Sure thing Mark,

It is entertaining how you avoid the questions that do not support your view, and then you also choose to take an ideal mathematical model and require a non-ideal external extraction process,, not exactly good science is it Mark.

The system also does not behave in a linear fashion, but then to play with that a person would not be able to use your spreadsheet, would they Mark.

Heaven forbid if someone were to play with the AR1 fill heights.  What if they put in a height value of 21.57mm or less,, then what.

That's right,, that just becomes stupid because there is more out than what was put in,, and that without changing your spreadsheet, except for the spillway time.

ST2_AR1Height   21.57mm
ST2_EnergyAdded   0.0007132J
ST2_ST3_INTERNAL_ENERGY_LOSS   0.0007132J
ST2_ST3_External_Work_Performed   0.0007132J
ST2_ST3_PCT_ENERGY_LOSS   17.3%   
ST2_ST3_PCT_ENERGY_LOSS vs ST2_ENERGY_ADDED   100.00%   
ST3_Uplift       1.584875mm   Up Lift Distance


ST2_AR1Height    15mm
ST2_EnergyAdded   0.0003449J
ST2_ST3_INTERNAL_ENERGY_LOSS   0.0003799J
ST2_ST3_External_Work_Performed   0.0003799J
ST2_ST3_PCT_ENERGY_LOSS   10.1%   
ST2_ST3_PCT_ENERGY_LOSS vs ST2_ENERGY_ADDED   110.15%
ST3_Uplift   1.156696mm


Go figure that,, those changes just by changing the AR1 fill height.

M:

But, how does that 78.7% compare with a simple spring?

Just saying...

Bill

As predicted you avoided the question, you must have missed it, it's a perfectly reasonable question, I will posted again for you, maybe we'll help you if it's in red letters,
Name a single Ph.D. and/or professional engineer who endorses your fraud..

It's good to hear you state your position, but Wayne's mathematics has been shown to be at fault and no one has ever been able to produce a working device that produces free energy from his mathematics.

Wayne apparently chooses not to release any information that might support his claim and of course let's not forget the promised public verification..... all we get from Wayne is excuses like ...everything is secrets until some future launch date = if everything is so secret why the hell come on this website in the first place.   The man comes across as a conman.

Let's see... if Mags doesn't know something, then nobody does, and that makes your argument invalid. Is that how it goes, Magsie?

FYI:

1. There are plenty of people who know just exactly who and what I am, my history and qualifications and etc. and some of them are reading this thread right now. You aren't one of them, but that's irrelevant to the issue at hand. The "important" people do know! If you want to know why people on the internet want to preserve their privacy a little bit .... well, just google "internet killers" for examples.

2. If I had a device that was truly OU and that I was trying to publicize, sell, make money from, convince the set of insignificant trolls of..... you bet I'd be saying right out front everything anybody needed to know to make my claim as credible as possible, starting with the names of my co-authors on the SCIENTIFIC PAPERS that announce my discovery to the scientific world....that is, if the US DoD and Naval Research Laboratories aren't already knocking at (down) my door. No problem, bro.....

3. Once again.... it doesn't matter if the critics are a bunch of anonymous pastry cooks...... what matters is that the Claimant, Honest Wayne Travis, has never yet produced the evidence for his claims. But it's more than that: not only has he just not produced it, he has FAILED, he has "expectations not met, promises not kept, doors closing" and so forth: meaning he still doesn't have a self runner as he claimed and he is still paying for his electric bill at his home and shop.

The way that you li so freely and shamelessly is just awesome Wayne.  The math and physics are completely against you yet you just keep repeating your fantastical tales of:  Wayne Travis fraud.