Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 893879
  • *Total Topics: 15705
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 4
  • *Guests: 15
  • *Total: 19

Author Topic: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.  (Read 742840 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1635 on: April 04, 2012, 05:52:25 AM »
Don't make the whole forum laugh with your word games Rosie Posie - your claim is finished - kaput.  Just like I said it would be the case.  You should just forget about all of this nonsense and move on.  There no "magical zipon effect" coming from the binding of the matter in the inductive resistor, remember that?

The whole thing, this crazy miswiring of MOSFETs, has been a year-long exercise in silliness and futility and abject ignorance.  The fat lady has finally sung.
Really MileHigh?  Do you honestly think that anyone at all other than you, TK himself, Glen Lettenmaier and possibly a few members who are actively engaged in this 'debunk' have been convinced by anything at all that TK has proposed?  He uses the wrong data against the wrong circuit with the wrong DSO references against a supposed 'claim'.  He posts a series of videos against a variety of circuit variants which are filmed in such dark conditions that it challenges anyone with 20 20 vision.  And he tries to draw conclusions from that partial evidence with an abandon that is an embarrassment to good science.  He's circuits are a mess of wires that most amateurs would be ashamed to show.  And he insinuates and alleges and implies everything while he continues to show nothing at all that represents an intelligent and well considered argument.  He shows no complete circuits of what's being filmed and tabulates and then references a DSO shot - REPEATEDLY - with a glaring error in it that he still hasn't noticed - notwithstanding this being clearly explained to him.   He is over reliant on his tedious insistence on my incompetence and relies on these insinuations by refusing to reference our actual claim related as it is to our papers.  He has not even touched on the anomalies and - as a for instance - uses one video to explain a waveform that can only match our own when he sets his function generator to an AC setting. He insults everyone's intelligence here by assuming that all members and readers alike  are that easily 'suckered' by his misrepresentations and then proceeds to boast that this so called consultation fee of his is costing someone - somewhere - a fee that includes the price of a Buick.  And if that level of unprofessionalism is not enough - he then proceeds to try and negotiate with my own legal representative behind my back?  And this is the answer to my appeal to establish certain required parameters to test a circuit that not only merits but requires academic engagement.

I think you need to revise the facts here MileHigh.  Or if you're simply trying to convince yourself... then feel free.

Rosie Pose 'eo'.
 :-*

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1636 on: April 04, 2012, 06:00:49 AM »
It seems that you are still trying to solicit some free legal advice TinselKoala.

Look, eatenbyagrue: she NOW claims that she didn't post that video and that it doesn't represent her claims, only that it "relates" to them. After all this time discussing the video-- it started long before you or I joined this thread -- NOW she disavows it.
Not only free legal advice but you solicit it with all the finesse of a 5 year old.   I DID NOT POST THAT VIDEO.  IT DOES NOT REPRESENT OUR CLAIMS.  OUR CLAIM IS ONLY RELATED TO THE CLAIMS IN OUR PAPERS.  ALL OTHER WORK IS MERELY RELATED TO THAT CLAIM WHICH IS IN THAT PAPER. No amount of repeated allegation will change this until you manage to PROVE that I made that video publicly accessible.  When you've PROVED this - then LET ME KNOW.   

But it is perfectly clear that she did in fact post it or cause it to be posted, she wrote the description, and even uploaded the other two videos on that channel-- pertaining to the second Donovan Martin paper on the Faraday lines of force.
WHAT DONOVAN MARTIN PAPER?  THERE'S NO SUCH THING.  There are two papers that have been written by a group of collaborators.

Many times in the past she's opened forum accounts under various aliases or started blogs,  and then abandoned them, probably because she forgot the login details.
I have never abandoned any forums.  I have been locked out or banned.  And that the result of the incursions of yourself, and your team of trolls.

Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1637 on: April 04, 2012, 06:08:39 AM »
I represent no one yet!  Although I am fully in Rosemary's corner on this.  I only wish I knew more about electronics so I could follow some of what you guys are demonstrating with the scopes.   Rosemary, do not give up!

Thank you for the support eatenbyagrue.  I was beginning to wonder there.  And indeed - I will NOT give up.  Even if this is finally resolved through our courts.  In which case I intend making this a matter of public interest which I intend protecting. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1637 on: April 04, 2012, 06:08:39 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1638 on: April 04, 2012, 06:18:16 AM »
Don't make the whole forum laugh with your word games Rosie Posie - your claim is finished - kaput.  Just like I said it would be the case.  You should just forget about all of this nonsense and move on.  There no "magical zipon effect" coming from the binding of the matter in the inductive resistor, remember that? The whole thing, this crazy miswiring of MOSFETs, has been a year-long exercise in silliness and futility and abject ignorance.  The fat lady has finally sung.
And with reference to this circuit - then if this is what you find so amusing - trust me so do I.  It has NOTHING to do with our circuit or our claim and I'm intrigued to see the amount of work that has gone into just this one more sample of yours and TK's urgent misdirections.


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1639 on: April 04, 2012, 06:20:23 AM »
Really MileHigh?  Do you honestly think that anyone at all other than you, TK himself, Glen Lettenmaier and possibly a few members who are actively engaged in this 'debunk' have been convinced by anything at all that TK has proposed?  He uses the wrong data against the wrong circuit with the wrong DSO references against a supposed 'claim'.
LIAR.
Quote
He posts a series of videos against a variety of circuit variants which are filmed in such dark conditions that it challenges anyone with 20 20 vision.
LIAR.
Quote
And he tries to draw conclusions from that partial evidence with an abandon that is an embarrassment to good science.  He's circuits are a mess of wires that most amateurs would be ashamed to show.
YOU ARE A LIAR. My "mess" of wires was deliberate and necessary to emulate YOUR CRAZY PEGBOARD AND CLIPLEAD LAYOUT, you liar.
Quote
And he insinuates and alleges and implies everything while he continues to show nothing at all that represents an intelligent and well considered argument.  He shows no complete circuits of what's being filmed
LIAR LIAR LIAR.
Quote
and tabulates and then references a DSO shot - REPEATEDLY - with a glaring error in it that he still hasn't noticed - notwithstanding this being clearly explained to him. 
What are you talking about? What glaring error? SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS WITH REFERENCES you LIAR.
Quote
He is over reliant on his tedious insistence on my incompetence and relies on these insinuations by refusing to reference our actual claim related as it is to our papers.  He has not even touched on the anomalies and - as a for instance - uses one video to explain a waveform that can only match our own when he sets his function generator to an AC setting.
LIAR LIAR LIAR LIAR. YOU are LYING.
Quote
He insults everyone's intelligence here by assuming that all members and readers alike  are that easily 'suckered' by his misrepresentations and then proceeds to boast that this so called consultation fee of his is costing someone - somewhere - a fee that includes the price of a Buick. 
You idiot liar. You can't even get that part straight. Liar.
Quote
And if that level of unprofessionalism is not enough - he then proceeds to try and negotiate with my own legal representative behind my back? 
Here you are claiming that eatenbyagrue is your legal representative and that I have tried to suborn him. LIAR.
Quote
And this is the answer to my appeal to establish certain required parameters to test a circuit that not only merits but requires academic engagement.
Silly lying you. Nobody is stopping you from testing but YOU.
Quote
I think you need to revise the facts here MileHigh.  Or if you're simply trying to convince yourself... then feel free.

Rosie Pose 'eo'.
 :-*
You are the one trying to revise the facts here Rosemary LIAR Ains-lie.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1639 on: April 04, 2012, 06:20:23 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline MileHigh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7600
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1640 on: April 04, 2012, 06:22:46 AM »
Quote
And with reference to this circuit - then if this is what you find so amusing - trust me so do I.  It has NOTHING to do with our circuit or our claim and I'm intrigued to see the amount of work that has gone into just this one more sample of yours and TK's urgent misdirections.

No Rosie what that diagram shows is that while you were giddy for months thinking that you were measuring "COP infinity" you weren't even measuring the battery current.  It's that bad and worse.

You are the one that is misdirecting right now by alleging that I am misdirecting.  It's over and your claim is finished.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1641 on: April 04, 2012, 06:28:33 AM »
Of course you posted the video and wrote the description. If not you, WHO then? And how did it get posted so SOON after the demonstration itself if YOU didn't post it?

Why have you only started claiming NOW that you didn't post that video? It has been discussed for some time, well before I got here, and you never claimed that it wasn't a full and complete presentation of your claims, authorized by you, before NOW.

And just when are you going to ignore your detractors and forge on ahead with your proof? Why let a bunch of trolls distract you from your holy purpose? GO AHEAD, save the world, Rosemary.... prove that you have what you claim. There is absolutely nothing stopping you--- except the truth.

The Video Demo was done on the 12th of March 2011, allegedly. The YouTube "dooziedont" account was created on the 12th of March, 2011. The video demo was uploaded on the 22nd of March 2011. And the last time the "dooziedont" login was active was the 31st of March 2011.
 Ten days... for the video to be cut, processed, titles added... and somehow ESCAPED into the wild without RA knowing or authorizing it.
Yep, and I'm going to be the next Pope, too.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1641 on: April 04, 2012, 06:28:33 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1642 on: April 04, 2012, 06:32:39 AM »
LIAR. LIAR.YOU ARE A LIAR. My "mess" of wires was deliberate and necessary to emulate YOUR CRAZY PEGBOARD AND CLIPLEAD LAYOUT, you liar. LIAR LIAR LIAR. What are you talking about? What glaring error? SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS WITH REFERENCES you LIAR. LIAR LIAR LIAR LIAR. YOU are LYING.  You idiot liar. You can't even get that part straight. Liar.  Here you are claiming that eatenbyagrue is your legal representative and that I have tried to suborn him. LIAR.  Silly lying you. Nobody is stopping you from testing but YOU.You are the one trying to revise the facts here Rosemary LIAR Ains-lie.

Denial has never constituted a defense.  And I am alleging nothing.  There is an entire thread that lends support to my statements.

Rosemary

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1643 on: April 04, 2012, 06:35:10 AM »
Denial has never constituted a defense.  And I am alleging nothing.  There is an entire thread that lends support to my statements.

Rosemary

Sure, just like Powercat supported your claims. Just like Glen confirmed your claims.

That is... only inside your sick head.

Get off the net and go build something and test it. Or have your grounds privileges been taken away again?

TEST. SHOW YOUR WORK. STOP YAMMERING and TEST.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1643 on: April 04, 2012, 06:35:10 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1644 on: April 04, 2012, 06:38:04 AM »
Look, eatenbyagrue: she NOW claims that she didn't post that video and that it doesn't represent her claims, only that it "relates" to them. After all this time discussing the video-- it started long before you or I joined this thread -- NOW she disavows it.

But it is perfectly clear that she did in fact post it or cause it to be posted, she wrote the description, and even uploaded the other two videos on that channel-- pertaining to the second Donovan Martin paper on the Faraday lines of force.

Many times in the past she's opened forum accounts under various aliases or started blogs,  and then abandoned them, probably because she forgot the login details. The "dooziedont" account on YT has been inactive since the end of March 2011, shortly after she posted the three videos. That's what happens when you forget a password !

Hi TK,

This is epic to say the least ....

Rosemary disavows the video uploaded to YouTube as "dooziedont" http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=fyOmoGluMCc  the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit Demonstration 12 MARCH 2011 ..... wow !! You can hear her voice in the background ....... hahahahahahaha ..... to funny !!!  ;D

What about these videos that "dooziedont" uploaded also ..... looks exactly like some of Donovan Martin's 3D rendering he's really good at.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=PxQDwDnV2xM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=iv1V6E5ABNo

There is also a Rosemary Ainslie name used here at OU called "Doozy2" she took out when she got banned the first time .....  :P
http://www.overunity.com/profile/doozy2.24875/

Starting with some colorful postings showing her true colors ....  ???
http://www.overunity.com/profile/doozy2.24875/area/showposts/

There are several screen names she has here .... no surprise with as much as she has to hide.   :o

Rosemary does need some badly needed clinical help ... anyone who posts comments to themselves is really bent .....

Fuzzy
 ;)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1645 on: April 04, 2012, 06:39:48 AM »
Of course you posted the video and wrote the description. If not you, WHO then? And how did it get posted so SOON after the demonstration itself if YOU didn't post it?

Why have you only started claiming NOW that you didn't post that video? It has been discussed for some time, well before I got here, and you never claimed that it wasn't a full and complete presentation of your claims, authorized by you, before NOW.

And just when are you going to ignore your detractors and forge on ahead with your proof? Why let a bunch of trolls distract you from your holy purpose? GO AHEAD, save the world, Rosemary.... prove that you have what you claim. There is absolutely nothing stopping you--- except the truth.

Had I pointed out that this did not represent our claim we would all have been denied the opportunity of seeing your manifold allegations and to measure the urgency with which you promote them.  I am seriously obliged to you TinselKoala for your precipitous and ill considered 'RUSH' into a debunk based as I knew it was - on such an entirely irrelevant argument.  I certainly was NOT disappointed.  And it afforded us all that opportunity see the limit of your rather unprofessional skills applied to entirely irrelevant information.  What you should have done is constrained your comments to a more professional detachment and limited it to the papers that you are well aware of but dared not remark on.  You still seem to think that people are persuaded by loud noises and empty protests.  One day you may actually learn that you rather underestimate the intelligence of those who engage here.

Rosie Pose

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1645 on: April 04, 2012, 06:39:48 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1646 on: April 04, 2012, 06:50:11 AM »
And lest Glen Lettenmaier again post a half page or so of spurious and unrelated links let me bring this comment back to your focus TinselKoala.

Don't make the whole forum laugh with your word games Rosie Posie - your claim is finished - kaput.  Just like I said it would be the case.  You should just forget about all of this nonsense and move on.  There no "magical zipon effect" coming from the binding of the matter in the inductive resistor, remember that?

The whole thing, this crazy miswiring of MOSFETs, has been a year-long exercise in silliness and futility and abject ignorance.  The fat lady has finally sung.
Really MileHigh?  Do you honestly think that anyone at all other than you, TK himself, Glen Lettenmaier and possibly a few members who are actively engaged in this 'debunk' have been convinced by anything at all that TK has proposed?  He uses the wrong data against the wrong circuit with the wrong DSO references against a supposed 'claim'.  He posts a series of videos against a variety of circuit variants which are filmed in such dark conditions that it challenges anyone with 20 20 vision.  And he tries to draw conclusions from that partial evidence with an abandon that is an embarrassment to good science.  He's circuits are a mess of wires that most amateurs would be ashamed to show.  And he insinuates and alleges and implies everything while he continues to show nothing at all that represents an intelligent and well considered argument.  He shows no complete circuits of what's being filmed and tabulates and then references a DSO shot - REPEATEDLY - with a glaring error in it that he still hasn't noticed - notwithstanding this being clearly explained to him.   He is over reliant on his tedious insistence on my incompetence and relies on these insinuations by refusing to reference our actual claim related as it is to our papers.  He has not even touched on the anomalies and - as a for instance - uses one video to explain a waveform that can only match our own when he sets his function generator to an AC setting. He insults everyone's intelligence here by assuming that all members and readers alike  are that easily 'suckered' by his misrepresentations and then proceeds to boast that this so called consultation fee of his is costing someone - somewhere - a fee that includes the price of a Buick.  And if that level of unprofessionalism is not enough - he then proceeds to try and negotiate with my own legal representative behind my back?  And this is the answer to my appeal to establish certain required parameters to test a circuit that not only merits but requires academic engagement.

I think you need to revise the facts here MileHigh.  Or if you're simply trying to convince yourself... then feel free.

Rosie Pose 'eo'.
 :-*

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1647 on: April 04, 2012, 06:52:14 AM »
Oh, so you managed to snare poor little TK in your web did you... all this BS over the past year, was just so that I could finally, in February, be manipulated into this little trap of yours, eh?
Riiigght, that's a good one, Rosemary.


Quote
   Created by   dooziedont     (Block UserSend Message)    Latest Activity Mar 31, 2011   Date Joined Mar 12, 2011     Age 63   Country South Africa   

You aren't taking care of yourself properly... I would have guessed you were in your late seventies from your "greetings from SA" video.
Or maybe you just lied about your age when you registered the "dooziedont" account.

Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1648 on: April 04, 2012, 06:56:14 AM »
And lest Glen Lettenmaier again post a half page or so of spurious and unrelated links let me bring this comment back to your focus TinselKoala.
Really MileHigh?  Do you honestly think that anyone at all other than you, TK himself, Glen Lettenmaier and possibly a few members who are actively engaged in this 'debunk' have been convinced by anything at all that TK has proposed?  He uses the wrong data against the wrong circuit with the wrong DSO references against a supposed 'claim'.  He posts a series of videos against a variety of circuit variants which are filmed in such dark conditions that it challenges anyone with 20 20 vision.  And he tries to draw conclusions from that partial evidence with an abandon that is an embarrassment to good science.  He's circuits are a mess of wires that most amateurs would be ashamed to show.  And he insinuates and alleges and implies everything while he continues to show nothing at all that represents an intelligent and well considered argument.  He shows no complete circuits of what's being filmed and tabulates and then references a DSO shot - REPEATEDLY - with a glaring error in it that he still hasn't noticed - notwithstanding this being clearly explained to him.   He is over reliant on his tedious insistence on my incompetence and relies on these insinuations by refusing to reference our actual claim related as it is to our papers.  He has not even touched on the anomalies and - as a for instance - uses one video to explain a waveform that can only match our own when he sets his function generator to an AC setting. He insults everyone's intelligence here by assuming that all members and readers alike  are that easily 'suckered' by his misrepresentations and then proceeds to boast that this so called consultation fee of his is costing someone - somewhere - a fee that includes the price of a Buick.  And if that level of unprofessionalism is not enough - he then proceeds to try and negotiate with my own legal representative behind my back?  And this is the answer to my appeal to establish certain required parameters to test a circuit that not only merits but requires academic engagement.

I think you need to revise the facts here MileHigh.  Or if you're simply trying to convince yourself... then feel free.

Rosie Pose 'eo'.
 :-*

What, you think you can post the same set of lies AGAIN and get away with it? You already made this post once, dear. I think you need to take your meds and go lie ... ha ha , I mean go rest for a while until you get your memory back.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.
« Reply #1649 on: April 04, 2012, 07:02:14 AM »
Oh, so you managed to snare poor little TK in your web did you... all this BS over the past year, was just so that I could finally, in February, be manipulated into this little trap of yours, eh?
Riiigght, that's a good one, Rosemary.

No TK - I did not intend to snare you.  You did that yourself.  But we were reasonably certain that you'd go to some considerable lengths to refute our claim based on ANYTHING AT ALL other than our papers.    And INDEED.  You did not disappoint us.  And your 'debunk' is not only irrelevant as a consequence - it is compounded by the rather crude application of allegations and innuendos and insinuations that have nothing to do with science and everything to do with propaganda.  And you and MileHigh still seem sublimely unaware of the effect of this.  Propaganda - as it's been advanced in the past is now so OVERUSED - that it serves to counter that propaganda.  When will you learn? 

Sorry if this has cost you that consulting fee.  Maybe try again?  And this time try and apply some professionalism?  That would be nice.

Rosie Pose.

 

OneLink