Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!  (Read 368347 times)

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #765 on: August 09, 2010, 08:43:27 PM »
.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #766 on: August 09, 2010, 09:16:27 PM »
No problem...
This is the wave of disgruntlement that appears every so often. You should see the ring pile size of Marco!

Here is one pattern that hasn't emerged yet so let me divulge:
Solid state needs a magamp. Why? A place for the activity to happen, to be stored and used/released. Tubes don't need this. Why? Because the happening, the storage and expression is in the ion/electron field between the cathode and anode. SS doesn't have this space.
Does not the infiinte ring storage have the same parameters as the tube space? Think about that...

--gk. To the victor go the spoils.

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #767 on: August 09, 2010, 09:52:06 PM »
I think what @otto is referring to is when the mosfet diode reversing speed is matched by the pulse frequency. Also when he says taking off the collector, that is because at high frequency, it is very difficult to separate what is being cause by the mosfet pulse or what is being caused by what is pulsing the mosfet in the first place. If you are using a mosfet to pulse a circuit, then you need an initial pulse on the mosfet gate. Sometimes the whole effect is caused by what is pulsing the mosfet gate. High frequency pulsing tends to be present in the complete circuit especially since we do it with no filtering components because we want the raw power to manifest itself.

It has happened to me many many times. That's why recently I suggested to guys that are doing circuit pulsing take off the negative and see if the same effect is possible although at another resonant frequency because once you take off the negative you change the circuits overall potential.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #768 on: August 09, 2010, 10:18:56 PM »
An interesting comment about Maxwell's equations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89z0TFEtk-Q

bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #769 on: August 10, 2010, 12:20:55 AM »
I think what @otto is referring to is when the mosfet diode reversing speed is matched by the pulse frequency. Also when he says taking off the collector, that is because at high frequency, it is very difficult to separate what is being cause by the mosfet pulse or what is being caused by what is pulsing the mosfet in the first place. If you are using a mosfet to pulse a circuit, then you need an initial pulse on the mosfet gate. Sometimes the whole effect is caused by what is pulsing the mosfet gate. High frequency pulsing tends to be present in the complete circuit especially since we do it with no filtering components because we want the raw power to manifest itself.

It has happened to me many many times. That's why recently I suggested to guys that are doing circuit pulsing take off the negative and see if the same effect is possible although at another resonant frequency because once you take off the negative you change the circuits overall potential.

See we keep coming back to this over and over with banging coils.  Its been done now for many years only thing that happens is you get stung on the face and hands from the EMP and headaches. The TPU's never ran like this they started up slow and gently as the frequencies slowly picked up speed. They could be handled without getting whacked and tingled from EMP.

Also lots of discussions about power fets, AMPS, nano second switching times, fast processor clocks handling all the timings. I think you need to remember the TPU was built late 80's long before the vids were even shot. Many years were past before SM had made a few model variants and got them to a stage of showing investors. If SM started off with a tube or two then we are talking about one or two amplifiers or oscillators to generate the frequencies. He already stated for the record there is no mass circuitry.

bolt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #770 on: August 10, 2010, 12:29:15 AM »
     
  Bolt says that to try using magamps in a system would take forever, but won't even take the time make one himself, as proof of concept.
 
                                         NZ
   
 

It takes money and a FULL lab. Only a few people here have that facility.  The magamp takes place of the fet thats all it does. Just an amplifier or switch. When you have a working TPU then the fet can be replaced with a magamp. Its cheaper and and infinitely more robust. If you want to play with mag amps then google search for simple DIY experiments there is a youtube vid for a light dimmer and xtal radio driving a speaker using tiny transformers as amplifiers. There you will learn what the 5Khz clock is for.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #771 on: August 10, 2010, 06:19:49 AM »
Just a start from my pile.
Need a bigger NST and neon isn't on.
4 ratshacks in series to up the turn count. 88ohms.

Got to pull some more goodies from my 'way too much' pile.
Its important to have too much stuff.

Bigger NST(thanks Bruce_tpu), 38khz, 6kvac, purple fanning in Neon. I dare not put scope directly on this.
The game is afoot. I gotta crash. Back at tomorrow night.

I don't remember the neon producing purple before. Hmmm, something new.
Camera can not pick it up or focus. Ain't normal light.


Anybody else building this? Or just lurkers?

This setup looks like Tesla coil with a high impedance primary, no secondary(yet), and no top.

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #772 on: August 10, 2010, 07:24:49 AM »
somehow got a double post - corrected one next...

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #773 on: August 10, 2010, 07:25:41 AM »
Very interesting video here by Dr. Eue Jin Jeong.  Mosty text and equations but I believe some of his concepts are very relevant to the TPU.  He even mentions 5Khz and in his final equation he mentions the 5Khz and 5000 watts of power.  Take a look before it's gone.  I see Youtube is making it more difficult to download and save vid's.  Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhXV3ca1J6g
I see he has a more recent vid that has lowered the power output to 2500 watts.  Theoretical but still some very impressive thoughts in this video. 
Dr. Jeong's blog site: www.dipoleantigravity.blogspot.com

sigma16

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #774 on: August 10, 2010, 03:16:51 PM »
  @ Sigma:
      I understand where you're coming from.  We are all in the same boat. But, if the idea is to help in this effort, please explain about the effect generation process that we are not looking at.

As I have already said: 

1. Wind up a simple solenoid coil with about 2000 to 3000 feet of HT magnet wire.  something around 28 AWG diameter, but doesn't really matter for this test.

2. Get a HV DC power supply.  Small neon power supplies like those for neon lights on cars are good with 2kv as a minimum.  4kv works good.  8kv is better.  10kv is even better.  Use some HV caps across the output to help keep it steady, say .01 uF of more.

3. put some sort of spark gap on the positive lead to the coil, other is grounded to pulse power supply

4. put a very small cap across the supply right before the spark gap

5. pulse the coil and you will find that within the space around it, conductive objects are attracted to the coil

Now, what you make if it and what you do with it, is up to you.  Tesla kicked this ball down the field toward the goal.  Most people just stay in their self-imposed coma.

What is it?  Tesla called it "radiant force".  The term "radiant electricity" was used for the charging of objects by this "radiant force".

What's really going on?  You are compressing and expanding "space", the "medium", the "ether", the Vacuum, The Dirac Sea", whatever you want to call it.  Lot more to it than that, but that is all you need to get started.  How this is occuring is anyone's guess.  I have my own ideas that I plan on keeping to myself for now.

Steven used a lot less wire and a different method, same end result though.  This is just a force and not converted to conduction current so don't expect too much. I expect that the 5kHz hash Steven saw is related to his method of producing this force, which I believe is not continuous in his coils.  Perhaps he will read this and comment.


giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #775 on: August 10, 2010, 07:08:30 PM »
@mkt3920,
http://merlib.org/node/5508: in reference:

I see it now. The devices that work have a metallic sink somewhere on the device. In a motor this would the windings and the ferrous. In Deyos coil it would the conductors running along the sides. In Don Smith's PVC there is a coil facing charge bar that is positioned at 90 degrees to the coil windings. In the ECD there are conductors running along the sides. My latest pretty coils have a conductor running the circumerference and 90 degrees to the windings. The GK4 had conductors at 90 degrees to the control windings but on the inside. Bedini mentioned a very simple circuit that engineers could not understand.  Jaf Cleer of Biomod stated the same thing.
So what if the simplest thing is a Radiant/RE/Reactive producer having a sink near it. A metal object to absorb the high speed energy. I leave the physics to someone else. I am just trying to show a configuration pattern.
In the rotovertor the ferrous aids the resonant tank operation. And when saturated it then collects the cold energy like a fully charged cap that charges way past its rating with a ghost charge.
In coils the collecting run is connected to caps to hold the charge. Sounds too simple but in the examples posted here the conductivity of the conductor is slower that the impinging charge. This makes me think of a hyper charge carrier.

I am going to put a bobbin coil over that neon an see what I get.

11:11

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #776 on: August 11, 2010, 09:24:30 AM »



have you tried to excite the flux,
in the TPU's iron primary coil,
using high frequency sound,
(speakers, electricity thought wet sand, or moving mechanical objects)
instead of high frequency electricity,
from a signal generator ?



frequency generators are an
expensive,
fragile,
bulky weakness.

which most normal human beings don't even know exists.
let alone find the justification to purchase.

but high frequency sound,
can be generated,
in many simple ways.



if you hit the iron primary coil,
with many different frequencies,
coming from 5 or 6 different sound-generation-sources,
than they might all combine together,
to create a much higher frequency,
inside the primary.


or maybe if you used two wire coils,
and a capacitor,
to make a tank circuit,
than the tank circuit could allow the existing frequency,
to super-oscillate,
under its own power.



i've read of people using simple coil/capacitor oscillators,
to create gigahertz of frequency.

cheap,
simple,
easy to repair parts,
will be required,
if a power source is ever going to become widespread.

otherwise,
the all-powerful-at-inhibiting economic obstacles,
will doom it to never be used.



if all of its parts,
other than maybe magnet wire,
cannot be found at a hardware store,
than that is a major weakness.

the average wage slave must not only understand how to build it,
but also be able to afford it.



forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #777 on: August 11, 2010, 12:37:07 PM »
11:11

I'm 100% with you ! Totally agree! even capacitors can be home- made

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #778 on: August 11, 2010, 06:00:52 PM »
Yep. This go around has a better set of configurations to test.

The coil on the neon with an LED didnt' do anyhting that I could tell. I will put a scope on it tonight. Time was short.

sigma16

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
Re: Bloch wall disconnect and reconnect. The final design!
« Reply #779 on: August 11, 2010, 08:36:02 PM »
11:11 sounds like IST