Time to re-open the door to the 93rd dimension you came from and return to your home planet. 



Seriously however, seek help.



"Nature is screaming at you her secrets, but you are deaf and blind to it all" - anonymous.

Wow that is the funniest comment to 93rd, almost fell out of my chair.....

It's like the space alien beam might had an effect on him since he was close to them..

Sorry to see that here....

I do read his posts for as they are quite strange... it's like driving past good looking babe !!! and trying not too look..


Acca.....

Acca.....

comments to PICS below:


James Clerk Maxwell’s “idle wheel” analogy:



Below: I only recently came across J.C. Maxwell’s vortex analogy and ‘idler gear’ comparison, which mirrored mine, except J.C. Maxwell did not grasp that unlike a mechanical idler gear which plays only a passive-effective interactive part in movement, the dielectric inertial plane, or ‘idler’ gear is the actual mover, the driver, so to speak. As is necessarily, logically, and absolutely the case to which dielectricity is by nature, being inertial, counterspatial, and creating magnetism as an Ether-modality in the discharge of itself. Also unfortunately J.C. Maxwell, while a strong supporter of the Ether, makes an Atomistic comparison of the “idler” gear of vortex reciprocation.



Below: On left redrawn correct analogy of dielectricity as the inertial driver (inverse to mechanical ‘idler’ gears). Middle and right are mechanical idle gears which mediation a passive-interactive role in movement and mechanical reciprocations.

Below: My discovery and formula for magnetic reciprocation given a perfect situation. To add to J.C. Maxwell’s analogy, as I have discovered, that unlike machines, the “idler wheel” of what is ‘driving magnetism’ is the stationary inertial dielectric which is the prima causa, the Prime Mover of magnetic reciprocations; just the inverse to a mechanical ‘idler gear’. This is the fundamental nature of dielectricity being the ‘electrical inertia’, and fundamental Ether-modality from which the other 3 are derived.

TheoriaApophasis: did you build your ferrocell yourself?  Where can I get one?

As stated the flow of particles is the driving force not the magnetic lines as they only trap the flow of particles to produce the direction of speed for the wheel ! In what Maxwell has started confirms this I do not see an extension to the said Maxwell definition as a new discovery you have made ?? Maxwell latter in he's life formed the foundation formulas for the vacuum not a magnetic vortex ! A vacuum to which acts like any vacuum a flow of particles in and out ...  I except that you have chosen an early discretion of Maxwell's work it would be a good idea to also consider the final formulas of the vacuum that is the final work of Maxwell .. To only turn a single stone among many and claim you have found what no other has found is questionable but interesting . 

In our research we isolated a zero point magnetic 2.2kw motor at 4000 rpm ! The room in which it is operated in gets cooler the longer the system runs ! This would only confirm a vacuum not a vortex as a vortex would increase to flow and temperature of entropy . As my college has stated to in previous text a vortex requires entropy to grow that is the excepted standard in international physics not quantum mechanics ! Please place your system in a closed insulated box if the temperature is increased you will confirm the said vortex and yes that would be a new discovery ..  If the temperature is decreased it is a vacuum and as said and confirmed in Maxwell's laws for the vacuum ! Maxwell's work and much latter after he's death formed the foundation of the now agreed zero point field !

Now we see you including time and space you will start to see the infinite mass which is always a condensed form of energy entrapped by its own vacuum not a vortex in sight ! Entropy will be the only form of indirect method to calculate such results, not a make it up as you go theory with your own formulas please use existing standard mathematics or it will not be excepted by us or any other independent that is now looking at your claims ! You are here in a public forum not an institution whom only dance to your logic so except some criticism detailed observations and a new and fresh perspective !

To us our aim is to isolate these particles and so far we are close to confirming them as bosons and gravitons , not a new type of particle just the ones we expected to see in many different combinations of technologies now being made all around the world ! There are many whom don't publish and one group we know in Israel have made outstanding advancements in holographic technologies with magnetic lensing !  To claim a discovery in this field is going to take a long time and a lot of talking with final proof confirmed by more than one independent observer ! Also the r would be many counter claims to the said claim !

Be advised on this and don't get so up set when others give facts that you wish not to consider in your claims or your reputation it self will hold a black mark of chaos over a non reality with a personality that will be ignored !

But having said this we appreciate you coming forward with your work and would like you to consider publishing it in a physics journal for correct and open debate among the real physicists of the science community !

Yours truly

Head of the earth science team

Captain cave man



   

 





   




 

The patent is actually useful.

" In an example, the
volume of ?uid 4 ranges from about 0.150 uL to about 2.0 ML,
per 25 cm2 of the surface area of surface 211 of lens 2. "

2.0mL/25cm^2 is about 1 cubic mm/25 cm^2... or part of a drop

Kinda, yeah,  but no.


As the patent holder will tell you, it took him a VERY long time perfecting the mix, and there are secrets both in the type of optical glass properties and the ferrofluid mix, dilution etc.


and THAT INFORMATION is not in the patent data sheet.


Having myself invented a few new ferrofluid devices / suspensions, .......The RANGE of dilutions and mixtures of ferrofluid is like figuring out the secret formula for Coca Cola   


You can guess maybe 70% of it, the rest, youll be growing a beard before you figure it out.   

THe glass is actually said in the patent that it can be basically anything that's transparent.

Haaa   "THe glass is actually said in the patent that it can be basically anything that's transparent."


TRANSLATION of the patent owner........:    "I/we dont have to give you that specific information"

 


As it should be



Because I KNOW that isnt true at ALL, the "anything transparent" part.