Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2231742 times)

memoryman · « **Reply #3180 on:** April 22, 2015, 03:00:57 AM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 22, 2015, 02:43:24 AM

It is absolutely confirmed that the White House and the Chinese Government are aware of lead-out energy and Flying Saucer. This thread is being studied.

My hope is that they will release the technology to benefit the entire human race.

Lawrence
reply 3156

More likely they are laughing themselves silly.

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #3181 on:** April 22, 2015, 04:17:25 AM »

Quote from: memoryman on April 22, 2015, 03:00:57 AM

More likely they are laughing themselves silly.

Yes, or possibly, Lawrence will receive a visit from some nice Secret Service Agents just to check him out for their files.

Bill

memoryman · « **Reply #3182 on:** April 22, 2015, 04:51:10 AM »

Lawrence, I will personally tell Barack Obama about you on my next (ultra secret) meeting with him.
You will not be ignored but will get your due. Ignore all the other nay-sayers and only listen to me, the best informed nay-sayer.

MarkE · « **Reply #3183 on:** April 22, 2015, 07:51:24 AM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 22, 2015, 12:34:51 AM

The Flying Saucer uses the "King David Sling" principle. It may not need any aerodynamics. It may use lead-out energy.

As such, the Flying Saucer is superior to all known planes, missiles of today. China and USA are keeping it as top secret. I believe that the technology should be used to benefit the entire human race. It must not be the start of another arms race.

The QMOGEN is likely to be easier for Developing Nations to master and excel. My bet is on India. Any development in USA or China may be "taken over" by the man in black???

Lawrence
reply 3156

Can you fly?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5e3qoREpuA#t=2m10s

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3184 on:** April 22, 2015, 06:28:04 PM »

Wong: "Have China and USA developed Flying Saucer prototypes that use lead-out energy?"

Chan: "If they have not, they will. This thread is so clear."

Tseung: "The Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier QMOGEN was around since 1996. UFO sightings have been around much longer."

Wong: "Is China technologically this advanced?"

Chan: "If Tseung can explain the King David Sling technology, China or any advanced Nation can build it."

Tseung: "The Flying Saucers will use lead-out energy. The new paradigm will be here."

Wong: "The top secrets of USA and China are revealed in this thread. The lead-out energy Flying Saucers can wipe out all existing war planes and Star War Defenses... USA and China are not likely to announce such Top Secrets. But another Nation..."

Chan: "Will USA or China hack this thread or the whole overunity.com? Is it too late now? Over 100 people in Hong Kong have been exposed to this technology. Many hundreds all over the World have accessed this information."

Divine Wine is for all to share. Seeds have been sown.

Lawrence
reply 3156

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3185 on:** April 23, 2015, 12:16:54 AM »

UFO in Hong Kong 2015

Should we be surprised?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2L0ts-JPtk

UFO in area 51 in April 21, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bmgEt--Tww

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3186 on:** April 23, 2015, 02:06:38 AM »

If population is under control, continued scientific and technology advances will guarantee a higher standard of living for all humans. Why should there be war?

The new paradigm of inexhaustible energy and the Flying Saucer is coming.

The aging population problem is NOT a problem if we accept that the additional resources developed will enable the Seniors to have quality of life and pass away. A smaller population will enjoy the increased amount of scientific and technology fruits.

Lawrence
reply 3156

memoryman · « **Reply #3187 on:** April 23, 2015, 02:21:42 AM »

"If population is under control" Who's control?

MarkE · « **Reply #3188 on:** April 23, 2015, 02:31:55 AM »

Quote from: memoryman on April 23, 2015, 02:21:42 AM

"If population is under control" Who's control?

Shhh, the graboids that don't fly so well all the time have complete control.

Paul-R · « **Reply #3189 on:** April 23, 2015, 04:19:30 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 23, 2015, 02:06:38 AM

The aging population problem is NOT a problem if we accept that the additional resources developed will enable the Seniors to have quality of life and pass away. A smaller population will enjoy the increased amount of scientific and technology fruits.

It sounds like Soylent Green.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3190 on:** April 24, 2015, 12:33:55 AM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 23, 2015, 02:06:38 AM

If population is under control, continued scientific and technology advances will guarantee a higher standard of living for all humans. Why should there be war?

The new paradigm of inexhaustible energy and the Flying Saucer is coming.

The aging population problem is NOT a problem if we accept that the additional resources developed will enable the Seniors to have quality of life and pass away. A smaller population will enjoy the increased amount of scientific and technology fruits.

Lawrence
reply 3156

Wealth of Nations is technology, technology and technology. The new wealth will be lead-out energy and Flying Saucers. China has the one child policy. Japan is allowing its population to naturally decline.

Both are likely to enjoy higher standards of living without wars or robbing other Nations. Both are competing on high speed trains. But soon, the focus will be on Flying Saucers.

ayeaye · « **Reply #3191 on:** April 24, 2015, 12:52:52 PM »

Maybe this question is naive but, is the possible overunity in that device really caused by gravity? I noticed that at least in some implementations of that device, there is some knocking or some kind of spring. Elasticity is electromagnetic, so can it be that the reason for overunity there is really electromagnetic? Which makes more sense, because gravity is a symmetric field, and in theory a symmetric field cannot be made to do a continuous work. At least i am not aware of any theory which shows that this is possible.

Paul-R · « **Reply #3192 on:** April 24, 2015, 03:31:31 PM »

Quote from: ayeaye on April 24, 2015, 12:52:52 PM

Maybe this question is naive but, is the possible overunity in that device really caused by gravity? I noticed that at least in some implementations of that device, there is some knocking or some kind of spring. Elasticity is electromagnetic, so can it be that the reason for overunity there is really electromagnetic? Which makes more sense, because gravity is a symmetric field, and in theory a symmetric field cannot be made to do a continuous work. At least i am not aware of any theory which shows that this is possible.

There are two types of people:

1. Those who say they don't know the answer.
2. Those who say they know the answer but don't.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3193 on:** April 24, 2015, 04:41:54 PM »

Quote from: ayeaye on April 24, 2015, 12:52:52 PM

Maybe this question is naive but, is the possible overunity in that device really caused by gravity? I noticed that at least in some implementations of that device, there is some knocking or some kind of spring. Elasticity is electromagnetic, so can it be that the reason for overunity there is really electromagnetic? Which makes more sense, because gravity is a symmetric field, and in theory a symmetric field cannot be made to do a continuous work. At least i am not aware of any theory which shows that this is possible.

Please look at the series of experiments done in 2009.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LC3As-tmCQU

The idea was to get electromagnetic mechanisms to greatly improve the gravitational lead-out energy. In the particular video above, a permanent magnet is repelled by the coil to jump to great height.

The full experiment is supposed to be:

1. The permanent magnet inside the tube is allowed to fall from a height. The potential energy is converted to kinetic energy.

2. This magnet is allowed to rebound. If the collision is perfectly elastic, the magnet will rebound back to same height.

3. If a coil (electromagnet) were placed to provide additional repulsion, the magnet will reach much greater height.

4. The actual experiment in 2009 simply showed the energy that can be supplied by electromagnetic repulsion. It convinced us that the magnetic or electromagnetic energy that was lead-out or brought-in could be much greater.

5. Such a mechanism can force the entire vessel (tube) to jump up. That was the beginning of the Flying Saucer thoughts. See the series of experiment especially experiment 5. In experiment 5, magnetic attraction was used. The magnet after jumping up (carrying the whole tube up) would be attracted to remain in the tube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCz1Byt7fVI

6. We then focused on circular motion energy - the King David Sling mechanism in 2015. Continuous jumping is difficult to implement. Continuous circular motion is much easier.

7. If we can lead-out gravitational energy, we must be able to lead-out magnetic and electromagnetic energy.

8. Thus the QMOGENs without the Unbalanced Cylinder may still work but the conceptual picture is much more complicated.

My recommendation is to play with the Unbalanced Wheel/Cylinder to lead-out some gravitational energy. Then focus on leading out magnetic or electromagnetic energy without gravitational energy.

The top secret of China and USA is the use of lead-out energy in the Flying Saucer. You can assume that all sorts of lead-out energy are involved. Such lead-out energy can be replenished in space.

Lawrence
reply 3156

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3194 on:** April 24, 2015, 11:28:37 PM »

In general, if we can use energy from the environment, we do not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.

If one does not know how to use solar energy, one may conclude that the solar plane cannot fly.

The Chan Wheel is superior to the Milkovic 2SO. But we expect some will say otherwise.

The Flying Saucer is superior to the airplanes of today. But we expect some will say otherwise.

Using Electron Cloud or Electron Motion Energy is superior to Chemical Energy. But we expect some will say otherwise.

Divine Wine flows. Some will say that it is rubbish...

Lawrence
reply 3156

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2231742 times)

memoryman

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Pirate88179

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

memoryman

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

MarkE

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

memoryman

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

MarkE

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Paul-R

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ayeaye

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Paul-R

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !