Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?  (Read 100381 times)

Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #480 on: August 19, 2023, 01:44:51 PM »
"Yes, lithium nitrate (LiNO3) can react with aluminum (Al) and water (H2O) at high temperatures to produce oxygen gas (O2). This type of reaction is a variation of the thermite reaction and involves the reduction of nitrate ions (NO3-) by aluminum"[/size]
Congrats onepower!

Great use of AI, and for those skeptical, a response that seems worth fact-checking.
Producing O2 gas as a product, huh? Well how 'bout that!

A bit like Bedini circuits degreding the battery chemisty where the battery was supposed to be the constant factor. Consuming the engine, very VERY inspired of you to come up with and then ask Chat GPT about.

I've had mixed experiences with Chat GPT, I keep having to correct tis math because it just doesn't have a good handle on what's what in formulas.

For people like myself who don't realize that Lithium Nitrate introduces (so much) oxygen in that system, it would seem miraculous to get oxygen out. When really it's just part of the oxygen added coming back out. Especially when forcing the same fuel/air mixture, which might be key to these findings. An engine that only takes the air it needs, might not end up with extra oxygen? How does that realistically work?

How the 500 psi would impact the reaction, is for a better chemist than myself to theorize on. I'd like to see that done in isolation. Just distilled water, a bit of Lithium Nitrate, 500 psi and a spark. What can chemically be expected, and what's actually measured? The Lithium Nitrate if not fully recovered, would have at best been consumed. How much of a spark needed to get how much water to disbond and available for combustion or hydrogen fuel cell storage? The O2 measured out, can it exceed the LiNO3 provided as fuel?

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #481 on: August 19, 2023, 03:10:46 PM »
Yes
A test chamber to witness the (combustion?) event
Keep it simple has always been a priority .
 (Ticking over a one cylinder diesel is also a nice
Safe test bed !)


Tommy Reed is building a multifaceted test chamber
For testing this and other experiments .




 










adrouk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #482 on: August 19, 2023, 06:45:35 PM »
Arie de Geus Fuel for combustion engines and gas turbines, with additional Nukleair Merging Component
patent NL1030700 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2469.0,

Acetone, Borax or lithium stearate will do for engines with at least 9.5/1 compression rate, diesel engines have a higher compression rate than petrol engines.

We have almost all tech we want/need, but as we can see nothing comes up.

As far as I can see, no major player want to use any patent/invention that isn’t made in their own labs … maybe a sensible approach would be for inventors to encourage and grant usage of their patents for individual usage and bypass bigoilco (gov included).

In this very moment I can’t see anything happening in near future if we don’t start to do something at individual level. Just retain intellectual rights in case big brother want to show off, and make everything open source.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #483 on: August 19, 2023, 07:36:11 PM »
Sir
Here open source community has many assets ( people ,skills and equipment)
The simplest possible proof of an anomaly will benefit all (Globally)


And we are incredibly fortunate to have so many skilled persons willing to experiment
(Yes Arie de Geus need’s investigation too)


In this particular claim (Russ “water “furnace and Sam leach lithium nitrate at 20 ppm and 500 psi)
We are fortunate to have open source builder Tommy Reed placing this experiment in with his liquid piston test chamber topic here.


https://overunity.com/19454/tommey-reeds-liquid-piston-test-chamber/msg580970/#msg580970

We just need to get him the Lithium Nitrate samples


As mentioned here lithium nitrate is regulated item  ( do to illegal drug trade nonsense)
Better to learn how to make our own …
Since it’s such an incredibly small amount for Sam Leach claims above


Respectfully
Chet K


Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #484 on: August 19, 2023, 08:08:15 PM »
I we keep on theorizing on new technologies in a specific as possible way, we are blockign others from patenting same.
Say, one of us proposes a new way to do something.
A year later, a person comes up with the same, or even steals the idea here. They patent it, and the patent office investigator fails to find our proposals. If we then alert the patent office of the granted patent NOT to have been new, because already in the public space before their first submission date, their patent can and should be nullified.

Offering limited personal licenses for tinkerers is cool and all, but let the inventor then also please come through with a proper blueprint that is easily replicated from. If no-one can make it work, did it even work for the inventor or was is a measurement error?

adrouk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #485 on: August 19, 2023, 09:07:52 PM »
Tesla radiant energy easy diy cosmic energy lights 240v

https://youtu.be/srwU9d5bsHs

Coupled with Tesla pancake coils diy sand heater https://youtu.be/LRFI0V-2DlA instead of solar system and you don’t need to pay any gas/electric for heating your home.

If indeed we have here so many assets with skills and resources should be easy to see in less than 1 month few micro production lines pumping the market with different purposes and output.

Like, replace you heater exchange in your existing heating system with something derived from the above. Make a secondary unit to provide power for your domestic appliances etc.

All in the open ! :) And cheap to replicate without the need for expensive instruments, just make it and use it as you please.

I would strongly suggest downloading or recording as soon as you can, as if it get popularity it might disappear.

Just don’t use keywords unaltered, always specify solar or whatever for avoiding unwanted things happening.

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #486 on: August 21, 2023, 12:00:42 AM »
I wish people would quit making out the term "radiant energy" as if it were something lost, magical, or mystical. Tesla invented the term to explain phenomena he was seeing, specifically having to do with electrical fields. The term was used all over the place, everything from "radiant tubes" that used the brush effect from high current low voltage D'Arsonval style high frequency coils to the purple corona discharge of Tesla or Oudin style high frequency devices.

But then again, I shouldn't be surprised as most people don't know the difference between coil types. If the secondary is connected to ground, hint, it is not a Tesla coil. Most coils called a Tesla coil are in fact Oudin style high frequency coils. Yes, Tesla himself used all three types in his research, don't be surprised at that either. The highest voltages combined with the lowest currents are derived from Tesla style HF coils. Lowest voltage highest current are from D'Arsonval auto-transformer pancake style HF coils, mid-range on both comes from Oudin style HF coils.

Tesla's 685,957 radiant energy patent concerns the natural electric field of the earth. How is that radiant energy? Tesla knew it was caused by energy RADIATED FROM THE SUN. The earth acts like a giant capacitor in that respect, with the ball of dirt acting as one plate, and the ionosphere acting as the other. Lightning is a byproduct of voltages exceeding the breakdown voltage of the dielectric (air). The charge difference in the dielectric between the ionosphere and the ground is between 100 and 300 volts per meter.

That patent tells a basic structure using capacitance and a spark gap (figure one) between two electrically isolated plates to harness that natural energy, and how to use it in a few ways. the last two figures is that patent show you that it applies to directed radiant energy (parabolic dish as the source) or from a radiant energy tube, common at the time for "electrical medicine."  Nothing in that patent is even mysterious, let alone mystical -- in any sense. Engineers at the time knew exactly what the patent referenced, as it was a novel way of harnessing something thought to be worthless and unusable by science.

For those interested, figure 4 shows how to use a mechanically turned commutator (instead of a spark gap) in series with a primary coil to run a Tesla coil. Understand that an ordinary spark gap would work, not tht difficult to understand.

For those familiar with original HF Tesla coil circuit design, the stuff in figure 1 should stick out like a sore thumb. Spark gap across a capacitor, collector plate in the air, grounding plate buried in the soil. The two plates replace the high voltage source usually powering the tesla coil.

Understand that a D'Arsonval coil can be used to step down the voltage of such a device, though it would be HF at that point.
The Earth's electric field itself is not AC, but is in fact high voltage DC. It is a static field, like exists in any capacitor.  He put a capacitor inside an active capacitor to tap into some of the stored field energy.
Paul Andrulis

onepower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1116
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #487 on: August 21, 2023, 07:00:50 PM »
Cloxxki
Quote
Great use of AI, and for those skeptical, a response that seems worth fact-checking.
Producing O2 gas as a product, huh? Well how 'bout that!

A bit like Bedini circuits degreding the battery chemisty where the battery was supposed to be the constant factor. Consuming the engine, very VERY inspired of you to come up with and then ask Chat GPT about.

I tend to follow the best interpretation of Occam's razor. Which is, "the answer which relies on the fewest assumptions is probably the right one". Many say, "the simplest answer is the right one" but this is a fallacy. Logically, an answer can be simple but still be wrong. When we say answer we mean a fact and all facts rely on the fewest false assumptions.

For example, many critics claim a FE device must violate the Conservation of Energy. However if the COE cannot be violated then how could a FE device violate it?. It's clearly a false statement because it directly contradicts itself and yet we hear it all the time. Which begs the question, if a FE device cannot violate the COE then where does the energy come from?.

AC

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #488 on: August 21, 2023, 07:08:26 PM »
from Earth electromagnetic field

adrouk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #489 on: August 21, 2023, 09:29:02 PM »
I wish people would quit making out the term "radiant energy" as if it were something lost, magical, or mystical. Tesla invented the term to explain phenomena he was seeing, specifically having to do with electrical fields. The term was used all over the place, everything from "radiant tubes" that used the brush effect from high current low voltage D'Arsonval style high frequency coils to the purple corona discharge of Tesla or Oudin style high frequency devices.

But then again, I shouldn't be surprised as most people don't know the difference between coil types. If the secondary is connected to ground, hint, it is not a Tesla coil. Most coils called a Tesla coil are in fact Oudin style high frequency coils. Yes, Tesla himself used all three types in his research, don't be surprised at that either. The highest voltages combined with the lowest currents are derived from Tesla style HF coils. Lowest voltage highest current are from D'Arsonval auto-transformer pancake style HF coils, mid-range on both comes from Oudin style HF coils.

Tesla's 685,957 radiant energy patent concerns the natural electric field of the earth. How is that radiant energy? Tesla knew it was caused by energy RADIATED FROM THE SUN. The earth acts like a giant capacitor in that respect, with the ball of dirt acting as one plate, and the ionosphere acting as the other. Lightning is a byproduct of voltages exceeding the breakdown voltage of the dielectric (air). The charge difference in the dielectric between the ionosphere and the ground is between 100 and 300 volts per meter.

That patent tells a basic structure using capacitance and a spark gap (figure one) between two electrically isolated plates to harness that natural energy, and how to use it in a few ways. the last two figures is that patent show you that it applies to directed radiant energy (parabolic dish as the source) or from a radiant energy tube, common at the time for "electrical medicine."  Nothing in that patent is even mysterious, let alone mystical -- in any sense. Engineers at the time knew exactly what the patent referenced, as it was a novel way of harnessing something thought to be worthless and unusable by science.

For those interested, figure 4 shows how to use a mechanically turned commutator (instead of a spark gap) in series with a primary coil to run a Tesla coil. Understand that an ordinary spark gap would work, not tht difficult to understand.

For those familiar with original HF Tesla coil circuit design, the stuff in figure 1 should stick out like a sore thumb. Spark gap across a capacitor, collector plate in the air, grounding plate buried in the soil. The two plates replace the high voltage source usually powering the tesla coil.

Understand that a D'Arsonval coil can be used to step down the voltage of such a device, though it would be HF at that point.
The Earth's electric field itself is not AC, but is in fact high voltage DC. It is a static field, like exists in any capacitor.  He put a capacitor inside an active capacitor to tap into some of the stored field energy.
Paul Andrulis

I didn’t say anywhere that it might be something magic, quite the opposite !

Although I enjoy to see another explanation of the phenomena and nicely statement about being surrounded by energy.

Those videos just prove that we don’t need an phd in nano molecular or astronomy to make a simple device using few wires, transistor and capacitors to get our homes powered and warmed up. Yet it is a very simple and inexpensive device easy to replicate and should be done in schools as many adults are just blinded by mainstream “science”

Yet I can see on forum people struggling to replicate Don Smith, Kapanadze and they just don’t think that all they need is their wire lengths needs to match a fraction of wave length for frequency and their air core transformers produce standing waves being shorted and amplified waves create a huge energy ready for collection, they can’t understand that if you don’t use the gradient potential you need a battery to create that needed disturbance, yet they fall for silly trap of fe deniers to loop to prove whatever. Also designing their devices they don’t look to match the desired load with their system but still expect to see wonders in the sky.

Yet, it seems very difficult to see that using electricity is just shorting + with - in any devices you can find on shops, and they are utterly inefficient on how they have been designed for not being harmonic with the environment and most of them are just an fancy heating element sometimes with a screen, speaker and mic attached.

In Nikola Tesla and Arie Melis deGeus inventions we can see that HV at hf resistance of copper is almost nothing and electricity is always accompanied by magnetism, yet they still search for superconductors at room temperature as a new method for antigravity when we know the tech already exist and being used.

Now if my rant is excused by your grace, I can’t see why we don’t have anyone replicating this simplified schoolgirl project to prove or disprove the utility of another Tesla’s inventions along with many other that we are using even without noticing.

And, please don’t get me wrong, but I believe that if we start to use this energy we may witness less devastating storms and hurricanes around the globe according with the level of modern lifestyle  for at least 1/2 of inhabitants on this planet.

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #490 on: August 22, 2023, 12:07:55 AM »
I didn’t say anywhere that it might be something magic, quite the opposite !

Although I enjoy to see another explanation of the phenomena and nicely statement about being surrounded by energy.

Those videos just prove that we don’t need an phd in nano molecular or astronomy to make a simple device using few wires, transistor and capacitors to get our homes powered and warmed up. Yet it is a very simple and inexpensive device easy to replicate and should be done in schools as many adults are just blinded by mainstream “science”

Yet I can see on forum people struggling to replicate Don Smith, Kapanadze and they just don’t think that all they need is their wire lengths needs to match a fraction of wave length for frequency and their air core transformers produce standing waves being shorted and amplified waves create a huge energy ready for collection, they can’t understand that if you don’t use the gradient potential you need a battery to create that needed disturbance, yet they fall for silly trap of fe deniers to loop to prove whatever. Also designing their devices they don’t look to match the desired load with their system but still expect to see wonders in the sky.

Yet, it seems very difficult to see that using electricity is just shorting + with - in any devices you can find on shops, and they are utterly inefficient on how they have been designed for not being harmonic with the environment and most of them are just an fancy heating element sometimes with a screen, speaker and mic attached.

In Nikola Tesla and Arie Melis deGeus inventions we can see that HV at hf resistance of copper is almost nothing and electricity is always accompanied by magnetism, yet they still search for superconductors at room temperature as a new method for antigravity when we know the tech already exist and being used.

Now if my rant is excused by your grace, I can’t see why we don’t have anyone replicating this simplified schoolgirl project to prove or disprove the utility of another Tesla’s inventions along with many other that we are using even without noticing.

And, please don’t get me wrong, but I believe that if we start to use this energy we may witness less devastating storms and hurricanes around the globe according with the level of modern lifestyle  for at least 1/2 of inhabitants on this planet.
When it comes to patent #685,957 -- I ran an idea past an AI -- that was interesting. Very interesting. Once I described what I was thinking, it caught the idea 100% and then came up with the formula I needed. I would have never thought of using that derivation for that particular system, but it fits when considering Tesla's own position on the subject matter. Viewing the earth as a conductive perfect sphere. I would have overlooked that formula every day of the week for various reasons.
P = E^2/C -> E= SQRT(P/C) where P equals power output in watts, E equals electric field strength in volts per meter, C = capacitance in farads
Totally the wrong formula, yet it makes perfect sense. In the second formula the plate size in square meters can be interchanged with E.
This might work, have to test. The AI is certain it will work, though a different AI is not so sure (since the earth is not a perfect sphere,) but I am pessimistic about easy answers so reserve my optimism for results.
Paul Andrulis

adrouk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #491 on: August 22, 2023, 01:14:10 AM »
Honestly, there is thousands of patent application for exactly the same principle … just look at this https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100207399A1/en … and always check patent citation, you’ll be amazed to see thousands variations of Tesla’s inventions and everyone want to have a patent.

Yet, we don’t have in any shop anywhere on this planet any device operating despite such a skilled inventors.

But, … someone with a soldering iron, just made it and shared for free with anyone … and even more than that, is cheap to make without any need for graphene or superconductor and you even don’t need an oscilloscope or any other fancy tools.

Amazing world 👏🏻

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #492 on: October 18, 2023, 10:01:49 PM »
It is very strange to see a picture in which I published an experiment that is an addition to the Joule experiment, because the latter did not imply that there is heat....

And people are still having weird discussions about wavelengths and whatnot.

wavelength. frequency and nothing else is nowadays realized in Ansys HFSS simulators.

Of course, there are different people here and so rarely those who can give quite an adequate technical answer to the questions....

But I wouldn't want to engage in criticism. since hardly anyone would be interested.

Now, at this stage. As soon as I gave up mechanics. because it is very costly for me - mechanics requires a fleet of equipment. and here I simply do not have it. so I decided to deal with hypotheses. which would not have mechanics, although in fact the displacement of ines or overcoming the potential that is formed on the windings of an electric motor, as an obrtimate machine...but pure mechanics - not anymore....

I would like to share some of my negative experiences with LSpice. The question was that it has models as a long line ideal and with losses. But both in some cases do not work quite correctly.

The point is that it works only if I form the LC chain by hand as a delay line with concentrated parameters.

Unipolar pulses in the delay line along the line itself are not unipolar, but due to the self-induction EMF they turn into a bipolar signal, and it was required to receive a unipolar signal along the line....

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #493 on: October 18, 2023, 10:09:55 PM »
The question now is to refine a different concept that once instead of radio frequencies works within 1 MHz to get the potential to prevent all that has to overcome in an electric motor, exactly as in a battery....

Once LTSpice gave out a non super unit )) thought - that it would not work for him...but now decided to refine the situation.... And the theme with a pendulum. which is described above - showed super-unit...but nobody needs it....

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Ilya Tsimbaluk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
« Reply #494 on: October 18, 2023, 10:14:31 PM »
I am now planning to create a library in Ansys Maxwell

If anyone has B and H data for FEMM or ANSYS MAXWELL, let me know