Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?  (Read 365271 times)

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1050 on: November 17, 2008, 03:26:14 PM »
   I feel that it is possible to gain or condense energy from the electrolyte mass in a condensor or capacitor. When a capacitor is charged the electrolyte is ionized with electrons held electrostatically in place against an insulated layer between the anode and the electrolyte.  The charge at the anode causes an electron migration towards the anode and an ion migration away from the anode.  The other plate of the capacitor doesn't even have to be there for this to happen but when it is the positive ions of the electrolyte migrate towards this secondary plate and the charge seperation of the field is increased.  The free electrons of the electrolyte concentrate there energy in the field of the anode.  This is gain from the mass energy of the electrolyte.  Do this at a high frequency and efficiency it doesn't take long to concentrate energy in the field we want it in.

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1051 on: November 17, 2008, 03:41:52 PM »
   I feel that it is possible to gain or condense energy

  Do this at a high frequency and efficiency it doesn't take long to concentrate energy in the field we want it in.


 ;)

this coil i just designed ...   still  needs a magnet to start it .. to trip the first reed and release the first charge... :) and start the cat running ...

the hemf is added to the next cap from the coplase of the last coil :o and dumped to the next coil...  at the end of the loop b4 it self runns there is a diode so the source will not back feed to the ring and cause it to run the opssite dirrection ...  after 1 reveloution it is self timed ...

also self running with gain if configured properly.... ;)

then you got this massive magnet feild flying around 4 free TAP IT ALREADY!!!!

ist

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1052 on: November 19, 2008, 04:47:09 AM »
Check out this patent, quite interesting.  (self sustaining electromechanical oscillators, etc..)

http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20080204152



sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1054 on: November 19, 2008, 04:00:29 PM »
      This is a voltage regulator circuit whereby the core saturation of the transformer is actively controlled.   These are what should be used on the grid instead of the pieces of shit they throw up on a pole like they were gold or something.  The power companies only  install voltage regulation at  their substations that are few and far between.  A big user goes on and off line between you and the substation pop go your electronics.  Phase imbalance when a big single phase user starts chewing up their junk energy will overheat every motor you have going trying to boost the low voltage leg because of their poor quality product.  Meanwhile their stack emissions (which with the use of a plasma arc field  as part of the stack)  would go to o carbon emissions are choking us and heating up the planet.  Why don't they clean up their act?  They don't give a shit about anything else but the bottom line.  Frigging criminals.

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1055 on: November 20, 2008, 07:25:36 AM »
thanks for those links wings

@all,
I cleaned up this one close up so the eyes can focus on the essentials.  I'm starting to wonder if there are toroidal windings around the two main loops,  I know I see bumps from place to place but I'm thinking that's a video artifact.  Any thoughts?   

EM

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1056 on: November 20, 2008, 08:23:03 PM »
Well I'll be.The center is the same as the SM17! And the loops around the edge are 2. SM17 had 3. No?

--giantkiller.

CodeWebs

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1057 on: November 20, 2008, 10:13:00 PM »
It does appear to be toroidal windings around the two main loops.  It also appears to be two separate windings around around each loop, counter wound with respect to each other.  They seem to be very near parallel to the loops, maybe only revolving around the loop 4 times around the whole circumference (shown clearest on the top loop), crossing every 90 degrees around the circumference.  What if these were fed the slightly offset pulses which has been mentioned in previous posts? I don't really know.  In some aspects of design it resembles multiple realizations of patent number 5442369.

zapnic

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1058 on: December 07, 2008, 02:02:03 PM »

khabe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1059 on: December 08, 2008, 12:22:19 AM »
just found, perhaps you have seen,
then sorry ...
regards,
khabe

http://www.phact.org/e/dennis4.html
Steven Mark �In according to this report has been scamming people out of big money based on a faked over unity – he’s thought to have preyed on dopey Hollywood types.
http://www.keelynet.com/interact/archive/00000564.htm
Steven Marks TPU (toroidal power unit) Update
Jerry W. Decker ( (no email) )
Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:31:44 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Lindsay Mannix: "Re: Electro-gravity proof!!??"
Next message: Jerry W. Decker: "Ecklin/Bedini combination energy generator?"
Next in thread: John Berry: "Re: Steven Marks TPU (toroidal power unit) Update"
Hi Folks!

The following did not get posted to the members but you need to know it.

If you are at all interested in the Stevens toroidal coil (as shown in
the video that is going around), you will want to read this newspaper
clipping from Australia, kindly posted to the KeelyNet Interact list by
Lindsay Mannix.

Here is the Omnidyne toroid post with the Steven Marks URLs from Patrick
Padraks INE database, which will show you what it is about and what has
been posted publicly to date;

http://keelynet.com/interact/archive/00000321.htm

and here is the article from the Perth newspaper;

http://keelynet.com/interact/archive/00000563.htm

feel free to use or pass the information around, but if you decide to
republish the newspaper story you should get written permission from the
Perth paper....

Wonder what these two guys figured out when they got together? This
Collins fellow certainly seems to have some convictions about it...if
you have any more info to share on it, please send it back to me so I
can pass it on to the list and maybe put all this together into one URL
that is always accessible. Thanks...>>> Jerry

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1060 on: December 08, 2008, 02:29:39 AM »

Here is the Omnidyne toroid

i must of missed this .....  along the way ....

ist

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #1061 on: February 20, 2009, 04:33:32 PM »
@all

I did not want to say anything yet, but I am having a tremendous success!!!!!!
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6362.msg158838#msg158838

Jesus