hi mark,

"you are increasing voltage but reducing current"
REPLY:always remember you can provide voltage to some load but the current is defined by the load it self

explaining further: in a 220 volt socket you can plug 1000 watt heater it will draw 4 to 5 amps
at the same time if you put 100 watt bulb it will draw 0.5 amps approx.
so voltage is provided , current is the drawn from the line according to the load.
in watt meter voltage coil only open the path for magnetic flux but current coil make the movement to see how much wattage is being consummed.


in my device i am providing it 30 volts

when we conduct a test of 160 watt  at output source of our device it was giving us 220 volts at 0.7 amps approx.
and when we check the current at the input the voltages are 30 volts at 1.5 amps

RESULTS:

input  =     30 *1.5 = 45 watt  (in a simple approach not going in complexity at the moment)
output = 220 * 0.7 = 154 watt (you see amps gone down from 1.5 to 0.7 this is very natural)

Now with in the device the switching is in a very specific way, causes a resonance and more charges aligning themselves then in a conventional manner 
telling you truly when i was conducting these tests i was knowing that charges are there but they are not in flow and i have to find a way to make them flow or convert them as workable PD(potential difference )

mechanical example of situation: you have bath tub full of water the top is open water cannot flow out from top  if you make a whole in bottom of the tub it will flow (natural) now i have to make water flow from top. if i can do the same in electronic means what i have achieved is creating PD with non aligned electrons.

i am in the middle of writing the thesis about my theories and there practical conversions so i will not discuss these concepts any further until i arrange to publish them

i am not saying that i am a very intelligent man but i am learning as well an argument for  argument will waste our own time rather then a simple practical output if my device is working and have potential soon it will be there in market its just a matter of time   

i think my idea to givel the unit for R@D purpose to get hold of some funds as donation to noble cause to further carry out research was not a good idea
coz according to my professional ethics i will not give unit to any one until he is satisfied and knows what he is getting
and people around me are not able to digest the new concept here, i should carry on my work and take it to a completion level

strange enough no body asked me ,what is the next level in development if its working why not i start producing it


the difficulties;
the behavior of the unit is purely like a generator you off load it, the  voltage rises we need to develop an AVR
loads like air conditioners turns on the compressor and turns off this could seriously effect the process, an instantaneous response to load variation is required to be incorporated with in device
device cannot work without load it will destroy it self (resonating frequency) we need to include dummy load to balance the device and harness the appropriate output according to current dissipation.
if output load increase from the capacity of input source the unit destroy it self 
things are not so simple as it seems, a lot more work is required before the device is ready for market

i posted the video on you tube when i saw magna coaster video, i did wrong i should complete the device by burning more of my own fuel to reach the destination , rather then giving people half cooked device i think i should get hold of some project to make enough money to complete my unit then sky is the limit.

thanks to everyone

Ali


 




     
 

Hi Ali,

Thanks for all this information and sorry to ask you even more questions. This is too fascinating to only watch and read 

I have following questions for you so we all can better understand what your circuit and software actually does:

- What is the range of the switching frequency of your circuit?
- You mentioned in your video that no transformer or coil is used in your circuit. How can you obtain resonance even if you apply a pure resistor load like a light bulb? Does the coil of the Wattmeter play a role too?

please do not get offended by all means i didn't mean to hurt anyone

i have discussed every thing very openly and have also mentioned where i am stuck, i have to finish the working by myself. well scams, measurement errors , tricking the meter , wrong theories , they all have one simple answer a complete product.
   

reply: robbie47

the LC circuit is one of the method to generating frequency, the other way is digital oscillator i have develop a digital circuit with feed back control you can see multiple capacitors in circuit this is where we are storing charges as a water tub and through siphon the level is raised to new voltage levels remember destination is going to be a lower level then initial start up otherwise it won't work

in our test i will not use watt meter the video was to show a lay man that less energy is consumed
for technical peoples measurements and numbers are good enough to establish results.
regards
Ali

Hi Ali,
sounds like you use the principle to load 2 caps in parallel and then switch
them in series, so you double the voltage, more like voltage doubler circuit.

Normally current just halves, so the power stays the same, but maybe you invented
some kind of strange MOSFET controlled switching frequency, that raises
the switching frequency
with some kind of feedback loop, so more charges in the caps are transfered to the
higher voltage potential ?
But what when you run out of electrons from the bigger first cap ?

I still don´t understand the Siphon effect.

Your example with the bathtub sounds logical, but does not make much sense
to me, cause in this case you might get only a potential energy difference for maybe
50 cm when you draw the water over the top
instead of in the bottom of the bath tube.

But if you would make a Siphon like using a hose and put the hose from under the bathtube
water surface first 3 Meters higher and then going from there
lower than the lower bathtube exit hole, you will definately draw first the water 3 Meter higher
and then the water goes over the top in the 3 meter higher hose and then will flow
down the rest of the hose to the output of the hose, which is lower than the upper
water level.

Now if you have found a trick how to trap some of the water there at 3 Meter higher level
and build there a storage before it is going down and keep sucking up more water higher
than goes down at the other side and thus get more and more water to the 3 Meters top,
this would be interesting.

So now the question is, how do you do this Siphon effect electronically with Electrons.

As it is your secret you will probably not tell us yet.

Well, maybe the best solution would be to design it this way, that you
really use a 12 Volts or 3 x 12 Volts battery in series= 36 Volts DC input  power
source, so you can show it with a better measurement DC power input.

P.S: Did you also try it with a 220 Volts to 30 Volts AC transformer as the input
or just only with the TRIAC dimmer circuit ?

I hope this is not related to the Meter-Triac jamming as
EMdevices has suggested, so better just try it without this
meter and without the TRIAC dimmer circuit by just using
a 220Volts to 30 Volts AC transformer for the input and
measure then using a scope with a shunt for power input.

P:S:

Again at the example with the bathtube:

If you would arrange the hose above the bathtube at 3 Meters height
for example of 100 loops of the hose , then you would
have a lot of water up there 3 Meters over the bathtube at the start when you
suck the air out of the hose and not much water had run down the hose yet.

So the question is, if sucking the air out of the hose uses less energy than the potential
energy of the water 3 Meters higher in the 100 loops of the hose ?

If the answer is YES , you could make a valve into the hose and
shut it up, when the whole 100 loops are full of water and have
that potential of water do more work, when it is released and
will fall down in the gravity field.

I was building these circuits many years ago and they work very well but there are bottlenecks or rather limitations which I am sure you are aware of.

Allcanadian, can you post some more details of the circuits that you tried earlier?