Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16594088 times)

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19905 on: November 03, 2013, 06:32:51 PM »

do you have more of it?
What next one  needs to do?






Wesley


 Yeah just look at the video I showed. The coils around the radiator should be grounded on one end and then lead to your load. In the case of this driver transformer there should be a negative wire and a separate positive wire. In the rf version these will alternate back an forth much like traditional AC system. The bifilar harvest coils should be enough capacitance to act like Tesla's top loads. So mini Tesla coils for each phase.


 I don't have it all worked out but that is as complete as I have gotten. We must start looking into this and that means building the transformers and bifilar ground tap coils.


 Lets think of it like this: No matter how many times you strike a tuning fork it still rings at it's resonant frequency right? Well that is kinda what is happening to the bifilar coils. This is why Akula was showing the two towers and how they differed. One driven (Tesla coil) and the other passive but still rung by the Tesla tower emissions. Hmmm... Wow thats interesting isn't it... This is where the guessing happens until I get my lab up....

 The smaller box is the cap I assume.. That too has to be custom made and oil filled. You know the one that the 9v battery connects to.

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19906 on: November 03, 2013, 07:17:27 PM »
Magnetic Spin Waves…
 
The FS Loop Antenna  proof of concept for spin-fields
within Ferrite Sleeve inductors.
 
 
http://gmweb2.net/The%20FS%20Loop.htm
 
http://www.am-dx.com/antennas/FSL%20Antenna%20Design%20Optimization.htm
 
“One of those pieces of hardware is a coil. It has a ferrite core and a trick winding on it. To look at it, it looks like a rather oddly wound inductor. When measured on a radio-frequency bridge, however, it shows some very peculiar properties. There are certain frequencies at which it is impossible to balance the r.f. bridge, and that is a direct contradiction to what any electrical engineer will tell you should happen with a coil of wire wound on a ferrite core. Now if we take this coil and we excite it with radio frequency energy at or near these critical frequencies, we find that energy goes into the coil and nothing comes out. It just disappears. As a matter of fact we had one coil about an inch in diameter and eight inches long and we poured a kilowatt into that coil for two hours from a kilowatt communications-type transmitter. The coil was in a two-inch brass tube with a plate welded on one end and a transmission line fitting on the other. We could find no radiation around the outside of that tube at all. In other words the energy went in; none came out. The information which we got from the boys topside was that we were actually making tenser energy, which is a six-dimensional radio wave, and it is a type of energy they use extensively for radio communications, transmission of power and for pushing and pulling. In fact they use it for just about everything that we can think of. We were not able to control this energy; we could just make it. We are hoping that later on we will be able to learn how to do it, but at the present time we are just not smart enough.”
 
Wilbert B. Smith  1961…
 

Hi Acca,

You refer to two links above on ferrite sleeve antennas and under the links then you quote a text from Wilbert B. Smith.

My understanding is that the quote from Wilbert Smith does not refer to the ferrite sleeve antenna coil. I know you did not write that it refers to it but I do think a clarification is in order.

So the coils wound for the ferrite sleeve antennas in your two links and shown in the picture your attached are normal single layer coils while the coil in Wilbert Smith's text is mentioned as a "trick winding" (an oddly wound inductor).  To put it otherwise, it is the caduceus coil which has "some very peculiar properties", tested first probably by Wilbert Smith back in the 1960's.

Here is shown such caduceus coil and how it is wound, tested by Naudin: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/smithcl.htm   

Greetings,  Gyula

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19907 on: November 03, 2013, 08:37:45 PM »
 To make the distinction between the two methods of using the transformer this might help to understand it.


" In connection with the coil I use either the ordinary form of discharger or a modified form.  In the former I have introduced two changes which secure some advantages, and which are obvious.  If they are mentioned, it is only in the hope that some experimenter may find them of use."

The magnetic disrupter (picture 1) is for the impulse form and the multiple gaps (picture 2) is for the traditional AC form.

 Reference:

 http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm
 http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/tesla/coloradonotes/coloradonotes04.htm


 Again I would like to stress the method Tesla used to get this information out there. It was never released in one single patent or document. He did this to make sure it was released without tipping off the norms. The patents were single aspects of a whole device and not all of the patents had this information. So you have to make the connection then collect the data from each patent or source to form the whole device.
 Again this was a Tesla tactic and was the way he operated. He tried to focus on each aspect to learn as much as possible for that particular  aspect.

 Also for the one that pointed out that Tesla said what he meant. I beg to differ with that. It is never more obvious then what he said above... He called the oscillator a coil so that ends that right?

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19908 on: November 03, 2013, 09:24:42 PM »


 Wow ask and you receive.


 Here is someone actually doing the work. Although he is almost all right there are a few things we need to explore more.


 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px14OF1D3EA

 Great job TheOldScientist!

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19909 on: November 03, 2013, 10:14:19 PM »

 Wow ask and you receive.


 Here is someone actually doing the work. Although he is almost all right there are a few things we need to explore more.


 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px14OF1D3EA

 Great job TheOldScientist!


Great Post. We're almost there. Notice he said the bifilar pickup coil coil needs hardly any tuning. Just as Akula said.
So we now know that in the Kapanadze setup coil 1 is ordinary; coil 2 is bifilar. Also the old scientist's bifilar looks to have a  core.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19910 on: November 03, 2013, 11:26:50 PM »

Great Post. We're almost there. Notice he said the bifilar pickup coil coil needs hardly any tuning. Just as Akula said.
So we now know that in the Kapanadze setup coil 1 is ordinary; coil 2 is bifilar. Also the old scientist's bifilar looks to have a  core.

So where is Kapanadze's second copper earth in the 'Green Box' video??

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19911 on: November 04, 2013, 12:45:28 AM »
So where is Kapanadze's second copper earth in the 'Green Box' video??


 Like I said there are ways to get around 1 of the earths and possibly both. Stronger power can be attained with 1 ground on the bifilar though.

 Maybe we can come up with two different sized machines for the same power output. The larger mobile unit will be necessary unfortunately. The bifilar can be connected to a virtual ground or antenna via a capacitor maybe...

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19912 on: November 04, 2013, 02:10:23 AM »
No the capturing happens in between the stout coils and whatever you choose to harvest the energy... IE Kapanadze 2005 backyard coil or the 3 phase coils I was talking about...

The three coils red, green and blue are the 3-phase output coils. Now how does Kapanadze manage to get a phase shift of 120 degrees between each of these three coils in order to run a 3-phase motor when all three coils harvest the energy from the same white stout coil in the center?

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19913 on: November 04, 2013, 04:36:37 AM »
The three coils red, green and blue are the 3-phase output coils. Now how does Kapanadze manage to get a phase shift of 120 degrees between each of these three coils in order to run a 3-phase motor when all three coils harvest the energy from the same white stout coil in the center?


 The only device to use the 2 phase would be the motor and that can be done via the internal caps in the bifilars, each coil is made in different lengths. That is a common Tesla method that can be adopted by this method.:http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-416,191-electro-magnetic-motor . Only one phase would be used for the lighting and the other two used for the motor possibly? Two coils look much bigger then the other coil. The red and green coils look to be bigger and the blue coil is much smaller...
 I'll have to recheck the video tomorrow and verify this...

 By the way the stout coil isn't white. It looks like an old industrial heater coil or induction heater coil from an electric water heater. The white stuff must be like that stuff he used on the disk motor setup. Probably cement or something like that.

Haan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19914 on: November 04, 2013, 05:48:16 AM »
The three coils red, green and blue are the 3-phase output coils. Now how does Kapanadze manage to get a phase shift of 120 degrees between each of these three coils in order to run a 3-phase motor when all three coils harvest the energy from the same white stout coil in the center?

Zeitmaschine,

that's a jolly good question!.

By the way, where did that picture come from?.

stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19915 on: November 04, 2013, 06:14:08 AM »
The three coils red, green and blue are the 3-phase output coils. Now how does Kapanadze manage to get a phase shift of 120 degrees between each of these three coils in order to run a 3-phase motor when all three coils harvest the energy from the same white stout coil in the center?
[/font]



stivep

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3567
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19916 on: November 04, 2013, 06:19:38 AM »
Zeitmaschine,

that's a jolly good question!.

By the way, where did that picture come from?.


Quote
The three coils red, green and blue are the 3-phase output coils. Now how does Kapanadze manage to get a phase shift of 120 degrees between each of these three coils in order to run a 3-phase motor when all three coils harvest the energy from the same white stout coil in the center?
motor
electrical  motor!!!
think about 220 in  your house in USA
and lack of third one
 
What static converter does?


than compare with   TK tent  presentation
there is motor there!!
than  compare it  with TK glass table
there are 2 motors there


 NONE is  ever connected to load!


got it?






by the way
 think also about asynchronus motor  from my posts in 2012


think about uncertainty what is in tent  presentation,, that looks like capacitors?



think about always problem to start TK device  it shows  big current at the first seconds
 
think about noise in TK bed presentation






Wesley





Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19917 on: November 04, 2013, 08:49:14 AM »

 Like I said there are ways to get around 1 of the earths and possibly both. Stronger power can be attained with 1 ground on the bifilar though.

 Maybe we can come up with two different sized machines for the same power output. The larger mobile unit will be necessary unfortunately. The bifilar can be connected to a virtual ground or antenna via a capacitor maybe...

Please provide a schematic to show how a Kapanadze type system can be configured with just one earth. He uses no visible virtual ground or antenna. Why do we need two different machines to provide the same power output and what would the larger mobile unit be necessary for?

a.king21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1650
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19918 on: November 04, 2013, 09:14:01 AM »
Aquarium 2 analysis: Just as per the patent.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19919 on: November 04, 2013, 09:48:58 AM »
Aquarium 2 analysis: Just as per the patent.

Thank you but I think we are all well aware of TK's patent system block schematic. I would like to see a schematic from jbigness5 which gives considerably more detail than TK's basic block schematic which nobody so far can translate into a working circuit schematic.