Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud? (Read 372924 times)

tosky · « **Reply #210 on:** June 23, 2008, 10:04:40 AM »

@Otto
Glad to hear it could be so long. Could you find a constant method to repeat the process? Within this 10 second you should have enough time to cut off the input power supply.
Does it stop instantly?
If yes, how long could be kept?

otto · « **Reply #211 on:** June 23, 2008, 10:20:27 AM »

Hello all,

@tosky

yes, I know how to repeat this. How else could I blow over 50 MOSFETs, ha,ha.

Dont forget that the coils are not patented but the controls have 13 or 14 patents. Or maybe I misunderstood something? So I dont want to play with this for now.

To cut off the PS would NOT help. To cut the collectors would help, or a big hammer, ha,ha.

We have a Mobius inside a TPU. This Mobius works if you want or not, so disconnecting the Mobius from the controls would help.

You have to understand something: when a runaway occures, the TPU is feeding itself with power. You can cut off the power supply but the beast is growing. As said, cut the flux somehow.

Its would be much cleverer to figure out the feedback so we can get rid of our power supplies.

Otto

tosky · « **Reply #212 on:** June 23, 2008, 11:08:43 AM »

@Otto
I don't know your word 'help' from which point of view, to help to avoid damage or help to deliver extra energy. Please don't be angry, you work very hard but unlogical. If you don't cut off your power supply. What made you so sure you got something different, burning MOSFET is very easy, for example, over the max. specification of V or A, or working from a switch mode to linear mode Melting solder is more easy if you ignore Ohm's Law. Up to this moment, there are not any evidence that you are not working on a ordinary converter. Why not use a battery instead of the power supply. It would not be burn easily at the end you can feed back for self running.

otto · « **Reply #213 on:** June 23, 2008, 12:43:16 PM »

Hello all,

your questions are wellcome.

In the first moment with help I meant only to avoid damage. Then I remembered what I ALWAYS thought when this happened: how to cut off my PS so the beast would use only this extra energy?

So, hmmmm.....I have to work on this but as said, first the feedback.

Im in contact with a very bright man here and he was ALL the time wrighting me that he pulses the coils and has no SPIN UP. I was almost laughing because I thought he was refering to our kicks, our little particles swirling inside the TPU,......until I saw it: this what he called a spin up is the moment when the TPU really spinns up but allone, to say so, the TPU starts to collect energy from the aether or the surrounding or....its on you to say the right word,ha,ha.

I said already that Im doing a oridinary boring EE work. Nothing unusual, special. Hey, my friend had a runaway with an oridinary, to say so, toroidal transformer. Maybe he rewound his transformer for other purposes but .....

What do you expect is a TPU??

A few coils in horizontal and vertical direction, thats it!!

Step up - TPU - step down - bulb. Thats all.

I have only 1 battery, car battery and the light is good. Not sooo brillant as with 24V, clear, but a good light.

Yes, I know that I have to work with this battery for feedback.

The ECD, wasnt it an oridinary converter? Step up - TPU - bulb.

Nothing special. So its written in books. Oridinary coils.

The Tesla patents, arent they also oridinary coils? Somehow? A little bit of copper, cores....

Now would Erfinder kill me.

Why Im wrighting this crap? Easy, I dont want to discuss anymore this stuff.

Otto

Grumpy · « **Reply #214 on:** June 23, 2008, 03:28:44 PM »

You get the "pumping" at 5 to 10 Hz because of the ambiant field (the earth's). You can get this same pumping with a Tesla Magnifier.

BEP · « **Reply #215 on:** June 24, 2008, 01:31:04 PM »

@Otto

You can get the 'pumping' if the primary becomes highly capacitive with the secondary highly inductive when you are slightly off resonance of the 'transformer'.
This can be done with a transformer.

I don't think the books say why the pumping is usually in the low Hertz

It sounds like your input coils are building capacitive reactance.

otto · « **Reply #216 on:** June 24, 2008, 01:53:33 PM »

Hello all,

@BEP

hmmm....it looked like the TPU was connected to the earths magnetic field. 7,8Hz. I dont know.

But this was done with a ECD TPU. Without a core, only with copper wires....

Im all the time comparing somehow the ECD with the TPUs I saw on this forum. Why did the ECD work so fine, with only 12V from the power supply at say 2 - 4A and for other TPUs I need 24V with a little bit lower current?

What was in my ECD so efficient? OK, I made a lot of tests to get good controls but.....in my iron core TPU is everything OK but what ever I do I have a bright light and thats all. I miss something.

I have to find it out. I know how.

Otto

Grumpy · « **Reply #217 on:** June 24, 2008, 02:31:33 PM »

Quote from: otto on June 24, 2008, 01:53:33 PM

Hello all,

@BEP

hmmm....it looked like the TPU was connected to the earths magnetic field. 7,8Hz. I dont know.

But this was done with a ECD TPU. Without a core, only with copper wires....

Im all the time comparing somehow the ECD with the TPUs I saw on this forum. Why did the ECD work so fine, with only 12V from the power supply at say 2 - 4A and for other TPUs I need 24V with a little bit lower current?

What was in my ECD so efficient? OK, I made a lot of tests to get good controls but.....in my iron core TPU is everything OK but what ever I do I have a bright light and thats all. I miss something.

I have to find it out. I know how.

Otto

Mobius has two flows.

No iron in the core.

wings · « **Reply #218 on:** June 24, 2008, 04:14:08 PM »

Quote from: Grumpy on June 24, 2008, 02:31:33 PM

Mobius has two flows.

like this:

http://serve.me.nus.edu.sg/limtt/#Video_Gallery

see down in the page Head-on Collision of Vortex Rings (Re=1000) or

wings · « **Reply #219 on:** June 24, 2008, 04:50:53 PM »

and this is one vortex ring

otto · « **Reply #220 on:** June 30, 2008, 08:54:13 AM »

Hello all,

a nice quiet place here!!!

How about using a Metglas magnetic alloy as a core???

Otto

Grumpy · « **Reply #221 on:** June 30, 2008, 04:12:23 PM »

How about "no ferromagnetic materials are permitted in the fields generated by the coils"?

otto · « **Reply #222 on:** July 01, 2008, 06:07:17 AM »

Hello all,

@Grumpy

maybe I got a newer information?

@All

Again - How about using a Metglas magnetic alloy as a core?

Otto

Grumpy · « **Reply #223 on:** July 01, 2008, 07:14:49 AM »

Quote from: otto on July 01, 2008, 06:07:17 AM

Hello all,

@Grumpy

maybe I got a newer information?

@All

Again - How about using a Metglas magnetic alloy as a core?

Otto

No. You can not have a ferromagnetic material in the core.

If you had newer information, it would be that you can not have a ferromagnetic material in the core - no magnets either.

otto · « **Reply #224 on:** July 01, 2008, 07:28:19 AM »

Hello all,

@Grumpy

why not?

Otto

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud? (Read 372924 times)

tosky

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

otto

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

tosky

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

otto

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

Grumpy

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

BEP

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

otto

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

Grumpy

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

wings

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

wings

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

otto

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

Grumpy

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

otto

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

Grumpy

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?

otto

Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?