Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243025 times)

dutchy1966 · « **Reply #1260 on:** October 13, 2006, 11:18:56 AM »

Quote from: ctglabs on October 13, 2006, 11:01:10 AM

Hi Dutchy! This looks good!

But if you are going to replicate it, may I suggest to get three standard transformers and replicate the effect before trying something new with torroids? Once you have replicated this you can validate it and THEN change it!

Regards,

Dave.

Hi again,

OK, have to find some similar transformers. Can you give me the specs of the ones you used?
Btw have you read that study? In the beginning it has some good examples of the phenomena e.g when two antenna's are transmitting the same signal in the same direction. Experience shows that the power is squared although classic theory says they should "just" be added up....

Dutchy

2tiger · « **Reply #1261 on:** October 13, 2006, 11:28:41 AM »

Hi Dave

Quote

SM says the voltage fluxuates so this seems to match that the spikes are random and you do not generate the same amount of spikes per second or the voltage would be steadier. This also means its not stored in an output cap or it would be more steady?

When the device starts it takes a minuite to get to full power, so these kicks that are extra power are able to loop back and supply more to the input and then generate even more.

O.K. - so let us assume that the kicks were not collected but produced "online" and they were looped back to self increase the energy in the coil-setup.
You say, that when the device starts it takes a minuite to get to full power.
Now what happens after the minute, if you don?t connect a load?

If the device don?t have a control-circuit to delitmit the production of kicks it will go on collecting kicks till selfdestruction.
In the case there is a control-circuit avalible to delimit the production of kicks by dumping them to a resistance i.e. then the energy produced in the first minute HAVE TO be stored somewhere. And when you dumped energy in a resistance, you will produce heat. Perhaps to selfdestruction too, but this time by burn up the insulation of the copperwires.

Please think about this.

So here is my question again: Is it possible to store this amount of energy in the smaller SM device?
Have anyone an idea ??

kr
2Tiger

sterlinga · « **Reply #1262 on:** October 13, 2006, 12:10:43 PM »

I've updated our feature page at PESWiki. I would really like to know what the present status is of this technology, and how we can help get it to market if it isn't already well on its way.

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Steve_Marks_Toroid_Generator
Steven Marks' Toroid Power Units - Five 1997 videos of several solid-state prototypes include footage of small unit (6" diam x 2" high x 1" thick toroid) powering a 100W bulb, a 3-amp drill, a television, and a small vacuum. Said to harness the power of the Earth's electromagnetic field. Larger unit puts out 7 amps; could power an electric vehicle. (PESWiki; Oct. 13)
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MarksToroid/ - Forum created to pursue the tech.

I would like to interview Steve on my Free Energy Now (http://FreeEnergyNow.net) radio show. Perhaps if you of you has his contact information you let him know and have him get a hold of me.

http://pureenergysystems.com/about/personnel/SterlingDAllan/

mrd10 · « **Reply #1263 on:** October 13, 2006, 01:25:26 PM »

Hi Marco,

So one of the coils is plugged into the transmitter, which is your sound system, - mp3 player, and the other blue coil is plugged in as receiver,
So you can clearly see that 2 coils arranged like this can act as a good antenna, and if your able to tune into the 7.28hz schuman resonance, it should be able to pickup power.....or something to that effect?

Cheers,

Dom

dutchy1966 · « **Reply #1264 on:** October 13, 2006, 01:47:47 PM »

Quote from: ctglabs on October 13, 2006, 01:38:32 PM

Marco,

I take it this is not the same as when you place two torroids, one on the other since here you now use iron coil and one segment of TPU?

What is the signal played from the memory chip? 7.8hz sinewave?

On your receiver, it is just one large torroid or is there long coil around the circumference with vertical coils wound around this, and if so which is connected to the PC?

Thanks,

Dave.

As i understand it, it's the Queen music that's played from the mp3 player, amplified through the stereo, then put into the bailing wire coil.
As the coil is put closer to the toroid the music gets louder (see the monitor he's showing)

regards Dutchy

mrd10 · « **Reply #1265 on:** October 13, 2006, 02:56:54 PM »

Hi Marco,

Shit so one of the wires is disconnected from the smaller blue coil, but when you squeeze the larger coil, it actually picks it up......damn did i get that right?

Rgds,

Dom

mrd10 · « **Reply #1266 on:** October 13, 2006, 03:28:03 PM »

This forum rocks, I reckon were closer than we think, So Marco what you are saying is that if you use wire made with iron and place a magnet near it, it will amplify the signal that your feeding into that coil, but when you do the same with copper wire, the signal gets weaker.

Dom

mrd10 · « **Reply #1267 on:** October 13, 2006, 03:35:34 PM »

Hi All,

I think I know whats going on now, refer to his first prototype, sm energy coil is an antenna, the coil he has ontop, is like a crystal radio receiver, this gets amplified by the coil segments, which are made from iron wire,:- bailing wire which probably have magnets near em also.

Cheers,

Dom

gn0stik · « **Reply #1268 on:** October 13, 2006, 04:04:46 PM »

So it works for one pole only one the iron, and neither pole works on the copper..

gn0stik · « **Reply #1269 on:** October 13, 2006, 04:26:33 PM »

Quote from: -[marco]- on October 13, 2006, 04:09:49 PM

Quote from: gn0stik on October 13, 2006, 04:04:46 PM
So it works for one pole only one the iron, and neither pole works on the copper..

gnostic hi ,
no its one coil wrapped with iron and copper wire togheter so you have one turn copper and one turn iron one turn copper and one turn iron and so on.
and it worked only on one end.
i did wrap it because nobody said anything about the control coils could have more then one wire in the segments.
marco

Actually If you look at my diagram it's got bifilar control coils on the first layer. Which connect two in series, one in parallel, and creates two resonant LC tank ciruits(not pictured), which are fed by the control circuitry(not pictured), which is fed by the toroids.

However after Mannix's last post, I'm not sure if this is the way to go.. That one really threw me for a loop. Now, it wasn't directly from SM, but mannix does have more contact with him than anyone else. I just wish he posted the results of his tests, so we don't have to sit here reinventing the wheel all the time... I guess that's what we're here for though. Problem with my setup is that it's set up for counter-rotating magnetic fields. However, it could be set up so that both tanks are fed simultaneously, creating the pump, or sqeezing action, the hose (collector)requires.

I'll re-do it to reflect that

twosox · « **Reply #1270 on:** October 13, 2006, 05:45:36 PM »

Hi guys,

just been tinkering, i'm no good at the theory part but i am good at 'trail and error' method.
and i don't mind blowing things up, (not really) lol. anyway, circuit diagram and scopeshot
attached of what i think is feedback through my pc sound card, very nice square wave but
'spikey', the cap gets charged (lots) and the right hand coil (coil 2) generates a nice big field.

thanks and keep up the good work.

starcruiser · « **Reply #1271 on:** October 13, 2006, 06:46:40 PM »

Marco,

Have you tried to connect the upper and lower coils in series and see what the outut is when you power the middle one?

Regards,

Carl

raburgeson · « **Reply #1272 on:** October 13, 2006, 07:25:45 PM »

Steven Mark I am going to ask you for a bone here because of the equipement I own. I swear to you I have been studying the fields by mechanically revolving the fields and the results I got was, it's not when the fields first collide, it's when the centers align that shit happens. Manix said we would have the help of someone who had access to lab equipement to die for (you) so I'm asking. Am I right are the fields fully in phase when the cores align and that is the moment of power production?
Also those 3 capacitive collector cores I theorize they serve a dual purpose, of course they do phase shifting, do they also store energy to keep the magnetic spheres from partly or fully collapsing?

starcruiser · « **Reply #1273 on:** October 13, 2006, 07:38:04 PM »

Quote from: -[marco]- on October 13, 2006, 07:03:20 PM

i have.
it looks like less with the wires looped.
it getting scary cause im measurin things that cant be.

Marco all 4 possibilities? with coils (top and bottom ones) both Clockwise, both counter clockwise (in relation to the center coils winding) as well as fliping the connections on the top and bottom so the top coils outside winding is connecting to the bottom coils inside and visa versa to see if the output varies substantially.

Carl

gn0stik · « **Reply #1274 on:** October 13, 2006, 07:52:10 PM »

Quote from: ctglabs on October 13, 2006, 04:33:06 PM

Hi Rich,

I was looking at Mannix first drawing, the second one is half missing?

So we can have two conductors in parallel, one has a current, it will have a certain flux density. If this is then replaced with many short wires in parallel with a single collector wire in the middle, then surely the resistance of the many parallel wires will drop and share their resistance, so any current flowing will be shared out equally the same, so in the end you have the same flux density, assuming same power supply of course.

If these many wires are looped as one long wire with a single wire rapped in the middle, surely we just have a step down transformer?

Although in a transformer its layered, not the many wires made in to a "tube" with the single wire in the centre.

Regards,

Dave.

I'm having a hard time visualizing what you are saying. So, you want a bunch of small, say 12", bifilar collectors wired in parallel around the control, with one of the windings connecting to the other on the next segment? All of them together making a tube which would squeeze the collector?

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243025 times)

dutchy1966

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

2tiger

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

sterlinga

Feature Page for Steven Mark Toroid

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

dutchy1966

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

mrd10

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

gn0stik

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

gn0stik

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

twosox

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

starcruiser

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

raburgeson

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

starcruiser

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

gn0stik

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"