Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243052 times)

giantkiller · « **Reply #1036 on:** October 07, 2006, 12:18:09 AM »

This is in reference to the previous video of the Freak wave at sea and the Coke bottle and speaker demo, in relation to the sun emitting gravity waves and those waves then relaxing and how that creates the planetary orbits or valence bands. Hence the collector would be the earth and the orbit would the magnetic Freak wave.

In response to previous posts about the SM3/6 compared to SM17.
The SM3 & SM6 use a single freq, the harmonic with the earth's. That is why they don't work upside down. The SM17 never got turned upside down because it wouldn't matter, it uses two freqs. and causes its own freak wave. And I have yet know what these are.
The SM3 & SM6 use the same freq. Their collectors sit just either side, respectively, of the main harmonic meeting point, Freak wave if you will. The major harmonic pulse for these two devices sits at 4.5 inches diameter. If a collector sits at the peak it will fry because the material can't handle the power at that point. So the freqs are adjusted to put the main harmonic pulse on either side of the collector. Like sideband positions.

Attached is a Java app screen http://www.falstad.com/ripple/[/b]]http://www.falstad.com/ripple/to create the harmonics. Even though the center is not the collector the same effect is observed in an orbit. In our case here, by varying the freqs we can cause the harmonic meeting place to vary under control.

Just another day on the planet...

c0mster · « **Reply #1037 on:** October 07, 2006, 12:44:19 AM »

Quote from: argona369 on October 06, 2006, 11:54:27 PM

Quote from: c0mster on October 06, 2006, 11:18:25 PM
Good News I stiched all the movies together for easer viewing.
http://cmnet.ca/projects/roundcoil/roundcoilfull.wmv
C0mster

could't you just use a step-up transformer to feed back to the input?
or is phase and transfomer losses a problem

Great question argona369.
I will be testing various ways to see how to use the extra wattage to provide a charge back to the source battery or cap this weekend. Other tests I have done in the past with step-up transformers have shown quite a bit of loss, the coupling is never 100%- 80% at best and yes phase may change things. I will test a couple step-up transformers this weekend and post some vids. I am thinking perhaps an arrangement of parallel caps that can be switched into series using some small electronic gates providing a 10v pulse back into the 9v source, brainstorming right now. In theory a true OU device should blow it self up if a capacitor drives it, and charge is put back into it. As the input voltage rises so will the output until the Cap goes PoP.

argona369 · « **Reply #1038 on:** October 07, 2006, 01:02:29 AM »

argona369 · « **Reply #1039 on:** October 07, 2006, 01:06:59 AM »

argona369 · « **Reply #1040 on:** October 07, 2006, 01:17:37 AM »

c0mster · « **Reply #1041 on:** October 07, 2006, 01:38:14 AM »

Quote from: argona369 on October 07, 2006, 01:17:37 AM

HI c0mster,

On second thought, couldn?t you just change the number of turns on the
Output coil to up the voltage? to feed back to primary?

Cliff

Cliff

I see your brainstorming too.

A very good question as well. Time to put on the lab coat and go to work.

Woo and it?s a long weekend here in Canada.

C0mster

argona369 · « **Reply #1042 on:** October 07, 2006, 02:00:49 AM »

supersam · « **Reply #1043 on:** October 07, 2006, 02:20:31 AM »

tao,
i think it must have been overlooked. rich did make one post but i guess he thought better of it. "there are several frequencies created in the cicumference of my collector coils". i think you may have found out why with your other posts a while back.

now let's see your thoughts on how to control them. it looks to me like you have placed two microphones to close together and you are about to get alot of noise. maybe that is why you need contol coils and a feedback coil?

lol
sam

gn0stik · « **Reply #1044 on:** October 07, 2006, 02:22:45 AM »

OK, it took me all day to get around to reading this stuff. Nice post Tao. We've been through this all before, but it's good to rehash it now that we have some builders in our midst.

This all came about because of SM's remark about the "worst case scenario of frequencies"... anyone remember that remark?

Well, what would that be now? Superposition maybe? hmmmm.

Everyone knows that somethings are bad for some applications (like communications) but good for others (power generation)... such is the case with superposition of waves.

Here's a good read regarding similar waves superpositioned. This page is a mainstream science page and confirms nearly everything that our Hungarian friend said. With some nice graphics to boost. Anyone wanna see what a kick looks like?

http://www.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/superposition/superposition.html

this is also a good supporter of the counter rotating field theory as well.

Have fun.

Rich

supersam · « **Reply #1045 on:** October 07, 2006, 02:42:21 AM »

guys,

what is a heater transformer?

lol
sam

ps: tao, shuttinup, shuttinup! so no need to tell me. lol
yea I know.

supersam · « **Reply #1046 on:** October 07, 2006, 03:13:21 AM »

rich,

that seemed to be a great example of the classical understanding of waves as we were all taught. do you remember the first time you were told that there was a set of 'imaginary numbers"?

lol
sam

c0mster · « **Reply #1047 on:** October 07, 2006, 05:23:30 AM »

Here is a excel graph representing correlations between volts driving the coil and measurements across the input and output resistor @ 33ohm

supersam · « **Reply #1048 on:** October 07, 2006, 05:29:26 AM »

guy's

let's say, you have that same magnetic force, speeding along at the speed of light- the impedance of copper, how much power would you have? ALOT!!!

LOL
SAM

raburgeson · « **Reply #1049 on:** October 07, 2006, 05:40:53 AM »

Notice in the picture of the large coil, wich way the wires are wrapped on the surface. Notice too were the outputs are located on the 6 inch coil. In an early post it was said power would be generated in perpendicular wires.
Why doesn't it work upside down. The magnetic componet of a potential is relitive of that potential. In other words a low voltage signal has a weak magnetic componet, a high voltage signal has a strong componet. The potential between your coil and ground is weak, the potential difference between your coil and the Ionosphere is great. On it's side it can still draw a great potential from beyound the horizon. The potential of the circuit is great considering the power of the Ionosphere. Pointed towards the ground there is not enough potential to cause a kick.

I've almost finished my new coil, I don't like to refer to any other circuit in discription. But what it looks like to me is we are trying to run a Tesla coil backwards. Instead of pulsing energy out we are trying to pulse energy in. I thought about wrapping one layer of perpendicular wire between my normal torroid wraps and continue these over the outer wraps. I've decided not to now though because air core mutual and self inductance is low Q, looking for the best possible inductance between coilsI need to keep the wraps as closely together as possible. If the outside perpendicular wraps don't act like a Tesla coil in reverse I can remove them.

Also I made a statement that was unfair earlier, Of course I know you can read. This subject is way hot, I figured a grump would make site management realise even against policy This particular subject might need some language support. So of you guys are missing stuff, all of us need 100% on this.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark" (Read 1243052 times)

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

giantkiller

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

c0mster

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

c0mster

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

argona369

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

gn0stik

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

c0mster

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

supersam

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"

raburgeson

Re: The Master Of Magnetics "Steven Mark"