alone. and the adjusting capabilities of L-1.

My electrostatic voltmeter won't pick up anything yet.
and my Gauss meter will just barely hold .3 mG

Reading the last patent posted here page two the first # 5 states, if you don't get it right, "even though you have all the parts" it will render the unit worthless.  "high capacitance values, discharging at required freq.  a ground for neg charge and a radiant energy collector for positive charge. 
These things are the same things we are working with. Nicola found the magnetic resonace in the natural ambient background. Don says we can manipulate it with freq. pulsations of our coils.

I love Don's statement about how he described this extra energy he develops in the units he built.  It is what is there!

I am going to visually show the incomprehensible relationships with the pots on the plasma globe in the videos because it has a quandary of interacting variables when you apply an L-2 and meters to the normal plasticine accepted view of the plasma globe.
you will notice various anomalies with the adjusting pots, where they act like their damaged. On the contrary I believe what is happening is they are finding resonance at different wavelinks. There I will show areas of high resistability to change and suddenly push past these areas while adjusting.
There may be two three or four variable visually taking place at any given time when looking at each various meter. these standard accepted variables move in exponential relationships to one an other at times..

Eric Dollard has a nice video about building a calculator, where he uses visual and other methods in examining the outcomes of various component arraignments.

There are more things happening here that I can explain right now.

Looking for what is there!!
Seek and yea shall find . Knock and the door will be opened.  Steel sharpens steel.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 18, 2009, 07:40:24 PM
Right-on H2Oc    seek & find   
Tesla's patent 685957 on the second page line 55 states that the opposite terminal of the condenser is connected to the ground WHICH MAY BE CONSIDERED A VAST RESIVOR OF NEGATIVE ELECTRICITY.
In this same patent Tesla indicates the importance of the capacitor(condenser)  he says the power is in proportion to the size of the insulated collector plate.

I did notice on the 1996 Tesla videos of Don that at some point after the first demo run he unscrewed the ground wire and I believe it was still disconnected on video #19 when the bigger bulbs were installed.  The unit still worked quite well but the guy with the bulbs stated the voltage was a bit lower.   I gotta wonder if this was due to the ground wire not being connected.

My new plasma ball should be here before Christmas, maybe you guys will have found the last puzzle part by then and I can just call the power company, thank them for their service these past years, wish them a merry Christmas, and ask how soon they can move those ugly power lines and poles from my land.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 18, 2009, 10:07:46 PM
  Tesla discovered the photoelectric effect.  A photon can be absorbed by an atom and overcome the binding energy of the electron to the atom.  The electron is then ejected from the atom.  The plate metal will go positive and want the electrons back bad. The electrons if made to drift away from the plate via orientation of magnetic field lines relative to the photocathode then a more efficient conversion of radiant energy to electrical energy is possible.  Especially if the electron get the hell out of there circuit is used to feed the other side of the capacitor.  Then you need to exploit Faraday's laws of induction which basically say the faster you change the magnetic field about a conductor the higher the electromotive force emitted from the conductor which should come into play when you discharge the capacitor.   You will have to use energy from the cap to saturate the core of an inductor but you will not have to use much to collapse it.  The collapse mother nature does for you and quite rapidly.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 18, 2009, 10:28:50 PM
photoelectric effect of longitudinal wave,if you wish to find a proof it is in one of Tesla GB patent
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 18, 2009, 11:58:57 PM
   Would a sound wave travelling through a plasma be called a scaler wave.  Tesla was into making plasma because he understood it's conductive properties.  What if he was gonna create a plasma from tower top to tower top and then transmit waves through the plasma.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 19, 2009, 03:46:11 AM
  "You will have to use energy from the cap to saturate the core of an inductor but you will not have to use much to collapse it.  The collapse mother nature does for you and quite rapidly."
[/quote]

Sparks,  this might be a dummy question but is this what that means?   When a load(work) is connected and demanding a lot from the inductor then the collapse or spark to earth would occur less because the load is using what normally would seek another path to earth ground?  If the load is reduced or removed I guess the cap would discharge much faster, mother nature.     Would that be what this means?

Another dummy question is bugging me.  If the wire on the receiving L-2 coil is 1/4 the length of the L-1 coil would the nst frequency being fed into L-1 be four times greater in the L-2 coil?  I know turns adjust volts but length?
Also, your explanation of the other stuff is very helpful to me.  Thanks
bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 19, 2009, 04:49:46 AM
    BW 

   Once we have the capacitor charged by whatever power supply whether it be a radio signal capture into a resonant circuit or a photelectric cell or perhaps an aa battery the next step is to store up this energy in a magnetic field.  Like we would find inside the core of an inductor.  When the capacitor is discharged to the inductor the inductor is like a flywheel.  At first no current will flow.  What is happening is that the coil is changing the magnetic field within its turn.  This is causing the coil to also generate voltage back against the capacitor.  The space or core of the inductor is going to saturate at some point and then the capacitor will discharge very rapidly with only the resistance of the inductor which is low now in play.  If we interupt the circuit before the core saturates the ambient magnetic field will return the magnetic field within the inductor to whatever it was before things got changed.  The core will magnetically reconnect with the ambient magnetic field Don was talking about.  This will produce a changing magnetic field within the core of the inductor that is fast unless we have steel or other ferromagnetic stuff in there.  This causes a large voltage spike which is supplied by the ambient magnetic parameters not by any supplied voltage.  We have to remember that voltage is induced whenever the magnetic field is changed around a conductor.  Doesnt matter if it is going from concentrated to diffused or vice versa it is going to induce an emf.  The faster it changes the higher the emf.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 19, 2009, 05:39:32 AM
I understand better now.  Thanks again.
bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 19, 2009, 08:49:00 AM
I have posted a utube kinda validating the pots on my plasma globe.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJHpSrtdd0

I need to get the hang of producing the videos but at least this one is a start.

I had to cull quite a bit, even-so I think it qualifies the need for having pots built into the plasma globe.
There will be quite a bit of change when I put the L-2 coil on the globe.   The meters will quantify that statement.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 19, 2009, 08:59:26 AM
Little help,

Looking at Tesla's patents, about condencers, then zooming forward to today I am struck by how Nicola just stated use one with substantial value and of excellent construction.
Where Don or others state values like , in excess of 5KV and 34 uF or higher.
I cannot rap my mind around how to choose a capacitor for my personal application.

Don said the plasma globe would output 40,000KVA RMS , I do not have that big of transformer and so am I thinking right about choosing my cap based on the output value of my transformer?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 19, 2009, 02:57:39 PM
H2Oc       This vid may help, look @ around 2:35  Don says to use a resistor to correct the frequency to whatever the transformer requires.  He refers to the ARRL chart to get values.  To me this indicates that you could use a big cap size based on expected power out, whatever you choose then with chart you can select a resistor size to reduce the frequency (60 or 120 hz ???). 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pvBOVB9Au0s&feature=related

Remember----In one of the videos Don said that he could only show us so much but if we are sharp we could figure out what's missing.   Also remember, what I say might be the blind guy giving directions to the man who only needs glasses.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 19, 2009, 07:21:56 PM
check this out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBfGcV12po4&feature=related
look around minute 2, I saw this same strange effect
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 19, 2009, 07:52:03 PM
good find
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 19, 2009, 08:15:19 PM
The controls probably alter the voltage, frequency or resistance, obviously. So here is a simple setup.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqOr2_rkm7I&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqOr2_rkm7I&feature=related)
I have built this 2 years ago and this does work. You can use an ignition coil also.

The purple light is higher frequency than the white visible. The white looks bigger because we can see more of the radiations. But the purple is just as big going towards the ultraviolet.

Now if you use the frequency spectrum chart
http://www.adec.edu/tag/spectrum.html (http://www.adec.edu/tag/spectrum.html)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqOr2_rkm7I&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqOr2_rkm7I&feature=related)
http://www.usbyte.com/common/approximate_wavelength.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 20, 2009, 08:37:55 AM
I got my plasma globe meter tests put on utube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSC3QCsAyAI

 :o

As you can see the adjustments and measurements seem to demonstrate various resonant points. the shocking and sparks do not seem to correlate at all with the freq. but they do with the visual effects.
there is one pretty narrow freq adjustment that sets the two resonant values stated above in sinc. I will put that together for you next.

This seems to be a good way to visualize resonance and how they are tied together somehow.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 20, 2009, 06:24:59 PM
H2Oc      Thanks for video.   Your multimeter did what mine did.  I got unreliable readings.    Don said mulltimeters don't work with high freq.  see http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf look at page 33 last paragraph, then look @ page 75 item #4 then #6.  4 explains why our multimeters don't work at this stage, I guess they would be useful downstream from the IT after frequency is lowered to mains 60hz or with nst not running upstream.     I have the paper copy of Don's book and I am almost sure I remember him reccomending an EMF meter (ghost meter) for hf stage.  I'll try to find that again.
Every time I review Don's book I find things that didn't click the first time around.   
Try touching the wire you felt a shock in to a true earth ground wire.   I think it will make a plasma arc then.

Isn't Don chosing the coils and caps with values for big storage then last with the ARRL chart picking a resistor to fit his goals of balancing or tuning coils to each other then finally one more to drop the frequency to a near dead 60hz ?   Maybe we're making this too hard, I keep going back to Tesla to see past the fog.  He didn't have a scope, multimeter, or ghost meter. 

I like the idea for tuning with pot, looks like Don's four coil setup (photo in chair) uses those as well.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 20, 2009, 07:10:26 PM
Those are am radio tuners, variable capacitors to match the tanks alike.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 20, 2009, 07:31:42 PM
GK,    Is a potentiometer an adjustable resistor?   I thought that was on his unit in chair seat.   Just guessing.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 20, 2009, 09:26:23 PM
You could be right! The C is the spacing of the L2 windings. So he would have a parallel RLC, big time.

Smith.pdf page 3-26
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Smith.pdf

Right now I am still going down the path of variable frequency, variable HV supply by Sine wave. Adjusting the freq is less painful than calculating or snipping wires. I have variac / MOT supply, an ignition coil, & flyback setups. The 555 to 3055 to ignition coil is the quickest. That way you wrap up the L2 adhoc, find the resonant, wrap 1/4 wave L1, and you're good to go.
Also in the movie, Don folds a wire in half and wraps around his arm. This is the Tesla patent. The L2 that Don uses is all wound the same direction with a 4 turn split in the middle. There are only a few little details left out. But this info is the closest yet.

@Gotoluc made a transmitter/receiver pair and said he didn't know where to go next. Don gives the answer on page 3-27. Just make more L2 coils and get equal (equal?) copies of the resonant energy without the L1 seeing any load adjustment or additional expenditure. Make adjustments to the secondary tanks and draw off the power.

Here is the secret everybody has been looking for. I have said this before multiple times. Our current power dogma is based on moving electrons / transverse waves great distances. We know this is wrong (If anybody likes to argue about fringe science weirdos then just tell them this and they shut up immediately! And you walk away a genius.). The answer is resonant energy transfer through kinetic / longitudinal effort. Click, clack, click, clack. We pick up the energy at the other side as fast as the speed of light and no energy consumed. Tesla stated 'A flick of a match can be heard at both ends of the universe immediately'. Line up 5 steel balls. Hit the first one and the last one shoots off. What if you had 3 balls at the end or 14? Go play Billiards and on the break shot you hit 1 ball and the other 14 fly off. The answer has always been on the pool table. Even Bill Muller showed this on his kitchen floor demo.

~giantkiller. Kinetically any winding will do. Super simple. Call this one done. Merry Christmas.

p.s. Everybody do this and keep your head down. Pass it along, pay it forward. The only way anyone could not do this is if they haven't read this post. Then they get a big 'DUH' in their Christmas stocking along with a lump of coal.

P.s.s. Thanks to all the great men before, especially Eric Dollard. I heard he is living in his car. If anybody can verify this and location that is the only thing I want this Christmas. Breaks my heart that good men go down.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 21, 2009, 12:53:54 AM
GK, http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/ericdollard.htm   this is all I find about Eric living out of his car in 2001

Your steel ball thing helps. 

Don's book is valuable and builds confidence.  The answers are in it, the ones missing are in the reference sources. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: turbo on December 21, 2009, 01:36:01 AM
Yep  :) Thats it.

Many configs possible but they do share similar things....

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on December 21, 2009, 02:45:14 AM

If Dollard has been living in his car since 2001, that explains his long beard!

Does anyone have the PDF copy of Don's book? I have looked everywhere. I can not even find a paper copy.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 21, 2009, 03:53:39 AM
I was a pinball wizard too.

GK, http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/ericdollard.htm   this is all I find about Eric living out of his car in 2001

Your steel ball thing helps. 

Don's book is valuable and builds confidence.  The answers are in it, the ones missing are in the reference sources.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 21, 2009, 04:13:06 AM
GK, I saw written that Don had 48 different devices.  They all operated on same principal.  Some used stacks of metal plate/insulator caps like the plasma tube thing on page 3-23 read bottom of second to last paragraph it says use as many plates as you want, each set makes an exact duplicate of the full force and effect of the energy present in the magnetic waves without depleting the source.  Another one of his 48 uses stacks of coils, one with sixteen total, one end of the big tank on one device is a badassed capacitor, the other device has boo-coo coils.  Some of the forty eight have both but all resonate and all use a bloch wall to make electrons spin left or right and all catch the electrons on return an convert to usable power.  They get caught at right angles and sent to earth ground, Don says the better your ground the better the performance of your device. 
I noticed the wire Don caught in the middle and shows how to get amps, helped me a lot.  A lot of this is old radio.  I remember antennas that draw radio waves in, tiny antennas that preform like huge ones.  I don't know much about old radios but remember tuning c.b. antennas swr just fine tuning to wavelength.  At resonance this should preform like the tiny antenna by drawing energy to it, curving the waves of magnetic energy.  The more times I read Don's book, the more I get.  The man really wanted us to get it, may God rest his soul.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 21, 2009, 05:17:58 AM
Imagine bathtub with an inch or two of water in the bottom.  You take your hands and put them into the middle of the tub and open them pushing water towards each wall.  It sloshes up either end then comes back to your now closed hands (palm to palm).  The two returning waves meet on either side of your palm to palm hands.  This wave is twice as tall as the two waves you initiated.  You wait and just as the wave starts to slide down the outside of your "praying" hands you split it and send two more waves out that come back and form a wave a little bit bigger this time.  You do it until the third wave hits the ceiling.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 21, 2009, 05:40:39 AM
Sparks you just explained perfectly what I think is going on.  With almost no effort but good timing you can send darn near all the water in the tub over the ends or you could just shake the house a little for kicks and giggles.  I got my brain around that one.   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 21, 2009, 06:16:39 AM
Here are pics of the micro Smith pvc. The L1 slider coil is 1/16 wavelength of the 2 - 200ft L2 coils.

--Giantkiller. Still.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 21, 2009, 06:27:46 AM
geese man, OK all the bad news about Eric Dollard and, God rest his soul is Don Smith dead?

I hope we are successfull soon I would like to shake someones hand who has been inspirational to all of us, God help us to rescue those in need.

Any way I have been contemplating the answers to my questions with the input given. I believe it is time for me to validate my calculations and chronological layout of my replication journal.
I figured out how to find the necessary size of the capacitors in Don's formulas, As W= .5 X CE squared X cps. thus we are using 120 cps because the .5 is used in the formula to designate 60 up and 60 cps down.
Where the voltage is found by the electrostatic voltmeter.
Don stated he was using a small gas engine spark plug and setting the clearance at .0025. This must be my next step because I must be able to get the voltage value reading. to choose my capacitor value. 
Two thoughts here; first Nicola Tesla stated that the best performance of a gap is heard as a clap, sharp! Second Don states the faster the oscillations the more energy pumped.
Conclusion; Using a small gap 25 tenthousandths gap you wouldn't have much waisted time thus setting the output by the amount of space involved in between the air gap.
second thought; As Don points out the more negative and less negative pole divisions of ambient non ionic electron; one side of a capacitor the sky, and the more negative surface of the earth, thus choosing the amount of ambient energy desired in the relationship choices.. being less negative amperage air gap and more negative earth grounded spark gap voltage. thus depending on your build nst or plasma would dictate what type is needed for optimal usage.

I am getting anxious to make something happen in the shop.
Time spent studying is as important as work on the bench.

Carefull considerations
Superior planning
overwhelming command of resources.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 21, 2009, 06:35:20 AM
Something just hit me like a brick.  Don made a lot of devices to do the same thing.   He likely could have built more if he wanted.  I say that because he didn't copy Tesla's inventions, he just made one of his own instead.  His generators do just what Tesla's plate in the air device did except faster and smaller.  Don's recommended reading and references are more clues, he gives everything from the American Radio Relay League ARRL handbook to one called High Voltage Measurement Techniques.  He wants us to find what he couldn't tell us.   

He mentioned a magetostriction oscillator, an op amps, a multipactor, and a few other things in his book.   I googled them and some appear to already be doing some of what we are trying to do.

The pdf files on Don's book are different.  One is written in mostly Don's words and the other is mostly someone explaining it third party and that may have some advantages.  The one in Don's words is here http://www.free-energy-info.com/Smith.pdf      This file seems to be an exact copy of the book I have except near the bottom under Don's photo.  Below the photo is new info not in my book.  It also has some killer additional reading I mentioned above.   The other copy told by maybe Don's assistant (just a guess) is at this link http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Smith.pdf
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 21, 2009, 07:00:51 AM
H2Odude, I did hear Don had passed away.  It came to me in an email from the guy who did a short video with Don.  The video has Don and him demonstrating a plasma tube, I posted it here awhile back.   
 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on December 21, 2009, 08:03:00 AM
speaking of resonance, here's some I like a lot           http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDeXUvWbLp8
Merry Christmas to all.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on December 21, 2009, 10:38:12 AM
bw
Nice !  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDeXUvWbLp8 [Very Nice !!]

H20c said
"I hope we are successfull soon I would like to shake someones hand who has been inspirational to all of us, God help us to rescue those in need".
also very nice!!

Sparks
 Mythbusters 2006 Earthquake Machine (Aug. 30)
Adam and Jamie take on one of the greatest scientist/inventor and myth creator legends of all time: Nikolai Tesla and his Earthquake Machine.

And it worked, shook the whole bridge with a little repetitive thump[not even synced to resonance]

The sharing I see here ,is what its all about.

I think" I'm"even starting to understand.[GK MANY thanks to you,and others ] The fog is lifting,this knowledge has been a long time coming!!

GREAT STUFF BROTHERS !!

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 21, 2009, 04:53:28 PM
You all are welcome.
But no one stands alone...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-17NWRddUk&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-17NWRddUk&feature=related)

bw
Nice !  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDeXUvWbLp8 [Very Nice !!]

H20c said
"I hope we are successfull soon I would like to shake someones hand who has been inspirational to all of us, God help us to rescue those in need".
also very nice!!

Sparks
 Mythbusters 2006 Earthquake Machine (Aug. 30)
Adam and Jamie take on one of the greatest scientist/inventor and myth creator legends of all time: Nikolai Tesla and his Earthquake Machine.

And it worked, shook the whole bridge with a little repetitive thump[not even synced to resonance]

The sharing I see here ,is what its all about.

I think" I'm"even starting to understand.[GK MANY thanks to you,and others ] The fog is lifting,this knowledge has been a long time coming!!

GREAT STUFF BROTHERS !!

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 22, 2009, 08:45:28 PM
Built.
Going to raise the voltage across the coil driver to 250v. Currently @ 12v / 150ma is not enough to cross the air gap of L1 to L2 with a load.

The tank cap L2 is .047 @ 500v, the storage cap is 3900uf @ 400v. I see people using uwave caps. These don't have the storage capacity.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on December 22, 2009, 09:20:42 PM
GK,

If this is an attempt a the Don Smith design the L1 tank is where the voltage builds until it reaches the breakdown of the spark gap which is rather low in voltage. The spark gap is used to isolate the primary tank from loading from the exciter ckt. the diodes are to convert the 3~9kv to pulsed DC. Could use a 555 timer ckt with a transistor and audio xformer to generate this off a 9v battery. A burnt fuse will provide the sparkgap.

Create a second tank with L2 and use the diodes to create the pulsed DC to step charge the large cap bank. The other transformer is nothing more than a isolation transformer. Use the ground connection to provide the electron source on the output side. Do not forget to tune the output for the desired frequency using a resistor.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 23, 2009, 03:58:33 AM
Thanks. That is good thinking. I will only output power not control it in the last stages.
Your 555 circuit is a stun gun ckt. I am going to step back here and do a 555 to irf840 to ignition coil or flyback. I only need sine at the end which the xfrmr does. And I don't need anything huge on my bench at the moment. I am striving for variable freq utmost.


GK,

If this is an attempt a the Don Smith design the L1 tank is where the voltage builds until it reaches the breakdown of the spark gap which is rather low in voltage. The spark gap is used to isolate the primary tank from loading from the exciter ckt. the diodes are to convert the 3~9kv to pulsed DC. Could use a 555 timer ckt with a transistor and audio xformer to generate this off a 9v battery. A burnt fuse will provide the sparkgap.

Create a second tank with L2 and use the diodes to create the pulsed DC to step charge the large cap bank. The other transformer is nothing more than a isolation transformer. Use the ground connection to provide the electron source on the output side. Do not forget to tune the output for the desired frequency using a resistor.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on December 23, 2009, 06:13:52 PM
GK

I have corrected schematic a bit.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on December 23, 2009, 06:32:57 PM
The L2 with a Cap will get you the sine or a close proximity and the output stage you are right, you do not want to try and control it there. The large Caps are for conversion.

A 555 Circuit is simple and easy, a simple audio xformer is something you have or can get from almost anywhere. If you need feedback remember to mod the 555 circuit to use a trigger coil near L1/L2 thus you get synchronicity.  Remember what Don Smith said it is simple, L1 and L2 are the magic with some diodes and a few cap's. The ground is the electron source. Just like lightening.

The other option is a blocking OSC which will train itself to the radiated field thus sync itself (if it is in proximity).
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 23, 2009, 10:42:30 PM
@Forest,
I see the spark gap after L2. I left off the L1 stage for simplicity. The sparkgap is in the L1 stage as a neon. I tried that and like STprue found the neon isn't a largest enough gap. Don also used automotive gaps.

@starcruiser,
I'll try a bunch of things this weekend. Christmas takes precedence, naturally.
The stun gun ckt has all that you mention. I tried it as is but I think the larger LC steel core on the output stage causes problems. I will remove this last stage and the use just the generator ckt itself leaving the Smith L2 as the substituted output xfrmr. An iron core xfmr tends to pass the squares of the pulses through. The air coil does a good job of smoothing. The microSmith air coil I have puts out a smooth sine at 3x the freq. If I want to use my Keely sine generator I have the add a current stage at the output.

GK

I have corrected schematic a bit.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 24, 2009, 02:17:16 AM
     I posted this over in tesla technology but put it here in my brothers thread because I admire his skills and tenacity.  He just found the common denominator for all of you who will take the time to dream of a world of limitless energy.  Energy enough to return mankind to the Garden of Eden.  Energy to take an arrid desert and turn it into a lush tropical paradise.   A world of bounty. A universe of bounty.  Merry Christmas GK  GRUMPY BEP WATTSUP MARCO OTTO PIRATE JEANNA MK1 ACER RAMSET FATBIRD INNO STEPHAN  and the many others who have shared their life with us on this board. May this new trip around the Sun be your best yet. 
    The self inductance part of the impedance of a coil isnt a problem because this is the phenomenon that is being exploited.  The sparkgap is of course in the middle of it all.  This is where the conversion begins.   Did you know that you can create a very nice refridgerator using magnetic fields?  Tesla runs over meets Kelvin runs over and meets Crookes.  Kelvin is into cold Crookes is into plasma.  Tesla is into electricity.  The magnetic field causes a compression of the aether.  Upon relaxation of the magnetic field the aether expands.  Upon expansion thermal energy flows into the field.  Upon compression it flows out of the field.  Conversion of thermal energy into electrical energy.  No ands ifs or buts about it.  Stars are magnetically selfconfined plasmas. Magnetically self confined plasma has a negative specific heat.  This was proven a while back by the hot fusion scientists and buried real fast.  Why would you need to have fusion when you could have thermal to electrical energy conversion only limited by how fast the conduits can get the chaotic gas kinetic energy to the reactor.  No pollution air goes in hot    comes out cold.  Endothermic reaction followed by an exothermic reaction. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on December 24, 2009, 03:24:45 AM
Sparks!
That is exciting in-site.
I am going to take extreme measures to building my spark gaps with high tolerances and micro adjustments.

I think if I can adjust in full revolutions of the wheel to an accurate .001" per revolution this should be close enough to achieve maximum effect.

Then too, to make two different kinds; one strictly air gap and the other with ground.

Figuring out where to put each, I contemplate what Don stated, we are utilizing the heavy side of the amperage. where it is found?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on December 24, 2009, 08:46:59 AM
Hello all,

Merry Christmas to all people here and all around the world.

@sparks

in your post youre talking about Tesla and his sparkgaps, not about the TPU! I hope.

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on December 24, 2009, 03:02:48 PM
Fellas and Jeanna[she's the only girl??]

Make the rest of your[our] life,
 the best of your life!!

You guys give me goose bumps on a regular basis.

May "merry' be a BIG part of your holidays and "Peace"

a bigger part of your lives.

God bless you Brothers [and Jeanna]
Oh yes and Witsend [the other girl]

Chet

PS Sparks
On this next orbit ,we'll be traveling  about 18 miles for every beat of our hearts [67,000mph]while spinning at 1000 mph [seems like I should have an air bag or seat belt??]
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 24, 2009, 04:00:31 PM
   @Otto

    GK once said a most interesting thing.  He saw the tpu as a large spark gap.   I have a hard time with the tpu exact construction and theory of operation.  I do know that Tesla created electomagnetic resonant circuits using bifilar wound pancake coils.  The resonant circuit in the all in one packaged bifiilar wound energy capacitor not a charge storage device an Energy saver upper.
I do not know the effect of two such energy capacitors resonat at the same frequency but exited at slightly different times or phase offset by nanoseconds residing within each others mutual capacitance and inductive fields of influence.  It may have been Marco who provided an oscilliscope shot of a couple of torroidal coils ringing and the remarkable thing was that the relative bias between the two ringers was changing. Floating up and down the oscope.  Well anyway I did my little overunity experiment a number of years ago and it produced too strong a reaction in the ambient field for me.
Marco knows what I'm talking about once it starts happening it is real hard to stop.  I dont even dare replicate my own experiment at this point.  SM said this is not for beginners and he sure as shit spoke the truth at that point. 
    Peace Love and Prosperity to all.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 24, 2009, 06:23:03 PM
@sparks,
Yes, I remember saying that. And maybe at the time I did not finish my thought. I felt my answer might not have any weight or be too far out there in the incorrect terms. I know most people had problems following me. As the energy goes around the coils the layers or plates it discharges electrostaticly. This firing at the wattage levels of the TPU would create a thumping via one way direction of operation with the magnetic connection and disconnection. I also saw that the breaking of the flux was not the energy producer but that happens during the reconnect and that would happen on the other side of the wire. All of this activity would be on one side of the wire which would create a condensed magnetic field. Since the BEMF is larger than the FEMF we have our answer right there. There would be a larger force or effect on one side of the coils as they sit in a ring. Smith's PVC jogs back and forth. This effort is now seen by the Earth's field which also collapses on to the coils. The BEMF is both things. So the resistance of moving the TPU around while in operation is really the point of connection with the Earth's field. Like Bolt said 'A virtual iron molecule' and not by an iron core but by the magnetic field created. Not by the freedom of movement, the release or skipping. Just depends on the interpreter's point of view because the language actually explains both sides. So the resistance looks the like start of gravity control. A minute effect of electrogravitics. TTBrown's tests were very close in parameter types to the TPU. There were just too many 'Oh Wow!' moments to stop and get explanations straight. Same event as if one would see the Holy Grail the first time and knowing what it is. Like a constant dream come true with no chance to catch one's breath. The comment in the latest Indiana Jones movie was 'The space between the spaces'.
I hope this clarifies some things.

And your explanations have been very helpful too.

   @Otto

    GK once said a most interesting thing.  He saw the tpu as a large spark gap.   I have a hard time with the tpu exact construction and theory of operation.  I do know that Tesla created electomagnetic resonant circuits using bifilar wound pancake coils.  The resonant circuit in the all in one packaged bifiilar wound energy capacitor not a charge storage device an Energy saver upper.
I do not know the effect of two such energy capacitors resonat at the same frequency but exited at slightly different times or phase offset by nanoseconds residing within each others mutual capacitance and inductive fields of influence.  It may have been Marco who provided an oscilliscope shot of a couple of torroidal coils ringing and the remarkable thing was that the relative bias between the two ringers was changing. Floating up and down the oscope.  Well anyway I did my little overunity experiment a number of years ago and it produced too strong a reaction in the ambient field for me.
Marco knows what I'm talking about once it starts happening it is real hard to stop.  I dont even dare replicate my own experiment at this point.  SM said this is not for beginners and he sure as shit spoke the truth at that point. 
    Peace Love and Prosperity to all.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 28, 2009, 07:23:59 PM
Smith stated the electron spin direction creates either volts or amps from their respective secondary ends.

Put either 2, 3, 4, or greater combination in series placed in a circle on 1 secondary and you get to make wattage at the intersecting points between the primaries.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 29, 2009, 04:37:56 AM
Thought I would reinterate from someone who definately helped me out.
The explanation is impecable...

its a while since a looked at the TPU but i always maintained that coil banging with pulses, and logic control is wrong!

In the past few months/years many many more RE/OU devices are shown on the net and they all have common themes. SM said the answer lay with Tesla and he is right. Its only a case of resonance and self oscillation. Again SM emphasized there is no mass control circuits and in fact no more then self running oscillators.

What i do know based on the work of Tesla and Don Smith is that RE = RF in a node of time space and magnetic coupling does not suffer entropy loss and this is the KEY!

In order to make RE you must first excite the local ambient space. Anything over 100Khz enters the RF arena and split EM can occur. 

Take HV coil transformer as used in strobe supply it will give 5Kv if we drive with  5Khz clock using a 12 volt source battery.  If i couple this through a balun driver i can match this into a collector loop of 5 turns.

if i take this  collector loop i get this to self oscillate at say 1 meg with a 2,200pf cap and the result will be around 1 meg that contains 5Khz modulation.

If this coil is loaded in anyway i will kill the source! if i rectify this i end up with DC 5000 volts with 5Khz hash as modulation, so far so good. EACH turn on the collector now has 5000/5 turns = 1000 volts. But i don't touch this source and this is unlike what everyone does on this forum is play with the source you must NOT touch this!

Now make another collector of 1 full turn. Its LC =F will be quite a bit higher then the primary driver the ratio needs to be 1.618 higher so 1.618 megs.   In open air non cored magnetic coupled to the source this loop will acquire 1000 volts. Remember SM explained all this in his notes.

This secondary collector will acquire magnetic non loss induction to the primary driver. Its o/p tank is fed to a FWBR and will be 1000 volts and the current is limited ONLY by the wire resistance.

Again if i want more current i add another collector and it COPIES from the source! SM explains all this again in his notes. If i want more volts i add this collector in series to give 2000 volt supply.

SO

What are the magic frequencies? There are NONE!!! only magnetic induction is 1.618 higher then source F

1  Clock driver to start HV

2 Driver RE energizer collector F = diameter of L plus C

3 collector load = F = diameter of L plus C and is tuned to 1st collector for best results look for 1.618 higher then source.

O/p = turns ratio of collector 1 to collector 2 into FWBR = DC PLUS source modulation = 5Khz 1000 VDC

Sounds too simple then read Tesla patents, read everything about Don Smith and Kapanadze the latter has several working systems using RF magnetic induction devices.

Can i build this using parts from Rat Shack? YES Is it simple like SM said? YES and does it work like Tesla as SM suggested? YES Does it rely on resonance? YES and of simple low cost circuits no complex mosfet coil bangers? YES

The minimum number of collector coils required is 2 one source one copy. But i can have one source and 5 copies each copy becomes a NEW supply of FULL capacity.

Don't forget RE = RF in energy transformation!

--giantkiller
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on December 29, 2009, 03:49:05 PM
Thats very interesting GK.  How is your Don coil replication coming along?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 29, 2009, 06:42:32 PM
I had a time expenditure in a SNAFU.
Had a power outage(Not by me but a storm) which took out my main station's wifi dongle. My Macfee choked and Sality virus took off. My station had repeatedly crashed before this incident. Had Zonelabs, got rid of that, had McAfee and got rid of that, downloaded Avasta, it found the Sality virus in a number of locations still on my harddrive and some down in the system root. Deleted the files, repaired the OS, bought a new wifi, now need to configure the pc to get access out to the net. I keep getting 'Aquiring network address'. This a configuration change I will alter. Main station runs much faster now. I am going to stick with Avasta.

Have gone back into my library stack of OU prints. A good habit to get into which reveals prior insight.

@stprue
To answer your question I have a setup which blew my amp meter fuse but the meter still showed a display of zero and the voltmeter worked. I took out the meter. I placed variable capacitors in circuit to adjust tuning. Did not see anything. Something on my list is the Opamp buffer from the xr2206 Keely controller to drive a circuit.

I did have the results Bolt metioned above a number of times where you put in a lower Khz frequency and get Mhz as a coil reading. Once 'tuned' is achieved it seems the the magnetic field is static at the RMS value and further out it is dynamic, what would appear as a waveforrm on top of a DC. You saw that in your 2 coil experiment where you had no inductive coupling when the two coils touched. The B field has latency after the E potential equals no light lit. This explains the height in the TPUs. My thinking tells me that when one drives a coil with HV and low current that this is a different operation than a low voltage like 12-36 with current. The later means some tuning. My suspicion says the former is what Bolt is explaining and that Smith has entered into the description. If we tune at low voltages that would not be a precursor for operating at the high voltages. This is what I am heading towards.

Christmas is not the best bench time either.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on December 29, 2009, 06:59:40 PM
Thank you for the insite...I agree with it all!  I have been thinking about TPU height and resonance and induction as key aspects to be examining for any sort of sucessful TPU operation.  I also like the direction Em has taken with his coils but I can't tune like he can...yet!  One of my goals is to power a cfl driver with one of my coils inductively but I want to tune either the cfl driver to the coil or the coil to the cfl freq!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on December 29, 2009, 07:23:40 PM
Christmas is not the best bench time either.

Ho Ho Ho....... How right you are....

@GK

Yes, thanks for putting that post up again.

I will be able to test this soon once I add my second ring, I just need to do some tests with the second ring isolated from the first and the toroid. The high voltage pulsing is not a problem either.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on December 30, 2009, 09:36:51 AM
   Checkout the Aharonov-Bohm effect.  There is what they call electromagnetic potential or A potential.  It is not positive or negative or north or south potential it is the whole deal relative to the rest of stuff.  Most times a description immediately uses the language of mathmatics.  Basically two guys working on Solutions to Einsteins equations predicted this effect pretty much simultaneously.  A particle (or wave) is relavent to the space in which an electromagnetic fluctuation or oscillation is occuring WITHOUT being in the electrical or magnetic field of that part of space.   That means two standing waves seperated by spacetime are effecting each other due to the difference in their electromagnetic oscillations.  The vacuum spacetime grid aether or whatever you want to call it conducts this ema information or potential difference.  To me this basically says the aether is a gravity conductor.  The polarity of gravity is determined by the density of standing waves aka photons.  So BOLTS is right.  Leave the main tank alone.  It creates a gravity pole.  If a vacuum is an extremely good conductor of gravity mass is a great resistor of gravity.  Causes alot of gravity collisions and heating effects coronal discharges light traveling waves strong and weak forces all sorts of radiant events as gravity information gets chaotic. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 30, 2009, 06:43:03 PM
A nice collection of fringe entities soon to become a stable reality.
http://www.unusualresearch.com/scalarbib/scalarbib.htm (http://www.unusualresearch.com/scalarbib/scalarbib.htm)

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on December 31, 2009, 05:10:12 PM
GK
When I was a kid I would read the life story[up to that time] of Chuck Yaeger
The SOUND barrier, one of the brave souls that strapped himself to a bomb[very big rocket] and was dropped out of a converted bomber[ just like a bomb would be] while every one else stood by and watched.

Those in the "know" at the time predicted DOOM!!
Faster then sound are you NUTS etc. etc.....

So Chuck threw the switches that lit the fuses that blew him past that barrier

A resounding BOOOOM was heard on the ground,
surely this was the end for this madman , thoughts of horror raced in the minds of the men on the ground, such a big sound

With the cocpit shaking like a cement mixer, suddenly all was quiet

Chuck had just made History!!

GK, you remind me of this guy.

Somethings you do alone.

Thanks for all you do brother

Chet

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on December 31, 2009, 06:27:43 PM
I say 'Thank you', to everyone, great and small and there are those who keep me on track.  :)
I missed JDO300, Motorcoach, Dansway, EMDevices, Bruce_tpu, Yucca, Gotoluc, JoeDirt, Sparks, Forest, Loner, Ramset, Earl, Bibhas De, JLNaudin, and Wattsup earlier. Everybody is important. Aint' this adventure great?

Had to go back over my library to recoup my thoughts and find another angle. There are so many things that fit together that is gets overwhelming. But in this late date it is a positive effect. So for those who are just starting out or daunted by the 'Too much' then 'Be still', 'Press on', 'Keep one hand in your pocket', 'Let no one tell you "No"' and 'Keep your head down'. You'll will get to a point where when you go back over your library you will see vast universes open up that you didn't see before. It is called the 'Truth'.

So,
Now that I have my PC fixed I am back on the HV / variable frequency supply. Instead of plugging the variactor in the wall I am going to drive the 120vac plug with my Keely controller through a fet driver. This type of setup to purchase can be quite expensive. The Keely controller was USD50, the variac was USD80 and the MOT was USD18. If I need more voltage I can add a microwave xfmr. I will post the setup and specs. Goal is potential and not conduction. We want purple streamers(potential) not white or yellow streamers (current). Higher voltage into smaller gauge wire. So a fet driving a coil is the supply and not the final result. The added stages create the HV(high volage) / LA(low amps) which is what the Neon Sign Transformers(NST) do but I'll have variable frequency from 1hz to 1Mhz. I will show the bandwith of operation at each stage. Naturally the limit of the variac will not help the MOT if the MOT has greater bandwidth. Wii will see. Any part of the sine wave that is not true will represent injected harmonics downstream. This may or may not be a bad thing. I got to have a clear goal or it doesn't make sense to start anything. That was Tesla's rule. Run through it in your mind a thousand times till it is perfected then put it in your hands. This power supply sits on a 2' by 2' board on a cart and is totally open. It is dangerous! Hooked up to this I have cheap meters, a portable isolated Oscope with 1000v probes. I am thinking of making a lid with a kill switch for this PW. I have 'thoughts of horror' too.

--Giantkiller. There are no challenges only opportunities.

GK
When I was a kid I would read the life story[up to that time] of Chuck Yaeger
The SOUND barrier, one of the brave souls that strapped himself to a bomb[very big rocket] and was dropped out of a converted bomber[ just like a bomb would be] while every one else stood by and watched.

Those in the "know" at the time predicted DOOM!!
Faster then sound are you NUTS etc. etc.....

So Chuck threw the switches that lit the fuses that blew him past that barrier

A resounding BOOOOM was heard on the ground,
surely this was the end for this madman , thoughts of horror raced in the minds of the men on the ground, such a big sound

With the cocpit shaking like a cement mixer, suddenly all was quiet

Chuck had just made History!!

GK, you remind me of this guy.

Somethings you do alone.

Thanks for all you do brother

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on January 01, 2010, 02:18:50 AM
GK you are right when you say
p.s. Everybody do this and keep your head down. Pass it along, pay it forward. The only way anyone could not do this is if they haven't read this post. Then they get a big 'DUH' in their Christmas stocking along with a lump of coal.

The clues Don and others left really are enough if we can see past our brainwashing.
Beware big caps like Don uses have the same power of a 44 Magnum caliber bullet, use extreme caution please.
bw
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on January 01, 2010, 06:50:36 AM
I finally moved the most important tools of my shop.

I started building my cart with remains of my hydroxy setup: It has a 2 1/2 HP electric motor powering a 130 amp alternator. this should give me plenty of valadation when I fire the completed system up. A new table top, mounted the plasma globe, the Inverter is placed with a cigerette liter incert. "inverter 12V 300 watt: There is a place for a car battery, a hardwired cord for normal 120 house supply, with an on off switch. and three recepticals. I started building the micro adj, for the 12 plug spark gap; Nicola tesla stated using multiple gaps increases voltage, he showes them in parralell. I have a grounding rod and circuit breaker panel to wire up soon. I tried an alluminum grounding plate but it would not stop the impulses enough to activate the rudimantary attempt of grounding.

Happy New Year!

Thank you all for contributing, This boosts my spirits and sharpens skills.

as we all pull in the same direction take caution and be patient as you go.
"Adopt the vurtue of nature, her secret is patients".

h2ocommuter.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: agentgates on January 01, 2010, 05:32:45 PM
@GK

Did You receive my PM? Thanks.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 03, 2010, 06:55:26 PM
@h2ocomm,
Nice setup.

@all,
On my current setup I put in 4khz, 7.6p-p sine wave to the fet gate. Across the series connected fet and coil I have 140vdc.
The red letter edition shows the output when power is on. Amp draw is less than 200 millliamps. The fet runs slightly warm at 88 degrees farenheit.
The frequency is locked solid at 8.69Mghz. That also looks like the correct frequency for the pen barrel coil that I am driving. By the way, there is no tank circuit there.


I have included a site on fet ringing and how it is a bad thing in power supply operation.
I believe this a necessary effect for the resonant circuit operation.
Don Smith says the whole circuit has to resonate / ring for the battery to self charge.
SM said he stumbled upon it.
Dollard calls it his multipactor. Farnsworth calls it his multipactor.
Spherics emphisizes angular themis.
I can't get rid of it when I resonate coils. The natural frequency just envelopes the whole circuit. How do I know? The little cheapy digi meters go funky but don't break. Great testing devices. Standard EE says filter it out, quench it or dump it to ground. If you don't this effect blows up equipment. Do we need a more obvious clue than this? Don Smith says this is a wrong approach and we should look at this with fresh eyes. He is adamantly clear of the stupidty.
I have seen experimenters scope shot of single pulses trying to emphasize rise and fall. This is important. This shows the angular wave impact in the circuit. This effect has to happen in surrounding space. Like the multipactor devices.
If you get this effect you can light a neon in proximity to the circuit. Stprue did this. It is just high frequency induction.

Square waves are equivalent to belly flops. You don't move the water like that. Sine waves are like gently pushing the water. Resonance will create rogue waves. ;)
In the movie 2012 just before Old Faithul blows there are sine waves.

--giantkiller. Go placidly amid the noise and haste. Happy New Year...


http://www.powersystemsdesign.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=87&Itemid=63
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on January 03, 2010, 07:24:58 PM
GK,do I see electrolytic capacitors ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 03, 2010, 07:37:00 PM
HVDC filtering.
But not when a battery is used.

And maybe not at all... ;)

GK,do I see electrolytic capacitors ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on January 04, 2010, 01:19:05 AM
  Dollard has done the math and the experiments.  There is a scalar potential that is everywhere all about us.  I asked once if we were all sitting in an air compressor tank how would we be able to know?  The only way would be to increase the flow of mass in the tank until it formed a vortex or cavitation.  Then step into the vortex and your ears would pop along with the dissolved nitrogen in your blood stream forming bubbles and all sorts of weird shit.  So be it with the scalar potential field.  A fifth dimension not of time xyorz exists.  It is the energy density dimension.  The Sun has so much energy or change residing within so much measure of the other vectors.  If we move x number of joules of energy so that it appears to manifest no change in all 4 dimensions it becomes relavent to the scalar potential field.  Aharanov=Bohm effect.  Einsteins spacetime warp.  Mass itself.  Tesla's bifiilar resonant coils.  SM's TPU>  It turns everything inside out.  Cold radiates,  insulators become conductors, conductors become resistors Mass becomes energy.  I have seen an entire truck body outlined in a blue coronal discharge as well as the flashing outlining the house.  Tesla with his experiment trying to figure out how much energy he could throw into a spot how fast saw the same thing.  The implosion devices dropped on poor unsuspecting humans.  Froze enough energy into the other 4 dimensions  it's scalar potential was heard round the Universes.  Is it any wonder that UFO sitings took a quantom leap afterwards.  What are these barbarians doing now with the "clockworks of the Universe"  They cant even figure out how to feed themselves but they sure as hell know how to destroy things.  Including a bit of trouble well beyond the 3rd rock from the Sun 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 04, 2010, 04:53:16 AM
@sparks!
Well let me tell ya what I got here and what I don't...
What I don't is something running off a nine volt battery, OU to drive our slow demons, or something to write home about(hell, who on the planet understands any of this beside a small group?)
I have Mighty Little hanging from my truck mirror. Fellow employees asked me does it run? I said 'Yes'. They asked me 'Why don't I do something with it?'. I told them I ain't the prairie dog this time. They told me to prove the technology. So I said 'Ok'. Then what I had to say shut them up dead in their tracks. I told them 'Their reality is based on moving electrons and that causes all kinds of detriment. That the real energy process is in atomic kinetics just like the table top toy made with the 5 pinballs suspended in the a wooden frame. The middle 3 balls don't move' yet the fifth ball flies away'. You could have heard a pin drop. They have since not asked me any more questions. They know I know what I stand behind.

Resonance is the 'Hammer of Thor'. Keely and Hutchison altered matter by ringing atomically. The molecules have no choice but to follow, obviously.

Looks like the new year has been rung in correctly. My present goal has been met by getting this HV Sine genny up and running. The rest is child's play. Today's posts show the feedback loop attained and in place. I will say this: if you use square waves you have to temper your build. I varied the genny sine wave frequency and the 8.6Mghz output did not change because the coil did not change. That is the secret. I will pursue this more.
What I am going to do now is wind another pen barrel 25 turns but spread them out to change the output frequency. By adding huge air capacitance the tank should run slower. Look at the air capacitance of a Tesla coil. Or maybe its all by wire length...

The HV supply design has been posted. It is made from junk. The controller I used is based on the XR2206 chip. 1hz to 1mghz. I just mentioned it don't matter. Bolt and Room posted the schematics. You could use a 555 with the 3 stage resistor sine wave creation. The parameters of the coil control the process because of using sine waves and air core. This ain't mine but Tesla, Smith and Dollard. It is that stinking simple. If frequency adjust is needed then it is in the control.
I looked at Dollard's Multipactor and was wondering about all the different primaries. One frequency to many resonances, a couple of feedbacks and 2 opposing secondaries equates to 2 Tesla coils bottom to bottom firing in opposite horizontal directions.

By using single IRF840s I can go to 500volts. Stack 'em up for higher Vs! But that would surpass the zoned design of this suburban box I live in.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on January 04, 2010, 02:40:27 PM
GK
Thanks [a humongous understatement]

And thanks for the smile I can't get rid of now ;D ;D ;D

Chet

PS "But that would surpass the zoned design of this suburban box I live in."

Hopefully you'll have a nice place in the country soon
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 04, 2010, 03:20:57 PM
#1. The 50 inch length is an incorrect match to the 200 foot 30awg coils that these are loosely coupled with.
#2. I will make reduce the spacing on the bottom one by half and test.

Another thing I have seen is using a 555 square wave to a 1:1 mag amp for sine wave creation. Small package.

@Chet,
Like Area 51? I have to get out of Dodge soon. I miss the 50 acres I used to have in the mountains. I thought about sending the wife around to the neighbors asking if they have experienced and cable or tv transmission interference. :D

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on January 05, 2010, 02:03:07 PM
GK
Knowing how this works[at least the effect]

You are just as likely to move things around on Mars or beyond

But it might not be a bad idea to borrow some sugar from the nieghbor [with the small talk about the cable]
 ;D ;D ;D

Chet
PS
Amazing stuff your finding in Gods sandbox.
Others are looking also
http://www.kepler.arc.nasa.gov/news/index.cfm?FuseAction=ShowNews&NewsID=16
[I don't think their having as much fun as you though.]
PPS
Thankyou for keeping this simple [maybe thanking the wrong guy??]
Then again they say men that are tops in their fields make it look easy.
Thats why I still have "BOTH" hands in my pockets.
Not that I'm that kind of guy.[I'm chompin at the bit over here]

 Patience is a virtue ,and I'm learning what it means to ""BE STILL""  :o


                 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on January 05, 2010, 04:47:42 PM
 :o :o :o  :o :o :o  :o :o :o

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8586.msg219636#new
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 05, 2010, 07:17:23 PM
@ramset,
Leedskalnin already put the inhabited planet map in the castle.

My latest test using the pen barrel coil coupled to two ratshack 30# crashed the cable box and fuzz ed the TV. The coil coupling distance is 6".
I do a couple of more turns tonight.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: altair on January 05, 2010, 07:21:43 PM
Hi GK,
your thread is fascinating !

Yesterday you quoted "bolt" from one of his posts from last August. He was mentioning the need for having a freq ratio of 1.618 which is the well known Golden Ratio in architectural design, but I've never seen that associated with electricity...
Could you tell me more if possible, or could you also tell me in what thread he was posting this.

Sincere thanks, you have been an inspiration

altair
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 05, 2010, 09:29:15 PM
@Altair,
Yes, the Phi ratio is what I use in the S)ignal H)eterodyning I)ntegration T)ransmitter. This is a 3 channel audio cannon with signal controlled phase shifting. I pick a base frequency then choose a Phi up and Phi down signal to get the output. The device also can do Phi Phasing. With the 3 tubes or cannons placed in a triangular postion I can send out waves of spinning audio producing targeting vortexes of sound. It is based on the XR2206 signal chip. Room3327 posted the schematic same as Elenco function generator. So, What does this do? I can power aim the audio intersection at any material or human. The frequency signal control is used for super high audio generation that produces a shifting signal on the last part of the bell curve of human hearing. The brain can hear but the ear cannot. With the noise cancellation microphone I can invert the incoming signal and cancel any external sound. Good for traffic stops with loud cars adjacent. I can also produce mixes that cause headaches in the target. Good for dogs that 'B)ark I)ntensely T)o C)ause H)avoc' in other yards. And if you live in apartments with noisy neighbors you can point this to your floor, walls or ceiling and cause irritability in them in their inappropriate hours.

I can replace the speakers with coils to produce very dangerous magnetic wave combinations or eclispes in adjacent space. Why? Lookup Hutchison, Leedskalnin, Rodin, Russell, and Keely. Keely and Russell give the best tables of numbers for manipulating matter. Rodin gives the best offsets for Keely's 3,6,9 combinations. Certain combinations pull gold out of Quartz. I am going test this device further at Red Rocks Amphitheater this summer. The echos enhance the process.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4299.msg199482#msg199482 (http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4299.msg199482#msg199482)
The last comment in the post above is the TPU secret.

--giantkiller. Enhanced living through Madness.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: altair on January 05, 2010, 11:20:44 PM
And I thought I knew everything !  (kidding)  :D
I would be genuinely interested if you could direct me where these topics were discussed. I like to blow my mind from time to time.
This SHI... of yours seems like the ticket !  :D

altair
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 06, 2010, 04:17:08 AM
A micromultipactor. A version of EVGray, Dollard's and Smith horizontal tube coil. Just a little different but the same.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on January 06, 2010, 01:40:51 PM
         


                     --giantkiller. Enhanced living through Madness.
                                                  ;D :o ;D

                                                    NICE!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: altair on January 06, 2010, 01:51:31 PM
Thanks for the link and pics. I'll have a lot to study in the next few days.
I already knew about Farnsworth's multipactor but your version looks intriguing.

Cheers
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on January 06, 2010, 08:15:33 PM
A micromultipactor. A version of EVGray, Dollard's and Smith horizontal tube coil. Just a little different but the same.

--giantkiller.

LOL, looks like the center of the LTPU. Does this work? Please enlighten us on the results.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 06, 2010, 09:52:49 PM
I built this for another build test from something Wattsup mentioned with a different set of specs for coils that Bruce_tpu made. And yes it is the center toroids. It is the TPU engine. All the units have this. The bigger rings of the the devices are for effective aperture, the power amplification stage. Just wires, that is why SM cuts them and on the opentpu he handles it gingerly. It will shock. He never lets anybody touch the smaller open unit. The section of windings shown on the open tpu is the sectional wind on the center toroids. The position is just outside instead of inside.
The new param is the primary red 30awg 1/4 wavelgth of the secondary green 26awg wavelength.
The secondary controls the run frequency. I have found that regardless of the input frequency the natural frequency of the secondary rules. I have even added pf tuning caps and the output frequency is tunable within the bandwith of the natural frequency.
So that told me that Don is correct in you measure the length and just wrap it around. The coil loop is not the device! It is the antenna/speaker. Everybody is missing the driver and feedback. Most of the builds are trying to incorporate the driver, feedback and antenna in one stage of the device. Separate these out.

LOL, looks like the center of the LTPU. Does this work? Please enlighten us on the results.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on January 07, 2010, 01:29:56 AM
@GK,

So did this build output anything of substance or didn't you drive it with enough EMF Like Don does? From the looks of it the wire lengths look to be approx the same since it appears you wrapped the green wire about the speaker (stranded) wire which looks to be 1.5 turns around the wire spool.

Anyways, so the wire lengths are based on the resonance of the coils then, secondary rules and you wound the primary to be 1/4 wave or the secondaries resonant f ?

Is the speaker/stranded wire the output connection?

Also from your comments do you think it is possible the outer ring is nothing more that a 1:1 transformer?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 07, 2010, 04:17:05 AM
I redrew what we have all seen. Tesla coils.
This is so clear. Alter the gauge or switch the pulsing coils.
Square waves create too high an impact to catch. All we see are sparks. But sine waves on the other hand resonate at one chosen frequency matching the coil inductance. So instead of spread spectrum we have a definable output which we can harvest with common materials and standard technology. You don't have to catch fields at certain angles or periods of skipping where windings touch at oblique angles. Clear? There is nothing new or strange about Smiths or Dollards configurations.

The miniature analog computer in the picture is 32 years old. It is an LMD TEM unit like in Dollard's video.

@GK,

So did this build output anything of substance or didn't you drive it with enough EMF Like Don does? From the looks of it the wire lengths look to be approx the same since it appears you wrapped the green wire about the speaker (stranded) wire which looks to be 1.5 turns around the wire spool.

Anyways, so the wire lengths are based on the resonance of the coils then, secondary rules and you wound the primary to be 1/4 wave or the secondaries resonant f ?

Is the speaker/stranded wire the output connection?

Also from your comments do you think it is possible the outer ring is nothing more that a 1:1 transformer?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on January 17, 2010, 04:32:32 AM
So.........

Hows things??

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Rosphere on January 18, 2010, 03:29:07 AM

Bump DLS. (http://www.youtube.com/user/cosmolv#p/u/0/UojMvCN3gck)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on January 18, 2010, 02:44:35 PM
Doing well with DLS.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Talath on January 19, 2010, 03:52:14 PM
I've got a newbie question  ???

When determining the L1/L2 length for a given frequency, Is the length the entire length of the element from terminal to terminal?  Or is it only that portion that is physically part of the coil?  I would assume that it is the entire length interstitial the terminals, but assuming has gotten me into trouble before...

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on January 23, 2010, 02:58:23 AM
GK, http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/ericdollard.htm   this is all I find about Eric living out of his car in 2001

I was reviewing many things and folowing this link I came across this Blog that was clearly exposing some of the many thoughts of NT.
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/04/teslas_creative_genius_intuiti.html (http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/04/teslas_creative_genius_intuiti.html)

NT stated herein about the time factor and the pulse relationship, being that each pulse of magnetic induction is in direct relation to the distance of the circuit.

Lengthy but worth while.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 11, 2010, 03:53:57 AM
Click this...
http://www.denver.net/~paul/ (http://www.denver.net/~paul/)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on February 11, 2010, 07:59:11 AM
nice
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on February 11, 2010, 01:33:38 PM
GiantKiller

http://www.denver.net/~paul/

The work of ten men!!
Holy %$%$
I won't be done studying the first "read" till Sunday!!

Chet
[glad I'm snowed in:}
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: altair on February 11, 2010, 02:00:55 PM
WOW! Giantkiller, this is the summum of your work!
I know what I'll be doing this weekend.

Thanks from the bottom of my heart.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on February 11, 2010, 02:41:38 PM

Make sure you watch this about coral castle

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1523833666089029157&ei=swh0S6fcL8rG-QbTlsXHBw&q=The+Secret+of+the+Universe&emb=1

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 11, 2010, 06:28:33 PM
I watched the video way before. The measurements weigh in well. They probably point to the two wavelengths somehow. The 3d model I build will verify.

The focus of what I published are the fields of the generator. I am always looking forward in time for applicability. Imagine my surprise when I realized I and a number of people have done these?

The video showing the rod in the wall has to be shortened. It is a prime part of the operation of the castle as a MEG type device, the 'Jericho protocol' as stated. Charge pumping. The Don Smith device does this too.

I knew this would have to be taken a step at a time. Glad this step proved so fruitful for the reader. I am consumed once more by this modern day Indiana Jones puzzle. It takes all the previous knowledge and jumps forward into the vast view of the possibilities. I still have more to add to the site.

I wonder how large the viewer base will be? I still have to post on youtube too. That should up the count.

At least now it can be seen of the integral part of the flywheel in operation.

I am still in shock myself over this. The rest of the planet is in dismay and we are having the times of our lives with a spec of information the world chooses to ignore but that holds the key to the rest of planet future. I'll be interested to see what contributions pop up from others realizations.
Thanks for watching and the feedback. If anybody knows or sees any additional info let me know. It ain't over yet.

But the most important part is, after breaking this down into terms and tests we have all either done or understand, is to reproduce this build to cause an array of standing waves on the ley lines of the planet. This is mandatory. He used the planet to aid his construction. The two fields are VLF intersecting at oblique angles. This amplifies due to Bloch wall stressing and relaxing. Refer to the Kunel patent.

And the thing I realized the most is a quote from the Bible that states 'There is nothing new under the Sun'. That simply means that the verifiable patterns are all around if we seek to find. And that is all I am doing here. Anybody else could or should.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: altair on February 11, 2010, 11:15:16 PM
Hi GK,
DSCN0300.MOV seems to be corrupted.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on February 12, 2010, 12:30:25 AM
GiantKiller

http://www.denver.net/~paul/

An amazing amount of info!
Much to view and read!!

"Waves"
WOW
starting to "understand" things I NEVER thought I would!
 
Chet

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 12, 2010, 02:34:13 AM
Yep. I am on site cleanup now. I have another vid with the 300.mov contents.

Those of you who get this are in for the ride of your life. Everything becomes soooo simplistic.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on February 12, 2010, 03:18:09 AM
     I see a pattern also.  Harmony produces mass.  A standing wave whether it be an electron or a massive black hole or hanging around a Tesla Tower is mass.  Tesla was the latest one to convert energy into mass.   His receivers feel the increase in mass relative to their own and the gravitational wave is born.  How dense does something have to get before it develops a gravitational inducement that is far greater than that produced by the Earth.  How many superimposed oscillations equals a nanogram.  Once Tesla mass was more dense than its surrounds it starts to accelerate things towards it instead of everything dropping towards the little spherical standing wave field down below.  It may take hours to get enough superimposed waves to create mass relativity of a grand scale but once you are there then you can make the Earth quiver with anything you do at point A.  Just a matter of time.    Last spark for awhile.  I hope that I have sparked some interest in the possiblities of a future filled with bounty for all. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on February 12, 2010, 05:03:35 AM
GK,
I would love to delve into this now because I believe our world in at a critical point in time where those who can should, and those who need to, better get with the program.

I find myself in both groups, so I must continue my first predetermined goal.
Keep up the good work.

having the time of my life.
h2ocommuter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on February 12, 2010, 12:37:37 PM
Sparks said,

"Last spark for awhile."

;o[


@GK
observing a "symphony"
Its hard to put music into words!
But your doing good bud, especially since there is no baseline,
Never been done!!

Chet

Studying....

PS
H2 ,you can work and study.........
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: altair on February 12, 2010, 02:36:16 PM
Hi GK,
in your video TPU Sings #6, you mention the plasma ball at :48 sec.
Are you sure it's really that ?  Because there is another one at :14 sec and it looks like either a fly or a speck of dust near the camera lens.

Your work is fascinating, although I admit having difficulty getting it all
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on February 12, 2010, 04:50:00 PM
Sparks, a ton of gold 14.2" square.

your comment about mass is the first in my life that ever made perfect sense about how mass is associated with matter.
This has been running around in my mind for months it has to do with nano particles and how close they get together.

mass is accumulated when everything is aligned or fits nicely together

Ramset,
As this is a new period in my life, revelations are abounding. I will take the challenge.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 12, 2010, 06:26:01 PM
Hi GK,
in your video TPU Sings #6, you mention the plasma ball at :48 sec.
Are you sure it's really that ?  Because there is another one at :14 sec and it looks like either a fly or a speck of dust near the camera lens.

Your work is fascinating, although I admit having difficulty getting it all

Read the 'energy sucking antenna' doc. I saw all the flying things. The one at :48 has a definate speed and tail. Ball lightning comes to mind also.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 12, 2010, 06:32:01 PM
Take the elongated device in the Kunel patent and change the geometry in two ways. Shorten the length and widen the diameter. It now looks like a TPU. Pulse the 20 end coils in the same direction to create a toroid ball field. Pulse the middle one in reverse to break the bloch wall of the original field. You now have a virtual spark gap or electrostatic charge pump.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petra (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petra)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on February 13, 2010, 01:08:37 AM
I think you got it GK.   I assume the 3 standing stones on South wall and 2 on E. wall are spaced or tuned to resonate off a straight wall on the opposite side. 

John Hutchison hit the frequency of the atoms inside of whatever metal he wanted to turn to jello.  Cool
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wings on February 13, 2010, 11:25:43 AM
I think you got it GK.   I assume the 3 standing stones on South wall and 2 on E. wall are spaced or tuned to resonate off a straight wall on the opposite side. 

John Hutchison hit the frequency of the atoms inside of whatever metal he wanted to turn to jello.  Cool

"This is an acoustic levitation chamber I designed and built in 1987 as a micro-gravity experiment for NASA related subject matter.
The 12 inch cubed plexiglas Helmholtz Resonant Cavity has 3 speakers attached to the cube by aluminium acoustic waveguides.
By applying a continuous resonant(600Hertz) sound wave, and by adjusting the amplitude and phase relationship amongst the 3 speakers; I was able to control levitation and movement in all 3 (x,y,z) axis of the ambient space.
This  was used to show the effects of micro-gravity conditions that exist in the space shuttle environment in orbit, but done here on Earth in a lab.
This is not "anti-gravity." So don't waste time arguing something pointless.
SEE: http://science.howstuffworks.com/acou..."

this using 3 Helmholtz Resonant Cavity has 3 speakers and works under gravity potential

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94KzmB2bI7s&feature=fvw

...... TPU use 3 electric voltage oscillator and work under earth voltage potential 

...the ball the electrons ..

... under high voltage lines it works better.....

similar effect
http://www.rexresearch.com/plauson/plauson.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 13, 2010, 07:03:40 PM
http://www.denver.net/~paul/ (http://www.denver.net/~paul/)   updated

'invisible wall' in adjuncts
corrupted vid in 5th step fixed
iron rod vid in generator room

These links tie even more together.

even more on the way...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: phoneboy on February 14, 2010, 12:08:22 AM
@ GK, be careful with your Trinity device you may be inadvertently generating infrasonic sound which can kill @ the right freq/power levels
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 15, 2010, 07:32:41 AM
Added the state to the Multiresonant pic to show how Homestead lines up in the castle grounds with the ley lines.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on February 20, 2010, 08:13:44 PM
Without reviewing,  as Sparks had come to the realization about how the great devices all had in common the spark gap; I have realized the protocol about how to get this block wall breakdown happening inside the IT.....

As many of my testings have been dealing with how to create the disconnect and reconnect using the SG, before the IT,

The realization factor has shown itself... I wanted to post it here first as things go

simply put just as the original NT circuits have showed that Don had referenced about "the circuits page",

Summary is this; using the SG after the IT forces the circuit to pulse the IT with magnetic flux. 

I will be posting all the related text and posts at this thread.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8713.30 (http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8713.30)

This valued information must get out to the people who will understand it.

Safety first!

h2ocommuter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 25, 2010, 04:33:49 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thxPgGatkd4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thxPgGatkd4)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 25, 2010, 04:53:17 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thxPgGatkd4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thxPgGatkd4)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 25, 2010, 04:54:05 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thxPgGatkd4
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on February 25, 2010, 01:03:22 PM
@GK

What is GFI ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on February 25, 2010, 02:57:04 PM
MasterPlaster
GFI= Ground fault interrupter [fancy circuit breaker]
we have this in the US around water/ electricity hazards [kitchen and bath outlets]
to prevent electrocution .

His GFI shouldn't be "buzzing" and "tripping"
Very strange!

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on February 25, 2010, 04:30:54 PM
I am sending a resonant charge pulse upstream on the ground line.
This is how Don Smith was charging his batteries while the device was on. He used the dc magnetic field on the battery supply lines to transmit the pulse back to the battery as an ac wave on the DC potential.
The 2 frequencies are 21hz and 200hz.

I can do more than just trip relays... There is nothing strange. lol
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bw on February 26, 2010, 03:10:38 AM
Check this out, high voltage and 400+ amps from a plasma globe Don Smith build.  This guy is relentless.  Around minute #8 he takes a strong hit while discharging caps.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rOsELFyZnM
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on February 26, 2010, 03:31:41 AM
Ouch!!

That's a one hand in the pocket "rule violation"!
No steel cage matches with the "Beast"!

A tenacious prodigy indeed.[very impressive]

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on February 26, 2010, 06:32:15 PM
Without reviewing,  as Sparks had come to the realization about how the great devices all had in common the spark gap; I have realized the protocol about how to get this block wall breakdown happening inside the IT.....

As many of my testings have been dealing with how to create the disconnect and reconnect using the SG, before the IT,

The realization factor has shown itself... I wanted to post it here first as things go

simply put just as the original NT circuits have showed that Don had referenced about "the circuits page",

Summary is this; using the SG after the IT forces the circuit to pulse the IT with magnetic flux. 

I will be posting all the related text and posts at this thread.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8713.30 (http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8713.30)

This valued information must get out to the people who will understand it.

Safety first!

h2ocommuter

I did not realize I did not post where I accomplished this task.
This video represents the correct method to pump Magnetic resonance through the IT as I see it.
This is the first glimpse of where I am going with the application.
Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVCOiiehk3A (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVCOiiehk3A)

Zane
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 02, 2010, 04:18:33 AM
Combination Don Smith & Steven Mark coils.
This is an amalgamation of processes and configurations we have all seen. Nothing new here.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on March 02, 2010, 04:02:43 PM
Nice coil @GK.
So how are you going to play with it? Maybe reverse connect the two top coils in parallel or in series. Or just drive the center two and check the ring output. There are so many ways.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 02, 2010, 05:45:27 PM
Yes!
The non visible part is the control coils are movable to adjust for phasing! Ooooooh, the crowd is in awe. lol. Useful at this stage. In Smith's tube model the smaller coil is movable. In the ring it is not so he found something valuable. Also the ring came out around the same time as SM and Muller.
The configurability is obvious due to all the knowledge gained so far.
One of the next steps is to wind a center toroid in the fashion from your picture.
Tonight I attach Marco's BEMF capture circuit to one of the antenna windings.
Another connection is to pulse the 2 antenna windings in parallel with a cap connecting both opposite ends. One of the inputs will have a piece of iron wire for a phase adjust which will let me use just 1 freq for comp wave experiments.
This new build is still very dangerous. If I tie the far end of the antenna runs together so that the pulse folds back on itself then as the pulse collides against itself in passing this looks similar to a caduceus operation but the angles are slightly off.

I call this build 'The Sport model'.  8)

Also I will pulse the control coils in a way like you said, 'reverse connect'. I should note that all the windings go over the top down thru the center in a top view, clockwise direction. There is a difference when the control coils are wound opposing, like bucking. I can fix this later.
The Sport Model cost $20.00 in parts.
I was waiting to get the correct amount of information to come up with this. The weak field is what was missing in Don Smith's explanations. This build has my full attention.

Something else: http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm (http://jnaudin.free.fr/steorn/indexen.htm)


Nice coil @GK.
So how are you going to play with it? Maybe reverse connect the two top coils in parallel or in series. Or just drive the center two and check the ring output. There are so many ways.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on March 02, 2010, 08:19:16 PM
@GK

I am just waiting to receive my camcorder back from the repair shop. Seems JVC had a recall on this model that went on the blink many months ago. They are fixing it for free.

Anyways, my video will be mostly on my center toroid experiments. Just make yourself a center toroid yes like in the photo, wound like bucking mode as shown below. I have found this type of toroid with bucking to be the best for pulsing and sending energy via the air to the outer ring.

I am now using a toroid with bucking secondary wound first, then bucking primary wound on top and now I can do both pulsing with one pulse. So with one pulse the primary sends energy via the air to the outer ring, and it sends energy via the core to the secondary to send back to the source. I think this is the final way we will discover the TPU center toroid will be used. Also, pulsing this with Tesla Ozone method will send the production up through the roof given each on/off creates two pulses and energy again can be redirected back to source.

The SM center toroid has two different gauge wires coming out the center, as you already know. This for me is the final and positive proof that the center toroid is two coils, actually four coils, wound 2 coils bucking secondary and 2 coils bucking primary. SM did not want to show this because in essence, the center toroid is the one doing most of the work as evidenced when he put his ammeter at LTPU center. His primary is wound rather sparingly leaving open spaces so the energy can exit the confining nature of the toroid to act upon the outer ring and coils.

When you pulse such a bucking coil let's say at 2MHz, for some weird reason, I cannot seem to stop the scope to see the clear waveform on my 60MHZ scope. It's as if the speed of the pulsing has gone over the roof. Probably directly due to the bucking mode. When the first half of the primary gets the pulse, it is already sending energy to the last secondary, and as the pulse reaches the second half of the bucking primary, it sends energy to the first secondary, and this criss crossing of the pulsed signal is creating more pulsations.

Anyways, I am sure if you make a toroid like this, you will soon realize the dynamics when pulsing and come back with a much more clearer explanation then I could ever put down.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bear rabbit on March 02, 2010, 08:46:37 PM
Nice coil!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 02, 2010, 10:20:13 PM
@BR,
thnx.

@WU,
I am thinking air core, or speaker magnets? If ferrite then the bucking would be lost in the core instead of slapping into the surrounding space.

This is the last piece I need for the next step. The bucking is the key. The GK4 was a bench-top bucking bronco.
Quote
When you pulse such a bucking coil let's say at 2MHz, for some weird reason, I cannot seem to stop the scope to see the clear waveform on my 60MHZ scope. It's as if the speed of the pulsing has gone over the roof. Probably directly due to the bucking mode. When the first half of the primary gets the pulse, it is already sending energy to the last secondary, and as the pulse reaches the second half of the bucking primary, it sends energy to the first secondary, and this criss crossing of the pulsed signal is creating more pulsations.

You are 'dead-on' with this statement. That is the self oscillation happening and it does travel well across space. That is why I keep showing the Smith collector stage in the vids. The only configuration I haven't shown is the self-osc wrapped inside a ring. :o
Your scope can't lock on because the self-resonance is self tuning. It wants to drift because of the feedback loop but can not because of the static parameters of the coils themselves. When you find the right note, the correct angle and distance the tube amp will blow. :o
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on March 03, 2010, 01:34:51 AM
GK
Sure is gonna be something .....watching history ,,,watching you fellas do this .

Its sure gonna be something.

Kind of hard to get your head around it.[what it "ALL" means]

Thanks

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 03, 2010, 06:19:35 AM
latest...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on March 03, 2010, 04:55:05 PM
Wattsup,
Ahhh, bucking coil. I thought I had seen it somewhere else before:

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on March 03, 2010, 05:05:11 PM
Wattsup,
Ahhh, bucking A. I thought I had seen it somewhere else before:

MP,
That looks like a Stanley Meyer schematic, What I find interresting here is only one part of the system opposite the bucking coil is the left handed wound coil on the flow through side.
This must be an important observation.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on March 03, 2010, 05:53:48 PM
Wattsup, Ahhh, bucking coil. I thought I had seen it somewhere else before:

Yes that looks like a very interesting coil diagram. It is strange enough to see that a toroid coil should keep the field inside the core, but in bucking method, you have two ways acting at one time. The coupling via the core and the coupling via primary to air to other pickup coils that could be placed near the coil. Not to make transmission of electricity but to simply have the  bucking field move the north/south over the pickup coils to get extra power output without hindering the pulses.

@GK

Is that center toroid wound on a teflon plumbers tape reel. I have one like that but I also put a horizontal wind inside the reel. lol

If you want a preliminary way to look at your coil/toroid relationship do this.

On the outer coils take each coil and put a low voltage LED on the ends. Then put your center toroid in bucking mode and connect the two end wires to your pulse generator. Set it at 10% duty - square wave and try and find the frequencies that will light up your led(s). Then try with the center toroid placed sideways and check again. This will give you some real revelations on what them coils can do, the angles best suited.

You can even try some other schemes like putting some of the outer coils in series or even pulsing the outer coils and putting a LED on the center toroid, just to see what it does..

One thing when you are pulsing your center toroid, you can try to take one of the wires of the outer coils and pass it over the center toroid. I have found in certain builds, this is the only way to get some effects.

I am now always using leds on my coils because using voltage meters and scopes can give wrong impressions because they do induce some energy into the coiling. But by using low voltage LEDs, you see exactly what is going on, when it happens and you can hold the position and play around and see exactly the energy relationships. For me, at this moment reading voltage and amperage is not more important then getting the right north/south coupling angles. Sometimes one degree and you are totally off the mark.

Video soon. Just got my camcorder back.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 03, 2010, 07:00:53 PM
Thanks guys.
I was trying to remember back if the center toroid was covered anywhere at this technical level of need. If not then Wattsup and I are the only ones covering this? And at this late date?

I included the patent 5565835. Look at section 40 on down. This seems to fit especially with what Wattsup just said about the external and internal field.

I wound that new toroid last night and was not thinking. I can put a horiz copper core in there. Only need 15 feet. This would then match the patent. I had to wind this new one to get the bucking in there. Or what is the difference if I use my previous ones even tho the windings are going the same way. I could just back pulse one of them. This is a different geometry.

I will use the LEDs as a 1 pixel indicator and an EGA monitor as an field scope. I have been waiting to pull this out and use it! The EGA will give a horizontal plane display and the Led will provide a 3d reference!  8)

Those are the new ratshack spools. Thicker than plumber tape spools. :)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MasterPlaster on March 04, 2010, 03:27:27 AM
Wattsup and I are the only ones covering this? And at this late date?

I am watching from the balcony with great interest. And perhaps the other 5 people who downloaded
the patent you enclosed.

There is an accompanying patent with that US5565836.

I got side tracked reading patent US1691699. Highly recomended for those who like way out ideas.

For those not familiar with the picture I attached in my previous post, look at

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3079.0;attach=12657
 

P.S. GK, Test your speaker wire to make sure it is not ferrous. I got some cheap speaker wires
like that and they are attracted to magnets!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on March 04, 2010, 04:25:48 AM
That makes me feel much more at home with you guys, I have studied this stuff much and have a huge amount of SM pats. read so many of them...  This particular circuit I have studied so much in the past I am enormously glad to see some putting the values where they should be.

One point of ref..  I have used a magnet to relinquish a spark manually. This works superbly as you all probably agree with.
This circuit where the bucking end is "not the pulsing side", may be the magnetic quenching device. this circuit is in a black box compartment. Thus the signal is externally controlled.

I have lost thousands of pages of SM work with this old computer that may be recalled if anyone does not have the Black box diagrams I am referring to.

This also is the coil that controles the whatchamacallit. mind plug

see ya
h2ocommuter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 04, 2010, 05:21:15 AM
SM said 5khz after I posted the the SM17 was a stun gun. There are 2 of those ckts in that box. The big yellow rounds things on each side of the box are the same in a stun gun.
Believe me, I had extensive clues and warnings thrown at me.
Guess what drives a stun gun? 5khz square waves! He just replaced the output probes with loops! Did this 3 years ago. Was gonna throw a 15 foot diam loop in the yard and he told me 'No!'. FAA problems.

@h20commuter,
I would still be interested in any pics you can retrieve. We have all, at one time or another through this, missed something.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 04, 2010, 07:01:19 AM
Latest...
Handwound core. Could have used 2 turns of speaker wire also.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 05, 2010, 03:28:40 AM
latest...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on March 05, 2010, 08:44:46 AM
Nice giantkiller  ;D

My proposition : make a coil UNIDIRECTIONAL.How ?
Unfortunately I can't draw a schematic but it hast to be that way :
wound one turn in normal style around coil core (which has to be torroid and you find why) - then make a small choke like coil around in the same direction 90 degrees from the first turn, choke should then become second turn and so on .... Keep in mind using only ONE wire.

Can someone depict this idea in the form of schematic ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 05, 2010, 04:43:23 PM
@Forest,
So you are saying no 2 bucking coil configuration?

And my assessment is the core is copper?

The attached pic shows a straight run but That will be in a circle to the match Smith's and Mark's rings.

Is this what you are thinking?

That would match my Sport model previously posted. And the center toroid is an exact match at a smaller model and lower drive specs?

As I have shown I have a smaller center toroid. The small ones are easy to build or reconfigure if the specs change.

So by what you are saying my Sport model is a correct configuration and now make a smaller version to drive and feed back the bigger one.

I'll be back in 12 hours.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on March 06, 2010, 01:06:22 AM
I have done everything to try to download these docs to a holding site scribd without success.  I did get one put on there under "h2ocommuter downloads" but the other one downloads and when I try to verify it myself it says they will not accept password protected files? what ever that means? this is for editing protection duuu! anyway I got these free but I didnot place a link to where I got it. Good idea though!

This one is the Meyer data report and the one primary part Stan is relating is how the signal being sent to the VIC is timed, and more particular the type or wire to use that facilitates the non amperage movement under magnifications of high voltage.etc, etc.
it is found in the, bookmark tool under- tech briefs sec 07
if you don't have this, I will email it to anyone.
dzndlideas@aol.com (http://dzndlideas@aol.com)
On the other hand if someone knows where I can download this in a friendly environment, that's cool too.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 06, 2010, 06:59:00 AM
Try www.metacafe.com
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 06, 2010, 07:36:13 PM
Forgot to post the pic...

2nd pic And better yet... The green is copper speaker wire. This single turn slides around the spool and carries the secondary with it.
This piece is easily replaceable with an iron core wire if necessary.
If the secondaries have to wind in the opposite direction from the primaries then I just pull out the core and flip it over.

@Forest,
So you are saying no 2 bucking coil configuration?

And my assessment is the core is copper?

The attached pic shows a straight run but That will be in a circle to the match Smith's and Mark's rings.

Is this what you are thinking?

That would match my Sport model previously posted. And the center toroid is an exact match at a smaller model and lower drive specs?

As I have shown I have a smaller center toroid. The small ones are easy to build or reconfigure if the specs change.

So by what you are saying my Sport model is a correct configuration and now make a smaller version to drive and feed back the bigger one.

I'll be back in 12 hours.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on March 06, 2010, 08:25:19 PM
5khz hiss from fast electrons in the plasmasphere is popping up "hear" and there

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V6T-46YCW19-7&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F1981&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1236086608&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a251dc0ea2a5af4790a4b5a68b95de18

So if you develop a loop receiver and excite it to open up the aperature  (place hearing horn to ear) the probability of converting elf incidence upon an expanded field of interest may be enhanced.  It is theorized that the brain reshapes the cavity influenced by the vibrations of the tympanic membrane to become resonant at the suspected frequency of transmission.  In other words an older person often goes deaf because they hear too much.  The muscles used to tune the ear to specific freqs loose their ability to sweep tune the cavity. The brain is constantly tuning the cavity for those freqs that are of interest such as those a child would make if it were crying or the rustle of leaves a prey would make as it moved through the forest.  A spectrum sweep.  Once the older person is aware that you are speaking to them they hear you fine because by habit their brain tunes the ear cavity for amplification of the human voice signal pattern.  You get the huh or what then they hear you.  Just amplifying the whole deal doesnt work well because the scanner isnt working inside the ear cavity.  There are more intense vibrations but they are not coherent with the cavity.  Newer hearing aids are programmed to output a small instigation vibration and delay the signal.  The person is hearing you not in real time anymore but at least they are hearing you.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on March 06, 2010, 08:43:59 PM
Giantkiller


Yes,something like that except I didn't thought about bifilar , just a coil wound on torroid from ONE wire
Take one wire and wind unidirectional coil.
I'm not sure I'm right just that idea blinked in my mind lately.Control and collector coils from the same wire. Flow in circle,feedback,maybe gain. Amplification of power in loop ? .Yes it looks like particle accelerator the only problem is how to wind acceleration coils (control coils ? I have always had problems which one is control and which collector but here it's quite obvious).Gain is visible too.
Now there are two possible scenarios : control coils produce field
in the direction of DC current or against it . I don't know which is correct.Depending on this choice control coils should be done in the same direction as collector winding or  opposite direction.But I see clearly that it has to be one wire coil matrix.And YES, Tesla patent is similar but he used iron wires as a segmented core of coil and mentioned generation of some fake currents because probably he connected one or more coils with iron core which created acceleration of current.
Remember it's only just my idea, maybe others thought about it previously, I didn't found that but what Mannix once posted was very very close to it.Unfortunately he posted unidirectional coil composed of 3 control coils of 3 colors and AFAIK feedback loops causing acceleration was not visible.
Gain is from slight acceleration of electrons in wire, means a slight higher current.DC requirement is obvious and it has to be probably  pulsed DC not plain flat DC to generate a lot of voltage kicks from BEMF which are then accelerated and converted into current kicks! The principle is the same as for Tesla coil flat pancake : coil are really perpendicular to each other and in no inductive relation yet some field causes acceleration of current .Gain is because accelerated current in next loop around causes a slight bigger "push" which creates as slight bigger acceleration. Snow ball effect.
All above is maybe just a garbage... or maybe not.
 ;D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 06, 2010, 09:33:26 PM
@forest & sparks,

I understand what both of you are saying and can apply that with this build. I replaced the core with the 1 turn speaker wire core and a bucking primary/secondary pair on that.

You can see one side inside. The center winding is angled just for the photo shot.
This build is better suited for the next tests. Now I can serially connect the little toroid like the this pic http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8227.0;attach=42704;image (http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8227.0;attach=42704;image)
and then serial connect this config into the sport model build. So I will have a interconnected driver inside another interconnected to achieve multistage interconnection. A pancake within a pancake or ionizer within an ionizer.
The inside windings are 180* of the outside tho not 90* like previously specified. But that can be changed in 30 minutes if it is a problem. So this little gem is a Don Smith pcv tube in a dual bucking pair. Inside and outside.

Quote
Condenser, capacitor or electrostatic microphone
Inside the Oktava 319 condenser microphone

In a condenser microphone, also called a capacitor or electrostatic microphone, the diaphragm acts as one plate of a capacitor, and the vibrations produce changes in the distance between the plates. There are two methods of extracting an audio output from the transducer thus formed: DC-biased and radio frequency (RF) or high frequency (HF) condenser microphones. With a DC-biased microphone, the plates are biased with a fixed charge (Q). The voltage maintained across the capacitor plates changes with the vibrations in the air, according to the capacitance equation (C = Q / V), where Q = charge in coulombs, C = capacitance in farads and V = potential difference in volts. The capacitance of the plates is inversely proportional to the distance between them for a parallel-plate capacitor. (See capacitance for details.) The assembly of fixed and movable plates is called an "element" or "capsule."

A nearly constant charge is maintained on the capacitor. As the capacitance changes, the charge across the capacitor does change very slightly, but at audible frequencies it is sensibly constant. The capacitance of the capsule (around 5–100 pF) and the value of the bias resistor (100 megohms to tens of gigohms) form a filter which is highpass for the audio signal, and lowpass for the bias voltage. Note that the time constant of an RC circuit equals the product of the resistance and capacitance.

Within the time-frame of the capacitance change (as much as 50 ms at 20 Hz audio signal), the charge is practically constant and the voltage across the capacitor changes instantaneously to reflect the change in capacitance. The voltage across the capacitor varies above and below the bias voltage. The voltage difference between the bias and the capacitor is seen across the series resistor. The voltage across the resistor is amplified for performance or recording.
AKG C451B small-diaphragm condenser microphone

RF condenser microphones use a comparatively low RF voltage, generated by a low-noise oscillator. The oscillator may either be amplitude modulated by the capacitance changes produced by the sound waves moving the capsule diaphragm, or the capsule may be part of a resonant circuit that modulates the frequency of the oscillator signal. Demodulation yields a low-noise audio frequency signal with a very low source impedance. The absence of a high bias voltage permits the use of a diaphragm with looser tension, which may be used to achieve wider frequency response due to higher compliance. The RF biasing process results in a lower electrical impedance capsule, a useful byproduct of which is that RF condenser microphones can be operated in damp weather conditions which could create problems in DC-biased microphones whose insulating surfaces have become contaminated. The Sennheiser "MKH" series of microphones use the RF biasing technique.

Condenser microphones span the range from telephone transmitters through inexpensive karaoke microphones to high-fidelity recording microphones. They generally produce a high-quality audio signal and are now the popular choice in laboratory and studio recording applications. The inherent suitability of this technology is due to the very small mass that must be moved by the incident sound wave, unlike other microphone types which require the sound wave to do more work. They require a power source, provided either via microphone outputs as phantom power or from a small battery. Power is necessary for establishing the capacitor plate voltage, and is also needed to power the microphone electronics (impedance conversion in the case of electret and DC-polarized microphones, demodulation or detection in the case of RF/HF microphones). Condenser microphones are also available with two diaphragms, the signals from which can be electrically connected such as to provide a range of polar patterns (see below), such as cardioid, omnidirectional and figure-eight. It is also possible to vary the pattern smoothly with some microphones, for example the Røde NT2000 or CAD M179.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 07, 2010, 07:30:36 AM
First test on the Sport model.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nGZNmi4Xdo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nGZNmi4Xdo)

Just the wiring diagram. 1khz into the control coils, variable frequency into the ring. Driving with 120vdc.

Have the center toroid  inside with led across outside winding. No lights yet but 4 - 27vac.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: supersam on March 07, 2010, 08:29:00 AM
@gk

i sure hope nobody is in the bathtub with a blow dryer tonight!

keep up the great work!

lol
sam
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wings on March 07, 2010, 08:58:38 PM
5khz hiss from fast electrons in the plasmasphere is popping up "hear" and there

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V6T-46YCW19-7&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F1981&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1236086608&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a251dc0ea2a5af4790a4b5a68b95de18

So if you develop a loop receiver and excite it to open up the aperature  (place hearing horn to ear) the probability of converting elf incidence upon an expanded field of interest may be enhanced.  It is theorized that the brain reshapes the cavity influenced by the vibrations of the tympanic membrane to become resonant at the suspected frequency of transmission.  In other words an older person often goes deaf because they hear too much.  The muscles used to tune the ear to specific freqs loose their ability to sweep tune the cavity. The brain is constantly tuning the cavity for those freqs that are of interest such as those a child would make if it were crying or the rustle of leaves a prey would make as it moved through the forest.  A spectrum sweep.  Once the older person is aware that you are speaking to them they hear you fine because by habit their brain tunes the ear cavity for amplification of the human voice signal pattern.  You get the huh or what then they hear you.  Just amplifying the whole deal doesnt work well because the scanner isnt working inside the ear cavity.  There are more intense vibrations but they are not coherent with the cavity.  Newer hearing aids are programmed to output a small instigation vibration and delay the signal.  The person is hearing you not in real time anymore but at least they are hearing you.


http://jlnlabs.online.fr/plasma/html/s_gdp3.htm
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/plasma/html/s_gdp1.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wings on March 08, 2010, 09:41:24 AM
5khz hiss from fast electrons in the plasmasphere is popping up "hear" and there

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V6T-46YCW19-7&_user=10&_coverDate=01%2F31%2F1981&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1236086608&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a251dc0ea2a5af4790a4b5a68b95de18

So if you develop a loop receiver and excite it to open up the aperature  (place hearing horn to ear) the probability of converting elf incidence upon an expanded field of interest may be enhanced.  It is theorized that the brain reshapes the cavity influenced by the vibrations of the tympanic membrane to become resonant at the suspected frequency of transmission.  In other words an older person often goes deaf because they hear too much.  The muscles used to tune the ear to specific freqs loose their ability to sweep tune the cavity. The brain is constantly tuning the cavity for those freqs that are of interest such as those a child would make if it were crying or the rustle of leaves a prey would make as it moved through the forest.  A spectrum sweep.  Once the older person is aware that you are speaking to them they hear you fine because by habit their brain tunes the ear cavity for amplification of the human voice signal pattern.  You get the huh or what then they hear you.  Just amplifying the whole deal doesnt work well because the scanner isnt working inside the ear cavity.  There are more intense vibrations but they are not coherent with the cavity.  Newer hearing aids are programmed to output a small instigation vibration and delay the signal.  The person is hearing you not in real time anymore but at least they are hearing you.

"The narrow-band 5 kHz hiss seems to be generated by the cyclotron instabilities of several keV to a few ten keV electrons for the most feasible electron density of 10 cm−3−103 cm−3  in the vicinity of the equatorial plasmapause since the hotter electrons with energy of 10–100 keV are dominant just outside the plasmapause. This will be the origin of the narrow-band 5 kHz hiss observed frequently in mid- and low-latitudes."

that can explain :

"An interesting measurement : The current flow is NOT equal in each branch of the GDP wire."

(because the connection to the ground is different)

with 41.54w input .... Voltage and the Current curves measured at the GDP output

"The left bottom scope picture, shows the third channel of the scope, this is the Math channel, ( Math=Ch1xCh2 ) this gives in real time the curve of the power flow. The "M" channel is set to 100W/div, the measured data on the right side "M Mean" is the Mean power =-173.3 W and the "M RMS" is the Root Mean Square power = 219.4 W"

http://jlnlabs.online.fr/plasma/html/s_gdp4.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 10, 2010, 06:33:48 AM
Cleared the hv off the bench. Going to reproduce Wattsup led resonance tests.
Pulled out my Linear technology http://cds.linear.com/docs/Reference%20Design/dc590B.pdf (http://cds.linear.com/docs/Reference%20Design/dc590B.pdf)
Driver, usb, and JDO300 fet boards to drive a bucking 1.xxxxxx Mhz coil with garden wire core(iron). Strictly 12 RV batteries.

Found out my usb hub was fickle. Spent months trying to fix the JDO300 controller I built. Lightning strike(no, really!).
Bought a new hub and back up and running.
The linear technology software only has a text entry for 1k to 68mhz. Can't do sweeps. I put scope on LED coil to see higher p2p when adjusting. When I find resonance on air coupled LED coil I will move it around to get the led to light. But when you get bang on the USB crashes. That is just the way it is.

To find resonance of all my other coils would take too long. I will pull the JDO300 controller out and see if it is truly busted and try to use it. I need sweep function and automation.

The thing I have been missing is a frequency genny greater than 1 Mhz. Necessary for coils of low windings.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 10, 2010, 05:33:46 PM
Shows winding geometry in detail
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiLcbTBewhw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiLcbTBewhw)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz4pN-LybGo&feature=channel (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iz4pN-LybGo&feature=channel)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on March 10, 2010, 05:36:06 PM
@GK

Thanks for your comments on the Understanding thread.

I could never get around all the required EE to do pulsing on my own, like you can do. That's why I need my pulse generator and sometimes the power supply and a single mosfet to do higher voltage pulsing.

But once you start doing these simple coil to coil pulsing with leds right on the coils and moving the coils around, this will show you things in real time that no scope or volt meter can show you. And by doing this simple thing, will eventually give you better and better ways of coupling the coils.

I will do a Video 6 this week with much much more leds and now that the preliminary introduction is done, this time I will be showing voltage and amperage. What I have seen in general is that the pulsing amperage rides around 0.20 amps when the coil is not at responance and when the leds are not lit up. But when you hit the right frequency, amperage drops down to 0.01 amps and the leds light up. I am saying LEDs in plural because I just got two small banks of multiples LEDS plus I am using two LED flashlight heads full of LEDS also and all are lighting up very nicely. I blew a single led so I know I am on a good track.

But all I really wanted to show guys is to get off your scopes and meters and just use LEDS to see the finer couplings. Take out your old builds and see them come to life anew. You see, as soon as you put your scope probe onto the coil or your volt meter, this already changes the whole sense/load situation and can give you false impressions of what is really going on.

Also, guys doing the JT stuff should start using outer coils with LEDS as this will give them proof of more output then they can ever see on their scopes or meters.

Anyways, the simple coil I am pulsing in is just dual lamp cord that is horizontal wound about 9-10 turns then connected bifilar. By pulsing this, it seems the whole space inside the coil is filled with coupling potential coming from all angles since all my coils that originally needed their special frequency and angle are all lighting up at the same time and in many frequency ranges. This means that whole space is constantly being filled with north/south alternations that any coil should catch just by being in the space.

But the most perplexing thing is sometimes a coil will light up only when it is exposed to one field, in most cases the south field, and for me, this means the natural Earths north field, since I am in Canada, must be playing on the other side of the coil to maintain an equilibrium of energy potential or I don't know exactly what. But it is there.

Ultimately, I see in the future that I will need a power grabber circuit. Basically I see it working like this.

At start all smaller transition caps are discharged into a holding larger capacitor.

Let's say you have 10 small caps all discharged.

You start catching only one volt in the first cap, then you switch to the second cap to catch another volt, etc., untill all 10 caps are charged.

The small individual isolated caps are then switched into series and this makes 10 volts that is then discharged into a larger holding cap. I think the smaller caps can use germanium diodes and the bigger cap can use a regular diode. I can catch 1 volts million of times but I can't do anything with them cause the cap will only charge up to 1 volt. So we need a way to catch single volties, group them, then hold them in a higher volts. For me, that is the easiest way to make free energy because there are many ways to make or catch from the abient field a 1 volt charge. so imagine if you had 10 x 10 starting caps, and 10 holding caps, that then go into series and all dicharge into a final  holding cap of 100 volts. All done with 1 volt of endless energy available all around you. It just takes the guys with the right brains to make it happen. It won't be me cause I just don't have the EE know how, but I do have the logic end of it. lol

Enjoy and keep well.

wattsup
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on March 10, 2010, 06:43:34 PM
Mk1
Has started a thread here.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8878.msg231968#new

He has invited all.

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 10, 2010, 07:13:46 PM
Tonight I lay the coil on the EGA screen. Then add and remove the scope to see the dramatization.
Otto stated before 'No steel or iron in the coil'. I can extend the scope probe with a small era phone as a probe in the near field.

If a diode is seen as a straight piece of wire in both directions to radiant energy then any metal in the field becomes a magnetic sink. You never see it.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on March 11, 2010, 01:51:33 AM
@all

I am not sure at all about the no iron soft that is .

I learned about the cook coil , it basically is a isolated soft iron coil connected to nothing , it will repulse a magnet .

After many studies made by Jeff Cook , he discovered that pulsing the coil with a 9 volt battery it would induce a strong rotational field that i believe could be captured by coil arrangements.

Please look at it ...

Also the vibration of the tpu i will say it , there is got to be a moving part , like a magnet in ferofuide , putting a magnet on top of it like SM dose would induce a rotation in the magnet it self .

Anyway keep the good work ...

http://www.jeffreyncook.com/jeff%20cook%20effect/jeff%20cook%20coil.htm

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 12, 2010, 04:39:54 AM
Controller and coil fired up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXccwTkaAl4 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXccwTkaAl4)

http://www.electrogravity.com/index2.html
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 14, 2010, 04:37:42 AM
Tesla bifilar pancake as transmitter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvb39SwTXBE (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvb39SwTXBE)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 15, 2010, 05:10:06 AM
Air led with resonance! Whoop! There it is!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0dMMEZW7M0
Still using Tesla bifilar pancake coil as transmitter.

--gk.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on March 17, 2010, 05:51:04 AM
@GK

Thanks for your good video and showing the effect. There is so much more to show and learn about this way of seeing coils/pulsing/interactions always with effort to link these effects with clues for TPU workings.

From the many coil winds and effects seen, from the fact that SMs center toroid has two different wire pairs, the fact that the toroids in the LTPU showed the greatest amperage readings, that the FTPU had the same Toroid and only went up to 60 vdc.

In my video I show a simple bucking coil that can impart via air to other coils and pick-up energy, but relatively speaking, my pulse generator does not have any real power to send into these coils. But the effect still speaks for itself.

What I have learned among many things.

The bucking coil is the tool. I will now use my recent new toroid that has bucking coil secondary wound first, then bucking coil primary on top. When I pulse the primary, I still get the air transfer, plus now, I can send all the secondary back to source, plus all the primary flyback, again back to source.

This is the answer. A wind mill that makes its own wind. That's why the center toroid in the LTPU had the highest amperage readings, because the primary was being pulsed higher and higher and the secondary was being sent back to the same growing source.

We should not even care about putting on any load. We should be more concerned with mastering pulse primary, send secondary back to source and perfect this to the point of unity. Then you add a primary in series with the first one and continue from there.

To ride your car, it first has to run at idle before you can step on the gas. This is what Tesla has been trying to tell us. Run unity, then attack. If you are always more concerned about the juice going to load, how can you work out overunity if what will help you achieve it is burned up right from the start.

Anyways, let me expand on what I think is happening when he says there is no mass circuitry in his device, he does not need it at all. All he needs is the following.

Once, way back I made a replication of the ambient energy device. It was a circuit with lots of diodes and caps that I connected one long wire from outside my house, to the circuit and it produced some 1.5 - 2 volts dc.

OK, you take that circuit and put two rings in series then to the circuit. That is your ambient energy catching device and we already know it works. Yes but there is not enough ambient energy to catch if the wire is not running outside the house. That is very true when you are waiting for the long long wire to catch ambient energy. But what if instead of waiting for the ambient energy, you make your own ambient energy pulse through the center toroid. So you pulse a primary and return the secondary back to source, but at the same time the primary produces the ambient energy that you want to catch instead of hunting the open space. You produce concentrated ambient energy that the circuit, via the rings, is more then willing to suck up.

So as for no mass circuitry, would an ambient sucker circuit plus a small pulsing circuit be considered mass circuitry. It would depend on what SMs degree of mass circuitry would be, but in my book, I would say no.

Do you understand what I am trying to say. lol

Shit. Next build coming up and video soon enough.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on March 17, 2010, 07:39:20 AM
wattsup

I believe you found very important aspect. Feedback is required.The circuit must be constructed that way as to allow energy conversion and putting back to the place where is original power source. Some time later power source could be disconnected. Power in circuit rises and we have to know how to stop it below certain level.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on March 17, 2010, 11:16:30 AM
 deleted. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 17, 2010, 07:12:10 PM
Wow,
I thought you all left the planet before the U.S. detonates Old Faithful in June 2010. (Think about that...).

Quote
Do you understand what I am trying to say. lol
Yes I do!
I am in a different kind of awe now. When I first started this 3 years ago I could picture the processes but could not quite get it on paper or in copper. Now you made the connection for me more clearer. It was a jumbled mess in my head before(ADHD).

The feedback is muy importante. That is why I orignally showed the 3 microphones pointing into the speaker. We have to play the note in the correct positioning to get the feeback loop to blow the amp. The hidden design there is the microphone coil is in semi parallel with the speaker coil. Just like your vids, Wattsup!
The reason I went directly to the small coil is to show the small amount of whatever it takes to do the job. Again, muy importante! When I saw all your coils it made so much sense of the different configurations that SM had in other ways.
I got a bucking made and I have a ferrite ring one too. The Joule thief comes to mind as an active ingredient to drive the bucking coil. I see the JT as an NST type.

@Sparks! Put your post back I want to know what you had to say! Feedback? :D

If Steven Mark could make them small and hold them in his hands then it is really the simplest of design.

Things are gonna speed up now.

--gk. The Lord is good to those who persevere. Ouch! It has been some time, more like just severe!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 19, 2010, 05:53:34 AM
Wound the bucking toroid in 10 minutes, fired up the controller and lit the led in less 1 minute. Setup was a snap.
http://upload.youtube.com/my_videos_upload (http://upload.youtube.com/my_videos_upload)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on March 19, 2010, 06:46:41 AM
@all

Here is the right URL for @GKs video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cCkijcHEE0&feature=channel

@GK

You gonna have lots of fun with that one. lol
Just put an LED on some of your old builds and pan that toroid around them and play with the frequency.

Back soon.

Added

The funnest part of this is I we do not have to try and prove anything. Just see the effects for what they are and learn from the angles, coil types, frequency relations, is all enough to practice getting to know the fields.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 19, 2010, 06:03:33 PM
I don't mind lurkers.

I see no comment about the sound on the video. Did everybody miss this one? I think so!
You can hear the bucking! I will now take a very extended bow to the audience...

Now lets get real serious...

What if....
Two counter pulsed rings facing opposite and each produce the comp field. Use that effect to pulse the center bucking build that Wattsup is mentioning. The comp field is much higher in amplitude than the input voltage plus little current.
In reproducing Wattsup's BFpancake and bucking mag amp tests I have seen how easy it is to conceal the magamp in a small confine plus this little device, the bucking toroid, really does amplify. SM's bucking toroids are all the same unit. Obviously it is the real deal like Wattsup said.
Now with the opposing comp fields producing a greater magnetic force it produces a really compressed tight field between the 2 rings that snaps like electrostatic discharge due to a very finite, and very pronounced, strong Bloch wall. This snap represents a high speed discharge and we know the reaction of coils to that. That snap becomes our striker that rings the bell. That bell emits frequencies to the outer rings or compounds into the center secondary of the bucking toroid.

The bottom line is to produce a Bloch with a lot of magnetic pressure then use that strong force as our magnetic bias. The strong the Bloch wall then the stronger that force equaling atomic matter or atomic/subatomic control.
And when we release the Excessive Bloch wall pressure? Mother nature takes over and puts the system back to equalibrium. And that can be read/captured also.

Otto stated 'No magnets in the TPU'. And you know what? He couldn't be more correct! The Bloch wall is to hard to modify. It is set in stone. But in Ferrite, we can produce it and alter it significantly. And this is the key!
I am still going to wrap an iron core one this weekend with the 2 layers like Wattsup said.

This is going to be a very amazing weekend.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 23, 2010, 11:46:22 PM
What if...

The coil pictured is the bucking toroid.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on March 24, 2010, 08:08:58 AM
Hello all,

@gk

hopefully the SOURCES are connected to the coils!!

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 24, 2010, 09:36:58 PM
@Otto,
Sure thing.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 25, 2010, 05:55:26 AM
I have used 1 pulse to both but pulse b has gone through an inverter. Check out H-bridge circuits for motors. Obviously? Don't know if you have been down this road.
I used Motorola Sensefet devices before for load overdrive/shutdown.
Jason and I talked about the shoot through currents. A delay or similar probably needs to be instituted since I am driving all four legs actively. I will see. I am using IGBTs and IRF840s.
I still have to set this up. Been on another mission. Check the TPU electricity thread.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on March 27, 2010, 03:44:04 AM
@ GK

   If your circuit is able to make transitions which are quite brief and then a second phase displaced transition that mix in the same circuit then your emp energy starts to get into the xray and above regime.  This is where atoms start spitting electrons.  If the atoms are moving already the electrons they spit will be too.  The electrons will react to an electric or magnetic field whereas the neutral atoms in molecular bonds won't.  Bang em bang em real good.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 29, 2010, 05:54:13 AM
This says to me 'Double pulse protocol on an air coil in a ring'. I have my controller up and running and have been testing with it. I ordered the next dual channel DDS controller coming from Jason. The frequency spec is tighter and we are going to ramp this up a notch with new software also. The sport model is the next build I have in line to test. It is not wired in bucking fashion tho.

@ GK

   If your circuit is able to make transitions which are quite brief and then a second phase displaced transition that mix in the same circuit then your emp energy starts to get into the xray and above regime.  This is where atoms start spitting electrons.  If the atoms are moving already the electrons they spit will be too.  The electrons will react to an electric or magnetic field whereas the neutral atoms in molecular bonds won't.  Bang em bang em real good.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 29, 2010, 09:16:57 PM
Look at the 'magnetically quenched spark gap' as an 'electromagnetically quenched bloch wall'. Between each discharge the Bloch wall reasserts itself snapping expediantly back across the 2 conductors of the terminals. The charge side goes to the source capacitor. The discharge side goes to the load side capacitor. The speed at which it returns makes the conductor look like an inductor.

Then as the power wave deccelerates is conducts through the load side of the circuit filling up the capacitor. But before the slow decceleration the capacitor has already taken on a charge from the high speed potential.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 31, 2010, 06:23:12 PM
Pentagon Aliens, Pages 27 - 33

Model T (A.K.A. Flivver(Tesla hidden right under our noses)) ignition coil fired by a spark gap is federally illegal. Guess I broke the law, big time.

3 years ago I stated the  SM17 was a stungun.
2.5 years ago I showed stun guns in a circle firing into the next one to make a loop. I fired a stun gun into the GK4 to see the dartlets.
2.5 years ago I stated connecting a stun gun to a 15 foot, large loop of audio cable. Was told 'No'.
2 years ago I stated Wardenclyffe was the worlds largest stun gun.
Grumpy posted numerous pix from Tesla patents showing more than 2 stages of spark gaps, caps, and inducting coils.

Flip the gag order around and you have blatant instructions:
Quote
No mass circuitry
means
Quote
Mass produced circuitry

SM mentioned
Quote
5khz
which equals stun gun which equals Tesla technology.

There are 3 ways to get this process going:
1: Spark gap to inductor stages.
2: Resonance of magnetic or mechanical means
3: Dual pulse protocol.

It is fini...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on March 31, 2010, 06:30:17 PM
http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/8817/supressione.jpg  ;D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 31, 2010, 08:07:51 PM
Quote
In his report Coler also described the following simple, significant experiment:

"Given a solenoid consisting of two windings, one upon the other, of the same length and number of turns, enclosing a soft iron cylindrical core. Firmly attached to one end of the core is a pre-magnetized steel rod. If an alternating current is passed through one of these coils, acting as primary, the residual magnetism of the steel rod is strengthened during one half cycle, through the magnetism induced in the core, during the other half it is weakened. If now the other winding is connected in series with the pre-magnetized steel rod (as secondary coil) in such a way that the secondary current must pass through the magnet, one half cycle of the secondary current must be more or less subdued; in other words, a rectifying effect must be created. It may be remembered that according to measurement by Profs. Kloss and Schumann a high-frequency pulsed direct current ~ about 180 kc ~ is flowing in the output resistance of the apparatus, for the creation of which no other explanation is possible." Another experiment with two double-wound solenoids, connected in series, revealed that "in such a secondary circuit a considerable DC component exists which can be strengthened by means which we shall not go into here…" Experiments were conducted with the plate and flat coil unit to test their interactions: As the plates are not only charged as condensers, but also have directed currents passing through them it had to be assumed that their mutual influences not only consisted of a condenser effect, but that they also created a magnetic field… It appeared that the "Ankertrakte" AC or BD are not all to be considered as oscillating units, but that the single group systems, consisting of plate - to anchor coils - plate, already represent independent oscillation circuits. According to this the apparatus contained ten such oscillation circuits… In order to make the apparatus work the harmony of all oscillating circuits in their individual frequencies would evidently be necessary -- at least within certain limits determined by the suppression in question… The previous occasional success must be considered as due to chance. The mutual influence of the flat coils upon one another could not the other hand easily be examined because, despite the great distance between the windings (25 mm), they have remarkably great apparent resistance (about 200 ohms at 10 kc). It appeared that the power factor of both of the flat coils wound 1:1, in consequence of their peculiar interwinding have the astonishingly high value of 0.85. The value of the power factor was at a maximum at 10 kc, at which frequency the most favorable matching of the impedance… was obtained. The repeated mention of 10 kc is also found in the scientific literature on the Barkhausen Effect. After all his experiments and measurements, Coler offered the following explanation of the way in which the apparatus works:

"Due to the connecting of the batteries, a current impulse is induced in the anchor circuit which charges the plates. The discharge circuit from the plates causes electrical interruption of short duration of the battery current in the field circuit, which furthermore inductively interrupts, or changes the direction of, the battery current in the directing current for a short time. The electromagnetic field induced by this process in the directing circuit by its dissipation, induces over the field circuit a current in the anchor circuit recharging the plates, and so forth.

"Due to the influence of the Barkhausen Effect each single process has an impulse-like character, and the necessary change of phase is produced to allow the regularity of the process.

"Due to a source, up to the present not investigated, and not explainable by existing scientific theories, an additional quantity of energy is freed during each cycle which leads to a continual raising of the amplitude of the mutual processes, until the magnetic cores are saturated.

"From the fact that in the resistance of the apparatus pulsed direct current is flowing… There is possibly an up to now unknown rectifying effect, or alternatively the gain in energy is produced only during one half of the cycle, either during the charging or discharging of the plates. The activity in the apparatus must take place in the ten oscillation circuits in a phase-like manner… No technical means were available to make the necessary tuning adjustments.

"It is clear from the above that the success of the inventor up to now could only be due to chance, or happy accident. The necessity, therefore, arises to transfer the apparatus from the state of empirical development, with sufficient technical means and based on results of an exact basic research, to a state of working procedure which can be controlled." Other experiments, conducted by Frohlich with the arrangement in Figure 6, convinced Coler that his theory was correct:

"The result obtained with this experimental arrangement… was the clear proof of a considerably larger energy during opening (intake), compared with closing impulses. The [10-50%] difference is always in favor of the opening impulse… Consequently this observation can also be considered as a proof of the fact that an energy difference exists. [There is a] considerable, but extremely short, energy peak of the opening impulse. My development of the "Space Energy Receiver" was based on this and was successful."

In the 1980s, George Hathaway (Planetary Association for Clean Energy, PACE) constructed a Magnetstromapparat that produced 50 millivolts, and demonstrated it at unconventional technology conferences. There has been no news of further development. The Barkhausen Effect upon which the Coler inventions work is a low-field phenomenon that occurs when a ferromagnetic material is subjected to a change in the applied magnetic field. A series of discontinuous steps develop, corresponding to reversals in magnetization domain volumes from 10-10 to 10-8 cm3. The size of the discontinuities can be increased by stressing the magnet. Possibly the soft iron magnets which Coler used were subjected to such stress by ultrasonic magnetostriction from the coil windings at the 180 kHz resonant frequency. One can only wonder why British Intelligence (sic) declassified the Coler report, but we can be glad they did. If only they had seen fit to include more schematics of the Stromzeuger, because the available diagrams are woefully inadequate. At least we now know a few key facts, to wit: (1) Ferromagnetism resonates at 180 Khz; (2) The Barkhausen Effect can be amplified to provide useful power (10 Khz is another key frequency here); (3) "Some of the magnets are wound in a clockwise direction looking at the N pole (called left) and others in an anti-clockwise direction (called right)". The resistance of the magnet-coil combination was about 0.33 ohm; (4) "The basic principle is that an electron is to be regarded not only as a negatively charged particle but also as a South magnetic pole"; (5) "The novel feature is that the capacities are connected to the secondary core through permanent magnets"; (6) "There is a considerable, but extremely short, energy peak of the opening impulse". It is to be hoped that the Stromzeuger can be redeveloped, since it is a relatively simple, low technology device requiring no exotic components. It should not be left "to chance, or a happy accident", as it was for Hans Coler. 

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 31, 2010, 08:31:17 PM
Amazing...
The guy that is credited with giving us the light bulb actually plunged us into darkness.

http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/8817/supressione.jpg  ;D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on March 31, 2010, 08:58:27 PM
Amazing...
The guy that is credited with giving us the light bulb actually plunged us into darkness.

Who knows, maybe he was innocent ?  He left nice notes  ::)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on March 31, 2010, 09:35:07 PM
True.
Edison could have been a pawn. After all he spent hours at the tasks while the financiers were comfortably watchful.

Who knows, maybe he was innocent ?  He left nice notes  ::)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on April 01, 2010, 05:35:27 AM
   2.5 years ago I did this.  Grumpy and BEP told me not to do it again if I didnt want to end up typing using a pencil in my mouth.

   I did alot of work with ozone cells in water repurification and seen my share of coronal discharge but it was to an obvious ground.  This is the only time I have seen an open air discharge to nowhere.  I have seen plasma created like you are after when a pole pig shorted from primary to secondary and sent 20k into a building bridging the fused disconnect with about a 5inch gap.  Again there was an obvious potential setup between the grid and ground.  The current was resisted just enough to allow the primary pole breaker to stay engaged.  Then there was the time some water with salt in it sprayed a 460volt motor relay box.  I heard the hiss but was trying to minimize damage control like stop the water from spraying all over the control room.  Well the plant called for the motor to engage and so it did.  It blew the NEMA 1 enclosure cover right off the box across the room and by my head at a good 100 miles an hour.  Only thing I can figure out is that the hiss was producing hydrogen gas of some sort and the plasma from the contacts making ignited it.  The motor starter itself was fine.  The box not so good.  A little bloated.  Well on the day in question with the flyback pulsing the iron coil I was curious enough to insulate myself from ground and stick my paw a good 12 inches from the weird dually plasma things.  Cold ass ion wind heading from the ground to the coil.  You could cup your hand and feel the cold stuff fill up your palm then leak out around the edges.  That and not all of it was coming from the air I could feel it coming from out of my hand.  It is not the feeling you get when you radiate your body heat and cold is radiating in.  It was cold radiating out.  Weird as it gets.  Pretty dumb too but I lacked any kind of thermal sensing device and just had a gut feeling this was not your ordinary radiant em event.  I think this is what was happening but not so sure.  The coil was acting as a solenoid and providing a relatively permanent magnetic field of a torroidal nature.  The lead from the flyback was attached in the middle of the 6 turn iron coil so the current was creating like two solenoids  back to back.  The pulsed  electric field was causing ionization of the air on the ends of the iron coil and the current maintaining the split polarity solenoidal magnetic field lines.  The free electrons liberated from the air ionization started a current that followed the magnetic field lines from the iron coil.  Since the coil ends extended through a uhmw block and ions like to float they were accruing inside the electron current flowing along the magfield lines.  This kept on going until with the ions relatively cold but still very positive but lighter than air amassed inside the electron loop.  This positive pole was insulated like a low pressure area in a twister.  For any high pressure to get to it it would have to negotiate the hot electron circulation.  The cold feeling was the thermal energy drop of the mass of the air and my hand as electrons left the atoms heading for the little cyclone deal I had going.  Ions lack the thermal energy of the relatively hot electrons.  I am quite certain that if I had kept running this thing it was going to get cold enough to form condensation of water vapor and some eery fog as reported around other plasma devices running in open air.  I didnt need to wait around for that kinda shit to happen and pulled the plug.   
 166.204.44.125
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 01, 2010, 06:24:52 AM
Well that didn't happen in the house now did it?
If you have a simple coil and spark gap then that is the driver. All one to do is add bigger coils with fatter wire and Poof! With adding smaller coils and regular wire (to keep it safe in suburbia) one gets nowhere but keep crashing pcs, household relays, and test equipment. Whoopty, frickin doo! I need an isolated lab. My relatives imply this also. Even my dogs run away. Making the bigger stuff is not rocket science. Just pump up the potential to electrostatic levels and yer done. Page 30-31 Pentagon aliens. But in suburbia the neighborhood shuts down or the incoming cable/idiot tv area gets whacked. It is just too simple to make shit happen at this stage. It is simply off the bench now.
The little tests with small coils and no usable output is not nirvana, never was. That is why I knew the stun gun with a bigger mass stage at the end was it. No playing with the small stuff. I know this sport model is gonna fry stuff.

But I do need to add this for the benefit of every one. I bought D-link wireless. It has a really cool dongle stand at the end of a USB cable. Being Wireless stuff I thought is would be a good extender cable. NOT! It's like a metal helmet in the lightning storm. I ran the wireless dongle on one and my controller on another one and previously fried more equipment. Just got back to stage normal. So I have gone to wireless usb.

I want to make bigger stuff.
2.5 years ago Ironhead almost blew his arms off cracking water. Jason blew a field into his chest. I have the ECD built to spec. I fried thumb nerves permanently. Hmmm. How could there be a next safe step? I have a ozone coil on a pen barrel in referring to the Kunel patent. It doesn't take big equipment! Either the correct frequencies or spark gaps. The results have to be up in the electrostatic range. This is what it all points to. But all the bench equipment and suburban necessities work in the range below this and looks like a current sink or radiant sinking antenna.
I have only read 30 pages of pentagon aliens and have the explanations of this process in my hands. He spells it out in 5 pages clear as can be. I have to go to bed and regroup my other personalities into one cohesive think tank. I have no one in my sphere of relationships that even has a clue as to what I talking about in all this here. But danger is easily understood.

   2.5 years ago I did this.  Grumpy and BEP told me not to do it again if I didn't want to end up typing using a pencil in my mouth.

   I did alot of work with ozone cells in water repurification and seen my share of coronal discharge but it was to an obvious ground.  This is the only time I have seen an open air discharge to nowhere.  I have seen plasma created like you are after when a pole pig shorted from primary to secondary and sent 20k into a building bridging the fused disconnect with about a 5inch gap.  Again there was an obvious potential setup between the grid and ground.  The current was resisted just enough to allow the primary pole breaker to stay engaged.  Then there was the time some water with salt in it sprayed a 460volt motor relay box.  I heard the hiss but was trying to minimize damage control like stop the water from spraying all over the control room.  Well the plant called for the motor to engage and so it did.  It blew the NEMA 1 enclosure cover right off the box across the room and by my head at a good 100 miles an hour.  Only thing I can figure out is that the hiss was producing hydrogen gas of some sort and the plasma from the contacts making ignited it.  The motor starter itself was fine.  The box not so good.  A little bloated.  Well on the day in question with the flyback pulsing the iron coil I was curious enough to insulate myself from ground and stick my paw a good 12 inches from the weird dually plasma things.  Cold ass ion wind heading from the ground to the coil.  You could cup your hand and feel the cold stuff fill up your palm then leak out around the edges.  That and not all of it was coming from the air I could feel it coming from out of my hand.  It is not the feeling you get when you radiate your body heat and cold is radiating in.  It was cold radiating out.  Weird as it gets.  Pretty dumb too but I lacked any kind of thermal sensing device and just had a gut feeling this was not your ordinary radiant em event.  I think this is what was happening but not so sure.  The coil was acting as a solenoid and providing a relatively permanent magnetic field of a torroidal nature.  The lead from the flyback was attached in the middle of the 6 turn iron coil so the current was creating like two solenoids  back to back.  The pulsed  electric field was causing ionization of the air on the ends of the iron coil and the current maintaining the split polarity solenoidal magnetic field lines.  The free electrons liberated from the air ionization started a current that followed the magnetic field lines from the iron coil.  Since the coil ends extended through a uhmw block and ions like to float they were accruing inside the electron current flowing along the magfield lines.  This kept on going until with the ions relatively cold but still very positive but lighter than air amassed inside the electron loop.  This positive pole was insulated like a low pressure area in a twister.  For any high pressure to get to it it would have to negotiate the hot electron circulation.  The cold feeling was the thermal energy drop of the mass of the air and my hand as electrons left the atoms heading for the little cyclone deal I had going.  Ions lack the thermal energy of the relatively hot electrons.  I am quite certain that if I had kept running this thing it was going to get cold enough to form condensation of water vapor and some eery fog as reported around other plasma devices running in open air.  I didnt need to wait around for that kinda shit to happen and pulled the plug.   
 166.204.44.125
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Bruce_TPU on April 01, 2010, 03:59:13 PM
Hi GK,

I suppose you have seen the new Don Smith video's on youtube? 

Well he mentions a power supply, that he says is OU to start with.  I went and found the exact one he uses, and from the numbers posted, if true, would be correct.  12 watts input and 20 watts output. 

Anyway, I have ordered one to have for future experiments, and you have worked more with HV then anyone else that I know, except maybe Moby.  So here is the info if you are interested in buying one and testing it out...They are very cheap!

Specifications: Input: 12 Vdc @ 1 Amp (Suggested power source CAT# DCTX-1215). Output: 2,000 Vac @ 10 mA. Open circuit voltage: 3,000 Vac 30Khz. Short circuit current: 15 mA. UL.

https://www.allelectronics.com/index.php?&page=item&id=HVS-1&index=1

Kind regards,

Bruce
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on April 01, 2010, 04:11:44 PM
How about this version, I am playing with this one now, need a better HV source than I have, need a NST or two for my bench.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on April 01, 2010, 05:08:31 PM
@GK

Found this one the other day at my EE surplus place. Had to buy it even though I have no plans to use it yet. I wonder if you can use these backwards. Pulse into the HV side and measure off the Primary side. Will try it this weekend. lol
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 01, 2010, 05:24:28 PM
@Bruce,
I ordered 4 of those xfmrs. I will use ATV batteries for power. Connecting to the grid is no longer viable for future tests. I don't want to pump charges back into the ground side. That runs in parallel to the supply side.
I have watched the Smith vids but if you have a link to the one you are referencing that would be appreciated. That would put us on the same page.

Also on the HV, I found that keeping the current low is mandatory. At least up to this stage it has worked to keep things safe. But as we see in the next pic it can get out of control real fast. Raise the current and added troublesome effects appear.

@Starcruiser,
Per the pic: stage #1 raises the voltages. Stage #2 is configured mobiusly(pancake like operation) so the electorstatic levels are raised again. Mondo with the sparkgap hitting it also. But diminutive if the spark gap is shielded. 90 degree air coupling is at the electrotatic level also. Coler does this also.
But over all item #3 is the raising the current into high electrostatic levels that interface with Aether and that excitation is then coupled into the final output additive to what was put in. This also explains the Earth ground connection. The lamps are put in series with the potential between the sky and the Earth. Basically a short circuit. So that points to the small awg windings creating a large aperture for massive conduction.
But this is a good addition to any bench.

Thanks guys.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on April 01, 2010, 06:22:43 PM
@GK, it is said to keep the TC supply at 90 degree to the bifilar coils, not totally sure why, yet, but thought I would mention it. Keep the TC coil vertical #1, and the generator coils, #2 horizontal.

I was tickling the coils I made with a Car ignition coil and running a stranded speaker wire pair thru the core, registers about 1v AC, if I placed the DVM leads on separate leads (isolated) and touched the other free end of one of the leads to the driving battery the voltage jumps to 10V, perhaps feedback from the control module. Need to scope the PS leads  (12vdc 20ah battery) the trigger is a old RCA audio generator which I had running at 60hz :)  so the DVM should be accurate.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stevenDmark on April 01, 2010, 06:24:25 PM
A D. Smith - TPU
Now you people are getting close!
For the first time in 10 years...

SM
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on April 01, 2010, 07:03:48 PM
Hi GK,

I suppose you have seen the new Don Smith video's on youtube? 

Well he mentions a power supply, that he says is OU to start with.  I went and found the exact one he uses, and from the numbers posted, if true, would be correct.  12 watts input and 20 watts output. 

Anyway, I have ordered one to have for future experiments, and you have worked more with HV then anyone else that I know, except maybe Moby.  So here is the info if you are interested in buying one and testing it out...They are very cheap!

Specifications: Input: 12 Vdc @ 1 Amp (Suggested power source CAT# DCTX-1215). Output: 2,000 Vac @ 10 mA. Open circuit voltage: 3,000 Vac 30Khz. Short circuit current: 15 mA. UL.

https://www.allelectronics.com/index.php?&page=item&id=HVS-1&index=1

Kind regards,

Bruce

Glad to see things are getting close with Don's concepts as I think they work but most are changed just enough to keep replication difficult. 
   I did read one time recently though that he was incorrect on those transformers being OU.  It is simply a misinterpretation of how they are rated by the manufacturer.  It was explained in detail although I don't recall where.  Just don't expect OU from the transformer itself. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: gyulasun on April 01, 2010, 07:30:32 PM
A D. Smith - TPU
Now you people are getting close!
For the first time in 10 years...

SM

Hi Steven,

Hopefully you are the real SM and not an alterego? lol

When can you revel any further "secrets"?

Thanks, Gyula
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on April 01, 2010, 08:19:25 PM
Interesting, using the above design, the output waveform has a peak to peak value of 386vac @ 6khz, this is coincidentally the driving frequency of the HV coil. If I take off the ground the frequency changes, no surprise here. If I open the lamp circuit (switched lamp base), it changes the operating resonance. What I found interesting though is that the wire through the core was 16ga speaker (copper), if I changed that to a 4Ga copper, the output increases to 580vac!

Now I need to throw in some diodes and a few caps since I have none in the circuit currently.

Still no lamp lighting so I need to rectify the HV for pulsed DC operation to see if this changes.

More to come when I have something to report.


Steve, Thanks for the post.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 01, 2010, 09:17:30 PM
An important passage...

@Gy,
Wrong response...

@Wattsup,
Watch out for the amperage!

@SM,
Thanks for the response.   8)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on April 01, 2010, 09:21:36 PM
IMHO to make a pump you have to have pure DC positive to attract electrons. AC will only tickle them. Tesla patented bifilar coil for purpose of electromagnets so it's very suitable for that.You have to have also spark gap to make that DC pulsating to allow electrons return to ambient state.
You have to have bifilar in non-inductive connection to primary, and spark gap should operate strangely without oscillations.
Don Smith method , also TPU.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 01, 2010, 09:27:26 PM
In this pic
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8227.0;attach=43527 (http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8227.0;attach=43527)
Replace the G-box with a stungun.

IMHO to make a pump you have to have pure DC positive to attract electrons. AC will only tickle them. Tesla patented bifilar coil for purpose of electromagnets so it's very suitable for that.You have to have also spark gap to make that DC pulsating to allow electrons return to ambient state.
You have to have bifilar in non-inductive connection to primary, and spark gap should operate strangely without oscillations.
Don Smith method , also TPU.

@Wattsup,
I too have a coil similar but on an E-core not An O-core like yours. I took the little black video coils posted by Sauron and modded it to a configuration like you show. But in mine the HV is inside the low winding like a little ferrite core Tesla coil.
But what Starcruiser posted is one within another within another like a trifilar pancake. All the older tpu windings from Marco and Mannix stated '3 all the way around the ring'. And alot of old TPUs are just that but probably not connected mobiusly like Otto did the GK4 but on a copper core.

I did notice that Starcruiser's schematic had no capacitors in it.

I pulled out a number of my coils and they can all be mobiusly wound and driven like a bifilar pancake, maybe trifilar. Guess that is where Moaby gets his name.

Thought I did this before but now that I think of it the double pulse protocol does the same thing. One pulse right behind the other like a snake biting its tail. This gives an electrostatic effect. Like what is mentioned in the document.
Well I have some easy setups this weekend to do...

There are many ways to skin a cat.
In reference to the GK4  pic:
I could never figure out why and where the destructive chatter of this monster came from. Take notice of the iron runs all connecting together at the end of their runs. With 3 different frequencies this coil would randomly conduct through the iron runs in different directions and different times. When one pulse is low another would be high. This would happen in the Tera/Giga/mega hertz. That explains where the damaging energy came from. And the iron wind is 90 degrees to the others. Major stress going on here in this coil like a traffic jam version of a Rodin coil.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on April 02, 2010, 01:15:46 PM
  Electrons moving appear to displace prevailing electric field states already existing.  They warp the gradient as they carry their monocharge scource through other electric fields.  They cause the prevailing field to change dimension.  Depending on their velocity the electric fields they pass through will alter.  Some longer wavelength electric fields will now be partitioned by the movement of the electron.  Producing two higher energy state waves from the one lower energy state wave.  The shortened electric fields or higher energy photon can work to ionize and accelerate electrons bound to neutral atoms.  Note you need the lower frequency oscillation and the electron velocity.  The faster she goes the greater probability that a lower energy wave becomes two higher energy waves and these higher energy waves are able to ionize atoms that the lower energy wave could not.  This can lead to an electron cascade event.  This is not energy from no where.  You need the low frequency wave to be altered and accelerated electrons.  Then something to observe the increased electron density induced polarization.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 02, 2010, 06:30:28 PM
The string is plucked, then press fret 12 to get an octave or higher harmonic. 8)

The new interconnections of Otto's pic of the GK4. Not bucking but precessive.

  Electrons moving appear to displace prevailing electric field states already existing.  They warp the gradient as they carry their monocharge scource through other electric fields.  They cause the prevailing field to change dimension.  Depending on their velocity the electric fields they pass through will alter.  Some longer wavelength electric fields will now be partitioned by the movement of the electron.  Producing two higher energy state waves from the one lower energy state wave.  The shortened electric fields or higher energy photon can work to ionize and accelerate electrons bound to neutral atoms.  Note you need the lower frequency oscillation and the electron velocity.  The faster she goes the greater probability that a lower energy wave becomes two higher energy waves and these higher energy waves are able to ionize atoms that the lower energy wave could not.  This can lead to an electron cascade event.  This is not energy from no where.  You need the low frequency wave to be altered and accelerated electrons.  Then something to observe the increased electron density induced polarization.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MACEDONIA CD on April 03, 2010, 03:29:55 PM
 ???
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 03, 2010, 05:16:47 PM
Middle layer sections of the GK4.

This is set up, step up, set up, step up.
Not electrostatic yet.
That is when the trinaries are wrapped around the secondaries.

Have model in Visio for easy doco. The coil is just as easy to config. The GK3 is same section configuration but continuous stranded wrap and heavier gauge with copper core. Transformers, just like in the movies.

Have top and bottom layers to include also.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on April 03, 2010, 08:35:40 PM
nice coils

Use aluminium shield around them and attach kind of Avramenko plug beetween shield and real ground using led diodes.If only one diode will light then it may be safe , if both then it may generate harmful RF radiation.Still aluminium shield is a good advice however I haven't figured yet how to make it clear like glass  :D
of course it's all theoretical based on Kozyrew experiments.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 05, 2010, 07:15:48 PM
That's Kozyrev.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19489945/Kozyrev-Mirrors-and-Electromagnetic-Null-Zones

Absolutely most fascinating!
This also fits in with the design of the comp wave detection device. A receiving amplifier enclosed in an iron tube. Naudin shows the specs to build one.

Current efforts:
I am going to test the dual pulse protocol as a spark gap replacement. I am in the process to build a variable gap distance SG.
Don Smith used the NST to charge and discharge a gap just to smack his resonating coils. I want to use a small gap to test. With this I can go back and test the stungun input to it.

The reason I mention this is I don't see how a circuit without a spark gap can produce the required hard hit or kick against the coil. The last 3 years have produced many builds or coils and circuits to attempt this. The spark gap or Bedini magnet polar shear is the only way I see as the simplest attempt that produces the most impact. To try this any other way or to find the holy grail of circuit operation is an effort far too deep into the physics of particular devices or special arrangements of circuit configurations. I will let others go down this solid state path. I have seen the size of the internal spark gap of the stun gun and am still in awe about its potential / voltage production.
It really is quite simple. The gun is 2 stages. The first stage is a 5khz blocking oscillator to a minature audio transformer that outputs to a diode chain, spark gap, capacitor. No different than in alot of Tesla's stages and patents. The last stage is the configuration that matches up with the type of output with the environmental interface whether it be 2 small terminals or a ground connection and an vertical aerial. Still a stun gun. The little black box in the SM17 could easily hold the stun gun circuit as well as the open TPUs holding separate components to perform this not so Herculean output. The TPU configurations are just smacked resonant ringers.
So instead of competing against the substrate's physical properties, stressed or obscure operation, winding configurations I am going back to spark gaps.

--gk. 'nuff sed.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on April 05, 2010, 11:31:28 PM
@GK
For an accurate SG with micro adjustments .001" per revolution I use a 19" wedge design "<" side is stationary that sets up a consistant tortion for tightenss of this end , The ">" side is 7" and the adjusting screw is 1/8 " course all-thread
The gap itself is set about 4" from the narrow end.
If you are up to building two, for the different effects that a grounded spark does instead of an air gap you may consider using a ground rod between the two spark probes, this also needs an adjustable end as well if you intend on using more than one spark gap at a time.

I have compiled videos that will show how the timing of the sparks can be manipulated using this device. and some pic as well.
Don stated using a gap of .0025 Surely this is directly related to the charge within that part of the circuit only. secondly we might also say the gap separates the circuit in that manner. Depending of course where the spark is conducted " to ground or into the circuit. or both.

Anyway it is a very good design. but not as easy to do as I have put forth here.

Good luck
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 06, 2010, 05:58:37 AM
Really, I mean really ingenious!
Nice design. In my experiments I noticed there are only four positions, visually. The smallest being matched to the gap inside the stun gun. The outside gap is merely for adequate production to go through clothes and flesh to hit the nerves. Short the mini gap inside and you got nada. That inside gap is quite small and not that specific although it is written up as to be. I have found different. You got to hit a small coil? You use small gap. You gotta hit a big coil to jump an inch? Use a big gap. Where the gap is important is the coil you want to hit. Fat copper coil will absorb all the energy and you get nada. In other words the gap size matches the inductance. The energy has to be greater than the coil. Obviously. What Tesla's patents don't show are the increasingly graduated stages. Motor brushes, the commutators act as the initial small gap. Then we get bigger and bigger. If you don't want to strive for exact resonance for massive reactance in, let's say, 2 stages then play sloppy and just keep throwing step ups in the circuit. Thats right, Ad infinitum! I have done 10 stages of 1:1 rat shack coils and the output still flies undiminished. Oh what fun! Like ringing the bells in sequence. The coils just are hyper reactive to high speed potential. If you want to use step ups then you need the loop of a cap and an added gap. Quite noisy. 8)

I appreciate the detail on the gap size and would really like to see any results where the gap size is specific to the geometry of the next stage. I am sure that the match can be made very specific. A matched gap to a very High 'Q' resonance ringing should really produce very expressive output.

So here is one that I am sure Grumpy had covered but can't remember. When the discharge crosses the gap the generated magnetic field should be spherical albeit very noisy or have an erratic edge and travel with the discharge from terminal to terminal. Not that it means anything here but should be like a cannon ball when it hits the other terminal. Just thinking about all this in a different plane of effect.

The small nst needs a small gap. Yes! And if you use a stun gun you can copy the 1" gap throughout the stages.
Tesla used commutators as diodes, resonance to increase the bias. We use diodes. Resonance is an option depending on the power out needed. Don Smith PVC is the Tesla ozone generator minus the fan / motor. The NST is the motor.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 14, 2010, 07:12:14 PM
Received (4) 30kv 510pf capacitors through Ebay.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 15, 2010, 05:07:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKtQOqw0qtc&NR=1
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 21, 2010, 12:44:52 AM
@Sparks,
This ones for you, Bud!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 25, 2010, 06:15:16 PM
In relation to Meyer:
He harvested the energy at the point of the crack. ZPE.
If you store the gases then burn them later you have lost the potential.

The crack can be produced in many ways. All those ways are in this site, Overunity.com. When the potential that has produced the separation has subsided then we harvest the returning backlash. This return is the atomic reconnection or rebonding. Mother nature abhors a vacuum.
Based upon the spectrum range we exist in this controls the atomic bonding in a limited fashion. Naturally occurring bonds exist all around us, obviously, which produce familiar examples of matter. We have the knowledge to break those bonds in numerous ways, i.e. Cleaning, cooking, burning, exploding, cutting, moving. This is where to resonant swing comes into play. We push, we wait, we harvest, push, wait, harvest. Your goal is to find the timing depending on what materials or forces you use. Using resonance overcomes the losses. Work with nature and you rule the universe. As a child did you ever cause tidal forces in the tub with your little hands? You don't have to stop no matter what age you are.

Look at your failed attempts in the past, change your timing and viola'!

If you want to use sines waves then resonance is mandatory. Square waves afford the speed inherently because of the rise and fall times.

--giantkiller.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on April 25, 2010, 10:04:03 PM

I appreciate the detail on A size and would really like to see any results where A size is specific to the geometry of the next stage. I am sure that the match can be made very specific. A matched gap to a very High 'Q' resonance ringing should really produce very expressive output.

So here is one that I am sure Grumpy had covered but can't remember. When the discharge crosses the gap the generated magnetic field should be spherical albeit very noisy or have an erratic edge and travel with the discharge from terminal to terminal. Not that it means anything here but should be like a cannon ball when it hits the other terminal.


I am not at the stage where I can say anything about the Q factor or test for it though I do have some videos that show some remarkable findings.
I have a silent spark that discharges from a 630 v .7 uF cap that taps "sound", the IT and lights the light bulb, "low wattage.
and if I discharge the cap another way I get a large bang and Nada on the IT or light?

That seems to contradict the quote of yours so I was wondering about your thoughts with my discharges, and circuit?
http://www.youtube.com/user/h2ocommuter (http://www.youtube.com/user/h2ocommuter)

The second video clearly shows how this tapping is heard.
http://www.youtube.com/user/h2ocommuter#p/u/2/2qC03Bqp7GA (http://www.youtube.com/user/h2ocommuter#p/u/2/2qC03Bqp7GA)

h2ocommuter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 26, 2010, 12:20:36 AM
@H2,
I reference the stungun ckt for this since that is a good model.
The internal microgap is there to ping the primary of the output transformer.
If you let a large spark transmit then you have lost power in the primary stage. The smaller spark is just the 'Clanger hitting the bell(coil)'. By having a large spark in the primary stage you are essentially hitting the bell(coil) with a sledge hammer and that deadens the output. The whole idea is to spank the primary causing high impedance when sends a greater shock wave to the later stages.
Are your CLF bulbs gutted or is the internal circuitry still in there? Put a regular filament bulb in those sockets. The CFL gas bulbs are easily excitable from shock. The filament offers slow resistance. They will blow if shocked too hard. Also the the CFL are electrostatic while the filament are conduction based.

Let me know where the contradiction my statements apply.

Also, increase the gap, like an inch, of the side you don't want to use while testing the other side.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on April 26, 2010, 01:40:31 AM
Thanks GK,

I realized the question was unfair on my part.
My CFL are not gutted and my normal bulbs will not blink.

my contradiction statement was trying to understand the silent spark verses the loud spark idea you stated.

It seems the quiet spark has more umph than the loud one?
I was trying to get a direct kickback about why that was the case.
I will do some more studying. The silent spark seemed to physically shake that 60# IT, and I wondered why it did that with the silent spark versos the loud one.

I have along way to go.

God Speed
h2ocommuter

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Rosphere on April 26, 2010, 01:41:27 AM
Your goal is to find the timing depending on what materials or forces you use. Using resonance overcomes the losses. Work with nature and you rule the universe. As a child did you ever cause tidal forces in the tub with your little hands? You don't have to stop no matter what age you are.

Thanks for the reminder.   :)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on April 30, 2010, 10:29:33 PM
Quote
In alternating current engineering the magnetic wave is the one that is consumptive and retarded, whereas the dielectric wave is productive and advanced. You could say the electromagnetism is the fundamental geometry of consumptive retardation. Dollard circa 1988.

--giantkiller. Pi/2 > c.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 16, 2010, 01:07:22 AM
Incoming...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 20, 2010, 09:17:14 PM
I believe this to be a Bloch Wall.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 24, 2010, 08:38:52 PM
http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat4874346.pdf
http://www.ufohowto.com/Magnetic%20vortex%20wormhole%20generator.pdf

Thundertorms, lightning, cooling. Now isn't that a coincedence?

SM mentioned the havoc if the frequencies were bang on. I have part of this build on my bench right now. So does Wattsup.
The nuggets in these patents are immense.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on May 24, 2010, 11:13:42 PM
Are you going to replicate this GK?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 24, 2010, 11:56:05 PM
I'll give it a whack.
The config is incredibly close to what I have been replicating from Wattsup and it looks like a close cousin to the SM17.
SMs model has a lower diam of the inner and offset from the outer centerline. I had posted this before about the off center alignment. In reading the patent I drew the conclusion that this could be the config because of paragraph [029] quote "effectively creating a power supply". I was thinking that the SM unit is a subset of what the patent is hailing. St.Clair also states the numerical parameters of the coils in the last paragraph of the patent.
I also wondered if this is another build relating to Tesla's transmitting patents, http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat645576.pdf (http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat645576.pdf).
William Lyne stated an interesting config of this in his 'P2' dissertations.

If I am to replicate this I am going to cheat and use aluminum for the center cores instead of supermalloy tape as mentioned in paragraph [038].

Muy fantastico.
In otherwords in all the postings this seems to be narrowing down to a few configurations of simplicity but talking about something outside the normal energy/power view. Model G expressed in subquantum kinetics by Laviolette, DeBroglie's phase-wave theory dealing with wave packet representation of a material particle,  and extra dimensional electron/proton path expressed in the St. Clair patent.

DeBroglie's phase-wave theory also attaches to Nuclear-magnetic resonance.

In essence: The wavelengths of the electron to nucleus distance, and the wavelenth of the atom to atom distance of lattice based molecular structures, like copper, iron, most metals and crystalines. And how to cause the effect the simplest way torsioning the Bloch wall.

I know I am all over the place but these items here are all the neccessaries in each of the prospective attempts of those before us and its taken a maniacal effort the gather up the fewest relating facts from the myriad of info out there.

Wikipedia has unlinked 2 Tesla patents from their list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Tesla_patents (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Tesla_patents)
Guess which ones?
This is exactly what William Lyne was harping about in his books.

But then there are those of us who will not comply with the idiocy.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 25, 2010, 03:50:10 AM
Current test thru the gate and drain magamp:
Notice the spike at mid pulse and excessive ringing from the ferrite ring itself.
This is with no resonant tuning at all. I just swapped the gate lines to the magamp so the gate signal is going to same direction as the drain to coil line. The winding pair of 23 turns is still mirrored. I will rewind to make the pair continuous wind.

I have a 120ohm resistor from the coil top to +12. If I remove it I get 51v spikes off the magamp with a 12v supply.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 25, 2010, 09:04:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ylMTDXAJF0w

On the current build I have pulsed the vertical / control coils all wound in series. I scoped the horizontal / collectors all wound in series.
Tonight I pulse the collectors/horizontal in series but the middle will be fired in reverse direction than the others. Like the video. And read the verticals / controls.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on May 26, 2010, 01:43:30 AM
@GK

I mean....... do I have to say it. I mean do I really really have to say it. OK OK

Nice build you have there. Bifilar half winds with multi loop inner core rings times three. Now that is a nice toy to play around with. I trust you will have some interesting effects to show.

Also, that was a great animation. Must have taken ages to do. Thanks.

Ran across this video from Jd0300 done in 2007 showing off his single wire pulsing, well not single wire but open ended pulsing.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6NlO-fVr_U&feature=related

I think we will now have to do tests in two ways. Do it in the way you think it should work, see the results, then do it with one wire pulsing to see if you can get the same effect and results. You see, I am now at the point where I have to do this because I do not know anymore if a build requires one or two wires to get the same effect. Even pulsing mosfets could be deceiving because you are actually applying only one wire on the gate.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 26, 2010, 05:50:33 PM
Didn't mean to sound like I was berating your prior posts. Not the case at all.

The graphic only took 1 hour. I have a huge self-built OU graphics library.

I see bailing wire glued around the sides. This SM unit does not drive anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHswoNpc0Tk&feature=related
Quote
It doesn't contain any batteries capable of producing the amount of electricity going to be witnessed here.

In response to no current or open end pulse:
The Lee Crook circuit does this also as does the St.Clair circuit by the blocking cap at K.

I looked at Jason's vid yesterday and will add this to the test protocol.

I got my current build configured and tested but the 3 horizontal layers are in parallel / opposing. I need to place in serial / opposing to use the impedance for a delay.

The red in the pic is the compressed magnetic field. The outside ring is the virtual block wall.
I will do another pic to show the StClair patent field activity. What is interesting is the field overlap in the center creating a vortex.
I believe the SM center toriod is set this way also as shown by one of my previous rat shack spool wraps.
The J magamp is used to pulse the mobius wound L & M & K tank.

Also the StClair patent only shows 1 frequency. I see that you have the patent in your FTP site.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on May 26, 2010, 07:33:56 PM
  Gk and all:
   The smallest MS device does show what looks to be a cap (at minute 2.10), it does seem to have both control coils wound like the St.Clair unit, and shows only 2 control coils, center torroid possibly wound in reverse, one magnet, and possible the cap that you mentioned between the two coils. Runs at 7.3. No other circuitry is seen or is mentioned. There is no signal generator, batteries, or outside source.and mentions that it has no complicated circuitry.
   There have been no replications done exactly like his, at least that I've seen. The reverse polarity of the center coil may be a very important point, possibly overlooked.
                                                      NickZ   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 26, 2010, 08:01:23 PM
@Nickz, Thanks.
In the vid unit the top and bottom could be the L & M winds. St.Clair used Supermalloy. My suspicion at first was to keep the fields pressed or reflected more into space where the the Bloch wall manipulation happens quite easily as in the Kunel patent. That is why I thought of using Aluminium. Maybe iron wire will work in place of SuperMalloy. Could it be that St. Clair never thought of simplicity and SM could just pull this out of thin air? When SM mentioned bailing wire I associated it with the iron laminations that Telsa harped on in his patents. It worked in my builds for those particular tests.
And in this vid the side winders are really clear and obvious!
That is one shitty build and I give great thanks to SM. Anybody that has prototyped knows the process of getting a process to show, alot of engineering, alot of prototyping, total lack of sleep. Come show and tell time the builder is just glad to use bubble gum and tape to get the demo done. That has been my life as I see it too. When the next stage of money people flock in the idea is to hide the process into a secret.

The SM17 is a close replica of the 'Little TPU that could'....

Now if we refer back to the references of 'Effective Aperture' The center units that are 'off center' in the SM17 shows the process of being 'not quite bang on'. The larger unit would be dealing with more space hence a larger magnification. He used 2 in a weaker area instead of trying to position 1 just before 'bang on'. I still believe 2 frequencies equals just 2 switches. One for each center unit of the same frequency unless two frequencies was another way to keep bang on at bay.

St.Clair Field video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UewWiUj57gE
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on May 27, 2010, 05:58:45 AM
  @Gk:
      Thanks for the reply.  I know what you mean by the total lack of sleep.  I also hope to find a way to manufacture safe electric power to light my home, run my car etz... and help others do the same, but I don't feel that we have much time left, before the lights go out, and our test instruments won't be of much help.
   As you know there are very few (if any) magnetic power devices that are compatible with a home or office environment, that don't make noise, or upset people close by, or that are portable, and can be moved elsewhere if needed.  That is the reason that I'm doing what I can, to help out with this effort, full blast, sleep or no sleep, come hell or high water. 
  As I can see that you and others in the group like to read (understatement), I'll send some information on the mostly unknown and unconventional Vortex Theory. From a source that I'm sure you've never heard of before.  More on that later.
                                            Regards to all,
                                                                 NickZ 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 27, 2010, 07:41:21 AM
I wait in stillness...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on May 27, 2010, 07:15:22 PM
While following one of the Masters by also waiting in stillness I pondered this concept  ;D
   I've got a big coil of copper tubing about 30 feet long wound in a flat spiral and it's 3/4" diameter tubing.  I thought about running a wire through it with it looped back coming out the same end (bifilar run of sorts).   I'm not sure what I could do with it but it would seem different than winding a wire TPU style around a bigger coil in a number of ways.  And it would not be like coax cable in that it runs both ways returning to the same end it entered.  First thought was to run some 12 guage stranded which has 600 volt insulation (as I've got a big roll of it) on it in this setup but I'm not sure the heavy insulation is what I'd want.  Any thoughts on this odd pancake recipe?   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 27, 2010, 07:44:09 PM
Think about this:
Take two wires in parallel, A & B,
at the pulse end in wire A the field collapses in wire A,
pulse the second wire in opposite direction (at the right time as we push the swing),
this pushes the collapse in wire A increasing the BEMF.
You'll notice in the St.Clair patent the L & M collectors are wrapped the same way but pulsed in opposition. We want to enable a phase and polarity relationship for the two fields so in opposition they work together by the collapse and expansion going the same direction in their path along the runs and perpendicular to the runs.

On a 3 layer TPU the middle run is pulsed in opposition. This pushes the collapse into the top and bottom runs, increasing the collapse speed, like cannonballs.

The minimum layer count is 2 to enable the Bloch wall torsion between the two. This Bloch wall is on the horizontal plane.

Now look at TPUs this way: the runs can be parallel in the horizontal or vertical plane. The space between does not change except in angular placement.
Now lets say we let the middle collapse and use the top and bottom layers to push the collapse. This equates to squeezing the hose!
With sloppy windings and no mass circuitry this is the only way achievable. Woo-hoo!
Also switch or reverse the vernacular of the control and collector coil labels. The collector can wrap at 90 degrees around the control coil so the that the control loop is the bigger winding. The pronounced BEMF creates Radiant energy perpendicular to the control or horizontal coil and thereby sinks to the collector or vertical winding. The same energy that charged doorknobs in Tesla's building multiple floors and rooms away.

Fini...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on May 27, 2010, 09:23:23 PM
Think about this:
Take two wires in parallel, A & B,
at the pulse end in wire A the field collapses in wire A,
pulse the second wire in opposite direction (at the right time as we push the swing),
this pushes the collapse in wire A increasing the BEMF.
You'll notice in the St.Clair patent the L & M collectors are wrapped the same way but pulsed in opposition. We want to enable a phase and polarity relationship for the two fields so in opposition they work together by the collapse and expansion going the same direction in their path along the runs and perpendicular to the runs.

On a 3 layer TPU the middle run is pulsed in opposition. This pushes the collapse into the top and bottom runs, increasing the collapse speed, like cannonballs.

The minimum layer count is 2 to enable the Bloch wall torsion between the two. This Bloch wall is on the horizontal plane.

Now look at TPUs this way: the runs can be parallel in the horizontal or vertical plane. The space between does not change except in angular placement.
Now lets say we let the middle collapse and use the top and bottom layers to push the collapse. This equates to squeezing the hose!
With sloppy windings and no mass circuitry this is the only way achievable. Woo-hoo!
Also switch or reverse the vernacular of the control and collector coil labels. The collector can wrap at 90 degrees around the control coil so the that the control loop is the bigger winding. The pronounced BEMF creates Radiant energy perpendicular to the control or horizontal coil and thereby sinks to the collector or vertical winding. The same energy that charged doorknobs in Tesla's building multiple floors and rooms away.

Fini...

Maybe another way is to disconnect the second end of coil-wire at the exact correct moment.... looks very very simple , right ?  ::)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: h2ocommuter on May 28, 2010, 12:09:31 AM
You all are hammering the details very well, bottoms up!

I am considering this patent, and how NT states the values trim out.

The values stated and how to tune this type of Pancake are the important factors in receiving the magnificent power available.

I have not built this yet but I am continually collecting knowledge, Parts and equipment to do so.

http://www.google.com/patents?q=512340 (http://www.google.com/patents?q=512340)

h2ocommuter
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 28, 2010, 04:24:17 AM
@h2
Welcome aboard. This process is so damn simple why not try. The cores can be aluminum, copper, or iron wire. Simple to wind and only a few feet.
I am completing this setup. I have noticed the magamp only passes the transitions and no dc. With that said the tank gets pinged by very fast ringing. That ringing is held in place by the tank so we can time another hit. This equates to a slow one wire shockwave or micro spark gap because the cap does not pass DC( we know this). Just depends on the speed of the attempt you want to imply. Adding groundloop's driver gives another speed level.

The bottom line is this: the Bloch wall torsion can be done at many angles and many speeds. You just need to know what kind of output material or configuration to match the associated result to.

JDO300 asked me about the output configuration in the patent. I told him it is strictly for the vortex field generation. After that it is left wide open for what ever you want to attach to it. And yes, @h2, I told him you could slap a pancake at the end of it to read it.

The serially connected inductors offers delay impedance just like the Deyo coil.  ;) Whoa!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on May 28, 2010, 07:56:18 AM
    @GK:  wait no more... 
    Some very interesting and unconventional reading on what is a vortex, light, magnetism, and electricity:
  http://www.angelfire.com/realm3/oahspedownload/OAHSPE.pdf
      I couldn't copy just part of the book, so if interested just download the pdf file (890 pages) and see page 761 on. The book is called OAHSPE.  Written in 1882, by John Ballou Newbrough.  It was written in the same time period as Tesla,  before they pulled the wool over our eyes.
   It takes a couple of minutes to download.
                                                                NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 28, 2010, 06:51:14 PM
@Nikz,
I like John's insight into the Aether. There are alot of nuggets in this. I'll skip the history portions and aim at the science.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on May 29, 2010, 03:19:10 AM
  @Gk: 
  Great, glad you like it, I hope that anybody interested in the Vortex Theory will get something out of that.  I have not found that type of information anywhere else, and I think that it does relate to what we are trying to accomplish.
  The Energetic Forum is also currently discussing the St.Clair patents: 
   http://professorelliot.com/wordpress/2009/08/who-is-john-quincy-st-clair/
  I also feel that a working vortex generator device will draw or pull in, or lead-out Aetheric energy from the immediate space around the energy producing device.   
  There may also be a relation to the way instantanious space travel works.  Demodulation and relocation. Interesting stuff...  As some units can cause an effect generation in the local space-time factor.
  Anyways, back to the drawing board and work bench for me, hope I didn't bore anyone.
 
 
                                                   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on May 29, 2010, 04:24:21 PM
Everything has value.

If one takes 2 St.Clair circuits and stacks them one on top of one another then he has achieved the SM17 in a slighty different configuration. And only slightly.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on May 30, 2010, 05:51:23 AM
   Gk and all: 
    It may not take two coils to accomplish this, as is being shown by another member of the forum. A spinning vortex already has a block wall in the center with a spiral on top and a reverse spiral below the center.  Spinning anything will cause a vortex,  and the power of the vortex is what powers all space and time. Time may not exist, but we have made it exist. 
  Since all physical matter tends to reach an equilibrium with it's surroundings,  we must somehow continue to pulse a device in order for it to continue to generate an effect, without stopping. St.Clair calls this the negative spring constant. So, it appears that in order to get a positive voltage we must produce a negative spike, and the negative mass (or Aether) will respond netralizing itself with a positive spike, which we can harvest. If we repeat this action over and over, positive current is produced.
  There are many ways to skin a cat, (quote from Wattsup), as we have seen several SM devices that use different components, but all using a similar proof of concept. Since his first and simplest device can resonate using only a couple of coils, a magnet, and possibly a cap. The proof is in the pudin.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: DreamThinkBuild on May 31, 2010, 02:43:01 PM
That St.Clair Patent reminded me of the Anderson Institutes warped fields.

http://andersoninstitute.com/time-warped-fields.html
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 01, 2010, 05:24:19 AM
This if for Forest and Loner the most:
The SM17 is the only unit that drove a true load. The other units just slam an incandescent coil with high frequency. He gets a white light not a yellow light.
Let us move to the next step:
All but the SM17 have vertical control coils, the coils on the outside. These units have interleaved fields. Pulse the bifilar in the same direction and you get coupling. Pulse the bifilar opposing and you get Bloch wall. The non-SM17 units have interleaved fields. The SM17 has a Bloch wall all on one horizontal plane because of the large diameter parallel loops. See the difference?

--gk. I see patterns.



Thanks @DTB,
That St.Clair Patent reminded me of the Anderson Institutes warped fields.

http://andersoninstitute.com/time-warped-fields.html

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 01, 2010, 07:06:36 PM
At this time I would to pay it forward:
Lets momentarily take this up a notch into the level of planetary engineering and use what we can conceive of as a simple tool, like the wheel.
We have seen Tesla in a progression of dates and experiments feel forces, stress forces, and accumulate forces, focus forces and projects forces. He stated that these forces which started as spurious emissions could be focused to any cartesian coordinate in space whether on, in, around a planet but also reflective and interplanetary. Correct?
Leedskalnin & Hutchison showed examples of focusing these forces to specifically move objects of great weight. The term 'great weight' has no meaning but I added it to accommodate the ground pounders.
Waltter Russell explained the coordinate make up of matter and Keely performed actions using this system.
I mention these men because we trust their experiments. Correct so far?

I would to take this time to offer a solution to the grave problem in the gulf. Follow me here and enjoy what will unfold as an opportunity of immense proportion.

In my adventures to Coral castle i have spent time around, in, and on the park invading every nook and cranny to distill the perpexity of this wonderous puzzle. I have spent time along side the previous people who have made attempts into the physics and measurements. And a fine job they did. They gave me the very large stepping stones to enable me to actually grasp what Ed had done and how he used the park as a resonant generator to achieve a lever type tool to pry the target object loose of its weight and then postion the object precisely by design. The design not being merely an extraordinary placement of weight but the accummulation of the those objects to perform functions on the planet and out in space. That being said it is quite easy to focus on the gulf of Mexico dilema. At a mechanical stage of operation the operator could move the land masses of the caribean up across the gulf opening connecting Florida to the southern continent then lifting the plane of rubble making up the Yucatan pennisula to enforce the dam and fill in the gaps.
Or put a focus beam on the subterranian flue to close it with matter like Keely expressed. Like a 'circle the wagons' with battle cruisers to perform a ring of Philadelphia experiments on and above site.
The process here will also align the sea water into a tighter crystaline alignment lattice producing a boundary layer to containg the disparate oil soaked water. Then pour in the bio bugs to expunge the oil out of the infected water or apply Kevin Coster's technology. As the water is purified it becomes part of the aqua boundary lattice steadily closing in on the less infected area or rubberized oil laden sea water.

I know how Ed drove the castle to enable it to perform it tasks.

Is this too far fetched for anybody? By mistake or stupidity we have seriously broken our home, our planet. Since when is a 'F*** U*' permissable, understandable and excusable to take the planet from our decendants? Since when is progress based on destruction and not positive, forward thinking engineering? Great societies become great by the taking of external lives and then their own. We have not only enacted attrocities on our descendants but now on our selves. Aren't we just great?!

I make this offer to the military industrial complex through Dr. Chen and Rand. Contact me and I will go TDY to Homestead, enact emminent domain and work the park to apply its properties to the problem. Do I need a team? Ed didn't. But that could serve as an engineering support and build documentation. I prefer a subserviant think tank to status quo sluggards. The paycheck is immortality in the history books and to save our home. Is this hype for a noble cause? If I didnt make this post do you think that the status quo process in place now is going to save our asses? I think not. We dispell dreamers and curse the idiots. But nobody up to this point has made a far leap as  this offer. The ants that run this anthill have no concept of looking into the magnifying glass from the top down.

Giantkiller.

Defense Information Systems Agency, Department of Defense.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 01, 2010, 07:22:53 PM
   @all:
   The first SM units were not rectified, and were just shown being connected direct to the bulbs. He later made a (huge) rectifier to obtain ac power to run the drill, TV, and other things that needed normal ac. current. He did mention that he was working on another new device that would output 20 amps.  But this last unit was never shown, and would have been his most advanced and usefull one, at that time.
   I imagine that SM is much further along now.  He did give us lots of hints, but no cigar.  Like most patents, ( including St. Clair's) just enough info so that we won't be able to replicated them.  Or he's been employed by the secret government.  (if you can't beat them,  join them).  They probably know all about that stuff,  but...
  Secret underground multi level bases like the one at Dulce, NM etz... have no visible electric power lines or apparent openings to alow air in, and may be making all necessary electric power, air, water, and possibly even food. Just like inside a space craft. And there may be many, many of these instalations working together, even together with alien technology, and aliens. Time will tell. 
 So, what happened to the UFO disclosure that was suppose to happen?  Too good to be true? Or did I miss something?
  Or are we the aliens, and they are our forefathers, like in Planet of the Apes.   If so, they have left us in the cold.     
    Sorry guys,  but I can't help it. I just keep feeling like they are fooling with us, and we keep swallowing the bait.
    Will the real SM,  PLEASE stand up,  and give us a hand. I know you hear me. This is all in your name. So don't forsake us.  Mail Stephan just one of the working units (the stolen one, maybe). He'll know what to do with it.  Might even win the prize.   Just kidding, ha ha he he.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 01, 2010, 08:30:08 PM
I stated last week the 2 sinkholes in the U.S.
Now this.
I say again:
There will be more as the gulf releases subterrainian pressure...
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/06/100601-sinkhole-in-guatemala-2010-world-science/
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 02, 2010, 06:08:22 PM
http://www.keelynet.com/keely/neutral1.txt
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Rosphere on June 03, 2010, 03:03:19 AM
http://www.keelynet.com/keely/neutral1.txt

"My highest power of concentration failed to attain the results which, at last, seeming accident revealed."
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 03, 2010, 04:28:58 AM
Ya lost me on that one.
"My highest power of concentration failed to attain the results which, at last, seeming accident revealed."
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Rosphere on June 03, 2010, 01:10:32 PM
Ya lost me on that one.

"Keely continues....

   'In seeking to solve the great problems which have baffled me, from
    time to time, in my progressive researches, I have often been struck
    by the fact  that  I have, to all seeming, ACCIDENTALLY TRIPPED over
    their solution.

    The mind of man is not infinite, and  it  requires an infinite brain
    TO EVOLVE INFINITE POSITIONS.

    My highest power  of  concentration  failed  to attain  the  results
    which, at last, seeming accident revealed.'"

That last line got to me.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 03, 2010, 05:53:06 PM
Got it!
This morning I had a revelation from reading this yesterday. But didn't fully grasp the poetic justice of stumbliing.
So here is what came to me.
Different materials have differing conduction rates.
Ezflow audio cable has 2 conductive layers, silver and copper.
The steel and copper coils I build last year have 2 conductive layers.
There was mention of iron delay coils parallel to copper coils.
The conductor that was posting around over the last 2 years was copper with corrosion. Corrosion produces a slower conduction attributable to resistance. Tin or silver is more conductive. This gives a field within a field also.
This 2 material conductor has popped up again in a current set of notes of tinned copper.

There has also been the placement of 2 coils at angles other than parallel.
There has also been two fields traveling besides each other at different speeds.
There has also been two fields traveling in opposition to each other.
The Bedini motor has 2 eclipsing fields.
The Tesla pancake coil and bifilar version has a field hit its circumferential predecessor from behind.
The spark gap produces a spread of different frequencies equating to multiple effects of impacting previously established fields.
Electrostatic discharge is this same production.
And so on ad infinitum.

The impact produces a connection and disconnection between the 2 fields. This make or break is what is to be achieved. Keely showed it in matter disassociation. Tesla showed it in the Tesla coil. TTBrown showed it in electrogravitic tests. These in turn produce a usable magnetic pressure as shown by Podkletnov.

So this is the starting point of any build, not induction or transformers. Then smack those two conductors with an electrostatic pulse.

I accidently woke up on the right side of the bed today.

"Keely continues....

   'In seeking to solve the great problems which have baffled me, from
    time to time, in my progressive researches, I have often been struck
    by the fact  that  I have, to all seeming, ACCIDENTALLY TRIPPED over
    their solution.

    The mind of man is not infinite, and  it  requires an infinite brain
    TO EVOLVE INFINITE POSITIONS.

    My highest power  of  concentration  failed  to attain  the  results
    which, at last, seeming accident revealed.'"

That last line got to me.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on June 03, 2010, 06:33:11 PM
well, the question is : WHAT IS THE COMMON DENOMINATOR OF ALL THOSE SITUATIONS ? They have to produce some situation the same exactly in all methods, this situation is a key.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on June 03, 2010, 06:44:06 PM
http://wise-technology.com/A%20SCIENTIFIC%20KEY.html

When there is a item depending on time , it's variation can be done by changing item quantity or the time
period of change.For example electric current...
Because we tend to think about absolute time, when something changes in time faster the surroundings we think there is more energy there, but it could be just flowing in different time period of changes.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on June 03, 2010, 06:50:45 PM
GK,  Do you think since SM was in the audio field that it is possible the use of speaker wire is significant as many speaker wire pairs have one wire bare copper and the other tinned or silver coated?
 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 03, 2010, 08:12:44 PM
   @all:
   As I fell out of bed (on the wrong side) this morning, it occured to me,  that since no inventor has really provided us with a working example of a device that needs no outside source (from the grid, batteries, etz...), to power our homes or anything else,  the answer may lie in NATURE.
  I look in amazement at the daily formation of our tropical thunderheads as they form out of thin air, dump massive amounts of precipitation, lightning, huricane winds, and then again dissapear into thin air, leaving no sign that they were ever there.  Where does all that energy come from?  Their tops are bright in color spiraling one way, and the bottoms are very dark and spiraling the other way.  Similar to the  the + and - of a dipole or magnet.  In their center is neutral. When they reach a point of saturation,  lightning is caused to happen, just like with our spark gaps. They are not a closed loop, but are infinately open, and as such, can charge and discharge with seamingly unlimited power.   I know this may be nothing new to any of us, but I feel the answer is still there,  before our eyes.
  Thanks for hearing me out.
                                         Regards,
                                                      NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 03, 2010, 09:13:13 PM
Yes. SM posted EZflow audio cable 3 years ago. Silver coated copper.
Also if you look at Home depot twin lead speaker cable. One side is copper and the other is silver. Not lamp wire.

GK,  Do you think since SM was in the audio field that it is possible the use of speaker wire is significant as many speaker wire pairs have one wire bare copper and the other tinned or silver coated?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 04, 2010, 08:36:34 PM
Have an 8" diam 2.9 turn collector wound on a single loop of iron wire as support and core.
Have ordered 2 100' spools of 22 awg tinned stranded for control windings. (10) AOP605's ordered.
Will use irf840 for coil drive. The feedback will be inserted midstream of pulsing buffers for inclusion of hash into DC bias.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on June 05, 2010, 01:20:43 AM
Hi @GK.

Well my trials are just blowing them PN4416s. @gyulasun was very right that they are just too small to do anything meaningful with real coils but stubborn me had to see for myself. So........ while I wait for my order of big JFETs to arrive, I will try to see about something else in the TPUs.

Here is the question I have.

High frequency pulsing will apparently create what we know as the skin effect on a wire more so then low frequency pulsing. Now the skin effect can be a great advantage especially if you have wound an exterior coil over a wire, the HF impulses will be "traveling" (used loosely) on the outer skin of the inner pulsed wire and hence will be at the closest position to effect the outer wound coil.

So the question is, is there a difference in HF pulsing a multi strand wire or a single strand wire if they have the exact AWG rating and have the exact outer winding on them.

You see, what I am thinking is that when we do HF pulsing into a multi-strand wire, each of those strands will have their own skin effect, but the majority of those strands are located on the inside layers, therefore the skin effect will only be felt by the other strands of the same wire, some causing cancellation effects, while others causing collisions, hence loss of power. We could equate this with a loss of fidelity if talking in audio terms.

On the other hand pulsing a single strand of wire will impart all its pulse energy on that one skin effected wire and any coil wound around it will feel most all of the effect.

So I am wondering if anyone has done specific comparison tests in this way.

Stranded wire is perfect for our every day lives with our devices working at 60hz and our audio systems working under 20khz. Having two types of wires in speaker wire is only done because the wire coating is transparent and they save money if they do not put a red line on one side for polarity identification. But I do not think there is any advantage in having two different stranded wires versus all copper. You will never notice that a trumpet sounds more trumpety or an oboe sounds more oboeish. lol
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 05, 2010, 01:49:49 AM
   @all:
   For those of us that may not take someone like John Quincy St.Clair's work seriously, we may want to considered checking into some of his patents.
 http://www.google.com/patents?q=john+quincy+st.+clair&btnG=Search+Patents
  So, it may be that the patent office is disfunctional, and almost anyone can put up practically anything there as an application, and later obtain the patent. As was mentioned to me by Winsonali,  or,  they are not.   
   Would be interested in hearing your thoughts on that?
                                                                          NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 06, 2010, 12:19:51 AM
   @all: 
    Could it be that it may not really take 2 or 3 multiple frequencies, with only a certain type wire coil or collector to make it work? I can't remember just now who I've seen make the Single coil with a single frequency, output a similar effect as the TPU.  Maybe someone else can refresh my memory, as it's not what it used to be.
 But in anycase, was it not you Wattsup that has shown that you can pile up many different types of secondary coils on top of properly configured primary, and get them All to light up their Leds?
  In looking back at the different types of working devices made by SM, it looks like there are several types of wire coil, magnet and cap combinations, that can be used to get that Kick:
which will cause the unit to feedback and thus increase the original kicks pulse and self pertetuate, "run with gain".  I like the analogy.  Once that running gain is obtained,  different types of coils and components can be made to tune for better performance.
  I think that what I'm trying to say is that the running frequency of the primary tank circuit, along with the perpetuating or resonating gain (feed-back) may be the real trick. Once that feed-back is going, the rest may not be that big a deal.  If so, what would cause a TPU device to feed back onto itself?  According to SM, it's caused by the worst senario of pulses that can thrown at it.    So,   crank it up... and stand back.
                                                                             NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 06, 2010, 06:46:31 AM
The stranded wire is a curled conduction path like a vortex down the wire. The outer edge of the field would have a pattern to it. Rodin coil has a pattern too. So if we are running a curl at different speeds around the center axis we create more intermediate activity. Seems like it would facilitate a better precession by swiping along side of the center axis at an angle instead of just up to down or vice-versa.
In the stranded type the red is in foreground and the green is in background.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjDrqsy6kH0&feature=related
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on June 06, 2010, 09:34:52 AM
Hello all,

a little bit off topic if allowed.

Im the last 3 weeks on a very nice vacation so I dont have time even to look what people are doing here. Last Friday (or was it Saturday - yesterday?)
I saw 2 new topics and a new guy said that he want to post a lot of TPU secrets or something like this. He said that he worked with SM......sorry, I had only 1 minute to read his posts and my memory is not the best. This post I saw in the morning.
The same day, a few hours later I saw that the 2 new topics are gone - completly deleted as they never existed!!
It seems that Im dreaming now with open eyes.

@GK

silver coated copper wires: AuCuO2
tinned wires: SnCuO2
other wires .....CuO2

I hope its Sn for tin but never mind because the O2 is IMPORTANT!! Would somebody maybe figure out whats about this O2??
Maybe its something important to understand why the TPU is "forbidden".

Now imagine that you have 3 frequencies in your TPU or to say it better in your wire.
And now imagine you have a wire with 3 "elements":

1. silver or tin or...
2. copper
3. copper OXIDE

And now imagine the skin effect.

1. a higher frequency at say 245kHz
2. a lower frequency at say 30 or 35kHz
3. a lower frequency at maybe 5kHz

Thanks for reading my s..t.

Otto

PS: still on vacation and without a PC.



Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: gyulasun on June 06, 2010, 10:56:51 AM
Hello all,

a little bit off topic if allowed.

Im the last 3 weeks on a very nice vacation so I dont have time even to look what people are doing here. Last Friday (or was it Saturday - yesterday?)
I saw 2 new topics and a new guy said that he want to post a lot of TPU secrets or something like this. He said that he worked with SM......sorry, I had only 1 minute to read his posts and my memory is not the best. This post I saw in the morning.
The same day, a few hours later I saw that the 2 new topics are gone - completly deleted as they never existed!!
It seems that Im dreaming now with open eyes.
...


Hi Otto,

You were NOT dreaming of course, I did notice those posts too. The person was a new member and mentioned the NDA expired and indicated to come forward with details.
It is very unfortunate that those posts were deleted, perhaps Stefan could explain this situation. 

Have a good time and weather on your vacation. TPU? Gossip! Have some beer instead :D

Gyula
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on June 06, 2010, 07:33:52 PM
Regarding copper oxide, normally copper in wire will oxidize when exposed to air overtime and develops a thin coat of copper oxide.  There are other ways to make copper oxide and are 2 varieties both of which can be a type of semiconductor.  Not sure if this is relevant in the TPU but just mentioning it as otto brought this up. 
  Has anyone asked Stefan about those missing posts?  I didn't see them or I'd ask.  Curious minds want to know  :D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 06, 2010, 11:55:30 PM
@Otto,
Are you saying is it good to 'have oxidation'? I have another set of specs that say 'no oxidation'. Things would change operationally as the material changes.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on June 07, 2010, 12:48:02 AM
@otto

So basically what you are saying is that if you have three frequencies in the same wire, the highest frequency will be more concentrated on the outer portion of the wire, the medium frequency will be moving from the core to the outside while the lower frequency will be more in the core of the wire. That is a very interesting concept indeed. But if using only high frequency, do you think it is better with single or multi stranded wire.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on June 07, 2010, 09:56:58 AM
Hello all,

@GK

yes its good to have oxidation but in a coated wire we have this oxidation in the structure of the wire. Its like a layer between the copper and the tin or silver or another metal. The point is that copperwas heated and then it was coated with a metal.

@wattsup

I can see 2 different kicks in 1wire: one is a very fast kick that is almost perfect(fast ON and OFF pulses) and the other kick is a fast ON but slowly OFF kick. Of course the wire pulsed with 2 frequencies.One with say 200kHz and the other maybe 30kHz. Or to say it better I use 2 different frequencies.
And your post in the other thread about AC: yes, I love AC from DC kicks in my coils.

The last 3 weeks of my vacation I made a few new oscillators and ....hmmmm the results are....what to say, I have lighted a bulb to almost full light with only 1 frequency using only a 555 that a lot of people "hates". Of course around the 555 are caps to get square waves.

It seems that the oscillators are more important then we could imagine. Especially the OUTPUT of the oscillators.

Otto

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 07, 2010, 06:48:57 PM
  @Otto:
    Good to see you back.  I was very glad to hear that you're able to light the bulb with just ONE frequency. I also feel the ocilator can be a big part of it, and was many times mentioned by people like Tesla.
    SM did mention two observations about his units: 
   slight vibration, and giroscopic effect. 
   Since he didn't use a SG, and has repetedly said NO batteries, I would assume that the slight vibration can possibly be caused by magnet chatter next to the coils, and Second, that the giroscoping effect felt may be caused by the unit's feedback ocilating onto itself, and thus creating that giro-like sensation.
  My question to you is:  could the SOUND of his device be analyzed with a scope, and its running frequencie(s) found out by using that method?  This is what is done when studing the sounds produced by UFOs.  Which to me do sound somewhat similar to those made by these magnetic devices. And when those recorded sounds from the UFOs are put on a scope it was found that as many a 8 different spikes can be noticed.
  As I listen to the sounds made my his devices in his videos, it appears to me like there are two waves (or more) ocilatiing very similar to the sound of feed-back in a normal amp when the volume is turned up to far. Not on - off, but back and forth.
   I am as interested as anyone in resolving the mistery of a working magnetic device, and SM had one of the few if not the only real examples known and shown, so far, that uses no outside source.  My only intension is to help in this cause.
  Best wishes to all,
                             Nick
             
                                       
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on June 08, 2010, 08:19:04 AM
Hello all,

@NickZ

I was on a very nice 3 weeks vacation and it was raining 2 weeks so I had more then enough time to work on my TPU and I have blown a lot of ICs, transistors and have learned a lot.

hmmm....yes, SM didnt use a function generator (FG) like a ICL 8038 or a XR 2206..... but he used oscillators, thats clear.

I dont know if the sound could be analyzed with a scope. Im using my little radio for that. At some frequency mixes I can hear a very strong 5kHz signal with my radio when I pulse my TPU and thats good enough for me. At other frequency mixes I can hear whats going on in my coils and on the scope I can analyze such signals. Maybe you will ask whats to analyze because we have "only" kicks. My answer is that we have kicks but not oridinary kicks. I mentioned it already.

I have a lot of magnets, used them in a lot of ways near the coils, inside the coils.... but as I can see there is no need for them. Of course there are cases when magnets are very usefull but I dont want to discuss it. I also used a lot of various caps connected in all possible ways in my TPU and hmmm.....they are maybe needed, not so sure.

Otto

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 08, 2010, 05:55:06 PM
  @Otto & all:
   Thank you so much for your reply.  Yes, the same two weeks of very stormy rainy weather here in Costa Rica, also a 6.8 earthquake right in my area, and the volcanos were and still are active.  250 houses and hotels located on the beaches just north of me are ruined and 35 or more electric power posts were also downed from the 65 mph winds. And, no electric power for me for a while, no water also.   But,  since the weather is somewhat back to normal, for now, I can continue to work on my coils and power generating systems.  Glad to hear your vacation only had rainy weather.
   I see no point (for me) to use power supplys, function generator, etz... as when at night all power is out... I can't even find their plugs. This weather I take as just a warning to give us time get my electric power source project going. So that I can have my water pump and well giving me water, and am also able to use my electric range to cook on, electric hot water heater, Ac, etz...  My point is that I take all of this very seriously.
   Thanks again for taking the time to answer me.
   Good luck to all with your work. I will continue to keep an eye on what is happening, from here.
  If I can help in any way, please let me know.
 
  My appologies to GK and Wattsup if I have offended them in any way, as they are both my most valued and honored co-workers in this team effort, even if they will not reply, at times. Hopefully, they will see where I'm comming from.
                                                                           NickZ
  PS. From the "sweet spot" of CR. (Picture below)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 08, 2010, 06:41:31 PM
I see no offense here. Everybody is welcome.

Nice pic. I like the lava flow to the water in front there.

This just in:
Do not get your wire from radio shack!
Due to rising retail costs and employment costs the corp has had to shop most visiously which harms us.
I used to be able to get tinned coated wire there, like back in SM's days. I called a wire supply company and asked about the tin coating. He stated that the cheap wire does not have this and that the copper purity is low. I had just gone to radio shack and pulled insulation back on a number of rolls and saw no tin. Well that made my mind up. Low purity equals lack of resonance qualities.

The better wire is on its way.

My quietness is due to fact finding and pattern matching. I spend huge amounts of time pondering. Tesla's orders.

I posted this to Wattsup.
Look at this this way. As the first field collapses we want to enable that or push it down faster. Get your timing just right and you see the bigger secondary spike. Push the swing at the point of least effort. Now if you have a ring of smaller diameter inside a ring of larger diameter at the correct ratio and on the same horizontal plane then 1 pulse will do the trick. StClair mentions this ratio of inner ring is 1/3 diameter of outer ring. We have 2 fields. If there are 2 rings of equal diameter and stacked vertically then you need to pulse sources. Else with 1 pulse source the ratios of diameter to stack height have to be exact mechanically. We can use switching speed to act like a spark gap discharge.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 09, 2010, 07:58:14 AM
  Gk and all:
   Thank you for your reply. Glad you liked the picture,  it is where I live and do my some of my ponderings, then later visualize the following designs mostly at night. 
 
   Since I can only assume the 0 external input to the SM toroid coils can come only from previously charged caps, and that without them along with the magnets, there would be no initial kick. I may use that same method to fire my version of the St.Clair wormhole vortex generator design which I will presently begin to build.
   I have been thinking on how to make both inner and outer cores of non laminated iron. As I can't come up with just how to make them  using laminated core materials. So for now, I have decided to make both cores from a 3" high 1/4 " thick solid metal soft iron strip, formed round and welded together at the ends. That will produce a 15" diameter circular iron core, and the same for the 1/3  diameter (5") inner core.  I will use a Single wire of solid copper insulated home instalation cable, to wrap both cores. And plan to pulse the coils with a single frequency HV source using a 12 volt motorcycle or car battery and ingition coil set up that will produce 20.000 volt pulses.
  Once I make the finished coils I will upload a picture of it, and discuss the method of getting that pulse circuit functioning.  That is where you or any others can possibly help me out.
 There is a detail in the St.Clair's coil wrapping design that shows a 45 degree offset on only the outter wire wrap of the coil, but not on the inside. I think that this could be an important consideration in getting the vortex spinning on both coils,  in opposite directions.
I will use a single HV frequency pulse to cause the opening of wormhole,  or vortex as I prefer to think of it, and to maintaining it open, thus drawing in Aether to the coils and further storing it into a cap, and from there to a rectifier, and out to the load.   
 How does that sound to you all?  Any ideas are most welcome.
  It is 12.00 am and I'm going to bed, hope I can sleep as my imagination is going wild...
                                         NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 09, 2010, 06:33:07 PM
@nickz,
Agentgates made coils using specific angles. These are a light subset of the rodin coil. The StClair patent also shows this type of topology configuration.

Adjunct:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Topology.html

My take on the StClair is the wind gapping. This is of pertainent interest and what he mentions about this.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 09, 2010, 09:03:02 PM
   Gk:
   I looked into the attached link, and will keep that in mind.
  As we are walking on unfamiliar ground here,  I really tend to side with the Vortex Theory, as explained in the Oshspe material, and am therefore looking for similar concepts, like the St.Clair patents.  I hope they work as stated.

   I will  review and follow the St.Clair 45 degree z winding pattern, and give that a try.
 
   As Agentgates (unknown toroid coil) video is one of the few similar devices that has been shown,  my thought about it is that it could very well be a working replication.  Or it could even be an original SM device of the many that he made, that could still be out there.  Even someone like the guy that came forth a couple of days ago that said he worked with SM and wanted to tell all, but whos post were quickly deleted,  has to show us.
 I also wish that Stefan would clarify this mistery about the deleted posts, if possible.

  These unknown device videos are like a kick in the head, forcing us to think outside the box.  My head is still spinning...
                                               NZ


Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 09, 2010, 10:39:48 PM
I agree with the Oshspe device and environment descriptions. Read about John Worrell Keely and Viktor Shauberger. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmOrtssMVQI&feature=related

As far as the mystery goes:
Look at it this way. The lifeguards are still watching the swimmers. Sometimes the whistle is blown to get our attention. The waters are kept safe while the activities are mentored and monitored.
Pay attention, give of your talents and you will receive what you want. The Truth is out there.
There are 'many ways to skin a cat'. Up to this point I wanted to know all the possible combinations. In Timothy Thrapp's lastest video he specifies 'We split the electron and positron for a microsecond then store off the two'.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RO6AXftkDg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5WKz_gf1u8&feature=channel
Listen to what he says!
And click on the 25 videos button to see the full list.



The only 'Bad English' is rudeness.

   Gk:
As we are walking on unfamiliar ground here,  I really tend to side with the Vortex Theory, as explained in the Oshspe material, and am therefore looking for similar concepts, like the St.Clair patents.  I hope they work as stated.

I will  review and follow the St.Clair 45 degree z winding pattern, and give that a try.
 
I also wish that Stefan would clarify this mistery about the deleted posts, if possible.

                                              NZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on June 09, 2010, 11:11:00 PM
@NickZ

I made some vortex coil , except i used the jt to pulse the coils , i did see some great results , with 1.5 volts i cant light bulbs , leds and run motors from it .

Unfortunately i did have the equipment to further my research , like a LC meter and a scope ...

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8878.0

If any of you have questions , feel free to ask .

There are many pictures , i use the basic joule thief circuit to pulse any 2 coils and use the others as secondary . That is true to any coil configuration , even the last one on page 13.

Mark




Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 10, 2010, 12:06:20 AM
 Gk:
   I think that I follow the analogy...  Don't feed the sharks!
   I have read the Keely material, and do see the point, (many variables), makes it tougher still. Please send the Shauberger info link, I'll be glad to follow up. 
  The Oahspe- is a 900 page book written by a guy over 100 years ago, in direct contact with beings of the invisible realms. Etherians. Those who can travel from one dimension to another in the blink of an eye, like in Stargate, and materialize at will.
The inventors of the word Starship. Multidimensional entities that can manipulate space and time, create and dissolve matter, like Merlin,  and like we are also about to do, and is already being done by some. I realize that most will not care for the writtings, since one cannot even touch, see, or weigh, their invisible worlds. Most people have not even heard of the book, or even care to read it, and will only belief what they can see.  I still feel that it's worth mentioning though. Glad that you agree on the science aspect. There are many nuggets there, you are right.
  Hope the waters stay calm. 
  Please included the Shauberger link, again, in case I missed it before.
                             
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 10, 2010, 12:32:23 AM
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&rls=com.microsoft:*&&sa=X&ei=ShYQTLGyHcH58AbcxpSsCQ&ved=0CBoQBSgA&q=viktor+schauberger&spell=1
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 10, 2010, 01:29:12 AM
  Mk1 and All:
   Thank you for the reminder and information on your work.
  I have also been following your efforts, and others like Jonnydavro, Lidmotor, Pirate, Jeanna and the JT thread, and even the IST team efforts.  The whole world is watching for the light at the end of the tunnel.  I was just thinking about the eventual possibilities of a JT's big brother , and have been wondering how you guys where making out with that. I'm still surprized at the shear simplicity, and powerfull effects of the JT, and hope to see more on your Vortex coils soon. Great stuff.
                                        Best wishes,
                                                         NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on June 10, 2010, 04:48:47 AM
Main stream physics before the giants of modern day called corporations took total control of science has mathmatically and experimentally validated energy from thin air.  It is called inverse thomson scattering.  This is when an incidental photon meets mass and leaves the mass with more energy then before the incident.  The mass somehow transferring energy to the wave.  A sympathetic vibrational mode.  The vibrational mode of a water molecule is sympathetic with infrared  Ocean thermal energy is so doable because of this.  We can store energy in neutron laden metals and instigate the conversion of neutrons to protons to heat water to create pressure to turn a turbine to change a magnetic field about a metal to induce an electrical current to get some heat somewhere else.  But we cant seem to get a grip on making a two mile long floating vertical pipe to drive heat engines.  Recently the Israelis have come up with what could be the end of the oil age.  Large canals carrying surface waters to 80foot towers.  The arrid conditions of the desert allow for this water to be absorbed by the hot air at the top of the tower.  This evaporation process cools the ocean water so thermal energy from the ocean water is transferred to the air.  The air upon becoming laden with water is heavier then the surrounding arrid air at the base of the tower.  The dense mosit air then rushes down like a continual microburst through a turbine at the base of the tower.  The plants then convert the mechanical energy to electricity.  Electrolysis then to supply hydrogen based fuels to compete with their friendly Arab neighbors making there last moves in the carbon based fuel game.  What a hookup.  Greedy stupid oilmen who are basically glorified well diggers and fuckedup Arabs who are basically goat herders.  Throw some sleazy horsetraders like the automotive industry in the mix and you got what we got a real cluster fuck of pollution and energy shortages.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 10, 2010, 06:27:39 AM
Out of the mouths of babes?

Holy mashugana!
The TPU is nothing but a giant JT? No, really?

@Nickz! Excellent call! Take a bow dude. I owe you one. This one was a pattern I didn't see! Where did you come from anyway? Like outta the blue?

  Mk1 and All:
   Thank you for the reminder and information on your work.
  I have also been following your efforts, and others like Jonnydavro, Lidmotor, Pirate, Jeanna and the JT thread, and even the IST team efforts.  The whole world is watching for the light at the end of the tunnel.  I was just thinking about the eventual possibilities of a JT's big brother , and have been wondering how you guys where making out with that. I'm still surprized at the shear simplicity, and powerfull effects of the JT, and hope to see more on your Vortex coils soon. Great stuff.
                                        Best wishes,
                                                         NickZ

I am with ya Sparks! And Israel shall bloom as rose in the desert.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 10, 2010, 01:15:26 PM
  Gk and All:
   Thank you bro.  I am not a religious man, God forbid. Nor do I fear God, but love him instead. I do feel that we are all being hypnotized into thinking that we don't know how to solve our energy production needs. WHAT IF,  we all agree that we do know? Then,  we will REMEMBER,  that we do know...
                                                                 NZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 10, 2010, 02:56:54 PM
 @Sparks:
    If interested in some highly informative although very technical aspects of our dimension, I recommend reading the book called: 
The 64 keys of Enoch- Book of Knowledge- Paraphysical code- book
  http://www.keysofenoch.org/html/home.html
 
  It is written by a guy who has discovered along with others, that under the Pyramids of Giza, is an anciant and huge underground city complex, with a one kilometer wide lake and temples older than time itself.  Now the government in that country is working together with other countries, and controling the digs and findings that are being excavated there, that lead to the rest of the underground complex.  We had no clue...
Get ready for some real interesting finds.
                                                           NZ
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 10, 2010, 05:33:23 PM
Same place Coral castle points to in the three bears grotto...
Quote
And what about the Queen's Chamber shafts, neither of which seem to reach the outside of the Pyramid?  According to the great Egyptologist Sir Flinders Petrie, the orientation of the northern shaft is 37 degrees 28 minutes [4] — which, if continued to the exterior of the Pyramid, points towards Ursa Minor (currently connected with our circumpolar movement).




Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 10, 2010, 06:13:03 PM
   All:
   The book  Oahspe,  and   Keys of Enoch, 
 both mention in great detail of the Secret Unknown purpose and construction of the Pyramids (Fire in the Center), which is still this worlds greatest achivement, and will never be replicated. The Giza complex is also our main contact focal point to the rest of the visable as well as the invisable Etherical systems that we are now crusing through, and for ages have been excluded from. 
   Watch what happens with our Sun (NOW) , and the rest of the solar system.  Even our DNA is transmuting.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 10, 2010, 08:06:40 PM
 @All:
   I saw this on Yahoo this morning.
   The normally dormant Solar Flare activity for the last 11 years, may now be waking up.  They may not be telling us all they know.
  http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20100609/sc_space/moreactivesunmeansnastysolarstormsahead
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on June 10, 2010, 11:37:49 PM
   All:
   The book  Oahspe,  and   Keys of Enoch, 
 both mention in great detail of the Secret Unknown purpose and construction of the Pyramids (Fire in the Center), which is still this worlds greatest achivement, and will never be replicated. The Giza complex is also our main contact focal point to the rest of the visable as well as the invisable Etherical systems that we are now crusing through, and for ages have been excluded from. 
   Watch what happens with our Sun (NOW) , and the rest of the solar system.  Even our DNA is transmuting.
I've got that Keys of Enoch by J.J. Hurtak.  Fascinating guy but I was not happy that he helped throttle Dan Winter if you know about that fiasco.  (sorry for the rather off topic post)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 11, 2010, 12:46:26 AM
  e2Matrix:
   Neither of the mentioned books are were actually written by the authors, but through them, instead.  The information they bring, is what counts.
  Case in point is the fact that another medium Edgar Cayce, predicted a long time ago of findings of which are only now being found and excavated at Giza.
  Things that cannot be known by logic or rational deduction can only be shown by inspiration, or books such as these.  Even then they only matters to us, because we make them matter.
 I know that some won't agree.
                                                NZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 11, 2010, 12:58:39 AM
At that level and this egos get in the way. It is not right.

The last mystery i want answers to is who thinks they are going to be one to save the planet?
I had a thought that since the angels that took women as their own were put down (they were abandoned here) could it be that they have spent the last 6k years trying to get mankind to release this technology so they would not be suspect? Who then would be the patsy in this grand scheme. This notion does account for the long time, the hidden history, the hidden technology, the professing groups through out history i.e. Mason's, Illuminati, Knights templar, the unexplained monuments and landmarks across the planet known to all peoples. If it weren't for wars our population would have exceeded the planet capacity thousands of years ago(Tower of Babel is the example here). And it isn't our self proclaimed ignorance of bliss but the shear and grand ignorance through some mechanism that makes us guard our stupidity with violence. We are marked by insanity. What drives me in this arena is there are those who know these answers and those who think the technology is the end to all means. I think it will open up pandora's box of nightmares. Hell, we have all the answers to solve all of our problems but we keep creating greater problems.

Anyway, back to the TPU. I posted that last pic to show that the copper core could be biased to produce a magnetic field which would make a ferrous core. Lidmotor showed this. A simple copper JT looks just like the TPU. I still fall out of my chair. That core bias is the media to manipulate and that will give the process without making speed or unneccessary circuitry neccessary. This is on the bench.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on June 11, 2010, 02:06:20 AM
  e2Matrix:
   Neither of the mentioned books are were actually written by the authors, but through them, instead.  The information they bring, is what counts.
  Case in point is the fact that another medium Edgar Cayce, predicted a long time ago of findings of which are only now being found and excavated at Giza.
  Things that cannot be known by logic or rational deduction can only be shown by inspiration, or books such as these.  Even then they only matters to us, because we make them matter.
 I know that some won't agree.
                                                NZ
Confused a bit by saying Hurtak is not the author of Keys of Enoch.  This is the book I have: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Knowledge-Keys-Enoch/dp/0960345043
It says he is the author.  Do you mean it was something along the lines of channeled info?  If so I understand otherwise I'm a bit confused by your statement.  Not a real concern here as I'd rather keep on topic but I get confused by the TPU too  :D

   So I like that GK after your deep philosophical ramblings 'Anyway back to the TPU'.  LOL  but you are right the TPU right now is what's important and maybe that is what might save us if we are lucky.  So you have a sort of JT/TPU on the bench?  Multi-frequency input?  I recently picked up a second signal generator.  I have a question if I'm using 2 or more signal generators on the TPU for experimenting.  Is there a way to protect them from damage that can happen if I happen to approach the right set of variables? 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 11, 2010, 02:31:10 AM
    Gk: 
     Hope that Big JT- TPU idea works out , even if only as a start in that direction. I thought you might jump on it, as you've got all the coils and most of the components there already. 
  Pirate and Mk1 and others have been working towards that end in their own way too. I haven't had a chance to see all their work on it, but, it's the closest thing to magic that I've seen yet.
  I also really liked Lidmotors spinning top with magnetic bearings unit (silent operation) and hope to see more improvement of that device.
  Pirate was one of the people that brought up the increasingly usefull output advancement in the JT project, and I thank him for any ideas that I may of brought up of the JT - TPU combination.
  I can see how it could all work out.
                                                     NZ 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 11, 2010, 03:10:43 AM
 e2Matrix: 
  Yes, something like channeled for Hurtak, and automatic writting on the Oahspe book, when the typewritter was first invented.  Neither of the two men could possibly know all the information that is mentioned there from their own personal experience, unless you are a million years old. 
  If you read the first part of the Enoch book you'll see what I mean, but it's difficult to explain in words, as it's somewhat outside the box of conventional thinking. Like the Vortex Theory.
  If I am cross-threading, please forgive me. But, I think that they are both very important sources in their own way, and may help with understanding what we are trying to do here.
  I will keep my comments to a minimum, although I must say I did enjoy seeing GK and others going off...  Alright!
   
                                             
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 11, 2010, 05:12:42 AM
Confused a bit by saying Hurtak is not the author of Keys of Enoch.  This is the book I have: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Knowledge-Keys-Enoch/dp/0960345043
It says he is the author.  Do you mean it was something along the lines of channeled info?  If so I understand otherwise I'm a bit confused by your statement.  Not a real concern here as I'd rather keep on topic but I get confused by the TPU too  :D

   So I like that GK after your deep philosophical ramblings 'Anyway back to the TPU'.  LOL  but you are right the TPU right now is what's important and maybe that is what might save us if we are lucky.  So you have a sort of JT/TPU on the bench?  Multi-frequency input?  I recently picked up a second signal generator.  I have a question if I'm using 2 or more signal generators on the TPU for experimenting.  Is there a way to protect them from damage that can happen if I happen to approach the right set of variables?
No way to protect. On your scope just lay the probe by the wire but do not connect. To date i have blown 2 scopes, 1 powered usb hub, 1 cable box, 1 router, 1 pc, 1 wifi usb dongle. But press on.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on June 11, 2010, 06:06:02 AM
@all

I really think i have solved the tpu power source And most of Tesla , and how it makes dc and ac ...

The bias coil , would be better explained as galvanic pair .

I started a topic for it , feel free to ask any question .

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9287.msg244493#new
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 11, 2010, 06:32:47 AM
   All: 
    Wow GK, that can get expensive
   I do have  a couple back-up PC's to keep me going though, through thick and thin of it.  Love to use magnetic energy that I can touch with my hands, and watch it go right through my body as if I wasn't there. Great to see guys that can light bulbs and the meter says 0 volts no amps. I think there is something else to it all. If we only knew...  vector potencial is more important than the magnetic field, according to St.Clair. I need to give him a call. If I can get him out of those wormholes.
   Since e2Matrix has a couple of good SG's now, I know we can count on him.  Looks like Otto has got a slightly used refried parts bin handy now too.  He must be having alot of fun as it sounds,  we haven't heard back from him in a few days. What's the good word Otto?  Gk says just don't connect the probe.
  Ok ok,  sorry.
                   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on June 11, 2010, 08:08:25 AM
Hello all,

a time ago I posted that you dont have to connect your scope probe to a TPU to see the signals.

Now I say that its totally WRONG to use profi made function or signal generators Square wave generators) because their outputs are useless. Useless for our TPUs.
I never saw the inside from such a generator but Im for 100% sure that they cant deliver signals like we need to pulse a TPU.

So, in short, you have to build your square wave generator. Home made is the best.

A 555 is sooooo a nice IC!! And cheap.

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: rensseak on June 11, 2010, 11:08:32 AM
Hello all,

a time ago I posted that you dont have to connect your scope probe to a TPU to see the signals.

Now I say that its totally WRONG to use profi made function or signal generators Square wave generators) because their outputs are useless. Useless for our TPUs.
I never saw the inside from such a generator but Im for 100% sure that they cant deliver signals like we need to pulse a TPU.

So, in short, you have to build your square wave generator. Home made is the best.

A 555 is sooooo a nice IC!! And cheap.

Otto

Hello all

@Otto

Du hast Dich auch schon mal anders angehört.  ;D

welchen 555 benutzt du denn? Da gibt es verschiedene - NE555, TLC555, LMC555 usw. Die CMOS Varianten geben ein sauberes Signal.

Und hier noch ein nützlicher Link dazu: http://www.timer555.de/uebersicht/


@all

sorry in german. i just ask wich one he is useing

Norbert
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on June 11, 2010, 11:28:55 AM
Hello all,

@Norbert

nothing changed sice I said that a 555 is not so good but.....if you want pure positive kicks its the best. I have only the cheapest, NE 555.

On my 3 weeks vacation I made a few oscillators to see the differences, some working good, others a crap and now Im fascinated with a NE 555 because I dont need MOSFET drivers. Im driving a MOSFET gate directly from pin 3 of the NE 555 oscillator. Of course its not clever because you can easily blow the IC but I only wanted to know if this is possible.

The most important point is to know what to use as MOSFET driver after the NE 555 IC. As always I have a lot of ideas but I cant buy the needed parts here and so I have to wait and wait ......they are ordered.

Otto

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on June 11, 2010, 05:23:50 PM
@otto

You are very right, I know but my EE level is so shitty that I need this FG to find the effects. If I had to do it all with caps and resistors it would take too much time and I would not be able to do as much testing. My main orientation is to find the coils that produce the effects that are additive. This means an effect that produces an output with low input and where that same effect is present as the low input is increased. If an effect is only present at 30 volts feed, then for me it is not right unless there is a first stage to bring it up to 30 volts. It has to start with like 3 volts with a good output enough to then loop it back to make it increase the input hence increase the output again. I have seen so many effects but they either work at a given feed voltage and quickly disappears with added voltage. It has to have a wider bandwidth otherwise during a voltage rise the capacitance/resonance changes the frequency somewhat and the effect dies again. Then finally it has to accumulate some amperage potential.

SM says the device "runs with gain", not with running shoes. So we are shuffling many parts of the puzzle, trying to make them fit because it is only when all the pieces are together that such a "portable" device will work. It will either work or not. There is no half work and half not.

Once I am ready with enough accumulated data on these and decide to set some operating parameters and frequency range, I will need help to calculate the pulse capacitor/mosfet relation to my chosen coil impedances since I will need to then pulse these without the power supply or FG, in order to start working out a return loop system.

Also, if you would like, you can PM me a list of items that you need along with your mailing address or postal box and I will see what I can do to send you these and more. I am always so sad to hear you have trouble accessing what you need. So please do not feel like you are imposing. If I can help I will be glad to do so.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 11, 2010, 05:40:56 PM
@Otto,
You are correct about using 555s. You and Bolt both said to use batteries also. I have been doing both for a very long time.

@all,
Now here is a fact that you all need to know. When you use a plugged in device you are essentially creating a Radiant energy sink! The measurement device will never see the process because the ground acts as a byass channel.
Now with that said you then have a battery operated floating device and the created field then impinges upon the circuit in the center. We want to use the field and all activiy as feedback. The feedback is not a loop just in the circuit but the whole floating device bounces up and down in the environment(can you say 'Vibration'). I showed this with my copper and steel coils before. That whole build used batteries, 555s, coils at 90 degrees to each other and was floating. 555s chatter. This adds to the feedback and guess what? It is very high speed and very low conduction. Why low conduction? Because the circuit is already turned on and the chatter really doesn't add to the current draw.
Why was it not reproducable by others? Plugged in devices is the answer.

No mass circuitry also includes testing devices. Recall the volt meter and clamp meter are all floating with the device and the operation during SMs videos.

I will post my new coil tonight. It is a single line of iron wire in parallel with 2.7 turns of tinned stranded 16awg. Then 22awg tinned stranded in 3 concentric layers all the way around and a floating ground line around the outside. All circuitry will sit in the middle. Battery operated, n/p fet pair push pull driving a irf840 on each channel for 3 frequencies. Similar to what Marco had posted before. The windings represent 3 fields all going clock wise one inside another. This field activity is picked up by the iron loop and relayed magnetically to the stranded core at the same time the field activity is hitting the stranded field at 90 degrees. Electrostatic?


@wattsup,
build a 555 ckt. SM said 5khz.


The St.Clair patent is so much easier with a stun gun, 2 coils of different circumferences on same horizontal plane, iron cores. Place another wire loop at 2/3rds radius and use it to read.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on June 11, 2010, 06:23:39 PM
Hello all,

@wattsup

1. coils made with tinned wires
2. a phi relation between the "primary" and "secondary"
3. no high voltage is needed
4. on the output of the oscillator is a pair of complementary JFETs driving a MOSFET and this for all of our 3 oscillators


You mentioned low input.....runs with gain...dont complicate...just use  tinned wires and a radio near your coils so  you can hear when you blow yourself.

Thanks for your offer. Its sooooo frustrating when you cant buy even oridinary PNP transistors without ordering them in Germany and waiting for them at least 3 weeks.

But,on the other hand I have here you and GK so I hope you can do the job.

Otto


Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 11, 2010, 07:32:58 PM
  GK and All:
   Thank you for that very informative explanation on the test instruments creating a EM sink hole... Could of been what happened in Guatemala... poor guy.
   About the Vector Potential:
   http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&type=867034&fr=greentree_ff1&p=vector+potential&SpellState=n-632381304_q-zp0JXi0nzqWedKu.JFgW4AAAAA%40%40&fr2=sp-qrw-corr-top
                         NZ
   
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on June 11, 2010, 09:22:21 PM
Hello all,

a time ago I posted that you dont have to connect your scope probe to a TPU to see the signals.

Now I say that its totally WRONG to use profi made function or signal generators Square wave generators) because their outputs are useless. Useless for our TPUs.
I never saw the inside from such a generator but Im for 100% sure that they cant deliver signals like we need to pulse a TPU.

So, in short, you have to build your square wave generator. Home made is the best.

A 555 is sooooo a nice IC!! And cheap.

Otto
Hi otto,  I intend to try using signal generators initially since I can vary the frequency and so on until I get close to something that indicates I'm getting some extra power.  I understand it's important to have or build standalone battery powered signal generators (like 555 based) but until I know exactly what signal I want it would seem easier to use a professional fuction generator (although my last one only cost $20 hardly more than putting together a standalone circuit).  Can you say why these would not work as both put out a square wave? 
Ooops!  If I had read a little further I see GK has answered my question.  I think that's the first time I had it explained that well.  I've got a bunch of inverters.  I wonder if I couldn't run my function generators off batteries with inverters (got a lot of 12 volt car batteries too).  I think that would mostly isolate it.  OTOH if I could just find my 555's I've got somewhere...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on June 11, 2010, 09:39:02 PM
otto,

I have old impulse generator from 1975, heavy one which has additional ground cable. Do you think it may work well when not grounded ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on June 11, 2010, 11:00:02 PM
Hello all,

guys,

that we understand us corectly:I dont say that a 555 is a must but as I see its a good IC to get square waves.

The main point is in the MOSFET DRIVER that is connected to the output of such a 555. Or another IC that can give the square waves.

Hmmmm....hard to describe.....we need signals in our coils that are in 1 moment positive and in the next they are negative. Kicks of course. The positive and negative kicks not in the same time.

I was totally desperate and connected a 4007 IC to the 555. The 4007 has 3 pairs of PNP/NPN MOSFETs inside. Of course this was not working but I saw fantastic signals.

And I forgot to mention:

with 2 frequencies I see 3 sorts of kicks:

1. very fast perfect kicks fast ON/OFF times
totally useless to get even 1W of power on a bulb. See,Im talking about power.
2. kicks with a very fast ON time but the OFF showes a square wave
also totally useless when we talk about power on a bulb.
3. kicks that look like hmmm.....they are in a tornado. They are not straight like normal kicks. They are a little bit ....never seen this but I know what they are. Notto mention how such kicks sounds on my radio. Scary. Somehow I have the impression that they are "gliding" on ice. Never mind.
This kicks are also useless wehn we talk about power on a bulb.

Now you maybe wonder what Im wrighting.

The point is that not 1 of the frequencies when used seperatly will give any output power from my TPU.

But when I use 2 frequencies I have a full light. Yes, the current is high, maybe 2A at 24V but it doesnt matter how much current is used.

Forgot to say: Im measuring with my scope 250VDC. I made such controls because I dont see a need for a high voltage in my coils.Im talking about a ECD TPU.

@forest

look inside this generator and look whats the output. Oridinary transistors I suppose. Thats NOT good enough.

Otto






Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on June 12, 2010, 06:22:00 AM
Current build.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 12, 2010, 01:32:55 PM
  @Gk & All:
     The Alex Jones Show discussion about the Petrolium leak in the Gulf, that Mk1 has posted the link on,  I suggest that everybody get informed ASPS. It is absolutely fritghtening what is going on there. It is much worse than publicized, and getting worse by the minute. It is the worse catastrophy in history.  And you my friend (Gk) were right again.  This will have unimaginable concequeces.
 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 12, 2010, 01:36:42 PM
  Guys:  Sorry about my spelling, just waking up, or I should I say did not sleep at all.  Will post again, later. It's 5 am here.
                                                                                   NZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on June 12, 2010, 02:50:46 PM
  Gk : 
  I just found this video made by Lidmotor from the Energetic Forum, on his Big JT:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=CA&hl=en&v=maRF1nw0J2Q
  I would think it that it could still be upscaled alot though, by 10X or more.
  I didn't know that there was a somewhat similar idea,  as to what I had mentioned the other day.
  Interesting to see  Lidmotor's version of 12v batteries, an ingition coil, and a tirfilar coil to make the bigger JT, with a charger circuit.
   Would be interesting to see something like that circuit hooked up to a St.Clair coil with a secondary, instead, or like the one you are working on now. 
  Can't wait to see what happens next.
 
                                       
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on June 12, 2010, 04:43:08 PM
  Guys:  Sorry about my spelling, just waking up, or I should I say did not sleep at all.  Will post again, later. It's 5 am here.
                                                                                   NZ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WgjobZcAeA&feature=channel

Same here , this stuff is really scary , i could not sleep either yesterday...

Chamlin may be in fact played , this time , but now the 4000 UN trucks , and possible evacuation of the southern states make sense .

Mark 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on June 12, 2010, 08:26:15 PM
otto,

I have old impulse generator from 1975, heavy one which has additional ground cable. Do you think it may work well when not grounded ?
If it plugs into the wall then it will be grounded at least in the U.S. and I presume most countries have one side of the outlet at the same potential as ground.  In the U.S. the ground and the neutral are tied together so I am sure this will not work in the way that has been suggested.  You need to run from batteries although I have some cheap low power inverters that are enough to run a signal generator or two.  I may try that if I can't get find my 555's to build a cicuit. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 03, 2010, 04:06:39 PM
Current build: Rodin coil wind with associated fields.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 03, 2010, 04:08:07 PM
2 binary encoded messages:
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 03, 2010, 05:31:20 PM
    2 All:
           A not so current build.
  But, could have more than one answer to our power puzzle, if we could just ask him.
  Code:  Beward of strangers bearing false gifts...
 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 03, 2010, 07:32:51 PM
I was going to try to use the formation animator program from www.formationresearch.com to show 3d field displays and interaction. It looks to be a really cool program. But alas, I purchased it and it crashes on my pc. I have the current directx version too. I have tried numerous times to get in touch with the company to no avail.
If anybody has a clue let me know. Cannot a man be without correct tools (Yoda paraphrase). :(

I am currently reading 'The Gift' by Doug Ruby. I am going to try to get in touch with him also. And anybody associated with Lucy Pringle.

I am working on a virtual spark gap circuit at the moment based on cmos switching window circuits of Earl and Otto. Parts are coming in. Ebay is great. You gotta love the autolinks on this site. No links to Overuntiy type words or phrases only commerce based entities. Isn't money the root of all evil? So I have heard.

The use of flip-flop outputs as clocks leads to timing skew between the count data bits. This skew window is faster in cmos.

Add another hero to the list: Leonhard Euler

--Creativity = tools + knowledge. Plus wisdom = success.

This next quote is why the jitter on a 555 gets focus:
Quote
Hello all,

guys,

that we understand us corectly:I dont say that a 555 is a must but as I see its a good IC to get square waves.

The main point is in the MOSFET DRIVER that is connected to the output of such a 555. Or another IC that can give the square waves.

Hmmmm....hard to describe.....we need signals in our coils that are in 1 moment positive and in the next they are negative. Kicks of course. The positive and negative kicks not in the same time.

I was totally desperate and connected a 4007 IC to the 555. The 4007 has 3 pairs of PNP/NPN MOSFETs inside. Of course this was not working but I saw fantastic signals.

And I forgot to mention:

with 2 frequencies I see 3 sorts of kicks:

1. very fast perfect kicks fast ON/OFF times
totally useless to get even 1W of power on a bulb. See,Im talking about power.
2. kicks with a very fast ON time but the OFF showes a square wave
also totally useless when we talk about power on a bulb.
3. kicks that look like hmmm.....they are in a tornado. They are not straight like normal kicks. They are a little bit ....never seen this but I know what they are. Notto mention how such kicks sounds on my radio. Scary. Somehow I have the impression that they are "gliding" on ice. Never mind.
This kicks are also useless wehn we talk about power on a bulb.

Now you maybe wonder what Im wrighting.

The point is that not 1 of the frequencies when used seperatly will give any output power from my TPU.

But when I use 2 frequencies I have a full light. Yes, the current is high, maybe 2A at 24V but it doesnt matter how much current is used.

Forgot to say: Im measuring with my scope 250VDC. I made such controls because I dont see a need for a high voltage in my coils.Im talking about a ECD TPU.

@forest

look inside this generator and look whats the output. Oridinary transistors I suppose. Thats NOT good enough.

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 03, 2010, 10:42:09 PM
   GK & Otto:
    Probably have to wait until the formation animator site is up and running, it's interesting though, hope you get it to work. 
  What did you think of the Grey holding the Mayan code?  It has been decoded.
  Check the Mayan Calender picture below.
  There have been lots of Crop Circle references to energy forms. Maybe hundreds. They are trying to tell us something, before its too late, but, we may be a bit slow and dense for them.
   @ Otto
   I was wondering if you had gotten your parts from Germany,  you must be having great fun with them, as we haven't heard back from you in a while, again.  I for one would like to hear of any more news you have to tell. Your last video was good and informative, and such a nice looking guy, should really make some more videos.
                                                        Nick
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 05, 2010, 06:33:43 AM
accumulating notes...

Why not use floating ground as feedback loop? Just like blowing an amp on stage.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 05, 2010, 08:39:26 AM
Hello all,

@NickZ

Im still waiting for the parts from Germany but this is not the problem.

The main problem now is that a tinned wire works a little bit different then a oridinary copper wire. In a copper wire we are mixing 3 frequencies, they work together or dont......everything is well known.

But the tinned wire is something totally different: in 1 moment you have no light and suddenly you got one or you change a frequency and suddenly I see totally different signals or......a lot to describe.

As already mentioned, it seems that at 1 frequency, 245kHz, the particles are moving on the outside of this tinned wire, at the other frequency, 35kHz, the particles are maybe on the CuO2 layer that is between the copper and tin and at another frequency the lowest, are the particles only in the copper circling around the circumference of the TPU.

Of course there are different resistances of the metals and so is the speed of the particles different. Of course, as we use 3 different frequencies we already have different speeds of the particles but ....as mentioned, in my case I see at some frequencies totalls different signals.

But the best signals I see when I disconnect the minus or plus from the coils and mosfets and when I switch the Volts on my scope to the range of 50mV. Amazing signals.

Otto

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 05, 2010, 06:29:17 PM
     @ Otto and All:
      Well, I see.  Thank you for your reply.
The reason that I wonder how you were coming along is that sometimes the Germans, Russian, Yugoslaves, etz... have a different idea compared to the current thought on electric theory, and can and do come up with solutions that can work out, even if they do go contrary to current principles.
I can somewhat relate to both sides of things as my father was from Yugoslavia, and my name is also Nikola, as was my Grandfathers name, just like Tesla.  But no, I'm no genious,  sorry.  But, my father although a scientist, had always played with radios, electronics, scopes, and instruments of all types.  He would charge big huge capacitors just to show me what they could do when quickly shorted out. So, those kinds of things stayed with me, even now.
   There are a couple of things that I have noticed:
   First,  that if the pulse that is being sent to the coils is a positive voltage and frequency, it will be mirrored back off the earths pulse and come back and produce a negative spike, as can be seen by the meter going to the - side for a second. So, my thought is how to produce a negative pulse, so that the contrary reactive pulse will be a  positive spike instead. 
  Second, it looks as if all the SM working units have a shift is polarity, not just on/off pulses. The 2m2222, 2n3055, 2n3904 transistors, or 555 switching may not provide for this polarity shift by themselves, as they are basically only switches, but instead it may need to be done by the reversal in the field caused by or at the coil(s) polarity themselves. I feel that this quick and constant reversal is the trick or key, as that is what is causing the disruptance in the equilibrium of the medium and thus drawing in of the Aether to compensate for the vacume or presure change. Or else, where is the added power coming from?  So, maybe a system does not need to be an OPEN circuit to work, but needs to provide for that kind of switching in polarities. Like an Aether diode, or Aether pump.  It may be possible to do the same effect without the switching in polarities, but that may be why no real positive charge is obtained from the applied pulses, as it may be that they are being dissipated mostly at the negative side, before returning back as a positive spike.  What do you think? 
  At first I thought that the Joule thief may work similar to the TPUs, but the more I look into it, and investigate, it does not seem like that to me now.  Although there can be similarities, but , there are no Joule Thiefs that can start a car, like the MITTS's dome device.  Which is the only other device that is  about the same size as the SM units, that has been shown as having that kind of power and that kind of CURRENT. 
  I also think that amount of Mass in the unit is also very important, as you can not start a car, or run your house, with a match box sized device,  at least not yet.
  I now feel like that what is needed is more like a Scalar Wave device made using coils, capacitors, diodes, etz., with very quick and short field reversals. It may be that magnets are also helping with those abrupt occilations, as the chatter or vibrations may be just that (occilations), and the giroscopic effect may be the vortex spinning inside, possibly both ways at the same time while also switching polarities. The hash and heat may be negative and undesirable side effects to be worked on to further improve the performance.
    I am studing those Scalar Technologies and theories, now.
  So, Otto, thanks again for your honest answers, and my best wishes to you and your work.
                                                 NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 06, 2010, 06:41:10 AM
@Loner,
Lets say we have a circuit with floating ground. We bias the coil on constantly. Then we switch that off. The inrush or bemf is very quick to fill the void. The iron wire ground receives the pulse and the whole circuit rises up. The magnetic fields picks this up too. The whole circuit is now thumping attached to antennas, transmitting and receiving. This scenario is similar to the audio feedback loop of placing a microphone in the center towards a speaker. Posted this 3 yrs back. The analogy is we move the microphone in and out like the noise wavers the fields across the TPU. Kapeesh? The inrush is fast and free if we trap it to pulse another turn.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 06, 2010, 09:36:51 AM
Hello all,

@NickZ

yes, Im from ex Yugoslawia, now Croatia. Im working all my life in electronics but.....principals? In electronics? Im working on the TPU from the first moment Mannix posted the SM stuff. After only a few days I saw that a TPU is something different then I have learned in school: I had a negative resistance when I connected a bulb to something like a toroidal coil. In that time nobody knew how to build a TPU or something near a TPU. We knew only that it was a toroidal set of coils.

So, I saw that a classical thinking about a TPU was useless. Especially my education was useless.

Later I decided to build TPUs that nobody made. Tests that nobody made......

I dont want to talk about theories because they are all guesses and speculations but I can tell you where the extra energy - power is coming from: the TPU coils are able to "produce" it. Nothing from outside!! Yes, crazy.

Earlier, maybe a year ago or 3 months ago, if somebody would be crazy enough to wright this I would laugh. But today....

All I know is that not 1 device, from the oldest to the newest works on the TPU principals. This is totally new and never seen. And this is the reason the TPU is "burried" very deep.

Or, in other words, the TPU coils have at some frequency mixes negative resistance. Not only when you connect a bulb and then you see the current dropping. All the time the coils are pulsed there is a negative resistance.

Or, if I was not clear enough, Im talking about a superconductor!!

Ever seen a device that works on this principals?

Its cleverer to learn about superconduction and superconductors and not about scalars and the stuff where a device sucks extra energy from the outside.

You will find a lot on the net about superconduction but.......again useless because Im talking about superconduction at our temperature where we live!! Is this the so called "room temperature"?? And, not to forget, this superconductor you can buy, its a very cheap superconductor....

I hope the bad guys dont read my crap. Crap?

Thanks for the wishes. Only a very hard work will give the results.

Otto



Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 06, 2010, 06:54:41 PM
  @ Otto and All:
      Wow, thanks again for that answer.
      Yes, my father and grandparents were also from Yugoslavia, ( Zagreb).  And I have also worked before in the electronics field for over 15 years, mostly on PC circuits, and can build most any electronic device.  But, I am a builder, and not an inventor.  I have been following you All since the beginning, waiting for the moment that the SM invention would be replicated, but.... no luck.  Because of this I got impatient and decided that it was time to do something about it for my own sake.  It is almost inconceivable that such a simple device as the SM units has not be replicated in more than 14 years.  As it only has less than 10 components. But the secret of operation is still a secret to us. If it were not for his videos, nobody would have guessed there was such a thing.  I agree that NOBODY has been replicating it as it is.
   The Scalar devices are now being used for many purposes, including diverting the last storm Alex oil 1 from its course, also possibly causing the Haiti earthquake, and others.
Yes,  this is all speculation, but the Russians have huge third generation working scalar operations that are no speculation.
  My point was that the devices may be working similar to a Aether diode pump, and unlike (or like) a joule thief may not be recycling the energy that is already found in the device or battery, but instead pumping Aether energy through it, and later with a rectifier producing useable current. The capacitor is the Aether energy filter.  Tesla's Longitudinal Waves may be the same thing as Aether waves, and were known about many years ago.
  No device can produce power without that energy being replenished, and as SM devices have no outside sources or even batteries (possibly) where is the power coming from if not from the Aether?  Is this idea so inconceivable?
  The point is to reproduce the effect of running with gain, by  overriding the effects of entropy.  So, how can this be done, if not by using it's own feed back to further accelerate the device.  We have been afraid to do this thinking that it can blow itself up, but that would be the least of our worries, as we haven't been able to produce even one iota of electricity.
  I will considered your ideas also and hopefully we will be able to see some progress on this subject, soon. 
  As I am far from an electronics supply center, I can't afford to to make too many mistakes, and have to be carefull in my approach.
  My greetings to all from Costa Rica, the sweet spot of perpetual kicks.
                       NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 06, 2010, 08:03:25 PM
I think there is a real strong hint in this document and I know GK has mentioned some of this before.  Look at the Fe56generator doc here in this post # 3098 in the TK thread: (this is the .pdf download link from here on OU)  http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=7679.0;attach=45973

Nickz,  I'm not sure scalar is quite what we are wanting in the TPU - just a feeling and I think scalar waves can be very dangerous especially at higher power levels.  Read the document above and it may give some ideas of where I think the power is coming from. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 06, 2010, 11:29:03 PM
@e2matrix, loner, nickz,
The event is when the polarity flips to return. The BEMF shows up as(not AT) the field collapses. But the starting event is scalar, RE, aether modification point, ZPE(that is where the zero comes from(its really a big universe in there)). Very high frequency at ZPE. Why the window is so short that all we can do i stick a conductor in there to see the shockwave. Oops big secret here. Copper is an antenna(Tesla). Oops another big secret. Diodes dont work. Oops another big secret. Conduction is current. Oops another big secret. The shockwave is perpendicular, scalar. Uh Oh. Point an IR gun at a spark gap(not the terminals) and tell me what you see. Damn, I am giving away the frriggin farm again.

You want big flip? Hit with hard, fast energy. Because at the flip point you have massive movement for mass quantities. Now what is the easy way? Spark gap into a coil. All hail the ignition system circuit. What is the secret? HAhahahaha. The auto ignition system is backward! But it is sparked by the ignition point stage. So we have a spark generator to a step up coil(Tesla) to a spark gap into a flammable plasma cloud! What? Are we insane? It called internal combustion whoopteedoo... This is akin to the storage of hydrogen after electrolysis. And no this is not Stanley Meyer. He called it cracking because we don't ignite the gas at all, Hello? We use the energy at its high snap point. At the crack!

Remember the "white" spark show SM gave with the SM17? Well, lo and behold, there ya go. Cold energy. If it wasn't it would have detonated his rib cage. Why he even held it with both hands! No Telsa left hand rule. Why? No current. This could still get a man killed.

My brain is so full. Processes 1, configurations infinite.

@all,
Simple, simple recipe. But there are those who will still argue. To those I say 'Put you heads down, you're already asleep'.

Here is your puzzle for the day:
In the design of a microwave oven the controls are always on the right. Why? Because that is where the MOT sits. Why? Do we stack microwave ovens? Do we operate them back to back? Do we operate them facing in opposite directions? Clue: It has something to do with the MOT placement.

Good Lord! I sound like IST... CHEERS  :D

--GK. There is only one thing missing...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 07, 2010, 02:07:20 AM
    GK: 
    Looks like you've been taking leasons from IST again.
  Good thing he's right on, most of the time.
                                                                NZ
 
 
                                                                             
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 07, 2010, 07:29:01 AM
Quick someone give GK another shot of tequila so he'll give up the last secret - LOL    Thanks for the great tips!  I did get a couple stun guns but it looks like everything including the final coil is potted in epoxy.  May still be able to use them and if nothing else they are damn scary units for only $11 shipped (fleabay).  Better quality than I thought they'd be (but IMO stun guns are never really a good defense item).  Currently I'm trying to get a Red Snapper (electric fence charger) open to see if there are any goodies in there I might try in a TPU. 
    So if there is scalar waves involved with the TPU does that require caduceus style winding of some coils? 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 07, 2010, 09:34:54 AM
Hello all,

@NickZ

Im born in Zagreb and live here in this nice town.

The TPU was never replicated because nobody knew whats going on in such a device. Nobody even guessed that its based on superconduction.

The idea that a TPU uses Scalar energy, to say it in this way, is maybe fine for you but sorry to say, its wrong.

I already said yesterday that the TPU gets his extra energy from the inside. From the coils.

I dont want to "sell" my theory because I didnt finnish my job and even then I think I wouldnt post my theory because its hard to describe what you cant see.

So, in short, no Scalars but superconduction.

Otto






Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 07, 2010, 09:56:40 AM
otto,

Maybe it's superconductor not because it is a special material but because of producing special massless electrons ?  ::)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 07, 2010, 10:24:45 AM
@forest

yes, its possible. But its only a speculation.

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on July 07, 2010, 01:25:25 PM
@otto

In your 3 frequencies, can you also adjust individual frequency, pulse width (duty) and also the applied voltage.

I have noticed more often then not that some frequencies work better at a certain voltage and others work even better at a certain duty. Go above or below either of these and the effect is gone or diminished.

My best general operation is at 10-15% duty because this give more room for resonance without over saturation but again sometimes at about 60% duty you only get the effect. Then with voltage, in many cases you see an effect and then lower the voltage and notice the effect is still as strong realizing you can maintain it at much lower applied voltages.

I am asking this because you mention that the effect happens in a very thin window of settings. Maybe one of these parameters is too strong or to weak and that is what is keeping the effect very narrow.

Thanks for the aluminum no no. I am making it with insulated bailing wire.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 07, 2010, 01:28:24 PM
  Cool Otto no pun intended.  It does appear that energy can flow at accelerated rates when things are cold.  Like when it is 1 degree outside and your body is 99.   Energy flows from your body at an accelerated rate especially if the wind is ablowing and your naked.  This crap that wind chill doesnt effect objects is ridiculous.  Why do we use fans in front of radiators dah.  To accelerate the energy flow from point a to point b.  Of course we can never use the energy of something hot to make something cold.  Another bag of poop.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 07, 2010, 05:26:18 PM
   Otto:
   I have read about superconductors on the internet, but there is not much mention of the superconductor effect working at any room temperatures.  I must say that reading about that theory got my head spinning, and you would have to be true scientist to figure how it all would work especially at room temps. 
  If the energy is made by the coils (at room temp), acting as a superconductor.  Where is the power coming from? As a superconductor is conducting medium, how or what in this case is being made to conduct? Also How can the few things that make up a TPU (iron or copper wire coils, a capacitor or two, and magnets or chokes.) and not much else that can be seen are fuctioning as a superconductor?  I don't get it,
  I think that the TPU is working by producing energy with the few simple components, converting Aether into useable energy.  As to me the device is working as an energy conversion model or Aether pump.  Most people are afraid of the word Scalar as they associate it with nuclear, or something that it's not. Natually found Aether energy is what permeates the univers, Scalar devices use the positive or negative power of the vortex to funtion.
 
  If you would prefer to e-mail me, I can send you my address, as I would like to hear more about it your ideas.
 
  Many people have been pulsing coils for years now, but  to no avail.  But nobody has made a device just like SMs. He had no external input, or batteries, but must have used the pre-charged power in the capacitors to start the units, which all of his devices had.  He did not send several frequencies from External Sources into the devices to make them work.

   It could also be that the MITTS dome is a fake, but I personally don't think so. It also shows having a toroid, they say it starts with a capacitor, and it has the reflective dome shell. So, it has a somewhat similar size and components as the SM devices,  but may use something like a contained reflective implosion force to work, like John Keely mentions.

  Tesla had no solid state components or superconductors to work with,  but did mention longitudinal (Scalar?) waves.

  Glad to hear that you live in the same city as my relatives. did, although most of them are not living now, except for one cousin.
             Nick
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 07, 2010, 10:04:32 PM
  @ Otto and All:
      In reference to Scalar technology, Aether, and its relation to superconductivity:
                             [ RC ] or Reciprocating Current:   

 
  In a recent understanding of scalar technology Matt and myself have come to a realization of a new form of energy which is produced and needed to drive this Aether pump to produce gravity.

We are not the first to discover it but the first to go on record calling it RC [ Reciprocating Current ] Dr. King calls it Scalar Current and Dr. Nikola Tesla called it longitudinal waves.

Now Tesla was known for AC [ Alternating Current ] and Westinghouse for DC [ Direct Current ]. Direct current is the current from a battery cell with negative to positive flow [ hole theory ] or positive to negative flow [ electron flow theory ].

We can thank Tesla for our using AC voltage today. He found that AC was more efficient and could travel longer distances without need of amplification. We have not done away with DC, for it is still needed in car batteries flashlights, and portable electronic equipment. We do not use DC through the house wiring because AC is the more efficient for this purpose. With RC, DC and AC will still be needed, but RC will have some advantages over AC or DC. RC voltage will travel on the surface of the conductor therefore giving characteristics of superconductivity.

That is to say that resistance will not be of great importance with RC. It is known as cold electrons due to this ability and most incandescent lamps will almost never burn out due to very little heating up of the filament.

You would not be able to use RC voltage on an electric stove or heating blanket or total electric heater.

Another property of RC is electrostatic characteristics. RC voltage will travel down a conductor almost like microwave does in a waveguide.
 
   The short but partial explanation although incomplete, was taken from was taken from:
  http://www.zoklet.net/totse/en/fringe/gravity_anti_gravity/scalar1.html
   Although these theories are still being tested, updated, and experimented on, and, are still also very controversial. I have placed them here to show that there indead may be a relationship to what is being tried here with the TPU projects.
Scalar Techologies, or not?
                                        NickZ
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Qwert on July 08, 2010, 12:23:39 AM

Good Lord! I sound like IST... CHEERS  :D

--GK. There is only one thing missing...
Somewhat illiterate. Must be IST to catch it.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 08, 2010, 11:50:52 AM
Hello all,

@wattsup

yes, youre right. I saw this also.

@sparks

yes, especially not in a freezer.

@NickZ

I have again to say that a TPU works not at full superconduction properties. If this would happen, the TPU would be destroyed. So, its very important that the frequencies are as stable as possible.

You missed a post where I said that we have to use tinned wires in our TPUs and not only copper wires. I think we could also use silver coated copper wires but this is only a guess.

So, we have an alloy with a changed structure between the 2 metals.

If you look at todays super conducters they have all something very nice: an oxide.

Im not a scientist and not so clever and have to figure out things that others "know" but when I have lighted a bulb on this oxide (copper oxide) I was really surprised because the light was soooo bright.

The future will show if Im right with my posts or I failed in my direction.

Otto

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 08, 2010, 01:18:30 PM
     Funny you mention oxides.  I was watching this video last night and the oxide coating on a razor blade appears to be important in the workings of a tiny energy converter. 

                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skKmwT0EccE
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 08, 2010, 04:20:31 PM
  @ All:
   High temp superconductors:  In an effort to understand the relation to a TPU.
   http://phys.kent.edu/pages/cep.htm
                                                        Nz
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 09, 2010, 03:34:09 AM
   Otto & GK:
   I think that it was GK that mentioned something about that there are different types or qualities of the tinned copper wires, and that he was going after the better ones. So, we would need to find just the right type of working tinned copper wire, for each coil.
   Any suggestions or updates on the tinned copper wires, or the best combination of wire types to use, so far,  for winding the coils?

  I was thinking (to myself) that maybe what Otto might be saying (in other words), is that it takes a cord of three notes or three frequencies pulsed together to produce the effect that one vibration by itself would never produce.  Like pulsing a three note cord into the coils instead of a single note pulse. And that the way that it would work out on the coils is that, on each wire coil the inside as well as the outside of each wire surfaces are distributing the three frequencies, each in there own way, and thus producing light, as if, it were operating as a high temp superconductor of sorts.  Yes? No?
                                                                     NZ
 
                                                                         
 


  Interesting video about the razor blade bluing,  I can see how changing the structure of the surface of the blade could affect reception, and other things.
                                       
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 09, 2010, 06:16:35 AM
I'm wondering if anyone read the document I linked to on the last page.  For any lazy keyboarders here's the essence of what it said:
"This patented generator is a solid-state generator which uses the nuclear resonant ferromagnetic effect in a cylindrical rod of iron (56). This effect has been named by the inventors the "isotopic mutation effect".
They use a common iron rod (isotopic number 56) with 3 simple coils wound around it.  This rod is placed between a U shaped core (soft iron) for closing the
magnetic circuit and thus reducing the magnetic losses (see the diagram). 
The inventors claim that if we introduce 105 eV to the iron (isotope 56), its change to the iron isotope 54. The energy generated by this nuclear reaction inside the iron rod will produce an energy gain of 20,000 eV. The energy required for generating the isotopic mutation is produced by a nuclear magnetic resonance effect. The parametric excitation is obtained by the coil #2 acting as the pump.
The energy output is collected by the coil #3 which is able to produce 110-220-380V at 400Hz.  The iron rod is used as the main source of energy by isotopic mutation effect, thus, this will provide a simple and cheap source of energy for a long time.
The inventors claim that this device can be used for building self-powered electrical power supplies. "

     20,000 Volts !  3 coils on an iron rod?  Sound familiar?  Do I have to start sounding like IST too?  LOL
Unfortunately I haven't built anything yet so I can't do the IST jive but this sure sounds very relevant here. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 09, 2010, 08:04:53 AM
Hello all,

@NickZ

the link you showed.....isnt there Cu and O in this alloy??
Dont we also have in a tinned wire Cu and O??

Im using tinned wires from "Helucable" and they are cheap with a good quality.
No, every coil is pulsed with 1 frequency. They are mixed together in the coils. This is more effective then to pulse each coils with all 3 frequencies. And it would be totally wrong because we have to remember the story about 3 cannons.

@Loner

Yes, its time to have COILS with a negative resistance and not only a negative resistance when I connect a bulb to the coils.

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 09, 2010, 01:34:30 PM
  e2

    I followed the link and it immediatelly reminded me of a Tesla pyromagnetic generator.  A Tesla pyromagnetic generator relies on alternate heating and cooling of a keeper that closes the magnetic circuit of a pm.  The machine described in your link produces free neutrons a scource of heat.  It is also know that electro magnetic excitation of spent neuclear fuel rods can reduce the 1/2 lives from 20,000 years to 20 minutes.  That and an Italian physicist recently announced the transmutation of iron isotopes with the use of em pulse excitation.  This is a huge problem for the Uranium miners.  There is lots and lots and lots of iron around with lots and lots of extra neutrons.  Gluons must have mass.  The conversion then follows E=mc2.  The gluons mass converted totally into energy. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 09, 2010, 06:11:07 PM
@e2,
I did read that. It struck me as a heavier version of the Kunel patent. I should have responded.

Had other duties to attend to this past week. I have to get on the bench this weekend.
This weekend  I set up the Fet driver to the IRF840 driven with 555.
Have a second coil matching the first one in the works. This is in line with the P2 designations.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: gyulasun on July 09, 2010, 06:56:59 PM
I'm wondering if anyone read the document I linked to on the last page.  For any lazy keyboarders here's the essence of what it said:
"This patented generator is a solid-state generator which uses the nuclear resonant ferromagnetic effect in a cylindrical rod of iron (56). This effect has been named by the inventors the "isotopic mutation effect".
They use a common iron rod (isotopic number 56) with 3 simple coils wound around it.  This rod is placed between a U shaped core (soft iron) for closing the
magnetic circuit and thus reducing the magnetic losses (see the diagram). 
The inventors claim that if we introduce 105 eV to the iron (isotope 56), its change to the iron isotope 54. The energy generated by this nuclear reaction inside the iron rod will produce an energy gain of 20,000 eV. The energy required for generating the isotopic mutation is produced by a nuclear magnetic resonance effect. The parametric excitation is obtained by the coil #2 acting as the pump.
The energy output is collected by the coil #3 which is able to produce 110-220-380V at 400Hz.  The iron rod is used as the main source of energy by isotopic mutation effect, thus, this will provide a simple and cheap source of energy for a long time.
The inventors claim that this device can be used for building self-powered electrical power supplies. "

     20,000 Volts !  3 coils on an iron rod?  Sound familiar?  Do I have to start sounding like IST too?  LOL
Unfortunately I haven't built anything yet so I can't do the IST jive but this sure sounds very relevant here.

Hi,  you wrote 20,000 Volts, I think you wanted to write 20,000 eVolts, correct?
Here is an energy conversion calculator between eV and Joule:
http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/electron-volts-to-joules-conversion.html
It says 20000 eV gives 3.2e-15Joule. This seems a very small energy gain...  probably I miss something.

rgds,  Gyula

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 09, 2010, 07:28:51 PM
Hi,  you wrote 20,000 Volts, I think you wanted to write 20,000 eVolts, correct?
Here is an energy conversion calculator between eV and Joule:
http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/electron-volts-to-joules-conversion.html
It says 20000 eV gives 3.2e-15Joule. This seems a very small energy gain...  probably I miss something.

rgds,  Gyula
Nope I'm sure you are right Gyula.  You just caught me ignoring that little voice in my head saying "I bet there is a significant difference between eVolts and Volts".  LOL...   I guess I knew someone here who's a lot more current than I am would catch it if it was important.  Thanks Gyula.  It does appear that is a very significant difference. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 10, 2010, 07:28:02 PM
    @ Otto and All:
     Thank you for clarifying the use of ONE frequency pulse to the coils. What then is the frequency that has been working best so far?
  The two or three different tinned copper wire coils are combining to produce the desired effect then?   Like a three note cord (frequencies) interacting inside the coils, but,  being caused to interact by the one pulse that is being sent to the primary coil? 
  So, then what type of coils are used in this case (toroid?), wire size, and what type of core, if any?
 
  You've mentioned that: "But the best signals I see when I disconnect the minus or plus from the coils and mosfets and when I switch the Volts on my scope to the range of 50mV. Amazing signals".
 Otto, Can you explain the above observations, a little,  please? 
  I realize that you are still working on it, but maybe a foto of your device would help also.
  Sorry for so many questions, but, as you can see I am paying attension, and, so are the rest of us.
                                                      Nick
                                                 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 10, 2010, 08:03:29 PM
These frequencies were mentioned in another TPU message thread here (I believe that's where they came from):
Modulation Frequency 1:
222 KHz

Modulation Frequency 2:
115 KHz

Fundamental Frequency:     
30.075 KHz

THE ABOVE THREE FREQUENCIES ARE THE THREE SECRET INPUT FREQUENCIES for the 15" TPU, PER SM!"

It may have come from a .pdf file somewhere possibly Bob Boyce ?  I've also seen reference to 5 Khz and some other frequencies that were worked out by Bruce_TPU on here. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on July 10, 2010, 10:27:40 PM
    @ Otto and All:
 
  You've mentioned that: "But the best signals I see when I disconnect the minus or plus from the coils and mosfets and when I switch the Volts on my scope to the range of 50mV. Amazing signals".
 Otto, Can you explain the above observations, a little,  please? 
  I realize that you are still working on it, but maybe a foto of your device would help also.
  Sorry for so many questions, but, as you can see I am paying attention, and, so are the rest of us.
                                                      Nick

When you take the negative off, you then fall into finer resonance pulsing instead of the classic positive/negative controlled pulsing. The waveforms can then fly all over the place, going into very high voltage but very little amperage.

Guys that are doing high frequency pulsing and find an effect, should get into the habit of then taking off the negative to see if the same effect will intensify. In many cases it will. This is why it is so hard to isolate the true reason for an effect if you don't try to take off the negative. You may have to find a new frequency but this will give you a better idea on what is really going on.

The other day I tried a dual ring control coil with center toroid pulsing with both wires. Took off the negative and the output rose higher. Then for some reason I took off the positive also and held the positive in my hand and the coil still lit the led from a good three feet away. The pulse was using my body as the transmitter and my led bank that starts lighting up at 5 vdc lit up very bright. Can't explain it any other way. High frequency pulsing is very omnipresent so it is very hard to figure out what is exactly causing the effect.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 11, 2010, 09:08:31 PM
  @ Wattsup and All:
     Thanks for the explanation.  Looks like you're the superconductor.  I think I get what Otto was saying now, a little better.  Sure would like to see some positive results from all this pulsing, though. I don't see much difference in the wiring of the big JTs compared to the TPU, other than using a higher voltage transistor like the 2N3055 instead on the 2N2222 which has a 12 volt limit.
   So, take  the negative off,  hold the positive, and watch for sparks.  It that it?
                                               
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 11, 2010, 09:38:21 PM
  @ e2:
      It may have been Bruce that came up with the three frequencies, but nobody has been able to make them work, as far as I know. Even when winding the three windings in the TPU like Bruce recommended,    if he had any success from those coils designs and frequencies,  I must of missed it.
                                                   NZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 12, 2010, 03:35:44 AM
  @ All:
     Since the 3 mentioned frequencies are dependent on a particular tank circuit, I would think that they may only apply to a particular device like the 15" SM coil. But there may be a certain vibration that is universal and can be used to cause resonance in general. Maybe some vibration that jibes with the Aether flow, and will cause an induction in the coils and cause them to act as a superconductor.  Hopefully Otto will have some luck with that. 
  It is obvious that the scope and other test instrument including the persons body and his thought waves become part of the circuit. 
Keely mentions something about mind technologies influencing his work.
  I also don't get what is the proof of concept yet.
  It does seam that SM had different coil materials that worked. Not just tinned copper, as he also use bailing wire etz... which does oxidize, but is not an aloy, just rusty soft iron.
  While copper is not magnetic, it but must have other qualities that make it act as if were magnetic and will cause a Lens effect similar to iron, when hooked up to a battery or a cap.
  I still tend to side with the Vortex theory and continue to look for solid state non moving devices that will go along with that view point, as I don't know what a superconductor really is. Although from reading about it, it looks like it works with the influence of vortexes to produce a charge. Did SM know what it was?  Does it really matter? No, if we can make it work. We don't even know what electricity really is...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 12, 2010, 08:51:39 AM
Hello all,

@NickZ

I dont want to talk about frequencies because I think every TPU will work with his frequencies. It depends on the wire lenghts. If the TPU works only with the mentioned frequencies then OK, I have no problems with them. So far, I dont see any "effect" but as I still have to wait for the parts I dont wonder that I dont see anything.

Every frequency is feeded into 1 coil and the result is a "mix" of 3 frequencies.

Yes, Im now hmmmm.......using my Aluminium ring with I dont know how many turns of a thick copper wire as a "pick up" coil. It was @wattsup who gave me the dimensions. I hope he was it! This is maybe the same silver ring as we can see it inside the 15" TPU or on top of a 6" TPU.

This pick up coil is NOT pulsed but I see fine signals. When I then connect a + to this coil I see the best kicks ever seen at all frequencies and the current from my battery is still 1 - 5mA. But to see all this  I have to place the potentiometer, wich is changing the frequency of my oscillator, in the middle of this ring.

Now, if the signals are amplified......the you can see them in volts and not anymore in milivolts.

Of course, if I use a oxidized copper core the signals are much bigger then without a core. I dont know the exact wire sizes but the controls are thin wires and the collectors are 1,5mm2.

I really dont know it this is related to a TPU but.....Im playing a little bit and learning. Maybre for some tests in the future because I still think that a core is inside each TPU. This is out of question for me. I only have to figure out the best metals for a core.

There is no need for a photo because there are a lot of photos here in this forum.

Of course Im working on this TPU problem and I see not 1 reason to stop.

Otto



Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 12, 2010, 09:44:44 PM
Let me throw this pattern in the mix:

The GK4 was very noisy and even more so when the certain frequencies were achieved. This is not to say that I needed a correct set. With the magnetized core getting beat with an immense amount of eclipsing the thing just spewed. So it looks like the Bedini field shearing but in a chaotic Rodin type pattern surrounding the device itself.

Now it gets real bizarre. There is a Rodin pattern surrounding twin galaxies 'in the dance'. I mention this because of the perect symmetry going on. It is shown in the youtube: 'Through the wormhole' series. I was surprised at the terms usage that closely suround what we are working on here.

So what I see are the entry points being very specific by most involved here. Otto and a few others have tried a jumbled mix at one time or another.
In my own attempts I have played both sides of specifics and chaos. Either Nickz or E2matrix posted documents that mentioned floating grounds and that is most important factor based upon the writers credentials. This has popped up from obscurity every so often and not from the device builders either. Tesla stated 'multiple indepedent floating grounds' in his 'Nonlinear oscillating shuttle circuit'. Maybe SM started with one in his simple beginning devices.

My latest thinking is that a floating ground of a magnetized ring enables the device potential to remain high due to the magnetic activity looking like storage. This would act as a medium for the capture or slowing down of the high speed energy. Also fits in with the virtual aperture of previous posts. Mentioned a few times has been the magnetic toroidal field acting as a mag amp.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: penno64 on July 12, 2010, 10:50:32 PM
@all

I was searching youtube for TPU replications and came across this comment posted
to -

TPU V1.0 Experiments (Part 1)


"
JackDurban
2 years ago I worked with Steven Mark. The magnet was a ruse. It closed a reed switch in the primary. Steven thought it would throw off analysis of snooping eyes during demos. He was the most paranoid person I ever met. By the way, if you want a little hint as to the device's basic make up and why it acted like a gyro in its resistance to motion pull Tesla's patent 381,970 circa 1888. Study the quadrature nature of the coils and disregard the rest. From there ask yourself why the specific resonant freq.
JackDurban 2 years ago see all
Video Responses"


Regards, Penno
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 13, 2010, 05:35:14 AM
    2 All:
    Could it be that a disconnected negative, or an open ground allows for the circuit to then become an Open circuit? And can therefore draw in or least not restrict or limit the available energy that is then available to flow through, or be produced by the coils, through an otherwise closed and limited circuit.  Looks like when you disconnect a ground connection is like opening a RC current Aether valve.
  In order for any unit to output unending energy, it has to be able to redirect or draw through the device that same amount of energy, just like a photovoltaic cell.  Any closed system will not allow for that.
  We still need a working unit that can be used as a Prototype, or as an example to work with and improve upon. Like is being done now in the JT thread, using their basic JT as a starting point.
  Question is, do we have such a device, yet???
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 13, 2010, 07:33:26 AM
@all

I was searching youtube for TPU replications and came across this comment posted
to -

TPU V1.0 Experiments (Part 1)


"
JackDurban
2 years ago I worked with Steven Mark. The magnet was a ruse. It closed a reed switch in the primary. Steven thought it would throw off analysis of snooping eyes during demos. He was the most paranoid person I ever met. By the way, if you want a little hint as to the device's basic make up and why it acted like a gyro in its resistance to motion pull Tesla's patent 381,970 circa 1888. Study the quadrature nature of the coils and disregard the rest. From there ask yourself why the specific resonant freq.
JackDurban 2 years ago see all
Video Responses"


Regards, Penno

Good reminder on Tesla's patent.  It always boggles me how similar this looks to SM's big TPU and knowing SM studied Tesla a lot.....
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 13, 2010, 01:28:55 PM
Good reminder on Tesla's patent.  It always boggles me how similar this is to SM's big TPU and knowing SM studied Tesla a lot.....
When a coil induces a counteremf it must first disrupt the magnetic field in which it lies.  As it does the coil sees a changing magnetic field and generates the counteremf and we say the signal is choked.  We do not see any loop current because of this.  This would be Tesla's coil of highself induction.  Within the confines of his coil of high self induction is usually found a coil of low selfinduction experiencing the same magnetic field disruption as initiated by the choked input.  I'ts counteremf is more in tune with the initial signal impedance.  In an ac voltage transmission line the selfinduction along the transmission line results in tremendous amounts of power being lost.  Tesla recognized this and told Westinghouse he had a better transformer that would use pulsed dc on the transmission line.  He even made the motionless dynamo's to do it.  Even patented them.  The power companies now use pulsed dc transmission on their main trunk lines to overcome the selfinduction losses in transmitting ac.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 14, 2010, 07:29:10 AM
@all

I was searching youtube for TPU replications and came across this comment posted
to -

TPU V1.0 Experiments (Part 1)


"
JackDurban
2 years ago I worked with Steven Mark. The magnet was a ruse. It closed a reed switch in the primary. Steven thought it would throw off analysis of snooping eyes during demos. He was the most paranoid person I ever met. By the way, if you want a little hint as to the device's basic make up and why it acted like a gyro in its resistance to motion pull Tesla's patent 381,970 circa 1888. Study the quadrature nature of the coils and disregard the rest. From there ask yourself why the specific resonant freq.
JackDurban 2 years ago see all
Video Responses"


Regards, Penno

Magnet not a ruse you can be quite sure of that.  The magnet squashed the hysteresis of the mag amp which consists of 2 small toroidal ferrite cores it can be done with one with less efficiency. All later models used 2 ferrite rings with a magnet close by. The mag amp changed the inductance of the large coils to keep them pumped into a high VARS condition where the VSWR  = ~
This allows low cost simple parts of the late 1980's like 555's or 74 series logic to control the mag amps.

Reason is very important and SM already told you this. The high volts and amps swirling around his coils would have killed most early FET's and  trannies of the 80's. Even today an IGBT of 3kv and 50 amps handling going to cost like 50-100 bucks.

 Mag amps provide control over very high volts and amps without problems of them being destroyed. In the large TPU my guess to provide an o/p of 1000 watts requires 20 KVARS on his coils. The magnetic field will easy be enough to interact with earth magnetic field and create juddering.

The frequencies in the TPU are related to the the size. SM already told you this there are NO magic frequencies. The ONLY frequency of common use in SM tpu is 5khz which is a standard clock he just happened to use. It may have been part of another device or circuit as SM was fond of using other stuff he had laying around.

 This is used as a Quencher at 5khz which interrupts the oscillations on the TPU which increases the overall Q as in Super Regen radio. If you do this the o/p will contain the source you want ie DC power out PLUS 5khz sat on top and this is EXACTLY what the TPU provided. This is why SM said his device operates a bit like a radio collecting signals. ..and it does.

The effect of the TPU is a precursor as SM said its a means to an end and the frequencies going around the coils are just that and nothing more - means to an end and are not the part you seek.

All OU devices i seen on paper at least have similar principles. Disturbance of the ambience's does not alway mean coil banging.

The TPU is nothing more then a 3 phase pump to create an excess of 20 KVARS this WILL take several seconds to wind up like a turbine AND interact with earth magnetic field but the earth field is NOT the source of the energy.

The TPU is a virtual electron. As creation of a giant electron spin field we create fractal copies into ambient electrons spin fields. Electron themselves are NOT electricity they are a parasite going for the ride.

I give you a quote from my mentor

 "RE (RF) current node within COIL (amps max voltage zero),
OU in nature as it pumps energy from electron spin domain,were energy in +
energy acquired / energy in = overunity = energy out .

as field collapses its transfered to a charge within a tuned LC
as joule ampere volt farad potential. (diode plug )

tuned LC capacitor can act as shorted coil equivalent at hi Q." - Hector ARK Research.

I can create and demonstrate a 3 phase pump using 24 volts 10mA and the o/p is over 2000 VARS! If i add quenching i can increase the gain and get 20,000 VARS the i/p power required is milliwatts.


Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 14, 2010, 12:46:19 PM
  Many years ago I was called out to repair a heating system behind another technician who had installed a second control system transformer and left the old one active.  Both transformer secondaries were toast.  The primaries fine.  The electronics on both boards was fine the wiring in between the two boards was melted.  Large amounts of current had circulated between the two transformers with no consequences external to this circulation.  One transformer secondary alternately seeing the other transformer secondary as a load.  The homeowner wanted to know why a fuse hadnt cooked.  I replied that the transformers were impedance protected where the wire is so fine that it acts as a fuse.  Which is the case for the primary windings in these step down transformers.  Well it didnt work this time did it she replied.  Always rembered that job out of thousands.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 14, 2010, 04:09:02 PM
sparks

Very interesting. Could those two secondaries  become parametric LC oscillator ? That would explain current rise.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 14, 2010, 04:52:52 PM
You need open source VLC player to watch this file as its open source OGV codec for any platform.

https://sites.google.com/site/silverfreeenergy/links/out-2.ogv?attredirects=0&d=1

This is for self sync RV 3 phase motor runs mostly on Radiant Energy just replace motor with the 3 collector winding of TPU and it will run with gain! The frequency is not important for TPU it will run at any frequency so desired. I suggest though an 12 inch tpu made of 4 turn collector with 0.01 tank cap (SM large yellow caps HV 2000v) will put the TPU in the 100kHz region.

You create VARS your create SCALER WAVES! RE =RF where RE enters at node points.

If you want replace the fet with mag amp same at SM did and bias with a magnet.

I have omitted the 5khz quenching circuit as it overloaded the sim and i couldn't record it but increases gain about another 100 fold.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 14, 2010, 09:22:14 PM
@all

I think Bolt is right for the mag amp , i still have not seen anyone showing a 2 toroid magamp working .

The heat , could also be chemical thing like a battery ...

Mark
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 14, 2010, 10:14:45 PM
@all

I think Bolt is right for the mag amp , i still have not seen anyone showing a 2 toroid magamp working .

The heat , could also be chemical thing like a battery ...

Mark

try it works no problem just get 2 toroidal and wrap some turns around them. Even two normal transformer work like 20VA   12v - 120/240v wire them out of phase and put 9 volt battery on to turn mains side on or off as lamp control. By adding a pot to 9v battery you can make a home made lamp dimmer circuit. A small variation in voltage creates a huge difference in the inductance. By placing a mag amp in my circuit as SM did he controls the oscillations thru his TPU WITHOUT even using a power fet. A magnet beside the mag amp corrects the bias. This is like adding bias to a FET where we want the amp to run in the small near vertical part of the b curve for max gain.

By taking a sniffer coil off the collecter coils (overwound control coil)  this can be looped around to control the bias to give positive feedback to keep the tank oscillations running. So the mag amp is used as a passive magnetic amplifier.

SM was probably forced to come up with this idea as FETs back then could no way handle the stress which is why he said start off with tubes just to get the concept working.

He hinted in his notes and said "try looking at transformers out of phase and see the effects"
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 15, 2010, 07:49:12 PM
Windings must be carefully designed to give the largest mutual flux possible.

The final input parameters now are:
Some kind of excitation.
A tank or storage.
Capture or feedback the ringing.
Connect for output.

I realize this is simplistic. Each statement has its group following and technology.
@Bolt,
I have the magamps previously wound. I understand the lack of component configuration but like you said 'SM tried tubes first to get the effect'. I am pursuing the excitation stage utilizing the CMOS switching window. Then will attach caps for the tank, the sniffer coil or the like. In my current design I am using a feedback line to add switching noise to the driver line.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 16, 2010, 12:16:58 AM
Windings must be carefully designed to give the largest mutual flux possible.

The final input parameters now are:
Some kind of excitation.
A tank or storage.
Capture or feedback the ringing.
Connect for output.

I realize this is simplistic. Each statement has its group following and technology.
@Bolt,
I have the magamps previously wound. I understand the lack of component configuration but like you said 'SM tried tubes first to get the effect'. I am pursuing the excitation stage utilizing the CMOS switching window. Then will attach caps for the tank, the sniffer coil or the like. In my current design I am using a feedback line to add switching noise to the driver line.

Hi GK,

You don't have to use a fet this is my point. In fact you only use a mag amp when you have no choice and it "might" come to that pending how successful the 3 phase pump.  So lets imagine you have a mag amp for a mo. In this condition the only power needed is CMOS control stuff it will run on a 9 volt battery at 10mA easy. There is no need to use 100 watts of fet coil banging i said this from day one.

The cmos control will send a 9 volt pulse into the collector loop via the mag amp. 9 volts is enough to control a mag amp and switch hundreds of amps at thousands of volts. (no wonder they are not used too often nowdays)

 The 3 phase configuration gives a KICK automatically as it converts to VARS. A control feedback signal sees the kick and the mag amp controls the inductance as a switch to add pumping at the right moment.  There is no silicone in effect in line of duty only the mag amp switch is in the VARS loop which will build up to 10-20KVARS over 5 seconds. This is the precise thing we see as SM turns on the TPU it doesn't just TURN ON it warms up like an old tube TV. The magnet SM used is to set the bias of the mag amp b phase into higher linear operation. Its a bit like class C rather then class AB. This is why the device can be started IF perfectly balanced without any batteries whatsoever. Yes i understand how this will start with one swipe of a magnet over the collector windings. To do this though requires exceptional gain maybe >1 MIO. This is where the 5khz clock comes into play as the mag amp is switched fast to provide super regen and will end up as "5khz mush sat on top of the DC o/p"

OK so back to a fet its easier and simple to use a fet if you understand what its job it supposed to be. I imagine SM used an EL84 pentode or something here originally as the VARS will present several KV's and dozens of amps in circulation.

SO whats the purpose of creating VARS? To excite the ambient and tap the free energy of course!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 16, 2010, 03:26:01 AM
I am in total agreement here with you.
I don't bang coils anymore. Why? because the circuit and operation to this day and from my first OU day still seems to like a stun gun ckt with a 'special' or different coil as the last stage. Driven by a 9v battery, transistor oscillator to a charge pump. no coil driven by solid state. With a 'tuned' / in phase pumping to the coil via electrostatics. The stun gun is an EV generator, we know this.
I see the very small drive circuitry just to excite and gently pump. The rest is all reactive harmony.
So where did I go? I wanted to cover all bases with what I didn't know and with I did know. Turn page. The mystery is now over for me but I still a myriad of configurations and applications. But TPU first and foremost.
I do see the mag amp taking the place of the xfmr in the stungun ckt.
Thanks for the response.

Hi GK,

You don't have to use a fet this is my point. In fact you only use a mag amp when you have no choice and it "might" come to that pending how successful the 3 phase pump.  So lets imagine you have a mag amp for a mo. In this condition the only power needed is CMOS control stuff it will run on a 9 volt battery at 10mA easy. There is no need to use 100 watts of fet coil banging i said this from day one.

The cmos control will send a 9 volt pulse into the collector loop via the mag amp. 9 volts is enough to control a mag amp and switch hundreds of amps at thousands of volts. (no wonder they are not used too often nowdays)

 The 3 phase configuration gives a KICK automatically as it converts to VARS. A control feedback signal sees the kick and the mag amp controls the inductance as a switch to add pumping at the right moment.  There is no silicone in effect in line of duty only the mag amp switch is in the VARS loop which will build up to 10-20KVARS over 5 seconds. This is the precise thing we see as SM turns on the TPU it doesn't just TURN ON it warms up like an old tube TV. The magnet SM used is to set the bias of the mag amp b phase into higher linear operation. Its a bit like class C rather then class AB. This is why the device can be started IF perfectly balanced without any batteries whatsoever. Yes i understand how this will start with one swipe of a magnet over the collector windings. To do this though requires exceptional gain maybe >1 MIO. This is where the 5khz clock comes into play as the mag amp is switched fast to provide super regen and will end up as "5khz mush sat on top of the DC o/p"

OK so back to a fet its easier and simple to use a fet if you understand what its job it supposed to be. I imagine SM used an EL84 pentode or something here originally as the VARS will present several KV's and dozens of amps in circulation.

SO whats the purpose of creating VARS? To excite the ambient and tap the free energy of course!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 16, 2010, 03:56:32 AM
  In older generators they employed saturable core reactors as voltage regulators.  A portion of the ac output from the main windings was rectified and fed into the core of one saturable core reactor.  As ac voltage on the output of the alternator rose this core would saturate at the desired alternator voltage ouput level.   This would allow ac to now pass to a second satcore. This sat core had two control windings one fed from the sensing sat core and one from a reference dc supply.  The two dc supplies mixed in the core of the second satcore in opposition.  As the voltage on the alternator rose the two opposing dc supplies would cancel each other out.  The ac exciter current would see an unsaturated core and no current would pass to the main rotor of the alternator.  These regulators replaced relay technolgy and the need for an exciter generator mechanically coupled to the alternator.  They were rock solid.  Response times pinning down the transient spikes every alternator has when a load is suddenly taken off line or applied.  To mess with them for field service we would place a piece of alnico dc motor field pole magnet on the core laminations and depending on polarity of the magnet make the voltage go up or down.  I was working one that was a standby generator to supply power to a radar tube filament in a large weather monitoring station in case the grid went down.  The tube had to be staged off or the envelope would pop it ran so hot.  All sorts of  military types running around watching weather forming over russia at this installation).  I put the little magnet on the satcore which sends higher dc to the exciter to overcome insulating films that build up on brass brush rings when the standby plant isnt exercised.  The alternator cut in.  They started looking at me like I was in tune with some black majic or something and I put the magnet away fast and got the screwdriver out to gain access to the rotor rings.  They felt much more comfortable with me wielding a screwdriver than the less understood permanent magnet.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 16, 2010, 06:29:27 AM
  In older generators they employed saturable core reactors as voltage regulators.  A portion of the ac output from the main windings was rectified and fed into the core of one saturable core reactor.  As ac voltage on the output of the alternator rose this core would saturate at the desired alternator voltage ouput level.   This would allow ac to now pass to a second satcore. This sat core had two control windings one fed from the sensing sat core and one from a reference dc supply.  The two dc supplies mixed in the core of the second satcore in opposition.  As the voltage on the alternator rose the two opposing dc supplies would cancel each other out.  The ac exciter current would see an unsaturated core and no current would pass to the main rotor of the alternator.  These regulators replaced relay technolgy and the need for an exciter generator mechanically coupled to the alternator.  They were rock solid.  Response times pinning down the transient spikes every alternator has when a load is suddenly taken off line or applied.  To mess with them for field service we would place a piece of alnico dc motor field pole magnet on the core laminations and depending on polarity of the magnet make the voltage go up or down.  I was working one that was a standby generator to supply power to a radar tube filament in a large weather monitoring station in case the grid went down.  The tube had to be staged off or the envelope would pop it ran so hot.  All sorts of  military types running around watching weather forming over russia at this installation).  I put the little magnet on the satcore which sends higher dc to the exciter to overcome insulating films that build up on brass brush rings when the standby plant isnt exercised.  The alternator cut in.  They started looking at me like I was in tune with some black majic or something and I put the magnet away fast and got the screwdriver out to gain access to the rotor rings.  They felt much more comfortable with me wielding a screwdriver than the less understood permanent magnet.

You are very lucky to have this hands on experience.  Mag-amps almost a forgotten art outside of specialized industry or military usage. If i get stuck i know who to call for advice:)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 16, 2010, 05:57:51 PM
One of the tests I was trying to do to see if the iron ring core can be replaced with a magnetic field.
The simplest thing I came up with was a muli(lamenant) loops of iron wire as the core and this would be small. I will throw the GK4 in this then since it matches the sat core config or I can put a smaller one in. Either way.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBX1-POuJMw
Replace the pot with a feedback connection.

Up from antiquity: http://www.themeasuringsystemofthegods.com/magnetic%20amplifiers.pdf

Two toroids: http://sparkbangbuzz.com/mag-audio-amp/mag-audio-amp.htm

You are very lucky to have this hands on experience.  Mag-amps almost a forgotten art outside of specialized industry or military usage. If i get stuck i know who to call for advice:)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 16, 2010, 11:51:27 PM
The video has an enormous amount of validating demos of graphics models I posted over 3 years ago.
Are you talking about the crystal radio demo as the Tesla coil?


Also:
This site:
http://www.zoklet.net/totse/en/fringe/gravity_anti_gravity/scalar1.html
Looking for references to the publications of EXTRAORDINARY SIENCE, VOL II, ISSUE 1.
If anybody knows where these are It would greatly appreciated. I need the graphics.

GK, That is nice....

Did anyone else notice the "Editor's insert" that showed a Tesla Coil driven by the Mag amp concept.  That coil had NO POWER INPUT, just the control.

If that were truly operable, as shown, then the game is over.  I can't wait to see as I'm going to wind up a basic immeadiately, just to see.
Title: tT
Post by: sparks on July 17, 2010, 05:30:14 AM
    The tesla coil mentioned appears to be in receive mode.  The circle is a symbol for a capacitor.  Just one electrode plate piece of foil or metal stick way up high.  The inductor is an inductor that induces an electral motive force.  The ground is the other plate piece of foil or metal stick placed way down in the ground.  If an electrostatic charge is conveyed to the stick in the air it becomes charged relavent to ground.  An electric field now persists just like you are inside a charged capacitor.  Inside the capacitor is placed the helix which will respond to an electrical current as one would find flowing between plates of a  capacitor.  There is no conveyance of any electrons between plates of a charged capacitor but there is an electrical field.  If between plates of a charged capacitor we insert charged mass then a force, the electricity,  goes to work on mass and it moves.  The velocity of the mass an indication of the amount of energy transferred from the electrical field within the capacitor.  Assume that we are inside the capacitor and move one end of a wire close to one plate.  The end of the wire will now be in the electrical current flow between plates and charged mass free to move inside the wire will move.  It will move without us having to short the capacitor.  It will move not in a linear relationship to our movement it will move in an expotential relationship to the wires movement.  The closer we get to a plate the force on the charged mass increases expotentially,  We do not have to move the wire against the electrical current.  If you have a river flowing by you to get some power out of the river all you need to do is put a paddle in it and hold on.  It will spin you around until the paddle is out of the flow.  Reinsert the paddle which will take some work but no where near the work exhibited by your transformation into a turbine.  Notice that the river could give a damn if it is spinning you around like a top it is going to flow no matter if the paddle is in there or not.  The Earth is charged up to a full columb or more.  This is an enourmous amount of charge.  Charge comes from the flow of virtual particles which create all the known forces.  We are walking around on a charged spherical capacitor where there is a tremendous flow of virtual particles to support the Earth charge.  Out there in space a few Earth radii away all around the Earth there exists a difference in charge state whereby an insulated conductor would experience a 36kv emf.


w
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 17, 2010, 07:04:02 PM
@Bolt,
To save time could you post or send the 3 phase motor script you have here?
Tnx in advance.
 
You need open source VLC player to watch this file as its open source OGV codec for any platform.

https://sites.google.com/site/silverfreeenergy/links/out-2.ogv?attredirects=0&d=1

This is for self sync RV 3 phase motor runs mostly on Radiant Energy just replace motor with the 3 collector winding of TPU and it will run with gain! The frequency is not important for TPU it will run at any frequency so desired. I suggest though an 12 inch tpu made of 4 turn collector with 0.01 tank cap (SM large yellow caps HV 2000v) will put the TPU in the 100kHz region.

You create VARS your create SCALER WAVES! RE =RF where RE enters at node points.

If you want replace the fet with mag amp same at SM did and bias with a magnet.

I have omitted the 5khz quenching circuit as it overloaded the sim and i couldn't record it but increases gain about another 100 fold.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 18, 2010, 02:51:40 AM
@Bolt,
To save time could you post or send the 3 phase motor script you have here?
Tnx in advance.

Sorry GK i dont have any script for this now i make these circuits get the results i expect to see on the simulator then tear them down. On this occasion i happened to make a screen-shot movie for someone else so i thought i share it here.

Where of course a simulator can only show conventional circuit and logic then the road to OU starts with precursor technology which is standard text book RF. No magic here. I only need to create the conditions and nature will do the rest. Not everything can be validated on a sim but an awful lot can be. An oscillator is an oscillator and phase and timings are good enough for real life replications.

Once its understood that RE = RF then it easy to understand how joule thief works or Katcher or Dr Stiffler amplifier or hundred other devices because they all speak the same language only the method changes.

As i said a magamp is just a useful device and not required to make a TPU its just another method of controlling the phases without using silicon.

People ask to see some useful stuff. I give a circuit one simple power fet and handful or caps and resistors and to use a standard off the shelf 3 phase motor can run on 48 volts and virtually zero current. Its FAR more useful and powerful then any Bedini motor or imoteep fan but no one can be arsed to try it. Only when you build something like this you become shell shocked and in awe of how there can be many amps and few hundred volts in the motor in circulation. The magnetic intensity is amazing far better then a Newman motor.

Every-time i see a special "super duper" magnet motor I RUN!  Why? Because to replicate such a motor will cost many many thousands of dollars or it requires IPO funding of $10 MIO and up so they ALL become paper weights or museum pieces.

If you cant make 99% efficient or OU device with cheap off the shelf parts without using Kryptonite or Searl rolled magnets at $1 MIO each then don't bother:)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on July 18, 2010, 03:51:36 AM
  @ GK and All:
    Lead-out energy:
    "It is extremely important to realize that resonance hunting is still very much an art.  The Output Instantaneous Power can show a COP >> 10.  When the circuit is disassembled and reassembled with the same electronic components, the COP can drop to 3.  It appeared that the clips used might change the frequency considerably.  This is in line with our understanding of resonance – a few hertz to either side of the resonance condition will show sharp decline in amplitude".

"Now the secret is out.  Any research organization can buy two oscilloscopes; produce a two layer toroid; use the inner layer as Joule Thief to act as Primary.  The outer layer acts as the Secondary of a transformer and an LCR circuit can be placed for tuning.  At the appropriate settings, the COP can be much higher than 1.  In a more advanced form, the battery can be replaced by a signal generator.  Resonance Hunting via a full frequency sweep can take place.  Once the correct frequency is found, a cheap oscillator circuit can replace the signal generator".

"The actual size of the toroid, the core material, the exact electronic component parts can change.  Resonant condition with COP > 1 can still be achieved.  The “race” is to get the best configuration to lead-out most electron motion energy for actual products.  Every team known to me told me that they would keep such information confidential as such information is worth many millions or billions".

   GK:  Is this not what we were trying to do?  Giant JT- TPU?
   Proof is in the pudding...
                                           NickZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 18, 2010, 03:55:52 AM
  If we have an oscillator there are times when the state of charge on one side of the capacitor drops well below the ambient charge surrounding the capacitor. At these time it is possible for a current to be established between the ambient into the capacitor through the pump and end up on the dense side of the capacitor.  Now when the flow is reversed it starts off with a higher state of charge which develops more inertia in the system which pumps the  once dense capacitor  plate dry.  The problem is that as one plates goes low the other goes high.  Any input from the ambient will flow through the sytem.  Therefore we might expect an increased current flow and anticipate this with a translatory device that converts current into voltage.  A current transformer.  A bunch of wire wrapped around a conducting core. let the main oscillator oscillate like bolts says/  Monitor the current flowing in the tank and feed off this monitor like a wattmeter runs off of current transformers wound around lines feeding a building.  The currents in the resonant portion of the circuit can be thousands of times greater than the currents maintaining them.  A current transformer does not impede the flow of current in the lines to a building.  Why would it impede currents in an oscillating tank circuit.  Feedback and control is tricky.  Your capacitor voltage is going to climb and at some point resistance will need to be inserted in the circuit to radiate excess input to the tank.  SM had an overheat problem because he couldnt damp the oscillations and the wire resitance was the only thing getting rid of the RE/
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: iflewmyown on July 18, 2010, 04:50:58 AM
Quote
People ask to see some useful stuff. I give a circuit one simple power fet and handful or caps and resistors and to use a standard off the shelf 3 phase motor can run on 48 volts and virtually zero current. Its FAR more useful and powerful then any Bedini motor or imoteep fan but no one can be arsed to try it. Only when you build something like this you become shell shocked and in awe of how there can be many amps and few hundred volts in the motor in circulation. The magnetic intensity is amazing far better then a Newman motor.

Bolt, do you know how many thousands of super duper best ideas there are on this site alone being pushed by people who can't be arsed to try their own idea themselves????? I have been building those ideas for fifteen years with exactly the same results as all of the other posters here including two versions of Naudin's latest.  I have a shop and all of the equipment needed to duplicate your simulation but I will need some time to decide why your idea is any better than some other guys, who also hasn't built his own. The rotoverter by itself is not overunity as I have proved to myself and Hector spends his time trying to sell motors that idle efficiently when they could just be shut off.
Garry
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 18, 2010, 07:44:36 AM
Bolt, do you know how many thousands of super duper best ideas there are on this site alone being pushed by people who can't be arsed to try their own idea themselves????? I have been building those ideas for fifteen years with exactly the same results as all of the other posters here including two versions of Naudin's latest.  I have a shop and all of the equipment needed to duplicate your simulation but I will need some time to decide why your idea is any better than some other guys, who also hasn't built his own. The rotoverter by itself is not overunity as I have proved to myself and Hector spends his time trying to sell motors that idle efficiently when they could just be shut off.
Garry

"I have been building those ideas for fifteen years with exactly the same results as all of the other posters here including two versions of Naudin's latest. " Well clearly you picked all the wrong ones then.

First Naudin was seriously flawed from day one. I posted many times on this even stated lets wait for the music to stop because he failed to run the kapagen of a car battery and inverter and take a simple DC reading. For someone doing OU experiments for many many years that was a really stupid mistake that cost a lot of people time and effort.

The rotoverter is advanced training tool into teaching about RF OU tuning. It may not be OU off the shelf as simple RV but pulse driving and or using perm magnet rotor is loopable. I know 4 people that have looped RV's and one guy posted a complete and full disclosure on here about 3 years ago. The post has long gone but not going into that now suffice to say it really happened. Hector says there are at least a dozen including himself which have looped many times. There are no hidden dark secrets its only tuning and having access to a lab. Oh i tell you SAAB Sweden also have a looped RV its been running now about 2 years non stop.

Even without looping a well tuned RV has real practical applications  like water pumps etc or Air Con and saving a small fortune. Unlike other toy bedinni and newman  motors etc people build that spin and do absolutely nothing else useful. If an application design saves say 300 watts to do the very same task that is the very same thing as making a 300 watt over-unity device and applying it.

BTW Hector doesn't sell ANYTHING and certainly not RV motors as you can buy them off the shelf.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Rosphere on July 18, 2010, 04:13:27 PM
@Bolt,
To save time could you post or send the 3 phase motor script you have here?
Tnx in advance.

@giantkiller,

Attached is my stab at it.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 18, 2010, 06:11:40 PM
@Rosphere,
Thanks.

@Bolt,
Well said. One rendition of magnetic looping can be pictured as attached. And again the Johnson looks like a tpu.

@all,
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/rotoverter.htm
So close... As in 'side by side'.


Another request: I am looking for the document that talks about magamps/toroidal transformers with graphics of the toroids in light brown color.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 18, 2010, 07:13:18 PM
This one?  http://www.sendspace.com/file/hips9n
I forget where I got this from but it was in the last week or so and I just put it up here for convenience.  It's about 7.5 Megs.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 18, 2010, 11:02:54 PM
Tnx but I have that one.
Here is a pic of the best I can remember. Very simple graphics.

Found it. I happy now!


This one?  http://www.sendspace.com/file/hips9n
I forget where I got this from but it was in the last week or so and I just put it up here for convenience.  It's about 7.5 Megs.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 19, 2010, 02:46:10 AM
  The pistons below the seesaw do the work or dampen the oscillations.  The pump will keep on pumping taking the low level water and pumping it up into the tanks as long as need be.  The oscillator creates a condition whereby we can become relavent to the scalar electrical potential.  If you allow the tanks to just tap the surface of the water you get waves.  If you use the pistons you can pump closed loop currents through various loads at high velocity.  As the tank that is full sinks it is resisted by the piston and load circuit.  The underground pump with flywheel attached doesnt give a damn about how fast the tanks teeter. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 19, 2010, 03:38:20 AM
Tnx but I have that one.
Here is a pic of the best I can remember. Very simple graphics.

Within Kapanadze device mag amp is fed by the HT spark which provides both the AC requirements of a mag amp to work and supplies joules to the tank. Only very very low power required. The mag amp IS THE LARGE BLUE COIL is then controlled by a weak push pull sinewave generator to modulate the 25Khz HT spark to 50/60hz sine wave. You dont HAVE to do this 50Hz sine wave its an added feature so that it can run other loads like motors etc other then lamps. But if you do it now as a precursor mixer its 1000 times cheaper then using are real 5Kw inverters later.  This is one little feature the TPU didn't have until SM modified an old triplite inverter to run on 800 VDC.

Tank is excited into high VARS condition. Approx 1/10th of VARS is extractable. To light 100 watt bulb requires 1 KVAR. Ferrite core is there to provide inductance and coupling as it operates in the high KHz region. The over windings on the large coils is for feedback and mag amp operation.

TPU is far  more advanced then kapandze as its a 3 phase version controlled by mag amp toroidal tiny cores where the 5KHZ clock common device on all tpu takes place of a kapagen spark gap which provides AC joules to the tank coils. The 3 phase coils set up their own independence resonance in the hundreds KHz to couple of MHZ pending size of TPU set by the yellow acrylic caps seen on the large TPU's The TPU operates in virtual 3rd phase to create leading edge power factor and revolving magnetic field again in  very high VARS condition. Due to 3 phase and operating in at least 2 or more layers where 3 is best the magnetic field revolves in all X Y and Z planes to provide a spherical field.

The 5khz clock acts as both precursor energy and quencher a super regen to increase the Q and overall gain by at least 1/2 MIO where the mag-amps control the inductance of the main collectors to maintain 3 phase resonance. The mag-amps are a substitution for any power fet or transistor as none are actually required. All this FET coil banging for years total of waste of time and effort!

 However they only work on AC so the 5khz clock servers two purpose to enable mag amps to function and to provide quenching.  Mag amps for audio use normally have to run class A Where the mag amp is already half turned on unless push pull class AB but we need them to run in class C magnetic modulation so a magnet is used at 45 degrees to offset the bias. The DC bias is set OFF for class C. This is the most effective operating condition >90%.

You can bet SM had both nice magnetic audio amp and tube amps to play with:)

Because its class C the hardest part is getting the TPU to start so a magnet is required to sweep over the collectors to get the first pulse going then the mag-amp turns on and continues from there. SM always  carried several magnets around in his pocket one to set the bias and the other often cupped in his hands in case one of the TPU needs a kick start.

 Again the collector tanks run in high VARS to provide powerful magnetic field so a 1000 watt device will have least 10-20 KVARS in circulation.

Well as this thread is called the final design i just added my input again.

So if you REALLY want a TPU before the lights go out soon for whatever reason like solar storm, grid overload or even your heart says now is the time to do something we wasted enough time already. Whatever then donations are always welcome!

PS no deep bunker labs and NDA's please i had plenty of those offers already.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on July 20, 2010, 12:56:42 AM
@ Bolt

Can we get a schematic of your idea?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 20, 2010, 01:24:38 AM
This is my next try. 9vbat runs the whole deal.

I see a stun gun.

Found a gold mine:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.hvlabs.hu/zpe/Gruz/kapanadze.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.hvlabs.hu/zpe/Gruz/&h=2001&w=2625&sz=639&tbnid=PguRIFmh0F4n1M:&tbnh=114&tbnw=150&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dkapanadze&usg=__LpAjIxft1jD5UBhBeY-X6wu_pSI=&sa=X&ei=Et9ETJW3K8P98Ab8utXaAQ&ved=0CDAQ9QEwBg
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on July 20, 2010, 01:38:59 AM
@ Bolt
Can we get a schematic of your idea?

Ditto..............
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Motorcoach1 on July 20, 2010, 05:28:18 AM
Giantkiller, we must have had the same brain fart this week LOL , you are figureing what i am .
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 20, 2010, 06:06:53 AM
@Bolt,
Tres ditto. I am always learning. The last circuits I worked on with you were by far the most effective. From Those I have built products of far reaching capability.

@MC
Ah but the lowly spark has so much to offer. To conceive of a replacement would be the grandest of thinking.
Our lives are permeated by electrostatic processes of eV.

@All,
I would hate to think that we would spend our days blowing shit up.

So  I will mix the Kapanadze with the mag amp, the 5khz and the stungun. After all the transistor in the stungun does not drive the coils.
The 5khz DC(pulses above ground) produces a mag flux in one direction. The stun gun abruptly alters the domains. This would equate to electrostatic voltage of higher value. The capacitors will look like a continuous void with a load attached. And the greater the load... Correct me if I am wrong.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 20, 2010, 01:01:56 PM
@all

Did anyone check the magamp for OU , i would not be so fast to dismiss its potential . It is capable of gain , like a transistor or a valve .

I never ever heard the term collector coil , but my recent reading confirms its a magamp lingo ...

I wonder if rca ever played with those ... i sure found some interesting stuff looking for the answer with google patent .


this document is quite informative , it has many pages and enough information to build the magamp .
http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14180/css/14180_140.htm

I will start building one real soon .

Mark


http://www.google.com/patents?id=iQx0AAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=MAGNETIC+AMPLIFIER+rca&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q=MAGNETIC%20AMPLIFIER%20rca&f=false
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 20, 2010, 01:53:05 PM
"Tres ditto. I am always learning. The last circuits I worked on with you were by far the most effective. From Those I have built products of far reaching capability."

Well thats good to hear. BTW the circuit i already gave outline to which you build this FIRST! Then later you swap the FET for a pair of mag amp toroidal to do the switching instead of a FET and spend some time to get the bias perfected using PD divider and a magnet placed at 45 degrees and get it running in Class C!

No clearer i can be but requires only experienced  RF engineer. This is NOT a kapagen so only those with 20+ years experience plus a full lab need apply. DITTO SM remarks on this!!

Of course mag amps require an AC drive so you drive this circuit with 5Khz pump like SM does on all his TPU's and then you have everything you need to make a TPU including several 1000's VARS from a tiny battery!! You know what you get when you do this? DC with 5Khz hash on top.

As always RE = RF for ALL circuits of this nature i don't care if its a SS Bedinni, A Stiffler oscillator, an RV, a MEG or Kapanadze they are all the same. RF book rules apply standard no magic here only understanding the process. Don't believe me? fine go and watch Eric Dollard vids again and Don Smith. (not you GK i know you got a good handle on things) Even Newman knows how this works even though he has lost too many brain cells he realize long time ago you put a large coil into PF = 0 or VSWR ~ then you get huge VARS and a fking huge magnetic field.

GURUS like to call it other stuff to make it sound exciting like Lead Out, FLEET, Cold electricity, Tesla waves, scaler waves, vapor, ether, magic, and fking pixie dust! Its all the same thing.

OU is no secret too many here still wondering if it even exists!  FACT Rotoverter 3 phase motors looped several times now. Ask Stephan he knows:)

Im laying out the cards we wasted so much time and little time left. If any one REALLY wants a TPU then I will do it but i need 25k no strings donation to tool up for a full lab and parts. This is dirt cheap when others waste millions on saving the polar bears or other crap.

 Or do it  yourself im not bothered but only so much theory i can layout on the table.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on July 20, 2010, 02:58:22 PM
bolt
Quote:
If any one REALLY wants a TPU then I will do it but i need 25k no strings donation to tool up for a full lab and parts. This is dirt cheap when others waste millions on saving the polar bears or other crap.
-----------------------------
Make a list of what you need!
I have NO DOUBT! you will get your Lab!
While I am not a wealthy man, I will buy a piece![have done this before for other researchers and NEVER regretted it]
The polar bears will have to wait!

We do what we can!!

Besides I think it will cost "MUCH" less than you think!!

Chet
PS
Gk says bolt helped him!!
End of story!!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 03:09:15 PM
"Tres ditto. I am always learning. The last circuits I worked on with you were by far the most effective. From Those I have built products of far reaching capability."

Well thats good to hear. BTW the circuit i already gave outline to which you build this FIRST! Then later you swap the FET for a pair of mag amp toroidal to do the switching instead of a FET and spend some time to get the bias perfected using PD divider and a magnet placed at 45 degrees and get it running in Class C!

No clearer i can be but requires only experienced  RF engineer. This is NOT a kapagen so only those with 20+ years experience plus a full lab need apply. DITTO SM remarks on this!!

Of course mag amps require an AC drive so you drive this circuit with 5Khz pump like SM does on all his TPU's and then you have everything you need to make a TPU including several 1000's VARS from a tiny battery!! You know what you get when you do this? DC with 5Khz hash on top.

As always RE = RF for ALL circuits of this nature i don't care if its a SS Bedinni, A Stiffler oscillator, an RV, a MEG or Kapanadze they are all the same. RF book rules apply standard no magic here only understanding the process. Don't believe me? fine go and watch Eric Dollard vids again and Don Smith. (not you GK i know you got a good handle on things) Even Newman knows how this works even though he has lost too many brain cells he realize long time ago you put a large coil into PF >0 or VSWR ~ then you get huge VARS and a fking huge magnetic field.

GURUS like to call it other stuff to make it sound exciting like Lead Out, FLEET, Cold electricity, Tesla waves, scaler waves, vapor, ether, magic, and fking pixie dust! Its all the same thing.

OU is no secret too many here still wondering if it even exists!  FACT Rotoverter 3 phase motors looped several times now. Ask Stephan he knows:)

Im laying out the cards we wasted so much time and little time left. If any one REALLY wants a TPU then I will do it but i need 25k no strings donation to tool up for a full lab and parts. This is dirt cheap when others waste millions on saving the polar bears or other crap.

 Or do it  yourself im not bothered but only so much theory i can layout on the table.

Stop spreading your disinformation!  Everything you say about these devices is totally wrong.  If you would try to build any of these devices you would know that you don't know anything about them.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on July 20, 2010, 05:25:47 PM
@Gobaga,

So you know how it works to discount Bolts design/concept? You have built something already? Please share it then.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 20, 2010, 06:21:07 PM
Of any of the suggestions that Bolt has offered there is depth to them. Maybe its just me but I only need a chink on the armor to gain access to the whole suite. One day I will list the series of events that happened from reading and accepting the nuggets thrown at us. Truly mind boggling. With the Class a amp that Bolt and I talked about, then I helped IST, then ISt helped others with his sound demos(Hey! We are all odd so get over it.) Then the 3 channel sound generation lead to the Keely controller. And now I over look Red Rock natural amphitheater from my bench. Red Rock, you say? A crystaline makeup close to quartz. Just like Keely disassociated in the San Fransisco gold mine with his sound generation. I only need to change the output structure of my device to disassociate the whole Red park and walk away with the gold from there. Kinda like a Hutchison demo. 8)
For those of you who disbelieve then go be foolish somewhere else. For when one can not dream they cease to live. This is the best adventure on the planet, almost ever...
Bolt does not need my protection. I am only stressing a boundary against the naysayers.

Let the bullshit eaters consume this:


PS
Gk says bolt helped him!!
End of story!!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 06:35:10 PM
25k for a lab and he can build you a TPU - ROFLMAO!!!

I leave you all to your respective disillusions.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 06:39:32 PM
Of any of the suggestions that Bolt has offered there is depth to them. Maybe its just me but I only need a chink on the armor to gain access to the whole suite. One day I will list the series of events that happened from reading and accepting the nuggets thrown at us. Truly mind boggling. With the Class a amp that Bolt and I talked about, then I helped IST, then ISt helped others with his sound demos(Hey! We are all odd so get over it.) Then the 3 channel sound generation lead to the Keely controller. And now I over look Red Rock natural amphitheater from my bench. Red Rock, you say? A crystaline makeup close to quartz. Just like Keely disassociated in the San Fransisco gold mine with his sound generation. I only need to change the output structure of my device to disassociate the whole Red park and walk away with the gold from there. Kinda like a Hutchison demo. 8)
For those of you who disbelieve then go be foolish somewhere else. For when one can not dream they cease to live. This is the best adventure on the planet, almost ever...
Bolt does not need my protection. I am only stressing a boundary against the naysayers.

Let the bullshit eaters consume this:

You, of all people here, should not be so gullible.

EDIT:

The stun gun was a great idea and you should have had not problem getting RE with that.  RE is definitely NOT RF!  They have nothing in common - like apples and oranges.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 20, 2010, 06:40:59 PM
This dismissal was cheaper than a 9v battery.

Obvisouly there are those that don't realize the stungun built large enough can be a 'weapon of mass destruction' with a 9 volt battery.

25k for a lab and he can build you a TPU - ROFLMAO!!!

I leave you all to your respective disillusions.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 06:45:06 PM
You GK, of all people here, should not be so gullible.

EDIT:

The stun gun was a great idea and you should have had not problem getting RE with that.  RE is definitely NOT RF!  They have nothing in common - like apples and oranges.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: steeltpu on July 20, 2010, 07:09:58 PM
Gobaga,  Can we call you Mr. Negative?  What really is your purpose here?  Some quotes from your messages here:

"What a fukin' dipshit.  Blame others for his in-breading and self-professed-ignorance. "

"Pull the trigger next time dumb-ass. "

"good luck with your attempt to win a "Darwin Award"."

"I leave you all to your respective disillusions."

"Don't rely on others to prove all of your false talk, insolent troll!"

"Stop spreading your disinformation!  Everything you say about these devices is totally wrong.  If you would try to build any of these devices you would know that you don't know anything about them."

And like bolt said it is a good sign we are getting close when you have upped your attacks so much recently.  I think everyone can see where you are coming from.  Now how about if you GO away BAGA shit.   ROTFLOL at how obvious you are dude.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 20, 2010, 07:51:58 PM
Okay thread banger: I am not gullible. I send no money. I have the basic drivers to numerous items on this sight. Have I shared? Why, yes all of them. Have I demoed the process? Why, yes all of them. Are the potentials real? Those that can't see the plain truth will forever bitch about their plight.
Did you ever see the Twilight issue titled 'Kick the can'?
You're due.

You, of all people here, should not be so gullible.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 08:03:56 PM
Gobaga,  Can we call you Mr. Negative?  What really is your purpose here?  Some quotes from your messages here:

"What a fukin' dipshit.  Blame others for his in-breading and self-professed-ignorance. "

"Pull the trigger next time dumb-ass. "

"good luck with your attempt to win a "Darwin Award"."

"I leave you all to your respective disillusions."

"Don't rely on others to prove all of your false talk, insolent troll!"

"Stop spreading your disinformation!  Everything you say about these devices is totally wrong.  If you would try to build any of these devices you would know that you don't know anything about them."

And like bolt said it is a good sign we are getting close when you have upped your attacks so much recently.  I think everyone can see where you are coming from.  Now how about if you GO away BAGA shit.   ROTFLOL at how obvious you are dude.

To the loser with 2 posts:
Asinus asinum fricat
Pacta sunt servanda


GK:
You have been spinning in circles since GK4.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 20, 2010, 08:08:17 PM
True and yes I have.  ;)

I never agreed that RF was RE. But the same frequency, one goes parallel and one goes perpendicular.
It this test over now?

To the loser with 2 posts:
Asinus asinum fricat
Pacta sunt servanda


GK:
You have been spinning in circles since GK4.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 20, 2010, 08:40:17 PM
Why we can't understand each other ? Towel of Babel.
All I can say is : follow the nature. Gobaga is right but also bolt is right.
I suppose that you have to have at least two RE to create RF and when created it "eats" all energy because it is balanced state.RE is unbalanced up to the ambient source filling the gap.
In other word : RE is unipolar while RF is constantly changing face from magnetic to electric ; if you stress magnetic electric change to maintain balance and vice versa
From RE being unipolar there could be at least two kinds : electric and magnetic, but magnetic probably really fast decay into normal RF. I imagine that most stable RE would be reverse of electric current where electric or dielectric rotational field flows longitudinally while magnetic field is concentrated inside tubular flow.
Exactly opposite to what we see in electric current.

he he another crap theory  ;D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 20, 2010, 09:28:14 PM
@all

I got to say i am quite disappointed in the Tpu elite , ego starved knows it all running after there tails , when you start thinking that Ist is right you got problems . And even bigger if you ignore the jt because ist is talking about a Joule thief.

The only thing we know for sure about the tpu is the mag amp , usually this tread is quite slow , i make on comment about the mag amp it get berried in less then a day , the facts are that before 1954 this technology was revolutionary they started hiding it October 1954 .

And we are looking for hidden stuff ...

It can be used as a dimmer or amplifier , there are audio amp magamp 2 stages sold for close to 20 000 dollars .

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 09:37:19 PM
Here is the "source" of Bolt's "vast knowledge" - which, by the way is all BS:

http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Combine.pdf

The least he could do is give credit for his plagarism to Dan Combine.

An excerpt from page 5:

Quote
With theoretical ideal components, the signal decay is 0, and the resonance does not fade out. In reality no component is ideal (all of them have some resistance), as such the impedance resistive will never be 0, but the lower the better. As RE (Radiant Energy) is RF, we need a deep knowledge in RF practice, resonance Q, antenna multiplication factors, dipole dynamics, standing wave theories, thermodynamic delta transform & others. It’s an electrical equivalent of the acoustics (sound) laws.

Another excerpt from the same page:

Quote
In low impedance OU goes unnoticed, as it is lost to resistance and impedance mismatch, but at HI impedances the amplification effect becomes evident. The SECRET to PURE magnetic amplification is the HI impedance factor found in "Roto-conversion". This is one of the factors that create Over-unity. OU is in resonance; the higher the Q the closer to self sustaining within proper elements. In RESONANCE power can be EXTRACTED, even if theory says PF is 0 and power does not exist (but is there). COLD electricity is under RESONANT
conditions (Tensor) nodes. Add to it permanent magnet rotors and PF correction in hi impedance mode, it becomes an EMA device.

Anyone who has been in the game for a few years knows that this document is incorrect.    RE is not RF, and cold electricity is not some sort of under-resonant condition.

If you are going to follow the BS that bolt is spreading, at least give credit to the source of the BS.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 20, 2010, 09:57:18 PM
Gobaga

Criticize is easy.Give us your theory about what RE is.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 10:17:38 PM
Gobaga

Criticize is easy.Give us your theory about what RE is.

I'm not criticizing.  I'm merely exposing the plagiarising imposter.

As for what RE is, you will have to "earn" that bit of knowledge.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bboj on July 20, 2010, 10:24:17 PM
At least in relation to RE I think gobaga is right. It is not RF
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 20, 2010, 10:34:06 PM
At least in relation to RE I think gobaga is right. It is not RF

I KNOW THAT! Any better comment ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 20, 2010, 10:38:39 PM
I see that most posters here think that following an individual is a necessity. A simple word or praise to an individual for a nugget promotes a lifelong following. Sheesh. I don't know what drives that kind of thinking but I don't subscribe to it. So if I give a thank you or good note doesnt mean I got a new religious figure in my life. Sharing info also includes sharing the times.
It is about the information and the builds.
Previous builders of yester year are gone because they never signed up for the 'Rode hard and put away wet' rodeo that goes on here.
And after this session today do we have to go through the branding and cattle poking to get the correct info made public?
But I guess I am on the "merry go 'round sit-n-spin" with no brass ring in sight?

To the valid posters i give a whole hearted thanks. I have my plan from your posts.

Why the contention about RE / RF? Produce it and move on.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 20, 2010, 10:44:31 PM
All knowledge is acquired from somewhere through ones own experience or what we have been taught. The fact the columbine document has it in there is not plagiarism it just happens to show the information i'm giving is correct!

As google picks up the words I'm using of course if you do a search you will find related material. BUT its information stored in my head as knowledge its been there for many many years maybe even longer then the columbine document even written i don't know and don't really care.

If i said RE was orgone then a google search would pull up hundred pages on orgone. Would that make we wrong and a plagiarist?

While you at it don't just pick up one sheet of paper go and watch Eric Dollard at the Radio HAM conference search for it as you are good at searching ONE sheet of paper. He tells you you get RE = RLC RF = trashed VSWR! Now i don't give a rats ass if you are taking about a 5Hz signal or 5 GHz the method of generation the conditions for RE is exactly the same using book applied RF principles.

GO and watch he Eric Dollard vid and im not mentioning this no more. If you want to believe RE is found using other methods ..........fine whatever you like believe what you want.

This is direct out of wiki. Sorry i STOLE it

"Ferro-resonance occurs when an unloaded 3-phase system consisting of an inductive and a capacitive component is interrupted by single phase means. In practice this is typical of a high voltage electrical distribution network of transformers  (inductive component) and power cables (capacitive component). If such a network has no load and the applied voltage is then interrupted on a single phase, a ferroresonance may be observed. ;D If the remaining phases are not interrupted and the phenomenon continues, overvoltage can lead to the breakdown of insulation in connected components resulting in failure."

Now any smart people here know what has happened to create ferroresonance? Let me make it real simple RLC went into a power factor Zero using book applied RF conditions and created the conditions to make RE.  The RE caused the extreme power increase and creates the damage to the circuits and transformers etc. This can easy be created and tapped, stored, collected and looped. Yes its pure RE and the transformers can suddenly see a COP>20!! Go and try it go find a 3 phase transformer, bigger the better they go RE very easy due to the mass of iron one precision ping will shake the thing to bits the iron screams and pumps RE.

The text books like you to believe that  ferro-resonance is some random ad hoc event like lightning and is hard to reproduce. But why go looking for it UNLESS you want to make RE of course! LOL

The electric companies know this they spend all their time trying to STOP RE from happening. To them its a pain in the arse having stuff explode and trip out because Radiant Energy pumped mega joules into the grid.

BTW Please don't go down the road the TPU has iron wire, or iron cores etc we been here may times and there are lots of ways to skin a cat. FR is only one such method.


By why waste time teaching the same old stuff over and over to non believers and saboteurs??!

Now as I'm also a HAM i used to be active back in the late 80's, trained EE tech, i worked on military transponders, radar, microwave, cellphones and towers, i spent a few years working on old TV's part time while doing my training. I love old tube stuff but of course don't see much of it any more. I think im qualified enough to pull information,  swirl it around in my head discard any crap and pass good judgment.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 20, 2010, 11:40:51 PM
I'm done talking to you gents. 

Best of luck to all of ya. 

You'll have to get your hands dirty to figure out what RE is.  Ya can't understand it by reading.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 20, 2010, 11:48:17 PM
I'm done talking to you gents. 

Best of luck to all of ya. 

You'll have to get your hands dirty to figure out what RE is.  Ya can't understand it by reading.

Now we put YOU on the spot to describe RE or how to make it, extract it, utilize it, describe it you can't! Have no choice but to leave the scene because you bring nothing of value to the table. I read back thru some of your posts and i see not ONE bit of information NOT one tiny weeny scrap of anything of any value anywhere. Just page after page of negative statements and trolling.

Good bye Gobaga we all going to miss you terribly. :'(
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on July 21, 2010, 12:01:28 AM
bolt
Quote:RE Gobaga,
Now we put YOU on the spot to describe RE or how to make it, extract it, utilize it, describe it you can't! Have no choice but to leave the scene because you bring nothing of value to the table. I read back thru some of your posts and i see not ONE bit of information NOT one tiny weeny scrap of anything of any value anywhere.
-----------------------------------

Not a scrap!
Just  taunts![like this example]

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: tak22 on July 21, 2010, 12:22:46 AM

As for what RE is, you will have to "earn" that bit of knowledge.

hmm, we just lost another "I know it but ain't telling" character.

Not that much of a loss now is it? It's simple, say or go away.

I learn from those that contribute and I make my own assessment
of what they say.

tak
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 21, 2010, 12:34:16 AM
Just another pothole in the path, thats all.
We jump over and move on.
I will post my Kapanadze test. Just a stun gun with the large caps and then bridge. The bridge can be swapped out with coil configs.

Correct me if I am wrong here but I seem to see that the faster the energy is the more the caps want to suck it up. That is where the ghost charge comes from. These loose ends keep popping up.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 21, 2010, 12:39:09 AM
bolt
Quote:RE Gobaga,
Now we put YOU on the spot to describe RE or how to make it, extract it, utilize it, describe it you can't! Have no choice but to leave the scene because you bring nothing of value to the table. I read back thru some of your posts and i see not ONE bit of information NOT one tiny weeny scrap of anything of any value anywhere.
-----------------------------------

Not a scrap!
Just  taunts![like this example]

Chet

Hey Chet,

Are you still part of that Mossad Group out of Canada?  Too bad Buzz isn;t around to ride you like a rented mule - LOL!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 21, 2010, 12:44:10 AM
Now we put YOU on the spot to describe RE or how to make it, extract it, utilize it, describe it you can't! Have no choice but to leave the scene because you bring nothing of value to the table. I read back thru some of your posts and i see not ONE bit of information NOT one tiny weeny scrap of anything of any value anywhere. Just page after page of negative statements and trolling.

Good bye Gobaga we all going to miss you terribly. :'(

Didn't you explain RE in your diatribe?  Didn't you proclaim what it is and how it is produced?  Show us the goods then, oh yeah you need $25k for a lab first.

I posted a while back that "sparks" had it figured out, but you all missed it because you were too busy spreading misinformation.

@GK
Do yourself a favor and leave these losers behind.  They are holding you back.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on July 21, 2010, 12:45:29 AM
Gobaga
I do miss"The BUZZ"
But I also sleep on a bed of nails at night ,
And come here for relaxing dialogue [not]

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 21, 2010, 01:51:23 AM
What other measurement is there than to replace the spark gap with tensors/ev?

Didn't you explain RE in your diatribe?  Didn't you proclaim what it is and how it is produced?  Show us the goods then, oh yeah you need $25k for a lab first.

I posted a while back that "sparks" had it figured out, but you all missed it because you were too busy spreading misinformation.

@GK
Do yourself a favor and leave these losers behind.  They are holding you back.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on July 21, 2010, 03:18:10 AM
I understood all of this thread except everything after post #1. lol

Just jok'in around @GK. Don't you love it?

OK, maybe I am the slow one, but for the benefit of the readers, in general writing practice, when you want to use an abbreviation for the first time, especially the 2 letter ones because they can be confused with so many other usages, you first write it in the long form then follow it with the abbreviation in parenthesis. Example: Rat Excrement (RE) or Rat Feces (RF). That's what I though you guys were arguing about. Based on the above usage of the abbreviations, then RE=RF. What else is there? OK, don't answer that.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on July 21, 2010, 04:16:40 AM
Sup

very funny!!

Chet



                                                                                   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: BEP on July 21, 2010, 04:43:54 AM
The fact the columbine document has ...

Columbine?

Quote
While you at it don't just pick up one sheet of paper go and watch Eric Dollard at the Radio HAM conference search for it as you are good at searching ONE sheet of paper. He tells you you get RE = RLC RF = trashed VSWR! Now i don't give a rats ass if you are taking about a 5Hz signal or 5 GHz the method of generation the conditions for RE is exactly the same using book applied RF principles.

GO and watch he Eric Dollard vid and im not mentioning this no more. If you want to believe RE is found using other methods ..........fine whatever you like believe what you want.


Quote
"Ferro-resonance occurs when an unloaded 3-phase system consisting of an inductive and a capacitive component is interrupted by single phase means. In practice this is typical of a high voltage electrical distribution network of transformers  (inductive component) and power cables (capacitive component). If such a network has no load and the applied voltage is then interrupted on a single phase, a ferroresonance may be observed. ;D If the remaining phases are not interrupted and the phenomenon continues, overvoltage can lead to the breakdown of insulation in connected components resulting in failure."

Now any smart people here know what has happened to create ferroresonance? Let me make it real simple RLC went into a power factor Zero using book applied RF conditions and created the conditions to make RE.  The RE caused the extreme power increase and creates the damage to the circuits and transformers etc. This can easy be created and tapped, stored, collected and looped. Yes its pure RE and the transformers can suddenly see a COP>20!! Go and try it go find a 3 phase transformer, bigger the better they go RE very easy due to the mass of iron one precision ping will shake the thing to bits the iron screams and pumps RE.

The text books like you to believe that  ferro-resonance is some random ad hoc event like lightning and is hard to reproduce. But why go looking for it UNLESS you want to make RE of course! LOL

The electric companies know this they spend all their time trying to STOP RE from happening. To them its a pain in the arse having stuff explode and trip out because Radiant Energy pumped mega joules into the grid.

Quote
Now as I'm also a HAM i used to be active back in the late 80's....

No-code Technician class, I presume.

Quote
I think im qualified enough to pull information,  swirl it around in my head discard any crap and pass good judgment.

May I suggest a bit less swirling?

The difference between RE and RF is about the same as comparing SunShine to a Flowing River. They aren't the same thing either, or are they? Come on, say it..... SS=FR!

Oh well! Throw them some abbreviations with some acronyms mixed in. It tends to calm them down  :D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: BEP on July 21, 2010, 04:50:25 AM
Rat Excrement (RE) or Rat Feces (RF).

THANK THE HEAVENS! @Wattsup, you have clarified this for me, FINALLY.

All this time I thought he was talking about radiant energy and radio frequency. No wonder I couldn't follow the thought. Man! You know how I have trouble with all the abbreviations for TPUs? Well, same for RE & RF. Thanks to you, it is clear and making sense now  ???
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 21, 2010, 06:24:54 AM
I was going to reply in more detail. I cant be bothered. I am surprised even those with 1500+ post on here don't know what RF OU and RE means nor can the majority even grasp that simple RF principle is the path to RE. (radiant energy) You see you don't need to know what RE actually is only how to get it when you want some and that is RF=RE. Its not supposed to be literal its a simile. It breaks down all the hype and BS and tells you how to extract RE.....you apply simple RF understanding.

No surprise the TPU has remained hidden for 20 years and and that rate another 20+ will pass. Maybe the launch date is 2050.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MrMag on July 21, 2010, 06:54:12 AM
I agree with you Bolt. But I do have a question for whoever started this thread. After following the 46 pages of the thread, when are we going to see "The final design". Isn't that part of the thread subject?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 21, 2010, 11:17:06 AM
    If we push a child upon a swing the child goes higher and higher.  The energy shifting between kinetic and potential.  If the child gets high enough on the swing to pick an apple off a nearby tree at the apex then the potential energy of the apple is added to the system.  Soon you had better back off because now your 60lb child is slowly turning into a 300 lb gorilla.  She need not even hold on to all the apples just let them go near the ground each cycle and she will go faster and higher or she can hold on to them and letem go all at once whatever.  You dont have to push the swing anymore.  The swing starts to push you with the energy flowing into the system from the potential energy of the plucked apples.  In the second law of thermal dynamics it is stated that the Universe does not like to have a highly condensed field of energy.  It wants the energy density at every point in the Universe to be the same.  This describes a totally radiant Universe becoming larger and cooler.  You strike a match here on this little planet eventually the Universe will distribute this action to all points.  This would create a scalar potential energy density throughout the Universe.  Lot of players out there striking lots of matches which at least locally increases the scalar energy density.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 21, 2010, 11:59:03 AM
.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Hoppy on July 21, 2010, 12:58:28 PM
It amazes me how many words have been written in the various TPU threads. None of this has changed my mind that the TPU is most likely a clever device concealing some type of inverter. The small TPU is so small its hard to imagine that there is much complexity to it or advanced citcuitry in it.

Hoppy.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 21, 2010, 01:18:01 PM
    If we push a child upon a swing the child goes higher and higher.  The energy shifting between kinetic and potential.  If the child gets high enough on the swing to pick an apple off a nearby tree at the apex then the potential energy of the apple is added to the system.  Soon you had better back off because now your 60lb child is slowly turning into a 300 lb gorilla.  She need not even hold on to all the apples just let them go near the ground each cycle and she will go faster and higher or she can hold on to them and letem go all at once whatever.  You dont have to push the swing anymore.  The swing starts to push you with the energy flowing into the system from the potential energy of the plucked apples.  In the second law of thermal dynamics it is stated that the Universe does not like to have a highly condensed field of energy.  It wants the energy density at every point in the Universe to be the same.  This describes a totally radiant Universe becoming larger and cooler.  You strike a match here on this little planet eventually the Universe will distribute this action to all points.  This would create a scalar potential energy density throughout the Universe.  Lot of players out there striking lots of matches which at least locally increases the scalar energy density.


This is where mag amp has its place.But RE is from conversion at correct moment.It's a time machine.
Using mag amp or other way you have to have exponential resonance interruped at peak moments radiating RE and quickly recover high energy state.


P.S. IMHO this is the real reason why TPU output is modulated at 5khz
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on July 21, 2010, 02:35:23 PM
@bolt

My post was not designed to mock you. I have been researching the TPUs for a good while now and have stumbled on something that I think will create some great havoc for many members regarding SMs OTPU, and I just needed to let out some steam. When this argument of RE/RF started, it just clicked.

Personally, I did not know what the RF meant. I was thinking Radiant Force, Radiant Field or something like that but would not have considered RE close to Radio Frequency. So since guys rarely declare their abbreviations (abs), I mean when there are two letters that can be confusing, just spell it out from the start. I am not saying do it with longer abs. Like OTPU (hint-hint) or NASA.

Now to just say RE=RF is an absolute declaration and this I have extreme problem to accept it at face value. If you said (RF=RE minus the "sting"), then I would start being in more agreement. Any energy form that is actually being conveyed through open air, open space could fall into that same category with their own nuances attached.

Compare it to light and one could say UV=GAMMA, they are both light.
Ice=Steam, they are both water.

Oh, Oh I'm sure @sparks in getting his pencil sharpened.

@all

I just made a video on the OTPU 60 watt bulb brightness comparisons. Very boring I know. lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3uICYap92g

I will be posting a rather long OTPU demo workings explanation tonight or tomorrow on my Understanding thread. Hope it does not ruffle up too many feathers.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 21, 2010, 06:17:58 PM
I was going to reply in more detail. I cant be bothered. I am surprised even those with 1500+ post on here don't know what RF OU and RE means nor can the majority even grasp that simple RF principle is the path to RE. (radiant energy) You see you don't need to know what RE actually is only how to get it when you want some and that is RF=RE. Its not supposed to be literal its a simile. It breaks down all the hype and BS and tells you how to extract RE.....you apply simple RF understanding.

No surprise the TPU has remained hidden for 20 years and and that rate another 20+ will pass. Maybe the launch date is 2050.
Exactly what I had always assumed you meant when you said RF=RE.  People need to realize this is a discussion forum and not your college physics or calculus book.  Thank goodness as those books were way to dry whereas this forum has a flare that adds fun to things.  The only downside is some get confused too easily.  That may be good though as we don't want the easily confused playing with mega-power devices ;)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: gyulasun on July 21, 2010, 08:34:12 PM
....
I just made a video on the OTPU 60 watt bulb brightness comparisons. Very boring I know. lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T3uICYap92g
....

Good job, thanks.

Bulb's nonlinear behavior can clearly be seen when comparing the change in brightness versus its input power when the voltage part of the latter went down to 60-70V and lower, linearly, as you controlled it and brightness diminished much faster.  If someone is not aware of this he can easily get fooled by using only bulbs for figuring out output power, for a few Volts difference may yield 10-15W difference easily. Of course this mistake can be reduced by 'calibrating' the bulb's known DC input power versus a lux meter and always use the lux meter when unknown power is fed into the bulb. LEDs can also be 'calibrated' this way by lux meter, but LEDs have a huge fooling possibility if someone is not aware of it:  LEDs consume current ONLY when the voltage amplitude feeding the LEDs is just above the forward voltage, under it the LED does not conduct, hence only the output waveform peaks (either the negative or positive peaks as the LED diode direction lets it) are loaded!

rgds, Gyula
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 21, 2010, 08:56:44 PM
RF equals Tidal wave, RE equals Rogue wave. The final design is not only in this thread but all the other threads not just as puzzles pieces but as whole pictures which spell out the keys needed. You can do this process by spark gap or by domain flipping(some won't like this term). For the vulgar we'll call it 'Shock the monkey'.
The thread name is 'Final design' not 'Final product'.

Now this process can be run with current(Edison) or excited by electrostatics(Tesla or Dollard).
The GK4 test way back when was a current and electrostatic based test regime. When the phasing is off we use current but the closer the phasing(but not bang on) the closer to electrostatic/kinetic the process gets. This happens because of the eclisping of positive / negative or expanding / decreasing fields over different types of material. In the GK4 build it was copper and iron. Two different hysteresis curves, inpedances, resistances, atomic structures, ad infinitum.
The Kapanadze devices show 9 volt battery and lead cells. Look at how the devices run loads. The 9v run filament bulbs. Why? No real load, purely excitation. The small TPUs run loads of filament bulbs. Why? No real load, purely excitation.
Kinetic? Do ya feel the particles?

I did the stungun based Kapanadze test. See attached.
Rememer: Tesla employed multiple stages of spark gaps in 1 circuit. What you don't see is the higher and higher graduating levels of sparkage or the wire gauges.

Bolt was right. Here is fortune cookie wisdom: He who bangs coils, bangs head. He who sings coils saves head. Ray Bradbury was correct too in : 'I sing 'the body' electric'.

You will never find power as long as you keep searching for it. This is not about squeezing power from power. The power is a lower, later stage of the process. Tesla: 'Exceedingly high speed voltage and high speed currents'. He did not say current. Tensors not conduction.

It is not the tidal waves that breaks the ship but the rogue wave eclipse point that disassociates the material.


p.s. It is not about finding the correct components to achieve the correct power but the choosing the correct components that can handle the achievement.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on July 22, 2010, 12:53:29 AM
RF equals Tidal wave, RE equals Rogue wave. The final design is not only in this thread but all the other threads not just as puzzles pieces but as whole pictures which spell out the keys needed. You can do this process by spark gap or by domain flipping(some won't like this term). For the vulgar we'll call it 'Shock the monkey'.
The thread name is 'Final design' not 'Final product'.

Now this process can be run with current(Edison) or excited by electrostatics(Tesla or Dollard).
The GK4 test way back when was a current and electrostatic based test regime. When the phasing is off we use current but the closer the phasing(but not bang on) the closer to electrostatic/kinetic the process gets. This happens because of the eclisping of positive / negative or expanding / decreasing fields over different types of material. In the GK4 build it was copper and iron. Two different hysteresis curves, inpedances, resistances, atomic structures, ad infinitum.
The Kapanadze devices show 9 volt battery and lead cells. Look at how the devices run loads. The 9v run filament bulbs. Why? No real load, purely excitation. The small TPUs run loads of filament bulbs. Why? No real load, purely excitation.
Kinetic? Do ya feel the particles?

I did the stungun based Kapanadze test. See attached.
Rememer: Tesla employed multiple stages of spark gaps in 1 circuit. What you don't see is the higher and higher graduating levels of sparkage or the wire gauges.

Bolt was right. Here is fortune cookie wisdom: He who bangs coils, bangs head. He who sings coils saves head. Ray Bradbury was correct too in : 'I sing 'the body' electric'.

You will never find power as long as you keep searching for it. This is not about squeezing power from power. The power is a lower, later stage of the process. Tesla: 'Exceedingly high speed voltage and high speed currents'. He did not say current. Tensors not conduction.

It is not the tidal waves that breaks the ship but the rogue wave eclipse point that disassociates the material.


p.s. It is not about finding the correct components to achieve the correct power but the choosing the correct components that can handle the achievement.

GK put your diodes the other way to collect RE. The ground is POSITIVE so the cap to be charged is positive ground. The negative is air side and the cap charges to minus 6000 volts relative the ground. The PSU MUST float above ground so you can only use batteries.

The Radiant energy is positive and will refill the cap BACK TO ZERO. The refill is cold electricity. Everyone always puts their diodes around the wrong way and uses convention to make the earth 0 volts.

If a cap is charged negative to ground the RE being positive dont like displacement and will refill the cap as opposites attract.

By convention a positive charge cap REPELLS a radiant positive charge and leads to total waste.

The top of a storm cloud is positive charge. The base is negative the ground below that cloud goes positive relatively speaking.

This is why if you do this right you can be struck by lightning. SM told you this and ask Bob Boyce his lab was struck by lightning several times.

The only other person that tends to get this right is John Bedini. Don Smith knows but he deliberately laid out his circuits in reverse polarity to "protect investors".
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 22, 2010, 04:00:05 AM
  In the below Tesla patent there are a number of interesting things.  What I find most interesting is that if ac is used to deliver power to the working circuit you need two air gaps.  Whereas if dc is used you just need one.  I seriously doubt that more than one gap at a time is active.  So we need only worry about one form of electricity doing any moving about in these circuits.  Another interesting thing about this patent is the disclosure that Tesla was working with megahertz way back there.  He also states that time is gained while the portion of the circuit l is propogating a high resistance to the pulses from the sparkgap.  The capacitor is accruing the pulses from the spark gap the coil of highself induction is also charging the cap.  The electricty flowing into the coil induces a magnetic field change which induces a voltage that is counter to the exciting voltage.  So what we have now is two scources of emf dumping into the capacitor one from the sparkgap and the counteremf of the inductor.  The voltage on the capacitor rises until it  overcomes the resitance of the load.  So for each pulse from the spark gap and there is a boattload of them results in gaining the amount of charge going into the one capacitor plate over that directly conveyed by the gap.  It really doesnt matter if a loop current forms after l at all.  This is simply series resonance at high frequency.  The spark gap capacitively couples the generator with the working circuit.   As the air ionizes it takes the plates that are very close to begin with an moves them even closer.  At some point the gap between the moving capacitor plate (hot electrons in the plasma) and the stationary one is so close that the electrons in the plasma force charge to be conveyed to the working electrode.  Electricity can move faster than the speed of light because it is a force in motion not mass in motion but a a force in motion.  Quantom physics will say that it is the virtual particles that move so I guess electricity is made up of a flow of virtual particles that create the charge which the electron carry and the protons carry.  This is what constitutes an electrical current.  This flow of virtual particles that give birth to negative and positive charge.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MrMag on July 22, 2010, 06:15:43 AM
Sparks,

In the patent he mentions that one or both "B" can have a spark gap. I don't think it is meant for AC or DC, he doesn't mention it. Most of his patents mentions the supply as a generator of high tension. He used both AC and DC in his experiments. As far as the time being gained, he was speaking at the moment about a single pulse. When this pulse happens, no current will flow in branch "L" as it is being absorbed by the condenser. I don't see where he mentions that time is gained while the portion of the circuit is propagating a high resistance to the pulse of the spark gap??

@All

When reading Tesla's patents, just try to read and understand what he is saying. Too many people try to interpret what he saying and that just complicates the things that aren't complicated. This is one of his more simple patents. You may have to read it a few times but there is nothing there but an explanation of the circuit and it's operation.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 22, 2010, 03:22:39 PM
GK put your diodes the other way to collect RE. The ground is POSITIVE so the cap to be charged is positive ground. The negative is air side and the cap charges to minus 6000 volts relative the ground. The PSU MUST float above ground so you can only use batteries.

The Radiant energy is positive and will refill the cap BACK TO ZERO. The refill is cold electricity. Everyone always puts their diodes around the wrong way and uses convention to make the earth 0 volts.

If a cap is charged negative to ground the RE being positive dont like displacement and will refill the cap as opposites attract.

By convention a positive charge cap REPELLS a radiant positive charge and leads to total waste.

The top of a storm cloud is positive charge. The base is negative the ground below that cloud goes positive relatively speaking.

This is why if you do this right you can be struck by lightning. SM told you this and ask Bob Boyce his lab was struck by lightning several times.

The only other person that tends to get this right is John Bedini. Don Smith knows but he deliberately laid out his circuits in reverse polarity to "protect investors".

RE and "diode" do not belong in the same sentence.  RE has nothing to do with diodes.

You might want to try some of the things you recommend, before you recommend them. 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Gobaga on July 22, 2010, 03:26:36 PM
  In the below Tesla patent there are a number of interesting things.  What I find most interesting is that if ac is used to deliver power to the working circuit you need two air gaps.  Whereas if dc is used you just need one.  I seriously doubt that more than one gap at a time is active.  So we need only worry about one form of electricity doing any moving about in these circuits.  Another interesting thing about this patent is the disclosure that Tesla was working with megahertz way back there.  He also states that time is gained while the portion of the circuit l is propogating a high resistance to the pulses from the sparkgap.  The capacitor is accruing the pulses from the spark gap the coil of highself induction is also charging the cap.  The electricty flowing into the coil induces a magnetic field change which induces a voltage that is counter to the exciting voltage.  So what we have now is two scources of emf dumping into the capacitor one from the sparkgap and the counteremf of the inductor.  The voltage on the capacitor rises until it  overcomes the resitance of the load.  So for each pulse from the spark gap and there is a boattload of them results in gaining the amount of charge going into the one capacitor plate over that directly conveyed by the gap.  It really doesnt matter if a loop current forms after l at all.  This is simply series resonance at high frequency.  The spark gap capacitively couples the generator with the working circuit.   As the air ionizes it takes the plates that are very close to begin with an moves them even closer.  At some point the gap between the moving capacitor plate (hot electrons in the plasma) and the stationary one is so close that the electrons in the plasma force charge to be conveyed to the working electrode.  Electricity can move faster than the speed of light because it is a force in motion not mass in motion but a a force in motion.  Quantom physics will say that it is the virtual particles that move so I guess electricity is made up of a flow of virtual particles that create the charge which the electron carry and the protons carry.  This is what constitutes an electrical current.  This flow of virtual particles that give birth to negative and positive charge.

All Tesla is talking about in this patent is changing the frequency of the oscillation in different parts of a circuit by changing the parameters of the circuit in the location that you want to be different.

Nice blurb on the virtual particles and force in motion - really diggin' that.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 22, 2010, 06:28:55 PM
Bolt's statement about reversing the diodes is not to charge 'up' the cap from the circuit source but to place a reverse pressure on the cap to create a larger void than it is already. Once the pressure is released the cap will return to balance or zero. This still creates activity on the coils. IMHO.
Jason and I both have seen diodes act as straight conductors in both directions with RE, acts like a wire. Since this is the case as the RE conducts to any metal(Telsa sparking doorknobs). It will then balance or charge the cap. I see the cap as a huge, high speed receiving antenna.

Refer: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=8227.0;attach=46340
In the first unit the cap is not being overutilized therefore the spark doesn't jump. The stun gun doesn't have enough output or tensor. That is why I put the diode there as a reminder to put that in the circuit next. The 2nd unit shows the spark. I will also replace the cap at the end with a sparkgap.
I will also replace the 1.5 inch 1:1(22awg:22awg/ferrite) magamp with a 3.5 inch 1:20(22awg:30awg/iron) magamp.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 23, 2010, 06:28:13 AM
The basic law of electromagnetic induction is the faster you interrupt a current the higher the voltage induced.  The higher the voltage the more current will insue through a resitance or converter.  An ignition coil in a car takes a current of large quanity to produce an abnormal magnetic flux state inside it's own core.  Being of realtively few turns and resisted by an external resistor matched to the duration of contact closure and the permeability of the core.  Upon closure of the contacts current flows in a closed loop heating the resistor doing work and as a bystander in the process the core gets magnetically altered.  If the points never opened we would have your basic electric heater circuit.  exnumber of joules radiated by the resistance of the wire and the external resistor in series following i2r power dissipation.  We now open the switch.  Something quite overunity happens.  Current is sustained for just a millisecond while a capacitor parallel to the contacts which were completing the primary circuit to ground  charges.  This allows the contacts to open up wide with no power dissipation melting the contacts.  As the capacitor charges and the current drops off expotentially suddenly there is no electrical current to hold the core in the altered magnetic state.  And boom.
Lightning strike from ignition coil across the distributor contacts down the wire to the spark plug across the plasma to the frame of the car back to the other side of the coil.  The equivalent of passing a wire through a very powerful horseshoe magnet at thousands of mile per hour.  Where did this power come from.  It didnt come from the electrons flowing from positive to negative terminals of the battery circuit we are shutting that one down.  It appears that something got stored in the core and then moved on into the secondary.  Will this bonus energy ever be enough to recharge the battery,  If the electrical current messing with the core instead of heating up a resistor is charging a capacitor which every so often puts current back through the transformer and into a capacitor instead of an inefficient device like a battery then we only need the battery to get this thing oscillating.  A portion of the bonus energy needed to replace the radiated energy from the system the rest of the bonus energy to radiate photons out of lightbulbs or electric motors somewhere external to the system.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: MrMag on July 23, 2010, 03:16:18 PM
Sparks,
What do you do for a living? You should be a technical writer, if you aren't one already. Or, be an author. I think you could whip up a few volumes in no time. :)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 23, 2010, 09:46:18 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJdS57AsTZI&feature=grec_index&videos=1yTos56mz6M
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on July 23, 2010, 09:52:54 PM
GK
that put a smile on my face:}.
I don't hear any audio ,but I like what I see !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJdS57AsTZI&feature=grec_index&videos=1yTos56mz6M

Thanks
Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 24, 2010, 03:56:27 AM
@all

Correct me if i am wrong ...

Ok the core of a transformer will conduct electricity if there is a change in the magnetic field up to saturation regardless of the power source dc or ac , 5 volts or 5000 , the freq of the change in the field will change the amplitude of the output , the turn ratio also but to me it is where most of the losses happen ...

The core is the limit ? yes ?

Now how dose DC saturate a core compared to AC , they are 2 different beast , now lets say i send a AC signal in a core ex : 20 volts 10 mili , but also bring in some DC , this should bring the core closer to saturation wouldn't that that give more current ... and what happen to the voltage .

How could i use a core rated at many amps , and still make a decent Joule thief from 1.5 volts DC ...

Toroid core where used in logic computer circuit has adder , hard to imagine but that was done between 1950-1960 , now only the army uses it .

Mark
 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 24, 2010, 06:51:02 AM
@MK1,
Your questions are right on schedule.
I posted this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwJ6cpM48RY

I used a small toroid and the spark was copied 2 more times.
I put in that bigger toroid and I saw no spark. Even with mixing the different windings around. The iron core seems to suck it all up. The potential never seems to build up to cause the jump.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 24, 2010, 07:29:19 AM
@gk

Nice video , it seem the toroid is drawing electrostatic potential from the surroundings , dose it do it if you reverse the polarity from one of the coil on the mag amp.

I have to say its not the type of magamp i know .

I got this link that is quite informative on the magamp subject , i am sure it got edited some of the good parts are missing , but if you read carefully the words chosen you will see the potential ,http://avstop.com/AC/apgeneral/MAGNETICAMPLIFIERS.html

Mark

The mag amp is acting like a transistor and not like a transformer ...

http://avstop.com/AC/apgeneral/MAGNETICAMPLIFIERS.html
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 24, 2010, 08:50:40 AM
@MK1,
I don't have the control in there. I am adding that 5khz next.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 24, 2010, 11:03:31 AM
Is magnetic amplifier kind of parametric oscillator with a valve ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on July 24, 2010, 06:54:24 PM
GK, have you tried a magnet to bias the mag-amp? I ask this since there is no control coil on it and you need something to saturate the core.

As for the 5khz (ish) driver, why not just create a tank and insert the mag-amp in series with it? Then perhaps parallel. The control coil would be the input for the driver frequency and the magnet is to bias the core. Just some thoughts.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 24, 2010, 06:59:12 PM
Thanks for the combination. I will try that. I am also going to rotate the small toroid 90 degrees in connections so that the the potential goes down 1 side of the amp and the return trip is on the other, like Bedini magnetic shearing, BEMF. I will post schems later. Muwhaha!

GK, have you tried a magnet to bias the mag-amp? I ask this since there is no control coil on it and you need something to saturate the core.

As for the 5khz (ish) driver, why not just create a tank and insert the mag-amp in series with it? Then perhaps parallel. The control coil would be the input for the driver frequency and the magnet is to bias the core. Just some thoughts.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 24, 2010, 09:58:56 PM
  A magnetic amplifier simply uses variable impedance of a transformer to control a higher power circuit.  Instead of gating a highvoltage dc supply with a low voltage dc supply you are gating a highvoltage ac supply with a low dc current flow.  Changes in the amount of dc flowing through the amp will change the impedance of the reactor without the ususal isolation problems we see in voltage driven switching.   
  It is ridicuoulus for an ac supply like an alternator not to charge a capacitor as a load.   This way the electrical currents move first to charge the capacitor then reverse to discharge the capacitor back into the generator.  The load is drawn from current transformers monitoring the oscillations.  The power companies are probably doing this already bouncing power between plants and those pole pigs arent nothing but ammeters for their kvars.  Meanwhile we are led to belive that the load effects the amount of fuel consumed by the plants.  One pulse from 0=130 volts repeated a million times a second is alot more powerful than the one pulse from o=130volts pushed out by a generator for one millisecond to excite and sustain the system in oscillation mode.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 25, 2010, 05:59:10 AM
@gk

I had time to think about your toroid spark , now things i would like to say .

So DC travels in the wire , high freq travels outside your experiment and video is great to see that .

Now we know that glass holds water and electricity in the same manner , what if you made two plates and connected them to the coil of the mag amp and put it into a glass , the glass should fill up each time ...

Anyway , this is pretty far off and don't expect any response , but had to share the idea of putting transformers into a glass  :-\ ...



Mark
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 25, 2010, 06:08:18 AM
Two opposing power pathways: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzNjIViEw7g
This shows another result set of fields eclipsing and providing a boost.
Next I will add more combinations and 5khz to the magamp config. Am winding a new set of Magamps out of coils of garden wire. Real quick and dirty.

@MK1,
I had the Notched PVC coil with aluminum ring plates on top and bottom, ran 3 frequencies into it. The tingles shot off the sharp edges. Like throwing mercury on the floor. Stun guns are alot safer than RE. When ever my coils spit I tend to back off. The headaches can last for 3 days. Not good. I have used shields but then I blew up equipment. So I tread lightly.

Back to the bench...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 25, 2010, 07:11:49 AM
@gk

I was hoping the glass would magnify the charge but also contain the health hazardous element of the experiment ...

Mark
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 26, 2010, 06:35:29 AM
My final TPU ....






Don't I wish  :D
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 26, 2010, 08:15:04 AM
@all

i will let you in on a secret , why do i love the joule thief .

It because it is a great signal generator , really simple runs on 1.5 volt max and one pot freq adjustment , one transistor , one toroid one battery .

Look at the video i have found on the net great example http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6TcJAb5jZM
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: EMdevices on July 26, 2010, 08:35:00 AM
@e2matrix

nice rendering of the Gunderson patent application 0163971. 

EM
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 26, 2010, 05:13:52 PM
A chicken coop patent...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on July 26, 2010, 06:02:35 PM
That was something I found when I stumbled into an open FTP site.  Probably someone who is on here since they had folders for Steven Mark and folders for a lot of members here of things they have posted.  I assumed the rendering had been posted here at some time but I had not seen it before. 

 That patent is a chicken coop (I thought GK was kidding).   But I think this is what we are looking at.  I just found where these were posted here and discussed before.  All 5 pics and patent links here:  http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1827.0

    The open FTP site I found these on:
  http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 26, 2010, 10:28:54 PM
It's Wattsup's files.

First thing this morning I typo'd 'chicken poop canteen'. Quite the dislexic moment.


    The open FTP site I found these on:
  http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on July 27, 2010, 04:40:11 AM
You called Master GK. lol

Actually I need to ask you something. I am very hesitant to post something that many here may not like to read concerning the OTPU. It is my best rendition of how and why SM made his OTPU video the way he did. So what would you do? Would you post it knowing that it may cause you some hassles with other members that may not be so open to considering all the angles? I am after all only looking for the truth of the devices that can help to "understand" the "real" electricity in the SM TPUs. Geez I feel like we are all in a drama series called CSI-Overunity.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on July 27, 2010, 04:45:09 AM
wattsup do it
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on July 27, 2010, 07:09:16 AM
wattsup do it

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Nihilanth on July 27, 2010, 11:28:53 AM
Hey, as long as you're not saying that it's powered by magic and unicorn farts, I don't see why not.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: BEP on July 27, 2010, 12:22:15 PM
Hey, unicorn farts can be highly energetic!

@Wattsup,

Your perspectives are always interesting. Whattzup?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 27, 2010, 05:31:52 PM
@wattsup,
wattsup do it?
CSI-Overunity is correct. It is a crime scene and we are the sleuths.
(I did meet a PHD in chemical engineering that works for the EPA as a investigator. She is a cute blonde gal just like on the tv shows.)

So,
I am putting all the pieces together into a bigger compilation.
Joule thief oscillator, cmos switch exciter, push/pull gate on fet, floating ground, dual magamp for 2 phase resonance into larger loops. Only the larger device, which to me looks like a step up, drives big loads. On the smaller TPUs it looks like the magamps are the TPUs resonating back and forth or up and down. All configs use resonant rise and can run on a 9 volt battery.
As a side: I was looking at the 3 coil transformer in the stun gun and have the notion that it act as a magamp.

This is what I see.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: rensseak on July 27, 2010, 05:47:00 PM
Wattsup come on, do it. What shall happen, except that they see you as a sceptics. And?

Norbert
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 27, 2010, 07:57:03 PM
@wattsup,
Do it. I was given advice of "If they mock your efforts then they don't understand the mission".

Well, except if you are talking about dancing on your roof in a pink tu-tu with a TPU driven chainsaw! I am sure not many will follow.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mannix on July 28, 2010, 01:30:20 AM
anything is possible ,

Lets hear it .

You are respected whatever your conclusion is , agreed or not
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on July 28, 2010, 02:00:50 AM
Wattsup,


Roll The dice!!

Chet
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on July 28, 2010, 02:22:37 AM
When you stir Earth magnetic field how can you name that whirl ?  Why those guys from power stations have so much troubles grounding electric lines ?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: tak22 on July 28, 2010, 03:11:52 AM
wattsup,

let it out!

nobody has a TPU theory that's supported by anyone but themselves,
so anything TPU related is going to be received a thousand different ways.

a long chain always needs another link.

tak
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on July 29, 2010, 07:38:47 AM
@wattsup

Well wattsup , the cat caught your thong , its funny no one even begin to make a mag amp , its not that hard , i honesty did not start but gathered all the material , i bet i am not the only one but just can't start.

And enough info to know how and why it works , ARE we being controlled , like in James Bond ?

Get to work damn it !

Mark 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 29, 2010, 07:24:04 PM
Uh oh....

I am working 2 mag amps with an iron core and stranded copper core. I am winding the 3 control coils all that way around(this gives a solid toroid field) and overlapping instead of 3 segments. This still flips domains, controls bloch wall, cancels flux.
The leads coming off the collector are 2 inches apart.
All silicon is in and on the bench. I use JK flipflop with !Q pointed back to reset for fast cmos switching.
Design documents are also on the bench.
I have to finish winding my 2 coil then prototype the driver.
All electronics will sit in center and are battery driven.

Tube based JK flip flop... Looks like a mag amp setup, no? Hmmm. 2 magamps throttling back and forth. Thumping? Hmmm. And then out to 2 larger rings thumping up and down. Oh, what wonderous field activity!

Anybody else?

Quote
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Condition
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on July 30, 2010, 05:41:54 PM
Lets keep it simple:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edqGNOrW1GM&feature=related

TPU bootcamp:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaXMw6JOPPs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaXMw6JOPPs)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAcw7BuHhwA (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAcw7BuHhwA)

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 06, 2010, 04:27:28 AM
Here ya go pretty coils straight from the bedside: go to downloads and look for gk1-gk27
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=downfile&id=406
You still have to work.

The big chips are 'break before make' when the address lines change. Try a JK flipflop with the !Q tied to CLR then clock it. Very high speed. That is the big secret. Floating ground, floating fets(IRF840), low current, controls all the way around(snake biting its tail).

The fet driver chip is a p605. The clock chip could be a 4 bit binary out. Look at the truth table. 1 line then 2 lines are on at the same time then 1 line.
There is also a funny looking switch in the circuit. I have used a fet. It is in the feedback loop internal to the ckt itself.
All cmos for 9v bat operation in center.
Notice no caps on the coils? That is where we come in and what about the magamp? Iron centers. Color picture posted previous. I have this build 80% done. I prototype now.

Quote
sorry not so great news in the call, not what you wanted to hear.

here are all the scans.

to recap
for 8" to 15" base freq ~ 1.4khz - 3.2khz
freq 2 = base x 2.1 +/-
freq 3 = base x 3.2 +/-

driver2.jpg was my preliminary interpretation

some comments.
important to have the collector outputs around 1-2" separated, not together.
wind a / b / c with same # of turns on top of each other
lowest wind (closest to collector) uses slowest freq
the control coils should be wound over top and into middle (winding direction) clockwise
the control coils should meet in the middle between the collector outputs, and be brought into the middle (not come outside)
all the electronics should be housed inside the torroid (not outside)
use tinned stranded insulated wire
fine tune 2nd, for max output, then 3rd for max output then repeat (for max output)
more collector turns for more voltage

sometimes a build would not work, so start again
found older wire (some corrosion) would work better

use a outer circumference wind to stablize electronics ground (notice the 2 grounds mentioned in diagrams) float gnd
2 grounds (9v battery) plus the outer wind ground

lots of buffers everywhere.

too many stories to tell (12 or so meetings over 12 months, sometimes 4 months of no contact)

Quote
I figured out what the second set of windings in the drawing is for. If you remember what "S" said, part of the output from the collector was wrapped around all the control coils together as a magnetic bias that helped to intensify the effect - the "furnace that feeds itself". I also noticed that one of the collector rings didn't appear to be attached to anything but the VCC source. Perhaps it's functioning as some sort of potential bias?

Also, I studied the pictures containing the big ICs with the resistors and stuff on them. I looked up the 4009 and it is a Hex Inverter IC. If you look above it in the picture where he has all those resistors tied to inputs and outputs, it looks like the things on the left are actually electrolytic capacitors. He is using the RC values probably to male an oscillator to generate one frequency for each channel. It looks like he has three of those ICs there which create pulses for the three channels (you can see them labeled A, B, and C). So by controlling all of the RC constants, you can effectively make both a digital oscillator for the frequency and a delay line setup to control the pulse width. I haven't studied the circuit in as much detail as I will later but those are my initial impressions from the drawings he gave.

That's my thoughts for now. This is making more sense by the day :-). Also, I checked my rat shack coil spools (the pack you can get that has a red, green, and black set of wire). They are definitely tin plated!

Rat shack arent plated anymore.
I got mine from http://stores.sacelec.com/sacramentoelectronics/ (http://stores.sacelec.com/sacramentoelectronics/) search for wh22-

Look at the TPU this way:
All who know are under NDAs. How do they get it out? Recruit somebody who has a clue, who can be shown with out mentioning vital terms and then the recruit takes it from there. Might the recruit be you?
Could be my last build. I am not saying anybody has to follow. I just give

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mannix on August 06, 2010, 07:50:55 AM
cut and paste?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 06, 2010, 03:07:35 PM
Here ya go pretty coils straight from the bedside: go to downloads and look for gk1-gk27
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=downfile&id=406
You still have to work.

The big chips are 'break before make' when the address lines change. Try a JK flipflop with the !Q tied to CLR then clock it. Very high speed. That is the big secret. Floating ground, floating fets(IRF840), low current, controls all the way around(snake biting its tail).

The fet driver chip is a p605. The clock chip could be a 4 bit binary out. Look at the truth table. 1 line then 2 lines are on at the same time then 1 line.
There is also a funny looking switch in the circuit. I have used a fet. It is in the feedback loop internal to the ckt itself.
All cmos for 9v bat operation in center.
Notice no caps on the coils? That is where we come in and what about the magamp? Iron centers. Color picture posted previous. I have this build 80% done. I prototype now.

Rat shack arent plated anymore.
I got mine from http://stores.sacelec.com/sacramentoelectronics/ (http://stores.sacelec.com/sacramentoelectronics/) search for wh22-

Look at the TPU this way:
All who know are under NDAs. How do they get it out? Recruit somebody who has a clue, who can be shown with out mentioning vital terms and then the recruit takes it from there. Might the recruit be you?
Could be my last build. I am not saying anybody has to follow. I just give

You should not believe everything people say.  You should perform simple experiments before building full-blown devices.  Otherwise, you waste a lot of time and money, and get no where.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 06, 2010, 06:25:59 PM
Field within a field within a field.

Simplest of explainations.

Who's time, money and destination?

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: steeltpu on August 06, 2010, 07:11:09 PM
You should not believe everything people say.  You should perform simple experiments before building full-blown devices.  Otherwise, you waste a lot of time and money, and get no where.

You should not believe anything sigma16 says.  Disinfo agent.  Troll.  Joined July 29th, 2010.  sigma16 has only posted negative crap on TPU threads.   Are you being paid sickma or is your sole purpose in life to stomp on other people's hopes for a better world?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 06, 2010, 07:33:22 PM
You should not believe anything sigma16 says.  Disinfo agent.  Troll.  Joined July 29th, 2010.  sigma16 has only posted negative crap on TPU threads.   Are you being paid sickma or is your sole purpose in life to stomp on other people's hopes for a better world?

Yes.  You should all follow the idiot with the Golden Gate Bridge in his TPU and 3 posts, who registered July 20, 2010.

Go back to the trailer park, Looooser!

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 06, 2010, 11:40:53 PM
Thanks for your input.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-energy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condensed_matter_physics
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 07, 2010, 08:31:32 PM
I pulled them into GIMP and cameoed them. The chips are CMOs. THe mux input lines are hild high by 10k and there is a 1uf cap for noise reduction. Follow the lines on the buffer chips and you see a mobius type wiring going on to the coils. The circuit has been reverse engineered 3 ways. The 8 to 1 muxes, then 2 to 1 x 3 muxes, then the jk flip flop !q to clr. This gives the high speed low current hit to the coil. The clocking is still under scrutiny but I feel it is a 4 bit output hidden the in box drawing. Granted this process can be done in other ways. I believe I was shown this in the way I would latch onto. And I have. This is still a Rubik's cube to a finite solution. But like I said all the pieces of the process are embedded in this design. Am I saying this while untested? Yes. The functioning is really apparent and I have seen and done these things in other places and ways.

Take the cameoed drawings and remark the lines with a sharpy. Other things should jump out at you if you know digital logic. The muxes are analog through put addressed by digital logic. Some of the 4009 buffers are really 4010s, inverting non-inverting.

GK, Very Interesting, but those prints are tough to read/figure.

(I am curious as to their source, but will not ask and request no answer be given, either way.   There is something strange there.....  Familar writing?)

I will be very interested in any results.  I never made multiple layers on multiple coils, but have tried Multiple layers on a single coil.  The results were posted here, and looked interesting, but I got no further.  I hope you can!

Good Luck, and I really appreciate the data.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 07, 2010, 10:54:19 PM
Cmos is voltage potential(fets), TTL  is current(transistors).
Just get the idea of high speed like Earl was pushing before.

Spark gap based devices don't have to ramp up. This circuit is a virtual spark gap that creates light potential switching to set the process going and it ramps up. The ramp up is the resonance building. We push the swing at the correct time. Pretty simple actually. When the swinger crosses the mid point is where the most potential is.

Yeah, muxes for short. The ones I found worked bi directional through the analog path.

And circuit shown was not using the Mux part at all, just the break before make part. All input lines are tied high. :P
Only the obvious lines are drawn. No clutter.

And let me reiterate. What the ckt shows is:
+9volt,
High speed switching,
Floating ground(this is part of the feedback loop)
Circuit in center,
battery operation shows float process,
Snake bites it tail(push the swing at this point),
field within a field,
low current,
resonance building(ramp up),
Feedback(circuit within circuit, Resonance, ring operation back to circuit(MOBIUS on a 4d scale))

Now get all these mechanics in place and tweek the operation to perfect the whole process.
The frequencies are close to the circumference which enables a field to push. Same process as Don Smith's ac pump charging the supply battery using the dc magnetic field of the supply line. 8)

There are just too many items in place at this juncture. It is what I have been watching for. The examples match up with the learning which match up to the realization. Now the operation based on the process will prove out.

If anybody disagrees then by all means let me know?!?!?!!? Newbies might be in a quandry. But the old heads can surely see the implications.

@Grumpy,
I will try one layer at a time. I was just posting the whole 'Kit -n- kabootle' 8)

Testing will be on the ring mounted vertical.  I suggest anybody else do the same for starters. Its not what you think. 8)

GK, Thanks!!!   I think I am getting it.  I think you mean De-Mux's...

Interesting that this goes way back to the "Original" circuits I used for my first try's, though mine were TTL and my "Driver" section stunk.  This IS a great way to line up and sync multiple outputs, very cleanly.  I really wonder what this would/could do, built in CMOS and allowed to float up via non-grounded battery power.   Hmmmmm......   

Rats, now you have got that little curious part of my mind working, that won't leave me alone till I try.  I'll probably go 3 to 8 line and see what happens, as digital logic and counter response WAS my original job description, before LSI became popular.  This will take a while.  (Note: old school shortcut...  If the entire "Bus" in connected, then aligning the chips on the drawing doesn't require drawing all the lines.  Just assume they are all in use.  If not all are in use, the some draw just the "Last" one, and the assumption is beginning to drawn.  Just a comment.)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 08, 2010, 03:50:09 AM
Wind up a big solenoid coil with 2000 feet or more. HT mag wire.  Insulation looks like bronze.  28 awg is good.  Doesn't really matter.  Use a hollow insulator material for the core or no core if you pot it somehow.

Hit this coil with a few KVDC (at least 2kv), through a spark gap pulse circuit.  This is just a test, so you don't need a full blown build.

Set this up and you are at step one.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 08, 2010, 05:05:35 AM
This sounds like a stun gun to the secondary of an ignition coil if the 2kv does have current. Maintain the outer spark gap of the gun. oops. The ignition coil is not air core though. Could use a ratshack spool? Stacked 4 high to get the turns.

Wind up a big solenoid coil with 2000 feet or more. HT mag wire.  Insulation looks like bronze.  28 awg is good.  Doesn't really matter.  Use a hollow insulator material for the core or no core if you pot it somehow.

Hit this coil with a few KVDC (at least 2kv), through a spark gap pulse circuit.  This is just a test, so you don't need a full blown build.

Set this up and you are at step one.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 08, 2010, 05:58:38 AM
No  need to go back to banging coils its been done for yeas now nothing good came of it. A single fet low powered driving 3 phase WYE can produce several KVARs for a few watts drive.  You don't HAVE to use magamps but if you do no need to use a fet and it makes the device immune (till lightning strikes anyway)  from power surges.

Only copper wires required no special cocktails of silver and iron wire required.

In order to create the desired circuit we need to produce NEGATIVE inductors. We all heard about negative resistors but the key here is negative inductors and because we must CANCEL out  the magnetic fields as much as possible in the circuit, there by keeping the total inductance of the circuit negative. We do this by creating VARS as this disturbs the ambient but there is no current flowing as there No in phase amps. If there is no amps there is no current flowing and no Lenze. If you bang the coils you create current and a magnetic field. Everything must be done in complete opposite.

A bifilar coil cancels out magnetic flux but so does polyphase system as power factor is slashed.

 BUT everything else is happening the space is now highly energized as electrostatic field its pumping longitudinal waves. The i/p power may only be watts but there is several KVARs in circulation. Now there is Kinetic Energy.

As Don Smith stuff = Low power precursor (a few real watts) convert to VAR = Kinetic Energy = Device rating 50KVARS+ convert to magnetic as two converging electrostatic fields = real WATTS o/p.

Or RE = RF through RLC where OU derived from RE transformations of one energy type to another.

In the case of TPU 3 phase negative inductors create rotational electrostatic stress and not magnetic to begin the process and stores a negative energy charge in a space where the relative magnetic field appears, and as a counteraction, the inductors generates an electric power with a positive energy. The free electrons from the VARS field got  kinetic energy from a space as accelerating returns the kinetic energy to the space becomes deceleration.

The negative inductances  of the negative 3 phase inductors is proportional albeit non linear to the product of the rate of change of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the coils and the number of turns of the coil, like that of a NORMAL inductors but in reverse.  By raising the voltage applied either side of the exciter collector coils  the total number of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the WYE inductors can be increased. So the TPU is a sandwich where we have rotating electrostatics (Not magnetic to begin with otherwise you need current and 100 watts of coil banging only gives you a headaches and eats the power supply) where a HV positive and negative DC charge is applied. While the atomic level dynamics drops the heat out of the device the rotational electrostatic fields create eddy current when driving a real load as now we have REAL amps flowing. Note electrostatic does not mean DC static from my standpoint but much closer related to RF where the nodes are either Zero or Max and not NULL. Null means nothing so bad use for this.

 The device is vertically polarized from this charge as the ambient is polarized from earth to space.

In kapanadze the process is actually very similar but instead of 3 phase he using single phase 50Hz as the negative inductor is a VARS tank. In fact its a tube homo-polar transformer where the PF = ZERO or VSWR infinity so its an electrostatic device to begin with not magnetic. The HT DC charge is applied between the inner and outer non magnetic tube copper will work fine. OR it can be separate layer windings.  Whatever method is chosen its important the MASS is identical between the inner and outer layers. (close as practical)

 Now the conditions are SET they need moving side to side to induce a REAL current with amps and volts in phase. So the 50 Hz push pull sine wave driver modulates the HV so the action is a side to side motion of two interactive electrostatic layers. The coil becomes a NEGATIVE inductor and so the normal entropy bell ringing to loss becomes GAINS of increasing magnitude while taking up ambient atomic thermal heat energy drops the inductor through its negative. With this is mind the spark gap only requires just enough to create an arc 2kv perhaps and hardly any current.

As Tesla said "Don't underestimate the force of electrostatics" .
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: SkyWatcher123 on August 08, 2010, 06:19:16 AM
Hi bolt, those are interesting thoughts. I was a couple days ago just thinking about bifilar coil and why could we not somehow induce energy into another coil from the interplay of the so called canceling fields, though it sure sounds like your saying the fields under a certain condition can generate power for us. That rings true to me.
peace love light
Tyson
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 08, 2010, 06:28:30 AM
Hi bolt, those are interesting thoughts. I was a couple days ago just thinking about bifilar coil and why could we not somehow induce energy into another coil from the interplay of the so called canceling fields, though it sure sounds like your saying the fields under a certain condition can generate power for us. That rings true to me.
peace love light
Tyson

It already does as Joule Thief uses biifilar to CANCEL magnetic field so the in phase power is trashed into VARS. Now you have kinetic energy field as electrostatic and volts goes UP. How do you think JT get 50 volts from 5 without a transformer and its not electromagnetic. That is Hertizian leads to loss you need longitudinal. Now you see the JT is actually making a tiny weak NEGATIVE inductor where power of the sense we want flows back INTO it and NOT out. But only if you understand this and make it properly.

Oh also note with JT as really simple concept has missing field? There is no interaction layer of two electrostatic X Y components as within the Don Smith, TPU and Kapandze. You need a relative field otherwise the earth with provide a weak X one and give weak results.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: SkyWatcher123 on August 08, 2010, 08:40:24 AM
Hi bolt, thanks for more explanation, though I'm no not so great at visualizing things with words. Could you possibly make drawings or diagram of some kind to help explain your ideas better to me, maybe it could help others understand better as well, thanks very much.
peace love light
Tyson :)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: stprue on August 08, 2010, 05:01:22 PM
Here ya go pretty coils straight from the bedside: go to downloads and look for gk1-gk27
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=downfile&id=406
You still have to work.

The big chips are 'break before make' when the address lines change. Try a JK flipflop with the !Q tied to CLR then clock it. Very high speed. That is the big secret. Floating ground, floating fets(IRF840), low current, controls all the way around(snake biting its tail).

The fet driver chip is a p605. The clock chip could be a 4 bit binary out. Look at the truth table. 1 line then 2 lines are on at the same time then 1 line.
There is also a funny looking switch in the circuit. I have used a fet. It is in the feedback loop internal to the ckt itself.
All cmos for 9v bat operation in center.
Notice no caps on the coils? That is where we come in and what about the magamp? Iron centers. Color picture posted previous. I have this build 80% done. I prototype now.

Rat shack arent plated anymore.
I got mine from http://stores.sacelec.com/sacramentoelectronics/ (http://stores.sacelec.com/sacramentoelectronics/) search for wh22-

Look at the TPU this way:
All who know are under NDAs. How do they get it out? Recruit somebody who has a clue, who can be shown with out mentioning vital terms and then the recruit takes it from there. Might the recruit be you?
Could be my last build. I am not saying anybody has to follow. I just give

Hello GK can you post this description and pictures here before the trolls push this post back 10 pages?  Some of us don't have access to to view the downloads.

Thanks...Stew
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 08, 2010, 05:50:06 PM
This sounds like a stun gun to the secondary of an ignition coil if the 2kv does have current. Maintain the outer spark gap of the gun. oops. The ignition coil is not air core though. Could use a ratshack spool? Stacked 4 high to get the turns.

From a practical perspective, the stun gun is too much.  Your typical coil can't handle that much voltage, and the only easily obtainable switch is a spark gap.

Drive a flyback or even an ignition transformer and get a few KV, hv bridge of diodes and cap bank to get HV DC.  Small neon transformer or HV DC converters work great as you only need a few mA.

The drive section can have a ferromagnetic core.  It's just producing HV.

Ratshack wire is enamel coated and will arc through.  HT mag wire or other HV rated wire.

Oh, and ignore "bolt", he doesn't know what he is talking about.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 08, 2010, 05:58:56 PM
@stprue,
Show a file sharing site and i will put them there. The files are in the range of 500k.

Of course you don't have access to the downloads. Your attention is kept on advertisements and useless hyperlinks.
Guess that is an indication to move or go away.

I would even put them on Wattsup's ftp if i get access. I don't have a problem with doing any of this.

@Bolt, Sigma16,
I see both sets of design specs and both are valid. If I have to play referee I will. :D
The choice of approaches just depends on the level of shockwave one wants to play with. So I am not nor ever choosing sides. But if we are to find the designs that perpetually run a cell phone or battlecruiser we must entertain all the aspects of the process whether they are in a button cell or meld matter. We have seen these and the full gamut in between. All one has to do is see the prospect or pick a level to work in. If you like watching sparks jump into your pc then knock yourself out(that too will eventually happen :o) or if you believe it can happen across a substrate level at the subatomic layer then go for it.
The larger effect production takes a certain type of material(Simg16) whereas the smaller effect takes a certain level of configuration(Bolt).
@Sigma16,
I can order the wire and do that with a NST too.
@Bolt,
The ECD is a 2 phase Wye or yagi configuration. This means 3 snakes biting the others tails at 3 places in the ring. I have a ring configuration of this happening at 1 place on the ring. 1 place. I can continue this build knowing full well that when it is done all I would have to do is split the full control windings in 2 more places to achieve the yagi configuration of the ring. Not a big deal to do.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 08, 2010, 06:38:06 PM
No  need to go back to banging coils its been done for yeas now nothing good came of it. A single fet low powered driving 3 phase WYE can produce several KVARs for a few watts drive.  You don't HAVE to use magamps but if you do no need to use a fet and it makes the device immune (till lightning strikes anyway)  from power surges.

There is very secretive group of highschool kids making power by banging coils.  Probably because they did not listen to people like you.

Only copper wires required no special cocktails of silver and iron wire required.

Depends on how you look at it, but most conductors will work.

In order to create the desired circuit we need to produce NEGATIVE inductors. We all heard about negative resistors but the key here is negative inductors and because we must CANCEL out  the magnetic fields as much as possible in the circuit, there by keeping the total inductance of the circuit negative. We do this by creating VARS as this disturbs the ambient but there is no current flowing as there No in phase amps. If there is no amps there is no current flowing and no Lenze. If you bang the coils you create current and a magnetic field. Everything must be done in complete opposite.

Total BS.  Cancelling magnetic fields is BS in this case.  Has nothing at all to do with it.  VARS has nothing to do with it.  Complete opposite and you get nothing.  Lenz is avoided.  Lorentz still applies.  You really need to try some of this stuff before you pass it on.  Most people in the OU circus just want to make a buck selling books, vids, and other BS.

A bifilar coil cancels out magnetic flux but so does polyphase system as power factor is slashed.

What if it is a different type of bifilar that doesn't cancel?  Two separate wires, same direction.

BUT everything else is happening the space is now highly energized as electrostatic field its pumping longitudinal waves. The i/p power may only be watts but there is several KVARs in circulation. Now there is Kinetic Energy.

It's not a direct process.  You can't just create longitudinal waves and everything starts working because it doesn't.


As Don Smith stuff = Low power precursor (a few real watts) convert to VAR = Kinetic Energy = Device rating 50KVARS+ convert to magnetic as two converging electrostatic fields = real WATTS o/p.

Or RE = RF through RLC where OU derived from RE transformations of one energy type to another.

Don Smith's devices never worked.  Don't believe the hype.

In the case of TPU 3 phase negative inductors create rotational electrostatic stress and not magnetic to begin the process and stores a negative energy charge in a space where the relative magnetic field appears, and as a counteraction, the inductors generates an electric power with a positive energy. The free electrons from the VARS field got  kinetic energy from a space as accelerating returns the kinetic energy to the space becomes deceleration.

The negative inductances  of the negative 3 phase inductors is proportional albeit non linear to the product of the rate of change of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the coils and the number of turns of the coil, like that of a NORMAL inductors but in reverse.  By raising the voltage applied either side of the exciter collector coils  the total number of the relative magnetic fluxes impinging on the WYE inductors can be increased. So the TPU is a sandwich where we have rotating electrostatics (Not magnetic to begin with otherwise you need current and 100 watts of coil banging only gives you a headaches and eats the power supply) where a HV positive and negative DC charge is applied. While the atomic level dynamics drops the heat out of the device the rotational electrostatic fields create eddy current when driving a real load as now we have REAL amps flowing. Note electrostatic does not mean DC static from my standpoint but much closer related to RF where the nodes are either Zero or Max and not NULL. Null means nothing so bad use for this.

 The device is vertically polarized from this charge as the ambient is polarized from earth to space.

I can;t even begin to say how wrong this rant is.  It sure as hell was not vertically polarized.  It's circular.

In kapanadze the process is actually very similar but instead of 3 phase he using single phase 50Hz as the negative inductor is a VARS tank. In fact its a tube homo-polar transformer where the PF = ZERO or VSWR infinity so its an electrostatic device to begin with not magnetic. The HT DC charge is applied between the inner and outer non magnetic tube copper will work fine. OR it can be separate layer windings.  Whatever method is chosen its important the MASS is identical between the inner and outer layers. (close as practical)

 Now the conditions are SET they need moving side to side to induce a REAL current with amps and volts in phase. So the 50 Hz push pull sine wave driver modulates the HV so the action is a side to side motion of two interactive electrostatic layers. The coil becomes a NEGATIVE inductor and so the normal entropy bell ringing to loss becomes GAINS of increasing magnitude while taking up ambient atomic thermal heat energy drops the inductor through its negative. With this is mind the spark gap only requires just enough to create an arc 2kv perhaps and hardly any current.

As Tesla said "Don't underestimate the force of electrostatics" .

Kapanadze appears to use more than 50Hz and you can bet your ass he is impact exciting that large coil, and he is using a lot more than 2kv.  Probably driving an ignition coil or similar.  Don't let the spark fool you.  It is HV DC into a high impedance load.  Try it yourself.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on August 08, 2010, 06:51:04 PM
@bolt

I would like to know how to make a Negative Inductor. The word "Inductor" implies coil and the word "coil" implies both negative and positive sides. So where does the negative come in to make is specifically negative.

I have done tests in this line of thinking but not with an inductor. With rings of only 2-3 turns maximum. You take a high inductance coil, put a positive pulse source on one end, on the other end you connect one end of the ring and put the negative pulse source on the other end of the ring. This will give you a ring that gets the negative of the coil on one end and the negative of the pulse on the other end, making it fully negative. But the ring cannot have too many turns otherwise it will automatically delimit its own positive/negative sides.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 08, 2010, 07:37:45 PM
password 'switching'
http://s1013.photobucket.com/albums/af259/giantkilleroverunity/?action=view&current=compositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy2.jpg#!oZZ2QQcurrentZZhttp%3A%2F%2Fs1013.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Faf259%2Fgiantkilleroverunity%2F%3Faction%3Dview%26current%3Dcompositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy1.jpg%26

http://s1013.photobucket.com/albums/af259/giantkilleroverunity/?action=view&current=compositebrownpaperdrawing_enhancedcopy2.jpg

Bolt's process equals the TPU.
Sigma's process equals Hubbard's coil.

But could the TPU be an ignition coil type setup and the sparkgap be a little neon?
The smaller TPUs would then only have 1 to 2 copies instead of 6 or 8 like Hubbard.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on August 08, 2010, 08:05:23 PM
   @ Wattsup and All:
    The John St.Clairs patent shows how to build a negative inductor.
 I have not seen anybody try it, yet.  I am planning on making something similar, in my own way.  Negative resistance in the coils is what Otto calls it, if I'm not mistaken.  If I am off on it, he will probably correct me. Thats one way to get him to respond. 
   It does seams like pulsing the coils with HV should yield higher voltage back.  As even increasing the input voltage from 1.5v to 12v should yield at least ten times higher output voltage. The coils would need thicker high temperature insulated wires to handle it, so they don't melt and short out.  SM did not use thin wires, neither did the  MITTS Dome device (that could start a car).   
                                                                 NickZ

   http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=nB-dAAAAEBAJ&dq=john+quincy+st.+clair
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 08, 2010, 08:21:28 PM
@Nz,
good point.
Not too many options now.
The preclude to the STclair patent was my itty bitty coil test. Then the ratshack spool virtual magamps I made.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NB8fXByWj8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkPUVqX3cNk
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sparks on August 08, 2010, 09:25:32 PM
  @gk

  It is rumoured that the old model ts could run off just the ignition coil output ignitiing air. There is enough heated air around to power something somewhere somehow.  I figure that there is mass in motion until you get down to o degrees Kelvin.  Just a matter of converting the randomized elastic collisions of a heated fluid into more ordered motion of charged mass through a "translatory device" to convert kinetic energy into electrical energy.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 08, 2010, 10:25:07 PM
Degradation through distance and time can be captured.

  @gk

  It is rumoured that the old model ts could run off just the ignition coil output ignitiing air. There is enough heated air around to power something somewhere somehow.  I figure that there is mass in motion until you get down to o degrees Kelvin.  Just a matter of converting the randomized elastic collisions of a heated fluid into more ordered motion of charged mass through a "translatory device" to convert kinetic energy into electrical energy.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 08, 2010, 10:41:34 PM
@bolt

I would like to know how to make a Negative Inductor. The word "Inductor" implies coil and the word "coil" implies both negative and positive sides. So where does the negative come in to make is specifically negative.

I have done tests in this line of thinking but not with an inductor. With rings of only 2-3 turns maximum. You take a high inductance coil, put a positive pulse source on one end, on the other end you connect one end of the ring and put the negative pulse source on the other end of the ring. This will give you a ring that gets the negative of the coil on one end and the negative of the pulse on the other end, making it fully negative. But the ring cannot have too many turns otherwise it will automatically delimit its own positive/negative sides.

Practical losses come quickly in small JT as bifilar is badly constructed and without perfect cancellation. Self capacitance will cap the voltage usually around 50 volts on 1.5 volt JT. If you want hundreds of thousands of VARS then use 3 phase as rotary action keeps the volts and amps separated within a power factor of zero. A 3 phase motor will run on just 10 watts in RV mode but the VARS is in the order of 1.5KVAR or 2KVAR which is not bad for 120v supply. This is less power to turn a 100lb 5 Horse Power motor then most people run their Newman or Bedini motors and if tuned to the load it will take your arm off!

Copy this as 3 wired inductors or make a LARGE toroidal core 3 windings wired in WYE. 12 volt supply should easy get 1000 volts and 1 amp in circulation. This is why Bob Boyce coils so powerful on collecting RE.

RF simile as VARS is electrostatic field and produces kinetic energy from near-space electron spin.  Coil bell ringing decays becomes inverted as energy stored in the coils increases and becomes a negative inductor and losses heat in the process.  This is standard book RF applied theory even a simulator works because no rules broken.

Put your glasses on and look as this is only 320mA i/p for 3.7KVAR!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on August 08, 2010, 10:51:46 PM
  @ GK and All:
   Seams like the best way for the secondary coil to feed-back to the primary, is by winding the secondary coil right on top (or below) the primary. As the greater the distance between them, the less effect the secondary would have to induce the feed-back that makes it all "run with gain"  Close proximity of the resonant coil circuit to each other may be an important point to optimise the output gain effect.
  I liked the idea of the "PTU in a can" that Wattsup mentioned. As it might reflect back more gain to the primary coil, and thus avoid losses, and have also cause less outside interference.  Keelly mentioned that the sphere and the dome worked the best.
  Lidmotor has shown that a big bifilar coil JT with a secondary coil wound on top of it, works very well to light a CFL bulb, and can also charge a battery. Jeanna has shown that the JT can produce 1000v+.
  I still feel that polarity flip-flop is important, and I don't see how the transistor's on-off cycle is going to do that. Maybe it is not totally necessary, though, as it might be enough to just to switch off the power and turn it back on fast enough to see the gain effects, without having to have the change in polarity.
  The magamp idea looks promising as there are no moving parts to burn out, and it reverses the polarity in a passive way. I still have not seen an example of it working in a TPU, though. Maybe Bolt can show us how it's done, (other that on paper).
  Chilliqueen has shown that with a PnP and NpN transistor,  practically no toroid coil is necessary, as both transistors are working together to reverse or flip-flop the fields, and have minimized the input power needed by quite a bit.
                                    NZ

                                                               
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 08, 2010, 11:09:44 PM
Mag amp version is basically this for the TPU. Machine wound toroidal as magamps work better but can use standard transformers  for learning! You dont HAVE to use magamps but in late 1980's when the tpu was born fets were low powered and very expensive. Magamps are immune to abuse once working correctly.

The driver is 5Khz for the magamps in reality for tpu. Look how it Runs with Gain! All components are set to unique frequency of the tpu diameter size.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 09, 2010, 01:44:32 AM
I believe the little video transformers the Sauron posted are the matched pair traffos and the 2 transformer tests also.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on August 09, 2010, 01:56:21 AM
     @ Bolt:
      If you have any pictures or images of the Magamp, and how it would look incorporated into a TPU,  would be good to see. Can it be set up to start with a capacitor?   I don't get the part about the 5khz driver, can you explain a little.  What would the magamp look like for lets say a 15 inch SM type TPU?  I'm trying to get an idea on how to replicate the 15 inch SM type using the magamp, would it be anything like his? As his does not show any other components other than a capacitor or two.
                                                                                             NZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 09, 2010, 02:04:10 AM
@Bolt,
Well you started a landslide...

Do you have the scripts for the schematics? I know you said you don't keep them but I thought I'd ask. I see the traffos in a flipflop configuration so they would ring back and forth. With the scripts I could put test points in and verify. Would just save us time.

Thanks.

And for those that don't have the simulation site: http://www.falstad.com/circuit/
This guy should win the Nobel peace prize for truly open source and sharing!
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 09, 2010, 02:19:30 AM
     @ Bolt:
      If you have any pictures or images of the Magamp, and how it would look incorporated into a TPU,  would be good to see. Can it be set up to start with a capacitor?   I don't get the part about the 5khz driver, can you explain a little.  What would the magamp look like for lets say a 15 inch SM type TPU?  I'm trying to get an idea on how to replicate the 15 inch SM type using the magamp, would it be anything like his? As his does not show any other components other than a capacitor or two.
                                                                                             NZ

The magamps are the little toroidal things sat on top of the control box in several TPU variants. As i said many times you don't need to use them at least not at first. They are the "icing on the cake" when everything else is working perfectly as it does away with power fets.  So i STRONGLY suggest you dont start messing with this as no one yet has the full tpu working. In addition the bias is set higher up the non linear portion to force the device into Class C. This is why SM use a magnet beside these cores. We don't want class a b etc as this waste drive power but for now don't worry about these tiny details. You only need this when you want to make TPU without any power source whatsoever and hardly and SS devices. It will start with one swipe of a magnet on the collectors.

Oh I forgot the magamps only work on AC or Square drive as the power source they can't control DC. SO if the power source is 5Khz clock then this signal will sit ON TOP of the main DC o/p. Its the sound you hear on the SM vids and the 5Khz MUSH on the DC o/p.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 09, 2010, 02:28:08 AM
@Bolt,
Well you started a landslide...

Do you have the scripts for the schematics? I know you said you don't keep them but I thought I'd ask. I see the traffos in a flipflop configuration so they would ring back and forth. With the scripts I could put test points in and verify. Would just save us time.

Thanks.

And for those that don't have the simulation site: http://www.falstad.com/circuit/
This guy should win the Nobel peace prize for truly open source and sharing!

Sorry no scripts i post these in public a while ago then i just move on to other stuff. Only take a few minutes to rebuild the sim and copy my layout but please DO NOT get hang up on magamps because till you have a working TPU this is something that SM may have taken months or years to perfect after moving away from SS device and TUbes.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 09, 2010, 02:43:40 AM
Just take 3 inductors even 3 large mains transformer wired in WYE  and wire as my FET driver. Tune the caps to overall frequency to suit your coils and when you hit the magic spot the reactive power and volts will FLY!!! Amps drop down to almost nothing at 12 volts i be surprised if you hit 100mA. Measure the volts and amps going round the coils! Freaky:)

 Now you got a rotary 3 phase electrostatic field that creates all kinds of weird effects. Anyone thinks this is hogwash not paying attention in class. This is a basic building block to many many OU devices.

Go and watch Eric Dollard Ham Radio conference if you not seen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhuSn6sc7sc
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 09, 2010, 03:19:32 AM
Quote
$ 13 4.9999999999999996E-6 30.13683688681966 49 5.0 54
T 240 224 272 240 0 4.0 1.0 0.1247616687560119 -0.08025312348361974 0.999
T 320 224 352 224 0 4.0 1.0 -0.5603558067052512 0.5164885116133933 0.999
w 320 224 272 256 0
w 272 224 320 256 0
d 448 256 448 320 1 0.805904783
l 496 176 560 240 0 1.0 -0.03638582839176202
l 624 176 560 240 0 1.0 0.018827952851354326
l 560 240 560 320 0 1.0 -0.017557875540407695
c 624 176 624 320 0 4.9999999999999996E-6 32.56733914306682
w 624 320 560 320 0
w 352 256 448 256 0
w 448 320 560 320 0
r 96 224 160 224 0 10.0
w 48 256 80 256 0
w 80 256 240 256 0
w 160 224 240 224 0
w 352 224 384 224 0
w 384 224 384 288 0
w 384 288 272 288 0
w 272 288 272 256 0
w 496 176 496 224 0
w 496 224 384 224 0
v 160 144 192 144 0 1 60.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
w 192 144 272 144 0
w 160 320 448 320 0
x 20 307 83 313 0 24 12vdc
w 272 144 272 224 0
w 160 144 160 320 0
v 48 256 48 192 0 0 40.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.5
w 48 192 80 192 0
p 624 176 624 320 0
p 640 176 640 320 0
w 640 176 624 176 0
w 640 320 624 320 0
174 80 192 80 256 0 1000.0 0.0347 Resistance
x 166 101 190 107 0 24 5v
x 254 2 306 8 0 24 hello
o 31 64 0 34 80.0 9.765625E-5 0 -1

You need return at end...

And watch to traffo action.
Scope is across capacitor. Voltage is higher than input.
The sine input doesn't have to be pure. Like Motorcoach and I discussed using a stun gun in place of the sine wave.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on August 09, 2010, 10:10:50 AM
gk

that only works for a moment then voltage is falling down
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: otto on August 09, 2010, 11:31:45 AM
Hello all,

@NickZ

yes, when I connect a bulb I see how the current dropps.

@Lindsay

Its finally time to say a few words to you:

You have always insisted that we use tubes in our tests because its easier to see the "effect" and so its cleverer to use them.
On the other hand Im going the "hard way".

Now I want to tell you my little secret why Im using SS: tubes are "clever", to say so. You cant fool a tube!!
But SS, like transistors, fets, MOSFETs and ICs are sooooo "idiotic" devices that you can fool them in a lot of ways. Some transistors are doing their "job" without a connected emiter or collector, same with some types of MOSFETs. ICs have a little bit other "problems, not to forget batteries that are not only batteries but switching devices.

No, I dont want to go deeper into this thematic.

So, this is one of the reasons why Im using SS.

Otto
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on August 09, 2010, 07:28:08 PM
      @ All:
       The problem with using solid state components instead of the magamp idea, is that Nobody so far has been able to produce and demonstrate any real CURRENT by using a solid state device.  Or, for that matter even a prototype of a working device using a magamp.
  Most all of SM devices have a coil or two, a magamp and a capacitor or two, and thats all, maybe a battery.  Even if his devices were Full of batteries, or, working off of the electric power grid lines, or phone lines, etz...still nobody has been able to replicate his simple set-up.
  Wattsup says that he will show us how it was all faked.  Ok, lets see it.  Light as many bulbs as SM had, with only batteries, that can be hidden in an OPEN TPU.  Forget the closed one with the mistery base.  He has said there are NO Batteries, in front of many observers, many times, to all the men that are there to look for faked components like hidden batteries. 
  There must be something to the SM system, with just what is shown in the videos.  Has ANYBODY really tried to make on, just like his, in 10 years?  Yes, No?
  Bolt says that to try using magamps in a system would take forever, but won't even take the time make one himself, as proof of concept.
   Otto says that SS can be fooled to produce power.  But has not shown us how much power they can be fooled to produce, lately.
  Wattsup says the SM devices only work because All of the SM devices are full of batteries, but he won't show us a small working device that is full of batteries (that can start a car) like MITTS Dome.
  GK has made so many coils he's lost count. You get the prize for effort, (hopefully a working device, someday). Looks like he enjoys the ride, and not just the getting there.
  IST says that its not the coils, it the way they are wired, but again stops there, and won't show us more.  IF there is more.
  Sigma16 is the only one that knows all,  but like the Shadow,  he's not telling, or showing, only endless clues...
  you gettin hotter,  no,  now your getting colder...
  Why won't you tell us Sigma? If you really knew how it all works,  you wouldn't be playing games, and hiding behind the curtain. You'd be a rich man, and so would we...
                                         NZ
   
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Mk1 on August 09, 2010, 07:43:53 PM
Its not because your body is free to roam around , dose not mean you have freedom ...

We live in self build imaginary castle , steps must be taken insure stability trough out our self empire .

Its usually easy to spot , and fix .

If you got all the answers , why can't you show it , you are scared of what the MAN , or your self ego telling you how great you are but blinding you to the truth .

Being free requires to over look our self imposed fears .

Are you a free man ...   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 09, 2010, 07:54:56 PM
      @ All:
       The problem with using solid state components instead of the magamp idea, is that Nobody so far has been able to produce and demonstrate any real CURRENT by using a solid state device.  Or, for that matter even a prototype of a working device using a magamp.
  Most all of SM devices have a coil or two, a magamp and a capacitor or two, and thats all, maybe a battery.  Even if his devices were Full of batteries, or, working off of the electric power grid lines, or phone lines, etz...still nobody has been able to replicate his simple set-up.
  Wattsup says that he will show us how it was all faked.  Ok, lets see it.  Light as many bulbs as SM had, with only batteries, that can be hidden in an OPEN TPU.  Forget the closed one with the mistery base.  He has said there are NO Batteries, in front of many observers, many times, to all the men that are there to look for faked components like hidden batteries. 
  There must be something to the SM system, with just what is shown in the videos.  Has ANYBODY really tried to make on, just like his, in 10 years?  Yes, No?
  Bolt says that to try using magamps in a system would take forever, but won't even take the time make one himself, as proof of concept.
   Otto says that SS can be fooled to produce power.  But has not shown us how much power they can be fooled to produce, lately.
  Wattsup says the SM devices only work because All of the SM devices are full of batteries, but he won't show us a small working device that is full of batteries (that can start a car) like MITTS Dome.
  GK has made so many coils he's lost count. You get the prize for effort, (hopefully a working device, someday). Looks like he enjoys the ride, and not just the getting there.
  IST says that its not the coils, it the way they are wired, but again stops there, and won't show us more.  IF there is more.
  Sigma16 is the only one that knows all,  but like the Shadow,  he's not telling, or showing, only endless clues...
  you gettin hotter,  no,  now your getting colder...
  Why won't you tell us Sigma? If you really knew how it all works,  you wouldn't be playing games, and hiding behind the curtain. You'd be a rich man, and so would we...
                                         NZ

Maybe I am just screwing with you, like bolt does.

Maybe I don't want mean people showing up at my door and taking my property.

I will say one thing though:  you will not get a damn thing out of the collector without the "effect" and no one is looking at that
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on August 09, 2010, 08:06:45 PM
I have nothing, but theory says that SS is able to produce that effect.It is tricky with SS, completely weird mode of operation as otto said.You should search for SS components combo able to switching in nano or picoseconds quite a lot of amps and without slow falling edge, also you have to find a way to make them switch so fast by using extremelly short impulse. I guess that limit for ordinary cheap SS is around 1,5kW
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on August 09, 2010, 08:17:57 PM
G-----
Quote;

Maybe I don't want mean people showing up at my door and taking my property.
---------------------------------
Let the mean peeps come to my house![spread it around a little]

5 watts
5 minutes
1 gallon of water into 5700 liters of HHO
Magnetrolysis

Perhaps between rounds you guys could take a look ?
The inventor/Chris Hunter
Known as Alaska star on O.U. power forum
Arctictek.com

 answers Email ,and returns phone calls
Help please? in anyway possible!
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9448.msg251654#new

Chet
PS sorry for the intrusion GK
{I know you've had experience with HHO}
And the pool of talent here is way to valuable !
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on August 09, 2010, 08:31:09 PM
  @ Sigma:
      I understand where you're coming from.  We are all in the same boat. But, if the idea is to help in this effort, please explain about the effect generation process that we are not looking at.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on August 09, 2010, 08:43:27 PM
.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 09, 2010, 09:16:27 PM
No problem...
This is the wave of disgruntlement that appears every so often. You should see the ring pile size of Marco!

Here is one pattern that hasn't emerged yet so let me divulge:
Solid state needs a magamp. Why? A place for the activity to happen, to be stored and used/released. Tubes don't need this. Why? Because the happening, the storage and expression is in the ion/electron field between the cathode and anode. SS doesn't have this space.
Does not the infiinte ring storage have the same parameters as the tube space? Think about that...

--gk. To the victor go the spoils.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on August 09, 2010, 09:52:06 PM
I think what @otto is referring to is when the mosfet diode reversing speed is matched by the pulse frequency. Also when he says taking off the collector, that is because at high frequency, it is very difficult to separate what is being cause by the mosfet pulse or what is being caused by what is pulsing the mosfet in the first place. If you are using a mosfet to pulse a circuit, then you need an initial pulse on the mosfet gate. Sometimes the whole effect is caused by what is pulsing the mosfet gate. High frequency pulsing tends to be present in the complete circuit especially since we do it with no filtering components because we want the raw power to manifest itself.

It has happened to me many many times. That's why recently I suggested to guys that are doing circuit pulsing take off the negative and see if the same effect is possible although at another resonant frequency because once you take off the negative you change the circuits overall potential.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 09, 2010, 10:18:56 PM
An interesting comment about Maxwell's equations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89z0TFEtk-Q
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 10, 2010, 12:20:55 AM
I think what @otto is referring to is when the mosfet diode reversing speed is matched by the pulse frequency. Also when he says taking off the collector, that is because at high frequency, it is very difficult to separate what is being cause by the mosfet pulse or what is being caused by what is pulsing the mosfet in the first place. If you are using a mosfet to pulse a circuit, then you need an initial pulse on the mosfet gate. Sometimes the whole effect is caused by what is pulsing the mosfet gate. High frequency pulsing tends to be present in the complete circuit especially since we do it with no filtering components because we want the raw power to manifest itself.

It has happened to me many many times. That's why recently I suggested to guys that are doing circuit pulsing take off the negative and see if the same effect is possible although at another resonant frequency because once you take off the negative you change the circuits overall potential.

See we keep coming back to this over and over with banging coils.  Its been done now for many years only thing that happens is you get stung on the face and hands from the EMP and headaches. The TPU's never ran like this they started up slow and gently as the frequencies slowly picked up speed. They could be handled without getting whacked and tingled from EMP.

Also lots of discussions about power fets, AMPS, nano second switching times, fast processor clocks handling all the timings. I think you need to remember the TPU was built late 80's long before the vids were even shot. Many years were past before SM had made a few model variants and got them to a stage of showing investors. If SM started off with a tube or two then we are talking about one or two amplifiers or oscillators to generate the frequencies. He already stated for the record there is no mass circuitry.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on August 10, 2010, 12:29:15 AM
     
  Bolt says that to try using magamps in a system would take forever, but won't even take the time make one himself, as proof of concept.
 
                                         NZ
   
 

It takes money and a FULL lab. Only a few people here have that facility.  The magamp takes place of the fet thats all it does. Just an amplifier or switch. When you have a working TPU then the fet can be replaced with a magamp. Its cheaper and and infinitely more robust. If you want to play with mag amps then google search for simple DIY experiments there is a youtube vid for a light dimmer and xtal radio driving a speaker using tiny transformers as amplifiers. There you will learn what the 5Khz clock is for.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 10, 2010, 06:19:49 AM
Just a start from my pile.
Need a bigger NST and neon isn't on.
4 ratshacks in series to up the turn count. 88ohms.

Got to pull some more goodies from my 'way too much' pile.
Its important to have too much stuff.

Bigger NST(thanks Bruce_tpu), 38khz, 6kvac, purple fanning in Neon. I dare not put scope directly on this.
The game is afoot. I gotta crash. Back at tomorrow night.

I don't remember the neon producing purple before. Hmmm, something new.
Camera can not pick it up or focus. Ain't normal light.


Anybody else building this? Or just lurkers?

This setup looks like Tesla coil with a high impedance primary, no secondary(yet), and no top.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on August 10, 2010, 07:24:49 AM
somehow got a double post - corrected one next...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on August 10, 2010, 07:25:41 AM
Very interesting video here by Dr. Eue Jin Jeong.  Mosty text and equations but I believe some of his concepts are very relevant to the TPU.  He even mentions 5Khz and in his final equation he mentions the 5Khz and 5000 watts of power.  Take a look before it's gone.  I see Youtube is making it more difficult to download and save vid's.  Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhXV3ca1J6g
I see he has a more recent vid that has lowered the power output to 2500 watts.  Theoretical but still some very impressive thoughts in this video. 
Dr. Jeong's blog site: www.dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 10, 2010, 03:16:51 PM
  @ Sigma:
      I understand where you're coming from.  We are all in the same boat. But, if the idea is to help in this effort, please explain about the effect generation process that we are not looking at.

As I have already said: 

1. Wind up a simple solenoid coil with about 2000 to 3000 feet of HT magnet wire.  something around 28 AWG diameter, but doesn't really matter for this test.

2. Get a HV DC power supply.  Small neon power supplies like those for neon lights on cars are good with 2kv as a minimum.  4kv works good.  8kv is better.  10kv is even better.  Use some HV caps across the output to help keep it steady, say .01 uF of more.

3. put some sort of spark gap on the positive lead to the coil, other is grounded to pulse power supply

4. put a very small cap across the supply right before the spark gap

5. pulse the coil and you will find that within the space around it, conductive objects are attracted to the coil

Now, what you make if it and what you do with it, is up to you.  Tesla kicked this ball down the field toward the goal.  Most people just stay in their self-imposed coma.

What is it?  Tesla called it "radiant force".  The term "radiant electricity" was used for the charging of objects by this "radiant force".

What's really going on?  You are compressing and expanding "space", the "medium", the "ether", the Vacuum, The Dirac Sea", whatever you want to call it.  Lot more to it than that, but that is all you need to get started.  How this is occuring is anyone's guess.  I have my own ideas that I plan on keeping to myself for now.

Steven used a lot less wire and a different method, same end result though.  This is just a force and not converted to conduction current so don't expect too much. I expect that the 5kHz hash Steven saw is related to his method of producing this force, which I believe is not continuous in his coils.  Perhaps he will read this and comment.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 10, 2010, 07:08:30 PM
@mkt3920,
http://merlib.org/node/5508: in reference:

I see it now. The devices that work have a metallic sink somewhere on the device. In a motor this would the windings and the ferrous. In Deyos coil it would the conductors running along the sides. In Don Smith's PVC there is a coil facing charge bar that is positioned at 90 degrees to the coil windings. In the ECD there are conductors running along the sides. My latest pretty coils have a conductor running the circumerference and 90 degrees to the windings. The GK4 had conductors at 90 degrees to the control windings but on the inside. Bedini mentioned a very simple circuit that engineers could not understand.  Jaf Cleer of Biomod stated the same thing.
So what if the simplest thing is a Radiant/RE/Reactive producer having a sink near it. A metal object to absorb the high speed energy. I leave the physics to someone else. I am just trying to show a configuration pattern.
In the rotovertor the ferrous aids the resonant tank operation. And when saturated it then collects the cold energy like a fully charged cap that charges way past its rating with a ghost charge.
In coils the collecting run is connected to caps to hold the charge. Sounds too simple but in the examples posted here the conductivity of the conductor is slower that the impinging charge. This makes me think of a hyper charge carrier.

I am going to put a bobbin coil over that neon an see what I get.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: 11:11 on August 11, 2010, 09:24:30 AM



have you tried to excite the flux,
in the TPU's iron primary coil,
using high frequency sound,
(speakers, electricity thought wet sand, or moving mechanical objects)
instead of high frequency electricity,
from a signal generator ?



frequency generators are an
expensive,
fragile,
bulky weakness.

which most normal human beings don't even know exists.
let alone find the justification to purchase.

but high frequency sound,
can be generated,
in many simple ways.



if you hit the iron primary coil,
with many different frequencies,
coming from 5 or 6 different sound-generation-sources,
than they might all combine together,
to create a much higher frequency,
inside the primary.


or maybe if you used two wire coils,
and a capacitor,
to make a tank circuit,
than the tank circuit could allow the existing frequency,
to super-oscillate,
under its own power.



i've read of people using simple coil/capacitor oscillators,
to create gigahertz of frequency.

cheap,
simple,
easy to repair parts,
will be required,
if a power source is ever going to become widespread.

otherwise,
the all-powerful-at-inhibiting economic obstacles,
will doom it to never be used.



if all of its parts,
other than maybe magnet wire,
cannot be found at a hardware store,
than that is a major weakness.

the average wage slave must not only understand how to build it,
but also be able to afford it.


Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: forest on August 11, 2010, 12:37:07 PM
11:11

I'm 100% with you ! Totally agree! even capacitors can be home- made
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 11, 2010, 06:00:52 PM
Yep. This go around has a better set of configurations to test.

The coil on the neon with an LED didnt' do anyhting that I could tell. I will put a scope on it tonight. Time was short.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on August 11, 2010, 08:36:02 PM
11:11 sounds like IST
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: 11:11 on August 12, 2010, 02:49:22 AM
11:11 sounds like IST



i don't know who "IST" is,
or what forum-atrocities,
they may have committed.

but i can think of at least 50 different responses,
which are all more constructive,
than what you posted above.


Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 12, 2010, 02:03:54 PM
.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on August 12, 2010, 05:52:55 PM
I found this story, person and device all interesting and some close similarities to the TPU: 
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9586.msg252120#new
 Just in case anyone here missed it - a Peace TPU  ;)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Bentoptics on August 13, 2010, 04:46:53 PM
Sorry if this is off topic and its aimed at GK as I know you will appreciate the info and figure an angle as how it can be applied.

http://caraudiomag.com/articles/rockford-fosgate-t15kw-test-report-amplifier (http://caraudiomag.com/articles/rockford-fosgate-t15kw-test-report-amplifier)

Something about stored power for large output peaks is ringing a bell.

Bent
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 13, 2010, 09:11:20 PM
Why this couldn't be any closer is hard to conceive.

Biomod talks about the caps afterwards also.

And I look at the amp boards. Lo and behold. I also see dual magamp, SM17, hendershot configuration.

As far as OU goes? The process can be achieved in 2 ways. One can smack the bell or one can ring the bell. Ringing allows us to grab tpus barehanded without damage.
There are 3 configurations to achieve the action. Spark to cap, spark to coil to cap, resonate 2 coils.

Sorry if this is off topic and its aimed at GK as I know you will appreciate the info and figure an angle as how it can be applied.

http://caraudiomag.com/articles/rockford-fosgate-t15kw-test-report-amplifier (http://caraudiomag.com/articles/rockford-fosgate-t15kw-test-report-amplifier)

Something about stored power for large output peaks is ringing a bell.

Bent
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 20, 2010, 06:43:39 PM
Received all parts to bench.
Started breadboarding on a large Radio shack board that is mounted on a larger aluminum plate. If this is to sit in the coil center then this interaction with the magnetic field is not acceptable. I want a toroidal field with no or negligable warpage. Beside, I don't want the field spewing off the sides of the plates into space. I am moving the circuit to a simpler breadboard.

Here is the 2 circuit stages of the design. The coil configuration as how it is hooked in comes last.
As can be seen I have spruced up and noted the design with the process sections at certain parts.

It produces slower fields snapped by higher ampilfied noise, Electrostatic.

I have spent an inordinate amount of time picking this circuit apart to document the process. More to come.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: IndianaBoys on August 21, 2010, 03:48:05 PM
GiantKiller,

Not sure if you came across this before but is informative on moving the bloch wall and thought it would be good to add to your repository:

Cores and coils:
http://www.totallyamped.net/adams/page4.html

Full article:
http://www.totallyamped.net/adams/

Keep up the great work,

IndianaBoys
Periodic Spontaneous Energy Discharging From Top Of Neodymium Magnet Into Ferro Fluid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTMquhXlYPU

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on August 23, 2010, 04:36:41 PM
Put this in a ring and watch it go around...
You have 3 frequencies.
You have 3 layers, 1 frequency per layer.
At some point in time in the circumference the frequencies overlap. Get this just right and you can control the width of the overlap. Make this overlap very short and you get very fast eclipsing which snaps the bloch wall in the accumulative field space.
Since this process is in a ring we can also achieve overlap by revolution control. And when you get this bang on you get very large eclipses. We have seen this in many, many devices. BEMF, magnetic field shear, eclipsing, pick your builder also.
Revolution control on the circumference is achieved by maintaining the ratio of the 3 frequencies and changing all of them either up of down.

So this process looks like virtual spark gaps being executed in a circle all hitting the collector in a precessional manner. And OBTW, the ring field in its entirety is also effected by the discharges. Can you say 'Bang on'?

The ring is also LC tanked.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on September 12, 2010, 07:20:11 AM
This refers to previous schematic and is a cross sectional view of the windings around a single collector of multiple turns.
A is low freq
B is medium freq
C is high freq with dual pulse from B controlled by A.

Collector is in middle of A coil.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on September 12, 2010, 05:22:59 PM
    @Gk and All:
     Thanks for the update on your current project. It's been a while since your last post. What do you have for input-output from this set up?
   I have been working on the JT-TPU.  As it seemed that  the Big JT Thread was moving forward onto bigger and better outputs on their projects. 
  So, I have connected the standard JT useing the 2N2222A transistor to a 8 inch torroid bifiliar coil. Although this will light plenty of Leds, but now I'm trying to see if I can light a gutted CFL. The primary 8" bifiliar coil has a steel core, and has 150 windings (stereo wire) on it. But without a secondary on it, it won't light the 13 watt CFL bulb. So, next I will be further winding the coil with a secondary on top.   Any suggestions are welcome.
                                     NickZ
   
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on September 12, 2010, 10:55:17 PM
Low voltage, low current.
The object is to apply a dual pulse to the outer coil c. it consists of the initial frequency then the frequency after the B/middle coil gated by A's pulsing circuit, being before the fet switch.
Been sprucing up the schematic.

So here is the nuts and bolts:
We have a slow freq on the inside coil A, a medium freq on the middle coil B, and the higher frequency on C coil, the outer. The C coil also has the secondary pulse, the dual or companion signal. See the magnetic field action here? The B and A fields are bias. The stress on the fields outside the conductors travels with much less resistance. The correctly timed dual pulse was shown on youtube by ,I believe, JohnnyDavro. There is a prominent pulse returning to the coils from outside. The set up I have uses this return as part of the ramp up.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on September 13, 2010, 03:27:23 AM
I am still getting the final stage done. This is the feedback to the C coil dual pulse. It is hooked up and i have to turn it on and see the scope shots.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on September 13, 2010, 05:32:18 PM
http://content.techrepublic.com.com/2346-13629_11-464580.html?tag=nl.e101

The SM17 has large caps in its large loop tanks because the inductance of the the loops are low. This accomplishes using lower frequencies.

Using tanks instead of just coils allows a latency that we can tangle with instead of constantly pulsing to keep the power up, which is minimal. The circuit can therefore pulse at a slower rate somewhere in the harmonic timeframe of the depricating ringing. The heterodyning of the pulse and the in phase echo of the ringing permits the power to be gained as that tank is pushed at the correct moment. 5khz works with copper while granite works well in the audio range. Monuments and churches have great echoes. Steel has great ringing but nickel and iron do not.

The center toroid caps use low farads but high voltage. Similar to Don Smith.

I am still getting the final stage done. This is the feedback to the C coil dual pulse. It is hooked up and i have to turn it on and see the scope shots.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on September 16, 2010, 07:00:46 AM
Turned on current build:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXX6X_sYA6w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCAUJabQ7lQ
Coils are driven clockwise.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on September 16, 2010, 08:08:10 AM
@GK

Thanks for your videos. It's good to see someone is able to progress on something during these sad days.

Can I mention two things.

1) Maybe add a pot to the coil C since it is on the same impulse timing as B. If I understood your set-up correctly that is.

2) The ground you removed to make it floating, maybe consider connecting it to one or more of the iron cores if they are floating as well. Should not hurt anything but I am just curious to learn what that would do.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on September 16, 2010, 11:05:32 PM
Absolutely @WS.
I have a finished schematic to post, hand-drawn with notes.

I have 3 clocks, a, b, c. But the original schematic shows the 3rd clock as a combination of a and b. I pondered this a long time. It looked like 4 clocks from the chips. but now I think 2! like SM said.
That would be A & B, then C would a combination. This facilitates using #1 and #2 frequencies to produce the companion wave then reading B coil to feed that into C coil. This would give amplification.
The specs state to tune 1-a, then 2-b, retry the 1-a, 2-b loop. When this is correct then tune 3-c. This is the same process as the dual pulse protocol to produce the companion wave.
This is a wonderous circuit with great flexibility. I plan to stick with this a long time for configurability. On the list is opto driven clocks and HV on the coils themselves. This will facilitate / permit the other 2 coils connection.
This schematic came to me as a puzzle and I had to spend alot of time breaking it down to build it piece meal then peer deeper into the total configuration. I also had outside conferences and suggestions.
I also have plans to solderboard this one. When you find a good circuit, put in stone.

Yes. I am glad you pointed out the outer iron wire ground. This is in the circuit but not fully configured yet. The iron core is not usable as a connection. I buried it. Now I think I screwed that up. In the pictures the core is exposed at every 120 degrees. I can get to it if need be, because it will pick up any energy hitting it and transfer unlike 2 copper wires at 90 unless electrostatic.

I have a HV electrostatic power supply to repair.

Whoever made this schematic was a real mastermind.  8)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on September 20, 2010, 04:56:02 AM
woofer kitty:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmRTGRbrATs&feature=channel
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: e2matrix on September 20, 2010, 05:17:55 AM
Best laugh I've had all day !   Cats are great!!  Thanks GK
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 03, 2010, 03:45:16 PM
The description of the proton is very telling.
http://magnetism.vfedtec.com/Sweet.htm
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on October 05, 2010, 07:29:37 PM
Interesting link GK, ran with it and found some interesting points about copper mass. Seems to relate to the TPU and the Kapandze device too. One article I read spoke to using a copper pipe or mass in the center and using a bifilar coil on one end and a pick coil on the other end of the pipe to convert the torsion waves back to EM. All using a static amg field and some sq wave or HV pulsing to emit the torsion waves.

So in the Kapandze device a large copper cable (stranded) is used for the mass. The HV spark is used to excite the Torsion output of the coil and a second coil is used as a static field. Something was mentioned about a 90° coil to the first (pickup?) or perhaps another coil is used? Ideas...humm

as for the TPU design a few wraps of stranded copper for the core, over wrapped coils for pickup and static field (or a neo magnet) and the core torrid is the converter (torsion field generator)?

In either case the mass & length of the coils is the key. Sweet...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 05, 2010, 11:53:55 PM
Yes. Bias the core with HV and use the field instead of the conductor for transmission. Similar to Don Smith's back charging the battery.
I flew outa sleep this morning @ 3am realizing what this means in a ring configuration.
I have the EC600 on the way and ordered (50) 1kv@1a diodes for a cap and diode ladder.

http://www.zephyrtechnology.com/UFO_Technology/Build_Flying_Saucer_/build_flying_saucer_.html

Interesting link GK, ran with it and found some interesting points about copper mass. Seems to relate to the TPU and the Kapandze device too. One article I read spoke to using a copper pipe or mass in the center and using a bifilar coil on one end and a pick coil on the other end of the pipe to convert the torsion waves back to EM. All using a static amg field and some sq wave or HV pulsing to emit the torsion waves.

So in the Kapandze device a large copper cable (stranded) is used for the mass. The HV spark is used to excite the Torsion output of the coil and a second coil is used as a static field. Something was mentioned about a 90° coil to the first (pickup?) or perhaps another coil is used? Ideas...humm

as for the TPU design a few wraps of stranded copper for the core, over wrapped coils for pickup and static field (or a neo magnet) and the core torrid is the converter (torsion field generator)?

In either case the mass & length of the coils is the key. Sweet...
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: Rosphere on October 06, 2010, 12:05:01 PM
...I flew outa sleep this morning @ 3am realizing what this means in a ring configuration...
"...I flew out of my bed to see what was this matter..."  ;)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 06, 2010, 06:16:56 PM
T.T.Brown applied high voltage to an aluminium plate which then registered lighter in weight.
He applied pulsing and this caused propulsion and velocity to a piece of mass.

Podkletnov removed the physical target then applied vectored pulsing which produced propulsion and acceleration to a magnetic density of mass but having no material properties. In other words no physical properties relating to a visible object. This magnetic mass then moved very quickly in a linear path.

Both of these men created a movable mass of high density.
T.T.Brown did not move a metal plate. It was deflected by the high density magnetic mass to a lower density area in space.

Steven Mark put this process in a ring. The Podkletnov process now becomes an inertial vortex. Time this correctly to spin the field. Place conductors in the travel path to collect the EMF.

The pulsing creates a higher density field in the High voltage, high density field of the bias. We also get fast pulse transistions which look like high density boundaries.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on October 06, 2010, 07:27:32 PM
  @ GK:
     Thanks for keeping us up on your ongoing ventures.
  Who would of thought that it was going to be this complicated,  getting some usable magnetic energy up and runnin'.. .   
MS said that it was "not rocket science... how wrong he was.  But, once we get this one down, rockets will be a thing of the past.
    Anything "Electrifying" with your current set-ups?
                                                                           NZ
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 06, 2010, 08:19:01 PM
I had to reposition the bench to accomodate the HV to the coils. I also am going to integrate the center toroid things as readers or triggers.
I am taking controlled steps into this. No blown equipment, no headaches, no cancer.

I have my variac/ MOT monster power supply configured. I also am building a Villard cap and diode multiplier and have an EC600 4kv module coming in. I realize this is over kill compared to the SM17 but I want to manage the discreet steps.

With an HV biased copper core all coils now look viable.

The plan is to use the high density flux field as a meduim for creation of rogue waves.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on October 07, 2010, 05:10:26 AM
    @Gk and All:
   Getting the vortex spinning in the coils, is the trick,
 by using multiple repeated kicks.  Once its spinning and going good, the input source can be reduced to a minimum, and some feedback thrown back to source, like to the run capacitors, to keep it all going.   Like setting a top spinning, and just watching as it slows down. BUT, if a coils vortexial momentum (flux line controls) are kept going by short pulses that the device produces itself, it doesn't have to slow down and stop, but instead it "runs with gain". 
  Magnetic Vortex Reactor...
  Why has it been so hard to get one working? 
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 07, 2010, 05:44:03 PM
With no bias field to work with the coil fields just expand and contract. When the expansion occurs there is no medium to push. What I see with TTBrown and Podkletnov they used incredibly high voltages(which they pulse )in the megahertz) to create a large disparity between the normal earth flux or aether and the device. The greater this difference the more stable the earth flux looks like to push against. Now because our coils use lower voltage it is like we are paddling canoes with feathers on dry land. This should wake some people up. Now what kind of kick would one expect when firing a gun with its barrel pointed under water?

The GK4 having an iron wire core held onto the field longer than the collapse of the pulse. When the next pulse came there was a slight medium to push against. I can wholeheartedly thank Otto for this revelation. I was actually using hysteresis to my advantage. This actually makes it very apparent. As far as getting a low voltage version going I could pull out the GK4 again and put DC on the iron wire core while pulsing the outer control coils.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: NickZ on October 07, 2010, 07:20:18 PM
   @All:
    Since it is the coils pulsing against the earths field, the stronger the force of the pulse the stronger the effect generation.
  But do we need to use dangerously high voltages to achive our goals?
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: starcruiser on October 07, 2010, 08:36:37 PM
magnet???? :P
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: sigma16 on October 07, 2010, 09:07:01 PM
If I have this straight, wouldn't it be easier/simpler to create our own field to push against?  As in, a fairly strong bias field around the entire device?
I'm not the one who originally suggested this, but it seems rational.....  (Grump/Spher)

Actually, this is being discussed elsewhere on the forum as well, right now.

Positive pulses rarefact (expand) the aether.  Expansion is a sequential fashion causes movement of the ather.

The moving aether moves through the magnetic field, no against it.  The magnetic field aligns the spin axis of the aether votices.  This does not mean that the aether becomes a magnet, but the spins are aligned (polarized) and that is what you need. 

This doesn't have to be complicated. 

Also, it should work with a linear movement of the aether, but I have not tried this yet.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 07, 2010, 09:43:55 PM
I did a youtube test using an NST with a Neomag placed on the core and the rise in the scope signals was apparent.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rs1URHIfYQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Rs1URHIfYQ)

magnet???? :P
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on October 25, 2010, 03:41:09 AM
Think about the Newman motor the "Giant Hotdog" :)  He has converted a low voltage stack PP3 battery source into an ELF pulse through large inductor. The inductor the coil of the motor prevents current flowing so the power factor has been trashed it now like a PF almost 0

http://www.josephnewman.com/  yes i know he is as Loopy as a fruit cake but he worked this out decades ago!

"The energy machine is proof that the strength of the motor's magnetic field
is dependent upon the VOLTAGE --- NOT the CURRENT!

For the first time, Joseph Newman demonstrates the
energy machine that turns a 1,650-lb rotary and powers a
375-lb positive displacement pump using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!

In the video demonstration, the energy machine produces phenomenal
speed, torque, and continuously pumps water using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!"

In so doing now you have a machine which is basically KVARS due to current < very small on the batteries yet in circulation is > massive together with a circulating voltage of hundreds or thousands of volt  from a few PP3 batteries. The central motor contact ARCS violent on switching.

WHERE does the machine gets its power from?  The answer is a PF 0 trashed power factor conditions create large magnet forces from the ambient.  So powerful in fact a magnet 12ft away hanging on a thread spins violently! This magnetic energy is converted to motor torque which provides more HP out then the power IN.  This energy came from the ambient due to scaler PF 0 electrostatic field causing disruption to local electron spin. The misalignment is over corrected in the windings and iron cores where internal spin domain currents create a magnetic field as a result.

Anytime you have a moving charge you get a magnetic field.

So as Newman motor works so slow its the best visual example to see how to convert VARS to magnetic force then use that to create shaft power far in excess of the PP3 batteries.

As also per Don Smith teachings a HV source can become electrostatic (VARS) and THEN modulated to create a powerful alternating magnetic field. Use this FREE magnetic field for the source of your energy and NOT the EM fields. Alike his 1 to 4 copy Tesla tower device.

As TPU its the free magnetic rotational field which does all the work.  The conditions to create a powerful magnetic field in rotation WITHOUT power banging fets is the key!  Class C modulated electrostatic fields is the answer.

If the coils have a rotational 3D 2 layer magnetic force spinning it only takes another standard coil placed close by to make a generator. There is no EMP, no banging not in uS anyway only gentle switching. No CPU's and no 30 volt 20 amp lab PSU's required. OH shit that rules out just about EVERYTHING in the last 5+ years:)
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: plengo on October 26, 2010, 03:44:49 AM
Think about the Newman motor the "Giant Hotdog" :)  He has converted a low voltage stack PP3 battery source into an ELF pulse through large inductor. The inductor the coil of the motor prevents current flowing so the power factor has been trashed it now like a PF almost 0

http://www.josephnewman.com/  yes i know he is as Loopy as a fruit cake but he worked this out decades ago!

"The energy machine is proof that the strength of the motor's magnetic field
is dependent upon the VOLTAGE --- NOT the CURRENT!

For the first time, Joseph Newman demonstrates the
energy machine that turns a 1,650-lb rotary and powers a
375-lb positive displacement pump using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!

In the video demonstration, the energy machine produces phenomenal
speed, torque, and continuously pumps water using LESS THAN 20 WATTS!"

In so doing now you have a machine which is basically KVARS due to current < very small on the batteries yet in circulation is > massive together with a circulating voltage of hundreds or thousands of volt  from a few PP3 batteries. The central motor contact ARCS violent on switching.

WHERE does the machine gets its power from?  The answer is a PF 0 trashed power factor conditions create large magnet forces from the ambient.  So powerful in fact a magnet 12ft away hanging on a thread spins violently! This magnetic energy is converted to motor torque which provides more HP out then the power IN.  This energy came from the ambient due to scaler PF 0 electrostatic field causing disruption to local electron spin. The misalignment is over corrected in the windings and iron cores where internal spin domain currents create a magnetic field as a result.

Anytime you have a moving charge you get a magnetic field.

So as Newman motor works so slow its the best visual example to see how to convert VARS to magnetic force then use that to create shaft power far in excess of the PP3 batteries.

As also per Don Smith teachings a HV source can become electrostatic (VARS) and THEN modulated to create a powerful alternating magnetic field. Use this FREE magnetic field for the source of your energy and NOT the EM fields. Alike his 1 to 4 copy Tesla tower device.

As TPU its the free magnetic rotational field which does all the work.  The conditions to create a powerful magnetic field in rotation WITHOUT power banging fets is the key!  Class C modulated electrostatic fields is the answer.

If the coils have a rotational 3D 2 layer magnetic force spinning it only takes another standard coil placed close by to make a generator. There is no EMP, no banging not in uS anyway only gentle switching. No CPU's and no 30 volt 20 amp lab PSU's required. OH shit that rules out just about EVERYTHING in the last 5+ years:)

I love it. Very profound and I think possibly very correct.

Good merging of concepts man.

Fausto.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 28, 2010, 02:25:30 AM
@Bolt,
I agree 100%.
I know the devices have HV in them someway, somehow. And the manipulation of a control on a magnetic field. I have taken steps to cut out certain parts to see just what the basis is with a full configuration. The TPU being a whole of many parts I wanted to see separate items that I thought were inherent. I have a set up that has a coil between 2 buffers pointing towards the coil. This effectively is no current and strictly potential.  The coils are 3 layers each wound from start to end. This is different from the segmented controls before. The setup is complicated but the process just mentioned is attainable.
I am looking to go back to some of the simpler tests and applying the process of the double pulse to the fields, if that makes sense.

I been off the bench to get things done around the house in the last days of warm weather. The next step I took was to get the hardware removed from my left foot, 8 screws and a bracket.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 29, 2010, 04:58:12 AM
Things are fine.
No pain today just discomfort. All in a days work.

Just looking at some things:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Rotoverter

GK, I hope all is well with the support "removal".

I'm still lurking about here, and had to wish you well.

Art.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on October 29, 2010, 05:20:40 AM
@GK

Man I was worried from your pretty long absence. Glad to learn that you are doing better and hope you have a quick recovery.

I am back at my bench and continue my tests with Tesla Ozone Patent style using my new huge JFETS. Have to be careful they are about 58$ each. But at last I now have fast pulsing without an internal diode. Now to match the JFET throughput and the copper masses. I will probably need some help from @gyulsan. With the right mix, I am sure this will get very very close. I am seeing new waveforms with multiple inner waveforms that I could never see with a regular mosfet. I am planning on buying 5-10 small transformers or toroids all put in parallel as the working circuit.

What I have learned recently is that when pulsing at high frequency, it is pointless working with just one toroid. The high frequency will be present in one primary or in 10 primaries or in 100 primaries just as strong because it is only resonance that has no limit to the mass it can resonate in. The problem is always grabbing it out with only one secondary so I am sure working with several primary/secondaries will work best.

All in good time.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: iflewmyown on October 29, 2010, 02:08:27 PM
@ giantkiller,
I have a 600 lb. rotoverter on my driveway. 25 horse power 1160 rpm. It will run on an 120 volt ac lamp cord. It is supposed to pull over 30 amps at 460 volts. This is my third and largest rotoverter. I could never be sure on the small ones if my measurements were correct. Now I am sure. I tested with the Phil Woods double plug and dc motor system and just with a prony brake and analog ammeter. It is never over unity. At it's best it can be tuned to put out 1 hp using about 2% more energy than 746 watts. In other words it is a dud. Who wants a 600 lb. one horsepower motor... It has to be re-tuned for each load. Tesla was the greatest motor man who ever lived. Where is his rotoverter patent? If there is anyone who would like to prove me wrong on this they are welcome to come here and test this. I would love to be wrong. And no I won't spend any more time on it. Anyone who wants to use it may do so just as long as they come here and spend their time.
Garry
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: wattsup on October 29, 2010, 02:47:11 PM
@iflewmyown

No point in proving you are wrong, because you a right. lol
Yes they will run on peanut juice, but you won't feed an elephant.

The only way I can see this work is with a good DC motor that is modified so that you add two more brushes on the commutator that are right next to the existing pair of working brushes. This way you can get back the energy supplied to the motor and re-cycle it. This lowers the overall DC drive motor consumption while still providing the full torque to turn a generator. Now the generator would have to be double the size, meaning if you wanted to produce 1000 watts, you use a 2000 watts generator that is only loaded at 50%. This way the generator does not produce its maximum drag.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: ramset on October 29, 2010, 04:55:10 PM
I flew
Perhaps you can share a little more on your experience here?
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=396.0
Chet
Ps Some folks claim this works !
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: iflewmyown on October 29, 2010, 06:36:41 PM
@Ramset,
I know some folks claim this works. It is quite impressive to see that huge hunk of metal spinning with just a tiny lamp cord. I have talked to Hector on the phone many years ago and he would never explain exactly how to self loop it. I don't believe it has been despite the claims I read. I told my electronics instructor in 1971 that I could use the reactive power in this type of circuit to produce free energy and he laughed. After many nights of experiments and study I now believe him. The rotoverter is easy to be fooled with small replications. This giant will let you see the truth. Again I say that Tesla would have done it if it were worthwhile.
Garry
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on October 30, 2010, 05:32:01 AM
No one ever said RV is OU but its a VERY efficient motor like 99%.  It can never go OU within itself unless method used to cover the 1% losses. If it could and it has happened under certain pulse drive conditions the motor goes into incremental frequency latches and accelerated to 30,000 rpm and explodes like a bomb.

Best I seen is 10HP motor running on 11 watts. So where does the energy come from which is actually driving the motor? The answer is magnetic! Like newman the "power" in converts to VARS and high volts no amps creates local electron spin stress creates high magnetic fields. Its this which drives the motor the 11 watts is just the "energiser". To see this in action is 1000 times more exhilarating than any joule theif flashing an LED or Bedini bicycle wheel:)

 BUT it can go OU when driving another 3 phase motor and use the 3rd phase leading edge as gain typical 1.618 by the book and i have seen it draw 100 watts and provide 160 watts o/p on several occasions. Or you can drive a single phase motor and use that to recover the losses to the prime mover. This method has been looped and documented using pulley 5:1 ratio, banks of caps and 1000 watt inverter to get the thing started.

The best gains are when RV drives an axial perm mag generator. Or you can make one by modifying off shelf 3 phase motor and fit neos on the rotor to make a synchronous generator. This will provide a PF >1 back into the mains supply and drastically lower the electric bill.

I don't have time to trawl the net to show you all the experiments but looping is real i seen it too many times on private skype calls not everyone likes to shout about looping. This one of the better ones. A good neo generator is OU only needs the gearing sorted and cap bank to loop it. THis Would work perfectly without water RV driven.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhwQt1tJYa8

Magnetic drives greatly reduce losses they are also 99% coupling devices. See youtube Donald Duck motor 100 watts i/p for 157 watts o/p.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: yuvgotmel on October 30, 2010, 06:09:45 AM
The initial statement caught my attention about the RV and OU, which OU is easily calculable if the device has a load. This is good info that you included:

BUT it can go OU when driving another 3 phase motor and use the 3rd phase leading edge as gain typical 1.618 by the book and i have seen it draw 100 watts and provide 160 watts o/p on several occasions. Or you can drive a single phase motor and use that to recover the losses to the prime mover. This method has been looped and documented using pulley 5:1 ratio, banks of caps and 1000 watt inverter to get the thing started.

The best gains are when RV drives an axial perm mag generator. Or you can make one by modifying off shelf 3 phase motor and fit neos on the rotor to make a synchronous generator. This will provide a PF >1 back into the mains supply and drastically lower the electric bill.

Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2010, 06:43:31 AM
The rotoverter on a single shaft is not correct. The Generator and motor have to be side by side to share each others fields.

Howard specifically talks about the pulley ratio and self adjusting for slippage.
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/Howard_Johnson_Motor/

@iflewmyown:
I would be interested in seeing your setup.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: tosky on October 30, 2010, 07:36:33 AM
How did he start up the machine rotor?
Did he use the same battery to make it move from stop to full speed?
If he use other power to start up then it seems already stored much energy before rotating. The battery just use to keep the motion.
If no other loading, it consumes very little energy when implemented very good bearing. That may be the reason of the long last battery.
It needs to clarify the start up method.
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: iflewmyown on October 30, 2010, 05:51:48 PM
@GK
There is no setup left. Here is a picture of the motor with an automobile battery for size comparison. My goal in posting was to encourage you to stay the course. Your work with coils is important in my estimation. The rotoverter is a myth in my opinion. It is an efficient motor but I don't need a 600 lb. one horsepower motor. Joseph Newman has a similar problem in that his machine puts a tiny fraction of horsepower for its size. I have a pump in a solar tank of 4000 gallons that will pump the same gallons as Newman's multi-ton setup. It uses ten times as much energy as Newman's (400 versus 44 watts) but Newman's setup would not even fit in my tank which is 8' x8'.

I know that some people would have a hard time accessing a motor that size to play with and I will repeat my offer to loan it to whoever wants to play with it. It is unbelievably dangerous with that many hi voltage caps so caution is advised.
Garry
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: giantkiller on October 30, 2010, 06:21:46 PM
I understand. Every configuration has a nugget of the process in it. I scrutinize every build to find the depth of the actuation. I.E. two coils resonant at 90 degrees have a twisted bloch wall between or middle connection plane in space. Hutchison runs 2 Tesla coils and a transducer to produce a twisted interference pattern on or in the target. The molecular lattice aligns itself with the pattern.

So there are 3 things:
What is the shape, size and focal point or area of the pattern? Is the target a resonant point in space or a target material, like a ferrous path?
So far, I have not seen anything to the contrary how it is created and utilized.

@GK
There is no setup left. Here is a picture of the motor with an automobile battery for size comparison. My goal in posting was to encourage you to stay the course. Your work with coils is important in my estimation. The rotoverter is a myth in my opinion. It is an efficient motor but I don't need a 600 lb. one horsepower motor. Joseph Newman has a similar problem in that his machine puts a tiny fraction of horsepower for its size. I have a pump in a solar tank of 4000 gallons that will pump the same gallons as Newman's multi-ton setup. It uses ten times as much energy as Newman's (400 versus 44 watts) but Newman's setup would not even fit in my tank which is 8' x8'.

I know that some people would have a hard time accessing a motor that size to play with and I will repeat my offer to loan it to whoever wants to play with it. It is unbelievably dangerous with that many hi voltage caps so caution is advised.
Garry
Title: Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
Post by: bolt on October 31, 2010, 12:19:22 PM
@GK
The rotoverter is a myth in my opinion. It is an efficient motor but I don't need a 600 lb. one horsepower motor. Joseph Newman has a similar problem in that his machine puts a tiny fraction of horsepower for its size. I have a pump in a solar tank of 4000 gallons that will pump the same gallons as Newman's multi-ton setup. It uses ten times as much energy as Newman's (400 versus 44 watts) but Newman's setup would not even fit in my tank which is 8' x8'.
Garry

Garry,

Hector advised you NOT to use a 600lb motor as RV efficiency works best on motors 3 to 10 HP. Also while RV works to about 1/4 plated value this is only true for 50/60Hz operation. Now you are stuck with a monster on your drive which requires a crane to move it.

This means a 10hp motor usually only 72% efficient can run at 99% efficient at 2.5 HP in RV mode.

If you need 50 HP from a 10hp motor while running it in pure RV mode then change the bearings to HS ceramics, balance the rotor and run it at 30,000RPM and you get your 50HP. The faster you run the more horses:) Of course needs pulse drive and will still idle on a few watts at full speed.

Now can you see why Newman motor is only a demonstrator of resonance technology but impracticable? RV is good off the shelf and can be tweaked at very low cost ie bearings and frequency drive will piss over anything else bang for bucks. Even Newman knows this as stated in his video "speed is power" but his pile of junk motor can hardly muster  300 rpm LOL