Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos (Read 1614081 times)

sadang · « **Reply #1545 on:** August 17, 2014, 07:57:42 AM »

Quote from: Floor on August 17, 2014, 02:30:02 AM

@ Tinman / others

I am also interested by this kind of measurement, because I have not found it anywhere! I'll do it myself when I will receive the Hall linear sensors, and will post here the result.

SaDAng

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #1546 on:** August 17, 2014, 10:56:53 AM »

I call this 6 MIN. STOVETOP MAGNETIC LEVITATION!!

Decided to FINALLY make a video of this method tonight ....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSjDJgD7fO8

$20 for 1 POUND of 99.95% PURE BISMUTH (however I bought some time ago 35 pounds CHEAP).

the bottom of coke cans (or beer cans, whatever the hell you drink!)

take a CRUDE chunk like below, melt it on the stoptop (ONLY MELT PURE PURE BISMUTH!!!!)

takes 6 mins or so to melt, pour it into the bottom of your coke cans, let cool, pop out, and TAAA DAAAAAAAAAA DIAMAGNETIC BISMUTH DISKS FOR BUILDING YOUR OWN MAGNETIC LEVITATION DEVICE!!!!

1 pound will fill 4 CAN BOTTOMS, meaning 2 COMPLETE sets of levitation devices.

go from CRUMBLY metal to smoooooth as a babys ass disks

........bismuth is JUST above lead in weight, so its some VERY heavy stuff.

Make a BISMUTH NEO MAGGIE LEVITATOR!!

Oh, I wore a mask just for the hell of it, however with pure bismuth you really dont have to.

Is Bismuth RADIOACTIVE? YES.....and no, ....mostly NO.
Physicists in France have measured the longest ever radioactive half-life - over twenty billion billion years - in a naturally occurring element that decays by emitting alpha-particles. Nőel Coron and colleagues at the Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale in Orsay used a ‘scintillating bolometer’ at very low temperatures to detect the emission of alpha particles – charged particles that consist of two protons and two neutrons – as bismuth-209 decays into thallium-205

Although bismuth-209 is commonly thought to be the heaviest stable isotope that exists in nature, theory suggests that it should be metastable and decay via alpha-particle emission to thallium-205. This decay is not easy to measure because the alpha particles generated have very little energy, which means that the isotope decays at a very low rate.

and of course , you can grow pretty Bismuth crystals like below:

93RDELEMENT · « **Reply #1547 on:** August 17, 2014, 05:47:45 PM »

TA YOUR ONE SICK INVERTED HOLE !!! YOU CANT EVEN DO ONE SIMPLE EXSPERIMENT !!! AND FINALY THE PROOF THAT NO MAGNETIC VORTEX EXISITS HAS BEEN CONFIRMED SO YOU DAFT BOOK IS FULL OF NOTHING AND YOU KNOW IT .................................... METAPHYSICS IS A REALITY BEYOUND YOUR COMPREHENSION AND QUATOUM MACHANICS IS AN IMPOSIBLITY FOR YOU TO LEARN OR EXSEPT ! SO NORMAL SIMPLE PHYSICS IS ALL YOU CAN DO YET YOU CANT ADD UP CAN YOU SO FORGET IT SON ......

PARTICLES RULE

YUO STUPID DUM HOLE IGNERANET DUBBLE GLAZING SALES MAN

YOU KEEP USEING TERMS THAT PREVOKE PEOPLE TO LOOK AT YOUR WORK AND NEVER PROVE THEM AS REALITY ITS ALL A CON ! THAN YOU TRY AND ACT LIKE AN INTELIGENT BEING BUT CANT HELP ABUSING PEOPLE SO THAT MY SON IS PURE MENTAL PHYSCOTIC FANTUM MENISSS AN IDIOT WHO NEED TO BE SEE BY A DR FOR A TREATMENT THAT DOES NOT YET EXISIT ! YOU MY SON ARE ONE SICK MAN YOU NEED HELP FAST .......

PARTICLES RULE

TRY AND COUNT ENERGY WITHOUT THEM AND YOU HAVE NOTHING THAT WILL MAKE ENERGY OR ENTROPY YOU DUMMY SOUP BRAIN !

COME WITH ME SON I WILL INTRODUCE TO YOU A REAL DEMON AND IF YOU UP SET HIM HE WILL NEVER LEAVE YOU ALONE COME ON SON ITS TIME FOR THE GHOST FIELD I WANT YOU TO RUN FOR YOUR LIFE HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOU STUPID MUG HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

REGARDS

THE HOLY GHOST

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #1548 on:** August 17, 2014, 06:41:31 PM »

testing the Bismuth

93RDELEMENT · « **Reply #1549 on:** August 17, 2014, 07:45:54 PM »

We know ! you idiot ! Now take the hot magnet down into the ground at 500 m and you will find what we found a cool normal heat signal ! That my son is proof you are wrong about everything ! and the magnet suspended over the tin can is suspended its not levitating is it ........... you silly boy !!!

So the summery so far is there is no dielectric on the edge of the magnet and there is no magnetic vortex and Maxwell's vacuum is what is attracting radiation to the magnet ok boy you silly ignorant rude selfish nincompoop hahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha I win again that's 5 points to me and zero point to you ! I keep full account of my winnings !!!!

You must now change the term magnetic vortex to Maxwell's magnetic vacuum and also reject the dielectric formulas you have made ! Particles rule and dimensional rules apply !

Regards

king monkey

minnie · « **Reply #1550 on:** August 17, 2014, 08:08:45 PM »

King monkey,
you sure are a joker! Hahahahahahahahahahaha.
John.

gravityblock · « **Reply #1551 on:** August 17, 2014, 08:09:20 PM »

Quote from: sadang on August 17, 2014, 07:57:42 AM

I am also interested by this kind of measurement, because I have not found it anywhere! I'll do it myself when I will receive the Hall linear sensors, and will post here the result.

SaDAng

On a slightly related note, the flux swept by a radius of the Faraday Disc does not detect a constant changing flux by a curl-meter. A curl meter is a device to probe the field for studying the curl of the field. It responds to the circulation of the field. So, a test should also be done with a curl meter to see if there are any variations of the linked flux by sweeping the radius of a Faraday Disc when using an EM.

Reference: Electromagnetic Induction and the Conservation of Momentum in the Spiral Paradox

Gravock

93RDELEMENT · « **Reply #1552 on:** August 17, 2014, 09:00:15 PM »

DID YOU READ THAT TA?

??

THE FARADY DISC DOES NOT READ A CURRENT HAHAHAHAH SO THAN SON YOU LOST WITH MAXWELL AND THE VACCUM STANDS PROUD THAK YOU GOD !!! AND GOD IS NOT YET A MAGNETIC HAHAHAH NOW SON LETS SEE YOU ATTACK FARADAY HAHAHAHHA .......... COME ON HAHAHAHAH WHERE IS THE MAGNETIC VORTEX

? HAHAHAHAH

THE DEMON I KNOW IS REAL VERY REAL ! HE LIVES IN AN OLD HOUSE THAT MY FRIEND OWNS BUT MY FRIEND WILL NEVER STEP FOOT IN THAT HOUSE EVER AGAIN EVERY NOW AND THAN SOME OF US GO ROUND TO WIND UP THIS DEMON HAHAHAH FOR REAL !!! HE HAS A SENSE OF HUMMER AND LOVE A PINT OR TWO NO JOKE .... JUST BEFOR HE ARIVES ICE IS FORMED ON THE WINDOWS AND WALLS THAN HE NORMAIL PICKS UP A VERY LARGE TABLE AND SLAMS IT ON THE GROUND ! IS THAT THE DIELECTRIC EFFECT TA HAHAHAHAH HE CAN ROCK THE WHOLE HOUSE AND OFFTEN KICKS THE DOOR DOWN ... I LOVE HIM A LOT OF FUN ..... HAHAHA WHEN WE LEAVE WE LEAVE A CREATE OF BEAR NUTS AND A FULL SUNDAY ROST WHEN WE RETURN THERE IS NEVER A CAN IN SIGHT HAHAHAHAH FOR REAL !!!!

SO DOES THAT MEAN THERE IS ANOTHER DIMENTION

?? A WORLD WITHIN OUR WORLD

? TA LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO HIM I WILL LOCK YOU IN FOR THE WEEK END AND DO A LIVE ON THE OU SPECIAL HAHAHAHAHAHAHA I WILL ALSO SUMMON UP MAXWELL AND FARADSY THERE ALL ALIVE SON !!! THERE IS NO DEATH !!!! OH SORRY YOUR BOOK IS NOW DEAD HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

X LOL X

sadang · « **Reply #1553 on:** August 17, 2014, 09:43:32 PM »

Quote from: gravityblock on August 17, 2014, 08:09:20 PM

On a slightly related note, the flux swept by a radius of the Faraday Disc does not detect a constant changing flux by a curl-meter. A curl meter is a device to probe the field for studying the curl of the field. It responds to the circulation of the field. So, a test should also be done with a curl meter to see if there are any variations of the linked flux by sweeping the radius of a Faraday Disc when using an EM.

Reference: Electromagnetic Induction and the Conservation of Momentum in the Spiral Paradox

Gravock

Thanks for suggestion, but right now I can't afford a curl-meter. And if I think better I believe I'm not interested in this kind of measurement. I just want to be sure the strenght of the two poles are the same at different specific distances from a magnet!

SaDAng

d3x0r · « **Reply #1554 on:** August 17, 2014, 11:00:46 PM »

Quote from: sadang on August 17, 2014, 09:43:32 PM

Thanks for suggestion, but right now I can't afford a curl-meter. And if I think better I believe I'm not interested in this kind of measurement. I just want to be sure the strenght of the two poles are the same at different specific distances from a magnet!

SaDAng

I would predict that where there is an edge or point, that flux is strongest (pyramid/cone magnets esp. as used for spark gap quenching ... charged stream deflector )

if it were made like a meat tendorizer (or frozen ferrofluid on a maget, as the points develop) then each point would be a individual strong point of flux.
a sphere magnet has no increased flux except the pole, with a gradual fade to the bloch wall (or maybe it's an increase as you get more north and south).

just my hypothesis... so far we've only hear TA say there is more flux on the edge of a magnet

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #1555 on:** August 18, 2014, 02:47:19 AM »

Quote from: d3x0r on August 17, 2014, 11:00:46 PM

just my hypothesis... so far we've only hear TA say there is more flux on the edge of a magnet

HELL, I told you there is a youtube video on same, and YES, there is MUCH higher gauss at the edge of maggie.

HERE IT IS:::::

start watching at 2:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTWYAFJuq7M&list=UUh3cY-IW8QsEFmAh-TAWwrw

BY THE WAY, I INVENTED SOMETHING WHOLLY NEW, ITS AMAZING, POSTING VIDEO NOW ON IT.

d3x0r · « **Reply #1556 on:** August 18, 2014, 03:12:40 AM »

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on August 18, 2014, 02:47:19 AM

HELL, I told you there is a youtube video on same, and YES, there is MUCH higher gauss at the edge of maggie.
HERE IT IS:::::

start watching at 2:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTWYAFJuq7M&list=UUh3cY-IW8QsEFmAh-TAWwrw
BY THE WAY, I INVENTED SOMETHING WHOLLY NEW, ITS AMAZING, POSTING VIDEO NOW ON IT.

nice one; that's quite a chunk of copper

and quite a chunk of magnet
but... what about the areas inbetween... scalesup? dips down and then goes back up?

TheoriaApophasis · « **Reply #1557 on:** August 18, 2014, 03:46:38 AM »

Quote from: d3x0r on August 18, 2014, 03:12:40 AM

but... what about the areas inbetween... scalesup? dips down and then goes back up?

thats the low intermediate zone.

intermediate is low between center and edge (relatively).

100% as per my model of how magneto-dielectricity MUST conjugate itself in a "magnet".

MileHigh · « **Reply #1558 on:** August 18, 2014, 03:46:58 AM »

And the funny thing is that just about everything that Kenny has been freaking out about is answered in these two pictures.

If you don't try to understand what the picture is saying then you will never get it. There is no point in freaking out over macro effects if you don't start with this level of understanding and mastering the understanding and application of this basic fundamental building block. For example, seeing higher Gauss measurements at the edge of a magnet? Big deal, it's perfectly explained by what you see here. No kidding, you just have to apply the knowledge by using your wits. Serious food for thought.

There is simply no point in looking at other examples without understanding the root cause for the very existence of the magnetic field. It really and truly explains essentially everything. You start here and then you learn Faraday's Law and some other fundamentals and then just about everything will fall into place and become crystal clear and Kenny will be swept away because you will understand and be able to separate the seed from the chaff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waTF7kjmmt8&list=UU6x7DywfEqLg-3Cg_JnyTlg

gravityblock · « **Reply #1559 on:** August 18, 2014, 04:14:23 AM »

Distinti has good information on edge currents.

Gravock

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos (Read 1614081 times)

sadang

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

TheoriaApophasis

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

93RDELEMENT

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

TheoriaApophasis

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

93RDELEMENT

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

minnie

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

gravityblock

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

93RDELEMENT

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

sadang

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

d3x0r

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

TheoriaApophasis

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

d3x0r

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

TheoriaApophasis

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

MileHigh

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

gravityblock

Re: Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos