Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"  (Read 1243002 times)

dean_mcgowan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2055 on: November 05, 2006, 02:57:53 AM »
comster .. that is one sweet piece of work there buddy

mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2056 on: November 05, 2006, 02:59:27 AM »
referencing with sm's hand

thickness of ring 5mm
fat cable between 3 to 5 mm

c0mster

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 183
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2057 on: November 05, 2006, 03:16:39 AM »
Dom
Thats pretty much the size of the one I built.
Hold on I'll post the measurements.
Comster

c0mster

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 183
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2058 on: November 05, 2006, 03:31:24 AM »
Ok close... OD 240, ID 190 mm.
Thanks for all the info. :)
Now to start this puppy up!

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2059 on: November 05, 2006, 04:19:23 AM »
 ::)
« Last Edit: November 21, 2006, 06:22:59 AM by EMdevices »

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2060 on: November 05, 2006, 05:43:05 AM »
@Sam,
Be cool or it will be just you yelling all alone. Ok? It is the europeans that left. Their primary form of communication is politeness, not buddy, buddy down and dirty. That is one of the reasons americans are seen with disdainement worldwide. We sound rude. So roll up your sleeves to contribute to bring others towards you.
You get more flies with honey.

@Those that are on board.
The ones that are left are diligent in their efforts. So to all, let those who are experimenting, be. No efforts are incorrect. Let this thread be a place where all can come and contribute in peace. If you disagree, then make it so and make it sound like your opinion is in humbleness. This ain't tag team wrestling and nobody wins by flicking matches.
It looks like the posts go when a poster deletes his account. This truly is an travesty. I will fire off to Stefan to see if a dupe blog can be put up to capture everything. I hope so. Alot of info has disapeared. But I trust in those who are staying on.

@comster,
I need a conversion of sorts. My controller puts out a digital 0-5 square wave. I would like to add a stage to make +15 -15 with the wave form crossing 0. Really specific analog is not my forte. I am a whiz in digital. My drive stage uses a bias of +5volts at the transistors bases. This drives my coils fine. But I want to higher in volts. I have a schematic of 2 555s that are synced and put out 90d out of phase square waves. I would like to use this. If I put those into dual supply opamps, what would that look like to get them zero crossing.
I see Tesla's circuits doing this with commutators. Lucky guy.

Thanks, everyone take care, tomorrow is new day. --giantkiller.

c0mster

  • elite_member
  • Full Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 183
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2061 on: November 05, 2006, 06:16:37 AM »
Guys your right about perhaps needing some metallic materials. I'm starting with this design for the following reasons. When SM holds the 90V model it doesn't seem like it is made from steel or a metal just in the way he moves it around. I have read lots of information on Tesla, Ed Gray, Hans Coler and the casmere effect. I don't see Steven adding any input to his device except for the magnets he attaches. As well Hans Coler claimed by adjusting the magnets in relations to the coils a voltage became present.  You could say I am starting from a different perspective. I have kept in the back of my mind the need for cores in the upright posts but tomorrow I want to see if I can rotate a compass with the flat coils. I then want to check each coil to see what frequencies they pick up and see if there is any differences. I am trying to wrap my head around all the great input on the OU sites I have read. Like one big a** brainstorming meeting. I may not be posting to much here for a while <lab time>, but I will be reading any suggestions that are posted. And if I come across anything I believe may help I will post it right away as I did with my video on "more watts out than in". 

@giant
I may be off base here but I use Tina pro as a prototyping software for circuits  if you send me your current setup I can draw it in Tina and see what kind of solution we can get.   [qoute]I would like to add a stage to make +15 -15 with the wave form crossing 0. [/qoute] I have done this with 4, 9 volt batteries and 2 npn transistors something like this. If this is what you mean. http://www.trinary.cc/Tutorial/Transistors/Transistors.htm
Using 90d out of phase square waves may be a bit tricky with 555 timers and I haven't tried it. I understand how Tesla's rotating field works and perhaps I will come across needing to try it with my TPU but I believe the energy we seek is like  the part of the spectrum we cannot see, it's there, we know we just can't see it unless we use special glasses :)

Thanks for all the great comments. I enjoy this hobby, I don't care where I am going, it's what I learn on the way there. Besides I have been doing this for so many years I don't know anything else. 

Cheers
Comster     
           

Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2062 on: November 05, 2006, 06:43:22 AM »
Hi All,

PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY

A person just found "q" and has left this group in fear of the uncontrolled reaction the he achieved.

He seems very scared and as many times as I have to say it ..THIS IS SERUIOUS.
Be careful THEY ARE DANGEROUS.

Controlling the reaction is vital otherwise all you have is sparks and smoke ..Dont anybody tell me "that's good". Its just the first step.

I wont answer questions on this..you can work it out for yourselves.

Its time for the non high voltage experienced to just watch.

PLEASE.. PLEASE.. Dont take this lightly YOU MUST BE ABLE TO QUICKLY BREAK THE CIRCUITS

More soon

now read it again!!!

Mr_Video

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2063 on: November 05, 2006, 06:59:43 AM »
Hi All,

PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY

A person just found "q" and has left this group in fear of the uncontrolled reaction the he achieved.

He seems very scared and as many times as I have to say it ..THIS IS SERUIOUS.
Be careful THEY ARE DANGEROUS.

Controlling the reaction is vital otherwise all you have is sparks and smoke ..Dont anybody tell me "that's good". Its just the first step.

I wont answer questions on this..you can work it out for yourselves.

Its time for the non high voltage experienced to just watch.

PLEASE.. PLEASE.. Dont take this lightly YOU MUST BE ABLE TO QUICKLY BREAK THE CIRCUITS

More soon

now read it again!!!

well, if this is true.........

I hate to say I told ya so............. but.......

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2064 on: November 05, 2006, 07:06:51 AM »
Hi All,

PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY

A person just found "q" and has left this group in fear of the uncontrolled reaction the he achieved.

He seems very scared and as many times as I have to say it ..THIS IS SERUIOUS.
Be careful THEY ARE DANGEROUS.

Controlling the reaction is vital otherwise all you have is sparks and smoke ..Dont anybody tell me "that's good". Its just the first step.

I wont answer questions on this..you can work it out for yourselves.

Its time for the non high voltage experienced to just watch.

PLEASE.. PLEASE.. Dont take this lightly YOU MUST BE ABLE TO QUICKLY BREAK THE CIRCUITS

More soon

now read it again!!!

well, if this is true.........

I hate to say I told ya so............. but.......

What is 'q' ?

--giantkiller. I think i am stupid now.

mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2065 on: November 05, 2006, 07:09:16 AM »
GK , Its to do with the oscillation I think, look up Q and inductance:-

"Q" is a most important property of both capacitors and inductors although it is actually dimensionless. The "Q" of capacitors is generally so high as to be ignored however it is the "Q" of inductors we mainly concern ourselves with. All inductors exhibit some extra resistance to ac or rf, "Q" is the reactance of the inductor divided by this ac or rf resistance.

Dom

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2066 on: November 05, 2006, 07:11:10 AM »
@ comster,
I think I need a biphase motor control circuit.
I included my schematic.

--giantkiller

mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2067 on: November 05, 2006, 07:12:34 AM »
ok let me correct that:-  The higher the value for "Q," the "purer" the inductor is. Because it's so easy to add additional resistance if needed, a high-Q inductor is better than a low-Q inductor for design purposes. An ideal inductor would have a Q of infinity, with zero effective resistance.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_3/5.html

Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 564
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2068 on: November 05, 2006, 07:15:45 AM »
GEES!
Q in this case is fire,sparks and smoke.

DO NOT SAY THAT YOU WERE NOT WARNED!!


mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"
« Reply #2069 on: November 05, 2006, 07:18:45 AM »
Lindsay is that you = Anybody?

Good to hear from you, and again thanks for all you have done, I can't speak for everyone here, but I'm honored.

@comster, sorry I didn't write back to you, I had to rush to get out of the house...had urgently to go somewhere.

So q doesnt mean what i thought it did, Apologies

Dom