Warms the cockles of my heart and a tear to one's eye.
Yeah, I woke up this morning also thinking about this. The main thread was 'Is there anywhere else this world wide conglomeration of this subject resides?' I thought how unique that would be if it is and totally fanatasticand odd! Finally a set of minds meet with the right subject that looks beyond the boundaries of the status quo? I am glad that I am finally not alone with my thoughts and that this could have come about from a cohesive group no matter what the differences... Thanks for bringing this to light instead of one person fighting against the tide.

--giantkiller. What are the odds...

You could possibly weave yourself a straight jacket?

I am reading the Tesla patent 390,721. Where was this supposed to go?

--giantkiller. Knittin' and a grinnin'

Well ? I've read about the first fifty or so posts on this device.

Here are my thoughts.

When a sudden (short) DC pulse is passed into a wire you will get a radiant event as noted by Tesla.  This radiant energy will move out radially from the wire in all directions thus super charging electrons.  The intensity of the radiant event is proportional to the voltage pulse applied and its abruptness.  However, you can use less voltage and more wire either wound as a coil or laid out in parallel.  This, I believe, is what Mr. Mark was talking about.  The thing is, the radiant event is lost if it is commingled with current flow.  John Bedini noted this as did Telsa.  John's device cancels out the current induction using bucking fields in coils.  In other words, a DC pulse is applied to one winding to create the radiant event which then tries to induce a current in another winding, but that current is then pumped into the base of transistor through a sensor winding which then energizes a bucking coil that cancels out the magnetic field that is created by the first coil.  In other words, only a small amount of current is allowed to flow in your radiant energy collector winding by induction.  John is in fact invented radiant distillation process, where most of the radiant energy is allowed to get through, but very little current.

I think what Mr. Marks device does is kick out a radiant pulse which then energizes collector coils that then start to resonate at their (two) preferred frequencies.  There are at least two frequencies that create a beat frequency which rotates around the toroid.  Mr Mark's controller is designed in such a way so as to stay off the exact critical frequency so it won't run away.

I think to capture a radiant event you must try and avoid educing current flow in your secondary collector windings by the primary (Tesla's air core transformers did this).  From what I understand I think Mr Mark does this by winding the radiant windings in a toroid but then winds the other coils at ninety degrees around the toroid windings.  This would avoid inducing too much of a current flow in the secondary windings thus leaving these winding to soak up whatever they can in radiant energy.  When the system is tuned to the cosmic radiant beat frequency, and is in sink with it, you then get a synergistic effect.  Henry Morey tuned his system to this beat frequency using multiple stage radiant amplifiers.  The system would start to amplify the oscillations until they reached an amplitude that was above a predetermined floor.  Anything above that ?floor? was used to run a load.  Mr Mark's device may work on this same principle.

Anyway, that's my four cents.

@All,
Thanks for the replies.

I see in the patent 390,721 that in the transformer part he, again has opposing coils end to end and drive them in pairs across from each other. Well if we use DC pulses the BEMF from the first pair will be pushed/added with the second growing field. and them on to the next pulse. Is this thinking wrong?  I am working on a graphic avi to show this.

--giantkiller. Sometimes simplicity is just too open for stupidity.

Hi Dave, Dom,

I hate to task anybody but,
I am looking at the diagram of patent 390,721. It looks pretty obvious but is everything 180d?

Thanks,
--giantkiller

inertial effects due to "flow" through center of toriod not because of rotating magnetic field

Inertia is a property of the gravito-magnetic vector potential.



BTW - Tesla used a commutator to switch the coils on and off and and iron core.

Hi Dave, Dom,

I hate to task anybody but,
I am looking at the diagram of patent 390,721. It looks pretty obvious but is everything 180d?

Thanks,
--giantkiller

Hi GK,
Yep they sure are, and there respective poles are the same, i.e s---n n---s s---n n---s s---n, I don't know what the outcome would be, but my guess with the coils excited someway, it might work as SM's device does. Dave is probably doing something right now, and i'm hoping we will see something.

1)stick a function gen in and see if compass still rotates,

2) then build some tuned cct and see what effect that has

Of course Otto is hard at work, so hopefully we will see some very nice results soon.

Perhaps i all of this , its like what SM says, its just the knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other.

Dom