Question?
it looks like only 2 segments are wrapped on the ring on the bottom.

Comster, theres 4 fat coils wound around the ring, If you look back some posts back, dave actually has pointed all the different angles, and theres def 4, what gets me is the one infront, I strongly believe SM has wound it with gaps inbetween, no he may have done this to kill back emf , as we want to try and induce these kicks, so we can get an increase in power.

This makes me think of Tesla, who I'm pretty sure did the same thing, i.e he would kick a high voltage into the atmosphere and when it came back he would kick it again, but everytime it came back it would be stronger.   Correct me if I'm wrong anyone, that way i can go check my facts again.

Cheers,

Dom

Great, thanks. I will try to find that post. Are those coils aswell between the top ring and the bottom? In other words the 4 posts that hold the top and bottom ring together, are those vertical coils in relation to the coils rapped on the bottom ring?

C0mster   

comster let me draw a pic for you, at least as a guide, then anyone here can make comments, hang 10

Dom

Now comster, the fatter coils to me looks like they are all connected in series --c1--c2--c3--c4--

You'll have to experiment, let me say this though, even that I drew this for you, and anyone that wants to build this version, it's still best to start your experimenting small scale. wire some coils , put them in different configurations , even with magnets near by to see what happens.

My pic is only a reference, and should be used as such. I havent started building, rather I have been trying to understand what being said by Lindsay and Steven.

I would prob do this first, wind some fat coil on a former of sometype, this could be plastic, then wind finer wire on two segments only, i.e on the fatter coil, make one of the fatter coils with gaps, then pulse the finer coil and see what results you get at different frequencies. Also it maybe the case that the finer coils are two segments , and these are connected to the magnets, which may have coils under them.

don't worry about magnets for now, just start of with what we know, or close to what we know.
Oh and i suggest that you read from post 1 to 20, collect all with Lindsay and Steven Marks, and listen to what SM has got to say.

cheers,

Dom

Thanks Dom.
I am drawing a prototype in some cad software with everyones recommendations.

@Dave
Many Thanks.
I'm looking forward to some lab time this weekend to implement your experiments.

@All
Cheers
 

http://pixerve.de/43323/pese.html

I seen here Patent of Daniel McFarland.
I have same Drawling from Stubbelfield !!

I will find the windings details (not described by Farland
Pese

Hello ctglabs-I was reading your statement
((((When the current stops, the magnetic field collapses on the wire and causes a current that flows in the opposite direction.  Is this not just normal Back EMF?  Since the energy that created the back emf was contained in the magnetic field that was created by the original current flow, then we have nothing more?)))).

This is not really correct and may be part of the problem, when current stops the magnetic field collapses,your scope shows a positive voltage followed by a negative voltage on collapse of the B field but current flow is always in the same direction. If you put a coil in series with a battery and a switch, you close the switch current flows-you open the switch current stops abruptly and the momentum creates an electron pile-up measured as a negative voltage but it is not, the electrons are moving in the same direction they pile-up raising voltage, creating ionization,ADG,and finally VAD or an arc discharge across the switch. Logically you can test this easily, we normally put a blocking diode in parallel with a coil to prevent switch arcing or frying switching transistors, What direction is the diode facing? the diode is letting current flow in series with the coil/transformer in the same direction as it was initially, so if the current supposedly reversed it would have nowhere to go and fry the diode? You can google -electron flow -DC switch arcing -blocking diodes to verify this, it is a common misconception that just seems to go on and on and on, the best thing I think anyone interested in this technology can do is to research (Electron Flow) because 95% of the people I talk to basically believe what modern physics has proven incorrect 60 years ago.
Here is something else to consider in your project, If current flow is always in the same direction- What would happen if you took a piece of wire 1 mile long,started current flowing for an instant then completely disconnected the source? What if the wire was a coil and you applied current only for a millisecond then switched from the source to a seperate load circuit? If current flow is forward and it cannot draw from the source-can or could it draw from a seperate external source? and if the voltage is measured as reversing but the current flow remains in the same direction as physics says it must,does this not seem to be a bit of a paradox?.

Questions are all I have