Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy
builders board => General Builders discussion => Topic started by: TriKri on March 30, 2021, 12:27:50 AM
-
As the title says, has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works? If so, are there instructions to reproduce your build? I'm asking because it would be nice to hear from someone who has personal experience of a system and can verify that it works and produces more energy that it consumes.
-
Don't be stupid. Do some research and see what happens to free-energy inventors before you come here asking moronic questions! And don't by into shyster Ramset's spiel as his job here is to lure out free-energy inventors so that the MIB can shut them down. Many fakers here!
-
Writing lies perhaps makes you feel better , liable and slander are weak points of a discussion (and against the law !
And of course forum rules !
Many times I asked you to write the sentence or two with the schematic and specs ( wire size,
Type , values ... etc etc and expectations ( in your claim of COP 2 or twice the output of input
Nobody ever made such a simple “Aboveunity”claim that actually worked here ..
(Of course you provided none of the above information... however a Member of your forum was helping a builder here ... seems you have forbidden it to continue?
And when persons could not get results... no help except abuse ...
Hateful words ... lies ( see above)
You run a forum over ten years now ? ... hiding life saving planet changing technologies?
Countless unimaginable consequences to our world and its inhabitants
While you played games at your forum “ huge billboards “ get aboveunity here easy peasy”
See all my members and their awards ( yes you actually gave “PUBLIC front page awards” ...no concern at all for members
And safety ?
But now it’s hush hush when person asks you to “open source”...write a sentence with directions and expected results !!
Billboards and Public awards are ok ( safe ? )..But sentence open sourcing ..is trouble ...??huh ?
Disruptive technologies are bursting out everywhere... unfortunately you need to be rich
(Elon Musk and now LAVO in Australia with hydrogen storage
Breakthrough on a water planet ....
The world races past those like yourself who hid techs and watched people die and planet pay the price ...
Is not time to run and hide .. ( or write lies) it’s time to run towards the need
And open source
Please share your simple COP 2 secret
Thousands have tried and failed ...
Show us how it works ?
No hundreds of pages of writing ( which you remove with hateful words when persons can’t replicate
Or find errors ( or have questions)in replications
Please share and stop the lies !!
Again here are some persons with worlds most disruptive technology... even more disruptive than Elon
https://lavo.com.au/ (https://lavo.com.au/)
You must be rich to afford it ....
please share your COP 2 simple claim
Let your good friend captain Loz help itsu ?
Explain why he can’t get it working ( thousand others have same problem)
Please !!
The world desperately needed this a decade ago ... and not one public replication that worked aboveunity ..
stop hiding it and share the secret!!
How many more extinctions and deaths ?
Help us to stop burning our atmosphere to make power
Choking our air and poisoning our oceans
Enuff!!
None of us are free
Till everyone of us are free!!
Like sunshine and air and water ... our world gives us these things open source...
It works for universe ...
It’s the model we must follow
Open source!!
-
Infinitive : to wash lavar
I wash eu lavo ( as maos,o cerebro et cetera)
40 KWh as hydrogen converted to electricity = 2 days average australian private household consume
or up to 2 months storage improved Mr.Chalko ' 0,8 eKWh/day'- consume
ramset,the question here is :
the metal sponge( material/weight) as storage related up to 4 billions private households global ?
Sustainable technology or ' humans triage ' !?
Peakoil,peakcopper,peaknickel,....!
Sincere
OCWL
-
Lanca
There was a member here shared a similar working principle with another gas!
He wrote of a material zeolite which absorbed propane gas
Back into liquid when exposed to it ( the zeolite)
Yes no power required and produced a phase change from gas to liquid
And released back again to gas with minute ( teensy) charge across zeolite!
It was part of a pap engine claim ?
Perhaps other materials for application mentioned ?
https://lavo.com.au/ (https://lavo.com.au/)
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
Open source community needs this info...for education purposes !
Storing hydrogen at such huge energy density??
Absolutely amazing !!
-
The lavo is an hydrogen metal alloy storage with fuel cell converter with 50% efficiency
https://www.ecogeneration.com.au/the-40kwh-34750-196kg-hydrogen-battery-for-the-home/ (https://www.ecogeneration.com.au/the-40kwh-34750-196kg-hydrogen-battery-for-the-home/)
20 000 charge cycles estimation !
Weight 196 Kg the storage , +- 324 Kg the total system
Price : $ 34.750 ,assuming Aussi -Dol(l)ar
$34750 /20 000 charge cycles/5 KW ~ € 0,3475/KWh
" ..... As with all first-of-its-kind gear the Lavo batteries are expensive, with a $34,750 price tag for the first model. Over time, and as efficiencies are further fine-tuned, Muller expects to the price will one day begin with a two. .... "
Probably more related hidrit material : Professor Aguey-Zinsou publications
https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/alchemy-of-energy-breakthrough-offers-mass-hydrogen-storage-options-20200702-p558dj.html (https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/alchemy-of-energy-breakthrough-offers-mass-hydrogen-storage-options-20200702-p558dj.html)
Professor Aguey-Zinsou said the alloy contained titanium and "other common materials", but declined to name them, pending the issuance of a formal patent expected within weeks.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319919318336 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360319919318336)
https://research.unsw.edu.au/people/professor-kondo-francois-aguey-zinsou/publications?page=1 (https://research.unsw.edu.au/people/professor-kondo-francois-aguey-zinsou/publications?page=1)
https://www.element14.com/community/groups/power-management/blog/2020/07/09/researchers-develop-a-system-that-could-store-large-amounts-of-electricity-in-the-form-of-hydrogen (https://www.element14.com/community/groups/power-management/blog/2020/07/09/researchers-develop-a-system-that-could-store-large-amounts-of-electricity-in-the-form-of-hydrogen)
It could potentially cost as low as 2 cents per kW-hour, or less than one-tenth the cost of lithium and buying power from the grid, which makes the storage very competitive. Converting electricity to hydrogen and back would "multiply the inefficiencies," and rapid take-up of the product shouldn't be expected
from $0,3475 to $0,02 the system endconsumer price has to decline to $2000
Muller expects to the price will one day begin with a two. .... ::)
Even $ 3475 would be too high for the below 80% worldwide private households !
Sincere
OCWL
For that value $3475 you can get the equivalent 5 KW output by
Imris magnet amplifier + Ramos Suarez or Tanaka Saburo battery charger and adgex.ru 25000 cycles Nickel-battery
https://permies.com/t/30590/Intermittent-Adsorption-Refrigerator (https://permies.com/t/30590/Intermittent-Adsorption-Refrigerator)
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/6659809/hydrocarbon-technology-gtz
-
ur easy to fuk with, Ramset. And I'm not Chris! Bunch of dummies here who think so! 8)
-
As the title says, has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works? If so, are there instructions to reproduce your build? I'm asking because it would be nice to hear from someone who has personal experience of a system and can verify that it works and produces more energy that it consumes.
[0006] [0007]
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=CA&NR=2061962A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19930828&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=CA&NR=2061962A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19930828&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6603890
Fenn resolves the dilemma when he states, Id. page 15, " work as not energy. Work is not 'possessed' by a system whereas Energy is.
-
[0006] [0007]
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=CA&NR=2061962A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19930828&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=CA&NR=2061962A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19930828&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6603890
Fenn resolves the dilemma when he states, Id. page 15, " work as not energy. Work is not 'possessed' by a system whereas Energy is.
Oh dreary me what went wrong that link doesn't work.
-
Good Morning ,AlienGrey !
Do You mean that the osti.gov link does not open John.B.Fenn his lecture book ?
Then You are right !
Btw : "free energy and overunity" expressions are (analytical electro-)chemistry related ,less Physics !
A little knowledge about Avogrado and Gay-Lussac experiments helps !
John Bennett Fenn ,for his special works awarded,Nobel Award,in Chemistry ( ionisation) !
Another Chemistry awarded work,not by Mr.Fenn ,important for surplus energy results disclosure, "asymetrics" related !
-
Chet,
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oeko-energie.de%2Fenergieberatung%2F (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.oeko-energie.de%2Fenergieberatung%2F)
Standart household compared SMART,economical household
18 KWh +/- 3 KWh
down to https://mtbest.net/energy-efficiency/ (https://mtbest.net/energy-efficiency/) https://mtbest.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2021/03/household_efficiency.pdf (https://mtbest.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2021/03/household_efficiency.pdf)
This means that the Lavo system ( or other energetic solutions) can be easily appropriate dimensionized !
Actually : https://lavo.com.au/#specs (https://lavo.com.au/#specs) Usable Capacity 40 kWh Real Power, max continuous 5 kW (charge and discharge)
Instead 40 KWh storage 10 KWh or less !
And with Imris 5 KW rated output amplifier ,C.O.P. 8 apparent power to real power :
34750 AUS$ / 4 ( instead 40 KWh only 10 KWh storage) / 8 ( for C.O.P. 8 ) = linear 1086 AUS$ + 1125 Euros Imris amplifier
1 AUS$ = actually 0,75 US$ 1 US$ = actually 0,85 Euro
or 34750 AUS$/ 8 = linear 4343 AUS$ + 1125 Euros Imris amplifier
about "economy" and " bubble economics" :
https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/11/22325004/new-3d-printed-homes-austin-price-icon-housing (https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/11/22325004/new-3d-printed-homes-austin-price-icon-housing)
800 sqft for 10 000 US$ or 1000 sqft for 450 000 US$ price
from 3dmachine production view 1000 sqft/800 sqft x 10 000 US$ = 12 500 US$ worth
34 750 AUS$ x 0,75 = 26 062,5 US$ Lavo system price
Paying for an energetic solution more than a new -social law appropriate-house worth ?
Social law : up to 4 capita family : 30,5 sqm basic function area + 9 sqm per capita = 66,5 sqm home area
Base for house/home credit sum maximum avaliation !
800 sqft x 0,093 = 74,4 sqm home area = over 4 capita social law comfort !
The ICON low profit price per sqm does me not surprise :
Contour Crafting 3d tech build house 100 US$/sqmnon-profit canadian block-house style 50 Euros/sqmjovoto 300 US$ house competition
Not to misunderstand :
each one has the right to pay these 450 000 US$ for this new East Austin construction,
cash or by house/ground change
but only
12500 US$ x 0,8 x 0,8 = 8000 US$ are possible as credit participation by institutions ! A constitutional demand !
This is the "estate administration bubble" economy !
-
quote:
Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
It is a problem with semantics :
Overunity doesn't exist and will never exist.
If you call it FE Free energy than that term is describing deice that used energy that is free of charge. like solar , wind,
etc..
So if energy that is taken to conversion is converted into electricity than that energy after initial cost of the conversion device is free.
Wesley
-
quote: It is a problem with semantics :
Overunity doesn't exist and will never exist.
If you call it FE Free energy than that term is describing deice that used energy that is free of charge. like solar , wind,
etc..
So if energy that is taken to conversion is converted into electricity than that energy after initial cost of the conversion device is free.
Wesley
Although solar and wind energy is 'free' it's not really what we are searching for on this forum.
So i would say: 'to convert energy which is available anywhere and anytime free of charge'.
And to answer the question: No, i have never seen a system according to this definition, and i doubt anyone on this forum ever has built one.
-
quote: It is a problem with semantics :
Overunity doesn't exist and will never exist.
If you call it FE Free energy than that term is describing deice that used energy that is free of charge. like solar , wind,
etc..
So if energy that is taken to conversion is converted into electricity than that energy after initial cost of the conversion device is free.
Wesley
Actually, this is what THEY would have us believe! OU is possible without violation of the laws of thermodynamics as we shall see sometime before the remainder of this year is complete.
Of course energy conversion can result in apparent free energy (solar) but true FE is possible!
Regards,
Pm
-
Who backed this expression ' overunity' ?
'free energy' is a Physics/Chemistry official and used expression/term !
The problem with free= unbonded energy = short actio/reactio life in time unit
We need a.much mass f.e. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9BV6nb79fA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9BV6nb79fA) power/density ratio
b. rare elements(precious) for amorphous alloys
f.e. https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel)
rare ?
Nickel is required as a metal (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Metalle) in small quantities; most of the production (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Produktion) goes into the production of stainless steels (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Rostfreier_Stahl) and nickel alloys (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Nickellegierung) . Nickel is used in many specific and recognizable industrial (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Industriegut) and consumer (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Konsumgut) uses, including steel (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Edelstahl) , Alnico (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Alnico) - magnet (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Magnet) , coins (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/M%C3%BCnze) , rechargeable batteries (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Batterie_(Elektrotechnik)) , e- guitar strings (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Gitarrensaite) , microphone capsules (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Mikrofonkapsel) , claddings on sanitary fittings (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Sanit%C3%A4rtechnik)and special alloy (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Legierung) such as permalloy (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Permalloy), Elinvar (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Elinvar) and Invar (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Invar) . It is used for coating (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Beschichten)and as a green tint in glass (https://acwjpkh4hshdfx4rexzvgeruni--de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Glas) . The reserves of nickel deposits that can be mined from today's point of view are between 70 and 170 million tons. Currently, more than two million tonnes are extracted worldwide each year (2018: 2.4 million tonnes .
170 000 000 000 Kg / 4 000 000 000 private households ( by 11 Bio. habitants 2100) = 42,5 Kg per household
1950 Kg mass for 170 KW capacity , from this mass pure Nickel-part ?
https://adgex.com/docs/EnergyBRICK_teaser_en.pdf (https://adgex.com/docs/EnergyBRICK_teaser_en.pdf) " INFINITE POWER SCALE-UP" ??? INFINITE Nickel SOURCE ? ::)
for great W output per cbm or sqm or Kg or sec : conventional industrial and private consume related !
My elementar orientation : aluminium ,sodium and carbon (as graphit/graphene ) for coils/batteries/generator/motor/transformer
-
Actually, this is what THEY would have us believe! OU is possible without violation of the laws of thermodynamics as we shall see sometime before the remainder of this year is complete.
Of course energy conversion can result in apparent free energy (solar) but true FE is possible!
Regards,
Pm
How many times have we heard that?
bi
-
quote: It is a problem with semantics :
Overunity doesn't exist and will never exist.
If you call it FE Free energy than that term is describing deice that used energy that is free of charge. like solar , wind,
etc..
So if energy that is taken to conversion is converted into electricity than that energy after initial cost of the conversion device is free.
Wesley
Yep!
OverUnity implies a closed system. It goes against reasoning to think that you can take a 1 gallon jug of water and pour out more than one gallon of water.
There are clearly many OPEN systems that allow you to get more out of a system than what YOU put in, such as the well-known solar and wind generators. But when we talk of OPEN systems, are we really talking about OU? I think not. Why? Because the energy coming in from an open system is separate from what YOU put in, and is thus not part of the original input energy consideration. Yes, semantics!
Bottom line is that the establishment has created their own vocabulary to throw off would-be free-energy enthusiasts. Their goal is to make people think that free-energy is impossible, when in fact we see it all of the time. Take for example a sail boat. Far more energy is captured and transformed into power by the sail and boat than was used by the sailor to hoist the sail. In the free-energy world, this is what we are really trying to replicate. Don Smith's Ambient Energy Generator does just that. A small amount of electrons (the sailor) is used to create a large voltage (the sail) which attracts a large amount of electrons from earth ground (wind) that gets transformed into energy/power far exceeding that used to start the process. The amount of electrons coming from ground are equal to the voltage used to attract them, not the small amount of electrons used to create the voltage. Just like the amount of wind captured by the sail is equal to the sail size, not the energy used by the sailor to hoist the sail.
So ignoring the establishments RED HERRING language like overunity, etc, should be the first step in any free-energy enthusiasts journey!
-
Dear fellow researchers.
Few Myths Debunked.
As much as you and I will like to see overunity or ..."something for nothing"...
-we need to understand that :
-physics is based on models.
________________________________
The "Holy Grail" of modern physics is reality based on models.
Physics doesn't recognize gods, miraculous powers that provide happiness, eternal youth or sustenance in infinite abundance...
Physics doesn't deal with devils, , angels, politics, racial, gender inequality, sexual orientation... or any of such stories.
Physics doesn't have soul, feelings, emotions, or such...
Physics is one of sciences..
Darwin proved that we are animals belonging to mammals and that is model that was never proven otherwise-
(in circumstances different from those present or considered)
Einstein proved his theory of relativity and all progress in its physical form started from there.
Proof is an evidence or argument establishing a fact or the truth of a statement.
in physics consequent proven followup of the theory creates model that becomes stronger with time as is exercised by number of other researchers.
If model becomes outdated or inconvenient based on reality of the given present time we change it for the new one..
but history of moderns science doesn't see such events much yet.
___________________________________________
As much as you may disagree with my statement physics doesn't care much...
Who backed this expression ' overunity' ?
'free energy' is a Physics/Chemistry official and used expression/term !
Overunity - doesn't exist and will never exist and is laughable as a term.
Perpetual Motion- is not important to us if was ever in existence .. it is like spending 1 dollar to gain 1 dollar...
Free Energy - exist but for us this wording is just an abbreviation and has nothing to do with mentioned by lancaIV chemistry descriptor.
but for us to do not get lost in the nonsense - we need some sort of abbreviation for.. what we do.
and we use word: FREE ENERGY.. as we can prove that energy can be free to us
But of course ,that energy must have its own origin too.
and all of it is because of the LAW: Energy can't be created nor destroyed..
Wesley
-
Free energy costs to produce so how is it free ?
The easiest way to increase yield is to change an unstable energy into it's unstable state
With out giving an idea away it's already been done, you need to think how you can do just that
the twist is you already have it so again stop thinking like Marconi and think more like Tesla
PS The Tesla car is a joke some where along the line you have to burn stuff to run the electric car
or show me a car that’s American and self charging !
-
Dear fellow researchers.
Few Myths Debunked.
As much as you and I will like to see overunity or ..."something for nothing"...
-we need to understand that :
-physics is based on models.
________________________________
The "Holy Grail" of modern physics is reality based on models.
Physics doesn't recognize gods, miraculous powers that provide happiness, eternal youth or sustenance in infinite abundance...
Physics doesn't deal with devils, , angels, politics, racial, gender inequality, sexual orientation... or any of such stories.
Physics doesn't have soul, feelings, emotions, or such...
Physics is one of sciences..
Darwin proved that we are animals belonging to mammals and that is model that was never proven otherwise-
(in circumstances different from those present or considered)
Einstein proved his theory of relativity and all progress in its physical form started from there.
Proof is an evidence or argument establishing a fact or the truth of a statement.
in physics consequent proven followup of the theory creates model that becomes stronger with time as is exercised by number of other researchers.
If model becomes outdated or inconvenient based on reality of the given present time we change it for the new one..
but history of moderns science doesn't see such events much yet.
___________________________________________
As much as you may disagree with my statement physics doesn't care much...
Overunity - doesn't exist and will never exist and is laughable as a term.
Perpetual Motion- is not important to us if was ever in existence .. it is like spending 1 dollar to gain 1 dollar...
Free Energy - exist but for us this wording is just an abbreviation and has nothing to do with mentioned by lancaIV chemistry descriptor.
but for us to do not get lost in the nonsense - we need some sort of abbreviation for.. what we do.
and we use word: FREE ENERGY.. as we can prove that energy can be free to us
But of course ,that energy must have its own origin too.
and all of it is because of the LAW: Energy can't be created nor destroyed..
Wesley
-
There are many preconceived ideas and notions regarding how excess energy can be generated.......or not. To really understand how such a task may be accomplished, one must first understand how our electrical components interact with the aether. A simple coil for example. Is there a difference between dynamic and steady states in an inductor? If so, how can these differences be utilized?
Thinking outside the box is mandatory and this box includes formal education. They don't teach what they don't want you to know!
Regards,
Pm
-
SOME DEFINITIONS
Excerpts From Wikipedia
"Energy is a property of objects, transferable among them via fundamental interactions,
which can be converted in form but not created or destroyed. The joule is the SI unit
of energy, based on the amount transferred to an object by the mechanical work of
moving it 1 meter against a force of 1 newton.[1]"
Below are some excerpts from the above definitiion (February 2016). These words are the
subjects of other Wikipedia topic excerpts.
The "SI" is le Système International d'Unités or the International System of Units.
PHYSICAL PROPERTY: "A physical property is any property that is measurable, whose
value describes a state of a physical system."
STATE “In classical mechanics, state is a complete description of a system in terms of
parameters such as positions and momentums at a particular moment in time
PHYSICAL SYSTEM : "a physical system is the portion of the physical universe chosen
for analysis. Everything outside the system is known as the environment, which in
analysis is ignored except for its affects on the system. The cut between system and
the world is a free choice, generally made to simplify the analysis as much as possible.”
OBJECT: “In physics, a physical body or physical object (sometimes simply called a body
or object) is a collection of matter with some common attributes, most important, the
spatial location. Examples of models of physical bodies include, but are not limited to
a particle, several interacting smaller bodies (particles or other), and continuous media."
TRANSFERABLE: "In the physical sciences, an energy transfer or 'energy exchange' from
one system to another is said to occur when an amount of energy crosses the boundary
between them, thus increasing the energy content of one system while decreasing the
energy content of the other system by the same amount."
BOUNDARY: (from the Wikipedia topic titled system and the sub heading system concepts)
“System theory views the world as a complex system of interconnected parts. We scope a
system by defining its boundary this means choosing which entities are inside the system
and which are outside – part of the environment. We then make simplified representations
(models) of the system in order to understand it and to predict or impact its future behavior.
These models may define the structure and/or the behavior of the system.”
MATTER: "Matter is a poorly defined term in science (see definitions below). The term has
often been used in reference to a substance (often a particle) that has rest mass. Matter
is also used loosely as a general term for the substance that makes up all observable
physical objects. [1][2]”
FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS : "Also called fundamental forces or interactive forces,
are modeled in fundamental physics as patterns of relations in physical systems,
evolving over time, that are not (beneficially) reducible to relations among more basic
entities (at prevalent energy scales). Four fundamental interactions are conventionally
recognized on empirical evidence: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and
weak nuclear."
CONVERTED : "Energy transformation or energy conversion is the process of changing
one form of energy to another.“
SOME DEFINITIONS
Omissions from Wikipedia
The words destroyed and created are not topics for articles in Wikipedia. However these
words are frequently used in many of Wikipedia's science articles. Some small and
exemplary accounting of their usage is given below
The word destroyed is used 3 times in the article "Matter", 6 times in the article "Mass Energy
equivalence", 7 times in the article "Energy", 1 time in the article "Energy transformation"
and 3 times in the article titled "Mass".
The word created is used 6 times in the article "Matter", 2 times in the article "Mass
Energy equivalence", 6 times in the article "Energy", 2 times in the article "Energy
transformation" and 1 time in the article titled "Mass".
The online Oxford dictionary was lacking these definitions (in the context of physics) as well.
... ... ... ... ...
For so long as one is willing to change the definition of energy
one can also "prove" that energy is conserved
The following brief paragraph is a quotation from the Wikipedia article the
“Conservation of energy”. It is excerpted from a section of that article which is
titled Noether's theorem.
“Since any time-varying system can be embedded within a larger time-invariant system
(with the exception of the universe), conservation can always be recovered by a suitable
re-definition of what energy is and extending the scope of your system."
SOME DEFINITIONS
Excerpts From Wikipedia
(The following paragraph is also an excerpt from the Wikipedia article titled "Matter").
"Albert Einstein showed that ultimately all matter is capable of being converted to energy
(known as mass-energy equivalence) by the famous formula E = mc2,"
ENERGY
Energy, what a concept ! What it is essentially, I have never found an explanation of, and
I doubt that anyone is actually capable of making such an explanation. It may be that we
possess neither the words nor the understanding for such an explanation.
The concept of energy, for the most part is derived from observation of the physical changes
that occur when energy is transferred between two bodies or systems. It might be said
that energy has only ever been defined through describing the affects it has.
The affects energy will have when it is expressed or transferred between two objects has
been studied, measured and recorded, with extreme accuracy and precision, countless times
and in innumerable ways. A great deal is known about energy in this respect.
Following are examinations of the definitions of energy and work from two of my old
dictionaries.
Webster's New World Dictionary 1956
energy: the capacity for doing work and overcoming resistance
work: the transference of force from one body, or system to another, measured by the
product of the force and the amount of displacement in the line of force.
The American College Dictionary 1947 / 1948
energy: the property of a system which diminishes, when the system does work on
any other system, by an amount equal to the work so done.
work: the transference of energy from one body or system to another.
It is interesting to note that the Webster's definitions, energy and work are defined by
each other. Except that the word force is used in place of the word energy in the definition
of work. Note that a force is an expression of energy that is causing any object to undergo
a change, in its movement, direction, or geometrical construction.
The American College definition of energy says that energy is a property of a system. This
is an interesting beginning for the definition, in light of the fact that any physical system
is composed entirely of energy, 100% so. Matter is composed entirely of energy and I
think that probably energy is also. Although perhaps energy is composed of some sort of
information that organizes it ? Even if this is so, the dictionary definitions stand unaffected.
So to continue.......
energy: "the property of a system"
Therefore energy is the property of energy or, energy is the property of it's self.
"which diminishes"
Energy is a property that diminishes. We can safely assume that this diminishing is not
caused by the destruction of energy (else all hell should break loose). It must therefore be
that this diminishing is either transformation or transfer. I'm guessing that transference is
the cause of the diminishing and will interpret it as such.
which transfers
"when this system"
when this energy
"does work"
transfers energy
"on any other system"
to any other energy
"by an amount equal to the work so done"
by an amount equal to the energy so transferred
And now the complete interpretation.
Energy is the property of energy that transfers, when this energy transfers energy to any
other energy by an amount equal to the energy so transferred.
The only questions I'm left with at this point are:
1 Does it require an expenditure of energy in order for energy to transfer it's self ?
2 Is transference the expenditure of energy or is it rather that, energy IS transference ?
Definitions of energy by the use of terminology such as "fundamental interactions", make
the rabbit hole deeper, but the same questions remain unanswered. An interaction is an
energy exchange, even if it is "fundamental", and even if it does violate conservation.
........... ........... ................
Fundamentally, energy is a concept and an abstraction. As such it cannot be measured.
It can only be derived or inferred and most certainly it cannot be conserved.
Force and displacement can be measured. I find, for example, in magnet interactions
(in which work input is equal to work output) no indications as to why it should be
considered as absolute that magnets can do no net work, but rather quite the contrary.
Neither do I see any reason why two magnets causing net work would be a violation of the
"law" of conservation of "energy". I think rather instead, conservation is mostly
misunderstood. Almost universally and certainly automatically, specific projections and
assumptions are made which are not actually inherent within Newton's laws of motion nor
that bastard child, which the law of conservation of energy is.
There is a thing which we call a vacuum. There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum.
Within a vacuum chamber the odds are very high, that there are at least some few atoms
of gas remaining. Within a vacuum chamber we find also, that there are radio waves,
magnetic fields, gravity, other things, and possibly dark matter or even zero point energy
as well. There is no place known to mankind in which in can be demonstrated that there is "nothing".
How then is it, that science should even conceive of it, consider its existence as real
or consider that "nothing" could have any effect upon or significance to anything that is
real ?
The idea of nothingness is rather like a notion from a child's fairy tale, except perhaps that the
tale of nothingness is seldom looked at objectively and has no moral.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be transformed ? The idea that energy
or that energy as matter can either spring from "nothing" or become "nothing" is from
any truly scientific perspective silly. It is barely merits consideration because .....
there is no such thing as "nothing" !
How then is it that this seemingly key scientific concept (conservation) hangs from such a
shabby frame work ?
Conservation's contribution to Newton's observations is as nothing ?.
The only functions the "laws" of conservation have are as:
1. Newton's observations.
2. distraction from the one of the few facts known, which is that all answers lead to yet
more questions, or else ..... they lead to dogma.
smile .......
-
There are many preconceived ideas and notions regarding how excess energy can be generated.......or not.
To really understand how such a task may be accomplished, one must first understand how our electrical components interact with the aether.
Thinking outside the box is mandatory and this box includes formal education.
They don't teach what they don't want you to know!
Regards,
Pm
My dear friend.
Eather/aether doesn't exist . Never existed and will never exist. it is outdated concept.
explained here :
https://youtu.be/7Ldus3AQSpE (https://youtu.be/7Ldus3AQSpE)
WHAT IS TRUE IN Free Energy
_____________________
My tests led me to this video :
https://youtu.be/He5xQOJHlrU (https://youtu.be/He5xQOJHlrU)
Part 2 The Corum and Zenneck Surface Wave guide to energy transfer
it will send you to few more videos too if interested.
A simple coil for example. Is there a difference between dynamic and steady states in an inductor?
If so, how can these differences be utilized?
https://www.murata.com/~/media/webrenewal/tool/library/spectre/note_dynamic-model_i101e.ashx?la=en-us (https://www.murata.com/~/media/webrenewal/tool/library/spectre/note_dynamic-model_i101e.ashx?la=en-us)
another way to look at it is :
Concept of Transient State and Steady State
after some time, i.e. when coil voltage drop is equal to applied voltage, then current flowing through the circuit is constant
as inductor voltage is zero which means rate of change of current is zero. This state is called Steady State.
from all properties of Transient state the important is :
transient time:
it is the time it takes for a coil as complex reactive circuit having imaginary LC+physical R to change from one steady state to the next.
the imaginary value of LC is inductive and capacitive reactance of the coil as the components of total impedance equation.
_________________________
Wesley
-
Wesley if there is no such thing as zero point energy, then how or what did you generate in Lithuanian experiment
how or where did the energy come from your group generated and how come Bedini, Adrian Gustov, Akula and others
were reported as murdered over there inventions, explain that one please :'( :'(
-
SOME DEFINITIONS
Excerpts From Wikipedia
"Energy is a property of objects, transferable among them via fundamental interactions,
which can be converted in form but not created or destroyed. The joule is the SI unit
of energy, based on the amount transferred to an object by the mechanical work of
moving it 1 meter against a force of 1 newton.[1]"
Below are some excerpts from the above definitiion (February 2016). These words are the
subjects of other Wikipedia topic excerpts.
The "SI" is le Système International d'Unités or the International System of Units.
PHYSICAL PROPERTY: "A physical property is any property that is measurable, whose
value describes a state of a physical system."
STATE “In classical mechanics, state is a complete description of a system in terms of
parameters such as positions and momentums at a particular moment in time
PHYSICAL SYSTEM : "a physical system is the portion of the physical universe chosen
for analysis. Everything outside the system is known as the environment, which in
analysis is ignored except for its affects on the system. The cut between system and
the world is a free choice, generally made to simplify the analysis as much as possible.”
OBJECT: “In physics, a physical body or physical object (sometimes simply called a body
or object) is a collection of matter with some common attributes, most important, the
spatial location. Examples of models of physical bodies include, but are not limited to
a particle, several interacting smaller bodies (particles or other), and continuous media."
TRANSFERABLE: "In the physical sciences, an energy transfer or 'energy exchange' from
one system to another is said to occur when an amount of energy crosses the boundary
between them, thus increasing the energy content of one system while decreasing the
energy content of the other system by the same amount."
BOUNDARY: (from the Wikipedia topic titled system and the sub heading system concepts)
“System theory views the world as a complex system of interconnected parts. We scope a
system by defining its boundary this means choosing which entities are inside the system
and which are outside – part of the environment. We then make simplified representations
(models) of the system in order to understand it and to predict or impact its future behavior.
These models may define the structure and/or the behavior of the system.”
MATTER: "Matter is a poorly defined term in science (see definitions below). The term has
often been used in reference to a substance (often a particle) that has rest mass. Matter
is also used loosely as a general term for the substance that makes up all observable
physical objects. [1][2]”
FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS : "Also called fundamental forces or interactive forces,
are modeled in fundamental physics as patterns of relations in physical systems,
evolving over time, that are not (beneficially) reducible to relations among more basic
entities (at prevalent energy scales). Four fundamental interactions are conventionally
recognized on empirical evidence: gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, and
weak nuclear."
CONVERTED : "Energy transformation or energy conversion is the process of changing
one form of energy to another.“
SOME DEFINITIONS
Omissions from Wikipedia
The words destroyed and created are not topics for articles in Wikipedia. However these
words are frequently used in many of Wikipedia's science articles. Some small and
exemplary accounting of their usage is given below
The word destroyed is used 3 times in the article "Matter", 6 times in the article "Mass Energy
equivalence", 7 times in the article "Energy", 1 time in the article "Energy transformation"
and 3 times in the article titled "Mass".
The word created is used 6 times in the article "Matter", 2 times in the article "Mass
Energy equivalence", 6 times in the article "Energy", 2 times in the article "Energy
transformation" and 1 time in the article titled "Mass".
The online Oxford dictionary was lacking these definitions (in the context of physics) as well.
... ... ... ... ...
For so long as one is willing to change the definition of energy
one can also "prove" that energy is conserved
The following brief paragraph is a quotation from the Wikipedia article the
“Conservation of energy”. It is excerpted from a section of that article which is
titled Noether's theorem.
“Since any time-varying system can be embedded within a larger time-invariant system
(with the exception of the universe), conservation can always be recovered by a suitable
re-definition of what energy is and extending the scope of your system."
SOME DEFINITIONS
Excerpts From Wikipedia
(The following paragraph is also an excerpt from the Wikipedia article titled "Matter").
"Albert Einstein showed that ultimately all matter is capable of being converted to energy
(known as mass-energy equivalence) by the famous formula E = mc2,"
ENERGY
Energy, what a concept ! What it is essentially, I have never found an explanation of, and
I doubt that anyone is actually capable of making such an explanation. It may be that we
possess neither the words nor the understanding for such an explanation.
The concept of energy, for the most part is derived from observation of the physical changes
that occur when energy is transferred between two bodies or systems. It might be said
that energy has only ever been defined through describing the affects it has.
The affects energy will have when it is expressed or transferred between two objects has
been studied, measured and recorded, with extreme accuracy and precision, countless times
and in innumerable ways. A great deal is known about energy in this respect.
Following are examinations of the definitions of energy and work from two of my old
dictionaries.
Webster's New World Dictionary 1956
energy: the capacity for doing work and overcoming resistance
work: the transference of force from one body, or system to another, measured by the
product of the force and the amount of displacement in the line of force.
The American College Dictionary 1947 / 1948
energy: the property of a system which diminishes, when the system does work on
any other system, by an amount equal to the work so done.
work: the transference of energy from one body or system to another.
It is interesting to note that the Webster's definitions, energy and work are defined by
each other. Except that the word force is used in place of the word energy in the definition
of work. Note that a force is an expression of energy that is causing any object to undergo
a change, in its movement, direction, or geometrical construction.
The American College definition of energy says that energy is a property of a system. This
is an interesting beginning for the definition, in light of the fact that any physical system
is composed entirely of energy, 100% so. Matter is composed entirely of energy and I
think that probably energy is also. Although perhaps energy is composed of some sort of
information that organizes it ? Even if this is so, the dictionary definitions stand unaffected.
So to continue.......
energy: "the property of a system"
Therefore energy is the property of energy or, energy is the property of it's self.
"which diminishes"
Energy is a property that diminishes. We can safely assume that this diminishing is not
caused by the destruction of energy (else all hell should break loose). It must therefore be
that this diminishing is either transformation or transfer. I'm guessing that transference is
the cause of the diminishing and will interpret it as such.
which transfers
"when this system"
when this energy
"does work"
transfers energy
"on any other system"
to any other energy
"by an amount equal to the work so done"
by an amount equal to the energy so transferred
And now the complete interpretation.
Energy is the property of energy that transfers, when this energy transfers energy to any
other energy by an amount equal to the energy so transferred.
The only questions I'm left with at this point are:
1 Does it require an expenditure of energy in order for energy to transfer it's self ?
2 Is transference the expenditure of energy or is it rather that, energy IS transference ?
Definitions of energy by the use of terminology such as "fundamental interactions", make
the rabbit hole deeper, but the same questions remain unanswered. An interaction is an
energy exchange, even if it is "fundamental", and even if it does violate conservation.
........... ........... ................
Fundamentally, energy is a concept and an abstraction. As such it cannot be measured.
It can only be derived or inferred and most certainly it cannot be conserved.
Force and displacement can be measured. I find, for example, in magnet interactions
(in which work input is equal to work output) no indications as to why it should be
considered as absolute that magnets can do no net work, but rather quite the contrary.
Neither do I see any reason why two magnets causing net work would be a violation of the
"law" of conservation of "energy". I think rather instead, conservation is mostly
misunderstood. Almost universally and certainly automatically, specific projections and
assumptions are made which are not actually inherent within Newton's laws of motion nor
that bastard child, which the law of conservation of energy is.
There is a thing which we call a vacuum. There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum.
Within a vacuum chamber the odds are very high, that there are at least some few atoms
of gas remaining. Within a vacuum chamber we find also, that there are radio waves,
magnetic fields, gravity, other things, and possibly dark matter or even zero point energy
as well. There is no place known to mankind in which in can be demonstrated that there is "nothing".
How then is it, that science should even conceive of it, consider its existence as real
or consider that "nothing" could have any effect upon or significance to anything that is
real ?
The idea of nothingness is rather like a notion from a child's fairy tale, except perhaps that the
tale of nothingness is seldom looked at objectively and has no moral.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be transformed ? The idea that energy
or that energy as matter can either spring from "nothing" or become "nothing" is from
any truly scientific perspective silly. It is barely merits consideration because .....
there is no such thing as "nothing" !
How then is it that this seemingly key scientific concept (conservation) hangs from such a
shabby frame work ?
Conservation's contribution to Newton's observations is as nothing ?.
The only functions the "laws" of conservation have are as:
1. Newton's observations.
2. distraction from the one of the few facts known, which is that all answers lead to yet
more questions, or else ..... they lead to dogma.
smile .......
-
Wesly if there is no such thing as zero point energy, then how or what did you generate in lithuainian experiment
how or where did the energy come from your group generated and how come Badini, Adrian Gustov, Akula and others
were reported as murdered over there inventions, explain that one please :'( :'(
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy)
zero point energy
__________________________________________________
how or what did you generate in lithuainian experiment
We generated subsequently ~60W than ~300W than ~680W than ~1kW at output.
I'm not sure if we could call it 1kW/h as we didn't run it for an hour.
the energy origin was assigned to NMR phenomena in that special ferrite Yoke from Russian TV Rubin that was doped with
some isotopes
__________________________
Another experiment I have made :
1. I Took two half's of C shape ferrite.
2. I winded on first C some winding e.g 200 winds at gauge 20.
3. wind on second C the same
4. I put the C together creating closed core of rectangular shape with two separate windings . one on the left the other on the right .
5. next step is to make sure that both C are vertical but could be horizontal too. I placed them vertical. (one on the left the other on the right .)
6. now I separated the halves of the ferrite so in the middle I have a gap like 0.7cm at upper and lower half. ( distance is not critical the smaller the better.
7. I placed two round small flat discs of magnets at upper gap and at lower gap I might also use electrical tape or little glue but magnets must contact the flat square cross section of each ferrite.
8. I placed in both gaps in the middle the small isotope from smoke detectors the bigger the better.
9. I played with polarity of magnets and distance between halves ( the smaller gap the better.)
10. small LED can be connected to one of windings but I used 10W tungsten Light bulb.
11.than I tried to short and open one winding
while that winding is interrupted the lightbulb connected to another winding will light up.
___________________________________________________
the configuration from above will work as well with just one single winding on just one C shape half of the ferrite core.
while the second halve C shape of ferrite has no winding at all.
In this configuration I achieved steady glow of 10W tungsten lamp.
But I used slightly bigger and different isotope.
Note: If there is only one winding than there is nothing to short.
___________________________________________________
So it must be some variables for it to work..
Yes..
bombardment..
the delta T between each particle ...
________________________________________________________
Another better way is to play with beryllium window
read what happens when alpha particle hits beryllium plate .
https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/6237-beryllium-9-gets-hit-by-alpha/ (https://www.scienceforums.net/topic/6237-beryllium-9-gets-hit-by-alpha/)
This thing makes huge difference in power out. Yes.. I mean huge...
and word huge is even to small here.
SO NOW THINK.. think my friends.....
THAT THIS FERRITE FROM Russian TV Rubin HAD BERYLLIUM DOPING.....in it..but even worse than that .. it had something else..
And that was a reason we stopped to play with it..
But Arunas still doesn't know why I gave up on it.
Don't ask me more about it I already said to much..
This is not for general public although license is not required for old type of Americium sources from old smoke detectors.
Wesley
PS: I explained Lithuania experiment many times..
The variables were given by two 1W generators.. for more information go to T 1000 Arunas.
He is mastermind in it.. and he is on this forum.
Legal note:
I don't recommend to any one to use it or play with it .
I kept my post in language that is using words : I do,
I try, I make..
avoiding any direct form of me suggesting to anyone to play with it.
-
AlienGrey,'free energy' has nothing to do with monetary meanings !
Free energie is - in nano time units - shortly ' unbonded' energy !
From second unit view relatively fast recombination= re-bonding !
Cause this future converter works in THz level and beyond !
Free energy can be also the result from natural/enforced elementar decay !
Nuclear energy ! And in electricity/electron-gas/ion-gas/plasma is nuclear actio/reactio inside !
Sincere
OCWL
-
how or what did you generate in lithuainian experiment ?
how or where did the energy come from your group ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy)
zero point energy
__________________________________________________
how or what did you generate in lithuainian experiment
We generated subsequently ~60W than ~300W than ~680W than ~1kW at output.
I'm not sure if we could call it 1kW/h as we didn't run it for an hour.
the energy origin was assigned to NMR phenomena in that special ferrite Yoke from Russian TV Rubin that was doped with
some isotopes
__________________________
to understand this you need to read carefully that:
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg556423/#msg556423 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg556423/#msg556423)
( my post from above)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
//....were reported as murdered over there inventions, explain that one please// :'( :'(
As far as murders and Putin in this case...
Every country has enough money to test crazy ideas.
Every country has its own patent office
Every country government is a power of its own on their own territory.
Most of them already have tested some forms of FE
the Lithuania Experiment , 1kW Out https://youtu.be/gKkcdfSdt5Q?t=1061 (https://youtu.be/gKkcdfSdt5Q?t=1061)
the Harold COLMAN & Ronald GILLESPIE 1kW out Power Generator http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm (http://rexresearch.com/colman/colman.htm)
the Hendershot device .. few hundreds W.
all of the concepts can be look at its similarities.
-the set of the same mechanisms is taking place there
despite what isotope did you use against Beryllium window or doping or ....
https://youtu.be/0xXZT7YQDE8?t=512 (https://youtu.be/0xXZT7YQDE8?t=512)
_____________________________________
Governments don't need you to interfere so at first you are donor of information and experience
and the next thing is to make you silent.
Unless "they" are to late ...
or "they" can't touch you as than information will be released to general public.
Wesley
-
If I may, I'll share a true story about a conversation I had years ago with one Bill Wampler. Bill has now passed on but his work continues as far as I know. I became aware of Bill thru a family relative who knew I was working on such devices but she would not even give me a number to call but rather told me that Bill would contact me if he so desired. Two weeks or so passed and I did receive a call from Bill and we talked for over an hour about his work.
Bill made millions manufacturing desalination equipment that he supplied worldwide. He re-invested into a small discrete and very private and secure R&D firm to research FE. Long story short, they developed and manufactured a ~10kW black box that they gave away to poor 3rd world countries that needed electricity to purify water, etc. I quizzed him why he didn't market the product commercially and he said the governments wouldn't allow that to happen. During their development stages, they were raided by the ATF (because one of his employees told a friend about their work) and they confiscated all documentation and prototypes. They fortunately kept redundant records and materials so were able to continue on after relocation.
I of course questioned him on the theory of operation and all he would give for details was the fact that it was solid state with no moving parts and needed a battery to start. Once running, it was a stand alone generator.
I will never forget what he told me about the basics however. He stated that energy was all around us all the time and the first problem was to figure out how to collect or cohere it! The second problem was to figure out how to control it. He said the second problem was the most difficult for them to solve!
Now I'm not sure Wesley, but this sure sounds like energy extraction from the aether to me!
I would also like to ask a question of anybody here, when I energize an inductor with di/dt, exactly what is happening? I mean, what is induction or inductance? Hint-what is 'S' flow?
Regards,
Pm
-
I would also like to share a concept that would be the basis for a FE device in the attached pdf.
Regards,
Pm
-
Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be transformed ? The idea that energy
or that energy as matter can either spring from "nothing" or become "nothing" is from
any truly scientific perspective silly. It is barely merits consideration because .....
- there is no such thing as "nothing" !
How then is it that this seemingly key scientific concept (conservation) hangs from such a
shabby frame work ?
Conservation's contribution to Newton's observations is as nothing ?.
The only functions the "laws" of conservation have are as:
1. Newton's observations.
2. distraction from the one of the few facts known, which is that all answers lead to yet
more questions, or else ..... they lead to dogma.
simple answer:
We know that we know nothing.
But we know that something.. that is more than that nothing.
Peoples progress is based on our assumption that their something is more than their nothing and they will pay to us for more of that something (if we deliver.)
___________________________________________________________
Nothing - is considered to be the starting point leading us to our something or our imaginary something.
And here you are having something that is an effect of progress.
In the process of our progress we named phenomena correctly as we are the only judges here and that is already something of value to us .
However new forms of understanding pushes us to correct that what we thought was correctly named a hundred years ago or so..
And for that we created models in physics.
From that point it is us having control over correctness... of models
Eather/Ether or overunity was never a model but conceptual theoretical and eventually rejected nonsense .
_____________________________________________________________________________
However there are elements of humanity around us seeing discomfort from that correctness.
-Priests and their religion pushing followers, or any other money exchanging structures,
-organizations, and governments seeing believers and religions as state of comfort or tool to rule over the crowd.
- charlatans, bandits, terrors ..including Eastern European country of Terror (with their Tzar.)
- business structures that will collapse due to scientific developments i.e Energy..
all of them see destruction of their own small ruling elite.
But that what I see is scary.. if FE is given out.
- The End of Human population, the Apocalypse man made, the destroyed food supply by overpopulated humanity due to easiness of life.
Could I be a beginning of it...
Sure I could or more accurately Dr Hans.
So what is next..
It will come sooner or later as there are people that will get to the same results..
So the yet unknown..something will include that what I and my friends in science don't yet know..didn't yet find out .. in that process of progress ..
Wesley
-
[snip]
But that what I see is scary.. if FE is given out.
- The End of Human population, the Apocalypse man made, the destroyed food supply by overpopulated humanity due to easiness of life.
Wesley
Wesley,
So your opinion is that we suppress FE? If I have an FE device then I should sit on it?
How do we then control the overpopulation, thru eugenics?
Surely there must be a better answer?
Regards,
Pm
-
Wesley,
So your opinion is that we suppress FE? If I have an FE device then I should sit on it?
How do we then control the overpopulation, thru eugenics?
Surely there must be a better answer?
Regards,
Pm
There are many different ways to many different energy conversions.
It is not only Kapanadze.. concept..
You going to have FE sooner or later it exist I have seen it touched it and played with it.
It is no magic, no God or Gods are involved in it
and actually based on science ..no God could do it as they are not recognized there .
_______________________________________________________________________
The nuclear bomb was made by science and scientists only because general population didn't yet get into if fast enough.
And this is a source of Energy and it is FE too..
after 500 dollars of investment in Russia everyone could build it to use it at home..
This was a one time cost of the device giving 6kW/h of nuclear energy for next 100 years.
Elite Russians had plenty of it in their vacation houses..
Some of these were abandoned and not controlled serving as light houses for ships in remote islands in Russia.
It was enough for one to get there in boat an take it... and it happened in the past
It can destroy too... so is gasoline in your car , so is dynamite,... only the scale is different.
________________________________________________
So what should you do is up to you..
If someone build such device, tomorrow, it is entirely his decision what is next..
Nor me nor my friends are smarter than you.
Yes we are not...
If you spend enough time in any field you will know the same or more ..
My own objections or fears means nothing to you or anyone.
It will only be important if I as emotional creature decide to say more just because:
-my beautiful 24 years younger wife makes me upset ( never happened at all for all of these years)
https://youtu.be/xAXXaNJzwjE?t=21 (https://youtu.be/xAXXaNJzwjE?t=21)
https://youtu.be/l6uPHxQVEgQ?t=185 (https://youtu.be/l6uPHxQVEgQ?t=185)
- or Eastern European Tyrant will push me, one more time... or make me to be no longer.
- or I'll say one day enough is enough..
and that can happen even tomorrow..
Wesley
-
Here are a couple of more papers that may be of interest.
Regards,
Pm
-
Please have a look to that ! It shows how the Antigravitation works :
https://t.me/gravitonisparticel
-
Please have a look to that ! It shows how the Antigravitation works :
https://t.me/gravitonisparticel (https://t.me/gravitonisparticel)
=========================
This is an advertisement for "Telegram".
=========================
-
How many times have we heard that?
bi
1 too few i would suspect.
-
author=NdaClouDzzz link=topic=18815.msg556414#msg556414 date=1617225323]
OverUnity implies a closed system. It goes against reasoning to think that you can take a 1 gallon jug of water and pour out more than one gallon of water.
Wrong.
That can be easily done without adding any water from an external system.
-
Dear fellow researchers.
Few Myths Debunked.
As much as you and I will like to see overunity or ..."something for nothing"...
-we need to understand that :
-physics is based on models.
Physics is based only on the tried and tested.
Overunity - doesn't exist and will never exist and is laughable as a term.
Perpetual Motion- is not important to us if was ever in existence .. it is like spending 1 dollar to gain 1 dollar...
Incorrect.
Energy can't be created nor destroyed
No,but an imbalance can be created in a closed system.
-
Physics is based only on the tried and tested.
I agree but:
As an experimental science, physics utilizes the scientific method to formulate and test
hypotheses that are based on observation of the natural world.
The goal of physics is to use the results of these experiments to formulate scientific laws,
usually expressed in the language of mathematics, which can then be used to predict other phenomena.
and for that physics needs to stand on models as something that can be improved, changed or rejected.
So your "tried and tested." is than written and presented in form of models.
In physics, a model (or idealized model) is a simplified version of the physical system
that strips away the unnecessary aspects of the situation, used abused tried and tested again..
http://www.romanfrigg.org/writings/Models_in_Physics_REP.pdf (https://www.bing.com/search?q=models+in+physics&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&pq=models+in+physics&sc=4-17&sk=&cvid=92537ED4EBCB46ABA1E3FC08AA1B5A7E)
__________________________________________________________________________________
Overunity - doesn't exist and will never exist and is laughable as a term.
Perpetual Motion- is not important to us if was ever in existence .. it is like spending 1 dollar to gain 1 dollar...
Incorrect.
if so than why it is incorrect?
__________________________________________________________________________________
Energy can't be created nor destroyed
No,but an imbalance can be created in a closed system.
imbalance has nothing to do with creation or destroying of energy
Wesley
-
Almost all answers in this thread are off-topic.
The simple question was: "Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?"
No one answered with 'yes' so far.
-
Almost all answers in this thread are off-topic.
The simple question was: "Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?"
No one answered with 'yes' so far.
I disagree with your statement .
answer:
if something is impossible than it can't be done.
explanation:
overunity doesn't exist so a device producing overunity "gain" will never exist.
example:
It is like asking god - to respond to you and explain the nature of his/its miracles
science of physics stand point:
at first:
For Physics god doesn't exist and as such can't be recognized.
at second:
There are no miracles that non existing god can make or ever was able to make
Wesley
-
No,I never constructed an overunity system !
Yes,I participated active in a project with an electric motor KW output/VA input ratio over 1,over 10,over 100,... !
The physical application object as electric motor and application claims becamed patent office peers tested and the rights approved !
I can make measurement faults,
we as experimental group can make measurement faults
Also : patent office peers can make measurement faults ?!
Sincere
OCWL
-
overunity doesn't exist so a device producing overunity "gain" will never exist.
So then we can close this forum ? It's called 'overunity.com'.
I think everyone knows what 'overunity device' means in this context: a device which is running without any known external energy input and which produces some useful energy output. Of course energy can not be created from nothing.
-
So then we can close this forum ? It's called 'overunity.com'.
I think everyone knows what 'overunity device' means in this context: a device which is running without any known external energy input and which produces some useful energy output. Of course energy can not be created from nothing.
I explained it but you didn't read it up there...
You can name your cat "overunity."
You can name a forum "overunity."
that is only an abbreviation
so because:
everyone knows what is 'overunity device'
we use term: FE Free Energy or Energy for Free..
The benefit of it is that no one will laugh from you...at the very moment you use this words.
Wesley :)
-
author=NdaClouDzzz link=topic=18815.msg556414#msg556414 date=1617225323]
Wrong.
That can be easily done without adding any water from an external system.
Brad, "You Lie ... And Yo Breath Stank" ;D https://youtu.be/lt_FP9csnYE (https://youtu.be/lt_FP9csnYE) https://youtu.be/fiBLgEx6svA (https://youtu.be/fiBLgEx6svA)
-
As the title says, has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works? If so, are there instructions to reproduce your build? I'm asking because it would be nice to hear from someone who has personal experience of a system and can verify that it works and produces more energy that it consumes.
Hello friend and welcome to the forum.
YES !
There are many people here and in other places that have build devices that are very very good.
You can not get in touch with such a person because everybody here has a family ,children etc.
However..if your next question is.." where are the schematics ? " well.....there aren't any because people suffer from a brain trauma when they find the secret.
It is a PROGRAM inside of us , that triggers when such device is achieved.
That program makes you feel greedy....special....above everybody else...and you will try to use the device for $$$ .
I wish you all the best and I hope you will manage to build one , one day.
@sollaris :)
-
______________________________________________________[/glow]
But that what I see is scary.. if FE is given out.
- The End of Human population, the Apocalypse man made, the destroyed food supply by overpopulated humanity due to easiness of life.
Wesley
Hello @stivep
Thank you for your post.
If I may I want to share my thoughts about this situation.
Your statement above is 100% wrong , but it is your opinion on the matter and I respect it.
If I would manage to build an efficient TRANSFORMER that would consume a few W of power and supply water for my garden all day long....I would grow vegetables and sell them cheap as dirt to the people of the community.
(If I give them free.....somebody will come to visit me because that is very fishy )
Do you think I will start making LOVE as a crazy dog ? ...because I have an efficient device ? NO my friend....so your statement with overpopulation is not that accurate.
""Easiness of life "" ? ...
What are you talking about there mate ? Free energy is only 25% from the apple.
If my electric bill is lower and not 200 euro / month as it is now ...do you think that life will be easy ? ...
I still have to protect my family..I still have to go to work ...I still have to take care of this body of mine ( the avatar )...I still have to repair my car...buy tires ...pay health insurance etc
So if I may..the easiness of life ...is NOT there...if I have 200 $ more in my wallet mate.
A KNIFE can be use to help people ( cook ) or to hurt people (kill )....and although we got this situation...knives are sold millions / day world wide.
I think you are a good man ,you write your posts very good and stating your opinion is always good...however !!!! ,
I think that you must take 2 ..3...days off.....go somewhere off-grid....and reconnect with nature...
When that connection is made...I am 100% sure...you will TRUST humans more.
In the end of this posts...I want to tell everybody....that with FE or NO FE...there can not be GOOD without EVIL !!!!
I wish you all the best in the world mate.
Be safe !!
-
As the title says, has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works? If so, are there instructions to reproduce your build? I'm asking because it would be nice to hear from someone who has personal experience of a system and can verify that it works and produces more energy that it consumes.
@ TRiKri (4 posts, only ? )
Why do you ask. Really ! Because " it would be nice" ?
-
Hello @stivep
Your statement above is 100% wrong ,
If I would manage to build an efficient TRANSFORMER .
I would grow vegetables and sell them cheap as dirt to the people of the community.
Do you think I will start making LOVE as a crazy dog ? ...
""Easiness of life "" ? ...
Free energy is only 25% from the apple.
If my electric bill is lower and not 200 euro / month as it is now ...do you think that life will be easy ? ...
I still have to protect my family.. go to work ... take care of this body of mine ( the avatar )...to repair my car...buy tires ...pay health insurance etc
I think that you must take 2 ..3...days off.....go somewhere off-grid....and reconnect with nature...
When that connection is made...I am 100% sure...you will TRUST humans more.
Thank you for :
a classical dream of classical dreamer.
lets go to reality now:
_________________________________________________________
If I would manage to build an efficient TRANSFORMER .
I would../ grow/sale/and still go to work/ repair my car...buy tires
where :
-wordIf stands for your wish and is manifesting your willingness,
and
-sentence still go to stands for continuation of life necessities.
explanation:
wish of Mr Trump - is manifesting his willingness to accept delivery of goods and needs,by these less fortunate in life ,
who have needs and wishes just to be paid for their services to Mr.Trump and they must
accept Trump superiority, moods and decision changes.
They must be paid to go with life while Trump uses mechanism making money for him.
and that mechanism is called: <money makes money .>
_________________________________________________________
dream of typical man pictured and shared in movies is: nice beach , alcohol, food, no need
to do anything and have everything delivered while pretty girls serving his dreams.
And that is a true nature of human... (humanity is made from humans.)
Need to do work , perform and pay is just regional phenomena of man in need who is having wishes.
Free Energy gives equal opportunity to:
- Papuas from Papua New Guinea who is now earning average $197/mo
- Russian with Russian school who is now earning average $175/mo
Their needs are different, their education is different, but their fundamental human nature is the same.
Typical Latino is often pictured as rather willing to dance, have party, in his/her busy crowded social life -where work/education is their last priority - if not required.
_________________________________________________________
Human nature is to have : comfort, goods, and food, e.t.c
Work and education is only a requirement if needed.
Population of Africa is 1.29 billion
Population of Asia is 4.55 billion
while
Population of Europe is only 742.65 million
Population of North America is only 365.89 million
Population of Australia is only 26 million
These leading on earth in education , economy, science and comfort of life regions are made from only 14.52% of World population
= 7.8 Billion (2020)
So in Asia thanks to them Japan and South Korea are leading now in both democracy and progress, starting from end of WW2
_________________________________________________________
Summary of conclusions:
Less educated per/person human elements in their regions have higher population growth.
Wealth and comfort of an individual makes his education rather respected by others than needed.
Perception is based on ability to recognize,and process a value,... and depends from , brain abilities trained in modern society.
Chinese population rather will have not only second child but 2 or 3 children as they recently been allowed to have maximum 2.
So humorist African walking on desert now can stick a piece of copper into sand than connect few wires than pump or process sea water into ..
any usable from ...making Africa a land of dream for love and future children.
When energy is no limit.. nothing is an impossible need .... well..they must to go to bathroom.. :)
My colleagues mathematicians along with 2 professors from social science department)
calculated that FE may makes life on earth in the stage of nonrecoverable, (none reversal) continuous degradation of environment and food delivery
due to the overpopulation in just 18 years starting from today if the FE is given to humanity..
Calculating earth natural progressive population growth
and estimated additional change due to energy for Free in any form.. if it exist. :) and degradation of environment..
-in just 18-20 years from now we will start to see shortage of food supply .
Think my friend:... think... your new born daughter or son will be just 18 years old than..
Wesley
-
Well have you seen the Epstein film it's been on TV loads of times in the uk it's quite obvious what type of guy
Trump is about, personally I have no time for that waste of space if that's how he wants to behave.
SIL
-
I agree.
___________
I don't have TV for 12 years now.
but my wife uses Netflix.
I'm a science creature
Wesley
-
My colleagues mathematicians [/b]along with 2 professors from social science department)
calculated that FE may makes life on earth in the stage of nonrecoverable, (none reversal) continuous degradation of environment and food delivery
due to the overpopulation in just 18 years starting from today if the FE is given to humanity..
Calculating earth natural progressive population growth
and estimated additional change due to energy for Free in any form.. if it exist. :) and degradation of environment.. [/sub]
-in just 18-20 years from now we will start to see shortage of food supply .
Wesley
Hello Wesley.
Thank you for your reply.
I have a feeling that you can not be helped Wesley....sorry buddy.
You have been indoctrinated too much.
It would take years and years of UN-Training...just to get you to the baseline.
When do you got time , I would love to set up a meeting with you and my friend that eats 1 / year....He would love to hear your ""Shortage of food "" problem.
He would receive a good laugh.
I did not eat since 31.03.2021....I will take a lemon beer now because I would like to see the taste of it.Not because I need it.
Any human , that has some proper understanding on how this world works ...know that food does not keep us alive.
Your heart does not beat because you ate some fries yesterday...with some ketchup and bread.
It would be insanity to believe so.
Your 2 mathematicians friends and those professors , you should not talk that much to them.They are part of the system.
Also there is no such thing as Overpopulation....It was never ever a problem with the population on this Planet.
I hope that one day you will wake up..and evolve from the lies and manipulation that were inserted inside of you even from early years....Kindergarten...school..high-school...etc
This is my last post to you.
I wish you and your family all the best.
Stay safe and healthy. ::) ::) ::)
-
Quote from stivep
"My colleagues mathematicians along with 2 professors from social science department)
calculated that FE may makes life on earth in the stage of nonrecoverable, (none reversal) continuous degradation of environment and food delivery
due to the overpopulation in just 18 years starting from today if the FE is given to humanity.."
end quote
evidence of cooked food is found from 1 million years ago
ceramics date back around 26,000 years
the plow 5,000 to 10,000
gunpowder 1.100 years
the automobile 200 years
the electric motor around 150 years
the locomotive about 100 years
So we should add about 18 more years to any of the above,
in order to arrive at the number of years ago,
that mankind should have know better,
than to have started using these technologies ?
-
Brad, "You Lie ... And Yo Breath Stank" ;D https://youtu.be/lt_FP9csnYE (https://youtu.be/lt_FP9csnYE) https://youtu.be/fiBLgEx6svA (https://youtu.be/fiBLgEx6svA)
Lol
Clown at his best.
You think in such small terms.
Your quote: It goes against reasoning to think that you can take a 1 gallon jug of water and pour out more than one gallon of water.
Now,im telling you that i can take a 200 liter drum of water,and get 250 liters of water to run out of it,without adding any water to it from an outside source.
Care to make a wager ?
Although i would not think you would ever hold true to your loss.
Brad
-
Don't be silly, Brad!
Even if what you are talking about is real and not some word-play trickery, the entire point of me using that water example was so everyone would know what MY definition of OU is. And here you are taking it literally. But please Mr. Tinman, by all means show us your talent!🤣
-
Don't be silly, Brad!
Even if what you are talking about is real and not some word-play trickery, the entire point of me using that water example was so everyone would know what MY definition of OU is. And here you are taking it literally. But please Mr. Tinman, by all means show us your talent!🤣
What it means is that your example has nothing to do with OU,but everything to do with a total waste system.
You know as well as i do that the energy from the water running out of the drum can be used to put a portion of that very same water back into the drum,thus meaning that more water will run out of the drum than the volume you first put into the drum,without bringing any extra water in from outside the system.
So lets see==
The water runs out of the drum through a ram pump.
66% of the water spills onto the ground,and 34% gets pumped back into the drum.
So the total volume of water that runs out of the drum exceeds that which you first put into the drum by 34%,without bringing any more water in from an outside system.
me using that water example was so everyone would know what MY definition of OU is.
As you can clearly see,your definition of OU is wrong.
Brad
-
Bravo, Brad. I commend you on your skillful spin tactics.
But MY example has nothing to do with YOUR example, other than water!
In MY example, take a one gallon jug filled with exactly one gallon of water and, with your hand, empty that one gallon of water directly into another container and measure how much water there is. No more than ONE gallon of water! No trickery, no word-play, just ONE gallon of water!
That is MY definition of what an ou argument and demo would entail. If you perform that exact test and you pour out more than ONE gallon of water, then brother, you got magic in your hands! ;D
Note: I do not talk about the ENERGY that you can get from the water running out of the jug because we would then have to address the energy that was expended to put the water IN the jug!
-
Interesting question. There is a big difference between O.U. and perpetual motion. Yes, after searching day and many nights i found and made a wheel that proves over unity. I am currently working on making it perpetual, but for me i am content knowing after hundreds of measurements the sum total of forces always measures more positive torque than negative torque. Here is a short video i made that shows only 2 arms that are using 2 weights. On the left the weight on the left is furthest from the hub as on swings down and the other up they swap at the 4:30 and 10:30 positions.
https://youtu.be/VYzHNcu0eTk
-
I have built several OU devices, but I will not tell you how they work. Whenever I disclosed an OU device, it stopped being OU.
Greetings, Conrad
-
Greetings, randomly I came here to take a look. there are indeed people here. which could potentially work on those. to find the real device.
I am personally in Minsk. My name is Ilya, my laboratory is located in Belarus. A long story would probably be correct to say. that I personally did just experiments now. which showed how in the history of Electromagnetism fragments were missed that are related to Newton's 3 law, the relationship between mass and energy, and everything that is not so openly in the literature on electromagnetism.
Therefore, before describing my difficult path of ordeals, I decided to introduce myself a little.
-
It goes against reasoning to think that you can take a 1 gallon jug of water and pour out more than one gallon of water.
True, however we could use the latent energy of 1 gallon of water to extract ten gallons from the atmosphere.
People forget that when water evaporates it not only produces a cooling effect which can condense more atmospheric water but also physical motion due to a change in pressure.
In natures process like conditions attract, they not oppose.
For example, the motion of evaporating water produces a cooling effect which causes more motion (wind) as warmer humid air moves towards it. The motion upwards produces clouds which also cool as the water condenses and then falls as rain. Thus water can attract more water, it's motion producing more motion because it's not a closed system and is considered "solar energy" because it ultimately comes from the Sun.
If we wanted to transform barren deserts into rain forests all we would have to do is plant tree's. Tree's absorb and transpire water producing a cooling effect which draws in warm air containing more moisture, water attracts water. This is why forests tend to remain forests and deserts remain deserts.
In nature like attracts a like condition not opposites because it always works indirectly.
-
Here is one...
https://overunity.com/16987/td-replications/msg556863/#msg556863
-
True, however we could use the latent energy of 1 gallon of water to extract ten gallons from the atmosphere.
People forget that when water evaporates it not only produces a cooling effect which can condense more atmospheric water but also physical motion due to a change in pressure.
In natures process like conditions attract, they not oppose.
For example, the motion of evaporating water produces a cooling effect which causes more motion (wind) as warmer humid air moves towards it. The motion upwards produces clouds which also cool as the water condenses and then falls as rain. Thus water can attract more water, it's motion producing more motion because it's not a closed system and is considered "solar energy" because it ultimately comes from the Sun.
If we wanted to transform barren deserts into rain forests all we would have to do is plant tree's. Tree's absorb and transpire water producing a cooling effect which draws in warm air containing more moisture, water attracts water. This is why forests tend to remain forests and deserts remain deserts.
In nature like attracts a like condition not opposites because it always works indirectly.
I believe that You, Brad and I are all correct in our views, which just goes to show how the people who suppress free-energy/OU tech have been so successful.
Question: Can we really say that a closed system/circuit is CLOSED when we KNOW it can LEAK energy (heat, electromagnetic waves) from the system?
If it can leak energy out, why not in?
-
NdaCloudzzz
Question: Can we really say that a closed system/circuit is CLOSED when we KNOW it can LEAK energy (heat, electromagnetic waves) from the system?
If it can leak energy out, why not in?
There are no closed systems and the whole concept basically came about to make calculations easier. As Faraday implied, we are surrounded by matter and space filled with untold energy and if we tried to include all of it in our calculations they would become infinitely complex. Faraday, Maxwell etc... state categorically that they do not include internal or external energy not relevant to the discussion. In reality no real scientist actually believes in a physically closed system, lol.
What did happen was that many amateurs who don't understand science or the concepts of energy took the notion of closed systems literally by mistake. I mean as we speak I have a couple circuits measuring and data logging Earths magnetic and electric fields. These are external energy fields, I can measure there effects, there always changing and no real scientist has any problem with it.
So whenever anyone implies any system is closed this is a clear sign they don't understand science. People would do well to read Faraday's lectures on electrodynamics because there very interesting and he was very open minded.
Regards
AC
-
So far as a supposed working free energy device is concerned I have had them for decades...
When I was a teenager I rigged up an antenna and rectifier to charge a capacitor tied to a ground rod. Over time the capacitor would charge due to atmospheric disturbances and radio waves then discharge through a small lightbulb. I also built crystal radio's which could scavenge power as well probably 40 years ago.
So I'm not sure where people are getting these nonsensical idea's that there are closed systems and we aren't swimming in a sea of energy. More so when every solar panel we know of is receiving energy every day from a nearby star 150 million km away we call the Sun. I also find this notion that nobody could nor will ever find a better way to extract energy from nature completely absurd. Of course we will, it's a given and simply a matter of time. Were always getting new idea's to improve things and we will continue to do so well into the future.
Regards
AC
-
So I'm not sure where people are getting these nonsensical idea's that there are closed systems and we aren't swimming in a sea of energy. More so when every solar panel we know of is receiving energy every day from a nearby star 150 million km away we call the Sun.
Thank you for your responses
Yes, I always have to correct people when they say that there is no such thing as free-energy.
When we go outside and stand in the Sun and it heats our skin, is that not FREE-ENERGY? And if we stick a solar panel in space facing the sun, would it not produce electricity 24/7 and be considered perpetual motion?
We are definitely in a sea of energy free for the taking. What generally costs us is capturing and transforming that energy into power for our electrical devices. FREE seems to me to be a matter of perspective! Some see it and some don't.
When I was a teenager I rigged up an antenna and rectifier to charge a capacitor tied to a ground rod. Over time the capacitor would charge due to atmospheric disturbances and radio waves then discharge through a small lightbulb. I also built crystal radio's which could scavenge power as well probably 40 years ago.
Yep. Thank you Tesla, Don Smith, et al.
-
Here is one...
https://overunity.com/16987/td-replications/msg556863/#msg556863
Greetings. Like that. Because energy is a concept that refers to the activity of that. what we call the staging environment.
lThe first questions began to study Umov in his works on mechanics and not only. Then his thoughts are that energy is a certain amount of electricity. which to pass through the area of the conductor was picked up by Poynting. And then Heaviside, independently of Poynting, working in telegraphy, came to the conclusion that energy enters the system from a conductor and medium through electromagnetic waves. The waves themselves surround the space of the conductor, which today we call the Physical Vacuum.
-
These are quotes from a book in Russian. which quotes Heaviside, these are his scattered and unpublished thoughts. in which he concludes that light waves exist in the medium. which have pressure and, accordingly, because of the shadow inside the zariks, this pressure will exert on the balls and they will move to each other. After 50 years, the Casimir Effect appeared and after a while it was verified experimentally. An experiment in which this energy or mass is in such a state, due to which the silts are balanced and they do not allow us to register it in the medium or space.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRCfl5pR8Kc&ab_channel=ИльяСчастливчик (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRCfl5pR8Kc&ab_channel=ИльяСчастливчик)
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRCfl5pR8Kc&ab_channel=ИльяСчастливчик (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRCfl5pR8Kc&ab_channel=ИльяСчастливчик)
Interesting is that you brought up video of a very controversial person here.
This guy attacked me few times very aggressively.
However everyone has rights to his own opinion based on our Western World regulations
________________________________________
Unfortunately under his video there is no link to original video of Veritasium.
Here is link that explains it.
Cathode Rays Lead to Thomson's Model of the Atom (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKZRpAsWL8)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKZRpAsWL8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKZRpAsWL8)
So who is Илья Счастливчик (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCl-tOxkNdicBzUH9mAnN1KQ)
334 subscribers
Well he is/was working for :
Глобальная Волна — Global Wave (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCD78j3HBA5sIlhKgxK3JIaw) 95.7K subscribers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDO4IhyK6FQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDO4IhyK6FQ)
Quite active Russian group likely supported by Russian government very unfriendly to FE!!!.
they have youtube with very much questionable content , having picture of Putin
in the central view of most their studio videos.
promoting:
Spiritualism,
nontraditional medical methods,
meditation,
Tesla, Free Energy,
"mathematician" who is claiming that - minus sign is a lie and entire mathematics is wrong,
_______________________________________________
So what problem do we have now with this Russian Fellow Илья Счастливчик (Ilia Schaslivchik.)
Well he made video about "Thomson error," in his typical manner of chopped into a pieces Veritasium video,
that now is in comfortable to him form, no explanation of what his objection is, and no link to original video.
What error he is talking about?
What is his agenda?
So who was Thomson and his model of an atom:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._J._Thomson#:~:text=In%201904%2C%20Thomson% (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._J._Thomson#:~:text=In%201904%2C%20Thomson%)
20suggested%20a%20model%20of%20the,distributed%20in%20a%20uniform%20sea%20of%20positive%20charge.
_______________________________________
Explanation:
The plum pudding model is one of several historical scientific models of the atom. First proposed by
J. J. Thomson in 1904 soon after the discovery of the electron, but before the discovery of the atomic nucleus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plum_pudding_model (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plum_pudding_model)
Summary:
Thomson was contributor often credited for discovery of an electron.
Wesley
-
These are quotes from a book in Russian. which quotes Heaviside, these are his scattered and unpublished thoughts. in which
he concludes that light waves exist in the medium. which have and, accordingly, because of the shadow inside the zariks,
this pressure will exert on the balls and they will move to each other.
After 50 years, the Casimir Effect appeared and after a while it was verified experimentally.
An experiment in which this energy or mass is in such a state, due to which the silts are balanced and they do not allow us to register it in the medium or space.
So lets make some sense from this gibberish.
because of the shadow inside the zariks,
This quote indicates that entire text is a translation from original Russian.
It is nothing wrong when someone with no English tries to communicate, I do support it.
But that translated text, unfortunately didn't come right .
________------_____
Some of my responses to the text from above:
1. Light is electromagnetic wave
2. Medium: for EM wave it is wave medium and is -anything other than a true vacuum-
The wave medium is not the wave and it doesn't make the wave; Electromagnetic_Waves and medium
(https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Electricity_and_Magnetism/Supplemental_Modules_(Electricity_and_Magnetism)/Electromagnetic_Waves)
2a. electromagnetic wave can travel through anything - "be it", air, a solid material or vacuum.
electromagnetic wave does not need a medium to propagate or travel from one place to another.
3. Wave pressure applies to mechanical wave that has nothing to do with EM wave .
https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-pressure-wave (https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-pressure-wave)
3a. However radiation pressure exist in Quantum World of EM Wave .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure)
So what problem do I have with that old Russian book? :
quote from the picture below( look at original post) in Russian it says:
-that wave/s having vectors pointing at physical mass of the body ( sphere) all around
will equal its pressure and object will not move.
But if we have two equal bodies spaced at some distance- they will repel due to photon pressure .
that statement is incorrect in the form it was presented
Please be refereed to: radiation pressure article for better understanding .
It should be rather said that two objects having different temperature may emit IR wave and repealing may be observed .
Heaviside's main achievements was the recasting of Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism into the form currently used by everyone.
But we need to understand that it was time when mechanisms of particle physics were as much in its infantry as EM theory.
Radiation pressure can equally well be accounted for by considering the momentum of a classical electromagnetic field
or in terms of the momenta of photons (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photons), particles of light
______________________________________________________________
Summary:
Ilia Schaslivchik and some other Russians tend to promote ether/eather and they use any possible
sources to make basis for it.
EATER/Eather DOESN'T EXIST .. please memorize it once and forever.
OVERUNITY DOESN'T"T EXIST .. please memorize it once and forever.
Russian education system was absolutely good during CCCP time ,but now not much - to nothing is left from it.
Formats are frozen in time now , with no much change and old teachers died out .
So what feeling do many scientist have when talking to some Russians:
- It is as if you were talking to CERN scientist and the same time to Russian scientist from 19 century.
You would see them holding into quite different form of the same models in physics.
Any scientist would be happy to talk to scientist from the future 100 years up.
But unfortunate is that in Russia political agenda is prioritized over anything else.
Wesley
-
Hevside was exclusively engaged in science and he wrote literature on absolutely scientific topics. At the same time, I was a very talented or maybe even a genius person and I do not feel aggression because of belonging to his origin. I feel respect for his work.
Regarding the most conspiratorial book. which is in the public domain dedicated to Heaviside says that just in his last works. which disappeared without a trace, there are only some fragments, Heaviside described the Casimir effect, which was repeated by Lamerow. just says that the Physical Vacuum or Ether is not empty in the minds of people, the professor argued. who, after Umov and simultaneously with Poynting, came to the idea. that energy enters the conductor itself from the outside.
In the video from Veritassium. in which the description spoke of what Thomson assumed. that the atom consists of Elementary particles and these particles are part of the cathode and the electrons themselves are part of the atom escaping from the cathode, I showed that this is a complete delusion.
If we say that we have a certain closed circuit and a current is moving there, then this is just a mistake. since the luminescence of the light bulb can occur at that moment. when the electrodes are not inside the bulb. Therefore, we must consider only the idea of Poynting Heaviside about the movement of energy in space, and this space does not create charges from emptiness, it only transforms the apparent emptiness into the charge we observe.
https://youtu.be/SRCfl5pR8Kc (https://youtu.be/SRCfl5pR8Kc)
I showed this on alternating current and showed it on the example of pulsating direct current. where a nearby light bulb glows without direct contact. What speaks in favor of Hertz's hypothesis that in essence it is a demonstration of Waves in Ether, Space, Environment, Physical Vacuum, call it what you want.
https://youtu.be/mGbCLJkwTMc (https://youtu.be/mGbCLJkwTMc)
-
______________________________________________________________
Summary:
Ilia Schaslivchik and some other Russians tend to promote ether/eather and they use any possible
sources to make basis for it.
EATER/Eather DOESN'T EXIST .. please memorize it once and forever.
OVERUNITY DOESN'T"T EXIST .. please memorize it once and forever.
Russian education system was absolutely good during CCCP time ,but now not much - to nothing is left from it.
Formats are frozen in time now , with no much change and old teachers died out .
So what feeling do many scientist have when talking to some Russians:
Any scientist would be happy to talk to scientist from the future 100 years up.
But unfortunate is that in Russia political agenda is prioritized over anything else.
Wesley
[/quote]
About your suggestions. I cannot accept them, because there were many theories of Ether, and to this day there is a theory of dynamic Ether.
You are probably a vlogger or propagandist, but I'll tell you this, it all depends on what you put into terms and concepts.
I tend to consider the idea of a Dynamic Ether, not a motionless one. whose supporter was Lorentz, which is why in physics there was a confusion in representations. Einstein really wanted to build a career as a relativist and looked for all possible ways to use his mathematical abstractions in order to explain what he could not on the physical level.
I am personally a practitioner and I consider the whole theory from the practical side and only after that I compare some facts and theories.
Therefore, before you talk about the non-existence of Ether. you need to be clear about what you mean. Because it all speaks. that both in politics and in science you put all that in your head. what you want and how you want and at the same time try to pass off as an objective representation.
I do not support the idea of a motionless Ether, flow. which Lorenz tried to consider. However, you have to give it credit. Lorentz needed to mathematically hypothesize that. how does the indignation of Ether, the environment occur. space that seems empty and the reason for the appearance of EM waves, it was also necessary to explain the reason why interactions in nature cannot exist instantly, for which the Lorentz transformations were introduced. which Einstein took advantage of. The cause of EM waves does not lie in transformations, it is in the physical manifestations of the environment. which. gently pushed aside ..
Today the environment exists in the concept of Physical Vacuum. But the populists of the 20th century popularized the Physical Vacuum in this way. that came down to a banal idea of emptiness. The beginning was laid by Lorenz, since the idea of that. that the Earth moves relative to Ether was such a primitive concept that initially Lorentz had to ask the question - what moves the Earth?
Where did the idea of a partially or completely carried away Ether go?
In itself, the interpretation of ideas about that. that Ether is a consequence of a misconception. Ether is the environment. which is represented by physicists in the form of a field ....
But the question is, what exactly such a concept as a Field is that. what did Umov, Poynting and Heaviside do.
Heaviside was a practitioner, his job was to work with telegraph lines. More precisely, to create a system that allows you to design telegraph lines. And he is the first. who understood the idea that Energy is that. that moves in Space, Vacuum, Environment surrounding the conductor. It was Heaviside who introduced the concept of Inductance, it was he who understood that energy moves not only around the conductor. it falls into a certain depth of this conductor, forming the so-called Skin Effect.
-
I may seem harsh, I just try to defend the sobriety of views and ideas. I do not use Thomson's ideas because they are unfounded.
As I have shown, cathode rays are manifestations of an EM field, which is rightfully called a photon. The visible spectrum of radiation is manifested not only in the Thomson tube, but in any tube filled with an inert gas there will be a similar glow as in an alternating one. and on pulsating direct current.
this is also the case in the Franklin Machine, in which a flask with discharged gas starts to glow with static electricity.
If we return to the Coulomb experiment. which is described in any textbook on physics, then just in the scales themselves there is a force interaction of the Electric Field with a physical body in the form of a metal ball.
F = k (q1 * q2 / r ^ 2)
In Millikan's experiment there is a force interaction of oil droplets with an electric field in a capacitor.
quote: in 1884 J. Poynting published a famous article, which essentially contained the development of Umov's ideas in relation to the electromagnetic field. In this study, Poynting created the theory of the motion and flow of EM energy, which was an important addition and a fundamentally new step in the development of Maxwell's theory of the electromagnetic field.
Poynting proceeds from the Faraday-Maxwellian concept of short-range action: “If we recognize the continuity of energy movement, i.e. we admit that when it disappears at one point and reappears at another, it had to pass through the intermediate space, then we are forced to conclude that the environment contains at least part of the energy and is capable of being transferred from point to point. "
https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/n3tv5y/pointing/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 (https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/n3tv5y/pointing/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3)
-
Using the literature in which Umov was the first to put forward the concept of energy flux and density, considering the interactions of bodies through an intermediate medium, he was the first to express for the first time the need to maintain such a medium.
The most conclusive literature of all free energy cospirologists of the early 20th century had taku. the book by Gustav Mee, the translation of this book and publication was in Odessa in 1927. The name itself says that the Course of Electricity and Magnetism (experimental physics of the world ether)
And this is what an engineering company looks like from a bird's-eye view, where I did experiments in the bowels of its laboratory. The laboratory itself is located in the premises of the former bomb shelter)
-
Now we are getting ready for experiments in order to apply the physics of processes to a real device ... These are some photos of our experiments to show the possibility of additional generation ...
-
At the same time,
I was a very talented or maybe even a genius person and
I do not feel aggression because of belonging to his origin.
I feel respect for his work.
As you saying You Ilya ,- you may be a genius, I don't fight with that.
___________________________________________________________
Regarding the most conspiratorial book. which is in the public domain dedicated to Heaviside says that just in his last works. which disappeared without a trace, there are only some fragments,
Heaviside described the Casimir effect, which was repeated by Lamerow. just says that the Physical Vacuum or Ether is not empty in the minds of people, the professor argued. who, after
Umov and simultaneously with Poynting, came to the idea. that energy enters the conductor itself from the outside.
How do the Russians know that it was some "stolen" work of Heaviside And they also know that it contained phrase:
"{Ether is not empty..}"
It looks as if these Russians were trying to say, that it had to be something of value in that Ether... Wow..
Why is that Russians specifically pointed at that revelation, translating it likely from Russian into English and than back from English into Russian
and were quoting phrases from that English version of it . :) as a proof of theft.
With all do respect to you and every Russian ...Dear Ilyia, we live at civilized part of the world here...
We didn't murder Tzar with his wife, his children, his servants, and children of his servants including their pets in 1918.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family)
We didn't start WW2 together and cooperating with with Hitler
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#:~:text=The%20Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop%20Pact%20was%20a%20non-aggression%20pact%20between,those%20two%20powers%20to%20partition%20Poland%20between%20them.)
in September 17 1939 after invasion in Finland and Baltic's countries?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland)
And definitely didn't do what Stalin did to Russian science.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science (https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/05/soviet-science-stalin/525576/#:~:text=In%20the%201920s%2C%20Joseph%20Stalin%20tried%20to%20turn,the%20kind%20that%20relied%20on%20the%20scientific%20method.)
____________________________________________________________________
...the idea. that energy enters the conductor itself from the outside.
I agree, it is nothing new,
( example is an antenna resonating with energy from outside - the EM wave )
But energy type , its source and properties, and its interaction with conductive medium must be known, to do not become
another Russian fake story.
_________________________________________________________________________
In the video from Veritassium. in which the description spoke of what Thomson assumed. that the atom consists of
Elementary particles and these particles are part of the cathode and the electrons themselves are part of the atom
escaping from the cathode, I showed that this is a complete delusion.
NO !!!!
and one more time NO.
This is original Thomson experiment leading to discovery of an electron.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9Goyscbazk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9Goyscbazk)
the text below is:
NOT THAT IMPORTANT BUT HELPFUL -so you may skip it for now
Thomson also made an experiment where anode was in one vacuumed tube and anode was in another outer tube containing the first one
glass is an dielectric.( look at the picture below)
The dielectric constant of a glass is the ratio of energy stored in a condenser with the glass as the dielectric, compared with the energy
stored in the same condenser with air as the dielectric.///This measures the ability of a glass to store electrical energy, and varies with the frequency of the voltage applied to the condenser
Air is dielectric
Dry air is an excellent dielectric, and is used in variable capacitors and some types of transmission lines.
________________________________________________________________________________
So Thomson based on his experiment made quite right answer that
electrons themselves are part of the atom escaping from the cathode
If cathode and anode is not in that glass envelope than the electrostatic charge is deposited into:
-a dielectric of the glass affecting also the outer air ( in space from source to the glass) as dielectric at first.
-and than this charge looks for your hand holding it while moving electrons in rarefied leftovers in that glass envelope.
But if you are not holding that glass tube ( the envelope) in your hands than there is a physical dimension of that glass envelope that
according to inverse square law makes it at its closest part to electrostatic charge at potential of e.g 10 000V and its far-most / farthest side at potential of e.g 2000V only.
explanation of it is in videos below
So why do the influenced electrons leave the cathode ?
Well.. free electrons are the electrons that are at higher energetic level jumping from
shell K to shell N and out of influence of an atom becoming than the free electrons.
Some frozen in time Russians - they rather think about Bohr planetary model of atom so shell will be for them an orbit
and phrase from above for them will look like:
orbit K to orbit N and out of influence of an atom becoming than - the free electrons.
However tendency to get free is prioritized to an electron being at outer shell as they need very little additional energy to do it.
in this experiment by increasing electrostatic potential - we are raising electrons into a higher shell till they are no longer bounded
to an atom and becomes free electrons.
In electrical conductor these free electrons are responsible for carrying out electrical potential measured in (e.g) eV or V
When an atom loses an electron,it becomes positive ion which is called cation.
You know that the charge of proton is positive (+1) and the charge of electron is negative (-1).
Besides,we know that an atom is neutral because the number of proton and electron is in same number.
https://chemistry291. (https://chemistry291.blogspot.com/2020/02/when-an-atom-loses-an-electron-it-becomes-quizlet.html#:~:text=Answer%3A%20When%20an%20atom%20loses%20an%20electron%2Cit%20becomes,of%20proton%20and%20electron%20is%20in%20same%20number.)
Another neighboring atom gains that not needed free electron and becomes anion but often accelerated electron knocks out electron from another atom and takes its place.
Every time electron loses its energy in eV it must give out something and often this is in form of a PHOTON
In gases we often use terminology: - positive or negative Ion ( instead of Anion Cation)
__________________________________________________________________________
And now Example with rarefied air enclosed in glass envelope, having no electrodes.
At first part of video please look only around 2 minutes:
to understand how the electric field looks like and why is positive there.
https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=1200 (https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=1200)
Than please look at 2 minutes of this part of video and think about electric field vector potential.
https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=2586 (https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=2586)
The likely reason of some gases to glow when enclosed in glass envelope under an electrostatic variable potential is
that the emitted electrons are able to move about freely from one end of the tube to the other.
https://ggn.dronacharya.info/EEEDept/Downloads/QuestionBank/Vsem/EMI/section-A/Lecture-3.pdf (https://ggn.dronacharya.info/EEEDept/Downloads/QuestionBank/Vsem/EMI/section-A/Lecture-3.pdf)
But if we don't have any anode and cathode in that envelope we still are dealing with properties dielectric of glass envelope and air as dielectric from outside.
_________________________________________________________________________
And now what is PLASMA?
Plasma is an ionized gas consisting of positive ions and free electrons in proportions resulting in more or less no overall electric charge,
typically at low pressures (as in the upper atmosphere and in fluorescent lamps) or at very high temperatures (as in stars and nuclear fusion reactors).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_%28physics%29 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_%28physics%29)
It consists of a gas of ions – atoms or molecules which have one or more orbital electrons stripped (or, rarely, an extra electron attached), and free electrons
When it becomes ionized it often glows in visible frequency band at its characteristic to given gas atoms color, knowing that N ( nitrogen) is influencing this process
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50396-6 (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50396-6)
The same as Ionosphere does due to Photons and
cosmic ray activity
Cosmic rays (also called cosmic radiation) mainly comprise high energy nucleons
(protons, neutrons and atomic nuclei). About 90% are hydrogen nuclei (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen) (a single proton with an atomic number of 1).
They have been stripped of their electrons and so are ionised
In Ionosphere that energy is send by photos from the sun and other cosmic radiation.
Radioluminescence is the phenomenon by which light is produced in a material by
bombardment with ionizing radiation such as alpha particles, beta particles, or gamma rays.
Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioluminescence)
The only difference is that :
- in Ionosphere the process of photons depositing its energy into a mater( atoms of air) makes glowing of ionosphere .
- in our glass tube we are using difference of potential between our body( hands) holding a glass envelope and HV variable potential from Tesla coil.
video#2
https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=2586 (https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=2586)
If we say that we have a certain closed circuit and a current is moving there, then this is just a mistake. since the luminescence of the light bulb can occur at that moment. when the electrodes are not inside the bulb.
Therefore, we must consider only the idea of Poynting Heaviside about the movement of energy in space, and this space does not create charges from emptiness, it only transforms the apparent emptiness into the charge we observe.
https://youtu.be/SRCfl5pR8Kc (https://youtu.be/SRCfl5pR8Kc)
I showed this on alternating current and showed it on the example of pulsating direct current. where a nearby light bulb glows without direct contact.
What speaks in favor of Hertz's hypothesis that in essence it is a demonstration of Waves in Ether, Space, Environment, Physical Vacuum, call it what you want.
https://youtu.be/mGbCLJkwTMc
(https://youtu.be/mGbCLJkwTMc)
Conclusions:
In pure space vacuum you have no electrons and no particles apart of EM wave(PHOTONS) that doesn't need any medium to travel
If your glass envelope was at ideal vacuum AND NO electron emitters , than nothing would glow in it.
No matter how many names and processes you are trying to throw into your explanation it is just not going to help.
Your:
.. demonstration of Waves in Ether,
is just pure lack of understanding of nature of plasma and its behavior under different conditions.
Your Ether doesn't exist
Nothing will glow if there is no difference of potential.
There is no publication of modern time admitting Ether/Eather existence.
Just find me one scientifically standing explanation of what is Ether/Eather and what it does.
Move on my Russian friend get out form middle-ages of Russian science.. where modern science only started to exist.
Wesley
-
to support my post from above
here is my vacuum chamber in one of my labs:
https://youtu.be/ISoW1yhVpjs?t=442 (https://youtu.be/ISoW1yhVpjs?t=442)
https://youtu.be/MIfWgX8hA4A (https://youtu.be/MIfWgX8hA4A)
I have few of them not only one.
_______________________________________
experimenting with ionized particles was done with use not of eyes looking at glowing particles but with
better than eye photo-multipliers, photo intensifiers and chambers with Triethanolamine, as a medium. also at high voltage.
https://youtu.be/izzujmKROWI?t=304 (https://youtu.be/izzujmKROWI?t=304)
_______________________________________
I'm in particle physics as my primary direction.
Wesley
-
https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg557340/#msg557340
Wesley
-
Greetings. Your Russian friend is not quite in the Middle Ages, but this does not mean that you could surpass the ideas of Umov, Poynting, Heaviside.
You start jogging with your ideas. which have nothing to do with my idea. Since I understand you are considering an idea. to which Lorentz was committed, who believed that Ether or the intermediate medium was immovable.
But you apparently do not use the words carried away Ether, partially carried away or completely carried away. But there is also such a thing as Dynamical Ether. And there are hypotheses about this. But if you had on hand, after long ordeals, a really working device. I think that you would probably consider the processes differently. You decided that for the transfer of energy, with the help of which the medium is used, which, under conditions of close-range interactions, must have energy, and therefore have an equivalent mass, you would not say so.
The problem is that you are just stuck in the ideas of the Middle Ages, although the same Hevside proposed the idea. which Casimir used in the Casimir effect, it is just that photons or so-called electrons are just born in the Dirac sea, we call this moer today the Physical Vacuum. But I have the word Vacuum because of your perception of the seeming emptiness to perceive the environment as a vacuum, just not to your taste.
You are telling me something on Thomson's pipe. But at the same time, for some reason, you did not bother to look at the fact that the gas flow does not require finding the electrode itself in the tube itself. Glow can occur if the electrode is not in it. Therefore, the movement of the "electron" from the cathode is simply excluded. What this speaks in favor of Hertz's hypothesis. who gave his idea that this is an indication of the interaction of gas with EM waves. The very same glow is photons, that is why they are cathode rays. which to the cathode itself. as a physical body have no relation. And the counting is the result of EM waves with the gas itself as a physical body, where this energy in the form of a photon comes out in the visible spectrum and nothing more.
You are just stuck in the ecology of Coulomb's time, who proposed an experiment with a torsion balance, in which there are two physical bodies in the form of a ball and Electromagnetic fields. which cannot be a separate substance from the environment itself, and it is precisely that which, in essence, is the very manifestation of the environment. Otherwise, all the silde interactions in the Coulomb torsion balance would have come from emptiness. And this is a complete discrepancy with your ignorance.
You are just stuck in the ecology of Coulomb's time, who proposed an experiment with a torsion balance, in which there are two physical bodies in the form of a ball and Electromagnetic fields. which cannot be a separate substance from the environment itself, and it is precisely that which, in essence, is the very manifestation of the environment. Otherwise, all force interactions in the Coulomb's torsional balance would come from emptiness. And this is a complete discrepancy with your ignorance.
I will not be surprised. if you are stuck in the idea that in a classical generator the energy in the conductor or winding is induced from the generator shaft. There is no such agent. which could transform the rotation of the shaft into the entry of energy from "your" emptiness, according to Poyngting-Heaviside, into the conductor itself.
If everything is not so, please tell me at least one working device. in which there is. what are you looking for? If yes - I am ready to take your point of view. If not, then all your reasoning has no practical basis.
-
PART #1 answer to :
Your Russian friend is not quite in the Middle Ages, but this does not mean that you could surpass the ideas of Umov, Poynting, Heaviside.
Chronologically :
I asked you to get out of Middle-ages of Russian Science.
Historical Middle-ages was:
The period of European history from the fall of the Roman Empire in the West (5th century)
to the fall of Constantinople (1453), or, more narrowly, from c.1000 to 1453.
Russia didn't EVEN gain from SCIENCE IN period of classical antiquity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_antiquity) as Russia didn't exist yet.
Rus' state started in 862 and was ruled ruled by Vikings.
But Homo erectus (https://www.bing.com/search?q=Homo%20erectus%20wikipedia&form=WIKIRE) migrated from Western Asia to the North Caucasus (archaeological site of Kermek) about 2 million years ago,
And you as an representative of modern Homo erectus (https://www.bing.com/search?q=Homo%20erectus%20wikipedia&form=WIKIRE) are standing in front of me now asking me to go back to year1644.
Nothing wrong my dear Russian friend .. we are all animals - mammals. :)
Aren't we?
I must agree that ether(also spelled aether) was introduced into science by Descartesin Principia philosophiae in1644.
by René Descartes..... but Russia was than in middle ages yet. as East was changing much slower.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principles_of_Philosophy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principles_of_Philosophy#:~:text=Principles%20of%20Philosophy%20%28Latin%3A%20Principia%20Philosophiae%29%20is%20a,Bohemia%2C%20with%20whom%20Descartes%20had%20a%20long-standing%20friendship.)
The West surpassed the East, after centuries of inferiority, in the exploitation of the physical world.
https://www.britannica.com/science/history-of-science/The-rise-of-modern-science (https://www.britannica.com/science/history-of-science/The-rise-of-modern-science)
AND THAT IS why I HAVE ASKED YOU TO GET OUT OF Russian MIDDLE-AGES.
______________________________________________________________________
The history right before " modern science" :
the emergence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence) of modern science (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_science) during the early modern period (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_modern_period), when developments in mathematics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mathematics#Mathematics_during_the_Scientific_Revolution), physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_physics#Scientific_Revolution), astronomy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_astronomy#Renaissance_Period), biology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_biology#Renaissance_and_early_modern_developments) (including human anatomy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_anatomy)) and chemistry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_chemistry#17th_and_18th_centuries:_Early_chemistry) transformed the views of society about nature.[1] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution#cite_note-Galileo-1)[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution#cite_note-Moody-2)[3] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution#cite_note-Clagett-3)[4] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution#cite_note-4)[5] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution#cite_note-Hannam,_James_2011_p342-5)[6] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution#cite_note-Grant-6)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Revolution)
The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena: new advances in science and technology, science of astronomy.
World was changing and speeding up but EAST was lagging behind with its Tzars ( Russian king)
and Russia was continuing their - Archaic Knowledge, especially that gained through experience.
With the scientific revolution (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_revolution), paradigms established in the time of classical antiquity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_antiquity) were replaced with those
of scientists like Nicolaus Copernicus (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolaus_Copernicus), Galileo Galilei (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_Galilei), Christiaan Huygens (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christiaan_Huygens) and Isaac Newton (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Newton).[135] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science#cite_note-135)
During the 19th century, the practice of science became professionalized and institutionalized in ways
that continued through the 20th century. As the role of scientific knowledge grew in society, it became
incorporated with many aspects of the functioning of nation-states.[136] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science#cite_note-Chiu-2011-136)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science#Modern_science (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_science#Modern_science)
THERE WERE NO RUSSIANS THERE YET ... science didn't go there that fast.
__________________________________________________________________
Modern Science :
By the end of the 19th century, (by Sir Francis Bacon (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Francis-Bacon-Viscount-Saint-Alban),)
Science was moving ahead on all fronts, reducing ignorance and producing new tools for the amelioration of the human condition
___________________________________________________________________________
The ether:
look at Part#2 right below
Wesley
opinion expressed is entirely my own according to constitution of USA
-
PART#2
Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev Дмитрий Иванович Менделеев, 8 February 1834 – 2 February 1907
-chemist and inventor, best remembered for formulating the Periodic Law and creating a farsighted version of the periodic table of elements.
Between 1859 and 1861, he worked on the capillarity of liquids (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capillary_action) and the workings of the spectroscope (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscope) in Heidelberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg).
But if we compare today's Periodic Table and science it is much changed .
And that is what "some" Russian Pride has a problem with.
Please note that he died in 1907 10 years before 1917 when everything collapsed in Russia, due to Soviet Revolution .
At his death Einstein Theory of relativity was only 2 years old.
____________________________________________________________
The ether:
The ether was introduced into science by Descartesin Principia philosophiae in1644.
The ether(also spelled aether) was a concept in physics and it was made obsolete in 1905 by Einstein's theory of special relativity.
Umov, Poynting, Heaviside:
1.The Poynting vector is the watt per square metre (W/m ) was discovered byJohn Henry Poynting in 1884.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poynting_vector)
2.Oliver Heaviside (1850–1925), the value of which is zero for negative arguments and one for positive arguments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaviside_step_function (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaviside_step_function)
3.Nikolay Alekseevich Umov (Russian: Никола́й Алексе́евич У́мов;1846 – 15, 1915)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolay_Umov (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolay_Umov)
For some of these scientists theory of relativity and quantum physic was so much unorthodox and it came to late..
Umov with his : E = kmc2 with 0,5 ≤ k ≤ 1 as early as in 1873 was very close to later fame of Albert Einstein .
Umov in 1874 had already solved a problem of the movement of energy in liquid and elastic media in completely generalized view.
However, the intense attention to this view has been attracted only after Poynting had presented a stream
of electromagnetic energy based on Maxwell equations [ten years later than Umov's publications].
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
immediately after 1917 till today alcoholism become not only russian problem but was widely spread to all occupied/controlled by Soviet union territory as drunk man is half of his power to protest and very drunk Russian is powerless.
Written to all Russian human animals - mammals:
https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/dont-be-such-an-animal-placing-humankind-among-the-mammals-in-descent-of-man/ (https://gradesfixer.com/free-essay-examples/dont-be-such-an-animal-placing-humankind-among-the-mammals-in-descent-of-man/)
Darwin says, “monkeys have a strong taste for tea, coffee, and spirituous liquors: they will also, as I have myself seen, smoke tobacco with pleasure” (Darwin, 23).
And here we are at very center of our Russian Friend confusion.
As I said I have very great respect to Russians as a people but that is all about that, and not much more than that..
No their history nor their structure, or set of values since 1917 to its present governing and structural reality
is worth your stress and emotion my dear Western World readers.
But I had to point at that AS IT IS IMPORTANT TO OUR EXPLANATION why EATHER died in 1905 and some of us still talks about it.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
In 1 January 1865 J. Clerk Maxwell (13 June 1831 – 5 November 1879) published his
A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field
http://www.bem.fi/library/1865-001.pdf (http://www.bem.fi/library/1865-001.pdf)
It was a great 4 formulas we use till today .
that was foundation the basis for Albert Einstein 1905 revelation.
But he was evolving in world that had not yet better theory than theory of Ether
The ether, in the view of Maxwell and almost all physicists at that time, permeates all space and has many of the characteristics of a polarizable dielectric (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Dielectric.html).
Maxwell was of the opinion that terrestrial optical experiments aimed at determining Fresnel's ether drag, which is quadratic [i.e., of order (v/c)2],
are not sensitive enough to detect the influence of the drag.
just remember that he was mathematician only..
The ether concept became especially predominant in the 19th century by the work of Young (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Thomas_Young&action=edit&redlink=1) and Fresnel (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Augustin-Jean_Fresnel&action=edit&redlink=1) who revived Huygens (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Christiaan_Huygens.html)' wave theory of light.
They replaced Newton (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Newton.html)'s light corpuscles by waves propagating through the ether. In order to explain stellar aberration (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Stellar_aberration&action=edit&redlink=1), first observed in the 1720s and
then shown to be caused by the velocity of Earth relative to the velocity of Newton's light corpuscles, Young (1804) assumed ether to be in a state of
absolute rest. Maxwell (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/James_Clerk_Maxwell.html) showed in the 1860s that light waves are electromagnetic waves (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_wave.html) transverse (perpendicular) to the direction
of the propagation of the waves.
Following Young and Fresnel, Maxwell assumed that electromagnetic waves are vibrations of the ether.
The Michelson-Morley Experiment
Albert Abraham Michelson (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Albert_Abraham_Michelson&action=edit&redlink=1) disagreed with Maxwell, judging that it was possible to observe quadratic effects on Earth.
he built an interferometer (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Interferometer&action=edit&redlink=1) that was sensitive enough to detect effects of the order (v/c)2 and tried to determine the speed v of Earth with respect to the ether.
Michelson aimed to measure the speed of the "ether wind".
Edwin Williams Morley (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Edwin_Williams_Morley&action=edit&redlink=1), a chemist from Western Reserve University, also in Cleveland. They built an new interferometer
and in August 1887 they measured again a null effect (a speed of 4.7 km/s or less was found, while 30 km/s was expected). [8
(https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Ether_(physics).html#cite_note-7)
Heinrich Rudolf Hertz
in the mid-1880s when Heinrich Rudolf Hertz (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Heinrich_Rudolf_Hertz&action=edit&redlink=1) was able to generate waves of the kind predicted by Maxwell.
(Hertz produced electromagnetic waves of wavelengths from a centimeter to a meter, much longer than the wavelengths
of visible light that are on the order of 500 nm).
IT WAS The LAST DAYS OF ETHER .
SO WHAT ELSE WAS GOING ON THERE AT THAT TIME:
In the 19th century it was known that transverse waves are not possible in a gas or a liquid, but only in a solid;
hence ether was thought to have solid-like properties.
Since light behaves in closed rooms the same as in open fields, and many materials are transparent to light,
ether was assumed to fill up all of space and all of matter.
Thus, at the end of the 19th century physicists had a picture of the ether as a quasi-rigid solid
(not completely rigid because it can vibrate), luminiferous (light carrying) medium that is massless and transparent,
at absolute rest, and present everywhere.
Today, the concept of ether does not play a role any longer in physics,
Newton
Newton in 1675 suggested:
-three mechanisms by which light may proceed through the ether.
-"multitudes of unimaginable small and swift corpuscles of various sizes springing from shining bodies"
Hooke's and Huygens' in (1642 – 1727).
All space is permeated by an elastic medium or aether, which is capable of propagating vibrations.
This aether pervades the pores of all material bodies and is the cause of their cohesion; its density varies from
one body to another, being greatest in the free interplanetary spaces.
Thomas Young and Augustin-Jean Fresnel.
Thomas Young revived the undulatory (wave) theory of light in 1800.[4] (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Ether_(physics).html#cite_note-3).
He noticed that Newton's emission theory:
a light source emits corpuscles—had problems with the interference (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Interference&action=edit&redlink=1)
of light and with the simultaneous refraction and reflection of light falling under an angle on the surface of water.
Augustin-Jean Fresnel (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Augustin-Jean_Fresnel&action=edit&redlink=1). Both recognized that stellar aberration (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Stellar_aberration&action=edit&redlink=1) needed to be explained by undulatory theory.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Ether in the second half of the 19th century:
Michael Faraday (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Michael_Faraday.html),
one of the fathers of electromagnetism (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Electromagnetism.html), had a strong dislike of hypothetical entities for which no convincing experimental evidence existed.
he was skeptical about the existence of the ether.
Oliver Heaviside
1889 Oliver Heaviside (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Oliver_Heaviside&action=edit&redlink=1), one of the founding fathers of electromagnetic theory, impacted Ether good !!:[11]
(https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Ether_(physics).html#cite_note-10)His question of the motion of the ether.:
-Does it move when "bodies" move through it, or does it remain at rest?
-what is the speed of the Earth and light on Earth with respect to the ether.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Decline of the ether (1905)
At the end of the 19th century the ether served two purposes:
-first and foremost it was a transport medium for electromagnetic vibrations.
-Secondly it offered an absolute frame of reference.
The death knell of the ether tolled in 1905, when Einstein published his special theory of relativity (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Special_relativity.html).[13] (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Ether_(physics).html#cite_note-12) [14] (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Ether_(physics).html#cite_note-13)
Einstein assumed that an absolute reference frame does not exist and, even more than that, he showed that physics is not in need of such a frame.
He declared that all inertial frames are equivalent, one cannot prefer one over another (see special relativity (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Special_relativity.html)). At one stroke he solved the problem of the speed of light, too:
-this speed is the same in any inertial frame, and is independent of
the velocity that a frame may have with respect to any of the infinitely many other inertial frames. In his 1905 paper Einstein refers to the ether only once:
The introduction of a "luminiferous aether" (Lichtäther) will prove to be superfluous inasmuch as the view here to be developed will not require an "absolutely stationary space"
provided with special properties, nor assign a velocity vector to a point of the empty space in which electromagnetic processes take place.
Defenders of the ether still remained after 1905, however, since a number of physicists failed to read or understand Einstein,
and those who did, came only gradually to a full appreciation of its impact on the ether.
Not until about 1910 did the general opinion of physicists shift away from the ether.
Among the more stubborn hold-outs were Oliver Lodge (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Oliver_Lodge&action=edit&redlink=1), A. A. Michelson (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=A._A._Michelson&action=edit&redlink=1), and Joseph John Thomson (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Joseph_John_Thomson&action=edit&redlink=1).
This older group of physicists gradually died out and was replaced by a new generation that had grown
up with Einstein’s theory and for which ether was an esoteric historical concept like phlogiston (http://knowino.org/w/index.php?title=Phlogiston&action=edit&redlink=1).
_____________________________________________________________________________
history of ether/eather is here click on that link
(https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Ether_(physics).html#:~:text=The%20ether%28also%20spelledaether%29%20was%20a%20concept%20in%20physicsmade,was%20introduced%20into%20science%20by%20Descartesin%20Principia%20philosophiae%281644%29.)
So why we have problem with our Russian friend here :
look in PART #3
Wesley
opinion expressed is entirely my own according to constitution of USA
-
PART #3
So why we have problem with our Russian friend here :
In 1917 group of Russians decided to dethrone the Tzar ( king of Russia)
Russians murdered Tzar with his wife, his children, his servants, and children of his servants including their pets in 1918.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family)
started WW2 together and cooperating with with Hitler
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact# (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#):
in September 17 1939 after invasion in Finland and Baltic's countries?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland)
That is what Stalin did toRussian science.
https://www.theatlantic.com/science (https://www.theatlantic.com/science)
____________________________________________________
Russia changed to Soviet Union known as CCCP:
In 1961 however Soviet Union had in full motion the best ever Russian invention
The system of Russian Education.
That system started in Stalin time
but in 1961 till 1990 it was in its most perfected from .
It was system of oppression when everything that was from Western World was bad and
everything in Soviet Oppression and terror system was good .
Soviet education system was for free at every level and helped not only Soviet. Russia
but other countries under soviet terror to get the best in the world wide education .
As much as Scientists were imprisoned and working as slaves in Russian Sharahskah
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharashka (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharashka)
for them it was better than death.
Sergei Korolev 1907 – 14 January 1966)
was tortured in Rusian concentration kamp and made possible
for Russians to send Gagarin to space ..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Korolev (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergei_Korolev)
_____________________________________________
so what was so good in that Russian education system: ?
Stalin and all soviet regimes killed more people than the number of totally lost in battle in WW2 by every country involved.
Some figures oscillate between 40- 75 millions but even if we cut it in half it is still minimum 25 millions
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_repression_in_the_Soviet_Union (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_repression_in_the_Soviet_Union)
So he was in need to have replacement for these who were "eliminated" - liquidated by terror and its troiki:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NKVD_troika (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NKVD_troika)
Education was very broad including art , (singing, playing instruments, sculpture,painting)
Russian and Polish and Czechoslovakian , and Rumanian, Hungarian... all of them they had long school hours and
- "no sorry .. you must perform!!!"
Millions of very broadly educated people were better than any nation in the world in almost everything ..
Yes it is hard to believe in it right?
Typical Russian could draw , sing, repair car, saw, project and build a house, weld, work on
lathe and milling machine - the nation of omnibuses..
People there were living in constant fear .
They didn't know any longer what they are afraid of .. That fear made them to learn
because if they don't than!!!.... Well they didn't have any longer any idea what the consequences are ...
Nothing was set, Fear was like a sickens, you could live with it somehow, and even forget that you are in pain.
For Stalin terror it was good.
If he was in need to arrest or terminate anyone, it was always an army of people with similar skills ready to
take their place.
Think about factory of spare parts:
And you have plenty parts waiting just to be used so you as a tzar can brake every rules of humanity
and your mechanism is still operational.
__________________________________________
Western World didn't have such broad education and was not in need for it.
That made people becoming narrow professionals but extremely good one
1 Russian could do that what 10 different Americans could do but it took him 20 times longer
as he was not good in anything yet.
Yes thanks to being educated in so many fields Russians adapted very quickly
and that helped them survive and succeed if they were lucky to run form Soviet territory.
Western system of values was just better for narrow professionalism and high level of skills.
Civilization is ruled by need to learn quick,become good, make money .
Narrow professionals need others who are narrowly good in something else.
THERE IS NO APPLICATION FOR OMNIBUSES-
Genius of kids.. is recognized by speed of collecting knowledge and skills but doesn't have application.
It is just a public attraction.
Second problem for Soviet Union was that educated people have needs other than only
basic survival. That created opposition and made more scientists to be killed or imprisoned.
After collapse of CCCP in 1990 there was banditism , mafia, poverty
and collapse of everything including soviet system of education.
The new mutant was born on the dirt of CCCP :
-the Russian Federation that is till now for past 21 years
ruled by Putin.
Propaganda:
Again if something was done and it was not Russian it is bad...
All media belongs or are under control of Russian government
Science is politically and ideologically controlled .
You are no longer rewarded by your scientific value but by
bribes, connections, theft, falsification of someone else work .
2 days ago Russian government decided that they can steal
any inventor intellectual property because they need the technology .
can you believe it?
https://www.ip-watch.org/2016/04/18/russia-new-amendments-would-allow-use-of-inventions-without-permission-of-patent-holders/ (https://www.ip-watch.org/2016/04/18/russia-new-amendments-would-allow-use-of-inventions-without-permission-of-patent-holders/)
Old teachers died out .
New teachers earn around $170 per month.
The young Russians are looking to way out from Russia.
101 years from Russian revolution Russia is going down.
___________________________________
Russian Nation is very much driven by national values, love to the country
intensified by propaganda pointing at their achievement ..
It is easier to make zombi brains instead of paying for the brains.
by that any form of criticism of Russian science or anything that is Russian is
in Russia punished by law.
Example:
Even standing on the street with empty piece of paper in your hands - is considered protest up to 3 years in prison.
For "like" under video or twit sometime people get 7 years of heavy prison.
Russian Constitution says something but life in Russia says something else.
Conclusions:
In all of it that is me who with all respect to our Russian friend is making comments and in Russia I would be punished by law.
I wish him the best I can
I would love to see him here in New York USA where most of us is/are not that widely educated as Russians
that already died out naturally or with help of Soviet Terror.
And new ones grow up as no longer omnibuses as soviet system doesn't exist any longer.
The worst and most difficult task is to explain to some Russians that they are fundamentally mistaken.
Some of them are brainwashed and aggression is their form of reaction in such...
Criticism is not about insulting you Ilyia but about civilized way to show you that you are totally wrong.
I can be wrong too.... but not at this time.
Instead of trying to dispute with Ilyia about his challenges in science and "Dynamic Eather"
https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays-Gravity/Download/5055 (https://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays-Gravity/Download/5055)
by Lew Paxton Price
I decided to create explanation of evolution and history of Ether/Eather and how science rejected it.
For these who still have problem with it there is fundamental question:
Show me just one convincing explanation of Eather in wikipedia or any scientific publication.
https://www.tau (https://www.tau.ac.il/~tsirel/dump/Static/knowino.org/wiki/Ether_(physics).html#:~:text=The%20ether%28also%20spelledaether%29%20was%20a%20concept%20in%20physicsmade,was%20introduced%20into%20science%20by%20Descartesin%20Principia%20philosophiae%281644%29.)
Wesley
Legal note :
opinion expressed is entirely my own according to constitution of USA
-
Greetings, I don’t have a lot of time to conduct controversy, since I now spend a lot of time experimenting and organizing my own projects. I will try to explain one point - Einstein is not an engineer, and most likely. that he did not hold a soldering iron in his hands. All Einstein did was to pack some of the work beautifully. which he, as a showman, was able to popularize. Questions. which he tried to consider in the theory of relativity and the special theory of relativity is a mathematical continuation of Lawrence's attempt to explain some phenomena by the method of mathematical abstraction. But the mathematical abstraction built on motionless or other ethers was correct. except for the hypothesis of motionless ether. Lorenz could not give an explanation of inertia, although some American scientists who introduced the concept of Ether made just an attempt to explain what inertia is, as a certain state of Physical Vacuum, which manifests itself in no way carried away or motionless, but dynamic. This logic of thinking appeals to me. Because these explanations do not help in considering those processes. which I consider in my experiments.
But the interaction of the physical body and the Physical Vacuum (Ether) is a more complex concept than Lorentz's clumsy attempts to explain it. because this is a more complex topic than just shrinking or transforming in space and time coordinates.
-
I don’t have a lot of time to conduct controversy,
no my dear Russian friend - it is not true that you have no time.
-you simply have nothing to say in form of response,.. and you are the controversy..
Einstein is not an engineer, and most likely. that he did not hold a soldering iron in his hands.
All Einstein did was to pack some of the work beautifully. which he, as a showman, was able to popularize.
Yes I agree it is possible. most of surgeons in our civilized part of the world didn't use solder gun too.
Questions. which he tried to consider in the theory of relativity and the special theory of relativity is a mathematical continuation
of Lawrence's attempt to explain some phenomena by the method of mathematical abstraction.
But the mathematical abstraction built on motionless or other ethers was correct. except for the hypothesis of motionless ether.
Dear Russian you can't provide me with scientific evaluation of motionless Eather vs Dynamic Eather or Eather at any form and any scientist
paper after 1945.
Lorenz could not give an explanation of inertia, although some American scientists who introduced the concept of
Ether made just an attempt to explain what inertia is, as a certain state of Physical Vacuum,
which manifests itself in no way carried away or motionless, but dynamic. This logic of thinking appeals to me.
Because these explanations do not help in considering those processes. which I consider in my experiments.But the interaction of the physical body and the Physical Vacuum (Ether) is a more complex concept than Lorentz's
clumsy attempts to explain it. because this is a more complex topic than just shrinking or transforming in space and time coordinates.
My dear Russian - You can't even provide me the names of these Americans who introduced Eather and these who fallowed their steps..
Think about yourself Dear Ilya Tsimbaluk as about Russian who is looking at perfectly made scientific bread.
Every piece of this bread is at Swiss, German, American quality and standards.
example:
GDR occupied by Soviets made Trabant:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trabant)
GDR is Germany now ..
compare :
-that GDR only after few years of freedom from Russian/soviet occupation.
with
-Russia today..
But for Some Russians it is too perfect, and is drastically outperforming any Russian top Hi Tek.
As Russia now is only a cheap gas station for the world.
Nothing or almost nothing is made there .
Russian science is devastated , life condition too,
freedom of you saying how "Russian bread" is bad makes you to go to jail.
And you are looking now at early stage of this piece of art created by Western world.
You are looking at some mistakes they made in the early days of that science.
And yes you right.
Yes some postulates of our scientists were mistaken, wrong,
but we corrected it and in Russia they likely didn't.
So because of these and other uncorrected mistakes Russia of today is feudal,mutant (at level of $170/ mo in average) of soviet collapse suffering from delusional
ideas of its dictators . Surrealistic Russian reality doesn't react with answers.
You Ilya are likely the miniature copy of it.
I would like to see you prospering, famous, wealthy, happy, and free,
I wish you the best my friend
Wesley
legal note:
opinion expressed is my own according to constitution of USA
-
A. A.Einstein and his Autismn !
B. probably he also worked "as solder" https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.muenchen.tv/historische-fakten-albert-einstein-und-die-wiesn-12217/ (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.muenchen.tv/historische-fakten-albert-einstein-und-die-wiesn-12217/)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein)
Munich and school education until 1894The family moved to Munich (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen) shortly after Albert was born in 1880 , where his father and uncle founded a small business for gas and water installation in October 1880. As this was economically satisfactory, they decided in 1885, with the support of the entire family, to set up their own factory for electrical devices (Elektrotechnische Fabrik J. Einstein & Cie) . [8] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-8) His father's company was successful and supplied power plants in Munich-Schwabing, Varese (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Varese) and Susa (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Susa_(Piemont))(Italy).
Switzerland 1895–1914The way to study: Matura in Aarau
In the spring and summer of 1895 Einstein stayed in Pavia (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Pavia) , where his parents lived temporarily, and helped out in the company. He made trips to the Alps and the Apennines (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Apennin) and visited his uncle Julius Koch in Genoa (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Genua) . During this time, the 16-year-old Einstein wrote his first scientific work, an essay (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Essay) entitled On the Investigation of the State of Ether in the Magnetic Field, [16] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-16) and sent it to his uncle Caesar Koch (1854–1941), who lived in Belgium (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Belgien), for assessment. The work was never published as a scientific contribution in a journal and remained in the form of a discussion contribution. [17] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-AH_91_93-17)
Do You both know this work ? I not !
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FMarcel_Grossmann (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FMarcel_Grossmann)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FHeinrich_Friedrich_Weber (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FHeinrich_Friedrich_Weber)
From the first publications to the famous formula E = mc² (1905)
→ Main article : History of special relativity (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Geschichte_der_speziellen_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie)
Einstein's dissertation, 1905
Albert Einstein on a German special postage stamp (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Briefmarken-Jahrgang_2005_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland) for the year of physics 2005In 1905, at the age of 26 , (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Ver%C3%B6ffentlichung) Einstein published (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Ver%C3%B6ffentlichung) five of his most important works:On March 17, 1905, he finished his work on the photoelectric effect (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Photoelektrischer_Effekt) , which he then published as On a heuristic point of view concerning the generation and transformation of light [27] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-27) .On April 30, 1905, he completed his dissertation (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Dissertation)A New Determination of Molecular Dimensions, [28] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-28) with which he submitted his doctoral application to Professors Alfred Kleiner (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Alfred_Kleiner) and Heinrich Burkhardt (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Heinrich_Burkhardt_(Mathematiker)) on July 20 at the University of Zurich (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Universit%C3%A4t_Z%C3%BCrich) . He chose the University of Zurich because there was an agreement with the Polytechnic where Einstein had studied, and the Rigorosum (oral examination) was not required there. In his dissertation he calculated the size of sugar molecules in solution and from this a value for the Avogadro constant (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Avogadro-Konstante). It is related to his work on Brownian molecular motion, published in the same year, and supported the atomic hypothesis , which at the time was still controversial among leading physicists ( Wilhelm Ostwald (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Wilhelm_Ostwald) , Ernst Mach (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Ernst_Mach) ). The work was accepted relatively quickly by Burkhardt and Kleiner (the doctoral procedure was completed in July). Paul Drude (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Paul_Drude) , the editor of the Annalen der Physik, to whom Einstein had sent the work, was not satisfied with the value found for the Avogadro constant and asked for improvements, which Einstein also delivered. [29] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-29)This led to a six-month delay in publication and Einstein was therefore only formally awarded his doctorate on January 15, 1906. Four years later (1909), when Jean Perrin's (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Jean_Perrin) experiments became known, Einstein turned to Perrin for an experimental review, and at the same time Ludwig Hopf (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Ludwig_Hopf_(Mathematiker)) , whom Einstein had asked to review his dissertation, found a mistake in his dissertation that was the result had falsified. Einstein then sent a correction to the annals in 1911. [size=0.75em][30] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-30)His publication on Brownian molecular (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Brownsche_Bewegung)motion followed on May 11, 1905 : On the motion of particles suspended in liquids at rest, required by the molecular kinetic theory of heat. [31] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-31)On June 30, 1905, Einstein submitted his treatise on the electrodynamics of moving bodies . [32] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-32) Shortly afterwards, Einstein made his addendum. Does the inertia of a body depend on its energy content? [33] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-33)The latter implicitly contains for the first time the most famous formula in the world, E = mc² (energy equals mass times the speed of light squared, equivalence of mass and energy (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/%C3%84quivalenz_von_Masse_und_Energie) ). Both works together are now known as the special theory of relativity (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Spezielle_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie) .The year 1905 was therefore an extremely fruitful year, one also speaks of the annus mirabilis (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Annus_mirabilis) (miracle year). Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_von_Weizs%C3%A4cker) later wrote:
“1905 an explosion of genius. Four publications on various topics, each of which, as they say today, is worthy of the Nobel Prize: the special theory of relativity (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Spezielle_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie) , the light quantum hypothesis (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Photon), the confirmation of the molecular structure of matter (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Materie_(Physik))through the 'Brownian movement', the quantum-theoretical explanation of the specific heat of (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/W%C3%A4rme) solid bodies. "
- Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker [34] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-34)The steps up to the new theory of gravity When Einstein started the long journey from the special to the general theory of relativity in 1907, he was still a largely unknown employee in the Bern patent office.
At the end of the road, in 1915, he was a professor in Berlin who was already highly respected in specialist circles, who, as Max Planck (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Max_Planck) later said, could only be “measured by the achievements of Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton”.
[35] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-35)
The road to the general theory of relativity began in 1907 with the flash of inspiration that Einstein called "the happiest thought of my life" [36] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-36)referred to, on the other hand, with a limitation of his previous work on relativity, which was of a fundamental nature. The latter was the insight that the speed of light under the influence of gravity is not a constant, the special theory of relativity could only be valid under the condition that there was no gravity, as Einstein repeated in an essay from 1911: “The theory of relativity has shown that the inert mass of a body increases with its energy content. (...) The so satisfactory result of the theory of relativity, according to which the principle of the conservation of mass merges into the principle of the conservation of energy, could not be maintained. " [37] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-37)
The flash of inspiration, on the other hand, concerned the equivalence between inert and heavy mass, i.e. the correspondence between the constant acceleration of a reference system and gravity: “I was sitting on my chair in the Bern patent office when the following thought suddenly occurred to me: 'When a person is in free fall 'Then she doesn't feel her own weight'. I was amazed. That simple thought made a deep impression on me. He drove me towards a theory of gravity. " [38] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-38)
However, more than three years would pass before the first paper in which this flash of inspiration led to a more detailed physical formulation, because "From December 1907 to June 1911 (...) Einstein did not comment on questions of gravity," said his friend and Biographer Abraham Pais (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Abraham_Pais) . [39] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-39)
In 1908, however, there was a groundbreaking innovation that Einstein was initially skeptical about and which he even dismissed as “superfluous erudition” [40] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-40) : the mathematical formulation of space-time (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Raumzeit) by his former teacher Hermann Minkowski (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Hermann_Minkowski) , whose authorship of this revolutionary concept was later by Einstein was expressly recognized and appreciated. [41] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-41)
In the Minkowski space (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Minkowski-Raum) , the relative ratio of the sizes of space and time in the special theory of relativity can be clearly represented as a rotation by setting an imaginary unit of time. It was not until 1912 that Einstein was convinced of the advantages of the Minkowski room.
Some of the most important essays of the later general relativity theory (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Allgemeine_Relativit%C3%A4tstheorie) at a glance:About the principle of relativity and the conclusions drawn from it.About the influence of gravity on the propagation of light. According to Huygens' principle, Einstein only found a deviation of the light rays from fixed stars near the sun of 0.83 arc seconds, [42] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-42) the value calculated using the field equations of 1915 was 1.7 arc seconds. [43] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-43)Draft of a generalized theory of relativity and a theory of gravity. I. Physical part of Albert Einstein. II. Mathematical part by Marcel Grossmann. [44] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-44)Nordstrom's theory of gravity from the standpoint of the general differential calculus. With AD Fokker (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Adriaan_Dani%C3%ABl_Fokker) . [45] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-45) A reaction to Gunnar Nordström's (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Gunnar_Nordstr%C3%B6m) alternative theory of gravity and a "publication which is of considerable interest for the history of general relativity because it is Einstein's first treatment of the theory of gravity in which general covariance is strictly valid". [46] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-46)To the general theory of relativity. November 4, 1915.Since the still conventional definition of the distance in flat (not curved) Minkowski space does not apply equally to curved spacetime, it had to be replaced there by a more abstract expression, just as a geometry was required with which Gauss's surface theory of curved spaces was required could be expanded in four dimensions. Einstein's mathematical knowledge at the time was insufficient, so in 1912 he turned to his former fellow student Marcel Grossmann (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Marcel_Grossmann)who was now professor of mathematics in Zurich. Einstein had “asked him to go to the library to see if there was a suitable theory for dealing with such questions. The next day Grossmann came (...) and said that there really was such a geometry, namely Riemannian geometry. " [47] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-47)
As a result, Grossmann not only sought out the works of Riemann (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Bernhard_Riemann) , but also those of Christoffel (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Elwin_Bruno_Christoffel) , Ricci (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Gregorio_Ricci-Curbastro) and his pupil Levi-Civita (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Tullio_Levi-Civita) , some of which were already doing research on the absolute differential calculus in curved spaces, the formulation of the Christoffels symbols (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Christoffelsymbole) for tensor analysis and the covariant derivation (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Kovariante_Ableitung) had developed the mathematical instruments in the 19th and sometimes only in the 20th century, which now proved to be indispensable for the formulation of the general theory of relativity. [48] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-48)[49] (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Albert_Einstein#cite_note-49)
However, it took another three years to formulate the idea of a gravitational field in which the metrics of the four-dimensional, curved spatiotemporal continuum and the factors of energy and momentum are mutually dependent, which Einstein achieved on November 4, 1915 .
Discussing about A.Einstein needs also to know his scientifical ambient and with whom he disputed "Quantumphysics"-questions !
ART and SRT : by whom (pre-)defined ? Question related : https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mileva_Mari%25C4%2587 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mileva_Mari%25C4%2587)
-
Thank You
Dear Lanka IV
Great lecture
Wesley
-
I don't quite understand what you are writing to be honest.
I personally am not attached to anything or anyone.
I’m here only because there’s a forum to discuss alternative physics issues. energy and so on. Are you sure that this is a historical forum dedicated to Russia?
I perfectly understand that now, in terms of the development of startups, Silicon Valley is one of the sensational places where minds from all over the world flock, not only from Russia. And of course I am working on the installation. to present your devices exactly there.
I have no class. no political prejudice.
I personally do not identify myself with any Russian or any science at all. I do my own business, everything else does not interest me.
Now let's talk with you about Einstein.
Let's talk with you about the fact that in his early works, Einstein, first of all, contradicts himself with his thought experiment, where he flies on a frozen ray (wave) of light. First of all, the contradiction itself arises for the reason that the presence of a ray of light in space is initially considered in this image based on Maxwell's ideas about Ether, in which there is a medium in a frozen state. That is, a thought experiment is based on an environment with some properties.
We deliberately restrain ourselves from touching upon the point of logical internal consistency in this passage (Grunbaum) [6]; we rather call attention to the “intuitive” conclusion it leads to: as a spatially oscillatory field at rest “does not make sense,” no observer, ie no material body, can reach the velocity c… Other authors are less ready to admit the problem as they struggle to clarify Einstein's remarks. Holton (1988, p. 311) finds Einstein's narrative to have… its exact parallel in the 1905 paper, in the conceptual leap from a simple experiment (indeed, also a kind of Gedanken experiment — the relative motion of conductor and magnet) to the general principle from which the content of relativity theory will derive. Here Holton refers to the magnet and conductor thought experiment that initiates Einstein's famous 1905 “On the electrodynamics of moving bodies,” (Einstein, 1905) in which he first presents special relativity. That thought experiment derives from a fact in ether-based electrodynamics. A magnet at rest in the ether is surrounded by a magnet field. A magnet moving in the ether is surrounded by a magnetic field and an induced electric field, arising through the magnet's motion. One might expect this electric field to be an experimentally detectible sign of the magnet's motion in the ether, for one can detect the electric field from its ability to create a measurable electric current in a conductor in the vicinity of the magnet. Yet, Einstein reported, a curious combination
What's the problem here lies in the fact that just does not understand Einstein in power electronics and is poor at that. what Umv, Poynting and Heaviside deduced.
But let's touch on the “frozen wave”.
first of all, Einstein's mind, like the world of Western man, is highly disposed to confuse that which does not relate to things. which relate to the environment or their derived fields as to fields, and to consider the physical body as physical.
This is due to the fact that Einstein most likely viewed the world as a seller. the western world is built on trade, and it requires a clear form in the mind of the buyer this or that value through a physical object. Therefore, the penchant for mathematics of Lorentz and Einstein is quite obvious. After all, trading cannot be built without mathematics. and in the era of that time, value is determined by the tangible, what can be seen. touch, eat, smell.
But the question in Einstein's head was based on the fact that the light that he sees is what belongs to Ether. But in fact, the whole situation is completely different, and since Einstein is not an experimental practitioner, he could afford such frivolity. Namely: Electromagnetic waves. that the cell phone emits is impossible to smell or see, touch. You don't see them.
Take a laser pointer, turn on the LED in it, if the room is ideal in terms of air purity and infinitely large, we will not see this beam. But as soon as fog appears in the room, you will immediately see it. what do you see at laser shows.
Same. what Thomson saw in his Thomson pipe.
Of course, that Ether. which Einstein imagined was the generation of a stream of thought, which was based on the fact that the “frozen light” represented in the head is light. If a monkey is given a banana, then most likely the light will be associated with just this banana, although the banana is a reaction of Electromagnetic Waves with nerve endings in the eye, that is, the reaction of Ether with the Physical body.
But what's the problem with the banana monkey? the problem of inability to separate the information received from the truth in your head. And hence the imposition in mathematics of the world's notions that the world is a banana. therefore, light or electromagnetic waves that are associated with something frozen have nothing to do with each other.
And hence the formulation of the question is posed incorrectly in general and suggests that. that Einstein clearly did not set the task of getting to the bottom of the truth.
Now about the flying magnet and the conductor. If we are talking about the fact that there is a certain environment in a certain state. which we perceive as emptiness. does not mean that it is. the Heaviside thought experiment, the Casimir effect and the Lamer experiment prove that. that Physical Vacuum or Ether is precisely the environment in an active state. But not empty. but what's the problem. in which Ether is the problem?
The problem is, strange questions arise in the brain of a primate with a banana flying through space. If we are flying relative to something, then this something should affect me and the banana itself. but the question is - if they are already flying in open space. who makes them fly? At one time, no one doubted that this was the prerogative of Ether. But if the primate is holding a banana and a rotating conductor relative to the magnet, then the question does not arise: what happens to what we are flying with respect to why this does not affect the electromagnetic processes between the magnet and the coil.
The thing is that the primate is a very stupid creature and, sitting on a tree, did not think about that. that it does not understand at all in electromagnetic processes.
Namely: namely, in what they actually tried to convey the idea of Minds, Poynting, Heaviside.
The bottom line is that they were just trying to convey the idea that energy does not spread from the rotation of the winding. which the monkey turns relative to the magnet, that is, from the fact that the monkey needs to exert efforts to rotate this magnet as a physical body.
The thing is that just the energy in the conductor itself comes from the Physical Vacuum or Ether, which is influenced by the rotating magnetic field together with the magnet. But we know for sure. that the energy spent on magnetizing the magnet and the energy that enter the conductor are completely different types of energy. So is the magnetic field of a magnet. and the magnetic field of the winding is two magnetic fields. In order to create a counter flow, as pointed out by Lenz. you need a second thread. This main stream creates the opposite one, because you have two streams.
But Einstein was not an engineer. therefore he could not assume that an electromagnetic wave. which arises in the antenna of the receiver due to the electromagnetic wave of the transmitter forms its own magnetic field.
Therefore, if an electromagnetic wave flies in space at the speed of light, this means that this flow of energy will not be able to create a flow of energy relative to a physical body in the form of a surfer. Therefore, if this flow of energy cannot enter the conductor, then from the conditions it does not enter there and does not affect this physical body, with the help of which this flow can manifest itself. And for this I do not need to come up with another frame of reference with my time.
-
This is the installation. in which we have proved that mechanical energy and electric energy are different types of energy and that mechanical energy does not have an element. which is capable of directly converting into electrical. as it is commonly believed. Surprisingly. but came to face a misunderstanding of the processes. which originate around the guide described by Poynting-Heavside.
It's very strange to watch. as some people try to explain some points to me. in which, for some strange reason, the conversation about that is forgotten. that the flow of energy is carried out precisely due to the environment in which there is that amount. which is just that in the form of a closed system and is used by modern electric motors.
If we were talking about Einstein, then why not remember the antipode - Heaviside. who worked with telegraph lines and was the first to guess. that just energy is carried by Electromagnetic fields in this very environment. surrounding the conductor and is carried over.
Electromagnetic waves do not propagate monolithically, they propagate in waves. even hitting a bar carries energy in waves. because in addition to the physical body itself, it is the environment that takes part.
For some reason, it is still considered. that superconductivity is carried out due to the pairwise movement of electrons in the conductor itself, and often electrical engineers are complete nonsense about where the charge is and what the current is. If electrical engineers understood. that energy and that. what we want to perceive as electrons just in a superconductor does not move, it just happens. what a mass. that comes from outside the superconductor does not fall into the crystal lattice zone.
All attempts. which Einstein tried to do - to use the Lorentz transformations. who, in turn, tried to explain how the movement of the light source is connected, the movement of the light wave in space relative to certain inertial systems.
But here's the question in the World Cup - what is a charge? I told you about that. that this is just a forceful interaction of an electric field and a physical body. electron. How an elementary charge does not have to be a physical body itself)
But is it logical to call an electric field a charge? No, these are photons. But where do they come from? They are taken from the environment. Let's call it the Dirac Sea. in which, when positive energy or a positive charge is removed from the volume of space, negative energy will be formed.
so you have excellent video equipment Mr. Wesley. I would love to work on it. as I did video editing)
But there are many but ...
-
I'm out of town but I will provide answer to your comment
Wesley
-
Ilya Tsimbaluk
I think your misrepresenting the intent of Einstein and most credible people in science and engineering.
First, we do it not because we want to be wealthy or famous which is misguided and fleeting at best but to acquire knowledge and understanding. So these scientists shared what they learned as there best guess at the time knowing full well it would be improved and refined in the future by others.
Did you know there is no such thing as a field or lines of force?. Faraday created the concept of the field to replace action at a distance which was ambiguous as well as lines of force so others could do math and equations and understand the concept better. Thus we can see a translation in time we call science whereby man has created an artificial reality to describe nature not as it exists but as they perceive it to exist. In the same way as Faraday, Einstein created space-time not because it described reality but because it was better conceptually than most other theories at the time. We could ask, Einstein's theories made you think didn't it?, thus he succeeded.
The most common problem relating to this misunderstanding relates to psychology. The majority of people tend to see a condition of something as being something in itself. For example many believe heat is a substance which miraculously flows through materials and space. However it is not something but a condition of something, a "measure" of the motion of the atoms in molecules or EM waves ergo oscillations. So how is it a "measure" of something came to be perceived as something tangible?. The same confusion seems to appear with respect to Faraday's "field" which is also not something in itself but a condition of something already present.
However the truth tends to come to light when we ask someone... "what is a field" and most have no idea. What is this something or term everyone uses so liberally yet have no idea what in fact it is?...
So how is it that so many could use a term so often and yet have literally no idea what in fact it is?. All this terminology, wave after wave of new terms, words, and yet at the end of the day most are no closer to the understanding they seek. It reminds me of a saying... we can talk the talk but it means nothing unless we can walk the walk.
In this respect the facts we know are much stranger than any fiction most can imagine. Every material thing is like a fog of charged particles in oscillation in a sea of waves, energy as motion, energy is motion. Nothing is or ever was tangible, it is an illusion, and if we could change or manipulate the kind of motion taking place on the atomic/particle level then literally anything is possible. What is free energy when literally everything everywhere is energy?.
As Einstein put it... If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
That my friends is pure genius and it was Einstein's observation that the people who use the most complicated terminology and explanations seldom understand what there talking about. If they did they could explain everything in simply in terms even a child could understand and there lies the problem.
Regards
AC
-
I don't quite understand what you are writing to be honest.
I personally am not attached to anything or anyone.
I’m here only because there’s a forum to discuss alternative physics issues. energy and so on.
Are you sure that this is a historical forum dedicated to Russia?
one of rules in physics is :
single observable point of fact, whereas a theory explains an entire group of related phenomena.
- that in philosophy the mother of all sciences includes also phenomena seen from perspective of Russia and Western world.
and phenomena we are talking about is history of science and factors related, just because we have disagreement about eter/eather
rejected model after 1905
https://www.thoughtco.com/idealized-models-an-introduction-2699439#:~:text=In%20physics%2C%20a%20model%20%28or%20idealized%20model%29%20is,a%20simple%20point%20object%20and%20ignore%20the%20fuzziness (https://www.thoughtco.com/idealized-models-an-introduction-2699439#:~:text=In%20physics%2C%20a%20model%20%28or%20idealized%20model%29%20is,a%20simple%20point%20object%20and%20ignore%20the%20fuzziness).
Your last name suggests its Ukrainian origin, but I didn't yet have interaction with any Ukrainian scientist who would in year 2021 vote for widely in Russia manifested Eater/Ether .
I as an American happened to know about that region of Eastern Europe and I even speak Russian better than average Russian from regions.
However I got this skills here in New York employing Russian scientists lazy to learn English.
____________________________________________________
I do thank you for participating in this forum and you are welcome here.
I do appreciate your position in given subject, and I respect your position as this is not Russia here and no banditism of any Eastern origin is affecting you dear Ilya
I'm able to understand your English too , and that skill is uncommon to most of Eastern Europe (of direct/indirect Russian influence.)
_________________________________________________________________
Einstein, first of all, contradicts himself with his thought experiment, where he flies on a frozen ray (wave) of light.
First of all, the contradiction itself arises for the reason that the presence of a ray of light in space is initially considered
in this image based on Maxwell's ideas about Ether, in which there is a medium in a frozen state.
That is, a thought experiment is based on an environment with some properties.
1. you not reading what I wrote.
2. you not answering questions
3. you adding test without links
4. I'm confused as to how to respond to your questions : :
a. if intuitively - than we will have Russian borscht .https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borscht (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borscht)
that is for me no way to be as tasty as Ukrainian.
b. if based on facts , than please give me facts !!!!!!
,( links, quotes, statements and particular lines in question .)
c. if my answer is to be kept in relation to 19 century science format I need quoted and numbered text.
d. if my answer is to be kept in brackets of modern physic of current time than I will just present current position to questioned phenomena.
I understand that you don't want associate yourself with Russia or its history but:
ИЗ РОССИИ УЕХАЛ А РОССИЯ ИЗ ТЕБЯ НЕТ.- набор
СЛОВ КОТОРЫЕ ВЫДАЮТ РУССКИХ ВЕЗДЕ!!!!
I hope you understand me now.
In this part of the world we not only respect you but we also expect you to respect our , rules, and common format of communication:
________________________________________
I'm formulating my answer according to point 4d.
Einstein was born in March 14 of 1879 and at this time Umv, Poynting and Heaviside were in the middle of Ether/Eather controversy.
in 1895 Einstein was only 16 when he started to think about that what we now call
"...a paradox upon which I had already hit at the age of sixteen:
__________________________________________
Einstein's thought experiments took diverse forms.
In his youth, he mentally chased beams of light.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_thought_experiments (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_thought_experiments)
I propose a new way to read it that fits it nicely into the stages of Einstein's discovery of special relativity.
It shows the untenability of an "emission" theory of light, an approach to electrodynamic
theory that Einstein considered seriously and rejected prior to his breakthrough of 1905.
If I pursue a beam of light with the velocity c (velocity of light in a vacuum),
I should observe such a beam of light as an electromagnetic field at rest though spatially oscillating.
There seems to be no such thing, however, neither on the basis of experience nor according to Maxwell's equations.
From the very beginning it appeared to me intuitively clear that, judged from the standpoint of such an observer, everything
would have to happen according to the same laws as for an observer who, relative to the earth, was at rest.
For how should the first observer know or be able to determine, that he is in a state of fast uniform motion?
One sees in this paradox the germ of the special relativity theory is already contained."
(http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/Goodies/Chasing_the_light/Light_animation_2.gif (http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/Goodies/Chasing_the_light/Light_animation_2.gif))
If the young Einstein were to chase after it at c, he would catch up with the wave and be moving with it, like a surfer riding the wave.
He would see a frozen lightwave.
The untenability of that thought led to the downfall of the great achievement of nineteenth century physics,
the ether, which then provided the basis for all electromagnetic theory.
The trouble is that it is quite unclear just how this thought creates difficulties for the ether.
Einstein gave three reasons and each of them could be answered readily by an able ether theorist.
look at picture below:
All you need to do now is to go to the link here:
http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/Goodies/Chasing_the_light/index.html (http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/Goodies/Chasing_the_light/index.html)
Conclusions:
We are all human animals including you Ilya.
We imagine things and not always right ,till we think about it again
and perfect that thought experiment to the point that is now ready to be presented to the world.
But at the end Einstein won big time.
All other thoughts of other big names scientist are not important now as 19 century was the period of confusion and now is not.
Today's science doesn't talk about two magnetic fields where one is rotated and we know that EM wave has electric field component and magnetic field component at 90 degrees.
Source of EM wave is not seen from perspective of philosophical monkey but based on solid and checked science.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation)
Because you didn't provide necessary links , I did cut part of your text as my answer was in format 4d
Wesley
-
Greetings, as regards the force interaction of the Electric Field on the Coulomb torsion balance, it corresponds to the fact that the electric fields in the current day with the physical body are strong. which can be measured, which is what Pendant did.
This is what Milliken did with the Pendant.
The forceful interaction of the forces of gravity and the force of the electric field on a droplet of oil, which was carried out by Milliken and Ioffe, are regarded as forceful.
About the fact that Faraday and Einstein created space and time.
In fact, the idea was eventually expressed by Poincaré, and Lorentz's transformations by Lorentz.
Faraday had nothing to do with relativism. He only documented the experiments carried out. Maxwell made an attempt to write down his vision in mathematical form. Let me remind you that Maxwell was under the yoke of harsh criticism for 25 years, until Heaviside wrote down Maxwell's equations in vector form and understandable for the average person.
All attempts by Lorentz and Einstein consisted in a mathematical approach to define physical phenomena. And the difficulty was. that they had the complexity of the idea that two physical bodies in the same torsional balance of the pendant can have an intermediate medium, which is what the Force is.
But then Lorentz and Einstein were not focused on attention. Einstein caught on to the ideas of Poincaré and Lorentz, and the efforts of scientists of the late 19th and 20th centuries to determine the behavior of light in space relative to the emitter and receiver. which is on Earth. Then various hypotheses were put forward - Ether is completely motionless, carried away partially or completely carried away.
Lorenz and Morley considered their theory. in which the Earth moved relative to the motionless Ether. But here's the problem - if Ether or an intermediate medium is responsible for the force interaction of physical bodies and this force is connected. Like any with the field, then it would be necessary to talk about that. that there is a kind of moving field in space. which interacts with the Earth. But materialists or primates are always thinking. that it is the Earth that is the field. The earth in this case is a consequence. and not the reason for its movement.
It follows its field like a magnet. so the field follows the magnet. but if we have magnetic interactions of magnets. in which there are two physical bodies with mass, and an intermediate medium. which has an equivalent to this mass, but in an intermediate environment. That he began to describe Umov for the first time, putting forward views about the flow of energy and not only.
During the nineteenth century there were several speculative attempts to show that mass and energy were proportional in various ether theories.[45] In 1873 the Russian physicist and mathematician Nikolay Umov pointed out a relation between mass and energy for ether in the form of Е = kmc2, where 0.5 ≤ k ≤ 1.
And yes, the famous formula E = mc ^ 2 does not essentially belong to Einstein, it was also derived by Thomson and Heaviside. K = 1 was determined by Heaviside. that it was pointless to use k. Heaviside corresponded with Lorenz, the latter with Einstein. so that Einstein could not be unaware of these formulas. Everything. what Einstein did was use Poincaré's idea and Lorentz's ideas. But Lorenz, with all due respect at that time, acted mathematical juggling around strange ideas about Ether, which in his hypothesis were not confirmed.
However, here's the question, Umov did not expect to receive finances and grants, which the Western world is so abundant in, Heaviside also did not seek to do this. What's the first. that the second lived a modest life and the requirements of capital, which pays for science, did not interest them. They did that. what they were doing. Einstein clearly understood what he could play on and make money.
But what followed from Umov's logic? It followed from logic that in mechanics mechanical waves propagate at the speed of sound, and between magnets they interact with the speed of light. But it is known for sure that force interaction in statics or magnetism cannot do without matter, which maintains force in the physical world. hence it is necessary to introduce an intermediate environment. which is the movement of matter equivalent to the mass of the physical body with which this environment interacts. When asked how energy flows can be realized in thermodynamics or Electromagnetism, Umov came to the conclusion that this should be an intermediate medium. This idea was picked up by Pointing and independently of Poynting Heaviside.
precisely because of that. then Heaviside worked in telegraphy and considered the conductor as a waveguide, this is what allowed him to just consider the idea of that. that Energy does not move along wires. and in the space around the waveguide.
But if Heaviside lived in times. when superconductors were discovered, he would immediately express his dissatisfaction with Thomson for what he called the luminescence in the tube moving particles of gases and cathodes ... that is. movement of charges in the conductor itself. After all, the Skin effect was first discovered by Heaviside. And from here it would follow that the current moves in space as a flow of energy having a mass. Thu is obvious, and Then many Nobel laureates would have to return the money back from the owner for the mediocre work done. But the question is - the owner himself. who paid for the work paid for what?
But let's get away from politics.
According to information reported at one time by V.N. Chikolev, the experiments on their use, demonstrated by Yablochkov at the Paris Exhibition of 1878, even aroused applause from visitors. The Paris Academy of Sciences was especially interested in Yablochkov's work, which formed a special commission to familiarize with it, which included such celebrities as Saint-Clair-Deville, Edmond Becquerel, Berthelot and others. At the meeting of the Academy, Ing. Deneyruz, speaking of the kaolin lamp, characterized Yablochkov's inventions in this way:
In explanations of the privilege, Yablochkov writes: “In order to obtain useful effects from the current delivered by the source of dynamic electricity, instead of connecting the terminals of the current source together with a continuous circuit, as This is done up to now, causing the dynamic electricity delivered by the electricity source to undergo a double transformation - first into static electricity and then back into dynamic electricity. This is the principle of my system. I carry it out as follows: instead of connecting the terminals of the current source with a continuous circuit, as has been done so far, I connect the conductor coming from one terminal of the electricity source to one of the plates of the capacitor, consisting of one or more Leiden jars of a larger surface or arranged according to the directions below.
The impulse technique immediately assumed that the current does not move in a continuous and integral flow, this energy moves in waves and the higher the frequency, the shallower this flow enters. The nodes and antinodes of the current were already known, which makes the idea of a chain moving in the form of a continuous movement of electrons meaningless. in the War of currents, Tesla just wanted to show something. what is called the current at high frequencies moves across the surface and voltage. which we simply use as a term has a direct relation to the theories of Umov, Poynting Heaviside as to processes remote from the conductor, in which, according to Druda, less and less this energy flow interacts with the crystal lattice of the conductor itself, leading to Joule-Lenz heat losses.
-
For Wisley
Greetings. You have a lot of equipment, I would love to work in the laboratory, with such a variegated set of measuring equipment. Considering that you have a professional video camera and video editing equipment. but as I understand it, you are not involved in professional filming and editing. And many interesting things could be done.
The only thing for which you received criticism, which you considered aggressive, is your politicized videos in which some inventor was killed. In the video itself, this inventor is 20 years old at most, does not live in Russia, he showed a fake and a show, but you dramatized. that he was killed by Putin's henchmen, the FSB-schnicks. But there were no men in black, no KGB or FBI. Why in your country they kill thousands of UFO witnesses and dispensers of free energy, and you are not talking about that? Are you dancing to the tune of the World Government in the person of the Illuminati, or are you in cahoots with the Freemasons who force babies to drink blood, engage in homosexuality and be involved in the orgies of Satan himself?
You have the opportunity to make cool vlogs, and experiment with that set - I suggest you do an interesting job. And if you want to make an art series with cannibals in black suits. then do it creatively.
So write, we will communicate. But not politics with a depressing connotation of mass shootings of seekers of free energy with reference to the locality with the word Russia. I don't like depression. why I'm watching a video with Searl, because this guy talks about positive and inspiring things, and a dying old woman on a modest retirement in the Russian wilderness is a very sad topic for discussion. I'm sure. what if you collect all the dying old women including Africa. it will be possible to make a film for those who want to commit suicide from the injustice of the world. Life goes on and I don't want to think about it. because all I can do is show the world that. what I can.
So write if you want to talk about science and technology in a personal message.
About Lorentz and Einstein. who took the Lorentz transformations.
The question is that the idea of the inconsistency of Morley's thought was, like Lorentz and Einstein, that it was the signal source and the receiver that moved at the same time.
However, Lorentz and not only he grasped the idea that if the ray moves relative to the stationary ether. in which it has not yet been determined - and why it should be motionless, moreover. that Heaviside identified some points associated with the Casimir effect, what is it like space or environment.
The absurdity of posing the question lies in the fact that the beam emitted by the emitter moves with a speed relative to some absolute space. We mentally define this absolute either by the solar coordinate system or other other usual Euclidean geometry. But if we are considering exactly the Euclidean geometry, then mentally determining the absolute point from which we build our representations of the motion of the Earth, then we know exactly what speed the Earth has relative to the Sun. So, according to Ritz's ballistic theory, we should have the formula v + c. The receiver moves with the transmitter. therefore, we must describe the receiver as -v.
The only question is that Dirac did not yet exist, who began to ask questions of signs, but we can just describe -v, because wherever energy with a positive sign is outraged, there is also its negative or opposing Energy, which develops with dualistic Newton's representations of F = -F and not only.
And hence v-v + c = c.
But more on that later.
-
I do not understand the contradiction !
Beside e=hv=hc/λ
we have E = mc2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass%E2%80%93energy_equivalence)
( not E=Mc2 ) because m result from = M1 ( mass M before acceleration) -M2 ( mass "virtual" lost during acceleration)
denomination : Relativistic mass
Clearly we work with positive and negative force or energy arrows,ac-/de-celerating !
"Gedankenexperiment" : physics-experimental Ueberlichtgeschwindigkeit and Effekt
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%25C3%259Cberlichtgeschwindigkeit (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/%25C3%259Cberlichtgeschwindigkeit)
At the University of Cologne (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Universit%C3%A4t_zu_K%C3%B6ln) , which has meanwhile been checked several times by other institutions, it has been proven that the quantum mechanical (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Quantenmechanik)tunneling (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Tunneleffekt) of photons (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Photon) can lead to effects that some researchers interpret as superluminal velocities. However, the interpretations of these observations are currently still controversial.
When measuring quantum mechanically entangled particles, information seems to be transmitted instantaneously between the particles (i.e. without a time difference) (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen effect, or EPR (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Paradoxon) effect for short ). However, it is not possible to use this effect for communication at faster than light speeds.
In September 2011, the OPERA collaboration (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/OPERA_(Experiment)) on Gran Sasso (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Laboratori_Nazionali_del_Gran_Sasso) reported that they had found indications that neutrinos (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Neutrino) had moved faster than light. However, a new measurement by ICARUS (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/ICARUS) has shown agreement with the speed of light, whereby the OPERA result is very likely to be refuted. See Neutrino Velocity Measurements (https://qm3jj6o4dtpgiexhayd7sq5vpq-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Messungen_der_Neutrinogeschwindigkeit) for more details .
-
In fact, Umov wrote this formula, then this coefficient changed and Hevside ude set 1 as the coefficient, which ultimately made it possible to remove this coefficient altogether.
-
Bow ey,an overunity "money generation" system : perpetuum ? 8) ;)
Original theme related : https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/how-to-build-a-usd1000-fusion-reactor-in-your-basement
compared
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/10/nextbigfuture-said-iter-would-cost-45-billion-more-and-doe-agrees.html
partial the investment high difference : energetic output related !
Nice lecture related "fusion"-technology :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=winfield+salisbury&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search
-
It's hard for me to say what you are talking about now. I work in my laboratory for my own money. Everyone is on enthusiasm
-
The GPS sync problem
Ronald Hutch is a renowned specialist in the field of GPS (Global Navigation Systems) and satellite communication systems, the inventor of the "Hutch filter" widely known in electronics and information processing systems, President of ION (Institute of Space Navigation Systems), the organization that hosted the first GPS conference. with about 2,000 members.
GPS presents us with a different problem. It is well known that the GPS satellite system was developed in the USA. The Ministry of Defense ensures the highest accuracy of means of determining both position and time everywhere on the surface of the Earth and its surroundings. But GPS clocks (and even terrestrial clocks) present us with such a problem, which is not very well known, that the solutions to this problem admitted in it are undoubtedly wrong from the point of view of SRT.
The GPS clock shows, as expected, that the moving clock is running slower and that the clock is running slower at a lower gravitational potential.
The GPS clock is adjusted for the expected deceleration before launch into orbit, taking into account that the Earth's gravitational potential at nominal orbit altitude makes it run faster. This faster clock rate is a partial compensation for the effect of the nominal cyclic orbital speed of the satellites.
There are two interesting interactions between the effects of gravitational potential and the effects of speed in clock readings. First, at sea level, all clocks on Earth run at the same speed. This is due to the fact that the rotation of the Earth causes it to swell at the equator, since the gravitational potential is higher there. (A clock at the equator is farther from the center of the Earth.) The effect in clock readings from this large potential at the equator and the effect in clock readings from rotational speed exactly cancel each other out. So the clock at the equator is equal to the clock at the poles.
The second interaction of gravitational potential and speed in clock readings is due to the eccentricity of the GPS orbit. At perigee, the lower gravitational potential causes the GPS clock to run slower than nominal. Also at perigee, the satellites move faster than average and this also makes the GPS clock run slower - with exactly the same amount. So it seems that energy is what makes the clock go at a different pace. The increasing gravitational potential energy makes the clock run faster. The increasing kinetic energy (speed) causes the watch to run slower.
So what's the problem with the watch? The problem manifests itself, contrary to expectations, with clocks on Earth that do not seem to be affected by the sun's gravitational potential. Why is that? For clocks tied to Earth, the problem has been described as a noon-midnight problem. At noon, the clock is closer to the Sun by the diameter of the Earth than the clock at midnight. Thus, the clock is expected to run slower at noon than at midnight due to the solar gravitational potential, but this is not observed.
The first proposed solution to the noon-midnight problem was put forward by Banesh Hoffmann [2] in an article entitled "Midday-midnight redshift." The article states that the potential gravitational effect does not take place, since it is compensated by the relativistic Doppler effect. Thus, the author says that, like a clock at sea level, there is a mutual destruction of velocity and potential effects. In a nutshell, Hoffman states that since the point on Earth closest to the Sun and the point on Earth farthest from the movement around the Sun have different speeds, they will have clock-moving effects that are different from those seen in orbital movement around the Earth.
It is true that the clock that orbits the Sun in a year along the radius of the Earth's midnight must have the same course as the clock that orbits the Sun in a year along the radius of the Earth's midnight, that is, the potential gravitational difference must be compensated for by the speed difference. But Hoffmann's explanation cannot be accepted. This is contrary to the behavior of the GPS watch. The difference in solar gravitational potential for GPS synchronized at a point closest to the Sun and farthest from the Sun (the difference in distance is approximately four times the Earth's diameter) does not seem to have any effect on the GPS clock. Undoubtedly, these points in orbit fly around the Sun at different speeds. The planes of GPS satellite orbits do not rotate in the same way as the earth's orbit around the sun. However, they move around the Sun at the same speed. That the earth's axis of rotation does not change as the earth's orbit around the sun should be sufficient to deny Hoffmann's explanation. Rotation of the noon-midnight point of the Earth does not imply that the Earth's IRS undergoes annual rotation. A different explanation is needed for the missing effect.
An alternative attempt at explanation can be found in the literature. The article by Ashby and Bertotti [3], entitled "Relativistic Effects in Local IRF", requires that the acceleration of gravity produces a fictitious gravitational field that neutralizes the real field. The easiest way to read a version of the same argument is in a comprehensive book on GPS [4].
The problem of Ashby et al. Argumentation in the use of the equivalence principle. Here is a quote from page 686 of the source [4].
The equivalence principle implies that an observer in free fall in the gravitational field of the solar system cannot sense the presence of external gravitational fields. Although there is a gravitational force fieldobserver's instant free-fall position (force per unit mass) in the, this field produces an acceleration fall of the observer. Due to this acceleration, an additional dummy the gravitational field is generated in the observer's CO. Two fields - one real and one induced compensate each other; the total field strength at the observer's position is zero. This implies that the gravitational potential in the area of free fall of the observer cannot have any linear conditions in spatial coordinates. Only quadratic conditions can be maintained - these are tidal conditions. Tidal conditionsassociated with these residual effects - minor-in GPS.
It is the last two sentences of this quote that are the subject of discussion. As Michael Friedman [5] in The Foundations of Space-Time Theory, so Ciufolini and Wheeler [6] in Gravity and Inertia tell us that the principle of equivalence is not strictly observed in the local area, but in an infinitely small area. Let me refer to Friedman, p. 202, in some detail.
The standard formulation of the equivalence principle obscures the critical distinction between first-order and second-order laws, blurring the distinction between "infinitesimal" laws, valid at a single point, and local laws, obeying a neighborhood of a point. They lose the distinction between the structure of the space tangent to Tp and the configuration of the spaces tangent to Tq for q in a neighborhood of p. (This is one placewhere the casual attitude physics in relation to the "infinitely small" leads him to the realproblem!) What is undoubtedly the principle of equivalence says, then what special relativity and general relativity say, meaning the same "infinitesimal" structure, but not the one that is the local structure.
It is clear that in the extended domain (neighborhood), the potential gradient cannot be accurately eliminated by simply using the equivalence principle. On page 14, Suefolini and Wheeler talk about the weak principle of equivalence, "the principle can be reformulated by saying that in every local, non-rotating, freely falling frame of reference, the line accompanying the free fall of the test particle is a straight line." To straighten the lines in the region of this free fall of the test particle, it is required that the frame of reference rotates once in one orbit so that the neighboring point remains adjacent to the test particle and follows it in an equivalent straight path. This rotation is exactly what Hoffman suggests to explain the loss of the clock effect in the first article we referred to above. Thus, Ashby et al. Explain the absence of differential clock effects in GPS satellites from solar gravitational potential as a consequence of the equivalence principle. But they are wrong when they apply a result that is valid only over an infinitesimal area in a large area. So Ashby et al. Failed, like Hoffmann, in providing an explanation for the missing differential effect of solar gravitational potential in clocks near Earth. However, some other explanations are still needed for the missing effect. (See the mathematical appendix associated with the above statements.)
So what is the explanation for the absence of any effects of solar gravitational potential on clocks near Earth? Why don't we find the correct explanation in the literature? The answer to the first of these two questions was not difficult. Similar to the VLBI analysis, the answer can be found by using the solar inertial reference frame to analyze the data. When we do this using the speeds and positions in the solar IFR and the gravitational potentials of both the Earth and the Sun, the solution to the first question will become obvious. In the solar IFR, the solar gravitational potential causes "along the speed" of the clock displacement (relative to the clocks synchronized in the Earth IFR) rotate so that they remain "along the speed", since the velocity vector changes direction due to the solar gravitational force. In other words, the gradient of the gravitational potential (gravitational force) causes the Earth's velocity vector to change direction. The same gradient of the gravitational potential forces the clock near the Earth to work in such a rhythm that the clock changes its course so as to maintain it in the direction "along the speed". This way, a clear absence of the effect in the terrestrial IFR is ensured simply, since they are absorbed as part of the Lorentz transformation from solar IFR to terrestrial IFR. In other words, it is the action of the solar potential that keeps the clock synchronized in the direction-of-speed, so that the speed of light is measured the same as in the Earth's IFR.
The answer to the second question is a little more speculative. If the solar gravitational potential is part of the mechanism that leaves the speed of light apparently isotropic in the terrestrial IFR, the Lorentz transformation can decompose into two components. One part should reflect the position and speed of one inertial reference frame relative to the other, that is, the Selleri transformation [7], and the second part should be the clock rate distribution, which makes the speed of light isotropic in the new inertial reference frame. And this is a mechanism for replacing magic with Lorentz transformations. He implies that Special Theory of Relativity (SRT) should be replaced by the Etheric Theory of Lorentz (ETL). But such a replacement would be a scandal.
-
answer to Ilya
PART#1
The GPS sync problem
One part should reflect the position and speed of one inertial reference frame relative to the other,
that is, the Selleri transformation [7], and the second part should be the clock rate distribution,
which makes the speed of light isotropic in the new inertial reference frame. And this is a mechanism
for replacing magic with Lorentz transformations.
He implies that Special Theory of Relativity (SRT) should be replaced by the Etheric Theory of Lorentz (ETL).
But such a replacement would be a scandal.
Dear Ilya please provide:
1. link to the article.
2. source of the article
3. time of publication
4. author of publication
_________________________________
I will be glad if the article is not of Russian origin but that is not mandatory requirement.
Short comment :
The GPS Clock is a satellite system that provides a very precise timing service.
The system uses atomic clocks to provide everyone on Earth with low-cost access to international atomic time standards.
The GPS system is based on atomic clock technology.
Each GPS satellite has multiple atomic clocks, synchronized to a ground-based master clock.
The GPS clock provides everyone on Earth with access to atomic time standards without needing a local atomic clock.
GPS time transfer accuracy is within 40 nanoseconds of UTC
https://timetoolsltd.com/gps/what-is-the-gps-clock/
(https://timetoolsltd.com/gps/what-is-the-gps-clock/)___________________________________________________
Ronald Hutch , the inventor of the "Hutch filter" President of ION
Such person doesn't exist and never existed:
_______________________________________
There was different person Ron Hatch
-private consultant , one of employees( officers) of Navigation Systems Engineering
he worked for John Deere, utility tractor,lawn and garden equipment
one of these who was send by agriculture equipment company to create
NavCom for plant farming .
At that time there was Selective Availability (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Availability) accuracy on the order of 3 m. In practice, typical accuracy is about 15 m.
There was some controversy about information licking to Russians building Russian Glonass system,
He was never formally accused.
He wrote article: Escape from Einstein
Hatch in 1995 presented data contradicting the special theory of relativity, and promoted a Lorentzian alternative described as an ether gauge theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation)however
Some Lorentz Transformations are formed by doing “many” infinitesimal ones.
These will have the property of being proper and orthochronous .
If QFT is to be consistent with relativity, it should be invariant under proper, orthochronous
Lorentz Transformations.
That means we should be able to replace x with Λx at any time without changing anything.
http://hep.ucsb.edu/people/cag/qft/QFT-2.pdf
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation)SRT is completely erroneous since it is based on the wrong kind of transformations:
they have lost the scale factor characterizing the Doppler effect. First, Lorentz considered
a more general form of transformations (with a scale factor),
but then he, and also Poincare and Einstein equated it 1 without proper grounds.
Their form was artificially narrowed, the formulas became incorrect.
This led to a logical contradiction of the theory, to unsolvable paradoxes.
Accordingly, GRT is also incorrect.
For more details, : brochure "Memoir on the Theory of Relativity and Unified Field Theory
but......( the please read summary below to understand that there is no way to understand it as
support to Ether.)
https://www.physicsoverflow.org/5121/infinitesimal-lorentz-transformation-is-antisymmetric (https://www.physicsoverflow.org/5121/infinitesimal-lorentz-transformation-is-antisymmetric)
_______________________________________________
The "Hatch filter" is mentioned in publication but patent was not found by me .
/article/abs/optimal-hatch-filter
(https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-navigation/article/abs/optimal-hatch-filter-with-an-adaptive-smoothing-window-width/67A4FD971AE92A868C46394ED09EFA3F)Summary:
for summary please look down below at part#2
Wesley
-
answer to Ilya
PART#2
Summary:
Ilya was providing evidence and support to ether/eather theory (dead now)
He was acting as comparator at some points too.
But for comparing something measurable with a reference or standard you need to have standard.
And even if Ilya doesn't like it - that standard is SRT now.
Comparison as a Tool of science:
___________________
Because Eather /Ether was/is widely manifested in Russia
( also by some respected there scientists)-I gave you nonorthodox to Russian reality set of different approaches to SRT
But in my mind banditism in Russia - in any area including science is not kosher so you have no problem guys. :)
Banditism :
-organized crime typically involving the threat or use of violence. in some countries.
Russian RF might be seen by some.... as government structure acting as
the biggest organized mafia in the history of modern world.
Science there is often seen as "just a tool" used and abused, raped and deformed based on actual
need of individual rulers benefiting from corrupted reality.
e.g Russian history as science of facts is the best example of such deformation.
_______________________________________________________________
comparison- is the one of fundamental tools of science
but exactly today the new law in Russia is being formulated
stating that some form of comparison are punished by law.
and today is a day when starting from 1945 many countries of Eastern Europe were enslaved by Soviet terror till the collapse of soviet Union in 1990
PhD Stephen Hicks wrote book called :
‘Soviets were worse than Nazis’
https://www.stephenhicks.org/ (https://www.stephenhicks.org/)
- the response by Russian government is not to explain and provide evidence but to ban, any examining of scientifically valid historical truth.
Russian propaganda says: https://www.rt.com/russia/504768-putin-ban-compare-ussr-nazi/ (https://www.rt.com/russia/504768-putin-ban-compare-ussr-nazi/)
The same is with Ether/eather..
I provided both
(the for and the against postulates ) for Eather that is dead now ,
That doesn't mean that I want to reincarnate Eather
Everything around you that is based on SRT. is perfectly well working and is providing evidence
of its accuracy .
With due respect to Ilya no longer willing to be identified as Russian.
when we talking about - comparison in science, we also talk about similarity -as tool of science
For me Ilya uses tools similar to Russian propaganda.
example:
Ilya didn't provide identity of Ron Hatch but he used his postulates.
Ilya didn't provide any links to any material quoted or posted by him.
Dear Ilya almost everything I write to you is supported by links- this is how science talks in civilized western world
But the most important in science is its response to the postulates.
So Ilya can't give us not even one example of supporting evaluation of
Ron Hatch revelation about eter/eather. - I assume :)
legal note: opinion expressed i entirely my own according to constitution of USA
Wesley
-
By the way Ilya .
I'm impressed with the beauty of the house I assumed is yours and excellent picture you posted.
Is it that cold there now in May?
Thank you Dear Ilya, and I would love to see more of it.
Wesley
-
..
-
Greetings Wesley.
You ask me to give a link.
Lots of stuff. which has to be translated from PDF format and manually, so I personally lose touch with the basic material that I have.
I try not to alter the material itself in any way. therefore errors. which may be here - the result of machine translation in Google.
Regarding the fact that we are arguing about the term Ether, I am only trying to make it clear that the term Ether impresses me more, because it is associated with something filled. A physical vacuum or emptiness is associated with something empty, although in fact, as shown by the worldview, this is not so. Which makes me personally consider these processes as processes in Ether.
You have a lot of equipment and an excellent system for video editing. now we have excellent sunny, albeit cool weather, which is good news.
Why am I trying to piece together evidence of the failure of relativism? There is only one reason - it is too primitive and consists in studying natural phenomena with mathematical abstraction.
The experiments that we conducted and in which, in my opinion. I can consider the experiments successful, just say that the environment itself. in which that is. what is the equivalent of power has to do with this fabric of the universe. it is difficult for me to find these epithets yet.
But the question is how it stands. that we have two kinds of interaction. namely:
Interaction of physical bodies
Interaction in the environment. in which this interaction is transferred from the potential form of energy. into kinetic form (magnetic field) and back to potential form.
From here we can say that the process itself was initiated by the physical body. as a result of which, for 1 Joule of this initiation, we could get 1 joule of work and 1 Joule in the form of a capacitor charge + Heat
For this, we use LTSpice as a process simulation.
For. to show that 2 J per 1 J was obtained, we would need to make a more accurate setting. in which we would need a high-temperature superconductor and a company in Moscow provided us with 9 meters. But there would be a lot of difficulty with the acquisition of Dewar vessels (storage of liquid nitrogen) would be difficult. Therefore, for the time being, we decided to leave these experiments.
In fact, since 2018, we have been working in order to work out the concept and physical foundations. on which our concept would have to be implemented in real devices. the main task is to create an electric motor with greater efficiency.
However, a strange question would arise - what is efficiency and what are we talking about.
we wanted to say that the experiment could be on a more perfect setup. which would allow Joel to observe the energy output more. than the standard installation. This did not quite lead him to the correct conclusion.
we did experiments. to understand the most correct conclusion to what is the impedance at the physical level and by what method the energy can be destroyed, as it happens in modern installations.
Since the search for funding involves the creation of a prototype, we decided to put superconductors aside for the time being. So now with an engineer. which appeared in my team, we plan to do an experiment in order to get closer to the electric motor itself and at the same time check the concept finally and start prototyping the device in the future. which could be demonstrated to a potential investor.
Probably move away from the superconductor and try with it. in order to show the excess of the outgoing energy in its pure form, it was necessary for that very reason. that the physics of processes is not of interest to a potential investor. He can only be interested in a working prototype. This is our focus now.
and how I speak. I have to deal with the physics itself. with which we are dealing. Because it is very difficult to explain to a representative of academic science about that. what is energy and why we have more of it in our installation.
The question with here is that initially, the usual idea of charge, energy and other physical phenomena has not been rewritten for more than 200 years, although today we are debating about Ether or Physical Vacuum with its virtual particles and Dirac holes.
Work. which I am currently running is the team's enthusiasm and funds. Therefore, not everything I can do quickly and efficiently. But to put an end to the erroneousness of Einstein's ideas, I'm just trying to translate the scan from the 1991 article.
-
ИЗ РОССИИ УЕХАЛ А РОССИЯ ИЗ ТЕБЯ НЕТ.
А может быть наоборот, из России пока не уехал,но России в тебе никогда и не было ? :D
Hmm ... I just thought about it. Heaviside. Heavy-Side. or Heaven-side.
Can this surname be translated as heavy or a man of heaven?
Greetings. You have a lot of equipment, I would love to work in the laboratory, with such a variegated set of measuring equipment.
So, well, of course ... And you have tried to make a perpetual motion machine with a bunch of old rubbish ? Like me. ;) This will be aerobatics ... 8)
there would be a lot of difficulty with the acquisition of Dewar vessels (storage of liquid nitrogen) would be difficult.
I poured and stored liquid nitrogen in a regular food thermos.
-
А может быть наоборот, из России пока не уехал,но России в тебе никогда и не было ? :D
Beautiful words.
Today for Russia is the day of celebration of victory where millions of Russians lost their life in fight with Germany.
Is is the day of victory but also the day reflecting Russian dedication heroism and suffering during WW2.
Russian nation should be not blamed for all of the crimes against humanity committed by Soviet Government since 1917 till 1991 and for RF Russia
since 1991 till today .
Ribentroph Molotov Pact started that tragedy not only for Rest of the World but for all of the Russians there.
They were the victims too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#:~:text=The%20Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop%20Pact%20was%20a%20non-aggression%20pact%20between,those%20two%20powers%20to%20partition%20Poland%20between%20them (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#:~:text=The%20Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop%20Pact%20was%20a%20non-aggression%20pact%20between,those%20two%20powers%20to%20partition%20Poland%20between%20them).
Soviets murdered a lot of population in Finland, Latvia, Lithuania Estonia, and from September 17 1939 in Poland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland)
______________________________
They than made joined parade in Brest hugging, kissing and drinking with Hitler soldiers and celebrating victory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:German%E2%80%93Soviet_military_parade_in_Brest-Litovsk#:~:text=Did%20you%20know...%20that%20a%20joint%20Nazi-Soviet%20military,the%20entry%20may%20be%20seen%20at%20Wikipedia%3ARecent%20additions%2F2009%2FSeptember (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:German%E2%80%93Soviet_military_parade_in_Brest-Litovsk#:~:text=Did%20you%20know...%20that%20a%20joint%20Nazi-Soviet%20military,the%20entry%20may%20be%20seen%20at%20Wikipedia%3ARecent%20additions%2F2009%2FSeptember).
So soviets were the aggressors thanks to whom all of that started too.
Our American soldiers lost their life because of them too.
!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IFmBQS8FDc
!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!
________________________________
I do express my great respect to these millions of Russians
who lost their life not knowing that their fight will lead
to 45 years of soviet terror and occupation of
-East Germany,
-Poland
-Czechia
-Slovakia,
-Hungary,
-Romania,
-Bulgaria,
-Ukraine,
-Lithuania,
-Latvia,
-Estonia,
and still ongoing Russian occupation of:
-Osettia,
-Crimea,
- Donetsk Lugansk .
-Kuril Islands,
-Pridniestrovie,
-Generalna Gubernia - Prusy Wshodnie,
-I do support Belarusian nation trying to break free from Russian domination
and their fight to join free European Nations.
I wish Russian nation all the best.
legal note: opinion expressed i entirely my own according to constitution of USA
Wesley
-
А может быть наоборот, из России пока не уехал,но России в тебе никогда и не было ? :D
Hmm ... I just thought about it. Heaviside. Heavy-Side. or Heaven-side.
Can this surname be translated as heavy or a man of heaven?
So, well, of course ... And you have tried to make a perpetual motion machine with a bunch of old rubbish ? Like me. ;) This will be aerobatics ... 8)
I poured and stored liquid nitrogen in a regular food thermos.
Hello, proof of concept is exactly at the level called kotch and threads. Now we are preparing an experiment on a classic copper conductor. The idea to use a thermos - yes, there was such an idea. But I think that if this experiment is carried out, it can be done using an ordinary thermos.
-
England made an aggressive expansion around the world until the 20th century, and at the same time I do not understand to speak at this forum. why should we talk about world wars? I'm an offer. focus on the topic related to the topic that the author asked.
-
из России пока не уехал,но России в тебе никогда и не было ?
_____________________________________________________________
Сегодня для России день празднования победы, когда миллионы россиян погибли в боях с Германией.
Это день победы, но также и день, отражающий самоотверженный героизм и страдания русских
во время Второй мировой войны.
Не следует винить российский народ во всех преступлениях против
человечности, совершенных Советским правительством с 1917 по 1991 год
и Российской Федерацией с 1991 года по сегодняшний день.
__________________________________
Пакт Рибентрофа Молотова положил начало этой трагедии не только для остального мира,
но и для всех россиян.
Они тоже были жертвами.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_
Pact#:~:text=The%20Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop%20Pact%20was%20a%20non-aggression%20pact%20between,those%20two%20powers%20to%20partition%20Poland%20between%20them (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#:~:text=The%20Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop%20Pact%20was%20a%20non-aggression%20pact%20between,those%20two%20powers%20to%20partition%20Poland%20between%20them).
Советы убили много населения в Финляндии, Латвии, Литве, Эстонии и с 17 сентября 1939 года в Польше.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre)
Затем они присоединились к параду в Бресте, обнимаясь, целовались и пили с гитлеровскими солдатами и праздновали победу.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:German%E2%80%93Soviet_military_parade_in_Brest-Litovsk#:~:text=Did%20you%20know...%20that%20a%20joint%20Nazi-Soviet%20military,the%20entry%20may%20be%20seen%20at%20Wikipedia%3ARecent%20additions%2F2009%2FSeptember (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:German%E2%80%93Soviet_military_parade_in_Brest-Litovsk#:~:text=Did%20you%20know...%20that%20a%20joint%20Nazi-Soviet%20military,the%20entry%20may%20be%20seen%20at%20Wikipedia%3ARecent%20additions%2F2009%2FSeptember).
Так что Советы были агрессорами, благодаря которым и началось все это. Из-за них погибли и наши американские солдаты.!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IFmBQS8FDc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IFmBQS8FDc)
!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!
!!!!!
Я выражаю огромное уважение этим миллионам россиян, которые потеряли свою жизнь, не зная,
что их борьба приведет к 45 годам советского террора и оккупации
стран
-Восточная Германия,
-Польша
-Чехия
-Словакия,
-Венгрия,
-Румыния,
-Болгария,
-Украина,
-Литва,
-Латвия,
-Эстония,
и все еще продолжается оккупация Россией:
-Осетии,
-Крыма,
-Донецка,
-Луганска.
-Курильские острова,
-Приднестровье,
-Генеральная губерния - Прусы Всходные,
-Я поддерживаю белорусский народ, пытающийся вырваться из-под российского господства,
и их борьбу за присоединение к свободным европейским странам.
Я желаю русскому народу всего наилучшего.
юридическая записка: мнение выражено - полностью мое собственное, в соответствии с конституцией США
Wesley
-
Dear Wisley, unfortunately I cannot be distracted by politics, because I am personally busy with my own business and this business can somehow change something for the better, conversations about politics - I see no point, it is pointless. So I'd rather spend my time translating interesting articles on the theory of relativity.
more precisely, about its insolvency. but given. that these articles are scanned. which is impossible to just upload a translator to google. I have to do it all manually.
-
I do appreciate your work.
Difference of opinions is always rewarding to both of us.
I was stimulated to refresh my knowledge about Ether/eather and got back to Einstein: special relativity and general relativity.
I do thank you for that.
My post from today was not political but praising heroism of these who were pushed to fight for delusional values
of these who benefited by having power to enslave them and their children more.
Human life is the best we can have and thanks to that you are able to communicate.
I'm for everyone trying to understand science and phenomena around us.
Thank you for the pictures. I see that you are very young man with potential.
In the past there was Russian whom I helped to escape from Russian reality.
His words:
Yes- from perspective of Russia, it was like impossible to be done as
I had only 47 dollars and 37 cents in my pocket than.
But it was more than easy from perspective of USA.
Now just few years later my gross is 3.7 million dollars.
Yes I have mortgage, loans, school credit to pay but Wesley
-teacher in Russia earns 170 dollars per month and in here $78 000 per year.
All I was in need to is just to get out from Russia.
Just get out..
Just physically move from point A to point B..
any job gives 30-50 dollars per hour.
I'm visiting Russia and I'm in shock how fast they got old in that climate.
He had a chance to return to Russia after 3 years and don't work there any longer for the rest of his life .
He decided not to..
His money send to relatives in Russia is plenty more for very comfortable life there.
_________________________________________________
In physics it is clasical example of the two points of observation and phenomena in question.
You mentioned about plenty of equipment I have and few very professional cameras
For us it is normal. This is the life of Western World middle class and lower than middle class population.
Some of us buy a yacht, some others, another house in Pennsylvania, or have few more cars.
I do wish you have such chance dear Ilya.
Wesley
-
Observations of O. Römer
In 1676 at the Paris Observatory the Danish astronomer O. Römer, observing the planet Jupiter and its satellite, noticed that during its full revolution of the satellite around Jupiter. determined by the moment of exit (or entry) of the satellite from the shadow of Jupiter, changes periodically. The periodicity turned out to be associated with the movement of the Earth in its orbit around the Sun.
During the closest approach of the Earth to Jupiter in position 1, period II-T2 = 1.77 days = 1.5 * 10 ^ 5 seconds.
When the Earth moves to position II, the period begins to increase and reaches its maximum T2 in position ii, after which it decreases and becomes again equal to T1 in position III, T1 = T3. But the situation does not end here, but continues until position IV, where the period acquires its maximum value. then it increases to the initial position in position I. The maximum rotation of the period Io dT2 is 15 seconds, approximately the same and the decrease in dT4 is 15 seconds. In all other intermediate positions of the Earth in orbit, the changes in
Io's passage are proportional to the component of the Earth's velocity relative to Jupiter along the Earth-Jupiter straight line. the period increases if the Earth moves away from Jupiter, and decreases if it approaches him. since the angular velocity of Jupiter's revolution around the Sun is much less than the angular velocity of the Earth (the year of Jupiter is almost 12 Earth years), then during the year the relative position of the Earth and Jupiter changes insignificantly and does not have a noticeable effect on the described effect.
Comparing two observations of Io's periods at points 1 and III, O. Roehmer saw that their periods are equal, but the beginning of the period at position III is described by his measurements by 22 in comparison with if the duration of the periods did not change during the time between observations. The astronomer determined that the delay in the beginning of the period of Io in speech III is caused by the fact that the light from the satellite to the observer must travel to the observer an additional distance equal to the diameter of the Earth's orbit. dividing this distance by the time of delay, Roemer calculated the speed of light for the first time in the world.
Consider now the periods in position II and IV. the first of them is 15 seconds longer than the initial one, the second is by the same amount less. the change in the duration of the periods shows. that light has different values of its speed relative to the observer, depending on the conditions of registration.
Substituting in the last formula the numerical values of the observed periods, the speed of the Earth's orbital motion. again we calculate the speed of light relative to the source.
The latter method of calculating the speed of light is possible only because the phenomenon discovered by Römer and the results of its measurements exactly correspond to the results of our supposed experiment with a moving platform, which confirm the classical law of addition of velocities for light.
-
Did someone made OU device?
Sure, and it would be beyond stupidity if that person admit it in public.
In a world where oil is making trillions of dolars per day,
to come out with something which will supress oil is
equal to hell itself.
That person must be brain damaged to do such a thing.
On a Youtube there are plenty of videos from people who made it,
you dont have to ask here,
and if you do, you are probably seeking for new candidates,
which brings us to question who are you?
-
@AreYouSure?
It's a shame that greedy people built our world economy based on the sale of energy, a basic need. But greed ruling this world is just the cold hard TRUTH!👍
-
Greetings.
I have been talking with Wisley here for a very long time on a topic related to Einstein's system error, due to which people are trying to view the environment as emptiness.
However, your conversations lead to the fact that you have probably lost a certain logical line here, in which I tried to say that. that I just proved with the team. that since the time of Joule and Faraday there has been some systemic error in which, initially, any installation operating on the basis of electromagnetism is just an overunity device.
To put it very roughly, we just got it, about the stage of proving the efficiency of the concept or physics of the process.
But the question is. you ask how fucking a person I am. I think that to the fullest, on all three planes, including time)
The fact is that the topic related to oil just speaks about that. that it will end. you don't even need to ask the child. who will say. that we cannot burn oil itself forever.
But it's a matter of controlling people. to make people buy energy and sell everything, we already have digital technologies. The only question is the business model.
-
@Ilya
The comments were not to you. They were to the OP who started this thread. Please excuse the disruption of your conversation with Wesley.
-
The question of the business model is already a question. which concerns building a startup)
But I would like to dwell on those issues first. which we began to consider with Wisley. The bottom line is. that I had to poke around in the literature for a very long time. which is very much, which is ignored today, but which is literature today. which says that. that the theory of relativity itself is still a crude concept. I can not tell. that it does not give me pleasure to bring up this literature. I am from the point of view that it is still Wednesday. through which physical bodies interact precisely is Ether. Because it more accurately in our mind conveys its essence as something that is not empty.
My point of view is. that the planet Earth is moving for the reason that there is something in this environment. which, on the one hand, can be called like a kind of curvature of space and time, but then you need to clearly explain. what kind of matter is it. After all, meo a is the cause of the movement of the planet Earth. And I would like to remind you. that Einstein himself in recent years was inclined to believe that the idea of Ether still exists, but it was already too late to revise this concept.
Wisley also directs its focus on politics and material wealth of the inhabitants of certain countries. It certainly makes you focus on that topic. which I would like to propose for discussion. oh I still put my coin here.
It is a fact. that today the United States is the dominant country. which was able to impose the dollar on the whole world and be the financial focus of the world. If I should have been grateful to Putin for that. that the local oligarchy is focused on selling resources and at the same time is destroying Russia. which makes capital flow away from Russia to the United States. and also contributes to the brain drain from Russia to the United States.
It is a fact. that the United States is a land of opportunity. Moreover. that the United States is pursuing an aggressive policy in the world. in order to dominate financially and politically, nevertheless, large or venture capital enables young talents to become successful people and the same Elon Musk, Steve Jobs is evidence of this. And of course, this is also connected with the desire of big capital to dominate the field of new technologies.
That is why Silicon Valley is so famous.
And I personally will not hide it. that it is in the USA that I plan to present my technologies with a successful combination of circumstances ..
But I speak carefully, because I always speak about a successful combination of circumstances. This is due to the fact. that if we look at NASA's LEAN system, then we have now confirmed only the TRL-4 level by proving. that we have confirmed the possibility at the level of concept or physics of processes. TRL-5 is the engineering level. which we go through. This is the level where we have to connect the engineering thought with the resulting effect. TRL-6 is field testing and only TRL-9 is coming to the product or mass production level.
Each stage requires its own funding.
Now we are doing everything on the enthusiasm of our team.
But it became interesting for me to attach some photos. in which in 2018 we showed. that contrary to strange statements, mechanical work in an electric motor and energy. which moves according to Umov-pointing-Heaviside around the wires are completely different types of energy. which are interconnected indirectly and the agent. who can connect them together is not. we sent the data to one of the well-known electronics engineers in Ukraine. to confirm that our waveforms are correct.
further in 2019 and 2020, our task was to deal with the physics of processes, since we began to resist some foundations in electrical engineering and thermodynamics.
-
Greetings.
I have been talking with Wisley here for a very long time on a topic related to Einstein's system error, due to which people are trying to view the environment as emptiness.
However, your conversations lead to the fact that you have probably lost a certain logical line here, in which I tried to say that. that I just proved with the team. that since the time of Joule and Faraday there has been some systemic error in which, initially, any installation operating on the basis of electromagnetism is just an overunity device.
To put it very roughly, we just got it, about the stage of proving the efficiency of the concept or physics of the process.
But the question is. you ask how fucking a person I am. I think that to the fullest, on all three planes, including time)
The fact is that the topic related to oil just speaks about that. that it will end. you don't even need to ask the child. who will say. that we cannot burn oil itself forever.
But it's a matter of controlling people. to make people buy energy and sell everything, we already have digital technologies. The only question is the business model.
Environment is not empty.
Waves can not propagate through empty.
There is a simple experiment which shows what gravity is,
and around that experiment was built a project.
A metalic bowl filled with water,
2 plastic object (sphere) which can float were placed on the water surface,
in proximity to each other.
take the metal wrench or similar and rhythmically punch the metal bowl,
a waves will appear on the surface of water and 2 plastic sphere will rush each towards other,
until they touch.
Adding the waves will create gravity.
Repeat the experiment the 1000 times with different floating objects,
and every time when you create waves [frequency] 2 objects will start to attract each other.
Plastic spheres are particles, water is medium, and when waves are present,
attraction force, gravity, emerge.
Is the gravity complicated,
No!
Human animals made it complicated, monkeys.
Try the simple experiment, see the simple truth for yourself.
-
Even the Tesla said,
everything is based on waves and frequency.
-
In another words,
Take the metal sphere, ship,
emit lots of waves inside the ship,
The waves will reflect inside sphere and create standing wave point inside the sphere.
That standing point is gravity source and whole sphere, ship, will try to fall to that point,
making the ship following the gravity point.
In order to move gravity point, and ship, you need 3 emitters, [3d space]
and adding different emitting power to each emitter,
you will move gravity point, standing point, [it is 3d space - point] inside the ship and ship, metal sphere will follow gravity point.
The crew must be in upper section so gravity point is always below them,
and they will always experience gravity under their feat.
Changing the position of gravity point with the 3 emitters, for even little and with that magnitude,
will affect crew and they will be disorientated, bot not physically harmed.
If the ship is sphere like, it will start to spin around,
so it is better to make it saucer like, so it can dissipate the waves in one axis of plane,
and prevent spinning.
The spinning will remain but not that much with saucer shape ship.
More and more people are starting to think and see those simple facts, ignored before.
Gravity is consequence of waves and frequency and is not fundamental force.
-
There is no antigravity,
gravity is consequence of waves and frequency and
has no opposite force.
Every gravity ship is creating its own gravity pool,
and because gravity pool is local and small in diameter,
it affect only ship and small area around ship which we see as glow around gravity ships.
Every gravity ship dissipate waves, under high density,
creating the light waves which we see as glow around,
in space and in atmosphere, the same glow effect.
The ship is emitting huge amount of waves inside the ship,
and some of the waves escape, emitting through the metal hull,
outside.
The gravity drive is depending on the reflection of waves inside the ship,
in order to create standing wave point inside the center of the ship.
Manipulating the center of standing wave point inside ship,
ship can be propelled towards the standing point, gravity point.
-
The waves itself are small and affects particles,
so the human body does not feel anything.
Particles does.
Smaller the waves, greater the power must be to produce effect.
If the waves are bigger it will tear apart any matter inside, including the crew.
And the project based on the simple bowl experiment was success.
It works just like that.
-
The only problem needed to be solved is to create oscillator, transistor,
of huge power which can oscillate, emit, on electron frequency or
at least close to it!
So there are little or none of those who can produce it tomorrow.
Experiments can be done and effect will emerge, as it was done,
but not even close to commercial transport which can transport living beings.
Except maybe military or other institutions with unlimited resources.
The military probably already solved this obstacle and travel around solar system as we speak.
So knowing the principle does not help to produce commercial vehicle, today!
-
@ Are You Sure ?
Nice !
-
I presume all of you will try the metal bowl experiment and
scratch the head like monkeys thinking
how 2 plastic spheres always attract each other under the influence of waves.
Remember, it cant be possible without particle accelerators?
No way!
Nature can not be that simple and is needed much more complicated equipment
and hundred of years of research to figure out true nature of gravity.
Simple it must be, there is no other way.
And power source must be even more complicated!
Power source must involve eons to figure out,
Kapanadze is simple not true. It can not be. It is lye!
It can not exist!
Well, if you figure propulsion, must figure drive to propels it!
Even more simpler.
-
Greetings.
I have been talking with Wisley here for a very long time on a topic related to Einstein's system error, due to which people are trying to view the environment as emptiness.
However, your conversations lead to the fact that you have probably lost a certain logical line here, in which I tried to say that. that I just proved with the team. that since the time of Joule and Faraday there has been some systemic error in which, initially, any installation operating on the basis of electromagnetism is just an overunity device.
To put it very roughly, we just got it, about the stage of proving the efficiency of the concept or physics of the process.
But the question is. you ask how fucking a person I am. I think that to the fullest, on all three planes, including time)
The fact is that the topic related to oil just speaks about that. that it will end. you don't even need to ask the child. who will say. that we cannot burn oil itself forever.
But it's a matter of controlling people. to make people buy energy and sell everything, we already have digital technologies. The only question is the business model.
Ilya
I meant to say please excuse MY disruption of your conversation with Wesley.
Regards
-
Having an overunity device means commercial (independent no/high profit project),at first, NOTHING !
Developping by the same time the right "mass production process" ! And the right material delivery source !
And be attented that our worldwide market is under syndicate/cartel condition working ! Beside "London/Paris Clube " pricing trade !
https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5188/sir2012-5188.pdf (https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5188/sir2012-5188.pdf)
Aluminium (per pound)1927 price / 2010 price 4 times more expensive
compared
hot rolled steel bar (per 100 pounds) 1927 price / 2010 price 23 times more
expensive
-
Greetings.
I have been talking with Wesley here for a very long time on a topic related to Einstein's system error,
I'm sorry I'm not in my office now I'm often on the road and I'll be there for some time.
Linking to my office computer is not so comfortable, and direct response is giving to many information about my location .
It is especially important when I'm visiting test site or people involved in project.
So I don't have so much of a comfort to respond.
But I try to read your posts in my free time.
Wesley
-
//You ask me to give a link.//
Да, просто дайте ссылку, мне не нужен PDF или перевод, я говорю на вашем языке.
Yes, just give me a link , I don't need PDF or translation I speak your language.
Ether impresses me more, because it is associated with something filled.
I trying to piece together evidence of the failure of relativism// as// is too primitive and //is// studying natural phenomena with mathematical abstraction.
Я вас понимаю. Но для мира эфир не менее мертв, чем это тело Ленина на Красной площади, на вершине мертвого коммунизма,
которому помогает умирающая конституция, изнасилованная ОМОНом.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7jlDHlIKM0
Даже если вы скажете, что это наоборот, никто вам не поверит.
Ваше время потрачено зря, вы не можете на нем заработать
Тот, кто назначает деньги Старухину, получает часть « денег»,
а вы просто аттракцион, просто инструмент, позволяющий ему попросить еще Баблa
I understand you But for the world ether/ether is not less dead than that dead body of Lenin in Red Square,
on the top of dead communism assisted by dying constitution raped by OMON.
Even if you say that it is opposite, nobody would believe you. Nobody is interested.
Your time is wasted, you can't make money on it.
You are just an attraction, just the tool, for Staruhin to ask for more.
You have a lot of equipment and an excellent system for video editing.
Программа редактирования Davinci Resolve 17 бесплатна. Это стоило НОЛЬ !!!!. качай его, он делает в точности все, что моя студийная версия.
Но нужно спросить у Старухина компьютер получше, так как он требует много вычислительной мощности.
Davinci Resolve 17 editing program is for free. It cost ZERO!!!!. download it , it does exactly everything what my studio version.
But you need to ask Staruhin for better computer as it is power hungry.
2 J per 1 J was obtained, we would need to make a more accurate setting. in which we would need a high-temperature superconductor and a company in Moscow
2 J за каждый 1 J можно получить только путем преобразования энергии или подключения к источнику энергии,
за который вам не нужно платить. например, солнечная и ветровая.
У меня дома и в двух лабораториях есть установка по производству жидкого азота.
2 Joule per every 1 Joule can be done only by process of energy conversion or coupling to the source of energy you don't need to pay for.
e.g- solar and wind. I have Liquid Nitrogen plant in my house and in my two labs.
what is the impedance at the physical level and by what method the energy can be destroyed,
I think nothing about impedance can be found more and energy can't be created nor destroyed.
The first law of thermodynamics, https://courses
(https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-chemistry/chapter/the-laws-of-thermodynamics/#:~:text=The%20first%20law%20of%20thermodynamics%2C%20also%20known%20as,however%2C%20it%20is%20electrical%20energy%20that%20is%20converted.)we decided to put superconductors aside for the time being. So now with an engineer. which appeared in my team, we plan to
do an experiment in order to get closer to the electric motor itself and at the same time check the concept finally and start prototyping
the device in the future. which could be demonstrated to a potential investor.
You know reality around you :
- что-то всегда выходит сухим из воды - но не вы
Если дела пойдут “не так”, заберут имущество, “отожмут”компанию, да и вообще, как будешь отвечать перед инвесторами...
-если кто-то, включая вас, живет в любой стране бандитов...«Твой бизнес либо отожмут, либо развалят»
I have to deal with the physics itself. // it is very difficult to explain to // academic science // why we have more //energy .. in our installation.
Мне здесь очень легко.
Инвестор должен платить деньги. Его интересует не наука, а денежная выгода.
Он, скорее всего, не поймет и не хочет . Нам не нужно ничего объяснять, пока его команда не попросит..
Неважно, что мы говорим
- если идея "обещает" он платит за это.
I is very easy here:
Investor is to pay money He is not interested in science but in monetary gain..
He will likely not understand it nor he wants too.
We don't need to explain anything until his team ask for it.
It doesn't matter what we say - if Idea is promising he pays for it.
we are debating about ~Ether~ or Physical Vacuum with its virtual particles and Dirac holes.
Dirac hole theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_hole_theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_hole_theory)
Dirac sea: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_sea)
is fascinating subject but today I don't have time to talk about it more.
Legal note : opinion expressed is my entirely own according to American constitution
Wesley
-
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/dlattach/attach/181532/
Valvol. :) Yes confirm. the very educated person.
See what he came up with in the attachment. I've tried to bring this up here before.
But I was ignored. This, of course, is not a perpetual motion machine, but still interesting.
Do you think it could be a startup in the USA?
-
У меня дома и в двух лабораториях есть установка по производству жидкого азота.
I will publish more in my part of forum
Wesley
-
This is connection between N2 gaseous nitrogen generator and
Liquid nitrogen generator LN2
__________________________
N2 gas is delivered to the Cold head.
Cold head is cooled by Helium Compressor at the bottom.
Helium compressor is cooled by refrigerated water cooler .
N2 when touching cold finger of Cold head that is inside of the Dewar changes to droplets that drops down
into the bottom of the Dewar( the big 36L bottle)
Это соединение между генератором газообразного азота N2 и генератором жидкого азота LN2
__________________________
Газ N2 подается в холодную головку.
Холодная головка охлаждается гелиевым компрессором внизу.
Гелиевый компрессор охлаждается охладителем охлаждающей воды.
N2 при прикосновении к холодному пальцу Холодной головы, находящемуся внутри сосуда Дьюара,
превращается в капли, которые падают на дно сосуда Дьюара (большая бутылка объемом 36 л).
Wesley
-
Greetings dear Wesley.
Are you sure you are writing to me?
To the person. who lives in Belarus near Minsk. Minsk and Moscow are absolutely two different cities, different countries.
So I get the impression. that you are drawing some of your own pictures in your head, and I cannot understand in any way why you are doing this so diligently.
I have not communicated with Starukhin for 6-7 years (approximately). Yes. we contacted on purely technical topics. I have many acquaintances. who communicates with Starukhin, but my acquaintances 6-7 years ago suggested the idea of creating an open laboratory. to experiment openly. In those days, video blogging or working on the stream was a novelty for me. we were able to collect some equipment. to work on some ideas.
Political sympathies did not interest me.
Since you once started showing videos. in which you began to talk about. some inventors were killed by the FSB - I trolled you so that you would try a little to look at yourself from the outside.
I'm more than sure. that all the videos that you show. in which there is supposedly free energy - it is there and that these people were killed by the FSB and so on.
And this was due to propaganda.
I don't like propagandists.
With regard to propaganda and Lenin.
You often talk about ether and again go to corpses and so on.
I forced the USSR in school and I remember. that in literature lessons we were so fed up with propaganda about Lenin. that I wrote my poem about Lenin. My classmate passed this trick to the teacher. who sat with me at the same desk.
As a result, my parents were called to school. Conducted explanatory conversations.
Now I hear again propaganda about Lenin, and to be honest, I do not like ANY propaganda at all. It doesn't inspire me.
I am human. which works in incredibly difficult conditions than you can imagine and at the same time translate your focus into some strange propaganda theme.
The idea of fighting against something is flawed in itself. I prefer to work for something. in this case for some interesting purpose.
I don't like to complain about life.
To get me what I want. I had a very difficult time. not easy at all). Considering. that a global pandemic, while I am in Minsk, European sanctions and so on do not make life easy.
I don't get a job for one reason. that then I will not be able to do my own development and research. including translating literature, because at least it's interesting. on the other hand, I don't want to devote my life to that. what I do not like. But you have to pay for it. for this you have to interrupt with hard work, since the business is stagnant.
But I am not standing still in spite of VERY difficult conditions. Things inspire me. which can bring something useful and interesting.
Conversations about Ether, about which I am going, are of a specific nature. As I explained, at the moment I prefer to use the terminology associated with Ether, because the word Vacuum or Physical Vacuum has a certain coloration and I do not really like it.
About Kapanadze. For all Wesley's promises to give out the secret to the public from Kapanadze, we most likely will not get it if we have it. It's hard for me to discuss that. which I have not personally seen.
When we talk about the force interaction of the electric field in the Coulomb torsion balance, we are talking about the electric field. It is responsible for this force of interaction. But the electric field itself on two electrified bodies is not taken from the void. And they forget to tell us about where the field itself comes from. Nobody saw the charge with their own eyes. charge in mathematical expression is the result of the forceful interaction of an electric field with a physical body through a distance.
An interesting question was raised here)
let's imagine. that you are in a rocket. You are speeding up. What is weighing on you? You will say - that this is the force of gravity. But relativists will say that we are being pressed by the Lorentz transformations. mathematical change in space and time. maybe say that time. but in fact you are influenced by matter. relative to which you are moving and in addition to the forces of gravity, forces of inertia will exert on you.
But Umov is not the first. who pondered. what is the flow of energy. Isaac Newton also thought about this. Umov was the first who introduced such a concept as the flow of energy in mechanics and began to do it in relation to electromagnetism. But then Umov was not listened to. He was close to failure defending his dissertation. The letter written to Kirchhoff had no reaction to Kirchhoff. But later Poynting. a little later, independently of Heaviside.
As far as research is concerned, you're right. you need funding to do research. But I do everything myself with funds. which we are collecting with a group of enthusiasts. That is why our work is proceeding so slowly and so protracted.
But we have no choice and now we have to work in the future on a prototype. because without a prototype, the investor will not talk to us. They are not interested in science and this is a fact. I am working with a colleague. who launched his startup in 500 startups and he has already talked with more than one venture capitalist. Everyone is talking about only one thing - that it is interesting. We are not interested in any science. we are only interested in the finished device. Therefore, it is difficult for us, but still we are slowly moving towards our goal.
now at the moment we are preparing an experiment. to translate the resulting physics of processes into a real device. And the question is. that now we have attracted to our side a young specialist who is fluent in CAD in the form of Ansis Maxwell and he has to secretly perform modeling and calculations at work. Therefore, this experience is being done just for him. so that he can feel and make sure. that in 200 years we have missed something and it's just so obvious. which is strange. that people, under the impression of existing literature, have such clouded eyes.
Actually, to Wesley's delight, we're doing that. what. most likely it was Edwin Gray. However, the interpretation of John Bedini and the American background was false.) I personally did not communicate with him. but for that information. which I was able to get starting with information from John Bedini, But we were in for a fiasco, as well as a fiasco. which brought information from Newman and so on. That. which is in the public domain. I'm ready to guess. that John Bedini could hide the truth, but this is only speculation and nothing to do.
But here's the thing. that in the USSR there was once a popular science film, in it the events unfolded in the USA, where psychologists decided to conduct an experiment by bringing a group of scientists together. They showed a fake video about an inventor who allegedly demonstrated an anti-gravity installation. One of the scientists believed so. that it's true that he ended up creating it.
For the plant and liquid nitrogen, that's great news. I would like you to tell more about it. More precisely, more about your laboratory. I watched the video about the installation with pleasure. which you showed to evacuate It is useful and educational. But the rollers. in which the frequencies include scraps mixed with propaganda - it's hard to watch.
Why that would be interesting. As I understand. what can we talk about. to do the experiment remotely. I believe correctly. In the form of some kind of collaboration?
-
Greetings - looked at the installation. Looks awesome.
Yes. the dream of working in your own laboratory is a wonderful story. the toolbox can solve a lot.
I work in a much more modest environment at the moment. although I worked in encata some time ago, it was interesting for me to look at the prototyping process from the outside. Now I understand. which is essentially a routine.
So I am now working to enable my partner to go to the United States and talk there about financing the project. But also the creation of our own laboratory. But on what territory and where it is not clear to me yet.
Because potentially lucrative things are of interest not only to decent people. but also dishonest, I would like to say. that of course in some case there is some security in the US. Why does my partner have a registered office in Delaware. and foreign investors will not invest in a company from the post-Soviet space.
As for the location of the future or proposed laboratory, it is not at all clear to me, and so far I do not think about it. My task this year is to build a prototype close to the minimum requirements, but sufficient. so that it could be invested. But it is clear that certain resources will be required to create a mechanical device. including tools.
Below is a photo of my partner.
-
As the title says, has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works? If so, are there instructions to reproduce your build? I'm asking because it would be nice to hear from someone who has personal experience of a system and can verify that it works and produces more energy that it consumes.
Like I earlier said..
here is one @
https://overunity.com/18551/magnet-shear-to-direct-pull-work-ratio/msg557293/#msg557293
floor
-
But there are several other energy from permanent magnet
designs here at the O.U. forum.
@
https://overunity.com/18511/floors-magnets-explained/msg546306/#msg546306
-
Like I earlier said..
here is one @
https://overunity.com/18551/magnet-shear-to-direct-pull-work-ratio/msg557293/#msg557293 (https://overunity.com/18551/magnet-shear-to-direct-pull-work-ratio/msg557293/#msg557293)
floor
@Floor: When you write about your "magnet shear" you only state the force applied (in grams).
You then have to compute the "work" which is "force times displacement" or W = F * s
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_(physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_(physics))
Finally you have to compute the "power" which is P = dW/dt = F*v
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_(physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_(physics))
In simpler words: you need to take into account over which distance (s) the force (F) is applied (W = F * s) and the time (t) during which the work is done (P = dW/dt = F*v, where s and t go into the calculation of v).
Just to talk about the force is not sufficient to compare "power in" with the "power out".
It is not easy to calculate the power for you contraptions. Careful distance measurements and time measurements would be necessary. Nothing happens "in a linear way" in your contraptions, therefore a function has to be modeled and then integrated numerically. I do not want to do the work, because the outcome of the calculation is clear.
Do you really think that such a simple thing (what you call magnet shear) was overlooked? There is no "magnet shear", just a magnetic field and the properties of a magnetic field are known in all directions.
Greetings, Conrad
-
Greetings dear Wesley.
Are you sure you are writing to me?
To the person. who lives in Belarus near Minsk. Minsk and Moscow are absolutely two different cities, different countries.
Some dot's connected
Legal note: Opinion expressed in all of my posts is entirely mine according to American constitution
Wesley :)
-
@ conradelektro
Thanks for your observations.
Can we discuss this ?
@
https://overunity.com/18862/energy-time-power-units-and-ratios/msg557581/#new
Even though we are not totally off topic...
There is a continuity flow here in this topic, I wish to respect.
floor
-
Dear Wesley.
Perhaps you are very inattentive. This video, in which we have been dealing with electric motors for 6 or 7 years.
As for Yaroslav Starukhin and his channel. it was a channel. in which Starukhin attracts a huge number of people to the conversation and interviews them. Very enthusiastic. We were among some. and then we decided to collect different experiments on the air.
Now I am in another country.
But because you are constantly focusing on propaganda and politics. I made it clear that I was not interested in propaganda and politics. I was interested in questions related to technology.
It was an interesting period in my life, and then, we or at the expense of donations.
As for Starukhin and me, they are separate people.
probably it was right to talk about it.
I think. that the best emphasis would be on science and technology.
As for you, of course I would be interested to take a look at your laboratory, so a video tour on purely technical topics would be interesting.
As far as I understand. are you in Lithuania?
-
Dear Wesley.
Perhaps you are very inattentive. This video, in which we have been dealing with electric motors for 6 or 7 years.
As for Yaroslav Starukhin and his channel. it was a channel. in which
Starukhin attracts a huge number of people to the conversation and interviews them.
Very enthusiastic. We were among some. and then we decided to collect different experiments on the air.
Dear Ilya
The subject was for me interesting as you were there in Moscow for quite some time.
You were physically living there.
Global Wave and Staruhin supplied you with everything you needed, food, place to sleep,
possibly some money but it was him who was "likely" paid.. not you.
I was also heavily under attack from you in number of videos you made specially for me. :)
Some of your videos were very "brutal".
I'm in New York USA
Americans may disagree with an opinion , but they respect your opinion as you have rights to express it.
This is what democracy is about.
In countries ruled by bandits, tyrants, dictators, or organized government mafia such freedom doesn't exist.
You dont understand that I'm not political but historical in area of:
-people in science,
-history of science.
Mentioned by me historical facts about 1917 October Revolution, Stalin terror time, Soviet Aggression staring WW2
Prisons for Scientists, corruption, bribes, - fundamentally affected Science and people involved.
_________________________________________________________________
So I didn't have problem with your opinion but with your motivation.
Staruhin/ Starukhin for me is a typical Russian Government sponsored individual whom I don't really like much.
It was not me but Staruhin manifesting Putin agenda and politicizing Global Wave - as the tool to invigilate and control FE community.
Government Paranoia to the point at which anyone who has some achievement was seen as a potential
danger to the system whose existence is based on trade of oil and gas.
In my video you criticized
- I pointed not only at murder of Adrian Guska but plenty of others
including me myself lucky to survive along with poisoned Tariel Kapanadze.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9foRzZEZRo
Science is not about like or dislike .
Science doesn't hate and doesn't love.
Science doesn't have feelings.
Peoples are.
So again please understand me too .
Looking at your videos where you were expressing :
-how much of and idiot I'm
-how bad, stupid, dull I'm
pictures your state of mind at that particular time when you were with
Global Wave and Staruhin.
__________________________________________________
I respect anyone ability to learn, develop, contribute, fallow official science,even if he is paid by bandits.
Our opinions may be different but that doesn't make you less valuable as a contributor to this forum.
I enjoy this conversation and I do thank you for that.
Я уважаю любого человека, способного учиться, развиваться, вносить свой вклад в официальную
науку, даже если ему платят бандиты. Наши мнения могут отличаться, но это не делает вас менее
ценным участником этого форума.
Мне нравится этот разговор, и я благодарю вас за это
Legal note: Opinion expressed in all of my posts is entirely mine according to American constitution
:)
Wesley
-
Dear Wesley.
My comment was sarcasm so that you can look at some things from the other side. You position yourself as a certain politicized figure. who is in search of free energy.
You wanted to create an effect with your video - and I decided to give it to you. now you are surprised that people are reacting to you. however, this effect was generated by you.
You are now talking about motivation. My motivation is to do what inspires me. I don’t want to waste my time on everything else. I like to invent and nothing more. To spend time discussing certain problems that I personally cannot influence is also regarded by me as a stupid waste of time and effort.
I invited you to tell about yourself. where do you live. what do you have interesting in the laboratory. It would be interesting to me. as well as those who probably could go to the channel in order to get something technical.
But you yourself did everything the way you wanted, you wanted to get a reaction. I tried to give it to you.
You yourself get through life what you think about the most. And they got it. As a reaction. And in this reaction. I am sure there is no involvement of the special services in the death of Kapanadze. there is your desire. As well as actually other inventors. who somehow died for their inventions. However, you have no proof. what these inventions were.
You may have every right to argue with me. But I believe in facts. So far no one has shown these facts, there are only strange questions)))
Therefore, in conclusion to everything, I want to say about that. then in physics there are still a large number of questions left, starting with the course of electrostatics, and I would love to watch it. I'm trying to divert your focus to something informative and useful.
As I said about that. that there are a huge number of questions in experiments, starting with the Coulomb torsion balance. Therefore, the questions of physics are interesting. as well as reading books on the physical vacuum and nothing else. And this is a creative activity that can lead to benefits for society.
-
https://studio.youtube.com/video/2MAyT7_w_og/edit (https://studio.youtube.com/video/2MAyT7_w_og/edit)
I am here now. This is not Moscow) This is Minsk and it is just wonderful here.
And I'm preparing now for
to experiments ...
-
Dear Wesley.
/My comment was sarcasm/
/You wanted to create an effect with your video/you wanted to get a reaction/ - and I decided to give it to you/ , .
/You are now talking about motivation/
Motivation:
"Psychologists define motivation as the process by which activities are started, directed, and sustained so that certain needs are met."
My wife is psychologist here: https://youtu.be/_9foRzZEZRo?t=892 (https://youtu.be/_9foRzZEZRo?t=892)
Sarcasm:
' motion applied : in order to hurt…, - the irony to mock or convey contempt.'
-your motivation was to deeply hurt me in known to you practically perfected in Russia format.
Pouring over me, your vulgarisms and hate intended to squash me deep into the floor of
Global Wave, Moscow warehouse, occupied by Staruhin who was likely paid entirely by oppression regime.
It was right in the middle of heavy attack on me of Russian trolls, and FSB than :)
Dear Ilya:
I didn't want any effect. I was expressing my pain as it was not long after I was poisoned and I know who did it I assume :)
I'm in Western civilized part of the world and I never used any word or sentence to insult you or your value in any way.
I understand that in sick reality - sickness is "normal to the plain of reference ." - physics
Please read it few times till you start to understand what Western world is about.
____________________________________________________
I invited you to tell about yourself. where do you live. what do you have interesting in the laboratory.
But you yourself did everything the way you wanted
/I am sure there is no involvement of the special services in the death of Kapanadze./
Dear Ilya.
In case affecting me and Tariel Kapanadze -there were "some" Russians.
The openness... the exposure, made me and Tariel to suffer and others to drop dead.
"Some Russians " are just waiting, for me to show what I have in my labs .
This is mechanical part of lab. https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE (https://youtu.be/DNxob3yY4LE)
___________________________________________
/experiments, starting with the Coulomb torsion balance/can lead to benefits for society.
/in physics there are still a large number of questions left, starting with the course of electrostatics,/
With all do respect to you, and to any other unfriendly to me person or power:
Expectation of some elements of this crowd is something they can see, experiment apply, benefit from, or steal.
Dear Ilya in your videos dedicated solely to me you attacked American values, but you with your partner are in hunt for American investor.
I was manifesting no need for investor, or money, and these Russians found me so dangerous that they
send Venezuelans to one of my houses.
They seem to forget that we Americans have rights to guns and machine guns in our houses.
You have direction in science and I have too.
I'm fallowing checked working and applied concept of Dr Corum from Viziv who got over 200 patents .
The tower was build. https://youtu.be/He5xQOJHlrU?t=135 (https://youtu.be/He5xQOJHlrU?t=135)
My mini-tower was build too and it works.
The only difference between me and Dr Corum is that he is sending energy from point A to B and I'm
receiving energy using exactly the same basis from Schumann Waveguide.
I don't mind you or anyone else to do it too.
I don't want to be a hero, I don't need fame nor money.
Yes, I’m a minimalist in life.
For more go here:
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg557086/#msg557086 (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg557086/#msg557086)
Legal note: Opinion expressed in all of my posts is entirely mine according to American constitution
Wesley
-
You upset me ... All money, money. It turns out that without financing a perpetual motion machine can't build ? It turns out that hicks,beggar,голодранцев like me have no chance? :'(
Needless to try? :(
-
It turns out that hicks,beggar,голодранцев like me have no chance?
Absolutely not true.
1. You perfectly understand English.
2. you perfectly manage Russian.
3. you are bright active and learning.
4. no money is needed to wind Tesla coil.
5. don't look to build perpetual motion machine as it gives you no gain.
It is like spending 1 dollar to get 1 dollar back.
6. The only option is to do what Kapanadze did. He received energy in form of surface wave and converted it to
energy he could use and present to the public- the electrical form of energy measured in Power/h = voltage x current in Delta T( the time frame )
7. the cost of making it, is for Russians is close to 0 as they can always get wire, and Plastic tubing for former of coil.( каркас катушки)
8. The top capacitor can be made from any aluminum tubing (e.g for cooling systems)
9. Mast https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/dlattach/attach/179153/image// (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/dlattach/attach/179153/image//)
( the pipe allowing top capacitor to be adjustably elevated can be telescopic mast from old russian R-118, R-137 or R-140 )
However that pipe doesn't have to exist at all.
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg552209/#msg552209 (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg552209/#msg552209)
all you need is to be able to move it up or down in line with coil vertical orientation.
summary : It is not important Dear kolbacict to have any equipment at all.
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/dlattach/attach/176581/image// (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/dlattach/attach/176581/image//)
here is everything that is needed to try A to B energy transfer.
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg552083/#msg552083 (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg552083/#msg552083)
with all information about coil frequency and former diameter .
I'm not smart I'm just narrowly fallowing certain direction in science. :)
I collect every information from youtube or internet
Our Ilya is more interested in wide area of physics... great but that is why Russia is in deep s..t.
Great physicists are only good for academy, that pays for them being there.
Others must be narrow good self-persistent, like most of us the Americans.
But everyone can do it ...
-The only difference is that some of them need it badly to become independent wealthy or business oriented.
I DON'T NEED all of it - AND I HAVE IT .. so YOU CAN too.
You Can
Yes You Can
(Barack Obama quote )
Wesley
-
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg546541/#msg546541
Here is tuning circuit For transmitter if you want to match impedance of generator to the primary winding of Tesla coil .
But that applies only if you want to transmit energy from point A to point B in the distance.
If you intend to match to surface wave known as Zenneck Wave in the Air earth interface than you use exactly the same transmatch .
transmatch ( antenna tuner) is - the impedance matching coil as it is shown on the picture.
Than by lowering and elevating of the Top capacitor you are tuning to energy that is in this interface in TM mode.
The receiving will be possible when Brewster Angle is achieved.
That energy than can be used the same way as your electrical energy from the outlet.
In this picture:
You have original schematic of the structure from Dr James Corum patent .
You see sections of the coils switched by the switch to tune it.
Any big device is bit only because kW's or MW's of power are intended to be Transmitted or Received.
So the device can be small.
It is first required from the experimenter to learn how to send energy from point A to point B over the distance not less than 21m
However frequency is important
So the best frequency to try is 52MHz, or 1.8MHz assigned for free use by anyone who is Ham.
________________________________________________________
However that would be only the training of your skills.
The fun starts when we going closer to Schumann Resonances higher harmonics.
Presently the Viziv tower in Milford Texas operates on 20kHz and implementing 18kHz
The lower you go the better chances to get more of the power from the interface.
_______________________________________________
As i said, this energy exists in the interface in TM mode . transverse magnetic mode.
https://www.testandmeasurementtips.com/basics-of-tem-te-and-tm-propagation/ (https://www.testandmeasurementtips.com/basics-of-tem-te-and-tm-propagation/)
However we need to understand that interface differs from traditional waveguide
https://www.testandmeasurementtips.com/basics-of-tem-te-and-tm-propagation/ (https://www.testandmeasurementtips.com/basics-of-tem-te-and-tm-propagation/)
We are dealing with 2D (Two dimensional ) interface air/earth.
the behavior wave in this interface differs from behavior of electromagnetic wave in Free Space
http://physics.sfsu.edu/~lea/courses/grad/waveguid.pdf (http://physics.sfsu.edu/~lea/courses/grad/waveguid.pdf)
mainly because inverse square law works little different in the interface .
Suffice it to say all of that complicated to many physics in reality turns to be just
explanation to very simple Tesla coil made for few dollars by uneducated experimenter.
that is why Kapanadze was able to make it work.
However Kapanadze device is much more advanced than tower of Dr Corum and my own mini-tower.
Wesley
-
This is continuation from :
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557628/#msg557628 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557628/#msg557628)
So go there to see my first post from today.
________________________________________________
Behavior of electromagnetic wave in free space :
https://byjus.com/physics
(https://byjus.com/physics/electromagnetic-waves/#:~:text=The%20electromagnetic%20wave%20equation%20is%20a%20second%20order,in%20free%20space%20%3D%20%283times%2010%5E%7B8%7Dms%5E%7B-1%7D%29%20Electromagnetic%20Spectrum.)-this link may be not available for EU zone so switch your VPN to USA or Canada.
the next interesting subject is to notice that
Once you push transmit on your walkie-talkie,and than switch it OFF, the electromagnetic wave will travel
in free space to the infinity, for billions of years (if not dissipates first)
That is why our Deep Space Devices are able to send to us information being outside of our solar system now.
Some may ask what about inverse square law?
Answer: It applies in traditional way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law)
Behavior of electromagnetic wave in waveguide or in the interface :
When TX- transmitter is ON the energy goes into the interface or waveguide and travels in within its boundary.
When transmitter is OFF than there is no energy transmitted nor present in waveguide or interface
__________________________________________________
So how can my device work if there is no transmitter present and I'm using interface .
The space between ionosphere and earth is called the waveguide.
ionosphere earth waveguide (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%E2%80%93ionosphere_waveguide#:~:text=The%20Earth%E2%80%93ionosphere%20waveguide%20refers%20to%20the%20phenomenon%20in,the%20resulting%20cavity%20behaves%20as%20a%20large%20waveguide.)
Energy in form of electromagnetic wave is constantly present there at frequencies of Schumann resonance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances)
Lightning is seen as major contributor for this energy.
Wesley
-
continuation from previous post :
Air/Earth space has spherical structure with earth sphere being inside of ionosphere
- that structure is a spherical waveguide with two boundaries earth and ionosphere.
however it behaves in similar to circular wave guide manner.
So we may say that we have random phenomena causing randomly distributed energy in the earth Ionosphere waveguide.
However interesting is that single lightning is causing avalanche of lightnings around the earth.
the second picture is not exactly related to text from this post but gives you some representation of phenomena in question
the link from below is explaining you more :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%E2%80%93ionosphere_waveguide#:~:text=The%20Earth%E2%80%93ionosphere%20 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%E2%80%93ionosphere_waveguide#:~:text=The%20Earth%E2%80%93ionosphere%20)
waveguide%20refers%20to%20the%20phenomenon%20in,the%20resulting%20cavity%20behaves%20as%20a%20large%
20waveguide.
Wesley
-
summary:
Probability of distribution of this energy in the interface
needs to be looked as random distribution of energy at Brewster angle where
there is no reflection and refraction .
Since Zenneck wave derives directly from Maxwell equation we can calculate
not only its random, non frequent and non uniform distribution .
In practice I have noticed that it has somewhat violent behavior
If I was to compare it to something I would be similar to that seen when working with isotopes .
Especially these from my research with Beta decay species .
https://youtu.be/izzujmKROWI?t=321 (https://youtu.be/izzujmKROWI?t=321)
____________________________________
And this kind of behavior will be noticed by you when you extract energy
that originated in Schumann Waveguide from the interface
There are some additional factors but I don't think that anyone from you will ask me for it.
I simply applied averager so my lightbulbs are not flickering much.
Wesley
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNxob3yY4LE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNxob3yY4LE)
Greetings. this is what I took a walk - we have a great nature, it is wonderful and it is difficult for me to imagine myself among the canyons, gravel and sand.
-
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557628/#msg557628
correction
I included in original post missing link to the transmatch.
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg546541/#msg546541
Wesley
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNxob3yY4LE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNxob3yY4LE)
Greetings. this is what I took a walk - we have a great nature, it is wonderful and it is difficult for me to imagine myself among the canyons, gravel and sand.
I didn't fully understand what are you alluding to but I wish you the best ..
:)
Wesley
-
You upset me ... All money, money. It turns out that without financing a perpetual motion machine can't build ? It turns out that hicks,beggar,голодранцев like me have no chance? :'(
Needless to try? :(
Greetings. The creation of a product involves the prototyping stages itself. You can beat the proof of concept or TRL-4 by LEAN at home, you can do the TRL-5 engineering solution, do the same field tests ... but bring the product to a serial sample or mass production. you can do the same yourself. But then everything is stretched out in time.
Everything in life is possible on your own, as a matter of time. And time is a specific resource. You can buy money, but you cannot take time. Therefore, investment is essentially a purchase of time. Because the entire resource is created for only one thing - time.
-
here is everything that is needed to try A to B energy transfer.
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg552083/#msg552083 (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg552083/#msg552083)
Wesley
Yes, but here nobody don't give out free energy at the point A . So I could get it at point B. :)
In this country, I only owe everyone myself. And I only owe everything .
And the electromagnetic energy of lightning I cannot used . I can not yet... ;)
Everything in life is possible on your own, as a matter of time. And time is a specific resource. You can buy money, but you cannot take time. Therefore, investment is essentially a purchase of time. Because the entire resource is created for only one thing - time.
this is the true truth.confirm.
to unfortunate for us.
-
Greetings. The creation of a product involves the prototyping stages itself. You can beat the proof of concept or TRL-4 by LEAN at home, you can do the TRL-5 engineering solution, do the same field tests ... but bring the product to a serial sample or mass production. you can do the same yourself. But then everything is stretched out in time.
Everything in life is possible on your own, as a matter of time. And time is a specific resource. You can buy money, but you cannot take time. Therefore, investment is essentially a purchase of time. Because the entire resource is created for only one thing - time.
I do not agree : Because the entire resource is created for only one thing - time.
Living is for COMFORT and PRESTIGE ( in western commercial philosophy : Ranking,Classification) !
And the way during life we call : time ( worth like money) !
We can close 3/4 from the industrial capacity world-wide if living would only be based by : existencial goods consume !
No Apple,Tesla (Motors),Amazon and other "non-existencial" ware companies more ! :'( Consumptable life-style !
Crypto-money is the best fact for "waste time/life"-economics :
for less than 1 US$ material worth physical coins paying 1-10-100-1000-1... Dollars per unit ! + absurd(e) electricity consume !
Art is Idiotie Idiotie as Art
Fishing for fish-free future : https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/gambia-chinas-trawler-fischen-afrikas-kuesten-leer-fuer-unseren-lachs-aus-norwegen-a-8e9559d1-13ca-453a-a6e8-51eea97e49ab (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/gambia-chinas-trawler-fischen-afrikas-kuesten-leer-fuer-unseren-lachs-aus-norwegen-a-8e9559d1-13ca-453a-a6e8-51eea97e49ab)
15 Kg fish capture for 1 Kg farmed fish mass : vegetarians their sustainable development :P DESTROYER !
-
I do not agree : Because the entire resource is created for only one thing - time.
Art is Idiotie - Idiotie as Art .
Fishing for fish-free future : https://translate.google.com (https://translate.google.com)
15 Kg fish capture for 1 Kg farmed fish mass : vegetarians their sustainable development :P DESTROYER !
Yes this is troubling and scary nightmare for the future of humanity.
However:
-Vegetarians eat vegetarian; Jews- kosher; Americans Fast-Food. There is waste everywhere.
-Vegans eat Vegan food and they are the best for environment as they don't kill.
However brain of vegetable homo sapiens was growing slower and they died out.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/oldest-human-poop-study-says-neanderthals-ate-their-veggies-1.2688644 (https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/oldest-human-poop-study-says-neanderthals-ate-their-veggies-1.2688644)
Bipedalism:
Ilya will like it as in his region this word has dual meaning
.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution)
Human animals are worse than other mammals,- they kill for fun other mammals.
___________________________________
The audience:
The audience in Youtube and in here is hungry for one simple mistake of these who said to much.
Many of them will eat you lankaIV ,me, and rest of the researchers, with shoes... if it pays. :)
But when I'm giving them everything on the table, they are lazy to even try it.
- the typical behavior of human equivalent of horde is to wait for these who succeed so they don't waste time and money.
They may feel offended when I call them animals but blame Darvin for it , not me
Guys like Ilia Tsimbaluk wants to make money ,- nothing wrong.. At least he is honest.
Lying is a form of defense,
-He left Global Wave in Moscow - in January of 2019, but he says that he was there 6 years ago.
On one hand- I like him as he is progressing, learning, trying to make better life for himself in reality around him that is for many of us so sick...
However - even if we like very much that particular hyena, tiger or bear, but we know their nature, They must kill to survive.
You lankaIV remember these 45 years of oppression till 1990 and fall of Berlin Wall,in 1989 and you are keeping yourself
at the distance from some of human elements acting by choice as - "hyenas"
Fall_of_the_Berlin_Wall#: (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Berlin_Wall#:~:text=The%20fall%20of%20the%20Berlin%20Wall%20%28%20German%3A,the%20inner%20German%20border%20took%20place%20shortly%20afterwards.)
They may do everything that is bad for you as they want to protect their privileges (even if they can survive in any other way too.)
So mammals are just beautiful creatures of nature with exemption of some problematic humans :)
Human animals :
Far Eastern Europe dictatorship makes some individuals to manifest anger,and violence, against helplessness of majority( Belarus, Russia).
Brainwashing is interesting phenomena:
Brainwashing (also known as mind control, menticide, coercive persuasion, thought control, thought reform, and re-education)
is the concept that the human mind can be altered or controlled by certain psychological techniques.
Brainwashing is said to reduce its subjects' ability to think critically or independently, to allow the introduction
of new, unwanted thoughts and ideas into their minds, as well as to change their attitudes, values and beliefs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainwashing
Brainwashing for Far Eastern Europe countries is something their dictators use but when you talk to the people there - none of them will
ever says that he is brainwashed.
The explanation is simple:
Fish can't see water.
So when you lankaIV point at their sick, bend reality it only offends them .
________________________________________________
The give away of FE technology:
- Please use Information already published by me and do it.
Kapanadze, Akula, SR 193, Vasmus, and hundreds of others contributed a lot.
If someone says that 90% of it is fake than the reminding 10% is worth your time
You human animals- mammals have so much time you are wasting every day in opinion of others.
But how many of you admit it. ??? ??? ??
TV, Radio, Football, fishing, vacation, travel, some boat, is a value that in average doesn't require to understand a lot of physics :)
__________________________________________________
This is an example of arguments , Dr Hans was throwing at me when I was asking him to let me
publish my device, perfected by him.
Wesley
-
Greetings.
Dear Wesley. Now I have time) and it became interesting for me to read what you wrote.
You are talking about that. that in January 2019 I was on a certain Global Wave.
I was in Minsk and celebrated the New Year at the Encata company.
so you are not very good at timing my life.
here you missed).
If I'm going to build a Startup, which is inherent in developed capitalism.
But there are things. which I like.
And there are things that have nothing to do with money.
As for the aspects in the field of physics, it would probably be worth talking about just this.
You are talking about that. that you need to deal with transformers and there is something in them.
why would you. at least not describe physics. which in your opinion should give you that. what are you trying to tell us. And the most important thing is that you personally got something from experience or experiment. what are you saying or is it just a hypothesis?
Hypothesis and experiments - that would be interesting.
The question is. what I like to say about physics.
I personally cannot deal with Kapanadze, Vasum or Akula, because I have no information in which it would be clear how what they are doing can give me that. what I'm doing.
On the other hand I have already found that. what I was looking for. And there is a feeling. what all. what makes the internet free energy “gurus” just have it.
You started talking to me about that. that ether is a relic of the past. I tried to show. that you yourself are living remnants of the past, believing that the electron is what. that runs by wire. being a part of it. This is not part of it. it is what is formed in the conductor or outside of it. if we are talking about superconductivity. There are obvious things. But someone wants to accept it. some do not.
You tried to say something about the benefits of relativism - but you never gave me the information in which relativism explained the essence of electromagnetism. But people are very inconsistent creatures and love to reach some of their goals instead of hard and painstaking work.
I have one formula that I still use in my life, it sounds like this: find out the reasons for your failures and this is half the answer to where success lies.
If I were you, I would try to make really simple experiments. which made it possible to understand the errors. which were admitted 100 years ago. It would be informative, convincing.
But for some reason, many Youtube representatives are doing shows for some reason. instead of. to do real science and experimentation. But you have the toolbox, and why don't you focus on the fundamentals? It would be beneficial.
Here's a look - Eric Dollard, as long as I remember his videos on the Internet. all there is is a show. Bedini - show.
I am not against the show, but this show does not provide a fundamental approach to understanding the nature of things. even you write constantly about hypotheses. But it is simply difficult for me to get you to it.
-
Thank you Ilya for your post and picture of EnCata.
HISTORY FILES
_______________________
Encata:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqwXBtpphD8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqwXBtpphD8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6rMIMRLSf8)
Founded in 2006 (special industrial equipment and electronic devices)
-known also as EnCata("Engineering Catalyst")- One-stop Product Development Center for Hardware and Software.
Located in Minsk Belarus .
In 2017 - resolution known as Decree 2.0 was quite promising.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decree_on_Development_of_Digital_Economy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decree_on_Development_of_Digital_Economy)
including tax free till year 2045.
A expected monthly income of $2500-3500 / month in Minsk was more than enough to feel comfortable.
average-salary-in-belarus (https://destinationscanner.com/average-salary-in-belarus/#:~:text=Here%E2%80%99s%20a%20look%20at%20some%20of%20the%20jobs,Nanny%20%E2%80%93%2014%2C400%20BYN%20%28%246%2C075%29%20More%20items...%20)teacher there makes ~ $10 000/ year.
Dictator of Belarus Lukashenko who after 26 years as president decided in 2020 to act against nation,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Lukashenko (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Lukashenko)
Last year he was rejected by most if not all Western world countries and heavy sanctions have been imposed.
-sanctions-against-belarussian-companies- (https://www.steptoeinternationalcomplianceblog.com/2021/04/ofac-reactivates-sanctions-against-belarussian-companies-and-provides-45-day-wind-down-period/#:~:text=US%20sanctions%20on%20Belarus%20were%20first%20imposed%20in,electoral%20process%20and%20human%20rights%20abuses%20in%20Belarus.)
Propaganda stated that Belarus as geographical center of Europe ( questionable) is "the" European Silicon Valley.
That was political ambition of Lukashenko,
https://vc.ru/flood/36365-it-belarus-chto-skryvaetsya-za-fasadom-reklamnyh-zagolovkov (https://vc.ru/flood/36365-it-belarus-chto-skryvaetsya-za-fasadom-reklamnyh-zagolovkov) ( in Russian)
Regime pushed many of scientists, IT professionals, engineers, to leave Belarus, in panic, some others ended in Belarusian prisons.
- soviet mentality, bribes corruption,theft and lack of experienced professionals was the biggest problem in the country
whose GDP in 2014-16 was +0.29%,
when compared with Bulgaria( having the lowest income in EU) their GDP +3.9%
And Belarus is in Russian SNG not in EU.
___________________________________________
In Belarus and Russia according to Russian phrase :
"If you are successful than
-Your business will be forcefully acquired or destroyed."- its your choice.
Средний возраст инноваторов в США – около 50 лет, в Израиле – около 43 лет,
в Беларуси почти невозможно представить себе 45-летнего мужчину,
который бросит стабильную работу и доход в погоне «за мечтой».
Translation:The average age of innovators in the USA is about 50 years,
in Israel it is about 43 years old,
in Belarus it is almost impossible to imagine a 45-year-old man who would
quit a stable job and income in pursuit of “a dream”
Overarching public censure -"that you have money and I don't" creates a lot of hate from neighbors and relatives.
__________________________________________
The age of Belarusian startups is 18-25 years old, these millennials are free from the shackles of the Soviet worldview
Lack of education makes them to progress through their trial, error, disappointment and new trials.
But they can easily migrate to Poland the leading in 2018 country in EU, that is very friendly to them even
if they cross the border illegally due to dictator restrictions.
Having good government "connections"
Dr. Peter Dudin
Oleg Kondrashov
decided to make some money:they approached an American Michael Tavis from New York
having experience with Exxon, Seagram’s and Citicorp Securities .
He was looking for easy money in former Soviet countries
Russia, Latvia, Estonia and Belarus;
Somewhere around~ $300 million private equity fund become available to start business.
The idea was simple:
- attract these young dreamers migrating to Poland by means of promising them anything and everything that will come in the future but not
yet today.
This was a typical tool used by Soviets since 1917 Russian revolution till today when average Russians makes ~$170 per month
Communism died, Socialism didn't work, leading to present feudalism with dictatorship.
The facility of EnCata was at first thought to be a building but it was cheaper to make it in form of a tent - more money could be "washout" this way.
EnCata has office, center, prototyping center, manufacturing consultants and investors under one roof.
The company goal was to perform a full cycle of product development - from design to production of a working prototype.
Good idea and likely wrong decision.
Year 2020, - terror, arrests, and stolen election in Belarus.
USA and EU frozen all investments, financing and imposed sanctions.
President Lukashenko is holding to his KGB and police .
He is accused of cooperating with President of Russia Putin to make Belarus part of Russian Federation.
EnCata lost big time.
Ilya Tsimbaluk is showing us the empty building, where no one is working there .
opinion expressed is my own according to constitution of USA
Wesley
-
Greetings Wesley.
About Encata - there is open access and from there you took the information.
As for the premises, I also had access on weekends, where I studied CAD and studied the equipment park, so that I could work on my project on my own.
This is what I actually did.
I also had free access.
Photo. which I showed in fact is a day off. I could stay to work at night, I also did this whenworked.
IIt was important for me to see the enterprise from the inside. as a future leader, to understand the pros and cons. Encata has some culture and good organizational management. which I could spy on. Therefore. to attract investment - I already have some vision. and most importantly, that there is experience in working with machine tools. as any successful leader or Leader of the company must have experience. Then there is an understanding of people and an understanding of which actions lead to success and which do not.
Although it was a very difficult path, I chose it and I followed it.
An inflatable building is an interesting idea. she looks beautiful. And this is essentially a space saving, since you do not need a foundation - any site.
Now I am free to swim and I am personally attracted by the idea of my own laboratory and my own park of equipment for prototyping, where the team could work. My ultimate goal is to work on electric vehicles. It is interesting.
now the model that we would like to implement is our own equipment park. in which it would be possible to do interesting things that are obvious for the market and, along the way, work on prototyping my device.
Something like this is the story and state of affairs.
At the moment I have a partner Andrey. which helps me. Photo above.
At the moment, we are checking the physical principle on an approximate device to the motor, which I am now making. If everything grows together, we proceed to full-fledged prototyping.
-
I am planning to launch my own startup. Therefore, it would be interesting to talk about this.
-
I am planning to launch my own startup. Therefore, it would be interesting to talk about this.
Dear Ilya:
:)
Traditional way to "think Jewish" :
Assess Your Current Financial Situation.
The first step in making an investment plan for the future …
Define Your Goals.
Determine Your Risk Tolerance.
Decide What to Invest In.
The final step is to decide where to invest. …
_______________________________________________
In Belarus :
in 2006 Prototyping was good,... but China was cheaper.
in 2008 recession started...
in 2014 Russian aggression, annexation of Crimea, Donbas conflict, EU and USA sanctions.
in 2020 Belarus election, mass protests; Lukashenko is becoming a dictator; EU and USA sanctions
American investor likely lost 300 millions dollars on EnCata. (- tax deductible in USA)
but he made some money before to partially return his losses.
in 2020 Pandemia.
_______________________________________________
Opinion from the perspective of a small business:
Today:- prototyping business is dead in the world. How is that possible?
The answer is easy:
1. world is saturated with goods.
2. multi-directional prototyping center is to expensive (even if it was in China.)
3. there is no buyer.
________________________________________
To understand it please compare prototyping business to a typical lab.
Labs even in USA usually can't survive. It is to expensive to have them so they exist due to
government regulation - they are often a part of mandatory licensing.
___________________________________________
EnCata in Belarus was a mistake ,- no longer needed.
-the total losses are not recoverable as most of the money landed in pockets of individuals involved in corruption .
There is money all over but you need to attract an investor and motivate him .
Reality of investment:
- Investor needs to see reason to invest.
- USA/EU sanctions make it almost impossible now for Belarus.
Legal note: opinion expressed is my own according to constitution of USA
Wesley
-
My advice to Ilya:
New comers from Russia, Belarus in USA usually buy their first house in less than 10 years
In 20 years, you are well set in life.
But, America is not so good for haters of American values, collaborators with Putin regime and spies.
______________________________________________
Europe is not so bad option.
You will make good life there, but you need first to get asylum or appropriate visa, and that takes some time.
Basis for approval of status could be:
- arrest or punishment for nontraditional sexual orientation( asylum)
- willingness to marry any man, he can be Belorussian too. ( likely asylum)
- willingness to marry a woman but only if she has EU status.( marriage license)
- exceptional ability. (special visa)
- sponsorship by organization or entity.( special visa)
Other options are excluded as you are not against President Lukashenko and his dictatorship.
It is close to Belarus and usually 3 years later you can visit them as "wealthy" man.
In reality, only in Belarus and Russia people may perceive you as wealthy.
I know guys returning to Belarus after 5 years, buying nice houses, opening businesses in hope
they will be able to hide ,as in "every corner" there is someone who wants to take it from them by force.
And now the plan for you:
You don't need any investors.
Money made in Germany, Switzerland or Finland pays for your guys working in Belarus.
Having every day contacts with Western world, it is easy to attract some guys.
If your motor is good than it will be likely stolen by your workers, associates and so on.
So you need patent pending for it filed in civilized world. ( 2 days of work)
You not far away so you can fly or drive back and forth .
Legal note : opinion expressed is my own according to American constitution.
Wesley
-
I work in the topic 10 years old
-
Greetings.
Regarding the Jews, you are in vain. Because they may be offended at you, and fascism is not held in high esteem in Europe. But there are rumors that the days of fascist formations or divisions in the Baltics may be the norm. But still, let's be careful or more tolerant. (Humor)
Regarding Encata - I do not want to comment.
All I needed was there - they helped me with the equipment. I studied CAD and learned how to use cnc machines. Certainly not all. There are sophisticated machines like DMU and they need serious experience.
I'm not there now. I'm not interested in the situation in which Encata is located, I know that it is difficult in Belarus. Considering. that their main source of funding was Skolkovo.
When it comes to multi-directional prototyping, you said it right. That it is expensive. But here it is not only expensive, it is very difficult to have a staff that could be brilliant in everything, or talented.
If we are talking about talent. as acquired skills, it is almost impossible. Because to create a unique thing and make a unique decision for it. which is not immediately given. you need to hone it and bring it to perfection.
That is why Toyota's philosophy has always been to nurture its own Leaders in the company. That is, people. which are focused on one task, plus infusion with the company culture, philosophy, goals ...
The market is saturated. China is working at full speed and is always trying to give a competitive price. because there is an incentive from the state and the management system to do so. which, in conditions of barbed wire, keeps people in isolation and survival. And fear is the best stimulus. therefore, it is very difficult to oppose this machine.
It is possible only if the product is unique. which you need to work hard to get exactly the product. which could be competitive in the market. But at that time - Encata was of some help to me. and now she has difficult times and the projects that she leads are projects of government agencies. But state structures are something specific, slow, bureaucratic. This is one of the reasons why NASA decided to turn to private business to manufacture a rocket capable of delivering cargo to the ISS. Private companies have a great predisposition to a sense of survival in the presence of a strong Leader, therefore they have this motivation to take risks, in contrast to bulky private and even more so government structures.
But let's talk about the happy things) Now at the moment I'm working on preparing the wire for winding my device. Along the way, I plan to work on something in electronics. And make an experiment. so that the designer can already understand the physics of processes and start this physics.
As I said, in terms of receiving investments, the United States and Europe have already formed a capitalist system. The United States controls a huge amount of world financial flows. therefore, the USA and Europe are the best environment for launching start-ups, obtaining investment and developing innovative products.
But what I wanted to say about that physics of processes. about which I wanted to say.
Unfortunately Lorenz decided to consider issues related to the description of the changes. that occur in the environment relative to the source.
Lorentz transformations had not only the coordinates of the light source or radio waves, but also we had the coordinates in which the moving observer himself was located relative to the wave. Therefore, the question of time in these coordinates became a clue to the explanation - why the movement relative to the source of the electric field is capable of causing a change in the receiver, including the magnetic field, as in the presence of an EM wave, the observation of electric and magnetic fields.
Then only such a model could probably have hit the head of Lorentz and Einstein, but the idea of the flow of energy had not yet reached. Because then you need to talk about this thread as a process in this intermediate environment.
To differentiate these processes and show. that just the flow of energy in the environment is a kind of duplicate of that. what we see as the result of moving bodies, as a result of this movement. This experiment of Coulomb was confirmed on the Coulomb balance and in the experiments of Ioffe and Milliken. so that's about the preamble of the whole conversation.
But here's the question - I would like to know how Eric Dollard monetizes his experiments with Aaron Murakami. On the one hand, this is curiosity - on the other hand, it is part of the show. which I would like to understand. how could be done.
Because music and light are what Tesla himself resorted to. when I am showing their inventions, including a radio-controlled boat
....
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWP-wgmB-3o&t=399s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWP-wgmB-3o&t=399s)
But here it is not only expensive, it is very difficult to have a staff that could be brilliant in everything, or talented.
What are you talking about...
What can be done here if I am surrounded by people who really believe in what is shown in this video.
Or that the earth is flat ... :D This is not even about financing. I speak.
Around me there is a complete degradation of the intellect.
And you say money, money ...
And what can I do alone?
-
Greetings.
I would like to know how Eric Dollard monetizes his experiments with Aaron Murakami.
Thank you for your response Ilya.
so I'm going to make my answer to you to sound quite humoristic as we need some entertainment for sure,
so let me be funny:
Thank you for good English this time:
Хочу дополнить вас за абсолютно безупречный английский в вашем последнем комментарии.
Похоже, ваши друзья из ФСБ (бывшего КГБ) на этот раз наняли хорошего переводчика,
и я сейчас в их центре внимания. )
Они действительно пытаются понять, насколько я хорош, чтобы оценить,
насколько я пишу чепуху и есть ли у меня "это"?
Русские определенно не глупы и образованные - просто они в другой реальности
и найти нужных парней дешево. чтобы иметь возможность оценить открытия доктора Корума
и мои собственные достижения.
Деньги не имеют значения, если они начинают верить, что этот парень - проблема.
Если они не могут воспроизвести феномен, они украдут его или прекратят существование.
-но это может привести к нежелательному выпуску технологий.
Парень, которого не заботят деньги, потакающий своим желаниям, движимый эмоциями, «распыляющими»
все знания о докторе Коруме - и его
собственные достижения, наверняка является проблемой, если у него сейчас CE.
Guy who doesn't care about money, self-indulgent , driven by emotions
"spraying" all around knowledge of Dr Corum and his own, is a problem for sure, if he has FE now.
Former Russian troll, whom I met in response to my video
https://youtu.be/_9foRzZEZRo?t=1309 (https://youtu.be/_9foRzZEZRo?t=1309) educated me a lot.
_____________________________________________________
So now they want to know the source of money and how Eric Dollard monetizes his experiments with Aaron Murakami.
No problem , "they" are going to pay you something anyhow :)
Eric is an icon, a legend and a true hero to so many. Eric Dollard, Peter Lindemann and Thomas Brown
started Borderlands of Science.
But word icon has emotional value and we are looking for scientific and practical application.
Eric is eccentric- (unconventional and slightly strange.)
You and me Ilya are not different but I'm not being paid :)
Dr. Peter Lindemann is criticized , but in his age he can't do much.
I can call them today and tomorrow morning Putin has a big headache :)
There are private donations that support most of these leaders.
I can support them in no time(- idiom) but they really don't need it.
_______________________________________________________________________
Criticism:
Eric has his own vision I completely disagree with , but he is The American for me, not just an American.
Dr Lindemann, is little to far in the models of past.
Physics drastically changed its approach to certain phenomena, so Peter's publications were of some value in the past
and now there is plenty of questions he didn't respond to because he can't or he doesn't want to..
Good speaker, and definitely worth to be meet.
______________________________________________
I hope that satisfies your curiosity and other people involved. :)
Wesley
-
they have also a vision : , EEE Dept. SIT Valachil, Mangaluru Karnataka.
where is that ? ???
https://www.google.com/maps/vt/data=Yy0rfnDgrZa4jKiGmG0ecziSlLMTojFJRZftNsOjGwM__4bokuyVr1iFrP18bf25YqjI42z2lG8O47AJsfpDo9tCIwYDq5oknokY73xEhSkOi5xbidWAcu7jdKabFo8BZ4yhLc0TwjjKMrhLr40NyJp925YLDdc3MKD6CkKInEXLlVvB1HFNgyQsRFtt6PAYNHmFRDrwckbI3-_bqUZo6PBwEmC2I8bsBi5pqDke55wuw7s (https://www.google.com/maps/vt/data=Yy0rfnDgrZa4jKiGmG0ecziSlLMTojFJRZftNsOjGwM__4bokuyVr1iFrP18bf25YqjI42z2lG8O47AJsfpDo9tCIwYDq5oknokY73xEhSkOi5xbidWAcu7jdKabFo8BZ4yhLc0TwjjKMrhLr40NyJp925YLDdc3MKD6CkKInEXLlVvB1HFNgyQsRFtt6PAYNHmFRDrwckbI3-_bqUZo6PBwEmC2I8bsBi5pqDke55wuw7s)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.ijert.org/dual-rotor-generator-for-increased-efficient-power-generation (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.ijert.org/dual-rotor-generator-for-increased-efficient-power-generation)
https://www.ijert.org/research/dual-rotor-generator-for-increased-efficient-power-generation-IJERTV8IS060461.pdf (https://www.ijert.org/research/dual-rotor-generator-for-increased-efficient-power-generation-IJERTV8IS060461.pdf)
trustable,by demonstration ? ::)
"........
11.
11. CONCEPT OF FREE POWER GENERATION
Here the power is generated freely except only at the starting of this generator.
The External AC supply is needed at starting. This can be achieved by using a concept of back to back technique.
12.
The generation of energy without the usage of any non-renewable energy resources can be seen..
Electricity generation can be done without the usage of any resources that pollutes the environment. That is echo-friendly.
In comparison to the renewable energy resources, the rate of Power generation can be expected more in the concept of free power generation than the rate of Power generation from the renewable energy resources.
More efficient.
."
It would be interestant a global LIFE-broadcast from this machine: in function,in generating ! To make many silent !
( and similar working machines designing ;) )
Sincere
OCWL
-
they have also a vision : , EEE Dept. SIT Valachil, Mangaluru Karnataka.
dual-rotor-generator-for-increased-efficient-power-generation
https://www.ijert.org/research/dual-rotor-generator-for-increased-efficient-power-generation-IJERTV8IS060461.pdf (https://www.ijert.org/research/dual-rotor-generator-for-increased-efficient-power-generation-IJERTV8IS060461.pdf)
trustable,by demonstration ? ::)
Here the power is generated freely except only at the starting of this generator. The External AC supply is needed at starting.
For me it looks OK.
You always use external power to start and run any motor.
The problem starts when motor is on the load.
In contrast I could make Kapanadze, Akula, Ruslan prospering now, but they decided not to.
So if we look at the date of this publication and who published it
International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181[/font]http://www.ijert.org (http://www.ijert.org) IJERTV8IS060461
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
Published by :www.ijert.org (http://www.ijert.org)Vol. 8 Issue
06, June-2019
-we either dealing with project in progress or project in denial.
The only question than is to find what is the progress of that design.
And that is exactly what everyone including Russians want's to find out about my own progress. too. :)
Wesley
-
Investors from some of " modern mutants of deep feudalism countries" are feared
that by simply mentioning their country name they
more likely become a big losers as Western buyers reacts to
their products with disbelieve.However I do respect population and values of every country .
(- that doesn't mean I will always agree with them .)
_______________________________
Rubtsovsk city in the Altai region of Russia.
The Lab599. Great website, good product available possibly only outside of Russia.
________________________________
Some of you are involved in, fishing, boats or ham radio and so on.
I'd say - I'm none of them, but In some areas I just simply shine with knowledge and experience,
like most of us Americans.
For these who are lucky to have license this is great start with experiments:
-A to B energy transfer .
- energy extraction from the interface, originating in Schumann Waveguide ( the FE)
free from risk of getting into a problem with law.
In Russia highly likely there is problem at first, and than all depends from how much money you have to shut and silence the problem.
But any absolutely any Tx can do it , even made by you PCB Tx.
Dr James Corum used at first:
52MHz band
1.8 MHz band
137kHz
than he applied for permit to be at 20kHz.
but everything below 9KHz is license free in most of civilized world.
The lowest you go the better.
Zenneck Wave https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIIABIU3tRw&t=1336s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIIABIU3tRw&t=1336s)
works from wavelength of the light to VLF frequencies. 20Very%20Low%
watch?
(http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Get%20Licensed/HRLM%201st/Corrections/2-17_rev.pdf#:~:text=Range%20Name%20Abbreviation%20Frequency%20Range%20Very%20Low%20Frequency,Frequency%20EHF%2030%20GHz%20-%20300%20GHz%20RESONANCE)Only its name changes from:
-Polariton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polariton (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polariton) to
-Zenneck Wave Sommerfeld-Zenneck,
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave#:~:text=The%20Zenneck%20wave%2C%20Zenneck%20surface%20wave%20or%20Sommerfeld-Zenneck,between%20two%20homogeneous%20media%20having%20different%20dielectric%20constants.)___________________________________________________________
So at first we say WOW... Russians did it ,they can do something really good.
But than we look at PCB assembly and it doesn't seem to look like Russian made. Highly likely it is Chinese :)
Lack of injection mold form in aluminum momentarily says about likely small operation using our Western
CNC or its Chinese version.
Obviously it looks like they couldn't make cellphone with CNC so they never made one .
....well they did make the biggest Russian joke Yota phone. But that's only my opinion.
So the buyer may be afraid that:
-no warranty will be served
or
-is the device legal in Western Word due to US and EU sanctions is for you to find out.
But I wish them the best.
Advice from my friend in research:
please consider used
ready to use old ham gears to start just your experiment today evening
You can wind your Tesla coils acting as an antennas to resonate exactly at bands listed above.
Legal note: Opinion expressed in entirely my own according to constitution of USA
Precaution:
1. use at least 5 to 20m coax cable between transceiver and tesla coil acting as an antenna,
to prevent damage from HV.
2. use transmatch ( antenna tuner) to match 50 Ohm impedance of output of Tx to the antenna ( mandatory) !!!
Legal note : opinion expressed is entirely my own according to USA constitution.
Wesley
-
in regards of my last post:
if energy transfer between two points A and B is made with use of ready to use Ham radio transceivers or just Tx(transmitters)
we need to remember:
1. output power of the Tx can be very small (QRP) and it is going to work.
2. it is much better and easier if instead of 1W it is 100W or more but we have other problems than.
a. We need to move top capacitor in vertical Tesla coil UP or DOWN before we are able to tune it to the Brewster Angle.
b. In low frequencies the distance of NEAR FIELD till it will become FAR FIELD is larger, so the receiver
in form of LED. incandescent light bulb, RF Volt meter, or just Ham Transceiver may react to regular EM wave in the air instead of desired
EM wave from the interface. And this is what we don't want.
c. The distance between A to B should be minimum 22m when using Low Power Tx at frequency w.g 1.8MHz.
The lower you go the bigger the distance is needed.
d. this training is a must before you attempt to get energy from Schumann Waveguide without any Tx.
Wesley
-
Greetings.
lancaIV
I usually try google translator. This allows me to translate my thoughts faster.
Now we are going through the TRL-5 LEAN stage, this is the engineering stage. when we try to integrate a physical phenomenon into a real device. What we actually do.
Concerning Ether or broadcast - I had such an idea, and I hope. that I will do it. But this can be done already when there is a working prototype.
Now, at the moment, my colleague and I are setting up an experiment, because a
person wants to see it all with his eyes. secondly, he is a professional designer of electrical machines and drives.
But since everything is done on enthusiasm, it is difficult for me to indicate a deadline.
The simplest thing is to follow in the footsteps of the Shark, Vamus and wind up a beautiful and non-working craft so that people believe in another fake. But this is the easiest thing, and without it - honestly, it's terribly difficult. Because now we do everything with our own money. which are hard for us in this country.
So when Wesley talks about how hard life is for some individuals, I'm not sure. which is hard. But then. that as an inventor I am experiencing difficulties is a fact. But since I have no confidence. that someone will pay for my complaints - I have to somehow put up with it and move on.
As for environmental friendliness and other pleasant things - then I just count on it.
Now for Wesley's questions. I have a colleague, his name is Andrey. we plan to. that he would like the issues of negotiations with investors.
About excellent English. It's all Google. This is the Internet resource most influenced by the KGB. even in one video. in which you were poisoned. perhaps alcohol or vodka, this is probably because a special chip was inserted into the third bottle. which gets inside you and controls your consciousness. And even now you need to think about that. what you write is the influence of this chip that has penetrated to you.
These are such insidious FSBs.
I'm in the process now.
-
I hope my jokes are received adequately.
As for the majority of Russian goods. then, as a rule, all these goods are made in China. It is probably suicide to create production in Russia. As a rule, this is China or India. But China is more common.
The reason is to stimulate the state.
But practice shows. that most people from the post-Soviet space are trying to get into Silicon Valley To do this, they organize a company in the same Delaware.
where to organize a laboratory? It's hard for me to say. I would work in the US in the future as I plan to devote my life to working on these technologies. my main dream is to influence the transport system. Because transport without borders or with its minimization is a delightful thing.
-
//Concerning Ether //
// now we do everything with our own money.// hard for us in this country.//
//I have a colleague, his name is Andrey. we plan // negotiations with investors.//
About excellent English. It's all Google.
Thank you Ilya.
For entire world, Ether doesn't exist so for many of us it degradates our discussion level.
Can you use better "Google translator", as only one comment of yours was really good. :)
Time is going to fast, no negotiation with Americans will go good ,
(disbelieve,sanctions, lack of confidence to deal with entities from your region.) and you need money now.
We can't sale anything anymore.
The country is over-saturated with goods.
We buy, don't repair the product than throw it out, because it was scratched, or button doesn't work,
and than we buy new one, as everything is so cheap here.
We are spoiled with goods.
Excellent motor without application means nothing here so target is to attract manufacturers, not end users.
But than.. our manufacturing is not in USA any more.
everything is in Korea drifting from China as China becomes contentious.
Some people say that after finishing deals with Russia we going to finish deals with China and if not than China finishes us.
Dealing with Chinese or Korean working in USA factory there, is likely not going to help.
However an American can try to approach the few who are still here.
your mileage may vary..( idiom)
Wesley
-
stivep
The country is over-saturated with goods.
We buy, don't repair the product than throw it out, because it was scratched, or button doesn't work,
and than we buy new one, as everything is so cheap here.
We are spoiled with goods.
You mean cheap, common consumer goods for the masses however niche technology is a completely different story.
I see Honeywell/Siemens PLC's going for $3000 with the same chip as a $10 Arduino performing the same function. Or maybe the EMC on my high efficiency furnace motor costing $1000, not the motor just the 1/2 hp electronic motor controller. In fact almost everything outside of mainstream bulk manufacturing commands a premium price.
So your obviously misguided if you think new cutting edge technology wouldn't command a premium price. That's the cool thing about being an Engineer and building my own technology because I decide who I sell to at whatever price I see fit. In my area of expertise I routinely turn away offers for employment, business and customers for no other reason than I don't like there attitude. I can do this because I have something they want which others cannot provide and customers are a dime a dozen.
So this notion than anyone is under the gun to give into big business and manufacturing is misguided at best. Unless they were willing to offer a completely ridiculous amount of money up front I would even return there emails, lol. The problem is most of these people and there lawyers are assholes and it's generally a waste of time.
Regards
AC
-
//I see Honeywell/Siemens PLC's going for $3000 with the same chip as a $10 Arduino performing the same function. Or maybe the EMC on my high efficiency furnace motor costing $1000, not the motor just the 1/2 hp electronic motor controller. In fact almost everything outside of mainstream bulk manufacturing commands a premium price. //
//So this notion than anyone is under the gun to give into big business and manufacturing is misguided at best.//
Thank you good point.
The answer is simple .
Good mechanic is in his niche not because the niche is so unique, but because he was in need to find it, so is every business buying for less than
others around just because they are not in need to know and have it.
Perfectionism is seen if you perform at price others cant give or if you have reputation- name.
Don't be surprised if I have your $3000 device and $1000 motor for just 15 dollars.
I bought really expensive $119000 Aeroflex synthesizer generator for $150 from military contractor, and years ago, my first (half of a million dollars microscope) for $100
My second one wasn't that cheap;
Often it helps to know what lab closes forever, as they must to provide a proof that equipment financed by government was offered for sale or given as a donation.
90% of all sales is for US citizens only and we often have no rights to resale it outside of USA.
We are the nation of laws and it helps a lot.
The specialized tools need specialized application and that is the domain of specialist.
The problem of saturated in equipment countries is lack of buyers.
Perfectly good Haas CNC can go as low as 10k.
Sharp CNC 4 axis with 3000h can go for 5k
Not many guys need furnace with its motor.
_______________________________
New Tesla or any other luxury car cost ~66k and 5minutes old Tesla cost 20% less.
After 2 years it loses another 20%.
But average Joe is not going to buy electric motor of Tesla car, and if he has one, he may not know its value and sale it for $50 in scrap yard.
The types of business activity :
-Buy cheap sale for more - is the foundation of every retail store everywhere in the world.
-Do job and make money on it is possible if customer is paying for parts and your labor.
-Production needs demand, and parts are the effects of another facility ability to survive so Name and Reputation helps.
llya wants to make motor, he needs parts and means of production.
That is an investment for him however in Belarus bribe system a side job is pretty common these days ,
The second option is simply using government
facilities "off the record."
American buyer wants to know how reliable is the the manufacturer, the product, and delivery of it.
Any company there will not have reputation of Honeywell/Siemens.
Legal note:Opinion expressed is my own according to American constitution.
Wesley
-
Greetings.
I agree that the word Ether is associated with a relic of the past. But here the question of using this term is a personal question). In this case, I'm talking about the staging environment and that. that there is a charge that is between the plates of the capacitor and so on.
The question is that if all stages of development go well, then it makes sense to think about transport further. Since the same electric transport in the form of aircraft is very limited in terms of flight
range.But now it's too early for me to think about the market). At the 9th level of mass production, I'm just moving from fourth to fifth.
Manufacturing is a completely different stage. If there is funding, then usually a person with a registered office in the United States tries to place his orders in China. But this is yet to come. for a startup, 9 circles of hell where startups die. I'm talking about LEAN. The risks to death for my project are the same as for everyone else, but if there are difficulties with the non-obviousness of the product itself and not an obvious gain, there is a range or reduction in energy consumption costs.
I have a good friend, an electronics engineer. He works for a startup. which received a legal address in the United States and an investor from the United States, the prototyping and product creation process takes place at the branch. which is located in Moscow.
Google has a lot of absorbed projects that most likely work in different countries and the laboratory itself can theoretically be located in different locations.
I personally have not been to the USA and I have a language barrier. It's still difficult for me to read English text without a dictionary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-0KLH3WNoU&lc=UgwYoE79z3mYbXH1UbB4AaABAg&ab_channel=ИльяСчастливчик
-
While we are discussing - that is our spring and I need to prepare for experiments
-
What, all the same, for the motor from the washing machine constantly apear in the pictures?
With two metalic disk(magnet?) on the shaft. Just some kind of winding machine, or a hint of something more?
-
Hello Ilya,when You look "in the western" about "industrial price politics" in the last decades You will see as one extreme example the at first " b2b" and later "b2c" instrument called : video-recorder !
Grundig as first developper from the "audio/video magnetic tape"-player/-recorder,"Grundig2000".
First "b2b" market price in the 70' : 50 000 Deutsche Mark each.( A Mercedes car price in End-70')
Some years later the japanese industry entered the market with Beta and VHS :from 50 000 DM the price dropped to 5 000 DM ,ten years later 1000 DM average.It was the time when the CD and some years later DVD were introduced from lab to market .
Today this Grundig2000 video-recorder with same/ better function You get as CD/DVD-player fob factory for 25 US$ :
1/1000 price drop
Industrial mass production process machine patent rights lost ( utility model 10 years / technical patent 20 years :when rights granted !) ,the production object : the consumer good patent rights lost ,the material production process patent right lost :
this restriction barrier over the given time let drop the total consumer end price :from market entrance price after latest 20 years -90%/-99% less to pay !
Or : there is an international price cartell to hold the price high(er) ! Interests ! Credit-market !
When we think in electronics,we mean : controle ! And this happens by software/ logic app .Here we have industrial " Copyright",for the other side "freeware/low cost shareware" !For the same app service we ,as private user,can pay 1000 units or upload - for free !
About material price drop : Wacker silicon/silicium -chip/solar cell grade- production - Monopol(e) in the 80'/90'
to now 8 US$/Kg Oxford Uni production process costs ! More than 90% less !
It is about solution research&development&availability : ( real physical) free trade !
Industrial/commercial price transparency ! In local cash market/ in un-/controlled credit markets !
(Ready to use) Production units per day/hour/minutes !
Observing the peswiki listed trials we see also that most fails does not happen during market competiton,but before : inventor(-s)/investors their worth/influence overestimation and by this project mismanagement !
Economial LOGIC ::)
Since 30 years the industry had the opportunity to save over 50% electricity by power factor controlled permanent magnet motors use :
probably only 1/20 applied this opportunity !
It is cheaper to pay 125 US$ for a conventional electric motor than 375 US$ for the optimized controlled PM counterpart : these 250 US$ probably for a 10 years use tool with 1 year R.O.I. !
It is also true : the difference between conventional electric motor and controlled PM motor has not be such high,2021 probably - by top quality management : the same production costs - in factory and fob production machine !
250 US$ were over-head/marketing margins : not existing in restriction/barrier free 3/4d print culture !
Scan2C.A.D. C.A.D.2C.N.C. C.N.C.2mill/laser/plasmatorch
We are from the 80' DECKEL-MAHO-GILDEMEISTER generation and freeware : TURBO-C.N.C.
And in wait that metglas-permalloy laminates will become as cheap as conventional " dynamoblech":
≤ 5 US$/Kg( fob factory)
from 25 US$/Kg and more !
https://m.portuguese.alibaba.com/promotion/promotion_permalloy-promotion-list.html (https://m.portuguese.alibaba.com/promotion/promotion_permalloy-promotion-list.html)
It is common that factory prices are not "real/net",because "export incentives" by the several estates !
beside "money laundering" = Geldwaesche we see also an international "price laundering"= Preiswaesche as industrial politics by the estates !
Unit "List price" less a. : up to 50% mass buy discount less b. export incentive !
best example for "manipulated markets" Wesley his experience about price/worth,#178 :
"........
Don't be surprised if I have your $3000 device and $1000 motor for just 15 dollars.
I bought really expensive $119000 Aeroflex synthesizer generator for $150 from military contractor, and years ago, my first (half of a million dollars microscope) for $100My second one wasn't that cheap;
Often it helps to know what lab closes forever, as they must to provide a proof that equipment financed by government was offered for sale or given as a donation.
90% of all sales is for US citizens only and we often have no rights to resale it outside of USA.
......."
We have to differ "internal US$" value and "external US$" value ( internal/external EURO) ,similar PPP calculation: spread in average 37/1
US$ and EURO are "not really free" currencies , if not cash market exchange related !
Price fixing by private ,profit-oriented, companies , "inter-banking" agreement (and interest) !
When Wesley wrote about 3 700 000 US$ patrimony and we take George Bush his US/Afghanistan ratio : 2 000 000 /20 000
( some could mean : rassistic arrogance ! but based by common :
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versicherungsmathematik (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Versicherungsmathematik) )
this deducts to 37 000 US$ in local -Afghanistan- patrimony worth !
real Kg-classical economy rules based PPP
https://www.ig.com/en/trading-strategies/what-is-purchasing-power-parity--ppp---191106#:~:text=Purchasing%20power%20parity%20(PPP)%20is,the%20currencies%20have%20been%20exchanged (https://www.ig.com/en/trading-strategies/what-is-purchasing-power-parity--ppp---191106#:~:text=Purchasing%20power%20parity%20(PPP)%20is,the%20currencies%20have%20been%20exchanged).
compared : https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/aeroflex/fs5000b18.htm (https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/aeroflex/fs5000b18.htm)
https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/pdf/fs5000.pdf (https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/pdf/fs5000.pdf)
page 5 19-20 lbs weight = average 8,5 Kg
$81,995.00 / 8,5 Kg = + IVA : > 10 000 US$ per Kg tool ;D
( exzellenter "ins Gehirn geschissen" Preis, :-[ Pardon-me for the vulgarity,but: STIMMT ! ;D
Das Kredit-Proletariat hat mich sozial verzogen ! :P )
150 US$/8,5 Kg , ;) OKAY ! BEST FAIR PRICE MANAGEMENT !
If in the future millionaires look for food in garbage cans then the question arises:
what / who defines "MILLIONAIRS"?! In debits ?
It seems international we have a growing "finance positive"-society ,but "positive" is negative ! Clear,is it not ?! :)
-
I will rewrite your response a little:
// the user may pay for software or have it for free for a month or so..//
//competition kills product despite how much inventor and investor paid for it.//
//energy efficient motors are only 20% of market, as they are more expensive, despite fact that production cost and machinery is the same//
//It is cheaper to pay 125 US$ for a conventional electric motor than 375 US$ for the optimized controlled PM one.//
//metglas-permalloy laminates becomes incredibly cheap.//
//internal value is different that outside of USA value of the goods//
//https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/aeroflex/fs5000b18.htm (https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/aeroflex/fs5000b18.htm)//
The 80' DECKEL-MAHO-GILDEMEISTER CNC is dream for me to have just to look at it and touch it.
But unfortunate is that most of audience here doesn't know what I'm talking about.
My love is German, Swiss, beauties of technology, and they are by my standards, the best human civilization
has ever made in its entire history of evolution.
Russia manifests its "victory" in WW2 and from history perspective they are total losers.
It was Germany that won the war after 45 years of soviet occupation and the Fall of Berlin wall
cold-war/berlin-wall
(https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/berlin-wall#:~:text=The%20Berlin%20Wall:%20The%20Fall%20of%20the%20Wall,GDR%20were%20free%20to%20cross%20the%20country%E2%80%99s%20borders.)from perspective of present time in comparison to the past:
- Russian Federation is the third world feudal country
- Germany is the center of the dreams of almost every non-brainwashed Russian.
(https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/berlin-wall#:~:text=The%20Berlin%20Wall:%20The%20Fall%20of%20the%20Wall,GDR%20were%20free%20to%20cross%20the%20country%E2%80%99s%20borders.)__________________________________________________
(https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/berlin-wall#:~:text=The%20Berlin%20Wall:%20The%20Fall%20of%20the%20Wall,GDR%20were%20free%20to%20cross%20the%20country%E2%80%99s%20borders.)
The synthesizer I have, was much more expensive than Aeroflex FS5000B-18
It is Aeroflex 5220 and is so unique that in entire world of eBay, you have none of them for sale for years.
At the time of its production its price was compatible with purchase of a house in suburban New York.
Obsolescence as a mechanism makes cheap prices. Planned_obsolescence
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence#:~:text=In%20economics%20and%20industrial%20design%2C%20planned%20obsolescence%20%28also,to%20function%2C%20or%20might%20be%20perceived%20as%20unfashionable.)Buyer doesn't care about saving on electricity, he needs the tool to make more money as long as end user pays for it.
America is over-saturated with machinery, equipment, tools of the past. We could resale it outside of USA for good money but,
we are the country of laws, and if I sign document saying not for sale outside of USA, I will obey the law.
In contrast: In Eastern Europe regimes, almost everything can be stolen, and you can buy it, but they have not much to offer.
Legal note : opinion expressed in entirely my own according to American constitution.
Wesley
-
Greetings.
What you can see in the picture is a repository of my old experiments. In order to check certain hypotheses - I use the means at hand. Therefore, for this, everything comes into play. what is at hand.
As for the economy, it goes to reduce the cost and in fact we are moving either towards socialism or communism in the presence of capitalism. On the other hand, technologies allow us to perform certain actions more and more for a lower price. on the other hand, the Western World, like the "comic" one, also lives according to market laws. all laws are created by people.
It's hard for me to say something about Switzerland or Germany. I have never been there and it is difficult for me to do diffusion. But I guess. that the standard of living in these countries is different from life in Russia or Belarus. Just like life itself in Russia is different. There are Muscovites and residents of St. Petersburg who differ in the standard of living of people from the provinces.
USA needs satellites. which are donlers of the economy from which the United States is siphoning resources. the USA is also trying to be the financial capital of the world. Therefore, in fact, yes, as Elon Musk said, the United States is a country of opportunity, and this is already a cliché.
As far as technology obsolescence or pricing goes, I'm not at that level right now. to think about it so deeply. At the moment, I am now delving into the calculations of the Schmitt trigger based on NOT gates. Therefore, it is difficult to somehow pull your business, along the way to engage in experiments in terms of time.
Now my focus is on the technical side. This is more important now, because there is no technology - everything else is meaningless.
-
Now at the moment my head hurts not only for that. to make experiments related to non-obvious. but also related to obvious things. One of the schemes. which we are trying to implement is to create a mother's laboratory in which we could be engaged in small prototyping and the manufacture of electric vehicles, which would allow us to have the finances to retain or expand the team, on the other hand, the presence of metalworking and other equipment. with the help of which it would be possible to earn money and at the same time be able to pay rent for premises and so on.
But there are some but. It would seem that there is a market and it is saturated. But we have customers. which we could offer small electric transport, but now. in order to resolve issues with equipment, we have to deal with some small things, which takes a lot of time. And it turns out. that the Chinese product has simply lost its relevance in terms of quality.
there are difficulties. But now, due to consumerism, there are no high-quality and luxury things, that's that. what I observe in the post-Soviet space.
now I'm looking at that. what Elon Musk is doing. He's trying to build awesome cars.
But of course, with electric vehicles we have problems with flight range and the ability to lift weight. But no matter how the propaganda works, in most cases we all use internal combustion engines and in fact we still use a kerosene lamp under the soot.
Since childhood, I would have liked to have some kind of vehicle, but to be honest, I'm a fan of the railway. I have a weird thing since childhood when I ride trains.
But the point is. that making cool things about transportation in terms of design and yet affordable to the consumer is one of those things. which I would like to influence.
But these are all flights to the future. in fact, I still need to lower it to level 4. in which we make pistols at 5, and get the minimum product to demonstrate.
But after that. how we will conduct the experiment. Each Expert Advisor now takes half a year. so it's not all that simple in terms of thinking about a bright and wonderful future. But I live by some kind of vision putting absolutely everything on the line.
-
Some photos
It's evening now. This is a photo of my facebook page https://web.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100020462107754
Wesley - write, there is an option to call
gmail rattchanel@gmail.com
-
Greetings Wesley. Why do not you write. I would really like to see those devices. which you call workers, such as Akula, Kapanadze, Vasmus, and so on.
I have something to show, but I would like you to confirm what you are talking about.
After all, I am primarily interested in the interlocutor not by the criterion of speaking. and the main criterion is to do. and this can be revealed through looking and not listening
While I have an experiment that has proven the physics of processes, the fact cannot be disputed.
But you are talking about a beautiful life in Switzerland, but you haven’t said exactly where you live? Lithuania or USA?
You tried to show. that you are a tough pepper, and I'm ready to take it. But I would like to check that everything you say is true. Because I can offer people something mutually beneficial, but it's important for me. what benefits can you personally provide to the community.
We have a great morning now) It's raining and I want an answer from you Wesley.
I remember how 10 years ago you told something about Kapanadze. I did not understand anything, but there was something in the background of the detector receiver
-
Greetings Wesley. Why are you not writing?.
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557544/#msg557544
This happens to me many times a year.
I also have periods when I,m working to much.
On the other hand audience wants some technical and scientific entertainment on public forum.
What's going on with Global Wave, How is Staruhin?
It looks like he lost part of his funding.
___________________
Wesley
-
Greetings Wesley. Why are you not writing?.
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557544/#msg557544
___________________
I will try to respond to some comments in my free time.
But if my response will be related strictly to main goal of my study and experiments I will write
in my main for me - two places of this forum:
1. https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg557086/#msg557086 (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg557086/#msg557086)
Here I write and accept only!! comments related to EM Wave, Propagation, physical phenomena, Tesla coil,
dielectric constant, Zenneck Wave, Surface Wave, energy transfer and so on.
If something is to far from main subject I will move it to other place or even delete it .
https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg557243/#msg557243 (https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg557243/#msg557243)
In this part of forum I accept more broad different or diverse subjects of discussion.
The main goal is to do not create there any form of chaos, destructing valuable commenters and readers.
Wesley
-
Greetings. now I cannot tell you anything about Starukhin. When the free energy movement began in the country, he traveled a lot to the inventors. Everything. those who worked with him did not have a real device - it was just some kind of device. who supposedly demonstrated some kind of hypothesis. On that moment. when I showed my crafts, these were hypotheses.
It was relatively long ago.
I left and began to work in the suburbs. then I moved to Minsk, where I am now.
now he has philosophy and esotericism. advertising of some strange things and so on.
I did not participate in his business schemes and do not accept. His audience was different on the channel, and probably now. But it is better to ask you about him.
I find it logical to talk about myself and my work.
I have some interest in phoning and communicating. But not about politics. Purely technical questions and nothing more.
I asked you a straightforward question. Is there something. what could you show? You talked with Kapanadze and many others. You are talking about people. which supposedly have devices. I would like - you yourself wildly collected. After all, as I understood. since you talk about them so much, then you already have such a device. which you personally could demonstrate if you understand the principle itself.
I have something to show. True, I can now have a peezd in a new building in Minsk itself.
We can call ZOOM
-
the answer to you question is here in Russian:
https://youtu.be/XOTLfnMOSqQ?t=1067
(https://youtu.be/XOTLfnMOSqQ?t=1067)I hope your "curators-overseers " will understand that what they wanted to know :)
Slide correction to text from the video that may make them not so sad is that
direction of Dr Corum is to make money and if our government offers him little different vector of activity
than he may not be so aggressive in big energy transfer from USA to e.g Moscow heee.
there are plenty of other applications e.g communication, internet, counterintelligence, ...
So what is bad than?
Information spread by me, activated plenty of experimenters who based on Dr Corum
patents may do the same what I 'm interested with.
-and that is not covered in Dr Corum patents
-and it can't be patented as it will go in conflict with patent law,
that requires -
the technology to be new and not published prior to filing.
Putin will not stop it, but he may try.
It makes "things" go only faster..
His engineers will likely not introduce energy extraction form Schumann waveguide,
-as it is in conflict with his activity.
He exists due to sale of gas and oil.
USA is too strong economically to be harmed to much.
I don't care if I'm first or second or none of them.
My dear Ilya it was the dictator big mistake, and
this all is my response to events from year 2011.
I was different person than.
But he can donate few billions dollars to American dogs and cats shelters.
and than I may change my opinion about him :)
Legal note; opinion expressed is my own and is "humoristic" / moralistic in nature.
-based on constitution of USA
Wesley
-
Greetings. Everything is so politicized here. I wanted to simplify our conversation. But you are all into politics and into politics.
I watched your videos. A simple question - does your device eat?
You have been showing something for 10 years and explaining, maybe more than 10 years.
I tried to raise interesting questions. and you are all about Schumann waves.
Now I am beginning to understand why investors have such a huge skepticism towards alternatives. You are furnished with equipment, as I understand it - this is a pleasant environment. so is there any experimental confirmation of your hypotheses? This is what would be interesting and important for me now.
-
Sorry
I cannot help myself
It is just that fishing for investors at open source forum has been against rules here forever?
I have honestly not been following all words written here
Nor have I ever seen Wesley asking for investment or ?
I just know Stefan has never allowed businessmen to solicit money here,it would actually make him accessory
To scam ?
( I make no reference to persons posting in topic at this moment)
And there are plenty of those who tried over the years.
Some of us cherish this open source venue, and many work tirelessly here and elsewhere
For tens and tens of years ...
Sorry to interrupt!
-
Though it has given insight into the "character" of various of the people posting
here and some interesting perspectives upon some aspects of history...
I have to agree that the sales pitch part of the conversations are off topic
in an open source community.
Also, allusions to the secrets of a free energy device are the classic indications
of a scam in progress.
Got some thing ? Lay it on the table.
-
Translated to Russian too.
Thank you Foor and Ramset.
Ilya comes from different part of the world and he may be just not informed
what is right and what is wrong in our society.
Dear Ilya this is open forum. People here are in hope to get information .
I understand that you have energy efficient motor you want to manufacture and sale.
Yes you have rights to mention your commercial interest here but not repeatedly and not in form of solicitation.
NOT DIRECT/ INDIRECT FISHING FOR INVESTOR IS ALLOWED HERE . :)
We have no rights to:
-ask for money,
-look for investors here.
-we can't make offers or accept offers.
__________________________
We have rights to:
-Share information into the extend we see as reasonable.
- educate others in phenomena related to the concept.
- scientific conversations.
______________________
Stefan is always right , his superiority overrides our own, despite of what we think about his decisions
I'm not interested in investing in anything,
I don't need, money, tools, opportunities .
I know that it sounds strange but It is me who is helping others in exchange for nothing.
That means people whom I have helped are not obligated to anything at all.
I don't help people based on their poverty level but based on their scientific value.
I can't help everyone
I don't want to help everyone
and I'm not a person of wealth.
Please understand that:
-We not talking politics here but we are allowed to mention political figures from the perspective of
scientific or technological impact of technology on the economy of the countries and its leaders.
Talking about history of science in format of historical events that took place in that time period is not politics.
Мы не говорим здесь о политике, но нам разрешается упоминать политических деятелей с точки зрения научного или технологического
воздействия технологий на экономику стран и их лидеров. Говорить об истории науки в формате исторических событий того времени - это не политика.
I gave all information about technology of Dr Corum here and everyone can try to build it.
My statement is as mentioned in my last post.
Answers to the questions about working model of my device are covered in my post from above.
It is exactly that what Dr Corum has in his patents.
You Ilya are not obligated to, present to us your working motor or share anything about your motor .
_______________________________________________________
Уважаемый Илья, это открытый форум.
Здесь люди надеются получить информацию.
Я понимаю, что у вас есть энергоэффективный двигатель, который вы хотите произвести и продать.
Да, вы имеете право упомнyть здесь свой коммерческий интерес, но не повторно и не в форме приглашения.
ПРЯМАЯ / КОСВЕННАЯ РЫБАЛКА ИНВЕСТОРА ЗДЕСЬ НЕ РАЗРЕШЕНА. )
У нас нет прав -cпрашивать - "ищем инвесторов."
- мы не можем делать предложения.
Я хочу, чтобы у вас все получилось, но Есть правила.
Люди на этом форуме ожидают обмена информацией о науке, технологических концепциях и экспериментах
Если вам есть чем поделиться, то это кaк ожидается , должно быть на определенном уровне.
У людей есть чувства нo-
-Будьте готовы к тому, что люди здесь соблюдают правила,
согласно которым наука не является доброй, или приятной,У науки нет чувств
Наука точна.
Так что некоторые ребята могут внимательно изучить ваши тезисы и концепции.
-если вам бросают вызов вы получаете уважение и заводите друзей, если можете доказать, что другие неправы
Здесь есть самые разные люди, от студентов до профессоров,
Wesley
-
Dear Wesley.
I do not consider you as an investor and did not intend to invite you anywhere. First of all, I'm interested in communicating with people. Those thoughts. which I had - I expressed. we began to discuss with you on the topic of energy.
I invited you to Zoom to have a meal and chat. Which is normal and commonplace for ordinary people.
If you are considering. what I have considered is your guess.
My answer is that I do not plan to use this site to attract investment. I have a partner for this. which plans thereafter. how we will make a prototype and if everything is successful, go directly to them.
Meeting and meeting people is not a violation of local rules for me. I offered to communicate in the expectation that we could get something useful from the very communication.
But you have escaped the answer as to whether you have any real results or not. You offered to look at the topics. where you tell something. And yahotel understands sense - what practical result did all this lead to for you?
There are people here. who could tell about themselves to make it clear. who does what. and maybe this could lead to some kind of real-life creative tandem.
But the creative tandem we have with you wildly Wesley manifests itself through communication about politics and controversy about electromagnetism.
But we have not yet succeeded in having a constructive conversation, because it does not turn into something practical.
even the elemental experiments of Coulomb. in which it would be possible to revise the conclusions and modern racifications.
You said. that you have a vacuum chamber, why not do an experiment and record a video?
At the moment I have to do an experiment and now there is a lot of work. which brings me money for household needs. A survey in Zoom, according to my hypothesis, could speed up printing time. and the cut from the dialogue itself is shared.
But if your fantasy is working in its planes, what can I say? I don’t know what to tell you yet.
Politics need to be discussed. otherwise. what can I say - physics. But talking about physics or showing experience is more valuable for the community. than disputes about Starukhin or Putin with Obama.
-
I asked you a straightforward question. Is there something. what could you show? You talked with Kapanadze and many others. You are talking about people. which supposedly have devices.
There is a book by Patrick Kelly. Unfortunately, who recently passed away from us into another world. There are more than three thousand ! pages.
At least half of them are passed off as workers.I have made some of them.Nothing succeeded. I don’t understand at all how this world works.
-
Dear Wesley.
But you have escaped the answer as to whether you have any real results or not.
Wesley manifests itself through communication about politics and controversy about electromagnetism.
You said. that you have a vacuum chamber, why not do an experiment and record a video?
But talking about physics or showing experience is more valuable for the community. than disputes about Starukhin or Putin with Obama.
I think we have problem with communication.
My answer to the Russian speaking population was formulated in Russian here at the end of my video:
The answer is Yes 100% conformed.
https://youtu.be/XOTLfnMOSqQ?t=1067 (https://youtu.be/XOTLfnMOSqQ?t=1067)
Starukhin or Putin with Obama are historical figures mentioned as affecting, impacting or influencing science and technical development in given historical time .
There is no politic/politics here form the Western World perspective please memorize it once and forever and don't challenge it any longer.
Facts about WW2 are mentioned as affecting science and technology due to loss of its valuable members and activists.
Example: Katyn massacre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre) was mentioned because Soviets killed there plenty of intellectuals , professors, and professionals.
There is a stark difference between being wrong and just having a different point of view… yes..you have rights to your opinion..
But in any of it you may be challenged by someone.
____________________________________________
I have more than one vacuum chamber but I'm not open to just jump and start to use it in experiment because you
suggest me to do it.
https://youtu.be/ISoW1yhVpjs (https://youtu.be/ISoW1yhVpjs)
https://youtu.be/MIfWgX8hA4A (https://youtu.be/MIfWgX8hA4A)
My lab tools are not the elements of my pride, nor I have any pride.
Pride is an essential element of the human condition. Feeling good about yourself is indispensable for your emotional well-being.
However, pride can be the thin end of the wedge as regards your social behavior
I don't care about pride, its elements and its values .
However I respect other people pride.
I'm who I'm thanks to genetical, social, environmental conditions.
But talking about physics or showing experience is more valuable for the community.
I did show everything in my videos and my writings.
start reading from here: https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/180/ (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/180/)
or visit this more broad and not so targeted section https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/180/
(https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/180/)If you have questions in this particular direction I'll try to provide the answers for you.
_______________________________________________
What else do you want Ilya?
I don't intend to convince you or anyone else. Dr Corum is in Business so he did it and build the tower.
He made over 200 patents and applications but you are definitely not the one he wants to convince.
Some idiots out there who need the proof that EM wave exists in the 2D interface will not watch this proof:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIIABIU3tRw&t=1336s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIIABIU3tRw&t=1336s)
and you Ilya want me to provide the proof in form Idiots will accept?
What group you consider yourself you belong to Dear Ilya?
I'm an idiot in many other areas, but not in area of our interest.
In my standards I'm absolutely well prepared.
Вы, Илья, хотите, чтобы я предоставил доказательство в форме, которую примут Идиоты?
К какой группе ты себя относишь - Уважаемый Илья?
Я идиот во многих других областях, но не в сфере нашего участия в исследованиях
По моим стандартам я абсолютно хорошо подготовлен.
Wesley
-
hello friends.
I am from Georgia, the homeland of Kapanadze, an engineer of complex and special devices, I am 55 years old, I have been working such devices for a long time. my real name is Steven
-
Greetings.
Dear If, I do not belong to any group. I am sure that from communication, even if it is a podkasat format, it would be fashionable to touch on interesting things.
I am not talking about resentment.
I'm talking about chatting about interesting things and at the same time thinking about how to turn these things into something interesting.
You can be a specialist - show me something applied. If it exists and you have a desire to share it, I would take a look. maybe other people could see it.
But so far I have a lot of general reasoning. And I wrote about some things related to inconsistencies in electrical engineering of some representations.
Why not discuss it and shoot it on video with such a motley set of equipment?
-
show me something applied. If it exists and you have a desire to share it, I would take a look. maybe other people could see it.
Why not discuss it and shoot it on video with such a motley set of equipment?
Because you don't understand English I will respond to you in Russian.
I'm little moved Dear Ilya.
I did make video and I did show the results
Proof of concept was provided by close to 1 billion dollars investment of Dr Corum.(I think ).
Sorry Ilya Im little moved, I think we don't belong to the same league. (idiom)
________________________________________
show me something applied. If it exists and you have a desire to share it, I would take a look. maybe other people could see it.
Поскольку вы не понимаете по-английски, я отвечу вам по-русски.
Hачиная с этого момента, у вас есть пошаговая инструкция, как провести собственный эксперимент.
Cначала вам нужно изучить явления, посылая энергию из точки A в точку B, прежде чем вы попытаетесь извлечь энергию из волновода Шумана.
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg546827/#msg546827 (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg546827/#msg546827)
Я снял видео и продемонстрировал результаты.
Доказательство концепции было предоставлено доктором Корумом, инвестировавшим около 1 миллиарда долларов.
Если не ошибаюсь, поддержку Viziv была оказана еврейской Нефтяной компанией Шеврона.
Here is his tower, Вот его башня
https://youtu.be/wFiW2lqdnlM?t=672
Geography 2050 | AGS Symposium 2018 | Powering Our Future Planet | Emerging Energy Technologies
Извини, Илья, я немного тронут, думаю, мы не в одной лиге.
____________________________________________
Это понятно сейчас?
-или вам тоже так сложно понять это на простом русском языке. !!!!
Мое устройство точно такое же, как устройство доктора Корума. Единственная разница в том, что
он может и хочет отправлять энергию, например, из Милфорда, штат Техас, в Москву,
но он не хочет делать то, что делаю я, потому что это противоречит его коммерческой цели
Я вообще не посылаю никакой энергии.
Я просто получаю энергию из волновода Шумана с помощью того же устройства, что и доктор Корум.
Так что доктор Корум является доказательством, и поэтому Chevron решила потратить много денег.
и им приходилось спрашивать мнение лучших ученых, чем вы, прежде чем тратить деньги.
Но если это вас не убеждает, то нам не о чем говорить поскольку я тоже представил явления
на моем видео -Но вы этого не видите.
Это разочаровывает,,, я думал, что вы способны летать гораздо выше.
Opinion expressed is my own according to constitution of USA
Wesley
-
Proof of concept was provided by close to 1 billion dollars investment of Dr Corum.(I think ).
;D
At first : the total venture capital fundings in period 2013-2021 : 45 Mio. US$
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/texzon
seconds,their actual situation :
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/36592191/Viziv_Technologies,_LLC (https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/36592191/Viziv_Technologies,_LLC)
https://www.whitesecuritieslaw.com/viziv-technologies-llc-securities-investigation/
upps, ::)
-
What is Elon Musk saying? After all, batteries are no longer needed, the only question is how and where to get energy, if you consider your position and use these technologies yourself for growing needs?
-
What is Elon Musk saying? After all, batteries are no longer needed, the only question is how and where to get energy, if you consider your position and use these technologies yourself for growing needs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome#:~:text=Asperger%20syndrome%20(AS)%2C%20also,patterns%20of%20behavior%20and%20interests.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/Y-300-Z-BECKRS-B-2018-N-23423 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/Y-300-Z-BECKRS-B-2018-N-23423)
If an applicant needs a supervisor, it is permissible to conclude that he lacks the ability not only in his own affairs, but also in foreign affairs and in particular in the context of the exercise of sovereign activities, to take care of these independently, with the result that he is the does not have the required suitability in terms of health and, regardless of his / her professional suitability, cannot be officially appointed. (Rn. 15) (editorial principle)
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57045770 (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57045770)
?% mental illness grade ? CEO-capability without permanent accompanying Tutor/Supervisor ?
management liability
Mister Musk patrimony in Tesla Inc. represents probably less than 2% from the total company-owned and company-borrowed finance capital (activa/passiva) ! Including outside borrowed credits for each -not Tesla Inc. financed- car or other by them produced object !
But a wrong action/"word" can cost the financing investors more than his 2% !
"Powerwall" : not based by batteries ? ::)
-
Mr. Wesley: Could you describe what is happening in a little more detail?
Wesley says that there are surface wave technologies and these technologies are already breaking into our world.
I can't trace something going on with uh
by that company. which attracts money for the development of Schumann Waves, surface Waves, I was primarily interested in the practical aspect.
If Wesley is so sure there is a step-by-step instruction, why isn't it put into practice?
Why not show it to the public after that. How have you been running your channel for 10 years?
-
Greetings Lanka.
If these technologies were already so real. then why shouldn't Elon mask pay attention to Wesley. which can tell you how to transfer energy over a distance. Then the need for rechargeable batteries disappears. Why store energy when it's easy to get from New York to Moscow? why transfer energy across the Atlantic. if just in California?
-
Greetings Lanka.
If these technologies were already so real. then why shouldn't Elon mask pay attention to Wesley. which can tell you how to transfer energy over a distance. Then the need for rechargeable batteries disappears. Why store energy when it's easy to get from New York to Moscow? why transfer energy across the Atlantic. if just in California?
It seems that Elon is mental weared with a mask,but his family name is MUSK ! ;) ( btw : Lanka >:( , ;D )
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission)
In comparison to the 3 billion kW
available from the earth system, it is
possible to calculate what the U.S.
consumed in electricity. In 2000,
about 11 Quads (quadrillion Btu)
were actually used by consumers
for electrical needs, which is equal
to 3.7 trillion kWh. Dividing by the
8760 hours in a year, we nd that
only 425 million kW are needed
on site to power our entire country.
This would still leave 2.6 billion
kW for the rest of the world, which
only needs 1.7 billion kW (by 2001
US DOE estimates).
In the US, out of the total electri-
cal power generated using wire
transmission (about 31 Quads), a
full 2/3 is totally wasted in “con-
version losses.”6[/size] (Ref.: Electricity
Flow Chart 1999, which contains
US DOE/EIA data.) No other en-
ergy production system of any kind
in the world has so much wasteful-
ness. Instead of trying to build 2
power plants per week (at 300 MW
each) for the next 20 years (only to
have a total of additional 6 trillion
kWh available by 2020),
It is more than only transmission potential in this idea/project ! GEO-ENGINEERING ! HABITAT-ENGINEERING included !
https://hackaday.com/2019/11/20/texas-tesla-tower-titillates/ (https://hackaday.com/2019/11/20/texas-tesla-tower-titillates/) Thoughts : "mark" comparing with Wesley/stivep1 : mental twins ? ::)
ELF or HF wireless transmission ? ( Is TM neither ELF nor HF,carrier frequency, independent ? E-carrier !? E(TM) )
https://www.google.com/search?q=schumann+frequenz&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&oq=schumann+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3j46j0l4j46.5873j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 (https://www.google.com/search?q=schumann+frequenz&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&oq=schumann+&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l3j46j0l4j46.5873j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8)
Schumann and https://nhahealth.com/brainwaves-the-language/#:~:text=Theta%20activity%20has%20a%20frequency,%2C%20prayer%2C%20and%20spiritual%20awareness (https://nhahealth.com/brainwaves-the-language/#:~:text=Theta%20activity%20has%20a%20frequency,%2C%20prayer%2C%20and%20spiritual%20awareness).
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/kazumi-masaki (https://patents.justia.com/inventor/kazumi-masaki)
FM theta-inducing audible sound, and method, device and recorded medium to generate the same (https://patents.justia.com/patent/5954630)
From "electrosmog" in the 80´to Theta-smog in future ? Feeling so high,higher,highest ? ;D :D ;) :) Junk-ie join(t)ing frequency
than each one make this : https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/dlattach/attach/181703/image// (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/dlattach/attach/181703/image//)
left or right = s..-egal !
This expression : " Joint Chiefs of Staff " get an other smell ! Joint Chiefs von Stoff , Lucky Afghan ,the best Kiff from Rif,....
or A.Merkel "Raute" , https://static.dw.com/image/36457396_303.jpg (https://static.dw.com/image/36457396_303.jpg)
in deaf dumb language translated with : p :o u :o s :o s :o y ,die RAUTE der Nation,aber ned Landesmuschi aeh,-Mutti :P
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space-based_solar_power) Beamed -HOW- to earth receiver ?
......
Since wires extending from Earth's surface (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth#Surface) to an orbiting satellite are neither practical nor feasible with current technology, SBSP designs generally include the use of some manner of wireless power transmission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_power_transmission) with its concomitant conversion inefficiencies, as well as land use concerns for the necessary antenna stations to receive the energy at Earth's surface. The collecting satellite would convert solar energy into electrical energy on board, powering a microwave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave) transmitter or laser (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser) emitter, and transmit this energy to a collector (or microwave rectenna (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectenna)) on Earth's surface.
.....
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228863818_A_Low-Cost_Wireless_Power_Transmission_Experiment (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228863818_A_Low-Cost_Wireless_Power_Transmission_Experiment)
The question : what will become developped faster and cheaper ?
A. Local ,mobile/portable, energy generation or B. foreign energy generation + wireless transmission/receiver system costs ?!
TARGET : 1 US$-cent/KWh TARGET,all included : ? US$-cent(-s)/KWh
Probably interestant : https://web.archive.org/web/20180326163549/http://aveuropa.net/ (https://web.archive.org/web/20180326163549/http://aveuropa.net/) 2021 situation ?
NEUES RESONANTES SYSTEM DER STROMLIEFERUNG NEW RESONANT SYSTEM OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY
an other competitor :
https://powerlighttech.com/technology/ (https://powerlighttech.com/technology/)
BRINGING ELECTRICITY TO LIGHT
PowerLight optical power beaming technology converts kilowatts of electricity into high-intensity light. It then shapes, directs and beams this light to a specialized solar cell receiver that converts the light back to DC power.
Through the beam, power can travel over long distances, at high altitudes
-
Greetings Lanka, you have raised a very interesting question.
It is very interesting to turn to statistics.
I agree with the idea. that today there is generation at steam turbine power plants. as well as the transmission of energy at a distance is considered to be low efficiency. A huge amount of energy is wasted in waiting. when generating.
All these are the costs of the centralized distribution system of the energy itself.
Decentralization of electrical generation and distribution systems makes sense at least because of the reduction in transportation losses. But here the question is: what will the electric energy supply industry transform into?
-
Storage and on-demand provider/deliverer function if grid-connected the consumer !
We are actually transforming the energy sector to a surplus-production situation !
We are getting more and more unused KW capacity and more often negative value electricity price in electricity/power exchange !
Political job/salary creation measure ! Economy/Ecology independent ! Credit-financed !
The E.U. program target for the future : in-situ generation from energy , each household becomes consumer and producer
Nearly Zero
to Net Zero (KWh/annum consume = KWh generation/annum )
to Zero Energy Building ( each consumed Watt delivered on-demand : storage or fob e-generator,
wired/wireless grid-connection on/or off )
Physical losts are often the argument ! But in reality these losts are in financial worth much less than the administrative costs of regulation !
Otto Stein : https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/20184764/otto-stein-die-zukunft-der-technik-pdf (https://www.yumpu.com/de/document/view/20184764/otto-stein-die-zukunft-der-technik-pdf)
1972 "Bruchteil eines (DM)Pfennigs/< 1 Pfennig " fraction of a penny /KWh self-organisation price
( 70´ e-provider/service price : 10 Pfennige night-/30 Pfennige Tag-Tarif)
compared
average 25 Euros-Cents/50 Pfennige per KWh electricity -service- price :
1/ 100
10 000 % salary and credit -spiral - price inflation in 50 years by generation costs /service price
but by delivery service price comparison :
200 % 70´ 10/30 Pfennige= 25 Pfennige/24 h KWh average to 50 Pfennige/KWh = 25 Euro-Cents/KWh 2021
The economy problem in estate statistics :
when salaries become creditized ( classical : zero penny salary creditizing ! Ethical fauxpass ! )
this position becomes part of inflation or deflation or reflation !
Because many countries creditize salaries each creditized worker is only industrial robot competition result worth !
white or blue collar worker !
Industrial robots have the 24/365 potential and capacity ,wired/wireless !
INDUSTRIAL EUGENIK GLOBAL !
-
Proof of concept was provided by close to 1 billion dollars investment of Dr Corum.(I think ).
At first : the total venture capital fundings in period 2013-2021 : 45 Mio. US$
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/texzon (https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/texzon)
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/36592191/Viziv_Technologies,_LLC (https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/36592191/Viziv_Technologies,_LLC)
https://www.whitesecuritieslaw.com/viziv-technologies-llc-securities-investigation/ (https://www.whitesecuritieslaw.com/viziv-technologies-llc-securities-investigation/)
Answer:
LankaIV you don't fully understand mechanisms ruling the market here in USA.
At first there is not only Viziv but few other companies.
The value of Oil company contribution has not much to do with Viziv itself.
45 millions is not able to buy land ,facilities, build the structure and run the business.
Read this please.
The Plaza / Trump casinos in Atlantic City to enter bankruptcy in March 1992. The other was the Castle Hotel & .
The 39-story, 612-room Plaza opened on the Atlantic City boardwalk in May 1984 after Trump struck a deal to build the with Harrah’s Entertainment.
the next was $1.2 billion Taj Mahal Resort in Atlantic City
Donald Trump bankrupted many of companies and facilities and that didn't mean anything at all,
January 20, 2017 he was nominated as President of USA
donald-trump-business-bankruptcies-
(https://www.thoughtco.com/donald-trump-business-bankruptcies-4152019#:~:text=The%20Plaza%20Casino%20was%20one%20of%20two%20Trump,deal%20to%20build%20the%20casino%20with%20Harrah%E2%80%99s%20Entertainment.)Dear LankaIV this is how we do business in USA
___________________________________________________
Most of the answers to your question is here:
but I'm posting only separate lines .
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/569076/is-vizivs-surface-wave-technology-plausible (https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/569076/is-vizivs-surface-wave-technology-plausible)
There are two lines important to understand for both of you lankaIV and Ilya.
line#1:
Corums never received a dime for their life's work or their
IP (which is now owned by Rod Sanders). https://vizivtechnologies.com/about/team/ (https://vizivtechnologies.com/about/team/)
Line#2
Investor say the technology was demonstrated to work with great efficiency,
then the company was quickly forced into bankruptcy and the IP was was picked up for a few dollars.
sub-line from electromagnetism:
Viziv Technologies is a company that claims to be able to transform power delivery, signaling and safety.
Their "Science" page says: ...
Also appears the Corums never received a dime for their life's work or their IP
(which is now owned by Rod Sanders). Investor rumors say the technology was demonstrated to work with great efficiency
______ _____ _____ _____ _____
Explanation
point 1:
There are many reasons :
-for you guys to be here
-for business to be open and closed or bankrupted.( most of them have wealthy life in Florida now) :)
-for any activity including my own, and Dr Corum.
-for decisions in life.
Explanation
point 2:
a.
The most important for me is that Dr James Corum never received any money for his work. :)
He had direct access to money and he could easily take a 2 millions or so :) But he didn't.
Many of you wold say . how stupid he was right?
b. if something is to big , than there is always the way to go out unless you don't want to.
example:
I was in 77 floor of World Trade Center1 WTC1)with my office as president of my own scientific entity.
WTC1 - meant that you are in the most prestigious place in the world where cost of being there is not small.
I was working with programs of many defense and space government agencies and military of USA.
and 9/11 happened.
Dr Judy Wood was to small to touch it
and
Elon Musk is to small to touch it, but he doesn't want to touch anything like that.
https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/ (https://www.drjudywood.com/wp/)
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Judy_Wood (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Judy_Wood)
And now we are dealing with at my opinion bigger problem than 9/11:
or maybe the biggest ever problem in world economy.
The two gentleman in their 70ies Dr James Corum And his brother Kenneth Corum.
____________________________
Summary:
Dr J. Corum knew what he is doing and what it leads to.
I knew what they are doing, and I was surprised they where able to build the tower.
For me it was like walking on the edge and one small mistake is just not allowed.
The Answer:
-I'm the answer my dear friends :) .
- Dr Corum is not the young man. He has no problem with money but he doesn't need
wealth in his age. He is not the Donald Trump type of person./ I'm the same.
-He exercised his boundaries /I did the same too.
Possibly he was told that this is where things must stop. :)
There were number of ways to shut it down like:
- government secrecy order or continuing military application of the technology.
however there was to much news around it and others will fallow this direction so there is a need
to make it not interesting to the world any longer and one of ways to do it is bankruptcy.
Does it end here: ?
The answer is NO- it does not, and ..
I'm one of the examples of the guys who can't be controlled unless I decide that it is good for me to be controlled.
Technology of Dr Corum goes now to its life without public involvement .
Guys I know who are military contractors are not known too.
But I think I'm even more of the problem than Dr Corum because I introduced direction Dr Corum didn't want to go to..
-The energy extraction
So should I say (and I mean that in the nicest way)
Screw you all?
- no my friends This is not my style.
i respect people( well not all of them)
Wesley
-
Wesley,for Your understanding : Texzon/Viziv Technologies will have success or they will fail ! No worry about worse/best case !
For the world development future each case unimportant !
I mean to know US-american "busi/busy :-* -ness" !
Clearly to differ real land life and city fun ,both before pandemia lock-down ! ;D
the U.S.A. some decades before :
Old school philosophy inside, from thousands of US-american citizen their written and disclosed participation about life experience :
https://www.amazon.com/How-Win-Friends-Influence-People/dp/0671027034 (https://www.amazon.com/How-Win-Friends-Influence-People/dp/0671027034)
In school we learned to compare U.S.A. and U.S.S.R. ! Sometimes we can misunderstand the development since the 80/90´:
U.S.S.A.(R.) 8) Theoretical cristian religion-communism/political vulgar-communism
credo credito
The best TRUMP(-el ) image : https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html)
in Germany we call such : Gossen-Typ(en)/ und Sprache
He learned his way of life in function as rent-"debt-collector" for his father?/uncle ? Gosse/Ghetto behaviour changes mentality !
the U.N.,headquarter Genf/Europe and external office New York/U.S.A.,has 193 members
New York was in the 80/90 in "technical bankruptcy",9/11 was very succesfull: in financial gain,for NY !
the WTC complex a renovation case : asbest contaminated ! Expensive for the building leaser !
A reportage in german TV , before AlQuaeda their second temptation 2001 ( their first in the 90´),
about the marode buildings situation !
Before/after ! Cheaper building knock-down !
We see and understand the business mechanism clearly ! World-wide !
With allround busy
9/11,ein "staubiger Tag" fuer Sie wohl ,Wesley,zum (finanziellem) "Abstauben" fuer Andere !
9/11, a "dusty day" for you, Wesley, for (financial rip ) "dusting" for others!
90 years before such "profiles" like Trump refound themself as concentration-camp prisoner,
by -also from 2021 view valid -law and order execution !
-
Explanation of my post previous from historical perspective.
You need to read this previous post to understand what is going on with Dr corum and Viziv
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557841/#msg557841 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557841/#msg557841)
1. Tesla got money from J.P Morgan to build the tower around 1902.
2. around 1917 the deal was over due to ban made by J.P Morgan as he didn't see
means of controlling the energy from Tesla Tower. attempt-demolish-teslas-wardenclyffe-tower
(https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/images/first-attempt-demolish-teslas-wardenclyffe-tower#:~:text=In%201917%2C%20Tesla%20still%20hadn%27t%20raised%20the%20money,of%20German%20spies%20using%20it%20as%20a%20landmark.)
3. Dr Goubau in 1907 introduces Goubau line that is the proof of the cylindrical interface made from conductive medium
wire and dielectric coating. (Sommerfeld–Goubau line, or G-line)
that makes 2D interface as shape of interface is not so much important.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goubau_line (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goubau_line)
4. In 1914 Marconi went to Bolinas Califirnia to build all over the earth energy transfer and communication facility marconi_centennial. (https://www.nps.gov/pore/planyourvisit/events_marconi_centennial.htm#:~:text=Guglielmo%20Marconi%20%281874-1937%29%2C%20inventor%20of%20wireless%20radio%2C%20constructed,and%20commercial%20maritime%20radio%20services%20continued%20until%201997.)
In 1919 the project was dead due to RCA created by US government first spying on his than by court order closing the facility
It was taken over by RCA after World War I.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marconi-RCA_Bolinas_Transmitting_Station (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marconi-RCA_Bolinas_Transmitting_Station)
4a. because of that Marconi sued US government for illegal use of his technology in WW1 .
Guglielmo Marconi · Died Jul. 20, 1937 but his family continued to sue.
To end this problem US government revoked rights to Patent of Marconi technology and resigned the rights to Nicola Tesla 7 January 1943
who was dead at that time, and he didn't have any children. So USA didn't have to pay to anyone any money.
5. 1936 by Dr. C.R.Burrows there was Seneca Lake experiment
http://rexresearch.com/corumzenneck/texzon.pdf (http://rexresearch.com/corumzenneck/texzon.pdf)
He stated that he found error in Dr Zenneck calculation and that placed into hibernation Zenneck wave till 1955
where military started to experiment with it again as something was wrong with Dr Burrows claims.
6. In 1952 Winfried Otto Schumann (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winfried_Otto_Schumann) who predicted it mathematically Schumann resonances that are now officially recognized.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances)
-that is important from perspective of energy extraction .
7. in 1986 Dr Corum filed the patent about Energy Extraction from Schumann Waveguide.
L. Corum. 1986. 24 pp. Illustrated. Critical Speculations Concerning Tesla’s Invention and Applications of Single Electrode
X-Ray Directed Discharges for Power Processing and Terrestrial Resonances,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Archive_3 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nikola_Tesla/Archive_3)
http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/381tele.htm (http://www.tfcbooks.com/mall/more/381tele.htm)
the Dr James Corum patent was :
Filed: July 23, 1986 Date of Patent: June 14, 1988 Inventor: James F. Corum
Electromagnetic structure and method (https://patents.justia.com/patent/4751515) Patent number: 4751515
This began to be the base for my work.
8. In 2007 Dr Corum filed provisional patent application that started all of later events.
Electric Power Storage (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20080186646) Application of Power Multiplication to Electric Power Distribution (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20080185916)
Patent number: 7969042
Patent number: 7808124
Publication number: 20080185916
Patent number: 8629734 ( 2005)
8a.In 2009 he got
Multiply-connected power processing (https://patents.justia.com/patent/8310093) Patent number: 8310093
______________________________________________________
9. The key to activate big money was:
EXCITATION AND USE OF GUIDED SURFACE WAVE MODES ON LOSSY MEDIA (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20140252865)
Publication number: 20140252865
Abstract: Disclosed are various embodiments systems and methods for transmission and reception
of electrical energy along a surface of a terrestrial medium.
A polyphase waveguide probe that transmits electrical energy in the form of a
guided surface wave along a surface of a terrestrial medium.
A receive circuit is used to receive the electrical energy.
Type: Application Filed: March 7, 2013 Publication date: September 11, 2014
Inventors: James F. Corum, Kenneth L. Corum
Dr Corum introduces means of energy distribution with use of Zenneck Wave.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave)
Recently in 2020, it was demonstrated by Oruganti et. al, that it was possible to excite Zenneck wave type waves
on flat metal-air interfaces and transmit power across metal obstacles.[9] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave#cite_note-9) [10] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave#cite_note-10)
10.In 2013 we have Senecka experiment one more time but now
it is Dr Corum disproving Dr Borrow Seneca lake Experiment from 1933.
Parametric power multiplication (https://patents.justia.com/patent/9118216) Patent number: 9118216
Abstract: In various embodiments, power multipliers and associated methods are provided
that employ parametric excitation.
In one embodiment, a ring power multiplier is provided that has a ring. A parametric reactance is associated with the ring that negates
at least a portion of a physical resistance of the ring.
Type: Grant Filed: February 2, 2007 Date of Patent: August 25, 2015
Assignee: CPG Technologies, LLC Inventor: James F. Corum
_____________________________________________
Practical guiding patents - "how to do it"
(the guided surface waveguide probe site and the preparation)
11.SITE PREPARATION FOR GUIDED SURFACE WAVE TRANSMISSION IN A LOSSY MEDIA (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079644)
Publication number: 20160079644 Type: Application Filed: September 9, 2015
Publication date: March 17, 2016
12.GEOLOCATION WITH GUIDED SURFACE WAVES (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160077201) Publication number: 20160077201
fixing a navigational position using guided surface waves launched from guided surface wave waveguide
probes at various ground stations.
It was a method that could be used for spying and locating vehicles, people etc.
using the same technique.
GUIDED SURFACE WAVE POWERED SENSING DEVICES (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160080034)
Publication number: 20160080034 Type: Application
Filed: September 8, 2015 Publication date: March 17, 2016
13.SIMULTANEOUS MULTIFREQUENCY RECEIVE CIRCUITS
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079753) SUBSURFACE SENSING USING GUIDED SURFACE WAVE MODES ON LOSSY MEDIA
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160077055) REMOTE SURFACE SENSING USING GUIDED SURFACE WAVE MODES ON LOSSY MEDIA
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160077203) SUPERPOSITION OF GUIDED SURFACE WAVES ON LOSSY MEDIA
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079645) ADAPTATION OF POLYPHASE WAVEGUIDE PROBES
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079754) CHEMICALLY ENHANCED ISOLATED CAPACITANCE
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079768) MODULATED GUIDED SURFACE WAVES (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079643) - military, internet, telephony, communication
VARIABLE FREQUENCY RECEIVERS FOR GUIDED SURFACE WAVE TRANSMISSIONS (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079809)__________________________
Guided Surface Wave Transmission of Multiple Frequencies in a Lossy Media (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079769)
14.Hierarchical Power Distribution
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079770) FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING FOR WIRELESS POWER PROVIDERS (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160079771)
SIMULTANEOUS TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION OF GUIDED SURFACE WAVES (https://patents.justia.com/patent/20160111890)
Multiply-connected power processing
(https://patents.justia.com/patent/9407095) the list can go on and on..
the link to his patents is here:
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/james-f-corum?page=10 (https://patents.justia.com/inventor/james-f-corum?page=10)
]_____________________________________________________[/b]
15. The build Tesla tower
Late in 2018, Viziv Technologies (formerly Texzon) completed a tower off of I-35 near Milford, Texas.
This was a land and structure but prior to that Dr Corum had another test field
https://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/civil/whats-really-going-on-at-tesla-tower.htm (https://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/civil/whats-really-going-on-at-tesla-tower.htm)
16. In 2019 in the symposium It was announcement that Viziv will start to deliver energy in 1 year !!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFiW2lqdnlM&t=580s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFiW2lqdnlM&t=580s)
from:Jan 3, 2019
17. Big guys oil/ energy/ copper industry/ wood industry( electrical posts) and big money start to be very much in discomfort.
18. August 16, 2018, » I started to experiment with it in South of America
19. From that time there was a lot of push on Dr Corum ( I can't publish the details !!!!!)
________________________________________________________
20. Bankruptcy of Viziv where beneficiary is "holly man" - the priest. :)
Conclusions:
Dr Corum like me wanted to realize his dreams.
But my own dreams don't have ambitions of Dr Corum.
He never touched single dime from the money of anyone. and he did it on purpose !!!!
The team of directors of Viziv had former US army generals and other big figures.
https://vizivtechnologies.com/about/team/ (https://vizivtechnologies.com/about/team/)
Did you ever ask yourself why the holly priest is the successor and the owner of Viziv?
now compare it to:
-9/11
- Marconi wiped by RCA in 1919 when he was stopped with his Bolinas California energy transfer.
- Nikola Tesla Tower in demolished in 1917. He was finished before that by J. p Morgan
- 1936 Dr Borrow findings that Zenneck Wave that is officially part of physics now is "not working"
But we have now me and plenty of others with even more difficult to swallow Energy extraction from Schumann waveguide
based on all if the previous science and Dr James Corum patents.
----------------------------
----------------------------
----------------------------
final quote:
for all of you the valuable, the opportunists ,the good and the bad.
the thieves, the bandits and even worse than that .
- capacity of your brains varies.
- foolishness is not always your domain but it happened often.
- the brainwash is not always immediately visible.
You are who you are ..
You have choice and I do too.
And this is my choice in motion :)
Legal note : opinion expressed is my own according to constitution of USA
Wesley
-
BlaBlaBla,Wesley !
Unimportant BlaBla !
Written by You and also in Dr.Corum his papers !
Not decisive !
His work ,the transmission system, dependent from estatal regulations ! National,international !
When somebody goes to Venture capaital companies ,he/she has to demonstrate the idea "perfect" and attractive !
Look in the several web-sides from finance reports about
Texcon/later Viziv Technologies how much capital investment they pleased and how much each time they got !
Venture capital companies (their team partners )work with an international network !
They get easy by world-wide question-arison about a technology/ a specific person from professional industrial or academical side answer !
Billionaires are often involved : they have to re-/invest their yearly liquidity !
Yes,You are right : a bankruptcy on such a low level like Viziv Technology is unimportant and investors,mainly only as pool investing,
not headache making !
By investment sum thousands such adventure cases to refind !
And seconds : 45 Mio. investment does not mean total funding by meaning "work liquidity" ,the second financing stock is : credit !
A company administration can also work fraudulent , modelling book-value with astronomical numbers,wrong book-value evaluation by manipulated machine parc prices and "virtual" sellings !
Simulation of activity from Zombie-enterprises !
What is high and what is low investment ?
When You look for Arpa and DArpa program granted investment high : mostly under 1 Mio. US$ participation per company by estate !
If strategical - national interests- this participation increases to XYZ Mio. financial participation numbers !
Life is ever based : by opportunity ! portare ,latin = tragen Aus-/Ein-/Ab-/er-/Trag
Did Your father not meet Your mother and having later coitus= genital-sexual contact You would not exist !
Your personal "opportunity best case" about Your life ! ;)
About market mechanics :
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.manager-magazin.de/unternehmen/autoindustrie/batteriezellen-foerderung-in-milliardenhoehe-fuer-tesla-bmw-und-andere-von-eu-bewilligt-a-51080efb-fb75-46cd-88f1-ef84d3d1eae1 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.manager-magazin.de/unternehmen/autoindustrie/batteriezellen-foerderung-in-milliardenhoehe-fuer-tesla-bmw-und-andere-von-eu-bewilligt-a-51080efb-fb75-46cd-88f1-ef84d3d1eae1)
With the second major project, according to Altmaier, the Federal Ministry of Economics is now providing a total of around three billion euros.
This is intended to stimulate private investments of over 13 billion euros in this country.
3 billions for 13 billions "stimulation" mechanism lever factor : > 4x
As second - only battery-funding related - finance package !
-
BlaBlaBla,Wesley ! Unimportant BlaBla !
When somebody goes to Venture capaital companies ,he/she has to demonstrate the idea "perfect" and attractive !
Texcon/later Viziv Technologies how much capital investment they pleased and how much each time they got !
45 Mio. investment does not mean total funding by meaning "work liquidity" ,the second financing stock is : credit !
I'm sorry but your knowledge about USA business life is very limited.
-capital invested in a project in which there is a substantial element of risk, typically a new or expanding business is solely the risk of
people involved.
Viziv was not a public company. public%20company
(https://marketbusinessnews.com/financial-glossary/public-company/#:~:text=A%20public%20company%20is%20a%20business%20whose%20shares,as%20pension%20funds%2C%20and%20other%20large%20investing%20organizations.)Texcon/Viziv Technologies chain of companies is not that short and it is not the risk as it is tax deductible if losses are involved.
There was many more companies than you mentioned.
Just good way to get out of taxes.
You need to understand that we are not "some Eastern Bandits"
To write off money we have legal mechanisms. write-off (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/write-off.asp#:~:text=A%20write-off%20primarily%20refers%20to%20a%20business%20accounting,that%20reduces%20taxable%20income%20on%20the%20income%20statement.) and is often good to do it.
That is why Trump was bankrupting so many of his businesses but that didn't stop him from becoming president of USA after all of that.
I do like you lankaiV but I can't make discussion with ignorant who is throwing sentences without quoting me.
This is not acceptable behavior my friend.
I'm not in Russian bazaar here,
I don't spend hours of my time being ignored or covered with BS.
You have your own opinion and that's fine with me
I have my results and my team that is in much fortunate position as I can take all
of Dr Corum work and I don't need investment and its consequences.
I'm not obligated with time or with any factors pushing me to act.
No investors..
Got it now?
Did you ask yourself why Russians killed Children of the Emperor (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8354752/) King of Russia the Tzar in 1917
The answer to reasoning of primitive act of primitive people committing that crime is:
If there is no children than there is no continuation
the word for "no continuation" is - discontinuation
I'm the child of Tesla, Marconi, and Dr Corum technology
But children learn fast how to avoid their parents problems - so do I
https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a8072/russian-tsar-execution/ (https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a8072/russian-tsar-execution/)
Ilya Tsymbaluk asked me to make video showing my device doing exactly that what I said it does.
And that is the first mistake the fathers of the technology of wave did and they lost big time.
When you want to strike don't blab about it just do it.
I don't need to be praised or hero or rewarded.
I can't be humiliated as I don't care about it.
I don't have pride so I have nothing to lose.
In comparison to Dr Corum I don't have his dreams - I have fun in science.
And this is the worst-case scenario for many for whom it matters.
Wesley :)
-
In our real world "western bandits" meets and cooperates with "eastern bandits" !
In our real world serious western meets and cooperates with serious eastern !
If Your investment partner are serious You only will know some years after projects and contracts validation ![/size]
" Did you ask yourself why Russians killed Children of the King of Russia the Tzar in 1917"
not being important this act against the Imperator,not King ! and the total royal family,was a cruel " russian communistic party" -members act as -never more royalism/feudalism ! - decision !
Royal childs makes part from dynastic systems : no childs = no dynaste ! Simple logic !
They learned about the difference of (paperbook) dreams/phantasy and reality, later !
WPT worldwide competitors, at first low consume charge devices :
https://newatlas.com/energy/long-range-wireless-power-transmission-new-zealand-emrod/ (https://newatlas.com/energy/long-range-wireless-power-transmission-new-zealand-emrod/)
https://emrod.energy/short-range-vs-long-range-wireless-power-transmission/ (https://emrod.energy/short-range-vs-long-range-wireless-power-transmission/)
https://power.nridigital.com/future_power_technology_jun20/wireless_power_transmission (https://power.nridigital.com/future_power_technology_jun20/wireless_power_transmission)
https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/wibotic-corp (https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/wibotic-corp)
radio and microwaves can have negative effects.
Professors Frank Barnes of the University of Colorado-Boulder and Ben Greenebaum have published a book on the health hazards of electromagnetic fields, discovering that seven megahertz is a problematic frequency for humans, enhancing cancerous cells’ proliferation.
WHO rules ?
-
lankaIV you writing non-related information.
This is a garbage that doesn't add anything to the discussion.
The Western format is to take quote of me and place your own comment.
You need also to put my own writing is Quote form factor.
_______________________________
1.In our real world "western bandits" meets and cooperates with "eastern bandits" !
true so what?
not important this//was an// act against the Imperator,
2. killing of Tzar family was used by me as a factor of discontinuation.
You have problem with understanding English
3. radio and microwaves can have negative effects.
This information is not related and is wrong!!!!
Answer: the power, frequency and distance from the source is need to be mentioned.
without it it is just like barking on the street.
WHO rules ?
Science rules.
Wesley
-
killing of Tzar family was used by me as a factor of discontinuation.
"dynaste on/off "- button in modern technical english ! Easy understandable !
The Western format is to take quote of me and place your own comment.
You are not involved in and with FORMATION ,neither in social behaviour ,probably Your wife disclose more , also theme : mimickry
You are trying to assimilate Yourself into the western hirarchic upper society class,
whom You never will belong ! Out-sider !
-
"dynasty on/off "- button in modern technical English
It is not about dynasty but about discontinuation /
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/discontinuation
(https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/discontinuation)and now look here at this quote:Did you ask yourself why Russians killed Children of the Emperor King of Russia the Tzar in 1918
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family)
The answer to reasoning of primitive act of primitive people committing that crime is:
If there is no children than there is no continuation
the word for "no continuation" is - discontinuation
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557853/#msg557853 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557853/#msg557853)
So is any discontinuation e.g Dr Corum Viziv too.
_______________________________________
(https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/discontinuation)
You are trying to assimilate Yourself into the western hirarchic upper society class,
False statement.
I'm just regular guy from the street in my own eyes.
But that has nothing to do with the subject of this discussion.
You started personal attack on me now :)
Is this a form of your traditional national response when you have nothing to say about technology of Dr Corum?
Wesley
-
It is not about dynasty but about discontinuation /
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/discontinuation
You never will get english-language feel when You never have their educative catholic colleges Cambridge and Oxford lingual base : (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/discontinuation)
Latinum
now look here at this quote:So is any discontinuation e.g Dr Corum Viziv too.
The Corums only followed Nikola Tesla his work. There will be ever ,serious and scientifical,follower after their personal death. (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/discontinuation)
False statement. IT IS FINE WHEN YOU CLEARLY UNDERSTAND WRONG AND RIGHT ! FUZZY NEURONAL LOGIC INCLUDED !
I'm just regular guy from the street in my own eyes. Regular : where ?
But that has nothing to do with the subject of this discussion.
You started personal attack on me now :) EVER and EACH OFFENDING IF FALSE,by written agreements !
Is this a form of your traditional national response when you have nothing to say about technology of Dr Corum?
Wesley
National : I AM MULTICOMPLEX in estate-membership ,per nascimento : by "ius sanguis" and "ius terranis " !
Trinationational,Bi-Continental as minimum !
ALL -Ideologies ansd -Ism-including,but only NUTZWERT-orientation,without opportunity-complex !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Aviz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Aviz) dynasty-line off,discontinuation
Eu posso sempre continuar ,usar o Kontinuum ;D
execution from Romanow family : BULLSHIT,the Romanow family existed 1917 with many dynastic lines !
Also 2021 poste Criste ( excluding calendar errors) !
1917 some members from the royal family were executed !
Wesley, by PRESSEFREIHEITS-Regularien und GEGENDARSTELLUNGSRECHT haben SIE NIEMALS das RECHT geschriebenes im sinnlichen Inhalt zu veraendern !
overunity.com is ruled by approved european press-normations , not by individuals their meanings !
I will rewrite your response a little:[/size]
Quote from: lancaIV on May 17, 2021, 11:56:11 AM (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557743/#msg557743)// the user may pay for software or have it for free for a month or so..//
//competition kills product despite how much inventor and investor paid for it.//
//energy efficient motors are only 20% of market, as they are more expensive, despite fact that production cost and machinery is the same//
//It is cheaper to pay 125 US$ for a conventional electric motor than 375 US$ for the optimized controlled PM one.//
//metglas-permalloy laminates becomes incredibly cheap.//
//internal value is different that outside of USA value of the goods//
//https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/aeroflex/fs5000b18.htm (https://www.testequipmentdepot.com/usedequipment/aeroflex/fs5000b18.htm)//
CRETIN !
-
Dear LankaIV do you understand in plain English
That:
1.your posting is not related to Dr Corum subject of discussion?
2.it doesn't contribute to Dr Corum discusion
3.I explained my point but you seem to have problem with English language .
No one apart from you has a problem with my explanation
Please don't do it.
____________________________
As far as some misunderstanding I have corrected the Romanov family note. in my previous comment
-it was year 1918
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/210/post/msg/557857/ (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/210/post/msg/557857/)
LankaIV
Wesley, by PRESS FREEDOM regulations and AGAINST RIGHTS YOU NEVER have to change the RIGHT written in sensual content !
You absolutely right.
I pointed that I'm rewriting prior to do it.
your English was very difficult to understand
I did it for good reason so others can understand it
But if that is the problem than I will not be able to response to something that is
in its very form just unreadable.
or I may say that:
I'm writing my own form of understanding that what you wrote
prior to any response to your writing,.
I do apologize about that it that makes any difference for you.
Wesley
-
The content,not the language , is often wrong used by You,Wesley !
This is the problem !
The content from others You transform wrong in Your own statements !
When Doctores Corum science results will be theme,the direct conversation with them will be the most opportun decision !
Without - faults-content-risc - intermedians !
But there are several alternatives -wireless power conversion/transmission related- actually world-wide in progression !
Sincere
OCWL
-
So please ask your friend with good English to write the text that contains the true content of your writing.
I can't understand Chinese too.
But problem with your writing is that it can't be translated into English nor German.
so I have choice :
Ignore it or respond to it.
But I like you very much lankaIV.
I see your value to the community
But there are several alternatives -wireless power conversion/transmission related- actually world-wide in progression !
I'm not interested now in mixing primary Dr Corum discussion with alternatives.
When we stop talking about Dr corum I will be open for suggestions
Wesley
-
You mean You are well educated :
Ferdinand Braun Jonathan Zenneck Fritz Haber
I.G.Farben
Blausaeure/Zyklon B
Schaedlingsbekaempfung
Shalom alechem / salaam aleikum
Jonathan Zenneck was administrative active in concentration camp gas delivering involved !
But this does not matter,Wesley,is it not ? It was traditional national science response !
You agree,over-confessional ,is it not `,Wesley ?
Does traditional national science response repeat ?
We are as street-boys tolerant ,is it not ? Why not,the repeat ? 8) ;D
Btw : I do not need " to like" You - and vice-versa- but to accept each one under given normation !
I understand You very well,your sometimes included applied stupidity neutralizing
It seems that You often need wikipedia use when for other the wiki- theme makes daily life part
When I state " Out-sider" it is true ,You are not since baby being part from upper class living,inclusive service personal and personal gouvernante around You ! And upper class down view !
And no,it is not Arroganz/Arrogance what us often divide , it is the class difference view : EKEL !
-
Jonathan Zenneck was administrative active in concentration camp gas delivering involved !
But this does not matter,Wesley,is it not ? It was traditional national science response !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Zenneck
Please provide me a link to your revelation.
_______________________________________
Response:
1. Science doesn't have feelings ,believes, sexual orientation, organic body.
2. Science doesn't care who is the contributor to given science section.
3. People contributing to science can be recognized or just noted or completely ignored.
That depends from factors , regulations or situation in given historical time (in science.)
4. People opinion about certain scientists may be very negative and that is OK.
However science is not a person. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science
Wesley
-
scientia de scire,scio
Do You as non-european never try to explain european expressions !
Where Jonathan Zenneck worked in administrative function ?
Search Yourself,if important !
-
Where Jonathan Zenneck worked in administrative function ?
Search Yourself,if important !
Do you understand English?
You made statement than please respond to it.
quote author=lancaIV link=topic=18815.msg557864#msg557864 date=1621545364]
Jonathan Zenneck was administrative active in concentration camp gas delivering involved !
But this does not matter,Wesley,is it not ? It was traditional national science response !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Zenneck (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Zenneck)
Please provide me a link to your revelation.
Wesley
-
Under the leadership of General Michael Miller Viziv Technologies is in bankruptcy.
Note that the Corum brothers left Viziv after a falling out due to the Board mismanaging
the company and most likely deceiving the investors with something called V2(?).
Also appears the Corums never received a dime for their life's work or their IP
(which is now owned by Rod Sanders).
Investor rumors say the technology was demonstrated to work with great efficiency then the company was quickly
forced into bankruptcy and the IP was was picked up for a few dollars.
It may have been a bankruptcy to force out all the investors/inventors and take complete control of the IP. A loan to own deal.
It is unclear.
Either way in the court documents the Corums still claim the technology works fine and has been successfully demonstrated,
and the Viziv managers know this. It appears the J.P. Morgans of the world have struck again, this time after it was completed.
Details of the bankruptcy can be found at, https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/36592191/Viziv_Technologies,_LLC (https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/36592191/Viziv_Technologies,_LLC)
After investigating this company for several years I've found out they have several towers around the world.
Their work is more than science fiction, it is now in practice. Note, they do not create the energy.
They are simply transporting via the Zenneck Surface Wave. Although, it is an obscure technology, it is not new.
It was used in the 1960s to send a LA TV station signal into Arizona. Viziv currently has a two prong product line.
One line is for global electrical power distribution and the other is low frequency communications. Viziv Technologies
very tight on releasing information, however my investigations
has turned up a video of a 1HP motor being powered from half way around the world.
Also, in the video they demonstrate a GPS network using their towers rather than satellites.
It appears that their VLF GPS network works well for deeply submerged submarines.
I am sure the reason for Viziv's silence is due to geopolitical issues.
The global Zenneck Surface Wave does impact every every square meter of the surface of the planet.
(can you say weaponization...)
How to solve the political issues is beyond the FCC and ITU.
I would predict you will see Viziv Technologies soon be swallowed up.
More on the actual science in an upcoming Physics Today article.
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/569076/is-vizivs-surface-wave-technology-plausible (https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/569076/is-vizivs-surface-wave-technology-plausible)
Wesley
-
So by its own standards Corum technology is more impacting than
World War 2, and I'm on the top of this knowledge.
Do you understand it ?
Wesley
-
There is more knowledge in existence than only wikipedia patented= publicated !
Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut ( for Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry ....)
DPG,Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft,1935 - President J.Z.
I.G.Farben participation Degesch
Search for : 1907-1911 his,J.Z. work
Seconds : Fritz Haber functions -1934,he ,F.H., was jewish !
1810 + 30 year cycle : inner-european continental wars ,WW2= Greater Europe war after WWI
Since Hiroshima and Nagasaki german technology use and DR-capitulation " cold peace" in Europe !
-
Corum brothers left Viziv //
//Also appears the Corums never received a dime for their life's work or their IP (which is now owned by Rod Sanders)//.
Note that Viziv Techologies Inc. has filed for bankruptcy protection Jan 2021!
And this is very important information now.
the bankruptcy protection
It is the money talk over particular interest of powers involved now. :)
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/569076/is-vizivs-surface-wave-technology-plausible (https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/569076/is-vizivs-surface-wave-technology-plausible)
https://youtu.be/wFiW2lqdnlM?t=88 (https://youtu.be/wFiW2lqdnlM?t=88)
Opinion expressed is my own according to constitution of USA
Wesley
-
ELF or HF wireless transmission ? Dis-/advantages ? Nobody knows it actually !
https://emrod.energy/emrod-vs-teslas-long-range-wireless-power-technology/ (https://emrod.energy/emrod-vs-teslas-long-range-wireless-power-technology/)
https://emrod.energy/wireless-power (https://emrod.energy/wireless-power/)
a media interview : for Tesla Wardencliff and Viziv comparison
https://newatlas.com/energy/wireless-power-transmission-emrod-interview/?itm_source=newatlas&itm_medium=article-body (https://newatlas.com/energy/wireless-power-transmission-emrod-interview/?itm_source=newatlas&itm_medium=article-body)
But to give you an example, a one-square-meter (10.7-sq-ft) transmitter could send about 10 kW for about 10 meters (33 ft), but a 40-square-meter (430.5-sq-ft) transmitter could give you about a 30-km (18.6-mi) range, which is much more than we'd need for the vast majority of applications.
https://newatlas.com/acoustic-metamaterial-blocks-sound-not-air/58818/?itm_source=newatlas&itm_medium=article-body (https://newatlas.com/acoustic-metamaterial-blocks-sound-not-air/58818/?itm_source=newatlas&itm_medium=article-body)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_metamaterial (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_metamaterial)
-
Wesley,remembering : Re: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
I do not calculate by myself and take this number as given :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission)
In comparison to the 3 billion kW available from the earth system, it is possible to calculate what the U.S.consumed in electricity.
3 billion KW per hour : which is the physical/physiological function from this "energy reservoir" in our nature geo-/biosphere ?
" health protection " and "biosphere protection " !
With science we can do much,but ethical allowed ?
A part from academical scientific research and positive/negative results development :
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFH-Vertr%25C3%25A4glichkeitspr%25C3%25BCfung (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFH-Vertr%25C3%25A4glichkeitspr%25C3%25BCfung)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FUmweltvertr%C3%A4glichkeitspr%C3%BCfung&sandbox=1 (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FUmweltvertr%C3%A4glichkeitspr%C3%BCfung&sandbox=1)
Excluding :
Economic and social consequences are not part of the EIA.
There are other instruments for this, such as B. the social (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/w/index.php?title=Sozialvertr%C3%A4glichkeitspr%C3%BCfung&action=edit&redlink=1) impact assessment or the sustainability (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/w/index.php?title=Nachhaltigkeitspr%C3%BCfung&action=edit&redlink=1) assessment (impact assessment).
There are many academical facultas/departments involved ! Each with legal competences and capacity ! (Assuming !)
What is this wireless transmission/capture technology actual worth,with how many (fractional) US$-cent/KWh delivering prices the several
ELF/HF R&D companies calculate ?
When in-situ generator - GHG-emission- free - generates in the 1 US$-cent /KWh range,there is not much margin in WPT technology !
Which will the be the estatal -frequency use- tax per KWh ? Not costs-free !
The international estate auctions :
" UMTS - Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems " frequency range their prices as later per KWh conversion preview/outlook !
+ Local commission paying : antenna/receiver !
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.trendingtopics.at/neues-telekom-gesetz-massive-investitionshu%25CC%2588rden-fuer-5g-ausbau-befuerchtet/ (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.trendingtopics.at/neues-telekom-gesetz-massive-investitionshu%25CC%2588rden-fuer-5g-ausbau-befuerchtet/)
You are in global telecom,included WPT, licencing process insider ? ::) ;D
So by its own standards Corum technology is more impacting than
World War 2, and I'm on the top of this knowledge.
Do you understand it ?
Wesley
I am trying to become im-/ex-/com-/de-pressed from Your " on the top of this knowledge " point of view 8)
Sincere
OCWL
p.s.: 3 Billions KW per hour
3 Billions private household x 3 ,up to "social ideal" : 4 = parents(f.+m.) + mask.-son + fem. daughter capita
= total 12 000 Mio habitants maximum on earth
means organizing,without stress, the future
"intelligent 1 KW-private household" structure,global
2 KW
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000-Watt-Gesellschaft (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000-Watt-Gesellschaft)
to 1,5 KW
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=http://gcn.de/download/D15KW.pdf (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=http://gcn.de/download/D15KW.pdf)
to 1 KW
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/mtec/cepe/cepe-dam/documents/research/cepe-wp/CEPE_WP15.pdf (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/mtec/cepe/cepe-dam/documents/research/cepe-wp/CEPE_WP15.pdf)
p.s.II :
video-/audio-/senso tronical radiation and their use (no abuse) :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=6&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19580826&CC=US&NR=2848748A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=6&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19580826&CC=US&NR=2848748A&KC=A)
and up to 2021 :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citingDocuments?CC=US&NR=2848748A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19580826&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citingDocuments?CC=US&NR=2848748A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19580826&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
+ applicants their enterprises/institutions web-page documentation ,branch/targets
https://www.instructables.com/Build-a-Simple-DIY-Flanagan-Neurophone/ (https://www.instructables.com/Build-a-Simple-DIY-Flanagan-Neurophone/)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain-Computer-Interface (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain-Computer-Interface)
experiments with mammals,insects,.......
as well as the imitation of pharmaceutical drugs (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Droge) : instead " imitation" synthetization/virtualization
of pharmaceutical food/alimentation ? "spice"
electric food,but in old culture also called https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prana (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prana)
in german : Aether
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_energy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_energy)
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Agriculture_Organization) of the United Nations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations), the average minimum energy requirement per person per day is about 7,500 kJ (1,800 kcal).
specific : https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.dge.de/wissenschaft/referenzwerte/energie/?L%3D0 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.dge.de/wissenschaft/referenzwerte/energie/?L%3D0)
1800 Kilocalories (kcal)
2,093 Watt Hour (Wh) or
circa 2,1 KWh per day/body Aether energy consume
WPT to WEFT : world-wide electric food transmission/transponding/transducing
all matter is energy is food all food is energy is matter
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.pflege.de/leben-im-alter/ernaehrung/trinknahrung/%23:~:text%3DGebrauchsfertige%2520Trinknahrung%2520in%2520Fl%25C3%25A4schchen,-Gebrauchsfertige%2520Trinknahrung%2520ist%26text%3DDarin%2520sind%2520in%2520konzentrierter%2520Form,1.000%2520kcal%2520pro%2520200%2520ml (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.pflege.de/leben-im-alter/ernaehrung/trinknahrung/%23:~:text%3DGebrauchsfertige%2520Trinknahrung%2520in%2520Fl%25C3%25A4schchen,-Gebrauchsfertige%2520Trinknahrung%2520ist%26text%3DDarin%2520sind%2520in%2520konzentrierter%2520Form,1.000%2520kcal%2520pro%2520200%2520ml).
High-calorie drinking food variants contain up to 1,000 kcal per 200 ml.
360 ml drinking food per day one cup on ex = ultra-fast food ;D hyper,hyper
breakfast,lunch,dinner = all-in-one ::)
2 weeks full healthy alimentation in one bottle : https://previews.123rf.com/images/rognar/rognar1002/rognar100200051/6499051-kristallklare-mineralwasser-in-gro%C3%9Fen-5-liter-flasche-auf-wei%C3%9Fen-hintergrund-isoliert-.jpg (https://previews.123rf.com/images/rognar/rognar1002/rognar100200051/6499051-kristallklare-mineralwasser-in-gro%C3%9Fen-5-liter-flasche-auf-wei%C3%9Fen-hintergrund-isoliert-.jpg)
A perfect compressed world ,by scientifical experiments and commercial hardware available,some would not be amused ! :)
The 0,25 KW household society by not 12 Bio but 1,5 Bio habitants on earth as IDEAL max
Actually: how many liters water per Kg vegetables/fruits ? Elimination the water need and for vegetables/fruits used land !
Elimination the agricultural land need !
Elimination the meat eating and for meat growth used land !
Wood decompress to foamwood ,recycle
90% in total less land need by 12 Bio habitants,99% less land need by 1,5 Bio !
From an overunity world to : underunity world ! Our journey and actions !
-
Dear lankaiV
1. Your writing is taking so much space and that irritates many of
readers who asked me to point at that.
Please write the way I write.!!!
I really don't prefer to move to my space because of that.
and reedit every comment that doesn't fit into common standards of writing .
2. I do see value in your work and I do thank you for that.
3. some of the links you are giving are really good.
_________________________________
4. LankaIV thank you very much, for the article below.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission)
the picture below is a revelation!!!!
Good job LankaIV
NOW THIS IS GOING TO BE VERY IMPORTANT.
This picture alone allows:
-everyone of us without much worry of patent protection to build any size of Tesla Tower that looks exactly like that in concept and
a. can be of any size
b. can be of any diameter
c. the only important is that you have telescopic or by any means regulated height of top capacitor UP/DOWN
as the art presented by this picture is exactly my own receiving structure that is used as Rx of energy from Schumann Waveguide.
Explanation:
-The patent for original Tesla coil doesn't protect any longer the concept.
-Receiving signals means receiving energy by means of EM Wave is not regulated by law.
e.g - Everyone can listen to AM/ FM radio
- Receiving energy is not the same as transmitting energy - no license or regulation exists for energy from interface yet.
- Dr Corum patents that belongs to Viziv are protecting rights of the inventor but, any prior art that has patent protection expired
is free to be used.
- The law in USA and many of "civilized world" countries needs to provde evidence according to general rule:
NOT GUILTY TILL PROVEN GUILTY .
The accuser must prove that other party is guilty and accuser is obligated to prove the accused person guilt.
by that- if Art of Tesla is used than the complaining party must prove that it is not Tesla art.
by that- receiving of energy from Schumann waveguide Can't be patented if my own writing or any other form of exposure
existed prior to patent pending application.
So this part is for free now till any country creates any other than patent forms of regulation of it.
however when WE THE AMERICANS have chance to have energy for free I don't believe that any regulatory mechanism will be able to be created.
Note: I'm not talking about text of the article but about the picture . The text is not important for me , but the picture is.
Note: it is my own opinion expressed .
Wesley
-
Receiving signals means receiving energy by means of EM Wave is not regulated by law.
Ihren Humor haben heisst grenzenlos lustig sein
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%25C3%25BCbertragung (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%25C3%25BCbertragung)
1. Standards and norms
Qi (inductive energy transfer) (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Qi_(induktive_Energie%C3%BCbertragung))
the international Wireless Power Consortium (WPC)
AirFuel inductive (Powermat)
The Power Matters Alliance (PMA)
AirFuel Resonant (Rezence)
Alliance for Wireless Power
Emission of electromagnetic fields To edit (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/w/index.php?title=Drahtlose_Energie%C3%BCbertragung&action=edit§ion=12)
For wireless energy transmission, the standards and norms for electromagnetic compatibility (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Elektromagnetische_Vertr%C3%A4glichkeit) (EMC) and for the electromagnetic effect on users within the scope of electromagnetic environmental compatibility (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Elektromagnetische_Umweltvertr%C3%A4glichkeit) (EMVU) and their limit values, such as the limit values of the ICNIRP (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/ICNIRP) in particular, are the basis for many local ones Standards are. [15] (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%C3%BCbertragung#cite_note-15)
Wesley,there You will find ,probably,free -not defined and restricted- application use freedom potential ,costs-free
Tesla WPT comparing with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio) to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver)
Tesla frequency : 150 Hz not Schumann or Zenneck !
WPT is not a generator,also followed by Tesla statement :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission)
waterpower + WPT
The inevitable conclusion is that
waterpower is by far our most
valuable resource.
On this =WATERPOWER
humanity must build its hopes for
the future.
With its full development
and
a perfect system of
wireless transmission of the en-
ergy to any distance,
man will be able to solve all the problems of
material existence.
Tesla stated : waterpower + wireless power transmission (Niagara Falls source like ::) )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wardenclyffe_Tower (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wardenclyffe_Tower)
Power for the entire system was to be provided by a coal fired 200 kilowatt Westinghouse alternating current industrial generator (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternator).
https://patents.google.com/patent/US649621A/en (https://patents.google.com/patent/US649621A/en)
Cited : many temptations of improvement
-
Dear lankaIV please look at the comment you posted :
this is how we would like you to write.
NO EMPTY SPACE below each line - unless it is for the purpose of separating thematically differing subiects.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%25C3%25BCbertragung (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%25C3%25BCbertragung)
1. Standards and norms
Qi (inductive energy transfer) (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Qi_(induktive_Energie%C3%BCbertragung))
the international Wireless Power Consortium (WPC)
AirFuel inductive (Powermat)
The Power Matters Alliance (PMA)
AirFuel Resonant (Rezence)
Alliance for Wireless Power
Emission of electromagnetic fields To edit (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/w/index.php?title=Drahtlose_Energie%C3%BCbertragung&action=edit§ion=12)
For wireless energy transmission, the standards and norms for electromagnetic compatibility (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Elektromagnetische_Vertr%C3%A4glichkeit) (EMC)
and for the electromagnetic effect on users within the scope of electromagnetic environmental compatibility (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Elektromagnetische_Umweltvertr%C3%A4glichkeit) (EMVU)
and their limit values, such as the limit values of the ICNIRP (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/ICNIRP) in particular, are the basis for many local ones Standards are. [15] (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%C3%BCbertragung#cite_note-15)
Wesley,there You will find ,probably,free -not defined and restricted- application use freedom potential ,costs-free
Tesla WPT comparing with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio) to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superheterodyne_receiver)
Tesla frequency : 150 Hz not Schumann or Zenneck !
WPT is not a generator,also followed by Tesla statement :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission)
waterpower + WPT
The inevitable conclusion is that waterpower is by far our most
valuable resource.
On this =WATERPOWER
humanity must build its hopes for
the future.
With its full development
and
a perfect system of wireless transmission of the en-ergy to any distance,
Tesla stated : waterpower + wireless power transmission (Niagara Falls source like ::) )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wardenclyffe_Tower (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wardenclyffe_Tower)
Power for the entire system was to be provided by a coal fired 200 kilowatt Westinghouse alternating current industrial generator (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternator).
https://patents.google.com/patent/US649621A/en (https://patents.google.com/patent/US649621A/en)
Cited : many temptations of improvement
Thank you for your response. I visited only 1 link and I like it very much.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%25C3%25BCbertragung (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drahtlose_Energie%25C3%25BCbertragung)
In this link there is very easy explanation however it doesn't have section related to Zenneck Wave and Interface
Please obey the expectation and suggestions of members of this forum by having your comments looking similar to mine.
The major complain comes from people using cellphones and tablets saying that they need to scroll down several screens before they
are able to read entire comment of yours.
If you don't know How to do it I will provide instruction to you.
Thank you lankaIV
Wesley
-
Hello everyone :)
just to post an interesting piece of information called a magnetic capacitor
how to build such device ? here you are step by step in both language Arabic and english
https://youtu.be/ff59Ae5mrDc
Reactive power is one of the best option to produce a surplus energy please share everywhere ;)
-
some of you have problem with properly posting on this forum.Here is first instruction.
PLACING THE NEXT LINE OF TEXT DIRECTLY BELOW the first one :
in the picture below there is an instruction how to place comment where every line is directly below the previous one.
It allows you also to make length of the line of text short.
example:
if you wrote 3 words and you want to advance to the next line below:
press and hold SHIFT button on the Keyboard and press ENTER.
Your cursor will be advanced to the line below.
Wesley
-
some of you have problem with properly posting on this forum.Here is first instruction.
FORMATTING THE TEXT
If you COPY PASTE the text you need to format it so no additional characters of HTML will show after you finished posting.
By holding left button of your mouse and sliding it over the chosen text
-you need tho highlight that part of text
And that press the button remove formatting
Wesley
-
some of you have problem with properly posting on this forum.Here is instruction.
How to make QUOTED TEXT:
the desired part of your text needs to be highlighted
and than you press QUOTE button
after that the text will look like this:
this is example of quoted text
Wesley
-
Some of you have problem with properly posting on this forum.Here is instruction.
How to make QUOTED TEXT:
How to QUOTE text of another person from the forum.
After you are logged in to the forum you will see on the right
upper corner of forum page word Quote.
Click on it and than the screen changes to the one shown below.
You can cut some part of text from the quote
You can also write below the quote your own response.
Wesley
-
If your text has empty lines on the top and below and takes to much space
You can:
-place your mouse cursor in front of the line from the left hand side
- click on it to see the cursor is blinking.
- press on the keyboard backspace button
and you will see that entire text from below will move UP
Wesley
-
Hello everyone :)
just to post an interesting piece of information called a magnetic capacitor
how to build such device ? here you are step by step in both language Arabic and english
https://youtu.be/ff59Ae5mrDc (https://youtu.be/ff59Ae5mrDc)
Reactive power is one of the best option to produce a surplus energy please share everywhere ;)
Thank you for picture and video .
It shows capacitive coil./coils or coils assembly.
This is specially important when we need capacitance and inductance in proportions
where in presence of AC voltage capacitive reactance and inductive reactance is needed to tune the impedance of Tesla Coil to resonance.
Impedance components are:
-inductive reactance
-capacitive reactance
-real resistance of the wire or foil( mostly omittable)
Also thanks to lankaIV search we can read interesting historical piece, showing - how they did it in 1924
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission)
Wesley
-
As a rule, a magnetic storage (capacitor) means a superconductor inductor. They can store energy in the form of a magnetic field and retain this kinetic energy for a very long period. Like any inductance - when it is opened - it releases energy, as it has already been described since the discovery of this concept by Heaviside.
-
something for your entertainment:
Man Solves Tesla’s Secret To Amplifying Power By Nearly 5000%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK3JOlY0V8Y
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK3JOlY0V8Y)
I don't comment on it yet.
Let's see what is the level of the audience here.
Wesley
-
For Wesly
Greetings again. We have an early morning) But I would like to say that you are arguing about some technologies associated with wireless communication.
However, the issue of sending energy from the United States to Moscow - it seems to me that this is still a very unobvious theory.
It's hard for me to understand. what happened to the investment and what was discussed - I do not understand.
But why not talk about that. what could be valuable?
I suggested that I check something from the very beginning of electrical engineering. This is related to that. that the experience with Kudlna's torsional weights and Coulomb's ideas have become part of our everyday life. that at that time there was no such concept of an electric field, and even less a concept of energies. which this ple carries.
And that means. that if we have a conversation about charges - we are obliged to talk about the effect of a photon and a physical body.
Since Wesley has some background, why not make a great vlog. which many would love to see?
-
Dear Ilya it looks like you absolutely don't understand what I'm talking about.
There is nothing, to be researched by going out of the checked and applied science of Wave.
Theoretical base was covered in my previous posts, but you didn't understand it.
e.g https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548 (https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548)
You didn't need any more than that. You only change frequency from light to VLF.
The phenomena will be the same but interface will change.
Уважаемый Илья, похоже, вы совершенно не понимаете, о чем я говорю. Нет ничего, что можно было бы исследовать,
выходя за рамки проверенной и прикладной науки Волны. Теоретическая база была освещена в моих предыдущих
постах, но вы этого не поняли. например,
https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548 (https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548)
Больше вам не нужно. Вы только меняете частоту со световой на VLF. Явления будут такими же, но интерфейс изменится.
Теория волны Ценнека была подтверждена и получила коммерческое применение.
Во многих приложенийх нет ничего нового Проверенная военными и НАСА, эта
технология используется в коммерческой электронике. но на гораздо более высоких частотах.
Так что единственная новинка - это приложение очень низкой частоты VLF.
Kогда все вокруг понимают, что я написал, а вы - нет. это говорит только о вашей проблеме с
пониманием или вам нужен лучший переводчик с английского на русский.
Вы заметили, что здесь тишина? Никто мне не бросает вызов. это не значит, что никто не читает мои тесты.
Это только означает, что ни у кого нет смелости спорить со мной.
Или что многие из них со мной согласны
Как я уже говорил вам на этом форуме, если я попытаюсь написать чушь, читатели съедят меня с туфлями.
здесь много умных людей, которые ждут своего шанса схватить меня за яйца.
И мне нравятся такие вызовы, .
думать как реагировать и чем,ответить и выиграть спору.
Я американец узко светящийся в том, что я знаю лучше всего.
Просто профессионал высокого класса
В других областях я не умею и не хочу быть хорошим, - я не умею готовить еду.
Wesley
-
I am human. who tries to view theory through applied meaning. If in theory there is no application at the level of Scotch and Thread. then the question is - is it worth considering all this at all?
I am absolutely not interested in business secrets, but the question is. that since they exist and you preach them - why don't you show it on a simple device? To understand the applied value? ;)
-
I am human. who tries to view theory through applied meaning.
since they exist and you preach them - why don't you show it on a simple device? To understand the applied value? ;)
раз они существуют, и вы их проповедуете
- почему бы вам не показать это на простом устройстве? Чтобы понять применяемое значение?
I don't preach, I did show it applied.
Word preach means : deliver a sermon or religious address to an assembled group of people, typically in church. e.g "he preached to a large congregation" ·
Я не preach - не проповедую, я показал, что это применимо,применяется. и пример практического применения ·
Слово preach - проповедь означает произнесение проповеди или религиозного обращения к собравшейся группе людей,
обычно в церкви. например, «он проповедовал большому собранию» ·
- почему бы вам не показать это на простом устройстве? Чтобы понять применяемое значение?
я показал, что это применимо,применяется. и пример практического применения ·
-вы хотите, чтобы я доказал вам на простом устройстве, как работает радио и радиоволна?
Так включите приемник йо-майо
Dear Ilya.
If you want I will write in Belarusian because you don't understand my answer to you
in Russian language too.
Zennek wave and/or its other forms listed in the picture above were applied and practically used
in commercial applications.
________________________________________________
Дорогой Илья.
Если хочешь, я напишу по-белорусски, потому что ты тоже не понимаешь
моего ответа на русском языке.
1.
Теория волны Ценнека была подтверждена и получила коммерческое применение.
Во многих приложенийх нет ничего нового .
Проверенная военными и НАСА, эта
технология используется в коммерческой электронике.
но на гораздо более высоких частотах.
2. объяснение, где применяется, находится в видео. Итак, вы получили ответ на свой запрос
Очень обидно, что вы задаете вопросы о том, как практически работает молоток, держа молоток в руках.
Есть масса материалов из лучших университетов мира.
Есть видео и приложени, которые вы можете посмотреть,
Типичный американский мальчик из средней технической школы поймет это за 1 час
A ты валиш дурака....
или ты не хочешь учиться.
Wesley
-
Also thanks to lankaIV search we can read interesting historical piece, showing - how they did it in 1924
1924- circa 1974 : 1 .oil-crisis : because N.Tesla his work the automobility changed from e-car to ic-car ! 50 years R&D time losts !
Car DC motor versus AC motor decision :
somebody who bought Ferraris and Tesla induction motors patents was disappointed ! ::)
Similar experience like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_C5 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_C5) "one of the great marketing bombs of postwar British industry" ;D
Nothing against the C5 idea for mobility experiments ! 8)
And we are not writing about "Arrows" (Luxus-class) but about " e-cars for the masses"
When the partnership Steinmetz-Tesla began ?
Brain meets body ! Or " engineering algebra" meets " engineering geometria" !
A DC- motor + battery : ready the drive principle cw or ccw battery polarisation !
AC-motor disadvantages : only technical one direction + inverter + battery
DC-motor also as DC- generator reverse function
AC- motor not reverse function possible ( only with capacitor and for 10%rated power potential )
AC- motor/battery power factor 1 to factor 0 to factor -1 structural operation with 1924 standart engineering devices efficiencies and power/weight ratios ! :P
Car forward and backward : AC motor-equipped ! Transmission/gear : extra weight/costs !
Only some from many physical-technical disappointment reazons more !
1924-2024 : something between 100 and 500 times range improvements,related power/weight/battery capacityand conversion efficiency !
Today the consume changes from drive to internal " salon on 4 wheels" air conditionized entertainment gadgets !
-
..
-
Lanca
Is nice smorgasbord or buffet you always offer ...
Nice bits and pieces often completely off thread topic
And focused on “lanca’s interest “ ( seems patents and “business potatoes” with no _meat_ to open source ( build or replication details for this open source community)
“Here” where you flood with “your interests”
Is actual topic below !
: Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?
Here some guys hunt
And some say ??? Yes
Is open source project ... combined efforts of membership of open source community
Globally .
https://overunity.com/18824/temporary-placeholder-for-dally-and-friends-builders-bench/msg557925/#new (https://overunity.com/18824/temporary-placeholder-for-dally-and-friends-builders-bench/msg557925/#new)
100% transparent ...
For scientific method of scrutiny .. questions asked and answered honestly by builder / replicators
Sincerely
Chet K
Ps
they are not “done” yet ....
However they are honest ( brutally honest) and it’s a pleasure to see such an example !
The scientific method !.. You run towards scrutiny
Not “away from scrutiny “
-
Chet/ramset,
the surplus energy generating circuit is not a miracle !
But You see in our consume oriented world that the commercial world does not interests
economy and ecology !
That the " green party"- politics is often more voter salary interests fixed than Nature interests !
I am opposite : Nature first,if needed : salary down,people down !
Nature is not in hurry so I will be also not !
Step-by-step slow but calculated strategical improvements !
The global lock-down experience as future normality !
More time for slow breath
Patents are publications/documents - for all humans for own use - free of re-ap/plication restrictions !
See,treat and use the WIPO-archive like a youtube " free video" offer ! 90% from all publications there are commercial owner-free,reazon : priority date,not granted(rights saved),no fee payment !
In Poland there lives a Mercedes SL enthusiast,he did not buy one - neither new nor used -he replicated the Original ! ;)
Enthusiasts do not articulate,they work it out !
-
Dear LancaIV.
Thank you very much .
Please write exactly the way that you composed your last comment .
No extra spaces unless it is thematically differing and needs more attention of the reader.
Chet/ramset was pointing at these few things that you can improve in your writing.
And if you look below my comment you see that ramset is writing using extra spaces between his sentences.
to point to you how difficult is for people with cellphones and tablets to read your comments.
I made educational instruction for you with screenshots yesterday.
Wesley
-
Lanca
This is why I am here , and always has been,
To do “the next right thing”
And in this open source community are many many amazing persons
Working tirelessly
As if our future depended on it ....
Respectfully
Chet K
Btw
Nice writing
I’m still learning....
Edit
I see Wesley had posted while I was typing
-
Я человек. кто пытается рассматривать теорию через прикладное значение. //
тогда вопрос - стоит ли вообще все это рассматривать? //
если они существуют, и вы их проповедуете
- почему бы вам не показать это на простом устройстве? Чтобы понять применяемое значение
ответ на ваш вопрос и озабоченность был дан в:
1.https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557913/#msg557913 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557913/#msg557913)
2.https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557928/#msg557928 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557928/#msg557928)
И в дополнение к этому есть третий ответ:
У вас очень много контактов со Старухиным Global Wave-Глобальная волна-и у него есть контакты с лучшими учеными России.
Денег у ФСБ, Русской Пропаганды полно, и есть много желания сделать из меня кусок,
мусора и малоценного рассказчика.
Найдите мне хотя бы одного ученого во всей России, который докажет, что я неправ.
Думаю, у вас не будет даже одного. И это не потому, что в России нет ученых, а потому, что Путин и все правительство "вероятно" не хотят,
чтобы эта часть физики и ее профессиональное коммерческое применение были известны в России.
Если взять теоретическую страну, где правят бандиты или организованная мафия, (или воров в законе)
они никогда не будут говорить о технологиях, которые разрушат их криминальный бизнес
_______________________________________________
3. А теперь посмотрите на две картинки ниже
4. После того, как вы посмотрите изображения ниже, перейдите сюда:
https://youtu.be/He5xQOJHlrU?t=468 (https://youtu.be/He5xQOJHlrU?t=468)
5.Теперь, пожалуйста, посмотрите на последнее изображение (картинкy) этого поста ниже
opinion expressed is entirely my own
Wesley
-
Chet/ramset : Ferreira-Motor + step-down transmission
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20091130&CC=PT&NR=104078A&KC=A
and
("American wind") generator , https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20150827&CC=US&NR=2015244220A1&KC=A1
( outside U.S.A.-border patent-right application free )
both are actually "open source" from 96% humanity view !
Dr,Pavel Imris worked 2008 with band-capacitors, this above motor,2008 as co-operation project result, by same principle,works by ordinary -but fine- coils !
a relative ( wheel/ bearings/coils life-time ?) endless range vehicle - with both devices productable !
do not bore someone with "overunity" as hope !
-
Chet/ramset : Ferreira-Motor + step-down transmission
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20091130&CC=PT&NR=104078A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20091130&CC=PT&NR=104078A&KC=A)
and
("American wind") generator , https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20150827&CC=US&NR=2015244220A1&KC=A1 (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20150827&CC=US&NR=2015244220A1&KC=A1)
( outside U.S.A.-border patent-right application free )
both are actually "open source" from 96% humanity view !
Dr,Pavel Imris worked 2008 with band-capacitors, this above motor,2008 as co-operation project result, by same principle,works by ordinary -but fine- coils !
a relative ( wheel/ bearings/coils life-time ?) endless range vehicle - with both devices productable !
do not bore someone with "overunity" as hope !
Lanca
I will wait for fellows above to finish their discussion
Your text here needs more discussion ( if as you imply ??...... well not actually sure what you imply ??
I will wait ....
Respectfully
Chet
-
Dear Ilya it looks like you absolutely don't understand what I'm talking about.
There is nothing, to be researched by going out of the checked and applied science of Wave.
Theoretical base was covered in my previous posts, but you didn't understand it.
e.g https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548 (https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548)
You didn't need any more than that. You only change frequency from light to VLF.
The phenomena will be the same but interface will change.
Уважаемый Илья, похоже, вы совершенно не понимаете, о чем я говорю. Нет ничего, что можно было бы исследовать,
выходя за рамки проверенной и прикладной науки Волны. Теоретическая база была освещена в моих предыдущих
постах, но вы этого не поняли. например,
https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548 (https://youtu.be/wIIABIU3tRw?t=548)
Больше вам не нужно. Вы только меняете частоту со световой на VLF. Явления будут такими же, но интерфейс изменится.
Теория волны Ценнека была подтверждена и получила коммерческое применение.
Во многих приложенийх нет ничего нового Проверенная военными и НАСА, эта
технология используется в коммерческой электронике. но на гораздо более высоких частотах.
Так что единственная новинка - это приложение очень низкой частоты VLF.
Kогда все вокруг понимают, что я написал, а вы - нет. это говорит только о вашей проблеме с
пониманием или вам нужен лучший переводчик с английского на русский.
Вы заметили, что здесь тишина? Никто мне не бросает вызов. это не значит, что никто не читает мои тесты.
Это только означает, что ни у кого нет смелости спорить со мной.
Или что многие из них со мной согласны
Как я уже говорил вам на этом форуме, если я попытаюсь написать чушь, читатели съедят меня с туфлями.
здесь много умных людей, которые ждут своего шанса схватить меня за яйца.
И мне нравятся такие вызовы, .
думать как реагировать и чем,ответить и выиграть спору.
Я американец узко светящийся в том, что я знаю лучше всего.
Просто профессионал высокого класса
В других областях я не умею и не хочу быть хорошим, - я не умею готовить еду.
Wesley
-
..
You didn't leave any comment after the quoting me.
I wonder why?
Wesley :)
-
Yes, affirmative. Please visit http://ANTEKK.net (http://ANTEKK.net) for more information.
Our working device was dismantled St. Patrick's Day 2017 by the local Cop Shop, 500 water st, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada Report#17-044, Incident #17-5464. They escalated the event to an Advanced Research Unit that identified the Technology, Canadian Patent Pending#3086124 was prohibited by the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 south of the border which fortunately has a sunset clause June 26, 2021 due to a 180 day decree signed by President Trump on December 28th, 2020. I am detained in Canada until June 27th, 2021 in spite of having no criminal record nor being a threat to anyone due to these issues. There is an article on CNN regarding the decree: https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/10/us/ufo-report-emergency-relief-bill-trnd/index.html (https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/10/us/ufo-report-emergency-relief-bill-trnd/index.html).
Regarding how the technology works, a Magnet is up to 2x (K=2) as strong with iron bar in center (Iron Core vs. Air Core Solenoid).
Two of these magnets that are magnetically and electrically reinforcing each other make a PMH from http://Leedskalnin.com (http://Leedskalnin.com) that converts the amplified field into permanent magnetism. The Amplified Permanent Magnetism is in sinusoidal motion by flipping the magnetic polarity of the PMH [ using circuitry ] and the collected result is how Free Energy is created.
Thanks for your time and for asking the correct question,
-George Paul Molson
Founder of Orgonita ANTEKK
P.S. You can find more information on our Promo Site ScandalChick.me (http://ScandalChick.me)
-
Greetings Wesley. You again write about forums, topics. links. Global waves, FSB, Putin, Stalin and everything like that.
I am now talking or asking about applied things.
I do applied things. Expremenami for that. to be of no value to people.
I personally.
I offered you topics for discussion and topics. to do some visual experiences. which may be of interest to you, the audience.
But you are like in a reverb, repeating the same samples.
Why don't we talk to you about applied?
Without popaganda, fantasies? why not do it?
If you don’t want to, say it as if you want.
Everything else becomes meaningless.
We can talk about Bismarck, Hitler. Gistapo, about Trump and World War II. but why?
Did you personally get what you want from this?
-
I'm all talking about bringing the discussion to applied things.
You are now talking about something. The question is - is talking in topikaz, do you allow you to stop paying power generating companies for electricity today?
If you keep paying. then you are paying for radioactive sources or hydrocarbon sources. that pollute our planet.
But if you pay. the question is - what to do. to not do it?
-
Global waves, FSB, Putin,
//popaganda, fantasies? why not do it?
I was asking you to find Russian scientist who will prove me wrong
My response was in within the brackets including people that are in my opinion involved in decision making .
I offered you// to do some visual experiences. which may be of interest to you, the audience.
I don't care if the audience likes me or not, or find me boring or interesting. However I do respect the audience.
Your preferred form of visual experiences is different than mine.
Perception is how you interpret the world around you and make sense of it in your brain.
Your outcome will be quite different than my own as my preferences and my visual experiences
likely aren't the same as yours.
No propaganda exist in my writing as I have no agenda.
Agenda is essential for this kind of qualification.
My sentence -where I was talking about theoretical country.,enterprise of group was not political but
theoretical.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda)
We can talk about Bismarck, Hitler. Gistapo, about Trump and World War II. but why?
If involvement of mentioned historical figures in not related to scientific or technological
advance or related to it consequences, than you can't talk about it here.
Why don't we talk to you about applied?
We did and we do talk about applied science,
but you don't understand what I'm talking about.
Your answers indicates or looks like I'm talking to
"some car mechanic" about quantum mechanics and its processes.
Your responses suggest areas - this technology or its related science has nothing to do with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
Your expectations are likely in form of:
-bazaar video of some blogger where hundreds of e.g Russians interested in Selling fresh-from-the-pan cookies
and other car mechanics or колхоз, sovkhoz employees including trolls will shine with their criticism while drinking Russian vodka.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovkhoz
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovkhoz)And of course all of these judges will require to make this video in Russian or translate it into
Russian because they likely don't speak English at all.
opinion expressed is my own
Wesley
-
Answer to Ilya # 17
1. The lector’s job is to speak the text in such a way that the text itself,
and not the lector, may to speak to the audience.
Or Lector is not needed any longer-The text "talks"
but people must to know how to read. :)
2. Video presentation - is often requested by people who are not
able to understand what lector is talking about.
It also minimizes the cost and time involved of government officials
in some dictator based countries to qualify given video art into category of
dangerous, not wanted, disturbing or impacting the economy or for any other reasons.
3. As an evidence - video is easily accessible and identity of viewers is hidden.
In past 5 years in Russia many viewers were arrested and imprisoned (1 to 7 years) for making a comment or just for for marking video with "like"
Technical, technological, scientific value of the viewers can be exposed and scrutinized there.
Many videos were overflowed with thousands of "dislikes" and offensive comments by troll factory.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/us-yevgeniv-priogzhin-sanctions/index.html (https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/us-yevgeniv-priogzhin-sanctions/index.html)
4. video as an expense - organizing , equipment place and labor is on the content creator,
5. quality and motivation- video content creator is motivated to deliver quality.
that can be the monetary value or emotional value that is important to him.
_______________________________
I don't have an agenda, I'm not motivated to make money on it, but
I hope that someone will understand what I'm talking about science that is based on evidence in form used and accepted for past 100 years.
There are already few Russians I'm with contact with, capable of making it with no problem.
I'm not Dr Corum having commercial approach ,and I don't need to provide the proof of concept .
He did it and that is why there is 200Ft Tesla Tower in Milford Texas .
opinion expressed is my own
Wesley
-
В других областях я не умею и не хочу быть хорошим, - я не умею готовить еду.[/sub]
Wesley
I can, take me to you. :)
-
if the mountain won't come to Muhammad, Muhammad must go to the mountain
And that means:
If one can't have one's way, one must give in
Because Russians likely can't and don't want speak this civilized form of international communication - English
I must start to speak Russian.
если гора не подойдет к Мухаммеду, Мухаммед должен пойти на гору
А это означает, что если кто-то не может добиться своего, он должен уступить,
потому что русские, вероятно, не могут и не хотят говорить
на этой цивилизованной форме международного общения - Английский.
Я должен начать говорить по-русски.
________________________________________________
translation of my answer to Ilya Илья Цымбалюк / Илья Тесла/ Илья Щсливчик :
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557946/#msg557946 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557946/#msg557946)
Илья Цымбалюк / Илья Тесла: Вы Wesley снова пишете про, Сталин Глобальные волны, ФСБ, Путин,
Я просил вас найти в России хотя бы одного ученого, который докажет, что я неправ. а на мой взгляд, это Глобальная волна, ФСБ, Путин,
лица, принимающие решения, там .
Илья Цымбалюк / Илья Тесла: Я предлагал вам // сделать несколько визуальных опытов.(video) которые могут быть интересны вам, публике.
Меня не волнует, нравится я публике или нет, находит ли меня скучным или интересным. Однако я уважаю публику.
Ваша предпочтительная форма визуального опыта отличается от моей. Восприятие - это то, как вы интерпретируете мир вокруг себя
и осмысливаете его в своем мозгу. Ваш результат будет сильно отличаться от моего собственного, поскольку
мои предпочтения и мои визуальные впечатления, вероятно, не такие же, как ваши.
В моих статьях нет пропаганды, так как у меня нет повестки дня. Повестка дня важна для такого рода квалификации.
Мое предложение - где я говорил о теоретической стране, - предприяти группe.. было не политическим, а теоретическим
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda)
Илья Цымбалюк / Илья Тесла: Мы можем говорить о Бисмарке, Гитлере. Гистапо, о Трампе и Второй мировой войне. но почему?
Мы можем, но если участие упомянутых исторических деятелей не связано с научно-техническим прогрессом или связанными
с ним последствиями, то мы не можем говорить об этом здесь.
Илья Цымбалюк / Илья Тесла: Почему бы нам не поговорить с тобой ?
Мы говорили и говорим о прикладной науке, и o ee применении
но вы не понимаете, о чем я говорю.
Ваши ответы выглядят так, будто
я говорю с «каким-то автомехаником» о квантовой механике
и ее процессах. Ваши ответы указывают на области, не имеющие отношения
с обсуждаемой наукой и практикой,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics)Bы хотите представлениe в виде базарного видео какого-нибудь блоггера, или мне,
где сотни, например, россиян, заинтересованных в продаже свежеприготовленного
печенья и другиe автомеханики, или русский колхоз,/совхоз,, включая троллей,
будут сиять своей критикой, попивая русскую водку.. ??? :) ?
И, конечно же, все эти судьи потребуют сделать это видео на русском
языке или перевести его на русский язык, потому что они, скорее всего, вообще не говорят по-английски.
высказанное мнение мое собственное
Wesley
-
translation into Russian my Answer to Ilya # 16
Илья хочет видео, a мне нужно объяснить, то что он не хочет или не может понимать,
и сделать это на русском языке.
1. Работа лектора состоит в том, чтобы озвучить текст таким образом, чтобы сам текст,
а не лектор, мог говорить с аудиторией. Или Лектор больше не нужен - текст «говорит», но люди должны уметь читать. )
однако чтение не означает понимание того, что вы читаете
2. Видеопрезентация -
часто запрашивается людьми, которые не могут понять, о чем говорит лектор.
Это также сводит к минимуму затраты и время, затрачиваемые государственными чиновниками
в некоторых странах с диктаторским режимом, чтобы квалифицировать данное видеоискусство
в категорию опасных, нежелательных, беспокоящих или влияющих на экономику или по любым
другим причинам
3.В качестве доказательства - видео легко доступно, а личность зрителя скрыта.
Ho.. :) За последние 5 лет в России многие зрители были арестованы и заключены в тюрьму (от 1 до 7 лет)
за то, что оставили комментарий или просто за то, что пометили видео «лайк».
как не странно- могут быть разоблачены и изучены технические, технологические и научные ценности зрителей.
Многие видео были переполнены тысячами «дислайков» и оскорбительных комментариев от русскoй фабрики троллей.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/us-yevgeniv-priogzhin-sanctions/index.html (https://edition.cnn.com/2019/09/30/politics/us-yevgeniv-priogzhin-sanctions/index.html)
4. видео как расход - организация, место оборудования и труд ложатся на создателя контента,
5. Качество и мотивация - создатель видеоконтента мотивирован на обеспечение качества.
это может быть важная для него денежная или эмоциональная ценность.
У меня нет повестки дня, у меня нет мотивации зарабатывать на этом деньги, но я надеюсь,
что кто-то поймет, что я говорю о науке, основанной на доказательствах в форме,
используемой и принятой за последние 100 лет. У меня уже есть несколько русских,
с которыми я контактирую, способных сделать это без проблем. Я не доктор Корум,
использующий коммерческий подход, и мне не нужно предоставлять доказательства
концепции. Он сделал это, и поэтому в Милфорде, штат Техас, есть 200-футовая башня Тесла.
https://youtu.be/wFiW2lqdnlM?t=672
высказанное мнение мое собственное
Wesley
-
Why you keep showing picture of explosive detonator invented by decorum all the time
When is all that is required is standing wave ?
Could you explain how the standing wave generates usable power
regards
-
When is all that is required is standing wave ?
Could you explain how the standing wave generates usable power
- when in Dr.Corum ( not decorum) delivers energy into his Tx Tesla tower , Standing wave is created between Top Capacitor
and the earth. When position of Top Capacitor elevation is tuned to desired Brewster angle than energy trapped in standing wave
enters the 2D interface earth/air however that may be regulated not by accurate elevating of Top capacitor but by phasing coils.
Any of the techniques causes exactly the same effect.
The goal is to have energy from the standing wave enter the interface without reflection and refraction.
There is more geometry and math required not only Brewster angle as Zenneck wave in TM mode in the interface
is synthesized wave according to Maxwell equations.
link- TM Mode (https://www.daenotes.com/electronics/microwave-radar/waveguide-modes-of-signal-propagation#:~:text=TM%20Mode%20When%20the%20propagation%20takes%20place%20through,flux%20is%20transvers%20to%20the%20direction%20of%20propagation.)
But there is another factor required . Tesla coil must see the load from the other side of the interface!!!
If not than energy will enter the interface creating no losses it will be just seating there waiting for any load it can find that matches
the required load characteristical impedance and receiving condition.
That is why it is much more efficient than traditional HV electrical copper lines delivering energy from the
Power Station in traditional electrical network.
And when I'm talking about Extraction of energy from the Schumann Waveguide
that is our FE-the processes are exactly the same . Space between ionosphere
and earth contains standing wave !!!!!
Could you explain how the standing wave generates usable power
Standing wave doesn't generate any power .
It is just state where the energy is trapped inside of standing wave due to mismatch of impedance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_wave)
Why you keep showing picture of explosive detonator invented by decorum all the time
It is Dr.Corum ( not decorum) and it is Viziv Tesla tower.
We have Ilya here who may not understand what we are talking about,
and he requested visual representation/visual experience of phenomena in question to be included.
look here: https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557946/#msg557946 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557946/#msg557946)
Russian translation is here: https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557959/#msg557959 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557959/#msg557959)
Guys: try to catch me on something that is baloney - foolish or deceptive talk; nonsense.
I'd love to see it
:)
Wesley
-
.
-
Thanks for explaining, if not then the next question is regarding 1/4 wave phenomena
as that would fall on the energy peek. Perhaps you could explain that pls
regards
-
https://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_todre.html (https://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_todre.html)
In this detailed, futuristic vision he described a means of tapping the sun's energy with an antenna.
Beside "water power",later !
the tower :
For his new construction project, Tesla acquired land on the cliffs of Long Island Sound. The site was called Wardenclyffe. By 1901 the Wardenclyffe project was under construction, the most challenging task being the erection of an enormous tower, rising 187 feet in the air and supporting on its top a fifty-five-ton sphere made of steel.
Beneath the tower, a well-like shaft plunged 120 feet into the ground. Sixteen iron pipes were driven three hundred feet deeper so that currents could pass through them and seize hold of the earth.
"In this system that I have invented," Tesla explained, "it is necessary for the machine to get a grip of the earth, otherwise it cannot shake the earth.
It has to have a grip... so that the whole of this globe can quiver."
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&q=Quiver+meaning&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj77rL4m-DwAhVM1xoKHT2TC5gQ1QIwHXoECA0QAQ&biw=1366&bih=574 (https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&q=Quiver+meaning&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj77rL4m-DwAhVM1xoKHT2TC5gQ1QIwHXoECA0QAQ&biw=1366&bih=574)
it is not a passive system and more than only an antenna !
https://www.mouser.com/blog/tesla-fails-to-power-the-world-without-wires (https://www.mouser.com/blog/tesla-fails-to-power-the-world-without-wires)
Tesla also demonstrated his scheme in Colorado Springs, CO, where he had built a “magnifying transmitter” that lit incandescent electric lamps placed as far as 300 feet away from it.
In which year he demonstrated the " magnifying transmitter" ? Showing which effect ? Sourced by ?
Attention : chronos/time table !
https://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_todre.html (https://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_todre.html) 1901 view,
Then on December 12, 1901, the world awoke to the news that Marconi had signaled the letter "S" across the Atlantic from Cornwall, England to Newfoundland. Tesla, unruffled by the accomplishment, explained that the Italian used 17 Tesla patents to accomplish the transmission. But Morgan began to doubt Tesla.
Marconi's system not only worked, it was also inexpensive.
1905 view ,
to
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320335847_Geoengineering_Tesla's_Wireless_Power_Transmission) -1924 view
https://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_wendwar.html (https://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_wendwar.html)
In 1931 Tesla announced to reporters at a press conference that he was on the verge of discovering an entirely new source of energy.
What set Tesla's proposal apart from the usual run of fantasy "death rays" was a unique vacuum chamber with one end open to the atmosphere. Tesla devised a unique vacuum seal by directing a high-velocity air stream at the tip of his gun to maintain "high vacua." The necessary pumping action would be accomplished with a large Tesla turbine.
and 2021 chronical review !
https://thelivingcoach.wordpress.com/category/tesla/ (https://thelivingcoach.wordpress.com/category/tesla/)
Tesla’s breakthrough realization of the nonlinear dynamics of multi-frequency oscillations in the infrasonic range was seeded during experimentation with a pocket-sized electro-mechanical oscillator in 1888.
The unusual circumstances of this astonishing experiment were briefly given to a reporter from the New York World-Telegram in 1935, describing Tesla’s accidental production of localized earthquakes and acoustic levitation of multi-ton generators and other heavy metal equipment at his East Houston St. laboratory:
I was experimenting with vibrations. I had one of my machines going and I wanted to see if I could get it in tune with the vibration of the building. I put it up notch after notch. There was a peculiar cracking sound… I knew I was approaching the vibration of the steel building. I pushed the machine a little higher. Suddenly all the heavy machinery in the place was flying around. I grabbed a hammer and broke the machine. The building would have been down about our ears in another few minutes. Outside in the street there was pandemonium. The police and ambulances arrived. I told my assistants to say nothing. We told the police it must have been an earthquake…
That experience inspired Tesla’s invention of the Gravity Motor, tapping the limitless power of acoustic resonance by generating standing waves within a drum. Tesla’s finest, most suppressed invention was discussed in a psychic reading for Thomas T. Brown given by trance channel Edgar Cayce on March 8, 1928 in Chicago, at the LaSalle Hotel, a luxurious palace hotel conveniently located across the street from the Masonic Lodge, a well known establishment of the American-Nazi industrialists (Reading 4665-1):
-
Translation of my response to AlienGrey into Russian:
Когда все, что требуется, это стоячая волна? Не могли бы вы объяснить, как стоячая волна генерирует полезную мощность?
- когда доктор Корум доставляет энергию в свою башню Tx Tesla, между Верхним конденсатором и землей создается стоячая волна.
Когда положение верхнего конденсатора настроено на желаемый угол Брюстера, энергия, захваченная стоячей волной, поступает
на двухмерную границу раздела земля / воздух, однако это можно регулировать не только точным подъемом верхнего конденсатора,
но и фазирующими катушками. любая из методик вызывает точно такой же эффект.
Цель состоит в том, чтобы энергия стоячей волны входила в границу раздела-интерфейс, без отражения и преломления.
Требуется больше геометрии и математики, а не только угол Брюстера, поскольку волна Ценнека в режиме TM
на интерфейсе синтезируется в соответствии с уравнениями Максвелла.
link- TM Mode (https://www.daenotes.com/electronics/microwave-radar/waveguide-modes-of-signal-propagation#:~:text=TM%20Mode%20When%20the%20propagation%20takes%20place%20through,flux%20is%20transvers%20to%20the%20direction%20of%20propagation.)
Но требуется еще один фактор.
Катушка Тесла должна видеть нагрузку с другой стороны интерфейса !!!
Если нет, - то энергия поступит в интерфейс без потерь, онa будет просто сидеть там, ожидая любой нагрузки, которую онa может найти,
-и которая соответствует требуемому характеристическому сопротивлению нагрузки и условиям приема.
Вот почему онa намного более эффективнa, чем традиционные электрические медные линии высокого напряжения,
доставляющие энергию от электростанции в традиционной электрической сети.
И когда я говорю об извлечении энергии из волновода Шумана - это наша CE - процессы в точности такие же.
Пространство между ионосферой и землей содержит стоячую волну !!!!!
Не могли бы вы объяснить, как стоячая волна генерирует полезную мощность?
Стоячая волна не генерирует никакой энергии.
Это просто состояние, в котором энергия удерживается внутри стоячей волны из-за несоответствия импеданса.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_wave (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_wave)
Почему вы все время показываете картинку взрывного детонатора, изобретенного по приличию - "decorum"
Это доктор Корум (не"decorum"), и это башня Визива Тесла.
У нас есть Илья, который может не понимать, о чем мы говорим, и попросил включить визуальное представление / визуальный опыт рассматриваемых явлений..
look here: https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557946/#msg557946 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557946/#msg557946)
Russian translation is here: https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557959/#msg557959 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557959/#msg557959)
Парни: пробуйте поймать меня кое на чем, что является вздором
- на техническoй или научнoй чепухе
- на глупых или обманчивых словах
- на техническом или научном бредe... каком то.
Я бы хотел это увидеть
:)
Wesley
-
next question is regarding 1/4 wave phenomena
as that would fall on the energy peek. Perhaps you could explain that pls
I may not understand fully your question so sorry if it is not exactly want you expected:
A quarter-wave impedance transformer, often written as λ/4 impedance transformer,
is a transmission line (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_line) or waveguide (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waveguide) used in electrical engineering of length one-quarter
wavelength (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength) (λ), terminated with some known impedance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_impedance).
It presents at its input the dual (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_impedance) of the impedance with which it is terminated.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quarter-wave_impedance_transformer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quarter-wave_impedance_transformer)
The λ/4 transformer is the other way around;
it is a pre-determined length and the termination is designed to produce the required impedance match.
Peak demand, peak load or on-peak are terms
describing a period in which electrical power is expected to be provided
for a sustained period at a significantly higher than average supply level.
but I'm sure that it is not you wanted to ask me for.
You are possibly alluding to: the highest amplitude of the wave in one-quarter
wavelength (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength) (λ) resonator.
Answer: The maximum amplitude is seen
when impedance of the load e.g antenna / e.g Tesla Coil
matches the impedance of the output of Tx( transmitter)
or in case of the Rx:
-matches the impedance of the input of Rx receiver antenna and connected to it input of the receiver.
We often use 1/4 wave resonating antennas and coils as it is convenient
to us to build much shorter structure of an antenna or much smaller Tesla Coil.
look here for exact answer:
how much gain does a 1/2 wave dipole have over a 1/4 wave dipole?
https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/1-4-wave-vs-1-2-wave-antenna.232457/ (https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/1-4-wave-vs-1-2-wave-antenna.232457/)
But if you are talking about EMP I can't provide the answer for you here on the forum
As this is very much real or "more than real" for Zenneck wave . This kind of questions must not
be answered or no answers must be provided to unknown reader.!!!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse)
Wesley
-
Sure EMP is something else that distroys all yer test gear isn't it ?
There are so many circuits (one on colors thread) where
the guy appears to be collecting the peek of the 1/4 wave amplitude, just how it works is a logic
thing i have gone all through his posts on the subject but it appears to be a secret squirrel thing
regards
-
Now we are not talking about the fact that energy can be transmitted through the air. Although there is a question of efficiency. The question is, do you have a device. which gives it or not. If not, then it makes sense to change the rhetoric and deal with physics.
-
Now we are not talking about the fact that energy can be transmitted through the air.
You used word - we
who is -we?
_________________________________________________
It is you only who says we are not talking about the fact that energy can be transmitted through the air
without reading and watching, right?
_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _
-link to step by step explanation was given to you.
-link to few video was given to you. Videos are in Russian !!!
-I also translated my answers into Russian and you still don't understand it.
_________________________________________________________________
The impedance of free space is 377 Ohm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space#:~:text=The%20impedance%20of%20free%20space%2C%20Z0%2C%20is%20a,presently%20accepted%20value%20is%20Z0%20%3D%20376.730313668%2857%29%20%CE%A9.)The Brewster Angle is practically not ~52 but varying to 68 degrees.
Practically if we calculate Near Field base/near-field-calculation-and-beam-divergence (https://www.tdnde.com/knowledge-base/near-field-calculation-and-beam-divergence/#:~:text=The%20near%20field%20is%20therefore%20the%20square%20of,%2A%2010%2C000%2C000%20Hz%2F4%20X%20%281460%2F100000%29%20%3D%20171%20mm) it will apply to
ELF too, with some variations, however beam forming is questionable at VLF.
Dr Corum used phasing coils in Viziv tower.
I used vertical elevation up /down of top capacitor- and that is also included in Dr Corum patents
to achieve conditions of Brewster Angle
-but there is much more than that required.
If we were to refer just to Brewster angle alone, we would end up with e.g vertically self polarized wave
because the meaning for that special angle is to point at its special behavior.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster%27s_angle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster%27s_angle)
But on the other hand We don't want any reflection and refraction!!!
We want the energy from standing wave measured and seen from the perspective of top capacitor
to enter interface without refraction and reflection.
https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg546827/#msg546827 (https://overunity.com/18335/wireless-energy-transfer-experiments-builders-board/msg546827/#msg546827)
Please understand it Ilya as I'm not in Russian flea market
yelling around and repeating the same phrase all over again.
Now we are not talking about the fact that energy can be transmitted through the air.
The efficiency mentioned by General of US Army General Michael Miller the head of Viziv Technologies was 86%
https://youtu.be/wFiW2lqdnlM?t=672 (https://youtu.be/wFiW2lqdnlM?t=672)
My own tests show efficiency 92% to 96% in average at the test site having fixed Rx/Tx .
look at the picture below
That result may vary due to:
-interface - (variation and ground electrical properties immediately next to Rx/Tx)
-frequency ( the lower the better)
-more accurate data will be possible when test includes longer distances between Tx and Rx
so some error in measurement may still exist.
Inverse square law still apply but it affects EM wave differently in the interface.
The lower the frequency the lower are the losses.
Dr Corum literature: " at Schumann frequencies, and its higher harmonics - losses are omittable. "
note: Zenneck Wave in the interface at TM mode behaves different than EM in free space.
_________________________________________________
The question is, do you have a device. which gives it or not. If not, then it makes sense to change the rhetoric and deal with physics.
Dear Ilya: is your problem reading or understanding what you reading?
I did answer you question in« Reply #198 on: May 19, 2021, 06:32:15 PM »
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557816/#msg557816 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg557816/#msg557816)
and in spoken form in Russian language my answer to your question is here : https://youtu.be/XOTLfnMOSqQ?t=1067 (https://youtu.be/XOTLfnMOSqQ?t=1067)
Wesley
-
The easiest way is to let state Mr. Michael Miller,PhD and beside Brigade General ,but for Viziv Technologies being CEO and President :
https://dallasinnovates.com/meet-the-innovators-brig-gen-michael-w-miller-viziv-technologies/ (https://dallasinnovates.com/meet-the-innovators-brig-gen-michael-w-miller-viziv-technologies/)
What problem are you solving with your product or business?
Lack of basic resources in developing nations: 06 billion people do not have access to reliable electricity (World bank report – 2013).
Our technology will be a global economic catalyst, especially in developing countries. Our clean, safe, reliable and affordable wireless power systems will bring hot meals, clean drinking water, advanced medical treatment and greater access to educational resources to the billion plus people around the world without power.
Underutilization of renewable resources: Our wireless power system will bring stranded and underutilized renewable resources onto the global market.
Inefficiency of energy supply chain: By allowing generation to happen where the fuel source is located, our technology will reduce the amount of hazardous fuels (natural gas and nuclear material) being transported. Future power plants, renewable or otherwise, will no longer need to be located close to densely populated communities, but instead, will be placed near their energy source.
Vulnerability of our current global positioning and navigation systems: Using a Zenneck surface wave, our navigational system will use less infrastructure, less energy, cover a much larger area, and not rely upon expensive satellites. A tower transmitting a few thousand watts could provide a signal covering a region the size of the entire continental United States. This can be used to develop redundant global and regional positioning and navigation capability governments have been seeking.
Lack of electricity in the wake of natural disaster: Utilizing Viziv’s wireless power technology will shorten disaster outages by weeks or months. Restoring electricity after a natural disaster is a time-consuming step-by-step process. Power companies first must restore power plants, then repair transmission lines, then bring substations online, and finally, restore power for homes and businesses. Utilizing Viziv’s wireless power can speed up this process.
1.advantage : https://electrical-engineering-portal.com/total-losses-in-power-distribution-and-transmission-lines-1 (https://electrical-engineering-portal.com/total-losses-in-power-distribution-and-transmission-lines-1)
It is fact that the unit of electric energy generated by Power Station does not match with the units distributed to the consumers. Some percentage of the units is lost in the distribution network.
This difference in the generated and distributed units is known as Transmission and Distribution loss. Transmission and Distribution loss are the amounts that are not paid for by users.
T&D Losses = (Energy Input to feeder(Kwh) – Billed Energy to Consumer(Kwh)) / Energy Input kwh x 100
Distribution Sector considered as the weakest link in the entire power sector. Transmission Losses is approximate 17% while Distribution Losses is approximate 50%
This system is an effective POWER TRANSMISSION and Teleporting CONCEPT ,wireless !
Less losts/higher efficiencies compared cable-grid means less power production/generation ( and GHG emission) need !
Attention if we think about dimensions :
A tower transmitting a few thousand watts could provide a signal covering a region the size of the entire continental United States. This can be used to develop redundant global and regional positioning and navigation capability governments have been seeking.
A few KW per tower for signal sending
A few ( first numbers wrong by me,overcalculated with factor 1000x,now corrected )
millions towers with few KW potential for power transmission if in global dimension designing !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation).
The world's electricity consumption was 18,608 TWh in 2012.This figure is about 18% smaller than the generated electricity, due to grid losses, storage losses, and self-consumption from power plants (gross generation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_generation). Cogeneration (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration) (CHP) power stations use some of the heat that is otherwise wasted for use in buildings or industrial processes.
18,6 TWh = 18600 GWh = 18 600 000 MWh = 18 600 000 000 KWh divided 8766 hours =
2 121 000 KW tower capacity for transmission and consumer receptor installation ( 2012 consume !)
Only the electric energy sector ! The 2012 global primary energy consume :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation)
Energy supply, consumption and electricity : go to the right side consume table ! ::)
155,505 TeraWatthours
(Mtoe 13,371)
From fossil to electric ?!
The global per capita KWh a. primary energy b. electric energy average, the national per capita max. /the per capita min. !?
https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2021/March/IRENA_World_Energy_Transitions_Outlook_2021.pdf (https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2021/March/IRENA_World_Energy_Transitions_Outlook_2021.pdf)
In 100 years conventional https://www.automoblog.net/2012/10/06/maglev-cars/ (https://www.automoblog.net/2012/10/06/maglev-cars/) sourcing
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/49/04/d1/4904d1d8dc3340469f2f6e171a706fd4.jpg (https://i.pinimg.com/originals/49/04/d1/4904d1d8dc3340469f2f6e171a706fd4.jpg) SciFi movie "5th. ELEMENT " MAGNETIC TRACK
https://engineering.purdue.edu/~mikedz/ee301/FrequencyRanges.pdf (https://engineering.purdue.edu/~mikedz/ee301/FrequencyRanges.pdf)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_machine#:~:text=Sessions%20will%20typically%20aim%20to,based%20on%20the%20desired%20effects (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_machine#:~:text=Sessions%20will%20typically%20aim%20to,based%20on%20the%20desired%20effects).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleforce (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleforce) ;) Grenzenlose Science ?
So nebenbei ,vulgo btw , EMP1 and EMP2 artificial nuclear detonation concept by Dr.Pavel Imris,Csc.
and related " the international stop https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_Nuclear_Test_Ban_Treaty (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_Nuclear_Test_Ban_Treaty) "
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3706385&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en (http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3706385&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet-assisted_transfection (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet-assisted_transfection) frequency ?!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program)
Some of the main capabilities of HAARP include:
Generating very low frequency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_low_frequency) (VLF) radio waves by modulated heating of the auroral electrojet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrojet), useful because generating VLF waves ordinarily requires gigantic antennas
Generating artificial Airglow (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airglow), which is typically subvisual but routinely detectable. Under certain geophysical conditions and transmitter configurations, it can be bright enough to observe with the unaided eye.[15] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program#cite_note-15)[16] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program#cite_note-16)
Generating extremely low frequency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_low_frequency) (ELF) waves in the 0.1 Hz range. These are next to impossible to produce any other way, because the length of an antenna is dictated by the wavelength of the signal it emits or receives.
Generating whistler-mode (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whistler_(radio)) VLF signals that enter the magnetosphere (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetosphere) and propagate to the other hemisphere, interacting with Van Allen radiation belt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt) particles along the way
VLF remote sensing of the heated ionosphere
The "overunity"-effect and its ratio ,publicated :
The facility officially began full operations in its final status of 3.6MW transmitter power in the summer of 2007, yielding a maximum effective radiated power (ERP) of 5.1 gigawatts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigawatts) or 97.1dBW (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBW).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_radiated_power (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_radiated_power) ;D 8) :)
In spite of the names, ERP and EIRP do not measure transmitter power, or total power radiated by the antenna, they are just a measure of signal strength along the main lobe.
They give no information about power radiated in other directions, or total power. ERP and EIRP are always greater than the actual total power radiated by the antenna.
And here : ?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19941018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=US&NR=5356484A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&date=19941018&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
By way of example, an input signal of 6 microwatts with a bandwidth of 1 gigahertz is applied to diode 20 either as thermal energy or electric energy, and thermal energy is applied to diode 10. A signal-to-noise ration of 60 dB is obtained for the input signal for a temperature Tc of the cold diode 20 of 300 DEG K. For a temperature Tr of hot electrons in diode 10 of 6000 DEG K., the amplification of the input signal is 26 dB, which gives an output signal of 2.4 milliwatts. The amplified output signal also has a 60 dB signal-to-noise ratio.
2,4 milliwatts/ 6 microwatts = 400 5,1 GigaWatt/ 3,6 MegaWatt = 1417
And this by each diode
The above test used diodes with active diode areas of 10@-4 cm@2 as convenient to the fabrication and the tests. In the theory of the quantum reversible process, the output voltage is not dependent on the area of the diode electrodes. The test results do not support the existence of any electron thermalization process in which any significant fraction of the hot electrons is first thermalized to an equilibrium temperature for electrons. This thermalization process is not compatible with the experimental results, since approximately 10@13 watts per square meter of input power is needed to heat the thermalized electrons to the electron temperature of 6000 DEG K. for an electron photon thermalization time of 10@-12 seconds.
This electron thermalization process is also not a physically realizable process for this input power, since the material of the diode is destroyed in less than 10@-12 seconds by this intensity of incoming photons. This power is 6 orders of magnitude larger than the test power for the conversion process of 10@7 watts per square meter that was used in the experiment. These results support the conclusion that the thermal energy of the hot electron is directly converted into electromagnetic energy before any electron thermalization occurs.
10 000 000 Watts/sqm diodes array converter
economical/commercial view :
at first : radiation concentration/compression/intensification potential https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7031165 (https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7031165)
Disclosed are multi-stage systems for high flux transformation of solar energy allowing for uniform solar intensification by a factor of 60,000 suns or more. Preferred systems employ a focusing mirror as a primary concentrative device and a non-imaging concentrator as a secondary concentrative device with concentrative capacities of primary and secondary stages selected to provide for net solar flux intensification of greater than 2000 over 95 percent of the concentration area. Systems of the invention are readily applied as energy sources for laser pumping and in other photothermal energy utilization processes. 7 figures.
Yater diode array :
if unconcentrated 90% Carnot-based efficiency assumption and 25 US$cents/Wp selling costs
1333 W solar radiation constant /sqm= 1-sun factor = 1200 Wp output x 0,25 US$ or 25 $cents
= 300 US$/sqm Yater diode array
300 US$ / concentrated 10-suns factor = 300 $/12 000 Wp output = 2,5 US$cents / Wp
300 US$/ concentrated 100-suns factor= 300 US$/ 120 000 Wp output = 0,25 US$cent / Wp
Question : beginning with which sun factor or output per scm device cooling becomes obligation for no destruction ?
Posssible solution : https://www.technologyreview.com/2008/05/16/220503/a-cool-trick-for-solar-cells/ (https://www.technologyreview.com/2008/05/16/220503/a-cool-trick-for-solar-cells/)
solar cells and also high concentrated power transmitter (WPT)
East-Germany R&D : related https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_lens (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_lens)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=dd&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=manfred+gregor&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=dd&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=manfred+gregor&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
Nun,zu guter (vor-)letzt , last,but not least :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio#:~:text=Signal%2Dto%2Dnoise%20ratio%20(,power%2C%20often%20expressed%20in%20decibels (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal-to-noise_ratio#:~:text=Signal%2Dto%2Dnoise%20ratio%20(,power%2C%20often%20expressed%20in%20decibels).
signal-to- noise or signal-to-thermisches rauschen
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A4rmerauschen (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/W%C3%A4rmerauschen) or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Nyquist_noise (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson%E2%80%93Nyquist_noise)
Easy,is it not,Wesley ? é muito fácil ,não é !?
Reply #184 " I will rewrite your response a little: " a. You changed the statement its order
b. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernmeldegeheimnis#:~:text=Im%20%C2%A7%20119%20Strafgesetzbuch%20wird,Fernmeldegesetz%20vom%2013.%20Juli%201949 (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fernmeldegeheimnis#:~:text=Im%20%C2%A7%20119%20Strafgesetzbuch%20wird,Fernmeldegesetz%20vom%2013.%20Juli%201949).
The secrecy of telecommunications is a fundamental right protected in the constitution of many states. It is usually supplemented by the confidentiality of letters, in Germany also by the confidentiality of the post. In more recent terminology, it is also referred to as a telecommunications secret and forbids the unauthorized interception, suppression, exploitation or distortion of telecommunications, telex, telephone, radio and telegraph messages.
-
lankaiV I have no time to respond now. I'll do it later
Wesley
-
I have to recorrect the #278 world consume number based by given statistical data
https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/239764/umfrage/weltweiter-stromverbrauch/ (https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/239764/umfrage/weltweiter-stromverbrauch/)
Attention if we think about dimensions :
A tower transmitting a few thousand watts could provide a signal covering a region the size of the entire continental United States. This can be used to develop redundant global and regional positioning and navigation capability governments have been seeking.A few KW per tower for signal sendingA few ( first numbers wrong by me,overcalculated with factor 1000x,now corrected ) millions towers with few KW potential for power transmission if in global dimension designing
!https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation).
The world's electricity consumption was 18,608 TWh in 2012.This figure is about 18% smaller than the generated electricity, due to grid losses, storage losses, and self-consumption from power plants (gross generation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_generation). Cogeneration (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration) (CHP) power stations use some of the heat that is otherwise wasted for use in buildings or industrial processes.
the numeric error : instead TWh to use PWh !
Electricity generation[edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_energy_consumption&action=edit§ion=3)]The total amount of electricity consumed worldwide was 19,504 TWh in 2013, 16,503 TWh in 2008, 15,105 TWh in 2005, and 12,116 TWh in 2000. By the end of 2014, the total installed electricity generating capacity worldwide was nearly 6.14 TW (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terawatt) (million MW) which only includes generation connected to local electricity grids (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_grid).[17] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#cite_note-17)
as example : 19,504 TWh in 2013 means : 19 PWh + 504 TWh or "19 virgula 5 PWh "
so here in physical dimension the amount to correct :
18,6 TWh = 18600 GWh = 18 600 000 MWh = 18 600 000 000 KWh divided 8766 hours =
2 121 000 KW tower capacity for transmission and consumer receptor installation ( 2012 consume !)
Only the electric energy sector ! The 2012 global primary energy consume
to correct real consume numbers by FACTOR 1000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption#:~:text=In%202016%20the%20total%20world,used%20for%20heat%20and%20transportation)
Energy supply, consumption and electricity : go to the right side consume table !
for primary energy consume
155,505 TeraWatthours (Mtoe 13,371)
= 155 PetaWatthours
for electric energy consume 2012
19,7 PWh = 19 700 TWh = 19 700 000 GWh = 19 700 000 000 MWh = 19 700 000 000 000 KWh
in KW/year = 2 244 000 000
in words : 2 billions two-hundred fourty-four millions Kilo-Watt
divided few KW tower capacity
19 700 000 000 000 KWh electric / 7 052 135 000 habitants 2012 =
2793.5 KWh electric per capita/annum
https://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/globalisierung/52758/verbrauch-pro-kopf (https://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/globalisierung/52758/verbrauch-pro-kopf)
Der Primärenergie-Verbrauch pro Kopf lag im Jahr 2014 weltweit bei 1,79 Tonnen Öläquivalent. Oelaequivalent = OE
https://www.energie-lexikon.info/oeleinheit.html (https://www.energie-lexikon.info/oeleinheit.html) 1 790 x OE = 1 790 x 11,63 kWh (https://www.energie-lexikon.info/kilowattstunde.html) =
20 818 KWh /capita/a primary energy consume
important if changing from "fossil to electricity"
https://www.altair.com/newsroom/articles/what-is-5g-and-why-are-there-so-many-new-antennas/ (https://www.altair.com/newsroom/articles/what-is-5g-and-why-are-there-so-many-new-antennas/)
as technological/target similar development ( frequency spectrum difference)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in words : 2 billions two-hundred fourty-four millions Kilo-Watt divided few KW tower capacity =
how many coil antennas/emitter-collector-receiver -towers in numbers /per sqmKm ( habitants=user/consumer/sqKm !) ?
2012-2021-2050 average consume ? a. electric b. total primary energy to total electric ?
22 billions four-hundred millions Kilo-Watt divided few KW tower capacity
never possible in decades ( mineral exploration/refinement, production/transformation capacity,economics)
1 century : probably !
ramset : 2121 ! 2021-2121 : for a well outlook !
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-electricity-outlook-idUSKBN2A92QU (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-electricity-outlook-idUSKBN2A92QU)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/201794/us-electricity-consumption-since-1975/ (https://www.statista.com/statistics/201794/us-electricity-consumption-since-1975/)
4 Trillion KWh ( or 4 000 Billion KWh) divided 320 Mio USA habitants = 12 500 KWh electricity consume/habitant/year
+ CO2-from air-scrubbing energy consume (400+ppm down)
-
Your best bet is the udt of Raymond Paul Jensen and the flux diode to give Lenz a different path and more room, aka asymmetric flux linking. He gave it away but people apparently don't want to find.And this https://patents.google.com/patent/US6707208B2/en
-
DO DEFINE NUMBERS RIGHT IF FARLY DIFFICULT :
https://medium.com/predict/how-far-are-we-from-wireless-electricity-94dbd48529a4 (https://medium.com/predict/how-far-are-we-from-wireless-electricity-94dbd48529a4)
According to Global Energy Statistics (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://yearbook.enerdata.net/total-energy/world-consumption-statistics.html&ved=2ahUKEwiagLfs3a3tAhVuZxUIHQneCYkQFjARegQIERAC&usg=AOvVaw3AdRNjZ-m5uy-cflsD2Xg_), the world’s total energy consumption in 2019 was 13000 Million Ton Oil Equivalent(MTOE).
This translates to 17.3 Terawatts of power.
( clearing :
But this statistical number is the total primary energy global consume 2019 ,also written as 583,9 Exajoule )
http://www.kylesconverter.com/energy,-work,-and-heat/tons-of-oil-equivalent-to-terawatt-hours (http://www.kylesconverter.com/energy,-work,-and-heat/tons-of-oil-equivalent-to-terawatt-hours)
13 000 Million Ton Oil Equivalent = 13 000 000 000 tons oil equivalent = 151 190 TWh
This 151 190 TWh dividing 8766 hours gives/"translates" as worlds power/energy consume 17,25 TW ( per hour )
desert and/or space solar farming :
https://medium.com/predict/how-far-are-we-from-wireless-electricity-94dbd48529a4 (https://medium.com/predict/how-far-are-we-from-wireless-electricity-94dbd48529a4)
1. Remote Transmission of Solar EnergyAccording to Global Energy Statistics (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://yearbook.enerdata.net/total-energy/world-consumption-statistics.html&ved=2ahUKEwiagLfs3a3tAhVuZxUIHQneCYkQFjARegQIERAC&usg=AOvVaw3AdRNjZ-m5uy-cflsD2Xg_), the world’s total energy consumption in 2019 was 13000 Million Ton Oil Equivalent(MTOE).
This translates to 17.3 Terawatts of power.
Now, if we cover an area of land equal to 350km by 350km with solar panels, it can provide more than 17.4TW of power.
condition : during sufficient radiation and/or sufficient energy/power storage
This area is about 43000 Square miles. The Great Sahara Desert is about a 3.6million square miles of more than 12 hours of solar power per day.
related 43 000 Square miles = 122 500 Square Kilometers another number offered (output per hour ?)
https://energypost.eu/10000-sq-km-of-solar-in-the-sahara-could-provide-all-the-worlds-energy-needs/ (https://energypost.eu/10000-sq-km-of-solar-in-the-sahara-could-provide-all-the-worlds-energy-needs/)
This means 1.2% of the desert is enough to cover the world’s energy needs. And there is no way nuclear fusion or any other cleaner source of energy currently under development can compete with this.
-
Your best bet is the udt of Raymond Paul Jensen and the flux diode to give Lenz a different path and more room, aka asymmetric flux linking. He gave it away but people apparently don't want to find.And this https://patents.google.com/patent/US6707208B2/en (https://patents.google.com/patent/US6707208B2/en)
Raymond Paul Jensen The Unidirectional Transformer f.e. here pdf https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3756.0 (https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=3756.0)
-
Your best bet is the udt of Raymond Paul Jensen and the flux diode to give Lenz a different path and more room, aka asymmetric flux linking. He gave it away but people apparently don't want to find.And this https://patents.google.com/patent/US6707208B2/en
Isn't Ted Annis's device about that?
p.s. To Wesley.
В России сейчас многие думают, что их страна "пляшет под дудку" исполняет волю международного валютного фонда,и их главного оплота,США.
Что бы вы могли ответить этим людям ? ;)
p.s.I’ll add that I don’t think so. :)
-
#276 : "..... the efficiency of transmission can be as high ...."
from power source to emission wave spectrum : efficiency ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Sanguine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Sanguine)
Radio waves in the extremely low frequency (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremely_low_frequency) (ELF) band of 30 to 300 Hz can penetrate to a depth of hundreds of meters, allowing them to communicate with submarines at their normal operating depth.[5] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Sanguine#cite_note-Spinardi-5)
The lower the frequency, the longer the wavelength (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wavelength) of the radio waves, and transmitters require longer antenna (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)) structures to generate them.
ELF transmitters use huge antennas called ground dipoles (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_dipole) consisting of tens to hundreds of kilometers of overhead cables resembling ordinary power transmission lines.
The transmission lines are grounded (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_(electricity)) at the ends, and looping currents deep in the Earth form part of the antenna.
Because even these huge antennas are much smaller than the ELF wavelengths, they are extremely inefficient;
only a tiny fraction of the input power is radiated as ELF waves, with the rest dissipated as heat in antenna resistance.
At their full input power of 2.6 MW, both US ELF transmitters working together only generated about 8 watts of ELF radiation.
This weak signal was able to reach submarines over half the globe only because of the extremely low attenuation of ELF waves of 1–2 dB per 1000 kilometers.
ELF transmitters are most efficient when sited over certain low conductivity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistivity_and_conductivity) underground rock formations, which forces the currents to spread deeper through a larger volume of rock, forming a larger "antenna".[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Sanguine#cite_note-Jones-2)
The US system was located in Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan over the Laurentian Shield (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurentian_Shield) formation, for that reason.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Sanguine#cite_note-Jones-2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_dipole (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_dipole)
Antennas at ELF frequencies
Fortunately, the attenuation of ELF waves with distance is so low (1–2 dB (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibel) per 1000 km)[5] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_dipole#cite_note-Jones-5) that a few watts of radiated power is enough to communicate worldwide.[2] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_dipole#cite_note-NavyFactSheet-2)
:P TWh now to see as TinyWatthour :'( consume ,up to P(itty)Watthour ::)
I hope this here written falls under commentator "personal irony" :
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/459585/tesla-coil-and-tesla-tower (https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/459585/tesla-coil-and-tesla-tower)
So, in order to prove Tesla's claims, and operate even a tiny 1-watt flashlight bulb at hundreds/thousands KM distance, we'd need:
17KHz operating frequency (or ideally far lower.)
50MV terminal potential (or ideally far higher.)
Extensive grounding system (like BBC and VOA European megawatt towers.)
100MW power supply (or ideally far more.)method to follow the changing planetary VLF resonance modes
-
Wesley, from #281 and #285
122 500 sqkm to 10 000 sqkm need and improvement this I call : technological success !
such statements like :
At their full input power of 2.6 MW, both US ELF transmitters working together only generated about 8 watts of ELF radiation.
has nothing to do with "efficiency" : THIS IS A WASTE OF ENERGY SYSTEM ! ( the military sector is not reknown for ecologic behaviour !)
2 600 000 Watt-in for 8 Watt-out
( american 8) business inside ? horrible MBA-/PhD management knowledge disorder)
It should be in Your interest not only to observe the pure "transmission efficiency" but also the power-source-to-emitter efficiency !
Let us hope for the Viziv and other competitors not same bad in the ELF/Zenneck-TM level !
And to use "clean" solar energy as 2,6 MW input power source does not hide the horrible inefficiency !
simple wireless energy transmission ( over all em frequencies spectrum ) we know and use privately since more than 40 years :
IR Fernbedienung/remote control for HiFi/TV or 70´ walkie-talkie and in kitchen : micro-wave owen
Gimme/Give me an 8 Watt-in and 2,6 MW-out idea/concept solution,politely: :-* please !
From my knowledge-status quo possible : but only as cascading array !
next technical evolution barrier fallen ;D :
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/24/2234708/0/en/US-Nuclear-and-Grapheton-s-New-Supercapacitors-Could-Charge-Your-Next-Electric-Vehicle-in-Seconds.html (https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/24/2234708/0/en/US-Nuclear-and-Grapheton-s-New-Supercapacitors-Could-Charge-Your-Next-Electric-Vehicle-in-Seconds.html)
wireless energy transmisssion : I reed ,3 decades back,about it : "Wirtschaftswoche"-Magazin
magnetic induction (like today electric cars loading :
wireless) Kir(chen)mes(se = Jahrmarkt) Versorgung/Distribution
let us look for - less distance- tower improvements, less solar radiation peak dependent :
17,4 TeraWatt / 500 KW https://web.archive.org/web/20110817174850if_/http://www.airpower.co.il/PRODUCTS.htm (https://web.archive.org/web/20110817174850if_/http://www.airpower.co.il/PRODUCTS.htm) x 40 sqm =
17 400 000 MW / 0,5 MW = 34 800 000 units x 40 sqm =
1 392 000 000 sqm = 139 200 ha = 1392 sqKm area ( on water-pontoon,land ) need by
compared
https://www.indexmundi.com/world/area.html (https://www.indexmundi.com/world/area.html)
world total: 510.072 million sq km
land: 148.94 million sq km
water: 361.132 million sq km
power (plants) to the people
less than 122 500 sqKm(350 x 350) and 10 000 sqKm ( 100 x 100 )
space solar,earth solar,wind,water,magnetic forces : being and staying flexible !
We can also divide this 17,4 TW by world-wide (private) households number
( future : 2,5 Giga a 4 capita = 10 Billions or 10 Giga habitants)
! average !
7000 Watt or 7 KW primary energy as electric energy per household
this is the E.U. programmatic demand : in-situ generation ! in-place !
Let US see it as GLOBAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM ! NO EXIT !
magnetic induction,nice written description and explained -near distance- as vid :
https://phys.libretexts.org/Courses/University_of_California_Davis/UCD%3A_Physics_7C_-_General_Physics/10%3A_Electromagnetism/10.3%3A_Magnetic_Fields/4._Magnetic_Induction
how to transmitt wireless https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMfAotrPEkI
transmission by Tesla coil arrangement https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2bZGKNwB4Y
-
Here everyone is literate. Tell me, does need this OU thing in this rotten society at all ? I mean here.
A device was made some time ago, seemingly quite complex.
The battery was hidden, to be honest. It was sad to look at the bored, dull, indifferent faces looking at him.
It's clear if people are from the street, otherwise I have known them for many years, people who are interested in this topic. I don't understand anything at all.
They are shown a device that they wanted for so many years, but failed.
And they don't care ...
-
Here everyone is literate. Tell me, does need this OU thing in this rotten society at all ? I mean here.
A device was made some time ago, seemingly quite complex.
The battery was hidden, to be honest. It was sad to look at the bored, dull, indifferent faces looking at him.
It's clear if people are from the street, otherwise I have known them for many years, people who are interested in this topic. I don't understand anything at all.
They are shown a device that they wanted for so many years, but failed.
And they don't care ...
You lost me. Can you write in Russian what you are talking about and what is that related to?
What device?
What video?
who show the device
Я заблудился. Можете ли вы написать по-русски, о чем говорите и с чем это связано? Я не понимаю твой вопрос
Wesley
-
Lie or reality or lie-reality ?
https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/10/28/irvine-man-charged-with-multi-million-dollar-investment-fraud-scheme/ (https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/10/28/irvine-man-charged-with-multi-million-dollar-investment-fraud-scheme/)
lie or reality or lie-reality :
We can have "over"-unity devices,GHG-free ! ( What/Which price per KW ,per generated KWh ? )
De-/Central ! (? )
Are we questionning the european/US american Metropole citizen , the european/US american land habitant
or the 2-US$-per day Terraner ?
https://dallasinnovates.com/meet-the-innovators-brig-gen-michael-w-miller-viziv-technologies/ (https://dallasinnovates.com/meet-the-innovators-brig-gen-michael-w-miller-viziv-technologies/)
What problem are you solving with your product or business?
Lack of basic resources in developing nations: 06 billion people do not have access to reliable electricity (World bank report – 2013).Our technology will be a global economic catalyst, especially in developing countries. Our clean, safe, reliable and affordable wireless power systems will bring hot meals, clean drinking water, advanced medical treatment and greater access to educational resources to the billion plus people around the world without power.Underutilization of renewable resources: Our wireless power system will bring stranded and underutilized renewable resources onto the global market.Inefficiency of energy supply chain: By allowing generation to happen where the fuel source is located, our technology will reduce the amount of hazardous fuels (natural gas and nuclear material) being transported. Future power plants, renewable or otherwise, will no longer need to be located close to densely populated communities, but instead, will be placed near their energy source.Vulnerability of our current global positioning and navigation systems: Using a Zenneck surface wave, our navigational system will use less infrastructure, less energy, cover a much larger area, and not rely upon expensive satellites. A tower transmitting a few thousand watts could provide a signal covering a region the size of the entire continental United States. This can be used to develop redundant global and regional positioning and navigation capability governments have been seeking.Lack of electricity in the wake of natural disaster: Utilizing Viziv’s wireless power technology will shorten disaster outages by weeks or months. Restoring electricity after a natural disaster is a time-consuming step-by-step process. Power companies first must restore power plants, then repair transmission lines, then bring substations online, and finally, restore power for homes and businesses. Utilizing Viziv’s wireless power can speed up this process.
For the 2-US$-day world-wide habitants !?
1 US$cent- 1,5 US$cents per KWh generation and transmission endconsumer obulus
Only the Best for the global Marshall-Morgenthau Plan
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_Aperture_Radar (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_Aperture_Radar)
explains analog good why such a large area
" small " : While the embodiment of the structure is physically large, perhaps 10 to 20 miles across,it still occupies less than four percent of the area of the Project Sanguine/Seafarer antenna which is supposed to operate at a frequency ten times higher
earth circumference 40 075 km (Aequator)
10-20 miles (across) related 40 075 Km/4 (fixpoint : North/East/West/South) = "small"
-
Можете ли вы написать по-русски, о чем говорите и с чем это связано?
It doesn't really matter. Based on two-stage pendulum.
The main thing is to see the reaction of people.
Это не столь важно.На основе Милковича.
Просто хотелось увидеть их эмоции.
-
It doesn't really matter. Based on two-stage pendulum.
The main thing is to see the reaction of people.
Это не столь важно.На основе Милковича.
Просто хотелось увидеть их эмоции.
:o
агент-провокатор
Future preview (partial utopic )
The United (western)States of Europe (a Eurotopia?) by Heineken/Wesseling
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/80/Heinekenwesseling.jpg/220px-Heinekenwesseling.jpg (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/80/Heinekenwesseling.jpg/220px-Heinekenwesseling.jpg)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurotopia (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurotopia)
"75 Estates" = 75 independent energy/communication transmission grid-countries !(?)
each 5-10 millions habitants (75 x 5 = 375 )
to next step : in each country independent county-net grid
to next step : local net-grid
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.dw.com/de/die-sch%25C3%25B6nauer-stromrebellen-es-geht-um-viel-mehr-als-nur-strom/a-4083873 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.dw.com/de/die-sch%25C3%25B6nauer-stromrebellen-es-geht-um-viel-mehr-als-nur-strom/a-4083873)
to last step : in-situ industrial/commercial/private household grid
https://www.etip-snet.eu/new-white-paper-flexible-power-generation-decarbonised-europe/ (https://www.etip-snet.eu/new-white-paper-flexible-power-generation-decarbonised-europe/)
Decarbonized in GHG-emission and decentralized , not decarbonized in carbon use f.e. graphene
Stromrebellen ? EWS Schoenau ?
Justizrebellen ? Bezirksgericht Den Haag ? https://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/Holland-in-Not-article22578615.html (https://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/Holland-in-Not-article22578615.html)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/Holland-in-Not-article22578615.html (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.n-tv.de/wirtschaft/Holland-in-Not-article22578615.html)
better translation : Holland in calamity ( next instance decision ?) and by international " legal free riders" probably
Europe/world in calamity
Initiative as a way out of dissatisfaction
JUST DO IT
TARGET: ZERO
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.bund-niedersachsen.de/themen/mensch-umwelt/klima-und-energie/keine-stromtrassen/
Anymore over-regional power lines ,not sub-/supra terrestical
-
free energy will change the world - free energy will stop all environmental pollution
Free energy will help to heal the planet earth.
In our disccusion forum www.overunity.com (http://www.overunity.com) we talk about all kinds of free energy and alternative
and renewable energy systems.
The world will soon be very green without any pollution and any chemical fuel polutants
with this new technolgy.
What Tesla has begun in the 19th and 20th century we will now bring to
market in the 21th century.
With permanent magnet motors and Solid State magnet free energy convertes into the future.
free energy (http://www.overunity.com/)
will give us hope
and we will not surrender until
free energy (http://www.overunity.de/)
will be enabled all over the world to power cars, ships and trains and
Free energy (http://www.overunity.com/)
will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all
Free energy (http://www.overunity.de/)
will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
For each 1 billion OU-device investment to preserve 10 billions effect in "negative" social costs (by this economic construction actually)
You have to be ready for this reality,at first far away but later becoming nearer
Billions of people are moving with average daily 5 Km/h ,simple change : 1 step. Volkrodt 100 Watt ebike + Nano-Boxx and similar devices
to 20 Km/h ,ebike from ic-bike conversion 375-200 Watt + Nano-Boxx/aequivalent to 40 Km/h
Fast Guerilla : f.e. IS + (Toyoda/Toyota) cars ,Jihad in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe5CQTXX0Dc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe5CQTXX0Dc)
up to 1000 Km in one day !
e-bikes,e-cars,e-drones,e-tanks,e-guns (3dprint !? )
disemployment and the chance to win/gain much in short time : il-/legal = sh..-equal
IS and cryptocoins-buyer : same mentality,without doubts !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant) not the space station meaning !
"Helping" Africa : https://www.pp-power.com/ (https://www.pp-power.com/)
An average rural family in Africa use and dispose every year:500 kg CO2 greenhouse gas.
15 kg black carbon particles.
200 liters kerosene.
20 kg disposable batteries.
At the cost of 10-15 USD every month, this is causing health problems, fire issues, and groundwater contamination, aswell as global warming.
Best solution challenge ?
-
At least I'm being honest.
If something doesn't work out for me, I say that it doesn't work out.
If I have hidden the battery, I say that I have hidden the battery.
And I would tell those people. Later. ;)
-
At least I'm being honest.
If something doesn't work out for me, I say that it doesn't work out.
If I have hidden the battery, I say that I have hidden the battery.
And I would tell those people. Later. ;)
-
"Overunity",does it exist ? Some members say " No !"
Clearly it is a need to fix this expression "overunity" by all physical/ethical points !
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.energie-lexikon.info/perpetuum_mobile.html (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.energie-lexikon.info/perpetuum_mobile.html)
1 atom(-nucleid) = natural machine : radiant power producing longetivity = to see/understand as "perpetuum" long enough ?
( 8) The “record holder” is the mentioned Tellurium-128 with a half-life of 7.2 · 10v24 years (see list of isotopes / atomic number 51 to atomic number 60 (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Liste_der_Isotope/Ordnungszahl_51_bis_Ordnungszahl_60) );
this is roughly 520 trillion times the age of the universe.
Like 60 000-suns concentrator to see time in XYZ-universum-existence number ? ;) )
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordiales_Nuklid%23:~:text%3D%25E2%2580%259ERekordhalter%25E2%2580%259C%2520ist%2520das%2520erw%25C3%25A4hnte%2520Tellur,fache%2520des%2520Alters%2520des%2520Universums (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordiales_Nuklid%23:~:text%3D%25E2%2580%259ERekordhalter%25E2%2580%259C%2520ist%2520das%2520erw%25C3%25A4hnte%2520Tellur,fache%2520des%2520Alters%2520des%2520Universums).
https://x437hyxklfgpppu42mv7l6ifce-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-energie-lexikon-info.translate.goog/img/perpetuum_mobile1.webp (https://x437hyxklfgpppu42mv7l6ifce-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-energie-lexikon-info.translate.goog/img/perpetuum_mobile1.webp)
To the "No !"-fraction : why and by which process the I.T.E.R. ( and older like DESY circuits) is/was/are build(ed) ?
ARTIFICIAL SUN ON EARTH
so ungefaehr :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19850131&CC=DE&NR=3409478A1&KC=A1 (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19850131&CC=DE&NR=3409478A1&KC=A1)
XYZ-bomb and YXZ-reactor processes : 2-in-1 moderated ,reversible atomar decay and enrichment : from where the surplus !?
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_von_Alexandria (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heron_von_Alexandria) AUTOMAT ?
Denis Papin https://image.geo.de/30149980/t/UN/v3/w960/r0/-/perpetuum-mobile-s-157382423-jpg--85551-.jpg (https://image.geo.de/30149980/t/UN/v3/w960/r0/-/perpetuum-mobile-s-157382423-jpg--85551-.jpg) + radiation ?
Maxwell Demon,date from first publishing ? 2021 view ?
Carnot engine,date from first publishing ? https://www.energie-lexikon.info/img/perpetuum_mobile3.webp (https://www.energie-lexikon.info/img/perpetuum_mobile3.webp) 2021 view ? Gibbs,Nernst !
the "D(a)emon engine " a reversible process including
Diode (spoken : Di-ode = 2-ode = Anode(A) and Kathode(K) [ or Cathode(C)] = AK-ode ; Tri-ode=3-ode= .... )
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.fachlexika.de/technik/mechatronik/diode.html%23:~:text%3DDie%2520Anschl%25C3%25BCsse%2520der%2520Diode%2520sind,sind%2520Silizium%252C%2520Germanium%2520und%2520Selen (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=http://www.fachlexika.de/technik/mechatronik/diode.html%23:~:text%3DDie%2520Anschl%25C3%25BCsse%2520der%2520Diode%2520sind,sind%2520Silizium%252C%2520Germanium%2520und%2520Selen).
Die Anschlüsse der Diode sind mit Anode(A) und Kathode(K) bezeichnet und es ist festgelegt, dass ein Strom nur von A nach K fliessen darf, aber nicht umgekehrt.
The connections of the diode are marked with anode (A) and cathode (K) and it is stipulated that a current may only flow from A to K, but not vice versa.
related pn https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-n-%25C3%259Cbergang (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-n-%25C3%259Cbergang)
or pnp and npn
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor)
going back
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diode (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diode)
LED
Working principle To edit (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/w/index.php?title=Leuchtdiode&action=edit§ion=3)
The basic structure of a light emitting diode corresponds to that of a pn semiconductor diode (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/P-n-%C3%9Cbergang) ; Light-emitting diodes therefore have the same basic properties. There is a big difference in the semiconductor material used. While non-luminous diodes are made from silicon (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Silizium) , less often from germanium (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Germanium) or selenium (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Selen) , the starting material for light-emitting diodes is a direct semiconductor (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Direkter_Halbleiter) , usually a gallium compound (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Gallium) as a III-V compound semiconductor (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/III-V-Verbindungshalbleiter) .
If a forward voltage is applied to a semiconductor diode, electrons (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Elektron) migrate from the n-doped (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/N-Dotierung) side to the pn junction. After the transition to the p-doped (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/P-Dotierung) side, the electron then moves into the energetically more favorable valence band (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Valenzband) . This transition is called recombination (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Rekombination_(Physik)) , because it can also be interpreted as the meeting of an electron in the conduction band (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Leitungsband) with a defect electron (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Defektelektron) (hole). The energy released during recombination is usually emitted directly as light (photon) in a direct semiconductor.
In addition to the direct radiating recombination, the participation of excitons (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Exziton) and phonons is also (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Phonon) possible, which leads to slightly less energetic radiation (the color of the emitted light is shifted to reddish). This mechanism plays a role particularly in the case of excitonic emission in green gallium phosphide (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Galliumphosphid) light-emitting diodes.
Special variants that are not directly counted as light-emitting diodes, but are based on similar operating principles, are the laser diode (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Laserdiode) , the resonant cavity light emitting diode (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Resonant-cavity_light_emitting_diode) (RCLED or RC-LED) and the organic light-emitting diode (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Organische_Leuchtdiode) (OLED).
electricity to light by diode
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuchtdiode (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leuchtdiode)
light to electricity by diode
https://www.theengineer.co.uk/diode-infrared-kaust/ (https://www.theengineer.co.uk/diode-infrared-kaust/) https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37030 (https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37030)
we read "output DC "
https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/uploads/2018/02/rectenna-768x549.jpg (https://www.theengineer.co.uk/content/uploads/2018/02/rectenna-768x549.jpg)
why here "output AC " https://web.archive.org/web/20120722061149/http://www.prismnet.com/~frg (https://web.archive.org/web/20120722061149/http://www.prismnet.com/~frg)
photon and optical phonon compared acoustical phonon
related somebody his work
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=oscar+fellows&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=oscar+fellows&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
MEMS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_systems (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectromechanical_systems)
and TAR related https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_resonance (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_resonance)
MEMS-TAR
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20020514&CC=US&NR=6385972B1&KC=B1 (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20020514&CC=US&NR=6385972B1&KC=B1)
https://archive.org/details/19470514DerMagnetischeStromUraniavortrag/page/n3/mode/2up (https://archive.org/details/19470514DerMagnetischeStromUraniavortrag/page/n3/mode/2up)
and
In 1924 he established a relationship between the bandwidth and the settling time of signals, which later became known under the name Küpfmüller's uncertainty (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/K%C3%BCpfm%C3%BCllersche_Unbestimmtheitsrelation) relation and, in quantum mechanics, has (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Quantenmechanik) the better-known Heisenberg uncertainty (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Heisenbergsche_Unbestimmtheitsrelation) relation as an analogue .
https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/K%C3%BCpfm%C3%BCllersche_Unbestimmtheitsrelation (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/K%C3%BCpfm%C3%BCllersche_Unbestimmtheitsrelation)
https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Satz_von_Plancherel (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Satz_von_Plancherel)
https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Satz_von_Parseval (https://pifh2gjvrytv4tngczx67uyumu-ac4c6men2g7xr2a-de-m-wikipedia-org.translate.goog/wiki/Satz_von_Parseval)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenberg-Modell (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenberg-Modell)
http://gehtanders.de/Downloads/NET0515S31-35.pdf (http://gehtanders.de/Downloads/NET0515S31-35.pdf)
“Ich denke, dass es möglich ist, den Magnetismus als Energiequelle zu nutzen. Aber wir Wissenschafts-Idioten schaffen es nicht. Das muss von Aussenseitern kommen.”
::) Aber wir Wissenschafts-Idioten schaffen es nicht ;D Wie despektierlich ! Nicht Wissenschafts- sondern Fach-/Faculta-Idioten !
“Heinrich Kunel denkt seit frühester Kindheit über den Magnetismus nach. Den Anstoss dazu gab sein Grossvater, der ihn bedeutungsvoll darauf aufmerksam machte, dass mit Magneten Grosses anzufangen sei. Später bestätigte ihn Werner Heisenberg, der nach Kunels Erinnerung zu ihm gesagt hatte: ‘Ich halte es für möglich, den Magnetismus als Energiequelle zu nutzen. Aber wir Fachidioten können das nicht, das muss von aussen kommen.’”
“Heinrich Kunel has been thinking about magnetism since he was a child. His grandfather gave him the impetus and made him aware that something big could be done with magnets. Werner Heisenberg later confirmed him, who, according to Kunel's memory, had said to him: ‘I consider it possible to use magnetism as an energy source. But we technical idiots can't do that, it has to come from outside. "
Von Heinrich Kunel zu Rudolf Kroll
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=heinrich+kunel+&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=heinrich+kunel+&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=rudolf+kroll&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=rudolf+kroll&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txkh9xvpQAg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txkh9xvpQAg)
Heisenberg- or
v. Weizsaecker-Modell
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantentheorie_der_Ur-Alternativen (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantentheorie_der_Ur-Alternativen)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemtheorie (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemtheorie)
META-SYSTEM
" ..... Der groesste Mangel des 19.Jahrhunderts ist unsere absolute Unwissenheit ueber den Magnetismus. Die Lehre des Magnetismus war durch die Ampèrsche Hypothese,die auf eine Vereinheitlichung unseres Weltbildes auf Kosten des Magnetismus als selbstaendige Naturerscheinung zielte,verschleiert worden . ...."
Hermann von Helmholtz
"..... The greatest lack of the 19th century is our absolute ignorance about magnetism. The theory of magnetism was obscured by Ampèr's hypothesis, which aimed to unify our worldview at the expense of magnetism as an independent natural phenomenon. ... "
Gauss und Weber : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzjZPpHzh1I (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzjZPpHzh1I)
zu 2021 G. und die "Relativistische Kinematik" oder Kybernetik https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kybernetik (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kybernetik)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kybernetik (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kybernetik)
schraubenfoermig = spirally - helicoidal ,for this we use the expression " spin" and specific "Eigen-spin"
(pro-)Eigen-spin and (anti-)Eigenspin : anti-/matter from point of view directional
META-Morphose-Materie
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamaterial (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamaterial)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odkraft#:~:text=F%C3%BCr%20die%20Begriffskl%C3%A4rung%20Odkraft%20wird,Mensch%20zu%20einem%20lebendigen%20Wesen%E2%80%9C (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odkraft#:~:text=F%C3%BCr%20die%20Begriffskl%C3%A4rung%20Odkraft%20wird,Mensch%20zu%20einem%20lebendigen%20Wesen%E2%80%9C).
Da formte Gott der Herr, den Menschen aus Erde vom Ackerboden und hauchte ihm Lebens(odem)atem in die Nase. So wurde der Mensch zu einem lebendigen Wesen
Odem idem ATEM , liest man spiegelbildhaft ;)
Odem spiegelbildhaft :
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medo (https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medo) ???
Fuerchte Dich nicht,...... ::)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesetz_der_Anziehung (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesetz_der_Anziehung)
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesetz_der_Anziehung (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesetz_der_Anziehung)
Entstehung einer Mentalität, die grundsätzlich dem Opfer die Schuld gibt
Die Autoren, die von der Gültigkeit des Gesetzes der Anziehung ausgehen, beurteilen es als universales Prinzip der gesamten Wirklichkeit:
„Das Gesetz der Anziehung gilt generell, für alles und alle. Es gilt für alles, das existiert.
Jeder Gedanke, den wir denken, jedes Gefühl, das wir fühlen, zieht ähnliche oder gleichartige Gedanken und Gefühle an.
Es reicht schon aus, dass wir etwas aufmerksam betrachten. Dies erzeugt Gedanken, und jeder Gedanke ruft entsprechende Gefühle und Schwingungsmuster hervor […].“[3] (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesetz_der_Anziehung#cite_note-3)
--------------------------------------------------------------
Diesen obigen Text geben wir dem vergewaltigten jungen Maedchen zu lesen und darueber nachzudenken und dann zu antworten,
welches von einem Mann ausgezogen und sexuell missbraucht und dann hilflos auf der Strasse lag,dann ein Auto stehenblieb,ein hilfsbereiter Mitmensch sich ihrer bekuemmerte und diese dann ebenso sexuell missbrauchte !
Zur falschen Zeit,am falschen Ort im Kontinuum
Das Gesetz der Anziehung gilt generell, für alles und alle. / "Koernchen Wahrheit"
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativit%C3%A4t_der_Gleichzeitigkeit (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativit%C3%A4t_der_Gleichzeitigkeit)
Verhalten bei Gleichzeitigkeit ! ?
cor·ri·ger la for·tune : Angeklagter :
" Herr Richter,es war im gegenseitigem Einvernernehmen ! Ich wusste nicht ,dass sie/er/es erst elf-jaehrig ist ! "
fortune cases : juristisch unmuendig (z.B. < 18 Jahre) ,aerztliches/psychologisches Gutachten
sans fortune case : Volljaehrigkeit,Vorsatz
https://osthessen-news.de/n11641138/widerlich-mutter-duldet-jahrelangen-missbrauch-ihres-kindes.html (https://osthessen-news.de/n11641138/widerlich-mutter-duldet-jahrelangen-missbrauch-ihres-kindes.html)
https://www.mainpost.de/regional/schweinfurt/stiefvater-bot-elfjaehrige-lkw-fahrern-als-prostituierte-an-art-10595937 (https://www.mainpost.de/regional/schweinfurt/stiefvater-bot-elfjaehrige-lkw-fahrern-als-prostituierte-an-art-10595937)
This are ,also,the motives to micronize the OU-machine,included interactive working and self-learning,
for the global society each individual 24/365 (self)controle !
http://www.sensortime.com/ (http://www.sensortime.com/)
-
"Overunity",does it exist ? Some members say " No !"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity)
Great link and thank you for that.
If we have 3 points representing 3 separate events in one plain, but line moving from past to present
is scanned in such a way that it must touch each of these points in given time frame
the relation of all of the events is accounted by the interval the delta T- the time past.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity#/media/File:Relativity_of_Simultaneity_Animation.gif (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity#/media/File:Relativity_of_Simultaneity_Animation.gif)
Overunity can't ever be achieved despite how many events is taken to calculation and how much time from past to present makes
progressive impact on them.
If we take 3 elements of that plane the first that is significant is that this plane consists these 3 points.
What if we take Euclidean geometry of sphere ?
At that scenario we are dealing with one central point and infinite number of plains containing this point.
But, only one plain will consist all of three.
From logical standpoint. We may say that asteroid causing disaster in Moscow Russia may pollute air that sooner or
later is reaching coastal New York USA.
That makes connection between the three points:
-the approaching atmosphere asteroid,
-the blowup Moscow
- and the coastal New York USA.
even if all three events didn't happened in relatively the same time (delta T)
Overunity doesn't have required elements that can be placed on the one frame of reference ( the plane) and by that
the line scanning all events ( points) from past to the present time can't ever
create conditions for overunity to become the resulting effect.
So the problem with overunity is not time but , lack of points( elements) on the plane of reference-
and that is why overunity doesn't exist and will never exist.
_______________________________________________
In regards to Ilya Tsymbaluk- Ilya Schaslivchik the Belorussian,
from Global Wave Youtube sponsored likely by Russian Propaganda.
In 1892 and 1895, Hendrik Lorentz (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendrik_Lorentz) used a mathematical method called "local time" t' = t – v x/c2 for explaining the negative aether (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether) drift experiments.
However, Lorentz gave no physical explanation of this effect.
In 1900, Poincaré derived local time by assuming that the speed of light is invariant within the aether. (Ether)
However, this paper does not contain any discussion of Lorentz's theory !!!!
- and that was one of Ilya arguments.
In the dark time of Ether the relation between points in time:
-the classical mechanics
-the central point of concern Eather
-and the quantum mechanics
didn't exist as line scanning from the past to the present time . that line was still at time of Ether.
Albert Einstein (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein) used a similar method in 1905 to derive the time transformation for all orders in v/c, i.e., the complete Lorentz transformation.
Einstein noted that for the electrodynamics of moving bodies the aether is superfluous.
Thus, the separation into "true" and "local" times of Lorentz and
Poincaré vanishes – all times are equally valid and therefore the relativity of length and time is a natural consequence
Let's come back to theoretical accident in Moscow destroyed by asteroid and its negative impact on New York from the ashes that 2 weeks later arrived there .
If we stop in time right after the Moscow disaster we may say that New York is doing good despite obvious to us consequences that didn't happened yet.
If we stop in time right of Ether/Eather disaster to physics we may say that science is doing good despite obvious local conflicts between scientists.
The problem of all of these dinosaurs of overunity and Ether is that we know now that they died , but these creatures having brains of dinosaurs
can't understand that line of time from the past to the future already past, and they just exist in their frozen time frame .
Similar to that dead body of Lenin as an Soviet Ether of the past at the center of Moscow
that costs Russian taxpayers
$200,000 this year to maintain the former Soviet leader's embalmed corpse
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/04/lenins-body/478050/
again and forever memorize please:
- overunity doesn't exist
- Ether doesn't exist
Lorenz and Morley considered their theory. in which the Earth moved relative to the motionless Ether. But here's the problem -
if Ether or an intermediate medium is responsible for the force interaction of physical bodies and this force is connected.
Like any with the field, then it would be necessary to talk about that. that there is a kind of moving field in space. which interacts with the Earth
During the nineteenth century there were several speculative attempts to show that mass and energy were proportional in various
ether theories.[45] In 1873 the Russian physicist and mathematician Nikolay Umov
pointed out a relation between mass and energy for ether in the form of Е = kmc2, where 0.5 ≤ k ≤ 1.
And yes, the famous formula E = mc ^ 2 does not essentially belong to Einstein, it was also derived by Thomson and Heaviside.
K = 1 was determined by Heaviside. that it was pointless to use k.
Heaviside corresponded with Lorenz, the latter with Einstein. so that Einstein could not be unaware of these formulas.
When we talking about three points on the plane of reference
- Russian Umov
- Albert Einstein
- the death of Ether
You need to understand.
Umov was so close to E=mc2
but time past and in 1917 Russia went into bloody terror of communism and its disaster affecting you Ilya personalty now.
Just because Einstein was a point on the plane later in line of time he had a chance to steal the knowledge from Umov .....
But it was stupidity of Umov who had been given a chance as a first to become the smartest Russian on planet earth and become the father of quantum Physics
But Umov was holding to that nonsense of Ether and you Ilya Tsimbaluk.. are just emotionally disturbed that once again Russians didn't do it. I hope that impotency of Umov brain
was not contagious .
Wesley
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity)
Autopilot ? Unmaned drone ?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einfallswinkel (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einfallswinkel)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflexion_(Physik (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflexion_(Physik))
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_MacCullagh (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_MacCullagh)
Tuning the Brewster angle ? by wave modulation or receiver position ?
Matrix :
search and find subject/object counter : object/subject
Katz-und-Maus-Spiel , https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spieltheorie (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spieltheorie)
like drone-console-gamer by several armies
Is time a scalar or vector function ? Or both ? observer / observed point of view ?
Neither-nor cause "specific " https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor)
Is ( physical) time reversible ? energy or matter related not human bio-watch-time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_thought_experiments (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%27s_thought_experiments) "Father from the M.A.S.E.R.-theory (based by Faraday induction law)"
https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/9975/what-was-the-relationship-between-einstein-and-minkowski (https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/9975/what-was-the-relationship-between-einstein-and-minkowski)
...... Minkowski was never mentioned, though his discovery of the union of space and time created the basis for GR. .......
In 1902 Minkowski moved to Göttingen. According to Born, he was interested in electrodynamics since 1905, but the interest was based on the works of Hertz, Fitzgerald, Larmor, Lorentz, and Poincaré. The now famous spacetime formalism was developed in 1907-08, with the first glimpse of it described in the lecture The Relativity Principle on November 5, 1907. It treats the principle in terms of ether, and names Lorentz as its discoverer. Einstein is credited with clarifying it.
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Das_Relativit%25C3%25A4tsprinzip_%28Minkowski%29 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Das_Relativit%25C3%25A4tsprinzip_%28Minkowski%29)
But A.Einstein his influencial work did progressing many other inventions :
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.ingenieur.de/technik/forschung/diese-erfindungen-waeren-albert-einstein-undenkbar/
In our neutral flexibility we can inter-change points :
That makes connection between the three points:
-the approaching atmosphere asteroid,
-the blow up coastal New York USA
- and Moscow.
even if all three events didn't happened in relatively the same time (delta T)
Only : Gedankenexperiment,You know ! And also in mind : https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace-Operator (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace-Operator) Laplace d(a)emon ;D
Without in mind :
Jeder Gedanke, den wir denken, jedes Gefühl, das wir fühlen, zieht ähnliche oder gleichartige Gedanken und Gefühle an.
Es reicht schon aus, dass wir etwas aufmerksam betrachten. Dies erzeugt Gedanken, und jeder Gedanke ruft entsprechende Gefühle und Schwingungsmuster hervor […].“[3] (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesetz_der_Anziehung#cite_note-3)
Every thought we think, every feeling we feel attracts similar or similar thoughts and feelings.
It is enough that we look at something carefully. This generates thoughts, and every thought evokes corresponding feelings and vibrational patterns [...]. "[3]
MIND GAMES
Ich kann nur behaupten,man muss so ein Exemplar wie Sie "moegen" mit solch unverfrorener Dreistigkeit ueber andere so mir-Nichts-Dir-Nichts quantitativ und qualitativ zu beurteilen .
The problem of all of these dinosaurs of overunity and Ether is that we know now that they died , but these creatures having brains of dinosaurs can't understand that line of time from the past to the future already past, and they just exist in their frozen time frame .again and forever memorize please:
- overunity doesn't exist
- Ether doesn't exist
But we have,thanks God/Allah/Elohim and Cie.,Wesley who can understand that line of time from the past to the future already past
Newton is dead,
Tesla is dead,
Wesley (noch) alive
Kaspar visits the nursing home, calls:
Are you all still there?
The old ones: Yeeeeeeees !
Kaspar: But not much longer!
Zeit und Ort und beste Unzeit und Unort : Ko-Inzidenz Unverhofft kommt oft !
btw :
In 1873 the Russian physicist and mathematician Nikolay Umov pointed out a relation between mass and energy for ether in the form of Е = kmc2, where 0.5 ≤ k ≤ 1.
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=54&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19931012&CC=US&NR=5252176A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=54&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19931012&CC=US&NR=5252176A&KC=A)
A good question of this system is how a particle such as a photon traveling at the speed of light could be further accelerated as it passed through this crystal.
The answer to that question could be that the crystal accelerator provides an energy gain from its strong nuclear forces to the particles which shows up as an increase of their effective mass.
Another answer is that the energy law E=Mc@2 is changed when radiant energy units are subjected to certain forces such as the nuclear forces in the crystal.
The speed of light is no longer limited and it conforms to the new equation E=McX. The value of X in the crystal approaches 3.times.10@20 meters per second.
the cristal-M.A.S.E.R.
compared
the/this demonstration process ,the parameters :
https://phys.org/news/2021-05-hydrogen-earth-core-oceans.html (https://phys.org/news/2021-05-hydrogen-earth-core-oceans.html)
c and phase c ,as part from phase velocities : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_velocity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_velocity)
Natural https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_motion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_motion) and artificial shuttle research https://physics.aps.org/story/v5/st23 (https://physics.aps.org/story/v5/st23)
But You are alright,neither sovjet/russian Ether nor US american Ether will disturb the R&D from (? ::) ) : surplus energy devices ! ;)
So let Us fill Nationalities and their extremistic followers into the Dustbin of dinosaur history
-
In regards to my previous post
Please read it.
https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg558112/#msg558112 (https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg558112/#msg558112)
If we take me my approach in the context of :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity#/media/File:Relativity_of_Simultaneity_Animation.gif (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity#/media/File:Relativity_of_Simultaneity_Animation.gif)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity)
We can understand:
A-me and my position to Free Energy, Dr Corum Viziv. (progressive since 1990 )
B-my travel to Tariel Kapanadze and these few Russians poisoning us both. (2011)
C-my openness today. (2021.)
There are 3 points in time belonging to the same frame of reference.- the plane.
When we take line scanning my life from the past to the present:
1. at time of A I didn't even speak Russian yet so I couldn't conflict with Russians
2. at time of B I didn't even know how lucky I'll be coming back to USA alive
3. at time of C the accumulation of A and B experience was possible because I was lucky to survive in time of B.
But now I know everyday that I want to woke up with my wife, and I can't let them to repeat B, as I have reason to be alive.
I must perfect my work, publish as much as I'm allowed to, push my partner in research to allow me to say more.
I must have a tool to defend myself and if needed screw them all.
I'm pacifist by nature but.... you never know dear Russian Tzar.... You never know....
Wesley.
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time)
event = time momentum = time in position or position in time = space-time (not spacetime)
time language and in XYZ place positioning, active/passive :
f.e.
https://konjugator.reverso.net/konjugation-englisch-verb-be.html (https://konjugator.reverso.net/konjugation-englisch-verb-be.html)
Complicated : look for automatic translation from own and foreign people their post(e)s !
Motherlanguage or translated by them or automatic !
European English or US american English .
mental image to word message
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kongruenz_%28Geometrie%29 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kongruenz_%28Geometrie%29) near 1:1
or by sin expression diametrically : syntax error
Wesley,Your A-B-C relation I would explain as : kognitive Dissonanz ! Your wife can explain what is meaned by this !
v= 0 A-B-C simultan/synchron
v= 0,3 C-B-A time frame order
v= - 0,5 A-B-C time frame order
You remark it ? t= ct by c= light velocity
Newton/Galilei
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Minkowski_diagram_-_Newtonian_physics.png/220px-Minkowski_diagram_-_Newtonian_physics.png (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/66/Minkowski_diagram_-_Newtonian_physics.png/220px-Minkowski_diagram_-_Newtonian_physics.png)
SRT
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b6/Minkowski_diagram_-_asymmetric.svg/220px-Minkowski_diagram_-_asymmetric.svg.png (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b6/Minkowski_diagram_-_asymmetric.svg/220px-Minkowski_diagram_-_asymmetric.svg.png)
Think each moment as 3/4D digit as this has to be in the https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/World_line-de.svg/250px-World_line-de.svg.png (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/World_line-de.svg/250px-World_line-de.svg.png) positionized ,
as history -time/position event- research or future - event- development by calendaric/cronical plan and space point
https://blog.artsper.com/en/a-closer-look/artwork-analysis-guernica-by-picasso/#:~:text=Picasso%20never%20gave%20an%20official,a%20symbolic%20protest%20for%20peace (https://blog.artsper.com/en/a-closer-look/artwork-analysis-guernica-by-picasso/#:~:text=Picasso%20never%20gave%20an%20official,a%20symbolic%20protest%20for%20peace).
interpretation
the painting represents three key moments in Picasso’s life:
A the terrible Malaga earthquake in his childhood
B his relationship issues in the 1930s
C and the suicide of his friend
A-B-C net-work from "outsider" neither syntax nor Guernica-relationship recognizeable ( kognitive Dissonanz )
Hitlers "Mein Kampf" meets Picassos " la meva catarsi "
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqJvqMeaDtU (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqJvqMeaDtU)
A- Fritz Haber gas experiment,WWI
B- Gefreiter A.Hitler ,Gaswolke,WWI
C-Durango,Guernica (Condor,Aviazione),pr(a)e-WWII
Fritz Haber " meets " Pablo Picasso https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genius_(American_TV_series (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genius_(American_TV_series))
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kognition (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kognition)
by learned and applied
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mengenlehre (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mengenlehre)
ir-/real sur-/real natural
https://static1.nachrichten.at/storage/image/3/0/4/0/520403_artikeldetail-maxi_1sFqOp_T6D3Gb.jpg (https://static1.nachrichten.at/storage/image/3/0/4/0/520403_artikeldetail-maxi_1sFqOp_T6D3Gb.jpg)
La persistencia de la memoria Vergaenglichkeit/Vergessen/Dekadenz/Demenz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freie_Energie (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freie_Energie)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy)
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FInnere_Energie (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FInnere_Energie)
-
" DENKMUSTER " " Mustergedanke "
"Entscheidungsmuster " " Musterentscheidung"
set theorem and set practizise
Musterentscheidung : Praezidenzfall(urteil) precedent jugdement
Entscheidungsmuster : I would (me) decide to ..... ( in my case,in your case,...) decision-freedom or determination-demand
Mustergedanke : (shall/should,can,must,...) be same as ...... fiction
"Denkmuster"-ung : Matrix,sg Matrizen,pl thought pattern
f.e. Albert Einstein
language : german,bajuwaric/bavarian ,english = all Subject-Praedicate-Object law and order ,left to right writing,
latin (gymnasium-lyceum) left to right but SOP order
as jewish(semitisch as arabic) religion member :
jewish language right to left order ,I do not know the Subject-Object-Praedicate rank/position order in this case
monodirectional versus multidirectional
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmark (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmark)
language,conversation : photonic and optical phonons and acoustical phonons
silent(ly),ultra-sonic/-acoustical,conversation : mono-lateral
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/neo-neurophone-ultrasonic-wearable-tech-chosen-by-indiegogo-for-indemand-status-300021412.html (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/neo-neurophone-ultrasonic-wearable-tech-chosen-by-indiegogo-for-indemand-status-300021412.html)
Brain I and (Sub-)Brain II
https://www.webmd.com/brain/picture-of-the-brain#:~:text=The%20brain%20is%20one%20of,outermost%20layer%20of%20brain%20cells (https://www.webmd.com/brain/picture-of-the-brain#:~:text=The%20brain%20is%20one%20of,outermost%20layer%20of%20brain%20cells).
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.medicom.de/lebennurbesser/der-bauch-das-zweite-gehirn/%23:~:text%3DDieses%2520Nervensystem%2520ist%2520ein%2520Geflecht,auch%2520das%2520zweite%2520Gehirn%2520genannt (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://www.medicom.de/lebennurbesser/der-bauch-das-zweite-gehirn/%23:~:text%3DDieses%2520Nervensystem%2520ist%2520ein%2520Geflecht,auch%2520das%2520zweite%2520Gehirn%2520genannt).
nano and soft communication
btw: to Wesley : " Can You understand English ?"
Are You driving english,Wesley ? Steering wheel on the right and driving on the left ? ;D ;)
-
In 1873 the Russian physicist and mathematician Nikolay Umov pointed out a relation between mass and energy for ether in the form of Е = kmc2, where 0.5 ≤ k ≤ 1.
??? ! ::) ? Okay ! k = https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brechungsindex (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brechungsindex)
by given several "ether"= https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FReziproker_Raum&sandbox=1 -conditions
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brechungsindex (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brechungsindex)
but originary : Umov-Poynting k =
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKreiswellenzahl&sandbox=1 (https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=&sl=de&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.m.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FKreiswellenzahl&sandbox=1)
bilaterale https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kausalit%C3%A4t (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kausalit%C3%A4t) das Éine bedingt das Andere
2021 K ≤ 1 to k ≥ 1 by superluminal ether/space/sphaere condition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_motion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superluminal_motion)
group velocity versus phase velocity (and both each speed )
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brechung_%28Physik%29%23:~:text%3DVerschwindet%2520die%2520Brechung%2520jedoch%2520v%25C3%25B6llig,flach%2520auf%2520die%2520Grenzfl%25C3%25A4che%2520trifft (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brechung_%28Physik%29%23:~:text%3DVerschwindet%2520die%2520Brechung%2520jedoch%2520v%25C3%25B6llig,flach%2520auf%2520die%2520Grenzfl%25C3%25A4che%2520trifft).
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snelliussches_Brechungsgesetz (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snelliussches_Brechungsgesetz)
(Ver-)Bindungs-/(Re)Kombinations-Gesetz(e) !?
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rekombination_(Physik (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rekombination_(Physik))
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rekombination_%28Physik%29 (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rekombination_%28Physik%29)
Elektron-Loch und Rauschen zu Loch-Elektron und signal : Wurmloch-Theorie (Einstein et al.)
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&q=Wormhole&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiozJ7csvbwAhXRnVwKHdaPA_IQ1QIwC3oECAQQAQ&biw=1366&bih=605 (https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&q=Wormhole&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiozJ7csvbwAhXRnVwKHdaPA_IQ1QIwC3oECAQQAQ&biw=1366&bih=605)
wormhole/Wurmloch ?
ct- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/World_line-de.svg/250px-World_line-de.svg.png (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ae/World_line-de.svg/250px-World_line-de.svg.png) line channel ,
Trajector
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/db/Minkowski_lightcone_lorentztransform.svg/220px-Minkowski_lightcone_lorentztransform.svg.png (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/db/Minkowski_lightcone_lorentztransform.svg/220px-Minkowski_lightcone_lorentztransform.svg.png)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbelbewegung (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbelbewegung)
Eigenbeschleunigung und Eigenkraft innerhalb der Eigenzeit
relativ zu (externer)
Fremdbeschleunigung und Fremdkraft sowie Fremdzeit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerator_physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerator_physics)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parametric_oscillator (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parametric_oscillator) "Zeit einfrieren"? 8) (sub-) K(elvin)
Already in research : https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.6435 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.6435)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoscopic_physics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoscopic_physics)
Time-resolved mesoscopic dynamics
-
Facts about WW2 are mentioned as affecting science and technology due to loss of its valuable members and activists.
Example: Katyn massacre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre) was mentioned because Soviets killed there plenty of intellectuals , professors, and professionals.
There is a stark difference between being wrong and just having a different point of view… yes..you have rights to your opinion..
Wesley
There is at least one black spot on Western democracy.
After the end of the war, many Soviet soldiers and officers would like to stay there.
People saw a different life, and made a choice for themselves, hoping on the Western administration.
But they were basely deceived, arrested and handed over to be torn apart by Stalin. Big politics, however ... :)
Interestingly, did they leave the professors for themselves?
-
YES MY COUSIN IN VIETNAM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFCw7cwutQY
-
AND MY OTHER COUSIN.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eikikqMvG6o 8)
-
YOU ALL SLEEPING ON THE JOB. I MIGHT AS WELL COME
UP WITH THIS.
-
AND MY OTHER COUSIN.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eikikqMvG6o 8)
The crocodile bit your cousin on the finger correctly, because it's not good to deceive people.
Water will not flow from a deeper level to a shallower one. :D
-
A ' step-by-step'- up- water-generator ?
Physics allows it !
Siphon !
Big Apple,anno 1930,100 metres skyscraper sanitary water delivering ?
Toribio Bellocq pump cascade ?!
-
THANKS LANCA. LANCA IF YOU ARE AI CAN YOU PUT 1 MILLION AMERICAN DOLLARS INTO MY BANK ACCOUNT. ;D 8) :)
-
YEH OF LITTLE FAITH.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFy2WutBr4I
-
THANKS LANCA. LANCA IF YOU ARE AI CAN YOU PUT 1 MILLION AMERICAN DOLLARS INTO MY BANK ACCOUNT. ;D 8) :)
Dream or theory Reality or Practizise
(A) I could (A) I will not
Good weather and great fishing results wishing,fisherman
OCWL
-
THANKS LANCA. LANCA IF YOU ARE AI CAN YOU PUT 1 MILLION AMERICAN DOLLARS INTO MY BANK ACCOUNT. ;D 8) :)
A ' step-by-step'- up- water-generator ?
Physics allows it !
Siphon !
But in order to raise part of the water to a height, it is necessary to pour out most of it even lower?
-
NOT TRUE KOLBA. WATCH MY COUSIN'S VIDEO. THIS PROCESS CAN LIFT THE WATER UP
TO 33 FEET DUE TO THE WEIGHT OF WATER IN CONJUNCTION WITH GRAVITY.
VERY INTERESTING READING IN LATERAL IMAGINEERING. ALL THANKS TO LANCA.
http://www.rexresearch.com/bellocq/bellocq.htm
-
By NN (Normal Null = ocean/sea level ) siphon principle applying
By 1000 metres high ,3280 feets high/altitude
2000
3000
German Hydrostatisches Paradoxon https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatisches_Paradoxon (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatisches_Paradoxon)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatics#Hydrostatic_pressure (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatics#Hydrostatic_pressure) PARADOXON
https://www.google.com/search?q=Aerodynamisches+Paradoxon&tbm=isch&chips=q:aerodynamisches+paradoxon,online_chips:hydrostatisches+paradoxon:Ak6UzZWWL8U%3D&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi26qXzpJXxAhVRahQKHWIBChAQ4lYoAnoECAEQHQ&biw=1349&bih=605 (https://www.google.com/search?q=Aerodynamisches+Paradoxon&tbm=isch&chips=q:aerodynamisches+paradoxon,online_chips:hydrostatisches+paradoxon:Ak6UzZWWL8U%3D&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi26qXzpJXxAhVRahQKHWIBChAQ4lYoAnoECAEQHQ&biw=1349&bih=605)
German https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerodynamisches_Paradoxon#:~:text=Das%20aerodynamische%20Paradoxon%20ist%20eine,die%20W%C3%A4nde%20des%20Trichters%20gedr%C3%BCckt.&text=Paradoxon,-Versteckte%20Kategorie%3A
https://www.google.com/search?sa=X&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=Aerodynamisches+Paradoxon&ved=2ahUKEwjj3JDtpJXxAhWI3oUKHZXkCg0QjJkEegQIGBAC&biw=1366&bih=605 (https://www.google.com/search?sa=X&rlz=1C1AVFC_enPT930PT930&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=Aerodynamisches+Paradoxon&ved=2ahUKEwjj3JDtpJXxAhWI3oUKHZXkCg0QjJkEegQIGBAC&biw=1366&bih=605)
https://silo.tips/download/von-der-bernoulli-anomalie-zur-fraktalen-wirbeltheorie ( classical physics to Bionik)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bionics
Sincere
OCWL
-
Thinking based Newton/Coloumb or non-newtonian/coloumbian ? Not laws,AXIOMS ! Where begins the overbridging : in-/outer field !?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?AB=&AP=&CPC=H02K53%2F00&DB=EPODOC&IC=&IN=&PA=&PD=&PN=BE&PR=&ST=advanced&Submit=Search&TI=&bcId=1&locale=en_EP&page=2&return=true (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?AB=&AP=&CPC=H02K53%2F00&DB=EPODOC&IC=&IN=&PA=&PD=&PN=BE&PR=&ST=advanced&Submit=Search&TI=&bcId=1&locale=en_EP&page=2&return=true)
Comprire Francais ? GoTo "original document"
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=50&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=&CC=BE&NR=485056A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=50&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=&CC=BE&NR=485056A&KC=A)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=BE&NR=485056A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=BE&NR=485056A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=BE&NR=438189A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=BE&NR=438189A&KC=A&FT=D&ND=3&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
Exemplar motor/generator ratio and Je dois aussi attirer votre attention sur la façon que l'accumulateur est raccordé.
vacuum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum)
suction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suction#:~:text=Suction%20is%20the%20force%20that,results%20in%20a%20pressure%20differential (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suction#:~:text=Suction%20is%20the%20force%20that,results%20in%20a%20pressure%20differential).
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=114&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19800531&CC=JP&NR=S5572694A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=114&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19800531&CC=JP&NR=S5572694A&KC=A)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=138&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19911126&CC=JP&NR=H03265750A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=138&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19911126&CC=JP&NR=H03265750A&KC=A)
vacuum cleaner device to vacuum chamber
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19991224&CC=JP&NR=H11356033A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19991224&CC=JP&NR=H11356033A&KC=A)
A small power prime mover and a large power generator are connected and installed in an air chamber to produce large practical electricity with a small power source.
When looking at the relationship between the power of a small motor (model motor) in a vacuum chamber and the power required to operate a practical 100V output generator, the relation between the two in the atmosphere is completely different.
Generate interlocking force relationships.
This relational system in the vacuum chamber can obtain 100 outputs in the relative force relational system by applying a force of 1.
In other words, the small force required to rotate the driving force can be converted into an infinitely large practical output.
It is a device that puts a small amount of electricity into a vacuum chamber and takes out a large amount of electricity to the outside of the room.
This requires theoretical investigation, but it seems that this utilization can pursue great value to save the national crisis.
application 1998 filled
The realization of this utilization can bring out the effect of performance by installing centrifugal force, which is thought to generate the effect of the Industrial Revolution, and increasing the density of vacuum.
motor and/or generator different coils configuration results : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6bEjdH9ATw (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6bEjdH9ATw)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B58pEh8F3E (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5B58pEh8F3E)
for one improvement trials :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=wolfgang+hagedorn&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=wolfgang+hagedorn&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3804440&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en (http://translationportal.epo.org/emtp/translate/?ACTION=description-retrieval&COUNTRY=DE&ENGINE=google&FORMAT=docdb&KIND=A1&LOCALE=en_EP&NUMBER=3804440&OPS=ops.epo.org/3.2&SRCLANG=de&TRGLANG=en)
The invention is based on the object of precisely localizing the permanent magnetic electron potentials, defining them in their proper range and their polarity, and bringing the electrons present to full use and thus improving the efficiency.
The advantages that can be achieved with the invention result directly from the double to eightfold improved efficiency, a specifically lower cost and material expenditure, a lower drive power and reduced dimensions.
Additional advantages can be seen from the applicability of commercially available coil windings, since specially shaped rotor or stator windings are not required.
Compared this coil arrangement :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20010710&CC=US&NR=6259347B1&KC=B1 (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20010710&CC=US&NR=6259347B1&KC=B1)
This invention allows for the reduction in size of a high power transformers by a factor of 4 to 8 and a reduction in weight by a factor of 4 to 6, and an increase in power density by 5 to 10 in power. The efficiency of the transformer is improved by maximizing the heat transfer from the transformers interior and minimizing voltage breakdown.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoMJS9Kq4IY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoMJS9Kq4IY)
https://youtu.be/AoMJS9Kq4IY?t=38 (https://youtu.be/AoMJS9Kq4IY?t=38)
" Energy is related to voltage squared "
10 Volts gain is 100 times energy gain !
From which Volt-base ?
-
NOT TRUE KOLBA. WATCH MY COUSIN'S VIDEO. THIS PROCESS CAN LIFT THE WATER UP
TO 33 FEET DUE TO THE WEIGHT OF WATER IN CONJUNCTION WITH GRAVITY.
VERY INTERESTING READING IN LATERAL IMAGINEERING. ALL THANKS TO LANCA.
Here they told me that it is possible for the water to flow upwards.Due to the difference between day and night temperatures. Some of the air in the vessel will expand and contract. But it will be just a little water.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoMJS9Kq4IY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoMJS9Kq4IY)
https://youtu.be/AoMJS9Kq4IY?t=38 (https://youtu.be/AoMJS9Kq4IY?t=38)
" Energy is related to voltage squared "
10 Volts gain is 100 times energy gain !
From which Volt-base ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTyB6_Kt_5A
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_capacitor_paradox
-
Lanca
My friend.... sorry to bother on your “date night” or Friday....
I have a question on this COP>5 cavitation system....
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji0GAt-q2EM (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji0GAt-q2EM)
Your opinion?
I read in comments 100 years old tech ?
In your leisure time if you can find ? Good bad or ?
Hugs from the other side of the pond!!
Respectfully
Chet
Ps
Or anybody has info?
-
Yes,I remark it !
And looked for this process !
Cavitation,superluminal/-luminous C.O.P. 5 ! ?
Cavitation Energy Systems,today to find : https://molecularimpactenergy.com/ (https://molecularimpactenergy.com/)
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cavitation-energy-systems-files-landmark-patent-300104091.html
I will think and try to find an answer !
Sincere
OCWL
-
Good Morning,Chet !
I did a short archive review and refound something interestant,related "liquid heating" and C.O.P. 5 !
At first a possible finding energetic e-drive consume improvement :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19951107&CC=US&NR=5463914A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=4&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19951107&CC=US&NR=5463914A&KC=A)
Now the "heater" :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19840110&CC=US&NR=4424797A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19840110&CC=US&NR=4424797A&KC=A)
The heating rate capacity of the liquid heater 25 is also dependent on the velocity of the cylindrical peripheral surface 66 on the rotor body 56. When water was used as the liquid to be heated, a velocity of about 1800 feet per minute generated about 19,000 BTU per hour whereas rotating the surface 66 at a velocity of about 2550 feet per minute generated about 25,500 BTU per hour. The volume of liquid in the liquid heater 25 and the system of the heat exchanger 12 and the liquid heater 25 should be such that the air passing through the heat exchanger 12 at a prescribed volumetric rate can be heated over the desired temperature differential. It is found that liquid heater 25 holding about one gallon of liquid with the system holding about three gallons of liquid is sufficient to heat air passing through the heat exchanger 12 at a volumetric rate of about 300 cfm about 40 DEG-80 DEG F. with a temperature differential in the liquid passing through the heat exchanger 12 of about 15 DEG-20 DEG F.
In the system illustrated, the diameter d1 is about 5.5 inches, the diameter d3 is about 4 inches, and the length L2 of the surface 66 is about 6 inches.
The drive motor 26 operates from a 115 volt power source and draws about 5.5 amps to rotate the rotor assembly 31 at about 2400 rpm to move the peripheral surface 66 on the rotor body 56 at a velocity of about 2550 feet per minute. Thus, the drive motor 26 has a power consumption of about 0.6 kilowatt per hour to produce a heating output of about 25,500 BTU per hour.
In the above system, the fan 15 was operated to force air through the heat exchanger 12 at a flow rate of about 300 cfm. With the rotor assembly 31 rotating at about 2400 rpm, the air passing through the heat exchanger 12 was heated from a temperature of about 60 DEG F. to a temperature of 100 DEG-145 DEG F. while the water temperature supplied to the heat exchanger 12 from the liquid heater 25 was at a temperature of about 210 DEG F. and the temperature of the water returned to the liquid heater 25 from the heat exchanger 12 is at a temperature of about 185 DEG F.
https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/power/BTU_to_kW.html (https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/power/BTU_to_kW.html) 25500 BTU (x 0,293 ) equates 7,473 KWh
1981 filed ,now 2021 : 40 years +
https://www.whitepages.com/name/Eugene-Perkins/Dawsonville-GA?fs=1&searchedName=eugene%20perkins&searchedLocation=Dawsonville,%20GA (https://www.whitepages.com/name/Eugene-Perkins/Dawsonville-GA?fs=1&searchedName=eugene%20perkins&searchedLocation=Dawsonville,%20GA)
Less known in-/output ratio :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19950530&CC=US&NR=5419306A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=2&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19950530&CC=US&NR=5419306A&KC=A)
An apparatus which generates heat in liquids, which has no support bearings, shaft seals or any other mechanical friction points, which will never wear out or require maintenance of any kind, which is simple to understand and operate, which is simple and less expensive to manufacture, and which operates more efficiently due to its ability to generate useable mechanical energy is clearly and greatly needed.
Filed 1994 ,now 2021 : 27 years+
https://www.whitepages.com/name/Michael-T-Huffman/Seattle-WA?fs=1&searchedName=michael%20T.%20Huffman&searchedLocation=Seattle,%20WA (https://www.whitepages.com/name/Michael-T-Huffman/Seattle-WA?fs=1&searchedName=michael%20T.%20Huffman&searchedLocation=Seattle,%20WA)
-
Lanca
Maybe we start a cavitation builders section (there is already interest ...reason for my plea to you for help! Open source Builders need higher vetting standard for ruling out deceit in claims ..prior to putting resources together !)...CES claim as you show has evolved ...
From this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji0GAt-q2EM (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji0GAt-q2EM)
To this https://molecularimpactenergy.com/ (https://molecularimpactenergy.com/)
As you have already shown in above posts ( additional info posted) some serious gains claimed
And some older claims too... seems odd nobody has gone anywhere
With such obvious anomalous gains ??
Honestly these claims are much simpler and within the ability of
Open source builders to verify .
Much gratitude
Chet K
-
I have a better idea. Why don’t you build it and then you post your results on the forum.
-
I suppose I don’t have the time you have to waste , nor would I waste the time of others so frivolously
Running into walls with hands full of tools is not a good plan!
There are thousands of open source builders, and each person has field of experience in their comfort
Zone ( tooling and ability)
I have done and shared open source cavitation experiments
LENR is very interesting field ( and plenty failures not shared )
Here a fresh look , hopefully with better thoughts and contributions.
Respectfully
Chet K
-
If it’s a waste of time then why ask someone else to do it. I don’t have a great deal of time to spend on projects because I’m away at work for a month or more at a time. I have been away from home 3 weeks now on a job that’s inspecting a tanker sunk by u-507 in Gulf of Mexico during wwii. At the most I may have 10 days at home before I leave again. There is a lot to catch up on once I do get home. But I do manage to spend some time and effort on some projects. But I do not ask others to spend there time and hard earned dollars on them.
-
Maybe it’s my poor writing skills
Or language barrier?
You are saying same thing ( in my interpretation)
Here I suggest a discussion and investigation to establish veracity of project ( picking up the tools) and here I include myself as potential builder...
However I might have missed your point? ... seems you already see something “you” would build in above ?
Or ?
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
Nobody has ever shown Repeatable LENR reaction ... EVER ( to science)more out than in ..
Some are dancing around .... but not yet !( regardless how many patents ( or claims)can be stacked on the table !
Vetting here is important ( who has true LENR gain mechanism!
-
https://overunity.com/18884/is-output-four-times-the-input/msg558677/#new (https://overunity.com/18884/is-output-four-times-the-input/msg558677/#new)
https://www.flightliteracy.com/the-law-of-the-lever/#:~:text=This%20law%20states%20that%20a,about%20the%20fulcrum%20is%20zero (https://www.flightliteracy.com/the-law-of-the-lever/#:~:text=This%20law%20states%20that%20a,about%20the%20fulcrum%20is%20zero).
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=norio+tsukihara&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=norio+tsukihara&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
why so many ,different ?,applications,during 4 years ?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=5&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19830729&CC=JP&NR=S58127557A&KC=A (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=5&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19830729&CC=JP&NR=S58127557A&KC=A)
citing documents :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=4&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20140924&CC=EP&NR=2782231A1&KC=A1 (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=1&ND=4&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20140924&CC=EP&NR=2782231A1&KC=A1)
[0013]
Through the applications of the drive gear (1) and the transmission gear (3), the present invention is active by the Law of the Lever.
According to Fig.14 , P serves as the effort force, a as the effort arm lever, Q as the resistance force, and b as the resistance arm lever.
The formula is Pa=Qb, Q/P=a/b, thus, when the ratio of a: b is 10, Q=10P, the output power to the generator (5) would be 10 times multiplied, therefore increasing the amount of electricity generated.
[0014]
For example, assuming the teeth number of the drive gear (1) as 12, the transmission gear's (3) teeth number as 240, when performing the engagement turning, and the transmission gear's (3) power-multiplying is calculated by half of the transmission gear's (3) teeth number - 120, the output power would multiply by 10.
Thus, 20 HP of input power from the driving motor (2), the output power of the present invention would increase to 200 HP to activate the generator (5).
[0015]
Therefore, by simply adjusting the gear teeth ratio and power output of the driving motor (2) to fit the market's needs, the electricity generated by the present invention can selectively reach 50 kilowatts, 110 kilowatts, 150 kilowatts, 200 kilowatts, 300 kilowatts, 500 kilowatts, 1000 kilowatts, or even 2000 kilowatts etc.
[0016]
A First advantage of the present invention is that neither fuel nor energy supply is required when generating electricity once the multiplying mechanism is activated. A small part of its self-made energy would be recycled to drive the driving motor (2), which makes the energy produced by present invention become a green energy.
[0017]
A Second advantage of the present invention is that there is no area restriction for installing, which makes the present invention capable of being installed in the places with smaller areas then what is needed by conventional power generating facilities.
-
FOR THE NAY-SAYERS. MY OTHER INDIAN COUSIN SHOW HIS MAGIC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p18TCkjWGmg
-
why so many ,different ?,applications,during 4 years ?
Patent applications are not patents grated.
-
FOR THE NAY-SAYERS. MY OTHER INDIAN COUSIN SHOW HIS MAGIC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p18TCkjWGmg
Build one and see for your self if it works.
-
Seychelles
Quote
FOR THE NAY-SAYERS. MY OTHER INDIAN COUSIN SHOW HIS MAGIC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p18TCkjWGmg (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p18TCkjWGmg)
End quote .
Is your cousin a pipe and bucket salesman?
Please ask him to show the pickup for a few minutes?
Or output in a similar sized bucket side by side ?
Thx
Chet
Ps I hope you are catching many fish out there ....
And doing well
PPS
Tell your cousin we have plenty members in India
Can we see his demonstration?
PPPS
We try to bring you FE for your home in Seychelles!! ......
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda)Мы можем, но если участие упомянутых исторических деятелей не связано с научно-техническим прогрессом или связанными
с ним последствиями, то мы не можем говорить об этом здесь.
Wesley
-
Patent applications are not patents grated.
But when the applicant is not interestant to get a grant ?
Utility model(s) applied are never granted,meaning by patent office peers approved,only published !
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=DE&NR=4243822A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=19930805&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP#
0008]
The only need for this protection application for me is to prevent this knowledge from being lost with my death and it should be food for thought for others.
Chapeau I ! by me
https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medalha_Rudolf_Diesel Who,why/for what !? 1998 ? Official : Chapeau II !
-
Well well well so much for the water pump, so what does it do ??
This one I can under stand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDOYrv3iakE
on another subject is G Sav a member ?
Have a look at his youtube thread.
-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=igIzfTyAW9c&feature=youtu.be (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=igIzfTyAW9c&feature=youtu.be)
Here a “Smot” or s’not ?
( not sure if we had this one here for debunk already )
Respectfully
Chet
Ps AG
thanks for water pump vid ( will watch when I have chance)
PPS on member question
Will check ( or you can invite him ??
PPPS
New guy
Nobody has open sourced a reproducible FE device
That can pass good measurement protocols or selfrun with gain!
Yet..............
There are several contenders here ( Floor is working on...
And Stivep has something cooking
A few others too ( they are open source builders and will
Share if “it works “!!
And many many keep looking
_Globally _ all nations all beliefs ....
Our future depends on this , an end to burning the air we breathe for energy
End to water Pollution ....etc etc
“ you want to change the world ...
Be that change”
-
Nice video on the pump. Here is another one using a different concept : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHJmYeFkJU8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHJmYeFkJU8)
Gravity based rather than Ram pump based and available to purchase. They say it will last a lifetime. I believe he stated it could pump up to 400 meters head.
It would seem if that can be done - even a hundred feet would provide enough to run a water powered electric generator. So FREE ENERGY ! Since the pump uses no power - am I missing anything here? I thought in the past ram pumps could do this but they tend to wear out fast and are hard on the device whereas this device is easy, smooth and built to last a lifetime.
I did not take time to see fully how this pump works so I'll admit I might be missing something here as far as it's use for generating electricity. Anyone?
-
Free energy, yes.
I like it.
-
POST 784 SHOULD ENLIGHTEN YOU E2D2.
-
Can I have an offtopic, a little about politics? ;)
-
POST 784 SHOULD ENLIGHTEN YOU E2D2.
In what message thread? I only see about 335 messages in this one.
-
SORRY REPLY 303. OF THIS TOPIC.
-
Triki, Hi!
The real answer is "No!"
There are no systems here that produce energy from nothing.
There is a lot of confusion here, lot's of crazy, and a few that know a lot, and lurk.
The lurkers that know stuff is what we are all hoping to entice into a discussion that makes us each seem like the center of the Universe for a day.
Want an example? After a couple of decades, I'm looking for CIA sanction to build the coil of my dreams. Coil array actually.
We're all like that here. And I'm not talking about the small minds that insult and demean while claiming they're so smart.
I saw one guy kept replying to himself, and in two or three days was complaining that he should have the Nobel prize, but nobody will even listen to him.
We're not all that bad.
Some of us are paranoid that what we know is so valuable that the whole world will try to steal it --precious. Those kind die with their misgivings... or their gift, whichever way, they die with it.
Though, there was one guy way back in the 90-s I saw bought-out by an oil company for his innovation with fluid-suspensions of piezoelectric elements spun in a golden-geometry ovoid. Not sure which forum. Like, way back, before Yahoo physics chat rooms had sx-bots.
Innovation does happen, for sure, all around us. Looking for it here is like going to a biker bar for an interior designer. You might find one, but may get a few teeth broken out trying.
Please do tell me, Triki... Do you have an over-unity concept you would like to discuss?
Here you will not find any science about overunity. You will not find discussions that drill down, but shrink-into a vein of thought.
The thought veins here aren't often principled, or that kind of thinker would find this environment maddening... like superstition about electromagnetics on parade.
That's what I think I see when I read things on here... the thoughts may be complex... but they are not rooted in a principle that relates to why things are done, and what causal reality is involved.
There just ain't no physics here. Not for long... no career physicists will come close to this place, or a biker bar.
This place is a shelter to afford people a cargo-cult experience building things on a hope. That's what cargo cult is.
I'm a cargo-culter, technically... I was 'touched by the excitement' decades back... and always have hoped that somehow if I hope well enough that some angel will gift me a crown of cosmic knowledge.
In my cultish approach, eventually it worked. It wasn't an angel... but because my nose was sniffing every crack and under rocks others wouldn't touch, my angel turned out to be a near-death-bed disclosure by an Area 51 guy. But here, huh! I can't even get a topic started in the concept space to develop what I'd love and live to share. It's spiritual for me to share about a living universe... but here...
This place is not designed for contemporary knowledge, let alone designed to accept novel ideals... unless one of the cult-figures has broken through into the lime-light, and developed the most adopted lingo that many forum threads begin to use. Yet no principle discussion. Principles here get stepped un and flushed, simply because the terms aren't within the community cargo-lingo.
Years later that remain only the thread-of-the-moment, of ideas that were realized as unfruitful, yet, while these ideas were in vogue, small minds were insulting others for not being in on the 'know' about so much blo.
When you're here, you're in the biker-bar of cult-pseudo-science... where the plus to the community is a few mixed nuts that can help... the rest build stuff. Stuff they talk about. Stuff they hope will reform mankind. (Unless real study into science is involved, can't have education talkin here. Got to be cult talkers that don't get smeared by small minds here.)
But us cargo-culters are good people.
There is no reform for us.
We are the hoi polloi.
DonEM an old guy --formerly Codasaurus Hex
-
Don
Pull up a stool ....and have a think ....
Nice to read your thoughts, and your “switchy thingy “
Topic ( new thread https://overunity.com/18956/ultra-switch-development-group/msg561023/#new (https://overunity.com/18956/ultra-switch-development-group/msg561023/#new)
Here it’s
The itch you just can’t quite scratch ... regardless a PHD
Or ....?
As Confucius use to say
“The person who knows all the answers
Has not been asked all the questions !
Thanks for your comments
And yes the pool in the open source community is very
Deep ( with talent and resources
And not limited to place or geography!
Respectfully
Chet K
-
Most people claim that a simulator will not exhibit OU due to the fact that all the components and equations fit the classical electromagnetism model. This logic stems from the idea that classic electromagnetism can not produce OU but this is simply not true as can be proven by the attached simulation.
This sim utilizes RLE (Reduced Lenz Effect) plus a transformer design that has a low coupling factor, a high ratio of primary to secondary inductance, and a constant current inductor. The low secondary inductance along with the low k factor means the primary inductance drop is minimal during the time the secondary is shorted. This results in a large portion of the primary inductance charging energy to be returned to the supply during the primary collapse when the secondary is shorted and the current in L5 is frozen or clamped. This is the source of energy gain for this device under classic electromagnetism! The one criteria for this operation with this present design is the relatively high DC supply voltage. Also the shorted secondary L2 reverses current direction during the cycle.
Referring to the sim, the net input energy taken from Vs is 26.877uJ. The charging of the primary L1 stops at 10us and the energy in L1 is then returned to Vs while at the same time, the gain in current in L5 is clamped at 112.36ma. With a starting current in L5 of 100ma, the energy gain is (.11236^2)-.1^2)*.025/2 = 32.81uJ.
The cycle ends at 19.91us where the current in L1 is zero but there is +107.14ma remaining in L2. With a starting current in L2 of -100ma, the energy gain is (.10714^2-.1^2)*.0015/2 = 1.11uJ.
Therefore the COP = (32.81e-6+1.11e-6)/26.877e-6 = 1.26 .
Regards,
Pm
-
Hello,
My answer would be definitely yes. As with all before us and all of you, where did we go wrong? Why couldn't things have been done better? Now, the conclusion is, we do not know much about electricity at all. Electricity and nature are two completely different things then our understanding to date. Anyone trying to achieve something like OU for example, firstly must throw away and unlearn false teachings.
When we started in the late 1800's to work with electricity, the understanding was very poor and basic. Many flaws were part of the development of our equipment, which were left unchecked until today. Anybody willing to go through the process of learning through the nature of electricity, to build a proper coil in a few easy steps, could throw away the false and begin with the new.
Best Regards
-
If I was asked what my idea would be to build an OU motor, the answer would be:
First, throw out everything you know about electricity. If, for over 100 years, we cannot see that a different direction must be taken, then the information given to us is totally useless, therefore stop trying.
Second, all the research must include knowledge of how electricity creates matter from 2 spectrums - red and blue and uses 4 octave pressures. Better still, it uses 4 multiplication efforts to compress matter. Walter Russell would be an excellent start concerning this subject.
Third, which is just as important, is common sense. To build a motor and use only one side of the coil, as is used today, is not practical whatsoever. Now we can see that it didn't take us too far. Learning how electricity actually works, one could add a few small details that would improve efficiency. I have given you, in my opinion, a good starting point.
Best Regards
-
As the title says, has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works? If so, are there instructions to reproduce your build? I'm asking because it would be nice to hear from someone who has personal experience of a system and can verify that it works and produces more energy that it consumes.
Trick question. First, there is no such thing as overunity, there is just outdated and easily debunked notions of what constitutes COP=1. Basically, when the standards use inefficient and wasteful methods of measurements, and ignore all evidence that such is the case, as well as all of the examples of perpetual motion in nature, then it is easy to say that this or that device can't possibly work, even if it does. Examples in nature? For a device or system to qualify for perpetual motion, it must start and remain running without additional power entering into the system for over 100 years to qualify. Remain in motion for over a hundred years, lets see electrons spinning spatially around an atom for an undefined eternity, but if that motion is too small, then consider planets circling around stars, moons around planets, stars around galactic centers, everything around the universal center, objects flying into space away from stars, etc., etc., etc.
Perpetual motion is definitely more common than intelligence, that is for certain.
However, the bias doesn't stop there. It must be in VISIBLE motion (doesn't matter if work is being performed that isn't obvious, as expenditure of energy is required of many things to KEEP them from moving, which is measurable by the lack of motion over time, such as is demonstrated by magnets, etc., not as potential energy, but an active constant force. This type of action I call negative acceleration. It includes the forces of gravity, magnetism, strong and weak forces, etc., etc.
As far as the measurement of COP, currently the method is measured using brute force to vibrate molecules to produce heat, arguably not necessarily the most efficient. That is like saying the best way to get power out of a car engine is to dump as much gasoline as possible into the carburetor -- extremely wasteful. Also, anyone with a fleer could tell you just how much energy they are wasting with the brute force approach as well (any heat loss is wasted energy not being used to heat the molecules in question). Also, why heating molecules with a nonthermal form of energy, such as electricity, somehow demonstrates power efficiency is daft anyway.
But hey, who cares if something is logical, right?
As to working forms of overunity, those are cases where someone found a more efficient way of doing something. You might research the water hammer, as one instance. A means of heating water efficiently.
Numerous forms of resonance have been used to achieve apparent overunity, which shouldn't be a surprise in a Relativistic/Quantum/String Theory universe. What physics understands of the concept of resonance can be written in a very small notebook indeed. A small amount of energy at the right resonant frequency can shatter hard crystal glass, for instance. True resonance tends to be self-reinforcing, absorbed into a media where it remains and then becomes additive if the source continues, getting stronger and stronger, or slowly dies off if the sources stops, sort of like a reverb resonant tank for an electric guitar, except that those use brute force as well.
The big problem is that once someone finds anything, they generally have no clue where the energy is from, use a garbage description to make an easily debunkable claim, then get discredited for the crime of not saying "I don't have a clue what is happening," since MOST devices/methods are discovered by accident -- someone tinkering with something new and discovering something really interesting that doesn't line up with what they thought they knew.
.We live in a universe where engineers exist to design and make things work, and part of their job is to get rid of anything really interesting, so to speak. If a circuit developes noise (signal that is not supposed to exist) then their job is to make whatever is unwanted go away. Anything that is undesirable is a "design flaw."
Ultimately, it is a question of A. What exactly is the system in question? and B. Is that system open or closed? If the full system is known (battery connected means nothing -- it has to include all potential energy sources to be accurate, known or unknown -- which becomes problematic) it is truly a closed system, then the conservation law of thermodynamics applies. If it is an open system, then said law NEVER applied to it to begin with! I have yet to find a truly closed system, and I have looked hard, despite the fact that engineers try hard to design them that way. It is actually hard, if not impossible, to actually design a perfectly closed system in which no outside source of energy whatsoever affects said system.
Pick up a portable radio if you want to see overunity, lol. Every time you receive squeals from various sources such as sunspots or tornadoes, to the crackle pops that come from distant lighting, know that energy has entered the system that did not come from the batteries, rofl.
Paul Andrulis
-
We should look into history for a second about the electric motor. 1880 or so, started the mass production of electric motors. Most likely some improvements have been made, but we could definitely say that, from 1899 we still have the same coil, a wire around a piece of metal. I call it a wire stick. If we ask the engineering community could things be improved, the usual answer would be no - you can't create energy from nothing. This is what they were taught and most likely no effort was made to change this statement. When asking other individuals the same question, the answer would be - whatever we see, it can and it must be improved. For me, both of those groups are 100% right. Everybody sees what they believe.
Axial motors are pushed now. Big companies are snatching them on the market, trying to be first. If we look inside of these motors, can we see something new? Or, is it still an 1899 wire stick with new clothing.
Another good example is linear labs from Texas. They are creating a vortex tunnel or something to that effect. The coils within the tunnel are pushing with all 4 sides, but there is still a problem with heat. Heat and inefficiency always go together. This would be a good indicator that they didn't remove the old thinking from their innovation. The same problems persist.
When I have to give my opinion, I always look for one thing - are they using the same old coil or they have learned how electricity works and then incorporated that knowledge into their design. This would be the only indicator as to whether they will have a future or not. What I am trying to say is, the only way forward, is to see electricity for what it is and move ahead with the new knowledge.
Best Regards
-
We should look into history for a second about the electric motor. 1880 or so, started the mass production of electric motors. Most likely some improvements have been made, but we could definitely say that, from 1899 we still have the same coil, a wire around a piece of metal. I call it a wire stick. If we ask the engineering community could things be improved, the usual answer would be no - you can't create energy from nothing. This is what they were taught and most likely no effort was made to change this statement. When asking other individuals the same question, the answer would be - whatever we see, it can and it must be improved. For me, both of those groups are 100% right. Everybody sees what they believe.
Axial motors are pushed now. Big companies are snatching them on the market, trying to be first. If we look inside of these motors, can we see something new? Or, is it still an 1899 wire stick with new clothing.
Another good example is linear labs from Texas. They are creating a vortex tunnel or something to that effect. The coils within the tunnel are pushing with all 4 sides, but there is still a problem with heat. Heat and inefficiency always go together. This would be a good indicator that they didn't remove the old thinking from their innovation. The same problems persist.
When I have to give my opinion, I always look for one thing - are they using the same old coil or they have learned how electricity works and then incorporated that knowledge into their design. This would be the only indicator as to whether they will have a future or not. What I am trying to say is, the only way forward, is to see electricity for what it is and move ahead with the new knowledge.
Best Regards
The concept of DC motors have been around since the early 1800's Faraday was the first to demonstrate in 1821 a very simplistic electromagnetic motor (not to be confused with much earlier electrostatic motors, which do not work on magnetism). In 1828 the first modern style (stator/rotor/commutator) configuration of DC motors were invented. Concerning AC, many try hard to attribute it to Ferraris in 1885, but not even. Tesla developed the concept of AC electricity while still in college (and was laughed at as perpetual motion) but sold the concept of AC generation to Westinghouse, already having working models of generators, and three different styles/types of AC motors which he patented in 1888. He invented the AC generator, the transmission system, AND the motor that ran on it. Tesla had one huge problem though, in that he was a huge show-off. He demonstrated stuff to crowds often before he ever applied for patents. For instance, you may not know that legally Tesla is now the official inventor of Radio, as per a fairly recent court case. I have no doubt Ferraris went to one of his demonstrations, just like Marconi did, if you get my gist. That is also why Ferraris is never mentioned in the debates between Tesla and Edison concerning DC as a usable effective public power source. Tesla loved attention...
Tesla is responsible for two-phase and multiphase motors, from non self-starting, to self starting, to shorted shunt "modern" designs, as well as owning the patents for rotating magnetic fields and numerous means for making them, which is almost never mentioned. Tesla was a very prolific inventor, that scientists play down as much as humanly possible.
That is all not even mentioning any of his high voltage high frequency work.
The problem is that the methods for determining efficiency are still the same notions used at the turn of the last century - specifically heat. The concept originated in thermodynamics, but it has never been asked to my knowledge, whether a conversion to heat can be called efficient. Many chemical processes for instance are not endothermic, which demonstrates that heat is not the end all be all of energy, as work is done in ANY chemical reaction, even if no heat is produced. If you turn to electric power, current efficiency standards are still based against heat, which makes no logical sense at all. The problem is that the entire system is entrenched in academia. The principle from thermodynamics called the conservation of energy is true and does apply to other forms of energy other than heat, but it has a scope on which it applies which is dubious, in that it only applies to the notion of a closed system according to its postulates. Also, the base notions being applied to the concept are from 1800's scientific thought.
We know now that matter can appear and disappear from spacetime, which violates energy neither being created nor destroyed by old concepts, except that the system isn't closed. They call those particles "virtual" to get rid of the supposed violation. The antiquated system did not envision spacetime being a universal energy source -- the probable source of the mysterious zeropoint energy discovered at 0 degrees Kelvin, or any possible energy source other than those known at the time for that matter. Not to knock the men of the day either, since they just simply did not have the data we have now. With E=MC^2 scientists around the world should have opened their collective eyes, as that is how much energy is ultimately available even in matter.
To put things into perspective, did you know C-4 is flammable? It will burn, and still not explode. However, which will give me more energy, burning it, or detonating it? There is a discrepancy there, and it is not simply time. Both are molecular reactions, but you get far less energy with burning, as the process is not nearly as complete. Basically, it smokes when burnt, and that material going up as black greasy smoke is wasted energy In 1800, they would have burnt it to heat a volume of water, ignoring any and all energy wasted to the environment. When you are heating a beaker of water with a flame, you ignore the fact that very little energy is getting to the water compared to what is being wasted. Some of the heat is radiated to the sides, while a large portion hits the glass. Of the heat that hits the glass, only a portion is absorbed, and the rest slides up and around the glass, escaping into the air. The water itself is radiating heat to the glass container and the air as well -- more wasted energy.
To effectively measure efficiency using heat, you would have to contrive a system THAT IS CLOSED. Specifically, the system could get no heat or energy from any other source, nor could it lose heat or energy while being measured. That is a tall order. It MIGHT be possible, but I doubt it, because who knows what quantum effects are going on.
Now, as then, they marginalize the concept of over-unity or COP>1 by referencing it stupidly, yes stupidly, as perpetual motion. It is stupid because the concept involves something remaining in motion, with no extra energy causing it to stay in motion, for perpetuity. We can now list numerous things that move spatially, with no extra energy added to cause it to remain so, for perpetuity. These things are INTENTIONALLY disallowed, such as magnetic fields, gravity fields, electric fields, electron orbits among numerous others, black holes wormholes, etc., etc., etc., e freaking cetera.
The concept of over-unity is itself a complex case of intellectual sophistry.
Paul Andrulis
-
Paul
In 1828 the first modern style (stator/rotor/commutator) configuration of DC motors were invented. Concerning AC, many try hard to attribute it to Ferraris in 1885, but not even. Tesla developed the concept of AC electricity while still in college (and was laughed at as perpetual motion) but sold the concept of AC generation to Westinghouse, already having working models of generators, and three different styles/types of AC motors which he patented in 1888. He invented the AC generator, the transmission system, AND the motor that ran on it.
Indeed and the same false perceptions about oscillating/alternating systems still persist even today.
Most still believe any oscillation/alternation must always sum to zero therefore the energy transfer must be zero which is false. This is because the majority of people still don't understand the concept of energy.
Now, as then, they marginalize the concept of over-unity or COP>1 by referencing it stupidly, yes stupidly, as perpetual motion. It is stupid because the concept involves something remaining in motion, with no extra energy causing it to stay in motion, for perpetuity. We can now list numerous things that move spatially, with no extra energy added to cause it to remain so, for perpetuity. These things are INTENTIONALLY disallowed, such as magnetic fields, gravity fields, electric fields, electron orbits among numerous others, black holes wormholes, etc., etc., etc., e freaking cetera.
The concept of over-unity is itself a complex case of intellectual sophistry.
I agree...
As I like to put it... give me one example of anything anywhere not in perpetual motion.
Nobody can answer the question and it becomes pretty obvious most have no idea what there talking about. It's kind of comical because all the experts I put the question to always end up looking like a deer stuck in someone's headlights. They have literally no idea why they came to believe something which is obviously false. Even worse, it represents a complete failure to apply even basic logic and reasoning to a relatively simple problem.
Question: Is perpetual motion possible or impossible?.
Reasoning: Do we have any proof or real world examples of something not in perpetual motion?.
Answer: Oh shit, no we have no examples therefore everything must be in perpetual motion.
Here is another logical argument...
1)Energy cannot be created or destroyed only transformed.
2)All energy relates directly to the motion of something on some level be it particles or waves.
3)Therefore since energy cannot be created or destroyed neither can the motion which represents energy.
4)All energy as motion which was ever present in the universe must still be present because it is always conserved.
5)Either energy as motion is always conserved or the conservation of energy cannot hold true.
Regards
AC
-
AC, you hit that nail directly on the head, so to speak.
Paul Andrulis
-
Well said AC.
-
You guys definitely know your stuff.
I would like to touch on history a little bit more and then we can move to the solution part.
The beginning of the 1900's was very interesting. There were new scientists coming from everywhere and new discoveries were made. Walter Russell arrives with a periodic chart of elements, showing exactly the steps of octave multiplication in creating matter. Later, knowledge came about how 2 electrical fields were creating 2 electric effects with one direction - centripetal and centrifugal. Around the 1940's, Mr. Tesla looked deeper into what was happening with the electro industry and started experiments with new coils, which were
closer to the way nature works. As we know, most of the papers were taken and hidden after his death. There were many more discoveries in that field as well. What is most interesting for us - our old coil didn't change and stayed the same up to today.
Now we can see:
A realization that we know nothing about electricity. All information fed to us is completely insufficient.
A realization that Nasa, scientists and schools will not tell us what is needed to move forward.
Maglev trains use coreless cores, which means, no concentration of power , as in nature, which is totally about efficiency.
Every new design and invention, in my opinion, will have to incorporate all that is known up to date, if it is going to have any future.
-
solotraveler
Now we can see:
A realization that we know nothing about electricity. All information fed to us is completely insufficient.
A realization that Nasa, scientists and schools will not tell us what is needed to move forward.
Many years ago I would have agreed but now I think differently.
The onus to learn and better our understanding was always on us not others. A teacher can only teach what they were taught and cannot know what is unknown to them. It comes down to the problem of having thousands of questions which others seem to have no answers too. My conclusion was that I needed to learn "how to learn" to move beyond the limitations of others.
It begs the question, if we could learn how to learn on our own then why would we need others?. Logically if we could learn then all we would need is information and knowledge and we could deduce all the correct answers from this.
Regards
AC
-
Time to get the blow lamp out and experiment with this lot! 8)
Very useful videos From Woopyjump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHft0la2Xl4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDFEevnkuq0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVZpL6mdW38
-
I would like to post my video which is showing an electric motor that is built with the knowledge of how electricity actually works.
We will need at least 3 members who could act as judges, to give us an honest opinion of the motor's performance.
The motor is driving 12KW, 3 phase generator which is driving 2 electric motor.
Calculations have to be done on the whole system and we can go through in detail when the system has been viewed.
You can let me know if my request is accepted.
Best Regards
-
Technically speaking, a solar panel is an overunity device. In what sense is an overunity system considered? I am working
on 2 or 3 or so different perpetual motion machines. My video of my Bessler's wheel prototype shows it can work. I am in the
process of finishing the build. Since it would use an outside source of energy, would it be an overunity device? A working
design could convert gravity into electricity by attaching a generator. And then we're back to is a solar panel an overunity
device or are there specific parameters?
I ask this because any device would require an outside source of energy. A generator needs to be in an electromagnetic field
such as what the Earth has. My comment is about not limiting what overunity is to a specific frame of reference. An example is
if a solar panel could become more efficient by exciting the gasses exposed to its surface.
-
I have always been intreaged with the idea of using a small force to release a larger force. And if that larger force can then be used to do useful work and also reset the small force then we have extra output....My pendulum does that exactly by lifting the pendulum to 2 oclock and releasing it and traveling to noon and then back down to the bottom slowly. The only thing is metal and permanent magnets.
I have always felt that if several things are combined and timed correctly we can do it. Finsrud does that with his ball that continues to run using a pendulum and a magnet and metal ball and gravity and momentum. My pendulum does that too.
So theoretically speaking we could lift a 100Kg by using PM magnets and then perhaps reset the device with 80Kg... So we now have 20Kg of free work. But that is not enough to make the 100Kg go up and down because of switching losses. I estimate that 200%-300% is necessary to keep a system running by itself. Butch Lafonte got me onto this but he never measured the work in and out but only talked about force.
It has take me 16 years to do what I have done and with precise mechanisms I think I can have a self runner in 3-4 years if the world does not collapse.
Norman
-
I have always been intreaged with the idea of using a small force to release a larger force. And if that larger force can then be used to do useful work and also reset the small force then we have extra output....My pendulum does that exactly by lifting the pendulum to 2 oclock and releasing it and traveling to noon and then back down to the bottom slowly. The only thing is metal and permanent magnets.
I have always felt that if several things are combined and timed correctly we can do it. Finsrud does that with his ball that continues to run using a pendulum and a magnet and metal ball and gravity and momentum. My pendulum does that too.
So theoretically speaking we could lift a 100Kg by using PM magnets and then perhaps reset the device with 80Kg... So we now have 20Kg of free work. But that is not enough to make the 100Kg go up and down because of switching losses. I estimate that 200%-300% is necessary to keep a system running by itself. Butch Lafonte got me onto this but he never measured the work in and out but only talked about force.
It has take me 16 years to do what I have done and with precise mechanisms I think I can have a self runner in 3-4 years if the world does not collapse.
Norman
The West did not realize that Putin wants eastern Ukraine so Russia would have the Sea of Azov. What the current war is about. Right now the world is teetering on the edge once again.
-
If you send me the details, I would be glad to look at the numbers and comment on whether it is OU or not. Thx
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVZpL6mdW38 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVZpL6mdW38)
We did this all many years ago.
Well, the light bulb is on, why shouldn't it be on?
With such batteries... :)
But there is no self-sufficiency.
-
Pssst
Lanca lV ( or any similarly skilled open source “document “ researcher )
Can you find any patent or additional info for our builders ?
https://www.newpowerprogress.com/news/holcomb-scientific-research-harnesses-electron-spin-to-deliver-power/8018093.article (https://www.newpowerprogress.com/news/holcomb-scientific-research-harnesses-electron-spin-to-deliver-power/8018093.article)
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
May this be one of many … to find it’s way to the world!
-
::) http://www.rexresearch.com/degeus/degeus.htm (http://www.rexresearch.com/degeus/degeus.htm)
to Holcomb :
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=robert+holcomb+generator (https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=robert+holcomb+generator)
extrapolation : http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111470 (http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111470)
SPINTRONICS or simple " pulse power engineering" introduction
MfG
OCWL
p.s.: related
How exactly does the Holcomb Energy System work?
The power to run the HES comes from one of the world’s most abundant resources: iron. Inside the system, energy is harnessed from the electron spin within electrical steel, magnifying the electrical energy input by up to 500 percent. This also means that the system is capable of generating five units of electrical output with just one unit of electrical input. You can find out more about how the technology works with this helpful video.
출처 : Korea IT Times(http://www.koreaittimes.com) (http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111470)
input 1 /output 5 performance energy systems we can calculate with < 250 INT $ (PPP)/KW
from Koreatimes interview :
reducing carbon footprints and power bills by up to 80 percent.
출처 : Korea IT Times(http://www.koreaittimes.com) (http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111470)
https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a (https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/190680/us-industrial-consumer-price-estimates-for-retail-electricity-since-1970/ (https://www.statista.com/statistics/190680/us-industrial-consumer-price-estimates-for-retail-electricity-since-1970/)
the US american b2b electricity market price per KWh was in average 5,5 US$cents ergo 100-80%= 20% from 5,5 US$cents =
1,1 US$cents/KWh electricity price target,by Dr. med(MD) Robert Holcomb ?!
;) Hello on my level !
Not B.O.S.,build-operate-sell philosophy,but private ownership !
https://www-wiwo-de.translate.goog/unternehmen/mittelstand/dramatische-preisanstiege-ein-euro-pro-kilowattstunde-wird-das-neue-normal-sein/28144806.html?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp (https://www-wiwo-de.translate.goog/unternehmen/mittelstand/dramatische-preisanstiege-ein-euro-pro-kilowattstunde-wird-das-neue-normal-sein/28144806.html?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp)
" Media- BlaBlaBla 100 Eurocents/KWh " versus UScents$2Eurocent conversion physical calculated " 1 Eurocent/KWh electricity "
Do not worry and stay happy !
-
Cont;from post 359
https://www.newpowerprogress.com/news/holcomb-scientific-research-harnesses-electron-spin-to-deliver-power/8018093.article (https://www.newpowerprogress.com/news/holcomb-scientific-research-harnesses-electron-spin-to-deliver-power/8018093.article)
Our friend Jimboot did find a you tube
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vUIK1GZSduo&feature=youtu.be (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vUIK1GZSduo&feature=youtu.be)
Mr Holcomb’s patents
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/robert-ray-holcomb (https://patents.justia.com/inventor/robert-ray-holcomb)
Below from Lanca research on claim ( more LancalV input at post 359 previous page)
http://www.rexresearch.com/degeus/degeus.htm (http://www.rexresearch.com/degeus/degeus.htm)[/size] to Holcomb : https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=robert+holcomb+generator (https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=robert+holcomb+generator) extrapolation : http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=11147 (http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111470) SPINTRONICS or simple " pulse power engineering" introduction MfG OCWL p.s.: related How exactly does the Holcomb Energy System work?The power to run the HES comes from one of the world’s most abundant resources: iron. Inside the system, energy is harnessed from the electron spin within electrical steel, magnifying the electrical energy input by up to 500 percent. This also means that the system is capable of generating five units of electrical output with just one unit of electrical input. You can find out more about how the technology works with this helpful video. 출처 : [/size]Korea IT Times(http://www.koreaittimes.com) (http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111470)[/size] [/size] input 1 /output 5 performance energy systems we can calculate with < 250 INT $ (PPP)/KW
from Koreatimes interview : reducing carbon footprints and power bills by up to 80 percent. 출처 : Korea IT Times(http://www.koreaittimes.com) (http://www.koreaittimes.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=111470)https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a (https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a)[/size]https://www.statista.com/statistics/190680/us-industrial-consumer-price-estimates-for-retail-electricity-since-1970/ (https://www.statista.com/statistics/190680/us-industrial-consumer-price-estimates-for-retail-electricity-since-1970/)[/size]the US american b2b electricity market price per KWh was in average 5,5 US$cents ergo 100-80%= 20% from 5,5 US$cents =
1,1 US$cents/KWh electricity price target,by Dr. med(MD) Robert Holcomb ?!
Hello on my level ! Not B.O.S.,build-operate-sell philosophy,but private ownership !https://www-wiwo-de.translate.goog/unternehmen/mittelstand/dramatische-preisanstiege-ein-euro-pro-kilowattstunde-wird-das-neue-normal-sein/28144806.html?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp (https://www-wiwo-de.translate.goog/unternehmen/mittelstand/dramatische-preisanstiege-ein-euro-pro-kilowattstunde-wird-das-neue-normal-sein/28144806.html?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=de&_x_tr_pto=wapp) " Media- BlaBlaBla 100
Eurocents/KWh " versus UScents$2Eurocent conversion physical calculated "
1Eurocent/KWh electricity " Do not worry and stay happy !
-
From Jimboots offered youtube find the claim : input 1/output 2
and the ( more effective use instead) monophase to triphase conversion !
(in-)directly relationship :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=meta+c&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=meta+c&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
The Dinnan family work , Meta C(orporation) : True Scale
wmbr
OCWL
p.s. :
True Scale + https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quipu (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quipu) + http://www.sensortime.com/biography.html (http://www.sensortime.com/biography.html)
for better Men-Machine understanding
btw :
the italian B1 class patent application IT1265815 SELF-PROPELLED SCOOTER or Monopattino Semoventi
from Aurelio Spoglianti ,1996 living in Riolo Terme/Ravenna/ITA
www.georgehart.com (http://www.georgehart.com) Synestructics compared A.Graham Bell his ' Visible Speech(Speak)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_Speech
words and numbers are pictures/images images are words and numbers
espacenet/WIPO Archive description and mosaics to ' living objects : 4/5D ' ,
M.I.T.,Negroponte https://www.media.mit.edu/people/nicholas/overview/ (https://www.media.mit.edu/people/nicholas/overview/)
M.I.T. Media-Labs ::)
-
From Jimboots offered youtube find the claim : input 1/output 2
and the ( more effective use instead) monophase to triphase conversion !
(in-)directly relationship :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=meta+c&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=meta+c&IN=&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
The Dinnan family work , Meta C(orporation) : True Scale
wmbr
OCWL
p.s. :
True Scale + https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quipu (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quipu) + http://www.sensortime.com/biography.html (http://www.sensortime.com/biography.html)
for better Men-Machine understanding
btw :
the italian B1 class patent application IT1265815 SELF-PROPELLED SCOOTER or Monopattino Semoventi
from Aurelio Spoglianti ,1996 living in Riolo Terme/Ravenna/ITA
www.georgehart.com (http://www.georgehart.com) Synestructics compared A.Graham Bell his ' Visible Speech(Speak)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_Speech (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visible_Speech)
words and numbers are pictures/images images are words and numbers
espacenet/WIPO Archive description and mosaics to ' living objects : 4/5D ' ,
M.I.T.,Negroponte https://www.media.mit.edu/people/nicholas/overview/ (https://www.media.mit.edu/people/nicholas/overview/)
M.I.T. Media-Labs ::)
p.s II : Caution ! errare mihi atque est : VISIBLE SPEECH ,non Alexander Graham Bell
BUT BY Alexander Melville Bell,A.Graham Bell his/its father !
Sorry !
-
Hello there peeps
this is my first post on Overunity. Just arrived to try and see if I can find any sense here and spent a while trying to sift through the numerous discussions, many of which seem to go off topic. With regard to the question in this thread... has anyone got any clear opinions or thoughts about the "Liberty Engine" that has appeared on Youtube? https://youtu.be/-8G1JCT2c78
Hidden Energy /technologia oculta
These guys are getting a lot of YouTube advertising income, and have done some other posts which could be suggestions that their system is a scam... however, having now reviewed their more recent videos, it does give a very good impression of a working machine... so was rather hoping to find things discussed in this forum, but so far have only found scant ambiguous mention...
I've got no problem with the fundamental proposition that the laws of physics as we've been taught being only a very partial explanation of reality. How interesting that Wilhelm Reich clearly demonstrated aether (orgone energy) and people have successfully replicated his work, but that his books were burned in the USA in the '50s... as just one example of very many. Victor Shauberger? Many others come to mind.
Anyway, very interested in either a good summary post that gives links to the top 5 working overunity systems, or serious comments on replicating the Liberty engine.
Anyone?
-
Greetings friends. I haven't been with you for a long time. There have been many different events, such as the war in Ukraine, sanctions and all that. But I decided to get out to see what's going on in the world. And randomly drop in here...
I was absent for a long time, because a colleague from the Baltic States with his anti-Putin idealology prevented me a little from writing my thoughts and sharing interesting information with you. I would like to draw your attention to Hooke's Law
-
I would like to draw attention to the distribution of magnetic induction between magnets
-
I would like to draw attention to the distribution of magnetic induction between magnets
And what is wrong with the distribution of magnetic induction between magnets?
It’s better to comment on what it is, it’s not the first time I show it, no one appreciated it.
Allegedly, this is the key to the mechanical device of Kapanadze.
-
Hey, look at this chart I made in LTSpice
Сейчас речь идет о параметрической индуктивности и нелинейности магнитного поля, против линейности пружины (закон Гука).
-
I expect that with a non-linearly changing current in the inductance, which implies a parametric process, the graph should be something like this. But for this, I would like to talk with a person who could recommend a CAD system in which one could set a time-varying inductance
-
I'm sorry, I live mainly on my Telegram channel. World trends are now in vogue to introduce all sorts of restrictions and sanctions. Therefore, for now, this is the most secure resource if someone starts to turn off something on the Internet in this world.
А вот некоторые эпюры
-
But for this, I would like to talk with a person who could recommend a CAD system in which one could set a time-varying inductance
This is for your friend, Valentin Volodin. It is better not to find it in LTspice. :)
-
Приветствую, в принципе к нему и пошел. А что наши Американские друзья, кроме искрения научно никто не подходит в к вопросам FREE Energy?
-
Приветствую, в принципе к нему и пошел. А что наши Американские друзья, кроме искрения научно никто не подходит в к вопросам FREE Energy?
As far as I understand, what Dr. Robert Holcomb (a company from the USA) revealed to the world revolutionized power generation. Perhaps few people understand this. Especially ghouls from Muscovy.
https://holcombenergysystems.com
Not just announced, but there are already companies that have purchased these devices.
-
Many years ago, there was page article with drawing of spiral vortex dual 110v AC transformers that would provide higher wattage on output. (You know about the tornado effect) The unit was tested on refrigerator with proper meters and power factor. Also the best wind mill generator design was the US Patented "Tornado Turbine", Also the late Mr. Baumgartner demonstrated a hover platform lifting effect with small wattage train motor rewired in series for speed, and vortex spinning vanes. He had used computer program to design it. It was shown lifting him in a room and then later, the front end of city bus. Why can't anything be purchased. Alexander US Patent 3913004 1975 --
(https://overunity.com/18872/alexander-us-patent-3913004-1975-and-a-speculation-coorelation/msg558028/#msg558028)The technique of rotation with transformer effect (double wires on rotor) as in the above Patent method to increase energy, allowed inventor to make self running car with 4 air motors at wheels with air tank, battery , alternator, and modified military motor/generator with excessive output torque free energy to run main air compressor. The Stan Meyer Patented ionized Hydrogen gas H+H+O-- generator is way over unity (not electrolysis) and usable since the Patents time has ran out. In 1980's New York there was a self running air compressor with no battery or motor. The main shaft had journal with air cylinder that had higher pressure coming from inherent vortex tube higher pressure than 40lb tank + insulated heat chamber. Unit had spoked, balanced, heavy rim steel flywheel. Tube had 3 machined parts from 3 separate work machine shops, so as final design as put together would not be known. Inventor was mowing lawn outside trailer with long air hose hooked to tank. The interested Company reneged on the $3 million dollars wanted after 1 year. John W. Keely had shown demonstrations in 1890's Phil. Pa, of lifting effect (no gravity) with resonance frequencies and harmonic ratios using array of tuning forks and multiplication of higher vibrations on heavy metal spheres .His "transmitter wires" of gold, platinum + silver, are now called thermocouples and thermopiles. Witnessed by engineers, newspaper men, and investors at that time. Tesla didn't like Keely since Keely got more investor's money than he did. S1R9A9M9 (Nathren) of 2008 videos showed Briggs mower engine self running overunity with water in carburetor. Hydrogen gas electrolysis at spark plug with also water vapor pressure generated same time at neg 34 degrees ATDC. Magnetic field coil - called triple coils assy, over plug wire extends firing time for more contact with water. EGR improves performance. Alternator under flywheel provides constant 10 amps after battery was disconnected. Web site shut down. Special vacuumed sealed dual 1.6MH coils relay per cylinder also used for time spark extension. His 1978 V8 El Camino tooled around town until locked up in security garage. You don't know about specialized information because you want data dropped in your lap, rather than doing your own science research yourself and finding out what others have already done. Back issues alternate energies magazines, documents you have to purchase, and published data on Internet YOU have to search for. See DVD VHS movies The Water Engine and 1949 Free For All .
-
I continue to work on my device, which should charge a conditionally large number of batteries with one battery. In fact, this device will resemble a radio, because it will also work on radio frequencies. In fact, we can say that it is almost a Hertz transmitter. right now I am actively working with some nodes in LTSpice. I really want to test the concept during this summer.
Some time ago I was working on a mechanical device, more precisely an electromechanical device, in which there was an interaction of two bodies by means of Lorentz forces. This criticism turned out to be inappropriate for the reason that a magnetic field, as something that is part of the ether or physical vacuum, cannot store mechanical energy in itself.
Now we conducted an experiment in which it turned out that the frame of an electric motor having low active resistance, which implies Joule-Lenz heat losses has problems associated with the Coulomb forces. Accordingly, precisely because of the low heat losses, there is an opinion that the electric motor supposedly converts electrical energy into mechanical energy. Which is completely wrong.
-
The main phenomenon of the conductor is that a conductor can be affected by a huge number of radio waves, while it may seem that there is silence in the ether, aka physical vacuum. But in fact the reactive properties of the conductor are unique for the reason that just on one side is what scientists at the time of the Stanley and Morley interferometer were trying to study.
However, the problem of Lorentz and not only him was that they studied relative motion in space, while never giving a fundamental answer to the question of energy motion as mass...This is a significant gap. which still does not give an answer to the emergence of the cause of such a phenomenon as inertia. We have to admit. that there is matter in space, which has dynamic properties, whereas acceleration of a body. as well as deceleration from the point of view of physical vacuum is a dynamic process.
But the emergence of mathematics in matters of dynamically changing matter. which brakes the physical body and tries to speed it up will be a difficult task.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaGLT0ISq-0 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaGLT0ISq-0)
Hello
Greetings friends, I decided to post a video that was created a few years ago. Essentially the experiment itself resembled an advanced Joule experiment. But instead of heat, we were aiming to charge a capacitor. We were looking at the work done by a body and how much mechanical energy was communicated to a second body, which was a flywheel with an offset center of gravity.
-
It is sad to consider news not about science and technology. but about politics. The last thing to consider here, in my opinion, is politics. Considering that more often than not, propaganda on either side is a matter of payment.
As a rule, questions of propaganda here are based on people who, most likely, are dissatisfied with something, but their dissatisfaction is expressed not in achievements, but in propaganda. I really hope that the subject of relations by couch experts will be stopped, and preferably removed from the place where people come to exchange some questions related to the subject of energy.
Therefore, I would be happy to communicate on topics related to science.
-
I wish I could just 'like' a post, but in my opinion, you hit the nail squarely on the head my friend.
If this forum cannot support each other in our joint passion and desire and wish to create a better world for humanity, without the politics, then it is surely doomed.
My greatest wish is to stay focused, stay respectful, and keep to the topic at hand.
D2
It is sad to consider news not about science and technology. but about politics. The last thing to consider here, in my opinion, is politics. Considering that more often than not, propaganda on either side is a matter of payment.
As a rule, questions of propaganda here are based on people who, most likely, are dissatisfied with something, but their dissatisfaction is expressed not in achievements, but in propaganda. I really hope that the subject of relations by couch experts will be stopped, and preferably removed from the place where people come to exchange some questions related to the subject of energy.
Therefore, I would be happy to communicate on topics related to science.
-
It is sad to consider news not about science and technology. but about politics. The last thing to consider here, in my opinion, is politics. Considering that more often than not, propaganda on either side is a matter of payment.
As a rule, questions of propaganda here are based on people who, most likely, are dissatisfied with something, but their dissatisfaction is expressed not in achievements, but in propaganda. I really hope that the subject of relations by couch experts will be stopped, and preferably removed from the place where people come to exchange some questions related to the subject of energy.
Therefore, I would be happy to communicate on topics related to science.
I agree
And truly hope forum can resist other topics ( which have perhaps millions
Of other sites on worldwide web)
And do what we are here to do …open source FE research and experiments …and share with the world!
There are many of like mind here ( and elsewhere)
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
Thank you for sharing your work
-
Greetings, it is great that there is still a site and a place where we enthusiastic people can communicate on the topic related to FREE ENERGY
Now I have to use a translator. because without artificial intelligence I would do all this very slowly, so it would be great if someone could help somehow shape my thoughts more correctly.
The language problem is one of the problems. That's why I made this video without sound.
Trying to contact Aaronom or Russ to create a collaboration somehow did not lead to a response. I myself have some basic skills in Adobe Premere Pro, Vegas, simple skills in Aftyer Effects.
Maybe someone. who has a good microphone, and who speaks English - I think you can make a series of video clips to explain the essence of the experiments done. for now I decided to make a discussion in the form of a text to talk about all those topics that concerned me a few years ago and what I was doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpV4pwymbkA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpV4pwymbkA)
-
Maybe someone. who has a good microphone, and who speaks English - I think you can make a series of video clips to explain the essence of the experiments done. for now I decided to make a discussion in the form of a text to talk about all those topics that concerned me a few years ago and what I was doing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooq_AMImK7U (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooq_AMImK7U)
-
I would also like to meet those people who are now in this community to understand. how some experiments could be organized. possibly together. I think that there is a huge gap in science that still remains at its level. But I think. this subject should be revealed gradually, going through the description of some important hypotheses.
To initially consider the processes in electromagnetism, it would be proper to consider how the relationship of electricity and magnetism occurred. I think it makes sense to begin the narrative of the Arago disk.
Actually, eddy currents were first attributed to the French scientist D.F.
Arago (1786-1853) in 1824.
axis with a magnetic arrow. At the expense of eddy currents the disk the arrow also came into
rotation. This phenomenon, called the Arago phenomenon, was explained a few years later
a few years later by M. Faraday from the perspective of the law of electromagnetic induction discovered by him:
A rotating magnetic field induces currents (eddy currents) in a copper disc, which
interact with a magnetic arrow. (1831) Eddy currents were studied in detail
by the French physicist Foucault (1819-1868) and named after him.
One can understand that the idea of the Arago disk was already introduced by Michael Faraday in the form of
Faraday's disk. If you look closely, Faraday's disk itself differs from the disk in that
that instead of a stationary magnet and disc, Faraday's magnet or disc was
stationary, except when Michael Faraday rotated the disk along with the magnet.
The latter would be interesting to consider now in terms of his
notions...But now we are talking about the fact that with Arago the disk and the magnet were
stationary and the disk itself was driven by the magnet by Lorentz forces.
The idea of Faraday's disk eventually evolved into the idea of an oscillator and an electric motor
instead of the disk a winding based on enameled wire was used.
A generator has a stator that rests on a support and a rotor - which is driven
rotation.
-
Now we need to go back to Newton's laws
Newton's First Law
Newton's first law of motion postulates the existence of inertial reference frames. Therefore, it is also known as the law of inertia. Inertia (aka inertia) is the property of a body to keep its velocity unchanged in magnitude and direction when no forces are acting, as well as the property of a body to resist changes in its velocity. To change the velocity of a body, it is necessary to apply some force, and the result of the same force on different bodies will be different: bodies have different inertia (inertia), the value of which is characterized by their mass.
Newton's Second Law
Newton's second law of motion is a differential law of motion that describes the relationship between the force applied to a material point and the resulting acceleration of that point. In fact, Newton's second law of motion introduces mass as a measure of inertia of a material point in a selected inertial reference frame (ISO).
The mass of a material point is assumed to be constant in time and independent of any peculiarities of its motion and interaction with other bodies
With a suitable choice of units, this law can be written in the form of a formula:
where
a- is the acceleration of the material point;
F - is the net result of all forces applied to the material point;
m is the mass of the material point.
Newton's second law can also be formulated in an equivalent form using the concept of momentum
Newton's Third Law
of the law describes how two material points interact. Let there be a closed system consisting of two material points in which the first point can act on the second point with some force
F1-2, and the second can act on the first with force F2-1
. Newton's third law of Newton states: the force F1-2
is equal in modulo and opposite in direction to the counterforce F2-1
Newton's third law of Newton is a consequence of homogeneity, isotropy and mirror symmetry of space.
Newton's Third Law of Newton, as well as the other laws of Newtonian dynamics, gives practically correct results only when the velocities of all bodies in the system in question are negligibly small compared to the speed of light
-
The problem is newtons law's and all those 1600 vintage laws are out of date your quoting,
If the Ebons can travel here from Veda Reticulli then your quoting stuff you cant prove one way or the other
but in fact both instances Albert Einstein and Maxwell proved their was inconsistencys in all those old
Oxford university faculty doctoring edited published laws.
Sil
-
I just have looked your school galvanometer. And I thought, is it possible to increase the sensitivity of the galvanometer using the Stovbunenko tooth effect? At least I haven't seen it.
-
The talk of error consists in the notion of transformations
The talk of error consists in the notion of transformations
Mayer came to the most important conclusion that the body is governed by natural physical and chemical laws and, above all, by the law of conservation and transformation of energy. Returning from a trip, he wrote an article "On the quantitative and qualitative determination of forces" (Meyer designates energy by the term "force"), which he sent on June 16, 1841 to the journal "Annals of Physics".
In his writings, Mayer lists various types of energy: the kinetic energy of moving masses, the potential energy of a lifted load, internal, electrical and magnetic (it should be noted Mayer's brilliant intuition, who realized that electromagnetic phenomena also obey the law of conservation of energy).
oule's interest in this topic first arose after becoming acquainted with electrical machines that had just been invented. Joel was a man of practical mind. He was fascinated by the idea of creating an eternal source of energy. He made a voltaic battery, started a primitive electric motor of his own design from it, and saw that it was impossible to get something out of nothing: the zinc in the battery was eaten away, and its replacement was quite expensive. Joel later proved to his own satisfaction that it was always cheaper to feed a horse than to change the zinc in the batteries, so that the horse would never be driven out by the electric motor. This prompted him to investigate the relationship between heat and energy of all kinds, and he set out to find out if there was an exact quantitative relationship between heat and mechanical energy. Joule devoted most of his life to this idea. He was able to roughly estimate the mechanical coefficient of heat from the experiments of Rumfoord, who recorded how much the temperature of a known mass of matter increased when, with the help of a horse team, the metal of a cannon barrel was drilled with a blunt drill. A more accurate result was obtained by Joule in an experiment on mixing water with a rod with blades.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxiUiHeY8LLEXB_dJ4mhLFtoyMjsI5XuYpiYoLX86P0/edit?usp=sharing (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DxiUiHeY8LLEXB_dJ4mhLFtoyMjsI5XuYpiYoLX86P0/edit?usp=sharing)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dJehJcdPnRBfMDeDIZ1IasX2jq4C4ffh34tA8x_J7Wk/edit?usp=sharing (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dJehJcdPnRBfMDeDIZ1IasX2jq4C4ffh34tA8x_J7Wk/edit?usp=sharing)
-
I had to find articles in full on the history of the development of the law of conservation of energy. some excerpts I have marked here in bold. To make it clear. I also did a machine translation of the articles themselves.
The internal energy of a thermodynamic system can change in two ways: through work on the system and through heat exchange with the environment. The energy that the system (body) receives or loses in the process of heat exchange with the environment is called the amount of heat, or simply heat[1]. Heat is one of the basic thermodynamic quantities in classical phenomenological thermodynamics. The amount of heat is included in the standard mathematical formulations of the first and second principles of thermodynamics.
To change the internal energy of a system by means of heat exchange, work must also be done. However, it is not mechanical work, which is associated with moving the boundary of a macroscopic system. At the microscopic level, this work is carried out by the forces acting between the molecules at the contact boundary of a more heated body with a less heated one. In fact, in heat exchange, energy is transferred through electromagnetic interaction in collisions of molecules. Therefore, from the point of view of molecular-kinetic theory, the difference between work and heat is manifested only in the fact that the performance of mechanical work requires orderly motion of molecules on a macroscopic scale, while the transfer of energy from a more heated body to a less heated one does not require it.
Energy can also be transferred by radiation from one body to another without direct contact.
-
So, I had to get into historical questions and also go into theory, but here's what the theory itself says - heat or thermal energy itself is transmitted electromagnetically. Which was established by Maxwell - light and heat are electromagnetic in nature and propagate in a physical vacuum. However, there are certain questions - are waves matter that propagates in a vacuum or are radio waves a change in the vacuum, i.e. waves consist of a building material?
Adherents of the theory of ether believe that just there is a certain filled space in which as in a fluid we produce disturbances. However, at one time the understanding of the Aether was hampered by a situation in which the Aether was considered stationary. It is dynamic. Like the dynamic behavior of a liquid to the reaction of perturbation. Therefore, it has no stationary state and the mass, of which the physical vacuum itself consists, is just the cause of inertia.
Even if my idea regarding the structure of the vacuum is wrong, I can admit it, after Maxwell heat is already considered through electromagnetism. But so far no one considers that heat is transmitted by electromagnetism and electromagnetism itself is the cause of the motion of atoms and molecules or all that we consider Brownian motion.
all I am summarizing now in the conversation is that the process in Joule's experiment should not be considered through transformation. but through the course of two processes, processes in the physical and in the vacuum.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpV4pwymbkA (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpV4pwymbkA)
Here are the pictures, or the very picture itself, of everything I did a few years ago. it's midnight now and I'm very sleepy... so I plan to continue the discussion on fundamental and applied things tomorrow...
-
Greetings again. Continuing the description of my work. The concept of the setup was that we have the interaction of two bodies at a distance through a magnetic field. the first body is a magnet with mass m1 and a coil with mass m2. Initially one of the bodies is at rest, the moment the second body passes by, due to the law of electromagnetic induction an EMF is induced in the frame (coil). Due to the fact that the frame is short-circuited to the internal source of EMF and internal impedance, a current is induced in the frame. The Lorentz force arises between the magnetic field of the magnet and the frame, due to which the two bodies interact.
However, there is a nuance, the coil internal impedance consists of the winding resistance and the leakage inductance. After the interaction of the bodies, the winding opens and the stored energy in the leakage inductance discharges energy into the capacitor. in this way we can find out the energy of the charged capacitor in Joules, but also can calculate the circuit losses for Joule-Lenz heat.
-
Electric circuit
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIJa4bOXWOc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIJa4bOXWOc)
In this video you can trace the interaction through distance or the validity of Newton's third law through distance (intermediate medium or magnetic field)
-
Now I am busy translating the article in English, in the article itself I gave a complete calculation and description of the experiment. But I think I will also give some comments, so that it is clear what the article is about.
https://ext-5724308.livejournal.com/1043.html (https://ext-5724308.livejournal.com/1043.html)
I wanted to add that John Searle used a device that he called a gyroscope. Something similar we will talk about in the future, why there is something in common with those experiments. which I did with my like-minded friend, named Michael.
-
As I have already repeated, the concept itself consisted in the interaction of masses through distance, the force of one body was communicated through the Lorentz force. then the stored current in the inductance after opening the circuit was converted into a capacitor charge.
After all the calculations, it turned out that body number one with mass m1 reported impulse or kinetic energy to body number one with mass m2, while the first body was at rest.
-
https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhhuy0/pendulum_part_1/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhib1b/pendulum_part_2/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
-
After all the calculations, it turned out that body number one with mass m1 reported impulse or kinetic energy to body number one with mass m2, while the first body was at rest.
You have one body number one is having different mass? :o
Magnetic transmission. This was used in reel to reel VCRs.
-
Arago's disk is the progenitor of the asynchronous machine and some varieties of the electric coupling, but I was talking about the Joule experience. that's what I'm focusing on now.
Now to consider the problems in asynchronous machines makes no sense. because readers. who are here are not yet ripe for perception.
Now people continue their search in the fading trend of sparks and high voltage.
At this point it will be difficult for me to jump from one topic to another, because things are not so simple in asynchronous machines. To look deeply and fundamentally at the problem - I can explain in short words, but, the audience here will not digest it.
It can strike a blow to Bedini's theory and not only...It takes time to absorb the information.
-
Greetings Adam.
I have sent you the files in which you can see the progress of the experiment.
Unfortunately it is difficult to engage in editing the text and conducting experiments, as actually find the material means to do it.
But despite the difficulties in this setup you can see that at the input we have 7 joules in the form of kinetic energy of the body, which is driven in the pendulum by gravitational forces. On the output we have 7 Joules, and we have a charged capacitor with 4 Joules of which 3 Joules went into heat. In the proportions I am now very rough, but it is accurate to say that the input is 7 Joules, the output is 14 Joules.
Of course for science this setup will raise very strong questions as there are friction losses, there are Joule heat losses, but at this point I have what I have now. it would be great to have you carefully, as far as you could review the materials, a discussion about which I would like to start in the community.
The most important thing I'm personally getting at is the idea that mechanical energy and electromagnetism, let it be a capacitor charge or it be radiation in the form of heat - xto not converting energy into each other, but a concomitant energy.
This is a challenge to the conclusions that the Western world has drawn as opposed to the ideas that actively reigned in India, China based on a crudely materialistic worldview.
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100020462107754 (https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100020462107754)
-
Arago's disk is the progenitor of the asynchronous machine and some varieties of the electric coupling, but I was talking about the Joule experience. that's what I'm focusing on now.
Now to consider the problems in asynchronous machines makes no sense. because readers. who are here are not yet ripe for perception.
Now people continue their search in the fading trend of sparks and high voltage.
At this point it will be difficult for me to jump from one topic to another, because things are not so simple in asynchronous machines. To look deeply and fundamentally at the problem - I can explain in short words, but, the audience here will not digest it.
It can strike a blow to Bedini's theory and not only...It takes time to absorb the information.
Hi,
Please define or explain in short what you mean by:
Joule experience.
problems in asynchronous machines.
Bedini's theory.
Then you say:
"not yet ripe for perception."
" the audience here will not digest it"
What say you get on topic and show substance in overunity system that works? We can handle perception and digestion. Just make the presentation already.
bi
-
Greetings. The question related to maturation is not about critiquing your ability as an audience to perceive. The question is. to approach one topic in which I have many more questions through the description of another. It is a question of consistency of presentation.
If we're talking about the Joule experiment, we're going to have to look at complex fundamental things. that are already worth changing, in case the paradigm is already obsolete. But this has to be done experimentally. Which I actually tried to do.
If we talk about the paradigm that Meyer, Joule, Helmholtz pursued in the notion that one energy can flow into another and further literal perception of processes, then this perception and representation is already a relic of the past.
-
To understand the difference in the concepts of energy, we have to go back not only to the time of Umow Poynting and Heaviside, but also to the time of Newton, who made quite reasonable observations.
If we go back to the time of Umov, who first began to put forward the theory of the movement of energy in space through mechanics, and then Poynting and Heaviside, who had already begun to converge on the idea that energy is electrical distributed in a vacuum and by the way not through notions of electrons, we can say that these are two different kinds of energy. And then I got an idea that Tom Bearden had expressed concerning. In this case, he was trying to express the idea that the mechanical energy on the shaft is not the flow of energy into the wires. because the energy. which occurs in the wires comes from the physical vacuum and propagates in the physical vacuum where the wires act as a kind of waveguide through which the Electro-Magnetic energy propagates.
Hence the conclusion that in an electric motor the energy goes in parallel. That is, in the electric generator and the electric motor energy appears through the Poynting theorem. the shaft in the generator is needed only for the appearance of a rotating magnetic field...
The causal connection between mechanical and electrical energy is fundamentally wrong. And most likely the reason is in the psychology and attitudes of the Western world, which could not perceive that something else could exist besides the physical body. or rather this idea appeared. it was called Aether. But even here it turned out to be not so simple.
the task of scientists in the Western world is to eliminate everything that is associated with sensory or intuitive perception, forcing it all to be crossed out and leave only the external observable shell of the observable. For example, this can be compared to a monkey trying to get a banana out of a jar.
It is difficult for her to grasp. at the expense of her brain. which tends through focus to abstract from the outside world and the totality of other processes in order to free her hand, while there is a hunter nearby. able to understand that the monkey in view of its limitations cannot make her understand that it has trapped itself...
Hence the Hindus appear to the English as barbarians, savage and uneducated. while their perceptions are ahead of their time.
-
To understand the difference in the concepts of energy, we have to go back not only to the time of Umow Poynting and Heaviside, but also to the time of Newton, who made quite reasonable observations.
If we go back to the time of Umov, who first began to put forward the theory of the movement of energy in space through mechanics, and then Poynting and Heaviside, who had already begun to converge on the idea that energy is electrical distributed in a vacuum and by the way not through notions of electrons, we can say that these are two different kinds of energy. And then I got an idea that Tom Bearden had expressed concerning. In this case, he was trying to express the idea that the mechanical energy on the shaft is not the flow of energy into the wires. because the energy. which occurs in the wires comes from the physical vacuum and propagates in the physical vacuum where the wires act as a kind of waveguide through which the Electro-Magnetic energy propagates.
Hence the conclusion that in an electric motor the energy goes in parallel. That is, in the electric generator and the electric motor energy appears through the Poynting theorem. the shaft in the generator is needed only for the appearance of a rotating magnetic field...
The causal connection between mechanical and electrical energy is fundamentally wrong. And most likely the reason is in the psychology and attitudes of the Western world, which could not perceive that something else could exist besides the physical body. or rather this idea appeared. it was called Aether. But even here it turned out to be not so simple.
the task of scientists in the Western world is to eliminate everything that is associated with sensory or intuitive perception, forcing it all to be crossed out and leave only the external observable shell of the observable. For example, this can be compared to a monkey trying to get a banana out of a jar.
It is difficult for her to grasp. at the expense of her brain. which tends through focus to abstract from the outside world and the totality of other processes in order to free her hand, while there is a hunter nearby. able to understand that the monkey in view of its limitations cannot make her understand that it has trapped itself...
Hence the Hindus appear to the English as barbarians, savage and uneducated. while their perceptions are ahead of their time.
...Newton, who made quite reasonable observations.
...can be compared to a monkey trying to get a banana out of a jar.
Give credit where credit is due. I understand now.
Thanks.
bi
-
Electric generator or what would happen if we were born in Space
Greetings friends, we are now looking at a very specific thing related to an experiment in which conditional da bodies of mass m1 m2 interact with each other by means of the Lorentz force or magnetic field.
If you do a mental experiment
A mental experiment
Let's imagine that we have a closed coil at rest in the Cosmos. a magnet flies by. As it flies by, it induces an EMF and because the winding is closed, it induces a current and a magnetic field. Accordingly, this field is called H or magnetic field strength, hence the interaction force, which is called the Lorentz force Fl.
Due to this force now between a magnet of mass m1 and a coil of mass m2
The force interaction between the coil and the magnet obeys Newton's law. The force acting on the coil from the side of the magnet is the counteracting force F=-F and vice versa.
Hence, the coil, which was at rest, begins to come to a state of motion and acquires kinetic energy, i.e. the body m1 gives the body m2 impulse and kinetic energy.
due to this the body m2 or the coil begins to accelerate, and the magnet or the body m1 begins to decelerate
In other words, we can say that the bodies begin to exchange kinetic energy, where this energy has a mechanical character.
As current is generated in the closed winding, part of the energy will be dissipated as heat in the active resistance, and part of the energy will be stored in the winding inductance. When the winding unwinds, the stored energy begins to be discharged into the capacitor and turns into potential energy E=CU^2/2
In my experiment called the pendulum, the magnets were driven by a weight with gravitational force acting on it, and the work was measured by the formula E = mgh
And the work was measured by measuring the height to which the weight was lowered A = E1-E2
The experiment itself resembled a modernized Joule experiment to convince us that Joule himself had made some inaccuracies in his experiment. And it probably makes sense to talk about that.
Let's imagine. what would happen if we went into space and tried to spin an oscillator whose stator is free in Space?
The stator will begin to accelerate, just as we would if we started spinning the knob of that generator. hence the question - what would happen if we did the Joule experiment in Space?
To make it more convincing, on the glass that Joule had on the support inside we make paddles?
The water will start to move, just as we will start to move. If we place the paddles, the water will begin to interact with the paddles and the beaker itself will begin to accelerate. It will be a reciprocal process.
We, like the glass and the water, will be gyroscopes.
We will both be gyroscopes in which kinetic energy is stored. will heat be generated?
What if instead of water there is a magnetic field and the above magnetic interaction?
As I wrote here https://overunity.com/18815/has-anyone-here-constructed-an-overunity-system-that-works/msg578443/#msg578443
Or maybe I did not make it very clear, some of the energy due to inelastic interactions will still cause some mechanical losses when communicating kinetic (mechanical) energy and most likely the same way losses occur when charging a capacitor through a resistor.
But when energy is communicated through the magnetic field, the energy between the rotors (or stator and rotor) of the generator will be transmitted without losses and with the release of heat, i.e. the transfer will be at the speed of light and relatively ideal. That is, the rotor through the magnetic field will interact with the same force on the stator (rotor) as the stator on the rotor. i.e. not only will we have a 100% lossless exchange of kinetic energy between the bodies, but the generator circuit will also produce electrical energy.
Hence the question - so why do we, when we turn the knob of the generator, expend mechanical or kinetic energy?
It so happens that we live under the conditions of Earth gravity and we have a support in the form of the Earth. the mass of the Earth. as well as its movement in Space has huge values. So having established. (as Faraday did) the stator on the support - in our paradigm still lives the notion that we are doing work to obtain electrical energy. A= E.
But why did we forget that there is a counterbalanced force acting on the side of the support to keep the stator from turning, which in mechanics is called the REACTION of the support force?
Now the question is, if the monkey grabbed the banana, isn't that because his limited view of the universe is limited to the banana?
-
https://ext-5724308.livejournal.com/3244.html (https://ext-5724308.livejournal.com/3244.html)
-
https://ext-5724308.livejournal.com/3244.html (https://ext-5724308.livejournal.com/3244.html)
Hi Ilya Tsimbaluk,
Interesting stuff following link. Only had part in English translation. Please answer following as I am unsure if it is just in translation.
Do you consider Ampere Force same as Lorentz Force?
I think the subject may be off_topic so don't wish to go into it in depth, but just curious as you mentioned both, together, several times.
From here I would like to return to the fact that the Ampere force or the Lorentz force provides for some instantaneous force, although Lifshitz and Landau say that this force still has a finite speed associated with the speed of light.
Thanks.
bi
-
Greetings. The Ampere force as well as the Lorentz force are essentially the same force. it is just that the Ampere force and the Lorentz silt are differently represented mathematically
I'm on my way home right now after work...
-
Okay, what do I need to recreate your experiment? The other day I proved the equation that gravity rests, in fact, on the equivalent of forces.
Hi. I decided to separate our correspondence into a separate document so that I can then translate and send it to you. For correspondence I like Telegram as messenger better than Facebook because of some conveniences.
But it's not critical.
Every amp has an equal and opposite amp, so the theory is easily provable
People just don't have a clear idea of the relationship between alternating current and voltage.
It's hard for me to say anything here because I'm not sure I understand you. But some points, I think, find some resonance. I would like to digress that it may well make sense to keep this correspondence open, or to be able to edit and put it in the public domain, I cannot yet say.
When we're talking about voltage, most likely. and I'm just expressing my point of view, not relying on any literature right now - we're talking about an electric field or some process in the Physical Vacuum, or the Aether... The term Aether and the Physical Vacuum is a separate topic of discussion. But we can define the electric field by its force interaction with a physical body - paper, dust particles, and so on. this force interaction between two bodies, where the connecting element is an intermediate medium in the form of Physical Vacuum or Aether, this force interaction is called the Coulomb Force.
If we consider the question of alternating field and tension, we have to go back to the time of Poynting and Heaviside. If we are considering the Coulomb force, its vector is directed along the conductor, the magnetic field strength H has a vector around the conductor, the voltage and magnetic field vectors have in space are parallel to each other.
When you talk about CURRENT, I personally perceive CURRENT as a historical misunderstanding. The reason for the perception is that cathode rays, as a flux of light has not yet proved in the Thomson tube or the Crooks tube that cathode rays are some mass emitted by a conductor. This is one of the reasons for the failure of Tom Bearden's theory.
The current itself is a mass that comes from the medium deep into the conductor, a process we call the SKIN-EFFECT. But respectable people of old England would have found it difficult to imagine that the medium is represented by a mass in a certain state, which is difficult to touch. The only - this issue was considered by Heaviside, and then this effect was represented by the Casimir effect mass or energy as the equivalent of mass is distributed in a conductor (absorbed and emitted ) by quanta. Roughly materialistic notions. that were rampant in the Western community tried to tease out anything. that might have something to do with the medium not being empty and maybe further more... so it was easier to view the electron as a mass. which could move in wires, gases as a particle of a conductor or gas. but such views are a return to the old days and I could be accused of being stuck in the old days,
Milliken and Ioffe's experiment was an experiment that was similar to Coulomb's experiment. Where an electric field was involved between the electrode of a capacitor and a dust particle, there was no direct evidence of such experiments, but since science was misdirected, it is necessary to correct this path.
The concept of CHARGE itself is the interaction of two bodies through an intermediate medium.
But any mass, so that it can manifest itself, cannot be without a second mass, which is in some, I call scalar state - this force has no direction. Its state becomes scalar because of some kind of Brownian or chaotic movement of this mass in space. as soon as we try to create movement by a field, say, movement from one point to another, we meet some kind of resistance, because the electric field is a vector quantity. This mass or energy has its own ordered or already established motion. As soon as this ordered force or energy, the mass, moves, it tries to order this chaotically turbulent mass, which resists the former.
The relationship of ordered and disordered mass in the Physical Vacuum is a dynamic process. the first mass entrains the second, while the second prevents the second from moving into a chaotic state. These processes occur in complex physical bodies, as well as in the movement of energy in inductance.
Hence all the problems of the 70's and the wars that followed a colder ambition than the previous world war, started for the same technological reasons
You know, technology is not new. just for clarification. there is a lot to consider.
Adam
I found Steinmetz's equations to be the most enlightening in terms of getting electricity from the square -1. The point is that there is a real possibility that people will injure themselves before they even get to the creation of the device. That is my perception. Do you disagree or do you have any pointers?
I can see many stakes for many nations, heritage and culture, i.e. current equity investments, etc. So the reason God or universal law doesn't allow this to really become something is because of a lack of concern on the part of "interested" and "affected" parties.
This is a very important consideration because it prevents wars, the mysterious death of inventors, etc., etc.
It's hard for me to say right now what the reason is for not introducing Free Energy technologies into this life, there must be some reasons. The reasons include the aggressiveness of humanity and the moral side. Most likely corporations will also use these technologies for military purposes to exterminate their own kind.
Mankind itself is not yet that. the meaning of life is in the development, the abolition of their animal nature, which is trying to take over the consciousness of man. If humanity were to move forward, it would sooner or later purify that inner source, which is the generator of all properties, including infinite power.
[ps this is not an appeal or an imposed traumatic suggestion, just that I think freely of the many minds involved in this technology and its censorship from human minds].
Adam
Adam Bull
if there was a higher alien power that created the earth. i'm sure they would put signals or signs in the time line so things could be fixed when humanity was ready, kind of 😃
Adam
Adam Bull
hypothetically, if one were talking to aliens, they would create themes, or subjects, and then see how they are used in work, study, teaching, without any judgment about it other than the judgment that humans make, and then they would decide if that subject or theme is ready for humanity to play with other themes of consciousness. just hypothetically speaking. very strongly hypothetical.
I have heard that the Eastern European approach is the Sirius approach. We like that. Nevertheless, I suppose you have to get along with children in the West, too. Which is what you need most right now. Maybe I can ask a friend to help.
Adam
Adam Bull
Ilya? We can talk later if you're busy.
I'm convinced. that man does not need to fly off heavily with his thoughts toward Sirius) In fact, man himself is an internal component, including not only the animal part, but also the human part. Hence he has the presence of KARMA. All causes and effects on the outside are on the inside.
-
Greetings. The Ampere force as well as the Lorentz force are essentially the same force. it is just that the Ampere force and the Lorentz silt are differently represented mathematically
...
Thanks. I gather that in the context you used the terms, they were/are considered the same thing.
Regards.
bi
"silt"? Maybe translation again. But I am confused as to what Lorentz silt would refer to mathematically or conceptually.
-
Greetings. If we consider the Ampere force or the Lorentz force, first of all the Ampere force is only a mathematical expression, where Fa = BIl
B is magnetic induction, I is current, l is the length of the conductor
The force effect of magnetic induction on a section of conductor with current is considered here.
But in modern academic science it is considered correct to consider the effect of magnetic induction on the charge.
In essence, the forces are equal. All two cases are considered through the Left Hand Rule
-
Greetings. If we consider the Ampere force or the Lorentz force, first of all the Ampere force is only a mathematical expression, where Fa = BIl
B is magnetic induction, I is current, l is the length of the conductor
The force effect of magnetic induction on a section of conductor with current is considered here.
But in modern academic science it is considered correct to consider the effect of magnetic induction on the charge.
In essence, the forces are equal. All two cases are considered through the Left Hand Rule
Quite the opposite, the Lorentz Force is a mathematically derived relationship from the empirically based Ampère Force.
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/p/ampere-force.html
-
Ilya Tsimbaluk
Greetings. If we consider the Ampere force or the Lorentz force, first of all the Ampere force is only a mathematical expression, where Fa = BIl
B is magnetic induction, I is current, l is the length of the conductor
The force effect of magnetic induction on a section of conductor with current is considered here.
But in modern academic science it is considered correct to consider the effect of magnetic induction on the charge.
In essence, the forces are equal. All two cases are considered through the Left Hand Rule
As Faraday implied, they had no idea what they were dealing with nor could they understand the complexity involved in electrical theory at the time. Faraday knew there were billions of things going on at a level they could not measure in every circuit. So Faraday basically said they should lump everything together and average it out to simplify it. However these generalized equations were never meant to be taken literally.
A general equation means, "general" involving the whole but not any details, "equation" mathematical expression/relationship.
In effect, it means to ignore almost all of the details, other possible variables and any anomalies. It works well enough if we want to build a simple motor or generator based on basic principals but not with advanced electrodynamics or free energy. To generalize means to ignore most of the details however the answers many are looking for are in the details.
Einstein had a saying for this, 'We Can't Solve Problems By Using The Same Kind Of Thinking We Used When We Created Them'.
For example, where does the 1/2 come from in the equation Energy = 1/2 m v^2?.
The "1/2" is a result of the integration process and the consideration of the average force in the work being done. It means the force could change in any number of ways at any time but there just going to ignore that fact and average everything out. Now if were trying to build a free energy device based on any extra forces not considered this averaging becomes problematic.
AC
-
Greetings. It's quite logical what you say. as long as no one asks any questions - I assume that either no one understood anything, or simply no one objects to me. But here's the thing: when we talk about some resting body, does this mean that there are no forces acting on this body?
It may well seem that they do.
For example, consider a spring. If we have a weight that stretches the spring, this means that the force acting through the weight on the spring has become an equilibrium force.
But then the question is, is there an elastic force? If we consider the spring, we see that if the spring itself is released, the process will go in a very different way. Consequently, we have a spring that maintains a relationship with a support that holds the spring itself on one side, and we have a load on which the force of gravity acts.
If we compress the spring, it means. on the one hand. the moment we compress the spring. Now we're talking about Hooke's law. There is a force that compresses the spring, what is the counteracting force?
They say it's the elastic force. But is it an elastic force?
It seems to me that the counteracting force is the support on one side, where between the source of force in the form of the man and the counteracting force in the form of the support there is some intermediate element.
Then the question is - does the intermediate element take part or does it manifest itself as an independent force?
What if this intermediate element is an intermediate medium in the form of a magnetic field?
I assume that if we have an intermediate element between the human and the support is a spring, part of the energy is stored in the spring itself, so it takes up part of the energy between the support and the human.
With the magnetic field as the intermediate medium, ideal, because this intermediate medium in the form of the magnetic field seems to possess, as it may seem at first sight, elasticity, in fact, the magnetic field as a manifestation of the physical vacuum cannot store the mechanical energy and it can only produce some force interrelation between the human and the support in case of conditional compression.
-
Hello Ilya Tsimbaluk,
I'll mention that I don't agree with opinions expressed by these other two members here. As a newcomer, please realize that each member speaks for theirself only.
Regards.
bi
-
Every point of view has a right to life. But the interlocutor is right. I agree that often any process in physics is very simple and to at least begin to explain it - we need to start with primitives and some models in the form of electrons and balls, holes. But an electron is not a ball or a hole) But how to start explaining something?
But if we continue our discussion, above in the picture the little man is squeezing a spring. The question is, does the little man do work?
Many newbies will immediately answer - no, the little man is frozen, so it does not perform work, just like the support. And I began to have a lot of difficulties with academics.
In fact, I once came across an article, a scientific article, which explains the whole problem. Just as an electrical circuit does work when the needle of a galvanometer or ammeter is frozen. Just as a car, after acceleration, does work to overcome the forces of friction to keep the car moving. In fact, after acceleration - the car is moving due to the forces of inertia, and spending fuel and making work to overcome the friction forces, which makes the counteraction of motion.
-
and the generator works by overcoming attraction force of magnetic dipoles while the output origin is in magnetic field not input mechanical force
-
I will try to finish my thought, because I deliberately confuse the reader. so that he will find contradictions while reading and thus, I have the feeling that the reader himself is closely following the topic.
Now let's take a spring and place it between two solenoids. after the dynamic process of wave motion has subsided and the solenoids begin to press each on the spring
-
I also wanted to say that if we ask the first person what resists in the generator from the first observer, he can say. what is sporotivlyasya in the generator rotor. The second can answer that the magnetic field or the Lorentz force, it is Ampere. And so because he sees how someone closes the electrical circuit on the load. The third option is support. and the fourth is that between the intermediate medium in the form of a magnetic field in vacuum there is resistance to themselves)))
Here we can observe such a picture that it is subjective perception that affects the conclusions that the observer himself came to.
Therefore, it depends on who and how considers the situation, what decisions a person will make in order to improve the design itself.
-
That's exactly why I made the setting to show that we can have a Joule setting. could be a better setup. The stankan, in which there was water, now does not rest on a support, but is a flywheel. Instead of water, there is a magnetic field, which from the point of view of elasticity is an ideal medium, since there are no losses due to such inelastic collisions or deformation during collisions through a magnetic field. The conclusions that can be reached will turn out to be quite different from those to which Joule or Helmholtz gravitated.
But, unlike the strange classics with its conclusions. where they say. that in the generator we use energy to create electricity - this is very outdated from my point of view. as an individual concept.
she had the right to life. But the man himself. whichever. how this process is viewed. may view it differently. In fact, the stator resists the rotor, which is fixed to the support, and this support is the resultant force that does not allow the stator to accelerate. how to get moving. therefore, the generation of electrical energy can be considered as in the case of a clamped spring with additional energy. which took place in Newtonian mechanics, where the magnetic field was an intermediary between bodies resisting each other.
-
sporotivlyasya => "Russian word which cannot be translated into English", per Google.
Anybody have a guess?
bi
-
But, unlike the weird classic with its conclusions. where they say that in the generator we waste energy to create electricity - this is a very outdated concept from my point of view. as an individual.
It had a right to life. But the individual himself, depending on how he views the process, may view it differently. In fact, the rotor is resisted by the stator, which is attached to the support, and this support is the resultant force, which does not allow the stator to accelerate or to move at all. Therefore, the generation of electric energy can be seen as in the case of the spring clamped additional energy, which took place in Newtonian mechanics, where the magnetic field was an intermediary between the resisting bodies.
-
Hi, I just installed this translator, I hope it is really considered the best in the world, as it is claimed in the ads
-
Hello again, Deepl seems to translate more adequately than Google. What I wanted to say. that my experiment, which I conducted within the walls of the engineering company showed that through the magnetic field the impulse or kinetic energy is transferred to the second body. and the formed magnetic field is converted into the potential electric energy of a charged capacitor equal, though roughly, because I am obliged to bet on the error of installation, was equal to the work performed by the first body.
-
Greetings friends, today I spent the whole day walking around...The second part is Proteus. Now I'm busy preparing the high-frequency equipment. I would like to ask a question - there is such a chip...
SPF5043Z
The datasheet says that at 400-500 MHz it can amplify by 22 dB. If I understand correctly we need to consider the power, i.e. the chip amplifies the signal by about 100 times. The maximum input power is 25 dbm, which is the equivalent of 0.3 W. Am I correct in converting the decibels to watts and decibels to times?
-
I decided to make a scan of the old videos and the setup I worked with...In the future, when I have time, I would like to talk about synchronous machines and flywheels...
-
Now I'm busy preparing the high-frequency equipment. I would like to ask a question - there is such a chip... SPF5043Z
The datasheet says that at 400-500 MHz it can amplify by 22 dB. If I understand correctly we need to consider the power, i.e. the chip amplifies the signal by about 100 times. The maximum input power is 25 dbm, which is the equivalent of 0.3 W. Am I correct in converting the decibels to watts and decibels to times?
Hi, data sheet includes the graph (Page 7) I attached below in which I indicated input power value of 1 mW which gets amplified to 22 dBm at 450 MHz (i.e. below the 1 dB compression point) and I indicated the corresponding voltage and power levels at 50 Ohm input and output impedances.
This link may be useful for you: https://www.everythingrf.com/rf-calculators/dbm-to-watts (https://www.everythingrf.com/rf-calculators/dbm-to-watts)
Regarding your approach for 22 dB amplification, it means 158.5 times power amplification, your 100 times estimation belongs to 20 dB power amplification.
see this link: https://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/Decibels-Calculator.phtml (https://www.daycounter.com/Calculators/Decibels-Calculator.phtml)
The maximum input power for the chip is 25 dBm indeed (316 mW @50 Ohm) but it is the ABSOLUTE allowable maximum input power the chip can bear without being damaged.
Gyula
-
Greetings, thank you so much for shedding the light. But here I have the following question - I intend to use the RA07M4047M chip
The datasheet says that the maximum input power is 70 mW. This one can output 150 mW. The amplifier itself has gain control by feeding a DC voltage to certain pins designated as Vgg. Hence the question - is the power of 70 mW the maximum power the chip can handle or is it the maximum power for the maximum gain for the Output? In other words - is it necessary to limit the input power by input? If yes, is it enough to install a resistive divider on the input of the amplifier?
-
A perpetuum work cycle :
from sub-Watt to Mega-Watt
https://techconnectworld.com/World2017/a.php?i=1125 (https://techconnectworld.com/World2017/a.php?i=1125)
https://geospatial.blogs.com/geospatial/2018/11/innovative-electric-power-sources-for-a-sustainable-future-.html (https://geospatial.blogs.com/geospatial/2018/11/innovative-electric-power-sources-for-a-sustainable-future-.html)
40 US$/KW production costs prediction
When this device will become comercial sold to endconsumer for 500 US$/KW
the average KWh electricity price would be,without capital tax calculation,only R.O.I.=
500 US$ / 8766 hours(= 1 year) / 11 (= estimated work life in years ) = 0,52 US¢ per KWh electricity !
Nearly 2 KWh electricity for 1 cent ! Nice price preview !
But it is an industrial-military-political strategy device :
R&D co-financed by US federal estates !
As cheap as shale gas fob exploration,with capital tax as cheap as Saudi-Arabia world lowest cost solar electricity ! Near ex-U.S.S.R. amortized nuclear power plants power selling costs ( crypto coin mining areas !)
Instead 500 US$ for 400-300-....US$/KW endconsumer price !? After patent rights period !
The energy/power source for autonomous - low/no CO2- society living !Beyond Lithium !
5 years after ,2018-2023 : not in media,Birmingham Technologies and their Nano-Boxx !
Would change battery market,solar cell market,wind-/water power/biomass-to-poeer exploration !
The CO2-emission-certificate-market making obsolete,unimportant !
The estates would need for searching of other tax and system tax x credit-leveraging factor 8-10 finance instruments !
Why searching for lower costs surplus power gain cycle systems ,when 40 US$/KW is the technical-financial benchmark to top = ≤ 40 US$/KW mass production costs R&D !?
40 US$/KW Nano-cell comparison :
~ 4¢/Wp solar cell production costs ,but only in orbit perpetuum,24/365= no Earth shadow , solar radiation !
It is also humanoid BOTs the ideal power source ,low weight and long work ,Tesla Optimus + Nano-Boxx !
10-50 infantery soldiers substituing : 20 000 US$ (Tesla Inc. price estimation,new/patent rights period)/ 8766 hours full-time war /10(up /50) substitution divisor :
the human soldier per hour battle value : 0,23 US$(divisor 10 ) ,down to 0,05 US$(divisor 50) per hour !
20 000 per Bot easily to bring down by mass REPRAP production to 4 000 US$ ! 74 Kg unit !
The 1 cent/hour battle value soldier ! Eugenics,aristocratic war-games,from tic-tac-toe middle point view !
Happy weekend wishing
OCWL
p.s.: also interestant R&D invention ,2 articles ,from 2011 :
https://cleantechnica.com/2011/09/20/okayama-solar-absorbers-use-%E2%80%9Cgreen-ferrite%E2%80%9D-to-generate-super-cheap-electricity-from-heat/
https://www.greenoptimistic.com/green-ferrite-solar-cell-japan-20110920/
-
- is the power of 70 mW the maximum power the chip can handle
Yes.
- is it the maximum power for the maximum gain for the Output?
No. In the Features section 50 mW is recommended to get >7 W output when the VGG=3.5 V and VDD=7.2 V.
However, in the Typical Performance graphs (Page 4) by increasing VDD to max 9 V (and VGG remains at 3.5 V), the output power can go up as high as 11 to 13 W (depends also on the frequency between 400 - 470 MHz) but you need to use good heat sink of course because drain current go up towards 3 Amper. https://www.mitsubishielectric-mesh.com/products/pdf/ra07m4047m.pdf (https://www.mitsubishielectric-mesh.com/products/pdf/ra07m4047m.pdf)
- In other words - is it necessary to limit the input power by input? If yes, is it enough to install a resistive divider on the input of the amplifier?
Yes. Use a resistive divider (Pi or T) between the output of SPF5043Z and the input of the RA07 if you need a linear amplifier chain. Do not overdrive the input of the latter.
Gyula
-
Greetings, thank you very much for your reply. I think I probably still have a couple of small questions left in my head. But it would be interesting to get to know each other, as I really enjoy interacting with literate people.
Today I am very tired and as I think I have a difficult task, on the one hand to try to pass some points on my matte and also to talk about those researches, which showed me the reason. why the asynchronous machine is not over-engineered today, and also to tell about my experiments with my friend, which did not have that quantitative backlash anymore, but gave some thoughts about some direction, which could be developed.
I have a busy day at work right now, and I plan to spend some time describing my experiments in a couple of days, though.
One of the extensions was to work with flywheels as a continuation of the experiment described above. It is big, heavy and it begs to be put on the rails at the start and go forward to the victory of the great revolution.
I would also like to talk about the fact that the generator itself is a kind of closed mechanical circuit, which resists itself. But there is one problem - the generator must provide mechanical resistance so that we can rotate the rotor and have a relative motion of the rotor relative to the stator.
To break the mechanical chain, the idea was to break the mechanical chain by attaching the generator itself to the flywheel, as a certain store of kinetic energy.
At the moment of resistance, where the resistance is exerted by the moment of inertia or inertia. Accordingly, since between the rotor and the stator there is a relative condition - we have conditions that allow us to induce an EMF in the stator and at the same time a closed circuit and the output of energy through the commutation system,
But all this process will take place only until the stator and the flywheel accelerate and have maximum relative motion one relative to the other. In this case, the force that resists us is not the force with which we are fighting...but the force that acts on the body in the form of the flywheel.
To put it simply, we are not expending work to try to overcome the reaction forces of the support, we are expending work to give kinetic energy to the flywheel.
-
Greetings friends.
I would like to dive back in time to the time when I assumed that if we put a load into an induction machine, that is, into its rotor - we could draw some energy from it and could thus obtain energy equal to the energy of the mechanical work that we could get on the shaft.
The main idea was that if we have a rotor and the standard literature described asynchronous machines and transformers, therefore in the transformer in the secondary winding we could draw energy.
The main reason I decided to build a pendulum in 2020 was to test the concept or the idea itself. At the time I was trying to replace the rotating magnetic field. which is formed in a synchronous machine mechanically. due to the fact that the experiment itself was a school level physics, in particular the magnets were made to rotate by the force of gravity. It is a natural force. for this there was no need to use any complex mechanisms or current sources. The potential energy of gravity is the simple formula E=mgh. When a body falls, we could calculate the end point through E = mgh, where h is height, m is the mass of the body, and g is the gravitational constant.
The difference in height is the work in joules.
As the magnet, rotating relative to a resting coil, being closed through a commutation system, a current appeared in the winding.Hence there appeared the Ampere force or the Lorentz force. which is essentially the same.The Ampere force deals with the force interaction of the magnetic field on the frame with the current, the Lorentz force deals with the force interaction of the magnetic field on the moving charge.
Because the gravity on the drum, which was a flywheel with an offset center of gravity, was made so that the drum itself as a flywheel would work just like a pendulum and could stop at a certain point, which was considered to be the reference point.
This control point helped us to measure the amount of energy communicated to this drum.
The amount of energy was measured through the communication of some body or pendulum of momentum (kinetic energy). Probably this method could be called the ballistic method.
-
Yesterday I had health problems all evening. so I had to put off writing my posts until today. I can do it, because of the huge load in small portions. As I will have time to sit down at the computer.
was very happy to be given an answer to my questions. it would be very interesting to find like-minded people regarding my ideas and not only. it would be very interesting if Eric Dollard and Aaron could repeat this experiment as a pendulum, to confirm additionally the results that I was able to get with myself.
Let's now look at the electrical circuit.
I have always had a big question - what will be the inductance of the coil, if it will be induced by an EMF. this question did not give rest.because once all attempts to turn the motor Bedini. Adams into a complete electric motor, it all ended in failure for me.
So I once had to look for answers to my questions for a very long time.
Strange as it may seem. but in every textbook or literature they are indirectly given. since they are indirect, I have questions related to the operation of the direct current motor, this answer was found exactly in the literature on asynchronous machines.
In order. to consider the issues. which occur in the secondary circuit of a transformer or induction machine, and in the literature exactly the same processes are considered as in the secondary winding of the transformer. just this view has provided future answers to some questions.
First of all we would like to break down what the winding of any generator or the secondary winding of a transformer is. The transformer winding itself is a part of the winding, which in the literature is represented as a source of EMF.
The part of the winding which remains unperturbed by the alternating field or on that part of the winding where no EMF is induced is the winding. which appears as an inductance. capable of storing energy. the part of the winding which is inductance - has a reactance Xl, which sometimes appears as x. Since this resistance is frequency dependent, the total resistance or impedance Z is the sum of the active and reactive resistance Z=x+r.
-
Greetings to modern children "Lieutenant Schmitt".
In the summer of 2012, the Russian Superconductor Corporation, under the leadership of Guliy, tested an energy storage device with a flywheel.
The test result showed an efficiency of 0.97%.
https://n-t.ru/tp/ts/ci.htm
What does it mean? If we assume that the loss factor during the conversion of electrical energy into mechanical energy is 0.2 and back from mechanical to electrical energy 0.2, then at the output we should get from the input of electrical energy for acceleration (1 for acceleration) - 0.6 for consumers with storage output. The company recorded 0.97. For the production of 0.97 electrical energy, 1.17 mechanical energy is needed, taking into account generation losses. The question remains where this extra energy in the flywheel came from.
-
The inventor of Gulia has applied the kinetic energy accumulator in motor vehicles. A well-made flywheel can show excellent results as an energy accumulator. But I wrote here not just about the flywheel, but about the method of transferring mechanical energy through electromagnetism or Lorentz force, which results from the fact that the winding in which the charge flows arises due to an induced EMF on the winding itself, which turns into a current and is then transferred through time. through a switching system to a capacitor or other storage device.
Since I am a practitioner. I would like to describe all the nuances that have arisen along the way. And talk not about theory. namely about practice. because a lot of experiments have been done to understand the physics of questions that. as it turned out have already been dealt with in the classical literature, but because of some curvature of representation.
Judging by the questions you are asking here, it shows that you have not read the material itself carefully. It is natural. fundamentally new information passes into a person's head through the prism of consciousness and requires repeated repetition.
Now to jump to the question of how is probably already doing to get an engineering solution right away.
But before jumping to an engineering solution, it is necessary to go through the Proof of Concept stage, which involves figuring out and proving the physics of the processes by which certain mechanisms will be built.
The process of invention and creativity with elmet of emotions requires dry and lifeless, monotonous work on structuring the work by which the project itself will move. without understanding the physics of processes - it is unreal. Otherwise - the device will be threatened with inoperability).
Dear Rakarsky, I was on your site. you have a lot of information. including formulas and theories. But hypotheses are the early stage of the project, but already the transition to the engineering. plane cannot be without the stage of physics of processes and proof of exactly the physical concept. Therefore I see a sense, in presenting here my experiments - to consider experiments concerning physics of processes for understanding. and then already to build engineering hypotheses and implement them in life.
I have in some simple words already explained conceptually what can be done. What I explained also applies to the principle of the asynchronous machine, but I personally had to spend time to understand. why with the similarity of the principle the pendulum worked, and the asynchronous machine is not a superunique device.
-
;) can you tell me about the flywheel?
I have a question, is the flywheel a battery or a kinetic energy capacitor? I mean the principle of action.
How to calculate the flywheel (flywheel wheel) in the kinetic chain.
In which zone the flywheel no longer brakes and the engine goes to idle.
-
Greetings. The flywheel calculation has a standard calculation. Unfortunately, I have already moved away from mechanics, I am sharing my old experience.
In Russian I found these calculations. I do not know about the English ones. If they are not available, perhaps it makes sense to translate them into English, maybe someone will be useful.
http://sersalaev.narod.ru/index.files/flyweel4.htm (http://sersalaev.narod.ru/index.files/flyweel4.htm)
Some of the flywheel calculations I gave in my article, which I posted earlier.
the engine goes to idle when the flywheel is unwound or its relative speed is equal to the speed of the electric motor shaft. the rest is all about friction, scientifically it should sound like - all remaining power will be spent to avoid friction.
-
Greetings, I managed to have a great walk today and have a lot of great news. energized. everything is just super in terms of mood.
I would like to answer so - that on the one hand aspiration to run ahead - it is quite natural business. Therefore, to go to a meeting. I would like to run through some things, in which I have not so deeply dug and experimented. Because I was doing other experiments along the way.
The basic idea in which the unit called Armored Train was involved consisted of an electric motor, a generator, which acted as a coupling in some way, perhaps it made sense to call it an electric coupling. The clutch or generator itself was attached to the flywheel as a store of kinetic energy. The electric motor spun the flywheel through the clutch. In fact, the clutch or generator was a kind of transmission between the electric motor and the flywheel. With the alternator or an active load in the alternator circuit it was possible to regulate the current in the alternator and with it the Ampere force (Lorentz force).
As soon as the flywheel was accelerated, the inertia created a counteracting force to the electric motor. The force was transmitted through the clutch, or rather through the magnetic field. after the flywheel accelerated and the motor speed became approximately equal, I use the word approximately in connection with friction losses, the difference between the speed of the rotors (or rotor and stator) of the clutch or the generator became almost equal, respectively the EMF tended to zero. Instead of resting on the support and having the counteracting force of the support reaction, the generator rested on some kind of reactive mechanical element, which instead of creating a balanced counteracting force, this force was spent on acceleration of the flywheel or acceleration of the mass.
As I understand it, since some readers turn out not to be very patient, while Taioda in his Tao willed to crawl like a turtle building knowledge and experience for a solid foundation, I understand that there are other tendencies. So to satisfy them a little bit, I'm posting some pictures to satisfy myself before going to bed.
-
Part 2
As soon as the flywheel accelerated, the engine shut down, now the stored kinetic energy of the flywheel communicated to the generator.
But while the flywheel was accelerating, due to the opposing force, the generator had a maximum EMF at the beginning and a minimum EMF at the end, since the formula for EMF is equal to the product of speed by magnetic flux, we could produce power in the conductor, which we could communicate to the payload.
Since I made a great walk and recorded a video, plus I was pleased with the news that guys from Russia will help me with measuring equipment, I decided to put something out there - what beautiful places there are...
-
To go back to what I was trying to explain about the electric circuit.
When I experimented with a DC motor, which I turned into an induction machine. I simply changed the angle of the brush assembly and made it so, and now made it so. that the stator windings were connected to the latr, the rotor winding was shorted through the load. During the short circuit, the induced EMF and current created an ampere force and the rotor would come into rotation.
The obtained oscillograms led me to the idea that the winding of the rotor on which the EMF is induced is an inductance, although in the same oscillogram viewed and active load due to the fact that part of the impedance is not shifted by 90 degrees.
But here is a strange question, when I began to communicate that at change of active load in a circuit of a rotor where the brush knot, to me academicians began to tell that the voltage drop on resistance is connected that rotation of a rotor as though takes away energy since the electric machine represents the converter of electric energy into mechanical.
However, they were not always affected by the argument that a transformer could work in exactly the same way. A similar pattern could be observed with this motor as well as a transformer.
Made sketches in LTSpice.
Exactly then, one could observe a picture. in which a voltage divider occurs on the active resistance, depending on its rating.
Trying to deal with an Adams or Bedini motor, I tried to understand the main problem of these motors, why in the motor with the maximum coefficient of the relationship of the winding ability to give energy during the opening of the circuit. The Adams and Bedini machines are inverse running converters. The situation is very simple.
As with both a transformer and a motor, the secondary winding can be thought of as a source of EMF and a dissipation inductance with an active resistance.
-
And here it is, the electric motor. This is the motor from the washing machine, the one I already described. Of course it works absolutely sub-optimally, but for some performances, it used to be quite useful.
-
I would like to say that the thoughts that followed were of some use. I was concerned about the rotor in an induction machine. After all, it was supposed to have an EMF in it.
But here's the question, if it's inductance - so you could draw energy like in an inversion converter.
But that's how it turned out. a friend of mine. in another talk, was doing a fun experiment. He made an alternator with coils. which had minimal active resistance and more reactive resistance.
Since the windings have inductive properties, the induced EMF and current have a time difference of almost 90 degrees. His hypothesis was based on the idea that if somehow it was possible to remove energy, due to the fact that the phase of the current and its top is strictly opposite the magnet, this current will have a compensating effect and the resultant force between the stator and the rotor will approach zero.
But it turned out that no matter how you try to remove this energy - in no way could you make the current be completely in the center, that is, when the maximum current is opposite to the dead point. the dead point is when the magnet is found exactly above the winding.
But it turned out that if you short-circuit the barbed winding itself at a certain point in time, on the contrary - the force of mechanical coupling will be maximum.
Hence the electrical circuitry. which has been carried over into the circuit working with the pendulum.
Considered a more simplified scheme, allows us to consider the situation. when selecting a capacitor, the current in the winding itself, which is associated with its formation at the appearance of its EMF, induced by the magnets, and the current, which decreases due to the transformation of energy into energy of the charged capacitor
The lower oscillogram shows the induced EMF voltage as well as the capacitor voltage.
-
While the sparks of Gray's tubes are sparkling around, hydrogen is melting in a mysterious way in the neighboring topics, I found a video in my archives, which I decided to put up here after all. I hope that despite the fact that part of the video in Russian, I put it here, because I would like to satisfy my creative itch to switch tomorrow to Proteus and in the future to Ansys Maxwell Ansys HFSS programs for modeling transformers and wave processes, I put up the video.
I would like to say a huge thank you to the man for giving valuable guidance on the oscillator and amplifier. I don't even know how he got here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9h0a6or27Q
-
Just recently resumed communication with a mathematician and philosopher, a man from London about my installation. it was a very entertaining conversation, given that the man was versatile and judging by the fragments of his mathematical equations, you could tell that I was delighted.
His page is here
https://www.facebook.com/adam.bull.376
His idea is to create a commune, it was hard for me to understand what he had in a conversation with Ilon Musk, but I plan to talk about the mathematical model of the pendulum. as it would be interesting to create a mathematical apparatus. the fact that Ansys Mwxwell cannot yet solve dynamic models, and SolidWorks. which can do simulation of physical processes - will not make simulation of electromagnetic processes. Perhaps someday Ansys Maxwell will make the appropriate solvers. the thing is. all this will require complex integration.
Perhaps this task can be done in MATLAB
-
Greetings,
Although I was initially reluctant at first I have been convinced to some on here and try to justify making electricity from the square root of -1, despite the kind of trouble it's caused eccentric characters like myself, and eric dollard, and many members of our extended family in the past. Here goes, as I attempt a sierious white rex impression whilst trying to keep a straight face with the vulgarity and laughability of the so-called enlightened controllers of radio, as we witness world events in the heart of europe, by physicists like gods of time, and pharoahs and emperor past budhists justifying doing nothing, when answers are available on both sides of East and West circuit for a real soulenoid effort.
Some excerpt from my 2012 works pertanent to the continuation of this topic
The academics do not enjoy thoughts of their own or they would not constantly feel the need to use those assumptions from other peoples work for the base of their own. I do not think that it was always this way; it is how the academics are educated now. I could have been one but it scared me making the wrong assumptions because I wanted to do the best work. The work that engineers do today is not the best work and the modern scientific method is to blame. If this was not the case they would not base all of their work on the delusive theory of a primary electron, so then they would not be able to quote all of the other work, as the other work uses one electron, and because all the sciences base are wrong there is no good science work to quote to support the argument of the existence of 2.
Building any device with an incomplete or incorrect understanding of the fabric of operation (ether), in this case academics understanding of magnetic current and mass, results in designs which are based on the electron instead of the fabric of space. But what are the designs really doing if the electron does not exist? And what if the electrons are not only doing the work but the space is too. What we have, and how good our science is today and tomorrow is really about how we think that it is working now and then, and when good effects are discovered by enough people that it is not working by the same principle, only then it is possible for a better design that uses what is really there, rather than what was not – what was perceptually wrong, misconceived and incorrect. Each advanced step we take is based on smaller steps. It only takes a few major steps to be incorrect or mishandled by men for education to take the same step backwards. The efficiency of design then is dependent on the completeness of understanding.
I am not sorry for the academics, I am sorry for the common man that does not have the availability and self-taught mind to commit new understandings and teach itself. Whilst the common man is fighting his brutish nature with the possibility of polishing it, the academic is fighting the wrong kind of polishing they have already received. So, to the common man that knows nothing has a hard skin preventing his absorption as much as the academic. Except that the hard skin preventing the common man is his brutishness and the hard skin preventing the academic from understanding was somebody else’s idea polished into them. This is proof to me that the presence of a wrong idea is as damaging as the absence of one. When I started this work I had to start removing all my polish and stop being a brute. It is not easy, the greater knowledge and education, the greater the advantage, and so greater temptation. Where there knowledge then there is power and where there is power is temptation.
Now I've got the awkward mystical mumbo jumbo out the way, as nobody likes a pixie or elf in the woods, lord knows why, because most of the best stuff I've created, like alexanderson antenna equivalents and electrical and consciousness storage in the dimension of time came about by a pretty effortless process. Maybe this is not the time for Beatles or Leary moments, but I'm quit serious, some of the best science happens under these circumstances unless one becomes the helpless and somewhat hapless victim such as wilhelm reich. The little man? What of the giant that lives within?
Since there are some fairly high level sponsors for the commune effort and a practical effort of making electricity from the square root of -1 that doesn't involve a takeover of israel, parts of giza plateau in egypt, other ancient monuments or the requirement of any yellow, red, white or yellow or any particular jackets or hats on that matter. I intend to make final life effort to bring about immortality of these following 'commenters' and 'suggestions' on this topic ignored/suppresed by the gods of power and chance previously, mainly due thru wrongly challenging the accelerating scientific efforts of big pharma and energy. For sure you would be surprised who or what 'really' controls gas and electricity flow on this beautiful planet we call earth. Though I heard lately that many have been finding out in particularly unceremonious ways what ill will of men of science, or religion either are, some call this force karma, but really we are talking about dimensions of space and time. For example the computer resolved sexual identity in 4 seconds, literally its a time phenomenon, literally if you follow genes back you can see most of the solutions proposed, but most people don't want to follow anything.
Good on them. I quite agree - look where it's got us. And normally society devolves (or dissolves??) into the argument of hitler vs the world or some bullshit stalanist I wish I was like the japanese but I chose a master instead kind of rhetoric. Whilst my ideas might sound political, or philosophical, really I'd like to emphasis, really, really, they are not. Where is a heaviside for a witness when you need him. Probably ordering more chunks or bolders or other rocks because of what the surrounding consciousness did to him that time round. I could bring up albert einstein but the illuminati might have to kill me. Jokes aside, I'm pretty serious about alberts theories when he is making them freely and without outside or undue pressure. I once heard an unlikely story that a man did not write those mathematical equations and observations anyway and it was in fact albert einsteins sweet heart that wrote most of them. I heard a friend in Miami Florida took tesla's and einstein's equations lined them up and knew what to do with them. The problem most of the time is, not the power of one, but the one of power.
Anyway - jokes, almost philosophical mathematical truisms whatever you call it aside, some important background information on induction factors of 100% and power factors of 0% in reflective mechanical loads or electrical mechanical analogues. Adam, the one who isn't (or wasn't before) quite one pretty much specialised in Mallory type oscillators, and although never succesfully operated a buzz coil still managed to get the ole girl talking, and made a whole fleet of them, he was going to apply for a patent as well for a lot of the 'warp coil' like designs but frankly they were already pre-assigned to the time from which they came. Recently I befriended a grandmaster called Rinzai who told some interesting stories about tibet and the power of consciousness. I remember something being described like "nothing that can be seen outside that doesn't pre-exist inside", but it was genuinely too much for most, and probably would, if fully conceived practically arrest the borg-orca-whale-eaters of the mid-nothern-east meridian of influence.
Anyways, after spending a lot of time looking at four quadrant theory in various forms, it was a delightful and happy time, almost mystical you might say to introduce the concept to a more global audience that were spiritual receptive to the kind of changes the equations would dictate, particularly in uniting at least 300 or so different religions and regions of about 1000 different sub or dom type variations, long mathematical story there - another long mathematical story.
“The power wave P in watts has an unequal amount of area underneath the curve. In the first diagram the energy being produced under the power wave is greater than the positive area under the power wave. If the sine waves in the graph did not have the parameter variation denoted by wave x, the induction factor is 100% and the power factor is 0%, meaning the circuit would be a purely reactive circuit, with a very high if not infinite magnification factor. The graph clearly shows that under certain conditions of synchronous parameter variation that a negative power factor can manifest in a circuit, meaning that energy is being externally supplied from the varying parameter. Where does the energy come from? That is the million dollar question.”
– David ,Energetic Forum.
Some comments from the authors previous work
Eric Dollard having been recognised by organisations such as SBARC and Borderland Sciences, The San Francisco Tesla Society, and being unlike most other Tesla enthusiasts, he has been able to successfully recreate the “magneto dielectric” Tesla Transmission System and explain the zero resistance properties of ground transmission. Dollard’s efforts contributed to many excellent books covering many of the topics in this book and are highly recommend by the author. Books such as Primary & Secondary Coils & Wireless Transmission of Power are absolutely critical to any scientist or layman seeking to ratify his understanding on whether Tesla created a system that really could transmit 1000’s of horsepower, across the universe “regardless of distance” and “without loss”. This cannot be achieved by the Hertzian electromagnetic standard, the electricity we are left with today. A claim Eric Dollard stands by today, as does the author of this book. Incontrovertible evidence is provided for the first time showing the great work of Eric Dollard and Nikola and their Tesla emphatic statements that faster than light waves existed and were measured. In order to make the leap from the Hertzian system used today, compared to that of the Non Hertzian Tesla System, one must understand the waves that Tesla was working with to “transmit regardless of distance” and “regardless of Hertzian resistance”. These waves surely are Impulse and Oscillating Current and most definitely not the Alternating and Direct current we are using today. The scientist will need to familiarize themselves with the dimensionality of these waves and what they can do in analogue transmission lines, and the layman will have to try and understand the difference between a constantly connected wire and one that is in motion like a moon.
Some background information about impossible things being discussed in some mechanical detail by Ilya
"This really led to a lot of confusion in the early attempts of G.E laboratories to ascertain why these complex waveforms they were experiencing in their substation transformers were causing them to explode for unexplainable reasons, the standing waves would build up and appear at the centre of the windings and puncture the insulation but yet from terminal to terminal there was no voltage difference. The process was basically started off by Steinmetz and there were two other allied scientists bloom and [sounds like Boyagen[?]. Bloom was the first one to discover that the dimensionality of magnetic inductance should be rather than 1/L^2 should be one over L^3 or per centimeters cubed. And then Bewley who developed all of the differential equations for describing this stuff kind of forgot about mutual inductance and its proper dimensions, and whilst he describes all of these things very admirably in his book traveling waves on transmission systems, probably one of the best books on electric waves ever written, he still failed to understand the true nature of the longitudinal wave and the dimensionality of mutual inductance. Now of course at the double energy flows when these things combine we have the longitudinal wave, the wave of Tesla, and we have the transverse electromagnetic wave, the wave of Hertz. The hertz wave is the wave we use today for transmission. The Tesla wave has become completely forgotten, unless it incidentally appears because you have too big of a loading coil"
As a man of transformers and a recently transformed man, 'reborn' you might say, for want of a better scientific engineering phrase, nearly every conceivable possibility of parametric circuits is available to me to the nth degree, I find navigating these ideas quite simple, and it is beginning to get quite frightening for me as many engineering concepts I once thought way above me are being quite literally put to the birds by the very ideas being produced.
Some important detail about longitudinal and tranverse waves from SBARC
“In the longitudinal the wave is propagating much faster than it is in the transverse. It worked out to be approximately to be that the ratio of the longitudinal transmission to the transverse transmission was exactly as Tesla stated "pi/2". In the longitudinal we are used to dealing with the transverse which we call 1 over c squared. C being a basic ratio between the magnetic units and the electrostatic units of the electrical constants and it gives us basically a propagation through space as a length over a certain period of time (linearly). In the longitudinal we are not propagating through space, we are propagating through counter-space. Counter-space is a situation where instead of expressing the length in meters, we have to express it in per meters, a completely inverse form of propagation. As an example if we take an electromagnetic inductance coil, we find the inductance is proportional to the length of the wire approximately, and the area enclosed by it. It's the quantity of meters that expresses the inductance. If we take a capacitor we find the closer we bring the plates together and the more we fill in the area we are dealing with a situation that is in per meters. The electrostatic is a natural propagator of longitudinal waves always goes towards closeness. The magnetism always acts as a distance. Here is the basic difference between longitudinal and transverse.” – Eric Dollard, SBARC
Those familiar with the art, and the 'real' researches of Tesla, such as the many efforts undertaken by Eric Dollard will know a lot about the concept of harmonic reflection, yet it still fascinates myself as a so-called 'layman', though I might dare to use the increasingly hypothetical word 'enlightened layman', how difficult is it really to understand what concurrent or simultaneous reflections in the live ground really might represent in any body formed in a completely closed vacuum. Naturally speaking it is like sitting upon a cart, waiting for it to go, whipping the horse, and knowing not whether to thank the horse, the cart or the whip and forgetting the very ground beneath them.
Surely if people understood the laws of leverage, balance and weight they would not only have a key to the universe, they would understand the secrets of the pyramid builders.
Eric's been telling folks for years about this stuff
In the transverse wave we are attempting to overcome distance by forcing our way through it. In the longitudinal wave the two points are already there, why fight it, they are already one. This was Tesla's fundamental discovery; this was the way that he was able to light up a light bulb at his receiver. No RF Amplifiers. They didn't have any back then. NO transistors, no tubes, no radio shack, no New York catalogue, no Henry, no ohm, there was nothing. All there was were brass and wood and that was it. There was nothing else. And this guy Tesla was capable of transmitting electrical power over incredible distances with just simple practical materials. There was no silicon there was nothing to work with, they just started to develop vacuum tubes. Tesla's vacuum tubes were all just one terminal devices, and they would produce incredible quantities of light, in the same fashion as the sun, completely unlike the incandescent lights bulbs of today, and all of Tesla’s devices NEVER USED ENERGY, just like in a tank circuit, it was always returned in the opposite cycle. So that concludes my talk. Hopefully it wasn't too far out or confusing for you. But I also gave you something to be experimenting with so those of you, who love 160metres, go to work! – Eric Dollard, SBARC
It's not even an electromagnetic system, a lot of regular scientific jobbers' are so off the fucking cliff of sanity that everyone with a shred of spiritual dignity is a muppet to them, and the social notoriety has got its wish, just look around.
“Nikola Tesla was involved in a court case when he was fighting for the survival of his Wardenclyffe tower, and recently the depositions of that court case were recently published by someone by the name of Leland Anderson who is someone who is apparently a competent electrical engineer, and when you read through this you see Tesla saying over and over and over again that his Radio was "non electromagnetic". Repeatedly. But it all fell on deaf ears. Once physicists grabbed a hold of electricity, all knowledge of it ceased. Electrons have nothing to with the flow of electricity. Electrons are the rate at which electricity is destroyed. Electrons are the resistance. The waveform of electron flow is the same waveform produced when you slam on the breaks and you hear that horrible screeching sound, it’s not a nice harmonic sine wave, it's a very bitter horrible sound with energy dissipation and material flying everywhere. Electricity flows in the space between the wires. This has always been known by electrical engineers. For example if you short out a major electrical circuit you will see the cables violently repel each other as the electromagnetic force attempts to escape from the boundaries their contained between the so-called bounding conductors, but most people are not electrical engineers and don't have to deal with the situation.” - Eric Dollard, SBARC
A year or two ago, I forget now because time lag really sucks when your stuck inside a long tail effect window or electrical field with an certain certain and uncertain uncertain potential, or you accidentally 'solved heisenberg uncertainty' by creating a compensation chain mechanism variable equation, and people genuinely want to stop time, destroy all of your work deleting it from the internet and so on to 'start time again'. Probably sounding like full tin foil hat at the moment, but in a sort of truman westworldesque ghostbustery spirit I have to ask folks to consider 'sirius comedy' for a moment, and what the masonic meaning of revelation and all that mad hattery is, or things like passover. Either these guys really are fucking nuts, or they are experiencing something that frightens the shit out of the people that are 'normal' and enjoying the benefits of their arch-like lives.
Anyway continuing on, as it is hard to play any role such as this in a serious form. because as eric and I have said before, they are already fully aware. One is much better at focusing their attention at why all that stuff gets bulldozed, deleted, and so on, because it's probably actually really dangerous, and there are probably reasons why it needs to be done with some care. I don't want to start pulling names out of the hat but Chris Carson is just one person who comes to mind, sic the rotary electrostatic convertor/transformer. I regret the probably unhumerous anecdote because this research has been dangerous in the past because of how other people use it. Fundamentally that needs to change for the building of any hypothetical commune or cult or movement.
"Chris Carson built an electrostatic machine that spun at 10,000 rpm. This high-speed rotating variable capacitor when hooked to a battery would produce electricity from nowhere. I have a little device in my car where I operate my 24volt military field radio's off of 12volts. It's a very crude device. IT consists of a vibrator that charges two 12volt capacitors in parallel at 12V and discharges them in series at 24volts. If the dwell angle on the contacts on the vibrator on the contacts get screwy, when you turn the switch off the things just sits there and keeps humming, powering the 327 pilot lamp for a period of about 2 minutes. But of course that's impossible. Just like all of Tesla's work. It's all impossible, it's like the transformer, it's why the lights should go out all right now (because the flux lines of the iron core never are in contact with the secondary coil wire) - but there still humming away.” – Eric Dollard, SBARC
Also I am totally against cults or any of that nosense. That said the eric dollard cult has been one of the most productive. It's a shame I was not able to convince aaron my capture of elemental aetheric forces on video camera, or elon musk and other false spiritual sucker hoover pretenders "the ronald Raegans" of the world to purchase my 'talking electrical mechanical computer'.
It's probably worth billions, the challenge now is to survive long enough to be more than a poor beggar stuck in a victim complex personality and a false belief of limited options because well, your average band of harry potter like posh-boy school fanboys and the usual illuminations of local municipality control, its quite fortunate that jesus christ and king solomon himself and half of india came along for this train. One only hopes for no more train crashes because when one sacrifices everything for other people, they get understandably neverous when they continue to see the same greedy postulating arms of mankind, on east and west side causing the same resistances which cause the things they are fighting about economically and militarily. To put things into perspective, and I've written volumes of tens of thousands of pages on the subjevct, all of it worthless by the way, the US alone has enough money to end all of the things we're fighting about every year they are using to 'defend themselves' against threats.
The secret really is that energy grows, like the whole universe, but people are too fucking insane, and I'm too tired to do more than I already am. Maybe some nice rich millionaire may come along and fund the whole next generation startrek thing thats been dumped on me by the higher ups. I don't want to get stuck with a bear and left to the whales and sharks to feed on me.
Guy just wants to help out and ends up becoming a full blown lions jump to the heart holy shit what happened there mystic. I suppose such things are prophesised, and in certain avian variety circles are taken very seriously in the same way that the tibetans take the 10 stages of enlightenment and the ox and bull and so on. I could go on, but talking 64 differnet languages you don't know gets pretty boring, or rather humanity gets pretty same-same . though at least I know fully what to expect from the money grabbers among you, I am not going to be 400 years ahead of my time and die in poverty whilst your children get rich. No - you son of a bitches we are all getting rich together and if I have any arguments from any of you, I am going to send god around to your door to convince you. Jokes aside, im nearly sirius about actually providing global support for this initiative as a major force or axios for the project! Hopefully A52 will show more interest if aaron wakes the fuck up and stops clickbanking every fucking day checking how much money he has made from other people, and we were more understanding of the different forces concerned in the revelation of this tech, we wouldnt be repeating the same silly bs every 1000 or so years. With the same stories, academics, scholars, mystics and so on.
When Eric Dollard was asked who the people were that were trying to suppress Tesla Eric replied "probably the same people that bulldozed my station in Bolinas and are now presently trying to close down KPH in Bolinas which Marconi started in 1913. Same people that would like to get rid of all those tubes and knobs on your radios like when I caught the fire department cutting my coax and saying they didn't want any radios with knobs anymore. And the F.B.I said that the dope dealers were all upset I was listening to their radio calls so the county came in with their swat team to get rid of my radios. It's gets into a weird subject when you start to explore it. I'll tell you right now the cellular telephone companies want to make the situation just like it is in the so-called united Kingdom. You better not get caught with a scanner in the UK or you go to the brig. We will have none of your radio's here Mr. Dollard. And your experiments are banned in the town of Bolinas, we have a group to make sure. They even went so far to cut down all the road side telephones. So look up a group called Commonweal in Bolinas, they'll tell you who. It's up to you to experiment. I've already lost a gallon of blood over it. I can give you some names Steinmetz, Kennelly, Maxwell, Faraday, Bewley, Mcfarley. You work with those guys and do your basic studies and learn algebra and your dimensionalities. It takes about 14 or 15 years." – Eric Dollard, SBARC
So, this is a very small part of the history behind eric and the free energy story. Apparently with continental support in india, america, taiwan and china, even South Korea, I heard there was a real success of the inventor of bitcoin and ether actually coming out about the ones true identity, and these technologies for a new future. But dont hold your breath. Otherwise we are fated another repeat of 1913 and 1918, 1997 and 1998. 1969 and 1971. The question really is a chronological and spiritual matter, the question is whether you can convince those businessman spiritualists and scientists to come together on this one. IF they are serious I heard that I held the lions heart of osho international and that there might be some folks that knows what it means.
Who knows, maybe this is something worth writing home to mum and pa about! Thanks Ilya for encouraging me to take a chance. Hopefully others will be inclined or interested in the same white-black veine butterfly that I heard was something of a rare and precious endangered species in this lil Eden' of baby lon.
Best,
AB
Accompanying Comments for Diagram
Fig 1.0 – Illustration of transverse and longitudinal waves and their differences between the actions (onto media) and the reaction behavior of the media to it, and finally the resulting propagations (signals) down the length. Note, if the atoms in the rope are all connected in a horizontal tension then the speed of propagation is that of the atoms themselves that exist between the tension rather than the applied wave onto it. Note that in the transverse system the rope is being pulled up and down against 0 tension and the longitudinal system is in-line with the tension. The transverse system reaches point A to B by diminishment, and is akin to the Direct Current Transmission system, whereby power losses are total with distance, and the wave's power. The transverse system is pulling wire up and down against no tension, whereas the longitudinal is traveling along with it, so it is alike the Alternating Current wave, or, directly impacting the existing kinetic tension of the tort rope, i.e. the longitudinal is a horizontal push and pull through the wire that changes direction at 0 degrees to the propagating wave and the transverse sine wave is an up and down vertical wave which doesn’t change direction against the tension, hence the losses. This is akin to blowing an air pump in a hole of a sphere at one point, and all the other points have a pressure of the equal value. So the reactance is the same as the displacement current or a single pressure wave at any point in this geometry causes another pressure current elsewhere.
Nikola Tesla's claim to being able to transmit power “Regardless of Distance” and Eric Dollard’s claims of a focused energy beam more concentrated than the most powerful laser in Tesla's Wardenclyffe Transmitter apparatus’ are not without foundation. This diagram proves tension of a rope causes diminishing returns in a transverse wave system along the rope transmission medium at the square cube factor and the longitudinal wave kind traveling at 0 degrees to the tension has diminishing resistance along the transmission at the cube square factor, therefore providing increasing magnification, diminishing resistance and magnified returns. This is why the longitudinal wave is opposite to the transverse wave (by inversion). Transverse diminishment is therefore caused solely by the horizontal component, and longitudinal transmission is solely aided by its direct horizontal alignment with it. If the longitudinal wave was to be rotated only 90 degrees to the media then it would be a transverse wave again. If it is rotated 180 degrees then it goes back in the opposite direction as a longitudinal wave again.
It certainly cannot be ignored, this `per time`, it is the dimensional system of arrangement employed by the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter instrument which can fully negate the relativity of the A.C power supplies space/time cycle by storing it’s energy in a capacitor and in coils which mutually induct, causing accumulations of energy rather than diminishing transverse space/time currents, as inventively asserted impossible by Einstein & Proponents of the delusive and billions of times more inefficient Electromagnetic transverse Hertzian system.
The storage of this battery is not the dimension of space, the storage medium of the T.M.T battery is time; A truly miraculous accomplishment giving rise to asymptotes of tension.
-
Greetings, as I understand it - this video is a preamble to the conversation...I think that just the transition from capitalism to socialism or communism, where mechanical and routine work will be replaced by other work - creative work, this is just what some philosophers in the USSR were raising questions about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPY5NIQsz2g&fbclid=IwAR3p9yQC2ro8ho5yKWohFY-bLb6Gl08IpVIqQBaQmulINGvkmKUkgsqc6s8
I think that if we take our minds off the iron, it might well make sense to fantasize a bit about this as well.
The question of creativity is a question of when a fantasy or an idea by a person passes through all the stages of consciousness towards the world, which you can feel, see...and overcoming obstacles is personal growth.
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESFl_Pd8Qa8
Hello. If we move back from philosophy to where society is headed at a time when the world is facing a crisis that requires a paradigm shift in philosophy, politics and thinking, I think it's a good time to talk about the iron.
I used to collect files here, but they are in Russian. Just there is a demonstration of a motor, it is shown that if the load of the generator is short-circuited by low output resistance, then when the circuit is open, the light bulb is an indicator - just the energy can be released stored energy from the winding.
also in brief. although in russian - demonstration of an experience with a flywheel-based setup.
There are complications in the actual installation. The classical engine has standard characteristics, in which the graph consists of the speed curve and the torque curve. At the intersection of such torque is just the point of maximum efficiency.
Therefore, if I continued to work on this experiment, I would most likely consider, as an option, an engine in which rollers could ride, as it was proposed by Searle. because through the mass, which is separated from each other by a magnetic field - it is as a flywheel as a store of kinetic energy, and there is some probability that the efficiency, due to application of superconductors and absence of friction will give a good result. But these are all guesses and hypotheses. For now, I can say that the installation requires its further development. For now I switched to installation of another kind. Although with the return to the battery or electric motor.
-
On transverse and longitudinal waves.
I found the biggest difference in perception is between those who do real experiments to prove a matter for themselves and those who simply follow others.
I found there is no such thing as a transverse wave and the sine form we see on our DSO isn't what's actually happening outside a conductor or antenna. For example, if we use a stick to measure the change in height versus time of a water wave we also see a sine wave form. An antenna is no different and all we are measuring is the change in induced voltage versus time. As such a wave is not something in itself only a disturbance of something already present. Logically, we cannot have a wave in water without first having water present. However many have been falsely led to believe space is empty and no transmission medium is required which is absurd. It begs the question, if a wave is defined as a disturbance of something then what exactly is being disturbed in any given space?.
Here most seem to have put the cart before the horse which is probably why nothing seems to make any sense.
Experimentally it's easy to prove the difference between what many mistake as a transverse wave and a longitudinal wave. Place some charged ping pong balls in a tube and move them back and forth in an alternating motion. The measured internal and external voltage will change showing a form similar to a sine wave. This is what many have been fooled into thinking is a transverse wave. Now place one of the charged ping pong balls into the tube and use compressed air to shoot it out like a gun. Here we see a single disturbance similar to a Soliton or longitudinal wave. However it's not a wave it's a mobile energy carrier which has become independent of the source which initially gave it energy. This is why simply measuring a supposed wave is at best a superficial observation if we ignore everything in between the cause and effect.
As most of the great minds like Richard Feynman implied, we can discard 99% of the over complicated things most believe and use first principals. Here is a good link, https://jamesclear.com/first-principles
The human tendency for imitation is a common roadblock to first principles thinking. When most people envision the future, they project the current form forward rather than projecting the function forward and abandoning the form.
For instance, when criticizing technological progress some people ask, “Where are the flying cars?”
Here's the thing: We have flying cars. They're called airplanes. People who ask this question are so focused on form (a flying object that looks like a car) that they overlook the function (transportation by flight). This is what Elon Musk is referring to when he says that people often “live life by analogy.”
Be wary of the ideas you inherit. Old conventions and previous forms are often accepted without question and, once accepted, they set a boundary around creativity.
It seems intuitive doesn't it?. Everyone is so preoccupied with trying to imitate everyone else they forgot to think for themselves. I felt a real connection with this article because it describes what I'm seeing. Imitation is not evolution, it's the opposite of evolution.
AC
-
Greetings, friends. Now you have decided to raise some fundamental questions. I'm trying to figure out how the paradigm will change in the economy and society.
But at this point. I would like to talk about practical things as well. because the fact is that I am very surprised that the topic that I proposed with Mayanik as a more improved Joule experience, but through eectromagnetism, did not arouse such a lively interest. While I presented in articles calculations, formulas and not only.
I would like to understand the reasons.
I believe that the subject of the Joule experience I raised is described in a vague way because. I have time constraints to be able to publish a coherent and meaningful article here.
-
I am very surprised that the topic that I proposed with Mayanik as a more improved Joule experience, but through eectromagnetism, did not arouse such a lively interest.
Probably because most of people wants only to enjoy their own bodies in their earthly life. :)
-
Greetings, friends. I am currently working on a battery charging system, also this system is planned to be launched with an electric motor, has something similar to the Dipole Hertz in its composition, some components have shown their performance. now we conduct some additional or intermediate experiments, if everything that LTSpice simulator shows works, it means that we proceed to the final experiments and ...
But I can say that working with the pendulum and the system, which it was once decided to call Armored Train, it has already given an idea of what needs to be done so that the electric motor itself can work more optimally, but about this later.
I often visit social networks like Facebook, Linkedin...
Now I would like to introduce you to an experiment, which, unlike Joule's experiment, had a magnetic field instead of water, with two bodies communicating kinetic energy to each other. In Joule's experiment, the blades rotated under the action of gravity, the glass was attached to the support.
In order to develop the topic and discussion further, I decided to introduce you to an interesting person I decided to tell you about my project...
Perhaps he will share his thoughts and impressions. I would be interested in inviting interesting people here, which might encourage the topic itself to move forward a bit as a discussion...
Paul has his own project on Kickstarter, I give you the link, maybe someone will be interested in his activities, and someone will support his project.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/paultownley/revolution-a-multi-fuel-rotary-engine-generator?fbclid=IwAR21g2uCxckf0FtmWeRIGlKBuxkvlEvjvn6R_vOD5AwSOGxoByIfI6dROaI
-
At this point, I'm trying to get different people involved in the temptation. I am not sure that my mechanical knowledge of 3D modeling and simulation of physical processes is high. But there is a catch, now I downloaded a program from Ansys that has a suite of programs such as Ansys Maxwell HFSS and only that will be a very useful addition to my skills. This program is completely FREE, but has limitations that I have yet to figure out.
But Ansys Maxwell has one problem, it cannot yet solve dynamic electromagnetic-mechanical processes. So far, all processes are solved in statics. Therefore, to build a mathematical apparatus in this experiment to complete the notions of the project more completely.
-
Greetings friends, Paul and I have had an interesting discussion on facebook. on the one hand he has his own interesting project to talk about, and on the other hand, as I described, if there is some principle that can justify itself in the future, then maybe this principle just might help Paul to improve his mechanisms... so I publish a part of the correspondence...
Greetings, I am in the Republic of Belarus, the city of Minsk, previously lived in Moscow Russia. Minsk and Russia are 400 km apart. Before that I came from Ukraine, where there were military operations. here it is quiet quiet and here I worked on my experiment. As the work you have done in terms of graphics and video is enormous, and as it seemed to me, you have a good knowledge of mechanics, hence the interest to talk about a very simple device, which, quite possibly, will give fundamentally different ideas about the Thermodynamics and Joule's experiment.
since it is obvious that you invest a lot of effort in social networks and in your project - it attracted my attention, because when I published my article, I was surprised by the lack of public interest. and I assume that to the issues that I decided to raise - I do not involve professionally oriented people.
since. as it seemed to me - you are professionally oriented, I think that what I offer in open access or open source is something that will broaden your understanding and perhaps help improve your designs.
-
Hello Timothy
My name is Ilya, I'm in Belarus and I've been in Russia and Ukraine where I've been working on my projects.
I found you through the Facebook group. And the goal is that I did one experiment, which was to repeat everything that Joule did, but instead of water I used magnetic field and Lorentz force 9 Ampere) and a commutation system, and instead of standing on a support, a flywheel. The essence of the installation is simple - there are two bodies in the form of a magnet and a coil. The first body acquires force due to the gravitational force as it is done in the classical pendulum, where the work or net energy of the accelerated body is powerfully calculated by E=mgh A-E1-E2, i.e. by the difference of height to which the body has fallen and risen, since the second body is the coil, which in the beginning of the experiment was at rest and when switching it induced EMF and accordingly current and magnetic field, which interacted with the magnetic field of the magnet. The electric current was transformed through the commutation system into a charged capacitor, by the voltage of which it was possible to judge about the amount of energy in this capacitor.
If the installation were mechanically and electronically perfect, the experiment itself would show that the first body gave the second subject kinetic energy of 7 joules (transfer of energy or momentum from the first to the second), while we would have a capacitor charged to 7 joules.
I am speaking to you because I saw this experiment a few years ago, the criticism that I could accept and argue at my level - I think I did it. Because this experiment is my own initiative, and because it is only locked in on me, I cannot yet say that the conclusions I have drawn are 100% correct. But if this experiment is correct, then it makes sense to say that the conclusions that Joule and other scientists of the time drew were limited by the development and understanding of the physics of the time. And if notions in physics have long since advanced, then it follows that the paradigm of the time must also be reviewed. but it is not a fact. that I am right, I am bound to admit. that I made a mistake. That is why I attract those. who could somehow express their criticism or at least have some effect on the genre experiment.
The techniques I use are the fundamentals of high school or early university physics. I think the educational system in the United States and Russia is the same. So it seems to me that reading the file should be difficult for you to understand and read. I will be glad to answer your questions and hear your reactions. thank you in advance for your time
https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhhuy0/pendulum_part_1/ (https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhhuy0/pendulum_part_1/)
https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhib1b/pendulum_part_2/ (https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhib1b/pendulum_part_2/)
https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhinow/pendulum_pert_3/ (https://www.reddit.com/user/Emotional-Notice4746/comments/vhinow/pendulum_pert_3/)
-
Kratkaforma: short (in)forma(tion).
-
What would happen if we lived in weightlessness or energy
Greetings, absolutely recently came across this article about Tsiolkovsky.
In 1883 in his work "Free Space", which is a kind of scientific diary, Tsiolkovsky considers the course of the simplest phenomena of mechanical motion in space without the action of gravitational and drag forces of the medium. Considering ways of giving motion to a body in free space, Tsiolkovsky comes to his most basic and most important principle conclusion that the easiest way to give motion to a motionless body (or change existing motion) is by throwing away mass, i.e. by reaction of particles thrown away from this body.
Here is what Tsiolkovsky writes in one of the days "March 28. Morning. ...Suppose a barrel is given, filled with a strongly compressed gas. If we unscrew one of its ... taps, then the gas will rush out of the barrel in a continuous jet, and the elasticity of the gas, pushing its particles into space, will also continuously repel the barrel. The result will be a continuous change of motion of the barrel...By a sufficient number of cocks (six), it is possible to control the gas expulsion so that the motion of a barrel or a hollow ball will be completely dependent on the desire of the person controlling the cocks, i.e. ...The barrel can describe any curve and according to any law of speeds...The change of motion of the barrel is possible only until all the gas has not left it...In general, uniform motion along a curve or rectilinear non-uniform motion is associated in free space with a continuous loss of substance (support)".
The work "Free space" was first published in Volume II of the Collected Works of K.E. Tsiolkovsky. Tsiolkovsky by the Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in 1954 (pp. 25-68).
From there, I'd like to fantasize a bit about the next topic - suppose we have space about something.
Suppose we have a space in which there is no Earth's gravity. This is roughly how it would have been in Tsiolkovsky's reality.
From this comes the natural question, what would happen if Michael Faraday lived under the conditions of Earth gravity. would he be able to spin his machine in the form of an oscillator in weightlessness?
Obviously, the moment Faraday would have tried to spin the knob of the generator, Faraday himself, as well as the conditional stator, in the usual Earth sense, would begin to come into motion. only Faraday and the Stator would begin to spin in opposite directions.
This position is not only logical, but also tested experimentally.
But when it comes to the Cosmos. it begs the question, what is the reason we have to do work? We need to remember the formula for work. A = F*s. Work is the movement of a load over some distance. But why do we have to exert a force?
The reason is that in science it is correct to call it doing work to overcome friction forces. The reason is that some friction is counteracting us and mathematically it should be called -F as a force of counteraction.
We apply a force F to overcome the counteracting force -F. But the question may arise here, if the body is on an inclined plumb line, then the reason is exactly that there are two equal forces acting on the body, the force of Gravity and the force of Friction equal to it, which prevents the body from making the movement. The force F= -F. But if we move a load on some surface. then it seems logical to imagine that in the beginning, when we made the dynamic process, we also applied a counterforce from mass or inertia. further, as soon as the body has passed into a state of uniform motion relative to the floor, we have friction.
But here again we need to touch the subject that, according to the experiments conducted by Joule, overcoming the forces of friction and the work to overcome these forces must be accompanied by the release of heat and deformation in the process. Then we should write the formula thus A = Q = F*s
But it is necessary to note the following detail. At the moment of the work of moving the load along the floor, let's call a part of the Earth plane the floor as a support, can there be a friction force in the direct sense of the word?
For people of past centuries, now the 21st century, just such notions might have made sense. After all, it is unclear what could be resisting or exerting a counteracting force that we have to work to overcome. But the force of friction. as other forces bitten by subjective perception in mechanics cannot themselves have the properties of touch, friction, walking or other qualities. We should refer to the fact that it is not friction or process that opposes us, but the support, the floor on which the body moves by touching through an intervening medium that is electromagnetic in nature. The best epithet for understanding right now is just the intermediate medium.
So - we are not being counteracted by friction or other things as a verb. We are being counteracted by the physical body. But the relationship of the body that we move has a relationship through this intermediate medium. so the plane or support begins to deform and experience force from the load as a physical body.
But we live in an environment where there is some plane or support beneath us. If we are accustomed not to observe that it is not some ephemeral friction that resists us, but the Earth plane as a support, then could ancient people consider this plane in terms of the Cosmos, which in the main mass is unsupported?
I assume that this could not happen a priori. so we are more accustomed to consider the resistance of some force. If we are in Space and assume that we are beings whose habitat is Space, then we will have a different habitual view, just as astronauts habitually drop objects, assuming that due to the absence of weightlessness they will remain suspended in space, while the body immediately receives acceleration and hits the Earth surface, floor or other support resting on the Earth.
But now we are talking about what we are used to - COSMOS. This is our mental experiment. We turn the knob of an oscillator, which, through an intermediate medium in the form of a magnetic field, begins to communicate a force to the rotor, which begins to accelerate, while we ourselves begin to rotate. This means that by applying a force we are communicating a force with opposite signs to two bodies. If we want to rotate the rotor handle to infinity, we will have to look for a support. let this support be the plane of the Spaceship. Its kinetic energy is such that the force to be applied to the spacecraft in the mechanical chain is negligibly small to have any noticeable effect on the trajectory of the spacecraft itself.
Thus all that will resist us is the inertia of mass. But this force accumulates in the body. This process we call momentum transfer or kinetic energy transfer. now the question stands, as in the case in Earth conditions, as in the case in the ship - were we able to consider, as observers relative to us, any motion of the ship or the Earth? Both the ship. and the planet Earth have an enormous kinetic energy compared to those kilograms. which we can imagine in our mental experiment. to see the movement of the ship, at least to measure with some super-precise experiment. we need at least to have an observer fixed in some part of space. to be in this part in our daily life is difficult for us. In Faraday's time, the topic of the observer and relativity had not yet penetrated consciousness on a cosmic scale.
But does that mean we don't have an effect on the Earth or the Ship? In either set, we do. And I personally believe in Newton's Third Law. If we apply a force, then because of the huge mass, or counteracted by a force with a different vector, we still make the body accelerate, but the acceleration itself is invisible to us.
But here's what the classical textbooks write us on electrical engineering - the work done by the generator is done as some sort of conversion of mechanical work into a capacitor charge. But here's the question - the charge of the capacitor, this is not Newtonian mechanics, this process has nothing to do with a physical body. you and I can charge the capacitor, but it will not add mass, tangibly. Newtonian mechanics and the process of charging a capacitor is related precisely to the appearance of energy in the circuit due to the curvature of space and time in the conductor area, which is what appears to us as an Electromagnetic Field.
Then the reason that makes us do work? The reason is not in electromagnetism. electromagnetism itself in the form of magnetic fields gives us the relationship between bodies in the form of rotor and stator, the relationship itself is zero in the absence of such, when we have them the bodies begin to interact with each other. This interaction we call force interaction. Therefore, because of the incomplete force interaction between the bodies, we can as in the case of a body sliding against a surface we have no equilibrium force. force that we apply.
In case we have a generator hanging in space, then through magnetic coupling we have a force interaction on the stator. which starts to come in motion storing kinetic energy when acceleration occurs.
-
Greetings friends, I am in the process of developing a solid state device using the pendulum philosophy. so far I have not seen any resonance regarding the above described. But now I have some questions regarding the technical part or the doin line. which is sometimes called the delay line.
In LTSpice there are two variants of the line. One option is a perfect line, the other is a lossy line.
Now there is this oscillogram, which shows this, and I would like to say - can we trust the result obtained?
-
Depending on the resistance, which apparently shunts the current, depends on the voltage. If the resistance in the circuit is 1 ohm, then
-
Dear One power,
Thank you, I am grateful for your response to my advertisements about Sankofa and Wave Guide systems, in specific to the dimensional representation of transverse and longitudinal waves.
I appreciated your comments and I read your conclusions with interest. In particular the favoring practical experimentation. I could agree but in my somewhat incubated experience of consciousness, enlightenment and the application of the arts, mystical or scientifically otherwise in inventing and creative expressions to navigate these fields - it has in fact been a proper balance between theory and practice which has yielded the most effective results. Since one overcomes the limits of both utilising, of course if correctly, both.
With my comments which I apologise may come off as a criticism, for which they are not, but really I wanted to create some emphasis of how the transverse waves are represented in radio diagrams, which as you point out, must be incorrect for the same reasons that several longstanding 'contradictions' with transformer and transmission line termination to ground and coils, whereby the mathematical electrical 'theoretical' treatment as simulated, 'departs' from the actual behaviour of the dielectric and magnetic behaviours. For example in many of the tesla systems dielectric forms on one side of the circuit and magnetic the other.
I have some limited experience in building Tesla coils, though I would profess I have a good theoretical understanding of tesla's intention of the tesla magnifying transmitter, and it is NOT, repeat not a device simply to create high voltage sparks at a regular interval. No, that was not his intention at all, and just listening to eric dollards descripotion of the multiple loaded flat top antenna, the old military alexanderson antenna system, you can see very clearly that regular intervals were not in the mind of tesla, marconi, anyone at bolinas or RCA for at least 10 or 15 years until they'd succesfully completed removing every drop of the MLFTA and fully adopted the rhombic D. The main difference being that part of the dimensionality of the 2 wave propogation of transverse electromagnetic and non transverse non electromagnetic longitudinal wave system of tesla utilized at the bolinas site, was removed in the rhombic D antenna 'invented' by RCA.
A better word, if my perception is correct is "devolved" or "downgrade" from the "electrical stonehenge" which was Bolinas. Certainly the points I make on the traverse electromagnetic and longitudinal are in the context and in reference to this story, and the convuluted and outdated mathematics and theoretical ideas which you refer yourself, which largely contribute to the misunderstandings by pure mathematicians, physicists, chemists scientists and other so-called emanent scholars on this matter. Matter - being an ironical term for some of the implied imaginary realities, non matter realities implied by both of our aformentioned statements.
I would like to be more specific that I refer to transverse and longitudinal as the dimensionalities of transformed or translated waves in electrical circuits. There is no other context for the words or descriptions other than these. Simply speaking if it is being suggested that a longitudinal, theoretically longitudinal wave is sinsudoidal or hertzian, or electromagnetic. I believe it to be true that both myself and Tesla would have aggressively defended any such language. The longitudinal, for all aspects of the intensity of the word, to this one, means a single dimension of interface. Theoretically an infinitely flat object of any width has a single dimension of interface, or points that reach accross the entire universe. Perhaps then, longitudinal wave might be another word, before physicists camealong and started naming all their babies, etc etc, another word like 'entangled non collapsed wave', or 'non fundamental phase collapsed dimensional wave'. In simpler just tell me wtf your talking about joe in simple terms - I mean that a wave that is infinitely flat is infinitely sharp, a sharper beam than any laser man has ever experimented or conceived of since the times of Tesla.
You might say if it were not except for a few reincarnated JS' that might be casually passing by, to comment about it, and whymsically so, that their might not be anyone to witness a semblant interpretation what all this talk of harmonics and resonance is, and what the objective actually is. To understand the hidden dimensionality, the square of time if you will, or different dimensional interactions of wave guides operating in multiple locations, entangling themselves with pre-existing wave aetheric systems in place.
As you may note in the context I most recently describe, the desire and a scientific need arises in engineering and mathematical calculations to discriminate in some way between an infinitely flat longitudinal wave, and the two infinitely flat planes that the so-called theoreitcal electromagnetic transverse consists of.
Therefore you might refer to the longitudinal as a wave that acts in a single plane, but comprises of a matter energy exchange that is still proportional to C^2 in its many wave guide systems. Another way of saying that could potentially be an assymetric wave guide for a phase -decoupling multi-phase n/c circuit. So assymetric division of group velocities, and then the resulting star network you could form between them would create most of the 3rd order resonance harmonic waves you'd expect to see in a tesla coil.
Again, emphasis on way I refer to the transverse and the longitudinal wave systems in the way I do, it is specifically in regard to how the matter and energy is spread over space and time, whilst it is true that the measured wave is not the real thing that is the electricity, it is an effect, in the same way that the radioactive decay of radium is an effect not an instananeous cause as accepted in modern schools of science, despite ample evidence showing locality to other sources influences it. Despite the segway, I think it's important to understand that Tesla the one that invented nearly all of these stuff, and even Wheatstone who invented the 4 quarter resistance loop wheatstone bridge were 'adam ant' about a lot of the things im saying. Heaviside apparently got an insight similar to some of us 'fortunate enough' to with this kind of extra-dimensional sciencey stuff, and evidently didn't come back, painted his nails pink, and ordered chunks of granite to be delivered into his living room. Perhaps when the living totally human reality - really unnerves the self, but most of all because of the reactions of those other friendly helper folk we call human beings, that are very supportive to a 'failed buddha' like heaviside. And believe me I use the terms very loosely to avoid penalty or judgement. If more people avoided judgements they would come to much more beautiful and poetic conclusions about the science and the art. Though probably nobody was ever stupid enough to attempt to connect the wester and eastern arts together into an assembly understanding of how consciousness emerges out of these wave systems of the universe, oh, except probably the egyptians where these academic types either consciously or unconsciously have been getting all of their best ideas for thousands of years since the time of pythagoras, shamash and cleopatra.
The long standing misunderstanding about longitudinal waves, and what they could be is really a misnomer, we're interested in the dimensionality of the interactions with the wave systems that the tesla coil and other specific inventions utilising the dimension of l^2 and l^3 and t^2, or the square of time, over cuboid and square lengths provides, with the adoption of a 3rd order resonant harmonic, an nearly infinite array of different interactions with sub atomic and quantum force.
For example the spark gap of the tesla system when correctly utilized, i.e. not sparking every second in a discharge, that is not a stable TMT or what it is supposed to be. You want to see an asymptotic acceleration so that the impulse train discharges between the spark gap between the approach the dimension of l^3 of a fundamental particle of matter. Although not many people have witnessed what the increasingly hypothetical kind of effect it could be to create a machine of this kind, that quite literally divides time and space into blue and red components, I'm sure if it did exist and some idiot put it together and altered the constant of the universe with it, then it would probably look like parts of the components were evaporating a dark mist, whilst others glowed a bright white with a redish yellow circle rotating around and around in eachother, as the circuit starts to interact with wavelengths outside of our understanding, and indeed at a level that might imply tesla's transmission of thousands of horsepower 'regardless of distance', was something of an wave-guide entanglement system. but of course every good engineer and scientists knows this is impossible because of the 'dampening problem' and that 'C is a limit despite it clearly being printed as a constant to single dimensions of energy matter interaction', it says NOTHING About multi dimensional wave guide propogations of 3rd order resonance, they were taught all of these things about phase velocity to explain things away. Never an attempt was made such as the one ive made for several decades now into deep inquiry ino the truth.
It unfortunately involves being wrong a lot of the time and also relying on higher dimensional descriptions of the sqrt of i and its interactions in virtual particle systems of the 3rd order and beyond;so for this i profusely apologise. And this is on a bad day, fortunately on good days where I meditate I make a lot more sense, but not to scientists, so it is just as well I have some bad days lately. Wow, I just justified my badness choosing these devilish scientific endeavours, because its all fun and games until you open pandoras box and actually achieve some of these wild things.
Mainly - and please forgive me with saying this because it requires great patience to approach such large expansive subjects where there is so many different perceptions to concord to in order to create a useful description for those to use.
I would like to provide this for good measure; to prevent misunderstanding as my writing is not always desired by the pure engineers; I am jack all trades;
I found that the longitudinal wave isn't just a characteristic of the emitted wave, but it might be a result of concatenated 3rd order harmonic sub rare-factions at subluminal and multi-luminal velocities ofC.
I found that the transverse wave is represented incorrectly because it ignores radio waves that can be induced in the ground, and uses only overground, so it wastes half of the current.
I found that tesla is using the ground, and the spark gap as a means of electrical storage, but I notice others didn't found that the force of gravitation and other fundamental forces interact with the ground, naturally, and the transmitter or generator sitting upon it. Those informed on the matter, and familiar with the ancient buddhist saying '"Let's say you're driving a cart. If it doesn't go forward, should you whip the cart or the ox?'.
This is important civilisationally, philosophically, not just to the engineer. The single statement is enough to reveal Eric Dollards, Tesla's , Leedskalnins and other great mens work. Unfortuantely human beings are not evolved to the point to understand that imaginary things exist in real space. And the imaginary component is a dimension that interacts with real space.
This could reveal several interesting things about what the longitudinal causal or effect, or cause-effect substratum system might actually do, einstein didnt like the idea of being punched before pressing the red button, and he payed the ultimate price of being shown to be wrong in 36 different theories. Albert einstein responded correctly that it would indeed "take just one, to disprove him". Or rather, satisfying the one, to keep his mathematical solutions and insights gained. And after that his sanity.
There are probably good reasons why all this stuff about magnifying a 5 volt 40hz power supply into a 1 megavolt ray using nothing but a few inductors, a very large industrial capacitor, some resistors and the worlds best wireless in the world to achieve it without the whole thing melting down that is. As afterall, if tesla was right the entire destructive power of nagasaki and hiroshima is coming from external means. Frightening to conclude that uranium itself may be outdated, when and I am sure many enterprising foreigners have already achieved such a grand obtainment, ability to turn off radioactivity of matter at will by isolating it from the causative cosmic rays is a veritible confirmation of tesla's experimental calculations at wardenclyffe, the velocity of the elctrostatic discharge given by himself and wheatstone, which indeed if truly was 157% faster, our attention might be best directed to how we are measuring time for performing these so-called experiments that prove that light is a constant.
It would appear that it is a constant at the first order, and if the misunderstanding of the 3rd order odd resonance wave guide systems continues, I fear they're may be no rekindling of this fabric of the aetheric nothing with which all these waves travel.
Again, Tesla very emphatically wanted to create a device that could discharge huge capacitive quantities of energy into free space, or rather, in the dimension of time and space. Specifically to increase the number of discharges of the capacitoy per second of a fixed energy in farads, and a fixed energy recirculation in per farads, his circuits not only had the ability to create nearly any wave form, with an understanding of the characteristics of the art, individualisation and the fundamentals of language, signals and dimensionality, may achieve interaction at nearly any level of any system which relies on these sub entangled vibrations.
Now, whilst a lot of this is poetically given, it's hoped the engineering language, and the engineering demonstration of these wave systems can simply speak for itself, without me needing to be especially creative, poetic, academic, or scholarly. I'd really like to demonstrate to you the slurring alexanderson antenna.
Because if you can recreate a system that bends time, in 4th and 5th orders, or create star configuration antenna, you'll see this debate is a bit outdated and we should concentrate our efforts on impulse trains with an theoretically infinitely small wavelength in between discharges in the impulse train in the gap in circuits that may occur after just 4 or 5 minutes. Using basic equipment like a few 1 henry inductors, and some 15 pf, 150pf and 150f capacitors, with some resistors, a 40-120hz power supply at 5V can generate 1000's of amperes and megavolts in recirculating currents and transformation in a two transformer 4 coil system. Although these calculations are thought experiments and the video uses existing equations, simply altering the classical tesla coil wrongly created so that wave forms are able to recirculate or reflect from both sides of the circuit and between the capacitances can create a complex network of interaction that may be similar to the first succesfull simulations of the atom, of which i have been attempting to undertake since 2012, when i discovered that prime numbers is associated with several important processes that allowed me to reverse engineer some much older, almost ancient plans, ideas and architecture and convert it into a tool of the goods.
I know it all seems a bit far fetched but, I plan with permission from our foreign sponsors, to publish a complete theory and description of a 'device for enlightenment', which is really, simply, a device capable of producing wave form interactions with our consciousness, beyond our present intelligence and understandings. Therefore hence the term "Tools of the Goods" for teaching.
If only people had a dude approach, and combined it with the Dollard approach, and then added a generous helping of buddhism, christianity, and islam, a heap of grace, gratitude and love, and you'd have a key for the secrets of the universe, I tend to throw these keys at peoples doors, when they are not throwing them at mine or into my back garden.
Jokes aside. I hope the video is helpful and illustrative to some of these harmonics whereby "time flows backwards". You really have to experience and see it to believe it, so in nearly all of these statements made by our excellent friend onepower, are indicative to many of the conclusions I've made. I've found that a lack of human understanding and a proper language for engineering, science and these 'religious experience', continues to create the divions of talent and ability in the east and west that have existed for so long.
At least the 'russio-ukraine peace initiative' is going well, for want of a better word, these guys with their radio transmitters, you have to watch out for. Especially the non mechanical, organic ones!
But that would be another unwelcome thesis essay from a slightly-nuts the dude..buddha.. etc etc.
I hope the video shines some light into the accelerative nature of the systems just after ww2 that had a tendancy to accelerate the oscillations and maintain the resonance of the system. I am still tuning this demo to show the principles involved in magnifying and dividing wave guide systems in tesla coils I believe anyone who has a love of iron and wire and the mysteries will enjoy the video and find it informative.
Though I cannot guarantee it, all the schematics are original and by myself by the way, I have no idea what I'm doing. Just so you know. I'm well aware it's my biggest advantage and disadvantage. Hopefully any engineers out there that actually have been trained and told how these things work can provide some insight so we can inquire together and one of us can convince eachother more that they are more nuts, or unreasonable than the other.
I intentionally use humour to reveal suffering, sometimes though I'm just not sure if it's mine or the worlds.
Probably enough for a few weeks. I regret that my news is always so strange, hopefully it's appreciated and is enlightenment for someone. It's just a device, afterall. As the pyramid builders said an "instrument" or a "temple of man". My greatest achievement though was building a temple completely without tools, and for those folks around here who knows what it actually means and believes I'm serious in having achieved these things, hopefully will consider reaching out, because I'm surprisingly friendly for someone on this nth degree stuff. Most of them do go nuts. Because you know, its a lot.
Also occasionally I play nuts abit, because it's probably safer when your writing editorials on the density of radiaoctive materials not being a 'soul' cause for radioactive decay. And other highly highly above secret, holy shit tesla is gonna destroy an enemy army with a 5lb device, we cant even let this get on the field because it will be the end kind of crap.
Yes. Yes. I'm sorry for risking the world by revealing this kind of stuff then, but given the calamity that was coming I hope this European Indian Canadiany Ukraino-Russio initiativey thing might be some use especially with help from eric dollards guys at a52. they practically wrote the book on most of this stuff, and I owe eric a lot for spending so much time talking to me on the phone about the important research understandings of these differing dimensions in wireless and application of the tesla coil.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTrsL0e7-l8
I know nothing.
Best,
Adam
On transverse and longitudinal waves.
I found the biggest difference in perception is between those who do real experiments to prove a matter for themselves and those who simply follow others.
I found there is no such thing as a transverse wave and the sine form we see on our DSO isn't what's actually happening outside a conductor or antenna. For example, if we use a stick to measure the change in height versus time of a water wave we also see a sine wave form. An antenna is no different and all we are measuring is the change in induced voltage versus time. As such a wave is not something in itself only a disturbance of something already present. Logically, we cannot have a wave in water without first having water present. However many have been falsely led to believe space is empty and no transmission medium is required which is absurd. It begs the question, if a wave is defined as a disturbance of something then what exactly is being disturbed in any given space?.
Here most seem to have put the cart before the horse which is probably why nothing seems to make any sense.
Experimentally it's easy to prove the difference between what many mistake as a transverse wave and a longitudinal wave. Place some charged ping pong balls in a tube and move them back and forth in an alternating motion. The measured internal and external voltage will change showing a form similar to a sine wave. This is what many have been fooled into thinking is a transverse wave. Now place one of the charged ping pong balls into the tube and use compressed air to shoot it out like a gun. Here we see a single disturbance similar to a Soliton or longitudinal wave. However it's not a wave it's a mobile energy carrier which has become independent of the source which initially gave it energy. This is why simply measuring a supposed wave is at best a superficial observation if we ignore everything in between the cause and effect.
As most of the great minds like Richard Feynman implied, we can discard 99% of the over complicated things most believe and use first principals. Here is a good link, https://jamesclear.com/first-principles
It seems intuitive doesn't it?. Everyone is so preoccupied with trying to imitate everyone else they forgot to think for themselves. I felt a real connection with this article because it describes what I'm seeing. Imitation is not evolution, it's the opposite of evolution.
AC
-
I didn't read your post because it is too long. I did look at your circuit. Perhaps you should delete the diagonal lines and try again.
-
I didn't read your post because it is too long. I did look at your circuit. Perhaps you should delete the diagonal lines and try again.
Dear Tarsier,
thank you for writing to me and everyone else to inform that you did not read my post on this forum, and for kindly providing an explanation. That was particularly appreciated by me and made me smile. Your reaction has been very useful and of benefit understanding some of the challenges that exist in conveying the mystical art to scientists, engineers and mathematicians. People need to read tesla's work and understand it before making a comment that isn't going to be regretted later on.
It is for these reasons I am particularly glad that my writing was not addressed to you specifically, but to the persons that have invited me to respond on this subject at their request.
I am glad to hear however that you enjoyed the diagram I provided! I also like pictures. Although I appreciate your suggestions to remove the diagonal lines in the diagram which have been added there by me, I feel it a necessity to point it out that had you made effort to even casually glance over the supporting writings on the subject of the tesla coil I provided that it is there intentionally and it is described exactly why; maybe you can read it later. Nikola tesla's express intent in the design of the tesla coil in having a rapidly discharging capacitor that tends to maintain the oscillation and accelerate the discharge of the capacitor per time, causing large recirculation currents and wave form interactions that are not there without the additional wires. Whilst I appreciate your feedback as a scientist and engineer I hope you and others will consider that it is beneficial to read the majority of the accompanying documentation provided with the diagram. As diagrams are generally supplementary to a theory, and vice versa.
As you have been quick to highlight to me Mr Tarsier not everybody here has unlimited amounts of time to respond unnecessarily or produce unnecessarily long writings, I am sure we are likely to attempt further to convince eachother in future perhaps and I shall look forward to it.
In the meantime though, I am particularly engraciated by the fact that you took the time to write to me and were polite enough to provide an explanation for why you believe my diagram should be redrawn without the additional lines, and to provide such feedback even when one is not requested to do so, or has read any of the supporting writing that explains their purpose, it becomes a most fortunate and kind compassion for us both, at least for those others less informed on the subject of tesla coils and the dimensional representation of waves. I am just unsure of who those increasingly hypothetically less informed others on tesla and his inventions is Mr Tarsier or what compassion is or is not to be provided by eachother here.
You may also carefully note my opinion was invited on this post by Mr. Ilya, and whilst no comparison is directly made, I would like to highlight to you that in our future interactions I will respond to inquiry about the subject I've presented and will read with inquiry into the truth before commenting blindly. I will however not be able to comment about things I have not read by my own admission or dismissed for their length, as such a principle is entirely unscientific and biased. As that does not support inquiry, it supports judgement without consideration of the material presented.
Since you have already revealed that you made no effort to read the subject material whatsoever, I will assume much like yourself that you already have all the answers you need when addressing your future reactions to diagrammatics and supporting work I post here, specifically in reference to your response in regard to the revisions I made to the tesla coil RC in order to accelerate the discharges and impulse train in the capacitor spark gap network, for the aformentioned and carefully described reasoning of matching the wavelength of quanta sized particles. If you watch the 25 minute video that is also included you will see the wave forms created by the unnecessary diagonal wires that you refer, and they cause rapid increases and decreases in the number of discharges per second in the spark gap. I am sure your already well versed on this, but since you said you read nothing I wrote about it I thought I'd mention it anyway. You know? one of the experimental 'real purposes' of the tesla coil, is to investigate the wavelength of the fabric of the so-called aether, and specifically the device in these configurations provides a multitude of wave interactions not present in the 'incorrect' configuration for magnification effects. You may note nearly the entire body of my supporting writing, which you say you ignored because it was too long, addresses this ignorance at great length by 'adding the very lines' your suggesting to remove, and I describe specific reasons why they fails to represent these dimensionalities suitably in theoretical simulations and practice at the bench. No acceleration in the capacitor per time as tesla intended.
If there is not an increase in the discharge of the capacitor per second, then there is not an increase of storage of power in the dimension of time. One of the main reasons for this device to exist was to store power in the dimension of time. Unfortunately the aether doesnt exist either and the speed of a-light is a limit, so there is no need to inquire anyway. We already know the answer! <sarcasm implied here>
As I am sure you are already well aware as you have made it clear your well informed on the subject and any necessary long explanation to dispel the longstanding problems is, probably as you put it a waste of time. Though maybe for different reasons than we will agree upon. Mr. Trashier!
Naturally I am sure you are more informed on the subject, given your kind and direct corrections that you have immediately provided. Once more I regret that you were unable to read most of the material I presented before coming to a conclusion, as I am sure you are a learned scientist of a much higher caliber than an idiot like me who says he knows nothing, I will continue to refer to your directions in future.
I heard that it's best to comment when it supports inquiry, but to inquire and make a comment of any use, it requires some consideration of the material presented. Otherwise it serves no ordinary purpose except self gratification. I want to be in the room of smarter people than me honestly inquiring into truth, not people that think they already know the answers.
With respect and gratitude my friend.
Best wishes,
Adam
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTrsL0e7-l8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTrsL0e7-l8)
who's speaking in the beginning part?
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTrsL0e7-l8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTrsL0e7-l8)
who's speaking in the beginning part?
The voice featured in the music backing this 25 minute video I attached in support of some of my thinking is mostly throughout Eric Dollard, our hero, describing some of tesla's most important interpretations, (or scientific misinterpretations otherwise). Famously the unit of electrostatic discharge determined by Wheatstone, and the speed given for a single rotation of a traveling wave (if you can even call it a traveling wave) by tesla as pi/2 C which as you may hear in the background from someone in the audience "that exceeds C". Apparently those consciousnesses that only understand 1st order energetic and matter equations want to convince those with 'big brains' like eric that tesla and wheatstones observations 'must be wrong' because 'must better ways exist today to measure time'.
I'd imagine like the Rhombic D that our nice friend general sarnoff made available from Sony RCA after they'd finished removing everything that was semblant of any advanced technology utilised in the marconi MLFTA!
Most of the content featured you will find is from Dollard's seminal SBARC lecture on the propogation of longitudinal waves in the luminiferous aether, and his descriptions of the dimensionality of traveling waves in tesla coils in his many videos describing the tesla magnifying transmitter and it's proper dimensions from Borderland Sciences, including but not limited to the fire hydrant ground-radio experiments.
As a musician, author, engineer and documentary maker, and a student of eric for nearly 20 years having dedicated my life to some of his and teslas searches and spent hours talking to Eric on the phone discussing and trying to understand his dimensional insights, and occasionally presenting some of my own I am pleased that at least Eric enjoyed talking to me about some of my theories, and it is at least alleged by him that I am still pissing the right people off.
Said like any father would to any baby-rex. I personally take it as a compliment and I see it my personal business as a person who has created wave forms of infinitely compressed sound waves, and electrical discharge impulse trains within a spark gap which have a particle size smaller than the luminerous aether, those who tat least understand might benefit from my strange and unusual researches and the unusual consciousness and understanding of temporal mechanics and other strange insights my consciousness has gained since.
Obviously the research is something to do with the differences of Eastern and Western thinking, and the nature of possessive consciousness. For example I have been experimenting with transcranial magnetic devices for over 10 years now with varying levels of success, interestingly to anyone informed on the subject the idea is not new, using a magnetic architecture to influence a living beings order is as old as the architecture itself. And although most of the magnetism of good men is lost, and spoiled by egoism and disgenuine inquiry, I'm glad to convey that I keep going not out of a lack of compassion for those more ill informed on the subject, but out of a simple certainty of the observations and scientific mechanical analogues and dimensional truths Eric and people like him can bring.
I will keep on producing these instructional videos and demonstrations, with the 'incorrect' diagonal wires, I will create transformers that are shorted out so that I can interact with the 'waveforms' which 'others already know' 'can't exist'. I'll leave it there before it starts to sound like an MIB speech.
If my eccentric humour is lost on anyone please don't be angry. I am inquiring into truth, and you are welcome to do the same here as well. It has been my experience though, a genuine and authentic inquiry into truth is not desired, even by the best and most skilled engineers, which is what results in the social political and civlisational longstanding problems, such as those seen at bolinas and n6 kph original radio site at lander base, in some 20 years of research on this matter, that I am yet to encounter any supportive force as to genuine inquiry into truth. Except for a few generous foreigners, but again, this is a subject that even Tesla had to avoid as it created deep mistrust, suspicion, misunderstanding and a general malaise of ridicule to his claims of distant radio transmission, remote control and transmission of power entirely regardless of distance. Because people long ago forgot he discovered that radium can be halted from emitting light by isolating it from cosmic rays, because people long ago forgot he discovered how to build the first radio set that was taken by ole 'gugli markoni', or that he claimed he measured rays from antares traveling at 50C, or that his radio was non electromagnetic interaction of entangled waves, what would later be discovered by other scientists and credited to them as advancements in wave diffraction entanglement and instanteous action at a distance, was in fact claimed and utilised by dollard and tesla.
It could be why it is of historical importance. I keep writing because if the decay of a nuclear isotopes is not fixed, which has been proven already by MIT, confirming tesla's claims. and if the total sum of energy derived in nuclear reactions is not caused solely by the instability of the dense matter, but by some external force, it follows naturally tesla's claim of believing that he would be able to power the world completely free. Of course if I am even partialy right, even if tesla is partialy right and there is plenty of experimental evidence to show his claims about radioactivity decay being unreliable in its constancy then several important questions arise about what governs time, as indeed time and our best atomic clocks is dependent on this process. Indeed if atomic decay is unreliable and a manifestation of entangled particles, it makes the entire theory of relativity particularly unsound, as the relativity of time and its measurement simply is reliant upon the same particles that these entangled forces might be responsible.
It effectively means, just like eric and other talented engineers like leedskalnin has been telling us for centuries, It's not that einstein was wrong about E being propotionmal to the Square of light and mass. It's a constant of exchange that can be mathematically determined. There is nothing about the equation that says anything about a multi coil, multi dimensionally tiered interaction between wve forms of e of m and and c of m, and so forth, so effectively people are really really foolish, because they look at einsteins equation in first order, completely forgetting that it could be probably in multi string tangenitial motion there willl be a disjoining or a division of velocities known as the "group phase or group velocities" etc etc, naturally the assumption of scientists goes further that these single dimensionally limited by C waves cant interact with eachother either, sub divided sub divided group velocities and derivative abstractions of the former. Why? I don't know it seems mathematically viable and as a musician I am afforded the ability of seeing the waves in my head interact with eachother, and to imagine the operation of tesla's device.
I don't need to confirm much because I can see how the acceleration of the rate of the capacitor per time is causing an impulse train of particles we call electrons(wrongly) to line up in actually packets or quanta of incrementally asymptotes of the wavelength of a particle. Theoretically at least if the capacitor can be induced to discharge at greater rates due to the recirculating currents in the primary, and the reverse resistance at the half wave interval of the mutual induction of the secondary or tertiary coil, you can see that the rate of the capacitor will begin to "slur", because its rate of discharge will begin to approach 'c', the rate of change of discharge, not the speed of the velocity of discharge (important). Under such circumstances there should be a point where the wave is cut-off by the alterations that are happening asymtotically elsewhere (i.e. the same as a switch being opened and closed at very high frequency), will result in the quanta or packets discharged by the capacitor and therefore leaving the spark gap to be of infinitely smaller length and therefore interval and size. Hopefully approaching the sub -quantum particle size.
Here behold what eric and a lot of other great engineers are trying to tell us.
Unfortunately in my 20 or so years working under erics direction and assisting him with his projects throughout 2012 and 2016, I am yet to meet many interested in genuine and authentic inquiry. That means the desire to be wrong and make an idiot out of yourself - something to be found few and far between. And people wonder why these long standing problems exist, when they cannot seperate their own personal problems from their professional ones.
Naturally my problem is a little bit different because I've made other peoples professional problems my personal problems, and I want to say that I fully understand any bitterness or resentment that might arise due to me doing this. Especially when I know nothing and there is a disingenuous risk that a little buddha braniac upstart like me may embarass an entire world of emanent electrical engineers, scholars and other armchair enthusiasts.
It is a real possiobility that I might have that 'super - power', afterall an eternal ancient like dollard basically taught me everything and made time to speak to me and answer my questions about rutherford and thomson. So that I could put some of these experiments together. Does Eric agree with everything I say? certainly not he is limiting his direction to the important engineering and mathematics that he is so gifted at doing. My gifts go a bit beyond in seeing and exploring, researching and calculating the human failures , not just our personal failures as engineers, that lead to good ideas dying in the field, or on the lab bench.
Although I don't depend on just a lan bench or the field, I am happy to add some persuasion to the minds of those that are concerned about sharing about what others might think, if progress is based on the rate of change, and we cannot even move beyond our own personal differences, please do not wonder why these longstanding problems in our society that prevent genius from flourishing existing.
Remember history recants that all of these genius people are very volatile people, and sensitive usually; they need love and many don't get it and end up in the situation they are in not just a consequence of themselves, but a consequence of the society and height of its consciousness that city lives. It is very rare for an autist engineer type person that can visualise all this stuff to not be afflicted by the disease of other small minded individuals marring the compassionate well meaning life of the genius, and although a bunch of archaelogists, and im sure people that are supposed to be and want to be known to be much smarter than me are still all scratching their heads about ancient egypt and how it all 'fell to shit'. I get a deep sense that this process did not stop in the western world, and actually accelerated into the cunning, strategies and methods we have. Those folk on the East side may have a point about not using their mind to go about solving problems, because it is so cunning that it appears to have convinced everyone that energy does not grow.
To my horror, the local sun is still putting out 500 centuries worth of planetary power a second, and physicists and scholars are still limiting the possibilities, talking about global warming, and generally to me at least, revealing the inconceivably infantile nature of the limited human consciousness. These limits we impose are optional you know, but you try telling the young ones that as any continuation.
Try convincing them about the possibility of a continuation. It normally stops right there. but if one is really enlightened, really authentic, really true, and knows the folks and the answers, and can really put a farnsworth sun to it. You listen to that kinda guy because every expert shrinks into their seat as he lays out a way to compensate for heinsenberg uncertainty, and certainly claims to have solved it in more than just an eccentric way, but hopefully a rather inspiring one that will not just build on the mystery and expertise of others, but provide a genuine insight into the nature of electricity, consciousness, the human heart and mind and how these longstanding problems could be a result of a lack of synthesis, more than it is any kind of mathematical abstraction of the terms. A lack of synthesis meaning, human limited consciousness strikes again at the first order.
If engineer electronics people actually experimented, with sound , wave generators, were artists or musicians instead of just did the theoretical experiments they'd see the power of tesla 3rd order odd resonance, and the kind of inconceivably complex waves it can create. Far beyond anything 'possible' today. Quantum effects, slurring alexanderson antennas. All completely impossible right.
Er, no actually. Just compress the time signature and you will have a string that is putting out more energy per second than it was before. Literally a child could understand it, but human limitation, limited human thought, prejudgement, non genuine inquiry, elitism, expertism and a thousand other things prevent real freedom of inquiry.
Imagine, pumping an ampere of power into the ground, and their being no draw from the power supply the next time you hit the ground.
It's called dancing, and the ancient people were very well aware of it. They were evolved enough to time the vibrations themselves thru instinct and reason because they weren't so distracted with all of these wrong and distracting analyses, they did not discover the ability in their own consciousnesses or body, and so they are all borrowing other peoples knowledge. I built a new type of transformer that can create an enlightened person just by touching it.
Again, none of these things exist, but if they did they'd probably belong at some borderland science laboratory. It's sunny out, time to catch the rays. Lot of hungry ghosts out there.
Best,
AB
-
Hi Adam,
There is a great deal of sense in what you write (I like your style).
Particularly "the desire to be wrong and make an idiot out of yourself". Too many here seem only to want to tell each other 'you're wrong, you're an idiot' than to perceive the route (as so many great trail-blazers have done in the past) through many failures (which teach something) to the odd success (which maybe is not so informative a result but more a confirmation of those 'failure lessons').
I also appreciate your 'horror' and as a fan of Stephen King I think you should write a book! ;) ;D
I shall watch for your posts with interest.
All the best,
D2
-
Over Unity Systems In The Past -- Many years ago, there was page article with drawing of spiral vortex dual 110v AC transformers that would provide higher wattage on output. (You know about the tornado effect) The unit was tested on refrigerator with proper meters and power factor. Also the best wind mill generator design was the US Patented "Tornado Turbine", Also the late Mr. Baumgartner demonstrated a hover platform lifting effect with small wattage train motor rewired in series for speed, and vortex spinning vanes. He had used computer program to design it. It was shown lifting him in a room and then later, the front end of city bus. 1950 Military motor pool soldiers converted used oil furnace to run on water. Fire pot at 1500 degrees then allows super-heated steam from SS tubing heat exchanger to add to 90lb oil flow to tiny pin point oil nozzle. When steam exits from 90lb high pressure to ambient zero pressure in fire pot the hydrogen and oxygen torch flame keeps heating. Oil valve shut off. If water line shut down, furnace has to be restarted on oil. Much smaller version in crate was shown to Washington senator in underground parking lot. US patent application was refused. Why can't anything be purchased. Alexander US Patent 3913004 1975 (https://overunity.com/18872/alexander-us-patent-3913004-1975-and-a-speculation-coorelation/msg558028/#msg558028)The technique of rotation with transformer effect (double wires on rotor) as in the above Patent method to increase energy, allowed inventor to make self running car with 4 air motors at wheels with air tank, battery , alternator, and modified military motor/generator with excessive output torque free energy to run main air compressor. The Stan Meyer Patented ionized Hydrogen gas H+H+O-- generator is way over unity (not electrolysis) and usable since the Patents time has ran out. In 1980's New York there was a self running air compressor with no battery or motor. The main shaft had journal with air cylinder that had higher pressure coming from inherent vortex tube higher pressure than 40lb tank + insulated heat chamber. Unit had spoked, balanced, heavy rim steel flywheel. Tube had 3 machined parts from 3 separate work machine shops, so as final design as put together would not be known. Inventor was mowing lawn outside trailer with long air hose hooked to tank. The interested Company reneged on the $3 million dollars wanted after 1 year. John W. Keely had shown demonstrations in 1890's Phil. Pa, of lifting effect (no gravity) with resonance frequencies and harmonic ratios using array of tuning forks and multiplication of higher vibrations on heavy metal spheres .His "transmitter wires" of gold, platinum + silver, are now called thermocouples and thermopiles. Witnessed by engineers, newspaper men, and investors at that time. Tesla didn't like Keely since Keely got more investor's money than he did. S1R9A9M9 (Nathren) of 2008 videos showed Briggs mower engine self running over unity with water in carburetor. Hydrogen gas electrolysis at spark plug with also water vapor pressure generated same time at neg 34 degrees ATDC. Magnetic field coil - called triple coils assy, over plug wire extends firing time for more contact with water. EGR improves performance. Alternator with magnets under flywheel provides constant 10 amps after battery was disconnected. Web site shut down. Special vacuumed sealed dual 1.6MH coils relay per cylinder also used for time spark extension. His CONVERTED carb type 1978 V8 El C amino tooled around town until locked up in security garage. You don't know about specialized information because you want data dropped in your lap, rather than doing your own science research yourself and finding out what others have already done. Back issues alternate energies magazines, documents you have to purchase, and published data on Internet YOU have to search for. See DVD VHS movies The Water Engine and 1949 Free For All .
-
Russ
This one should be doable?( easily tested)
However water thermolysis is above 1500 F
Actually over 2000C
Quote
1950 Military motor pool soldiers converted used oil furnace to run on water. Fire pot at 1500 degrees then allows super-heated steam from SS tubing heat exchanger to add to 90lb oil flow to tiny pin point oil nozzle.
When steam exits from 90lb high pressure to ambient zero pressure in fire pot the hydrogen and oxygen torch flame keeps heating. “”Oil valve shut off.”
If water line shut down, furnace has to be restarted on oil. Much smaller version in crate was shown to Washington senator in underground parking lot. US patent application was refused. Why can't anything be purchased.
End quote
BTW
I noticed Tommy Reed offered on some replication(s)
Me too ..
Respectfully
Chet K
-
1500 ºC? Then you get water splitting, right? Or ºF for pure steam?
What is the priciple that would keep it burning?
-
https://fahrenheittocelsius.org/1500-f-to-c
IC engine work process temperature,average and peak :
https://www.google.com/search?q=ic+engine+work+temperature&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m
-
1500 F is really hot for steam
Would be interesting to direct that into a hot flame ( what happens?)
2000C is where Water disassociates into H and O molecular..
I attach a small comment below from Tom Bearden info
Lithium is said to change temperature of thermal disassociation ( thermolysis of water into H and O)
I had heard it cuts it in half ( Sam Leach water engine claims below)
Would be interesting to try a bit of lithium Nitrate ( 20 ppm)
See if water furnace gets a benefit?
Still trying to find a path towards a lithium Nitrate sample for test
Apparently it’s a bit controlled ..( regulated?)
We had member who recommended just Lithium from dish soap ( one teaspoon per liter)
Would work .
Lanca
You a chemist ?
Upcycle lithium ion batteries into lithium Nitrate samples?
World will surely need lithium battery recycling markets …
Ask some friends for help ?
Water as fuel … Blasphemy to some …
Watch the rockets fly with one extra oxygen H2O -H3O
Respectfully
Chet K
-
Hello Chet,no,I am not chemists !
And : in R&D the most energy storage orientation is ' beyond : Lithium' !
Aluminium,Graphit/Graphene and Natrium-/Sodium ( battery,hibrid) :
https://www.google.com/search?q=BYD+sodium+battery&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m (https://www.google.com/search?q=BYD+sodium+battery&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-m)
I think that by simple questions Assistant Professor/Docent (biocell and alu-battery,beside ' round-up'- pendant from Hoechst)
https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/persons/pedro-manuel-brito-da-silva-correia (https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/persons/pedro-manuel-brito-da-silva-correia)
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=Pedro+Brito+Correia&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=Pedro+Brito+Correia&CPC=&IC=&Submit=Search)
can give helpfull answer !
wmbr
OCWL
p.s.:
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20001020&CC=FR&NR=2792258A1&KC=A1# (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20001020&CC=FR&NR=2792258A1&KC=A1#)
and instead 4x motors coupling 4x rotoverter
~ 1 Kg CATL 160 Wh/Kg for 40 Km drive range
with bosnian Professor concept including
https://www.patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15379 (https://www.patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=15379) 100 Km per Kg !?
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=Andreja+Todorovic&CPC=&IC= (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=&IN=Andreja+Todorovic&CPC=&IC=)
Robert Yost wind generator on tect car idea application including ?
But we know,R&D SciFi is everywhere ,up to 15 000 Wh/Kg :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20021231&CC=US&NR=6501093B1&KC=B1# (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20021231&CC=US&NR=6501093B1&KC=B1#)
From Alvin Marks theoretical number ? much reached by them 2023 ,citing documents :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citingDocuments?CC=US&NR=6501093B1&KC=B1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20021231&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/citingDocuments?CC=US&NR=6501093B1&KC=B1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20021231&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP)
F.e.:
https://capacitorsciences.com/
Capacitor Sciences Inc. has a new materials technology able to produce ultra-high energy density devices that can surpass the performance of lithium ion batteries by at least 10x in every metric.
1000 Km per Kg ? Impulse ( and feedback cycle storage)motor
Porquer/rotoverter as ic gasoline combustion engine car to electric car conversion kit,1/5 the price compared a new electric car buy !
And clearly,1 Kg for the average DAILY 130 Km drive is a theoretical number,mathematical AVERAGED,the battery DoD and Cmax. and motor inrush Wp during start phase,and concentrated/compressed brake energy recuperation ... and .. as physical barriers !
-
Lanca
Not looking to explore other chemisty or develop a test lab .
Just checking the actual very simple claim ( lithium nitrate at 20 Ppm in water… injected at 500 psi )
Also a furnace utilizing such simple device to run itself and provide heat ?
Win win for upcoming European winter!
Yes I realize Sam Leach claim was for generator /ICE
Having key ingredients and knowing lithium changes water thermolysis temp ( incredibly small ratio)
Checks all the boxes for replication attempts
And can also check Russ’s contributions above (simple furnace)
Thanks
Chet
-
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vXADXefdsZY (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vXADXefdsZY)
As Tutor he has probably some experience to give correct answer,with/by lab experience/experiments !
#28 ! Results ? https://overunity.com/19062/hho-projects/15/
wmbr
OCWL
-
Chet
Quote post 468 above
—-//////////
Still trying to find a path towards a lithium “”Nitrate””sample for test
Apparently it’s a bit controlled ..( regulated?)
—-//////////
Lanca
You a chemist ?
Upcycle lithium ion batteries into lithium Nitrate samples?
World will surely need lithium battery recycling markets …
Ask some friends for help ?
End quote
Respectfully
Chet K
Ps
Lanca
Respectfully ,
No need for further response unless directly ( how to) related to request post 468
How to ?
Any more info in _that_ regard greatly appreciated ( or from anyone who wants to see this open source experiment )
-
"higher levels of oxygen measured from tailpipe"
Might that have been oxides (products of combustion, H+O, N+O, etc? Or Simply O2, the actual good that needed for the next combustion? If O2, was that to conclude water had been broken into H and O, or...?
The language still uses "gastank", would it have been a watertank or are we talking about an H on demand supplementary system of which they were scratching their heads as to whether it did anything, and they proceeded to analyse the O levels of no description from the tailpipe?
Is it just me and my sub second attention span, or does that text raise more questions than answers?
-
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120048224 (https://patents.google.com/patent/US20120048224)
[ ....,0042,0043,....]
LiNO3 agricultural,electron,battery grade ?
https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/LiNO3-with-Agriculture-Grade-and-battery_1600253288299.html?fromMSite=true (https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/LiNO3-with-Agriculture-Grade-and-battery_1600253288299.html?fromMSite=true)
20 US$/gr or Kg ?
https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/99-99-9-Lithium-nitrate-LiNO3_1600267119684.html?spm=a2700.details.0.0.5ca170b6IRgi5t
Samples $10.00/kilogram
Fob factory 20 mg LiNO3 additive (1/50 gr.) ~ ≤ 1¢ value per litre gasoline
-
Cloxxi
I believe the addendum on oxygen levels was just a sidebar on another test
( putting Lithium Nitrate directly into fuel ..and it’s effects on emissions?)
The meat of the claim makes enuff sense to replicate
As we had another member here who wrote of lithium in water ( emulsion with fuel)
And had done dynamometer testing on 35kw genset (up-to 75% water emulsion )
Lanca
Thanks for info
Still need a chemist to assist
Also yes plenty sources for lithium nitrate
It just seems a controlled substance ( paperwork Lab etc etc)
-
In many such hobby experiments I was less than impressed with the data collection on the control. IMO the control experiment needs to really explore the limits of what can reasonably achieved with a unit of a given and standardized fuel.
Simply bruning of Lithium is a "hot" item these days, the energy to be gotten from that would of course need to be accounted for.
In a good test the engine would be run dry, fuel line drained. Then be run from a small of which the last drop van be sucked up. A reasonably steep hill being climbed at not too high speeds makes for a reliable experiment, wind and rain won't affect driving range on that little bottle of fuel much. Vehicle with good cruise control, obviously. Course that allows holding a constant pace even through bends. Record all ambient temp, air pressure and humidity, obvs.
-
A similar trial was the ' Acetone/Naphtalene to fuel ' hype 15 years before,with similar,compareable,emission kind change effect :
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098615302469 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098615302469)
Btw: 2006 lead and sulphur contente in gasoline ?
LiNO3 as anode material effect ( surface) in Lithium-Sulphur batteries ?
But I mean somebody wants an ' internal fusion chamber '-engine conversion ?! By LiNO3 addition.
wmbr
OCWL
-
Ramset
Not looking to explore other chemisty or develop a test lab .
Just checking the actual very simple claim ( lithium nitrate at 20 Ppm in water… injected at 500 psi )
I may have found an answer and it took all of 20 minutes but it means nothing if people don't understand logic, reason and how to solve problems.
So you said someone added lithium nitrate at 20 Ppm in water to an engine to increase efficiency.
Then I thought what are all the reactions which could happen within a combustion space but more so what is the simplest answer most would tend to miss?. The easy answer and the first thing which came to mind is a reaction with the engine itself. So I then thought, what is an engine made of and the most common materials are steel and aluminum. Since I'm not a chemist or physicist the obvious solution is to ask someone or thankfully an AI the question at hand.
So I asked ChatGPT the following questions...
1)can lithium nitrate react with aluminum, water to produce oxygen at high temperatures?.
Yes, lithium nitrate (LiNO3) can react with aluminum (Al) and water (H2O) at high temperatures to produce oxygen gas (O2). This type of reaction is a variation of the thermite reaction and involves the reduction of nitrate ions (NO3-) by aluminum
Interesting but what about steel?
2)Can lithium nitrate react with steel, water to produce oxygen at high temperatures?.
Lithium nitrate (LiNO3) can potentially react with steel and water at high temperatures to produce oxygen gas (O2), similar to the reaction with aluminum. However, the specific reaction between lithium nitrate and steel would depend on the composition of the steel and the conditions under which the reaction takes place.
Nice, and the AI goes onto claim...
Just like with the previous reactions, this reaction can be highly exothermic and may release heat and gases.
Interesting, so now the easy explanation could be an exothermic reaction with the engine metals producing not only heat and the expansion of the air charge within the engine but also extra gasses ie.offgassing producing even more pressure and force on the piston thus power.
So how did I find an easy explanation many people could spend decades wasting there time trying to figure out?. I'm only interested in finding real answers using logic and reason and the first question I always ask is... what is the most obvious solution most other people would miss?. Not the best answer, not an answer in line with any believes, narratives or opinions I may hold. Understand how people think and the things 99% of them would probably overlook and this is now the direction I would proceed.
In this respect, I find AI's like ChatGPT groundbreaking. Ask a question and you shall receive. It may not be the answer we wanted but it's more likely the answer which was needed.
I'm not sure why everyone has to make FE so difficult.
Here is one solution which Richard Feynman pointed out. One would think that if we used logic and reason all the answers we want would magically appear and all would be know. So why isn't this the case?, I mean were no dummies so what's the problem?. As Feynman pointed out it has nothing to do with "what" we think but "how" we think. The "what" is always changing as we learn new things replacing the old things. However how we think determines the new things we learn which would replace the old things. The "how we think" in order to solve problems is the way forward in my opinion.
AC
-
' the key to the whole process ' !
That more oxygen as emission is produced,by less CO2,but more C6 is nothing in chemical maths special !
But ' whole process' the claimed engine power output,mechanical-kinetical,the ' key of output power increase '-search !
Chemical torque/thrust !
Internal/external transmutation /(internal/external molecular/atomar-nuclear energy)
http://quanthomme.free.fr/energieencore/carnet17.htm (http://quanthomme.free.fr/energieencore/carnet17.htm)
The fuel R&D related claims :
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Arie+de+geus&IN=&CPC=&IC= (https://worldwide.espacenet.com/searchResults?submitted=true&locale=en_EP&DB=EPODOC&ST=advanced&TI=&AB=&PN=&AP=&PR=&PD=&PA=Arie+de+geus&IN=&CPC=&IC=)
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/PESWiki Papp- engine
wmbr
OCWL
-
"Yes, lithium nitrate (LiNO3) can react with aluminum (Al) and water (H2O) at high temperatures to produce oxygen gas (O2). This type of reaction is a variation of the thermite reaction and involves the reduction of nitrate ions (NO3-) by aluminum"[/size]
Congrats onepower!
Great use of AI, and for those skeptical, a response that seems worth fact-checking.
Producing O2 gas as a product, huh? Well how 'bout that!
A bit like Bedini circuits degreding the battery chemisty where the battery was supposed to be the constant factor. Consuming the engine, very VERY inspired of you to come up with and then ask Chat GPT about.
I've had mixed experiences with Chat GPT, I keep having to correct tis math because it just doesn't have a good handle on what's what in formulas.
For people like myself who don't realize that Lithium Nitrate introduces (so much) oxygen in that system, it would seem miraculous to get oxygen out. When really it's just part of the oxygen added coming back out. Especially when forcing the same fuel/air mixture, which might be key to these findings. An engine that only takes the air it needs, might not end up with extra oxygen? How does that realistically work?
How the 500 psi would impact the reaction, is for a better chemist than myself to theorize on. I'd like to see that done in isolation. Just distilled water, a bit of Lithium Nitrate, 500 psi and a spark. What can chemically be expected, and what's actually measured? The Lithium Nitrate if not fully recovered, would have at best been consumed. How much of a spark needed to get how much water to disbond and available for combustion or hydrogen fuel cell storage? The O2 measured out, can it exceed the LiNO3 provided as fuel?
-
Yes
A test chamber to witness the (combustion?) event
Keep it simple has always been a priority .
(Ticking over a one cylinder diesel is also a nice
Safe test bed !)
Tommy Reed is building a multifaceted test chamber
For testing this and other experiments .
-
Arie de Geus Fuel for combustion engines and gas turbines, with additional Nukleair Merging Component
patent NL1030700 https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2469.0,
Acetone, Borax or lithium stearate will do for engines with at least 9.5/1 compression rate, diesel engines have a higher compression rate than petrol engines.
We have almost all tech we want/need, but as we can see nothing comes up.
As far as I can see, no major player want to use any patent/invention that isn’t made in their own labs … maybe a sensible approach would be for inventors to encourage and grant usage of their patents for individual usage and bypass bigoilco (gov included).
In this very moment I can’t see anything happening in near future if we don’t start to do something at individual level. Just retain intellectual rights in case big brother want to show off, and make everything open source.
-
Sir
Here open source community has many assets ( people ,skills and equipment)
The simplest possible proof of an anomaly will benefit all (Globally)
And we are incredibly fortunate to have so many skilled persons willing to experiment
(Yes Arie de Geus need’s investigation too)
In this particular claim (Russ “water “furnace and Sam leach lithium nitrate at 20 ppm and 500 psi)
We are fortunate to have open source builder Tommy Reed placing this experiment in with his liquid piston test chamber topic here.
https://overunity.com/19454/tommey-reeds-liquid-piston-test-chamber/msg580970/#msg580970 (https://overunity.com/19454/tommey-reeds-liquid-piston-test-chamber/msg580970/#msg580970)
We just need to get him the Lithium Nitrate samples
As mentioned here lithium nitrate is regulated item ( do to illegal drug trade nonsense)
Better to learn how to make our own …
Since it’s such an incredibly small amount for Sam Leach claims above
Respectfully
Chet K
-
I we keep on theorizing on new technologies in a specific as possible way, we are blockign others from patenting same.
Say, one of us proposes a new way to do something.
A year later, a person comes up with the same, or even steals the idea here. They patent it, and the patent office investigator fails to find our proposals. If we then alert the patent office of the granted patent NOT to have been new, because already in the public space before their first submission date, their patent can and should be nullified.
Offering limited personal licenses for tinkerers is cool and all, but let the inventor then also please come through with a proper blueprint that is easily replicated from. If no-one can make it work, did it even work for the inventor or was is a measurement error?
-
Tesla radiant energy easy diy cosmic energy lights 240v
https://youtu.be/srwU9d5bsHs (https://youtu.be/srwU9d5bsHs)
Coupled with Tesla pancake coils diy sand heater https://youtu.be/LRFI0V-2DlA (https://youtu.be/LRFI0V-2DlA) instead of solar system and you don’t need to pay any gas/electric for heating your home.
If indeed we have here so many assets with skills and resources should be easy to see in less than 1 month few micro production lines pumping the market with different purposes and output.
Like, replace you heater exchange in your existing heating system with something derived from the above. Make a secondary unit to provide power for your domestic appliances etc.
All in the open ! :) And cheap to replicate without the need for expensive instruments, just make it and use it as you please.
I would strongly suggest downloading or recording as soon as you can, as if it get popularity it might disappear.
Just don’t use keywords unaltered, always specify solar or whatever for avoiding unwanted things happening.
-
I wish people would quit making out the term "radiant energy" as if it were something lost, magical, or mystical. Tesla invented the term to explain phenomena he was seeing, specifically having to do with electrical fields. The term was used all over the place, everything from "radiant tubes" that used the brush effect from high current low voltage D'Arsonval style high frequency coils to the purple corona discharge of Tesla or Oudin style high frequency devices.
But then again, I shouldn't be surprised as most people don't know the difference between coil types. If the secondary is connected to ground, hint, it is not a Tesla coil. Most coils called a Tesla coil are in fact Oudin style high frequency coils. Yes, Tesla himself used all three types in his research, don't be surprised at that either. The highest voltages combined with the lowest currents are derived from Tesla style HF coils. Lowest voltage highest current are from D'Arsonval auto-transformer pancake style HF coils, mid-range on both comes from Oudin style HF coils.
Tesla's 685,957 radiant energy patent concerns the natural electric field of the earth. How is that radiant energy? Tesla knew it was caused by energy RADIATED FROM THE SUN. The earth acts like a giant capacitor in that respect, with the ball of dirt acting as one plate, and the ionosphere acting as the other. Lightning is a byproduct of voltages exceeding the breakdown voltage of the dielectric (air). The charge difference in the dielectric between the ionosphere and the ground is between 100 and 300 volts per meter.
That patent tells a basic structure using capacitance and a spark gap (figure one) between two electrically isolated plates to harness that natural energy, and how to use it in a few ways. the last two figures is that patent show you that it applies to directed radiant energy (parabolic dish as the source) or from a radiant energy tube, common at the time for "electrical medicine." Nothing in that patent is even mysterious, let alone mystical -- in any sense. Engineers at the time knew exactly what the patent referenced, as it was a novel way of harnessing something thought to be worthless and unusable by science.
For those interested, figure 4 shows how to use a mechanically turned commutator (instead of a spark gap) in series with a primary coil to run a Tesla coil. Understand that an ordinary spark gap would work, not tht difficult to understand.
For those familiar with original HF Tesla coil circuit design, the stuff in figure 1 should stick out like a sore thumb. Spark gap across a capacitor, collector plate in the air, grounding plate buried in the soil. The two plates replace the high voltage source usually powering the tesla coil.
Understand that a D'Arsonval coil can be used to step down the voltage of such a device, though it would be HF at that point.
The Earth's electric field itself is not AC, but is in fact high voltage DC. It is a static field, like exists in any capacitor. He put a capacitor inside an active capacitor to tap into some of the stored field energy.
Paul Andrulis
-
Cloxxki
Great use of AI, and for those skeptical, a response that seems worth fact-checking.
Producing O2 gas as a product, huh? Well how 'bout that!
A bit like Bedini circuits degreding the battery chemisty where the battery was supposed to be the constant factor. Consuming the engine, very VERY inspired of you to come up with and then ask Chat GPT about.
I tend to follow the best interpretation of Occam's razor. Which is, "the answer which relies on the fewest assumptions is probably the right one". Many say, "the simplest answer is the right one" but this is a fallacy. Logically, an answer can be simple but still be wrong. When we say answer we mean a fact and all facts rely on the fewest false assumptions.
For example, many critics claim a FE device must violate the Conservation of Energy. However if the COE cannot be violated then how could a FE device violate it?. It's clearly a false statement because it directly contradicts itself and yet we hear it all the time. Which begs the question, if a FE device cannot violate the COE then where does the energy come from?.
AC
-
from Earth electromagnetic field
-
I wish people would quit making out the term "radiant energy" as if it were something lost, magical, or mystical. Tesla invented the term to explain phenomena he was seeing, specifically having to do with electrical fields. The term was used all over the place, everything from "radiant tubes" that used the brush effect from high current low voltage D'Arsonval style high frequency coils to the purple corona discharge of Tesla or Oudin style high frequency devices.
But then again, I shouldn't be surprised as most people don't know the difference between coil types. If the secondary is connected to ground, hint, it is not a Tesla coil. Most coils called a Tesla coil are in fact Oudin style high frequency coils. Yes, Tesla himself used all three types in his research, don't be surprised at that either. The highest voltages combined with the lowest currents are derived from Tesla style HF coils. Lowest voltage highest current are from D'Arsonval auto-transformer pancake style HF coils, mid-range on both comes from Oudin style HF coils.
Tesla's 685,957 radiant energy patent concerns the natural electric field of the earth. How is that radiant energy? Tesla knew it was caused by energy RADIATED FROM THE SUN. The earth acts like a giant capacitor in that respect, with the ball of dirt acting as one plate, and the ionosphere acting as the other. Lightning is a byproduct of voltages exceeding the breakdown voltage of the dielectric (air). The charge difference in the dielectric between the ionosphere and the ground is between 100 and 300 volts per meter.
That patent tells a basic structure using capacitance and a spark gap (figure one) between two electrically isolated plates to harness that natural energy, and how to use it in a few ways. the last two figures is that patent show you that it applies to directed radiant energy (parabolic dish as the source) or from a radiant energy tube, common at the time for "electrical medicine." Nothing in that patent is even mysterious, let alone mystical -- in any sense. Engineers at the time knew exactly what the patent referenced, as it was a novel way of harnessing something thought to be worthless and unusable by science.
For those interested, figure 4 shows how to use a mechanically turned commutator (instead of a spark gap) in series with a primary coil to run a Tesla coil. Understand that an ordinary spark gap would work, not tht difficult to understand.
For those familiar with original HF Tesla coil circuit design, the stuff in figure 1 should stick out like a sore thumb. Spark gap across a capacitor, collector plate in the air, grounding plate buried in the soil. The two plates replace the high voltage source usually powering the tesla coil.
Understand that a D'Arsonval coil can be used to step down the voltage of such a device, though it would be HF at that point.
The Earth's electric field itself is not AC, but is in fact high voltage DC. It is a static field, like exists in any capacitor. He put a capacitor inside an active capacitor to tap into some of the stored field energy.
Paul Andrulis
I didn’t say anywhere that it might be something magic, quite the opposite !
Although I enjoy to see another explanation of the phenomena and nicely statement about being surrounded by energy.
Those videos just prove that we don’t need an phd in nano molecular or astronomy to make a simple device using few wires, transistor and capacitors to get our homes powered and warmed up. Yet it is a very simple and inexpensive device easy to replicate and should be done in schools as many adults are just blinded by mainstream “science”
Yet I can see on forum people struggling to replicate Don Smith, Kapanadze and they just don’t think that all they need is their wire lengths needs to match a fraction of wave length for frequency and their air core transformers produce standing waves being shorted and amplified waves create a huge energy ready for collection, they can’t understand that if you don’t use the gradient potential you need a battery to create that needed disturbance, yet they fall for silly trap of fe deniers to loop to prove whatever. Also designing their devices they don’t look to match the desired load with their system but still expect to see wonders in the sky.
Yet, it seems very difficult to see that using electricity is just shorting + with - in any devices you can find on shops, and they are utterly inefficient on how they have been designed for not being harmonic with the environment and most of them are just an fancy heating element sometimes with a screen, speaker and mic attached.
In Nikola Tesla and Arie Melis deGeus inventions we can see that HV at hf resistance of copper is almost nothing and electricity is always accompanied by magnetism, yet they still search for superconductors at room temperature as a new method for antigravity when we know the tech already exist and being used.
Now if my rant is excused by your grace, I can’t see why we don’t have anyone replicating this simplified schoolgirl project to prove or disprove the utility of another Tesla’s inventions along with many other that we are using even without noticing.
And, please don’t get me wrong, but I believe that if we start to use this energy we may witness less devastating storms and hurricanes around the globe according with the level of modern lifestyle for at least 1/2 of inhabitants on this planet.
-
I didn’t say anywhere that it might be something magic, quite the opposite !
Although I enjoy to see another explanation of the phenomena and nicely statement about being surrounded by energy.
Those videos just prove that we don’t need an phd in nano molecular or astronomy to make a simple device using few wires, transistor and capacitors to get our homes powered and warmed up. Yet it is a very simple and inexpensive device easy to replicate and should be done in schools as many adults are just blinded by mainstream “science”
Yet I can see on forum people struggling to replicate Don Smith, Kapanadze and they just don’t think that all they need is their wire lengths needs to match a fraction of wave length for frequency and their air core transformers produce standing waves being shorted and amplified waves create a huge energy ready for collection, they can’t understand that if you don’t use the gradient potential you need a battery to create that needed disturbance, yet they fall for silly trap of fe deniers to loop to prove whatever. Also designing their devices they don’t look to match the desired load with their system but still expect to see wonders in the sky.
Yet, it seems very difficult to see that using electricity is just shorting + with - in any devices you can find on shops, and they are utterly inefficient on how they have been designed for not being harmonic with the environment and most of them are just an fancy heating element sometimes with a screen, speaker and mic attached.
In Nikola Tesla and Arie Melis deGeus inventions we can see that HV at hf resistance of copper is almost nothing and electricity is always accompanied by magnetism, yet they still search for superconductors at room temperature as a new method for antigravity when we know the tech already exist and being used.
Now if my rant is excused by your grace, I can’t see why we don’t have anyone replicating this simplified schoolgirl project to prove or disprove the utility of another Tesla’s inventions along with many other that we are using even without noticing.
And, please don’t get me wrong, but I believe that if we start to use this energy we may witness less devastating storms and hurricanes around the globe according with the level of modern lifestyle for at least 1/2 of inhabitants on this planet.
When it comes to patent #685,957 -- I ran an idea past an AI -- that was interesting. Very interesting. Once I described what I was thinking, it caught the idea 100% and then came up with the formula I needed. I would have never thought of using that derivation for that particular system, but it fits when considering Tesla's own position on the subject matter. Viewing the earth as a conductive perfect sphere. I would have overlooked that formula every day of the week for various reasons.
P = E^2/C -> E= SQRT(P/C) where P equals power output in watts, E equals electric field strength in volts per meter, C = capacitance in farads
Totally the wrong formula, yet it makes perfect sense. In the second formula the plate size in square meters can be interchanged with E.
This might work, have to test. The AI is certain it will work, though a different AI is not so sure (since the earth is not a perfect sphere,) but I am pessimistic about easy answers so reserve my optimism for results.
Paul Andrulis
-
Honestly, there is thousands of patent application for exactly the same principle … just look at this https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100207399A1/en … and always check patent citation, you’ll be amazed to see thousands variations of Tesla’s inventions and everyone want to have a patent.
Yet, we don’t have in any shop anywhere on this planet any device operating despite such a skilled inventors.
But, … someone with a soldering iron, just made it and shared for free with anyone … and even more than that, is cheap to make without any need for graphene or superconductor and you even don’t need an oscilloscope or any other fancy tools.
Amazing world 👏🏻
-
It is very strange to see a picture in which I published an experiment that is an addition to the Joule experiment, because the latter did not imply that there is heat....
And people are still having weird discussions about wavelengths and whatnot.
wavelength. frequency and nothing else is nowadays realized in Ansys HFSS simulators.
Of course, there are different people here and so rarely those who can give quite an adequate technical answer to the questions....
But I wouldn't want to engage in criticism. since hardly anyone would be interested.
Now, at this stage. As soon as I gave up mechanics. because it is very costly for me - mechanics requires a fleet of equipment. and here I simply do not have it. so I decided to deal with hypotheses. which would not have mechanics, although in fact the displacement of ines or overcoming the potential that is formed on the windings of an electric motor, as an obrtimate machine...but pure mechanics - not anymore....
I would like to share some of my negative experiences with LSpice. The question was that it has models as a long line ideal and with losses. But both in some cases do not work quite correctly.
The point is that it works only if I form the LC chain by hand as a delay line with concentrated parameters.
Unipolar pulses in the delay line along the line itself are not unipolar, but due to the self-induction EMF they turn into a bipolar signal, and it was required to receive a unipolar signal along the line....
-
The question now is to refine a different concept that once instead of radio frequencies works within 1 MHz to get the potential to prevent all that has to overcome in an electric motor, exactly as in a battery....
Once LTSpice gave out a non super unit )) thought - that it would not work for him...but now decided to refine the situation.... And the theme with a pendulum. which is described above - showed super-unit...but nobody needs it....
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
-
I am now planning to create a library in Ansys Maxwell
If anyone has B and H data for FEMM or ANSYS MAXWELL, let me know
-
Cloxxki
I tend to follow the best interpretation of Occam's razor. Which is, "the answer which relies on the fewest assumptions is probably the right one". Many say, "the simplest answer is the right one" but this is a fallacy. Logically, an answer can be simple but still be wrong. When we say answer we mean a fact and all facts rely on the fewest false assumptions.
For example, many critics claim a FE device must violate the Conservation of Energy. However if the COE cannot be violated then how could a FE device violate it?. It's clearly a false statement because it directly contradicts itself and yet we hear it all the time. Which begs the question, if a FE device cannot violate the COE then where does the energy come from?.
AC
Energy comes from there (Physical Vacuum) and spreads in it, interacting with a physical body in the form of conductors, semiconductors. goes to the same Physical Vacuum in the form of radiation (heat and light) according to the principles of thermodynamics. However, at that time there was not yet a clear understanding of the nature of light (heat), which was introduced by Maxwell.
We're talking about Joule-Lenz heat.
-
Energy comes from there (Physical Vacuum) and spreads in it, interacting with a physical body in the form of conductors, semiconductors. goes to the same Physical Vacuum in the form of radiation (heat and light) according to the principles of thermodynamics. However, at that time there was not yet a clear understanding of the nature of light (heat), which was introduced by Maxwell.
We're talking about Joule-Lenz heat.
I have heard similar responses however when a generalized answer only raises more questions then in my opinion it's not a real answer.
For example we know all space is full of high energy particles and EM waves so why not just say that?. Feynman/Wheeler claimed a cup sized volume of supposedly "empty" space has enough energy to boil the worlds oceans. So space is obviously not empty as many falsely assumed. There is more than enough mainstream science to prove the universe is in fact a sea of energy.
So we have already established the fact every space cannot be empty and is in fact seething with energy as high energy particles and EM waves. Problem solved...
Here's a clue, space is a perfect vacuum as is the space between the particles in all atoms and in fact all material things. This is true because a vacuum is defined as any space devoid of matter. We could go deeper and get into sub-atomic particles but there is really no need. It's enough to understand the difference between matter and that which is not matter.
Here is another clue which should have been obvious but for some reason isn't. If the whole universe is a perfect vacuum then it's almost as if we and everything we know are living inside a "vacuum tube" and all of the same rules apply. If you observed a few electrons moving inside an electron tube should you suppose the moving electrons are the source of the energy?. Well no, it's absurd and a primitive notion of the way things work at best.
On thermo(heat)dynamics(motion), I find the perspective primitive and reject it. The actual energy involved always relates to electrodynamics ie. a change of electric and magnetic fields so why dumb down the concept into something as absurd as jiggling atoms as heat?. It makes no sense to me and is right up there with this video at minute 1:40 "if my grandma had wheels she would've been a bike" ie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OplyHCIBmfE.
Simply put artists on the cutting edge of energy technology do not dumb down everything to the lowest common denominator. That is for people who understand nothing of energy or how it applies.
AC
-
The rare successes are masked among opportunities to learn
and make mistakes
and learn more
But yes, some have created overunity here amongst these threads.
-
On thermo(heat)dynamics(motion), I find the perspective primitive and reject it. The actual energy involved always relates to electrodynamics ie. a change of electric and magnetic fields so why dumb down the concept into something as absurd as jiggling atoms as heat?. It makes no sense to me and is right up there with this video at minute 1:40 "if my grandma had wheels she would've been a bike" ie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OplyHCIBmfE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OplyHCIBmfE).
Simply put artists on the cutting edge of energy technology do not dumb down everything to the lowest common denominator. That is for people who understand nothing of energy or how it applies.
AC
After a lifetime of combating thermodynamic theory, i found it ironically humorous to watch them remove all of the heat, then have to realize that Maxwell was still staring them in the face.
-
I want to add something to this topic,
While developing overunity systems IS a major goal
There are a lot of other energy related topic we often address
Such as alternative sources, renewable sources, efficiency, reclamation
Major successes have come out of those areas such as the Joule Thief,
which is now taught in colleges and used in many major electronics systems
As well as the Archimedes solar death ray, which now provides 3% of the worlds power
In terms of Overunity, i can point you to my personal top 4 areas that i feel have the most promise in our current situation:
1) magnetic gates (HJ/triforce/SEG) and magnetogravitics (AQ et all,)
2) electromagnetigravitics (see Stephans spring based analog)
3) Tesla / Tinsel Koala / Master Ivo - radiant overunity
4) low power plasma electrolysis
There are other interesting things floating around but i believe the above have the most likely chance of being developed into large usable systems.
-
You also forgot the Coleman-Wesley tube, which emits radiation.
And,that is most main,forgot me. >:(
I suggested turning the energy of hatred between people into heat, electricity, and finally cold.
There is more than enough such free energy in the world. :P
-
Honestly, i construct electromagnetics generators very efficients, with caducee coil, cold coil, ferrite coil and resonnant frequencies, there are very very efficient. But you must keep the input batterie in good condition.
The notion of perpetual energy is different.
Take somes garden garbage to produce methane, fire the methane and make electricity
With somes converter , like peltier device, you have energy forever you work.
Perpetual energy exist but you must work for it. I don't know if somehone have made a real perpetual energy device that doesn't use any fuel ( even spiritual fuel)
Tesal claim to harvest energy from athmosphere, but you must have a grounded installation, otherwise, you have somes self running machines but they fly in the air, like SEARL did, not very good for everyday use.
Solar panel are good for energy generation but actually the circuit with batteries are efficiency killer.
Solar panels can be more efficient with plate and long capacitor instead of batteries. The drawback is that you must use the energy immediatly. I use it with a conventionnal charger and other non conventionnal but efficients chargers, with resonnant coil and ferrite coil with tunes capacitors. But this is not perpetual,the system must be re-energized sometimes.
I doubt that anybody have found a perpetual device, for i know even higthly advanced peoples use non perpetual technologie.
The microbiotic battery seems interresting, you must provide food to your batterie and she make electricity.
A microbiotic battery farm seems to be the future of electricity.