Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2230470 times)

Low-Q · « **Reply #3135 on:** April 12, 2015, 08:56:53 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 12, 2015, 03:46:51 AM

The rotation of the Unbalanced Wheel effectively produced a vertical oscillation. The effective force on the shaft is higher when the Unbalanced Weight is moving down and lower when the Unbalanced Weight is moving up. This is due to the difference in centrifugal force.

If a flywheel is used, some energy will be stored. The increased torque and stored energy will rotate a generator with more power. The additional lead-out gravitational energy acts in the same way as the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier.

This experiment can be repeated worldwide. The cost of an old bicycle wheel in China is "scrap". Any recycling center will have dozens.

The debunkers will not (or paid not to) do such an experiment. They can jeer and smear. Was Jesus jeered and smeared at before he was crucified?

Lawrence
reply 3038 3092

Vertical oscillation does not differ from horizontal oscillation as in my experiment.
Reason: Gravity cannot apply energy into a mechanical oscillation system.
Gravity is just a force that pulls on the imbalanced wheel equally in all its positions - gained torque cannot happen.

Centrifugal force is a reactive force. A reactive force is a force that exchange within the closed loop and cannot perform work outside this system.
You can tap the energy from this force and its moving mass, but that will only cause the oscillation to stop - as shown in my video.

A rotating flywheel stores energy - potential energy that is. It has no torque because the stored energy in it does not change.
IF there was additional torque, positive torque that is, added to it from gravity, this flywheel would accelerate beyond comprehension
- in no time just by looking at it. Did that happen? NO!

I have replicated this very system, posted it on youtube, and linked it here. The result speaks for itself.

I am a debunker, not payed, and spent about two hours of my life replicating this system - including posting it on youtube and linked it here.
So your statement is untrue.

Vidar

MarkE · « **Reply #3136 on:** April 12, 2015, 10:40:02 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 12, 2015, 10:54:32 AM

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Free_Energy_Blog:2013:12:21#1930.2F1960_QMoGen_and_1882_patents_--_It.27s_variants_have_been_around_a_long_time

From: Butlergrt
To: sterlingda
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 8:03 PM
Subject: 1930/1960 QMoGen and 1882 patents, it's variants have been around a long time

Good Evening,
I believe many of you will find this most interesting, if you read it in it's entirety and think about it... Oh the surprises in life! A patent in 1882 and the U.S. Navy.
The QMoGen and it's variants has been around since 1882, less self-looping and then maybe....

The lead-out energy theory provides the theoretical justification for something that existed for a long time...

Those who do not understand Physics and Centrifugal Forces cannot see even it they look. They cannot understand (or paid not to understand). The logical path to take is to ignore them...

Lawrence
reply 3038 3092

The flippin' fool who disregards physics is you dude. But since you are just trolling with your idiocy, you know that.

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #3137 on:** April 12, 2015, 10:44:44 PM »

Mark:

Hey, maybe Lawrence is being paid to post this crap? Have we considered this? Possibly to obfuscate?

That would at least make some sense. He may be working for the Chinese government?

Bill

MarkE · « **Reply #3138 on:** April 12, 2015, 11:45:45 PM »

Quote from: Pirate88179 on April 12, 2015, 10:44:44 PM

Mark:

Hey, maybe Lawrence is being paid to post this crap? Have we considered this? Possibly to obfuscate?

That would at least make some sense. He may be working for the Chinese government?

Bill

If that is so they aren't getting their money's worth. He is less than unconvincing.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3139 on:** April 13, 2015, 12:31:02 AM »

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #3140 on:** April 13, 2015, 01:11:46 AM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 13, 2015, 12:31:02 AM

This post will be updated as necessary. It will help the new comer to focus on the appropriate technical information.

Lawrence Tseung
reply 3156

None of the devices in your above posted links have been substantiated nor replicated successfully. Not one. Not a single one. So, one has to wonder what you mean by "appropriate technical information."

Again, you make a habit of linking to devices that are not only unproven, but many are proven to not work as described.

This is your evidence?

I would call it, a severe lack of evidence...or...negative evidence.

Please point us to one, just one successful device that "proves" your theory. Only one is required.

You can not do this and I know why...and so do you.

Bill

Pirate88179 · « **Reply #3141 on:** April 13, 2015, 03:33:07 AM »

Quote from: MarkE on April 12, 2015, 10:44:46 AM

LOL, neither Organization X, nor even Racer X can make your fantasy true.

Did you know that Racer X's real name was Rex Racer? He was the long lost brother of Speed Racer but he changed his name after he had a fight with Pops and left home to be on his own.

Bill

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3142 on:** April 13, 2015, 10:27:17 AM »

Conversation with Mr. Cheung - an engineer who owns a machine shop.

http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2100.msg48089#msg48089

I have moderator rights on that thread.

MarkE · « **Reply #3143 on:** April 13, 2015, 11:22:46 AM »

Quote from: Pirate88179 on April 13, 2015, 03:33:07 AM

Did you know that Racer X's real name was Rex Racer? He was the long lost brother of Speed Racer but he changed his name after he had a fight with Pops and left home to be on his own.

Bill

Sadly, that fact is still embedded in my brain as is the fact that Rex Racer was a secret government agent.

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3144 on:** April 13, 2015, 08:26:45 PM »

If USA already has the QMOGEN and Flying Saucer Technology, would it keep them as top secrets?

If USA discloses such secrets, other Nations will pour resources into them and discover the secret in no lime. It was like the nuclear bombs. Scientific advances cannot be kept secret for long.

If other Nations have the lead-out energy and Flying Saucer Technology, the USA Military advantage of war planes, missiles and star war defenses will be gone. Thus the Military will put pressure on shelving the technology.

If China already has the QMOGEN and Flying Saucer Technology, would it keep them as top secrets?

China definitely has the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier QMOGEN since 1996. It most probably has the Flying Saucer Technology under advanced development.

If China discloses such technologies now, will its Military fear a massive "preemptive" strike by USA? Will it wait until the technology is fully developed and deployed? If China has thousands of Flying Saucers capable of carrying massive destructive weapons, it will feel safe.

Will an unexpected Nation such as India, Brazil or Peru announce a working QMOGEN using inexhaustible lead-out energy and/or a Flying Saucer?

Their scientists and engineers can read this thread. They can pour resources to implement them. There is no possibility of China or USA stopping such development and announcement. This is the most likely scenario. My bet is on India. I already know an Indian Organization that understands the lead-out energy and the Flying Saucer Technology.

Lawrence
reply 3156

Low-Q · « **Reply #3145 on:** April 13, 2015, 08:44:23 PM »

Quote from: ltseung888 on April 13, 2015, 08:26:45 PM

If USA already has the QMOGEN and Flying Saucer Technology, would it keep them as top secrets?

If USA discloses such secrets, other Nations will pour resources into them and discover the secret in no lime. It was like the nuclear bombs. Scientific advances cannot be kept secret for long.

If other Nations have the lead-out energy and Flying Saucer Technology, the USA Military advantage of war planes, missiles and star war defenses will be gone. Thus the Military will put pressure on shelving the technology.

If China already has the QMOGEN and Flying Saucer Technology, would it keep them as top secrets?

China definitely has the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier QMOGEN since 1996. It most probably has the Flying Saucer Technology under advanced development.

If China discloses such technologies now, will its Military fear a massive "preemptive" strike by USA? Will it wait until the technology is fully developed and deployed? If China has thousands of Flying Saucers capable of carrying massive destructive weapons, it will feel safe.

Will an unexpected Nation such as India, Brazil or Peru announce a working QMOGEN using inexhaustible lead-out energy and/or a Flying Saucer?

Their scientists and engineers can read this thread. They can pour resources to implement them. There is no possibility of China or USA stopping such development and announcement. This is the most likely scenario. My bet is on India. I already know an Indian Organization that understands the lead-out energy and the Flying Saucer Technology.

Lawrence
reply 3156

Watch my video again and then show me yours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV3RAL-SWjc

Vidar

ltseung888 · « **Reply #3146 on:** April 14, 2015, 12:20:41 AM »

My advice to the Chinese Government.

The best way to prevent a preemptive strike by USA is to lead the World into the new paradigm. Every family can use lead-out energy and own a Flying Saucer.

If China takes the lead, the intention to promote World Peace and prosperity will be clear. It is a clear win-win.

China has the Tsinghua University Energy Multiplier QMOGEN since 1996. Over 60 QMOGENs are now popping up around the World. There is no point in keeping this a secret any more. Have a conference at Tsinghua University. Let the Chinese Scientists and Engineers shine.

The Flying Saucer technology is based on the simple centrifugal force or the sling. There is no unknown physics involved. The only complex part is the engineeoring. It does not matter if the prototype is not perfect. So long as it can leave the ground and hover similar to the Nanjing UFO, the honor will go to the scientists.

The Space Exploration programs will take a different path - with China taking the lead. Invite the World to participate. China will not only shine in the manufacturing and financial sectors. China will shine in the scientific sector.

There will be no excuse for USA to do any preemptive strike. It would have no choice but to accept the win-win path. It may also disclose its top secret. The World will benefit.

China and USA can save some money on the debunkers (even if it is insignificant).

Divine Wine flows...

Lawrence
reply 3156

MarkE · « **Reply #3147 on:** April 14, 2015, 03:15:04 AM »

Quote from: Low-Q on April 13, 2015, 08:44:23 PM

Watch my video again and then show me yours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV3RAL-SWjc

Vidar

Vidar it is an excellent demonstration: simple, direct, and effective.

memoryman · « **Reply #3148 on:** April 14, 2015, 03:28:46 AM »

Quote from: MarkE on April 14, 2015, 03:15:04 AM

Vidar it is an excellent demonstration: simple, direct, and effective.

but vidar failed to connect the lead-out energy battery, so the result is invalid...

tagor · « **Reply #3149 on:** April 14, 2015, 06:27:39 AM »

Quote from: memoryman on April 14, 2015, 03:28:46 AM

but vidar failed to connect the lead-out energy battery, so the result is invalid...

LOL you are very funny

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system ! (Read 2230470 times)

Low-Q

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

MarkE

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Pirate88179

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

MarkE

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Pirate88179

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Pirate88179

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

MarkE

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Low-Q

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

ltseung888

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

MarkE

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

memoryman

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

tagor

Re: 12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !