Author Topic: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator (Read 173395 times)

ltseung888 · « **Reply #75 on:** September 22, 2007, 12:26:52 PM »

Some more comparisons - already in the new Campbell5-1B.doc.

** If we compare the Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator with the 225 HP Pulse Motor, the following points should be noted:
(1)   One slice of the 225 HP Pulse Motor has eight Drive Coils that can also act as Pickup Coils.
(2)   The Program can change the amount of current to the Drive Coils; the number of Drive or Pickup Coils in the interaction
(3)   The Magnetic Field from the Drive Coils already increases the effective Gravitational Constant G. Thus tilting the axle will not lower the Lead Out Energy significantly.
(4)   Another Ring with a Magnet rotating could produce the Flying Saucer Effect. Thus this is worth much more research.
(5)   Many slices can be put together (9 in the video shown).

Lawrence Tseung
Programs to modify the Pulsing Input Leads Out the desired Output.

RebeLLz · « **Reply #76 on:** September 23, 2007, 03:40:31 PM »

here nice video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1539570760730776284&hl=en

Jason · « **Reply #77 on:** September 24, 2007, 01:39:31 AM »

Thanks for the link that is a very interesting concept

Jason

hansvonlieven · « **Reply #78 on:** September 24, 2007, 01:54:49 AM »

G'day Lawrence and all,

Assume that such energy can be drained or supplied within x sec, power in Newton-meter/second (watt)"
4884.15252 if x = 3

and

The Energy drained or supplied at such high rotational rates is very different from what is experienced in daily life.

Regards,

Lawrence Tseung

What data lead to this rather wild speculation? What kind of energy are you talking about and how do you arrive at the formula?

Hans von Lieven

ltseung888 · « **Reply #79 on:** September 24, 2007, 09:06:09 AM »

Quote from: hansvonlieven on September 24, 2007, 01:54:49 AM

G'day Lawrence and all,

Assume that such energy can be drained or supplied within x sec, power in Newton-meter/second (watt)"
4884.15252 if x = 3

and

The Energy drained or supplied at such high rotational rates is very different from what is experienced in daily life.

Regards,

Lawrence Tseung

What data lead to this rather wild speculation? What kind of energy are you talking about and how do you arrive at the formula?

Hans von Lieven

Please see
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2794.msg51264.html#msg51264

for my reply. I would like this thread to focus more on Chas Campbell flywheel discussions.

ashtweth_nihilisti · « **Reply #80 on:** September 26, 2007, 06:00:09 AM »

UPDATED-Typos and grammar is being fixed, Lawrence's info has been added to the Panacea page on Chas, also we will look at time for testing Lawrence Tseung's suggestions and data and report back for te board.

http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/ChasCampbell.htm

ashtweth_nihilisti · « **Reply #81 on:** September 27, 2007, 04:25:45 AM »

Take some medication, and or a bullet.

@ Lawrence

some one just sent me this,

"Chas link in Panacea to the Lawrence Tseung document on Chas Campbell gravity wheel .... On page 25 on figure 7.1 the diagram has the small wheel in the center only a 1/4 of the circumference of the larger wheel. On the Chas wheel video he says to make it 1/2 the circumference so I just wanted to point that out"
regards
ashtweth

ashtweth_nihilisti · « **Reply #82 on:** September 28, 2007, 02:50:41 AM »

Page is still being fixed and updated.

TheOne · « **Reply #83 on:** September 28, 2007, 05:13:23 AM »

Quote from: RebeLLz on September 23, 2007, 03:40:31 PM

here nice video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1539570760730776284&hl=en

The new gravity engine from Chas is really amazing, the idea of this device is so simple. I like it

shruggedatlas · « **Reply #84 on:** September 28, 2007, 05:28:40 AM »

Quote from: TheOne on September 28, 2007, 05:13:23 AM

Quote from: RebeLLz on September 23, 2007, 03:40:31 PM
here nice video
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1539570760730776284&hl=en

The new gravity engine from Chas is really amazing, the idea of this device is so simple. I like it

You realize it cannot work, right? It is no different fundamentally than the thousands of failed gravity wheel designs we have already seen. It is just a play on mechanical advantage (specifically, leverage), which we know produces no excess energy.

jjbeamish · « **Reply #85 on:** September 28, 2007, 10:54:03 PM »

?They? also ?Knew? heaver then air machine could not fly. You should use the proper term instead of ?we?. Because some of us do not ?Know? it can not work. ?you? can think it does not work. That does not mean it can?t.

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #86 on:** September 29, 2007, 02:38:20 AM »

I don't think shruggedatlas was saying what you think she was saying. I believe she was commenting on this specific design and approach and saying it won't work, as have all of the other attempts by many, including me. This is far different from saying that no one will ever succeed at any working design. (Just not this one)

She can speak for herself but I took it as a commentary on this specific approach. Just my 2.00001 cents.

Bill

linda933 · « **Reply #87 on:** November 07, 2007, 12:55:36 AM »

From the Lawrence Tseung thread...regarding Charles Campbell and new reports by Patrick Kelly of Ashtweth's Panacea University...

Quote from: Forever on November 03, 2007, 08:10:58 AM

Participating in the AERO competition

I have discussion with Mr. Tseung on possibly participating in the AERO competition. The products that are already supported by the Chinese government (Wang, Liang, Tsing Hua, Chao etc.) will need government approval.

Quote
from Patrick Kelly
The ready-made product is the Chas Campbell electricity magnifier. Just a brief note
to let you know that in the last two or three days, Chas has confirmed the excess energy in his system by letting it get up to speed and then disconnecting the motor from the mains and plugging it into the output generator, making it self-powered.

He says that the speed maintains perfectly well and he has put a 75-watt lamp on it as an extra load. This is COP = infinity as the user's input power is zero while the output power is either 75 watts or 825 watts depending on how you view it.

We may be able to work with Chas Campbell, Gaby, Ash, Kelly and others to produce a prototype that can meet the requirement of the AERO competition.

It should be fun! US$ 200K plus USD $5million for the next two years is incentive enough for me.

Forever Yuen

Interesting that $5,200,000 US isn't enough to get Patrick Kelly, Ashtweth, Gaby and Charles to even respond to your suggestion! Could it be that the "news" of Charles Campbell now having a self-running machine that produces excess power is another big fat delusion?

If there were any substance to this third-hand report, one might think it would raise a response or two! Where is the excitement? The hoopla? Better yet...where are the corroborating reports and videos?

This sounds like a good time for Mark Dansie to visit Charles and check it out, maybe. Or has everyone lost all belief in the non-credible claims and fourth-party reports of this motley crew?

Linda

markdansie · « **Reply #88 on:** April 09, 2008, 03:16:58 PM »

Stll witing for the invite ...so how is it going Ash?

i_ron · « **Reply #89 on:** March 05, 2009, 05:12:32 PM »

Quote from: wattsup on September 10, 2007, 10:20:39 PM

@mscoffman

Thank you also for your kind information and also welcome to the overunity.com forum.

As you can tell, we are a bunch of die-hards, often stubborn and mostly enthusiastic in the endeavors for free energy systems.

Wattsup,

Good to see this little diversion, it raises a number of points that are related. First, as you are
probably aware, Harold Aspden considers the flywheel to be an Aether device, from his experiment
where the the flywheel takes less energy to spin up the second time (if done within a few minutes)

Second, the HV coil in itself is a more efficient generating coil than a HC coil. If you remember I
demonstrated this in one of my earlier tests on this list where discounting the total drive watts the
additional energy required was less than the output from the HV coil. (126% HV efficient?)

Keep in mind though that the shorted HV coil is not comparable to the shorted HC coil. The current
flow through the HV coil is severely restricted by the coils already high resistance, so additional
load such as light bulbs will not be necessarily be indicative or productive.

Ron

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator (Read 173395 times)

ltseung888

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

RebeLLz

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

Jason

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

hansvonlieven

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

ltseung888

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

ashtweth_nihilisti

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

ashtweth_nihilisti

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

ashtweth_nihilisti

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

TheOne

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

shruggedatlas

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

jjbeamish

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

Pirate88179

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

linda933

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator - Resurrected?

markdansie

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator

i_ron

Re: Chas Campbell Flywheel Generator