Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 71   Go Down

Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?  (Read 370496 times)

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #330 on: September 25, 2008, 06:48:00 PM »
I have 2 planes/bifilar of 8 coils/tanks fired in adjacent pairs on each plane sequenced in opposing directions. I can put in 1 frequency and get 4 times the crossover. A slight adjustment up to either input frequency can magnify the intersection speed. This would be controlled better than the spaz firings of the GK4.

This is my take on building a better generator. After that I can see where the energy lies.

--giantkiller. I love controllers.
Logged

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #331 on: September 25, 2008, 07:59:38 PM »
     I don't know if Tesla was confused about this or not but he also said that he could put in 10,000 horsepower and extract millions.  Just like swinging a hammer you put in a little bit of power for a long time and release it in nanoseconds but this is not an increase in horsepower.    A small gain from radiant energy fields at very high frequency can get us some increase in horsepower though.
   
Logged

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #332 on: September 25, 2008, 08:45:25 PM »
Remember a while back I mentioend that TEsla had used this formula:

Quote
Tesla

Yes; I charged the condenser with 40,000 volts.  When it was charged full, I discharged it suddenly, through a short circuit which gave me a very rapid rate of oscillation.  Let us suppose that I had stored in the condenser 10 watts.  Then, for such a wave there is a flux of energy of (4 x 104)2, and this is multiplied by the frequency of 100,000.  You see, it may go into thousands or millions of horsepower.


My previous post about Joules is what he was refering to - with different units.

1 terawatt is 1359621617 horsepower
Logged

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #333 on: September 25, 2008, 10:37:22 PM »
Tesla

"Yes; I charged the condenser with 40,000 volts.  When it was charged full, I discharged it suddenly, through a short circuit which gave me a very rapid rate of oscillation.  Let us suppose that I had stored in the condenser 10 watts.  Then, for such a wave there is a flux of energy of (4 x 104)2, and this is multiplied by the frequency of 100,000.  You see, it may go into thousands or millions of horsepower. "

     The key words here are very rapid rate of oscillation.  Every echo doing it's thing.  How the hell do we damp a 100khz wave to get it to run an electric motor?  Tesla's lightning shows are kinda cool but it doesn't cut the electric company out of the scene.
Logged

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #334 on: September 26, 2008, 12:47:58 AM »
Pancakes. Top and Bottom of rotational sequential pulsed coils/tanks. The rotation frequency equals the tank resonancy or I can speed up or slow down.

555 -> 74193 -> 74139 -> 74ls04 -> MAX621 -> Hi-side irf840 -> [8] 26khz tanks. 8)

Change out the 8 caps for a different res point. ;)

             ^
             I
 ------------   -------------
 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  ->
 ------------   -------------
             ^
             I

The buckwheats will see the activity. :D

Put a dc bias on the steel bifilar set.

--giantkiller. Lock -n- Load.
Logged

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #335 on: September 28, 2008, 08:42:57 PM »
the REAL SECREAT lies in makeing the device self sustaining in operation

this is tought to you in the ozone pattend ....

thank you erfinder

this is verry easly done ....

IST
Logged

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #336 on: October 01, 2008, 03:50:04 PM »
Quote from: innovation_station on September 28, 2008, 08:42:57 PM
the REAL SECREAT lies in makeing the device self sustaining in operation

this is tought to you in the ozone pattend ....

thank you erfinder

this is verry easly done ....

IST

Then show us a self-sustaining Tesla device in operation.  Anyone have one?  Seriously.  I want to see one.  I read the Ozone patent and there is nothing in there that aludes to overunity or self-sustained operation in any way, shape, or form.  The device is a cleverly efficient adaption of a disruptive discharge coil.

Logged

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #337 on: October 02, 2008, 06:09:55 PM »
Quote from: Grumpy on October 01, 2008, 03:50:04 PM
Then show us a self-sustaining Tesla device in operation.  Anyone have one?  Seriously.  I want to see one.  I read the Ozone patent and there is nothing in there that aludes to overunity or self-sustained operation in any way, shape, or form.  The device is a cleverly efficient adaption of a disruptive discharge coil.



i have showen much of my work .....

use 2 caps 1 is out put the other is selfsustaining mode

tesla states you can charge almost ANY  VALUE CAP!!!

so charge 2 of em  send 1 back to self sustain put the other to work ......

3 coils right

primary secondary and xtra secondary.....

a tesla coil with 2 secondaries  REMEMBER RE IS FREE!!!!!!!


so basicly you got a tesla coil  you want to tap off some on its way through and create a positive feedback loop with the extra secondary to feed the primary after the first pluse has gone through.....

 ;)

ist
Logged

Antimon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #338 on: October 10, 2008, 07:32:43 PM »
NEVER use feedback. Steven Mark used feedback and I say he was a lucky person that his devices always ran stable. One little special moment and you and your home are dust....

A.
Logged

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #339 on: October 10, 2008, 10:25:28 PM »
Quote
From Dale Pond's and Walter Baumgartner's 'Nikola Tesla's Earthquake machine' Page 15.
Sound waves travel in a spiral or vortexian fashion. This in addition with sympathetic vibration produces the gyroscopy. In the three dimensional configuration, the three primary motions are a Longitudinal wave, a Transverse or Shear wave, and a spiralling Vortexial wave shape called a Raliegh or Lamb wave. All 3 modes of vibration are 90 degrees to each other and occur simultaneously.

@IS,
Remember the AudioHenge spin? Do you know how close you are? Of course, you do! You then made the 3 phase Hubbard with 5 coils apiece. That means 3 frequencies. The Audiohenge, GK4 and the Bucket-o-Vibes are 3! Hamel had 3 layers.
I am boarding the proto setup of the 3 channel amplifier from the Bose 3 phase tests to make it portable. Then I look for echo producing tunnels around the city.

--giantkiller. This is the finally solution. Been there along. Right in front of everyones noses.
Logged

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #340 on: October 11, 2008, 02:36:12 AM »
Quote from: Antimon on October 10, 2008, 07:32:43 PM
NEVER use feedback. Steven Mark used feedback and I say he was a lucky person that his devices always ran stable. One little special moment and you and your home are dust....

A.

remember if you do as i describe in my last post you want to use some setup like the ozone pattend to SWITCH  IT so you tell it when to fire not  LET THE THING RUN WILD  OR IN SM'S CASE RUNAWAY.....


heres 1 more for ya what does sm have in the centre of the sm 17??

looks like a magnetic feed back....  i bet it is real close to the battery charger unit im working on ....

only i aint useing the magnetic feed back part of it ....


ist

btw im useing npn trannys... but i would almost bet sm used npn and pnp ....


why? do i say this ??   i learned this a while ago....  with my lite puter....   ;D ;D when i was fireing the turbo coil ...  and i would also think both are switched at the same time.... and the out of phase part and the phase invertor .....  lol lol

sounds like back emf through a diode....

 ;)

Logged

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #341 on: October 11, 2008, 02:59:57 AM »
Compression_ Longitudinal     Displacement_Transvese   Wake_Vortex

  One  steamy, you could cut the air with a knife night, a jet passed over my house.  It cut a hole right over my house through the steam.  The funny thing is that the jet sounded like it passed over my house 5 or six times in the course of the next two minutes.  I couldn't tell if it was coming or going.  Yet I could hear the far off sound of the jet transmitted outside the vortex tunnel of steam. 
  Combine this with vapor trails from fast movers that look like a chain of smoke rings and you have the above relationship.
   Now if space is assigned density and velocity (neutrinos?)  those little photon packets are just like a jet fighter going through pea soup.  Just like those dear little electrons doing 186,000 miles a second.  They don't weigh much but they sure as hell make up for it in speed. 
Logged

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #342 on: October 11, 2008, 05:01:13 AM »
@Sparks,
I enjoy and absorb what you post. Thanks.


@all,
be back in a week.

--giantkiller.
Logged

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #343 on: October 11, 2008, 05:44:45 AM »
here is a pic of my board with a meter on it


ist
Logged

Antimon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 81
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #344 on: October 11, 2008, 04:25:13 PM »
Quote
heres 1 more for ya what does sm have in the centre of the sm 17??

Saturable reactors

A.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 ... 71   Go Up
« previous next »