Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 100 101 102 103 104 [105] 106 107 108 109 110 ... 146   Go Down

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 941149 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1560 on: March 25, 2012, 01:16:31 PM »
  1532 TK
.  Manages to fill one third of the page with waveforms
.  That have nothing to do with the NERD oscillations
.  Admits that he hasn’t got appropriate equipment
.  Hopes that everyone will not mind this too much
.  References the wrong number of batteries applied
.  To the wrong test
.  And hopes that no-one will notice
.  Again
.  Concludes that all oscillations are spurious
.  Which on the face of it means that there’s no further need to test anything
.  On top of which team NERD – never included a shunt analysis
.  Because they’re incompetent
.  Still nothing more about that unproven length
.  72 inches of it
.  Golly
 
1533 MILEHIGH
.  Makes a reckless departure into circuit analysis
.  The less said about it the better
.  Admits that it’s probably wrong
.  But it has the merit of filling the page
.  Concludes that TK is right
.  There’s nothing evident other than spurious oscillations
.  Which Rosemary Ainslie thinks she’s discovered
.  Although Rosemary Ainslie insists that she’s discovered nothing
.  But who cares?
.  When the truth can be as varied as these multiple circuit variants
.  LOL
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1561 on: March 25, 2012, 01:17:22 PM »
  1534 TK
.  Acknowledges that MileHigh agrees with him but draws a distinction
.  TK does NOT agree with that negative voltage
.  Claims that the scope trace won’t reflect something or the other
.  If the FG is ‘loaded down on it’
.  Which possibly means something to someone
.  Claims that all the MOSFET’s are turned on simultaneously
.  As shown in his or NERD’s video
.  He doesn’t specify which but suggests that this sounds convincing
.  As he’s just burned his fingers which constitutes proof
.  FFS
.  Then states that ONLY Q2’s are on and proof is also from the IR thermometer
.  Further proof is that Rosemary also proved this
.  Her function generator oscillations go ‘off’ - which is difficult to interpret
.  Concludes by appealing to readers and members to read that work…
.  The term work again rather loosely applied
.  That he did at over unity research.com where he posted as Humbugger
.  Who as we all know is NOT 72 inches long.
.  Or wasn’t a year ago
.  He declared that he was barely the length of a ‘pickle’
.  And asked to ‘please be given some more’
.  Like Oliver – in Dicken’s story about Oliver TWIST
.  LOL
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1562 on: March 25, 2012, 01:18:22 PM »
  1535 MILEHIGH
.  Lends his support to TK
.  Explains that the RAT team overlooked the actual Q-Array
.  Which both was missed by either TK as TK
.  or TK as Humbugger.  Which says little about either persona’s genius
.  Sadly
.  And everything about Poynty Point’s 
 
1536 TK
.  Suggests that MileHigh is way too charitable
.  Proof of an oversight is proof of incompetence
.  He’s replicated the circuit easily
.  Maybe not yet but wait and see.
.  His genius is such that if he will – soon
.  Just as he can prove his 72 inches
.  Tall
.  Which is where the term ‘tall story’ originates
 
 
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1563 on: March 25, 2012, 01:19:17 PM »
  1537 MILEHIGH
.   Agrees with TK on everything
.   No matter what
.   And reminds readers and members that the fg outputs -5 volts
.   Which is likely to blow a 50 Ohm resistor
.   As he thinks there are two 100 Ohm resistors in parallel
.   Somewhere.  He doesn’t specify where
 
1538 TK
.  Asks permission from MileHigh to use an optocoupler
.  Because he proposed this earlier when he posted as Humbugger
.  Explains that it has the added merit of creating a spurious oscillation
.  That has no chance of recharging the batteries
.   Which makes it a desirable definitive debunk proof
.  Still makes no reference to his earlier request for more pickles
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1564 on: March 25, 2012, 01:19:54 PM »
  1539 TK
.  Asks for more guidance from MileHigh
.  Suggests that if he reverses probes he can make the -5 volts look like +5 volts
.  Speculates on this outcome for the balance of the post
.  Obviously prefers to apply that transposition
.  Possibly as definitive proof of a debunk
.  Which is to be used in his proposed replication
.  Which is proposed to PROVE that the NERD technology does not work
.  Which is interesting – if not exactly logical
.  Still nothing about those extra pickles
.  Sadly
 
1540 MILEHIGH
.  Points out that the sim doesn’t use a function generator
.  And the sim works just fine
.  Sort of – with applied innuendos
.  And caveats
.  Complains that the NERD waveform downloads gave him a headache
.  Insisted that it was ‘RATS’
.  Stated that the NERD CSR was incorrectly positioned
.  Thereby voiding any claims on any basis at all
.  Suggests that TK replace the CSR with a function generator
.  To produce an orgiastic waveform
.  That will ‘quiver’ in a ‘spastic feedback mode’
.  And that’s all the debunk requires
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1565 on: March 25, 2012, 01:20:39 PM »
  1541 TK
.  Asks for more explanations from MileHigh related to waveform analysis
.  Posts a picture of a little man with glasses to indicate that he, TK is, half blind
.  Which is fatuously self-evident
.  Promises that he does indeed have something ‘up his sleeve’
.  Or in his arsenal
.  Somewhere
.  Then confusingly he posts a picture of an element resistor
.  Which is, indeed, threatening
 
1542  MILEHIGH
.  Now satisfied that the function generator can be entirely replaced
.  Notwithstanding his earlier proposal to replace the CSR with this
.  Not happy with the use of the optocoupler
.  Nor is happy with the function generator
.  Wants to do nothing but apply a 50 Ohm resistor to enable current flow
.  Somehow
.  Suggests that TK simply apply a continuous positive voltage at the gate
.  And uses some extraordinary terms to explain this
.  But omits the picture of a little man wearing glasses
.  Which means that unlike TK he sees all this
.  Somehow
.  Then proposes that the LED’s of DOOM will definitely conduct continuously
.  Which is correct
.  Given a continuously applied signal at the gate of Q1
 
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1566 on: March 25, 2012, 01:22:19 PM »
  1543 TK
.   Assures MileHigh that he sees the point in this experiment
.   Advises MileHigh that he sees it even better than MileHigh
.   Refers to the applied negative signal from a function generator
.   Applies a square wave signal to some LED’s and surprisingly
.   Only one of those LED’s flashes
.   Which is STARTLING
.   Proposes that all that’s happening on the NERD circuit is this
.   Which results in more power to the MOSFET’s than to the load
.   Which may be relevant IF that was what the NERD circuit shows
.   Which it doesn’t.
 
1444 MILEHIGH
.   Sings a tune related to that ‘old black magic’
.   Fantasises about things that go ‘BOOM’
.   Convinces himself that the CSR was in the wrong loop
.   Posts the wrong schematic in support of this assumption
.   Allegation
.   Whatever
.   Concludes by humming to himself
 
1545 MILEHIGH
.  Wrestles with his conscience and admits that the counterclaim is COP infinity
.  Admits that he’s probably wrong about the position of the CSR
.  Goes ‘out on a limb’ and even states that CSR voltage is DEFINITELY wrong
.  Proposes that we apply Poynty’s proposal of a negative current discharge
.  Sings about that ‘old black magic’ but replaces Black with ‘rat’
.  Which has the dubious merit of being amusing
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1567 on: March 25, 2012, 01:23:12 PM »
  1546 TK
.  Tries to understand the applied analysis to each data dump
.  Complains that the NERD team never referenced the math function
.  Despite it being comprehensively demonstrated in the video
.  And despite his allegations of ‘closely’ recording the history of this technology
.  Unless his genius is actually just in not registering anything at all
.  While he records the progress of anything at all
.  Which on the face of it is possible
 
1547 MILEHIGH
.  Not an entirely comprehensible post
.  Some heavily obvious reference to MIB’s
.  Probably to pretend to some hope of importance
.  Which is sad
 
 
1548 TK
.  Just doing his usual self-promotion
.  Sadly ineffective
.  Still no proof of 72 inches
.  Good gracious
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1568 on: March 25, 2012, 01:24:05 PM »
  1549 TK
.  Speculates idly on Rosemary Ainslie’s possible answer
.  Assures the members and readers that he is not trying to get her banned
.  Makes some reference to ‘Leon…er’
.  Not sure what that means
 
1550 GLEN LETTENMAIER
.  Makes a garbled appeal to a collaborator to come in and ‘fight’
.  Takes half a page to do so
.  Language is not his strong point
.  LOL
 
1551 TK
.  Seems to think that he can do damage to anyone’s reputation
.  When in fact approval by him would constitute considerably more damage
.  He may possibly garner more credibility with proof of his ‘length’
.  Which he claims is 72 inches
.  Or the NERD technology
.  Or both
.  Asks eatenbyagrue to come in and argue
.  Or suggests that he’s turned tail
.  Because Rosemary Ainslie’s pestering him for legal advice
.  Still nothing more about his length
Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1569 on: March 25, 2012, 01:24:55 PM »
  1552 TK
.  Ennumerates a series of questions
.  Which Rosemary Ainslie not only will not answer
.  But she’s not inclined to acknowledge
.  But it’s managed to fill yet more space
.  At least 72 inches of thread
.  Designed to discourage any readership at al
.  Lest anyone notice that he can’t prove that little length thingy
.  That’s calculated as 72 pickles PER every 6 feet.
.  Golly
 
1553 TK
.  Speaks to MileHigh because no-one’s answering him
.  Walks down memory lane
.  Still nothing more about that 'proof of length' thingy

AMENDED
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1570 on: March 25, 2012, 01:35:07 PM »
Can you believe it? She's REWRITING REALITY.

And now she thinks I'm humbugger.

ROSEMARY.... you are clearly clinically insane.... and yes, I am actually a psychologist.

There are so many falsehoods in your chain of posts, Rosemary, that anyone can go back and check... you are sick.


Logged

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1571 on: March 25, 2012, 01:37:53 PM »
Quote from: TinselKoala on March 25, 2012, 01:35:07 PM
Can you believe it? She's REWRITING REALITY.

And now she thinks I'm humbugger.

ROSEMARY.... you are clearly clinically insane.... and yes, I am actually a psychologist.

There are so many falsehoods in your chain of posts, Rosemary, that anyone can go back and check... you are sick.

GOLLY.  And now we hear that he's not so much an experimentalist but a PSYCHOLOGIST.  No wonder his work here is somewhat faulty

regards TK
rosie pose
 :D
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1572 on: March 25, 2012, 01:45:24 PM »


OK baby, you want to play "clutter up the thread with lies and irrelevancies...OK let's play.
Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 25, 2012, 01:05:29 PM
Guys I've had to play catchup.  I thought I'd do a synopsis from post 1511 - for easy reading - enjoy.

  1511 TK
.  Anxious to advise readers that he really is 72 inches long
YOU brought up the issue of my height, which was a feeble attempt to identify me... and wrong.
Quote
.  Asks Rosemary to teach him the significance of the ‘green trace’
.  Again.
TEACH ME? NO, you lying bitch. I DEMAND that you EXPLAIN why YOU say it ISNOT the drain trace when it MANIFESTLY IS.
Quote
.  Asks her to believe that PER signifies ‘division’
.  When it actually represents a base unit of measurement
.  That can be used in any mathematical context required
.  Including addition, subtraction and multiplication
Look again, you stupid cow. You have been given references and formulae and so on to correct your misapprehension here but YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF LEARNING.
Quote
.  Urgent appeal to be ‘PROVED WRONG’
Urgent? That's right...PROVE ME WRONG, but you have not and cannot.
Quote
.  Recommends that readers equate him to Steven Hawking
.  Somehow?
.  Not sure that’s possible.
.  Steven Hawking is a genius
YOU LIE AGAIN. I have never "recommended" any such thing. When YOU started talking about my height, I ASKED "how tall is Steven Hawking, and what difference does it make".
Quote
.  Demands to be taught about a ‘green trace’
NOT "taught", Rosemary. YOU are the one lacking education and needing to be taught. YOU claimed the green trace is NOT the common mosfet drains, and I and everybody else says it IS, and I want you to EXPLAIN the discrepancy. This has nothing to do with "teaching" and YOU are not a teacher.
Quote
.  Assures readers that he’ll keep asking this until he DIES
.  Or alternatively…
.  Actually he offers no alternatives.
Actually, you LIE again. I did offer an alternative indeed: YOU RETRACT YOUR LIES AND STOP MAKING FALSE CLAIMS.
Quote
.  Stefan has undertaken NOT to lock this thread.
Stefan probably hasn't taken notice yet... unless you've been PMing him as is your pattern.
Quote

1512  Poynty Point
.  Tries to get TK to focus on the topic
.  Gives him another free lesson in the art of circuit analysis.
.  Which has the dubious value of being marginally topical
.  But says little about TK’s assumed knowledge of this
.  From that declared ENGROSSED STUDY
.  Of everything related to Rosemary Ainslie

Is that a fair characterization of .99's post? No, it is not. Does it even make sense as an English statement? No, it does not.

Shall I continue, so people can get even MORE distracted from the FACTS that I and others have uncovered about your little toy?
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1573 on: March 25, 2012, 01:54:16 PM »
Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 25, 2012, 01:06:52 PM
  1513 TK
.  Asks about the 5th resistor
WELL... there are 5 resistors aren't there? I didn't know this was a taboo topic.
Quote
.  Refers to his previous work on OUR.com.
.  When he posted there as HUMBUGGER
.  Insists that the work was relevant
I am not humbugger and this can be easily proven. cHeeseburger, remember? And Humbugger's work EXACTLY SIMULATING the circuit, or rather the circuit YOU CLAIMED AT THE TIME IN THE VIDEO to be using, was irrrelevant? On the contrary, it is the most relevant work that I've seen yet, other than my own, and indeed inspired me to try the sloppy layout that resulted in ME and EVERYONE ELSE WHO HAS TRIED IT to be able to duplicate "your" oscillations AS I HAVE DEMONSTRATED.
Quote
.  Tries to pin the anomalies on inductance from wires
.  Claims that the NERD team never measured the inductance on wires
.  Claims they don’t have the collective competence
And that much is true and you and your "team" have demonstrated it over and over. Just look at the video. That is incompetency preserved for posterity and can't be denied by anyone who KNOWS what they are doing. I'd like to see what a Tek engineer would say about your abuse of his fine instrument. If he could speak through his tears and laughter that is.
Quote
.  Complains that Rosemary Ainslie has no WIT
.  Tells readers NOT to think that he’s Humbugger
.  But why would they?
.  Humbugger was NOT 72 inches long
.  Clearly NOT the same person
.  Humbugger assured us his (sorry) correction, he was – no longer than a pickle.
You lying idiot dolt. You aren't even making the little sense you usually manage.

Quote

1514  POYNTY POINT
.  Poynty concurs
.  Sort of
.  Here and there


 
1515  TK
.  More evidence that he’s not up to scratch
.  Has NO idea which circuit to use
So I'm testing them ALL... all  the ones you have claimed, at various times, to have used. Like the one published IN THE VIDEO which was a lie from the start.
Quote
.  Reminds all and sundry that this is HIS work
.  And that everyone’s distracting him
.  Or thoughts of Rosemary Ainslie are distracting him
.  Or both.
Liar.
Quote
.  Claims Rosemary Ainslie is misleading him
.  Confusing him
.  Or both
.  Deliberately or otherwise
  And you ARE misleading me and everyone else with your mistakes, your lies, your bullshit comments and your refusal to answer simple questions.
Quote
.  Appeals to her to teach him
.  Please
.  Please, please.  Said many times
YOU STUPID LYING CRONE. I have NEVER asked you to TEACH me anything.
Quote

.  Complains that he has to drive 300 miles
.  For some obscure reason
Where's your reference? I said I had to drive 200 miles, and it was NOT a complaint... it was an expression of how valuable my function generator is-- a far better unit than the cheapo INSTEK that she used.
Quote
.  Asks a question about a frequency
.  Then tells the readers that he already knows the answer

Do you know what a rhetorical question is, Rosemary? Never mind, I already know the answer, you ignorant stupid lying scrawny wench.
Logged

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1574 on: March 25, 2012, 01:57:56 PM »
Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on March 25, 2012, 01:09:43 PM
  1516 TK
.  Mentions again that Rosemary Ainslie knows how tall he is]
No, I didn't. Another lie.
Quote
.  Suggests that she’s confused him with?
.  Not sure who. 
.  He seems to think she cares
.  Rosemary Ainslie knows exactly who he is
.  Which is Humbugger
YOU IDIOT.
Quote
.  Because they’ve got that ‘length’ thing in common
.  Which is considerably less than 72 inches Per pickle
.  Divisible or otherwise
.  LOL
Are you drunk as well as stupid?
Quote

1517 ROSEMARY AINLSIE
.  Tries to get the subject topical
.  Fails dismally
But for my having to correct your LIES and ERRORS, we wouldn't be off topic. When you aren't here, we talk about testing and evaluating your circuit, you stupid lying cow.
Quote

1518  ROSEMARY AINSLIE
.  Compares TK to Hitler
.  Savonarola
.  Mussolini
.  Tries to wrest back ownership of her thread
.  Fails dismally
 

You got that right.... you are failing dismally, and your "ownership" of this thread is not at issue.

Shall we continue?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 100 101 102 103 104 [105] 106 107 108 109 110 ... 146   Go Up
« previous next »