The sine wave is created due to the impedance of the load !?

The sine wave is created due to resonance condition of the oscillator part of the Kacher
and then transformed into the load circuit.

Would be interesting to know what frequency that sine has.
Will try to measure that later too.

sorry,  this forum might never get it...
delamorto - Stop misinforming people, connect a damn analogue wattmeter to the output, you will see you were being tricked.
this is not free energy people, you will realise very very soon.
If you keep buying into things that seems amusing at for first all you will get is frusttration at the end, have you not learned...

Would you stop accusing Delamorto of "wanting to trick people", if you were kindly asked to ?

He does present his device openly and thereby risks also that it could turn out to be nothing special in regards to energy gain. It is a comparatively simple set-up, so everyone can verify for him/herself if there is excess power or not by replicating.
Power measurements will eventually be taken. Should someone be frustrated about possible underunity results,
then he should be aware that no-one put a gun to his head and forced him to replicate it.

ОК, I is stopped. Do not want to mislead people.


P.S.
Admin delete my posts, it is the opinion of users - misinformation.


I'm tired of fighting with trolls

Are you scared of my little Warning to people?
you should have been putting up proper measurements by this time.

Are you scared of my little Warning to people?
you should have been putting up proper measurements by this time.

Good job! Now your earned yourself a little extra $$$ bonus from the agency ...
Happy?

 Everyone has their opinion and refuse to do it themselves. The first thing I would like to address is that as soon as you hook anything that we use currently for measurement it changes the whole unit's resonance. This is due to the delicate balance these circuits seem to have. As soon as you put the resistance in the circuit it unbalances the whole thing.


 The second thing is this, If you take the slayer exciter it is not the waves you want. The waves that are produced by a transistor are not true pulses. They are half cycles. This will never work. The ones who are doing spark gaps must also find a way to make them true one way pulses. As far as I know the only way to do that is to magnetically quench the spark gap.


 The final tip is this: using transformers to supply the exciter waves is very damaging to the coil if one does not use an oil filled transformer and it eats through the insulation. Sorry but you need a special oil filled transformer in order to make it short proof.


 So I'm guessing no one read the Tesla links I provided. Tesla goes through all of this already and teaches you how not to get the results you are seeing here.


 I also take specific note of the ones saying you've got nothing. Yet they want measurements knowing full well the devices we use for measurement pull anything you connect to them out of tolerance. Even if we did get one to work it would have to be part of the system forever. It has to be designed into them. In the case of analogue devices they would have to be oil filled to work without shorting out. Any coil exposed to the effect if it is not surrounded by oil will leak eventually and react to the environment via the atmosphere and burn the insulation.


 Also I highly suggest static shielding in these experiments. Leaks will kill all effects after the main coil. Just simple aluminum foil wrapped around the wires would work and connected to nothing. This method was tested by Tesla and he even used small pieces overlapped to get the right shielding effect. Tesla also talked about shielding the wires until you wanted to work with the energy or expose it to the environment or feed it to a device made to work with the signal.


 When you look at the special transformer that Tesla made with the bucking (normal coil) no core Bifilar overlap coils in series version he had to oil fill it and have special metal around the whole thing, this was also a static shield that contained the energy as well. In his investigation he didn't use it because he wanted to see the effects of a transformer like that not being shielded. He said it was ok to run without shielding but you get a little more bang for the buck when it is proper.

 What Tesla was doing was charging a cap bank to a very high value then dumping that charge across a spark gap and firing into one side of the two part coil wound in normal fashion but split in the middle and flipped so that they are bucking. This did two things. Only one half of the coil actually received the shot from the spark gap. Once that coil got to max it was inducing a reflection of itself + the original shot through it in the other half of the coil. This is like shooting a gun into the perfect spring mechanism. The Bifilar over wrap was merely a polar aligner and turned all induced voltages into the one way adding them together with all the ringing as well.

 Speaking about oil filled coils Tesla also tried using the spark gap as an oil filled device but it didn't work as well as the quenched gap.

 Tesla also talks about a device to detect the perfectly undamped(unaffected) waves. The bolometer. But it had to be improved by changing the detector part with a resistive mass very very small. He says a million times smaller then the bolometer had then he could even detect the disturbances from weather as well without blowing the meter. Heh Now thats sensitive!

Hello,

there is one thing I have to add to my photocell-setup which applies only here:

The bulbs you use here under test in a photcell-arrangement must be covered on one side with an aluminium-foil which is painted with a heat resistant black-varnish on the outside. When one compares the light-intensitiy with a reference-sinus-power with this bulb you must measure the temperature on the black side of the foil, because incandescant bulbs dissipate more than 80 % as heat.
If you find during your tests with the Kacher-setup that the bulb stays cool on the black side of the foil then only the light-intensity accounts for the input-power of the kacher. Things then are more complicated but a clear indication that the Kacher spends - based on slayers input-data - 12 Watt for producing a cold light, so far from being efficient < 20 % )
Should the temperature match in both tests then there is hope.

@slayer : add controlled mass of diffrent areas and weight to your yellow clip dangling.

Kator01

You people are constantly being fooled,  Lied to.. Daily... 
now i can see through all of these people like glass...

Can you see the truth?