Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE  (Read 2065598 times)

Offline Doug1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 763
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3900 on: August 12, 2016, 12:34:25 PM »
GM

 Your charts are what is confusing you. They show the wave form seen by a scope which measures time not the direction of the field in respect to time. The field is in one direction left to right high to low and then reverses direction and low to high. It's to be expected after all that is what people see on a screen from a scope or in a text book. Time seems to be the greater consideration not direction. If you really think about it a scope should show the field in only one full cycle bouncing back and forth not an endless repetitive log of cycles giving the wrong mental image. Some one ells decided for you how you should think but forgot to tell you or define the image is only to view time as a long string log. The output is ac and the general image like ripples on a pound traveling along to some distant point. Nah thats a contradiction, they dont move like that. They move back and forth a very short distance never actually traveling any distance because they move back just as far as forward. That is a net gain of distance of zero. So when your mind is thinking of field direction changing you still have a length of distance traveled as part of your thought. It screws up the thought process. If you had a coil in a field and rotate the coil in the one direction the field never changed just which side of the coil that was facing the pole of reference. if you use the N for reference the N is pushing on both sides of the coil one side then the other side and so on. That is a simplification because it excludes the magnetic field set up in the coil by induction when it is output to load and lenz law comes into play.Then you have an extra field to include into the mix. Unless you subscribe to the notion there is no connection to the load and or the load has no reaction to the changing field of the generator. Thats like saying you did work without working. So in essence that would be a welfare generator. Have not actually seen one of those.

Offline NRamaswami

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3901 on: August 12, 2016, 01:16:33 PM »

 I think some users dont have the problem of not understanding the commutator. They are just creating confusion and hijacking this thread for some reason.... Patents are our bible. The rest are interpretations

I would strongly disagree. What is stated in the Disclosure Document filed by Figuera as shown in the Spanish Patent Office website must be experimented as it is and observed. If the Experimental observations do not tally with what is stated in the disclosure document then we need to change the parameters until we get the desired result.

Generally when Loaded all transformer primaries will draw more current to adjust for the load. How do we defeat that? That is the big question that none has even attempted to answer but Doug has raised that question now. Did any one posting here do it..I would guestimate that possibly yes.

Regards,

Ramaswami

Offline darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3902 on: August 12, 2016, 01:18:37 PM »
Gmolina,

Figuera used two signals unphased 180°, not 90°. The patent states clearly that when one was at maximum the other was at minimum and viceversa. That why he patented his commutator and included it in the patent claims. In other cases he has said that AC was valid. If that were the case some very smart guys as Darediamond will had used AC from other known method in that time, as a common geneerator, and they had bypassed the patent protection. That is not the case.

I wonder if people really had read in deepth the patents. At least the patents and understand them. Later you may test all possibilities with the polarity NN , SS,  NS. But for clear reason I think some users dont have the problem of not understanding the commutator. They are just creating confusion and hijacking this thread for some reason.... Patents are our bible. The rest are interpretations

Hanon,  stop attaching Hijacking to me.

I am not seeking attention in anyway here.

I only present tested and proven Ideas.

No deliberate confusion.

No one have come to disprove the Link I post about The MEG.
The Magnetic DiPole must be complete before you can create genuine reversible high and low Motion in Figuera Device.

Patents contents are always most times altered to prevent the inventors efforts and resources being hijacked. So you have to think outside the box extremely widely to put things in order.

Chris told you youbcan not Buck the Primaries to generate useful output in the secondary let alone attaining overunity.

The Primary must be adding power at every Cycle of the Part G not subtracting Power or Buck each other. So this is why AC is essentially useful as it will give more output power than applying Vibrating DC which will only have one sided additive Power.

The case here also applies to Permanent magnet Alternators.or Generators. If you make an axial permanent magnet Gen and arrange your magnets in All North on one side and all south on one side on the Rotor, the amount of DC Output Power you will generate will be lower to if you apply Alternating Rotor Magnet assembly I.e NSNS on each rotor.

The Lenz negation is achieved in the way you.wind and connect your Output Coils. Simple.

Offline gmolina

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3903 on: August 12, 2016, 02:44:39 PM »
Gmolina,

Figuera used two signals unphased 180°, not 90°. The patent states clearly that when one was at maximum the other was at minimum and viceversa. That why he patented his commutator and included it in the patent claims. In other cases he has said that AC was valid. If that were the case some very smart guys as Darediamond will had used AC from other known method in that time, as a common geneerator, and they had bypassed the patent protection. That is not the case.

I wonder if people really had read in deepth the patents. At least the patents and understand them. Later you may test all possibilities with the polarity NN , SS,  NS. But for clear reason I think some users dont have the problem of not understanding the commutator. They are just creating confusion and hijacking this thread for some reason.... Patents are our bible. The rest are interpretations

Hi Hanon, i respect the Figuera original design, please see my previous posts, i'm newbie posting here, but i'm not newbie in this fields, i say two ac signals not two ac voltages is  very different, in my graph you can see N and S letters, this refer to a magnetic field not a voltage. I repeat, i respect the Figuera original design in my experiments, but all people here need have a open mind to other ideas, just like part G of mm, or ac ideas of Mr Ramaswami, or Darediamond, and try, not in papers, try in experimentation, because in the depth of all this, not matter if is Figuera, Cook, Hubbard, or a mix, i'm sure that all here are looking for energy freedom. I understand that this is a Figuera thread, but remember that Figuera time is very different to our time.  And i think that all is experimentation, observation and results.

Thanks

GM

Offline darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3904 on: August 12, 2016, 04:51:13 PM »
Opposing Polarity will not work whether yo uapply AC or DC.

Nort to North nor South to South will never get the central secondary empowered so to speak.

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4023
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3905 on: August 12, 2016, 06:05:36 PM »
WHATEVER YOU CHOOSE WILL WORK except pure DC (but DC may be created at output  :P  )
Even so glorified N-N or S-S poles against themselves will work. The point is every method has it's own drawbacks. What you got is what you put into ;-) if you put crap you got crap, if you put poles against , you got the phenomenal rate of change but weak field so I expect some huge voltage but tiny current and so on....just think clearly...
You can put whatever signal you wish and the effect will be different... So PLEASE stop this maddness and do not fight .


I have an idea to remove necessity of resistors by using electronics. Many of you surely know or have a DC lab power supply with regulated current. Similar method could be used to create DC-DC converter for example 150W which could limit output DC to required amps dynamically. One of the method is to use combined diodes and thyristors in bridge setup to adapt input current to the required level. I have no experience with such circuits so I'd be glad if someone could explain if it can keep output voltage steady or how to modify it  ?




Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3906 on: August 12, 2016, 06:31:09 PM »
I wish i could kill the stupidity because it's running rampant on this thread.

You people are completely WRONG ! one north electromagnet taken up while a south electromagnet taken down will not work because the spin directions are opposing. does your feeble tittle minds even comprehend what the hell i just said. probably not because small minded people think small together.
I REPEAT, SPIN DIRECTIONS ARE OPPOSING with a N/S set up. look it up on any fucking Physics web site of your choice, just do it.
you will find that all you N/S'ers are completely wrong from the git go. of course you people probably WON'T look it up because you to stupid to do the research and would rather run your big fat fucking mouth instead just for the sake of arguing and to save your sorry asses from complete Embarrassment. your research in the figuera device is piss fucking poor and lacks ANY SCIENTIFIC DATA TO BACK UP YOUR ABSURD CLAIMS.
all the data i have posted CAN be backed up scientifically and COMPLETELY proven with out one single notion of doubt unless your a complete idiot like daredummy of rstupid that post the most outlandish, Ridiculous shit i ever heard that has nothing to do with the Figuera device what so ever.
when GOD said get in line for brains, you two must of thought he said trains and both of you got on the slowest one you could find. ha, ha, ha, that's funny stuff there.

i repeat, repeat, N/S spin direction when used in the Figuera set up will not work, look it up yourselves "if" you can read. the ONLY way Figuera could get a stationary dynamo to work is with two opposing electromagnets, one taken up, while the other taken down causing not only the B fields to cancel but the Electric field to be doubled in strength.
with N/S set up the attractive forces are to strong to vary any kind of field what so ever.

my 1 year old grand child knows not to put the square block in the round hole because it wouldn't fit, i would suggest you two simple minded people do the same. being stuck on stupid does nothing but back step this thread and hamper what we are trying to achieve. if you can't handle the truth or the reality of the Figuera device then i would suggest you two clowns get your own thread and call it "Figuera's device, pee wee hermin style" or even " IDIOT 101" advanced class at 7 pm.


'WHATEVER YOU CHOOSE WILL WORK except pure DC"
   COMPLETELY WRONG STATEMENT,  i would expect a little better from you Forest since you've been on this site for so long. stop feeding the simple minded trolls, pets are not allowed.
your statement is so far from the truth it's not funny, this tells me you and the trolls have not built even a demo device to back up you claims.
 there is, and never will be resistors in the figuera device what so ever. resistors wastes electricity that is why figuera chose to it magnetically, no unnecessary waste.

part G can never be replaced or removed because the kick back from the declining electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary is stored in part G's core in the form of a magnetic field similar to an inductor,  to be used at the next half turn of the brush, feeding the next set of electromagnet.
this part can never be replaced with an inverter either as there is no place to store power in the form of a magnetic field. i'm not being disrespectful to you but you need to study the patents a little more before you post such completely wrong statements.

this is for all the misinformed people that think N/S will work. study the bottom graph, do you not see the induced are opposing in the Figuera device,  DUH !. if you can read then it will tell you it won't work PERIOD ! this graph was pulled from a physics web site so if you disagree with it then i guess the whole world is wrong and only you are right. get real !
now, look at the top graph, do you not see the fact that the induced of N/N set up in the Figuera device are in the same direction, meaning they support each other while B field cancel causing double intensity E field. if you can not understand this simple scientific fact that is staring you smack dead in the face then you are to stupid to attempt a Figuera build.
 i can though, draw it out for you in crayola crayons,  with nice pretty colorful pictures with pop up's that can help you understand my meaning,  but "if", and only "if" you talk nice to me.
i again say N/S WILL NOT WORK ! study the bottom graph and pull your heads out of you ass before it's to late to build a device. our whole way of life will change shortly at the hand of evil people that want us in bondage. people like the BUSH'S, OBAMA'S, CLINTON'S, ROTHSCHILD'S, ROCKEFELLER'S and so on,  will destroy this world.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2016, 10:02:15 PM by marathonman »

Offline Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3907 on: August 12, 2016, 06:37:14 PM »
THIS FORUM IS DAMN NEAR USELESS.

A couple of us decide that marathonman's and Doug's and Hannon's ideas are worth pursuing to us and what happens?

Can we have an exchange of ideas? HELL NO!!!! THE YAMMERING SPHINCTERS SHOW UP with page after page of NO YOU GOTTA DO IT MY WAY bullshit.

JEEZZUS


Marathonman, unfortunate timing on this post. It wasn't aimed at you, or the new guys.

Offline hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3908 on: August 12, 2016, 07:08:40 PM »

Suppose two primaries and two secondaries coils in the middle of the primaries. If the primaries are in attraction mode the only field transversing both secondaries is:
N ---------------> S. As per Lenz, the induced field of each secondary will be <-------- in one secondary and  <-------- in the other secondary. Both opposing to the primary field. How the hell are you going to buck both secondaries? Impossible. No way

If the primaries are in repulsion their fields will be N -------> <--------- N  . In this case one secondary will oppose to its closer primary field: <--------  and the other secondary will oppose to the primary field of the other primary coil:  -------->. There you have two bucking secondary coils. Perfect bucking output coils. In this case you may use pulsed DC. You just need to collide two fields in the center point, right in the point between both secondaries coild, no need for movement of the fields in this design based in flux linking.

Summary :

Attraction  N ------------------------>  S
                       <--------    <---------

Repulsion  N ----------> <-----------  N
                       <---------    --------->


I attach a new sketch to clarify what I meant. This is not Figuera 1908 patent. I just added here because it refers to the bucking coils subject mentioned in some post.


If two inducers are placed in repulsion and two induced coils in between, then each induced coil is just transversed by one inducer field, the one from the nearest inducer. That's the key. Both inducer fields collide in the center in a point between both induced coils and are expelled from the core. Therefore each induced coil is under the action of one inducer field. The two induced fields, which oppose to each inducer field, will be bucking each other  <------------   ------------->  . With vectors :   B1induced + B2induced = 0 . I have not tested it, but theoretically it is a perfect bucking system.


Repulsion  N ----------> <-----------  N    (inducer coils)
                       <---------    --------->         (induced coils)

.

Offline hanon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3909 on: August 12, 2016, 07:37:01 PM »
...and that a straight core can be implemented as long as there is movement. so try your staight core again but with movement. might need to change wire though. ie. magnet wire with top sanded.

I have done that test with a straight core and moving the contact point along the coil turns and I have not noticed any variation on the intenesity in any of the two bulbs. I guess that the inductance of the straight core is much lower and the effect over the final impedance is almost null. Also the frequency in my test is very low. In a toroidal core maybe the inductance is greater, as consequence of a stronger magnetic field, and the final effect is big enough to be noted in the bulbs as my other video shows. Also I may guess that you have not done the simple test that you posted for us some days ago to prove the part G theory of magnetic resistance. I hope your part G to be designed with good physical background and not the background that you used when posted that simple test.

https://vimeo.com/178585834

Note: my bulbs are built for 12V and 5 watts. Therefore the intensity across each one is I = 5/12 Amperes, and their ohmic resistance is R = V/I = 12*12/5 = 28 ohms. A big increase in impedance is required to modify this value and be noted in the light intensity.

From the moment I did the video with the variac powered with DC I realized the the proposal of magnetic resistance in part G could be valid. Anyway I still think that simple resistors, even wasteful, will make the same job: moving the fields.  And it is easier to design and build for non instructed people in this subject of magnetism as myself

Regards

Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3910 on: August 12, 2016, 08:46:50 PM »
Cadman;
we know !
 by the way,  i love this statement   "Can we have an exchange of ideas? HELL NO!!!! THE YAMMERING SPHINCTERS SHOW UP with page after page of NO YOU GOTTA DO IT MY WAY bullshit. JEEZZUS"
 well i would love to hear a rendition of "I'm dreaming of a white Christmas" by the YAMMERING SPHINCTER DUO.
does any one have any breath mints, it smells like shit on this thread.

Hanon;
The test you did with the variac is valid and prove what i have been saying for almost a year. the reason your other test did not work was the fact that the core was way to small. look at the size difference and you will see i am right.
wistiti did the exact same test and noticed a change in intensity but his test was on the toriod he posted.
 Doug told me the winding of the toroid core was a bitch to wind, boy was he right, the wire and core i chose with out a vise is almost impossible. that is why i did not post pics yet because i got so frustrated that i put it down before i slammed it on the ground.  i do not have a vise right now but will get one soon.
that is part of the reason why i am considering a 1500 to 2000 va straight core but have no funds at this moment  but it doesn't matter whether it is straight or in toroidal form,  the outcome will still be the same as long as the core is large enough. my theory of part G and your variac test is one and the same whether you think is is or not.

the choice of resistors use is of course your choice,  but you know it will never be self running and high power resistors are crazy expensive that will get hot, fore warned.

Offline darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3911 on: August 12, 2016, 11:43:51 PM »
I wish i could kill the stupidity because it's running rampant on this thread.

You people are completely WRONG ! one north electromagnet taken up while a south electromagnet taken down will not work because the spin directions are opposing. does your feeble tittle minds even comprehend what the hell i just said. probably not because small minded people think small together.
I REPEAT, SPIN DIRECTIONS ARE OPPOSING with a N/S set up. look it up on any fucking Physics web site of your choice, just do it.
you will find that all you N/S'ers are completely wrong from the git go. of course you people probably WON'T look it up because you to stupid to do the research and would rather run your big fat fucking mouth instead just for the sake of arguing and to save your sorry asses from complete Embarrassment. your research in the figuera device is piss fucking poor and lacks ANY SCIENTIFIC DATA TO BACK UP YOUR ABSURD CLAIMS.
all the data i have posted CAN be backed up scientifically and COMPLETELY proven with out one single notion of doubt unless your a complete idiot like daredummy of rstupid that post the most outlandish, Ridiculous shit i ever heard that has nothing to do with the Figuera device what so ever.
when GOD said get in line for brains, you two must of thought he said trains and both of you got on the slowest one you could find. ha, ha, ha, that's funny stuff there.

i repeat, repeat, N/S spin direction when used in the Figuera set up will not work, look it up yourselves "if" you can read. the ONLY way Figuera could get a stationary dynamo to work is with two opposing electromagnets, one taken up, while the other taken down causing not only the B fields to cancel but the Electric field to be doubled in strength.
with N/S set up the attractive forces are to strong to vary any kind of field what so ever.

my 1 year old grand child knows not to put the square block in the round hole because it wouldn't fit, i would suggest you two simple minded people do the same. being stuck on stupid does nothing but back step this thread and hamper what we are trying to achieve. if you can't handle the truth or the reality of the Figuera device then i would suggest you two clowns get your own thread and call it "Figuera's device, pee wee hermin style" or even " IDIOT 101" advanced class at 7 pm.


'WHATEVER YOU CHOOSE WILL WORK except pure DC"
   COMPLETELY WRONG STATEMENT,  i would expect a little better from you Forest since you've been on this site for so long. stop feeding the simple minded trolls, pets are not allowed.
your statement is so far from the truth it's not funny, this tells me you and the trolls have not built even a demo device to back up you claims.
 there is, and never will be resistors in the figuera device what so ever. resistors wastes electricity that is why figuera chose to it magnetically, no unnecessary waste.

part G can never be replaced or removed because the kick back from the declining electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary is stored in part G's core in the form of a magnetic field similar to an inductor,  to be used at the next half turn of the brush, feeding the next set of electromagnet.
this part can never be replaced with an inverter either as there is no place to store power in the form of a magnetic field. i'm not being disrespectful to you but you need to study the patents a little more before you post such completely wrong statements.

this is for all the misinformed people that think N/S will work. study the bottom graph, do you not see the induced are opposing in the Figuera device,  DUH !. if you can read then it will tell you it won't work PERIOD ! this graph was pulled from a physics web site so if you disagree with it then i guess the whole world is wrong and only you are right. get real !
now, look at the top graph, do you not see the fact that the induced of N/N set up in the Figuera device are in the same direction, meaning they support each other while B field cancel causing double intensity E field. if you can not understand this simple scientific fact that is staring you smack dead in the face then you are to stupid to attempt a Figuera build.
 i can though, draw it out for you in crayola crayons,  with nice pretty colorful pictures with pop up's that can help you understand my meaning,  but "if", and only "if" you talk nice to me.
i again say N/S WILL NOT WORK ! study the bottom graph and pull your heads out of you ass before it's to late to build a device. our whole way of life will change shortly at the hand of evil people that want us in bondage. people like the BUSH'S, OBAMA'S, CLINTON'S, ROTHSCHILD'S, ROCKEFELLER'S and so on,  will destroy this world.

Mr Kite, spin direction of AC do not collide when set up correctly. At each cycle,  the Polarity are always altered which reaching zero unlike in DC application.

You talk about Textbooks, I talked about Proven Ideas like the M.E.G of Thomas etc., can you see the difference?

The Secondary coils must be bucked not the Primaries.

Does AC Generators utilizes SS or NN rotor Manet arrangement?

Could you.please.point to one that uses.such geometry in the Whole world?

We are tired of your useless diagrams please.

Point us to a device that emulates your theory if you can not at least be a man to practically defend yourself.



Offline marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3912 on: August 13, 2016, 02:17:52 AM »
"We are tired of your useless diagrams please."

Well sir were "ALL" tired of you big mouth and completely stupid ideas. imagine that ! besides i know it is just your irritating mouth running because i have people pm me all the time thanking me for my detailed drawings saying it helps them understand.


"Could you.please.point to one that uses.such geometry in the Whole world?"
 YES ! the Figuera device you idiot, unlike ANY generator in the world.

"Does AC Generators utilizes SS or NN rotor Manet arrangement?"
 are you that fucking desperate and stupid you have to ask SUCH a stupid question. oh, well, i forgot whom i was talking to.

"Mr Kite"
You damn right i'm soaring high in the sky while looking at your stupid little self on the ground. what's your iQ 85

NO BODY WANTS YOUR LOOSER ASS ON THIS THREAD, NO BODY LIKES YOUR RIDICULOUS COMPLETE NONSENSE POSTING OR IDEAS.

please leave this thread,  you are chaotic, disrupting and a down right piss ant of a man that gives black men a bad rap. you are nothing but a big mouth, jive taking, getto running piece of crap.

"if you can not at least be a man to practically defend yourself."
 unlike yourself that closely resembles a "BITCH"

dude, no one on this thread wants you here, no one likes your idea's, no one cares to listens to your mouth run constantly. and if need be everyone will sign a petition to bar you from here, so do us all a favor and leave this thread. can you understand english, leave this thread for ever.
i bet you road the "special bus" to school, you know the special needs bus.

 Doug, tell him he did good today cuz i'm not.

well guys i guess this thread is over and done with, as long as this moron remains we will never get any where. i already know how it works so no sweat off my balls, but i tried to pass it on only to be blocked by utter morons.

good luck with this IDIOT !

Offline NRamaswami

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3913 on: August 13, 2016, 06:14:14 AM »
I think rather than personal attacks videos showing what works and what does not work irrespective of whether there is COP>1 or COP<1 would be far better to make progress here.

Mr. Cadman..You have indicated that the Ramaswami device configuration works but is COP<1. Why don't you try it with a diode in the secondary alone to making the secondary output to flow in one way which will merge in the voltages. The Primary can remain AC so that the inductive impedance reduces the current drawn. Half of AC would be not used though in the secondary output. Please see in such a case what is the voltage and amperage in secondary and whether it is COP<1 or COP>1.

My problem is entire team which worked on this project with me has left. I have used large cores and it requires a team to build the coils again and take a Video and show. I will most certainly post some video when time and money permits.

The problem that I see that both the identical pole and opposte pole arrangements work with different types of Geometries. In a straight pole only the opposite pole works. But it is a simple observation from experiments and there is no need to attack each other and use abusive language towards each other.

Offline darediamond

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 178
Re: Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE
« Reply #3914 on: August 13, 2016, 07:21:23 AM »
"We are tired of your useless diagrams please."

Well sir were "ALL" tired of you big mouth and completely stupid ideas. imagine that ! besides i know it is just your irritating mouth running because i have people pm me all the time thanking me for my detailed drawings saying it helps them understand.


"Could you.please.point to one that uses.such geometry in the Whole world?"
 YES ! the Figuera device you idiot, unlike ANY generator in the world.

"Does AC Generators utilizes SS or NN rotor Manet arrangement?"
 are you that fucking desperate and stupid you have to ask SUCH a stupid question. oh, well, i forgot whom i was talking to.

"Mr Kite"
You damn right i'm soaring high in the sky while looking at your stupid little self on the ground. what's your iQ 85

NO BODY WANTS YOUR LOOSER ASS ON THIS THREAD, NO BODY LIKES YOUR RIDICULOUS COMPLETE NONSENSE POSTING OR IDEAS.

please leave this thread,  you are chaotic, disrupting and a down right piss ant of a man that gives black men a bad rap. you are nothing but a big mouth, jive taking, getto running piece of crap.

"if you can not at least be a man to practically defend yourself."
 unlike yourself that closely resembles a "BITCH"

dude, no one on this thread wants you here, no one likes your idea's, no one cares to listens to your mouth run constantly. and if need be everyone will sign a petition to bar you from here, so do us all a favor and leave this thread. can you understand english, leave this thread for ever.
i bet you road the "special bus" to school, you know the special needs bus.

 Doug, tell him he did good today cuz i'm not.

well guys i guess this thread is over and done with, as long as this moron remains we will never get any where. i already know how it works so no sweat off my balls, but i tried to pass it on only to be blocked by utter morons.

good luck with this IDIOT !

You ain't soaring high in any sky.because up there like a weight.of a kite, you are a fraction to infinity being carried hitter and titer. No Balance, no grip.

Have been avoiding to label you a racist  but it is evident you are.

Can't even make your abusive speech without exhibiting such attitude. Evidently you a low human. Extremely low. You ain't Marathonman but rather a Maggot.

The N-S-N-S you are kicking against is a working principle.

People who thanked you for your ideas have now been able build a working Figuera Device in line with your useless non-practically proven useless bucking Primary Idea rigth?

Still with all your barking, you can't practically defend your self-wound baseless principle.

You called yourself a grand but defy the reality because you display no iota of maturity on here. and rigth from the day you replied to one of my posts, I see a need to drive you high and low like your Part-G.

I refuse to call rubbish rubbish, I say lubbish.