Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?  (Read 371406 times)

buzz-ard

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #285 on: July 18, 2008, 04:19:43 PM »
The answer is easy: when I connect a bulb and have a good frequency mix, I SEE that the current from my power supply is CONSTANT!!! In some cases - very good frequency mixes - I saw, when a bulb is connected, the current DROPPS!!!!

This means that my coils are really not good because all the current from my power supply is needed to run the coils and NOT the load.

@otto - Great advice! When my coils are good, I see exactly the same thing. Bad coil designs require more amperage for the same work.

altium

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #286 on: July 18, 2008, 05:28:21 PM »
Little corrected schem:

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #287 on: July 18, 2008, 05:44:20 PM »
yep what i have been working on is compleatly diffrent  ;D

sorry guys

i can not offer any help .....

when i apply 5 amps to my lil setup  woooooh  DONT TOUCH THE WIRES......

hell when i use 1 amp i would not want to touch the wires  plused dc need i say more  oh hand plused dc  :D

ist

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #288 on: July 18, 2008, 09:25:08 PM »
Hot is not the word. Burning hot is more like it. When I first did some tests on my yoke, the device was on my office table that has the regular hard enamelled melamine finish. Well I now have a nice round sun ray shaped burn mark on it. A permanent reminder of OU heat. Next time I take a photo of something on my table you will see it.

@otto

I am very glad that you are the one saying this in your last post and not me. If it was me, someone would say I don't know what I am doing. lol (Geez, they may be right also.)

I have noticed this from the beginning even with only one frequency. Just looking at the wiring diagrams spells power supply directly on low turns coils and on load. This spells close to short circuit and coil heat.

The coils would have to have more turns in order to produce a separation from the short circuit potential to become more of an inductive component.

With all the greatest respect for you and your endeavors,  what I feel is missing on the outset is a comprehensive theory (or intent) for the basic operation that can be the ultimate goal and from there, work the various effects involved. I know, I know what you will say. "But this is pure pioneering in new directions", which is very true but I am sure you have some idea of what you want to achieve or what you think is actually happenning in the device.

The more I play with this and the more I re-think what you have said about your own device especially when it has produced the bright light, the more I realize that the patent I had presented for seismic measurements, where they are using two frequencies on coils to neutralize the field like a degausing action, the more I am convinced this is what is happening with your device.

Remember when I had always stated this is brute force voltage applied to some scranny coils and there is no wonder it is producing both heat and lighting a light. Except that the high frequency pulsations could never be responsible for such an action since high frequency pulsing reduces the power and current applied to the coils. The faster you go, the less power is supplied because the 50% duty is less and less when you consider that each pulse will have its gradual up and down slope. You would have to increase the applied power as the frequency increases in order to compensate and maintain the same level of stress on the coils.

But what if the right frequency mix is causing a pulsed degausing of the coils. Then it is the degausing that is in control of the greatest pulsing action and not the frequencies themselves. If the degausing is causing the field to drop to zero in a much more forceful way then if you simply cut off the power. Said another way, instead of the traditional method of pusling applying voltage, from zero to 24 volts, on and off, on and off, imagine leaving the voltage at 24 volts all the time and simply degausing the field, on and off, on and off. The field would retract on degausing but the momentum is still active in the coil. When the degausing stops, the field JUMPS BACK without requiring the voltage rise. The PUNCH would be much greater then any other form of pulsing possible. The question is what frequency mix would cause a coil to degause.

Maybe said another way, what would produce more effect. If you had a 100 foot water hose and turned the valve at the beginning open and closed, open and closed, how would the water flow from the end, compared to if you put the valve at the end with pressure in the hose at all times and then opened and closed the end valve. The later would provide much more PUNCH because there is no pressure build up time required in the hose, the pressure is already there. The water would react instantly to the valve position. Pulsed degausing would be like the valve placed at the end of the pressurized hose.

Sorry for the long post and/or rambling.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #289 on: July 21, 2008, 08:40:49 AM »
Hello all,

@wattsup

my theory is to build first and then, when I SEE, I can have a theory!!!

If I would jump out with my newest theory the people wouldnt understand it, there would be a lot of bla, bla as always and I dont need it! A theory is OK but FACTS are much better.


@All

just an idea:

how about winding the controls in CW and CCW, maybe with different coil LENGHTS??

As said, just an idea


Lets dicuss if this is and good or bad idea.

Otto


wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #290 on: July 22, 2008, 02:03:52 AM »
@otto

I really do understand your apprehensions of discussing what or how you think or realize the device to operate but I really feel you have enough on the table to put a theory to work, otherwise how do you expect others to help in the process. Besides, I myself am always feeling intimidated every time I post something, even this post.

It does not matter if the theory holds any form of validity with others. It will just provide us with what you think is going on and with this, it will give us a better insight into your motivations and maybe, just maybe, this will give others enough to push this in their own research and hopefully provide you with some great and pertinent help.

Again, I know I know, you will humbly say "but I am just a small man from a small country". Who cares how big you are or where you come from. It's what's between the ears and what you do with your hands that counts and I for one have the utmost respect and encouragement for what you are doing. Such a workable and compact device, if it can be tamed, would be the ultimate power source for generations to come. But I would really appreciate getting some of your insights into the device and what is your "vision". There is no right or wrong here. And, there will always be bla, blah regardless.

I hope to receive my second FG in the coming days. I also got some 24 awg wire because I rewound my yoke again with my original 22 awg wire and burnt it again. Sh&t this thing gets so hot.. lol I will try with 24 awg. Maybe it will give some more resistance and draw less amperage.

Regarding your problem with not being able to post form the home computer, what browser and version are you using. You may have unknowingly put overunity.com in a revocation list or other list in the browser (or in Windows) that prevents you from posting. Weird.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #291 on: July 22, 2008, 09:02:46 AM »
Hello all,

@wattsup

hmmm....theory...

Google earths magnetic field to understand better.

I SEE that the TPU works with the earths magnetic field. Imagine our planet rotating in the CCW direction. Now imagine our TPU on our planet working in the CW horizontally direction. What happens? I see our planet as a bar magnet: top is the south MAGNETIC pole, bottom the north MAGNETIC pole. This "bar magnet" has a field all around our planet and this magnetic field is STATIC, only our planet rotates.
Now, our TPU, with his rotation, "cutts" the earths magnetic field at 90? and amplifies this magnetic field by an factor of......big factor. Whats the speed of rotation of our planet??

Idiots are teaching us that the earths magnetic field is weak!!!! Yes, maybe. I see in my coils that this field is very strong and I see that without this field the TPU would NEVER work.

If my memory serves me well I remember SM said later the TPU doesnt work with the earths magnetic field, or something like this?? Of course he said this because the people didnt "get it".

As you see its not much but for now it has to be enough.

About help: Im working with a man, a nice patient man, he doesnt want to be mentioned, with a good knowledge about coils. So, I dont need more help.

Get rid of the yoke core TPU and start to think about a TPU with a stainless steel core.
This yoke core TPU was only a learning tool for me.
If you want to stay with this TPU try to pulse it with 1 high frequency and then with the 2. frequency.
My yoke core TPU was hot but not sooooo hot as yours.

@All

Again the question from yesterday: is here a coil builder that tried a TPU with CW and CCW coils?

Any ideas? Woukd this be good or not?? Maybe with different control coil lenghts???

Otto














otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #292 on: July 23, 2008, 08:34:45 AM »
To Stefan Hartmann, the administrator of this forum!!

Would you PLEASE fix the problem with the message "user hartiberlin1" has exceeded.....

I tought this is a forum where I can work, post....but it seems this forum is a big joke!!!

Every 2 or 3 days is see this message....a few minutes ago I lost a big PM that I wrote....yes, I stored it in the outbox and saw its lost.

I hope that Im a serious researcher and I also hope that my posts are welcome but this forum is not anymore a place where I can work.

So, or  finally fix the problem or I will move to another forum and post there.

Otto


Gustav22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #293 on: July 24, 2008, 12:06:37 PM »
otto has drawn up a new schematic

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #294 on: July 24, 2008, 12:18:18 PM »
Hello all,

thank you Gustav22, youre really helping me.

@All

this is my newest "invention".

The stainless steel core is NOT shown. I have my core in 4 pieces, in quarters.

The controls are wound as you see in the picture. Wire diameter is 0,35mm. A very thin wire.

The collector has 9 turns lamp wire but is connected in series so I have 18 turns, a little pancake coil in 2 levels.

Results:

very bright light

NO MAGNETIC FIELD

ALL COILS ARE COLD

I pulsed this TPU with a lot of wrong frequencies and had a lot of times from my power supply over 7 amperes but the TPU still cold.

The output transformer is also cold.

There is of course a reason I use 40 and 60 turns but this is a long story that I will post in a few days when I have a verification of my little theory.

Otto

rayco

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #295 on: August 16, 2008, 07:21:37 PM »
If you would like to know where SM go the idea all of you need to check this out.

http://www.svensons.com/Energy/hendershot2.html


rayco

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #296 on: August 16, 2008, 07:24:18 PM »

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #297 on: September 23, 2008, 06:22:49 AM »
Hello all,

just a short question:

Is here somebody still working on a TPU?

Of course, except Marco, Giantkiller, myself....   I mean, its sooo quiet in our forum.

Otto

Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #298 on: September 23, 2008, 12:35:42 PM »
   OK:
   Crazy question for the group. Did steven have access to Zenier Diodes when he was doing
this work? I have been contimplating the controller part for a while and I have figured out how
to pulse the coils in sequence using only one freq. But it requires zeniers as part of the capture
system. Any takers?

thaelin

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #299 on: September 23, 2008, 12:44:35 PM »
Hello all,

yes, thaelin.

Otto