Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1242946 times)

mrd10 · « **Reply #1501 on:** October 22, 2006, 04:54:38 AM »

Again Guys lets focus and throw away any books we may have learnt, from Steven Marks first video, I keep going back to, because I believe thats where we should be heading:-

these are conversion devices and not free energy devices, they take energy from the natural magnetic field of the earth, which has an inheritant frequency, which basically tuned into that and ah, take the energy that is readily available from the earths magnetic field and produce electricity from that.
again very cheaply put together, theres no mass circuitry its just knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other.

God Bless

Dom

giantkiller · « **Reply #1502 on:** October 22, 2006, 05:02:01 AM »

Quote from: Kosh on October 22, 2006, 04:24:34 AM

Quote from: jacob on October 22, 2006, 02:56:13 AM
Harvesting much more current from the collector than what you would expect to be there.

I would like to know how that could be made?

Quote
By rotating a magnetic field radially within the space of the collector coils at a rotational frequency that depends on the collector diameter.

I have rotated a neo magnet over my coil with zero effect...

Kosh

HI,
I just rethought the specs we are working for the wavelength. When SM cut the coil in half everybody said they saw three coils. What if the freqs depend in the height of the device. Meaning that the quarter wave length would fall on the collector that sits between the two transmitting coils, top and bottom. This distance, which is much smaller the diam, would account for the higher freqs suspected in some posts. This would be a new finding since the height has not been talked about before or somehow missed? But I don't want to start a mad rush in the wrong direction.
Or
I had posted an excel spreadsheet and also posted the snapshots of the sheets for a certain diam or freq.
Use the sheet to plug in your diam and you'll get a page of resultant harmonic freqs that are the quarter wave distance to the core/collector. Anyway, it's a start.
Or just tell me your diam and I'll post the results. 3,4,6 are pretty common diams.
--giantkiller

jacob · « **Reply #1503 on:** October 22, 2006, 05:39:20 AM »

Quote from: Kosh on October 22, 2006, 04:24:34 AM

I have rotated a neo magnet over my coil with zero effect...

Kosh

Can you please explain your setup and experiment in more details.

Jacob

jacob · « **Reply #1504 on:** October 22, 2006, 05:41:28 AM »

Quote from: z_p_e on October 22, 2006, 04:46:10 AM

@Jacob

Why should anyone here take you seriously?

No one has to.

God Bless,

Jacob

jacob · « **Reply #1505 on:** October 22, 2006, 05:47:18 AM »

Quote from: giantkiller on October 22, 2006, 04:01:24 AM

@Jacob, sorry about the name slippage.

Hey, don't worry! It can happen to anyone!

God bless,

Jacob

dean_mcgowan · « **Reply #1506 on:** October 22, 2006, 09:16:50 AM »

hmmm.. jacob and SM seem to playing very similar roles ...

if i didnt know better ....

dean_mcgowan · « **Reply #1507 on:** October 22, 2006, 09:18:11 AM »

nice save . lindsay .. whole thing could have crashed and burned ..

dean_mcgowan · « **Reply #1508 on:** October 22, 2006, 09:29:43 AM »

ps .. where did all the pages go ? .. we were getting up to 500 . have we clocked the game here ?

mrd10 · « **Reply #1509 on:** October 22, 2006, 09:35:35 AM »

dean the pages are still here, stefan just made pages longer

hartiberlin · « **Reply #1510 on:** October 22, 2006, 10:54:20 AM »

Please all, can we please concentrate again on the technical site of things. Many thanks.

Kosh, your circuit is very interesting. Did you pulse all 8 coils at the same time or induvidually with a time period offset ?

How many spikes do you exactly get from each drivercoil pulse ?

Also it is interesting, that only the OFF switching of the driver pulse is producing the spikes... so what happens, if you make the duty cycle even smaller, like 2/98 % On / Off ?

If you put a load to the blue output coil, does it draw more input current ? If not, that is really a good method to violate the Lentz law ....!

hartiberlin · « **Reply #1511 on:** October 22, 2006, 11:02:49 AM »

Kosh, maybe you can try your circuit with the same electronic circuit, but with a different output coil and report the difference ?

What about using instead of stranded copper wire, just normal massive copper wire or

use iron garden wire and please post again the scope shots of the output coils.

Maybe you get also much more voltage, if you have the output coil with much more turns ?

But if you could prove, that when loading the output coil with a load,does not need more input power, then it will be easy to design an overunity transformer just by scaling up this principle circuit !

mrd10 · « **Reply #1512 on:** October 22, 2006, 11:43:14 AM »

Again Guys lets focus and throw away any books we may have learnt, from Steven Marks first video, I keep going back to, because I believe thats where we should be heading:-

these are conversion devices and not free energy devices, they take energy from the natural magnetic field of the earth, which has an inheritant frequency, which basically tuned into that and ah, take the energy that is readily available from the earths magnetic field and produce electricity from that.
again very cheaply put together, theres no mass circuitry its just knowledge of the coils and how they interact with each other.

God Bless

Dom Cheesy

mrd10 · « **Reply #1513 on:** October 22, 2006, 12:19:29 PM »

Quote from: giantkiller on October 22, 2006, 05:02:01 AM

Quote from: Kosh on October 22, 2006, 04:24:34 AM
Quote from: jacob on October 22, 2006, 02:56:13 AM
Harvesting much more current from the collector than what you would expect to be there.

I would like to know how that could be made?

Quote
By rotating a magnetic field radially within the space of the collector coils at a rotational frequency that depends on the collector diameter.

I have rotated a neo magnet over my coil with zero effect...

Kosh

HI,
I just rethought the specs we are working for the wavelength. When SM cut the coil in half everybody said they saw three coils. What if the freqs depend in the height of the device. Meaning that the quarter wave length would fall on the collector that sits between the two transmitting coils, top and bottom. This distance, which is much smaller the diam, would account for the higher freqs suspected in some posts. This would be a new finding since the height has not been talked about before or somehow missed? But I don't want to start a mad rush in the wrong direction.
Or
I had posted an excel spreadsheet and also posted the snapshots of the sheets for a certain diam or freq.
Use the sheet to plug in your diam and you'll get a page of resultant harmonic freqs that are the quarter wave distance to the core/collector. Anyway, it's a start.
Or just tell me your diam and I'll post the results. 3,4,6 are pretty common diams.
--giantkiller

Exactly giantkiller, that what i said a few 50 posts back, there is a height difference.

@ Dave
Hi Dave,

I don't know, its what I picked up from his first video, perhaps his found something we haven't as yet. I remember you saying, that this has to come from somewhere else, either EM energy or radiant energy, I will be trying to replicate his device soon, i.e two rings with two segments on each ring which will have a space between them by 2 inches, connect them upto an inductor and place a magnet on it, sounds far fetched, but if i get even a small result, it would be something. I have to start somewhere.

Regarding all of his devices, we are missing the point that he has a space inbetween, it could be this difference that everyone here is overlooking.

cheers,

Dom

mrd10 · « **Reply #1514 on:** October 22, 2006, 01:11:07 PM »

Quote from: ctglabs on October 22, 2006, 12:26:47 PM

Can can you post some pics with arrows point these things out? In the open view device we can see 4 bifilar coils clearly on the bottom ring only. The top ring has nothing wound on it and appears to be just part of the frame work. I popose here that this bottom ring can be seen as one layer of the larger SM device. Which means the larger one having 3 layers is just for parallel power? I looks like he has started with one layer, then another model with two, then another with three. You could probably go on. But we can see for sure that only one layer is needed.

As for the device he removed from a black case and starts with one single magnet, I cannot see anything on that one apart from a coil on top.

I always wonder that if is the earths magnetic field, it is sooo weak you can hardly even detect it. Why not use a permanent magnet for more power? This makes me think he means the schumann resonance as a natural signal generator, rather than the earths field.

Dave.

Hi Dave,

Sorry if my electronic theory on coils isnt upto scratch, the comments i made on the pic, might not be 100% right, I'm a newbie again, getting back into electronics, I'm just trying to observe the video pics, if you can correct me, i'd appreciate it.

Thanks,

Dom

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1242946 times)

EMdevices

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

giantkiller

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

jacob

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

jacob

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

jacob

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

dean_mcgowan

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

dean_mcgowan

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

dean_mcgowan

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

hartiberlin

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

hartiberlin

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"