Its easy to make coil lookiing image, its HARD to drive it properly to get OU..
All coils need filters ? LOW pass? High Pass?  Edge frequency of filters?
Why 50 Hz signal and 380 kHz signal have to by in SYNC?= One is VERY slow and other is fast. What difference does it make here?

Unless you do experiment, your questions won't be answered.

And it is simple as that: when you mix 2 incoming signals on ferrite in 2 coils(the geometry question still needs to be answered), you resonate ferrite core and use as transformer on same time. The experiment results show what happens when you tune those 2 signals in such way they start affecting needed power IN vs OUT.

Offcource there is.
You find things that make sense and you find things that are suspicious.
Besides, untill you got one running in front of your eyes you can never be sure.

@microcontroller, OK you have said what you wanted to say. So now, please clear off. There are lots of sites where you can communicate with people like yourself.

@T-1000

1) Please explain to us what the yoke coil replaces. Does it replace the flyback transformer (FBT) or the caduceus coil (CC) or is this a totally different system.

2) If it replaces the FBT, then should not the 150 turns coil have tap points at every 1/5th of total winds to put the small capacitor across the 3rd and 4th taps as per your diagram.

3) If it replaces the CC, then the topology is totally different concept. Can this be correct.

4) Another question is why do you guys want to work on the yoke coil when your first device works and people already started getting the components, etc. I think with the first device using the flyback and CC, we should look at this effect because it works with the CC that is extremely easy to make.

I have done some frequency hunting with the CC and have found some good effects. I will make a video hopefully tonight when I get back from work.

Also, I think I blew my flyback which was the standard dioded type. When I tried putting the HV output through the second FBT coil as per your diagram, I think the internal diodes just played havoc with that second coil.

5) Because of this, I would like to know if all have convened on a close match to the FBT you are using. Also, if we can identify the closest match to your flyback and if there is a good steady supply, I am willing to have one sent to you to try on your build, just to see if any other flyback will work before we all spend so much more time trying to hunt around for the right flyback. Maybe such a plan could be coordinated via @stivep and I am more then willing to paypal the expenses if this can lead to you trying a more widely available FBT model.

While testing my standard FBT, I have noticed that along with the HV output, there is another output. That output is the flyback returning to the power supply. When I provided the input power via my regulated DC power supply, the amperage and voltage reading flew through the roof and even if I put my Fluke 87 True RMS Multimeter across the feed supply, I could not get any readings as it only showed "overload".

So there is power exiting the FBT from the HV side but there is also some tremendous flyback return via the input side of the FBT that may need to be properly captured and returned to source.

I have so many more questions and even some requests for you to try certain variations but there has been so much off-topic things that it is not the good time.

Please do not give up on us.

wattsup

@FreeEnergyInfo
all is possible... 

this video ist SPAM ....!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pkvfo6opaiI&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAmDpqhvxZE&feature=player_embedded

VIEV...new video...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0LdGSO50l0

COOL VIDEO......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsKa532nYc0
forum...
http://realstrannik.ru/forum/39-kapanadze/102-analiz-replikaczii-ustanovki-tarielya-kapanadze.html?limit=18&start=4230#31530

@AbbaRue

Thanks for your reply.

The Caduceus Coil (CC) has some very special properties that still needs to be investigated and not just set aside because there is a new Yoke Coil (YC) on the block. This will help me better understand the original TK design. Don't get me wrong though. I have one other yoke available because my first one has a coil designed by @otto on it that I just do not want to take apart for sentimental reasons. So I will make this YC soon enough.

But also, from what I read in your post, we still need the Flyback Transformer (FBT) to feed into the YC. So we still have to find the right FBT type and from my tests with a regular FBT, I now realize that the internal components are not suitable for such a design. (I had to test it for myself but ti does provide great HV output to play around with. Just don't touch the output wires - lol).

If you made a moment by moment depiction of the total process of the FBT, you need those internal diodes taken out because the energy is being pushed around from both directions and this is amplifying the overall FBT output to a different level then if you did it with a standard FBT. So this also has to be better understood. Amongst all of theses variables, eventually it will become evident that a set of features that will be able to use as a base principle in many other device formats, including many of the past builds I already have on hand.

The one thing I do not like is the fact that the first device shown by @T-1000 has already shown to be OU and we should all be jumping up in the air celebrating this fantastic event, but instead, all of a sudden a key component, the CC, has been replaced by this new YC. Usually one of the main rules of OU research is "If you have a working device, DO NOT CHANGE IT."

wattsup

PS: One thing about pulsing the FBT and producing the first spark gap. Man oh man. Every time I had it running it would play havoc with the TV, channels would change, my computer key board would disconnect, programs would open up on their own. So I really have to find a better enclosed spark gap as right now it is only two copper wires.

wattsup,

where can I see some video, or schematics for this....there are soo many pages I get lost in all of this... is it in this thread, or?

@T1000 & Stivep

It might be a good idea to start a new "TK Builders Thread"  At 548 pages this is getting a little long in the tooth.

wattsup,

where can I see some video, or schematics for this....there are soo many pages I get lost in all of this... is it in this thread, or?

@bender

The links are all over the place. This is why we need one @member to do the following;

1) Contact @hartiberlin who is the forum administrator and ask him for permission to open a new companion thread to this one with moderator status and ability to lock the thread.

2) Open the new thread that can be called "Tariel Kapenadze" -
"Companion Thread", or,
"Tool Box", or,
"Compendium", or whatever.

3) Start post #1 as a Table of contents that has links to the main thread with a brief description of the link.

4) Put a link to the new thread in your profile signature so other @members can have access to it if it flies off recent posts page.

5) Once and a while post something on the main thread to keep your signature accessible on the main thread.

We need this to keep track and to enable anyone else who arrive here an easy method of getting up to speed.

I personally do not have the time to do it myself and hope that some @member will take up the challenge. So please all, let's get back on track.

wattsup

TK uses TV verticalmodule make magnetic field.