Cookies-law

Cookies help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
http://www.overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please leave this website now. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

Poplamp

poplamp

CCTool

CCTool

LEDTVforSale

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

OverUnity Book

overunity principles book

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

movieclipsfree

movie clips free

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 485556
  • *Total Topics: 14275
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 6
  • *Guests: 145
  • *Total: 151

Facebook

Author Topic: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency  (Read 56521 times)

Offline Magluvin

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1125 on: April 21, 2017, 03:23:35 PM »
Im getting tired of threads being trashed to the point of no discussion at all.

Over at OUR they give the ability to have private discussions where only welcome people are invited. It works well with keeping a thread clean. But some say it stifles free speech. 

Well if you owned a corporation and you have weekly business meetings with say 10 top people in the company, you would not allow a group of protesters to come in and run amuck. It would have nothing to do with free speech as everyone has rights and reasons for privacy. And in this case, the business meeting, we are in that same territory. We have better things to do with our time than deal with protestors. If some dont like the private thread ability, too bad, we dont have to tell you anything. The threads can be also read only for others where protestors can have their opposition thread to babble among themselves, and if the private/read only players 'want' and 'need' to go to that alternate thread to have battle, then so beit, I dont care..

I am talking with others about seeing if Stefan can provide the read only and or private threads so that real work is not interrupted, and the protesters can have their venue to say what they want to say without it being disruptive in the 'work' threads. If it is a private thread and something comes of value from it, then all persons involved in that thread should take a vote as to open a new thread that shows the progress, but have it as read only, where yet again, protestors can have their own rebuttal and abuse delivery threads, fine, sure, go ahead.  So just like a family talking privately at home, all the way to a top gov meeting, we are all entitled to privacy at times, and I do not see that to be a problem in having that here if we want.  If some do not like that idea, then they must not like the idea of having PM abilities, of which is private. So what would be the issue in having private threads when really we could have completely private talks just like a thread in pm, but a thread is just better for many reasons.

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2963
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1126 on: April 21, 2017, 03:47:33 PM »
Im getting tired of threads being trashed to the point of no discussion at all.

Over at OUR they give the ability to have private discussions where only welcome people are invited. It works well with keeping a thread clean. But some say it stifles free speech. 

Well if you owned a corporation and you have weekly business meetings with say 10 top people in the company, you would not allow a group of protesters to come in and run amuck. It would have nothing to do with free speech as everyone has rights and reasons for privacy. And in this case, the business meeting, we are in that same territory. We have better things to do with our time than deal with protestors. If some dont like the private thread ability, too bad, we dont have to tell you anything. The threads can be also read only for others where protestors can have their opposition thread to babble among themselves, and if the private/read only players 'want' and 'need' to go to that alternate thread to have battle, then so beit, I dont care..

I am talking with others about seeing if Stefan can provide the read only and or private threads so that real work is not interrupted, and the protesters can have their venue to say what they want to say without it being disruptive in the 'work' threads. If it is a private thread and something comes of value from it, then all persons involved in that thread should take a vote as to open a new thread that shows the progress, but have it as read only, where yet again, protestors can have their own rebuttal and abuse delivery threads, fine, sure, go ahead.  So just like a family talking privately at home, all the way to a top gov meeting, we are all entitled to privacy at times, and I do not see that to be a problem in having that here if we want.  If some do not like that idea, then they must not like the idea of having PM abilities, of which is private. So what would be the issue in having private threads when really we could have completely private talks just like a thread in pm, but a thread is just better for many reasons.

Mags

@Magluvin,

There are people on this web site, yourself included, who don't understand basic formulas and laws, or choose to twist and misstate them. The rest of us can't accept this level of ignorance coupled with 'High Fashion" technical arguments. It's our duty to expose you as frauds.


Offline Magluvin

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1127 on: April 21, 2017, 04:39:32 PM »
@Magluvin,

There are people on this web site, yourself included, who don't understand basic formulas and laws, or choose to twist and misstate them. The rest of us can't accept this level of ignorance coupled with 'High Fashion" technical arguments. It's our duty to expose you as frauds.

I approved this post above to reply to it publicly...

First off, it is mostly you who is saying that we dont understand this stuff. I dont see others agreeing with you here, its just you. You are not building anything to show and prove what you know. You just repeat day after day the same thing. What is that? Are you afraid that if you only wrote it once that nobody will see it?  After 50 times, still worried that nobody has noticed you? As for me, I am not sure that all of the laws and ideals are absolutely correct, so I dont hold them all as gold, otherwise it would be just a "move on folks, nothing more to see here' life. If they are, then this site is here just for giggles and wasted time. You are on moderation. And if you keep it up, as I can see every post before approval, I will do all I can to keep you moderated. There really isnt anyone here that I can see in agreement with your daily splatter.

You say there is fraud. You are only posting cut and paste. Woopty doo. Is that all you got? Do you have bench experience of what you declare as truth? If not then you dont have anything but cut and paste then its worth squat. Like reading a book on kung fu then saying you know kung fu. This isnt the matrix.  So you go ahead and keep posting as you wish, nobody is going to see them.

Mags

Offline webby1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2865
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1128 on: April 21, 2017, 05:02:21 PM »
Im getting tired of threads being trashed to the point of no discussion at all.

Over at OUR they give the ability to have private discussions where only welcome people are invited. It works well with keeping a thread clean. But some say it stifles free speech. 

Mags

How about having the threads as read only but the OP of the thread can "allow" or "deny" posting on a user or global basis,, this leaving the need for a moderator to remove any unwanted posts.

I think this would keep the intent of an open community in tact and then using PM you can still have the "closed" discussion when needed.


Offline Magluvin

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1129 on: April 21, 2017, 05:13:51 PM »
How about having the threads as read only but the OP of the thread can "allow" or "deny" posting on a user or global basis,, this leaving the need for a moderator to remove any unwanted posts.

I think this would keep the intent of an open community in tact and then using PM you can still have the "closed" discussion when needed.

We already have that in moderation mode. Sometimes it is five or more pages a day and if a moderator isnt around, it could take a bit of time to read, think then approve a waiting message.  So for example, you may have posted 2 days ago and are waiting for approval. Well if its approved, it apears right where it was posted, possibly pages back and possibly days later of which the post may not even get read by someone that has already read that section or page and never get noticed.

Like if there is a read only thread with 5 guys, and if you wanted to join, just ask and if your not a bugger you should be able to join. Its not a prissy private club, its just a way to keep important discussion or project threads clean without having to have the 'job' of running the mop every day. Id rather not have that job and the floors wont get dirty if private or read only threads are allowed.

Mags

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1129 on: April 21, 2017, 05:13:51 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1130 on: April 21, 2017, 05:18:28 PM »

I think this would keep the intent of an open community in tact and then using PM you can still have the "closed" discussion when needed.

Like I said before, PM is private and nobody can bother you between important private discussions. But you still have a different navigation of pm than you do with threads. And threads can show pics, pm not. Again if pm is allowed, then there should be no argument against a private thread that allows more convenience to the posters. And if a priv thread dies it should be made public

Mags

Offline webby1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2865
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1131 on: April 21, 2017, 05:33:58 PM »
Lets say I start a thread an set it global read write,, then someone starts posting all the usual garbage.

If I could then set that poster to read only for that thread only it would stop any further intrusion by that poster,, let them start there own thread then to have there say,, like what you are talking about and all of the discussion is out and in the public view.

I take my private stuff and keep most of it in email,, a little PM now and then,, but mostly email. 

If *I* could set that condition for the threads *I* start then no moderator is needed until there are posts that need to be removed,, I would also think that when enough threads are read only for a few posters that they would either change there ways or leave.

Just my thoughts on it.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1131 on: April 21, 2017, 05:33:58 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Magluvin

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1132 on: April 21, 2017, 06:08:20 PM »
Lets say I start a thread an set it global read write,, then someone starts posting all the usual garbage.

If I could then set that poster to read only for that thread only it would stop any further intrusion by that poster,, let them start there own thread then to have there say,, like what you are talking about and all of the discussion is out and in the public view.

I take my private stuff and keep most of it in email,, a little PM now and then,, but mostly email. 

If *I* could set that condition for the threads *I* start then no moderator is needed until there are posts that need to be removed,, I would also think that when enough threads are read only for a few posters that they would either change there ways or leave.

Just my thoughts on it.

If all thread makers had that ability, there may be some that are tossed because of things that are not legit and all could get messy and not fair at all.

monitoring threads and responding to complaints as a moderator is not a pleasant biz. Having read only threads I believe is best where all can see but cant disrupt and waste time, of which I really value my time.

Yeah we could all just leave and email eachother. But this site is setup for the convenience of not intermixing like having to sort through messages like email or pms if there is a lot of them. At OUR I think that there is a more happy environment in private and read only threads. Im all for happiness. Businesses succeed better with happy workers and so should a smart group of people trying to find OU in a thread where we dont have to have ANY disruptions and the record of the thread is clean and easily read through.

Mags

Offline citfta

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 441
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1133 on: April 21, 2017, 06:18:36 PM »
I really like the idea of read only thread for builders and researchers.  I don't think any of us have anything to hide but it would be nice to carry on a discussion with like minded builders and researchers without all the clutter.  I started a thread at EF just for technical discussion because of this very problem.  Some builders did not want their thread cluttered up with discussion so in respect to that I started that thread.  Sometimes it is used and sometimes not but it is there for use by the ones that want it.

There are a couple of threads there now that are considered builders threads only and most of us that still go to that forum just respect that request.  As far as I know it is not actively enforced by the Admin but just voluntarily respected.  From what I have seen here the voluntary part probably won't work.

If Stefan can set up a read only format with only selected members able to post I do believe it would help this forum a lot.

Respectfully,
Carroll

Offline webby1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2865
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1134 on: April 21, 2017, 07:09:35 PM »
If all thread makers had that ability, there may be some that are tossed because of things that are not legit and all could get messy and not fair at all.

Mags

I think most here are rather tolerant of non-preferred behavior and if the offensive poster were set to read only for the thread in question their posts would stay until a moderator removed them.

This might make the moderator position a little harder,, they would leave some posts that others may not like,, but it is in sharing the information and ideas that should be the main goal.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1134 on: April 21, 2017, 07:09:35 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline webby1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2865
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1135 on: April 21, 2017, 07:18:59 PM »
That coil is the subject of this thread....stop listening to milehigh preach about single sine functions!  ..... despite what you think, Tesla said what he said for the likes of milehigh, not you open minded folk!  For the open minded, there's a shit load you need to catch up on!  But you won't.....you will continue to listen to milehigh and others who know nothing more than the value of silence.....

MH shared his opinion,, that should be acceptable to all,, if he shares the same opinion 10 times then maybe he should be on read only until he has something new,, same thing with any poster.

This would keep the clutter down a fair amount and enable readers to follow easier.

You have shared your opinion on the classical view point,, how many times do you think it needs to be shared?

I think that there is more to what is going on than what the "laws and formulas" cover,, how do I get to a better view, a more complete view if I only read page after page of the same thing or flame wars?

I think it would be nice to be able to see many views shared openly, side by side, without all the agro.

Offline evostars

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
    • my youtube channel with bifilar pancake coil info
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1136 on: April 21, 2017, 08:12:08 PM »
Haven't followed this (my own) thread anymore. But as it is mine, here is a related post:

I made some more coils. I earlier used bifilar coils to be pulsed. I now tried single wire coils:

I connected the two single wire pancake coil in series, to my IGBT pulse driver.
The IGBT became extremely hot (much hotter than with a pulsed bifilar coil).
I guess this is because of the back emf produced, by the pulsed coils.
To avoid it, i should use a diode and a resistor in parallel with the coil, to burn the energy of the back emf.

So, I guess I will be making another bifilar pancake coil, to pulse in series.

isnt it funny, that the bifilar coil doesnt produce this troublesome back emf?

Telsa in his patent states, the back emf of a normal single wire coil, can be fixed with capacitance... but how?

I must say... these bifilar coils have their advantage (the IGBT stays cool)


Offline Magluvin

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5242
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1137 on: April 21, 2017, 08:58:03 PM »
This is a quote from Erfinder that was removed while I was reading it. I was going to reply but it said post didnt exist. So I back paged and still was able to copy. I will clean it up for the one that removed it so i can reply.

"Moderation is a waste of time!  You cannot expect to grow if you censor.  If you don't want to read someone's post, ignore them.  This place gets cluster @#$%^& quickly....which is worse, twenty pages of someone spamming, or twenty pages of someone slamming you with every text book ever written, showering you in s@#$ no one needs a lesson in,  and at the end of the lecture you're still as clueless as the guy/gal spamming....


This is not the place for a productive discussion, never was, and probably never will be.  Those whose experience allows them to"represent" the status quo aren't wise enough to shut the $%^& up and let people fall on their faces!  The excuse that you are trying to save people from taking advice from the idiots is idiotic....  The excuse that you just can't stand by and allow the ignorant spread lies is a bold face lie. There are no facts.  Think and believe what you want....  IF you take advice from a fool, and you didn't know the advice came from a fool...what does that make you...not a question.


That coil is the subject of this thread....stop listening to milehigh preach about single sine functions!  I read the patent too....and despite what you think, Tesla said what he said for the likes of milehigh, not you open minded folk!  For the open minded, there's a load you need to catch up on!  But you won't.....you will continue to listen to milehigh and others who know nothing more than the value of silence....."


I am not a fan of moderation. And in ref to the same paragraph I have voiced my concerns with the crap that screw up threads, and I have seen that read only and or private threads help with that a lot. At OUR others make separate threads that deal with further discussions that keep the read only threads clean so it is easier to go through for those that are really interested in the subject. So Im not sure why the beat down there...

As for who is in the thread doing builds and tests and how they do them, well they are doing it. You are not. You are just doing this. Not a great example really. I thought we could get along but you are now just here beating on me. You do have children dont you?........ Is this how you teach them? Come on dude.

As for the coil, maybe you dont see that Im 'trying' to figure out other ways of approaching it other than what the pat says, even though one of the ideas is based on what the pat says. So what if I am way off of what you claim is the proper way to deal with it. Maybe I havnt got there yet and maybe never will. Who knows. What you claim may not even exist 'as far as we know'. How could we know as we are all screwed as you claim.

Anyway, I tried to be on a good side with you but you are just too much.

Mags

Offline Erfinder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 849
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1138 on: April 21, 2017, 09:16:55 PM »
This is a quote from Erfinder that was removed while I was reading it. I was going to reply but it said post didnt exist. So I back paged and still was able to copy. I will clean it up for the one that removed it so i can reply.

"Moderation is a waste of time!  You cannot expect to grow if you censor.  If you don't want to read someone's post, ignore them.  This place gets cluster @#$%^& quickly....which is worse, twenty pages of someone spamming, or twenty pages of someone slamming you with every text book ever written, showering you in s@#$ no one needs a lesson in,  and at the end of the lecture you're still as clueless as the guy/gal spamming....


This is not the place for a productive discussion, never was, and probably never will be.  Those whose experience allows them to"represent" the status quo aren't wise enough to shut the $%^& up and let people fall on their faces!  The excuse that you are trying to save people from taking advice from the idiots is idiotic....  The excuse that you just can't stand by and allow the ignorant spread lies is a bold face lie. There are no facts.  Think and believe what you want....  IF you take advice from a fool, and you didn't know the advice came from a fool...what does that make you...not a question.


That coil is the subject of this thread....stop listening to milehigh preach about single sine functions!  I read the patent too....and despite what you think, Tesla said what he said for the likes of milehigh, not you open minded folk!  For the open minded, there's a load you need to catch up on!  But you won't.....you will continue to listen to milehigh and others who know nothing more than the value of silence....."


I am not a fan of moderation. And in ref to the same paragraph I have voiced my concerns with the crap that screw up threads, and I have seen that read only and or private threads help with that a lot. At OUR others make separate threads that deal with further discussions that keep the read only threads clean so it is easier to go through for those that are really interested in the subject. So Im not sure why the beat down there...

As for who is in the thread doing builds and tests and how they do them, well they are doing it. You are not. You are just doing this. Not a great example really. I thought we could get along but you are now just here beating on me. You do have children dont you?........ Is this how you teach them? Come on dude.

As for the coil, maybe you dont see that Im 'trying' to figure out other ways of approaching it other than what the pat says, even though one of the ideas is based on what the pat says. So what if I am way off of what you claim is the proper way to deal with it. Maybe I havnt got there yet and maybe never will. Who knows. What you claim may not even exist 'as far as we know'. How could we know as we are all screwed as you claim.

Anyway, I tried to be on a good side with you but you are just too much.

Mags


Moderation is a waste of time!  You cannot expect to grow if you censor.  If you don't want to read someone's post, ignore them.  This place gets clusterquickly....which is worse, twenty pages of someone spamming, or twenty pages of someone slamming you with every text book ever written, showering you in no one needs a lesson in,  and at the end of the lecture you're still as clueless as the guy/gal spamming....


This is not the place for a productive discussion, never was, and probably never will be.  Those whose experience allows them to"represent" the status quo aren't wise enough to shut the  up and let people fall on their faces!  The excuse that you are trying to save people from taking advice from the idiots is idiotic....  The excuse that you just can't stand by and allow the ignorant spread lies is a bold face lie. There are no facts.  Think and believe what you want.... 


IF you take advice from a fool, and you didn't know the advice came from a fool...what does that make you...not a question.That coil is the subject of this thread....stop listening to milehigh preach about single sine functions!  ..... despite what you think, Tesla said what he said for the likes of milehigh, not you open minded folk!  For the open minded, there's a shit load you need to catch up on!  But you won't.....you will continue to listen to milehigh and others who know nothing more than the value of silence.....
« Last Edit: April 21, 2017, 09:29:23 PM by tinman »


Offline tinman

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4660
Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1139 on: April 21, 2017, 09:31:15 PM »

Moderation is a waste of time!  You cannot expect to grow if you censor.  If you don't want to read someone's post, ignore them.  This place gets clusterquickly....which is worse, twenty pages of someone spamming, or twenty pages of someone slamming you with every text book ever written, showering you in no one needs a lesson in,  and at the end of the lecture you're still as clueless as the guy/gal spamming....


This is not the place for a productive discussion, never was, and probably never will be.  Those whose experience allows them to"represent" the status quo aren't wise enough to shut the  up and let people fall on their faces!  The excuse that you are trying to save people from taking advice from the idiots is idiotic....  The excuse that you just can't stand by and allow the ignorant spread lies is a bold face lie. There are no facts.  Think and believe what you want.... 


IF you take advice from a fool, and you didn't know the advice came from a fool...what does that make you...not a question.That coil is the subject of this thread....stop listening to milehigh preach about single sine functions!  ..... despite what you think, Tesla said what he said for the likes of milehigh, not you open minded folk!  For the open minded, there's a shit load you need to catch up on!  But you won't.....you will continue to listen to milehigh and others who know nothing more than the value of silence.....

I asked you politely to leave the foul language out,and you refused to do so.
I will not ask again.

Brad

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: The bifilar pancake coil at its resonant frequency
« Reply #1139 on: April 21, 2017, 09:31:15 PM »

 

Share this topic to your favourite Social and Bookmark site

Please SHARE this topic at: