Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 2364788 times)

Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 409
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3855 on: August 07, 2016, 02:41:07 AM »
MM,

This is the second time you have revealed this little test. I bet people will start paying more attention to what you've said now.

CM

wistiti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3856 on: August 07, 2016, 05:23:38 AM »
Thanks for the G part info!  :)

darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3857 on: August 08, 2016, 01:46:29 AM »
The problem with Ramaswami and Darediamond is because they are just using pulsed DC or AC to feed the generator. They did not have ever used the two signals created in the commutator properly built. Therefore they just have results with North-South polarity. With North-North they have null results with pulsed DC or AC as expected because they are not moving the fields. North-North requires the use the comutator described in the 1908 patent. Period.

I do not know how Ramaswami says that North-North, or South-South, does not work if he have never built the commutator as the patent describes. And he just repeat and repeat that the commutator is just to pulse the current. This is totally false. Also are false some statements done by Darediamond some days before telling that the commutator may be sustituted by a sine wave inverter. False. Please study the commutator.
What is it is to be studied about Part G which you are wrongfully promoting? Are you saying in this modern times, there is no 100% better efficiency to that Part G of a thing?.

Shows us your working model to support Part G being better than Alternate Current which do switch Polarity Without going down to Zero frequency.

Figuera Generator is Simple to build that why you and your cohorts are bent on misinformation deliberately.

When you Fluctuate DC via an Iron core be it moulded or otherwise what do you get as output current? Is it not Alternate Current?

How do you make the Primaries consume low current if you utilized low frequency like 60hz? And how do you generate extremely Powerful Flux if you do not utilise Twisted Serially Connected Multi strand Wire?

You want to Move the Magnetic Field by Bucking the field, WHAT SENSE IS IN THAT WHEN IT IS WIDELY KNOWN THAT:
1: South Pole Flux always flows to North??
2: Alternate Current will only allow for constant continuous Flux Pole Switching on each Primaries because AV do not have POLARITY like Pulsing DC nor DC?

The Figuera Gen utilises AC which the Part G is producing outrightly.

And the Oscillation or High and Low,  Low and High is caused by Alternate Current Application because at one cycle Primary On The Left will have South and North and Simultaneously, Primary On the Rigth.will have South and North Vice-Versa  and this will create Addition of Power at the center Where the secondary is not repulsion (Bucking Mode).
The interpretation of this is Motor Generator without applying Permanent Magnet as it is widely applied in AC Generators.

Now to get Pure Lenzless output, Buck the Secondary by Splitting it into 2 go the way of Chris Sykes A.K.A EMJunkie to connect them together.
 Download is guide on Partnered Output Coils here http://www.hyiq.org/Downloads/Guidelines%20to%20Bucking%20Coils.pdf to understand deeper why the secondary must be bucked.

Do not let anyone think for you; Think it out by yourself so to get librated.







darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3858 on: August 08, 2016, 02:06:10 AM »
To create addition of Flux in Figuera Gen, wind your primary on the.rigth and left in same direction and connect there leads in Parallel.

But to get pure lenzless output,  split your secondary into 2 and wind each part in Opposite directions and connect there leads in parallel.

To use low amount of Wire to generate HighbAmount Of Flux, divide your length of wire equallybinto multiple part and twist it together and use that to make your Primaries.

To use a single setup to generated high amount of Lenzless Output Wattage and keep heat down,You must use High Frequency, Moulded Core or large amount of Solid Iron Rods stucked into big plastic pipes.







wistiti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3859 on: August 08, 2016, 03:13:42 AM »
Cadman;  you are wasting your time talking to these simple mined single sided individuals that take things at face value. (visually)

 just like the table top demo William Hooper did,  he moved the magnets in unison exactly as the video did. this causes a double intensity E field to form. the goof can't see what is really happening because of his extremely narrow mind and inability to see outside the box.

this is the Figuera device all day long. they moved the magnets, Figuera moved the magnetic field, plain and simple. ( except to a few)
and in order to do this Figuera figured out that he could get completely separate feeds from one DC feed by opposing magnetic fields in part G. this device can be built by anyone at home to prove it's validity.

take some bare wire and wrap a iron or laminated core that has been coated with (your choice)) an insulator. put about 20 winds of thick or rectangle wire around the core (not touching) then secure. take two twelve volt car bulbs and attach the two ends of the core to each of the positive side of the bulbs. take the remaining bulb wire and connect to the negative side of the battery. now take the positive side, with attached wire and touch the core winding's in the middle.
what do you think will happen, both bulb intensities are the same. now touch at either end of the coil and see what happens, one bulb will be bright and the other dim. do the other end and see the bulb that was bright is now dim and the dim bulb is now bright.  if this is done in rapid succession this will mimic the actions of the figuera device completely.

Congratulations you just built your fist Figuera part G consisting of a splitter of currants and a magnetic resistor.

MM

Hi MM.
I have test it on a ferite rod but can  not see a particular difference in the brightness of the bulb... :-\
I have put insulating tape between the ferrite ans the bare wire. When i touch with the + of the batt on the left side or the right. The intensity of both bulb are the same...
Any advice are welcome!

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3860 on: August 08, 2016, 07:28:35 AM »
It will never cease to amaze my how someone can deviate from a patent so much with out ever understanding the patent in the first place. and spout off changes that can NEVER be proven scientifically or otherwise. to me that is just plain stupidity. so i guess Faraday, Maxwell, William Hooper and others are all wrong.
please my stomach hurts from laughter.
there is no bucking fields as you say,  they are opposing but when one it taken high the other low the currants will be in the same direction.
do this thread a favor and READ THE DAMN PATENTS!. i guess that's to much work and it's easier to flap the mouth. if you hadn't noticed NO ONE LISTENS TO YOUR BULL.
READ THE PATENTS !
wistiti; i think your core is to small and try silicon iron not ferrite. ferrite core will not produce a strong enough magnetic field. and also make sure the winds are not touching,  or use coated wire and sand the top of the wire coil.

darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3861 on: August 08, 2016, 08:31:41 AM »
It will never cease to amaze my how someone can deviate from a patent so much with out ever understanding the patent in the first place. and spout off changes that can NEVER be proven scientifically or otherwise. to me that is just plain stupidity. so i guess Faraday, Maxwell, William Hooper and others are all wrong.
please my stomach hurts from laughter.
there is no bucking fields as you say,  they are opposing but when one it taken high the other low the currants will be in the same direction.
do this thread a favor and READ THE DAMN PATENTS!. i guess that's to much work and it's easier to flap the mouth. if you hadn't noticed NO ONE LISTENS TO YOUR BULL.
READ THE PATENTS !
wistiti; i think your core is to small and try silicon iron not ferrite. ferrite core will not produce a strong enough magnetic field. and also make sure the winds are not touching,  or use coated wire and sand the top of the wire coil.
You are always worried by my post thinking I am seeking attention. I laugh in Chinese.

It is simple, shows us your working Device applying your Bucking Theory of the Primary.

Will you ever do that?

Never! What a pity!

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3862 on: August 08, 2016, 10:17:37 PM »
SHOW US YOUR FUCKING NON EXISTENT RESEARCH . YOUR AS RETARDED AS YOUR STUPID PROPOSAL . AND CAN NOT SCIENTIFICALLY BACK UP A F-IN DAMN THING. WELL I SHIT IN CHINESE, JAPANESE, AND TAGALOG.
I'LL POST IT WHEN PEOPLE ARE READY FOR IT NOT WHEN GETTO NIGGA SAYS SO. YOUR A SORRY PIECE OF SHIT THAT HAS NOTHING BETTER TO DO THAN DRAW ATTENTION TO YOUR SORRY ASS BECAUSE OTHERWISE  NO ONE WOULD PAY ATTENTION TO YOUR SICK ASS.
YOU ARE A VERY LITTLE MAN AND I USE THAT TERM LOOSELY.
LEAVE THIS FORUM , NO ONE WANTS YOU HERE, YOU DISRUPT THE VERY REASON PEOPLE ARE HERE. YOU GIVE NOTHING, YOU ADD NOTHING TO THIS FORUM BUT LIES, DECEPTION, AND STUPIDITY BASED ON UNPROVEN THEORETICAL BULL SHIT UNLIKE MINE THAT CAN BE PROVEN BY ANYONE.
YOUR A SICK FUCK AND YOU NEED TO LEAVE THIS FORUM.


darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3863 on: August 08, 2016, 11:49:23 PM »
Marathonman for how long will you remain crazy?

For how long?

Come on taken some  herb concussion and get well.

hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 616
    • https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3864 on: August 09, 2016, 12:16:06 AM »
Marathonman,

I tested your simple design to emulate a magnetic resistance exactly as you described. I used laminated magnetic steel wrapped in paper and 30 turns of thick household wire with plastic insulation. I used a 12 volt battery and 2 car bulbs for 12 volts and 5 W (type W5W).  I connected in each side of the coil and in the middle point of the coil. In all cases I got the same ligth intensity in both lightbulbs.

I think that the desired effect is only achived varying the impedance of the system. Intensity = Voltage/Impedance. So you have to vary the inductive reactance,   XL = 2*Pi*Frecuency*L . Therefore if you do not create some frequency it is not possible to get it. I do not know if in a toroidal core with a rotating brush that frequency may be generated. Thus why variacs works with AC.

Tomorrow I will try to upload a video. Now I can post a couple of pictures

PS. If you keep feeding trolls they will come back for more food. You are doing exactly what they want you to do: argue and discredit. It is better to stay quiet.

darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3865 on: August 09, 2016, 12:31:04 AM »
Marathonman,

I tested your simple design to emulate a magnetic resistance exactly as you described. I used laminated magnetic steel wrapped in paper and 30 turns of thick household wire with plastic insulation. I used a 12 volt battery and 2 car bulbs for 12 volts and 5 W (type W5W).  I connected in each side of the coil and in the middle point of the coil. In all cases I got the same ligth intensity in both lightbulbs.

I think that the desired effect is only achived varying the impedance of the system. Intensity = Voltage/Impedance. So you have to vary the inductive reactance,   XL = 2*Pi*Frecuency*L . Therefore if you do not create some frequency it is not possible to get it. I do not know if in a toroidal core with a rotating brush that frequency may be generated. Thus why variacs works with AC.

Tomorrow I will try to upload a video. Now I can post a couple of pictures

PS. If you keep feeding trolls they will come back for more food. You are doing exactly what they want you to do: argue and discredit. It is better to stay quiet.
You who have been schooled severally by respected Goal achievers still keep up with fruitless experiment. Youbcan please keep quiet to let truth reign. I remember how your friend the Kite A.K.A Marathonman, crazily pounce on Ramaswami in the past.

He made a horrible mistake trying that with me because I Dare Diamond an Hardened Truth Seeker Takes No Shit!

The bullshit both of you are promoting here was what Chris Sykes nullified band schooled you on sometimes ago.

Other people on YouTube also gain power Bucking the Secondaries not the Primaries but you Motos are here disrupting things spreading lies in all variations you know.

Are you people humans at all?

wistiti

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 187
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3866 on: August 09, 2016, 06:14:46 AM »
Marathonman,

I tested your simple design to emulate a magnetic resistance exactly as you described. I used laminated magnetic steel wrapped in paper and 30 turns of thick household wire with plastic insulation. I used a 12 volt battery and 2 car bulbs for 12 volts and 5 W (type W5W).  I connected in each side of the coil and in the middle point of the coil. In all cases I got the same ligth intensity in both lightbulbs.

I think that the desired effect is only achived varying the impedance of the system. Intensity = Voltage/Impedance. So you have to vary the inductive reactance,   XL = 2*Pi*Frecuency*L . Therefore if you do not create some frequency it is not possible to get it. I do not know if in a toroidal core with a rotating brush that frequency may be generated. Thus why variacs works with AC.

Tomorrow I will try to upload a video. Now I can post a couple of pictures

PS. If you keep feeding trolls they will come back for more food. You are doing exactly what they want you to do: argue and discredit. It is better to stay quiet.

Thank you hanon for sharing!
It seem you have the same results as i...
Mabe the split winding on a toroidal core (like in the chapt.3 of pjkbook) work better...? I Will try it when i have some spare time.
Ciao!

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3867 on: August 09, 2016, 11:42:00 AM »
Try with resistive wire  ;D

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3868 on: August 09, 2016, 02:57:07 PM »
Marathonman,

I tested your simple design to emulate a magnetic resistance exactly as you described. I used laminated magnetic steel wrapped in paper and 30 turns of thick household wire with plastic insulation. I used a 12 volt battery and 2 car bulbs for 12 volts and 5 W (type W5W).  I connected in each side of the coil and in the middle point of the coil. In all cases I got the same ligth intensity in both lightbulbs.

I think that the desired effect is only achived varying the impedance of the system. Intensity = Voltage/Impedance. So you have to vary the inductive reactance,   XL = 2*Pi*Frecuency*L . Therefore if you do not create some frequency it is not possible to get it. I do not know if in a toroidal core with a rotating brush that frequency may be generated. Thus why variacs works with AC.

Tomorrow I will try to upload a video. Now I can post a couple of pictures

PS. If you keep feeding trolls they will come back for more food. You are doing exactly what they want you to do: argue and discredit. It is better to stay quiet.

I stand corrected, there has to be frequency involved. ops brain fart. that's why the rotating brush set up works through inductive reactance.
so the straight core will work as long as there is a constant change from one end to the other.

good catch Hanon.

Forest; i used resistive wire on my first set up and it got hot with continued use.

Sam6

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3869 on: August 09, 2016, 05:13:36 PM »
 Reply #3848 on: August 05, 2016, 12:17:09 AM »
Marathon Man
 #3811 on: July 28, 2016, 11:54:32 PM » You said you would PM me regarding methods you use for your 20KW unit. Great! How do you go about that? Unless you have some other method you can use my email...  briceelectric@yahoo.com.

Thanks in advance for your help.
Sam

Considering that Marathon Man has not yet replied to my request for information about his methods for producing a 20 KW Figuera device weighing about 120 pounds, I created a spreadsheet (attached) for designing a Figuera single phase power section. The results show a unit that is much larger than Marathon Man's. It has been explained to me previously that I really don't know what I am doing, so I would appreciate forum members looking this over, pointing out my errors, and showing me how to correct them, as I want to get this right.

Thanks in advance for your help.
Sam