Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16552427 times)

vrand

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1890 on: June 10, 2010, 01:45:50 AM »
Here is my replication for Kapanadze-Kapagen style. No A yet as it is impossible to use digital equipment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a675_0onwjg

Nice work romerouk!

Looking forward to your design schematic and parts list.

Regards, Mike R.

aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1891 on: June 10, 2010, 02:06:41 AM »
BTW, has anyone noticed that this is similar to Steve Marks with the wire through the coil...

Or Coler
Or Markovitch
Or about 8+ others who have had FE or other weird effects from this and similar current through magnetic field orientations...

majkl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • Free Energy News to Your Facebook profile:
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1892 on: June 10, 2010, 03:46:15 AM »
in this video:
http://www.magistrala.cz/freeenergy/2010/01/16/fun-with-electrostatic-x-tros-tt/
input: 1.6A/27.2V and output is: 2.3A/40V
It's not exactly a kapanadze replication (no spark-gap,...) but maybe it helps (there is a diagram in video).

iflewmyown

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1893 on: June 10, 2010, 05:47:01 AM »
I have built the Kapagen device as drawn by romerouk and it does work as he shows. However we may be missing one important fact. The ground is an excellent conductor. If you draw out his circuit and tie the wires going to ground together you have a very poor way to conduct 2000 volts through a string of light bulbs. I will continue tomorrow but you may rest assured that it will light 3  100 watt bulbs much brighter than normal and will pop 3  40 watt bulbs instantly. My current going into a 900 watt MOT is over 25 amps measured with a fifty year old analog clamp meter.  Garry

callanan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1894 on: June 10, 2010, 06:33:28 AM »
Hi All,

It appears that this is the circuit JLN & romerouk are using based on what I can see from their videos and the information they have provided.


baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1895 on: June 10, 2010, 07:31:26 AM »
Quote
I have built the Kapagen device as drawn by romerouk and it does work as he shows. However we may be missing one important fact. The ground is an excellent conductor. If you draw out his circuit and tie the wires going to ground together you have a very poor way to conduct 2000 volts through a string of light bulbs. I will continue tomorrow but you may rest assured that it will light 3  100 watt bulbs much brighter than normal and will pop 3  40 watt bulbs instantly. My current going into a 900 watt MOT is over 25 amps measured with a fifty year old analog clamp meter.  Garry

@Romerouk, Dragon, iflewmyown, Naudin etc

In order not to rush to unreal extraordinary results, the ones with the devices on hand should follow a short of procedure so as to indeed verify that the claimed input is the actual one.

With the spark-gap working, tit produces all short of oscillations HF that can distort measuring equipment at input. (I know first hand)

i suggest two basic solutions for dealing with that problem (I am sure guys more skilled int the art will say so menthing better)

1) The use of choking cores suitable at working 50Hz (relative high impedance) and choking higher frequency oscillations. So the measuring equipment to be applied after the input chokes
(diagram 1)

2) Another very simple way is after having roughly estimated the input (that you think it is - say 3 amps at 120volts) to verify it by putting in line with the wall socket a suitable power of incandescence lamps so as to work at 1/2 or 1/3 of their nominal current strength. For economy the bulbs could be 12volt. it does not matter.

So if the input is 3 amps (you think is is) flow to the MOT the incandescence bulbs will remain off, or at a low glowing (that you know by previous experimenting) meaning that your estimation is accurate. If the input is not 3 but much higher, then the incandescence indicating bulbs will be far more bright that your meter suggests, indicating More current.
(diagram 2)

PS: I do not want to play the smart (ss) here, but we have to extract solid conclusions.

PS2: Actually with a clamp meter, a transformer and some patience the solution (2) is pretty much accurate (because all shorts of currents ( higher frequency or not, true or imaginary) have same effect on ohmic resistance even undetected by normal measuring.

So by practicing a bit you could tell by looking the arrays of bulbs how much input flows to your device.

 

Hoxan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1896 on: June 10, 2010, 07:52:27 AM »
Hello everyone,
Great work has been done, thanks romerouk.

Few years ago I was playing with tesla coil and i had to order custom transformer 10kV / 300W. I would like to replicate kapagen with trafo but I am afraid that i will destroy it.  What do you think ?


Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1897 on: June 10, 2010, 08:06:54 AM »
Hoxan:

Wow, that is nice!  I am kind of glad I don't have one of those as I would probably accidentally electrocute myself with it in under an hour.

Bill

Qwert

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924

vrand

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 214
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1899 on: June 10, 2010, 09:00:19 AM »
Hi All,

It appears that this is the circuit JLN & romerouk are using based on what I can see from their videos and the information they have provided.

Thank you callanan for the schematic.  :)

Romerouk also mentioned he is using DC and a capacitor 90.02mf connected in parallel with the load.

"DC as the source to the system, diode and a capacitor connected to the MT output."

Regards, Mike R.

tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1900 on: June 10, 2010, 09:26:50 AM »
Thank you callanan for the schematic.  :)

Romerouk also mentioned he is using DC and a capacitor 90.02mf connected in parallel with the load.

"DC as the source to the system, diode and a capacitor connected to the MT output."

Regards, Mike R.

Thank you callanan
 
but dragon said :
 
Quote

 
 The light intensity is brighter with the wire or coil through the center. The ground doesn't seem to make any difference if it's connected to the end or through the center. It will work without the ground but the intensity of the light is lower and consumption goes up to around 10 watts.


romerouk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1901 on: June 10, 2010, 11:10:38 AM »
Quote from: callanan link=topic=7679.msg244334#msg244334 =1276144408
Hi All,

It appears that this is the circuit JLN & romerouk are using based on what I can see from their videos and the information they have provided.

Well done callanan, this is exactly the diagram used by me.
I have changed now for high voltage dc with benefits for the spark gap, not overheating... but brightness is not the same, lower by 20-30%

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1902 on: June 10, 2010, 11:17:08 AM »
Many thanks to all who contributed to this.
Now we have a good schematics thanks to Ossi Callanan.

romerouk, how do you produce the DC ?
Do you use one way rectifier diode or graetz bridge at the MOT ?

What High Voltage cap do you use ?

I wonder, why the ground wire from the MOT goes through the center and then
back to the MOT ?
This normally will result in canceling the magnetic field inside the back and forth wire,
as it is a true canceling bifilar setup, so I wonder if this is really good ?

2. Also as you use 22 turns CCW and then 84 turns CW,
so the 22 turns cancels a bit of the 84 turns coils,
maybe it is just easier and better
to use just 62 turns alone, so you only need 2 coils in total and not 3 coils ?

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

romerouk

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1903 on: June 10, 2010, 11:26:25 AM »
I have connected capacitors in parallel with the load (0.5 - 2uf), not 90uf as someone have stated here.I have to go to work now, I will do some more testing this evening.
I need to get some more bulbs...
I understand that someone else had luck with this design, I hope many others will replicate and come with new improvements.

Regards,
Romerouk


baroutologos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #1904 on: June 10, 2010, 11:27:04 AM »
Quote

What High Voltage cap do you use ?

I wonder, why the ground wire from the MOT goes through the center and then
back to the MOT ?
This normally will result in canceling the magnetic field inside the back and forth wire,
as it is a true canceling bifilar setup, so I wonder if this is really good ?

2. Also as you use 22 turns CCW and then 84 turns CW,
so the 22 turns cancels a bit of the 84 turns ,
maybe it is just easier and better
to use just 62 turns alone, so you only need 2 coils in total and not 3 coils ?

Many thanks.

, Stefan.

hello admin,

....

Concerning the cancellation of the B-flux for the two coils wound CW and CCW, despite initial appearances this is not happening. Since the current comes from the CW section and then returns from the CCW section, inductance is enhanced and not diminished. I have measured just to be sure.

ps: If you think about it, while we wound any solenoid, we go (eg) CW till reaching an end then we continue CCW till the other end, the again CW etc. The alteration of currents total vector in combination with wounding alteration makes no a difference.

Just look at the pic below. Suppose that we start winding the black coil from the far right part. When reaching the close end, and we continue winding the red coil without any change in our winding style.
Yet if you consider the red/black coil as the strting point, results the one (red) to be wound CCW and the black CW.
Interesting little thing...


« Last Edit: June 10, 2010, 12:41:48 PM by baroutologos »