Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze  (Read 16407712 times)

skywalker66

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 182
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19845 on: October 31, 2013, 02:11:19 PM »
Using the ground as an electron pump can only work at high frequencies and/or high voltage (Tesla).
It will not work at mains voltages.
Don Smith used high voltages and spark gaps to get frequency.
Benitez in the patent  17811 I have referred to, uses a wimhurst machine to get volts and a series of Tesla switches
to get frequency.
Kapanadze uses high frequency and static.
E V Gray used High frequency and static.
Melnychenko in his Russian patent uses static and radio frequencies.

It work for HV DC also when a large metal plate is electrostatic charged  in respect to the ground. See Van der Graaf generator. Or when you get charged when get off an wool sweater and then touch something metalized or grounded get shocked.

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19846 on: October 31, 2013, 02:21:07 PM »
Do this with a 25KV charge picture tube as HV capacitor. See what happens. ;D

»The third plate of a capacitor which has a metal can, is the can itself and to use it as a three-plate capacitor, a connecting wire is attached to the can.«

3-Phase capacitors typically have such a metal can, even with screw mounting. Is it pure coincidence that TK uses a whole bank of these capacitors?

1. Is simple to build and has a long, trouble-free life. (that's indeed an unaccustomed feature nowadays)
2. Uses only a few, readily available parts. (from the junkyard)
3. Only a very low level of understanding is needed. (my level complies with this)
4. Once it is installed, the energy provided is free. (what a pity for all meter manufacturers)
5. The energy source is available everywhere. (unfortunately I can't test it on the Moon)
6. It fulfills any and all energy requirements, for example, cars and aeroplanes. (only some power plants will have to close down)

So what's still the problem? ??? :( Did I miss something? ???


 Me and a friend worked on the 3 plate cap. We called it a captret. Very interesting device. There is something about the 3 way of plates mixed with capacitance that allows it to energize the other plate via the electric field. This energizing effect further polarizes the cap. Sorta like a non polarized cap being made polarized. Once one set of plates forms a charge the other plate gets a sympathetic charge for free. It uses a common pairing of plates from case to negative plate of the cap to form the capacitance. Then you hook your device to be used to the common connections of the capacitor to pull power from.
 This was extrapolated from experiments where one could touch the can of the capacitor and energy would appear in the capacitor from seemingly no where. Every radio guy will attest to this.


 As for the health issues of this type of energy Tesla used, Well Tesla found this energy to be very beneficial to the human condition at a certain impulses per second(2000+). Please understand that the type of energy Tesla was using was impulses and not AC. AC creates a back and forth motion while impulses only energize in one direction. If enough impulses are present, the object, no matter what it is, stays energized and does not de-energize while the field is in effect. Another experiment verifies this finding. It's called an exciter circuit.


 You can use this as a reference: http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml

 Most think that Tesla was all about AC well for a little bit he was. But when he started to see that others wanted to put a price on the free flowing Niagrafalls and not use it to advance the human condition he was abhorred.

 As luck would have it when Tesla came to USA, Edison was having trouble with his system for which Tesla was Temporarily employed under the false pretense of being paid 50k for fixing Edison's problem. This is where Tesla learned about Radiant energy and learned about Edison's and mans cruel Humor. These guys were all about creating Money streams and not about advancing the human Condition. We know Tesla was all about the human condition because of this work: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1900-06-00.htm

 That information is a bit out of order but you get the point.

 Lets look at the difference between AC half rectified and impulses.

 At the same frequency of 2k we can see this.

 |_|_|_| <--- AC half rectified
 ||||||||  <----Impulses

 AC half rectified will always be Half or more less in frequency then IMPULSE technology. Since Impulse Technology can maintain the excitation of the target better we can see why it works better. I am of the opinion that AC half Rectified is impulse like but not enough to get the impulse effect. Tesla talked about the spark gap feeding a stout bar of copper. Well in the case of TK isn't that what is around his 2005 coil system? Isn't it fed by a spark gap?

 Tesla shows what is needed to make this system in a very economical and simple transformer version. HERE: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm

 Figure 3 is that transformer!

 To further polarize the system he employs a magnetic field around the spark gap... Isn't it funny that TK puts the spark gap very close to the coils in his system?

 Lets now touch on the stout copper and how it responds to the impulses. Impulses are one way. There is no negative direction. So where would the other half of the energy be coming from. From all around the stout copper bar. And to boot in the case of TK he uses a coil of stout copper. What happens when you pulse a copper coil? It responds with a very high voltage bemf. A conversion of the input to fill the gaps of a half rectified AC signal as a sort of response from the input. Lets look at an analogy. What happens when you push your hand forcefully into a pool of water? BABoom and a response of the water as it pushes back with all the force of the total pools volume to create a geyser.

 When I started looking at the other experiments of TK I saw many parallels to Tesla's experiments. This included the Transformer I mentioned above in figure 3. If you read down further in that Lecture you will see the one wire application of the transformer in respects to the motor TK built in the Warehouse Video in figure 17. In TK's version he used TWO disks and two iron bars under the disks.
You can see them in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3thvqFhFIfY

 Where the disks are you can see they go into the base a bit. This is where the iron bars are that have the coils on them. The only other thing you need is the oscillator transformer I mentioned above and a surface of metal as the virtual ground as shown in the Tesla lecture. There have been some improvements in TK's system because he uses two disks and a way to couple them together by a coil in between them. If that is a valid fact we will have to see. There is a lot of flim flam in his devices to make them look complicated because he didn't want people to see just how easy it was to do and in fact I have had some conversations with people who were in contact with TK, Those conversations always involved money so to protect his knowledge he uses a shield of large investment to release that information. But it isn't needed. All we need to do is build the transformer oscillator and do the Tesla experiment. Everything else can be rediscovered very easily. In fact this is my goal. When I get my lab running these things will be redone and shown for what they are in very concise and frank videos that will completely dissect the device after running the device to show there is no flim flam.

 Here is the challenge that I would like to extend to you all. Beat me to this... Do the Tesla experiments before I prove you all wrong. Do them correctly and as Tesla has set forth. Do not change a thing even if it goes against your teachings. Replicate Tesla's experiments and you will see the truth one way or the other and lets put this over drawn conversation to bed.

captainkt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19847 on: October 31, 2013, 02:26:34 PM »
@Zeit, regarding one wire and free energy. If out you get 25KW through a very very thin wire, standard thinking dictates 25KW must go in, however the wire in between with the best will in the world would melt at 1 or max 2KW regardless of what it is made of so thinking practical a lot less must go in for wires to hold up? After all Kapanadze uses 400w in 5KW out. Does single wire transfer use a similar ratio in to out.
Regards
Keith

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19848 on: October 31, 2013, 02:39:43 PM »
@Zeit, regarding one wire and free energy. If out you get 25KW through a very very thin wire, standard thinking dictates 25KW must go in, however the wire in between with the best will in the world would melt at 1 or max 2KW regardless of what it is made of so thinking practical a lot less must go in for wires to hold up? After all Kapanadze uses 400w in 5KW out. Does single wire transfer use a similar ratio in to out.
Regards
Keith

Captain,

Where did you get the 400W in for Kapanadze?

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19849 on: October 31, 2013, 02:46:13 PM »
But bringing a live x wire for kapanadze in the middle of the woods will be even harder, not to mention burying a large radiator there . ;D

No problem if you are a magician like Kapanadze.  ;D

captainkt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 262
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19850 on: October 31, 2013, 02:57:36 PM »
@ Hoppy, the old blue Russian inverter he uses is 400w. He also does say in one of his vids 400w I have noticed also that when I am playing with HV coils and transformers etc 350w to 500w seems the best for anything to happen.
Regards
Keith

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19851 on: October 31, 2013, 05:15:54 PM »
@ Hoppy, the old blue Russian inverter he uses is 400w. He also does say in one of his vids 400w I have noticed also that when I am playing with HV coils and transformers etc 350w to 500w seems the best for anything to happen.
Regards
Keith

Thanks Captain. I have a couple of home made bulky iron transformer based inverters around that rating that I could experiment with. Up to now I've been using smaller switched-mode inverters.

Regards
Hoppy

Ansis

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 112
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19852 on: October 31, 2013, 07:06:08 PM »

 Me and a friend worked on the 3 plate cap. We called it a captret. Very interesting device. There is something about the 3 way of plates mixed with capacitance that allows it to energize the other plate via the electric field. This energizing effect further polarizes the cap. Sorta like a non polarized cap being made polarized. Once one set of plates forms a charge the other plate gets a sympathetic charge for free. It uses a common pairing of plates from case to negative plate of the cap to form the capacitance. Then you hook your device to be used to the common connections of the capacitor to pull power from.
 This was extrapolated from experiments where one could touch the can of the capacitor and energy would appear in the capacitor from seemingly no where. Every radio guy will attest to this.


 As for the health issues of this type of energy Tesla used, Well Tesla found this energy to be very beneficial to the human condition at a certain impulses per second(2000+). Please understand that the type of energy Tesla was using was impulses and not AC. AC creates a back and forth motion while impulses only energize in one direction. If enough impulses are present, the object, no matter what it is, stays energized and does not de-energize while the field is in effect. Another experiment verifies this finding. It's called an exciter circuit.


 You can use this as a reference: http://educate-yourself.org/fe/radiantenergystory.shtml

 Most think that Tesla was all about AC well for a little bit he was. But when he started to see that others wanted to put a price on the free flowing Niagrafalls and not use it to advance the human condition he was abhorred.

 As luck would have it when Tesla came to USA, Edison was having trouble with his system for which Tesla was Temporarily employed under the false pretense of being paid 50k for fixing Edison's problem. This is where Tesla learned about Radiant energy and learned about Edison's and mans cruel Humor. These guys were all about creating Money streams and not about advancing the human Condition. We know Tesla was all about the human condition because of this work: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1900-06-00.htm

 That information is a bit out of order but you get the point.

 Lets look at the difference between AC half rectified and impulses.

 At the same frequency of 2k we can see this.

 |_|_|_| <--- AC half rectified
 ||||||||  <----Impulses

 AC half rectified will always be Half or more less in frequency then IMPULSE technology. Since Impulse Technology can maintain the excitation of the target better we can see why it works better. I am of the opinion that AC half Rectified is impulse like but not enough to get the impulse effect. Tesla talked about the spark gap feeding a stout bar of copper. Well in the case of TK isn't that what is around his 2005 coil system? Isn't it fed by a spark gap?

 Tesla shows what is needed to make this system in a very economical and simple transformer version. HERE: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm

 Figure 3 is that transformer!

 To further polarize the system he employs a magnetic field around the spark gap... Isn't it funny that TK puts the spark gap very close to the coils in his system?

 Lets now touch on the stout copper and how it responds to the impulses. Impulses are one way. There is no negative direction. So where would the other half of the energy be coming from. From all around the stout copper bar. And to boot in the case of TK he uses a coil of stout copper. What happens when you pulse a copper coil? It responds with a very high voltage bemf. A conversion of the input to fill the gaps of a half rectified AC signal as a sort of response from the input. Lets look at an analogy. What happens when you push your hand forcefully into a pool of water? BABoom and a response of the water as it pushes back with all the force of the total pools volume to create a geyser.

 When I started looking at the other experiments of TK I saw many parallels to Tesla's experiments. This included the Transformer I mentioned above in figure 3. If you read down further in that Lecture you will see the one wire application of the transformer in respects to the motor TK built in the Warehouse Video in figure 17. In TK's version he used TWO disks and two iron bars under the disks.
You can see them in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3thvqFhFIfY

 Where the disks are you can see they go into the base a bit. This is where the iron bars are that have the coils on them. The only other thing you need is the oscillator transformer I mentioned above and a surface of metal as the virtual ground as shown in the Tesla lecture. There have been some improvements in TK's system because he uses two disks and a way to couple them together by a coil in between them. If that is a valid fact we will have to see. There is a lot of flim flam in his devices to make them look complicated because he didn't want people to see just how easy it was to do and in fact I have had some conversations with people who were in contact with TK, Those conversations always involved money so to protect his knowledge he uses a shield of large investment to release that information. But it isn't needed. All we need to do is build the transformer oscillator and do the Tesla experiment. Everything else can be rediscovered very easily. In fact this is my goal. When I get my lab running these things will be redone and shown for what they are in very concise and frank videos that will completely dissect the device after running the device to show there is no flim flam.

 Here is the challenge that I would like to extend to you all. Beat me to this... Do the Tesla experiments before I prove you all wrong. Do them correctly and as Tesla has set forth. Do not change a thing even if it goes against your teachings. Replicate Tesla's experiments and you will see the truth one way or the other and lets put this over drawn conversation to bed.

I think the same. Tariel Kapanadze is real Tesla`s device replicator.
Unipolar Dynamo and I think the theory of long wires is taken from Teslas Fuelless generator.
Kapanadze`s motor spin fast and accelerate with time- like Teslas Unipolar Dynamo.


Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19853 on: October 31, 2013, 07:26:25 PM »

 Here is the challenge that I would like to extend to you all. Beat me to this... Do the Tesla experiments before I prove you all wrong. Do them correctly and as Tesla has set forth. Do not change a thing even if it goes against your teachings. Replicate Tesla's experiments and you will see the truth one way or the other and lets put this over drawn conversation to bed.

The challenge is yours, prove us all wrong. Show us a self-runner  ;D

You can talk the talk, can you walk the walk?? 

jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19854 on: October 31, 2013, 08:31:24 PM »
The challenge is yours, prove us all wrong. Show us a self-runner  ;D

You can talk the talk, can you walk the walk??


 No the challenge was thrown down to you and the others who like to talk the talk. It seems all you do is talk especially on the subject of Teslian technology. I on the other hand have been busy with experiments and when my lab is operational I will show all. Videos will be made and like I said all will be shown and nothing will be hidden. So again if all you got from my last post was the challenge then I humbly ask you to reread the whole thing then do the work. It is very simple.


 Do you actually think Tesla would bet on his reputation to do lectures in front of all of the then, current scientist and might I add stun them all and be in error? Tesla did not operate on that principle. He was a doer first then Talked about it. The discussions were quite interesting if you go back to when Tesla was allowed to write for the Electrical Experimenter. Obviously there are a lot of people who have not done there homework.


 Let me ask you a question.... How can you prove something wrong without doing one thing on the subject that the something is?


 One fact is true in all of our science. It is all Theory till it is exposed with fact. In the case of Tesla the facts were laid on the table a very long time ago and instead of people actually doing the experiments properly they just say it is impossible with the current theories. Theories are not facts. Just because the theories have not been disproven does not mean they are facts. Anyways when provided a way to prove the current theories wrong with the correct experiments they chose to do the experiments in the wrong manner or better yet not at all, knowing this would continue the falacies of the past because it would ruin their income stream.


 Lets be honest with each other, How much do you think money will be worth when this technology gets proven and applied? When people do not have to be put in "Survival" mode to exist. Everything will change and yes it will take some adjustment by humanity to ride the change out. The funny thing is man is so resilient that he can ride it out. We will adjust and money will be put in it's place, far behind what is good for humanity. Money will evolve too. It will be for the extra stuff and not be tied to our existence. We will become truly FREE. That is what scares them the most and I bet guys like you Hoppy...


 It is coming so get ready.

Hoppy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4135
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19855 on: October 31, 2013, 09:17:25 PM »

 No the challenge was thrown down to you and the others who like to talk the talk. It seems all you do is talk especially on the subject of Teslian technology. I on the other hand have been busy with experiments and when my lab is operational I will show all. Videos will be made and like I said all will be shown and nothing will be hidden. So again if all you got from my last post was the challenge then I humbly ask you to reread the whole thing then do the work. It is very simple.


Thanks but no thanks. You are clearly an authority on the works of Tesla, so it will be much simpler for you to show us how we should go about building a self-runner once you have built your own and posted your videos.

Grumage

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1113
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19856 on: October 31, 2013, 11:04:42 PM »
Dear Zeitmaschine.

With regard to your recent posts. Three plate capacitors.

I recently went to visit an old friend of mine who has been in the business of variable frequency drives for over 30 years. Typically I was on the "Cadge" For redundant cap's etc.!!

I was specifically after high value Non polarised capacitors. The next sentence may be of interest??

He said that you could connect the two positive plates of electrolytic capacitors together and then use the negative plates as a non polarised cap. This was something of a shock to me!!
However could this be the answer to a three plate design? I am just thinking laterally!!  :)  BTW I have not put this to the test. Has anyone else??

Just another thought, Cheers Grum.

Zeitmaschine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1267
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19857 on: November 01, 2013, 12:00:25 AM »
He said that you could connect the two positive plates of electrolytic capacitors together and then use the negative plates as a non polarised cap. This was something of a shock to me!!
Two caps connected in series is still two times two plates design. As I see this, it has to be one electric field (not two) in one capacitor but with three separated plates. The third plate should influence (the electric field of) the other two plates.

So let's say plain and simple, make a 50Hz resonant LC circuit, then connect the can of the cap to high voltage (and high frequency) and some other part of the circuit to ground. See what happens. Nothing unusual, I'm afraid. :(

And I'm still puzzled why I can find this sentence ...

»The only limit on the output power is the size of the capacitor«

... just on one single website (because they forgot to delete it), although that document from Don Smith is said to be published on 14th February 2004!

What's going on here? A conspiracy perhaps? 8)


 Me and a friend worked on the 3 plate cap. We called it a captret. Very interesting device. There is something about the 3 way of plates mixed with capacitance that allows it to energize the other plate via the electric field. This energizing effect further polarizes the cap. Sorta like a non polarized cap being made polarized. Once one set of plates forms a charge the other plate gets a sympathetic charge for free. It uses a common pairing of plates from case to negative plate of the cap to form the capacitance. Then you hook your device to be used to the common connections of the capacitor to pull power from.
 This was extrapolated from experiments where one could touch the can of the capacitor and energy would appear in the capacitor from seemingly no where. Every radio guy will attest to this.

Every radio guy? Could it be that every radio guy is in error?

Asking, because this website states:

»Chapter 9 (page 69). The removal of the section on captrets as I and several others have investigated them in some depth and are of the opinion that they are exceptionally difficult to analyse, are liable to damage capacitors and they appear to produce no useful power

So does that mean all other stuff in that PJKbook on 2586 pages does produce useful power beyond all doubt but they are absolutely sure that the captrets do not? Hmmm ...

And by the way, the two diodes on that three-plate capacitor reminding me of a statement from someone called teofiliuss: »In the output of the Turk device are powerful diodes. They fix output energy.«

Maybe that's just another coincidence. ???

P.S.: Also removed from that book David Wells Weather Control, because it is too powerful! :(



jbignes5

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1281
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19858 on: November 01, 2013, 12:16:09 AM »



 I just wanted to show you that no and I mean no frequency but our own bodies provide is enough for getting power from the ground.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVKbhK5vvgU

dllabarre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
    • Portal Page
Re: Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze
« Reply #19859 on: November 01, 2013, 01:22:28 AM »

 I just wanted to show you that no and I mean no frequency but our own bodies provide is enough for getting power from the ground.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVKbhK5vvgU
Along those same lines is this healing device:
http://www.u2ecom.com/PersonalEngy/personalenergydevice.htm
I know first hand that this device works.
DonL